RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
Did you try disabling the built-in winxp firewall? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Odette II Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 17:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] Jeff- As a matter of fact, YES! Dunno why, as I didn't have time to try figuring it out, but this was my scenario. Klever Nothings PumpKIN TFTP Server installed on WinXP workstation, and running with proper folder specified for images. Cisco 1750 Router configured to boot loading image from above mentioned TFTP Server. When the router boots, it does it's normal process and sends its broadcast request for TFTP service, and PumpKIN responds. But, the problem was that it would always fail, stating that there was a buffer overflow error from the PumpKIN side, and either an error reading the file (invalid file) on the TFTP server, or a timeout error reading the file from the Router side. This Router had its FastEthernet port plugged into a 1548 Switch that also had the XP workstation plugged into said switch. So, I put PumpKIN on a laptop with W2K Professional, jack into the Routers' ethernet port with a cross-over cable, and try the TFTP boot again, and it works like a champ. Now mind you, I tried specifying a specific TFTP server address, and using broadcast, and neither worked for connecting to the TFTP server on the XP box. I did the same on the directly-connected W2K laptop, and it worked either way. The only difference that I didn't investigate was plugging in the laptop to the 1548 Switch. None the less, I couldn't get it to work on XP. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff D Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work with my XP box. Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37746t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2nd try - 2501 console port doesn't like reverse telnet [7:37613]
Have you tried the Modem Host command on the line with the 2501? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Dickson Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 17:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2nd try - 2501 console port doesn't like reverse telnet [7:37597] Gurus, I posted this question a few days ago, but didn't get anywhere. I thought I might try again with a slightly different explanation of the problem. The last explanation got me a lots of kind advice about how to setup and use a reverse telnet connection, but that's not what I need. I have 12 routers, mostly 25xx's with a couple 26xx's and a 4500, along with a Cat 5000. All of this equipment is connected to a 2511, which is serving as an access server. The 2511 is configured to provide reverse telnet connections into the console ports of my lab equipment. All of the 2511's asynch lines are configured the same: line 1 16 no exec modem InOut transport input all I am able to make a successful connection to all my equipment, except for one 2501. With this 2501, I get an open response when attempting the connection, but no further response to the connection. When I swap the cable connection with another piece of equipment, the problem follows the 2501, not the asych line on the 2511, leading me to believe the problem isn't the 2511 or the cable. I've telneted into the 2501 to do a show line con 0, and compared it to the console port on a working router, and I don't see any difference. The strange thing is, if I take the problem 2501 and connect the console port to my computer's com1 port using a standard blue console cable, I can connect to the port just fine! So my question is, what the difference between the 2511 2501 connection and the com1 port 2501 connection? And why does this difference only affect one router, and not the rest of the routers? Thanks Mike Dickson MCSE+Internet, MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP Dickson Network Designs voice (512)-422-3192 fax (512) 394-0320 www.dicksonnetworks.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37613t=37613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharing IP address - int sc0 int vlan 1 [7:37624]
Does anyone know of a possible configuration where the ip address that is assigned to a Cat5k sc0 interface can be shared with a vlan interface on the Cat5k RSM? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37624t=37624 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing IP address - int sc0 int vlan 1 [7:37624]
Very true. Hmm.. Realistically speaking, telnetting into the switch isn't necessary, but I see your point; doesn't sound too feasible. It's too bad it's not all just one platform. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 21:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sharing IP address - int sc0 int vlan 1 [7:37624] maybe I am not interpreting this correctly...but if you do what I think you are saying you want to do, you would lose connectivity to one of the hosts...I mean...how would you be able to telnet into the switch portion to make a change if your router had the same ip? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37637t=37624 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Network Type (In)Compatabilities [7:36781]
Hello, Are P-t-P and P-t-M the only compatible pair of ospf network types (besides a type to itself)? I'm getting P-t-M and N_B network types to see each other as neighbors, but never exchange tables. Is it possible to get P-t-M and N_B networks to exchange tables? I've tried using the ip ospf network point-to-multipoint nonbroadcast and specifying neighbors under the router ospf configuration, but that didn't work. Seems to me N_B is only compatible with N_B...? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36781t=36781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542]
Certainly that was conceptually clear. I think this is probably an issue of semantics, but either way, I believe there is an exception to be made due to the fact that this is a cisco study list. Where you are in your studies could have some bearing on the immediate level of detail in responses one gets, because it indicates the level of detail you would desire. I really don't think that it is inappropriate to indicate where you are in your cisco studies on a cisco mailing group. I, like you, would not agree to putting MCSE Win2k Pro and Server on a cisco email list, but being appropriately detailed should be ok. I believe that the difference between a CCNP, CCDP, or CCIP and someone who takes the IE written is great enough to warrant such a distinction. I know I learned a lot between my DP and my IE written. I like to be thorough, and answering as many pertinent questions as possible in one email, be it stated or unstated, is appropriate. As far as dealing with semantics, it is possible to restructure the appendage, but why would that truly be necessary. If you think about it, the best shorthand for someone who passed the CCIE written would be CCIE written. If it is to be suggested that I can't use CCIE in a phrase simply because it *by itself* represents something different than what I'm implying, that would be a little silly. I'm not trying to get a job with this title, or pretend to be something I'm not; just indicating where I'm at. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Solar Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542] Have no clear idea of why the CCIE Written should be dropped. Unless you pass both written and lab exams, then append the CCIE after your name Compare it to the following Name CCNA, CCNP Routing Switching, BSc 3rd year, CCIE Written, MCSE Win2K Pro and Server, MBA 1st semester Is it conceptually clear to you ? Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36657t=36542 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542]
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put your lab date instead of the CCIE Written if you want to demonstrate where you are in your pursuit...for example. That sounds like a good idea. Unfortunately, I don't plan to grab a date until I'm almost ready to take the test because test spots usually open up a few weeks ahead of time. It doesn't seem like that specific idea would be applicable in this case. I'm still open to ideas though. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written --- Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36774t=36542 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542]
My suggestion is to get your DP and NP and see if you like it, if you have time. Then you can make a more educated decision. Certainly, if you have access to most/all of the routers and switches that are in the CCIE lab page exam, then it would be good to take advantage of your situation. As far as availability of jobs and such, I don't know this information. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36557t=36542 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542]
BTW - Tim? Drop the 'CCIE Written' 'bit' from you acronym collection...it ain't cool no more :) BTW - Oliver? Appending CCIE written isn't to be cool. It's not to pretend I'm a CCIE. It's to let others know how far my progress is in achieving my goal, where I'm at in an educational standpoint etc. It is purely a shorthand version of I have passed a CCIE written test. It would be the equivalent of saying something like I'm in college, if college and studying to be a CCIE were comparable. In your head you can append Studied hard and passed a CCIE written exam. I'm not claiming to be a CCIE, but I am claiming to be actively studying towards being one. As far as my certifications, I have studied very hard to earn them, and in no sense are they simply an acronym collection. In my case, treating them as such is inappropriate. If you have further issues, please email me off-list. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36570t=36542 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Point-to-Multipoint Non-Broadcast command [7:36402]
Hello, As I understand it, Frame-Relay is a NBMA technology. Why isn't it necessary to specify the non-broadcast command when configuring ip ospf network point-to-multipoint ? And for that matter, why does ip ospf network broadcast work with FR? This seems like an answer I should know... Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36402t=36402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT frustration [7:35928]
Dear listers, I am frustrated. I had this working perfectly, then my isp decided to change my ip address, then I had to change my configs and now it's not working. What I want to do is have NAT running on my 2511, be able to telnet into it, and have my dns server behind the nat in a private network. I was instructed earlier to have this partial config (IOS ver. 12.1(10) ): Interface ethernet0 Ip address 209.x.x.x Ip nat outside ! Interface s0 Ip address 192.168.1.1 Ip nat inside ! !! Maps nat translation process Ip nat inside source list 101 interface Ethernet0 overload !! For dns server mapping Ip nat inside source static 192.168.3.2 209.x.x.x ! !! Removes external address from nat process Access-list 101 deny ip host 209.x.x.x any !! Allows internal translation Access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any ! Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 e0 permanent Ip route 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 serial 0 permanent ! end !! EOF With the dns server mapping, nat forwards *all* outside traffic bound directly to the 209.x.x.x interface to 192.168.3.2; so pings from the interface don't work, and telnets to the interface don't work. I had it working where it would only forward appropriate packets to the dns server, and also allow telnetting from the outside to the 2511. I must be missing something. With or without the dns mapping all the private network clients are translated correctly. Telnet works fine from the inside. My understanding is that with cisco's NAT ALG, DNS translation is seamless *and* you still should be able to use that nat address for telnetting into the router. I'm not sure why it was working before, if it isn't supposed to work like this. Any ideas? Am I forgetting something that is obvious? Confused, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35928t=35928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dening telnet access [7:35628]
To filter telnet packets to the router it is necessary to apply access lists to the vty lines with the access-class command. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35747t=35628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DNS Request Redirection [7:35703]
Out of curiosity, what is the best practice for someone who has a DNS server on their private network with a private IP address? How would one go about doing this with a router? Is it impossible? Is the best practice/only possibly way to have the DNS server having a public IP address (in a DMZ)? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 13:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DNS Request Redirection [7:35703] hhmmm. as I understand the original question, each workstation in the network in question is hard coded for DNS. So, if for example, my machine is hard coded for DNS server 207.126.96.162 ( my ISP DNS server ) and I change ISP's, and make no changes to my workstation, then any DNS request will have a destination address of 207.126.96.162 The question, as I understand, if how to change that destination address without making workstation visits. Policy routing can change next hop, but not destination address. NAT outbound changes source address, not destination address. Unless there is a packet interceptor that takes all DNS requests, and physically changes the destination address, the user has few options. Again, IF the former ISP does not restrict DNS requests to its own address space, i.e. accepts DNS requests from anywhere, then there is no problem, and no changes need be made. However IF ( and this would be good practice for a lot of reasons ) the former ISP does indeed restrict DNS requests to source addresses within its own space, then there will have to be additional changes on the user network. This whole discussion illustrates why people SHOULD follow best practice from the get go. If they want to hard code IP's, then I believe DHCP can be configured so that it provides only DNS info and default gateway info, for example. the people who have insisted that their network hard code everything are now learning the hard lesson. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35772t=35703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem telnetting into router with NAT enabled [7:35634]
--- Tim, If I am not mistaken NAT is an application layer process thus any traffic initiated from the outside to the inside will need to have an IP and Port statically mapped!! As for the extendableI am not sure if it is neededI believe the extendable is used to allow two static translation with the same local address that does not have separate port translation assignment(the IOS does not normally allow this!!) --- I see what you all are saying, however, isn't the 209.xxx.xxx.xxx address external? Why would an external address need to be statically mapped? Or is it impossible to telnet into the interface that is doing the NAT translation? Thanks all for clearing up the extendable issue. Thanks, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35675t=35634 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem telnetting into router with NAT enabled [7:35634]
I am having a problem telnetting into the router from the outside when I have NAT on the router. Once I take the ip nat outside command off the outside interface, I can telnet into the router from the outside. I can ping the NAT router regardless of whether ip nat outside is on the interface or not. Note that I do, of course, have the vty 0 4 passworded. Here's the config (edited for bandwidth purposes): interface Ethernet0 ip address 209.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside encapsulation ppp clockrate 200 ! ip nat inside source list 101 interface Ethernet0 overload ! access-list 101 permit ip any any ip classless ! vty 0 4 password hrmm login ! end Packets are coming into the router from the telnetting host, and NAT tries to do a translation on it, but fails, I think..? NOTE in the debug output: 209.xxx.xxx.xxx is the external router ip address and 216.xxx.xxx.xxx is where I'm telnetting from. This is output from a debug ip nat detailed and debug ip nat port combined: 04:09:59: NAT - SYSTEM PORT for 209.xxx.xxx.xxx: allocated port 0, refcount 55, localport -1, localaddr 0.0.0.0, flags 1, syscount 55 04:09:59: NAT - SYSTEM PORT for 209.xxx.xxx.xxx: allocated port 23, refcount 2, localport -1, localaddr 0.0.0.0, flags 1, syscount 2 04:09:59: NAT: Allocated Port for 209.xxx.xxx.xxx - 209.xxx.xxx.xxx: wanted 23 got 2 04:09:59: NAT: i: tcp (209.xxx.xxx.xxx, 23) - (216.xxx.xxx.xxx, 3012) [0] 04:09:59: NAT: TCP s=23-2, d=3012 04:09:59: NAT: o: tcp (216.xxx.xxx.xxx, 3012) - (209.xxx.xxx.xxx, 2) [51] 04:09:59: NAT: TCP s=3012, d=2-23 04:09:59: NAT: updated sys port: port 23, refcount 1, localport -1, localaddr 0.0.0.0, flags 1, syscount 1 04:11:08: NAT: expiring 209.xxx.xxx.xxx (209.xxx.xxx.xxx) tcp 2 (23) Any ideas? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35634t=35634 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem telnetting into router with NAT enabled [7:35634]
-- Try this command: ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.1 23 209.xxx.xxx.xxx 23 extendable This will map the telnet port of the outside IP address to the inside, should work for you, let us know. -- Guy, Thanks very much. It fixed the problem. However, I'm curious as to WHY I needed to do this and what does the extendable command function to do? Thanks, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35640t=35634 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT and dynamically attained ip [7:34213]
Is there any way to get NAT (not PAT) to use as an outside interface, an Async interface that has IP ADDRESS NEGOTIATE and PPP IPCP ACCEPT-ADDRESS on it, or is it only possible to have NAT use an outside interface with a static IP address? Thanks, Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34213t=34213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What's it worth... [7:27400]
All goes well until the first CCIE candidate asks about money and was told its 60K (UK Sterling) no frills no overtime, maybe a car, but you only work at one site. This to work in London, where CCIE used to command 100K+ What's the equivalent in USD? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27411t=27400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CCIE written! [7:26765]
Hello all, I'm happy to report I passed my IE written just today. Whew!! Now on to the lab.. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26765t=26765 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Memory [7:26659]
Is the ROM in say, a 2501, actually EEPROM? Cisco doesn't differenciate between the two really. In the case that it is EEPROM, is it possible to re-write/erase it from within the IOS? I couldn't find any pertinant info on the Cisco site about this.. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26659t=26659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Non Cisco Cert [7:26532]
If you think the hardware test was tough, just wait for the OS test. Both tests are strange tests, but the OS test is even more so that way. It's pretty damn tough imo. There's a lot of questions on the test that have the most right type of answers. I got certified, but I really don't think that cert means a whole lot, certainly nothing compared to any Cisco cert. You could know a ton about hardware and old OS's and not pass because you're a bad test taker. That cert challenges your abililty to take tests, not know the material. Kind Regards, Tim Booth - Original Message - From: Jennifer Cribbs To: Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 14:52 Subject: Non Cisco Cert [7:26532] Well, I finally got the nerve to take the A+HW. I passed, but just barely. 610. It was harder than any cisco test I have had. It was adaptive, 30 questions and 30 minutes. If you don't fiinsh the test in the allotted 30 minutes, you fail. Simple rules that apply lots of pressure. I am dreading the OS portion of this test. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26602t=26532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDP Certification [7:26608]
Today I finished taking my last test for the CCNP certification. I took the 640.503, 640.504, 640.505 and the 640.506 According to CISCO Certification web page the requirement to become CCDP you will need the 503, 504, 505 and 509 My question is the only test that I need to take to become CCDP is the CID(640.509) You need to be a CCDA before you can become a DP... Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26614t=26608 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QuizWare vs. Boson [7:26361]
What are the differences, if any, between the QuizWare and Boson IE written practice test(s)? Is the QuizWare better than the Boson? Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26361t=26361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: test [7:23675]
My most recent post (an anwer to ITGuy's acl query) didn't appear. this is a test. I've had problems with missing posts as well Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23684t=23675 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: over 1700 passing ccie written every month [7:23860]
It's fine to have a healthy opinion of Cisco vs Microsoft accreditations but I do think you are severely underestimating the new Microsoft exams. The new Microsoft exams are a joke. They do NOT test your knowledge on Microsoft products. They're absolutely terrible tests IMO. Certainly they don't test your ability to do anything constructive, and certainly don't compare to Cisco exams much less the IE lab for how much they actually test useful knowledge. Kind Regards, Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23743t=23860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just passed the CCDA [7:22247]
Hello, Just passed the CCDA. 90% That's an annoying exam IMHO. I really don't think it's that great of an exam. A lot of trivial stuff on it. On to the DP.. Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22247t=22247 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE lab exam scheduling [7:22065]
Hello, Anyone want to get rid of their scheduled spot for the IE lab? Anyone know where people would post this information? Thanks, Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22065t=22065 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a CCNP today. [7:21693]
Hello All, Today is a good day. Just passed Support with 85%. I didn't find this test easy by any stretch of the imagination. I am now a CCNP. Thanks to all for any direct or indirect help in passing these tests. Now on to the D's...then the I's. Have a good one, Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21693t=21693 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:21051]
Alex, Ip dhcp-server should be sufficient for your needs. Nothing else should need to be enabled. Try it out. Tim Booth - Original Message - From: khramov To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:24 AM Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051] Hello, ip dhcp-server works, I didn't specify it with a hyphen. So would you agree that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed broadcast, ip helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config? If I enable ip dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp (ports 66 and 67)? Thanks a lot, Alex MADMAN wrote: Hmm.. I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's and an MSFC2, they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config. So I figured they must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and wallah, there it is!!! C7507MIX#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. C7507MIX(config)#no ip for C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67 C7507MIX(config)#^Z C7507MIX#wr t Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless no ip forward-protocol udp bootps Dave khramov wrote: I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file. I mean (ip forward-protocol udp 67). Is that the way it is suppose to be? MADMAN wrote: Check ip foward protocol Dave khramov wrote: Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21146t=21051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]
Michael, You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one to many channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of lines that will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups. Hope this helps, Tim Booth - Original Message - From: michael To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136] Dear all, could somone help me with my following question how to configure ISDN PRI to BRI ? I would like to configure the following szenario: 1 central site : 1x PRI 13 remote site: 1x BRI If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would like to activate ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote side and the other way arround. But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2 timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30 timeslots) on the central side. Please help me best regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21150t=21136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]
Michael, Per-PRI interface...(controller T1 or maybe E1 command) then set up the framing and linecode, then set up channel-groups with the channel-group command. Tim Booth - Original Message - From: Michael Dungl To: Tim Booth ; Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:44 AM Subject: AW: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136] thanks tim, but how it is possible to assign channel-groups ? best regards -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2001 16:17 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136] Michael, You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one to many channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of lines that will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups. Hope this helps, Tim Booth - Original Message - From: michael To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136] Dear all, could somone help me with my following question how to configure ISDN PRI to BRI ? I would like to configure the following szenario: 1 central site : 1x PRI 13 remote site: 1x BRI If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would like to activate ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote side and the other way arround. But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2 timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30 timeslots) on the central side. Please help me best regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21155t=21136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:21051]
Priscilla and others: Ip dhcp-server does not turn your router into a dhcp server. It tells your router where your dhcp server is. Tim Booth - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:12 PM Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051] Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and ip forward-protocol udp 67 no ip forward-protocol 137 no ip forward-protocol 138 The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a helper address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to configure it to be more discerning. Priscilla At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote: Hello, ip dhcp-server works, I didn't specify it with a hyphen. So would you agree that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed broadcast, ip helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config? If I enable ip dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp (ports 66 and 67)? Thanks a lot, Alex MADMAN wrote: Hmm.. I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's and an MSFC2, they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config. So I figured they must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and wallah, there it is!!! C7507MIX#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. C7507MIX(config)#no ip for C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67 C7507MIX(config)#^Z C7507MIX#wr t Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless no ip forward-protocol udp bootps Dave khramov wrote: I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file. I mean (ip forward-protocol udp 67). Is that the way it is suppose to be? MADMAN wrote: Check ip foward protocol Dave khramov wrote: Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21185t=21051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Support 640-506 exam difficulty [7:21060]
Hello, I have taken Routing, Switching, and Remote Access. I am wondering about the difficulty level of the Support exam as compared to the others. I feel as though I know most of the material when reading through the Support book (Lammle series). Also, I'd like to know if the CCIE book (Lammle series) is sufficient to pass the CCIE *written* exam. Thanks, Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21060t=21060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:21051]
Alex, Ip dhcp server [address | name] will solve your problems (IOS 11.0 and later). As far as the problems you're having with the NETBEUI traffic and ip helper, you need to make sure you have protocol forwarding enabled, and transparent or source-route bridging properly configured aka UDP flooding. This solution is much more lengthy and cumbersome than the ip dhcp server command for dhcp broadcast forwarding. As I found on the cisco site, with ip directed-broadcast the only protocols that are forwarded are those that are specified with the ip forward-protocol command. By default (IOS 12.0 and later), ip directed-broadcast is disabled, and all directed ip broadcasts are dropped. This command translates from directed broadcasts to physical broadcasts. I think what is meant by a directed broadcast is a subnet (or possibly multicast?) and a physical broadcast is meant as 255.255.255.255, and would be forwarded out all interfaces (?). Hope this helps, Tim Booth - Original Message - From: khramov To: Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: DHCP [7:21051] Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21077t=21051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
