RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-09-03 Thread Mears, Rob

So true but ICQ is using port 80, which kills me

-Original Message-
From: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Make sure that you carefully figure out the correct side of the
connection.
ICQ server runs on port 4000, and the client chooses a random
high-numbered
port. That means you will see UDP packets FROM (inbound/source) port
4000
going to the random port. In other words, don't go looking in a port
database trying to figure what that random, high-numbered port means.
The
significant port is the source.

HTH

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: Mears, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster?   Has any
one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
proxy usage?   I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
for every block I am countered with a way around it.  

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
proven and works, with exception to ICQ.  


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III,  CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+
Technical Mercenary




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52606t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-09-03 Thread Mears, Rob

Yep all steps you stated have been covered, but Employees will be
employees.
What can I say?





-Original Message-
From: Elijah Savage III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

ICQ now has a web based version also, just go the web put in your ID and
your on. Now being devils advocate I am aware of the trojans and viruses
that get spread on ICQ, but if it is not interferring with work progress
then why such the hassle. It seems as if your burning more cycles trying
to block it when it almost seems to me that this is a loosing battle.
The only recourse I think you have is to go to HR with your security
plan have them put this in your computer ussage policy for work and then
brief everyone of the employees why this is a no no. I have sniffed the
web version with sniffer pro and it looks to me it strictly uses port
80.

But just by blocking it and I do not know if you are notifying anyone or
if this is in your security poilicy it just seems like you're a loose
renegade on the network to implement your own security policy which will
tick people off. I think if you take my approach above and people
understand why your are doing it then it is less likely to turn
whirlwinds into a hurricane of upset users especially if it was allowed
in the past.

NO BASHING please :) you may have took these steps already then if so
the only thing to do is report them to HR especially if it is causing
problems for you on the network and putting business assets at risk.

-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


I may be off my rocker, but I think it's possible that you could set up
an IDS system that blocks access to any IP on the outside that sends
packets to your network that look like ICQ.  At the very least it could
record the addresses for future inclusion into ACLs.

This won't block the people who set up SSH tunnelling as described in
other messages, but you can make it a violation of security policy to
use that kind of back door.

Thanks,
Shawn

Mears, Rob wrote:
 
 Hi Cisco gods,
 
 I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I 
 think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find 
 that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a 
 hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked 
 so it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck,
I
 cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster?   Has
any
 one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
 proxy usage?   I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
 for every block I am countered with a way around it.
 
 My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking

 this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is 
 proven and works, with exception to ICQ.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52607t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-09-02 Thread Roberts, Larry

100% agree with all your points.

I was more trying to make a point that If given a correct set of
circumstances, anything can be blocked.

Thanks

Larry
 

-Original Message-
From: Chuck's Long Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


In a complex organization ( complex not meaning size or number of
departments, but in the way people need to work ) one might consider third
party applications such as Web Sense.

A couple of comments below:

--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch




Roberts, Larry  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Try my approach..

 Tell people no and put it in your security policy. They violate the 
 policy they get fired..

CL: that assumes that 1) the policy will be acceptable to management  2) the
policy will be enforced by management  and 3) you have the luxury of being
able to fire people for whatever reason you deem fit, trivial or otherwise.
Even in today's bad economy, companies may not have this luxury.


 Oh wait a minute, I think that goes along with cut-off desktop 
 internet access I guess.

CL: like it or not, internet access at the desktop has become one of those
intangible fringe benefits, right up there with using the photocopier for
personal business, using the telephone for personal business, using the fax
machine for personal business. When was the last time someone got fired for
making persoanl phone calls at work? Or photocopying their tax returns at
work?


 Its is a VERY effective deterrent though don't you think 

CL: sure - IF management enforces it, or even agrees to it


 Or I guess you could also just route your home subnet ( not just your
single
 home IP ) to Null0.
 I have found that effective of blocking sites when I don't have the
ability
 to walk around and see what people are doing...

 Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block 
 it. We may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...


CL: works really well until the person you block is some Senior vice
President, or one of the top sales people ( read - revenue producers ) in
the company, and makes the claim that the service is absolutely necessary
for success on the job. That's why this stuff has to work at a policy level,
and cannot nor should be considered a matter for firewall administrators to
deal with.

CL You gots to know your organization.




 Thanks

 Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:18 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


 If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux 
 firewall to listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the 
 only to stop me from IM is to cut off Internet access to my desktop 
 completely. Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?

  Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me 
 because unless you cut off Internet
 access on my desktop completely.

 Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

 Bill Creighton CCNP
 Senior System Engineer
 Motorola
 iDEN CNRC Packet Data


 -Original Message-
 From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

 Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: From 
 work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work 
 desktop, I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the 
 SSH encryption from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop. I 
 can fire up any X application to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, 
 Yahoo) that supports on
Linux
 platform.
 I can
 pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work
because

 the SSH tunnel is encrypted. I can go online shopping, chat with my
friends
 without having to worry about having my conversation being recorded. 
 There is no way for you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet 
 access on my desktop completely.

 Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

 I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think.
 As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find that 
 public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a hell 
 of a time
with
 ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so it does not work
UNLESS
 they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I cant block port 80 as 
 you
know
 so how do I kill this monster? Has any one had luck with this and has
anyone
 found a way to stop the public proxy usage? I really feel as if I am 
 fighting a losing battle, cuss for every block I am countered with a 
 way around it.

 My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this
 crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is 
 proven
an

RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-09-01 Thread FAhmed

You can try with putting the wrong ip for icq domain in newly created zone
in your dns servers

Best Regards
Have A Good Day!!
++
Farhan Ahmed
MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCA, CCDA, CCNA, CSE , CCNP
Network Engineer
Mideast Data Systems Abu Dhabi Uae. www.mdsemirates.com 

Tel: 97126274000Cellular: 971507903578
++


Be a builder, not a destroyer!!!

 

Disclaimer:
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Errors and
Omissions may occur in the contents of this e-mail arising out of or in
connection with data transmission, network malfunction or failure, machine
or software error, malfunction, or  by the person who is sending the email.
Mideast Data Systems accepts no responsibility for any such errors or
omissions  Opinions, Conclusions and other information in this message that
do not relate to the Official business of this company shall be understood
as neither given nor Endorsed by it.



-Original Message-
From: Chuck's Long Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 1:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


In a complex organization ( complex not meaning size or number of
departments, but in the way people need to work ) one might consider third
party applications such as Web Sense.

A couple of comments below:

--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch




Roberts, Larry  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Try my approach..

 Tell people no and put it in your security policy. They violate the 
 policy they get fired..

CL: that assumes that 1) the policy will be acceptable to management  2) the
policy will be enforced by management  and 3) you have the luxury of being
able to fire people for whatever reason you deem fit, trivial or otherwise.
Even in today's bad economy, companies may not have this luxury.


 Oh wait a minute, I think that goes along with cut-off desktop 
 internet access I guess.

CL: like it or not, internet access at the desktop has become one of those
intangible fringe benefits, right up there with using the photocopier for
personal business, using the telephone for personal business, using the fax
machine for personal business. When was the last time someone got fired for
making persoanl phone calls at work? Or photocopying their tax returns at
work?


 Its is a VERY effective deterrent though don't you think 

CL: sure - IF management enforces it, or even agrees to it


 Or I guess you could also just route your home subnet ( not just your
single
 home IP ) to Null0.
 I have found that effective of blocking sites when I don't have the
ability
 to walk around and see what people are doing...

 Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block 
 it. We may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...


CL: works really well until the person you block is some Senior vice
President, or one of the top sales people ( read - revenue producers ) in
the company, and makes the claim that the service is absolutely necessary
for success on the job. That's why this stuff has to work at a policy level,
and cannot nor should be considered a matter for firewall administrators to
deal with.

CL You gots to know your organization.




 Thanks

 Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:18 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


 If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux 
 firewall to listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the 
 only to stop me from IM is to cut off Internet access to my desktop 
 completely. Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?

  Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me 
 because unless you cut off Internet
 access on my desktop completely.

 Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

 Bill Creighton CCNP
 Senior System Engineer
 Motorola
 iDEN CNRC Packet Data


 -Original Message-
 From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

 Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: From 
 work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work 
 desktop, I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the 
 SSH encryption from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop. I 
 can fire up any X application to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, 
 Yahoo) that supports on
Linux
 platform.
 I can
 pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work
because

 the SSH tunnel is encrypted. I can go online shopping, chat with my
friends
 withou

Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-09-01 Thread Magdy H. Ibrahim

Hi Farhan,
Welcome back Farhan;-)

That is a good Idea, I tried it with some services and it works fine...
But, what if he does not have DNS server?? I mean if his DNS at his ISP
Location???

Best regards,,

Magdy

FAhmed  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 You can try with putting the wrong ip for icq domain in newly created zone
 in your dns servers

 Best Regards
 Have A Good Day!!
 ++
 Farhan Ahmed
 MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCA, CCDA, CCNA, CSE , CCNP
 Network Engineer
 Mideast Data Systems Abu Dhabi Uae. www.mdsemirates.com

 Tel: 97126274000Cellular: 971507903578
 ++


 Be a builder, not a destroyer!!!



 Disclaimer:
 Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
 Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
 not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Errors and
 Omissions may occur in the contents of this e-mail arising out of or in
 connection with data transmission, network malfunction or failure, machine
 or software error, malfunction, or  by the person who is sending the
email.
 Mideast Data Systems accepts no responsibility for any such errors or
 omissions  Opinions, Conclusions and other information in this message
that
 do not relate to the Official business of this company shall be understood
 as neither given nor Endorsed by it.



 -Original Message-
 From: Chuck's Long Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 1:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


 In a complex organization ( complex not meaning size or number of
 departments, but in the way people need to work ) one might consider third
 party applications such as Web Sense.

 A couple of comments below:

 --
 TANSTAAFL
 there ain't no such thing as a free lunch




 Roberts, Larry  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Try my approach..
 
  Tell people no and put it in your security policy. They violate the
  policy they get fired..

 CL: that assumes that 1) the policy will be acceptable to management  2)
the
 policy will be enforced by management  and 3) you have the luxury of being
 able to fire people for whatever reason you deem fit, trivial or
otherwise.
 Even in today's bad economy, companies may not have this luxury.

 
  Oh wait a minute, I think that goes along with cut-off desktop
  internet access I guess.

 CL: like it or not, internet access at the desktop has become one of those
 intangible fringe benefits, right up there with using the photocopier for
 personal business, using the telephone for personal business, using the
fax
 machine for personal business. When was the last time someone got fired
for
 making persoanl phone calls at work? Or photocopying their tax returns at
 work?

 
  Its is a VERY effective deterrent though don't you think 

 CL: sure - IF management enforces it, or even agrees to it

 
  Or I guess you could also just route your home subnet ( not just your
 single
  home IP ) to Null0.
  I have found that effective of blocking sites when I don't have the
 ability
  to walk around and see what people are doing...
 
  Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block
  it. We may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...


 CL: works really well until the person you block is some Senior vice
 President, or one of the top sales people ( read - revenue producers ) in
 the company, and makes the claim that the service is absolutely necessary
 for success on the job. That's why this stuff has to work at a policy
level,
 and cannot nor should be considered a matter for firewall administrators
to
 deal with.

 CL You gots to know your organization.


 
 
  Thanks
 
  Larry
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:18 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]
 
 
  If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux
  firewall to listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the
  only to stop me from IM is to cut off Internet access to my desktop
  completely. Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?
 
   Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me
  because unless you cut off Internet
  access on my desktop completely.
 
  Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall
 
  Bill Creighton CCNP
  Senior System Engineer
  Motorola
  iDEN CNRC Packet Data
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]
 
  Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: From
  work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work
  desktop, I am running X-server (

RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1

There is no way for you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet
access on my desktop completely.  

Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: 
From work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall.  On my work
desktop,
I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the SSH encryption 
from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop.  I can fire up any X
application
to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, Yahoo) that supports on Linux platform. 
I can
pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work because

the SSH tunnel is encrypted.  I can go online shopping, chat with my friends
without
having to worry about having my conversation being recorded.  There is no
way for
you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet access on my desktop 
completely.  

 Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster? Has any
one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
proxy usage? I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
for every block I am countered with a way around it. 

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
proven and works, with exception to ICQ. 


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III, CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+
Technical Mercenary
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52360t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread mike greenberg

If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux
firewall to
listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the only to stop me from
IM is to
cut off Internet access to my desktop completely.  
Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?
 
 Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me because
unless you cut off Internet
access on my desktop completely. 

Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: 
From work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work
desktop,
I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the SSH encryption 
from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop. I can fire up any X
application
to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, Yahoo) that supports on Linux platform. 
I can
pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work because

the SSH tunnel is encrypted. I can go online shopping, chat with my friends
without
having to worry about having my conversation being recorded. There is no
way for
you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet access on my desktop 
completely. 

Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster? Has any
one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
proxy usage? I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
for every block I am countered with a way around it. 

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
proven and works, with exception to ICQ. 


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III, CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+
Technical Mercenary
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52386t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread Roberts, Larry

Try my approach..

Tell people no and put it in your security policy. They violate the policy
they get fired..

Oh wait a minute, I think that goes along with cut-off desktop internet
access I guess.

Its is a VERY effective deterrent though don't you think 

Or I guess you could also just route your home subnet ( not just your single
home IP ) to Null0.
I have found that effective of blocking sites when I don't have the ability
to walk around and see what people are doing...

Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block it. We
may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...


Thanks

Larry
 

-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux
firewall to listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the only to
stop me from IM is to cut off Internet access to my desktop completely.  
Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?
 
 Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me because
unless you cut off Internet
access on my desktop completely.

Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: 
From work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work
desktop, I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the SSH
encryption 
from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop. I can fire up any X
application to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, Yahoo) that supports on Linux
platform. 
I can
pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work because

the SSH tunnel is encrypted. I can go online shopping, chat with my friends
without having to worry about having my conversation being recorded. There
is no way for you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet access on
my desktop 
completely. 

Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I think.
As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find that public
proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a hell of a time with
ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so it does not work UNLESS
they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I cant block port 80 as you know
so how do I kill this monster? Has any one had luck with this and has anyone
found a way to stop the public proxy usage? I really feel as if I am
fighting a losing battle, cuss for every block I am countered with a way
around it. 

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking this
crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is proven and
works, with exception to ICQ. 


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III, CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+ Technical
Mercenary Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes Do You
Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52390t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1

Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block it.
 We may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...

Well said, Larry.
I didn't want to respond for fear of sounding magnanimous but, indeed with
today's application-level proxies and stateful packet inspection firewalls,
the advantage falls unquestionably to Big Brother - -  er uh I mean
administrators ;)

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Try my approach..

Tell people no and put it in your security policy. They violate the policy
they get fired..

Oh wait a minute, I think that goes along with cut-off desktop internet
access I guess.

Its is a VERY effective deterrent though don't you think 

Or I guess you could also just route your home subnet ( not just your single
home IP ) to Null0.
I have found that effective of blocking sites when I don't have the ability
to walk around and see what people are doing...

Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block it. We
may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...


Thanks

Larry
 

-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux
firewall to listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the only to
stop me from IM is to cut off Internet access to my desktop completely.  
Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?
 
 Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me because
unless you cut off Internet
access on my desktop completely.

Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: 
From work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work
desktop, I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the SSH
encryption 
from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop. I can fire up any X
application to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, Yahoo) that supports on Linux
platform. 
I can
pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work because

the SSH tunnel is encrypted. I can go online shopping, chat with my friends
without having to worry about having my conversation being recorded. There
is no way for you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet access on
my desktop 
completely. 

Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I think.
As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find that public
proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a hell of a time with
ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so it does not work UNLESS
they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I cant block port 80 as you know
so how do I kill this monster? Has any one had luck with this and has anyone
found a way to stop the public proxy usage? I really feel as if I am
fighting a losing battle, cuss for every block I am countered with a way
around it. 

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking this
crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is proven and
works, with exception to ICQ. 


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III, CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+ Technical
Mercenary Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes Do You
Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52394t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread Shawn Heisey

I may be off my rocker, but I think it's possible that you could set up
an IDS system that blocks access to any IP on the outside that sends
packets to your network that look like ICQ.  At the very least it could
record the addresses for future inclusion into ACLs.

This won't block the people who set up SSH tunnelling as described in
other messages, but you can make it a violation of security policy to
use that kind of back door.

Thanks,
Shawn

Mears, Rob wrote:
 
 Hi Cisco gods,
 
 I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
 think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
 that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
 hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
 it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
 cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster?   Has any
 one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
 proxy usage?   I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
 for every block I am countered with a way around it.
 
 My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
 this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
 proven and works, with exception to ICQ.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52395t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1

Maybe not unquestionably but I'm speaking in terms of enforcing a usage
policy. I've never had major issue with internal network usage
policy/enforcement, and the limited infractions were caught and resolved
quickly.

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block it.
 We may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...

Well said, Larry.
I didn't want to respond for fear of sounding magnanimous but, indeed with
today's application-level proxies and stateful packet inspection firewalls,
the advantage falls unquestionably to Big Brother - -  er uh I mean
administrators ;)

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Try my approach..

Tell people no and put it in your security policy. They violate the policy
they get fired..

Oh wait a minute, I think that goes along with cut-off desktop internet
access I guess.

Its is a VERY effective deterrent though don't you think 

Or I guess you could also just route your home subnet ( not just your single
home IP ) to Null0.
I have found that effective of blocking sites when I don't have the ability
to walk around and see what people are doing...

Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block it. We
may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...


Thanks

Larry
 

-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux
firewall to listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the only to
stop me from IM is to cut off Internet access to my desktop completely.  
Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?
 
 Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me because
unless you cut off Internet
access on my desktop completely.

Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: 
From work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work
desktop, I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the SSH
encryption 
from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop. I can fire up any X
application to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, Yahoo) that supports on Linux
platform. 
I can
pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work because

the SSH tunnel is encrypted. I can go online shopping, chat with my friends
without having to worry about having my conversation being recorded. There
is no way for you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet access on
my desktop 
completely. 

Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I think.
As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find that public
proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a hell of a time with
ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so it does not work UNLESS
they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I cant block port 80 as you know
so how do I kill this monster? Has any one had luck with this and has anyone
found a way to stop the public proxy usage? I really feel as if I am
fighting a losing battle, cuss for every block I am countered with a way
around it. 

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking this
crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is proven and
works, with exception to ICQ. 


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III, CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+ Technical
Mercenary Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes Do You
Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52397t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread Elijah Savage III

ICQ now has a web based version also, just go the web put in your ID and
your on. Now being devils advocate I am aware of the trojans and viruses
that get spread on ICQ, but if it is not interferring with work progress
then why such the hassle. It seems as if your burning more cycles trying
to block it when it almost seems to me that this is a loosing battle.
The only recourse I think you have is to go to HR with your security
plan have them put this in your computer ussage policy for work and then
brief everyone of the employees why this is a no no. I have sniffed the
web version with sniffer pro and it looks to me it strictly uses port
80.

But just by blocking it and I do not know if you are notifying anyone or
if this is in your security poilicy it just seems like you're a loose
renegade on the network to implement your own security policy which will
tick people off. I think if you take my approach above and people
understand why your are doing it then it is less likely to turn
whirlwinds into a hurricane of upset users especially if it was allowed
in the past.

NO BASHING please :) you may have took these steps already then if so
the only thing to do is report them to HR especially if it is causing
problems for you on the network and putting business assets at risk.

-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


I may be off my rocker, but I think it's possible that you could set up
an IDS system that blocks access to any IP on the outside that sends
packets to your network that look like ICQ.  At the very least it could
record the addresses for future inclusion into ACLs.

This won't block the people who set up SSH tunnelling as described in
other messages, but you can make it a violation of security policy to
use that kind of back door.

Thanks,
Shawn

Mears, Rob wrote:
 
 Hi Cisco gods,
 
 I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I 
 think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find 
 that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a 
 hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked 
 so it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck,
I
 cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster?   Has
any
 one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
 proxy usage?   I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
 for every block I am countered with a way around it.
 
 My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking

 this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is 
 proven and works, with exception to ICQ.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52398t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-30 Thread Chuck's Long Road

In a complex organization ( complex not meaning size or number of
departments, but in the way people need to work ) one might consider third
party applications such as Web Sense.

A couple of comments below:

--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch




Roberts, Larry  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Try my approach..

 Tell people no and put it in your security policy. They violate the policy
 they get fired..

CL: that assumes that 1) the policy will be acceptable to management  2) the
policy will be enforced by management  and 3) you have the luxury of being
able to fire people for whatever reason you deem fit, trivial or otherwise.
Even in today's bad economy, companies may not have this luxury.


 Oh wait a minute, I think that goes along with cut-off desktop internet
 access I guess.

CL: like it or not, internet access at the desktop has become one of those
intangible fringe benefits, right up there with using the photocopier for
personal business, using the telephone for personal business, using the fax
machine for personal business. When was the last time someone got fired for
making persoanl phone calls at work? Or photocopying their tax returns at
work?


 Its is a VERY effective deterrent though don't you think 

CL: sure - IF management enforces it, or even agrees to it


 Or I guess you could also just route your home subnet ( not just your
single
 home IP ) to Null0.
 I have found that effective of blocking sites when I don't have the
ability
 to walk around and see what people are doing...

 Trust me, for every way you can find out, I can find a way to block it. We
 may play cat and mouse for a while, but I never tire of it...


CL: works really well until the person you block is some Senior vice
President, or one of the top sales people ( read - revenue producers ) in
the company, and makes the claim that the service is absolutely necessary
for success on the job. That's why this stuff has to work at a policy level,
and cannot nor should be considered a matter for firewall administrators to
deal with.

CL You gots to know your organization.




 Thanks

 Larry


 -Original Message-
 From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:18 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]


 If port 80 is open for outbound, I can change the ssh port on my linux
 firewall to listen on port 80 as well As I've said before, the only to
 stop me from IM is to cut off Internet access to my desktop completely.
 Isn't Unix a wonderful thing?

  Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:There is no way for you to stop me because
 unless you cut off Internet
 access on my desktop completely.

 Or until SSH port 22 is closed on the firewall

 Bill Creighton CCNP
 Senior System Engineer
 Motorola
 iDEN CNRC Packet Data


 -Original Message-
 From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:50 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

 Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking:
 From work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall. On my work
 desktop, I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the SSH
 encryption
 from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop. I can fire up any X
 application to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, Yahoo) that supports on
Linux
 platform.
 I can
 pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work
because

 the SSH tunnel is encrypted. I can go online shopping, chat with my
friends
 without having to worry about having my conversation being recorded. There
 is no way for you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet access on
 my desktop
 completely.

 Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

 I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think.
 As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find that public
 proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a hell of a time
with
 ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so it does not work
UNLESS
 they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I cant block port 80 as you
know
 so how do I kill this monster? Has any one had luck with this and has
anyone
 found a way to stop the public proxy usage? I really feel as if I am
 fighting a losing battle, cuss for every block I am countered with a way
 around it.

 My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this
 crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is proven
and
 works, with exception to ICQ.


 HELP WANTED

 Thanks
 Rob Mears III, CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+ Technical
 Mercenary Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes Do
You
 Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5240

ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-29 Thread Mears, Rob

Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster?   Has any
one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
proxy usage?   I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
for every block I am countered with a way around it.  

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
proven and works, with exception to ICQ.  


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III,  CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+
Technical Mercenary




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52285t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-29 Thread David Armstrong

Rob,

Currently we use MS Proxy server to restrict Internet access so I,
unfortunately, do not have your answer. Your offer to post your ACL for
peer-to-peer blocking would be very appreciated though. Soon we will be
removing Proxy and allowing our new PIX to restrict Internet access. At that
time we'll need to set up ACL's as you are now.

If you wouldn't mind posting yours, I would be extremely appreciative. It
will help save me a lot of time in the very near future.

Thanks,

David Armstrong

Mears, Rob  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi Cisco gods,

 I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
 think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
 that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
 hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
 it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
 cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster?   Has any
 one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
 proxy usage?   I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
 for every block I am countered with a way around it.

 My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
 this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
 proven and works, with exception to ICQ.


 HELP WANTED

 Thanks
 Rob Mears III,  CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+
 Technical Mercenary




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52293t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-29 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1

Make sure that you carefully figure out the correct side of the connection.
ICQ server runs on port 4000, and the client chooses a random high-numbered
port. That means you will see UDP packets FROM (inbound/source) port 4000
going to the random port. In other words, don't go looking in a port
database trying to figure what that random, high-numbered port means. The
significant port is the source.

HTH

Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data


-Original Message-
From: Mears, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster?   Has any
one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
proxy usage?   I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
for every block I am countered with a way around it.  

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
proven and works, with exception to ICQ.  


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III,  CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+
Technical Mercenary




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52299t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285]

2002-08-29 Thread mike greenberg

Here is how I get around ICQ, AOL, MSN and Yahoo IM blocking: 
From work, I Secure Shell (SSH) back to my Linux Firewall.  On my work
desktop,
I am running X-server (X-Win32 or Xceed) and just tunnel the SSH encryption 
from my Linux firewall back to the corporate desktop.  I can fire up any X
application
to my heart desire (Netscape, AIM, Yahoo) that supports on Linux platform. 
I can
pretty much do whatever I want without being spied by anyone at work because 
the SSH tunnel is encrypted.  I can go online shopping, chat with my friends
without
having to worry about having my conversation being recorded.  There is no
way for
you to stop me because unless you cut off Internet access on my desktop 
completely.  

 Mears, Rob wrote:Hi Cisco gods,

I have successfully blocked all chat services at the PIX firewall, I
think. As I walk around and find people using MSN or Messenger I find
that public proxy they are using and kill it too. BUT, I am having a
hell of a time with ICQ. I do have all the ports UDP and TCP blocked so
it does not work UNLESS they use port 80. This is where I am stuck, I
cant block port 80 as you know so how do I kill this monster? Has any
one had luck with this and has anyone found a way to stop the public
proxy usage? I really feel as if I am fighting a losing battle, cuss
for every block I am countered with a way around it. 

My inside ACL in the pix is quite impressive and all just for blocking
this crap, if anyone would like it for theirs I will provide as it is
proven and works, with exception to ICQ. 


HELP WANTED

Thanks
Rob Mears III, CCNP, MCSE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, NNCPS, MCP+I, A+
Technical Mercenary
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52332t=52285
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]