Re: Cisco CCNA 640-801 exam review [7:73950]
Good Review However one correction, you've mentioned that EIGRP is a link state routing protocol, when it is a hybrid distance vector protocol. Take Care Simon. - Original Message - From: Andy Barkl To: Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:18 AM Subject: Cisco CCNA 640-801 exam review [7:73950] Here is my Cisco CCNA 640-801 exam review; http://www.tcpmag.com/Exams/article.asp?EditorialsID=77 I hope it helps you with your studies. Good luck! **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73956t=73950 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: CCNP Re-Cert [7:72330]
Hi John At the moment I'm just going through my old ACRC,CLSC,CMTD CIT stuff coupled with Doyles Routing TCP/IP Cisco's Network Design Case Studies for IS-IS BGP, an MLS supplement Priscilla O recommended I'm going to go through test questions from CCxx Productions. What about you John Study materials ? Rgrds Simon. - Original Message - From: john parker To: Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:41 AM Subject: CCNP Re-Cert Simon - I am also getting ready to take the re-cert exam. Have you been able to locate any good study materials? Thanks, John Hi Guys Just a quick question on the Cisco Certification Challenge questions found on downloaded from Cisco.com.Im taking my CCNP recert in a few days and just wanted to know if these challenge questions on each CCNP segment is of a comparable level as in the actual exam. Thanks Simon. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72330t=72330 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re[2]: CCNP ReCert Questions [7:72071]
Sorry
I meant MLS.
Thanks Karen.
- Original Message -
From: Karen E Young
To: Simon Watson
Cc:
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:45 PM
Subject: Re[2]: CCNP ReCert Questions [7:72071]
Simon,
Careful there! Don't mistake MLS for MPLS. Two different animals entirely.
MLS is Multi-Layer Switching and is strictly a LAN technology while MPLS
(Multi-Protocol Label Switching) is predominantly used in the WAN.
Here's some stuff on MPLS.
http://www.convergedigest.com/Bandwidth/archive/010910TUTORIAL-rgallaher1.ht
m
http://www.mplsrc.com/
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/mpls/mpls_presentations.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/mpls/mpls_techdoc.shtml
Cisco Networkers 2001 Power session on MPLS:
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw01/pres/pr/542/
Also, if you go to http://www.webtorials.com, you'll see a link for MPLScon
2003 Conference Presentation Handouts. You'll need a Webtorials account but
they're free. The links for creating an account or signing in are up at the
top of the page. This is one of the best places to look since the
information goes into a bit more depth than that on most sites.
Hope this helps,
Karen
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 7/12/2003 at 9:17 AM Simon Watson wrote:
Hi PriscillaI'm in the same position as John (Cert expires on the 21st).
But I'm going to give the re-cert a go I've printed out the the MPLS
supplement you suggested to look on, will this be sufficent for the MPLS
portion of the test.Also the Catalyst 5K was the principle switch in the
switching portion 3 years ago.What switch is the switching portion of the
test based on now ???. From: Priscilla Oppenheimer Reply-To:
Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP
ReCert Questions [7:72071] Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:22:00 GMT John
Cianfarani wrote: Well I decided I wouldn't push it in such a
short timeframe with the one exam. With work and whatever else
probably won't have enough time to study fully for it. So I will
write either all 4 again, or cit/bcran and then the new Composite
once it's out. You shouldn't lose your CCNP, albeit temporarily
(hopefully). Think how hard you worked to get it. How will you feel when
you can no longer say you have it? I think you should try the recert
exam. I'm sorry if I scared you by saying it is hard. It is hard, but
study the IS-IS supplement from Cisco Press and some material on
multilayer switching and eat a lot of blueberries. At least give it a
try. Here's a link on multilayer switching:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/sw
itch_c/xcprt5/xcdmsov.htm
Do you know about the free PDF document that Cisco Press put out on
IS-IS for BSCI candidates? When Cisco added IS-IS, Cisco Press didn't
have a book out yet that covered it (from a BSCI viewpoint anyway), so
they put out a PDF. Here's a link:
http://www.ciscopress.com/content/images/1578702283/downloads/BSCNSuppleme
nt.pdf?session_id={D6502E20-0A8E-4868-8FE7-5A1A54F64857}
Good luck whichever way you go, but I definitely recommend not
lettting your CCNP disappear, even temporarily. Priscilla
Anyone know if the Composite will count towards things like CCIP? If
it doesn't I'd just take the 4 exam route. Thanks John
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP ReCert Questions
[7:72071] Amazing wrote: I just did the CCNP recet
test two weeks ago and passed withnot too muchstudying --
used boson test to see my weak areas and justbrushed up on
those areas -- hint -- you can use the same study materials you
used threeyears ago -- nothing has changed. I wouldn't
recommend just using the same material as 3 years ago. There are
some new topics, like IS-IS for Routing and multilayer switching
for Switching. Support and Remote Access seemed to be pretty
similar, but those other two were pretty different from 3 years
ago, at least in my test. I found it to be a two-Tums-package
test for sure, depsite a good score in the end.
as to the answer to your questions, my experience has been that
you shouldgo directly to cisco with these questions so you have
a I defintely agree there. Go to Cisco. Even if we give you an
answer, the Authoritative Bit will not be set. :-) That won't stop
me though from adding a few more comments below
documented answerwhen they change their mind later on ;-)
d John Cianfarani wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have to
recert my CCNP by the 21st of this month. (yeah Iknow I left
it late, but I was busy upgrading my CSS1 to CCSP). I
notice they have a new test coming out ( 642-891 ) CalledComposite
which is based on BSCI and BCMSN, which will also let you
recert your CCNP and CCDP with at the same time
question on Cisco Certification Challenge from cisco.com [7:72272]
Hi Guys Just a quick question on the Cisco Certification Challenge questions found on downloaded from Cisco.com.Im taking my CCNP recert in a few days and just wanted to know if these challenge questions on each CCNP segment is of a comparable level as in the actual exam. Thanks Simon. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72272t=72272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP ReCert Questions [7:72071]
Hi PriscillaI'm in the same position as John (Cert expires on the 21st).
But I'm going to give the re-cert a go I've printed out the the MPLS
supplement you suggested to look on, will this be sufficent for the MPLS
portion of the test.Also the Catalyst 5K was the principle switch in the
switching portion 3 years ago.What switch is the switching portion of the
test based on now ???. From: Priscilla Oppenheimer Reply-To:
Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP
ReCert Questions [7:72071] Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:22:00 GMT John
Cianfarani wrote: Well I decided I wouldn't push it in such a
short timeframe with the one exam. With work and whatever else
probably won't have enough time to study fully for it. So I will
write either all 4 again, or cit/bcran and then the new Composite
once it's out. You shouldn't lose your CCNP, albeit temporarily
(hopefully). Think how hard you worked to get it. How will you feel when
you can no longer say you have it? I think you should try the recert
exam. I'm sorry if I scared you by saying it is hard. It is hard, but
study the IS-IS supplement from Cisco Press and some material on
multilayer switching and eat a lot of blueberries. At least give it a
try. Here's a link on multilayer switching:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/switch_c/xcprt5/xcdmsov.htm
Do you know about the free PDF document that Cisco Press put out on
IS-IS for BSCI candidates? When Cisco added IS-IS, Cisco Press didn't
have a book out yet that covered it (from a BSCI viewpoint anyway), so
they put out a PDF. Here's a link:
http://www.ciscopress.com/content/images/1578702283/downloads/BSCNSupplement.pdf?session_id={D6502E20-0A8E-4868-8FE7-5A1A54F64857}
Good luck whichever way you go, but I definitely recommend not
lettting your CCNP disappear, even temporarily. Priscilla
Anyone know if the Composite will count towards things like CCIP? If
it doesn't I'd just take the 4 exam route. Thanks John
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP ReCert Questions
[7:72071] Amazing wrote: I just did the CCNP recet
test two weeks ago and passed withnot too muchstudying --
used boson test to see my weak areas and justbrushed up on
those areas -- hint -- you can use the same study materials you
used threeyears ago -- nothing has changed. I wouldn't
recommend just using the same material as 3 years ago. There are
some new topics, like IS-IS for Routing and multilayer switching
for Switching. Support and Remote Access seemed to be pretty
similar, but those other two were pretty different from 3 years
ago, at least in my test. I found it to be a two-Tums-package
test for sure, depsite a good score in the end.
as to the answer to your questions, my experience has been that
you shouldgo directly to cisco with these questions so you have
a I defintely agree there. Go to Cisco. Even if we give you an
answer, the Authoritative Bit will not be set. :-) That won't stop
me though from adding a few more comments below
documented answerwhen they change their mind later on ;-)
d John Cianfarani wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have to
recert my CCNP by the 21st of this month. (yeah Iknow I left
it late, but I was busy upgrading my CSS1 to CCSP). I
notice they have a new test coming out ( 642-891 ) CalledComposite
which is based on BSCI and BCMSN, which will also let you
recert your CCNP and CCDP with at the same time. Now that test
doesn'tcome out until Aug 7th. Anyone know if there is
still a Beta of thisexam available to write? I
don't think they ever did a beta for that new composite exam that
suddenly popped up? Maybe it will still come out? Or if
Writing BSCI / BCMSN is equivalent? I doubt you can just write
BSCI and BCMSN to get recertified. Also anyone know a
way extended you recert date maybe bywriting a current
CCNP exam or something or am I just gonna have tobuckle down
and write the 640-851 CCNP Recert exam? Just do it. It's not
that painful. :-) And I think it's your only option. Ask
Cisco and check your tracking info to be sure. Good luck!
Priscilla Thanks! John
misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's fast, it's fun and it's free! Click here to download MSN Messenger.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72180t=72071
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
Another CCNP Re-Cert Question [7:72105]
Hi All My CCNP expires on the 20th July.Are there deadlines set to re-certify in a certain time frame that if you do not you have to take the whole 4 exams again. Also are there any good books to brush up on things that were not in the CCNP three years ago ?? Thanks Simon. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72105t=72105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 Another question [7:71703]
- Original Message - From: simon watson To: ; Henrique Issamu Terada Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:08 PM Subject: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 Another question [7:71703] Hi Some how I was thinking VLAN tagging was something more than just Trunking in Cisco talk,as you can guess I'm pretty rusty when it comes to switching.I have another question.Look at the example below. REMOTE SITE PC's-CISCO 3550--CISCO 2600~~(256K LEASE LINE) (VLAN3) (802.1q TRUNK) MAIN SITE ~~CISCO 3600ALCATEL SWITCHPIX...INTERNET ROUTER/INTERNET. (256K LINK) (802.1qTRUNK) (VLAN3) A client wants to allow a group of PC's on a remote site, access to the internet via the main site's ISP.But wants these group of Pc's on their own VLAN so they have no connection to the rest of the network (except for the internet router which the whole network uses to access the internet) they have been advised by a third party to do it as above.They have a Cisco 3550EMI switch at the remote site a Alcatel Omnicore L3 switch at the Main site.The WAN link is a 256k lease line.They want to configure the PC's on the remote site with the same VLAN as a dedicated PIX on the Main site (also on the same subnet). The Cat 3550 is not using it's L3 capabilities and is trunked to the remote site's router Can this be done ? I'm sure thinking of the basic laws of routing it won't be possible to have devices being on the same subnet but across different WAN links, as routing loops can occur.Also would it be best to enable the layer 3 capabilities of the switches, or to let the routers do the work. I'm looking forward to your answers Thanks in advance Simon. - Original Message - From: Henrique Issamu Terada To: simon watson Cc: Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:09 PM Subject: RES: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Vlan tagging is commonly called by Cisco as trunks. Have you ever configured trunks as ISL ou 802.1q ? Actually the name vlan tagging makes more sense on non Cisco equipment, where only exists 802.1q . ISL doesn't do tag as 802.1q , but reencapsulates the packet with a new header . My 0,02 _ Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 IT Support - Open Network CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 Fax: 55 11 4196-0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cpm.com.br -- --- Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela contidas ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues. Se vocj recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua cooperagco. This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -Mensagem original- De: simon watson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terga-feira, 1 de julho de 2003 05:02 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Hi Guys A client wants a Cat 3550 configured for VLAN tagging, I have not done one of these before so how do I configure the switch, also there is a Cisco 2600 router also connected to the switch.Do I need to configure the router to accomodate VLAN tagging (and any router that packets of the VLAN goes through ?) Thanks Simon. Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71902t=71703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 Another question [7:71703]
Hi Some how I was thinking VLAN tagging was something more than just Trunking in Cisco talk,as you can guess I'm pretty rusty when it comes to switching.I have another question.Look at the example below. REMOTE SITE MAIN SITE PC's-CISCO 3550CISCO 2600~~CISCO 3600ALCATEL L3 SWITCH..PIX...INTERNET ROUTER---INTERNET. (VLAN3) (802.1q TRUNK) (256K LINK)(802.1q TRUNK)(VLAN3) A client wants to allow a group of PC's on a remote site, access to the internet via the main site's ISP.But wants these group of Pc's on their own VLAN so they have no connection to the rest of the network (except for the internet router which the whole network uses to access the internet) they have been advised by a third party to do it as above.They have a Cisco 3550EMI switch at the remote site a Alcatel Omnicore L3 switch at the Main site.The WAN link is a 256k lease line.They want to configure the PC's on the remote site with the same VLAN as a dedicated PIX on the Main site (also on the same subnet). The Cat 3550 is not using it's L3 capabilities and is trunked to the remote site's router Can this be done ? I'm sure thinking of the basic laws of routing it won't be possible to have devices being on the same subnet but across different WAN links, as routing loops can occur.Also would it be best to enable the layer 3 capabilities of the switches, or to let the routers do the work. I'm looking forward to your answers Thanks in advance Simon. - Original Message - From: Henrique Issamu Terada To: simon watson Cc: Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:09 PM Subject: RES: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Vlan tagging is commonly called by Cisco as trunks. Have you ever configured trunks as ISL ou 802.1q ? Actually the name vlan tagging makes more sense on non Cisco equipment, where only exists 802.1q . ISL doesn't do tag as 802.1q , but reencapsulates the packet with a new header . My 0,02 _ Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 IT Support - Open Network CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 Fax: 55 11 4196-0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cpm.com.br -- --- Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela contidas ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues. Se vocj recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua cooperagco. This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -Mensagem original- De: simon watson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terga-feira, 1 de julho de 2003 05:02 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Hi Guys A client wants a Cat 3550 configured for VLAN tagging, I have not done one of these before so how do I configure the switch, also there is a Cisco 2600 router also connected to the switch.Do I need to configure the router to accomodate VLAN tagging (and any router that packets of the VLAN goes through ?) Thanks Simon. Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71916t=71703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 Another question [7:71703]
- Original Message - From: simon watson To: ; Henrique Issamu Terada Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:08 PM Subject: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 Another question [7:71703] Hi Some how I was thinking VLAN tagging was something more than just Trunking in Cisco talk,as you can guess I'm pretty rusty when it comes to switching.I have another question.Look at the example below. REMOTE SITE PC's-CISCO 3550--CISCO 2600~~(256K LEASE LINE) (VLAN3) (802.1q TRUNK) MAIN SITE ~~CISCO 3600ALCATEL SWITCHPIX...INTERNET ROUTER/INTERNET. (256K LINK) (802.1qTRUNK) (VLAN3) A client wants to allow a group of PC's on a remote site, access to the internet via the main site's ISP.But wants these group of Pc's on their own VLAN so they have no connection to the rest of the network (except for the internet router which the whole network uses to access the internet) they have been advised by a third party to do it as above.They have a Cisco 3550EMI switch at the remote site a Alcatel Omnicore L3 switch at the Main site.The WAN link is a 256k lease line.They want to configure the PC's on the remote site with the same VLAN as a dedicated PIX on the Main site (also on the same subnet). The Cat 3550 is not using it's L3 capabilities and is trunked to the remote site's router Can this be done ? I'm sure thinking of the basic laws of routing it won't be possible to have devices being on the same subnet but across different WAN links, as routing loops can occur.Also would it be best to enable the layer 3 capabilities of the switches, or to let the routers do the work. I'm looking forward to your answers Thanks in advance Simon. - Original Message - From: Henrique Issamu Terada To: simon watson Cc: Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:09 PM Subject: RES: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Vlan tagging is commonly called by Cisco as trunks. Have you ever configured trunks as ISL ou 802.1q ? Actually the name vlan tagging makes more sense on non Cisco equipment, where only exists 802.1q . ISL doesn't do tag as 802.1q , but reencapsulates the packet with a new header . My 0,02 _ Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 IT Support - Open Network CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 Fax: 55 11 4196-0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cpm.com.br -- --- Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela contidas ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues. Se vocj recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua cooperagco. This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -Mensagem original- De: simon watson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terga-feira, 1 de julho de 2003 05:02 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Hi Guys A client wants a Cat 3550 configured for VLAN tagging, I have not done one of these before so how do I configure the switch, also there is a Cisco 2600 router also connected to the switch.Do I need to configure the router to accomodate VLAN tagging (and any router that packets of the VLAN goes through ?) Thanks Simon. Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71821t=71703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 Another question [7:71703]
Hi Some how I was thinking VLAN tagging was something more than just Trunking in Cisco talk,as you can guess I'm pretty rusty when it comes to switching.I have another question.Look at the example below. REMOTE SITE MAIN SITE PC's-CISCO 3550CISCO 2600~~CISCO 3600ALCATEL L3 SWITCH..PIX...INTERNET ROUTER---INTERNET. (VLAN3) (802.1q TRUNK) (256K LINK)(802.1q TRUNK)(VLAN3) A client wants to allow a group of PC's on a remote site, access to the internet via the main site's ISP.But wants these group of Pc's on their own VLAN so they have no connection to the rest of the network (except for the internet router which the whole network uses to access the internet) they have been advised by a third party to do it as above.They have a Cisco 3550EMI switch at the remote site a Alcatel Omnicore L3 switch at the Main site.The WAN link is a 256k lease line.They want to configure the PC's on the remote site with the same VLAN as a dedicated PIX on the Main site (also on the same subnet). The Cat 3550 is not using it's L3 capabilities and is trunked to the remote site's router Can this be done ? I'm sure thinking of the basic laws of routing it won't be possible to have devices being on the same subnet but across different WAN links, as routing loops can occur.Also would it be best to enable the layer 3 capabilities of the switches, or to let the routers do the work. I'm looking forward to your answers Thanks in advance Simon. - Original Message - From: Henrique Issamu Terada To: simon watson Cc: Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:09 PM Subject: RES: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Vlan tagging is commonly called by Cisco as trunks. Have you ever configured trunks as ISL ou 802.1q ? Actually the name vlan tagging makes more sense on non Cisco equipment, where only exists 802.1q . ISL doesn't do tag as 802.1q , but reencapsulates the packet with a new header . My 0,02 _ Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 IT Support - Open Network CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 Fax: 55 11 4196-0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cpm.com.br -- --- Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela contidas ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues. Se vocj recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua cooperagco. This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -Mensagem original- De: simon watson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terga-feira, 1 de julho de 2003 05:02 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703] Hi Guys A client wants a Cat 3550 configured for VLAN tagging, I have not done one of these before so how do I configure the switch, also there is a Cisco 2600 router also connected to the switch.Do I need to configure the router to accomodate VLAN tagging (and any router that packets of the VLAN goes through ?) Thanks Simon. Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71799t=71703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN TAGGING ON Cat 3550 [7:71678]
Hi Guys A client wants a Cat 3550 configured for VLAN tagging, I have not done one of these before so how do I configure the switch, also there is a Cisco 2600 router also connected to the switch.Do I need to configure the router to accomodate VLAN tagging (and any router that packets of the VLAN goes through ?) Thanks Simon. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71678t=71678 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN Tagging on Cat 3550 [7:71703]
Hi Guys A client wants a Cat 3550 configured for VLAN tagging, I have not done one of these before so how do I configure the switch, also there is a Cisco 2600 router also connected to the switch.Do I need to configure the router to accomodate VLAN tagging (and any router that packets of the VLAN goes through ?) Thanks Simon. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71703t=71703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can DRAM From Cisco 3600 go into a Cisco 1600 [7:65323]
Hi All I will soon get a 16MB DRAM that was in a Cisco 3600, can I install it in a Cisco 1603. Thanks Simon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65323t=65323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DRAM Simms from RSM to 2500 [7:64719]
Hi Guys I'm being offered 16MB DRAM Simms that were once in a Cat RSM module. Can I install these into a 2500 Router ?? Thanks Simon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64719t=64719 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2501 DC Power adaptors ? [7:64296]
Hi Guys I am based in the UK and have aquired some 2501 DC routers, I want to use the routers to set up a home lab but I only have AC power supply is there some form of AC/DC adaptor I can buy to plug my AC supply in and be converted to DC for the routers ??? Thanks Simon Message your friends in real time - and for free. Get MSN Messenger today! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64296t=64296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2501 DC Power adaptors ? [7:64300]
Hi Guys I am based in the UK and have aquired some 2501 DC routers, I want to use the routers to set up a home lab but I only have AC power supply is there some form of AC/DC adaptor I can buy to plug my AC supply in and be converted to DC for the routers ??? Thanks Simon Send instant messages for free with MSN Messenger. Click here to download it now! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64300t=64300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SRB HSRP [7:62660]
Thanks Dave From: MADMAN Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Simon Watson CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SRB HSRP [7:62660] Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:34:50 -0600Hi, I would have to look at the DLSW redundancy configs to give you a diffinitive answer, (I can't memorize all this stuff:), but I can promise you that you can't have two differant ring numbers on a single token ring. You will bring the ring down. Dave take a look at this, it sounds like what you want to do, you need to change your bridge number though as they should not match. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk331/tk336/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094548.shtml Simon Watson wrote: Hi MadmanAre you recommending me to configure both Token-Ring HSRP interfaces with the same SRB statement ? i.e source-bridge 101 2 300.Thanks Simon. From: MADMAN Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Simon Watson CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SRB HSRP [7:62660] Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 14:49:06 -0600 I have configured HSRP in SRB environments, they are two seperate things. What I wouldn't do is connect a secondary router to this token ring with a differant ring number!!! DaveSimon Watson wrote: Hi Guys I'm going to install a secondary router on a Token-Ring Source Route Bridge Network, and use HSRP between the two routers for redundancy. On the current router the SRB config on the Token Ring Interface is: source-bridge 101 2 300. On the secondary router's Token-Ring interface is it ok to use for example source-bridge 102 2 300 In other words is there any issues of using HSRP on interfaces that have SRB configured. Thanks Simon. It's fast, it's easy and it's free! Click here to download MSN archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. More info here.-- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Chat with friends online - download MSN Messenger today. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63413t=62660 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SRB HSRP [7:62660]
Hi Guys I'm going to install a secondary router on a Token-Ring Source Route Bridge Network, and use HSRP between the two routers for redundancy. On the current router the SRB config on the Token Ring Interface is: source-bridge 101 2 300. On the secondary router's Token-Ring interface is it ok to use for example source-bridge 102 2 300 In other words is there any issues of using HSRP on interfaces that have SRB configured. Thanks Simon. It's fast, it's easy and it's free! Click here to download MSN Messenger Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62660t=62660 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SRB HSRP [7:62660]
Hi Madman Are you recommending me to configure both Token-Ring HSRP interfaces with the same SRB statement ? i.e source-bridge 101 2 300. Thanks Simon. From: MADMAN Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Simon Watson CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SRB HSRP [7:62660] Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 14:49:06 -0600I have configured HSRP in SRB environments, they are two seperate things. What I wouldn't do is connect a secondary router to this token ring with a differant ring number!!! Dave Simon Watson wrote: Hi Guys I'm going to install a secondary router on a Token-Ring Source Route Bridge Network, and use HSRP between the two routers for redundancy. On the current router the SRB config on the Token Ring Interface is: source-bridge 101 2 300. On the secondary router's Token-Ring interface is it ok to use for example source-bridge 102 2 300 In other words is there any issues of using HSRP on interfaces that have SRB configured. Thanks Simon. It's fast, it's easy and it's free! Click here to download MSN archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. More info here. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62669t=62660 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing PA-E3 Modules [7:61656]
* Hi I'm going to be installing PA-E3 modules in 7200 routers at 2 sites, I haven't got all the details from the client,all I know is that they intend to use the full 34Mbps between the 2 sites(most likely hdlc). Is there any questions I should be asking the Circuit Provider so that I can properly configure the modules, and has anyone got any tips on setting up a E3 Module Thanks Simon. Overloaded with spam? With MSN 8 you can filter it out Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61656t=61656 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring/HSRP Question [7:61359]
Hi Guys I'm going to a client's site that has a 2513 router with 11.3(11a) IOS (image is c2500-ds-l_113-11a.bin). 2 things: I'm looking to set up HSRP on the router, should I have any issues with that level of software ?Also are there an issues I should be aware of when configuring HSRP on token ring routers ?? Thanks in advance Simon. Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61359t=61359 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring/HSRP Question [7:61344]
Hi Guys I'm going to a client's site that has a 2513 router with 11.3(11a) IOS (image is c2500-ds-l_113-11a.bin). 2 things: I'm looking to set up HSRP on the router, should I have any issues with that level of software ?Also is there an issues I should be aware of when configuring HSRP on token ring routers ?? Thanks in advance Simon. Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61344t=61344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADSL QUESTION with 3600/2600 routers [7:59805]
Hi All Long time no speak hope everyone is having a blessed Christmas I've a Client who has a WAN network comprising of a Cisco 3660(centre) several 2600's (currently each WAN link is a 256k lease line, each line will soon be upgraded to LES10 Circuits). The client has ISDN backup on all their sites but are looking to replace this with a ADSL Solution. What is the best ADSL Solution should I recommend for my client.Many Thanks Simon. STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 3 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59805t=59805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question on upgrading Memory Software on a AS5300 [7:40909]
Hi Guys I hope you can help me. A client has a AS5300 with old Modem cards in it, who are going to upgrade to the new CC2 Modem module.To upgrade to the new module the Boot Rom, System Flash,DRAM SIMMS,IOS Modem Software will need to be upgraded. The client is asking me in what order shall I start the upgrade?? (i.e put in the new boot Rom first then the DRAM SIMMS etc) as they want a worst case scenario(i.e if there is a problem to re-install the original kit) As my AS5300 Knowledge is pretty rusty, in what order do you think I should proceed with the upgrade ??. What precautions should I take (presumerly copying the config to a tftp server springs to mind) Many Thanks Simon.CCNP Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40909t=40909 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3660 RAS PROBLEMS [7:29521]
Hi Guys I am setting up a Cisco 3660 with remote dialling access for ISDN PSTN users(30 Digital Modem Module Pri Module installed), everything seems ok, however when a ISDN User dials in to the 3660 after approx 160- 180 seconds the user gets kicked out of the 3660(The user is typing at the time so there was activity). I have whipped up the idle timeout to 3 hours but the same thing happens.Below is a copy of part of the config, Is there anything I am ommitting please let me know. Thanks Simon encapsulation ppp timeout absolute 3 0 dialer rotary-group 0 isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice modem peer default ip address pool dialin_pool ppp authentication ms-chap ! interface Group-Async1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer-group 1 async dynamic routing async mode interactive peer default ip address pool dialin_pool ppp authentication ms-chap dial_in group-range 33 62 ! interface Dialer0 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 10800 dialer-group 1 peer default ip address pool dialin_pool ppp authentication ms-chap dial_in ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered Loopback1 Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29521t=29521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software compression IOS on 3600/2600 routers. [7:27555]
Hi Guys I'm looking over a WAN network comprising of 7 2600's connected to a 3660 over 256k kilostream links.Software compression is set on all the WAN links.I need to upgrade the IOS on all the routers from 12.0(7) to 12.2(x).My plan was to upgrade the remote routers first one by one, and then upgrade the 3600 last. Do you think there will be any problems in having software compression running on the WAN link with the 3600 on the main site running 12.0(7), and a router on the remote site(2600) running 12.2(x). Please let me know. Many Thanks. Simon. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27555t=27555 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Re: 4006 [7:27472]
Hi Guys Talking about Cat 4006 L3 Blades. I've got 2 4006 with L3 blades, and I'm still trying to work out the relationship between the Physical interfaces (gigabit interface 1 2), and the logical interfaces (gigabit interface 3 4). I know that the logical interfaces connects to the backplane of the switch. It seems that the Physical interfaces have no relationship with the rest of the box, and I've set all the configurations on the logical interfaces which seem to work(like a msfc on the 6500's).But I will need to use the physical interfaces soon. Can anyoune help Thanks Simon. From: Michael J. Doherty Reply-To: Michael J. Doherty To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 4006 [7:27472] Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:55:18 -0500 and a Layer 3 license - Original Message - From: Bill Carter To: Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:14 Subject: RE: 4006 [7:27472] Yes, with a Layer 3 blade. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4006 [7:27472] dear all, can the 4006 run on layer 3? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27556t=27472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with CiscoWorks 2000 [7:24391]
Hi Guys I've installed Ciscoworks 2000, at a clients site with 2 Cat 6509's 12 Cat 3548's. In resource Manager I'm setting up syslog to report messages from the switches to CW2000, when I check the syslog reports on where I should expect to see the IP address of the switch that sent the message, I see ThisAddressDoesNotExist I have checked to see if all was set up on the switch ok which it was, I have also disabled reverse DNS. Can anyone tell me why I cannot see the IP address of the switch(by the way the switches in question have been set up to be managed by resource manager. Also on Campus manager in the topology map I want to see the names of the routers rather than the IP address how do manage that ? Thanks Simon _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24391t=24391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOW DO I SET UP URL LOAD BALANCING ON A CSS (ARROWPOINT) SWITCH [7:23592]
Hi Guys As the above heading says I'm going to install a Cisco (formerly Arrowpoint) CSS switch and I just wanted to know how to configure URL load balancing on it as this is what the customer is requesting. Many Thanks in advance Simon Watson. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23592t=23592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]
Hi Bob The IOS version on all the routers are 12.0(7)XK1 Simon From: Bob Johnson Reply-To: Bob Johnson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742] Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:36:30 -0400 In my previous reply I'm refering to the (as far as I know..) the OSPF multicast messages being mucked up... Bob (still trying to find the bug ID) -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742] Most likely the hardware compression is mucking up the multicast traffic... I've had many many issues with hardware compression and multicast (got to know TAC people all across the world).. I'll try to dig up the bug ID. What image are you using? Bob -Original Message- From: Simon Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 5:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742] Hi Guys I have just installed a 3660 and 7 2600's (the 2600's connected to the 3660with 256k WAN links via 2 quad serial cards on 3660). ospf configured(all routers on area 0), I have just changed the compression from software to hardware to ultilize the AIM modules installed in both the 3660 2600's( I set up PPP Encapsulation from HDLC on all routers, and configured compress stac caim 0 on 2600's compress stac caim 0-3 on 3660) However as soon I made the change I was receiving the OSPF error message: SPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad Checksum from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 Jul 25 03:27:15: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad Checksum from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 Jul 25 03:27:21: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad Checksum from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 This was happening on all the 2600's, OSPF routes were being lost, on when I reverted to software compression the problem subsided. Has anyone seen this problem before.Pls let me know Rgrds Simon. -- -- Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13850t=13742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]
Hi Guys I have just installed a 3660 and 7 2600's (the 2600's connected to the 3660with 256k WAN links via 2 quad serial cards on 3660). ospf configured(all routers on area 0), I have just changed the compression from software to hardware to ultilize the AIM modules installed in both the 3660 2600's( I set up PPP Encapsulation from HDLC on all routers, and configured compress stac caim 0 on 2600's compress stac caim 0-3 on 3660) However as soon I made the change I was receiving the OSPF error message: SPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad Checksum from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 Jul 25 03:27:15: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad Checksum from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 Jul 25 03:27:21: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad Checksum from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 This was happening on all the 2600's, OSPF routes were being lost, on when I reverted to software compression the problem subsided. Has anyone seen this problem before.Pls let me know Rgrds Simon. Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13742t=13742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: switching , cisco exam question [7:42]
I would say a, d (assuming you meant to put "d" instead of the second "c") As Store forward stores the whole frame before forwarding it for error checking .The last question is a trick as cut-through does not forward on the layer 3 dest address but the layer 2. Rgrds Simon From: "Arthur Simplina" Reply-To: "Arthur Simplina" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: switching , cisco exam question [7:42] Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 06:52:12 -0400 Which are true: a. the latency of the store and forward switching method will be dependent upon frame length b. the cut-through switching method will provide forerror checking c. the latency of the cut-through switching method is dependdent upon frame length c. the store and forward switching method will provide for error checking d. the cut-through switcing method will send the frame as soon as the and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52t=42 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDA CCDP Question
Hi Guys I'm looking to take the CCDA CID exams in the next six weeks to become a CCDP.What are the best books to get to help me pass both exams, I've got Pricilla's Top-Down Network Design and a CD-ROM of Designing Cisco Networks (Version 2/1998). will these suffice. Thanks In Advance Simon Watson CCNP Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF NAT
htmlDIVHi Guys can you help me/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVFONT color=#00 face=Helv size=2 PI've set up a static NAT entry on a remote dual ethernet router(name of router is remote1), the global address that the local device will translate to is 10.10.10.100 this Global address is not in the subnet of the IP address on either interface, so I have set up a loopback address with IP address 10.10.10.1/24 and have placed it in the OSPF process on the remote router( network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 1), so that other routers in the same OSPF group will see the advertised Global network, ( as all Global addresses will be in the 10.10.10.x/24 network), and know where to send any data that has been translated./P PHowever on a Core router that is attached to remote1 via it's ethernet0, and is on the same OSPF process as remote1, when "show ip route" is typed on the Core router this is observed./P PO 10.10.10.1/32 [110/11] via 10.1.1.33, 00:16:08, Ethernet0./P PInstead of the whole 10.10.10.0/24 network being advertised, only the explicit address of remote1 has been advertised./P Ptherefore the global NAT address of 10.10.10.100 is unknown to other routers besides remote1./P PWhat do I need to do to get the whole 10.10.10.0/24 network being advertised via OSPF, so that the other routers will know where to send NAT data./P PIs the only way is to set a static route at the core router and redistribute it./P Pnbsp;/P PThanks in advance/P Pnbsp;/P PSimon/P/FONT/DIVbr clear=allhrGet Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at a href="http://www.hotmail.com"http://www.hotmail.com/a.br/p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content services switch what is it ???
htmlDIVHi Guys/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVI've been asked to install a Cisco CSS(Content Service Switch) 11051 switch. I've never heard of one before, before I start reading the manual, has any of you guys have experience of one before ?, how much different is it to configure compared to say, a Catalyst switch ?/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVAny thoughts will be appreciated./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVThanks/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVSimon Watson CCNP./DIVbr clear=allhrGet Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at a href="http://www.hotmail.com"http://www.hotmail.com/a.br/p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT HSRP Problem
htmlDIVHi Guys/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVI've got 2 dual ethernet Cisco 1605 routers connected to each other via 2 cascaded hubs.Both sets of interfaces are set up for HSRP.(eth0 of both routers arenbsp;in one HSRP group amp; eth1 are in another HSRP group). Both routers have also been set up to staically NAT a device(which will be called Test PC)nbsp;on the local network which is connected to eth 1 of the routers.Also tracking is set on both of the primary router's interfaces to monitor the other interface./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVEth0 on both routers are connected to a Core router via a hub. In normal operation,nbsp;ifnbsp;nbsp;the test PCnbsp;nbsp;sent continous PING's to a device hanging on the Core router, it's local IP address is translated by the HSRP Primary router amp; routed towards the core router amp; all is well. On inspection of the Core routersnbsp;ARP cache shows the translated IP address of test PC and the virtual MAC- address of the primary (int eth0) HSRP router as expected./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVHowever if the cable on eth1 of the Primary router is plugged out to invoke the Standby router to become nbsp;active the PING's seemed to be not getting through. On inspection of the 2 1600 routers the changover of the Standby router from standby to active has taken place, with the Primary router now in a standby state./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVHowever on inspecting the ARP cache of the core router, instead of seeing the translated IP address of the test PC with the virtual MAC address, the translated IP address was seen with the REAL hardware address of the now standby interface on the primary router, thus causing the PING's not to work./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVI've tried this with another set of routers amp; the same thing happened. Has Cisco got a bug with HSRP being configured with a router when NAT is also configued. Plase let me know your thoughts on this matter./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVThanks/DIV DIVSimon CCNP/DIVbr clear=allhrGet Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at a href="http://www.hotmail.com"http://www.hotmail.com/a.br/p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CiscoWorks 2000
Hi Guys Can someone tell me what are the minimum system spec(hardware software) I need toinstall Ciscoworks 2000 for NT on a System. Many Thanks Simon WatsonGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question on Subnetting
Hi Guys I've got a customer who has a VSAT WAN network consisting of Cisco routers, who has for a point to point connection between 2 routers used different subnet masks i.e on the interface of one router the IP address is 172.16.8.1 Mask 255.255.240.0, on the interface of the router at the other end of the link an IP address of 172.16.8.35 mask 255.255.255.240. (No dynamic routing protocol is in operation at the moment). For the remote router to send data accross the link a static route has to be configured as 172.16.8.1 is not in it's subnet. I'm trying to find documents on the web (i.e RFC's) to show to the customer that this subnetting scheme, is unconventional, unadvisable and not recommended, and that devices residing on the same network should have the same subnet mask. Can anyone help Thanks in advance Simon CCNP _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CCNP
Hi On the question if you should take the CCNP1.0 or 2.0. It depends what you have studied for in the pass if you are already prepared to take the exams. The CCNP1.0 exams expire on the 31st July(in 6 days) so if you have just commenced studying it would be advisable to go the version 2.0 route. Unfortunatley I can't help you much with recommeded reading, I had the student course work for all the exams plus the cisco ACRC book from ciscopress. Rgrds Simon From: "Phan H. Son" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Simon Watson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Passed CCNP Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:47:34 -0700 Simon, It was GREAT !!! I was so excited when i passed the CCNA few days a go :--) Bytheway, need to consult you ! Should I take CCNP 1.0 or 2.0 ? Can you name some web sites which are helpfull for your exam preparation Thanks a lot! Phan - Original Message - From: Simon Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 1:41 AM Subject: Passed CCNP Dear Guys Just Letting you know that I've just passed my CCNP. The path I took was the FRS exam and then the CIT got 900 out of 1000 on the FRS( 91% ACRC,91% CMTD,79% CLSC) 778 out off 1000 for the CIT. I found the CIT the hardest exam, make sure you know ISDN well as there was a lot of ISDN questions on my exam. This was for the CCNP1.0, how long before I need to recertify ??.I've heard it is 2 years. Well I must thank God for his immense help, and for you guys for your valuble input. Rgrds Simon CCNP,CCNA Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Subject
Hi Guys I'm due to take the FRS1.0 exam in the next 4 weeks and afterwards take the CIT to obtain the CCNP. I need some advise. Is it worth me taking these tests when version 2.0 is coming out in august ???. Are version 1.0 of the exams available after august ???. or should I just study for the 2.0 versions and take the v2.0 exams Thanks in advance Simon Watson CCNA Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FRS1.0 Exam
Hi Guys I'm due to take the FRS1.0 exam in the next 4 weeks and afterwards take the CIT to obtain the CCNP. I need some advise. Is it worth me taking these tests when version 2.0 is coming out in august ???. Are version 1.0 of the exams available after august ???. or should I just study for the 2.0 versions and take the v2.0 exams Thanks in advance Simon Watson CCNA Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
