Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for 9.0

2002-08-02 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Firstly, the only editor I could find when booted to the rescue CD is VIM. I
> think that's a big mistake. Most people (especially newbies) don't understand
> VIM, and nor do they want to. For these people I think Jed would be the best
> choice, since it is like MS-DOS Edit and isn't too far removed from GUI editors
> like Nedit and Gedit.

Well it sounds mostly historical to me, and jed is also larger
than vi. I would not see a rescue with jed but without vi, all
people used to unix would not like that. And the rescue is not
supposed to be run by newbies, especially since I've added a
graphical user interface for most common operations.

> Secondly, can the rescue disc please include cfdisk instead (or in addition to)
> fdisk? Cfdisk is far easier to understand and use. I haven't used the rescue
> disc in a while, so sorry if cfdisk is already there.

I've never tried cfdisk but I think fdisk is widely known to
people who often have to manipulate partitions.
 
> Thirdly, would it be possible to make the rescue disc and installation kernels
> to automatically detect software RAID from superblocks? That would make
> installation and configuration MUCH easier.

The installation does it now (this is one of the improvements of
the installer in 9.0). For the rescue, maybe in the future... it
needs that someone with enough motivation hacks in installer
changes in the rescue :-).

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for 9.0

2002-08-02 Thread mandrake

On Fri, 02 Aug, at 16:40:22 +1000, Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Secondly, can the rescue disc please include cfdisk instead (or in addition to)
> fdisk? Cfdisk is far easier to understand and use. I haven't used the rescue
> disc in a while, so sorry if cfdisk is already there.

I have to agree here.  I just recently came across an instance last
week and once again this week where I needed to use cfdisk to re-arrange
filesystems on boxes at work with hardware RAID.  Using any other disk
util, it just doesn't see the /dev/cciss/c0d0p partition table correctly.

Granted, this was on RH 7.2 boxes (which don't come w/ cfdisk) so I had
to scp over the cfdisk binary off of my Mandrake 8.2 laptop install.

For example, here's looking at the disk using fdisk:

---
# fdisk -l /dev/cciss/c0d0

Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 1 heads, 13760 sectors, 1 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 13760 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/cciss/c0d0p1   * 1 1 53024   83  Linux
Partition 1 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(0, 1, 1) logical=(0, 0, 33)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(12, 254, 32) logical=(0, 0, 106080)
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary:
 phys=(12, 254, 32) should be (12, 0, 13760)
/dev/cciss/c0d0p2 1 1  30718320   83  Linux
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(13, 0, 1) logical=(0, 0, 106081)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) logical=(0, 0, 61542720)
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary:
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) should be (1023, 0, 13760)
/dev/cciss/c0d0p3 1 1   2048160   82  Linux swap
Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) logical=(0, 0, 61542721)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) logical=(0, 0, 65639040)
Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary:
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) should be (1023, 0, 13760)
/dev/cciss/c0d0p4 1 1  56067360f  Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
Partition 4 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) logical=(0, 0, 65639041)
Partition 4 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) logical=(0, 0, 13760)
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary:
 phys=(1023, 254, 32) should be (1023, 0, 13760)
/dev/cciss/c0d0p5 1 1   1534064   83  Linux
/dev/cciss/c0d0p6 1 1   1024064   83  Linux
/dev/cciss/c0d0p7 1 1718064   83  Linux
/dev/cciss/c0d0p8 1 1509984   83  Linux
/dev/cciss/c0d0p9 1 1509984   83  Linux
/dev/cciss/c0d0p101 1  42003584   83  Linux
/dev/cciss/c0d0p111 1   9767504   83  Linux
---

And the same disk using cfdisk:

---
 Disk Drive: /dev/cciss/c0d0
Size: 91020165120 bytes
 Heads: 255   Sectors per Track: 32   Cylinders: 21786

NameFlags  Part Type  FS Type  [Label]Size (MB)
 --
c0d0p1  BootPrimary   Linux ext3   [/boot]54.32
c0d0p2  Primary   Linux ext3   [/cvsroot]  31455.56
c0d0p3  Primary   Linux swap2097.32
c0d0p5  Logical   Linux ext3   [/usr]   1570.90
c0d0p6  Logical   Linux ext3   [/var]   1048.66
c0d0p7  Logical   Linux ext3   [/]   735.32
c0d0p8  Logical   Linux ext3   [/tmp]522.24
c0d0p9  Logical   Linux ext3   [/home]   522.24
c0d0p10 Logical   Linux ext3   43011.69
c0d0p11 Logical   Linux ext3   10001.95
---

But to make a long story short, if it weren't for cfdisk, we'd be in
pretty bad shape.  This was actually the first time I'd used cfdisk, but
I've already copied it over to all of our other boxes.  I'd highly
suggest Mandrake include this small 51k util as it has already proven
(to me at least) a life saver.

Cheers,

-Charlie
-- 
GPG Key fingerprint = 4F36 EC4F 2F2C 5F59 9690  09E5 4C0F 9DB0 8623 53CE
Before you ask more questions, think about whether you really want to
know the answers.
-- Gene Wolfe, "The Claw of the Conciliator"




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for 9.0

2002-08-02 Thread Pixel

Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> How is it done at install? From what I understand, it is DiskDrake that does the
> detection instead of the kernel (good work there). If that can be made to work
> with the rescue disc that would be cool. As a general rule, a user doesn't care
> how something works provided it works well.

i'll see what i can do. but don't expect it too soon.

the code is quite simple

foreach (@parts) {
my ($nb) = grep { !raid::is_active("md$_") } 0..7;
output("/etc/raidtab", "raiddev /dev/md$nb\n  device " . 
devices::make($_->{device}) . "\n");
run_program::run('raidstart', devices::make("md$nb"));
}

and should not be too hard to add to lsparts...

[...]

> Maybe you
> can have a 'novice'/'expert' option when using DiskDrake. As it stands, I think
> there are far too many options for a beginner (e.g. zillions of filesystem
> choices), and so they could benefit from something more streamlined (maybe this
> is already done in the 'novice' install option?

it is

[...]

> From what I have read, DiskDrake automatically places all of its partitions into
> one extended partition. This is generally good. But what if I want to make some
> FAT partitions for Windows, one of which I want to be primary (so I can boot)
> and the others logical (I have such a setup on my two computers)? Can DiskDrake
> do this easily?

yes, in expert you can choose Primary or Extended.




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for 9.0

2002-08-02 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

On 02 Aug 2002 12:09:16 +0200, Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Thirdly, would it be possible to make the rescue disc and installation
> > kernels to automatically detect software RAID from superblocks? That would
> > make installation and configuration MUCH easier.
> 
> hard to do. Hardware raid must be built-in the kernel for this, and we
> won't do this for space pbs.
> 
> another solution would be to have something alike what i now do at
> install...

How is it done at install? From what I understand, it is DiskDrake that does the
detection instead of the kernel (good work there). If that can be made to work
with the rescue disc that would be cool. As a general rule, a user doesn't care
how something works provided it works well.

> > Fourthly, can you please make Diskdrake to more clearly represent extended
> > and logical partitions in the GUI? At present, logical partitions look the
> > same as primary ones, and the extended partition isn't shown at all. This is
> > confusing. PartitionMagic does a good job here: it shows extended partitions
> > as a primary partition but places logical partitions as boxes _inside_ the
> > extended.
> 
> why should it show it differently? IMO showing this has no real value.

Maybe I'm just weird, but I like to have some control over my devices. At the
same time, I don't want to fiddle around with something esoteric like fdisk.
PartitionMagic fits my needs well, but I'm never comfortable with using non-free
software (one reason why I use Mandrake). DiskDrake comes very close to doing
what I want; the only thing missing is the ability to see extended partitions. I
like to know at a glance whether a partition is logical or primary. Maybe you
can have a 'novice'/'expert' option when using DiskDrake. As it stands, I think
there are far too many options for a beginner (e.g. zillions of filesystem
choices), and so they could benefit from something more streamlined (maybe this
is already done in the 'novice' install option? I don't know since I always
install as Expert). Not all 'novices' want to let DiskDrake automatically
allocate their drive space for them, so they need an interface that is usable
but not overly complex (e.g. provide <10 filesystem choices).

At the same time, the only thing (in my view) stopping DiskDrake from being
better than PartitionMagic is the ability to see and manipulate extended
partitions. Features like this should be confined to the 'expert' version.

>From what I have read, DiskDrake automatically places all of its partitions into
one extended partition. This is generally good. But what if I want to make some
FAT partitions for Windows, one of which I want to be primary (so I can boot)
and the others logical (I have such a setup on my two computers)? Can DiskDrake
do this easily?


-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan

"I don't think it's right and I think it causes people to make decisions which
are not even in their best interest. A, we're not evil. B, we're not an empire."
-- Steve Ballmer, objecting to Microsoft being called "The Evil Empire"




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for 9.0

2002-08-02 Thread Pixel

Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Thirdly, would it be possible to make the rescue disc and installation kernels
> to automatically detect software RAID from superblocks? That would make
> installation and configuration MUCH easier.

hard to do. Hardware raid must be built-in the kernel for this, and we
won't do this for space pbs.

another solution would be to have something alike what i now do at
install...

> Fourthly, can you please make Diskdrake to more clearly represent extended and
> logical partitions in the GUI? At present, logical partitions look the same as
> primary ones, and the extended partition isn't shown at all. This is confusing.
> PartitionMagic does a good job here: it shows extended partitions as a primary
> partition but places logical partitions as boxes _inside_ the extended.

why should it show it differently? IMO showing this has no real value.




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Alan

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 13:20, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > > > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get
> > > > installed by default.  It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go
> > > > back and find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a
> > > > piece of code to build.
> > >
> > > No, development gives a few base development packages such as autoconf,
> > > automake, gcc, binutils, plus additional development packages for each
> > > group you selected.
> >
> > I said "should".  There needs to be some sort of option that will
> > automatically install development packages as part of the install. 
> > Finding out that you missed one is a real pain when you are in the middle
> > of a compile.  (Or dealing with users who have a low frustration level.)
>
> Sorry for not understanding.
>
> "All" devel packages is a vague notion and we can't decently install
> "everything" that is more or less related to devel.

Actually it is not.  If a package is installed and the "devel" flag is set, 
then the devel package gets selected and installed as well.

> Additionally, I've never seen any problem with installing one devel
> package for one given library *after* the installation. It's not a "royal"
> pain since I can do "urpmf gtk--.h" and then "urpmi libgtkmm1.2-devel"
> and basta, when a file is missing the header.

It is when you have to go back and find the discs a week after the fact.  
(Especially when it has happened a number of times in a row.)

It is even more of a pain for those people who are familiar with Unix and/or 
programming, but not with RPM package management.

> > > > 2) Something to configure multiple monitors/cards in X. (Also a way
> > > > to go back and reconfigure a monitor when you buy a new one because
> > > > the old one let out the magic smoke.)
> > >
> > > Via Xinerama or not you may configure two monitors when you have two
> > > cards or you have one card with dual head. This was introduced in 8.0
> > > or 8.1, not sure.
> >
> > I am speaking of a graphical Xinerama config option at install. I can do
> > this by hand, but I have been dealing with users who have never mucked
> > with an XF86Config-4 file in their life.
>
> I'm not a specialist for this, but I think during install it's handled.

Nope. I installed 8.1 from scratch. It did not detect or install the second 
monitor.

> > I have a Matrox G400 Max card with dual heads.  I have set them up
> > before. Users who have similar set ups with Windows are probably
> > wondering why Linux does not set things up to see the second monitor.
>
> It should. If not, there is a bug.

Then there is a bug.

> > > > 3) If SMP is detected, don't assume that it is a 686. (The
> > > > firewall-on-a-disc does this. My dual Pentium Pro 200 was not
> > > > amused.)
> > >
> > > Uh? SMP means using kernel-smp, which is a i586 kernel AFAIK.
> >
> > Well then it locked up for some other reason. I will have to investigate
> > further when I have time.
>
> Sometimes related to misdetection of amount of RAM.

The machine has only 32 megs of ram. Since it was installing the firewall 
version without X, it should not have been an issue.  

I have not seen RAM mis-detection since 2.0.x.




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> > > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get
> > > installed by default.  It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back
> > > and find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a piece of
> > > code to build.
> >
> > No, development gives a few base development packages such as autoconf,
> > automake, gcc, binutils, plus additional development packages for each
> > group you selected.
> 
> I said "should".  There needs to be some sort of option that will 
> automatically install development packages as part of the install.  Finding 
> out that you missed one is a real pain when you are in the middle of a 
> compile.  (Or dealing with users who have a low frustration level.)

Sorry for not understanding.

"All" devel packages is a vague notion and we can't decently install
"everything" that is more or less related to devel.

Additionally, I've never seen any problem with installing one devel
package for one given library *after* the installation. It's not a "royal"
pain since I can do "urpmf gtk--.h" and then "urpmi libgtkmm1.2-devel"
and basta, when a file is missing the header.


> > > 2) Something to configure multiple monitors/cards in X. (Also a way
> > > to go back and reconfigure a monitor when you buy a new one because
> > > the old one let out the magic smoke.)
> >
> > Via Xinerama or not you may configure two monitors when you have two cards
> > or you have one card with dual head. This was introduced in 8.0 or 8.1,
> > not sure.
> 
> I am speaking of a graphical Xinerama config option at install. I can do this 
> by hand, but I have been dealing with users who have never mucked with an 
> XF86Config-4 file in their life. 

I'm not a specialist for this, but I think during install it's handled.

> I have a Matrox G400 Max card with dual heads.  I have set them up before.  
> Users who have similar set ups with Windows are probably wondering why Linux 
> does not set things up to see the second monitor.

It should. If not, there is a bug.


> > > 3) If SMP is detected, don't assume that it is a 686. (The
> > > firewall-on-a-disc does this. My dual Pentium Pro 200 was not amused.)
> >
> > Uh? SMP means using kernel-smp, which is a i586 kernel AFAIK.
> 
> Well then it locked up for some other reason. I will have to investigate 
> further when I have time.

Sometimes related to misdetection of amount of RAM.

 

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Alan

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 04:38, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Some things I would like to see in the installer...
> >
> > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get
> > installed by default.  It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back
> > and find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a piece of
> > code to build.
>
> No, development gives a few base development packages such as autoconf,
> automake, gcc, binutils, plus additional development packages for each
> group you selected.

I said "should".  There needs to be some sort of option that will 
automatically install development packages as part of the install.  Finding 
out that you missed one is a real pain when you are in the middle of a 
compile.  (Or dealing with users who have a low frustration level.)

> > 2) Something to configure multiple monitors/cards in X.  (Also a way to
> > go back and reconfigure a monitor when you buy a new one because the old
> > one let out the magic smoke.)
>
> Via Xinerama or not you may configure two monitors when you have two cards
> or you have one card with dual head. This was introduced in 8.0 or 8.1,
> not sure.

I am speaking of a graphical Xinerama config option at install. I can do this 
by hand, but I have been dealing with users who have never mucked with an 
XF86Config-4 file in their life. 

I have a Matrox G400 Max card with dual heads.  I have set them up before.  
Users who have similar set ups with Windows are probably wondering why Linux 
does not set things up to see the second monitor.

> > 3) If SMP is detected, don't assume that it is a 686. (The
> > firewall-on-a-disc does this. My dual Pentium Pro 200 was not amused.)
>
> Uh? SMP means using kernel-smp, which is a i586 kernel AFAIK.

Well then it locked up for some other reason. I will have to investigate 
further when I have time.

> > 4) On upgrade, remove previous catalog entries in the Mandrake updater.
> > (So it does not show versions from 2+ versions, just the current one.) If
> > you don't remove them, label them better in the catalog listing so they
> > can be removed later.
> >
> > 5) On upgrade, find a way to make the upgrade complete in less than 12
> > hours! (This one has gotten on my nerves. The last upgrade from 8.0 to
> > 8.1 went to poorly, I did a scratch-and-burn on the system to fix it.)
>
> We've put some sleep everywhere, on purpose :-)).

Well, since the upgrade leaves the system in a fairly buggy state, few people 
try it more than once.

It should not take that long. I will need to look at that section of code I 
guess...





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le mer 21-11-2001 à 04:35, Alan a écrit :
> 
> Some things I would like to see in the installer...
> 
> 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get 
> installed by default.  It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and 
> find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a piece of code to 
> build.

and kernel-source too.


-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
L'idée que la science peut et doit être organisée selon des règles à la
fois
fixes et universelles est utopique et pernicieuse.
Paul Feyerabend





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Some things I would like to see in the installer...
> 
> 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get 
> installed by default.  It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and 
> find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a piece of code to 
> build.

No, development gives a few base development packages such as autoconf,
automake, gcc, binutils, plus additional development packages for each
group you selected.

> 2) Something to configure multiple monitors/cards in X.  (Also a way to go 
> back and reconfigure a monitor when you buy a new one because the old one let 
> out the magic smoke.)

Via Xinerama or not you may configure two monitors when you have two cards
or you have one card with dual head. This was introduced in 8.0 or 8.1,
not sure.
 
> 3) If SMP is detected, don't assume that it is a 686. (The firewall-on-a-disc 
> does this. My dual Pentium Pro 200 was not amused.)

Uh? SMP means using kernel-smp, which is a i586 kernel AFAIK.
 
> 4) On upgrade, remove previous catalog entries in the Mandrake updater. (So 
> it does not show versions from 2+ versions, just the current one.) If you 
> don't remove them, label them better in the catalog listing so they can be 
> removed later.
> 
> 5) On upgrade, find a way to make the upgrade complete in less than 12 hours! 
> (This one has gotten on my nerves. The last upgrade from 8.0 to 8.1 went to 
> poorly, I did a scratch-and-burn on the system to fix it.)

We've put some sleep everywhere, on purpose :-)).


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (2)

2001-11-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le sam 10-11-2001 à 00:18, John Haywood a écrit :
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:26, you wrote:
> > Yes, but what I meant with one place was to make some kind of
> > My Control Center, where the user could easily find everything
> > without searching for an hour or two..
> >
> > >> shortcuts to different configuration applications like Gnome Control
> > >> Center, Print Queue, etc, etc..
> > >
> > > ??? i d'ont understand. On the desktop ? n
> >
> > No, not desktop. I mean something like Mandrake Control Center but
> > for a user. Mandrake is very nice distribution as long as you have
> > the root privileges. But if you try to use Mandrake as a normal
> > user, it's just horrible. How to change your language, photo,
> > password? They are very hard to find from menu (because most of
> > the configuration tools need root privileges) if they can be found
> > at all ( +  + +/-). Even I don't try to find some
> > configuration tool from the menu, because it's much faster to
> > run it directly from a terminal. My Control Panel would fix this
> > together with Mandrake Control Center if they are both well made.
> 
> Your point is well made, from a single-user perspective.
> 
> In this case, access to what are essentially (in a *nix world) administrative 
> functions, are somewhat hidden and require root access for many.
> 
> However, I feel you are missing the point somewhat, inasmuch as any *nix 
> system is really designed for multi-user and multilayer security, integrated 
> into a network. Sure, we could allow all and sundry the ability to change 
> their gdm/xdm 'face' or whatnot, but in a lab full of budding hackers, or a 
> company environment, I for one wouldn't want to be the administrator!!!
> 
> Perhaps there is another way forward, without breaking the security model 
> which (though I may occasionally curse it) I have come to value over any MS 
> Garbage on offer - how about a sudo wizard on install?

usually users can change their password themselves if they have acces to
passwd command.
On top of that it's easy to implement a restriction. In the global
config file of this new Control Center you can put a flag/variable wich
will determine if users can start or not the application. We can also
add a variable that will list users who are allwed to lauch it. Ot may
not be so hard to do.

> Haven't thought my way through this one yet, but it would appear to be 
> exactly what sudo is designed for

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Les petits lits font les grandes maitresses.
-- Perret





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake

2001-11-09 Thread Charles Shirley

On Friday 09 November 2001 17:36, you wrote:
> Sounds like a great idea as I love GPIB/HPIB (memories) sigh !!
> :-) There is so much gear out there that uses this and for
> embedded linux it could open many possibilites (anybody remeber
> the commodore machines or the HP/80)


Heh!  My first computer after my old Comodore Amiga gave up the 
ghost was an HP 9000s375 that was excessed from the University I 
attended.  It had a 50 MHz MC68030 with at 6 MPU.  THe only 
interface it had when I first got it was HP-IB, so I wrangled up a 
7935 Hard Drive (404 MB, used 14" removable media modules, I think 
they had five platters...   The drive sucked 1500W by itself.  The 
rest of the computer burned another 500W.  If it weren't for the 
noice I could have heated my house with it!  But it sounded like a 
jet engine, so I ran 40' of HP-IB cable and stuck the dive out in 
the garage!) and was off to the ...er... races.  

Seriously, I have a a few old HP-IB peripherals hanginf around 
still, and would be jazed if I could put them to use again...  The 
only IEEE-488 card I have in my inventory is ISA, so they'll have 
to be strung off of a legacy machine, and accessed over the 
network, but hey... at least they could get some use...

~Chuck




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (3)

2001-11-09 Thread John Haywood

On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 18:43, you wrote:
> No. Nobody uses a central database for mime type handlers, because there
> isn't any. Even applications inside Gnome/KDE have their own mime
> files..:( But I would like this to change and the only thing towards
> working "pick a file and choose the program to run it" would be this
> kind of sollution. Of course the programs and users would have their
> own preferences, but in the case where there aren't any, they could
> pick _some_ application to run the file instead of letting the novice
> user to guess which application he/she needs to see a pdf document
> etc..
>
> I just looked at gnome-vfs, galeon and mozilla. They have all their own
> mime files, but as thay all are in text/xml, exporter would be quite(?)
> easy to make for them all. And of course the implementer could always
> go to talk mozilla/gnome/kde people. :)

So essentially, we're talking about a linux equivalent of Internet Config 
under MacOS, which allows apps to refer to a common mime-dbase, holds 
userspace stuff such as email address, news server, sigfile, local ftp 
mirrors etc.

The good thing (?) about Internet Config is that, while apps have to be 
IC-aware in order to use it, they can also opt out, or use their own schema 
(there's usually a check box in the prefs saying 'use Internet Config').
Another design feature is that it comes chockers with predefined mime-types, 
mirror sites & helper apps, but still lets you (or an installer package) add 
to the db.
-- 
john in syd




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (2)

2001-11-09 Thread John Haywood

On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:26, you wrote:
> Yes, but what I meant with one place was to make some kind of
> My Control Center, where the user could easily find everything
> without searching for an hour or two..
>
> >> shortcuts to different configuration applications like Gnome Control
> >> Center, Print Queue, etc, etc..
> >
> > ??? i d'ont understand. On the desktop ? n
>
> No, not desktop. I mean something like Mandrake Control Center but
> for a user. Mandrake is very nice distribution as long as you have
> the root privileges. But if you try to use Mandrake as a normal
> user, it's just horrible. How to change your language, photo,
> password? They are very hard to find from menu (because most of
> the configuration tools need root privileges) if they can be found
> at all ( +  + +/-). Even I don't try to find some
> configuration tool from the menu, because it's much faster to
> run it directly from a terminal. My Control Panel would fix this
> together with Mandrake Control Center if they are both well made.

Your point is well made, from a single-user perspective.

In this case, access to what are essentially (in a *nix world) administrative 
functions, are somewhat hidden and require root access for many.

However, I feel you are missing the point somewhat, inasmuch as any *nix 
system is really designed for multi-user and multilayer security, integrated 
into a network. Sure, we could allow all and sundry the ability to change 
their gdm/xdm 'face' or whatnot, but in a lab full of budding hackers, or a 
company environment, I for one wouldn't want to be the administrator!!!

Perhaps there is another way forward, without breaking the security model 
which (though I may occasionally curse it) I have come to value over any MS 
Garbage on offer - how about a sudo wizard on install?

Haven't thought my way through this one yet, but it would appear to be 
exactly what sudo is designed for

just a thought   
-- 
john in syd




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake

2001-11-09 Thread steve ide

Sounds like a great idea as I love GPIB/HPIB (memories) sigh !! :-)
There is so much gear out there that uses this and for embedded linux
it could open many possibilites (anybody remeber the commodore machines or
the HP/80)

- Original Message -
From: "kons Richard Bown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:20 PM
Subject: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake


> What I would like to see is support for GPIB  IEE488, this has a real
> foot hold on MS.
> At the moment apps are high cost and limited to a few companies.
> There was some interest and some drivers written for 2.0 kernels by some
> Germans, but that seems to have died.
> Its something which would push linux out of the user market and into the
> industrial markkey in a big way.
> All the manufacturers of electronic equipment use GPIB for controlling
> the test equipment
> --
> Its dominated by companies like National Instruments with their Labview
> s/w and Agilent with HPVEE.
>
> Maybe one day   :)
> Richard Bown
> Ericsson Microwave Systems AB
> SE-431 84 Mölndal
> e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tel +46 31 74 72422
> mobile +46 7098 72422
>





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le ven 09-11-2001 à 15:21, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
> Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > basically xmms is a winamp clone and most of the time is use to play mp3
> > ( as winamp ). So it will be more obvious to the Windows transfuge to
> > say :
> > XMMS is a Winamp clone
> 
> 1- not everyone knows winamp

wow
It's something rare. most of the time on forum they ask for winamp under
linux or an app like. Most of the time, young people that use Mandrake
know winamp.
Most of the time older people that use linux know winamp.
Few people don't know winamp.

> 2- i don't like refering to windows all the times

That's what Linux always do !
See look&feel of KDE ( panel, ... )
See evolution ( outlook killer )
etc ...

And last but not least : winamp exist for Linux, so technically you no
longer refer to windows.

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Ta mere en kit chez Ikea





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le ven 09-11-2001 at 14:50 Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> On Fridayen den 9 November 2001 14.36, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> > le jeu 08-11-2001 at 23:31 Todd Lyons a écrit :
> > > Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> > > > XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?
> > >
> > > The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
> > > "XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"
> >
> > I'm a new Windows transfuge.
> > X ? what's X ?
> > Multimedia System ? what's the definition of multimedia. We have audio (
> > mp3, ogg, wma, rm ), video ( mpeg, avi, divx, vob ) and sometimes
> > editing.
> 
> I would say multimedia is what you see and hear on the web. 

there was multimedia before the existence of the web.
Just analyse the latin origin of the word : multi = several, media =
mean of tansport.

The soundboards 
> of today have really nice specs, so it's not easy to say what's multimedia 
> anymore. But, I would say this is multimedia: 
> 
> 
> http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/187/north_rebirth.html
> http://d-srv.com/mp3/stun_in_the_sun.mp3
> 
> 
> -- 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
> | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
> | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-4mdksmp: 55min
> | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4090 rpm, temp +32.0°C
> | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4090 rpm, temp +31°C
> 
-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
L'Homme est un animal qui à la faculté de penser parfois à la mort.
Jules Renard





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> basically xmms is a winamp clone and most of the time is use to play mp3
> ( as winamp ). So it will be more obvious to the Windows transfuge to
> say :
> XMMS is a Winamp clone

1- not everyone knows winamp
2- i don't like refering to windows all the times

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Yura Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Todd Lyons wrote:
> 
> > Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> > >
> > > XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?
> >
> > The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
> > "XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"
> 
> XMMS is a multimedia player
> XMMS is a multi format audio player.

I'll keep "multimedia", because it does not only audio (reads id software
video and mpeg with smpeg, at least).


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (3)

2001-11-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le ven 09-11-2001 at 08:43 Matias Griese a écrit :
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Tom Badran wrote:
> >> POSTIN: /usr/sbin/mimedb add --priority=5 "mozilla" "text/html"
> >> POSTUN: /usr/sbin/mimedb del "mozilla"
> > That sounds like a great solution. Do kde and gnome both use this for mime
> > types? Also, you have to be careful with the del in case the item being
> 
> No. Nobody uses a central database for mime type handlers, because there
> isn't any. Even applications inside Gnome/KDE have their own mime
> files..:( But I would like this to change and the only thing towards
> working "pick a file and choose the program to run it" would be this
> kind of sollution. Of course the programs and users would have their
> own preferences, but in the case where there aren't any, they could
> pick _some_ application to run the file instead of letting the novice
> user to guess which application he/she needs to see a pdf document
> etc..
> 
> I just looked at gnome-vfs, galeon and mozilla. They have all their own
> mime files, but as thay all are in text/xml, exporter would be quite(?)
> easy to make for them all. And of course the implementer could always
> go to talk mozilla/gnome/kde people. :)
> 
> > deleted is not there (due to manual editing) and make sure that doesnt throw
> > any erros / crash rpmdrake etc. Sure this is a bit of work to implement now,
> 
> Of course this kind of database must be first designed so that this
> kind of situations would not arise.

It's close to what we have with unified menu.
 
> > but the amount of effort going into things like devfs etc. surely means that
> > this is a worthwile venture. I have installed mandrake on machines for people
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > Just my thoughts, its pretty hard to think of how to improve such a sweet
> > distro.
> 
> There is always room for iprovement. But there is usually not enough
> time to do it.

sure

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Nous apprenons aux gens a se souvenir,
nous ne leur apprenons jamais a progresser.
Oscar Wilde





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (2)

2001-11-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le jeu 08-11-2001 at 22:26 Matias Griese a écrit :
> On 7 Nov 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> >> there should be option to choose their own language and keyboard layout
> > a peer user localdrake ?
> 
> Yes, some kind of "My Control Center".
> 
> >> Another such a configuration could be choosing the size of the
> >> desktop (screen resolution).
> > At one time there's only one user. CTRL+ALT+ +/-
> > A personnal resolution for each user may be hard to implement unless ...
> 
> Yes, that works except the virtual desktop should be shrinked to
> the same size as the screen resolution is. 

eh X developpers are working on that trough a new extension : RandR ( X
Resize and Rotate Extension,
http://www.xfree86.org/~keithp/talks/randr/randr/ ).
This extension may will be add to Render (
http://www.xfree86.org/~keithp/render/ )

> if it is possible, but by restarting X Window system and by using
> different configuration file it should work..?

just set a different default resolution, but you need to restart X and
also have a progr'amme that will have a config file for each user and
that at each connection will change X config file. hum, difficult and
maybe not possible.
 
> >> There are also other things which should be in this user-level
> >> control panel, like: change password,
> > userdrake
> 
> Won't work: "In order to run "userdrake" with root's privileges,
> additional information is required. Password for root: __ "
> 
> There is Configuration->Other->Change Password, but how many finds it
> from there?

right. We can run it unprivileged but can't change our password.
 
> >> change photo,
> > userdrake
> 
> Look above..
> 
> >> edit menu,
> > menudrake
> >> task scheduler,
> > cf your wm/desktop
> 
> Yes, but what I meant with one place was to make some kind of
> My Control Center, where the user could easily find everything
> without searching for an hour or two..
manudrake is in MCC ( Mandrake Control center ).
concerning task scheduler, it's really depends on your wm/desktop. You
can have one from KDE with korganizer, there's several for gnome, you
have also evolution, 
 
> >> shortcuts to different configuration applications like Gnome Control
> >> Center, Print Queue, etc, etc..
> > ??? i d'ont understand. On the desktop ? n
> 
> No, not desktop. I mean something like Mandrake Control Center but
> for a user. Mandrake is very nice distribution as long as you have
> the root privileges. But if you try to use Mandrake as a normal
> user, it's just horrible. How to change your language, photo,
> password? They are very hard to find from menu (because most of
> the configuration tools need root privileges) if they can be found
> at all ( +  + +/-). Even I don't try to find some
> configuration tool from the menu, because it's much faster to
> run it directly from a terminal. My Control Panel would fix this
> together with Mandrake Control Center if they are both well made.

you're right. My Control center may be very interesting and may replace
some parts of First time wizard ( a fiasco at this time ).In my Control
center yoy can set up your email account for kmail/evolution/netscape
and others things.

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Ceux qui ne savent pas où ils vont sont surpris d'arriver ailleurs.
Pierre Dac





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-09 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Fridayen den 9 November 2001 14.36, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> le jeu 08-11-2001 at 23:31 Todd Lyons a écrit :
> > Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> > > XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?
> >
> > The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
> > "XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"
>
> I'm a new Windows transfuge.
> X ? what's X ?
> Multimedia System ? what's the definition of multimedia. We have audio (
> mp3, ogg, wma, rm ), video ( mpeg, avi, divx, vob ) and sometimes
> editing.

I would say multimedia is what you see and hear on the web. The soundboards 
of today have really nice specs, so it's not easy to say what's multimedia 
anymore. But, I would say this is multimedia: 


http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/187/north_rebirth.html
http://d-srv.com/mp3/stun_in_the_sun.mp3


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-4mdksmp: 55min
| cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4090 rpm, temp +32.0°C
| cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4090 rpm, temp +31°C




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le jeu 08-11-2001 at 23:31 Todd Lyons a écrit :
> Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> > 
> > XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?
> 
> The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
> "XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"


I'm a new Windows transfuge.
X ? what's X ?
Multimedia System ? what's the definition of multimedia. We have audio (
mp3, ogg, wma, rm ), video ( mpeg, avi, divx, vob ) and sometimes
editing.
Basically xmms is used as a mp3/ogg player and is considered as a winamp
clone. It is not a true multimedia player.
With the version of mdk ( and the GPL edition of the distribution ), you
can't play divx ( need of win32dll, they may think to use Divx4 or
ffmpeg ), to play mpeg you need smpeg ( unless you suggest it to the
user it will not install smpeg ).
xmms can't read wma and other exotic format. The same for video ( asf,
vob, ... ). And concerning editing : no luck.
A true multimedia player is ... mplayer as it supports many input format
( VCD, DVD, MPEG 1/2 System Stream (PS/PES/VOB) and Elementary Stream
(ES) file formats, RIFF AVI file format, ASF/WMV v1.0 files, QT/MOV
format ), and audio & video format : MPEG1 (VCD) and MPEG2 (DVD) video
,DivX ;-), OpenDivX (DivX4) and other MPEG4 variants, Windows Media
Video 7 (WMV1) and 8 (WMV2) used in .wmv files, Intel Indeo codecs
(3.1,3.2,4.1,5.0), MJPEG, ASV2 and other hardware formats, MPEG layer 2,
and layer 3 (MP3) audio (native code, with mmx/sse/3dnow optimization),
MPEG layer 1 audio (native code, with libavcodec), AC3 dolby audio
(native code, with sse/3dnow optimization), Ogg Vorbis audio codec
(native lib), Voxware audio (using directshow DLL), alaw, msgsm, pcm and
other simple old audio formats ) and you can encode in OpenDivx. So
mplayer is a true multimedia player.
To play divx it doesn't need win32 dll. It can use DivX4 ( 4.02 ) or
OpenDivx ( about the same ) or ffmpeg (
http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net/#formats ) :
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/codecs.html#2.2.1

Basically xmms is a winamp clone with some extra capabilities ( playing
mpeg/avi thanks to smpeg and avifile and divx with win32 dll ).

http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/info.html

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Statistiques
Accident de piétons a Paris. 
Un tué sur deux meurt des suites de son décès.  Les nuls





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le ven 09-11-2001 at 04:15 Murray Root a écrit :
>  Yura Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Todd Lyons wrote:
> > 
> > > Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> > > >
> > > > XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?
> > >
> > > The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
> > > "XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"
> > 
> > XMMS is a multimedia player
> > XMMS is a multi format audio player.
> > 
> 
> Go with multimedia. It also plays mpegs.

basically xmms is a winamp clone and most of the time is use to play mp3
( as winamp ). So it will be more obvious to the Windows transfuge to
say :
XMMS is a Winamp clone



-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Ta mere elle joue au tennis avec une balle en mousse 





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (3)

2001-11-08 Thread Matias Griese

On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Tom Badran wrote:
>> POSTIN: /usr/sbin/mimedb add --priority=5 "mozilla" "text/html"
>> POSTUN: /usr/sbin/mimedb del "mozilla"
> That sounds like a great solution. Do kde and gnome both use this for mime
> types? Also, you have to be careful with the del in case the item being

No. Nobody uses a central database for mime type handlers, because there
isn't any. Even applications inside Gnome/KDE have their own mime
files..:( But I would like this to change and the only thing towards
working "pick a file and choose the program to run it" would be this
kind of sollution. Of course the programs and users would have their
own preferences, but in the case where there aren't any, they could
pick _some_ application to run the file instead of letting the novice
user to guess which application he/she needs to see a pdf document
etc..

I just looked at gnome-vfs, galeon and mozilla. They have all their own
mime files, but as thay all are in text/xml, exporter would be quite(?)
easy to make for them all. And of course the implementer could always
go to talk mozilla/gnome/kde people. :)

> deleted is not there (due to manual editing) and make sure that doesnt throw
> any erros / crash rpmdrake etc. Sure this is a bit of work to implement now,

Of course this kind of database must be first designed so that this
kind of situations would not arise.

> but the amount of effort going into things like devfs etc. surely means that
> this is a worthwile venture. I have installed mandrake on machines for people

Agreed.

> Just my thoughts, its pretty hard to think of how to improve such a sweet
> distro.

There is always room for iprovement. But there is usually not enough
time to do it.

Regards,
  Matias






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-08 Thread Murray Root

 Yura Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Todd Lyons wrote:
> 
> > Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> > >
> > > XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?
> >
> > The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
> > "XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"
> 
> XMMS is a multimedia player
> XMMS is a multi format audio player.
> 

Go with multimedia. It also plays mpegs.

-- 
Murray Root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
(404) 978-1262 x2646 - voicemail/fax





__
FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-08 Thread Yura Gusev

On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Todd Lyons wrote:

> Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> >
> > XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?
>
> The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
> "XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"

XMMS is a multimedia player
XMMS is a multi format audio player.

-- 
 10:02pm  up 23 days, 10:59,  1 user,  load average: 0.04, 0.01, 0.00
__
 | /  \ |Iouri Goussev//  \\
\_\\  //_/   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   _\\()//_
 .'/()\'.   Foo-Bar / //  \\ \
   jgs\\  //   http://foobar.irc-unix.net| \__/ |
I am not 31337. But I can use the Vi editor... ;-0





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (3)

2001-11-08 Thread Matias Griese

On 7 Nov 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:

> So it's in fact a central mime type definition. Unfortunately we have 2
> desktop and until they manage to use some common config files we have to
> deal with this.

True. But as long as we have many config files, we could keep
our own database (configuration file) of MIME types and the programs
which can handle the MIME types. Every time when a program is
installed, it will be added to this configuration file. Then
the altered information will be exported to all the programs
which are supported (I assume that they all have some kind of
configuration files, which we could modify).

> But as menudrake there's maybe a way to have unified mime type.

I think it won't work for example in Mozilla, Nautilus or in any
program.. :(

Regards,
  Matias






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (2)

2001-11-08 Thread Matias Griese

On 7 Nov 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
>> there should be option to choose their own language and keyboard layout
> a peer user localdrake ?

Yes, some kind of "My Control Center".

>> Another such a configuration could be choosing the size of the
>> desktop (screen resolution).
> At one time there's only one user. CTRL+ALT+ +/-
> A personnal resolution for each user may be hard to implement unless ...

Yes, that works except the virtual desktop should be shrinked to
the same size as the screen resolution is. I'm not quite sure
if it is possible, but by restarting X Window system and by using
different configuration file it should work..?

>> There are also other things which should be in this user-level
>> control panel, like: change password,
> userdrake

Won't work: "In order to run "userdrake" with root's privileges,
additional information is required. Password for root: __ "

There is Configuration->Other->Change Password, but how many finds it
from there?

>> change photo,
> userdrake

Look above..

>> edit menu,
> menudrake
>> task scheduler,
> cf your wm/desktop

Yes, but what I meant with one place was to make some kind of
My Control Center, where the user could easily find everything
without searching for an hour or two..

>> shortcuts to different configuration applications like Gnome Control
>> Center, Print Queue, etc, etc..
> ??? i d'ont understand. On the desktop ? n

No, not desktop. I mean something like Mandrake Control Center but
for a user. Mandrake is very nice distribution as long as you have
the root privileges. But if you try to use Mandrake as a normal
user, it's just horrible. How to change your language, photo,
password? They are very hard to find from menu (because most of
the configuration tools need root privileges) if they can be found
at all ( +  + +/-). Even I don't try to find some
configuration tool from the menu, because it's much faster to
run it directly from a terminal. My Control Panel would fix this
together with Mandrake Control Center if they are both well made.

Regards,
  Matias






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-08 Thread Todd Lyons

Matias Griese wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:22:04PM +0200 :
> 
> XMMS: The must have X multimedia system -- ?!?

The only thing misleading there is the capitalization.  I would suggest:
"XMMS:  The X MultiMedia System mp3/ogg player"
-- 
tlyons at mandrakesoft dot com
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en



msg47003/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (3)

2001-11-08 Thread Tom Badran

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


> Why? There are easier ways to do the same:
>
> POSTIN: /usr/sbin/mimedb add --priority=5 "mozilla" "text/html"
> POSTUN: /usr/sbin/mimedb del "mozilla"
> (perhaps we should first look if the executable exists?)
>
> mimedb would be able to add and remove entries in a file
> /etc/mime.run or similiar..

That sounds like a great solution. Do kde and gnome both use this for mime 
types? Also, you have to be careful with the del in case the item being 
deleted is not there (due to manual editing) and make sure that doesnt throw 
any erros / crash rpmdrake etc. Sure this is a bit of work to implement now, 
but the amount of effort going into things like devfs etc. surely means that 
this is a worthwile venture. I have installed mandrake on machines for people 
who have never used linux before, and their biggest complaint (obscure 
hardware excluded - mostly winmodems) is that even though there is an icon 
for a file, there is no app, and they have no idea which apps do what.

I also think a nice idea would be a place on the website users can request an 
rpm of a package they want, but for which there is none (and therefore 
wouldnt know how to install) and we could view these requests and make rpms. 
This would obviously have searchable functionality and user mailback when a 
packages has been made etc.. When i was new to linux trying to get some apps 
working (from source) was very confusing. Especially as everything under dos 
had an 'install program' of sorts. Ive been using it for years and i STILL 
cant get festival speech synthesis to compile.

Just my thoughts, its pretty hard to think of how to improve such a sweet 
distro. 

Tom

- -- 
Tom "Tomahawk" Badran
Imperial College Dept of Computing
- -
PGP Public key available from:
certserver.pgp.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE76wTBXCpWOla2mCcRAszDAJ9GOWD1ayBk3ulOjoBq81vqp8W2hgCdEnp5
ltGRtA9xJOBuEGThcvyv0I8=
=gmN2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (3)

2001-11-08 Thread Matias Griese

On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Haywood wrote:
> four file browsers (konqueror, gmc, XWC, mc), six browsers (konqueror,
> Netscape, Mozilla, Opera, links, lynx) and a raft of possible helper apps
> (just look at PostScript viewers...)

I know. But if Mandrake would offer this kind of auto-MIME feature
for some of the most popular applications (like Mozilla), everyone
would start thinking that "hey, that's a good idea" and perhaps
join the efford..

> Not saying it couldn't be done, but there'd have to be a heck of a long IF,
> THEN, ELSE parsing the rpm database on a pretty regular basis - not for the
> low-end machine, methinks, and also fairly vulnerable to corruption

Why? There are easier ways to do the same:

POSTIN: /usr/sbin/mimedb add --priority=5 "mozilla" "text/html"
POSTUN: /usr/sbin/mimedb del "mozilla"
(perhaps we should first look if the executable exists?)

mimedb would be able to add and remove entries in a file
/etc/mime.run or similiar..

Then there would be /usr/bin/mimedb_update which would add the
entries to the config files of every supported program.. Or
better, get the programmers to change their programs to use
/ets/mime.run file by themselves..

>  although I suppose a package *could* have some sort of optional specfile
> field which gave the mime type(s) handled, then have that stored in a central
> db, but then we're talking 'bout extending rpm, can 'o worms

But I still like the idea. And it would not be too hard to
add few lines to spec files.. A few at one time, a few at the
another..

Regards,
  Matias






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for upcoming Mandrake (1)

2001-11-08 Thread Matias Griese

On 7 Nov 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> what about a brain storming about that ?
> We point out the description that we find incorrect or unclear and
> propose an alternative.
> After people give their opinion and if there's no major problem we adopt
> it.

I think that it's too much work. Better idea would be to get some
volunteer to make the new tooltips. And perhaps give him our ideas
if he wants some.

Regards,
  Matias






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-14 Thread Tim McKenzie

Michael Powell PhD wrote:
> 
>
> can we desist with the sprach crap and speaky english!
> --

That's right everyone... Make sure you "speaky" english... LOL. My dear
"doctor" will you please open up that closed little mind of yours and
understand that not everyone speaks or rather "speakys" English as their
primary language.




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-14 Thread Michael Powell PhD

Meir Faraj wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > Also sprach Geoffrey Lee :
> > > Can't remember which on but there is a jdk on the commercial disk.
> >
> > Sun jdk1.2.2
> so you've to put the 1.3 now ;-)
++
can we desist with the sprach crap and speaky english!
-- 

pub  2048G/48E9287C 2000-10-12 michael powell (sypher)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = 8C52 51C3 3ACA 70B8 5883  756E 92C8 3D0D 48E9 287C 
registered user #83815






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-14 Thread Meir Faraj

Hi ,
SUN Java 2 JDK 1.3
as already reach the release state



On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some suggestions for new softwares in contrib (or main distro) for
> next release of
> the Mandrake Distro ( >7.2 ).
>
> Some of these products are still beta products but some of them may
> reach a release
> state by the time the next Mdk distro (>7.2) reaches beta testing
> and as long as they
> are in Contrib (even as beta versions) that should be ok, shouldn't
> it?
>
>
> * Bluefish (Html editor)
>   web site: http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
>
> * Mahogany (Email client)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.wxwindows.org/Mahogany/
>
> * Magellan (Email client)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://linux.about.com/compute/linux/
>
> * Netscape 6
>   web site: you know it ;-)
>
> * Saint (Security Administrator's Integrated Network Tool)
>   web site: http://www.wwdsi.com/saint/
>
> * PMFirewall (IPchains Firewall & Masquerading config tool)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.pmfirewall.com/PMFirewall/
>
> * EasyFirewall (IPchains Firewall & Masquerading config tool)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE i guess (?) **
>   web site: http://www.linux-kheops.com/pub/easyfw/
>
> * IBM Java 2 JDK 1.3
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/download/index.html
>
> * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.3
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/
>
> * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.2.2_006
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/
>
> * SUN J2EE SDK 1.2.1
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/j2sdkee/
>
> * BLACKDOWN Java 2 JDK 1.2.2
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.blackdown.org/
>
> * Enhydra Enterprise (Web Application Server)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.enhydra.org/
>
> * Locomotive (Web Application Server)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.locomotive.org/
>
> * JOnAS (Web Application Server)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.evidian.com/jonas/index.htm
>
> * jBoss (Web Application Server)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.jboss.org/
>
> * Tomcat (Java Servlets / JSP)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/index.html
>
> * Ant (Java based build tool)
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html
>
> * Caucho's Resin JSP (Java Servlets / JSP)
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT THEIR LICENSING MODEL MAY ALLOW
> MANDRAKESOFT TO INCLUDE
>   ** IT IN CONTRIB (?)
>   web site: http://www.caucho.com/
>
> Cheers,
> Fred




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Skwar

On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 11:37:25AM -0500, Vox wrote:
>   If we are adding more mail clients, I'd like to nominate Pronto!

It's in contrib (v2.0.1 IIRC), as well as cscmail.  I tried to compile the
new versions, but cannot get them to work.  Starting cscmail/pronto just
gives me:

[askwar@teich ~/RPM/SPECS]$ Subroutine Gtk::CTree::get_node_position
redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux/Gtk.pm line 106.
perl: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libgtkhtml.so.4: undefined
symbol: new_pspell_config

Okay, so I tried to re-compile perl-GTK, but this also didn't work out,
because the Gnome stuff doesn't get compiled.  During compilation there are
some warnings to this effect:

Please specify prototyping behavior for GdkImlib.xs (see perlxs manual)

Don't know if this is why I don't get all the parts to compile.  But
actually they seem to compile, but just don't get installed.  So, for now
I've given up on pronto/cscmail.

> was nice...now it's n 2.2.2 and it rocks! :)  And, before somebody asks,

Is it possible to access *ALL* the features via the keyboard?  That's one
thing I really, really miss in all these GUI mailers and why I still stick
to mutt.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Homepage:   http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
Sichere Mail?   Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ:7328191




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-13 Thread Vox


During the bombing raid of Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:21:12 +0100, somebody
heard Frederic Soulier mumble in fear:

> Hello,
>  
>  Some suggestions for new softwares in contrib (or main distro) for
>  next release of
>  the Mandrake Distro ( >7.2 ).
>  
>  Some of these products are still beta products but some of them may
>  reach a release
>  state by the time the next Mdk distro (>7.2) reaches beta testing
>  and as long as they
>  are in Contrib (even as beta versions) that should be ok, shouldn't
>  it?
>  * Mahogany (Email client)
>** OPEN SOURCE **
>web site: http://www.wxwindows.org/Mahogany/
>  
>  * Magellan (Email client)
>** OPEN SOURCE **
>web site: http://linux.about.com/compute/linux/

If we are adding more mail clients, I'd like to nominate Pronto!
(www.muhri.net/pronto) I actually think we once discussed this programe,
after the mdk7.1 release...back then Pronto! was in version 1.x and it
was nice...now it's n 2.2.2 and it rocks! :)  And, before somebody asks,
yes, I'm involved in the project...I don't code, but the default icon set
is mine (it's theamable :) and I bug muhri a lot whenever I think of a
new feature :)

Vox

-- 
Pain is the gift of the gods, and I'm the one they chose as their
messenger...
For info about safety in BDSM, visit Vox's Info Center at 
 http://www.the-vox.com/

Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.  
Kind of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use 
_higher_ technology than everyone else.
-- Donald B. Marti Jr.

"Happiness is having a large, loving, caring, close-knit family in
another city." -- George Burns







Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-13 Thread Frederic Soulier

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > * Bluefish (Html editor)
> >   web site: http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
> 
> Already in 7.2
Cool!

> 
> > * IBM Java 2 JDK 1.3
> >   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> > (?) **
> >   web site: http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/download/index.html
> >
> > * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.3
> >   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> > (?) **
> >   web site: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/
> >
> > * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.2.2_006
> >   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> > (?) **
> >   web site: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/
> >
> > * SUN J2EE SDK 1.2.1
> >   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> > (?) **
> >   web site: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/j2sdkee/
> 
> Will NEVER be in contrib, since it's not opensource. Is on Commercial CD.
> 
> > * BLACKDOWN Java 2 JDK 1.2.2
> >   ** OPEN SOURCE **
> >   web site: http://www.blackdown.org/
> 
> Same thing apply, Blackdown port is NOT opensource
> 
Ok. As long as we can have all these different versions on the
commercial CD that's fine
(forgot to mention having the corresponding html docs as well).

No comment about all the Open Source Web Application Servers and so
on, does that mean
Mandrakesoft will consider having them in Contrib?

Fred




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-13 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Also sprach Geoffrey Lee :
> Can't remember which on but there is a jdk on the commercial disk.
Sun jdk1.2.2

-- 
Guillaume Rousse

Murphy's law : If anything can go wrong, it will.
O'Tool's commentary : Murphy was an optimist.




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-13 Thread Geoffrey Lee

Yo,

Answering those that I know.

On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:21:12PM +0100, Frederic Soulier wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Some suggestions for new softwares in contrib (or main distro) for
> next release of
> the Mandrake Distro ( >7.2 ).
> 
> Some of these products are still beta products but some of them may
> reach a release
> state by the time the next Mdk distro (>7.2) reaches beta testing
> and as long as they
> are in Contrib (even as beta versions) that should be ok, shouldn't
> it?
> 
> 
> * Bluefish (Html editor)
>   web site: http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
>


I think it is already there.


> 
> * Netscape 6
>   web site: you know it ;-)
> 

When it is stable then yes of course.:)


> 
> * IBM Java 2 JDK 1.3
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/download/index.html
> 
> * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.3
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/
> 
> * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.2.2_006
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/
> 


Can't remember which on but there is a jdk on the commercial disk.

-- 
Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
§õªø­·

~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant.

http://devel.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk
ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk


"7 days of honeymoon makes one whole week."




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for new softwares.

2000-10-13 Thread Frederic Crozat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frederic Soulier) writes:

> Hello,
> 
> Some suggestions for new softwares in contrib (or main distro) for
> next release of
> the Mandrake Distro ( >7.2 ).
> 
> Some of these products are still beta products but some of them may
> reach a release
> state by the time the next Mdk distro (>7.2) reaches beta testing
> and as long as they
> are in Contrib (even as beta versions) that should be ok, shouldn't
> it?
> 
> 
> * Bluefish (Html editor)
>   web site: http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/

Already in 7.2

> * Netscape 6
>   web site: you know it ;-)

Mozilla is in contrib

> * IBM Java 2 JDK 1.3
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/download/index.html
> 
> * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.3
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/
> 
> * SUN Java 2 JDK 1.2.2_006
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/
> 
> * SUN J2EE SDK 1.2.1
>   ** NOT OPEN SOURCE BUT SHOULD BE OK TO INCLUDE IT IN CONTRIB
> (?) **
>   web site: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/j2sdkee/

Will NEVER be in contrib, since it's not opensource. Is on Commercial CD.

> * BLACKDOWN Java 2 JDK 1.2.2
>   ** OPEN SOURCE **
>   web site: http://www.blackdown.org/

Same thing apply, Blackdown port is NOT opensource


-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-08-24 Thread Geoffrey Lee

> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At 24 August, 2000 Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mattias Eriksson) writes:
> > 
> > > Hi again...
> > > 
> > > I just saw that galeon 0.7.3 is out and I'd love to see it in cooker.
> > > That would also require mozilla M17 to be included... (or at least gecko)
> >  
> > It's in progress :))
>
> Great! I hope to see a crypto enabled mozilla package too... 
>

It is now OK for us to supply crypto software, after those silly US laws have
been loosened. However, a warning must still be in place since there are still
certain restrictions to those "terrorist" countries like Iran IraQ ..etc.

--
Geoff




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-08-24 Thread Mattias Eriksson

At 24 August, 2000 Frederic Crozat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mattias Eriksson) writes:
> 
> > Hi again...
> > 
> > I just saw that galeon 0.7.3 is out and I'd love to see it in cooker.
> > That would also require mozilla M17 to be included... (or at least gecko)
>  
> It's in progress :))

Great! I hope to see a crypto enabled mozilla package too... 

//Snaggen

-- 

 
Mattias Eriksson E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tvistevägen 26   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
907 36  UMEA Tel:090-198800
SWEDEN   070-5636769
 
'I don't fight for a cause   Hemsida: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen 
I fight for the fight'   PGP: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen/snaggen.asc






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-08-24 Thread Frederic Crozat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mattias Eriksson) writes:

> Hi again...
> 
> I just saw that galeon 0.7.3 is out and I'd love to see it in cooker.
> That would also require mozilla M17 to be included... (or at least gecko)
 
It's in progress :))

-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions

2000-04-28 Thread Robert L Martin

on the subject of Zip drives it would be nice if you had a
built-in Zip kernel (since Zips are so common) and maybe
have the modules built for the less common drives.
Side note the current RETAIL installer does not install my
Zip correctly.

Really side note I am now running a Custom 2.3.99 pre 6
kernel with
1 Zip drivers
2 BTTV drivers
3 and working PPP (found out about the new 2.4.0b1 pppd from
the changes file)
4 Mac partion support (anybody know how to mount the mac
partion of an AOL cd?)





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions & ISDN

2000-04-28 Thread Soulier, Frederic P

A. Mdk 7.0 & ISDN card setup

My ISDN Elsa Quickstep 1000 Pro PCI:

Bus 1, device 6, function 0
Network Controller: Unknown vendor Unknown device (rev 1)
Vendor id = 1048. Device id = 1000.
Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 18.
Non prefetchable. 32 bit memory at 0xfe7fff80.
i/o at 0xac00 [0xac01]
i/o at 0xafe4 [0xafe5]

Problem fixed by changing definitions in:
/etc/isdn/profile/card/mycard

(actually this file is self-explanatory as all necessary
parameters for each ISDN card supported are explained in this
file).

I reckon a manual selection of the ISDN card during install
would be nice :-) with an automatic setup of this "mycard"
file.

B. Software
---
Could we have "ripperX" (Mp3 encoding) in the distro?


Cheers,
Fred







[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 27/04/2000 11:40:00
To: cooker
cc: 
bcc:Frederic Soulier
Subject:Re: [Cooker] Suggestions

Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@INTERNET

"Soulier, Frederic P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello,
>
> May be off topic, if so pls ignore my comments ;-)

of course not!

>
> A. Mdk 7.0 & ISDN card setup
> 
> I am using an ISDN card Elsa QuickStep 1000 Pro PCI,
> the card does not work after installation of Mdk7 because
> the default ISDN config file contains definitions for a
> different ISDN card. Very easy to fix but I thought it would
> be nice to have the card setup (ie any supported ISDN card)
> as part of the installation of Mdk7.1

could you tell what to do? also give /proc/pci and /proc/bus/pci/devices

> B. Paride devices
> -
> My guess is there is a few people out there with devices on
> the parallel port (eg Zip, Ezflyer, Orb, CD-RW, etc..) and it
> would be nice to have the correct modprobe (or insmod) added as
> part of the setup.
>
> Note: I have the insmod commands for my Orb drive in the
> /etc/rc.d/rc.local file at the very end. It appears that

i don't think there's enough paride devices out there to make something easy :(

as for the modprobe pb, in 7.1b, you can just put pd in /etc/modules (not much
help, i know, but hell!)

[...]

> C. Package selection
> 
> Please, I beg you to change the package selection :-) it is
> not very beautiful and there must be a simpler way to put
> packages together with more meaningfull directories/sub-directories.

try 7.1b, it should suits your need much better (at least i hope)


cu Pixel.






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-04-27 Thread Eric MC DECLERCK

Bill & Lea Greenwood wrote:
> 
> Hey Pixel- I would appreciate that you didn't answer my mails anymore.
> Do you really think you know everything??  Many of us are not programmers,
> but know a great deal about beta testing, as well as other things in life.
> I was under the assumption that Mandrake wanted this all tested, and our
> suggestions put forth.  If this is not the case, then please let me know and
> I will gladly unsub-scribe.  I perceive you as an arrogant programmer with
> no public skills.
> 
> Did you really check out suggestions 1 and 2?  The rpmslist doesn't say
> which CD the rpms go on.  And drakboot doesn't have the MakeBootDisk button
> on it (unless I'm blind, in which case my humblest apologies).
> 
> I would also suggest someone replace the stars on the progress bar of the
> installer with small rectangles no taller than the text.  The stars really
> cheapen the installer (IMHO), and little colored rectangles would be much
> more professional, and would give more room for text and it would make it
> look not so crowded.
> 
> Again, I would appreciate someone other than a programmer answer my mails.
> Someone with some tact, and that will not put-down the humble beta testers,
> new or not.  I suggest Mandrake appoint one person with these public skills
> to act as an intermediary between the programmers and the Cooker list.
> Especially for suggestions vs. bugs.
> 
> -Bill
> 
> =
> 
> > 1)  Would it be possible to divide up the RPMs to the 2 different
> > directories (RPMS vs. RPMS2) for the two different CDs on all the Cooker
> > mirror sites?  This would be a BIG HELP in keeping them up to date.
> 
> the list is (now) in Mandrake/base/rpmslist
> 
> >
> > 2)  A MakeBootDisk button on the DrakConfig control panel would be handy.
> 
> there is via drakboot
> 
> >
> > 3)  On the installer:  I suggest that on the first section when we are
> > talking about SCSI, that the first question should be:  Do you have any
> SCSI
> > devices   then if not, then skip this section completely.  If you do then
> > ask the next question:  Do you want to search for (SCSI) devices   then
> > continue from that point.
> 
> it seems to be a good idea. I must be look at what it could break though :-/
> (very frozen here!)
DO NOT USE DRAK for the installation !
Use the TEX install.
I now, contribs made it (some) easier to install (and others) for the
new user,
but when we pay for it --- do it GOOD.
Eric




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions

2000-04-27 Thread Pixel

"Soulier, Frederic P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello,
> 
> May be off topic, if so pls ignore my comments ;-)

of course not!

> 
> A. Mdk 7.0 & ISDN card setup
> 
> I am using an ISDN card Elsa QuickStep 1000 Pro PCI,
> the card does not work after installation of Mdk7 because
> the default ISDN config file contains definitions for a
> different ISDN card. Very easy to fix but I thought it would
> be nice to have the card setup (ie any supported ISDN card)
> as part of the installation of Mdk7.1

could you tell what to do? also give /proc/pci and /proc/bus/pci/devices

> B. Paride devices
> -
> My guess is there is a few people out there with devices on
> the parallel port (eg Zip, Ezflyer, Orb, CD-RW, etc..) and it
> would be nice to have the correct modprobe (or insmod) added as 
> part of the setup.
> 
> Note: I have the insmod commands for my Orb drive in the
> /etc/rc.d/rc.local file at the very end. It appears that

i don't think there's enough paride devices out there to make something easy :(

as for the modprobe pb, in 7.1b, you can just put pd in /etc/modules (not much
help, i know, but hell!)

[...]

> C. Package selection
> 
> Please, I beg you to change the package selection :-) it is
> not very beautiful and there must be a simpler way to put
> packages together with more meaningfull directories/sub-directories.

try 7.1b, it should suits your need much better (at least i hope)


cu Pixel.




Re: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-04-26 Thread Jean-Michel Dault


> > 3)  On the installer:  I suggest that on the first section when we are
> > talking about SCSI, that the first question should be:  Do you have any SCSI
> > devices   then if not, then skip this section completely.  If you do then
> > ask the next question:  Do you want to search for (SCSI) devices   then
> > continue from that point.
> 
> it seems to be a good idea. I must be look at what it could break though :-/
> (very frozen here!)

Yesterday, I tried to install Mandrake 7.0 with an adaptec 2940UW card,
and it was impossible, because it couldn't get the driver to work (the
chips are not the same on each version). The SCSI card was only there for
the tape backup and cd-burner, so I could remove the card and get the
install running.

Otherwise, I was stuck in an endless loop, and there was no way I could
tell the installation not to use SCSI.

Jean-Michel Dault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-04-26 Thread Pixel

"Bill & Lea Greenwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The rpmslist doesn't say which CD the rpms go on.

sorry, tis the list of package to have on cd 1.

> And drakboot doesn't have the MakeBootDisk button
> on it (unless I'm blind, in which case my humblest apologies).

it appears only if package drakfloppy is installed.




RE: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-04-26 Thread Bill & Lea Greenwood




> 1)  Would it be possible to divide up the RPMs to the 2 different
> directories (RPMS vs. RPMS2) for the two different CDs on all the Cooker
> mirror sites?  This would be a BIG HELP in keeping them up to date.

>>the list is (now) in Mandrake/base/rpmslist

Would it be possible now then to have hd.img search both dirs on the hard
disk for files like cdrom.img does (or does it already do this)?  It would
be so much easier also if the two dirs were divided on the mirrors as well,
but thanks for the list.  That is a big help. :)

>
> 2)  A MakeBootDisk button on the DrakConfig control panel would be handy.

>>there is via drakboot

I looked there, didn't see it, will look again.

>
> 3)  On the installer:  I suggest that on the first section when we are
> talking about SCSI, that the first question should be:  Do you have any
SCSI
> devices   then if not, then skip this section completely.  If you do then
> ask the next question:  Do you want to search for (SCSI) devices   then
> continue from that point.

>>it seems to be a good idea. I must be look at what it could break though
:-/
>>(very frozen here!)

This should be pretty simple as it would only require a different order of
the questions, and the adding of the word 'SCSI' to the one dialog box.






Re: [Cooker] Suggestions...

2000-04-26 Thread Pixel

"Bill Greenwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 1)  Would it be possible to divide up the RPMs to the 2 different
> directories (RPMS vs. RPMS2) for the two different CDs on all the Cooker
> mirror sites?  This would be a BIG HELP in keeping them up to date.

the list is (now) in Mandrake/base/rpmslist

> 
> 2)  A MakeBootDisk button on the DrakConfig control panel would be handy.

there is via drakboot

> 
> 3)  On the installer:  I suggest that on the first section when we are
> talking about SCSI, that the first question should be:  Do you have any SCSI
> devices   then if not, then skip this section completely.  If you do then
> ask the next question:  Do you want to search for (SCSI) devices   then
> continue from that point.

it seems to be a good idea. I must be look at what it could break though :-/
(very frozen here!)




RE: [Cooker] Suggestions for cable modem / (A)DSL users

2000-01-12 Thread Don Head

In regards to the HOWTO documents, usually the most up-to-date versions can
be found on the LDP site, http://www.linuxdoc.org/.  There is in fact a more
current IP Masquerade HOWTO than the one you pointed to located at the LDP
site.  Also, according to the LDP site, it is now a HOWTO, not a mini-HOWTO.

Don Head
Linux Mentor
Wave Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[AIM - Don Wave][ICQ - 18804935]
[IRC - EFnet, #WaveTech, Don-Wave]


-Original Message-
From: Jason Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] Suggestions for cable modem / (A)DSL users


While using a cable modem at home and Mandrake 6.1 I noticed a few
things that I think could use a change.

1. The Installer for Mandrake 6.1 seems to be optimized for a machine
that is on a private network and the default settings leave a bunch of
potentially dangerous services going (like ftpd and telnetd). It would
be nice if when selecting type of Installation (server, workstation,
custom) if there was also an option for "Stand Alone / Private Network"
and "Internet Connected" in a separate selection menu.

2. A more complete networking code and up to date documentation to go
with it.  I found that setting up a little Linux-Mandrake based firewall
including such networking code as IP masquerading and packet filtering
was not all that difficult once reading the docs.  When I went to set up
port forwarding I found the docs (IPCHAINS-HOWTO, Firewall-HOWTO,
IPCHAINS man page, and kernel documentation) didn't have up to date info
and pointed me in all of the wrong directions. I found some usable
documentation at
http://home.plutonium.net/~sjhill/mirrors/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.65-6.html.
I installed the ipmasqadm-0.4.1-1.i386.rpm on my system and used that to
set up port forwarding.

3. Strong crypto.  I have noticed that at least in the past that Big
Brother doesn't like the idea of having strong crypto coupled with an
OS.  When using a public network like the Internet and especially when
reading docs on the Internet on how to spoof other cable modems on your
segment I feel much more comfortable using something like SSH2 to
transmit passwords over the Internet.  With what I have heard about
openssh 1.x and ssh 1.x, I don't feel all that comfortable using them.
I compiled ssh 2.0.13 onto my systems and even though I have had some
problems getting X to forward its ports transparently, I still feel more
comfortable with it.  (I find that after writing programs all day with a
text editor at work, using the command line is pretty strait forward to
me for some reason.)



Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for cable modem / (A)DSL users

2000-01-11 Thread Signal 11

Jason Snyder wrote:
> segment I feel much more comfortable using something like SSH2 to
> transmit passwords over the Internet.  With what I have heard about
> openssh 1.x and ssh 1.x, I don't feel all that comfortable using them.

OpenSSH is actually fairly good about fixing problems... although
I share your lack of enthusiasm over the SSH1 protocol, but until 
RSA expires in September, there's not a thing we can do for legal raisins.
=)