RE: 3DES [7:34756] AES? [7:34863]
Any idea when they might add the successor to 3DES (AES)? (I've seen the Jan 2001 position paper at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/hb/vp3000/prodlit/vpnpo_sd.htm -- just wondering if anyone knew more re timelines [assuming such can be shared, if it exists].) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3DES [7:34756] The paranoid among us can think of other industries where industrial espionage might play a part. Insurance, medical, any industry where there are proprietary processes in place. Imagine if people had been able to hack Enron :- Chuck Joel Satterley wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here, here, as long as you re-key every so often, who's going to bother ?? Daniel Cotts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... My opinion is that nobody is going to try to intercept and decrypt your traffic unless you deal in very large amounts of money. DES will keep the curious at bay. It is less processor intensive. -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3DES [7:34756] I have been looking at routers/firewalls. I am thinking of going with the 2611 with a ADSL card, I also want to get a 515. Our office is not that big yet, but I want to plan for the future. I see that the Pix 515R only does DES, but doesn't do 3DES. But when I buy the router, I can get it with 3DES. I am just kinda confused, where is the best place to use 3DES, on the firewall, or on the router? Or it doesn't matter. The way I see it, if I wanted to do 3DES on the firewall with the 515, I would have to buy the 515UR, which is about 10K. I don't really need the thoughput for 100,000 users just yet though. Any suggestions on this? Thanks in advance... Brian Zee MCSE, CCNA, A+ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34863t=34863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX [7:33281]
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of WW Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX [7:33281] our company have two subnet need to go to internet. however, just one FE internal interface is availible, one is dmz and one is for internet. Since one FE interface can't bound two different subnet. Two subnet can't go to internet at the same time. Would anyone know how to solve the problem? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33299t=33281 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX [7:33281]
One more time-- //www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/19b.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Johnson Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX [7:33281] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of WW Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX [7:33281] our company have two subnet need to go to internet. however, just one FE internal interface is availible, one is dmz and one is for internet. Since one FE interface can't bound two different subnet. Two subnet can't go to internet at the same time. Would anyone know how to solve the problem? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33301t=33281 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250]
Looks like a simple syntax issue --- Serendipity(config-if)#ip add ? A.B.C.D IP address dhcp IP Address negotiated via DHCP Serendipity#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 12.1(5)T5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250] Hello, A couple of weeks back someone had successfully configured his 2514 router to get a dhcp ip addr. from his cable service provider, configured nat on the router for his laptop to go out on the internet. I tried to do the same on my 2514 but I cannot type the command under e0 for my router to get the dhcp ip addr. from the service provider. I initially thought that it was the ios ver. (was using 11.3.(3)) I upgraded to 12.0.(9) but it still will not let me type the command. Will this command only work on higher routers like the 2600 and the 3600 series. Please advise. Thank you. Kind regards. Output from the router: RTA(config-if)#ip dhcp ? % Unrecognized command RTA#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. RTA(config)#int e0 RTA(config-if)#ip ? Interface IP configuration subcommands: access-groupSpecify access control for packets accounting Enable IP accounting on this interface address Set the IP address of an interface authentication authentication subcommands bandwidth-percent Set EIGRP bandwidth limit broadcast-address Set the broadcast address of an interface cgmpEnable/disable CGMP directed-broadcast Enable forwarding of directed broadcasts dvmrp DVMRP interface commands hello-interval Configures IP-EIGRP hello interval _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22258t=22250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250]
Mssr. Nuts, It's a 2503 -- that's why I included the 'show version' output to confirm 250X operation. Please take a look at http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft/121 t/121t2/dt_dhcpc.htm . In particular, the excerpt below may be of some interest given your stated 12.0(9) environment. Command History Release Modification 12.1(2)T This command was introduced. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 6:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250] What model is this showing up under? I am sure definitely not for the 2500 series?? RTF(config-if)#ip addr ? A.B.C.D IP address RTF(config-if)#ip addr dhcp ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. From: Glenn Johnson Reply-To: Glenn Johnson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250] Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 15:59:36 -0400 Looks like a simple syntax issue --- Serendipity(config-if)#ip add ? A.B.C.D IP address dhcp IP Address negotiated via DHCP Serendipity#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 12.1(5)T5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250] Hello, A couple of weeks back someone had successfully configured his 2514 router to get a dhcp ip addr. from his cable service provider, configured nat on the router for his laptop to go out on the internet. I tried to do the same on my 2514 but I cannot type the command under e0 for my router to get the dhcp ip addr. from the service provider. I initially thought that it was the ios ver. (was using 11.3.(3)) I upgraded to 12.0.(9) but it still will not let me type the command. Will this command only work on higher routers like the 2600 and the 3600 series. Please advise. Thank you. Kind regards. Output from the router: RTA(config-if)#ip dhcp ? % Unrecognized command RTA#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. RTA(config)#int e0 RTA(config-if)#ip ? Interface IP configuration subcommands: access-group Specify access control for packets accounting Enable IP accounting on this interface address Set the IP address of an interface authentication authentication subcommands bandwidth-percent Set EIGRP bandwidth limit broadcast-address Set the broadcast address of an interface cgmp Enable/disable CGMP directed-broadcast Enable forwarding of directed broadcasts dvmrp DVMRP interface commands hello-interval Configures IP-EIGRP hello interval _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22289t=22250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: RE: Orange lights on Catalyst 2900XL Switch [7:22109]
Not on point, but an amusing quote nonetheless from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/53.shtml VTP Another cause of inactive ports is when the VLAN they belong to disappears. Each port in a switch belongs to a VLAN. If that VLAN is deleted, then the port will become inactive. Some switches show a steady orange light on each port where this has happened. If you come in to work one day and see hundreds of orange lights, don't panic. It could be that all the ports belong to the same VLAN and someone accidentally deleted the VLAN that the ports belong to. . -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Ramsey Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Orange lights on Catalyst 2900XL Switch [7:22109] I believe in this case, the orange represents halfduplex Rizzo, Damian 10/04/01 05:28PM Hey all, I have a quick question regarding a Catalyst 2900XL Switch. All appears well, all the status LED's are green with the exception of two of them. Coincidentally, those two ports are connected to the Uplink ports of two Hubs. Now both hubs work fine, all connected devices work fine, a show int on the switch show's both the ports with a Orange LED as UP and the Line Protocol as being up. Physically all appears to be working. It just bothers me that those two ports are Orange. I thought Orange only meant one thing, NO GOOD. Just Curious if anyone else has experienced this. Thanks for your time -Rizzo This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying, or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by replying to e-mail and destroy message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of MARAKON ASSOCIATES shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the company. When addressed to MARAKON clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22318t=22109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regarding the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a given CCIE number. However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a low number that quite a few of the early CCIEs are now firmly entrenched in the upper ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily, out of touch with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption could be quite flawed. Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19303t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: one day lab will send ccie to the hell [7:18373]
Care to elucidate? Please include reality in your story as much as possible. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: one day lab will send ccie to the hell [7:18373] ccie will be useless, take juniper cert. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18376t=18373 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab scheduling ? [7:16464]
Does anyone have any idea what the current delay is like for scheduling the lab (anywhere in the western hemisphere)? I passed the written recently, but my info is not available online yet (otherwise I would check there). I imagine that the delay is at least six months, but thought that things might be different with the changes to the format taking effect in October. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16464t=16464 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't ping outside of PIX [7:15205]
conduit permit icmp any any -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can't ping outside of PIX [7:15205] I have spent the all day on the problem below and I still can't see what I did wrong. Can you help? The PC can ping the inside ip address of the firewall The Firewall can ping the default-gateway and anything on the Internet But I cannot get the PC to ping the outside IP address of the firewall (208.136.247.214) or anything outside like (206.26.90.8). |PC|(1)--(2)|PIX|(3)-(4)--DSL MODEM PC (1): ip address 10.1.1.12 subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 default gateway: 10.1.1.10 PIX (2): ip adddress 10.1.1.10 subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 PIX (3i ip address 208.136.247.214 subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 DSL MODEM (4): ip address 208.136.247.1 subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 PIX Version 4.0.7 enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted passwd kIQggKv8.UiICW/r encrypted hostname pixfirewall failover names syslog output 20.3 no syslog console interface ethernet outside 10baset interface ethernet inside 10baset ip address inside 10.1.1.10 255.255.255.0 ip address outside 208.136.247.214 255.255.255.0 arp timeout 14400 global 1 208.136.247.214-208.136.247.214 nat 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 age 10 no rip outside passive no rip outside default no rip inside passive no rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 208.136.247.1 1 route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.12 timeout xlate 24:00:00 conn 12:00:00 udp 0:02:00 timeout rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 uauth 0:05:00 no snmp-server location no snmp-server contact mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 : end [OK] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15217t=15205 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: X.25 interface maximum rate [7:14146]
a bit redundant, but also see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/133/3.html re X.25 and http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/cable/cab_rout/cfig_nts/3794 m8tx/3794over.htm#11858 for an X.21 table Neither should be confused with Racer X of Speed Racer fame whose top speed still remains a mystery -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: X.25 interface maximum rate [7:14146] Do you want to know about X.25 (your subject) or X.21 (your text)? I don't believe there is a theoretical maximum for X.25 - this has been discussed before, though, so try checking the archives. X.21 will run with no problems at 2 Mbps. We have lots of X.21 interfaces running at 2 Mbps in our network. However, it does depend on what hardware you're using - see for example http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7505/interpro/instal l/ipicgfsp.htm#xtocid88350 which describes limitations on the total bandwidth an FSIP can cope with. JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 31/07/2001 03:35 pm --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] @groupstudy.com on 30/07/2001 09:37:03 pm Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: X.25 interface maximum rate [7:14146] Hello Group, Can somebody tell me the maximum speed an X.21 interface can suport or a URL that has detail information on this. I have an X.21 interface connection to a 2MB link and it would flap after about 48hrs of operation with a lot of input, CRC errors. A Bit Error Rate test has been performed on the link and the link quality was confirmed to be good. Please help!!! Regards, Preye. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14334t=14146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GRE and routing protocols [7:14432]
fyi see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios102/em/48049.htm #xtocid200671 (watch the wrap) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Baker, Jason Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: GRE and routing protocols [7:14432] hi mike, if you posted some configs i could plug it into lab and check it out. Jason -Original Message- From: Mike [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2001 12:03 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GRE and routing protocols [7:14432] I've configured a point-to-point GRE tunnel between two routers. Works fine with static routes, however, once I turn on RIP I get the following in about 30 seconds. %TUN-5-RECURDOWN: Tunnel0 temporarily disabled due to recursive routing 1d01h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tunnel0, changed state to down I've read about the recursive routing problem with IP in IP, can someone explain exactly why this is happening? Also, what is the solution. thanks, Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14437t=14432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP SERVERS [7:14444]
fyi see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/rtrmgmt/ciscoasu/nr/nr50/nru g/11failov.htm#41357 (watch the wrap) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of RAJESH AGNIHOTRI Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP SERVERS [7:1] Greetings , I have a basic doubt about DHCP server. can we have two dhcp server in the same physical network i do how does it work... _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14448t=1 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two CPA2503 questions... [7:14445]
fyi see http://www.spc.org.nc/it/TechHead/cisco.html re power supply story -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Willard Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Two CPA2503 questions... [7:14445] Hello, I recently convinced my employer to give me a Cisco CPA2503 (the white box CiscoPro router) whose power supply died. I have two questions. First of all, before I check into finding a replacement power supply, I read on this list a long way back (probably 1999ish) about someone who had made an outboard 2500 series power supply from a PC power supply. Unfortunately, I can't get a search of the archives to turn up that post that I remembered. Does anyone happen to have that link, or perhaps is the original poster still lurking? Secondly, is it true that you can order a replacement boot ROM for the CPA2500 series and make them able to load standard 2500 series images? If so, does Cisco charge for these boot ROMs, or are they like the other routers where you pay for shipping only? Thanks, James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14450t=14445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP for a switch [7:14164]
fyi see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1214ea1/3550scg/sw hsrp.htm#25516 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1214ea1/3550scg/sw clus.htm#73115 (watch the wrapping) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Ramsey Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP for a switch [7:14164] Maybe I am confused If yo uwant redundant switches, you would implement spanning tree... This is at layer two...not three, where routing takes place. Now if you mean using it on say a cat 6509 with a routing module, then yes you can implement it. But it would still be at layer three and not two. You would not create redundant switches. Again, this is where spanning tree comes into play. -Patrick Spencer Plantier 07/30/01 10:39AM yes you can --- Jason Kinney wrote: Can you use HSRP to backup a switch as you would a router? Jason Kinney 925-961-0223 [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Spencer Plantier Internet Solutions Engineer Voice 919-949-9993 Cell 919-696-8848 __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14190t=14164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Approx release date for 2600 series routers. [7:14161]
fyi see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/146/pressroom/1998/mar98/21.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT Approx release date for 2600 series routers. [7:14161] I have a product catalog dated June 1998 (don't ask why) - it has a section titled introducing a new Cisco product: Cisco 2600 series - modular access routers So around then, I guess. JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 31/07/2001 03:02 pm --- Leigh Anne Chisholm @groupstudy.com on 31/07/2001 02:38:07 am Please respond to Leigh Anne Chisholm Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: OT Approx release date for 2600 series routers. [7:14161] I think it was the summer of 1998. I know that they were definitely out in the fall of 1998 so it had to be just shortly before then. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Curtis Phillips Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT Approx release date for 2600 series routers. [7:14161] Hi, Sorry for the off topic but.. Does anyone remember the approx intorduction date for the 2600 series routers? Thanks, Curtis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14328t=14161 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028] Atlanta? [7:14042]
Somewhat related -- Anyone know of any active CCIE study groups in Atlanta? Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 1:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028] Yes, I think this might be the instructor(s) that might conduct the training. The classes would be here in CA. As my present position does not allow me the opportunity to have any in production hands-on training I am looking for this mentor lead classroom format. I am also trying to assemble some equipment here at work for a lab as a prerequisite to the intensive classroom training. Thanks for the input. Ray --- if it is the one taught by Paul Borghese or Brian Dennis, by all means take it. I have not taken the course, but I have had personal dealings with both, and they are both first rate teachers Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028] One question for the group: has anyone taken any of the Global Knowledge Advanced CCIE Preparation Courses (ACPC 1,2, and 3)? I am considering taking them in prep for the CCIE lab certification. Just passed CCDP and planning my attack plan for CCIE TIA Ray Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14042t=14042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: telnet on Pix 515 ver 5.3.1 [7:1285]
OR from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/authtopix.shtml#E (following key generation) ssh outside_ip 255.255.255.255 outside -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: telnet on Pix 515 ver 5.3.1 [7:1285] you are a saint. That makes sense. Thank you very much - Original Message - From: Allen May To: Scott Dees ; Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 4:46 PM Subject: Re: telnet on Pix 515 ver 5.3.1 [7:1285] Can't do telnet to outside interface. It would be a security risk. You can set up a VPN or dial-in to the inside network and get there that way. - Original Message - From: "Scott Dees" To: Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:25 PM Subject: telnet on Pix 515 ver 5.3.1 [7:1285] Anyone who can help me. I have a PIX 515 running IOS ver 5.3(1) and am trying to set it up to be able to telnet into it from the outside. It is up and running perfectly aside from this little quirk. First question is this possible? Second question how do you do it? Any help will be greatly appreciated Scott FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1311t=1285 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC-2T(Smart Serial) to DB60 Crossover cable M-M [7:458]
If it's what I think that you are looking for, this type of cable does exist, I have used them between btb 26xx'x and 25xx's. Among other places, you can find one at -- www.pacificcable.com (use the QuickNav drop-down to go to the 'smart serial' section) Here's a pic to confirm: http://www.pacificcable.com/PicFrames/Photos/CAB-SS-6026X.jpg (this one has the DCE on the wic2t end, if you want it one the 60 side, you will need to order another version (which is available)). I'm not affiliated with Pacific Cable, but I have ordered from them and would do so again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MihaiDumitru Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 4:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WIC-2T(Smart Serial) to DB60 Crossover cable M-M [7:458] I think such cable is not available at Cisco. You can use two cables instead: CAB-SS-V35MT and CAB-V35FC. William wrote: Is this cable available at Cisco? What part number? Any vendor making this cable. Thanks, William FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mihai Dumitru CCNP, MCSE Systems Engineer, ROMSYS SA tel: +40 1 2300810, mobile: +40 92 764287 fax: +40 1 2300815 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=468t=458 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Implementing SSH on Cisco IOS
Related Q: Anyone know if Cisco has plans to support SSH2 anytime soon? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simmons, Chad Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 11:00 PM To: 'Sean Young'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Implementing SSH on Cisco IOS http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft/121 t/121t1/sshv1.htm Supported Platforms Cisco 1700 series Cisco 2600 series Cisco 3600 series Cisco 7200 series Cisco 7500 series Cisco ubr920 series But it does require a DES or 3Des software image. You may want to check CCO before posting erronious info. Best Regards, Chad A. Simmons, MCSE, CCNP, CCDP Network Consultant Network Services Group Court Square Data Group, Inc. 1391 Main St. Springfield, Ma. 01103 (413) 746-0054 (Phone) (413) 746-0058 (Fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.csdg.com Information solutions that work in the real world. -Original Message- From: Sean Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Implementing SSH on Cisco IOS Doesn't Cisco realize that telnet is a security risk on Cisco devices especially for us who often has to telnet to the router remotely to fix/troubleshoot problems? Because username and password are traveling across the Internet in CLEAR TEXT, the risk is too great. I work for a company that would not allow us to telnet to the router from the Internet to our company routers and switches. I know that SSH (version 1) is available on IOS 12.1.x (only on 7000 and GSR platforms). Why don't they just implement SSH on all platforms? It is not that difficult to do this (in my opinion). Because of SSH lacking in Cisco IOS, I have to drive all the way to work to troubleshoot when there is problem. This is suck. You could implement all access-list all you like; however, the problem is that telnet will no encrypt information especially username and password across the Internet. SSH is widely implemented on almost all of Unix flavor and Juniper as well. How difficult is it to implement it on Cisco IOS? Anyone disagree? Sean _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DSL internet with PPPoE
Any reason (other than $) that a simple linksys ($100) switch wouldn't allow you to accomplish your goal? Sample - http://www.us.buy.com/retail/product.asp?loc=sku=10249719PageFormat=7#prod uct It has DHCP, NAT, IPSec/PPTP pass-through, forwarding, etc. All of this for what seems like a bargain price. I'm not affiliated with Linksys. A Netgear switch would probably be fine as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rizzo Damian Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:59 PM To: 'Rahul Kachalia'; Timothy Metz; Rizzo Damian; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DSL internet with PPPoE I don't see how any of this will provide me with what I desire. I desire to plug my DSL modem directly into my router and use that router's address as the gateway for my LAN. There's no reason that with only ONE registered IP address that every PC in my LAN can't access the internet. There are many solutions for this, I would probably use PAT on the router for instance. The only thing that stands between me and my desire, is this friggin, useless, does nothing but supply accounting info to the ISP, waste of bandwidth of a protocol, PPPoE! Once you plug the Modem into the router, you somehow have to authenticate to the ISP PPPoE server with a name and password. I have not found a way to implement this yet. This make me mad! Thanks for the ideas... -Original Message- From: Rahul Kachalia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:48 PM To: Timothy Metz; Rizzo Damian; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DSL internet with PPPoE Tim, PPPoE fundamentals are pretty much similar to PPP over WAN links but PPPoE breaks the boundary on router/modem brings down to host level where PPP is initiated just like a router but instead of serial links they send PPP request over Ethernet frame which may add more Layer 2 frame as configured on router/modem towards dslcloud. If second PC need to connect to internet that PC too needs an internet account PPPoE software in order to access else first PC can be multihomed provide a gateway service to other host on LAN. thanks rahul. - Original Message - From: "Timothy Metz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Rahul Kachalia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Rizzo Damian" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:34 AM Subject: RE: DSL internet with PPPoE Yes, I think this would work but I don't see how a second PC could get access to the internet unless it used the PC that initiated the connection through the DSL modem as a gateway. Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rahul Kachalia Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:39 PM To: Rizzo Damian; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DSL internet with PPPoE Rizzo, I think its possible, following would be your topology LAN-switch-Ciscorouter-eth-dsl modem--dsl cloud ( make sure you have to turn ON bridging on both ethernet interface of router ) I am assuming you are using PPPoE client software on the PC. PPPoE send Ethernet broadcast which needs to reach to PPPoE server unless you dont turn bridging on at routers traffic wont pass it will fail. thanks rahul. - Original Message - From: "Rizzo Damian" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:22 AM Subject: DSL internet with PPPoE I have a home lab with a few routers and switches, I have a permanent DSL connection but unfortunately they use PPPoE for authentication. Is there any way possible I can use this connection with a Cisco Router??? I'd like to plug the modem into my router and then route traffic from there. But can't seem to get past the PPPoE problem. Thanks for the help. Damian Rizzo Senior IT Engineer Marakon Associates 203-978-6341 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dial Up
"Deutshe Demokratishe Republik" until around 1989 I think :-)
but I guess it _could_ also be
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/123/index.shtml that you are inquiring
about
if you opt to blend the two somehow, then name one of the routers
"checkpoint charlie" for cheesy realism
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
{USER_FIRSTNAME} {USER_LASTNAME}
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 8:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dial Up
What is DDR?
""Pierre-Alex"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I have a Cisco 4000 and a Cisco 2503 that I want to use for simulating DDR
IS IT POSSIBLE to connect the aux ports of both routers to simulate DDR?
From what I have read, it seems that I would need 2 modems and 2 phone
lines to accomplish this.
But I may have intepreted the information wrong!
Thanks
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 5000 for home
sh po ca 1/1 ModelWS-X5009 Port 1/1 Type 100BaseTX Speed100 Duplex half,full Trunk encap type ISL Trunk mode on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate Channel no Broadcast suppressionno Flow control no Security yes Membership static,dynamic Fast start yes Rewrite no -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Hardman Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Catalyst 5000 for home Humm... I remember reading one time that the SupI card's FE ports did not support ISL or 1.Q trunks or ehterchannle either. Did I remember wrong? TIA -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I ""louieb"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 000201c087a5$7842c810$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000201c087a5$7842c810$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The Sup 1 and 10 meg card will do all you need for the lab. Don't waste the extra bucks on the 100MB card unless you plan on keeping the cat for personal use after you pass the lab. When I bought mine, it had a sup I, 24 port 10MB card, 12 port 100FX card and an ATM LANE module. (Now that they have taken LANE off the lab, it looks like a big mistake). I've never used the 100 FX module and the ATM module is no longer needed. Be sure to keep several code release versions around as they tend to use older versions of code on the Cat's in the lab. LAB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Albert Lu Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 11:03 PM To: GroupStudy Subject: Catalyst 5000 for home Hi, I would like to ask what's the minimum modules I need for a Cat5000 for a home lab? I'm considering a SupI(ws-x5009) and a ws-x5010 (24pt 10meg telco ports) or ws-x5012 (48pt 10meg telco ports). Is this sufficient for a CCIE lab, the SupI has a 100Meg uplink surely this is enough to to ISL trunking, routing, etc, etc? Or should I go for a ws-x5213a (12pt 100Meg). This module is much more expensive than the other because of the onboard RJ45 and being 100Meg. Thank you for you advice. Albert _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which Router for BGP4 ??
i thought that the 265x series supported 128 (though the pps number is slower than the 3640) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Evan Francen Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:15 AM To: 'Andy'; John Gesualdi Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which Router for BGP4 ?? If I am not mistaken, a 3620 only supports up to 64 MB of RAM. The 3640 is the "lowest" router in the Cisco line to support 128 MB. E -Original Message- From: Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 4:01 AM To: John Gesualdi Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Which Router for BGP4 ?? 3620 with 128 megs of ram should be fine. andy On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, John Gesualdi wrote: I need to run BGP4 with my ISP. Which router would you recommend I purchase? Should I go with a 3620,3640 or a 2650,2651? Thanks. -- John A. Gesualdi,CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Providence Journal Company Phone (401)277-8133 Pager (401)785-6938 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Press Certification Guides vs. Cisco Press Regular CCNP Books
y not http://www.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?book=52 as an option? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Mellone Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Press Certification Guides vs. Cisco Press Regular CCNP Books Hi Group, As far as passing the CCNP is concerned (vs. dealing with real-life issues) Does anyone have any experience with: CCNP Remote Access Exam Certification Guide - Brian Morgan, Nov. 2000 CCNP Support Exam Certification Guide - Amir Ranjbar, Nov. 2000 vs. Building Cisco Remote Access Networks - Dan Farkas, Dec. 1999 Cisco Internetwork Troubleshooting - Catherine Paquet, Jun. 1999 I only want to read 1 book for Remote Access 2.0 and 1 book for Support 2.0. I was thinking the Nov. 2000 books may be more up to date with the new 2.0 CCNP track vs. the old 1.0 track? - Jennifer Mellone _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: !H not a complete answer found it, but confused........help chuck!!
This may sound silly, but has anyone just tried to run the various scenarios (tracing/pinging w/host physically off, access list applied, etc.) in a simple lab with various versions of the IOS in an attempt to discern a consistent pattern? or we can go get in line at the Fla Sup Ct :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Cribbs Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 3:52 PM To: Rossetti, Stan; cisco Subject: RE: !H not a complete answer found it, but confusedhelp chuck!! First of all, this is very confusing. I have in front of me right now two very different resouces regarding !A and !H. The first is the one I sent and what I learned in school and is the correct answer on exams that I have taken. That was the ref I sent to 'intro to cisco router configuration' that i sent earlier from pages 230, chapter 9, where it states !H means blocked acces to host due to access list. Now, the rest i this is a printing of what i got from cisco command ref on-line and it says exactly what you told me, which was the !A meant a problem with an access list that was adminstratively unreachable. What is really strange about this, it that these two conflicting statements, one saying !H is a reject due to access lists and the other !A means rejected due to access lists are both ciso ref's. My book is cisco press. So what's up with that Did someone goof and maybe a type-o, or are they both correct? As I sit and comptemplate this, the reading in the cisco book, says !H is sent when the PROBE IS RECEIVED but blocked due to an access list. and on line- !A is sent when administratively unreachable due to an access list. !H is sent when host is unreachable. Are these two things the same and one, which I doubt, and if that is the case, what is the differences between the two. I would really like to know and need some imput. Chuck The rest of this I did not write: I copied it from on-line under cisco command ref troubleshooting commands under traceroute. = Table 118: IP Trace Text Characters Char Description nn msec For each node, the round-trip time in milliseconds for the specified number of probes. * The probe timed out. ? Unknown packet type. A Administratively unreachable. Usually, this output indicates that an access list is blocking traffic. H Host unreachable. N Network unreachable. P Protocol unreachable. Q Source quench. U Port unreachable. == Thanks, Jennifer Cribbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last minute CID exam comments?
I'm taking the CID exam later today -- any last minute tips would be appreciated. I've read the cisco press book and reviewed the objectives. I'm just curious about what "surprises" (if any) people may have come across. (All in a generalized NON-nda violation way of course :-) Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CVOICE 2 Study Material
Thanks for the heads-up, but "intergration" I wonder if it's a typo or just "inter"-speak :-) http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1578701961.01.LZZZ.jpg http://www2.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?book=23 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 3:28 PM To: Win Yu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CVOICE 2 Study Material Cisco Press just released a new voice/data book that is fabulous. Integrating Voice and Data Networks Author: Scott Keagy, CCIE ISBN: 1578701961 This book, which is 800 pages long, might be overkill for the CVOICE test, but it is a must-have for anyone actually implementing a data/voice project. The author is a CCIE who has worked for both Cisco and Pacific Bell. He knows and can clearly explain the details of a huge variety of voice topics, including VoIP, VoATM, VoFR, SS7, digital and analog voice, QoS, etc. Don't be thrown off by the 800 pages. The author is such a great writer that he manages to explain everything so that anyone can understand it. But he doesn't over-simplify to the point of being wrong, like some authors. (Some of the first books that came out on voice/data were basically the author's PowerPoint slides ported to book format, errors and over-simplifications included.) Scott Keagy took care in producing a comprehensive book that doesn't gloss over the issues voice/data integrators will encounter. The book demonstrates Keagy's detailed understanding of the relevant standards, protocols, and implementation issues. Well, I just can't say enough good things about this book! And I do not just say all this because I also wrote a book for Cisco Press. ;-) I am sincerely in awe of this great book. Priscilla At 10:25 AM 11/3/00, Win Yu wrote: Hi, Can anybody suggest reading material for CVOICE2? I am currently using CVOICE student guide 1.0. I don't know if it is sufficient. Looks like CVOICE and CVOICE2 are pretty similiar according to some posts I read. Your comments are greatly appreciated. Thank You. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: CID Question of the Day - Oct 30, 2000
Minor point, but - How would you have answered this sample question from Cramsession's free QOD service? My choice would have been "C. HDLC" as I would think "standard" might be interchangeable with "default" (with HDLC being the default encapsulation on point to point serial lines). Perhaps the question refers to Cisco to non-Cisco devices (with PPP being necessary due to the proprietary nature of hdlc)? -Original Message- From: Cramsession Question [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:19 PM To: Cisco - Internetwork Design Subject: CID Question of the Day - Oct 30, 2000 Today's Question What is the standard serial line encapsulation method? A. PPP B. SDLC C. HDLC D. LABP The answer to today's question will appear in the next mailing. But, if you can't wait, you can get the answer at: http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/lists/cid.asp?TDate=10%2F30%2F2000 [The link above states that "A. PPP" is correct.] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
off-topic: PIX vs Raptor
does anyone know of a good comparison(s) between these two products? i have seen one cisco.com page at http://www.cisco.com/cpropart/salestools/cc/ccc/prod/security/pixfire/pix_cs .htm but would like something from a third-party. thanks **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exam Sequence for CCNP/CCDP?
Does anyone know if the CID exam be taken before any of the other three CCNP/CCDP exams? I was unaware of any sequence requirements, just Cisco's suggested path, until I noticed in a few CID books that this exam "could" be taken after the other three were completed. Thanks **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Foundation Courses !!!
Title: Foundation Courses !!! from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.html relevant excerpt: Why offer two different exam paths for CCDP or CCNP (that is, Foundation Exam alone versus the Routing, Switching, and Remote Access exams)? The material covered in the three individual exams versus the one Foundation exam is the same. It is a personal testing choice in providing an alternative to those individuals proficient in all technical areas. It allows a candidate to take one Foundation exam versus three single exams. A single exam in US/CAN costs $100US for a total of $300US. Foundation exam is $200US with a savings of $100. Internationally, a single exam costs $150US for a total of $450US while a Foundation exam is $300US with a savings of $150US. The single exam paths consist of individual exams mapped to individual courses. The Foundation Exam Path consists of 3 courses mapping to one exam. A possible drawback to taking a Foundation exam is if you fail one of the three primary areas you fail the entire exam.[emphasis added] -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raees Ahmed ShaikhSent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 1:41 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: Foundation Courses !!! Dear All, Just a question to ask, What is the foundation R S course for CCNP, What does it consists of, how is it a replacement for two-three ccnp exams and the availability in Prometric centres, also would like to know did anybody of you got his ccnp taking this foundation courses instead of the regular path, I heard that only one exam is needed in addition to FRS to achieve CCNP. Pls. throw some light on this undiscussed FRS. Thanks in advance, Bye for now Shaikh Raees Ahmed, Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer, Cisco Certified Network Associate, Systems Network, IT Division.
vendor question
sorry if off topic -- I'm looking at buying some cisco equip (26xx rtrs) and came across a place called www.lanblvd.com with what appears to be good prices (at least they are a lot less than www.CDW.com - where I normally buy items). Does anyone have any experience they might share regarding lanblvd? Thanks in advance. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
