4 Port Serial Interface on 2600 [7:66518]
I note the 4-port serial interface (NM-4T) is not supported on the 2600, but I recall having an older image which did list the interfaces, but I can't recall the image version. Does anyone know what version of IOS will support this module? Rik Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66518t=66518 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bandwidth [7:61552]
I would bundle the two serial interfaces together using Multilink PPP, then place access control on the router so customer's can't talk to each other, then apply rate limiting to each customer with guaranteed 64k, burst additional 64k and do rate limiting on bundle (if that's possible). This is generally what telco's are doing with Metro ethernet switches, except traffic is segregated by either VLAN or MPLS VPN. Rik -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 24 January 2003 12:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bandwidth [7:61552] kaushalender wrote: Thanx mam , Thanx alot thanx very much .Yes both customers are on same router but Whew, that's good. :-) how i will tell the s1 to use that bandwidth wich is not utilized by s0 Plz help.because ihave restriction on s0 s1 both from rate limit command. The method I told you before is based on the link still in use approaching a certain bandwidth. At that point it can take over the other one. I realize that's not quite what you want. I don't think there is a way to have the link still in use take over the other link when that link utilization goes low. Anyone know? If we don't get an answer, start another thread and explain the situation with more detail. That will get people's attention. Good luck. Priscilla Thanx in advance Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: kaushalender wrote: Hi group, I have a query Plz give anwserto it .Is it possible that if I have 2 customers which have circuits from me.Both having 64 Kbps bandwidth .If one customer is not utilizeing bandwidth than another customer can utilize that spare bandwidth whenever the another customer starts using bandwidth it gets back to normal. Where are the two customers? Aren't they physically in two different places? If yes, then there's no way to get this to work. It would be like saying if the road from New York to Miami has few cars, can we tell the extra cars travelling from New York to Boston to use the road from New York to Miami? If you had two serial interfaces between two sites, you can tell a router to use the second one when utilization gets to a certain point with the backup command. For example, let's say you had S0 and S1. S0 could start using S1's bandwidth when its utilization reached 60% and stop using it when it fell to 5% with the following command. int s0 backup int s1 backup load 60 5 But that's when the two interfaces go the same place. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Thanx In advance Kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62799t=61552 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Loading IOS [7:61413]
I recall years ago that 3Com had a utility that allowed you to place the card in your laptop, reformat the filesystem, then copy the image to it. If there is there a similar utility for Cisco, I'd be interested to know. Rik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 January 2003 5:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Loading IOS [7:61413] I am curious to know if it is possible to load 3660 IOS code to a PCMCIA card on a 3640 if all I am wanting to do is get the IOS on the flash card. I am not trying to load the 3640 router with the 3660 IOS. I am just in need of getting this IOS for a 3660 on a flash card but I dont have a 3660 at my present location so I thought about using my 3640. Thanks, Mario Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61424t=61413 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353]
What would he do if he had a FR link to a remote site and he wanted to ensure his high priority traffic was sent without DE, whilst low priority traffic can burst and be sent as DE - does FRTS (for Telnet only) solve this problem (if that can be done)? Rik -Original Message- From: mjans001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 January 2003 6:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You may need to use Priority Queueing, and hardcode telnet High prio based on an access-list. Normal traffic despools after telnet queue is empty. If you are sure that there will always be bandwitfh left for other traffic, PQ will do fine. That is one way of using it. During transmission, PQ gives priority queues absolute preferential treatment over low priority queues; important traffic, given the highest priority, always takes precedence over less important traffic. Packets are classified based on user-specified criteria and placed into one of the four output queues-high, medium, normal, and low-based on the assigned priority. Packets that are not classified by priority fall into the normal queue. Figure 7 illustrates this process. Congestion Management Overview http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c /qcpart2/qcconman.htm Why Use Priority Queueing? PQ provides absolute preferential treatment to high priority traffic, ensuring that mission-critical traffic traversing various WAN links gets priority treatment. In addition, PQ provides a faster response time than do other methods of queueing. Although you can enable priority output queueing for any interface, it is best used for low-bandwidth, congested serial interfaces. Considerations When choosing to use PQ, consider that because lower priority traffic is often denied bandwidth in favor of higher priority traffic, use of PQ could, in the worst case, result in lower priority traffic never being transmitted. To avoid inflicting these conditions on lower priority traffic, you can use traffic shaping or CAR to rate-limit the higher priority traffic. PQ introduces extra overhead that is acceptable for slow interfaces, but may not be acceptable for higher speed interfaces such as Ethernet. With PQ enabled, the system takes longer to switch packets because the packets are classified by the processor card. PQ uses a static configuration and does not adapt to changing network conditions. Martijn - -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Namens Julian P Verzonden: maandag 20 januari 2003 9:02 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353] Hi We would like to prioritize incoming traffic on our 256k internet link to uunet .We need to give telnet at least 64k incoming bandwidth. Any ideas on the best way to do this ? Thanks in advance Julian Version: PGP 8.0 iQA/AwUBPix7Bndq56XWk+VyEQJ+/ACfS2LZO44i+6Y+cRg37a/ApiovJtgAoLvz kS6ZvDnOtSXEqAAi/6u1v+p4 =nXJB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61425t=61353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]
This is something I am researching currently. I believe LLQ is CBWFQ+PQ and the PQ is strict. This means that anything above the allocated rate is dropped. This is fine for voice traffic where you reserve say 200kbps for 8 voice calls, and anything more than that is dropped, but not suitable for data applications. You will need to use CBWFQ for your data apps, not place them in the PQ. The CBWFQ will guarantee bandwidth to PC1 as you mention in your first post. I would say that the PQ only gives you 30k due to slow start after packet loss. Finally, why CBWFQ gives you sometimes 100k, sometimes 50k, - I can understand it giving you more than 80k, if there is more available, but I'm not sure why it gave you less. Perhaps the application or operating system applied some congestion control. I believe Win2k or XP does a lot of good work to not hog all of the WAN bandwidth. At this stage, I would question the appropriateness of FTP as an accurate traffic generation tool. As to the ping times, your bandwidth under the priority condition is only guaranteed up to the amount reserved. Anything above that is dropped if the Q is strict. PC1 would get better response if the ping traffic was in the PQ, but it isn't so it is placed in the same Q as all the FTP traffic. Then within the PQ, your ping has to sit at the end of a bunch of FTP data. I wouldn't be surprised if your ping traffic from PC1 was actually worse that PC2. PC2, under CBWFQ, would be more fair to small ping packets than many large FTP packets. Rik -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 December 2002 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820] Hi, I got the following information during debug. 128K_LL#debug priority Priority output queueing debugging is on 128K_LL# 3d01h: now 263877385 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263877750 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263877754 tokens 4288 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: WFQ: dropping a packet from the priority queue 1 3d01h: now 263878034 tokens 16000 pak_size 512 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263878307 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263878764 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263879040 tokens 16000 pak_size 512 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263879132 tokens 16000 pak_size 8096 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263879653 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263880046 tokens 16000 pak_size 512 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263880202 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263880202 tokens 3968 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: WFQ: dropping a packet from the priority queue 1 . Also, I found there is packet drops on the match ip address. The 'priority 80' is configured but there have a lot of dropped packets but default packet have no drop. Why? 128K_LL#show policy-map interface serial 0/0.1 Serial0/0.1: DLCI 200 - Service-policy output: 1 Class-map: 1 (match-all) 15552 packets, 16947920 bytes 30 second offered rate 3 bps, drop rate 7000 bps Match: access-group 21 Queueing Strict Priority Output Queue: Conversation 24 Bandwidth 80 (kbps) Burst 2000 (Bytes) (pkts matched/bytes matched) 2531/1983899 (total drops/bytes drops) 333/495184 Class-map: class-default (match-any) 18281 packets, 22054542 bytes 30 second offered rate 104000 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: any 128K_LL#show policy-map 1 Policy Map 1 Class 1 Strict Priority Bandwidth 80 (kbps) Burst 2000 (Bytes) It looks like the guaranteed bandwidth 80 was dropped first instead of the default packet? Why? Thanks again. rgds, ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59942t=59820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: simple network setup [7:59937]
Yes you can load share - but it wouldn't load share any individual flow - I believe this ensures the order of packet arrival is correct. If a link went down, I'm not sure about the packets in the interface queue (ie, those that had been placed on the outbound interface queue) but I would suspect they would be lost, so yes, you may lose a packet or two. Rik -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 December 2002 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: simple network setup [7:59937] Hi, I just thinking a simple question for a while... If I have only single router with 2 serial connection to Single ISP and no BGP was configured. Can inbound and outbound traffic be load balanced by only using 2 static routes on both routers? Also, what happen if either link is down? any packet will be lost? TIA. rgds, ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59943t=59937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Exam [7:59332]
Why be so pedantic - we should be congratulating the guy on qualifying for the lab not shooting him down with details. By saying he got his written, he is in no way implying that it is a certification, as you have incorrectly asserted. I would imply that what he got is his piece of paper which says you passed and he can now: 1) Sit for the lab 2) Access parts of the web specifically for those that have passed their written, including the other group groupstudy.com which is for CCIE candidates, as well as access to Cisco forum sites. So to Amer in Kuwait - well done, congratulations, and thanks for the info about which books to read and how long it takes. Oh - and where do you find 6-8 hours per day - do you not sleep or work? Rik -Original Message- From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 4:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written Exam [7:59332] I just got my CCIE written last week No, you didn't. You took a written test and passed it, but you didn't get anything. Remember, the CCIE Written is *NOT* a certification. BJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59414t=59332 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Perhaps O/T: Window TCP Rcv Window [7:59400]
A much much much easier way is to use a PC, load the dummynet image on a floppy disk, then in about 5 minutes with the right configuration, you have a simulated WAN, including bandwidth and delay. Dummynet works on FreeBSD or, as we do, you can download the version that fits on a floppy and boot from it. We use it to teach our application developers the hard lesson that not everyone has 100Mbps link to the servers, most sites have 64kbps. Rik -Original Message- From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 6:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Perhaps O/T: Window TCP Rcv Window [7:59400] Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote: Are you trying to make the window smaller? rgds Marc Yes. I was hoping to set up a demonstration on the impact of high bandwidth*delay product networks without actually having a high bandwidth*delay product network. By artifically enforcing a small rcv window, I should get about the same result. Thanks Marc, Scott s vermill wrote: On a W2k machine, I've tried several different recommendations for adjusting the TCP receive window size. None of them, including those directly from Microsoft, seem to have any impact. I'm capturing my own traffic and my advertised window is always in the 64k range. I've tried editing the \tcpip\parameters to include 'TcpWindowSize' and 'GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize' - neither of which had any effect. I've tried editing \VxD\MSTCP to include 'DefaultRcvWindow' - also no effect. Anyone know how to manipulate the rcv window that my machine will advertise. For that matter, what about the other MS OSes? XP? Win98? Thanks all, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59415t=59400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Traffic Shaping and Queuing [7:59258]
I want to be able to allocate min guaranteed bandwidth per application as well as use priority queuing for Voice on an edge router. Shall I use Custom queuing, which assigns min bandwidth per application, or CBWFQ (with Traffic Shaping if necessary)? I understand that LLQ (PQ+CBWFQ) is the best choice. I understand Custom Queuing and how it provides min bandwidth, but am not sure how traffic shaping and CBWFQ interacts - ie, do I need traffic shaping and if so, does the shaping occur before or after the queuing? Can anyone shed some light on this matter before I go back to what the ref books say? Rik Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59258t=59258 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Software for Statistical Profiling [7:58277]
Thanks for the info - I was looking at using the ErlangC model due to the nature of computer networks. Currently, my modelling is based on assuming an application takes 2 seconds to complete a task if it had 32kbps of bandwidth reserved for it, I can use the Erlang model to calculate whether 95% of transactions can be completed within say 2.3 seconds (with the 0.3 seconds being queue delay) - but by changing the bandwidth I change my underlying assumption of 2 seconds. Ie, if I allocate 64kbps, then the application may only takes 1.2 seconds and my model changes accordingly. The traditional Erlang model applies well on a packet-by-packet basis (just like queues of people in the bank, etc), but I'm not sure of its applicability to a series of packets on a whole which make up a transaction. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: charles dunkirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 30 November 2002 12:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Software for Statistical Profiling [7:58277] Try here for erlang calculator http://www.erlang.com/ There are 2 type B and C . B assumes blocked calls don't call back and C assumes they stay in queue. Chuck Dunkirk The Long and Winding Road wrote: Richard, the software used for your telephone booth problem is called an Ehrlang calculator. it seems that you could use an Ehrlang calculator to do this as well. There are a number of web sites that have Ehrlang calcs. A google search should reveal a bunch of them. A long time ago, in statistics class, we used to do something called monte carlo simulations to figure out stuff like this also. I don't remember much about the mechanics. Got a statistics professor on you campus? Chuck -- TANSTAAFL there ain't no such thing as a free lunch Larkin, Richard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I recall in Uni that we used te Poisson distribution and some mathematical formulae to say that if we have x people arrive per hour at a phone booth, and the average phone call is y minutes, we would need z phone booths to ensure that 95% of the time, people don't have to wait (or only have to wait xx minutes). Transposing this to application budgeting, I have an application at a remote site which has a max of 5 concurrent users and the worst transaction they do will hog the 64kbps line for 30 seconds (if it is the only transaction). My question is without revising my lecture notes, what software would help me determine what bandwidth to allocate this application so that 95% (or whatever) of the time the transaction can be completed in yy seconds? Is there any good software out there which would help me with this? Cheers Rik Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58379t=58277 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software for Statistical Profiling [7:58277]
I recall in Uni that we used te Poisson distribution and some mathematical formulae to say that if we have x people arrive per hour at a phone booth, and the average phone call is y minutes, we would need z phone booths to ensure that 95% of the time, people don't have to wait (or only have to wait xx minutes). Transposing this to application budgeting, I have an application at a remote site which has a max of 5 concurrent users and the worst transaction they do will hog the 64kbps line for 30 seconds (if it is the only transaction). My question is without revising my lecture notes, what software would help me determine what bandwidth to allocate this application so that 95% (or whatever) of the time the transaction can be completed in yy seconds? Is there any good software out there which would help me with this? Cheers Rik Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58277t=58277 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - comparing tcpdump files to identify packet loss [7:55749]
OT but - Anyone know a useful tool to compare two tcpdump files and show the difference. I have tried using the diff command on the text output of the files (print the packet header minus the timestamp) and this generally works but is not the nicest due to only comparing the header information. Rik Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55749t=55749 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written revised [7:53972]
Yeah I hear you brother. Our company reimburses successful tests and I've just bombed MPLS twice. Every time I bomb, the wife gets to go on a shopping spree worth $AUD190 to balance the equation. Certainly the best incentive to pass I ever had! Rik -Original Message- From: Theodore Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2002 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE written revised [7:53972] Larry, I have the same situation. She doesn't like that I have to shell out the money first even though I get re-imbursed. She thinks my money is HER money and has nothing to do with the company. I just passed MCSE/SD and even though it was free, I felt her pain. Should do the CCIE Sec lab sometime in the Winter 03 but I won't say anything to her out of fear :-) Any one else out there have test fee and spouse problems? Theo Larry Letterman Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/25/2002 06:47 AM GMT Please respond to Larry Letterman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: bcc: Subject: Re: CCIE written revised [7:53972] if the employer re-imburses you, whats the issue with your wife? Tim Medley wrote: So is that how people without experience do it? Just keep failing the ccie written exam until you've memorized all the questions or get lucky? You must be single, or rich, or both. My wife has a fit when I spent $125 on a exam I am well prepared for, let alone spend $300 on the written. And my employer reimburses for the exam. I guess now I know why my employer will only pay for an exam twice. Try picking up a book and learning something, then you could pass the exam on the first try. Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Julio Godinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written revised [7:53972] Passing score 105: First attempt 77, Second attemp (yesterday) 95 =( FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54038t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CCIP [7:53549]
I used the book you are referring too and have failed twice. I have now gone out and bought the Sybex MPLS book and will have another go once my collegue has finished with it. The answer is definitely no - the book is not enough - it only takes a handful of questions to get wrong and you're a goner! Richard Larkin -Original Message- From: Link Teo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 20 September 2002 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passed CCIP [7:53549] Thanks for your valuable advice! Did you use MPLS and VPN Architecture (CCIP Edition) by Cisco press to prepare for your MPLS exam?? If the answer is YES, Do you think the material of this book is related to the actual exam? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53685t=53549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS for 2500 [7:53353]
Definitely yes with PPP - a new NCP (MPLSCP) provides indication that the frame is an MPLS frame instead of an IP or IPX frame. MPLS is treated as just another network layer protocol. Not sure about HDLC though. Richard Larkin -Original Message- From: Tom Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2002 4:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MPLS for 2500 [7:53353] MPLS'ers, Assuming you find the IOS that supports MPLS on the 2500 or 2600, is it possible then to set up a little MPLS cloud with HDLC or PPP links connecting the routers? Alternatively, we have used the MPLS routers as access devices to connect to a FR cloud (ATM too but we don't have the ATM switches yet). But we'd like to just use three or four inexpensive 2500/2600 routers with HDLC/PPP serial links as the cloud. Can it be done? -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53519t=53353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QOS ?? help needed [7:52961]
Quick question - where does traffic shaping fit into all this. If I do traffic shaping on outbound traffic from a 3640, I presume that occurs AFTER the classification (ie, the shaping is the last step)? Richard Larkin -Original Message- From: Tom Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 10 September 2002 9:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tr: QOS ?? help needed [7:52961] Andy, This is a problem for Q Man! (whoever and wherever he is) But seriously, maybe we could work this one out on the list. May I suggest that you use the modular QoS CLI. This involves three steps: First, classify the packets using ACLs and the class-map command. Second, apply actions to the class using the policy-map command. Third, attach the policy to an interface (input or output). Fourth, enjoy your network. Anyone else want to take it from there? -- TT Original Message Subject: QOS ?? help needed [7:52961] Date: 10 Sep 2002 00:17:37 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (crow) Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Hi Group, i am having problems to solve the following scenario. kabelmodem-(E0)router2501(E1) - witch - win2k-pro (private address range) ( internetaddress )( using - win2k-server (private address range) i want to prefer udp-packets with port xxx over all other traffic (specially http) (leaving the win2k-pro in direction to kabel-modem, with all other traffic i mean traffic from win2k-pro and win2k-server, specially http) is this possible? i tried priority-queueing: priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 120 priority-list 1 protocol ip normal priority-list 1 protocol ip low tcp www access-list 120 permit udp host 10.0.0.2 any range int e 0 priority-group 1 but the result wasn' t efficient. also i tried route-maps with precedence flash-override as high and routine as low, but i dont know whether it is the right way solving the prob nor the configuration works. i was searching on the cco and trying to solve the problem for many hours. i need your help. any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53078t=52961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing Score for MCAST+QOS [7:52470]
I found it challenging, but certainly not as difficult as the MPLS exam which has a much higher pass mark and I have failed twice to date. For the QoS+Multicast exam, I didn't read the Multicast Cisco Press book, only the IP QoS book, plus some whitepapers/documentation - and I struggled - so I would recommend both books. Richard Larkin -Original Message- From: bi.s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 1 September 2002 5:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Passing Score for MCAST+QOS [7:52470] YASSER ALY wrote: What is the passing score for MCAST+QOS (640-905) ? For those who managed to pass it do you consider a tough or easy going one. Regards,Yasser hi, as far as i remember the passing score was 720. the answer to your second question depends i would say. i found it one of the most difficult exams i had so far. but you can make it. be prepared for deep questions and troubleshooting. hth -bis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52512t=52470 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stuck in rxboot mode on 2524 [7:51780]
We had the same problem last month on an old 4000. The solution, from memory, was to use the config register or boot system command in the conf t global mode. I remember we did o/r 0x2102 and the next boot showed the config reg at 0x2102, but it was still in rxboot mode. I think the next step was within the configuration. Memory a bit rusty - but it may help trigger some ideas. Rik -Original Message- From: McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2002 4:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stuck in rxboot mode on 2524 [7:51780] I just attempted an upgrade on a 2524 from 11.0 to 12.2 and am now stuck rxboot mode. I followed the instruction to the letter and rebooted from 0x2101 to 0x2102 and the config register is showing that is is now 0x2102 but it is still in rxboot mode. My upgrade of the IOS failed also. At the end I got a checksum error. Right now I just want to get back in regular boot mode. Any suggestions appreciated. thx Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51819t=51780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: 2 questions [7:51751]
The real question is how to do all that you mention below AND get paid for it; meaning, what about the other policy development, group meetings, proposal writing, etc, that happen along the way Rik -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2002 4:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT: 2 questions [7:51751] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been following this group for some time now and am very impressed by a few of the regular posters and I have some questions for them. How do you get all of your knowledge and information? For example I just read Howard Berkowitz OSPF tutorial from the Certification Zone and it is very very good. I was very impressed at the detail Howard went into the tutorial and his knowledge. The same goes for Pricilla. How do you guys get all your knowledge? You are very sweet to flatter me so. :-) I have learned so much because I have been doing this for over 20 years. I think Howard has been doing it for over 30 years (plus he is a genius! Seriously.) Other tips: Really do read RFCs and IEEE documents. If you want to be like Howard, get involved in the development of RFCs. Read the drafts. Join the mailing lists. Analyze protocol behavior with router show and debug commands, and, of course, with a protocol analyzer. (You knew I would say that!) Don't be afraid to try weird stuff in your lab. Chuck Larrieu can be our inspiration there! ;-) Choose your books carefully. Skip the silly Get rich quick, get Cisco certified books. When trying to decide if you should buy a book (if you have physical access to it, such as in a bookstore), look it over carefully for good writing and technical accuracy. Choose a subject that you know well and see what the author says about it. I choose TCP, for example. If the book makes it sound like all you have to know to understand TCP is that there's a 3-say handshake, I put the book back on the shelf (hopefully hidden so nobody else will buy it either.) Here's a list of the books that I think are the best in our field: http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/books.html Priscilla In the tutorial it talked about the Dijkstra algorithm and how Howard is working with a group and changing the route computation. Wow!! Where did you learn to do this? I'm in the process of studying for my CCIE and I want to be an Internetworking Expert. When I think of an expert I think of people like Howard, Pricilla, Jeff Doyle, and I am wondering where can I go to learn all that they know. Do you guys memorize stuff? Because there is so much to learn I wonder how you remember it all. I'm just wondering because I want to be like you guys. I know to be like this it is not easy but I am willing to work at it. Second question is what type of ISDN interface would I need to connect to an ISDN switch? Where can I go to find this information? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51820t=51751 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help, Switching Solution with 4006 [7:51799]
I was told by Cisco that Sup III didn't support IPX routing! Rik -Original Message- From: Wayne Jang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2002 8:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help, Switching Solution with 4006 [7:51799] Hi, I am proposing the following LAN solution to a customer. Does it make sense? -WS-C4006-S3(sup III engine) Do I need special licenses for this? The customer will be using IP and IPX. I saw some licensing software for the Sup III that was around $1700 for both IP and IPX. I don't know that that is all about. -One 48 port RJ45 blade for servers and workstations on same floor -One 6 port GBIC blade (WS-X4306-GB) that will be used to connect to five WS-2950s on different floors -I will use the WS-5483 GBICs to connect the 2950s to the six port WS-X4306-GB Can anyone think of things I haven't considered? Thanks Wayne Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51821t=51799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filtering [7:51667]
NBAR should do this -Original Message- From: Chris Sweeting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 20 August 2002 4:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Filtering [7:51667] What is the best tools for fiterring mp3's on a 2600 router in general Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51700t=51667 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
