PIX VPN Client Configuration - At my wit's end! [7:74363]
Hi all, Thanks in advance for reading this message. I am completely boggled on an issue here that I have literally been trying to troubleshoot for some 12 hours now. I'm trying to configure a PIX 515E for Cisco VPN Client connectivity. Here are the relevant parts of my config: :PIX Version 6.3(1) interface ethernet0 auto interface ethernet1 auto interface ethernet2 auto nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 nameif ethernet2 dmz security50 access-list nonat permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 access-list VPNUser_splitTunnelAcl permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 any ip local pool vpnusers 192.168.2.100-192.168.2.254 nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat nat (inside) 10 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 sysopt connection permit-ipsec crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp-des esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec transform-set vpn esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 300 crypto dynamic-map dynmap 30 set transform-set vpn crypto map crypto-map-swa 20 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap crypto map crypto-map-swa interface outside isakmp enable outside isakmp identity address isakmp nat-traversal 20 isakmp policy 1 authentication pre-share isakmp policy 1 encryption 3des isakmp policy 1 hash sha isakmp policy 1 group 2 isakmp policy 1 lifetime 300 vpngroup VPNUser address-pool vpnusers vpngroup VPNUser dns-server 192.168.1.23 192.168.1.22 vpngroup VPNUser wins-server 192.168.1.21 192.168.1.21 vpngroup VPNUser split-tunnel VPNUser_splitTunnelAcl vpngroup VPNUser idle-time 1800 vpngroup VPNUser password Let's say the outside interface is 100.100.100.28. These are the networks: 100.100.100.28 255.255.255.240(outside) 192.168.1.0255.255.255.0 (inside) 192.168.2.0255.255.255.0 (vpn IP pool) 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 (dmz) I can connect with the client just fine, but neither end can ping the other. Say the client machine gets the IP 192.168.2.100 from the pool, it cannot ping anything in 192.168.1.x. Conversely, nothing in 192.168.1.x can ping 192.168.2.100. The VPN Client side shows packets being encrypted but none decrypted. The IPSec SA on the PIX shows packets being encrypted and none decrypted. Also worth noting is that the VPN client status shows Transparent Tunneling: Inactive on the status page while connecting, even though isakmp nat-traversal is enabled. An ethereal capture shows the client sending ESP packets to the PIX but none are coming back. Please, if anyone has any ideas I would love to hear them. This has been driving me crazy! Thanks, James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74363t=74363 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Sprint Internet Backbone and VoIP? [7:70665]
My company is using Sprint's Internet backbone for VoIP. We initially started our VoIP project as VoFR several years back using their FR network but migrated to IP when we were able to get a good deal on full IP T1s to every office. VoIP works pretty well across the backbone. Every office is no more than 2-5 hops away from each other. The problem with going across a backbone is that you don't have end-to-end QoS and so we still experience some voice dropouts at times. Something Sprint just started offering that helped out a lot is their CoS option that for a $150 one-time setup fee per site, they will apply a policy map to their gateway interface so that as traffic crosses the slowest part of the link (the T1 between you and Sprint), voice traffic will get priority. Of course, that's something new they're offering and not all of their routers will support that yet. We had to have a circuit moved from their Stockton to their Anaheim POP because the router we were on in Stockton did not support this yet. We've played with a Sitara QosWorks box and got a lot better voice quality than we ever did when we let the 3810s handle QoS, but again, things still weren't perfect pin-drop quality. Anyway, Sprint is pretty good about not letting their backbone get too congested before building out, so the cause of problems is going to be traffic getting jammed up on your T1 between yourself and Sprint and not the Sprint backbone itself. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sprint Internet Backbone and VoIP? [7:70665] Is anyone using the Sprint Internet backbone for VoIP? If so how is it working and are you running the VoIP just in the states or outside of the states? Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70729t=70665 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice degradation problem in Cisco VoIP network [7:63823]
Regardless of bandwidth, the voice packets need to be given a higher priority than the rest of the traffic. Voice is extremely time sensitive, and jitter will occur if there's a one-way trip time of around 200ms. One thing to consider is whether or not you're truly using VoIP (which is VoIPoFR in your case), or VoFR. They're similar, but still quite different. If you're truly running VoIPoFR, the following is a link that guides you through configuring QoS and improving voice quality: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_configuration_e xample09186a0080094af9.shtml (watch the line wrap) James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K A Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice degradation problem in Cisco VoIP network [7:63823] Hi, I am getting voice degradation problem b/w our two sites. Both of these 2 sites are connected using Framerelay with a very good bandwidth. Routers on both sides are 2600 Series with VoIP cards. Calls from one PBX are forwarded to my 2600 router and then it will transmit the VoIP packets to next 2600 Series which will get it back to the destination. The problem is the voice quality which is really terrible. Can you please kindly let me know what are the factors that I should work over now. I am new to Cisco Ip Telephony. So please let me know the basic points or factors on which I should base my research now. I will do my hardwork to resolve it if you guys can give me the basic points to work on. I will really appreciate your co-operation. Thanks alot in advance. K Ali i=63823t=63823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63832t=63823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT : Routing Software [7:61668]
Check out Zebra (www.zebra.org). It supports RIP, RIPv2, RIPng, OSPF, IGMP, and BGP4. The interface was designed to be a clone of IOS for most functions. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shane Stockman Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT : Routing Software [7:61668] I am looking for free routing software (RIP,OSPF,ISIS,BGP,DVMRP) for a linux box.I would like to know as well where can I get X.21 serial cards and PCMCIA card slots for a PC as I would like to build a small network for practice. Any notes would be appreciated if anyone has done something like this. Thanks _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61694t=61668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic copying of the configuration scheduling [7:61538]
You can check out Kiwi CatTools... http://www.kiwisyslog.com/products.htm#cattools (Hopefully the list didn't eat the URL, if so, go to www.kiwisoftware.com and click on CatTools). It's quite a useful program, and I use it extensively to monitor about 40 routers at work. Definitely a time saver for automating tasks and backing up configs.. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mr piyush shah Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Automatic copying of the configuration scheduling [7:61538] Dear all I have been assigned the task of copying a series of configurations in a router on a daily basis .I am tired of giving copy startup-config tftp command in each router . I was wondering if is there any way wherein we can automate this i.e copy startup-config tftp will run in each riuter automaticall at 9:00 am daily morning ? I am in search of that kind of solution .Request you to help me. Thanks in advance. Piyush Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61545t=61538 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Broadcast Packet [7:60738]
Well first of all, how is the machine's networking configured? If your network is supposed to have a /24 netmask (255.255.255.0) but you set it to /25 (255.255.255.128) on that one machine, that would explain why that machine thinks 10.0.3.127 is the correct broadcast address. What netmask does that machine have? James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Azhar Teza Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broadcast Packet [7:60738] I have a small network where users have been complaining of slowness. I decided to run sniffer and was really confused about a machine running on ip address 10.0.3.10 sending a packet to a non-existing ip address which is 10.0.3.127. I understand that broadcast will be sent to all the hosts in the network only to existing ip addresses, but don't understand why the broadcast is going to 10.0.3.127. It doesn't effect the machine, but ofcourse its taking the bandwidth on the ethernet wire.Thanks, ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60740t=60738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP Status: notPresent(6) [7:60633]
Hi all, I have a 3662 router with four NM-1E2W modules. In each of those modules is a WIC-1DSU integrated T1 CSU/DSU module, thus giving me Serial 1/0, 2/0, 3/0, and 4/0. All four of those T1s are up and operational, but I have a SNMP management web page that's not showing them as being up because SNMP is showing: interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.1 = Serial1/0 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.2 = Serial2/0 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.3 = Serial3/0 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.4 = Serial4/0 .. interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.1 = notPresent(6) interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.2 = notPresent(6) interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.3 = notPresent(6) interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.4 = notPresent(6) I can't figure out why their status would be notPresent when it should be up. I have a 3640 with the same integrated T1 modules that shows up for the serial ports. Does anybody know what might be wrong? Thanks, James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60633t=60633 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SNMP Status: notPresent(6) [7:60633]
Actually, that is a snmpwalk from linux. I should have mentioned that. Snmpwalk shows notPresent for those particular serial ports, and up for other similar hardware on different routers. The IOS release is 12.2.13, so perhaps it's just an unlucky release :). I'll check with the TAC too, but I was wondering if this was just a configuration issue somehow. Thanks, James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SNMP Status: notPresent(6) [7:60633] Have you tried directly a snmpwalk from a linux? but I don't think you have a problem with the monitoring a station because is working fine with the other router. It sounds like a software problem, try to check in TAC what bugs your version has and keep us informed James Willard wrote: Hi all, I have a 3662 router with four NM-1E2W modules. In each of those modules is a WIC-1DSU integrated T1 CSU/DSU module, thus giving me Serial 1/0, 2/0, 3/0, and 4/0. All four of those T1s are up and operational, but I have a SNMP management web page that's not showing them as being up because SNMP is showing: interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.1 = Serial1/0 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.2 = Serial2/0 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.3 = Serial3/0 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.4 = Serial4/0 .. interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.1 = notPresent(6) interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.2 = notPresent(6) interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.3 = notPresent(6) interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus.4 = notPresent(6) I can't figure out why their status would be notPresent when it should be up. I have a 3640 with the same integrated T1 modules that shows up for the serial ports. Does anybody know what might be wrong? Thanks, James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60637t=60633 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O/T more campus design issues [7:60136]
Priscilla, You'll need to either have a domain controller on each segment or set the ip helper-address x.x.x.x on the DC-less interface on the router that's routing the two segments. In other words, if ethernet0 is on subnet 1 without a DC, and ethernet1 is on subnet 2 with a DC, place the command on ethernet0. NetBIOS will attempt to resolve names by broadcast, and the helper address will turn that broadcast into a unicast towards the IP of the DC you specify in the config. Let me know how that works. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O/T more campus design issues [7:60136] You all remember my very simple campus network re-design that I've been helping out with? It sure has been keeping me humble. ;-) So we upgraded the single subnet to two subnets and two VLANs. Everything is working OK except for Windows networking. The PCs on the new subnet can't find a domain controller for authentication. So, you can feel free to yell at me for not gathering more information on the symptoms, but the client hasn't told me much. ;-) But does this ring a bell with anyone? Are there standard recommendations on how to handle this in a subnetted VLANed internetwork. I'm not too well informed on Windows networking. My co-author wrote that chapter in my troubleshooting book. Thank-you so much! Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60138t=60136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cisco router as DHCP server [7:58049]
A quick search on Cisco.com's main page for IOS DHCP server reveals: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1830/products_feature_ guide09186a008008743b.html (Hopefully the list didn't eat the link as it often does, and watch the line wrap..) Before asking such a simple question, it's best to attempt to find the answer on your own. It will build your own problem solving skills and you might learn quite a bit more in the process... Just my $0.02 James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of puro prasad Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco router as DHCP server [7:58049] Hi all, can a cisco router act as a DHCP server by itself? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58052t=58049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird MC3810-VCM6 error [7:57916]
This is just a hunch, but could you possibly have a high performance VCM in a non-V3 MC3810 (i.e., MC3810 or MC3810-V)? It will say on the back of the chassis what type it is. Only the V3 model supports the high performance VCM, so using one in a non-V3 might cause that error... James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of cebuano Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Weird MC3810-VCM6 error [7:57916] Hi group. I'd like to know if anyone else has seen this strange error in MC3810 with VCM6. Basically, if I load an IOS that has no Voice feature, the card is detected as. 1 6-DSP(slot2) Voice Compression Module(v01.K0) and the router boots fine. If I load any image with Voice, the card is detected as. 1 6-DSP(slot2) High Performance Compression Module(v01.K0) and the router loops with this error. c54x_state_readyWARNING: DSP type unknown defaulted to C542 c54x_state_readyWARNING: DSP type unknown defaulted to C542 c54x_state_readyWARNING: DSP type unknown defaulted to C542 c54x_state_readyWARNING: DSP type unknown defaulted to C542 Any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57917t=57916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TFTP error message [7:57752]
Well, that's basically how TFTP works on Unix-style systems. You have to first create the file (i.e., 'touch cisco-confg'), then give everyone write permissions to it (i.e., 'chmod 666 cisco-confg') before it can be written by the TFTP server. As far as I know, there's no way to circumvent that using the default tftp server - at least not according to the man pages. It may be possible to find a third-party TFTP server that will, or modify the source to one and compile your own if it's a significant problem. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of supernet Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TFTP error message [7:57752] I tried to set up a TFTP server on solaris. When I do write net on router, I got TFTP: error code 2 received - Access violation error message unless I create a destination file first. How do I fix this problem? Many thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57753t=57752 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MC3810 - VoIP Requirements [7:57426]
The MC3810 requires 64MB of RAM to run a VoIP feature set. You'll also almost certainly need 16MB of flash as well. To support the 64MB of RAM, you'll have to also get an updated BootROM. Those are free from Cisco's 1-800 line - part number BOOT-381V=. And of course, once you have all of that, you'll also need to get a voice-enabled image (something with a v5 in it). Also, the 3810 needs some sort of hardware to support your VoIP needs. This includes a DSP module and some type of voice interface, either digital (T1 or E1), or analog (EM, FXS, or FXO). It's a lot to digest, but I hope it helps :). James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of HulaJoe Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MC3810 - VoIP Requirements [7:57426] Hello All, I just purchased a 3810 to practice some Voice labs. I was hoping someone could answer a quick question for me. The 3810 I'm getting has 32 MB of RAM - Is this enough to run the 3810 as a VoIP GW ? Can someone give me some insight in regards to setting up the 3810 to support VoIP ? Thanks in advance! Joe Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57456t=57426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how can I get the boot rom upgrade for mc3810 [7:56733]
You can order the bootROM's by calling Cisco's credit card orders department at 1-800-553-6387 and choosing the To place a credit card order, press ... option. The part number is BOOT-381V= and it's a zero-cost item, so they'll only charge you for shipping. Enjoy, James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of guest Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how can I get the boot rom upgrade for mc3810 [7:56733] I bought 2 mc3810, but I found I need to upgrade the boot rom first to support 64mb Dram, how can order this from Cisco, I am an end user.Is there some reseller can order this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56748t=56733 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Caveat for 12.1.11 ip address dhcp command? [7:50415]
Mark, I seem to recall from a document on CCO that Cisco's T releases were on a separate release track than the release of the non-T releases of the same version. In other words, 12.1 and 12.1T are parallel releases that do not cross over. It's not until the next minor version (in this case 12.2) where the previous version's T's are integrated into the mainline IOS. Therefore any 12.2T's will become a part of 12.3 mainline IOS. At least, that's my understanding of it all. To get the ip address dhcp command, upgrade to a 12.2 IOS. I am using 12.2 on a 1605 at my house with a cable modem and DHCP address. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Yanalitis Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Caveat for 12.1.11 ip address dhcp command? [7:50415] I am putting a 2514 16f/16d behind an Ericcson cable modem. image c2500-jos65i-L121.11-bin Enterprise IP/FW plus 56des When I issue the ip address dhcp command in (config-if)# for eth0 or eht1, I get a ^ error. when I access help and issue ip address ? I see no DHCP option. What gives? This command was first added to IOS in 12.1(2)T. I should have this command in 12.1(11). Any ideas why it is not there? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50429t=50415 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Supervisor Engines [7:50279]
Basically, Supervisor I: For the 4003 Chassis (3-slot 4000). Provides layer 2 switching Supervisor II: For the 4006 Chassis (6-slot 4000). Provides layer 2 switching Supervisor III: For the 4006 Chassis (6-slot 4000). Provides layer 2, 3, and 4 switching. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stuart Pittwood Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Supervisor Engines [7:50279] We're looking into replacing some of our old hubs/switches with a single 4000 series switch. My question is what is the difference between supervisor engines I, II, III? Any help appreciated Thanks Stu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50281t=50279 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Supervisor Engines [7:50279]
Argh.. My linefeeds were totally nuked. Here it is: Supervisor I: Works only in the 4003 chassis. It does layer 2 switching and runs CatOS (set-based commands). Supervisor II: Works only in the 4006 chassis. It does layer 2 switching and runs CatOS (set-based commands). Supervisor I and II are basically the same thing, just for different chassis's. Supervisor III: Works only in the 4006 chassis. It's the step up from the Supervisor II and provides a much faster backplane, a higher switching rate, layer 3 and 4 switching (routing), and it uses the beloved IOS. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Willard Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Supervisor Engines [7:50279] Basically, Supervisor I: For the 4003 Chassis (3-slot 4000). Provides layer 2 switching Supervisor II: For the 4006 Chassis (6-slot 4000). Provides layer 2 switching Supervisor III: For the 4006 Chassis (6-slot 4000). Provides layer 2, 3, and 4 switching. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stuart Pittwood Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Supervisor Engines [7:50279] We're looking into replacing some of our old hubs/switches with a single 4000 series switch. My question is what is the difference between supervisor engines I, II, III? Any help appreciated Thanks Stu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50285t=50279 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mc3810? [7:48519]
The MC3810's all support VoIP, but you have to give the non-V3's a ROM/Flash/RAM upgrade since the VoIP images require 64MB of RAM. Of course, that requires upgrading the ROM too, because the existing ROM only recognizes up to 32MB of RAM. You'll just need a DSP module, Analog Voice Module, and whatever type of Analog Personality Module you'd like (EM, FXS, FXO). You may also want to look at the 1750-2V or -4V's if you only want a FXS line or two to experiment with. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] GEORGE wrote : Does the mc3810 support voice over ip as well as voice atm ,or just the mc3810 v3. What would be better to be to practice more this model or a 2600 series? The mc3810 on a standalone what parts are required? If I wanted only to to regular analog phones FXS interface? I a bit confiused as to the parts that are necessary? ___ NOCC, http://nocc.sourceforge.net Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48538t=48519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: uploading config to pix [7:46606]
Steven, Write erase erases the configuration written to memory (stored in NVRAM). The currently running configuration remains in tact until you reboot the system. Basically, what you're doing is erasing the stored config while keeping your current config, tftping a new config to the stored config, and then promptly overwriting it with the current config once you issue a write memory. What you should do is write erase the NVRAM, tftp the new config to the NVRAM, and then reload. If it prompts you to save configuration changes, answer NO because you already have the configuration you want waiting for you in NVRAM :). James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bates, Steven K HQISEC/SIGNAL Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uploading config to pix [7:46606] I am trying to upload a config for a pix, one that I know is good and works. I do a write erase on the pix to blow the old one away and then do un upload via tftp but then when I do a wr mem, it still has the old config. Any ideas? Steven Kell Bates Senior Network Engineer Technology Integration Center (TIC) BLDG 53302, FT Huachuca SIGNAL Corporation comm 520.533.3998 DSN 821-3998 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46619t=46606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP Call Detail Reporting [7:43238]
I have a network of about 21 offices that each have a MC3810 doing VoIP between them. Now, I'm wanting to setup Call Detail Reporting (CDR) so that I can basically just get a total number of minutes each month that the VoIP lines are in use so that I can build some sort of dollar savings report. I'm planning on writing my own system by setting the CDR information to log to a linux box's syslog, parsing out the fields with utilities like awk and 'cut', and entering them into a MySQL database where I can then use PHP to generate pages on usage statistics. Sounds like a lot, hmm? Therefore, I'm wondering if anything exists that does this already before I start working on the project. I've looked at CallManager product literature, but it seems to be overkill for just generating CDR reports since we don't have IP phones. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43238t=43238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Call Detail Reporting [7:43238]
Right, I was saying that I looked at CallManager but it seemed like overkill since we don't use IP phones. Logging from the PBX is definitely not the easiest place to pull information when we're talking about 21 PBXs where it's hard to find two that are alike or even offer call logging. Searching around on the Internet, I've found a syslog daemon called msyslogd that has a MySQL module for direct insertion into a SQL database. This should help out a little bit, but I'll still have to parse the data. James - Original Message - From: Chris Charlebois To: Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:41 PM Subject: RE: VoIP Call Detail Reporting [7:43238] OK, if you don't have IP Phones, I assume that means you don't have CallManager. The question then is what are you using for a PBX. The easiest place to pull that information is from the phone switch. I haven't seen that information being collected at the voice gateway. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43247t=43238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]
John, What you want to look at is Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF). It allows load balancing across multiple T1's. For each serial interface you would have your own subnet (such as a /30) to your provider, because the serial interfaces cannot be on the same subnet. Turn on CEF using ip cef globally (you may want to ensure you have a recent IOS, as CEF was buggy early on). Then, on each serial interface, issue either ip load-sharing per-packet or ip load-sharing per-destination depending on how you want the load distributed. To give you the full 4.5Mbps to any one site, use per-packet load balancing. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Jones Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599] I have a configuration question. I have 3 dedicated T1's a router 3620 with three T1 CSU/DSU and one FastEthernet ports installed. All dedicated T's are from the same ISP. I want to aggregate the three T1's for increased bandwidth (4.5 Mbps) Would I run into issues Here is my config. Would this work? ! hostname Cisco3620 ! ! no ip name-server ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip routing ! interface Ethernet 0/0 no description ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial 0/0 no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial 0/1 no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial 1/0 no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.4 255.255.255.248 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial1/0 ! ! ip classless no ip http server ! end I tried this config with Cisco's config maker and I get IP address errors on the serial ports, specifically being on the same subnet. Would this do basic aggregation? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33600t=33599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]
Right, the remote router must also have ip cef capability. The cisco equipment was assumed since this is a Cisco group :). In case of no Cisco equipment on the far end, you can always just use static default routes as a previous post suggested. It will, however, not give you true load balancing. James - Original Message - From: Hartnell, George To: Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:38 PM Subject: RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599] Would this not also be a function of just what the ISP has/wants on the far end? My hookup uses a 3Com Accessbuilder 6100 I-Mux --- HSSI---Cisco 7200. The three T1's are inverse multiplexed on the 3Com. Scaleable to 7 T1's. 'Couse this is a 'Cisco' newsgroup Best, G. -Original Message- From: James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599] John, What you want to look at is Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF). It allows load balancing across multiple T1's. For each serial interface you would have your own subnet (such as a /30) to your provider, because the serial interfaces cannot be on the same subnet. Turn on CEF using ip cef globally (you may want to ensure you have a recent IOS, as CEF was buggy early on). Then, on each serial interface, issue either ip load-sharing per-packet or ip load-sharing per-destination depending on how you want the load distributed. To give you the full 4.5Mbps to any one site, use per-packet load balancing. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Jones Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599] I have a configuration question. I have 3 dedicated T1's a router 3620 with three T1 CSU/DSU and one FastEthernet ports installed. All dedicated T's are from the same ISP. I want to aggregate the three T1's for increased bandwidth (4.5 Mbps) Would I run into issues Here is my config. Would this work? ! hostname Cisco3620 ! ! no ip name-server ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip routing ! interface Ethernet 0/0 no description ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial 0/0 no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial 0/1 no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial 1/0 no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.4 255.255.255.248 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial1/0 ! ! ip classless no ip http server ! end I tried this config with Cisco's config maker and I get IP address errors on the serial ports, specifically being on the same subnet. Would this do basic aggregation? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33614t=33599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 2924G: 1000-T GBIC [7:30546]
Is anyone aware of the possibility of the Cisco Catalyst 2924G switch ever supporting a 1000-T GBIC (twisted pair gigabit ethernet) in its two 1000-X slots? I have a C2924G, but it only supports 1000-SX, 1000-LX/LH, 1000-ZX (all fiber). I'm just wondering if anyone has heard of support for the 1000-T is in the works for a future CatOS release. Thanks, James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30546t=30546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP on the 1600 series??? [7:20209]
Actually, the 1600 series running the IP Plus version of IOS does in fact support BGP. Cisco1605#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Cisco1605(config)#router bgp 1 Cisco1605(config-router)# I can't imagine it being very useful, but perhaps for a small view or lab situation it could serve its purpose. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Andras Bellak To: Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 7:34 PM Subject: RE: BGP on the 1600 series??? [7:20209] 1600 series won't run bgp - I believe that 2500's will, and I know that 2600's will. Andras Bellak Director, WAN Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP on the 1600 series??? [7:20209] Hi, Do the 1600 series routers run BGP? I tried to configure bgp 100 on a 1603 and it gives me an unknown routing protocol error msg.? I am running IOS ver. 11.2(15)P. Do I have to upgrade the IOS to run BGP? Please advise. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20232t=20209 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335]
I personally would be very surprised if this was in fact possible without requiring some serious hardware hacking. It's curious that the original poster of this message was extremely vague in the details and it makes you wonder whether or not it was just an attempt to create a few hundred Me too! messages, which seems to have worked nicely. Will everyone -please- stop replying Me too! and just ask that the person post the details to the group if in fact it really is possible, which I doubt seriously. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: anyong To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:23 AM Subject: Re: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] Very interesting post : D I've all the listed part apart from the flash card that need advice. Is these flash card just a ISA adaptor (converter) and insert a 16MB PCMCIA flash card or there are some flash chips build on the ISA board? If not, what's the brand name? The Cisco brand cost 7xx! Thanks anyong udo konstantin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Woww, please count me in to Thanks Udo Vishal Punjabi schrieb am 05.09.01: Me too Vishal -Original Message- From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] Me to Samuel ho -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tonton Rabena Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] count me too.. Richard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Count me in... mike johnson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Everyone, For those who are interested in learning Cisco PIX but do NOT want to spend a lot of money on buying an expensive PIX Firewall, I think I can help you. I have instructions on how to build a PIX firewall by using a PC. In case you didn't know, PIX firewall is essentially a PC with multiple interfaces. I've successfully built several PIX firewall using my old PCs (i.e. pentium 200 MHz processor). Actually, the PIX1 series (obsolete I know) is a PC with Intel EtherExpress Interface cards. However, you must have an account with CCO in order the software and download the software. The rest of the instructions on how to build a PIX firewall using PC is very simple. Anyone interested in learning it, let me know. Mike __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com __ Flug.de - 570.000 Nutzer, ein Ziel: der optimale Flug http://flug.de/sb/?PP=0-5-100-105-12 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18612t=18335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T1 Question: What happens after the SmartJack? [7:18215]
Hi gang, Ok, this may sound like a stupid question, but as they say the only stupid question is the one not asked. So, here it goes. What exactly is the function of the smartjack on local-loop circuits? I mean, I understand their function but I am a little unclear on exactly how they fit in the scope of things. If I have a CSU/DSU which connects to the demarc (smartjack), then it is the smartjack's job to regenerate that signal and send it to the CO, correct? They also have the capability of being placed in loopback. So, is there a special inband signal which the telco can send which is picked up by just the smartjack and not the customer's CSU/DSU which raises/drops loopback? Is there a normal smartjack -like device on the telco side as well, or does the leased line connect directly to a CSU/DSU? Thanks, James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18215t=18215 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ambiguous command [7:17568]
That isn't a NDA issue. That's something you can easily test on any router that runs IOS. A quick test of telneting to a router and typing show i results in the ambiguous command message followed by the Router# prompt. There's your answer. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wright, Jeremy wrote: Can't answer- must respect NDA -Original Message- From: jo carol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ambiguous command [7:17568] Hi I had a question on a test that said if after a command you get %ambiguous command will the router return to the original command or just router# Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -James Donavon Willard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17571t=17568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: linux client not able to connect to VPN Concentrator 3000 [7:15982]
As far as I know, The VPN3000 box doesn't support PPtP clients. However, if you have CCO access then you'll be pleased to know that the unified VPN client version 3.0.8 has appeared for Linux under the Software Center section. James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of suaveguru Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux client not able to connect to VPN Concentrator 3000 [7:15981] hi all anyone knows whether cisco concentrator supports LINUX pptp clients? I tried using linux pptp client version 1.03 Kernel (suse) 2.216 connecting to my VPN box , cisco concentrator 3000 . I always run into error below are my error logs : any inputs will be greatly appreciated Oct 26 19:01:44 carlsberg pppd[787]: pppd 2.4.0 started by root, uid 0 Oct 26 19:01:44 carlsberg pppd[787]: Using interface ppp0 Oct 26 19:01:44 carlsberg pppd[787]: Connect: ppp0 /dev/pts/0 Oct 26 19:01:44 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:01:47 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:01:48 carlsberg pppd[787]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:01:48 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:01:50 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:01:50 carlsberg pppd[787]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 ] Oct 26 19:01:50 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 ] Oct 26 19:01:52 carlsberg pppd[787]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:01:53 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:01:53 carlsberg pppd[787]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3] Oct 26 19:01:53 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x3] Oct 26 19:01:53 carlsberg pppd[787]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x4] Oct 26 19:01:53 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x4] Oct 26 19:01:55 carlsberg pppd[787]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x5] Oct 26 19:01:55 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x5] Oct 26 19:01:56 carlsberg pppd[787]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ] Oct 26 19:02:17 carlsberg last message repeated 7 times Oct 26 19:02:18 carlsberg pptp[789]: log[call_callback:pptp_callmgr.c:88]: Closing connection Oct 26 19:02:18 carlsberg pppd[787]: Terminating on signal 15. Oct 26 19:02:18 carlsberg pppd[787]: Modem hangup Oct 26 19:02:18 carlsberg pppd[787]: Connection terminated. Oct 26 19:02:19 carlsberg pppd[787]: Exit. Oct 26 19:02:26 carlsberg init: Switching to runlevel: 6 Oct 26 19:02:29 carlsberg named[322]: named shutting down Oct 26 19:02:29 carlsberg named[322]: USAGE 1445857349 1445856928 CPU=0.01u/0s CHILDCPU=0u/0s Oct 26 19:02:29 carlsberg named[322]: NSTATS 1445857349 1445856928 A=1 Oct 26 19:02:29 carlsberg named[322]: XSTATS 1445857349 1445856928 RR=2 RNXD=0 RFwdR=1 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=0 ROpts=0 SSysQ=1 SAns=1 SFwdQ=1 SDupQ=0 SErr=0 RQ=1 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=1 RDupQ=0 RTCP=0 SFwdR=1 SFail=0 SFErr=0 SNaAns=1 SNXD=0 RUQ=0 RURQ=0 RUXFR=0 RUUpd=0 Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: starting (/etc/named.conf). named 8.2.3-REL Thu Mar 1 00:15:00 GMT 2001 ^Iroot@ceesay:/usr/src/packages/BUILD/bind8-8.2.3/bin/named Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: hint zone (IN) loaded (serial 0) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: carlsberg.zone: WARNING SOA expire value is less than SOA refresh+retry (36000 ) set, using SOA minimum instead Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: master zone apc.edu.ph (IN) loaded (serial 2001061401) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: Zone 1.106.10.in-addr.arpa (file carlsberg.1.106.10): No default TTL ($TTL ) set, using SOA minimum instead Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: carlsberg.1.106.10: WARNING SOA expire value is less than 7 days (36) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: master zone 1.106.10.in-addr.arpa (IN) loaded (serial 2001061401) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: master zone localhost (IN) loaded (serial 42) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: master zone 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa (IN) loaded (serial 42) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: listening on [127.0.0.1].53 (lo) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: listening on [203.87.142.27].53 (eth0) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: listening on [10.106.1.248].53 (eth1) Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[321]: Forwarding source address is [0.0.0.0].1024 Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[322]: group = named Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[322]: user = named Oct 26 19:45:08 carlsberg named[322]: Ready to answer queries. Oct 26 19:52:05 carlsberg modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module Pentanet Oct 26 19:52:54 carlsberg modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module Pentanet Oct 26 19:53:06 carlsberg last message repeated 2 times Oct 26 19:56:43 carlsberg pptp[3067]: log[pptp_dispatch_ctrl_packet:pptp_ctrl.c:548]: Client connection established. Oct 26 19:56:45 carlsberg pptp[3067]: log[pptp_dispatch_ctrl_packet:pptp_ctrl.c:655]: Outgoing call established (call ID 0, peer's call ID 32573). Oct 26 19:56:46 carlsberg modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module char-major-108 Oct 26
Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
It will depend on your service provider. CEF has become much more stable in the latest IOS releases. Sprint uses CEF for load-balancing multiple T1s where the customer also has Cisco equipment. I don't know about other providers since I mainly deal with Sprint. Is there anyone else out there who can share their experiences with other ISPs? James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Scott M. Trieste To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. khramov wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can I load balance 1IP between 4 T1s. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15905t=15692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two CPA2503 questions... [7:14445]
Hello, I recently convinced my employer to give me a Cisco CPA2503 (the white box CiscoPro router) whose power supply died. I have two questions. First of all, before I check into finding a replacement power supply, I read on this list a long way back (probably 1999ish) about someone who had made an outboard 2500 series power supply from a PC power supply. Unfortunately, I can't get a search of the archives to turn up that post that I remembered. Does anyone happen to have that link, or perhaps is the original poster still lurking? Secondly, is it true that you can order a replacement boot ROM for the CPA2500 series and make them able to load standard 2500 series images? If so, does Cisco charge for these boot ROMs, or are they like the other routers where you pay for shipping only? Thanks, James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14445t=14445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sniffer Shareware [7:12520]
I can personally vouch for Ethereal (http://www.ethereal.com/), which someone mentioned earlier but didn't provide a link. It runs under both Linux and Win32 platforms. It has a lot of nice features and it's completely free. I recommend you check it out. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yhladi Ghfaskovich Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sniffer Shareware [7:12520] Does anyone know if there is a sniffer-like shareware that can run on a pc? Do anyone have any cheap suggestions? Thank you, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12589t=12520 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cable modem connection and a Cisco Router [7:8208]
I use my 1605 at home for my cable modem connection. You need IOS 12.1 or later to make the router act as a DHCP client. Use ip address dhcp on the interface connected to the cable modem. One thing you have to be aware of (or maybe someone can provide a workaround for me?) is that I have to manually change the ip address of the NAT pool when my DHCP lease changes. I can however specify the ethernet interface in the static port mapping entries (PAT), which prevents me from having to change all of those. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Juan Blanco To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:40 PM Subject: Cable modem connection and a Cisco Router [7:8208] Team, I have a cable modem connection, I want to be able to use my Cisco 1600 router, does any ones know I could find some information of how doing this, the problem that I see I that every time I reboot my router a new ip will be provided via DHCP...Is this possible, I have the impression that Cisco routers only works with static ip. Thanks in advanced on taking your time to reply JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8211t=8208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
