Re: VoIP Netmeeting [7:43949]
Priscilla Thanks for your input - tried all your suggestions but the issue still remains that I get connection in all but netmeeting to a remote phone (in that specific direction). There is something I am missing with the way netmeeting gets relayed and it may be a gateway problem but I cannot see it in this simple scanario. I understand the immediate router to be the gateway and should correctly relay the NM session across the WAN to the remote phone. eg NM12 should be able to call phone 22 - but does not. NM12 can call phone 11 ok and NM12 can setup a session with NM23. Both phones can successfully initiate a session with both the NMs. So there is something subtle I just don't see. I can ping all interfaces and hosts - see route table below. I am replying directly as my responses seem to get lost for some reason on the list. Correction below ie my diagramatical error should have been FXS interfaces not FXO. I have not seen any issues raised in TAC regarding the IOS or NM - maybe because no one would try to implement this in a serious deployment. I would be interested to know if anyone else on the list has successfully tried this experiment. - Scenario as per sketch below G===D G===D /o\/o\ --- Phone No=11--- Phone No=22 \/ FXS \ / FXS -- 192.168.10.0 -- ( A )---( B ) -- -- / 192.168.168.80 \192.168.20.1 / \ __ | | NetMeeting | | NetMeeting |___| 12 |___| 23 / // / 192.168.168.81 192.168.20.2 IOS = c2600-js-mz.122-7b.bin FYI the route table seems ok to me - below A#sho ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP . Gateway of last resort is not set 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 192.168.10.2/32 is directly connected, Serial0/0 C 192.168.10.0/30 is directly connected, Serial0/0 R192.168.20.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.10.2, 00:00:03, Serial0/0 C192.168.168.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0 B#sho ip rou Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP ... Gateway of last resort is not set 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 192.168.10.0/30 is directly connected, Serial0/1 C 192.168.10.1/32 is directly connected, Serial0/1 C192.168.20.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0 R192.168.168.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.10.1, 00:00:12, Serial0/1 B# Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Beautiful ASCII art! ;-) The thing that sticks out is this on Router A (and analgous thing on Router B): dial-peer voice 5 voip destination-pattern 22 session target ipv4:192.168.20.1 ip precedence 5 Why are you using the Ethernet port as the target? Can you ping that Ethernet port from the NM PC? What does show ip route tell you? What happens if you use the serial port as the target? That would be more direct anyway. Try simplifying. For example remore rtp compression and see if that helps. Remove ip precedence stuff until you get it working. Is there something else you're not telling us? ;-) You have FXO in the drawing. Basic analog phones are foreign exchange OFFICE (FXO). (that is the phone itself). Such a phone would attach to an foreign exchange STATION (FXS) port on a router Good luck! Priscilla At 01:18 PM 5/11/02, Edmund Woltynski wrote: Hi all Firstly I have checked the archives found nothing to help me solve this problem which I thought I had setup a working scenario in my lab 2 years ago (getting rusty have'nt played with this stuff for a while). Scenario as per sketch below G===D G===D /o\/o\ --- Phone No=11--- Phone No=22 \/ FXO \ / FXO -- 192.168.10.0 -- ( A )---( B ) -- -- / 192.168.168.80 \192.168.20.1 / \ __ | | NetMeeting | | NetMeeting |___| 12 |___| 23
VoIP Netmeeting [7:43949]
Hi all Firstly I have checked the archives found nothing to help me solve this problem which I thought I had setup a working scenario in my lab 2 years ago (getting rusty have'nt played with this stuff for a while). Scenario as per sketch below G===D G===D /o\/o\ --- Phone No=11--- Phone No=22 \/ FXO \ / FXO -- 192.168.10.0 -- ( A )---( B ) -- -- / 192.168.168.80 \192.168.20.1 / \ __ | | NetMeeting | | NetMeeting |___| 12 |___| 23 / // / 192.168.168.81 192.168.20.2 IOS = c2600-js-mz.122-7b.bin The problem I have is that I cannot get netmeeting 12 (192.168.168.81) with gateway (in NM 12) set to router A to ring converse with phone 22 (FXO) on router B but can with phone 11 (naturally) and vica versa ie netmeeting 23 (192.168.20.1) cannot ring and setup a call with phone 11 but can with phone 22. Both phones (11 22) are able to initiate calls and converse with either NMs 12 or 23 and phone to phone works. (BTW using the latest version of netmeeting and have installed other IOS (plus or better to eliminate possible buggy IOS)and NM12 to NM23 ok. Would anyone care to take a quick look and see what I have missed? - much appreciated. --- A#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1605 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname A ! enable password 7 xx ! memory-size iomem 10 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! call rsvp-sync interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.168.80 255.255.255.0 half-duplex ! interface Serial0/0 description connected to B bandwidth 1536 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression iphc-format no fair-queue clockrate 400 ip rtp header-compression iphc-format ip rtp reserve 16384 100 24 ! router rip version 2 network 192.168.10.0 network 192.168.168.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable snmp-server community public RO ! voice-port 1/0/0 cptone AU description connected to Phone (11) ! dial-peer cor custom ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 11 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 5 voip destination-pattern 22 session target ipv4:192.168.20.1 ip precedence 5 ! dial-peer voice 81 voip destination-pattern 12 session target ipv4:192.168.168.81 codec g711ulaw ! dial-peer voice 82 voip destination-pattern 23 session target ipv4:192.168.20.2 codec g711ulaw ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 password 7 x login line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 xx login ! end A# B#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1642 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname B ! enable password 7 x ! memory-size iomem 10 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! call rsvp-sync ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0 half-duplex ! interface Serial0/1 description connected to A bandwidth 1536 ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression iphc-format fair-queue 64 256 1 ip rtp header-compression iphc-format ip rtp reserve 16384 100 24 ! router rip version 2 network 192.168.10.0 network 192.168.20.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable ! ! snmp-server community public RO ! voice-port 1/0/0 cptone AU description connected to Phone_1 (22) ! dial-peer cor custom ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 22 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 5 voip destination-pattern 11 session target ipv4:192.168.168.80 ip precedence 5 ! dial-peer voice 81 voip destination-pattern 12 session target ipv4:192.168.168.81 codec g711ulaw ! dial-peer voice 82 voip destination-pattern 23 session target ipv4:192.168.20.2 codec g711ulaw ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 password 7 x login line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 xx login ! end B# -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law
CVoice [7:4394]
Hi Study Folk Just dropping a line to thank the group for the support and advice that was given - I knocked off this test successfully this afternoon at the eleventh hour (May 14 here - the US is still catching up). A pity it has been relegated to the lapsed category. Just a comment, I was surprised at how ATM centric the test was. A special thanks to Tim Medley who put things in perspective (it helped organise my chaos). -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4394t=4394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVOICE - Cisco Voice Over Frame Relay, ATM, and IP [7:2537]
Michael I am using Caputo - Cisco Packetized Voice Data Integration ISBN 0-07-134777-1 it is good read but will require additional supplementary information (eg CIPT hardware etc)- but most on the list seem to recommend Integrating Voice and Data Networks by Scott Keagy (I have ordered it bit I won't see it before my test - takes two or more weeks to get to the bookstore) Another recent addition is Cisco Voice over Frame Relay, ATM and IP ISBN 1578702275 (have not read it can't say much more) There is also good supplementary information at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/recertifications/multiserv_blueprint.html Good luck! Michael Bambic wrote: Anybody know a good book for this Exam? I can't seem to find one. Thanks! Mike Bambic FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2537t=2537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498]
Recently did the same - was apprehensive about using non-recommended Cisco parts, in lab equipment - used Kingston and has not missed a beat so far. Adam Burgess wrote: I have 8 2500's, two 2600's and a 4500M, all with Kingston Flash and DRAM and I have never had a problem with any of them. Regards Adam -Original Message- From: xc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 April 2001 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498] I need to upgrade some of my lab routers to handle 12.0 and 12.1. These IOS's are resource hogs, so apparently I need to pump up the DRAM and flash. So, has anybody tried out some of those non-Cisco approved DRAM and flash units? Don't worry, none of my routers are going to be used in a production environment. But I won't do it if these units completely blow some circuit on the router. XC FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2538t=2498 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help extra ethernet connection for a 2501!! [7:2187]
It may be that it is actually a 2501 and the serial link is attached to a terminal adapter (we used to do this with JTEC TA's in them thar good ole days the micro channel switching type (ts013) in the land of Oz) which would give the ISDN connectivity. Either way then the answers below are still valid (ie what Jenny said) BTW - I wonder when Cisco will finally change its recommended Australian type to net3/net5 - the ETSI standard. The old switch type is still in its latest books and manuals - has anyone told the yet? Take care all - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't sound like a 2501 to me - they don't have BRI interfaces. Did you mean a 2503? I'm not quite clear on your setup, but anyway... No, you can't use a serial interface to connect to a LAN. No, you can't add more LAN interfaces to a 2500 series router. They are fixed config, not modular. Can you connect to the 'outside world' using a cross-over cable to a serial port in the 'outside world' perhaps? Or is your 2500 in the outside world? JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 27/04/2001 04:26 pm --- Dan Pearson @groupstudy.com on 27/04/2001 08:36:49 am Please respond to Dan Pearson Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: help extra ethernet connection for a 2501!! [7:2187] Hi, I am setting up a test lab environment for a windows 2000 migration and want to have access to the outside world, the problem is we have a 2501 router which currently has the bri and ethernet interfaces in use, I need another ethernet interface for the test LAN, is there anyway I could utilise the serial connections for the test LAN? I m guessing that you cant put another ethernet card into the router due to the chassy type...i might be wrong...help! cheers in advance Dan FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2551t=2187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cvoice [7:2213]
Greetings All Just been told that I must get Cvoice before 14 May - (by boss - partner relations etc Yada Yada). There is no cvoice course running in this town so it is a self study trip. To cut a long story short, I am in the process of gathering study material for an assault on this thing - have some experience with implementing small implementations of toll-bypass VoIP VoFR 12 months back but no VoATM. Managed to get a copy of Caputo - Cisco Packetized Voice Data Integration, Keagy's book won't get here in time. The Cisco web site is thin on outline and some smatterings of information from the group archives. I gather 2600, 3600, AS5300 MC3810 are the focal points for this stuff. Can any kind soul who has recently done the CVoice 2.1 course throw any pointers/advice my way before they throw me down the cellar with some routers and a side of lamb and padlock the door for a week (I wish) ? Thanks - -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2213t=2213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Enterprise Plus IOS Image for 12.09/x [7:1685]
Roger This is what I got - just cleaned my glasses. Platform Release Software Features 2501-2525 12.0.9 ENTERPRISE PLUS Minimum Recommended Memory to download image - 16 MB Flash and 6 MB RAM FYI Platform Release Software Features 2501-252512.1.8ENTERPRISE PLUS Minimum Recommended Memory to download image - 16 MB Flash and 16 MB RAM Platform Release Software Features 2501-2525 12.1.8IP Minimum Recommended Memory to download image - 16 MB Flash and 8 MB RAM Platform Release Software Features 2501-2525 12.1.8IP/FW Minimum Recommended Memory to download image - 16 MB Flash and 10 MB RAM Roger Sohn wrote: Are my eyes playing tricks on me or has the size of the Enterprise Plus IOS image for the 2500 series gone up? I thought it used to be like around 6 or 7 MB but now checking it on CCO, it takes up 10MB. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1686t=1685 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwall Win2k Terminal server Clients [7:1598]
Hi Folks I am trying to get my head around how to poke holes in a router access list with a Firewall feature set (1600 series) to allow a Win2k terminal server client to access a remote TS. From the packet decode the server uses TCP =3389, but the client grabs a number in the range1560 upwards ie a new port per session - I can't seem to nail down a range. There has to be more than just this one port 3389 on the server side considering Citrix has a few to cater for. Does anyone know what the range is - or can nudge me in the right direction in solving this problem. I recall an email on the topic about 6-7 months ago, but can seem to locate it in the archives, I have searched through CCO - all the cookbooks, TAC tips, etc and the MS knowledge base to little avail. Any small hint to will be appreciated. Thanks Regards Edmund Woltynski Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1598t=1598 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVoice problem....
Check your IOS versions - the earlier versions were buggy (we had the same problem with 12.05) - I seem to recall something along the lines of ver 12.05XK or 12.0(7)XK- was the minimum spec. The latest IOS 12.1 IP Plus works just fine. Check CCO. Andrew Larkins wrote: We had the same problem here - all configs the same, but a dial is garbled. The only solution was to upgrade the software to the same version -Original Message- From: Mustafa Kemal Furat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2001 14:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CVoice problem Hello, Help!... I have a problem One of our customer using 2600 (IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.0(2a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) series FXS and FXO voice cards and 3640 IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-IS-M), Version 12.0(8), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) EM voice cards on their WAN and running VoIP, We replaced the 3640 with a 3660 IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-IS-M), Version 12.0(8), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) FXS voice cards Now we have voice problem. Whenever we try to place a call we hear only some strange noises Do you know the reason?... or can we solve it?... (Any solution other than IOS upgrade will be highly appriciated) Thanx _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski Ph: 08 83711492 Fax: 08 82971774 Mobile: 0414841704 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PSCS web: http://www.pscs.com.au 48 Spring Street NORTH PLYMPTON 5037 State: South Australia Country: Australia ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. If you received this communication in error, please contact us immediately at (618) 83711492, and delete the communication from any computer or network system. - _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
