Re: ccbootcamp lab 20 Nat [7:34977]
Yup... good job! ""zapeta zape"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > I am having problem with lab 20 nat. > > r13 > ip nat inside source list 1 interface Ethernet0 overload > ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.14 200.100.100.1 > ! > Is is the right config? > Thanks > Zape > > _ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35021&t=34977 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco exams are too easy??? [7:34923]
Let's see if you pass the CCIE lab that easy. Let us know! ""mike johnson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > I took the Cisco PIX CSPFA exam yesterday and I was > suprised to find out that my score is 970/1000. I've > never worked with any type of firewalls let alone PIX > Firewall. I read the CSPFA book and borrowed the > materials from a friend of mine who went to global > knowledge training a few weeks earlier. I am very > disappointed with the exam. I don't think anyone like > > myself should be able to pass the exam that easily. > > I thought yesterday's test score was a fluke so this > morning I went and took the MCNS exam and I got a > score > of 960/1000. I was completely shocked. A few hours, > I > decide to sign up for the CCIE written exam. > Amazingly > I passed with a score of 92/100 That is unbelievable. > To pass the exam for someone like myself really > de-value the prestige of Cisco Certification by some > bookworms like me. Cisco, after all, should make the > exam a lot harder than the way it is now. > > Anyone care to comment on this. > > Mike Johnson > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! > http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35044&t=34923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hacking a firewall [7:34978]
Don't you think an expert should do this? You have no clue how to do this yet you think you'll be able to assure your company about the "security" of the firewall in one day? This would be funny if it were not true. And companies wonder why they get hacked! ""sami natour"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi , > I am trying to test how secure BigFire firewall.I need > to run some tests in other words I want to find if I > can hack it or not.It is very important to our company > to know how secure it is . > > Best Regards , > sami , > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! > http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35023&t=34978 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN simulator [7:33841]
Thats a good one Brad. You can try to fool yourself but I hate to tell you your underhanded tactics are just as low (actually lower as your supposed to be a "reputable" CCIE) than the people who post posing as customers saying "hey, go check out this web site, the have great test prep material, all the while they are the ones selling the material. Just because you hid your lack of ethics in the guise of a response to a question doesn't change what you've done. Let's look at your post... BEllis Quote: If you want the lowest price simulator available, you should go with the simline2. It has S/T interfaces so it goes nicely with 2503s, 2504s, etc. Paul B. (the owner of groupstudy) also bought one of these for his home lab. I believe he posted about it somewhere. Check the archives: www.groupstudy.com If you want more detailed information on the simline2 you can visit www.cheapisdn.com BEllis Unquote: Now lets see... you speak as to how great the simline2 is. You refer to how satisified the owner of groupstudy is as if he's just a friend of yours who bought one and liked it and told you about it. You make no disclaimer that you are affiliated with that site and that YOU WILL directly line your pocket with cash when the purchase is made. You make no mention that Cheap ISDN (remember, you get what you pay for) is actually Network Learning. Now how this is not deceptive to you? Have you ever heard of full disclosure? Or I guess to you speaking as if this is something you just "heard" about and hiding the fact that you'll make lots of cash on the sale is not being deceptive? How about let's disclose in your future "unbiased recommendations" that you'll directly profit from the said recommendation? That would be the honest, upright thing to do! It's funny how you bash Duncan for not disclosing he works for your competitors yet you do not disclose you work for the company you recommend! Hah!!! ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Duncan, > > Hi! Actually, we have never offered Rik ANY form of compensation. Rik has > just been one of many happy customers of ours. > > While other competitors of ours use yahoo accounts, fake email accounts, > post spam, etc, we always post using our real names and dont use any > under-handed tactics. When there are questions about our products or > services, we answer them. I call that customer service, not shameless > plugs. > > It's interesting that you work with Capewave, a competitor of ours, and that > you are badmouthing us. Im not sure that PDS would approve of your post but > we'll copy Paul F. (at PDS) on it and see what he says. > > This thread has really gone off on a tangent, if you wish to respond, please > email me offlist, as I will not respond publically to any future responses > to this post/email. Or feel free to call me, 248-299-7789. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ""Duncan Stuart"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > How much are you getting paid to be brad's personal PR man. Why don't you > > reply to individuals instead of replying to the whole group. > > > > By the way your preferred vendor is not quite as squeaky clean as you > would > > think and like the rest of us to think. These guys actually employed some > > extremely unprofessional business ethics to bring you this simulator. I > can > > tell you exactly how much they buy the product for and just how badly they > > are ripping you off. > > > > Cheers and best wishes > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Rik Guyler > > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:11 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: ISDN simulator [7:33841] > > > > > > Shameless plug? Absolutely! No shame in how Brad does business. :-} > > > > Maybe he does have a financial interest but who cares? I have learned > over > > the years to listen to him...he is usually right. His simulator is as > > inexpensive as you will find and I know he wouldn't offer it if it didn't > do > > the job just fine. > > > > I have no financial interest here. I'm just a very satisfied customer > > standing up for my "preferred" vendor! > > > > Rik > > > > -Original Message- > > From: c1sc0k1d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:41 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subje
Re: ISDN simulator [7:33841]
Thats a good one Brad. You can try to fool yourself but I hate to tell you your underhanded tactics are just as low (actually lower as your supposed to be a "reputable" CCIE) than the people who post posing as customers saying "hey, go check out this web site, the have great test prep material, all the while they are the ones selling the material. Just because you hid your lack of ethics in the guise of a response to a question doesn't change what you've done. Let's look at your post... BEllis Quote: If you want the lowest price simulator available, you should go with the simline2. It has S/T interfaces so it goes nicely with 2503s, 2504s, etc. Paul B. (the owner of groupstudy) also bought one of these for his home lab. I believe he posted about it somewhere. Check the archives: www.groupstudy.com If you want more detailed information on the simline2 you can visit www.cheapisdn.com BEllis Unquote: Now lets see... you speak as to how great the simline2 is. You refer to how satisified the owner of groupstudy is as if he's just a friend of yours who bought one and liked it and told you about it. You make no disclaimer that you are affiliated with that site and that YOU WILL directly line your pocket with cash when the purchase is made. You make no mention that Cheap ISDN (remember, you get what you pay for) is actually Network Learning. Now how this is not deceptive to you? Have you ever heard of full disclosure? Or I guess to you speaking as if this is something you just "heard" about and hiding the fact that you'll make lots of cash on the sale is not being deceptive? How about let's disclose in your future "unbiased recommendations" that you'll directly profit from the said recommendation? That would be the honest, upright thing to do! It's funny how you bash Duncan for not disclosing he works for your competitors yet you do not disclose you work for the company you recommend! Hah!!! ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Duncan, > > Hi! Actually, we have never offered Rik ANY form of compensation. Rik has > just been one of many happy customers of ours. > > While other competitors of ours use yahoo accounts, fake email accounts, > post spam, etc, we always post using our real names and dont use any > under-handed tactics. When there are questions about our products or > services, we answer them. I call that customer service, not shameless > plugs. > > It's interesting that you work with Capewave, a competitor of ours, and that > you are badmouthing us. Im not sure that PDS would approve of your post but > we'll copy Paul F. (at PDS) on it and see what he says. > > This thread has really gone off on a tangent, if you wish to respond, please > email me offlist, as I will not respond publically to any future responses > to this post/email. Or feel free to call me, 248-299-7789. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ""Duncan Stuart"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > How much are you getting paid to be brad's personal PR man. Why don't you > > reply to individuals instead of replying to the whole group. > > > > By the way your preferred vendor is not quite as squeaky clean as you > would > > think and like the rest of us to think. These guys actually employed some > > extremely unprofessional business ethics to bring you this simulator. I > can > > tell you exactly how much they buy the product for and just how badly they > > are ripping you off. > > > > Cheers and best wishes > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Rik Guyler > > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:11 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: ISDN simulator [7:33841] > > > > > > Shameless plug? Absolutely! No shame in how Brad does business. :-} > > > > Maybe he does have a financial interest but who cares? I have learned > over > > the years to listen to him...he is usually right. His simulator is as > > inexpensive as you will find and I know he wouldn't offer it if it didn't > do > > the job just fine. > > > > I have no financial interest here. I'm just a very satisfied customer > > standing up for my "preferred" vendor! > > > > Rik > > > > -Original Message- > > From: c1sc0k1d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:41 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subje
Re: Boson router simulator [7:34130]
Why don't you get an upgrade from Boson? ""Michael Zunkowski"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I just got layed off from my job. I am looking at using the Boson Router > Simulator software as an alternative till I get access to a lab again. My > copy of 3.512 is not wanting to load on my home PC. Does anybody have a copy > they can send me. I have a key already. And will it work with this key? > > Thanks. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34261&t=34130 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE LAB requirements [7:34186]
Hr... try again... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#4 ""Ronnie"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Probably this question has been asked before but > > Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (Yep I passed the written) > and what to prepare for ? I can't find any usefull on the cisco website. > I'm very curious (since it seems that the WAN + IP part is already > configured and running) what subjects are asked... (Multicast, MPLS, IPSEC > etc...) > > Is their someone who has the right info on this ? > > > Cheers and thanks, > > Ronald van Dommelen > The Netherlands Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34204&t=34186 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE LAB requirements [7:34186]
""Ronnie"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Probably this question has been asked before but > > Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (Yep I passed the written) > and what to prepare for ? I can't find any usefull on the cisco website. > I'm very curious (since it seems that the WAN + IP part is already > configured and running) what subjects are asked... (Multicast, MPLS, IPSEC > etc...) > > Is their someone who has the right info on this ? > > > Cheers and thanks, > > Ronald van Dommelen > The Netherlands Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34199&t=34186 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAJOR OT: Free CCNPtraining for convicts [7:34039]
Cool... well I feel a little better now about my sentencing next week. Do you know if I'll have newsgroup access? ""steve skinner"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > guys, > > my boss has just told me that cisco are trailing a few prisons where they > are offering free CCNP training to convicts > > man does that just bite the buscuit. > > i worked long and hard to pay for my exams.get some work experience > and at my expence (bieng a tax payer)i am funding a convict to learn > about cisco. > > i know about re-abilitation.but it is just a bit sick that i as an > individual,could > > a) been robbed by this man ... my house is trashed and my insurence goes up > (i pay ) > b) funding him in prison to learn Cisco (i pay) > c) comes out of prison and de-vaules a cert becuse he has no experience (i > pay) > > > does cisco want to have a "useless" cert system(except ofcourse the > CCIE)because the more people who BLANTENTLY DONT have any experience > witht these certs ...the less they mean... > > > i`m sorry to rantbut sometimes i wish company`s would consider there > future.. > > FACT (from Cisco) there will always be more jobs for NA/NP than IE`s > > 1)i get exams to be employable... > 2)in order to get these exams i push the company`s kit .. > > i have recently installed some 4000`s over another companies kit,even > thought the other kit is more than capable of doing the job..because i get a > side benefit of learning about the equipment and increasing my CV value > > > 3)if i am working at a company and i dont want a cisco cert because it is > worthless..why would i push that companies products.. > > i would simply push another company`s products to get my certs in the there > equipment ,to keep my employability > > 4) cisco dont sell as much equipment > 5) certs become even more worthless.. > 6) cisco sells even less equipment as no-one is trained anymore > 7) cisco becomes Novell(my appologies to all novell staff)... > > a little for-thought is all that required... > > as my boss says... > > " one of my main reson for buying kit is the amount of tech staff availible > to install/fix the kit...if there`s no staff there no kit" > > in a job market that is already depressed that last thing that is needed is > a flood of Certified but unexperienced people on the market.. > > the it industry is like no other ,in that fact that we have to CONSTANTLY > update our skills ...that takes time,money and personal > sacrfisesomething i dont think cisco is at all concernd with... > > ahh welll. > > no chance of a "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" list starting any time soon...?? > > Sorry for the downer > > steve > > > > _ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34049&t=34039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Minimum Cat5k Supervisor to support 802.1q? [7:34014]
Sup II with the Sup mem upgrade kit. ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Despite using the CatOS software and compatibility advisors, I'm still > unclear to the minimum version of the Catalyst 5000 Supervisor engine needed > for 802.1q.. is it II or III? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34045&t=34014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the definition of Broadband ISDN ? [7:34037]
I imagine your referring to IDSL (ISDN DSL). IDSL is DSL at 144 kbps. IDSL uses ISDN transmission coding, bundling together both ISDN channels and voice all on one circuit. IDSL does not use any kind of dial up nor involve per-call fees. For those that live too far for regular DSL, IDSL may be the only DSL option. IDSL tends to be priced at a rather higher rate per bit of speed, than any regular DSL. IDSL can still be a very satisfactory solution for data transmission compared to the alternatives (modem), coping very well with online gaming, and medium quality streaming audio/video. ""Phil Barker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Its the 'Broadband' part I am getting at. > > Is it referring to PRI ISDN where 'Broad' is 23 or 30 > 64k channels ? So presumably narrowband is the > opposite reffering to 2B. > > I'm reading up on ATM at the mo' and could do with > clearing this up. > > Regs, > > Phil. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34043&t=34037 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when do you use an inverted mask? (i.e. 0.0.0.255) [7:33992]
Where do you use an inverse mask for summarization? ""Vincent Miller"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > summarization Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33992&t=33992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multicast / CGMP towards the multicast server [7:33964]
If by turn off the port you mean not send the multicast stream to that port then yes. Assuming you have it configured correctly. ""Fears Michael S SSgt 50 CS/SCBBN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If a multicast server is connected to a Cisco Switch running CGMP, and > several hosts are connected to the same switch, will a router turn off the > switch ports for the users that are not requesting the multicast? > > So, will CGMP work back towards the multicast server? > > Fears Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33983&t=33964 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when do you use an inverted mask? (i.e. 0.0.0.255) [7:33981]
Network statements under a routing process such as ospf or eigrp. ""Eric Waguespack"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > besides access-lists, that is. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33981&t=33981 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE benefits [7:33874]
Hopefully you'll get a course in how to only post a question one time! ""Joe Carr"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does > a CCIE receive? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33938&t=33874 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33912]
Uhhh... yea... looks rel funny... ""Joe Carr"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > haha very funny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33937&t=33912 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN simulator [7:33841]
Of course Brad forgot to mention he has a financial interest in his recommendation as he is affiliated with the company so his recommendation is not without bias. Here's some of your options. I'll leave out his as he already made a shameless plug. ISDN emulator on the NET http://208.1.40.80/ica/isdnsim.nsf www.brooktrout.com/pages/product_info/pi_data_wan/pdf/multiport.pdf www.diem.com/BT90001.htm http://www.tele-products.com/ http://www.arca-technologies.com/solohome.html http://www.conway-engineering.com/ 5105307682 http://www.acacia-net.com/ http://www.taskit.com/ http://www.monitor.co.at/monitor/498/story/isdnsim.html http://www.digitechinc.com http://www.ertmsales.com/products/search/viewcart.cfm?Page=1&QtyNA= ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Ronald, > > If you want the lowest price simulator available, you should go with the > simline2. It has S/T interfaces so it goes nicely with 2503s, 2504s, etc. > Paul B. (the owner of groupstudy) also bought one of these for his home lab. > I believe he posted about it somewhere. Check the archives: > www.groupstudy.com If you want more detailed information on the simline2 > you can visit www.cheapisdn.com > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > > ""Ronald James"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > just wondering anybody knows which isdn simulator is best for home lab in > > terms of functionalities and pricing? hope this is not violating nda, > > but very interest to see whether real ccie lab use isdn simulator or isdn > > lines?? if it's a simulator, which brand? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33945&t=33841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
It's sad that you are supposedly a CCIE candidate and you cannot read the web site stating what equipment you are expected to know for the exam. On top of that you request people violate the NDA they signed by telling you the exact composite of the rack! ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to > 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have > wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. > > >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan > 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor > too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, > January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent > One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except > in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already > calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in > message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. > In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle > you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring > on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 > PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab > Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a > monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the > equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: > Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the > new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did > you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What > models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still > the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on > it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > >_ >Do You > Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33739&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPX host static name possible? [7:33736]
Maybe if you ask one more time someone will answer. You only asked four times in ten minutes and the requirement to get an answer is five. ""Paulo Baptista"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all! > > Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host > name to an IPX address. > Like we do for IP addresses > This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. > > Thanks for any reply, > > Paulo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33738&t=33736 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said not to touch the flux capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it before the lab started. ""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to the > cubicle you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > -Ejay > > -Original Message- > From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could > hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > -Original Message- > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > Hello, > > Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to know > what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > Thanks! > > > > _ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33623&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PATS RULE! (EOM) [7:32614]
PAT who? ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32637&t=32614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for study partners in Atlanta,GA [7:32615]
There is a CCNA/CCNP study group in Atlanta and the web site link is below. I never attended as you must pay per meeting and the knowledge level seemed a little low for me. I didn't see the point of paying $10 per meeting for me to go teach people. It might be of use to you though. http://www.brainslap.com/accsg/ ""Ryn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone interested in forming a study group? I would like to get a group > together to study for CCNP and CCIE exams. > > Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32636&t=32615 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE R/S Written Exam [7:32546]
A quick search of www.cisco.com will answer all you questions. ""Ed Chuchaisri"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Guys, > What are some of the topics covered in the R/S written? It covers materials > for Routing 2.0 and Switching 2.0 right? What about Remote Access and > Troubleshooting? Is it necessary to complete Routing TCP/IP I and II back > to back for the written exam? Any other recommended books? > > Thanks, > > Ed > www.router4u.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32578&t=32546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I need Help in Cisco [7:31875]
Then your users might try to bypass the proxy by changing it themselves. Don't under estimate them. ""NetEng"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Have your web browsers proxy config point to your squid box. you dont really > need to setup anything on the router. > > ""Ing. Milton Amador Z."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have one Cisco 3640 i need to send all my trafic www to one linux box, > in > > this linux box i have Proxy squid, but i don4t know how make this. > > > > Somebody know how make this? > > > > > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31950&t=31875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I need Help in Cisco [7:31875]
With the limited description you gave I'd say you probably want policy routing. The k1d ""Ing. Milton Amador Z."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have one Cisco 3640 i need to send all my trafic www to one linux box, in > this linux box i have Proxy squid, but i don4t know how make this. > > Somebody know how make this? > > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31878&t=31875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I would like to hear from those who have taken the CCIE lab [7:31629]
I just took the lab in December and here are the tasks I had to do. I totally screwed up task 4 and 10. I can't guarantee you'll have the same tasks but you never know. I would make sure you can perform these anyway. Good Luck! ---CCIE One Day Lab-- 1. Describe the history of the papacy from its origin to the present day, concentrating especially, but not exclusively, on its social, political, economic, religious, and philosophical impact on Europe, Asia, America, and Africa. Be brief, concise, and specific. 2. You have been provided with a razor blade, a piece of gauze, and a bottle of Jack Daniels. Remove your appendix. Do not suture until your work has been inspected. You have 10 minutes. 3. 2500 riot-crazed aborigines are storming the room. Calm them. You may use any ancient language except Latin or Greek. 4. Create life. Estimate the differences in subsequent human culture if this form of life had developed 500 million years earlier, with special attention to its probable effect on the English Parliamentary System. Prove your thesis. 5. Write a piano concerto. Orchestrate and perform it with flute and drum. You will find a piano under your chair. 6. Based on your knowledge of their works, evaluate the emotional stability, degree of adjustment, and repressed frustrations of each of the following: a. Alexander of Aphrodisias b. Ramses II c. Gregory of Nicea d. Iammurati Support your evaluation with quotations from each man's work, making appropriate references. It is not necessary to translate. 7. Estimate the sociological problems which might accompany the end of the world. Construct an experiment to test your theory. 8. Define management. Define Science. How do they relate? Why? Create a generalized algorithm to optimize all managerial decisions. Assuming an IBM 3270 with 257 Radio Shack and Panasonic terminals and each terminal to activate your algorithm. Design the communications interface and all the necessary control programs. 9. The disassembled parts of a high-powered rifle have been placed in a box on your desk. You will also find an instruction manual printed in Swahili. In 5 minutes, a hungry Bengal tiger will be admitted to the room. Take whatever action you feel appropriate. Be prepared to justify your decision. 10. There is a red telephone on the desk beside you. Start WWIII. Report at length on its socio-political effects, if any. 11. Take a position for or against truth. Prove the validity of your position. 12. Explain the nature of matter. Include in your answer an evaluation of the impact of the development of mathematics on science. 13. Sketch the development of human thought. Estimate its significance. Compare this with the development of any other kind of thought. Extra Credit: Define the universe. Give three examples. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31629&t=31629 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
clear ip nat trans ""paul"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i > am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however > when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . > that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions > are obviously welcome ;) > thanx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31562&t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Number Expansion Question. [7:31238]
I think you have me confused with someone else. ""Robert Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > he he heRobert Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > Byte me says, > > Regular expression ranges do not work with num-exp commands > > DUMMY > > You know who Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31495&t=31238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" [7:31494]
My guess would be the next hop address is not in the routing table and therefore the route is not advertised to any external peers. The k1d ""Tom Pruneau"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" > > > Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual > owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. > > > > I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. > They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route > map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a > /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. > > The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 > > network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 > network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 > > When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network > 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine > When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network > 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" > > Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any > peer? > > Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. > > > router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 > BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Advertised to non peer-group peers: 10.0.0.17 > Local > 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) > Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > > > > router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 > BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Not advertised to any peer Local > 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) > Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > > > > > router > > interface Loopback0 > ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 > ! > interface Serial1 > ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 > ! > router bgp 400 > no synchronization > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 > neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 > neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out > neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 > no auto-summary > ! > ip classless > ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 > access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 > route-map set_meds permit 10 > match ip address 20 > set metric 5 > ! > route-map set_meds permit 20 > match ip address 21 > set metric 10 > > > Router > > ! > interface Loopback0 > ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Ethernet1 > no ip address > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 10.0.0.38 255.255.255.252 > no fair-queue > clockrate 200 > ! > interface Serial1 > ip address 10.0.0.34 255.255.255.252 > clockrate 200 > ! > router bgp 400 > no synchronization > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 > neighbor 10.0.0.33 remote-as 100 > neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out > neighbor 10.0.0.37 remote-as 400 > no auto-summary > ! > ip classless > ip route 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.37 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 > access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 > route-map set_med permit 10 > match ip address 21 > set metric 5 > ! > route-map set_med permit 20 > match ip address 20 > set metric 10 > > Tom Pruneau > Technical Trainer Network Operations > GENUITY > 225 Presidential Way Woburn Ma. 01888 > -- - > This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits > -- - > "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you > look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31494&t=31494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Number Expansion Question. [7:31238]
How bout this? num-exp [0-9] 312223 The k1d ""William Lijewski"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am working on a lab at school and I'm stuck. They want us to be able to > press any "number" to dial the full number 312223 > > I know that if you put just a "." such as: > > num-exp . 312223 > > This will let you press ANY KEY, # and * included. Is there any easy way to > make it just 0-9 without doing 10 seperate statements? > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31263&t=31238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31024]
Sorry... this is a lifetime group list membership. The only way to get off the list is to die. Make that choice if you must. The k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > nothing else has worked Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31024&t=31024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OBTAIN A UNIVERSITY DEGREE...EASILY!! [7:30781]
Get lost scam artist! wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > UNIVERSITY DIPLOMAS > > Obtain a prosperous future, money earning power, > and the admiration of all. > > Diplomas from prestigious non-accredited > universities based on your present knowledge > and life experience. > > No required tests, classes, books, or interviews. > > Bachelors, masters, MBA, and doctorate (PhD) > diplomas available in the field of your choice. > > No one is turned down. > > Confidentiality assured. > > CALL NOW to receive your diploma > within days!!! > > 1-305-460-3152 > > Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including > Sundays and holidays. > > > > If you no longer wish to be on our list send a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30788&t=30781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sniffing my broadband connection to my ISP ??? [7:30689]
Cable modem is a shared medium and you do not have the bandwidth on your segment to yourself. You could compare it to ethernet for practical purposes. The k1d ""Phil Barker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group, > I have been sniffing my broadband connection to > my ISP today and have a few questions. > > My main gripe is that I'm being sent around 100 > Arp requests per minute, which obviously I cannot > resolve. These ARP requests are all originating from > my default G/W at the ISP trying to resolve MAC > addresses of various users. Can anyone confirm if this > is usual or unusual. I cannot see this being correct > since if I set my router up to be one of these IP > addresses I can resolve it to my MAC address Eth 0 > int' or any other mac-address for that matter. > > They also send me DHCP requests, IGMP requests > for group 224.0.0.1 (Which I wish I could join) but > cannot and lots of their private address information > via the above mentioned ARP's. > > I also captured an attemt at an inbound TCP > connection on a dynamic port which my router RST, > thankfully. > > Are they wasting my B/W ? > > Thanx, > > Phil > > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30690&t=30689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about summary address [7:30528]
I guess the obvious question that you didn't address is why are you trying to summarize the 10 network on different routers... or at all for that matter? The k1d ""David j"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everybody. > The scenario is the following: > I have two Cisco 7500 an several 2600 connected to one of them by E1s, the > ISDNs of the 2600 are connected to the opposite 7500 and are configured as > backup lines. The 7500s are connected between them by ATMs an EIGRP is the > routing protocol. As you can guess, the 2600 belong to different branch > offices. I tried to summarize in both 7500 with the command ip > summary-address eigrp 1 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0, but I also had a static route > with AD 200 to reach a DNS server in another part of the network, no managed > by me, and as the summary-address command create default route, with AD 5, > 10.0.0.0 ponting to Null0 in the 7500s, people in the branch offices > couldn't reach the DNS server. > Now, i'm thinking about using the same command but changing the AD, i.e: ip > summary-address eigrp 1 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 230, but before doing anything > i'd like to know yor opinions. Do you see any problems?routing loops, perhaps? > I have been reading some post by MADMAN in the archives about summary > address, but I think this a bit more complex, and interesting, scenario, and > it's a real scenario! > Thank you for your time, and sorry for my English, as you can see it isn't > my first language. > Happy new year for everybody! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30532&t=30528 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Member [7:30524]
Welcome and good luck! The k1d ""Darrell Newcomb"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've been reading and posting for a week or so now and figured I'd > introduce myself. > > I'm preparing for the CCIE R/S Lab. At this point I'm trying to list > out which areas I need to study. I passed the written with a few days > prep in early December. I've got a CCNA and CCNP. Most of my > certification tests have been because peers bet I couldn't pass or score > whatever. I haven't eaten crow on that...yet. I've done consulting for > all size enterprises, some service providers, a small amount of applied > research and protocol design, and currently run a smallish > enterprise/xSP network. I'm looking for the R/S to represent existing > knowledge and provide income protection in the current economy though > many of the postings throughout groupstudy haven't been too reassuring. > > This is a great community and I look forward to participating. > > Darrell > Mountain View, CA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30531&t=30524 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: simple ip monitor [7:30433]
Search for Big Brother The k1d ""2387"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, I am looking for a simple program to monitor an ip and email me when > it > goes up or down. Can anyone recommend a very basic program like this? > thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30434&t=30433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: certification salary posting [7:30237]
I think it's been hashed out on this list before that this survey is pretty ridiculous. Some of the numbers might be slightly representative of the big cities, others are a laugh. A search of the archive should produce the various arguements. The k1d ""sam sneed"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > group, > > I found this link on a microsoft site. It mainly analyzes the the salaries > of people holding Microsoft certifications. The applicable part is on the > 3rd page of the report which lists the estimated salaries of all different > cert's including CCNA,CCNP, CCIE. > > http://mcpmag.com/salarysurveys/ > > I'm not supporting the claims on this site. I'm posting it here because > people always ask the list for this info so i hope noone comes after me for > posting this. I currently hold MCSE and CCNA with 2.5 years experience and > don't make what the list says my average would be, and this is working in > NYC where they pay very well. > > food for thought > > sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30239&t=30237 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
Well I dunno Chuck... that's kinda hard. That requires... 1. Searching 2. Reading 3. Understanding 4. Applying Lot's of people who come here don't want any part of that. They just want someone else to type out the config so they can paste it and look good to the boss, which Marc has so kindly done. The k1d ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > let's see - if I say that there are lots of examples on CCO, I'm not very > helpful. > > OK > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/inte > r_c/icdlogin.htm > > you should be able to get to the tunnel interface configuration guide from > there. > > HTH > > Chuck > > PS it is NEVER too soon to learn to do CCO searches. > > > ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can you pus something concrete in? > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > unless there are firewalls involved, this is a no brainer. trhere are > MANY > > > examples on CCO. > > > > > > I have done this several times in the last year with folks over the > 'net. > > > works just fine, with every routing protocol I can think of. > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > > ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over the > > the > > > > Internet routers? > > > > IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. > > > > > > > > Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30190&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Len Lee/CHI/NTRS is out of the office. [7:30160]
Thanks for letting us know! Oh yea, you forgot to let us know who to contact while your away. ""Len Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I will be out of the office starting December 26, 2001 and will not return > until December 27, 2001. > > I will respond to your message when I return. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30184&t=30160 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems [7:30079]
Sure enough, I just looked it up and it does support up to 8 ports. I don't know where I was getting 4 from. Maybe an older IOS version or something. Thanks for pointing that out. The k1d ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I could be mistaken, but I think I've seen somethings that support up to 8 > interfaces in an etherchannel bundle. From URL: (watch for wrap) > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/lan_switching/6.html > > "Some cards and platforms also support Gigabit EtherChannel and have the > ability to use from two to eight ports in an EtherChannel" > > From URL: (watch for wrap) > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/media/lan/ether/channel/tech/fete c_wp.htm > > "Compatible with Cisco IOS---Fast EtherChannel connections are fully > compatible with Cisco IOS virtual LAN and routing technologies. The > Inter-Switch Link (ISL) VLAN trunking protocol can carry multiple VLANs > across a Fast EtherChannel, and routers attached to Fast EtherChannel trunks > can provide full multiprotocol routing with support for hot standby using > HSRP" > > So it would appear both answers A. and B. are incorrect (i.e. they are both > supported by EtherChannel) > > As far as TACACS, I read through RFC 1492 (watch for wrap) > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1492.html > > and didn't see where it told about encryption, so I can't offer any help > there. > > HTH, > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30107&t=30079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems [7:30079]
AFAIK, you are correct. The models I have worked with only support up to 4 ports per group. The k1d ""Ellis Lam"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What is the feature that NOT included in Fastether Channel ? > > A. Up to 6 interfaces can be bundled into one prot-channel > B. Support of HSRP > > My ans is A cos' Fastether channel should support up to 4 int ? Right? > > > In TACAS+, pls advise if the entire packet is encrypted ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30091&t=30079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what's the news address of deja? [7:30009]
groups.google.com ""chenyan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > asd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30024&t=30009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149]
What is this new certification you have... the CCIE(Write)? Does that mean you write code for the IOS? ""Sureshhomepage .com"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > thanks for the excellant notes! > > cheers! > suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) > http://www.sureshhomepage.com > > > >From: "John Neiberger" > >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149] > >Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:40:08 -0500 > > > >Someone just asked me off-list how to summarize a certain range of > >addresses and I thought it might be helpful to post my reply to the > >list. It seems like everybody has their own shortcut to doing this, but > >this is how I learned how to do it. Once you learn it there are plenty > >of shortcuts. > > > > > > > >As far as summarization goes, to really understand what you're doing > >you need to think in binary. Write out those addresses in binary > >first: > > > >1010.0001.0001.= 10.1.1.0/24 > >1010.0001.0011.= 10.1.3.0/24 > >1010.0001.1110.0100=10.1.14.64/26 > > > >You can see that in binary they are all the same up to the 20th bit. > >If you slice the above table into two pieces at the 20th bit, on the > >left side you are left with: > > > >1010.0001. > > > >This, translated back to decimal, is 10.1.0.0/20, which is your > >summarized address. However, this is an awful example. Those would be > >really bad addresses to try to summarize. A better example would be > >this: > > > >10.1.0.0/24 > >10.1.1.0/24 > >10.1.2.0/24 > >10.1.3.0/24 > > > >1010.0001.. > >1010.0001.0001. > >1010.0001.0010. > >1010.0001.0011. > > > >You can see that these are the same up to the 22nd bit. Slice the > >diagram into to pieces at the 22nd bit and on the left side you are left > >with: > > > >1010.0001.00 > > > >which translates back to decimal as 10.1.0.0/22. Now you can see that > >a /22 precisely summarizes four /24s !! Cool, huh? > > > > > > > >Regards, > >John > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30023&t=29149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RRs and Confeds as they relate to IE studies [7:29968]
RR's are normally used in small to medium sized implementations. Confederations are normally used in large implementations. I imagine on the lab they'll give some clue as to which one is required. The k1d ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm currently tearing apart BGP as part of my IE studies. It's not too bad > since I come from a Network Service Provider background. But, I have run > into a conflict in regards to RRs vs. Confeds. I probably don't need to > straighten this out for the Written but when it comes to the lab I'd like to > know which route to go down. I have no idea how the lab poses it's topology > but if given the requirement to configure a simulated "large" network and > then having to choose whether to implement RRs or Confeds I wonder which one > Cisco prefers. I'm assuming that as part of the lab, the idea is to create > solutions that work and in doing so, solutions that are as simple as > possible and as short as possible. > > I'd like to hear comments about the pros and cons of each option in regards > to how Cisco might prefer to see implementation. Meanwhile, I'm going to > review all available case studies on CCO. > > Thanks, > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29972&t=29968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "port mirror" on 2621 [7:29958]
Yes... it's called bridging... The k1d ""nettable_walker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 12/22/2001 8:30pm Saturday > > Professionals, Is it possible to mirror all traffic going thru e 0/0 to e > 0/1 on a router ? > > Richard > > // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29973&t=29958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2500 Power Question [7:29869]
I don't know this offhand but Cisco has all this information for each product on their web site. The k1d ""Lin Mi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone know how much power a 2500 pulls? I mean how > many kilowatts does it use per hour? How can I tell > how much it will cost to run 4 2500s for 12 hours if > it costs 10 cents per kilowatt-hour. > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of > your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com > or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29873&t=29869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
Would you mind sharing your opinion as to which labs were better... and why? The k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Not me, I paid alot of $ And I paid for Marc's labs too, I thought they > were great. > > It ain't cheap, but what in life that's worth anything is? > > Mitch > CCIE #6011 > > -Original Message- > From: Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682] > > > Seems like this list will always have someone, like this - Jason, where > every six months or so they will come along and downplay the CCIE cert. or > those that make $$$ from the CCIE cert. process. Whatever happened to that > biggest of ranter's - Mr. PKM??? I never heard Derek Small of fatkid.com > whine or complain about anything or anyone - HE JUST DID IT! > > Jason, is it, remember talking s*** and doing it are two different > things! JUST DO IT!!! - quietly please : ) > > Just the other day I sold a PIX to a guy that told me he was going to > build a CCIE Security lab and put it online for everyone to use for FREE. > His eye's kind of glazed over when I pointed out the cost of building a full > lab, supplying a circuit and the monthly electrical bill for 24x7x365. That > was probably the least of his concerns since he claimed to be able to write > a 40 page lab in a single weekend and then sell it for a $1000. Although, I > thought he was going to cry because I wouldn't take a lousy $100 off the > price of the PIX!!! > > With these type on individuals on the loose I have no worry about an > endless supply of work for meI believe manager's call it - "Cleaning up > the corporate network." : ) > > Eric > > PS - How many CCIE's on this list got there cert for little or no > cost$$$ > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Larrieu" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:30 PM > Subject: RE: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682] > > > > as an FYI, the fatkid labs are FREE > > > > www.fatkid.com > > > > many require just three or four routers plus frame switch. you can always > > use a hub or a mau instead of a switch. > > > > the Parkhurst BGP book has a LOT of GOOD practice using just three > routers. > > > > Much of Doyle can be accomplished with just a few routers. > > > > Imagination and resourcefulness are also free. > > > > Chuck > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > c1sc0k1d > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:49 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682] > > > > > > Good idea... I'll work on one also but I won't be able to get to it till > > early next year. I'll let you know... > > > > The k1d > > > > > > > > ""Jason"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Well to start of this exchange of labs maybe we should set some basic > > > foundations: > > > 1. All labs should not exceed more than 6 routers. > > > I think we all know why this should be the case. > > > 2. The frame cloud in every lab should not exceed four connections. > > > > > > I have spoken to several people who complain about the > > > current competition use 5 connections in the frame cloud. Most of us > > > only have the four port > > >2500 at home that acts as a frame switch. > > > 3. Keep it up to date. > > > How difficult is it to do a practice lab while trying not to > > > be distracted by some technology that is not on the test any more. > > > 5. Keep it original. > > > Create your own work, don't take a lab out of Halabi's book, > > > add an extra router, then slap a 650 dollar price tag on it. > > > 4. Keep it FREE. > > > I don't know about the rest if you, but after dropping > > > 13,000 dollars in a lab at home, and 4,000 dollars in training, spending > > > an extra 650 just hurts. > > > > > > I think my game plan is, at least for the first few labs, to create a > > > map in visio with some core requirements. Then the group can suggest > > > such things as Local Area > > > Mobility, NAT, etc that can be incorporated in to the lab. > > > > > > Where can we post the labs? Can every one read visio? Do we have to > > > send it out in a different format? > > > > > > And yes Marc, the email is bogus. I did not want to be spammed by you > > > or your affiliates. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29772&t=29682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Buying IOS Software [7:29761]
AFAIK, there is no such thing as buying used IOS software. I don't think there is any provision for selling or otherwise transferring the software in the license agreement. Even if you buy a used router with the IOS on it, you are responsible for obtaining the appropriate "new" IOS license. The k1d ""Jonathan Kephart"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings, >I am looking at putting together a lab in order to study for the CCIE, > and I have encountered a problem. I figure that I need to have a 12.1.X > version of code, Enterprise Plus edition. According to the IOS Feature Tool > on CCO that is the feature pack that has BGP, IS-IS and other various things > I will need to study for the CCIE. My problem is, where can I buy this SW > used? I have checked several places on-line, and they all say they don't > have it and I should buy from Cisco direct - at a cost of $2500 - 4000. Can > anyone point to some place where I could buy a leagl used copy? > > I am looking for code to run the 4000, and the 25XX's. > > Thanks, > -Jonathan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29765&t=29761 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
Good idea... I'll work on one also but I won't be able to get to it till early next year. I'll let you know... The k1d ""Jason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well to start of this exchange of labs maybe we should set some basic > foundations: > 1. All labs should not exceed more than 6 routers. > I think we all know why this should be the case. > 2. The frame cloud in every lab should not exceed four connections. > > I have spoken to several people who complain about the > current competition use 5 connections in the frame cloud. Most of us > only have the four port >2500 at home that acts as a frame switch. > 3. Keep it up to date. > How difficult is it to do a practice lab while trying not to > be distracted by some technology that is not on the test any more. > 5. Keep it original. > Create your own work, don't take a lab out of Halabi's book, > add an extra router, then slap a 650 dollar price tag on it. > 4. Keep it FREE. > I don't know about the rest if you, but after dropping > 13,000 dollars in a lab at home, and 4,000 dollars in training, spending > an extra 650 just hurts. > > I think my game plan is, at least for the first few labs, to create a > map in visio with some core requirements. Then the group can suggest > such things as Local Area > Mobility, NAT, etc that can be incorporated in to the lab. > > Where can we post the labs? Can every one read visio? Do we have to > send it out in a different format? > > And yes Marc, the email is bogus. I did not want to be spammed by you > or your affiliates. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29710&t=29682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recap ? Lab study guides [7:29507]
Oh yea... don't forget the 5500! ""c1sc0k1d"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You can do most things from both labs with 9 routers. Depending on which > models you have you might have to skip some tasks but you should be able to > do most of the core stuff. > > The k1d > > > > > ""Nick S."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ok.. there seems to be some confusion (ok, i am confused :) over the bare > > minimum requirements (in terms of how may 25xx's) to complete say ipexpert > > labs and / or ccbootcamp labs. > > > > Can someone who has either/both suggest ? > > > > Nick > > > > juno vtv wrote: > > > > > > James, > > > > > > You have an option to buy rack time. These labs are lab > > > scenarios for you to use in your studies. You can do most of > > > the labs on your own rack and rent rack time (which they would > > > like you to do) for the more expensive stuff like ATM and Voice. > > > > > > -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29584&t=29507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recap ? Lab study guides [7:29507]
You can do most things from both labs with 9 routers. Depending on which models you have you might have to skip some tasks but you should be able to do most of the core stuff. The k1d ""Nick S."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ok.. there seems to be some confusion (ok, i am confused :) over the bare > minimum requirements (in terms of how may 25xx's) to complete say ipexpert > labs and / or ccbootcamp labs. > > Can someone who has either/both suggest ? > > Nick > > juno vtv wrote: > > > > James, > > > > You have an option to buy rack time. These labs are lab > > scenarios for you to use in your studies. You can do most of > > the labs on your own rack and rent rack time (which they would > > like you to do) for the more expensive stuff like ATM and Voice. > > > > -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29582&t=29507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccbootcamp labs [7:29512]
Here here! The k1d ""Jason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I was looking in to purchasing the labs from ccbootcamp, but correct me > if I am wrong, they look outdated and full of annoying little errors. > Ccbootcamp says that > it is a subscription but how many have they sent out in the last 3 > months? Zero! Or even the last six months. One! This just looks to be > a big scam! These guys > wouldn't last a minute if there was some real competition, who made > worth while labs. What a joke. Maybe, since we are all in this > together, we could collectively make > some labs and share them among the group. I will release some of the > ones I have been working on for FREE after I refine them. I say forget > ccbootcamp. They > just want to make a buck. Its time this group got some quality labs with > out having to spend even more money! > > -jason > Pissed off individuale, tired of people making a buck of OUR quest for > the CCIE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29583&t=29512 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: That Friday Follies Question... [7:29473]
Hmmm... interesting. I'll give it a go in my lab and let you know what happens. I'm looking forwards to Chucks answer as well. The k1d ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In my testing I was never able to get secondary interfaces to work > properly. IGRP would advertise over one or the other, but not both, and > I wasn't able to figure out how it picked which one to use. I've > configured slightly different scenarios from scratch two or three times > and I could never make secondary IP addresses work. > > John > > >>> "c1sc0k1d" 12/18/01 12:25:29 PM >>> > AFAIK, there is only one way to summarize with rip and igrp and that is > by > creating a static and redistributing the static. Since that is not > possible > and since we cannot use the default network command we must have an > ospf > interface that shares the /27 igrp network to get routes to pass. > That > could be performed with secondary addresses or a tunnel interface (or > a > frame subinterface). I think for igrp to advertise on the secondary > address > method, it also needs to be configured to advertised on the primary, > although I could be mistaken. I know it's that way for eigrp. > > The k1d > > > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The R1/R8 Tunnel needs to be a /28 since you're trying to get /28 > routes > > into the IGRP domain. However, since you're going from a > longer-match > > mask to a shorter-mask, you don't need to use this method. It will > work > > but you could also use a couple of the other methods posted. > > > > First, you could create a loopback interface on R8 and then assign > it > > to a "dummy" OSPF area. This allows you to use the area range > command > > to summarize the /28 routes into a /27. > > > > Another option that someone posted was to use two OSPF processes and > > redistribute one into the other and use the summary-address command. > > > > I thought that Chuck's Follies question was how to get shorter-mask > > routes from OSPF into IGRP. Using your example, try making the OSPF > > domain /27 and the IGRP domain /28. That makes things much more > > difficult! > > > > I've found two ways to handle this and I don't like either one, to > be > > honest. I'm anxiously awaiting Chuck's answer because this is > really > > bugging me. There ought to be an easier way. However, in the real > > world we wouldn't have the restrictions of the lab. > > > > John > > > > >>> "Richard Botham" 12/18/01 8:18:00 AM >>> > > John, > > Thanks for wrecking my weekend too.. > > I tried to get this to work using the tunnel method and the > secondary > > addressing method but with no success. > > > > My lab looks look like this > > > > r4--(igrp/27)--r2--(igrp/27)--r1--(igrp /27)--r8--(ospf /28) > > > > interfaces > > > > r4/r2 network 172.168.10.80/27 > > r2/r1 network 172.168.10.64/27 > > r1/r8 network 172.168.10.16/27 > > r1/r8 tunnel 172.168.11.0/27 > > r8network 172.168.10.32/28 > > > > > > I tried all combinations of /27 & /28 masks on the tunnel to try and > > get the > > /27 routes into the table on r1 but with no joy. > > > > Look at this form debug ip igrp trans > > > > 04:49:59: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Tunnel0 > > (172.168.11.1) > > 04:49:59: subnet 172.168.10.32, metric=6882 > > > > So the route appears to be advertised out of tunnel0 towards r1 as > you > > would > > expect , because the mask is the same. > > However the route never appears in the routing table on r1 although > it > > has > > an interface using a /27 ( tunnel ) > > You do not see r1 receiving the /27 route > > > > > > I would like to hear your thoughts as I cannot think of another way > to > > get > > around this one. > > > > Best regards > > Richard Botham Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29520&t=29473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: That Friday Follies Question... [7:29473]
AFAIK, there is only one way to summarize with rip and igrp and that is by creating a static and redistributing the static. Since that is not possible and since we cannot use the default network command we must have an ospf interface that shares the /27 igrp network to get routes to pass. That could be performed with secondary addresses or a tunnel interface (or a frame subinterface). I think for igrp to advertise on the secondary address method, it also needs to be configured to advertised on the primary, although I could be mistaken. I know it's that way for eigrp. The k1d ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The R1/R8 Tunnel needs to be a /28 since you're trying to get /28 routes > into the IGRP domain. However, since you're going from a longer-match > mask to a shorter-mask, you don't need to use this method. It will work > but you could also use a couple of the other methods posted. > > First, you could create a loopback interface on R8 and then assign it > to a "dummy" OSPF area. This allows you to use the area range command > to summarize the /28 routes into a /27. > > Another option that someone posted was to use two OSPF processes and > redistribute one into the other and use the summary-address command. > > I thought that Chuck's Follies question was how to get shorter-mask > routes from OSPF into IGRP. Using your example, try making the OSPF > domain /27 and the IGRP domain /28. That makes things much more > difficult! > > I've found two ways to handle this and I don't like either one, to be > honest. I'm anxiously awaiting Chuck's answer because this is really > bugging me. There ought to be an easier way. However, in the real > world we wouldn't have the restrictions of the lab. > > John > > >>> "Richard Botham" 12/18/01 8:18:00 AM >>> > John, > Thanks for wrecking my weekend too.. > I tried to get this to work using the tunnel method and the secondary > addressing method but with no success. > > My lab looks look like this > > r4--(igrp/27)--r2--(igrp/27)--r1--(igrp /27)--r8--(ospf /28) > > interfaces > > r4/r2 network 172.168.10.80/27 > r2/r1 network 172.168.10.64/27 > r1/r8 network 172.168.10.16/27 > r1/r8 tunnel 172.168.11.0/27 > r8network 172.168.10.32/28 > > > I tried all combinations of /27 & /28 masks on the tunnel to try and > get the > /27 routes into the table on r1 but with no joy. > > Look at this form debug ip igrp trans > > 04:49:59: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Tunnel0 > (172.168.11.1) > 04:49:59: subnet 172.168.10.32, metric=6882 > > So the route appears to be advertised out of tunnel0 towards r1 as you > would > expect , because the mask is the same. > However the route never appears in the routing table on r1 although it > has > an interface using a /27 ( tunnel ) > You do not see r1 receiving the /27 route > > > I would like to hear your thoughts as I cannot think of another way to > get > around this one. > > Best regards > Richard Botham Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29510&t=29473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
