Sprint Internet Backbone and VoIP? [7:70665]
Is anyone using the Sprint Internet backbone for VoIP? If so how is it working and are you running the VoIP just in the states or outside of the states? Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70665t=70665 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCI 640-901 or 643-801??? [7:70658]
Hi, I took 643-801 recently and there are minor additions - like IPV6, RIPv2, NAT and such like things. I also took 640-603 (BSCN) in September last year. I would say: take 640-901 - unless you want to save some $75.00 for taking the Beta. Reason: you will know immediately the result and move on, rather than waiting 8 to 12 weeks for the Beta result. Hope this helps. Mwalie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70666t=70658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over NMBA [7:70652]
sorry i forgot to show you my configurations becouse i dont have access to routers at these time, soon i must try some labs with multi-area do you have any lab examples 'configuratons or other things witch can be helpful' Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70667t=70652 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sprint Internet Backbone and VoIP? [7:70665]
Yea that's what I have been told by Sprint but I can not find anyone that is running it. Also I need to find away to run VoIP in India and from what I can see they do not have a POP in India. Ryan -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 7:54 AM To: Ryan Finnesey Subject: Re: Sprint Internet Backbone and VoIP? [7:70665] Don't know of any customers actually using VOIP across the Sprintlink Backbone but should be no problem if one needed to !! From: Ryan Finnesey Reply-To: Ryan Finnesey To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sprint Internet Backbone and VoIP? [7:70665] Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 05:47:32 GMT Is anyone using the Sprint Internet backbone for VoIP? If so how is it working and are you running the VoIP just in the states or outside of the states? Ryan _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70668t=70665 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to Configure F/R switching with CIR limit [7:70669]
Hi, I'd like to configure a router to act as a F/R switching and also I'd like to configure the CIR on the F/R switching. I want to use it for doing FRTS lab. Pichai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70669t=70669 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCI 640-901 or 643-801??? [7:70658]
Thanks, Having to wait for the results wasn't something I had considered. I guess I will go ahead and take the 901 test. I also don't want to test on the Ipv6 stuff yet either. Thanks for the heads up. I just looked over the test description again and the only thing they say is advanced IP addressing. if they are testing on IPv6 I think they need to let you know that. I guess that's why it's a BETA. By the way, How did you do? David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70670t=70658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCI 640-901 or 643-801??? [7:70658]
I'll correct myself before anyone else does. In the design portion of the test description, they list IPV6. I also didn't know that RIPv2 was on the test. I took the BSCI v1.2 class last year and have done all my studying based on the topics that were covered in that course. once again, GROUPSTUDY saves my butt. I just printed out the v2.0 test requirements to make sure I brush up on everything. David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70671t=70658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slightly OT but help needed nevertheless in HyperT [7:70672]
I use Teraterm for my Windowz machines. It's free. http://www.ayera.com/teraterm/ Even does SSH Ver 2. IMHO, a *lot* better than Hypertem. OT: I wonder if Cisco has plans to implement SSH ver 2 client on IOS. Scotty Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] After tinkering with every single option in HyperTerminal on Windows XP and Windows 2000, I have given up on the up arrow. :-) I just use Ctrl-P which seems to work correctly. Of course, another option is different software. SecureCRT is great. I hope someone else has better advice, but to be honest, I think HyperTerminal on newer Windows versions is simply broken in minor ways and there is no better answer!?! Priscilla Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello,Any Windows expert in this group know how I can use my UP Arrow key on my XP laptop to repeat my previous commands using HyperTerminal?Never had a problem in Win95 or NT but on XP when I use my Up Arrow key, it spits out the output of the cmd. right away and lands a @ sign at the prompt.Then, I have to use Ctrl-P keys.Thank you.Sincerely. Here is an example using the UP Arrow key: Core#sh int s0/0^@ Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.252 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 251/255, rxload 251/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 93, LMI stat recvd 93, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 34/0, interface broadcasts 34 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:15:29 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/3/16 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 1/1 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 5 kilobits/sec 30 second input rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/sec 30 second output rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/secCore#^@ Core# MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70672t=70672 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless problem [7:70674]
Hello all. Our office has a T1 connection to the internet that my boss wants to share with some of the other offices in our building (distances under 300').One office will have only 1 pc and the other will have 4.I figured wireless would be the easiest way to go since runing cable from our equipment to these offices would be a nitemare. I picked up an 802.11b (Linksys) access point and patched it through to my switch,set the SSID,and derived a wep key.The office with 4 devices in an attempt to save money bought an 802.11b (Linksys) access point as well.I provided their admin with all pertinent information (SSID,WEP key,IP\mask)and the access points do not seem to associate.Now I am by no means well versed in wireless but I assumed that as long as the SSID,WEP keys,and IP information was correct it would work.Im not sure what my problem is here and Im at a loss. Any help apreciated Don K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70674t=70674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wireless problem [7:70674]
Sorry forgot to mention some info that may be relevant. The office with 4 devices has their access point patched through into a hub that all 4 devices also connect to. Both access points are set to act as access points. The office with one PC will also need to connect to my AP but will do so with a wireless nic. TIA Don K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70675t=70674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676]
Hello i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN, the story so far ; the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and off(constantly, yes i know, not good), doing a #show ip int brief, obviously shows that both ATM0 and ATM0.1 are in down state (they are not admin. down), i have followed Cisco4s troubleshooting 'steps' from their website, from checking if DSL port is plugged in correctly, checking correct powersupply, placing dsl operating-mode in auto to checking if the circuit is tested (i have placed an Alcatel SpeedTouch and it works), now i am running out of options. a curious thing is when i issue a #debug atm event, i get the usual readout for activation state changes, then : LOCAL:Max noise margin for power cutoff 31 followed by a long list of bad news, modem state 0x8, on other adsl capable cisco routers(not over ISDN) i usually have dsl power-cutback set at 0 at the interface ATM 0, whereas with this router, i dont have this option. i tried to hunt for any intel relating to what does this power-cutback 'feature' actually do and if its related to this layer 1 problem and found nothing, maby i am taking the wrong approach to figuering what is wrong/missing, maby i should leave that Alcatel modem running and put that cisco router back in the box thing is i dont know where to look anymore, help? ;) sample of my config: ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group pppoe request-dialin protocol pppoe ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.0.210 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 ! interface ATM0 no ip address no atm ilmi-keepalive dsl operating-mode auto ! ! interface ATM0.1 point-to-point pvc 0/35 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 ! ! interface Dialer1 mtu 1492 ip address negotiated ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 no cdp enable ppp chap hostname xxx ppp chap password 7 xxx ppp pap sent-username xxx password 7 xxx ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70676t=70676 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very OT but help needed nevertheless in HyperT [7:70672]
I agree! My new site is still incomplete an will be launched next week but have a look at http://www.sysdom.org/html/downloads.html Best regards, Dom Stocqueler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Nelson Sent: 15 June 2003 17:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Slightly OT but help needed nevertheless in HyperT [7:70672] I use Teraterm for my Windowz machines. It's free. http://www.ayera.com/teraterm/ Even does SSH Ver 2. IMHO, a *lot* better than Hypertem. OT: I wonder if Cisco has plans to implement SSH ver 2 client on IOS. Scotty Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] After tinkering with every single option in HyperTerminal on Windows XP and Windows 2000, I have given up on the up arrow. :-) I just use Ctrl-P which seems to work correctly. Of course, another option is different software. SecureCRT is great. I hope someone else has better advice, but to be honest, I think HyperTerminal on newer Windows versions is simply broken in minor ways and there is no better answer!?! Priscilla Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello,Any Windows expert in this group know how I can use my UP Arrow key on my XP laptop to repeat my previous commands using HyperTerminal?Never had a problem in Win95 or NT but on XP when I use my Up Arrow key, it spits out the output of the cmd. right away and lands a @ sign at the prompt.Then, I have to use Ctrl-P keys.Thank you.Sincerely. Here is an example using the UP Arrow key: Core#sh int s0/0^@ Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.252 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 251/255, rxload 251/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 93, LMI stat recvd 93, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 34/0, interface broadcasts 34 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:15:29 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/3/16 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 1/1 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 5 kilobits/sec 30 second input rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/sec 30 second output rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/secCore#^@ Core# MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70673t=70672 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to Configure F/R switching with CIR limit [7:70669]
Look in the Bruce caslow book about configuring frame switch. Very helpful. - Original Message - From: Pichit Ruangroj To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: How to Configure F/R switching with CIR limit [7:70669] Hi, I'd like to configure a router to act as a F/R switching and also I'd like to configure the CIR on the F/R switching. I want to use it for doing FRTS lab. Pichai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70677t=70669 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676]
Have this cisco modem ever worked on ur line? You said dsl over ISDN, is this an IDSL? I know that some modems aren't compatible w/the dslams, or the Card connecting the circuit at the CO. Ask the provider, see what their recommendation on the modems. - Original Message - From: dlci_16 To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:44 PM Subject: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676] Hello i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN, the story so far ; the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and off(constantly, yes i know, not good), doing a #show ip int brief, obviously shows that both ATM0 and ATM0.1 are in down state (they are not admin. down), i have followed Cisco4s troubleshooting 'steps' from their website, from checking if DSL port is plugged in correctly, checking correct powersupply, placing dsl operating-mode in auto to checking if the circuit is tested (i have placed an Alcatel SpeedTouch and it works), now i am running out of options. a curious thing is when i issue a #debug atm event, i get the usual readout for activation state changes, then : LOCAL:Max noise margin for power cutoff 31 followed by a long list of bad news, modem state 0x8, on other adsl capable cisco routers(not over ISDN) i usually have dsl power-cutback set at 0 at the interface ATM 0, whereas with this router, i dont have this option. i tried to hunt for any intel relating to what does this power-cutback 'feature' actually do and if its related to this layer 1 problem and found nothing, maby i am taking the wrong approach to figuering what is wrong/missing, maby i should leave that Alcatel modem running and put that cisco router back in the box thing is i dont know where to look anymore, help? ;) sample of my config: ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group pppoe request-dialin protocol pppoe ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.0.210 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 ! interface ATM0 no ip address no atm ilmi-keepalive dsl operating-mode auto ! ! interface ATM0.1 point-to-point pvc 0/35 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 ! ! interface Dialer1 mtu 1492 ip address negotiated ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 no cdp enable ppp chap hostname xxx ppp chap password 7 xxx ppp pap sent-username xxx password 7 xxx ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70678t=70676 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP over Aironet Wireless [7:70679]
Hi Guys, I have two sites connected with Aironet Wireless Bridges. We have implemented VoIP between these sites over this wireless link.Considering the Bandwidth of 11 Mbps for 802.11b , it should not have been a problem for a few IP phones.Even if we consider the throughput of the Wireless link actually is close to 4.5 Mbps, the bandwidth should be sufficient for a few g729 calls or even a few g711 calls, but to contrary the call quality is not good. Anybody experienced the same kind of situation. Any comments? Thanks, neil FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with IPsec [7:70680]
Hello! I am having problem in deploying IPsec VPN for LAN to LAN. I am using cisco 3600 series in my network. Everything seems to be working fine, there is full connectivity. I can even send trafic from one end to the other. As I start sending the traffic the line protocol on the peer router starts switching up and down continiously and i have no idea whats makes it behave in such a way. If you have any suggestions that you think will help me in overcoming this problem will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Syed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70680t=70680 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676]
First of all you need Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH for adsl over isdn support. Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH is a short-lived, early deployment release that will be supported in the second release of Cisco IOS Software Release 12.3T. It supports the Cisco 831, 836, and 837 routers, and Cisco 1700 Series routers Check: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/prod_bulletin09186a0080 1746b0.html sh dsl int atm 0 is needed... a.. a.. 0x8 means that the modem is waiting to hear from CO. This probably means that you do not have a good connection to the central office. Check connection and make sure the correct cable is being used. a.. 0x10 means that the modem head from CO and now training. The CO is connected, and the modems are attempting to negotiate a connection. If it fails in this state then there is probably some incompatibility between the ADSL interface and the central office. Make sure the correct VPI/VCI is being used. a.. 0x20 means that activation is completed and link is up. Regards De - Original Message - From: dlci_16 To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:44 PM Subject: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676] Hello i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN, the story so far ; the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and off(constantly, yes i know, not good), doing a #show ip int brief, obviously shows that both ATM0 and ATM0.1 are in down state (they are not admin. down), i have followed Cisco4s troubleshooting 'steps' from their website, from checking if DSL port is plugged in correctly, checking correct powersupply, placing dsl operating-mode in auto to checking if the circuit is tested (i have placed an Alcatel SpeedTouch and it works), now i am running out of options. a curious thing is when i issue a #debug atm event, i get the usual readout for activation state changes, then : LOCAL:Max noise margin for power cutoff 31 followed by a long list of bad news, modem state 0x8, on other adsl capable cisco routers(not over ISDN) i usually have dsl power-cutback set at 0 at the interface ATM 0, whereas with this router, i dont have this option. i tried to hunt for any intel relating to what does this power-cutback 'feature' actually do and if its related to this layer 1 problem and found nothing, maby i am taking the wrong approach to figuering what is wrong/missing, maby i should leave that Alcatel modem running and put that cisco router back in the box thing is i dont know where to look anymore, help? ;) sample of my config: ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group pppoe request-dialin protocol pppoe ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.0.210 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 ! interface ATM0 no ip address no atm ilmi-keepalive dsl operating-mode auto ! ! interface ATM0.1 point-to-point pvc 0/35 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 ! ! interface Dialer1 mtu 1492 ip address negotiated ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 no cdp enable ppp chap hostname xxx ppp chap password 7 xxx ppp pap sent-username xxx password 7 xxx ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70681t=70676 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Beta exams [7:70659]
To be honest, I don't like them :-( I took few beta exams and never got to pass any of them. When I went for the final version once available, I had no problems clearing any of them. And I don't think the problem was with my preparations either. The few exams I took were rather poorly structured, with many questions having multiple right answers. Literally, you could have a question and 4 answers, with 2 of the answers being exactly the same, how do they score that beats me. So, my advice, if you get it for free, go ahead and test yourself but if you have to pay anything, save yourself the few bucks and time and prepare for the final thing. Rodrigo Baldez wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Just a curiosity.. What are the most diferences between the normal cisco exams and the temporary beta ones? Besides the price, are they more difficult? More questions? I heard that you don4t receive a grade when you finishes any beta, and so you can only know few weeks ahead is that true? Regars, rodrigo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70682t=70659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676]
First of all you need Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH for adsl over isdn support. Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH is a short-lived, early deployment release that will be supported in the second release of Cisco IOS Software Release 12.3T. It supports the Cisco 831, 836, and 837 routers, and Cisco 1700 Series routers Check: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/prod_bulletin09186a0080 1746b0.html sh dsl int atm 0 is needed... -- 0x8 means that the modem is waiting to hear from CO. This probably means that you do not have a good connection to the central office. Check connection and make sure the correct cable is being used. ---0x10 means that the modem head from CO and now training. The CO is connected, and the modems are attempting to negotiate a connection. If it fails in this state then there is probably some incompatibility between the ADSL interface and the central office. Make sure the correct VPI/VCI is being used. --- 0x20 means that activation is completed and link is up. Regards De - Original Message - From: dlci_16 To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:44 PM Subject: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676] Hello i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN, the story so far ; the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and off(constantly, yes i know, not good), doing a #show ip int brief, obviously shows that both ATM0 and ATM0.1 are in down state (they are not admin. down), i have followed Cisco4s troubleshooting 'steps' from their website, from checking if DSL port is plugged in correctly, checking correct powersupply, placing dsl operating-mode in auto to checking if the circuit is tested (i have placed an Alcatel SpeedTouch and it works), now i am running out of options. a curious thing is when i issue a #debug atm event, i get the usual readout for activation state changes, then : LOCAL:Max noise margin for power cutoff 31 followed by a long list of bad news, modem state 0x8, on other adsl capable cisco routers(not over ISDN) i usually have dsl power-cutback set at 0 at the interface ATM 0, whereas with this router, i dont have this option. i tried to hunt for any intel relating to what does this power-cutback 'feature' actually do and if its related to this layer 1 problem and found nothing, maby i am taking the wrong approach to figuering what is wrong/missing, maby i should leave that Alcatel modem running and put that cisco router back in the box thing is i dont know where to look anymore, help? ;) sample of my config: ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group pppoe request-dialin protocol pppoe ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.0.210 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 ! interface ATM0 no ip address no atm ilmi-keepalive dsl operating-mode auto ! ! interface ATM0.1 point-to-point pvc 0/35 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 ! ! interface Dialer1 mtu 1492 ip address negotiated ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 no cdp enable ppp chap hostname xxx ppp chap password 7 xxx ppp pap sent-username xxx password 7 xxx ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70683t=70676 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless problem [7:70674]
I'm not quite sure what your final network looks like. Are you saying that you have: switch AP - AP - 4 PCs?? I'm not sure that the Linksys can do an AP - AP connection. On the page for BEFW11S4, which is a Wireless Access Point router, you can click on Where it fits into my network. It doesn't connect to other APs, just clients. The same with the WRT54G, as well as the WAP55G - clients only. A new Linksys, the WET54G is a bridge which means that you use 2 just like you already tried. (or a bridge and an AP) http://www.linksys.com/splash/wet54g_splash.asp Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: Don Kanicki To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 2:22 PM Subject: Wireless problem [7:70674] Hello all. Our office has a T1 connection to the internet that my boss wants to share with some of the other offices in our building (distances under 300').One office will have only 1 pc and the other will have 4.I figured wireless would be the easiest way to go since runing cable from our equipment to these offices would be a nitemare. I picked up an 802.11b (Linksys) access point and patched it through to my switch,set the SSID,and derived a wep key.The office with 4 devices in an attempt to save money bought an 802.11b (Linksys) access point as well.I provided their admin with all pertinent information (SSID,WEP key,IP\mask)and the access points do not seem to associate.Now I am by no means well versed in wireless but I assumed that as long as the SSID,WEP keys,and IP information was correct it would work.Im not sure what my problem is here and Im at a loss. Any help apreciated Don K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70684t=70674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with IPsec [7:70680]
Hi, what kind of interface is it where the line protocol goes down? Perhaps the router is missing keepalives due to increased CPU usage (caused by encryption overhead)? Thanks, Zsombor At 08:53 PM 6/15/2003 +, Syed Mohiuddin wrote: Hello! I am having problem in deploying IPsec VPN for LAN to LAN. I am using cisco 3600 series in my network. Everything seems to be working fine, there is full connectivity. I can even send trafic from one end to the other. As I start sending the traffic the line protocol on the peer router starts switching up and down continiously and i have no idea whats makes it behave in such a way. If you have any suggestions that you think will help me in overcoming this problem will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Syed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70685t=70680 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VoIP over Aironet Wireless [7:70679]
We have always had good luck with it.Are you using newer code that can at least prioritize the voice packets in the queue to get them out first ?? You can do this in the AP's now, also if there is a lot of traffic we have run parrellel bridges, one set for IPT and the other for data. d- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of neil_k11 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VoIP over Aironet Wireless [7:70679] Hi Guys, I have two sites connected with Aironet Wireless Bridges. We have implemented VoIP between these sites over this wireless link.Considering the Bandwidth of 11 Mbps for 802.11b , it should not have been a problem for a few IP phones.Even if we consider the throughput of the Wireless link actually is close to 4.5 Mbps, the bandwidth should be sufficient for a few g729 calls or even a few g711 calls, but to contrary the call quality is not good. Anybody experienced the same kind of situation. Any comments? Thanks, neil FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70687t=70679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wireless problem [7:70674]
This is correct. With almost all wireless implementations, you cannot connect an AP to an AP. You have to connect an AP -- Client or AP -- Bridge. The bridge would then attach to the hub. Josh Vince -Original Message- From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Wireless problem [7:70674] I'm not quite sure what your final network looks like. Are you saying that you have: switch AP - AP - 4 PCs?? I'm not sure that the Linksys can do an AP - AP connection. On the page for BEFW11S4, which is a Wireless Access Point router, you can click on Where it fits into my network. It doesn't connect to other APs, just clients. The same with the WRT54G, as well as the WAP55G - clients only. A new Linksys, the WET54G is a bridge which means that you use 2 just like you already tried. (or a bridge and an AP) http://www.linksys.com/splash/wet54g_splash.asp Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: Don Kanicki To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 2:22 PM Subject: Wireless problem [7:70674] Hello all. Our office has a T1 connection to the internet that my boss wants to share with some of the other offices in our building (distances under 300').One office will have only 1 pc and the other will have 4.I figured wireless would be the easiest way to go since runing cable from our equipment to these offices would be a nitemare. I picked up an 802.11b (Linksys) access point and patched it through to my switch,set the SSID,and derived a wep key.The office with 4 devices in an attempt to save money bought an 802.11b (Linksys) access point as well.I provided their admin with all pertinent information (SSID,WEP key,IP\mask)and the access points do not seem to associate.Now I am by no means well versed in wireless but I assumed that as long as the SSID,WEP keys,and IP information was correct it would work.Im not sure what my problem is here and Im at a loss. Any help apreciated Don K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70686t=70674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7120-4T1 router [7:70688]
My 7120 router suddenly is not working. I can't even console to it. I was able to console first time, and the error message appeared, CAN'T CONNECT CABLE/CONNECTOR FE0/0, it appeared three times and went to start decompressing self image, and then the same message appeared again, and it hung. Nothing happened for 5 minutes so I decided to reboot again, and now I can't even Console. Nothing comes up when I console to it. I tried recreating new HyperTerminal Sessions, changed my speed settings, and even tried hit control-C few times by powering down and up to to see if it even can go to rommode. No luck. It's so frustrating to not get into a console since it is the first layer of troubleshooting. Thanks ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70688t=70688 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with IPsec [7:70680]
Consider checking the bug list on CCO. Even if you don't find a bug call the TAC. -Original Message- From: Syed Mohiuddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with IPsec [7:70680] Hello! I am having problem in deploying IPsec VPN for LAN to LAN. I am using cisco 3600 series in my network. Everything seems to be working fine, there is full connectivity. I can even send trafic from one end to the other. As I start sending the traffic the line protocol on the peer router starts switching up and down continiously and i have no idea whats makes it behave in such a way. If you have any suggestions that you think will help me in overcoming this problem will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Syed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70689t=70680 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
Mark W. Odette II wrote: Robert, the way you described your hiring/screening process is the way I wished all Corporate America job providers did it. It's nice to know that at least one business out there doesn't hide behind an HR group that isn't prepared to perform the screening process properly and/or fairly. Ah, but let's not give him more credit than he's due. Read my reply to him. Essentially, while Robert's practices are commendable, he left out a very important piece of information - namely out of all the original candidates who submitted resumes, how exactly did he figure out who was to be granted an interview? Obviously he used some sort of a screening process - # years of experience, ccie status (or lack thereof), degree (or lack therefore), etc. But it's obvious that he used something because it is simply impossible to grant an interview to absolutely everybody who submits a resume. And whatever screening process he used to whittle the numbers down to something manageable is inherently imperfect.Perhaps Robert's screen is better than ones used by HR departments around the world, but let's not kid ourselves here - it wasn't perfect. No matter what screen you do, you run the risk of throwing what may turn out to be your best candidate. And that's really the bottom line. While we would all obviously prefer not to be treated like some number, the fact is, no company is really prepared to properly investigate every single candidate thorougly. Every candidate is going to make some sweeping generalizations that while they may not be totally fair, are done in the name of economic efficiency. Degree'd people tend to be more productive than non-degree'd people. That doesn't mean that every single non-degree'd person is worse than every single degree'd person, but the general rule holds enough times that companies can and will use it as a screen. Things like that. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70692t=70328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless problem [7:70674]
some things to consider. I admire your boss' generosity but let strangers onto your network like this? well - maybe you got nothing worth protecting anyway;- more thoughts in line below: Don Kanicki wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello all. Our office has a T1 connection to the internet that my boss wants to share with some of the other offices in our building (distances under 300'). 300 feet but how many cement floors / ceilings? how many walls? you really need to do a site survey to see if you really can get wireless connection between the other offices any your own. use a laptop and the Lynksys software. Works nice. I just put in a Lynksys here at home. My wife and kids get great reception in the living room and various bedrooms, and even on the back deck. ( the AP is in the living room ) but I get jack here in my home office / study, and I am not more than 100 feet away ( and a couple of walls ) as the crow flies, so to speak. there is anopther room in the house where I can get real slow link if I am sitting on the floor, but if I stand up I get 54 mbs ( I bought the wireless G, as you can tell.) One office will have only 1 pc and the other will have 4.I figured wireless would be the easiest way to go since runing cable from our equipment to these offices would be a nitemare. I picked up an 802.11b (Linksys) access point and patched it through to my switch,set the SSID,and derived a wep key.The office with 4 devices in an attempt to save money bought an 802.11b (Linksys) access point as well.I provided their admin with all pertinent information (SSID,WEP key,IP\mask)and the access points do not seem to associate.Now I am by no means well versed in wireless but I assumed that as long as the SSID,WEP keys,and IP information was correct it would work.Im not sure what my problem is here and Im at a loss. you can configure the Lynksys as either an AP or a bridge. An AP is for communication to end stations. Bridges talk to other bridges. You want to make you new friends part of your own network? Bridge, assign them IP's from your network, and go for it. But I gotta say, you ( and your boss ) need to do a little bit of thinking. There are many ways to share the internet connection without opening up your internal network to the risk present by allowing strangers to use your connections. Just a thought You Others -- -- Linksys Bridge-Linksys Bridge-their network | Router---internet | internal network You would need one pair of bridges for each external network good luck Any help apreciated Don K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70693t=70674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCI 640-901 or 643-801??? [7:70658]
Hi, The new aspects of the exam (like IPv6, RIPv2, NAT, etc) seemed basic - probably because I was well prepared. The only reason you may want to do 640-901 has to do with waiting for more than 8 weeks; should one fail, it means one has to re-study again. That does not sound so good for me, considering that the other exam is of the same level and you know the result and plan your new move there and then. Good Luck; I guess in both exams, you have to know IS-IS, OSPF, BGP very well - including how to configure them :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70690t=70658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP over Aironet Wireless [7:70679]
neil_k11 wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Guys, I have two sites connected with Aironet Wireless Bridges. We have implemented VoIP between these sites over this wireless link.Considering the Bandwidth of 11 Mbps for 802.11b , it should not have been a problem for a few IP phones.Even if we consider the throughput of the Wireless link actually is close to 4.5 Mbps, the bandwidth should be sufficient for a few g729 calls or even a few g711 calls, but to contrary the call quality is not good. Anybody experienced the same kind of situation. Any comments? what duplex does a wireless bridge run at? what apps - what bandwidth usage your users pulling? if you were to do it this way: Net_A---router-wireless_bridgewireless_bridgerou ter--Net_B then you could do some prioritization of voice on the routers and perhaps eliminate the problem. but it it highly likely that your data traffic is crowding your voice. collisions are probably killing your voice. just my wild ass guess. As Priscilla would say, the only way to know for sure is to throw a sniffer on the line and do a study. good luck Thanks, neil FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70694t=70679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
Craig Columbus wrote: passing from October 2002 to present. The most recent number I've seen is 11757. Which, averages about 170 people per month. Extrapolating to October, the number of people passing from Oct 2002 to Oct 2003 should turn out to be around 2044. My conclusion then, is that since the labs stay booked, and since the expected doubling of the people passing has not occurred, that the new lab is somewhat more difficult than the old lab. Therefore, the difficulty barrier was increased to partially, but not fully, counter the effects of lowering the quantity barrier (number of lab seats). Had the difficulty been raised enough to fully counter the quantity barrier, the number of those passing would have been held constant. Actually, I believe your numerical analysis is somewhat incomplete. At the same time that Cisco made the change from 2 days to 1, Cisco also (quietly) eliminated weekend testing. Also, Cisco has lately banked some test locations (i.e. Halifax). Finally, anecdotally I've been hearing that the number of empty seats in any particular location seems to be higher than it was in the past. For all these factors, I therefore don't think that there has been a true doubling of seats. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70696t=70328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP over Aironet Wireless [7:70679]
I did a MOS calculation test a few days back and got excellent on the link for 5 g711 calls, but after a couple of days people starting complaining about quality and ran the test again and found the MOS was poor.The data traffic between the sites is not a lot, I know that, still I am having lots of problems with the VoIp. I have a IP PBX connected to a router and the router is connected to wireless bridge and same setup on the other side with IP phones. Anything, you would suggest.to take a look at. thanks, neil Dave wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] We have always had good luck with it.Are you using newer code that can at least prioritize the voice packets in the queue to get them out first ?? You can do this in the AP's now, also if there is a lot of traffic we have run parrellel bridges, one set for IPT and the other for data. d- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of neil_k11 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VoIP over Aironet Wireless [7:70679] Hi Guys, I have two sites connected with Aironet Wireless Bridges. We have implemented VoIP between these sites over this wireless link.Considering the Bandwidth of 11 Mbps for 802.11b , it should not have been a problem for a few IP phones.Even if we consider the throughput of the Wireless link actually is close to 4.5 Mbps, the bandwidth should be sufficient for a few g729 calls or even a few g711 calls, but to contrary the call quality is not good. Anybody experienced the same kind of situation. Any comments? Thanks, neil FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70697t=70679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless problem [7:70674]
Thanks for the responces. All of our machines are used for email\web with the exception of the accounting pc which is not on the network.Im going to look into some kind of software firewall for our network and I can only assume the other offices will do the same. All offices are on the same floor and next to each other. The largest of the two is the one with the 4 pcs and the distance between their AP and ours is less than 50' separated by 2 standard walls (no concrete or block). Our office is all ethernet to a switch which our AP and router connect to.The office with 4 machines is all ethernet to a hub which their AP connects to.and the other office with 1 pc is a stand alone box that will connect via wireless nic. I wasnt thrilled about this idea from the word go but my boss sees this as a way to cover some of the cost of the circuit as hes charging them a monthly fee. If I have both APs act as bridges to link the larger office will the small single pc office still be able to connect or would that require a separate AP? TIA Don K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70698t=70674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Beta exams [7:70659]
Hi, I agree. I think Beta exams are just for testing errors in the exams - from the comments we make. Like I had a lot of trouble with BGP Beta - because the drag and drop mechanism was not good; you drag, but as you drop, it comes out - I despised that aspect because I was meeting it very frequently. Anyway, do the real exam when it is out. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70699t=70659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TRUNKING MODES [7:70700]
Hi All, Here is a question, please. Accidentally two switches are connected together that are in different management domains. If both sides of the link have their trunking states set to on, what will the link do? I thought there will be no trunking, but the answer says they will trunk - even with different management domains? Thanks. Mwalie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70700t=70700 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
