Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Remember the message I sent last week about the Cisco CLI being 
inconsistent and somewhat illogical at times? I think that's the issue. 
With IP we do secondary addresses. With IPX we do subinterfaces. (Correct 
me if I'm wrong. I'm in a rush.) I'm still a huge Cisco fan, but their CLI 
needs work. At least we don't have to be C++ programmers to use it, though! 
&;-)

Priscilla

At 09:03 PM 2/21/01, Kenneth wrote:
>Oh yeah. Nobody said it's a layer 3 issue. It's obviously an IOS issue since
>it doesn't make sense why it can't be configured that way. NT servers can
>have one NIC with multiple IP addresses.
>
>Yonkerbonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You can add IPX addresses to it, so it doesn't seem to
> > be an issue of layer 3 addresses. I think it just a
> > matter of Cisco IOS supporting it.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --- Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > try adding an ip address to it.
> > >
> > > "Tim Lovelace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > > message
> > >
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > This seems to be incorrect. I tried this on a
> > > router I had spare and below
> > > > are hte results. It may be a newer feature, I am
> > > to lazy to look on CCO.
> > > >
> > > > Tim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Router2#sh ver
> > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> > > > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version
> > > 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> > > > (fc1)
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > Router2#config t
> > > > Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End
> > > with CNTL/Z.
> > > > Router2(config)#int e0/0
> > > > Router2(config-if)#int e0/0.1
> > > > Router2(config-subif)#
> > > > 00:01:29: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0,
> > > changed state to up
> > > > Router2(config-subif)#^Z
> > > > Router2#sh run
> > > >
> > > > ....
> > > >
> > > > interface Ethernet0/0
> > > >  ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.128
> > > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > !
> > > > interface Ethernet0/0.1
> > > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > !
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > > Brian
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:29 PM
> > > > To: Chris Wornell
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an
> > > Ethernet Port
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the only way you can create sub interfaces on
> > > ethernet is to use dot1q or
> > > > ISL encapsulation on a FastEthernet interface
> > > (VLANs)
> > > >
> > > > brian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Chris Wornell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've found out you can't create multiple
> > > interfaces on an ethernet port
> > > > > apparently.  I was wondering why this is
> > > exactly?  I know you can
> > > > accomplish
> > > > > the same on serial lines using pvc's but it
> > > seems odd you can't do it on
> > > > > ethernet.  I know there are ethernet only
> > > networks and the ip secondary
> > > > > command doesn't seem right compared to creating
> > > a new interface.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris Wornell
> > > > > Technical Support
> > > > > MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> > > > > 888-654-4971
> > > > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> > > > >
> > > > > _
> > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >   I'm buying used CISCO gear!!
> > > >   email me fo

RE: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-22 Thread Brian

On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tim Lovelace wrote:

> This seems to be incorrect. I tried this on a router I had spare and below
> are hte results. It may be a newer feature, I am to lazy to look on CCO.
>
> Tim

Ok, now try to add an IP address :))


>
>
> Router2#sh ver
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> (fc1)
>
> 
>
> Router2#config t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
> Router2(config)#int e0/0
> Router2(config-if)#int e0/0.1
> Router2(config-subif)#
> 00:01:29: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up
> Router2(config-subif)#^Z
> Router2#sh run
>
> 
>
> interface Ethernet0/0
>  ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.128
>  no ip directed-broadcast
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0.1
>  no ip directed-broadcast
> !
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brian
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:29 PM
> To: Chris Wornell
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port
>
>
>
> the only way you can create sub interfaces on ethernet is to use dot1q or
> ISL encapsulation on a FastEthernet interface (VLANs)
>
> brian
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Chris Wornell wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
> > apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can
> accomplish
> > the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it on
> > ethernet.  I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
> > command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.
> >
> > Chris Wornell
> > Technical Support
> > MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> > 888-654-4971
> > CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ---
>   I'm buying used CISCO gear!!
>   email me for a quote
>
> Brian Feeny   e:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security   p:318.222.2638x109
> CCDP  f:318.221.6612
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>

---
I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!!
email me for a quote

Netjam, LLC   http://www.netjam.net
Brian Feeny   Scarlett Parria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
318-222-2638 x 109318-222-2638 x 101
Fax 318-221-6612

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-21 Thread Kenneth

try adding an ip address to it.

"Tim Lovelace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This seems to be incorrect. I tried this on a router I had spare and below
> are hte results. It may be a newer feature, I am to lazy to look on CCO.
>
> Tim
>
>
> Router2#sh ver
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> (fc1)
>
> 
>
> Router2#config t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
> Router2(config)#int e0/0
> Router2(config-if)#int e0/0.1
> Router2(config-subif)#
> 00:01:29: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up
> Router2(config-subif)#^Z
> Router2#sh run
>
> 
>
> interface Ethernet0/0
>  ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.128
>  no ip directed-broadcast
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0.1
>  no ip directed-broadcast
> !
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brian
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:29 PM
> To: Chris Wornell
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port
>
>
>
> the only way you can create sub interfaces on ethernet is to use dot1q or
> ISL encapsulation on a FastEthernet interface (VLANs)
>
> brian
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Chris Wornell wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
> > apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can
> accomplish
> > the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it on
> > ethernet.  I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
> > command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.
> >
> > Chris Wornell
> > Technical Support
> > MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> > 888-654-4971
> > CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ---
>   I'm buying used CISCO gear!!
>   email me for a quote
>
> Brian Feeny e:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
> CCDP f:318.221.6612
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-21 Thread Yonkerbonk

You can add IPX addresses to it, so it doesn't seem to
be an issue of layer 3 addresses. I think it just a
matter of Cisco IOS supporting it.

Michael

--- Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> try adding an ip address to it.
> 
> "Tim Lovelace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message
>
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > This seems to be incorrect. I tried this on a
> router I had spare and below
> > are hte results. It may be a newer feature, I am
> to lazy to look on CCO.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > Router2#sh ver
> > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version
> 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> > (fc1)
> >
> > 
> >
> > Router2#config t
> > Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End
> with CNTL/Z.
> > Router2(config)#int e0/0
> > Router2(config-if)#int e0/0.1
> > Router2(config-subif)#
> > 00:01:29: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0,
> changed state to up
> > Router2(config-subif)#^Z
> > Router2#sh run
> >
> > 
> >
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> >  ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.128
> >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0.1
> >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > !
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Brian
> > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:29 PM
> > To: Chris Wornell
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an
> Ethernet Port
> >
> >
> >
> > the only way you can create sub interfaces on
> ethernet is to use dot1q or
> > ISL encapsulation on a FastEthernet interface
> (VLANs)
> >
> > brian
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Chris Wornell wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've found out you can't create multiple
> interfaces on an ethernet port
> > > apparently.  I was wondering why this is
> exactly?  I know you can
> > accomplish
> > > the same on serial lines using pvc's but it
> seems odd you can't do it on
> > > ethernet.  I know there are ethernet only
> networks and the ip secondary
> > > command doesn't seem right compared to creating
> a new interface.
> > >
> > > Chris Wornell
> > > Technical Support
> > > MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> > > 888-654-4971
> > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> > >
> > > _
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---
> >   I'm buying used CISCO gear!!
> >   email me for a quote
> >
> > Brian Feeny e:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
> > CCDP f:318.221.6612
> > Network Administrator
> > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-21 Thread Kenneth

Oh yeah. Nobody said it's a layer 3 issue. It's obviously an IOS issue since
it doesn't make sense why it can't be configured that way. NT servers can
have one NIC with multiple IP addresses.

Yonkerbonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You can add IPX addresses to it, so it doesn't seem to
> be an issue of layer 3 addresses. I think it just a
> matter of Cisco IOS supporting it.
>
> Michael
>
> --- Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > try adding an ip address to it.
> >
> > "Tim Lovelace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > message
> >
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > This seems to be incorrect. I tried this on a
> > router I had spare and below
> > > are hte results. It may be a newer feature, I am
> > to lazy to look on CCO.
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> > > Router2#sh ver
> > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> > > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version
> > 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> > > (fc1)
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > Router2#config t
> > > Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End
> > with CNTL/Z.
> > > Router2(config)#int e0/0
> > > Router2(config-if)#int e0/0.1
> > > Router2(config-subif)#
> > > 00:01:29: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0,
> > changed state to up
> > > Router2(config-subif)#^Z
> > > Router2#sh run
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > interface Ethernet0/0
> > >  ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.128
> > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0/0.1
> > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > !
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Brian
> > > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:29 PM
> > > To: Chris Wornell
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an
> > Ethernet Port
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > the only way you can create sub interfaces on
> > ethernet is to use dot1q or
> > > ISL encapsulation on a FastEthernet interface
> > (VLANs)
> > >
> > > brian
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Chris Wornell wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I've found out you can't create multiple
> > interfaces on an ethernet port
> > > > apparently.  I was wondering why this is
> > exactly?  I know you can
> > > accomplish
> > > > the same on serial lines using pvc's but it
> > seems odd you can't do it on
> > > > ethernet.  I know there are ethernet only
> > networks and the ip secondary
> > > > command doesn't seem right compared to creating
> > a new interface.
> > > >
> > > > Chris Wornell
> > > > Technical Support
> > > > MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> > > > 888-654-4971
> > > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> > > >
> > > > _
> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> > to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > >   I'm buying used CISCO gear!!
> > >   email me for a quote
> > >
> > > Brian Feeny e:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
> > > CCDP f:318.221.6612
> > > Network Administrator
> > > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
> > >
> > > _
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices!
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-20 Thread Brian


Personally I think this is not true, I think someone is spreading
something with no real data to back it up.

Their are physical issues on why some 10bT interfaces on cisco routers can
not handle VLAN's.  So I doubt secondary addressing will go away just like
that.  VLANs and secondary addressing each have their place.

Brian


On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Nabil Fares wrote:

> You're not dreaming!  Someone replied to my post last week, he/she advised
> that Cisco will at point stop supporting secondary interfaces.
>
> Nabil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bob Vance
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:21 PM
> To: CISCO_GroupStudy List (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port
>
>
> I would swear that I read that "secondary" was eventually going away
> and the sub-interfaces would replace it.
>
> Am I dreaming?
>
> -
> Tks        | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BV     | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sr. Technical Consultant,  SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co.
> Vox 770-623-3430   11455 Lakefield Dr.
> Fax 770-623-3429   Duluth, GA 30097-1511
> =
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port
>
>
> At 04:47 PM 2/19/01, Chris Wornell wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
> >apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can
> accomplish
> >the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it
> on
> >ethernet.
>
> Why do you want to create multiple interfaces on your Ethernet port?
> Ethernet was designed as a connectionless, packet-switched shared
> network.
> Serial links, on the other hand, are more often used for
> connection-oriented virtual circuits. Subinterfaces let you associate a
> single physical link with multiple virtual circuits.
>
> >   I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
> >command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.
>
> Sure there are Ethernet-only networks. Each physical Ethernet port on a
> router is usually associated with an IP subnet. If you happen to have
> two
> IP subnets on the LAN to which a physical port is attached, you could
> use a
> secondary IP address as a workaround to this problem. Traffic between
> subnets would still go through the router usually.
>
> If you're using your Ethernet port as a "trunk port," and you use ISL or
> 802.1q VLAN encapsulation, then you can configure subinterfaces. In this
> case, subinterfaces let you associate a single physical link with
> multiple
> VLANs. Inter-Switch Link (ISL) and IEEE 802.1q maintain VLAN
> identification
> information as traffic travels between connected switches.
>
> Maybe you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to accomplish
> and we can provide more tailored information, but I hope this info was
> somewhat useful.
>
> Priscilla
>
>
>
> >Chris Wornell
> >Technical Support
> >MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> >888-654-4971
> >CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> >
> >_
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---
  I'm buying used CISCO gear!!
  email me for a quote

Brian Feeny e:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
CCDPf:318.221.6612
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-20 Thread Fred Danson

>You live on First Street. One afternoon, instead of cursing at your
>routers, you take out your frustration by yelling out your window, >"Hey 
>neighbors, I think you're all ugly." Now let's say that some of >your 
>neighbors decide to rename their side of the street from First >Street to 
>Main Street. When you yell out the window, won't they  >still hear you? 
>Renaming their street would be like giving them IP >addresses in a 
>different subnet.
>
>Now, who can follow up with a VLAN example??! &;-)
>
>Priscilla


Here's a good one for multiple VLANs...

Your neighbors get fed up with your insults and in turn, decide to brick up 
your window. :o

Fred


>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Tony Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:55:36 -0800
>
>Adding a secondary IP address won't affect the number of broadcast domains.
>Secondary IP addressing is a network-layer configuration. Broadcasts are a
>physical and data-link layer issue. All stations in a LAN hear each others
>broadcasts because they either share a cable, are connected via hubs which
>forward all bits, or are connected via switches which forward all 
>broadcasts.
>
>Here's an analogy:
>
>You live on First Street. One afternoon, instead of cursing at your
>routers, you take out your frustration by yelling out your window, "Hey
>neighbors, I think you're all ugly." Now let's say that some of your
>neighbors decide to rename their side of the street from First Street to
>Main Street. When you yell out the window, won't they still hear you?
>Renaming their street would be like giving them IP addresses in a different
>subnet.
>
>Now, who can follow up with a VLAN example??! &;-)
>
>Priscilla
>
>At 10:48 AM 2/20/01, Tony Chen wrote:
> >Follow up question to the secondary IP address on the ethernet interface:
> >
> >When you add secondary IP address to an ethernet interface, does that
> >create multiple broadcast domains, or still one broadcast domain?
> >
> >Tony
> >
> > >>> Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/19/01 09:33PM >>>
> >At 04:47 PM 2/19/01, Chris Wornell wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
> > >apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can 
>accomplish
> > >the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it 
>on
> > >ethernet.
> >
> >Why do you want to create multiple interfaces on your Ethernet port?
> >Ethernet was designed as a connectionless, packet-switched shared 
>network.
> >Serial links, on the other hand, are more often used for
> >connection-oriented virtual circuits. Subinterfaces let you associate a
> >single physical link with multiple virtual circuits.
> >
> > >   I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
> > >command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.
> >
> >Sure there are Ethernet-only networks. Each physical Ethernet port on a
> >router is usually associated with an IP subnet. If you happen to have two
> >IP subnets on the LAN to which a physical port is attached, you could use 
>a
> >secondary IP address as a workaround to this problem. Traffic between
> >subnets would still go through the router usually.
> >
> >If you're using your Ethernet port as a "trunk port," and you use ISL or
> >802.1q VLAN encapsulation, then you can configure subinterfaces. In this
> >case, subinterfaces let you associate a single physical link with 
>multiple
> >VLANs. Inter-Switch Link (ISL) and IEEE 802.1q maintain VLAN 
>identification
> >information as traffic travels between connected switches.
> >
> >Maybe you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to accomplish
> >and we can provide more tailored information, but I hope this info was
> >somewhat useful.
> >
> >Priscilla
> >
> >
> >
> > >Chris Wornell
> > >Technical Support
> > >MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> > >888-654-4971
> > >CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> > >
> > >_
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondiscl

RE: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-20 Thread Nabil Fares

You're not dreaming!  Someone replied to my post last week, he/she advised
that Cisco will at point stop supporting secondary interfaces.

Nabil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bob Vance
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:21 PM
To: CISCO_GroupStudy List (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port


I would swear that I read that "secondary" was eventually going away
and the sub-interfaces would replace it.

Am I dreaming?

-
Tks        | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BV     | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sr. Technical Consultant,  SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co.
Vox 770-623-3430   11455 Lakefield Dr.
Fax 770-623-3429   Duluth, GA 30097-1511
=





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port


At 04:47 PM 2/19/01, Chris Wornell wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
>apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can
accomplish
>the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it
on
>ethernet.

Why do you want to create multiple interfaces on your Ethernet port?
Ethernet was designed as a connectionless, packet-switched shared
network.
Serial links, on the other hand, are more often used for
connection-oriented virtual circuits. Subinterfaces let you associate a
single physical link with multiple virtual circuits.

>   I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
>command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.

Sure there are Ethernet-only networks. Each physical Ethernet port on a
router is usually associated with an IP subnet. If you happen to have
two
IP subnets on the LAN to which a physical port is attached, you could
use a
secondary IP address as a workaround to this problem. Traffic between
subnets would still go through the router usually.

If you're using your Ethernet port as a "trunk port," and you use ISL or
802.1q VLAN encapsulation, then you can configure subinterfaces. In this
case, subinterfaces let you associate a single physical link with
multiple
VLANs. Inter-Switch Link (ISL) and IEEE 802.1q maintain VLAN
identification
information as traffic travels between connected switches.

Maybe you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to accomplish
and we can provide more tailored information, but I hope this info was
somewhat useful.

Priscilla



>Chris Wornell
>Technical Support
>MM Internet http://mminternet.com
>888-654-4971
>CCNA, CCDA, CSE
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-20 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Adding a secondary IP address won't affect the number of broadcast domains. 
Secondary IP addressing is a network-layer configuration. Broadcasts are a 
physical and data-link layer issue. All stations in a LAN hear each others 
broadcasts because they either share a cable, are connected via hubs which 
forward all bits, or are connected via switches which forward all broadcasts.

Here's an analogy:

You live on First Street. One afternoon, instead of cursing at your 
routers, you take out your frustration by yelling out your window, "Hey 
neighbors, I think you're all ugly." Now let's say that some of your 
neighbors decide to rename their side of the street from First Street to 
Main Street. When you yell out the window, won't they still hear you? 
Renaming their street would be like giving them IP addresses in a different 
subnet.

Now, who can follow up with a VLAN example??! &;-)

Priscilla

At 10:48 AM 2/20/01, Tony Chen wrote:
>Follow up question to the secondary IP address on the ethernet interface:
>
>When you add secondary IP address to an ethernet interface, does that 
>create multiple broadcast domains, or still one broadcast domain?
>
>Tony
>
> >>> Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/19/01 09:33PM >>>
>At 04:47 PM 2/19/01, Chris Wornell wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
> >apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can accomplish
> >the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it on
> >ethernet.
>
>Why do you want to create multiple interfaces on your Ethernet port?
>Ethernet was designed as a connectionless, packet-switched shared network.
>Serial links, on the other hand, are more often used for
>connection-oriented virtual circuits. Subinterfaces let you associate a
>single physical link with multiple virtual circuits.
>
> >   I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
> >command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.
>
>Sure there are Ethernet-only networks. Each physical Ethernet port on a
>router is usually associated with an IP subnet. If you happen to have two
>IP subnets on the LAN to which a physical port is attached, you could use a
>secondary IP address as a workaround to this problem. Traffic between
>subnets would still go through the router usually.
>
>If you're using your Ethernet port as a "trunk port," and you use ISL or
>802.1q VLAN encapsulation, then you can configure subinterfaces. In this
>case, subinterfaces let you associate a single physical link with multiple
>VLANs. Inter-Switch Link (ISL) and IEEE 802.1q maintain VLAN identification
>information as traffic travels between connected switches.
>
>Maybe you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to accomplish
>and we can provide more tailored information, but I hope this info was
>somewhat useful.
>
>Priscilla
>
>
>
> >Chris Wornell
> >Technical Support
> >MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> >888-654-4971
> >CCNA, CCDA, CSE
> >
> >_
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>http://www.priscilla.com
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>***
>This message is a private communication.  If you are not the intended
>recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it
>to others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying
>to this message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.
>
>
>-
>Visit http://www.ballfoundation.org for our latest news.




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-20 Thread Bob Vance

I would swear that I read that "secondary" was eventually going away
and the sub-interfaces would replace it.

Am I dreaming?

-
Tks        | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BV     | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sr. Technical Consultant,  SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co.
Vox 770-623-3430   11455 Lakefield Dr.
Fax 770-623-3429   Duluth, GA 30097-1511
=





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port


At 04:47 PM 2/19/01, Chris Wornell wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
>apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can
accomplish
>the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it
on
>ethernet.

Why do you want to create multiple interfaces on your Ethernet port?
Ethernet was designed as a connectionless, packet-switched shared
network.
Serial links, on the other hand, are more often used for
connection-oriented virtual circuits. Subinterfaces let you associate a
single physical link with multiple virtual circuits.

>   I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
>command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.

Sure there are Ethernet-only networks. Each physical Ethernet port on a
router is usually associated with an IP subnet. If you happen to have
two
IP subnets on the LAN to which a physical port is attached, you could
use a
secondary IP address as a workaround to this problem. Traffic between
subnets would still go through the router usually.

If you're using your Ethernet port as a "trunk port," and you use ISL or
802.1q VLAN encapsulation, then you can configure subinterfaces. In this
case, subinterfaces let you associate a single physical link with
multiple
VLANs. Inter-Switch Link (ISL) and IEEE 802.1q maintain VLAN
identification
information as traffic travels between connected switches.

Maybe you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to accomplish
and we can provide more tailored information, but I hope this info was
somewhat useful.

Priscilla



>Chris Wornell
>Technical Support
>MM Internet http://mminternet.com
>888-654-4971
>CCNA, CCDA, CSE
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-20 Thread Tony Chen

Follow up question to the secondary IP address on the ethernet interface:

When you add secondary IP address to an ethernet interface, does that create multiple 
broadcast domains, or still one broadcast domain?

Tony

>>> Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/19/01 09:33PM >>>
At 04:47 PM 2/19/01, Chris Wornell wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
>apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can accomplish
>the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it on
>ethernet.

Why do you want to create multiple interfaces on your Ethernet port? 
Ethernet was designed as a connectionless, packet-switched shared network. 
Serial links, on the other hand, are more often used for 
connection-oriented virtual circuits. Subinterfaces let you associate a 
single physical link with multiple virtual circuits.

>   I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
>command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.

Sure there are Ethernet-only networks. Each physical Ethernet port on a 
router is usually associated with an IP subnet. If you happen to have two 
IP subnets on the LAN to which a physical port is attached, you could use a 
secondary IP address as a workaround to this problem. Traffic between 
subnets would still go through the router usually.

If you're using your Ethernet port as a "trunk port," and you use ISL or 
802.1q VLAN encapsulation, then you can configure subinterfaces. In this 
case, subinterfaces let you associate a single physical link with multiple 
VLANs. Inter-Switch Link (ISL) and IEEE 802.1q maintain VLAN identification 
information as traffic travels between connected switches.

Maybe you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to accomplish 
and we can provide more tailored information, but I hope this info was 
somewhat useful.

Priscilla



>Chris Wornell
>Technical Support
>MM Internet http://mminternet.com 
>888-654-4971
>CCNA, CCDA, CSE
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html 
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html 
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


***
This message is a private communication.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it
to others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying
to this message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.


-
Visit http://www.ballfoundation.org for our latest news.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-19 Thread Brian


the only way you can create sub interfaces on ethernet is to use dot1q or
ISL encapsulation on a FastEthernet interface (VLANs)

brian


On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Chris Wornell wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
> apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can accomplish
> the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it on
> ethernet.  I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
> command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.
>
> Chris Wornell
> Technical Support
> MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> 888-654-4971
> CCNA, CCDA, CSE
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---
  I'm buying used CISCO gear!!
  email me for a quote

Brian Feeny e:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
CCDPf:318.221.6612
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-19 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

At 04:47 PM 2/19/01, Chris Wornell wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
>apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can accomplish
>the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it on
>ethernet.

Why do you want to create multiple interfaces on your Ethernet port? 
Ethernet was designed as a connectionless, packet-switched shared network. 
Serial links, on the other hand, are more often used for 
connection-oriented virtual circuits. Subinterfaces let you associate a 
single physical link with multiple virtual circuits.

>   I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
>command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.

Sure there are Ethernet-only networks. Each physical Ethernet port on a 
router is usually associated with an IP subnet. If you happen to have two 
IP subnets on the LAN to which a physical port is attached, you could use a 
secondary IP address as a workaround to this problem. Traffic between 
subnets would still go through the router usually.

If you're using your Ethernet port as a "trunk port," and you use ISL or 
802.1q VLAN encapsulation, then you can configure subinterfaces. In this 
case, subinterfaces let you associate a single physical link with multiple 
VLANs. Inter-Switch Link (ISL) and IEEE 802.1q maintain VLAN identification 
information as traffic travels between connected switches.

Maybe you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to accomplish 
and we can provide more tailored information, but I hope this info was 
somewhat useful.

Priscilla



>Chris Wornell
>Technical Support
>MM Internet http://mminternet.com
>888-654-4971
>CCNA, CCDA, CSE
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port

2001-02-19 Thread Kenneth

The only way you can create subinterfaces on fastethernet ports is when you
use encapsulation such as dot1q or isl. Otherwise, the router will tell you
that you can't.

"Chris Wornell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
00a701c09ad6$aee4e850$20c956d8@jabooty">news:00a701c09ad6$aee4e850$20c956d8@jabooty...
> Hello,
>
> I've found out you can't create multiple interfaces on an ethernet port
> apparently.  I was wondering why this is exactly?  I know you can
accomplish
> the same on serial lines using pvc's but it seems odd you can't do it on
> ethernet.  I know there are ethernet only networks and the ip secondary
> command doesn't seem right compared to creating a new interface.
>
> Chris Wornell
> Technical Support
> MM Internet http://mminternet.com
> 888-654-4971
> CCNA, CCDA, CSE
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]