Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
1. Doesn't seem like any respect at all. 2. You misspelled "bollocks" (sic) "c." wrote: -Caveat Lector- with all due respect, bollocks.
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
Next time an armed intruder breaks into your home, try defending your family with indisputable logic. "c." wrote: -Caveat Lector- with all due respect, bollocks. if you need any supporting evidence then contrast and compare per capita gun deaths (deliberate or accidental (the accident stat would be shocking on it's own)) in the USA with the UK more guns= more death. indisputable logic.
[CTRL] Re: THIS fan thinks I oughta be a rabbi j2
-Caveat Lector- Nessie wrote: -Caveat Lector- Sorry, I hit the wrong button. I should have hit the Paste button first. It was supposed to say: But I think I sound much more like a Jesuit. At least that's what people tell me. A rabbi can wear you down with his logic as well as Jesuit, but when a Jesuit sees that it is going to take a long time, he cuts to the chase. To a rabbi, the logic itself is a thing of beauty, a gift from G-d, and worth the time it takes just for that reason alone. A Jesuit, on the other hand, wants to convince you of the error of your ways and move on to the next guy. They keep score differently. The rabbi counts how many points he scored in the debate. The Jesuit counts how many people he convinced. It's a whole different system. People mistake one for the other because both are so methodical. But their goals differ, and goals define behavior far more than does style. I had an English prof once who was an ex Jesuit. He taught me a lot about language. It's no more about structure and meaning than a house is about bricks and mortar. If you can understand that, he said, and youre willing to study and practice, you might just learn how to talk. The other thing to know is that it's not plagiarism if you steal from more than three places. Everyone steals. They have to. Almost everything has already been thought of and said. A new idea comes along once or twice in a century. Most are never passed on. So make use of what you can learn from others, he said, from me especially, because I'm really good at it; I learned how from the best. Besides, he pointed out the first day, we'd already paid him and money doesn't grow on trees. My old prof had very good reasons for quitting the order (besides wanting a family), upon which he expounded quite frequently. There are some serious flaws in Jesuit logic, he taught us, but there is no point whatsoever in trying to explain it to them in any language but their own. This, as he impressed upon us frequently, is far, far easier said than done. On the other hand, it's worth knowing how to do because once you've climbed a couple of mountains, even the steepest hill fails to intimidate you. If you can't think, you can't talk. If you can't talk, you can't be understood, even by yourself. I can talk a blue streak. I understand myself perfectly. What I don't understand is why some people fail to also understand me. I'm clear. I'm logical. I tell only the truth. Yet some people hear me say one thing and other people hear me say something different. What's the problem? Are they stupid, or am I doing something wrong? I dont want to sound like a rabbi or a Jesuit. Im trying to be as plain spoken as possible, so as to reach the broadest audience. Maybe I need to dumb it down more. What do yall think? I'm open to suggestions. SHUT THE FUCK UP! J2 ;} A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Bush Executive Order-So Much For Church/State Seperation
-Caveat Lector- --- John Cone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With a little thought, one could make a very long list of examples in which the government is not operating constitutionally. The very first item on this list would be the Federal Reserve. Can anyone think of some more things which should be on this list? The FBI Hostage Rescue Team and other Federal paramilitary police forces can be added to the list. Tenorlove still looking for that govt-off-my-back article __ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Margaret Sanger - Racist / Eugenicist
-Caveat Lector- Quote from that Feminist Icon, Margaret Sanger. Sanger was trying to promote a birth control program for the "colored" people to discourage them from breeding - along with the feeble minded and other defectives. flw MARGARET SANGER IN A LETTER TO DR. CLARENCE GAMBLE, Dec 19, 1939: "We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: Federal Register - List of Executive Orders
http://www.nara.gov/fedreg/eo.html
[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] The Bastard President
Mike, Please list these "slave owning southern states."Could you possibly mean "FORMER" slave owning southern states? And how are they different from states not in the South where slaves were owned formerly, which was just about all of them, wasn't it? And also please explain how they have control over the government with such small populations. Congressional districts are still based on population, aren't they? My state only has around 5 million total despite being 23rd in land area. If these states have "control of the government" I was not aware of this and am very glad to learn of it as there are some major changes I have in mind. Amelia - Original Message - From: Mike Switzer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [CTRL] The Bastard President 3. It was done for a REASON -- stop complaining and do some homework. Yeah, so the slave owning southern states could maintain their control of the gov't... and I guess it works M -Original Message-From: BB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 12:49 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [CTRL] The Bastard PresidentJust TRY to get the following into your very narrow, disrespectful, DISRUPTOR mind: 1. Gore LOST. The more they count Florida, the more he loses. 2. The Constitution provides for an ELECTORAL COLLEGE. 3. It was done for a REASON -- stop complaining and do some homework. 4. A MAJORITY vote is NOT the epitome of all GOOD THINGS in the universe. 5. Bush won. He IS the president. Get over it. 6. Go, and DISRUPT no more. radman wrote: -Caveat Lector- The Bastard President
[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Tonight on History Channel: The Crop Circle Controversy
-Caveat Lector- I only caught the first half of the show on crop circles but really liked it! The History Channel has one on UFO's I believe is tonight. Some of the crop circles were quite elaborate. I could se two guys with a rope and board making the plain circles but the more elaborate designs would take some time and measurements being taken. Anybody have explanations? Favorite theories? I saw some "ice rings" on a pond during our recent freeze and asked a couple of farmers about possible causes and they seemed to think an underground spring bubbling up warmer water could cause this. Hhuumm--they were near perfect circles but I suppose it is possible. Maybe I should ask them about crop circles. I would need photos to show them as I doubt they are familiar with this phenomenon. Amelia - Original Message - From: "Ynr Chyldz Wyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:58 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Tonight on History Channel: "The Crop Circle Controversy" -Caveat Lector- From: "MICHAEL SPITZER" [EMAIL PROTECTED] BTW, has anyone else noticed that the cable network, "Travel Network" (i.e., the channel that is usually dominated by vacation travel destination type shows) has been almost EXCLUSIVELY *serious* treatments of shows dealing with UFOs, ghost and haunting locales, and paranormal shows having about ZERO to do with TERRESTRIAL travel for the last few weeks!?!?!? The Travel Channel puts these shows on during the weekend, for the most part...they bill it as "Haunted Destinations", I guess to appeal to people who would like to travel to interesting places... June A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: Executive Orders
Now does this Executive Order make any sense to anyone? We had Monica Lewinsky calling the President with her sex games, while the Mossad was tapping his line through her line. We had Linda Tripp who superseded her authority in taping telephone calls and meanwhile hooking up with Mark Fuhrman and this Goldbergsuch loyal Americans. But there is a pending book, behind every tree.and what price loyalty? We had the CIA Director taking home top secret files; we had Los Alamos burning down in attempt I believe to destroy evidence and the fires in the west - not to hard to figure this one. And then, Linda Tripp has plastic surgery, all ready to go on the TV circuit - and boom - Clinton is forgotten and she goes back into retreat - what was that woman paid to do on the joband what happened to Vince Foster for she was the last to see him alive? Atares = unrequited love? Watch the news media now - except for Fox, all seemed to want Gore in - and see them start to grovel now - and selling out what little principles they had to begin with - ever play Hardball with Chris Mathews? He no longer smiles as he did.He is old hat for the crowd now hangs out at Fox..goodbye Dan Rather, Jennings, MSNBC, CNN.times are getting touch. [Executive Orders] White House Press Release Access To Classified Information The White House Office of the Press Secretary ___ For Immediate ReleaseAugust 4, 1995 Executive Order #12968 - - - - - - - Access To Classified Information The national interest requires that certain information be maintained in confidence through a system of classification in order to protect our citizens, our democratic institutions, and our participation within the community of nations. The unauthorized disclosure of information classified in the national interest can cause irreparable damage to the national security and loss of human life. Security policies designed to protect classified information must ensure consistent, cost effective, and efficient protection of our Nation's classified information, while providing fair and equitable treatment to those Americans upon whom we rely to guard our national security. This order establishes a uniform Federal personnel security program for employees who will be considered for initial or continued access to classified information. Now, Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Part 1 Definitions, Access To Classified Information, Financial Disclosure, And Other Items Section 1.1. Definitions. For the purposes of this order: (a) "Agency" means any "Executive agency," as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105, the "military departments," as defined in 5 U.S.C. 102, and any other entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information, including the Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and the National Reconnaissance Office. (b) "Applicant" means a person other than an employee who has received an authorized conditional offer of employment for a position that requires access to classified information. (c) "Authorized investigative agency" means an agency authorized by law or regulation to conduct a counterintelligence investigation or investigation of persons who are proposed for access to classified information to ascertain whether such persons satisfy the criteria for obtaining and retaining access to such information. (d) "Classified information" means information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order No. 12958, or any successor order, Executive Order No. 12951, or any successor order, or the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011), to require protection against unauthorized disclosure. more (Over) 2 (e) "Employee" means a person, other than the President and Vice President, employed by, detailed or assigned to, an agency, including members of the Armed Forces; an expert or consultant to an agency; an industrial or commercial contractor, licensee, certificate holder, or grantee of an agency, including all subcontractors; a personal services contractor; or any other category of person who acts for or on behalf of an agency as determined by the appropriate agency head. (f) "Foreign power" and "agent of a foreign power" have the meaning provided in 50 U.S.C. 1801. (g) "Need for access" means a determination that an employee requires access to a particular level of classified information in order to perform or assist in a lawful and authorized governmental function.
[CTRL] Skolnick-MARC RICH and THE SECRET ACCOUNTS
http://www.skolnicksreport.com/mrichsa.html MARC RICH and THE SECRET ACCOUNTS 1/28/01 by Sherman H. Skolnick Name some espionage organizations. American CIA. Israel's The Mossad. Britain's M1-6. Italy's various secret police agencies. Name some secret Freemason and other secret societies that inflict bombings and political assassinations, to be falsely blamed on to others. Propaganda-Due, P-2, made up of legislators, cabinet ministers, judges, media honchos, and other high-level government officials, in Italy, France, England, and the United States. Name some P-2 members. George Herbert Walker Bush. Alexander Haig. Henry Kissinger. Bishop Paul Marcinkus, once head of the Vatican Bank. Marcinkus, having fled from Vatican City to escape inquiry and prosecution in Italy, moved back to Chicago in November, 1991, and then on to Sun City, Arizona. Marcinkus has been the dominant force, on behalf of the Giannini Family, in the infamous worldwide money laundry from his original home town, mafia enclave adjacent to Chicago, First National Bank of Cicero. Other P-2 members include former U.S. District Judge from Chicago, Nicholas J. Bua, who was the Special Justice Department Counsel to whitewash Reagan White House complicty in stealing the PROMIS Software in the Inslaw Affair. Some of these are also members of Gladio, similar to P-2, headquartered in Switzerland, of which Marc Rich has been the paymaster. Other P-2/Gladio members included CIA paymaster Roger D'Onofrio and the Archbishop of Barcelona, Spain, tied to mafia/CIA links to the Vatican Bank, in the smuggling of osmium nuclear bomb triggers, superior quality counterfeit currency, and stolen gold bullion. As reported early in December, 1995, date-lined Rome and Naples, Italy, by Reuters, United Press International, and Associated Press. The D'Onofrio Affair. Name some rogue banks. Bank of Credit and Commerce International, BCCI. Transit point for tens of billions of dollars of murder and mayhem funds of the espionage agencies, as arranged, in part, through Marc Rich. Banca Nazionale Delavoro, BNL, Italy's largest, owned in part by the Vatican; tied to the George Herbert Walker Bush family, and Hillary Rodham Clinton and her reputed lover/law partner, Vincent W. Foster, Jr., and Iraq weapons scandals, Atlanta and Chicago. First Union, owned in part by the Riady family reportedly trafficking in narcotics and weapons and tied to Lippo Group and Lippo Bank. Wells Fargo Bank, CIA proprietary, arranging funds for covert operations in Pacific Basin area. Bank America, and their unit, Bank of America, transacting covert and illicit funds for Marc Rich, in commodities and currencies, Chicago and elsewhere. Another rogue bank was Nugan Hand Bank, the principals of which either disappeared or were murdered in 1980; taken over by successor and alter ego, Household Bank and Household International. Former Director of Central Intelligence, William Colby, was general counsel of both Nugan Hand Bank and Household International, and was murdered in 1996, as he started to go public with certain misgivings of his past. Name some celebrities tied to some of the foregoing. Warren Buffet, major owner Wells Fargo Bank and CIA-linked, The Coca-Cola Company. Dope from South-East Asia, "The Golden Triangle", as supervised by General Colin Powell, his confidant Richard Armitage, and their confederates in the George Herbert Walker Bush Family. Richard Cheney, large stockholder of Enron, reportedly orchestrating the California electric mess. Name some international operatives closely tied to the foregoing. Vincent W. Foster, Jr., law partner and reputed lover of Hillary Rodham Clinton, murdered in 1993. Infamous international money laundry expert in insurance field, the late Hugh Rodham, Sr., father of Hillary Rodham Clinton, close to Gambino Crime Family and originally from Scranton, Pennsylvania. Reputed Deputy Chief of The Mossad for North America, Rahm Emanuel who on and off for six years was Clinton White House Senior Advisor. Rahm went on to become a Managing Director of Wasserstein Perella Co., reportedly laundering huge funds through the Chicago and New York markets for the Red Chinese and the Red Chinese Secret Police. The Wasserstein Perella Co. operation has merged with Germany's Dresdner Bank A.G. Name some of those who reportedly run huge sums through the foregoing. Rahm Emanuel. REFCO-LFG Division Chicago [Richard Friedman Co.] Warren Buffet and his false public statements that his fortune started with a "department store" in Nebraska. Name a supervisor, tied to some of the foregoing, of a secret 50 million dollar Federal Agency fund transferred to Little Rock, to cover up the embezzlement of an Arkansas-based Savings Loan, for which Bill and Hillary Clinton are subject to federal criminal prosecution and jailing for misappropriation of federally-insured thrift funds. As shown by undisputed federal court records, that supervisor has been Rodham Family
[CTRL] Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger
http://www.salon.com/news/col/cona/2001/01/30/ashcroft/index.html The artful dodger John Ashcroft's nose is growing faster than Pinocchio's during his Senate confirmation hearings. As attorney general, will he be as evasive with the truth? - - - - - - - - - - - - By Joe Conason Jan. 30, 2001 | Of all the perfectly sound reasons to oppose John Ashcroft's nomination -- and perhaps to mount a filibuster against him, now that his confirmation appears likely -- the most compelling is that he didn't tell the truth to the United States Senate. In deference to the presidential prerogative, many senators may feel they should approve Ashcroft despite his ideological extremism; others may think they owe a former colleague the benefit of the doubt when he promises to enforce the law impartially. But how are they to believe that pledge, or expect the majority of skeptical Americans to trust Ashcroft, after he prevaricated so blatantly during his own testimony under oath? Two years ago, the Senate conducted an impeachment trial against a president who had lied about personal matters in a private lawsuit. Before President Clinton was finally acquitted because the majority felt his offenses were not impeachable, dozens of Republicans declared that such lying was unacceptable in the nation's chief magistrate. Why then is similar conduct now deemed acceptable in a candidate for the nation's highest law enforcement position? And why would the Senate vouchsafe the responsibilities of that office to a man who has already mocked its trust? The senators who vote to confirm his nomination this week will laud Ashcroft as a public servant of unblemished integrity, and such praise may be uttered by them in full sincerity. But to any senator who fulfills his or her own obligation to examine the hearing record completely and dispassionately, Ashcroft's dishonesty will be too obvious to be ignored. Almost nobody believes his evasive answers about the ambassadorial nomination of James Hormel, for instance. Rather than admit forthrightly that he had blocked Hormel as ambassador to Luxembourg because the Clinton nominee would have been the nation's first openly gay envoy, Ashcroft chose to make vague claims about Hormel's "entire record," adding ominously that Hormel had "recruited" him to the University of Chicago. Few falsehoods more obvious than that one have ever been told under oath in a Senate hearing. Ashcroft also testified untruthfully about the substance of the St. Louis desegregation case. Instead of admitting that he opposed integration, which he clearly did, the former Missouri attorney general insisted that he was merely defending his state government from an overreaching federal judge. That may be a matter of opinion, but it left the clear impression back then of a politician stirring racial conflict for personal advancement. But when Ashcroft claimed repeatedly in the hearings that "the state had not been found really guilty of anything" in the St. Louis court case, he knew that answer was wholly false. Having appealed the matter all the way to the Supreme Court and lost, he can't have forgotten that the state of Missouri was held responsible by the courts for its long history of maintaining segregrated schools in St. Louis and its suburbs. Ashcroft lied confidently during the hearings about matters large and small, presumably relying on the gullibility of his former colleagues. Among the more disturbing instances was his attempted explanation of the now-notorious interview he gave in 1998 to the Southern Partisan, an organ of the neo-Confederate movement. On Jan. 17, Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., engaged Ashcroft in a long, rambling discourse about the Southern Partisan's racial and ethnic bias and its dogged defense of slavery and "states' rights." Mostly Biden seemed to be talking to hear the sound of his own voice, as he often does in hearings, but Ashcroft eventually had a chance to respond to Biden's scolding. "I don't know if I've ever read the magazine or seen it," he said, claiming that he had merely answered a few questions in a telephone interview. "And I regret that speaking to them is being used to imply that I agree with their views." Moments later he added, "I probably should do more due diligence on [Southern Partisan]. I know they've been accused of being racist." Unfortunately, Biden was ill-prepared to press Ashcroft any further. Otherwise he might have asked how Ashcroft could claim he didn't know about the Southern Partisan's content when he had told the editor who interviewed him that "your magazine ... helps set the record straight. You've got a heritage of doing that, of defending Southern patriots like Lee, Jackson and Davis." Certainly in that text, whose accuracy Ashcroft has never denied, he sounds like a fan who is quite familiar with the magazine's content. Maybe he was just giving a few strokes to a desirable white supremacist voting bloc. Yet even if Ashcroft was uninformed about the
[CTRL] Israeli commandos training with US Marines
http://www.timesofindia.com/280101/28mide7.htm Israeli commandos training with US Marines JERUSALEM: Israeli special forces commandos have been training with US Marines in urban warfare techniques in an exercise on capturing Palestinian areas, the Hebrew weekly Kol Ha'Ir reported in its latest edition.The "anti-terrorist" exercise was carried out in conjunction with US Marine snipers serving with the Mediterranean-based Sixth Fleet, the weekly said.Kol Ha'Ir quoted an Israeli military source as saying that the Israeli army trains regularly with US military units, to learn new combat techniques and test new weapons and equipment.Israeli troops have been battling a Palestinian uprising in the West Bank and Gaza Strip for the past four months. (AFP)
Re: [CTRL] Margaret Sanger - Racist / Eugenicist
In a message dated 1/30/01 7:51:33 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IN A LETTER TO DR. CLARENCE GAMBLE, Dec 19, 1939: "We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Baldwin's Great illustration of the true beliefs of this great social fascsit icon. Scratch the surface of the alec Baldwin's of today and this is what you will find lurking underneath. Carl
[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Bush-Cheney financial background IMPORTANT research
From http://www.newsmakingnews.com/archive8,6,00,8,13,00.htm scroll down to: HOW YOU CAN DISCOVER HOW ANY PERSON OR COMPANY IS "TRADING WITH THE ENEMY! by Linda Minor 20 Tracing the pro-Hitler roots which formed the branches of the fortunes of the Bush and Cheney families, who intend to take over the Presidency of the United States. Researcher Anton Chaitkin was the son of a Jewish attorney, Joseph Chaitkin, whose clients invested in bonds issued by the Hamburg-Amerika Line, which had taken over the North German Lloyd steamship line. After Hitler came to power, Hamburg-Amerika stopped payment to the bondholders based on an order issued by Hitler, but actually arranged by John Foster Dulles and his friend Hjalmar Schacht. Schacht was born in Germany but had grown up in the U.S. and been educated alongside America's elite sons, but who returned to Germany to be Hitler's finance minister. Joseph Chaitkin filed suit in New York in 1934 on behalf of his clients and organized a boycott against trading with the new German government. His efforts were stifled by a number of investment bankers operating in the United States, ostensibly American patriots, but later accused of being traders with the enemy. The research conducted by Anton Chaitkin into the cover-up that ensued has been thoroughly documented in the book he wrote with Webster Tarpley called The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush. Click to read excerpts. I have never been one who believes anything I read without investigation. After reading the book, I asked myself: "What is the best way to actually remove the veil that preserves the secrecy around the investments managed by the investment bank of Brown Brothers Harriman?" Is there anything I can do to find out what the real truth is? This alleged conspiracy -- of Bush and Harriman trading with the enemy--which took place between the two world wars, was continued after World War II by the rise to power of both Dulles brothers and their creation of the Central Intelligence Agency. After learning about this conspiracy, it seemed that the only way to learn the truth about whether the same type of trading with the enemy is continuing today is to follow the advice of the secretive "Deep Throat" and "follow the money." Thanks to the internet, all of us can do the same thing in the privacy of our own homes and offices. A few years ago I downloaded a list of all the partners of Brown Brothers Harriman Co. from a university computer. Recently I have been taking each name and running it through the recorded filings which are accessible through the SEC Edgar sites on the internet. Let's take one of those names and explore what we find. It's an historical name passed down through the generations--Elbridge T. Gerry--a family name which was around even before E.H. Harriman became a household word. The first Elbridge T. Gerry (a merchant shipper) was a signer of the Declaration of Independence and took a seat at the Continental Congress in 1776, served until 1785, and then retired to Cambridge, Mass. He was elected governor of Massachusetts in 1810 and, in 1813, was elected as James Madison's vice-president, though he died a year later. He had three sons and four daughters. (see http://www.jmu.edu/madison/gerry.htm ). His grandson "Commodore" Elbridge Thomas Gerry, 1837-1927, was a reformer. A position as legal advisor to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals led to his founding (1875), with the help of Henry Bergh, the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (sometimes called the Gerry Society). He devoted most of his life to this cause, which became national in scope. He and his wife, Louisa M. Gerry had two sons named after wealthy New Yorkers, Peter Goelet and Robert Livingston, and two daughters, Angelica and Francis. (See http://www.scripophily.net/scripophily/masvotbil.html ) Robert Livingston Gerry married Cornelia Harriman (daughter of railroad tycoon E.H. Harriman) in March 1908, and in 1912 built an estate, known as Aknusti on their 2,000 acre property in Delaware County, New York. They had four sons - Elbridge T., Robert L., and twins Henry and Edward. (See http://www.hartwick.edu/library/archives/gerry/moreinfo.html ) In 1939 their son, Edward H. Gerry, married Martha Botts Farish -- the daughter of William Stamps Farish, founder of Humble Oil in Houston. Cornelia Harriman was the sister of Averill. Edward's brother Elbridge, the eldest, born in 1908, held general partnerships in the banking firms Brown Brothers Harriman Company, and Gerry Brothers Company, and was a well-known philanthropist, notable polo player, avid participant in harness racing, and breeder of champion horse racers. In 1932 he married Marjorie Kane, daughter of John P. Kane. They had two sons, Elbridge T. Jr. and Peter G. II, and a daughter Marjorie. Elbridge Gerry, Sr. died February 26, 1999. Elbridge T.
Re: [CTRL] How the Democrats made loving Dixie a hate crime
-Caveat Lector- Curiously, the number of wealthy, slave-owning plantation owners in the Old South was relatively few--as with any "aristocracy.". Many--if not most--of those who are now running around waving the Confederate flag and pining for those Dear Old Days are not the heirs of that wealthy few. They are folks who descend from merchants and shopkeepers and on down the ladder to poor white farmers and sharecroppers too poor to own slaves, struggling to hold on to a mule and a piece of land. What those great-great-grandsons of poor whites and sharecroppers really want is someone below them on the social ladder so they don't have to feel that they're the bottom of the barrel. That's where the Negro/African-American comes in. That's where he has a functiona dog to kick, as it were. Humans seem to love hierarchy (is it hardwired into the system?) Like a flock of chickens, all those great-great-grandchildren of poor southern white folks just don't want to see themselves at the low end of the pecking order. And now, at the very highest reaches of our government, we have a pack of men who not only understand but share their pain. sno0wl A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Federal Register - List of Executive Orders
-Caveat Lector- from: http://www.nara.gov/fedreg/eo.html Click Here: A HREF="http://www.nara.gov/fedreg/eo.html"Federal Register - List of Executive Orders/A - Executive Orders Disposition Tables January 24, 1953 -- January 18, 2001 These tables contain information about Executive orders beginning with those signed by President Eisenhower. They are arranged according to Presidential administration and year of signature. For Executive orders issued before 1995, there are no links to the text of the order. For Executive orders issued since 1995, you can now find a link to the text of the order as it appeared in the Federal Register. To view the text, you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you don't have Abode Acrobat Reader, you can download it here: If you want more information about Adobe Acrobat Reader, read about it here. Note: The link in the tables provides only the text of the order as it was originally issued. It does not include any amendments to the text. Herbert Hoover 1929-1933 EO's 5075-6070 1011 EO's issuedFranklin D. Roosevelt 1933-1945 EO's 6071-9537 3728 EO's issuedHarry S. Truman 1945-1953 EO's 9538-10431 896 EO's issued Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953-1961 EO's 10432-10913 486 EO's issued John F. Kennedy 1961-1963 EO's 10914-11127 214 EO's issued Lyndon B. Johnson 1963-1969 EO's 11128-11451 324 EO's issued Richard Nixon 1969-1974 EO's 11452-11797 346 EO's issued Gerald R. Ford 1974-1977 EO's 11798-11966 169 EO's issued Jimmy Carter 1977-1981 EO's 11967-12286 320 EO's issued Ronald Reagan 1981-1989 EO's 12287-12667 381 EO's issued George Bush 1989-1993 EO's 12668-12833 166 EO's issued William J. Clinton 1993-2001 EO's 12834-13197 364 EO's issued George W. Bush 2001-Present EO's 0 EO's issued * About the Executive Order Tables * About Executive Orders About the Executive Order Tables These tables are compiled and maintained by Editors of the Office of the Federal Register and include the following information: * Executive order number; * Date of signing by the President; * Federal Register volume, page number, and issue date; * Title; * Amendments (if any); and * Current status (where applicable) All entries in these tables are subject to change, as new Executive orders, Presidential proclamations, other Presidential documents, rules and regulations, notices, and public laws often amend or otherwise affect them. These are informational listings, not provided as definitive legal authority. About Executive Orders Executive orders are official documents, numbered consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government. The text of Executive orders appears in the daily Federal Register as each Executive order is signed by the President and received by the Office of the Federal Register. The text of Executive orders beginning with Executive Order 7316 of March 13, 1936, also appears in the sequential editions of Title 3 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Federal Register home page Questions or comments about this page: [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Archives and Records Administration home page URL: http://www.nara.gov /fedreg/eo.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last updated January 25, 2001 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] MODERN KNIGHT TEMPLAR'S HEART CUT OUT IN ISRAEL
http://www.whitleysworld.com/news012901a.html 01/29/01: MODERN KNIGHT TEMPLAR'S HEART CUT OUT IN ISRAEL text version A Scottish tourist who died mysteriously in Israel may have been a member of the secret organization known as the Knights Templar Israeli journalist Barry Chamish says that he has evidence that the heart was removed after his death, as part of an ancient ritual. Israeli officials claim that the removal took place during a routine autopsy, but could offer no explanation of why it was not returned to the family with the other remains. A heart that was later given to them by Israeli health officials could not be verified as being the heart of Alisdair Rosslyn Sinclair. Sinclair made an unexplained five-day visit to Israel in April, 1998. He was arrested as he tried to leave the country and died in police custody. At the time of his death, he was a musician living in Amsterdam. Now, startling new evidence has been uncovered which reveals that the Scottish guitar maker was a direct descendant of a high-ranking family which helped found the Order of the Knights Templar, which is part of an international battle for the control of the holy sites in Jerusalem. Chamish's investigaton into Sinclair's death has led him to conclude that the musician was the victim of his inherited connection with the Templars. "In my opinion," Chamish says, "he was murdered and his killing was linked to a greater conspiracy." Last week the Israeli Government launched a massive investigation into Abu Kabir morgue, after allegations that body parts from corpses were illegally removed and sold on the black market for organ transplants. "But it was pointless removing Alisdair's heart for medical reasons," claims Chamish. "For a start, a heart has to be kept alive via a life support system if it is to be transplanted. Even more damning is the fact that in Israel we do not carry out heart transplants." It is believed that Alisdair Sinclair was murdered and his heart removed because of his bloodline, since he was one of the leading members of the Knights Templar hierarchy. "The Knights Templar believe they are the rightful heirs to the Christian holy sites in Jerusalem and are currently involved in a secret battle to gain control of them," says Chamish. "Alisdair may have been killed because he got caught up in this clandestine war. The removal of his heart is part of the Knights Templar tradition. When Robert the Bruce died he asked that his heart be cut out and taken from Scotland to be buried in Jerusalem. In Israel, legend has it that his dying wishes were fulfilled." Both Alisdair's brother and the Order of the Knights Templar have backed up some of Chamish's conclusions. James Sinclair, Alisdair's younger brother, said, "Alisdair knew all about our Knights Templar background. He was proud of the fact he was named after Rosslyn Chapel, which was built by the Knights Templar in Scotland. He and I were told about our heritage and bloodline by our father when we were young boys. And we often visited Rosslyn Chapel." Barry Chamish is convinced Alisdair became caught up in a religious feud in Jerusalem. Currently, no fewer than six organizations or nations believe they have first claim to the holy sites in the old part of the Israeli capital. As well as Israel and the Palestinians, others who believe they are entitled to the land include the Vatican, the Greek Orthodox Church and the Russian Orthodox Church. A spokesman for the modern Knights Templar, John Ritchie, lives two miles from the village of Temple, the site of the original Templar headquarters in Scotland. Ritchie, a journalist who works for Reuters, said, "The modern order has 100 members...We are currently involved in an attempt to remove control of the holy sites of Jerusalem from the Israeli Government. We believe they should be administered by the United Nations and are working with the UN and NATO to achieve that goal." Chamish revealed that Alisdair Rosslyn Sinclair is a descendant of one of the original Knights Templar, an order set up by a French relative of the St. Clair family of Rosslyn.The order, which flourished in the 13th century, spread across Europe and became wealthier than many nations. In 1307 the King of France arrested thousands of Templars in an attempt to destroy the Order and claim its assets. A small number escaped to Scotland where they were protected by the St. Clair (later Sinclair) family and continued to flourish. They eventually played a major role in Robert the Bruce's military triumphs. "I believe Alisdair was murdered," says Chamish. "He came to Israel because of his Knights Templar background and became caught up in the current conflict over Jerusalem. "The official explanations about his death cannot be believed. He was stopped trying to leave the country allegedly because he had 9000 Deutschmarks (about $5,000) in a secret compartment of a suitcase. There is nothing illegal about that. If I were
[CTRL] Fraud-As-Usual at the Redstone Arsenal
January 30, 2001 http://www.almartinraw.com/ by Al Martin Fraud-As-Usual at the Redstone Arsenal Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama -- where illegal foreign arms merchants enjoy sumptuous lobster and prime rib lunches at US taxpayers' expense. The Huntsville, Alabama complex is one of the four United States National Arsenals. It's also the headquarters of the United States Central Missile Production Command, where most of the United States missile systems are produced and tested. During the last year, there have been reports in the media about two congressional investigations, one by the US Senate Defense Oversight Committee and the other by its companion committee in the House, regarding illegal sales of extremely sophisticated US military technology and weapons systems to embargoed foreign countries. When a country is embargoed by the US Defense Department, US defense contractors can not sell them weapons because these countries constitute a potential threat to the United States, or they constitute a potential threat to destabilizing US influence within a certain region of the world. The principal weapons, illegally sold through the Redstone Arsenal, have been components of highly advanced missile technology. Through a circuitous shipment route, then, the end user or recipient has been the Peoples' Republic of China. These shipments have been disguised under the Freedom Space Station Program, as well as through the cooperation between the thirty-six nations which are contributing to this program. In fact, Congress passed a specific law, a little-known waiver for the Freedom Space Station Program, wherein the United States could ship certain embargoed technology (dual use) to other countries which were participating in the building of the space station. It is this loophole that is being used to ship weapons components which have nothing to do with the program. China is a partner in this deal. Over the past year (2000), this fraud has expanded into selling many other types of restricted high technology US weapons systems. This is often accomplished through the weekly meetings at the Redstone Arsenal by certain individuals known as "The Group." This Group consists mostly of foreign arms dealers, principally German, Russian, and Chinese brokers. These brokers are almost exclusively foreign military officers or retired foreign military officers. Often they even show up in uniform. Their US counterparts are mostly retired US Air Force senior officers, who have formed arms companies themselves, or they act as paid agents or distributors for US defense contractors. That in itself is not against the law, as long as they do not sell this technology to any embargoed country. There is, however, already an artifice in place to break that embargo. The foreign arms merchants oftentimes either own their arms companies or they work for foreign defense contractors. Most of the Germans there, for example, come under the auspices of the Siemens Group. In other words, the Siemens Group is being used as a front to broker weapons with the Russians to the Chinese. How they're doing it, by the way, is by disguising these transactions. They have weekly auctions. However, what the auction sheet lists as the items being sold are in fact not what the items are. Even my inside source, the Friendly Colonel, tried bidding on a lot. It was described as "Miscellaneous Department of Defense Used Office Furniture and Equipment." That lot was number 103 on the August 19, 2000 auction. It sold for $354,000. The man sitting at the table next to him was the infamous Chinese arms dealer, Lan "Lanny" Chin. It should also be mentioned that he is a colonel in the Chinese Ministry of State Security. The lot in question, actually contained a number of landmines. These landmines happen to be the most sophisticated landmines in US military inventory. These landmines are all made of non-metallic components. They have automatic proximity alarms and differential frequency alarms. They also automatically send out their own radar signal. These are the most sophisticated land mines produced in the world today. They're so state-of-the-art that the United States itself hasn't even deployed the system yet. And what happened then? This lot of landmines was then shipped from the military airfield in Huntsville, Alabama to the government of Mexico. They were listed as "Crates of Eggs." The Mexican Government, actually the Mexican Army, acted as a trans-shipper. From Mexico, they were shipped to Ecuador. From Ecuador, they were shipped to Peru. From Peru, they were shipped to Pakistan. And from Pakistan, they were shipped to China. That was the route taken by these particular "Crates of Eggs. What we got then was $354,000 of the Chinese People's Army
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
-Caveat Lector- more guns = more deaths This is not only faulty logic, but it flies in the face of the empirical data. More guns, at most, equal more death by gunfire. More guns do not equal more deaths period. Whered you learn math, anyway? Go back there and complain. Your math teacher was grossly misfeasant. Your equation is incomplete. You failed to factor in the deaths prevented by guns. Every year, at the barest minimum, Americans use guns to prevent crimes two million times. And thats just the ones that were reported. It is not at all unsafe to assume that the majority go unreported. The majority of all human activities go unreported. I, myself, have used a gun to prevent a crime. I sure didnt report it. Guns prevent crimes. Often that crime is murder. Then theres rape and robbery, but lets keep this simple and factor only for deaths. To accurately determine the death to gun ratio you have to subtract form the total number of deaths the murders that were prevented by guns in the hands of the intended victims of murders that didnt happen. Calculating the gun to death ratio is not the most revealing study, anyway. What you really want to be calculating is the ratio between the number of times a gun is used to prevent a death and the number times a gun is used to cause a death. Keep in mind that a certain number will cancel each other out because one way to prevent a death is to cause one. In the vast majority of cases where a gun is used to prevent a crime, however, it is not fired. It is, at most brandished. In my case, I didnt even brandish it. I just let them know it was there. I popped the lid of the car trunk and, while standing behind it, looked the nearest one in eye and said. Do you WANT trouble? He didnt, and neither did his friends. They backed off at once, and I dont blame them one bit. It was the smartest move they could have possibly made. I am one hundred percent convinced that having what I had in the trunk that day prevented at least three, and maybe five murders. And I didnt even have to show it off. For all they knew for certain, all I had in there was a stack of cream pies. But if I hadnt had what I did have in there, I wouldnt have been able to pull it off. My fear would have shown and theyd have been on us in a hot second. Never bluff. NEVER, not even once. Especially dont try to bluff a bunch of guys with lumpy pockets when one of them is coming straight at you across a parking lot with his hand in his pocket and race slurs coming out of his mouth aimed at the guy next to you. Dont bluff guys like this. Its way too risky. If shooting back is not at least one of your options, run. Run as fast as you can and hope they dont shoot you the back. If they shoot you anyway, as youre lying there dying, youre going to have some last thoughts. One of them, I guarantee, will be, I should have listened to nessie about this. Is that REALLY what you want to have for a last thought? Think about it. A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Margaret Sanger - Racist / Eugenicist
-Caveat Lector- IN A LETTER TO DR. CLARENCE GAMBLE, Dec 19, 1939: Where was this letter published? (Include ISBN, please) Is it online somewhere? What did the rest of the letter say? A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] How the Democrats made loving Dixie a hate crime
-Caveat Lector- Humans seem to love hierarchy (is it hardwired into the system?) Hierarchy is not hardwired into the system or else there would be no non hierarchical cultures. When, however, when hierarchy is imposed on a population, most members of that population tend to want to not feel like they are at they bottom. Our rulers use this to manipulate us. Divide and conquer. A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Elite US spy unit sent to Pine Gap
http://theaustralian.com.au/common/story_page/0,4511,1651661%255E601,00.html Elite US spy unit sent to Pine Gap By Cameron Stewart 27jan01 AN elite team of US Navy code-breakers has been established at the joint Australia-US intelligence base at Pine Gap as part of a push to boost surveillance of foreign navies in Asia. The group – known as the US Navy Detachment Combined Support Group, Alice Springs, Australia – was formally set up in early 1998, according to US naval documents obtained by The Australian. Intelligence experts believe the group was probably set up to help monitor developments in China's navy, which is undergoing a modernisation program amid continuing tensions with neighbouring Taiwan. China is one of several Asian navies, including India's, that are looking to acquire extra firepower to assert their strategic influence in the region – a development being carefully monitored by Western allies. Australia would have access to the information obtained by the US group at Pine Gap under longstanding intelligence-sharing arrangements between the two countries. In 1997 the federal Government foreshadowed increases in both US and Australian civilian and military personnel at Pine Gap but did not provide details. But a letter from the commander of the US Naval Security Group Command to the US Chief of Naval Operations in January 1998 provides a rare insight into the build-up at the base. "The NSGC Command has entered into a host nation partnership at the Joint Defense Facility, Pine Gap, Australia that requires assignment of a cadre of navy cryptologic officers and technicians," it says. "This action is required to support NSGC participation in a joint operational venture at the Joint Defense Facility, Pine Gap, Australia. "The letter proposes that the detachment comprise about 43 US naval officers and enlisted personnel, but does not make it clear if any of these would already have been serving at Pine Gap when the unit was set up. A spokesman for Defence Minister John Moore declined to comment specifically on the letter but said: "The Government in 1997 foreshadowed staff increases as Pine Gap's role continues to evolve to meet the demands of the post-Cold War environment." A spokesman for the US embassy in Canberra also declined to comment but pointed to the Australian Government's 1997 announcement about planned staffing increases at Pine Gap. An intelligence expert from Canberra's Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Des Ball, said the US naval unit would probably be responsible for monitoring specific developments in command and control of a major regional navy, most likely China's. "They are obviously monitoring some naval communications in the region that are of very high value to them," Professor Ball said. The tasks carried out by the US naval group might also include monitoring telemetry associated with development of long-range anti-ship missiles in the region, he said. China is seeking to develop a blue-water navy to maximise its strategic clout in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Straits and the Sea of Japan. US air force and army personnel have also been stationed at Pine Gap for some years, although their numbers are unknown. When the joint US-Australian intelligence facility at Pine Gap was built in 1967, it used satellites to detect and monitor missile launches in the former Soviet Union. Since then it has expanded into a huge high-tech ground station that monitors a vast range of military targets in South and East Asia. Since 1980, Australia has reportedly had full access to all intelligence gathered at Pine Gap. Professor Ball said the establishment of the NSGC detachment at Pine Gap marked the first time that a US intelligence agency other than the CIA had had a permanent presence there. The NSGC reports to the National Security Agency rather than the CIA, which runs Pine Gap. The NSGC's letter appears to reflect some sensitivity about this point, advising that "due to operational security concerns at the Joint Defence Facility, Pine Gap, the proposed title of the detachment does not indicate a relationship to the Naval Security Group". The Pine Gap base could become the subject of controversy later this year if the new Bush administration in Washington asks Australia to help establish its proposed national missile defence system. Such a system would almost certainly use the facilities at Pine Gap. The Howard Government has indicated its support for the planned system but the ALP has expressed serious reservations.
Re: [CTRL] School Vouchers
-Caveat Lector- Education is not a "right." Every parent has a duty to educate his/her offspring. Govt should not steal people's money to force them to pay for other's parental responsibilities. Thats where youre wrong. Every human being is born with the moral responsibility to care for, nurture, protect and educate every other human being who needs it. When you withhold what it is your moral duty to give, it is you who are stealing from the rest of us. This is errant nonsense and statist sophistry. It is the height of arrogance for you to lecture others as to their "moral duty". It is Fascistic to attempt to impose your concept of "moral duty" on others by threat of force through government intimidation. Other then not harm my innocent fellow citizens, or steal their property, my moral duty is not to impose my personal beliefs on others. Im a sociologist, an anthropologist, a psychologist, and old. Ive been around a long time. Ive met a LOT of people. Im a GOOD judge of character. In my expert opinion, you dont talk like a poor person or like somebody you cares about others, especially about poor people. Youre either a selfish, self centered, greedy, irresponsible jerk or else youre a world class fraud. Which is it? I am not interested in your matchbook cover credentials. You are a good example of that maxim: "No fool like an old fool." flw A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] School Vouchers
-Caveat Lector- This is errant nonsense and statist sophistry. Who said anything about statism? I dont think the government should run the schools, either. I just dont want to to see them fall into the hands of the corporations. That would be much, much worse. Personally, Id prefer to see schools managed by parent-teacher cooperatives. It is the height of arrogance for you to lecture others as to their "moral duty". Its my moral duty to attempt to enlighten you, because you are a fellow human being and you are morally remiss. It is also pragmatic to attempt to help you to mend yourself of your error because your error threatens the future of all of us. If public education falls into corporate hands, this will be a much worse place to live, worse even than it is today. It is Fascistic to attempt to impose your concept of "moral duty" on others by threat of force through government intimidation. That depends on the circumstance. In this particular instance Im not using force. Im using logic, reason and morality. If I was using force, you'd know it. Other then not harm my innocent fellow citizens, or steal their property, my moral duty is not to impose my personal beliefs on others. Thats a selfish, self centered and short sighted philosophy. If everyone felt like you, wed be in a sorry state indeed. If you ever find yourself bleeding to death in a ditch, as I once did , that you remember as the cars stream past, that by your way of thinking, they have no moral duty to stop and help you. A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
not according tohttp://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=bollocksbollocks v : make a mess of, destroy or ruin [syn: botch, fumble, botch up,muff, blow, flub, screw up, ball up, blunder, spoil, muck up, bungle, fluff,bollix, bollix up, bollocks up, bobble, mishandle, louse up, foul up, mess up,fuck up]be sure of your facts. how did you think it was spelled anyway? - Original Message - From: BB To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2001 08:40 Subject: Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE 1. Doesn't seem like any respect at all. 2. You misspelled "bollocks" (sic) "c." wrote: -Caveat Lector- with all due respect, bollocks.
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
LOL my logic is sound as a pound, darling, you can emote all you like about armedhousebreakers but the fact remains that whether it is the assaulter or theassaulted- the use of guns leads to more deaths than not using guns. like isaid- indisputable logic.the cost and availablity of guns in the UK is prohibitive.the scenario you describe does not really happen in the UK because there aren'tmany guns in circulation.we prefer blades, home made mostly because the damned government infringed ourright to bare shivs, butterfly knives, deathstars, etc without good reason."i am an artist officer- the machete is for sharpening my pencil" that sort ofthing, y'know?the amount of armed housebreakers is linked directly to the amount of gunsavailable in the country. here in the UK it is expensive and difficult to buyguns- from UKP200+ for the most basic (illegal that is- there are no legalhandguns- except for very few sporting and strictly policed pistols) handgun -petty burglars just do not either have the cash- or ready access to them. - Original Message - From: BB To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2001 08:43 Subject: Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE Next time an armed intruder breaks into your home, try defending your family with indisputable logic. "c." wrote: -Caveat Lector- with all due respect, bollocks. if you need any supporting evidence then contrast and compare per capita gun deaths (deliberate or accidental (the accident stat would be shocking on it's own)) in the USA with the UK more guns= more death. indisputable logic.
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
-Caveat Lector- nessie, in the UK i only realistically have to worry about getting stabbed or beaten at worst when i am out and about. in the US the reality is that you have to defend yourself with a gun because the assailants are armed, i understand and sympathise completely with that- and would not want to take your gun off ya (prying it from your cold, dead etcetera) but it is a bad situation that can only escalate. it is all you know and it is so sad that the stakes are that high in your country. it is normal to you- but strange to a western european. i think it may be immoral of your government to limit your options when the police, army, organised criminals and every other criminal is carrying on with the arms race. but it isn't normal to have such an overarmed population unless there is a national war on. - Original Message - From: "Nessie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2001 17:51 Subject: Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE -Caveat Lector- more guns = more deaths This is not only faulty logic, but it flies in the face of the empirical data. More guns, at most, equal more death by gunfire. More guns do not equal more deaths period. Whered you learn math, anyway? Go back there and complain. Your math teacher was grossly misfeasant. Your equation is incomplete. You failed to factor in the deaths prevented by guns. Every year, at the barest minimum, Americans use guns to prevent crimes two million times. A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
In a message dated 1/30/01 1:37:04 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nessie, in the UK i only realistically have to worry about getting stabbed or beaten at worst when i am out and about No guns. Cameras every 10 feet on the street. cameras that can see into homes from the street. A national DNA typing program in the works. Wasn't George Orwell from the UK? An unarmed population is a population of serfs. Carl
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
cameras every ten feet? LOL surely you jest, carl, you obviously haven't been here and orwell is generally believed to be "ofhis time" and any relevance to the UK people (in particular) lending themselves to being wooly and subjegated is attendent only to the fact that we love to identify and document our oppressors- celebrate them, even- we have a constitutional monarchy remember ;) and see into homes? whoopee... people in cars, pedestrians can see into my home- and if i want to hide- then i have a net curtain ;) the subject/ citizen argument you offer is good for philisophical theory- but is immaterial practically. your guns are mere comforters against your percieved threat from the government, because, dude, the government are always going to have an H-bomb bigger than yours- you cannot protect yourself from them. you may have a chance against criminals (if they are cheap criminals) but dream on boy about defending yourself from anyone with decent resources. - Original Message - From: Carl Amedio To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2001 19:49 Subject: Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE In a message dated 1/30/01 1:37:04 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nessie, in the UK i only realistically have to worry about getting stabbed or beaten at worst when i am out and aboutNo guns. Cameras every 10 feet on the street. cameras that can see into homes from the street. A national DNA typing program in the works. Wasn't George Orwell from the UK? An unarmed population is a population of serfs. Carl
[CTRL] BioApocalypse: How Secret Experiments May Have Unleashed Cancer Causing Viruses
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com.au/Articles/BioApocalypse.html BioApocalypse: How Secret Experiments May Have Unleashed Cancer Causing Viruses By Leonard Horowitz The American people, along with the rest of the world’s population, have been under attack by insidious lethal enemies. Most people cannot perceive or conceive that shadow governors are engaged in hideous biological and chemical experiments on unwitting populations. Minority and ethnic groups especially at risk for toxic exposures, many being done in the name of “public health.” The recent widescale spraying of malathion and Anvil, two known chemical carcinogens and immune system toxins, to allegedly prevent West Nile Virus attacks within several northeastern American states, is just one example of such “public health policy” based on no rational science. Most people are incapable of realising the scope and depth of such crimes against humanity. Perceiving, rather, their impotence in altering the course of history, and fearing the fight of a crusade, people rationalise their inefficacy or indifference in human terms – “Don’t tell me. That’s just the way it is. I can’t do anything about it anyway, so I’d rather not know.” During the past two decades, at least six internationally known authorities advanced theories that the AIDS virus (HIV-1) was developed by biological weapons researchers, and either accidentally or intentionally transmitted it with the help of the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) and the United Nations World Health Organisation (WHO). A 1969 US military appropriations document obtained through the Freedom of Information Act called for $10 million for the development of AIDS-like viruses by 1975. In fact the National Academy of Sciences / National Research Council had informed the Department of Defense (DOD) that: [I]t would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. During the 1960s and early 1970s, these agencies, with help from the World Health Organisation (WHO), the (US) National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Rockefeller and Alfred P. Sloan Foundations played leading roles in the development of cancer viruses for vaccine research and germ warfare. By 1969, the WHO had provided “prototype virus strains” for more than 592 virus laboratories in more than 35 different countries. That year, four of the most active centres, including the NCI and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), distributed 2,514 strains of viruses, 1888 ampoules of experimental vaccines, and about 100 samples of cell cultures throughout the WHO’s viral network. 70,000 virus isolations were reported by 1970, and many, cultured for further study, were breaking out of the laboratories that tested them. In March of 1970, WHO consultants even reported the likelihood of massive cancer epidemics from such virus outbreaks. Such “biological agents,” they noted, “may be used... to achieve the simultaneous infection of key groups of people, and the military consequences might well be of major importance” However, they warned of the “calculated risk that a virulent mutant might appear and spread rapidly to produce an uncontrollable epidemic on a large scale” These consultants also predicted that as a consequence of such biological attacks, “mass illnesses, deaths, and epidemics” would require the WHO and allied agencies to furnish supplies and personnel to deal with the resulting medical emergencies. The first viruses and retroviruses used for cancer and biological weapons research passed through the NCI. Among the premier labs specifically researching, developing, and testing immune system destroying viruses was the Cell Tumor Biology Laboratory at the NCI. This was headed by Dr. Robert Gallo – the notorious alleged co-discoverer of the AIDS virus. To date it remains uncertain when Gallo discovered HIV. It was reported Gallo’s discovery followed the French Pasteur Institute’s Luc Montagnier’s discovery of LAV, an identical virus, in 1984, but new evidence suggests he may have genetically engineered the virus as early as 1970 along with biological weapons contractors at Litton Bionetics – a subsidiary of the mega-military weapons producer Litton Industries, Inc. Dr. Gallo’s behaviour is, in fact, highly suspicious. As chronicled by bestselling deceased author Randy Shilts in And the Band Played On, and more recently by Eleanor Burkitt in The Gravest Show on Earth, Gallo’s collaborative efforts in search of the AIDS virus were deceitful and repugnant. The authors’ charged Gallo’s ego was largely responsible for delaying international progress in search of the AIDS virus.
Re: [CTRL] School Vouchers
-Caveat Lector- This is errant nonsense and statist sophistry. Nessie Who said anything about statism? I don't think the government should run the schools, either. I just don't want to to see them fall into the hands of the corporations. That would be much, much worse. MJ You do comprehend Statism? Not that you provide support for *any* of your drivel (as I remain on vigil for your pre-socialist schools literacy details) ... How will an education through 'cooperation' be WORSE than an education by force? Nessie Personally, I'd prefer to see schools managed by parent-teacher cooperatives. MJ Remove Government from the equation ... and this could certainly be one option. Will your cooperatives require other people's money which is to be provided without their consent? It is the height of arrogance for you to lecture others as to their "moral duty". Nessie It's my moral duty to attempt to enlighten you, because you are a fellow human being and you are morally remiss. It is also pragmatic to attempt to help you to mend yourself of your error because your error threatens the future of all of us. MJ How is a philosophy with roots in rape, theft and enslavement ... moral? WHO says it is YOUR 'duty' as you describe it? By what definition? Edict? Nessie If public education falls into corporate hands, this will be a much worse place to live, worse even than it is today. MJ Yes, you made this claim above ... How will an education through 'cooperation' be WORSE than an education by force? It is Fascistic to attempt to impose your concept of "moral duty" on others by threat of force through government intimidation. Nessie That depends on the circumstance. In this particular instance I'm not using force. I'm using logic, reason and morality. If I was using force, you'd know it. MJ What logic? Other then not harm my innocent fellow citizens, or steal their property, my moral duty is not to impose my personal beliefs on others. Nessie That's a selfish, self centered and short sighted philosophy. MJ What do you imagine the 'philosophy' you are shoveling is? Nessie If everyone felt like you, we'd be in a sorry state indeed. MJ How? If everyone took care of THEMSELVES ... stole from no one else ... cooperated ... how could this be possible? Nessie If you ever find yourself bleeding to death in a ditch, as I once did , that you remember as the cars stream past, that by your way of thinking, they have no moral duty to stop and help you. MJ Right. What makes YOU more important than others? Regard$, --MJ The classic redistribution-of-wealth mentality works this way: A and B get together to impose a tax on C so they can give his money to D, who out of a mix of envy of C, gratitude to A and B, and selfishness, then votes for A and B again so they can repeat the process next year. A and B justify playing Robin Hood by claiming that C has plenty of money and, in any event, has a social responsibility to help 'the needy'. Of course, D is 'needy'. -- William Stanmeyer Karl Marx tried to devise an economic system that got rid of selfishness. The results are well-known. The Soviet block lagged well behind the West in economic growth. The people there lived in a police state. But selfishness, of a type, continued to thrive there. A Soviet citizen did not get ahead by trading with others. He prospered by climbing the political ladder through corruption. -- Charles Oliver A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
In a message dated 1/30/01 2:08:12 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cameras every ten feet? LOL surely you jest, carl, you obviously haven't been here I just watched a BBC program on the complete loss of privacy in UK. The fact you pooh pooh this says volumes. Enjoy the gulag. Carl
[CTRL] Fwd: SOTHEBYS.COM - Collecting Guides - Jewelry
So my family always had an interest in diamonds and gems, in particular the Hope Diamond - the cursed diamond of all time. Now as I pointed out to snoOwl, on Larry King's show, Elizabeth Taylor wore this huge diamond. During this show Larry King suddenly l grabbed her hand and said "where did you get this ting" and he pulled and tugged at her hand and would not let go - Ms. Elizabeth Rosmond Taylor, aka 7 or so more names - tried to pull her hand away he he hung on to her hand in a not too gentle manner. She was drunk or spaced out on drugs; suddenlty she said "Richard bought it for me"..and he had bought it from KRUPP.he diamond looked as cheap as she did no doubt because so much gauze and goop was put on the lenses to knock off layers of wrinkles.a usual procedure which takes considerable time. So Richard bought it from Krupp.but then she said in a loud voice like what revenge a little jewish girl like her had that diamondand King said hey, Liz you are a convert jew aren't you? He was as disgusted with her as I hope those who watched her performance must have been. The diamond ring had belonged to Krupp and now she calls it the Taylor Burton Diamond? Now who's diamond was this Liz..part of the stolen loot from WWII ... Sotheby's now and then puts out a lot of things that were stolen in WWIIeven little Madeline Albrights family stole treasures like thieves in the night as they fled to safety some were not so lucky. So as I said, all Liz needed was an apple in her mouth and a ring through her snout.. So read the story here about this ring that Richard bought her - she claims she bought it from Krupp? Is this someone's stolen treasure fro WWII.. Saba Sotheby's Connoisseur Collecting Guides Jewelry Introduction ven the earliest prehistoric peoples believed in the adornment of the body; and later civilizations - the world over - have considered jewelry an integral part of their lives. Whether a gem-encrusted crown to convey power, an amulet for protection and comfort, or a simple pair of earrings to set off the color of your eyes - the language of jewelry is universal. Archaeological sites found in the Middle East suggest that there were jewelry-making centers in Persia as early as the 8th and 9th centuries BC. The Incas believed that the wearing of gold and jade passed mystical qualities of the precious materials onto the wearer. Queen Mary I (also known as "Bloody Mary") was so convinced that gold and silver were able to cure people of their ills that she ordered a large gold bust of St. George melted down to fashion rings for her "grouty" (morose) subjects. An archaeological-revival gold and enamel-fringe necklace, last quarter 19th century.Made of rare or precious materials (which vary widely from place to place and period to period), jewelry has been perceived by all civilizations not only as a form of ornament for the body but also as a means to display wealth, status and power. The Crown Jewels of England - featuring the famed Koh-I-Noor diamond from India and the massive Star of Africa and Lesser Star diamonds from South Africa - clearly speak to the global dominance that the British Empire exerted during the colonial period. A sapphire and diamond ring, 21.56 carats. A ruby and diamond flower brooch, Aletto Bros. Equally longstanding is the tradition of giving and wearing jewels to express sentiments of love, affection, and devotion. NOW READ THIS GARBAGE ABOUT THIS FAT PIG WHO IS SO LOVED - I SAY, ABOUT 8 HUSBANDS OR SO AND THE LAST WAS A POOR TRUCK DRIVER - HE PROBABLY NEEDED A TRUCK TO HAUL THAT OLD SOT ABOUTSABA *Measured by carat-weight, no one is more loved and admired than Elizabeth Taylor: she received three diamond rings - totaling more than 132 carats - from Mike Todd and Richard Burton. One of those diamonds is a 69.42-carat, pear-shaped diamond that now bears her name: the Taylor-Burton diamond. Sold here at Sotheby's in 1969, it was the first diamond to sell for more than one million dollars. SO SOTHEBY'S OPERATING A FENCE THESE DAYS TOO...OR DID BURTON AS LIZ SAID ON THE AIR BUY THAT RING FROM KRUPP. nobody else seemed to cath that one (Saba's Note" - today I wonder from whom her diamond was stolen - was it cut off a dead woman's finger at one time.gems once were for Kings and Queens and national treasures...and this fat pig, I would venture to say, has a stolen diamond but she still looks like a prostitute with a hump on her back from too much of the good things.bet that diamond is cursed like Hope Diamond ... *So where did the really get the diamond - only Sotheby's seems to know, for sure. While at one time jewelry was the exclusive realm of monarchy and nobility, collecting jewels is now within the means of many. It can make an extravagant statement or be frivolous fun. Pieces can be as serious as an engagement ring or as blithe as a pair of
[CTRL] Jewish broker told to wear Nazi uniform
Click here: Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | Jewish broker told to wear Nazi uniform at work
[CTRL] FW: Stop Military Voter Fraud
-Caveat Lector- Western Journalism Center Military Vote Fraud -- E-mail Petition January 30, 2001 JOSEPH FARAH Editor in Chief, WorldNetDaily.Com Founder, Western Journalism Center Dear Friend of WorldNetDaily: Do you believe the men and women who serve in our nation's armed forces should have the right to vote and have their votes counted in the 2002 election? If so, please read my short letter. Right now, Western Journalism Center investigative journalist Ken Timmerman is exposing the shameful attempt by former President Bill Clinton and his administration to block our military personnel's right to vote and have their votes counted in the last election. And Ken's discovering that Democrats have more of the same planned in 2002! I know what you're thinking -- now that Clinton's out and George W. Bush is president we'll get to the bottom of this. Think again! My friend, if you and I don't demand action -- a full congressional investigation -- then Democrat leaders in Congress are going to push it out of sight. In fact, Democrat Senate Leader Tom Daschle is working to kill a bill that would ensure the men and women in our military have the opportunity to vote and have their vote counted! I need you to help WJC go forward with its investigation without delay! I've attached a link below that will allow you to do two things: * Join the national campaign demanding Congress take action to protect our military personnel's right to vote by signing our NATIONAL PETITION: PROTECT OUR MILITARY PERSONNEL'S VOTING RIGHTS! We want to send 250,000 petitions to new Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the members of Congress who sit on the powerful armed forces committees in the House and Senate. * Make a tax-deductible, secure credit card contribution of $20, $35, $50, $100, $500 or more to Western Journalism Center. WJC must raise $36,500 over the next 45 days to track down the growing number of leads Ken is uncovering in this story. Ken has already uncovered a cesspool of pre-election corruption by Clinton/Gore prior to last November 7. Now he's mired deep in more interviews and ready to shake the powers responsible for the shameful voter fraud that nearly brought us to a constitutional crisis -- people who are prepared to pull the same dirty tricks again in 2002 unless we expose them now! But we need to raise the funds to proceed as quickly as possible. Here is the link: http://www.westernjournalism.com/voterfraud/military.htm I've pledged to WJC President Jim Smith that WorldNetDaily will publish every inch of Ken's story on our far-reaching news pages. And we're also working with editors from other major media, like Insight magazine, who have the courage to print this story in its entirety. But WJC needs your help. Right now! Sign WJC's NATIONAL PETITION: PROTECT OUR MILITARY PERSONNEL'S VOTING RIGHTS! Let's send a message right now to Secretary Rumsfeld and the members of the armed forces committees in the House and Senate that our men and women in uniform MUST have their right to vote protected and have their votes counted! Why would Tom Daschle want to prevent the Americans who are sent thousands of miles away to protect his position in the Senate, among other things, from voting? And why would America's mainstream media elite ignore this injustice? Can you think of anything more un-American? I can't. And I believe you're as fed up with this as I am. So please, click on this link now, "sign" your e-mail PETITION and make a generous tax-deductible contribution of $20, $35, $50, $100, $500 or more to Western Journalism Center right now. Please click this link now: http://www.westernjournalism.com/voterfraud/military.htm Thank you for your past support of not only WorldNetDaily but Western Journalism Center as well. We keep fighting to deliver the truth to the American people, and our readership continues to grow. But WJC is dedicated to changing the biased culture of our media -- they deserve every bit of support we can offer today. May God bless you and your family. Sincerely, Joseph Farah Editor in Chief, WorldNetDaily.com Founder, Western Journalism Center P.S.: Please act right now. We're going to make this a long-term project -- END VOTER FRAUD in 2002. So it's imperative WJC continue its investigation without any delays. But, of course, you can only proceed as long as you have the funds to do so. That's why your help is needed. If we don't get the truth out, I guarantee the Democrats in Congress and their mainstream media accomplices will kill this story -- and the same type of fraud will take place in the 2002 election! Here is the link again: http://www.westernjournalism.com/voterfraud/military.htm Thanks again. ___ Please do not respond to this message. This WND subscriber alert is handled by a system which does not process incoming mail. This list is distributed to those who have requested the WorldNetDaily News Alert service.
[CTRL] FW: Firearms - Fantasy and Fact
-Caveat Lector- I can't vouch for all these numbers, but it makes a good read anyway. -- nessie -Original Message- Sent: Tue 1/30/2001 10:32 AM Subject:[prj] Firearms - Fantasy and Fact Rare Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts: http://a-albionic.com/search.html * Conspiracy Shopping Cart: http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html * Misc Shopping On-Line http://a-albionic.com/ads/srch.html ** Firearms - Fantasy and Fact The governor's signing of Michigan's concealed weapons reform bill, HB 4530, on Jan. 2, 2001 has spawned a most incredible collection of media lies, fantasies, and distortions regarding firearms and crime. In order to provide thinking and rational people with facts to be used as rebuttal, this piece lists some of the more flagrant fantasies, followed by the relevant facts. Please feel free to use any or all of these data without attribution as to source. It is more important to present these facts to people who are able to comprehend them. Fantasy: Michigan's new concealed weapons licensing law liberalizes the carrying of concealed pistols. Fact: Instead of liberalizing existing law, the new law provides much tighter requirements on applicants than does the current law. The new law "de-elitizes" current law and provides very strong restrictions on recipients of concealed weapons licenses, and is the most stringent law of any of the 32 "shall-issue" states. Current (pre-2001) law contains virtually no restrictions on who can receive a permit to carry a concealed weapon. Detailed studies of licensees in Kent County and Washtenaw County, as well as numerous reported experiences of applicants throughout the state, have shown that the most important criterion for receiving a license is to have friends on the concealed weapon licensing board. Permits are issued preferentially to ex-police, judges, politicians, rock stars, and the very wealthy, and few are granted to competent law-abiding citizens. The new law mandates state-wide uniformity in issuing concealed weapons licenses, and requires the following, where in each instance the old law required nothing: · Anyone who has been convicted of a misdemeanor in the past 3 years is ineligible. · Anyone under the age of 21 is ineligible. · Anyone with a diagnosed mental health illness is ineligible. · Every applicant must complete an 8-hour training course. · Licensees cannot carry in any of the following locations: schools and school property, public and private; day care centers, public and private; college dormitories and classrooms; bars and restaurants that serve alcohol; property of churches, synagogues, and mosques; sports arenas and stadiums; casinos; hospitals; auditoriums seating more than 2500. · Licensees with blood alcohol greater than 0.02 percent are forbidden to carry. Current law allows some 3.5 million non-Michigan concealed weapon licensees and some 25,000 Michigan licensees to carry in *all* of the above locations. If the new law is repealed by initiative, this situation will continue. Fantasy: There will be "blood in the streets" from crimes committed by concealed weapons licensees if shall-issue becomes law. (Senator Alma Wheeler Smith, 18th District [Washtenaw County], personal correspondence.) Fact: It hasn't happened, anywhere. Concealed weapons licensees are incredibly law-abiding citizens. It hasn't happened in Florida, which was the first state with shall-issue laws: Since adopting CCW (1987), Florida's homicide rate has fallen 21% while the U.S. rate has risen 12%. From start-up 10/1/87 - 2/28/94 (over 6 years) Florida issued 204,108 permits; only 17 (0.008%) were revoked because permittees later committed crimes (not necessarily violent) in which guns were present (not necessarily used). It hasn't happened in Kentucky: "None of our concerns have been borne out," said Hazard police Chief Rod Maggard, president of the Kentucky Chiefs of Police Association, which opposed the concealed-carry bill for fear it would invite citizens to take the law into their own hands. A [Louisville, KY] Courier-Journal comparison of state police figures on the crime rate of permit holders with the crime rate of the state population at large shows that murder charges were placed against permit holders at a rate of 3.8 per 100,000 compared with 6.1 per 100,000 for the population at large during the three most recent years available. It hasn't happened in Texas: "I'm detecting that I'm eating a lot of crow on this issue...I think that says something that we've gotten to this point in the year and in the third largest city in America there has not been a single charge against anyone that had anything to do with a concealed handgun." John Holmes (Harris County [Houston, TX] District Attorney) December 9, 1996 "...It has impressed me how remarkably responsible the permit holders have been." Colonel James Wilson (Director
[CTRL] Fwd: The Solari Story
Kris: New court transcripts just unsealed that prove DOJ wrongdoing beyond any doubt. We are now in the process of talking with reporters to see if we can start to get some media coverage. Could you post this overview on CIA-Drugs in the hopes that folks would circulate it to reporters who may be interested? Thanks. Catherine Austin Fitts Solari = My name is Catherine Austin Fitts. I live in Hickory Valley, Tennessee. I am an entrepreneur starting a new company--Solari. Solari's mission is to help communities start local software tool and database developer/knowledge management operations called solaris. Think of it as a local "resource compass" for a neighborhood that helps communities continuously reengineer their resource use to support local prosperity in a global environment. My goal is to start Hickory Valley Solari this year and use our website to teach others how to do the same. I am a former Managing Director and member of the Board of Directors of Dillon Read Co, Inc. and Assistant Secretary of Housing-FHA Commissioner in the Bush Administration. For my complete resume, see: http://www.solari.com/about/ca_fitts.html After leaving the Bush Administration in 1990, I started The Hamilton Securities Company in Washington, DC. I declined an offer from the Administration to be nominated as a governor of the Federal Reserve Board. My tour of duty in the Administration had persuaded me that new software, networking and telecommunication tools made it possible to build a new kind of collaborative economy based on knowledge as the principal wealth creating resource. If you have read Peter Drucker, the Solari model is geared towards the practical integration of these ideas and new technology into new forms of high performance organizations and communities. Eighteen months at HUD persuaded me that communities needed to take the lead in reengineering government and essential services investment locally. This reengineering---despite common notions---could not be done from Washington. If anything we needed to get Washington out of our communities. We started in a little brownstone off of 14th street in Washington. It did not take long to figure with the right computer set up and a satellite dish on the roof, that it did not matter if we were in a bad part of town. Our mission statement was "to liquefy and make accessible". We believed that new technology and tools could so increase learning speeds in both organizations and communities that private entrepreneurs could end poverty with education and small business creation. After several years, we found a loft space on DuPont circle and created the first open office in DC over looking the circle and the fountain on the second floor over CVS Pharmacy, with integrated phone and computers, which was to win an award from the American Institute of Architects: http://www.e-architect.com/conted/advntech/projcts/proj10.asp The first phase of Hamilton's business was to build the "know how" of prototyping the new tools sufficient to understand how to invent a new form of collaboartive organization and community venture capital. We sought any financial advisory assignment that would permit us to prototype reengineering and venture transactions and business starts up that would inform how to finance a small business network and a community with private equity controlled within the community that promoted substantially high learning speeds and knowledge. Overview information about clients, assignments, finances and software development can be found at: http://www.solari.com/gideon/about/index.html To say that Hamilton's culture was unique, does not begin to touch on how magical it was to start, to build, to grow. We started on the premise that knowledge and learning can solve the most intractable problems by building a alignment and moving out of a combative model and into collaborative learning models that used software tools and development techniques to simply and make accessible things that had once seemed hopeless complicated or uncertain. Our work force was remarkably diverse in a very wonderful way. The amazing thing was how financially successful our model was. We were a huge hit. The market for our tools and skills was very strong. We got things done. We were fun to work with. Everyone wanted to come over to our place. The food was great. In late 1993, we were hired through a competitive process to help the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) determine if they wanted to do with their $12 billion portfolio of defaulted mortgages. We understood the risks the working with government. At the same time, HUD had the richest databases on how the money worked in communities. We helped HUD determine that they wanted to do loan sales, and then proceeded to serve as their lead financial advisor, with a twist. We took a software
[CTRL] Fwd: U.S. is recession-bound, says Cheney (http://www.msnbc.com/news/522846.asp)
Check out the "mudra' Cheney is giving, in pix at site. Om K http://www.msnbc.com/news/522846.asp U.S. is recession-bound, says Cheney.url
[CTRL] What the heck?
-Caveat Lector- As seen at my wonderful and informative website http://leviathan.weblogs.com Could this be a CIA psy-op or something? http://www.jonestownreenactment.org/ http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/05/14/stinwenws02036.html Arts group to replay massacre in park Richard Brooks, Arts Editor THE Institute of Contemporary Arts is to stage a re-enactment in a London park this summer of the 1978 Jonestown massacre in which more than 900 followers of the Rev Jim Jones committed suicide. Vivienne Gaskin, the ICA's director of live arts, said the aim was "to counter the popular misconception that Jones was simply demonic, evil and without humanity". She said: "He's remembered mainly for the mass suicide in Guyana, but we really want to look at what happened before." The plan has infuriated survivors as well as cult experts and local residents. "I think on principle it is distasteful and disturbing to do something that glamorises or sanitises the image of someone who caused the deaths of so many," said Ayman Akshar, the director of Triumph Over London Cults. "People do get attracted to join cults after seeing such images in films or public displays. They feel, 'Let's give it a try.' It is a sense of adventure and danger." Still life: the ICA courted controversy before with this exhibit featuring Sophie Dahl On May 26, Graeme Edler, who has appeared in The Bill and Brookside, will play Jones at the ICA and read some of his political and religious sermons from the mid-1970s, when thousands of followers flocked to his People's Temple in San Francisco. It will include one of the sham "miracle healings" he often performed. At the end of July, however, the ICA is taking its art outside. In a re-enactment of the final days in Guyana, several hundred people will play the followers who committed suicide after drinking Kool-Aid laced with potassium cyanide. The ICA is negotiating to use Coin Street, on the South Bank, or Meanwhile Gardens, in Westbourne Grove. "Why on earth are they doing it?" asked Tom Bower, 52, who lives near Meanwhile Gardens. One of the Jonestown survivors, Deborah Layton, who followed Jones to Guyana in her twenties, wrote an account of her experiences, Seductive Poison, which was published last year. Layton left Guyana six months before the November 1978 mass suicide, which, in a sworn affidavit in America, she correctly predicted. "I don't think that Jim Jones was evil at the beginning but he clearly became utterly psychotic when they went to Guyana," she said. The ICA's re-enactment will largely omit the fact that Jones was a womaniser who forced some of his female followers into sex. "I accept absolutely that Jones abused women," said Gaskin. "But this is not really what our re-enactment is about." The ICA, which has a history of provoking controversy with plays about the Moors murders and art installations including soiled nappies, as well as a cosmetics display featuring Sophie Dahl, is seeking a £7,000 grant from the London Arts Board for the re-enactment. Almost a third of the ICA's £3m budget comes from public funds. The insititute, based in the Mall near Admiralty Arch, initially sought funds from Benetton, the clothes firm known for its confrontational adverts, but was turned down. Trevor Phillips, former chairman of the London Arts Board and now chairman of the London assembly, was born and raised in Guyana. "The ICA often comes up with weird, whacky, what seem bizarre and bonkers ideas," he said. "Who knows about this one? But sometimes some of these bizarre and bonkers things turn out to be good and interesting performance art." Charles Krause, a journalist then with the Washington Post who was first on the scene after the mass suicide, said: "I would support their right to artistic expression, but I would want to ask some tough questions about their purpose in doing it." Rod Dickinson, the artist who is creating the Jonestown events for the ICA, argues that his re-enactments "explore the paradoxes of Jones: he was not deranged but was clearly very manipulative". He has recruited about 200 people to play the followers of Jones by advertising on the internet and in Fortean Times. "I see our re-creation of the Guyana death scene as being like the CND die-ins in the early 1980s," he said, when anti-nuclear protesters sometimes staged "fake" deaths by lying down in the streets. Dickinson admitted there was no particular reason for re-enacting Jonestown now except that "it was such an iconic event", which had been followed by similar mass deaths at Waco, Texas, and recently in Uganda. A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright
Re: [CTRL] School Vouchers
-Caveat Lector- You do comprehend Statism? Yup. What of it? Not that you provide support for *any* of your drivel (as I remain on vigil for your pre-socialist schools literacy details) ... I posted a bunch of pointers yesterday. Scroll back. How will an education through 'cooperation' be WORSE than an education by force? I didnt. I said that if corporations seize control of public education, it will be worse. Remove Government from the equation ... and this could certainly be one option. Im in favor of that. Im not in favor of anybody not paying their share of the expenses. Will your cooperatives require other people's money which is to be provided without their consent? Are you saying that you do not consent to contributing your share of the expense of public education? A simple yes or no will suffice. How is a philosophy with roots in rape, theft and enslavement ... moral? How is does my philosophy have roots in rape, theft and enslavement? Be specific. WHO says it is YOUR 'duty' as you describe it? God told me. Personally. By what definition? Edict? What logic? Since you ask that question at all, I must assume you lack the cognitive skills to understand the answer. Over the last few days I have stated and explained my logic in plain English and in math. Apparently you need somebody to draw you a picture. Im sorry I cant do that here. This is a text medium. What do you imagine the 'philosophy' you are shoveling is? Direct, participatory democracy, worker self management, sharing, cooperation and sustainability. In short, Im promoting anarchism, DIY government. If everyone took care of THEMSELVES ... stole from no one else ... cooperated ... how could this be possible? Because not everybody CAN take care of themselves. What makes YOU more important than others? I never said I was. I do say that Im smarter than you are and a heck of a lot nicer person. But thats another story, and this isnt the proper venue. Karl Marx tried to devise an economic system that got rid of selfishness. He did no such thing. Marxism is nothing but state monopoly capitalism. The USSR was nothing but a big company town. All Marxism does is change the bosss name. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. A boss is a boss is a boss. A pox on them all. Round em all up and herd em off a cliff, I say, every last one of them. And sing and dance while they fall. The Soviet block lagged well behind the West in economic growth. This was primarily because the West forced them to spend the bulk of their resources on defense. The people there lived in a police state. We live in a police state. But selfishness, of a type, continued to thrive there. A Soviet citizen did not get ahead by trading with others. He prospered by climbing the political ladder through corruption. How is that different from here? There is no difference between the political ladder and the corporate ladder because the real political power is not the government; its the corporations. They own the land, they control the food supply, they control the energy supply, the medicine, the transportation, everything. Even our tax supported military functions primarily as the private army of the oil companies. What we call the government is nothing but a front for the corporations. A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] WSJ: In Indicting Marc Rich, Prosecutors Used Tactics Later Reined In by Supreme Court
-Caveat Lector- January 30, 2001 Politics Policy In Indicting Marc Rich, Prosecutors Used Tactics Later Reined In by Supreme Court By DAVID S. CLOUD and JERRY MARKON Staff Reporters THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Maybe Marc Rich's lawyers had a point. The indictment against Mr. Rich that was invalidated by Bill Clinton's pardon was based in part on aggressive prosecution tactics later reined in by the Supreme Court and the Justice Department, legal experts say. While that argument wouldn't have come close to completely negating the massive tax-evasion case against Mr. Rich and co-defendant Pincus Green, it was heavily emphasized in the effort that persuaded Mr. Clinton to pardon the pair of fugitives, who now live in Switzerland. "I don't sit here to tell you that I know about Mr. Rich's character," says Mr. Rich's lawyer Jack Quinn, the former White House counsel who persuaded Mr. Clinton to issue the pardon. "I do sit here to tell you that the case that was brought against him was wrong." Political repercussions in the case are continuing. President Bush criticized his predecessor's last-minute pardon but said he wouldn't try to revoke it, a move that some administration lawyers had researched. "I was troubled by the decision the president made. I would not have made the decision," Mr. Bush said. "But, nevertheless, he was the president; he had the right to do so, to make that decision, and he did. And I'm going to protect that privilege not only for me, but for future presidents as well." The nub of the charges against Messrs. Rich and Green was an alleged scheme to circumvent profit and price controls on oil and to evade taxes on resulting illicit profits. In bringing the indictment, though, prosecutors employed a then-novel and aggressive use of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act of 1970. The law, originally aimed at organized-crime figures, lets prosecutors lump a series of allegedly criminal acts into a pattern of conduct. It's an attractive option for prosecutors because the law includes stiffer penalties and authorizes the government to freeze an allegedly corrupt company's assets prior to trial, with an eye toward seizing them later, thereby pressuring defendants into plea talks. In the case of two Rich companies, the tactic worked; they pleaded guilty in 1984 to false statements and tax evasion in a $200 million settlement, a move their lawyers now say was necessitated by corporate survival, not by a sincere belief in their own guilt. At the time of the indictment in 1983, RICO had rarely if ever been used in a major white-collar crime case. But the Justice Department's guidelines since 1989 have restricted the use of RICO in tax cases. "Tax offenses are not predicates for RICO offenses," says the Department's United States Attorneys' Manual. The indictment also uses mail-fraud charges to bolster the tax case, which could run afoul of another guideline that discourages mail-fraud charges when the mailing is "used to promote or facilitate a scheme which is essentially only a tax-fraud scheme." Moreover, the Rich indictment includes several mail-fraud charges based on allegedly fraudulent reports to the Energy Department. But in 1987, the Supreme Court ruled that mail-fraud laws don't cover violations of "the intangible right of the citizenry to good government." Congress later overturned the ruling, but Mr. Rich's alleged offenses occurred earlier, so arguably they were governed by the high-court ruling. Even a former Rich prosecutor says that might be valid. "I think it might have been a legitimate argument," says Otto Obermaier, former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. To Mr. Obermaier and others, such arguments don't justify a pardon. "If it was such a weak case, then why did they become fugitives?" says former prosecutor Morris Weinberg. "The essence of this case was not a RICO case, it was in essence a tax-fraud case. You can argue that the law may have changed, but it hasn't changed on avoiding $48 million in taxes." = Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: *Michael Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends = A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of
Re: [CTRL] FW: [RWWATCH] Missouri Official Denied Holocaust (Under Ashcroft Tenure)
-Caveat Lector- Maybe it isn't feasible to gas and then burn all those people? This executioner guy would presumably know something about it. And don't you think it's a bit extreme to find people who gave unpopular expert testimony then try and get them fired from their jobs and harassed? How would you liek it if you were put on trial, and when you tried to hire expert witnesses they were too afraid of the government putting them on trial? Sounds like Soviet Russia to me. On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 08:48:43 -0800 Nessie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Caveat Lector- -Original Message- From: Rich Cowan Sent: Fri 1/26/2001 7:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:[RWWATCH] Missouri Official Denied Holocaust (Under Ashcroft Tenure) Here is a tidbit sent to me when I was down in DC for the inauguration. It might be worth looking into these articles from the Star and Post Dispatch. If anyone can help dig them up, please email the text of the stories to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Jan! -rich Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:46:53 -0500 From: "Jan B. Tucker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [RWWATCH] Good Luck! People who know me know that I rarely -- if ever -- forget anything. This is when this trait comes in handy. John Ashcroft was Governor of Missouri in from January 1985 to January 1993. During his tenure, William Armentrout III was Warden of the State Penitentiary and Chief Executioner of the State of Missouri. In 1985, Ernst Zundel -- infamous Holocaust Denier (just put in the name in any search engine and see what you find) -- was on trial in Canada for promoting hate in violation of the Canadian anti-hate law. Guess who testified for the defense? William Armentrout, Chief Executioner of the State of Missouri, who got up and claimed that it was impossible to gas all those millions of people. I got it exposed around that time period in the state of Missouri. If I recall correctly, I got the story on page one of the Kansas City Star and the St. Louis Post Dispatch. What exactly did Governor Ashcroft do about this? Armentrout should have been fired. He wasn't. Was he disciplinedI don't think so. Spread the word about this. People in the Senate need to start asking Ashcroft what he did about the Armentrout-Zundel affair. Jan Tucker Organizers' Collaborative PO Box 400897, Cambridge MA 02140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.organizenow.net |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This message was sent via RWWATCH, a low-traffic forum that responds to right-wing campaigns (coming from any party) to misrepresent the truth in order to undermine democracy. info page www.topica.com/lists/rwwatch subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (send a blank email) unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organizers' Collaborative (OC) home page: www.organizenow.net Organizers' Collaborative PO Box 400897, Cambridge MA 02140 |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Please support our efforts to foster online communication and resource sharing by social change groups. All contributions to OC are tax-deductible. T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by
[CTRL] NM: Clinton Saved Sex Perv Who Sought Tryst with Catholic School Girl
-Caveat Lector- Tuesday Jan. 30, 2001; 12:04 p.m. EST Clinton Saved Sex Perv Who Sought Tryst with Catholic School Girl Overlooked in the batch of last-minute pardons and commutations signed by ex-President Clinton was the name of Mel Reynolds, the former Illinois congressmen who went to jail in 1994 for having sex with a minor and solicitation of child pornography. After examining the evidence against Reynolds, it's easy to see why Clinton sympathized with him. Exhibit A was a tape of a lurid phone conversation Reynolds had with his underage girlfriend, which surely must have impressed a president who had regular phone sex chats with his own girlfriend Monica Lewinsky. In one of the gamier exchanges, the former congressman proclaims his good luck at the prospect of having a threesome with his young ladyfriend and a Catholic schoolgirl. "Did I win the lotto?" the delighted legislator asks. Reynolds' language is too filthy to reproduce here verbatim. But even a censored version of his comments prompts questions about Clinton's judgement in favoring such a pervert with a commutation. We join Reynolds in mid conversation with his underage girlfriend Bev: MEL: Oh boy, yeah, I was really looking forward to seeing you. BEV: Yes, I was looking forward to seeing you also, yes. MEL: How about can you, can you -- Is there any chance you can leave later? BEV: I'm waiting on her to come in. I'm just, uhm, I don't even know because I -- She was supposed to be here about 4:00 o'clock and she still hasn't made it in and I can't leave the kids here. MEL: Have you -- of course not -- Have you spoken with her? BEV: No, I haven't. She didn't call or anything. MEL: (Expletive) BEV: That's what I'm saying. That's why I'm just hoping that she's gonna walk in any minute. I don't have the number to where's she -- MEL: How often have you -- how often have you babysat for her? BEV: Oh, not very often. But like I say it was Karen's sister so I went ahead and did it. And well, only about, uhm, three or four times now. This has never happened so it had to be something important. MEL: Yeah. BEV: Yes. So -- huh? MEL: What you gonna wear? BEV: Well, my peach underwear, like you told me to. I was hoping that we could do something really special but I see that's not gonna happen, I guess. MEL: I was definitely gonna (sexual vulgarity) you. BEV: Really? MEL: Right in my office. I was gonna (sexual vulgarity) too. BEV: Really? MEL: I was looking forward to it. BEV: Yeah, I been thinking about a lot times we had together. We had some really good times. MEL: Uh-huh, that summer when I used to (sexual vulgarity) you out south in that Riverdale apartment? BEV: Right, right. Remember that one, when I wore white lace underwear. I think it was like the summer of '92 over in the apartment -- MEL: Uh-huh. BEV: You had on that blue underwear, that was real nice. MEL: I want you to, I want to you -- first of all, I want you to think about sex. BEV: Yes. MEL: And I want you to think long and hard. I want you to tell me about a sex thing you did, that Idon't know about. BEV: Oh, let me see. MEL: Like when you (sexual vulgarity) or something but it was a time that I wasn't there for it. BEV: Oh, so you don't want to talk about any of our stuff, you want me to talk about something that you don't know about? MEL: Right, a sex thing you did with some person, either a woman or some guy or something. And -- cause I want to -- cause I'd like to think about you in those little panties that I used to (sexual vulgarity) you. BEV: Yeah. MEL: I like to think about somebody else doing the same thing to you. BEV: Okay. Uhm, ooh, let me see. MEL: Don't make nothing up. BEV: Well, the only thing I have is Karen now. MEL: But I'm talking about -- I know Karen now but maybe, maybe in the last couple of years, last year or so. BEV: In the last year or so. MEL: That day you saw that (sexual vulgarity) or played with it a little and then licked it or something. BEV: Okay. MEL: -- with a girl or a guy. BEV: Well, you wanna hear about Karen? That's the only person I been with. You don't want me making anything up, right? MEL: No. BEV: But -- Well, that's all I have. MEL: Only Karen? BEV: Yeah. MEL: When did you (sexual vulgarity) her for the first time, when did you (sexual vulgarity)? BEV: Uhm. MEL: When you all played with each others (sexual vulgarity) for the first time. BEV: Uhm, yeah, right, exactly. MEL: Right, right, exactly. BEV: Yes. MEL: How, how -- Did she approach you or you approach her? BEV: She approached me. MEL: What she say? BEV: She just -- She really didn't say anything, she just like kissed me and took off my clothes and I took off hers and were like lying down by the, and we just sort of (sexual vulgarity) each other. MEL: She she (sexual vulgarity)? BEV: Yes. MEL: What kind of (sexual vulgarity) does she have? Is it (sexual vulgarity)? BEV: Yes. MEL:
[CTRL] NYP: Morris: THE PERILS OF PARDONS
-Caveat Lector- THE PERILS OF PARDONS New York Post-Tuesday January 30, 2001 By Dick Morris THE Clintons are giving nouveau riche a bad name. Having made off with all the furniture their moving van could carry, one assumes that each of these couches, chairs and dishes will have their own little plaque identifying the name of the donor. Like the seats in the Metropolitan Opera House. Apart from their little gift caper, worthy of Rooster Cockburn and Mrs. Hanagan from the play Annie, the Clintons pardoned four Hasidic criminals in return for 1,400 votes for Hillary and pardoned Marc Rich to appease former White House Counsel Jack Quinn, who knows all their secrets. But this time, unlike after many of their previous shenanigans, the media is onto them and their credibility is taking a beating. Why can't the Clintons spin their way out of these latest scandals? Why are they shipping water, their reputation swiftly sinking? The Clinton formula for damage control is well known, but it can't work when he's out of the White House and she's a lowly junior senator. Consider why. Normally the Clintons: 1) Put out a press spokesman to handle things and stay out of sight. Usually, a spinner on the order of Mike McCurry or a damage-control specialist as good as George Stephanopoulos is around to spin the media. Without the White House staff to flack for them, the Clintons are helpless. Meanwhile, they can't stay out of reach of the media. A president can hide for days. A first lady can lie low for weeks. But a senator is fair game every time she shows up for work and a private citizen is open to questions whenever he walks the dog. 2) Let the story out when nobody is paying attention. Usually the Clintons release bad news over a holiday or, at least, on a Friday night. The Clintons goofed in letting these stories out when everyone was glued to television as this unusual transition came to a close and a new president was peacefully inaugurated. While we were all paying close attention, we read about Hillary's book contract, their second multimillion-dollar home purchase, Clinton's plea deal, the pardons, the trashing of the White House and the Clintons' gifts, one after the other in a continuous sleazy tableau. 3) Distract the nation with a new story. Able to control the national news cycle, the Clintons could always divert attention from bad news by making good news happen. When former Arkansas Chief of Staff Betsey Wright was quoted as saying that Clinton arranged for state troopers to get him women, we in the White House generated stories to cover the flap. Clinton intervened in the baseball strike, he announced possible sanctions against China and he put out other important announcements that weekend. Now it is beyond their ability to create hard news. They have to let the media talk about what it wants, none of it good for their reputations. 4) Distance themselves from bad events. Blaming subordinates, colleagues, co-workers or friends for bad stories has been a staple of the Clinton damage-control operation. But these gifts are so personal, the pardons so clearly a presidential decision and the plea deal so directly Clinton's that it isn't possible to blame the McDougals or the Tuckers or Vince Foster or various other hapless friends. They have to take the rap themselves. 5) Put off bad news. Procrastinate. The Clintons love to delay decisions that are bound to backfire. But they ran out of time. They put off the pardons until the last minute and decided to reveal their gifts only after Hillary was elected. So, they had no choice but to make all this bad news public at once in the final moments of his terms in office. 6) Focus on appeasing public opinion. Above all, the Clintons always cared deeply what we think of them. But now that she is elected for six years and he is out of public life, they are adopting the Cornelius Vanderbilt school of press relations - "the public be damned." Over the years in Washington, the Clintons have become addicted to money and luxury. The money from her and his - soon to be announced - book deal is burning a hole in their pockets. Determined to cash in on their opportunistic friendships while they still had the White House to sell, they decided to take their plush lifestyle with them, the devil with the consequences. Without the White House to hide behind, the Clintons have no choice but to take these shots on the chin, with inevitable damage to their public standings. = Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: *Michael Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends = A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list.
[CTRL] Stage Three in Education Has Arrived
-Caveat Lector- http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north32.html Stage Three in Education Has Arrived by Gary North There is a fixed pattern in economic development that is not well understood by the public. There are three main stages of development. Using political terminology, I call these three stages the oligarchic/autarchic, the democratic, and the individualistic. I realize that we lose some conceptual accuracy by transferring concepts from one discipline to another, but when no readily recognized terms exist in one discipline, imports sometimes help. Oligarchy The oligarchic phase of an economy is where skilled craftsmen produce mainly for the rich. The market is narrow. Competition is based on quality rather than price. Meanwhile, poor families produce for themselves (autarchy) and for barter with their neighbors, with a few local producers of low-quality goods that are priced in money, but at prices where the poor can just barely afford them. To maintain such a hierarchical, stratified economy, political compulsion is mandatory. A common feature of the medieval economy was the producers guild. Members of a guild cooperated politically with members of other guilds in cities to pass laws that restricted access to local consumers. A system of hierarchical apprenticeship and screening was established by each guild in order to restrict competition. The goal was to keep price competitive products away from consumers. This subsidized those who competed in terms of high quality rather than price. It kept the masses poor. Democracy At some point, those producers with the ability to produce a larger quantity of goods by means of a new technology break through the legal barriers. They beat their way into the market by offering significantly lower prices. The market responds to a fundamental economic law: "At a lower price, other things remaining the same, a greater quantity will be demanded." I call this the democratic phase of economic development. It is marked by a decline of political compulsion in the market. Price competition is initially associated with lower quality, but only when compared to quality that had been available to the rich elite. For the poor, these new mass-produced products represent a quantum leap in quality. Buyers who could never have afforded to buy similar goods at the older, higher prices now find new products available and affordable. For them, the quality seems very high: something rather than nothing. The goods lower quality in relation to the older array of prices and products is irrelevant to the buyers. Two groups oppose this development: those who produce for the rich, who now find that some of their rich clients also like a bargain; and those who produce for the poor, offering shoddy merchandise at prices that the poor have barely been able to afford. Both groups lose customers to the new producers. Individualism The new mass-market producers at first offer limited choices. As was said of the Model T Ford, "You can get it in any color, as long as you want black." The Model T opened the automobile market to the growing American middle class. But in the 1920s, General Motors took this market away from Ford by offering five brands of GM cars and many options within each brand line. This price competitive market had begun to increase diversity. Ford and Chrysler had to imitate this multi-brand automobile marketing strategy in order to survive. Then came foreign imports in the 1950s. Today, the level of diversity is beyond most car buyers ability to monitor. Here is the pattern. Price competition initially creates a mass market for some product line by offering minimal diversity. But as these new mass production techniques are imitated by competitors, diversity raises its lovely head. Buyers then are offered more choices at far lower prices than existed before the initial market-creating breakthrough took place. They get rising quality and falling prices. The microcomputer has been the best example of this process of diversification in a physical product line during the last two decades. As for services, the best example is the steady erosion of network televisions audience to cable and satellite channels. This process even has a clever phrase: from broadcasting to narrowcasting. This is the individualism phase. Buyers can get pretty much what they want. Dell Computer will sell you a computer with most of the features you can imagine. They will even help you to imagine lots of new ones. Your computer is put together for you personally in Taiwan (or wherever) and flown to the United States, to be delivered to your door. This is truly a personal computer. All this came about because a teenage Michael Dell started producing microcomputers to order in his college dorm room back in the early 1980s. He still offers the same service, but he uses a much larger room. Stages of Education The same stages of development have taken place in education. Prior to
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
-Caveat Lector- From: "Carl Amedio" [EMAIL PROTECTED] cameras every ten feet? LOL surely you jest, carl, you obviously haven't been here I just watched a BBC program on the complete loss of privacy in UK. The fact you pooh pooh this says volumes. Enjoy the gulag. There is a show on PBS called "Mystery", which shows primarily British imports. About a year ago on one of these imports, "Prime Suspect", a case of child rape/murder was solved due to these cameras. A big deal was made about how the suspect would never have been caught if it weren't for the fact that the suspect's car was caught on one of these cameras, showing the suspect was at the location of the crime at the time the crime was committed, when the suspect seemingly had an alibi for being elsewhere. I thought at the time that it was very interesting that this British show presented these cameras so matter-of-factly, and indeed I got the impression the whole plot twist of the cameras being used to solve a horrific crime was orchestrated to help "sell" the idea of these cameras... June A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Jewlee jewlee jewlee
-Caveat Lector- Received: from mail.mountaincable.net (mail.mountaincable.net [24.215.0.18]) by tor-smtp1.netcom.ca (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA25839 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:30:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pavilion (pc-23-169.mountaincable.net [24.215.23.169]) by mail.mountaincable.net (Postfix) with SMTP id BD474C2DAB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:30:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: 001601c087a4$93a62760$[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Jewlee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Get a job Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:30:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0013_01C0877A.A8F285C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-UIDL: 5AFC1FDB0496B29DA1BBBFFF94AA67BE Hello I was wondering what you do for a living? It just doesn't seem like you have anything better to do than to send me like 12 E-mails through the course of the day. I suggest that you find a job instead of sitting in front of your computer all day, not to mention your flooding my E-mail w/ messages that I don't even read. - Oh well! We can't all have fans! Kelly A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] BSE - COMING SOON!!
-Caveat Lector- RONNIE CUMMINS, BIODEMOCRACY NEWS: http://www.purefood.org/newsletter/biod31.cfm Sandra Blakeslee of the New York Times reported on Jan. 11 that the US Food and Drug Administration's supposed 1997 ban on feeding rendered animal protein to cows and other ruminant animals is full of loopholes, and moreover that the so-called ban is not being enforced among the thousands of companies involved in the $3.2 billion dollar rendering industry and the $20 billion dollar animal feed industry. As Blakeslee wrote: "Among 180 large companies that render cattle and another ruminant, sheep, nearly a quarter were not properly labeling their products and did not have a system to prevent commingling, the FDA said . . . Of 1,593 small feed producers that handle ruminant material and have been inspected, 40 percent were not using approved labels and 25 percent had no system in place to prevent commingling." In other words millions of US cows, sheep, game farm deer and elk, and pigs, not to mention household pets, are still being fed billions of pounds of animal feed or pet food containing meat and offal from ruminant animals - despite the obvious danger to human and animal health and despite the fact that the FDA and the USDA for the past three years have been reassuring the public that this was no longer happening. But the story gets scarier. In the Times on the front page of the Sunday Jan. 14 edition, (tucked under a misleading headline "Stringent Steps Taken by US on Cow Illness") Blakeslee drops the bombshell. Not only has the US Mad Cow feed ban been a joke, but apparently US feed companies, pet food companies, pharmaceutical firms, and nutritional supplement manufacturers have been carrying on with business as usual by importing large quantities of possibly contaminated bovine parts and rendered animal protein - no doubt at bargain basement prices. . . A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Hisory Channel: UFOs: Then and Now...Cause for Alarm
-Caveat Lector- UFOs: Then and Now Cause for Alarm Duration: 60 min. Cause for Alarm recounts the recorded UFO encounters that have taken place near test ranges, air bases and nuclear power plants. Included: a widely reported July 1952 sighting over Washington, D.C. Also: the secret world of Area 51. Rating: TV-G Category: Sci-fi Paranormal Show times: [Times are for Arizona, i.e., 1 hr later than West Coast Time Zone. --MS] Date TimeChannel Tuesday, 307:00 PM 28 HISTORY CHANNEL Tuesday, 30 11:00 PM 28 HISTORY CHANNEL Sunday, 4 2:00 PM 28 HISTORY CHANNEL = Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: *Michael Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends = A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] School Vouchers
-Caveat Lector- Is there a particular reason you removed the CONTEXT? This is errant nonsense and statist sophistry. Nessie Who said anything about statism? I don't think the government should run the schools, either. I just don't want to to see them fall into the hands of the corporations. That would be much, much worse. MJ You do comprehend Statism? Nessie Yup. What of it? MJ Your PREVIOUS comments when compared with the above remarks would indicate otherwise. MJ Not that you provide support for *any* of your drivel (as I remain on vigil for your pre-socialist schools literacy details) ... Nessie I posted a bunch of pointers yesterday. Scroll back. MJ Perhaps you can refresh our memories since the literacy rate pre-socialist schools exceeds the post socialist schools. MJ How will an education through 'cooperation' be WORSE than an education by force? Nessie I didn't. I said that if corporations seize control of public education, it will be worse. MJ I am well aware of your statement. How will corporations be able to FORCE students to attend or taxpayers to pay as our Government does now? How is it possible for corporations to 'seize' control without FORCE? Nessie Personally, I'd prefer to see schools managed by parent-teacher cooperatives. MJ Remove Government from the equation ... and this could certainly be one option. Nessie I'm in favor of that. I'm not in favor of anybody not paying their share of the expenses. MJ What is one's 'fair share'? MJ Will your cooperatives require other people's money which is to be provided without their consent? Nessie Are you saying that you do not consent to contributing your share of the expense of public education? A simple yes or no will suffice. MJ I have no choice in the matter currently ... it is taken by force. HERE is where the Statism from above comes into play. It is the height of arrogance for you to lecture others as to their "moral duty". Nessie It's my moral duty to attempt to enlighten you, because you are a fellow human being and you are morally remiss. It is also pragmatic to attempt to help you to mend yourself of your error because your error threatens the future of all of us. MJ How is a philosophy with roots in rape, theft and enslavement ... moral? Nessie How is does my philosophy have "roots in rape, theft and enslavement"? Be specific. MJ Above you suggest one contribute 'their fair share' to your education goals. Any meaning OTHER than a parent paying for their responsibilities -- ie their child or those children they have chosen such a role -- involves theft of someone's funds ... the enslavement of individuals in order to provide. MJ WHO says it is YOUR 'duty' as you describe it? By what definition? Edict? Nessie God told me. Personally. MJ Really? God just told me that you are full of shit. This is simply ANOTHER religious tenet that you would force on others. It is Fascistic to attempt to impose your concept of "moral duty" on others by threat of force through government intimidation. Nessie That depends on the circumstance. In this particular instance I'm not using force. I'm using logic, reason and morality. If I was using force, you'd know it. MJ What logic? Nessie Since you ask that question at all, I must assume you lack the cognitive skills to understand the answer. Over the last few days I have stated and explained my logic in plain English and in math. Apparently you need somebody to draw you a picture. I'm sorry I can't do that here. This is a text medium. MJ Oh, FALLACIES of logic ... now it makes better sense. Other then not harm my innocent fellow citizens, or steal their property, my moral duty is not to impose my personal beliefs on others. Nessie That's a selfish, self centered and short sighted philosophy. MJ What do you imagine the 'philosophy' you are shoveling is? Nessie Direct, participatory democracy, worker self management, sharing, cooperation and sustainability. In short, I'm promoting anarchism, DIY government. MJ Democracy is rule by mob and NOT compatible with anarchy -- which will necessarily result in gang warfare interrupted by dictatorship of various sorts. That which you are promoting is as selfish, self-centered and short-sighted as you imagine was being described to you -- if not more so. Nessie If everyone felt like you, we'd be in a sorry state indeed. MJ How? If everyone took care of THEMSELVES ... stole from no one else ... cooperated ... how could this be possible? Nessie Because not everybody CAN take care of themselves. MJ That was not the gist of the ideal. Who will determine which persons cannot care for themselves? Why this person? Nessie If you ever find
[CTRL] The Dirty P Word Frisco Progressives
-Caveat Lector- SanFran Libs, Progs, and other assorted strange creatures. flw begin 666 The Dirty P Word Frisco Progressives, Algore, and the Windbag Willie Brown, by T. E. Ruppenthal.url M6T1%1D%53%1=#0I"05-%55),/6AT=' Z+R]W=WNF]L871I;65S+F-O;2]6 M-2XU+V1IG1Y7W=OF0N:'1M#0H-"EM);G1EFYE=%-H;W)T8W5T70T*55), M/6AT=' Z+R]W=WNF]L871I;65S+F-O;2]6-2XU+V1IG1Y7W=OF0N:'1M ?#0I-;V1I9FEE9#TT,#)"-C,S.3,R.$)#,# Q.#4-"@`` ` end A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] The Dirty P Word Frisco Progressives
-Caveat Lector- SanFran Libs, Progs, and other assorted strange creatures. flw begin 666 The Dirty P Word Frisco Progressives, Algore, and the Windbag Willie Brown, by T. E. Ruppenthal.url M6T1%1D%53%1=#0I"05-%55),/6AT=' Z+R]W=WNF]L871I;65S+F-O;2]6 M-2XU+V1IG1Y7W=OF0N:'1M#0H-"EM);G1EFYE=%-H;W)T8W5T70T*55), M/6AT=' Z+R]W=WNF]L871I;65S+F-O;2]6-2XU+V1IG1Y7W=OF0N:'1M ?#0I-;V1I9FEE9#TT,#)"-C,S.3,R.$)#,# Q.#4-"@`` ` end A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Elites ubber alles: Who elected THEM to experiment with all of humanty?
-Caveat Lector- Original Message Subject: Guardian analysis of Davos Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:10:57 -0600 (CST) From: MichaelP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: ? To: undisclosed-recipients:; GUARDIAN (London) Monday January 29, 2001 Larry Elliott in Davos Opening gambit without strategy First, the good news. Everybody in Davos knows that there is a problem with globalisation. Things aren't working out the way they were supposed to when the grand design was outlined at the start of the 90s. There's a bit more humility and a greater willingness to accept that those who have been warning about the nasty side-effects of one size fits all integration might have a point. Klaus Schwab, the man behind the World Economic Forum, neatly summed the state of play when he said there were seven challenges of globalisation, none of which seemed the slightest bit controversial. Schwab's list of problems is worth considering, because it could be considered the modern equivalent of the five giants identified by Beveridge as standing in the way of progress when he was writing his report on the need for a cradle-to-grave welfare state in 1942. [ Note - I was twelve when -in the middle of a war the newspapers filled with this "Beveridge Report" which proclaimed a vision of e.g FREEDOM FROM HUNGER, FREEDOM FROM WANT. This is what set the stage for the creation of the brit. National Health Service and other ideas of social service which are being ( or have been) whittled away and replaced by nothing.. MichaelP ] First on Schwab's list came the need to create conditions for faster growth. Then he cited the need for environmental and social sustainablility, followed by effective international peace keeping, a narrowing of the technological and social gulf between rich and poor, the need for higher standards of health and nutrition, a common understanding of human rights and values and, finally, the safeguarding of cultural identity in an increasingly homogenised world. Or, in the lingo of Beveridge, Want, Pollution, War, Ignorance, Disease, Cruelty and Uniformity. The immediate riposte to Schwab's list is that this is a case of motherhood and apple pie. But this has not always been so, even in the recent past. The idea that globalisation has no future without greater inclusion, without environmental sustainability and without a concern for the human dimension, was certainly not in evidence in the first few years after the Berlin Wall came down. But life has moved on. The climate is not so benign and the Lyndon Johnson principle is now at work: it's better to have the protestors inside the tent pissing out than on the outside pissing in. So, that's the good news. What's the bad news? Well, the fact that Davos was turned into a fortress at the weekend is symptomatic of some deeper malaise. Civil society representatives who were invited to take part in the World Economic Forum were rightly concerned about the way in which the Swiss government treated those who sought to express their concerns about globalisation in a peaceful way on the town's streets. What this means, of course, is that getting the rhetoric right is one thing, changing behaviour is quite another. It's easy to make all the right noises about making globalisation inclusive, but what does this mean when the rich countries of the world are spending $1bn a day subsidising their farmers, with the annual subsidy three times as large as the entire amount spent on aid budgets? Not a lot... How much credence should we give to those who argue that free trade will work for everyone when the modest if welcome plan by the EU's trade commissioner, Pascal Lamy, to give duty free access to all goods except arms from the 48 poorest countries was met with a barrage of protectionist objections from the big barons of the European sugar industry? Not a great deal. How genuine is the commitment to tackling the epidemic of HIV-Aids in Africa when the big drugs companies use their enormous financial and legal clout to prevent poor countries from manufacturing their own cheap generic cures? You tell me. Moving from words to action is going to be tough. Playing chess is not simply about knowing that a bishop moves diagonally or that a pawn can move forward two squares on its first move, it is about the overall strategy. Sometimes a tactical retreat paves the way for a strategic advance. The good player also knows when to make a sacrifice. Those running the global economy appear to lack the grand master strategy. They have all their pieces but don't know how to play the game. The chaotic state of Russia in its first decade after the collapse of communism is largely due to the ill-conceived sequencing of moves, with privatisation and the scrapping of foreign exchange controls leading to larceny and capital flight on a grand scale. The economy halved in size in a decade; male life expectancy dropped by 10 years. China, by contrast, has followed a more
Re: [CTRL] How the Democrats made loving Dixie a hate crime
-Caveat Lector- Nessie wrote: -Caveat Lector- Humans seem to love hierarchy (is it hardwired into the system?) Yes. It obviously is. But it has nothing to do with love. It is the result of successful social evolution. Hierarchy is not hardwired into the system or else there would be no non hierarchical cultures. Your premise is logical but wrong. Logic is only a human construct. Nature is. Hierarchy is the norm. Nature allows for change and experimentation. It's called evolution. You only have to look at the history of humans to determine whether or not we are " hardwired " for hierarchy. It goes back a long way into our anthropoid development. Hardwired in social evolution is not hard. It's more like " firmwired." It must be stable enough to be continuous, but flexible enough to deal with changeable conditions and environments. When, however, when hierarchy is imposed on a population, most members of that population tend to want to not feel like they are at they bottom. Our rulers use this to manipulate us. Divide and conquer. That's because they know we are hardwired for hierarchy. Yes people don't want to be at the bottom, but they don't mind not being at the top either. The middle is good. Hence it's OK to be middle class but not low class. J2 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Fire on the Right
"Fire on the Right" by David Brock Appeared in the February 2001 edition of "Talk" Magazine George W. Bush's "new" Republican Party presented itself to the national convention last summer with much talk of unity, consensus, bipartisanship--even compassion. Bush aides carefully prescreened all speeches, deftly removing the word *impeachment* from each; you had to strain to hear the word *conservative*. Bush lieutenants blocked the Reverend Pat Robertson from speaking, replacing him in the party pantheon with General Colin Powell, who is reviled by members of the extreme right. All in all it was an impressive show designed to win support from independent voters, like me, who had turned from the party during the fanatical Gingrich era. Still, I wanted to ask Bush, who did not acknowledge the role his own party's leaders had played in creating so much rancor, exactly what he thought was wrong with the old party. And also: Where did he think all those rancorous old Republicans would go? Having been in and around the conservative movement for 15 years, I knew how unlikely it was that the party could transform itself overnight. It didn't take long for Republican loyalists to junk the pretty bipartisan rhetoric. In the hours and weeks following Election Day, a predictable cast of extreme right-wing players, many of them ex-associates and ex-friends of mine, emerged from the woodwork where they'd been hidden--or had hidden themselves--during the presidential campaign. House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, for example, organized what conservative Wall Street Journal columnist Paul Gigot approvingly called "a bourgeois riot" in Miami. Rush Limbaugh exhorted millions of Dittoheads, "We're fighting for our lives!" Pundit Ann Coultier referred to the justices of the Florida Supreme Court as "aspiring Pol Pots." Former Newt Gingrich strategist Tony Blankley wrote of Gore supporters, "They are Americans by birth, but they might as well be Martian reptiles for all the moral kinship they have with us." Appellate superlawyer Ted Olson made sweetly reasoned arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court. (When I worked at The American Spectator he was involved with the magazine's Arkansas Project, a multimillion-dollar dirt-digging operation against the Clintons, the very hub of "the vast right-wing conspiracy.") All over the down-channel cable news shows, gray-suited Republican lawyers who had helped me attack Anita Hill a decade ago droned on about law and victory. Even Newt Gingrich, whose win-at-any-cost spirit seemed to animate the Republicans' invective, surfaced from seclusion and made righteous appearances on television in the days immediately following the election. The Republicans' dramatic postelection display shows how deeply ingrained apocalyptic fervor, vitriolic rhetoric, and primal rage are in both GOP history and the psyche of its chief ideologists. In the aftermath of the election it is clear that fury--if not blind fury--will be shaping discourse in Washington for some time to come whether George W. Bush shares in the Republican hyperthyroidism or not. The vein-popping conservative backlash Americans witnessed after the 2000 election is rooted in the war over judicial nominees that began in the late 1980s, when presidents Reagan and Bush, in an effort to roll back decades of socially progressive jurisprudence, endeavored to confirm conservative nominees to the nation's top courts. "There really is a line from Broward County that goes all the way back to what *they* did to [failed Supreme Court nominee Robert] Bork: the attacks, and lies, and misrepresentations," says former Delaware governor Pete DuPont. "Then they almost did the same thing to [Supreme Court justice] Clarence Thomas. I think this time conservatives finally decided to stand tall." Gingrich was in on the tone-setting war from the start. Writing shortly after Bork's defeat, he promised to fight the Democrats "with the scale and duration and savagery that is true only of civil wars." It didn't take long to see that Gingrich and the people around him weren't conservatives in the original sense of the word; they were power-hungry radicals who consciously adopted the street-fighting political style of the '60s for their own ends. In the early '90s Gingrich's posse hung out at the Capitol Hill row house of Grover Norquist, an antitax lobbyist whom The New Republic once called the "Che [Guevara] of the Republican Revolution." At Norquist's parties, where conservatives convened to drink kegs and grouse about the latest liberal outrages, I ran into former Reagan and Bush speechwriter Peggy Noonan, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, conservative pundit Laura Ingraham, Wall Street Journal editorial writer John Fund, and many of the figures you saw kicking and screaming on TV about the "stolen" election. The integrity of ballots was the last thing I ever thought
[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] I SAID IT IS A HARD RAIN THAT IS GOING TO FALL
I am one who has his tentacles out for assassinations and this is news to me!! If this reporting is true then it is difficult to imagine a greater insult to the third world and Africa. For that reason I think it is true. Remember how I said we should be on the look out for key assassinations like the Reagan/Bush rub out of John Lennon which would set the tenor of the entire administration? Coming during the president elect period as the Lennon assassination, this assassination of a thorn in the side of the Bush family businesses seems a more likely example of this than I could think up myself. Remember how the press handled the car bombing on Embassy Row? Same suspicious way. The press always tries to cover these state rub outs. Brian Downing Quig Matthew McDaniel wrote: Message: 7 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:13:49 - From: "tlio" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Behind the Assassination of Kabila -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:21:11 +0100 From: info [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Subject: [mobilize-globally] Behind the Assassination of Kabila - Via Workers World News Service Reprinted from the Feb. 1, 2001 issue of Workers World newspaper - BUSH,CLINTON IN THE WEB: BEHIND THE ASSASSINATION OF KABILA By Deirdre Griswold and Johnnie Stevens The failure of both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush to express even the most perfunctory regret over the assassination of Congo President Laurent Dsir Kabila betrays how implicated Washington is in this latest outrage against the most important country in central Africa. Washington's silence is even more glaring considering that its foreign policy experts are well aware that the African people view the secret intelligence agencies of the U.S. government, which work closely with corporations seeking vast fortunes in the region, as the probable authors of this crime. George Bush Sr., father of the president, even had an intimate connection with one of these plundering corporations. But this is not mentioned in the commercial media, which, as usual, go even further than indifference to insult the fallen head of state, while speculating on the breakup of the Congo. What they carefully omit in their reporting is the deadly record of U.S. interventions in the Congo, beginning with President Dwight D. Eisenhower's order at a meeting of the National Security Council on Aug. 18, 1960, to assassinate Patrice Lumumba. Lumumba was the young and inspiring independence leader who was briefly the Congo's first president. The 40th anniversary of his assassination, Jan.17 of this year, was the day after Kabila was shot. The U.S. media are today blaming Kabila for failing to bring peace to the Congo. This is a monstrous charge, since Washington is largely responsible for the war that has crushed the Congolese people's hopes for a better life since the overthrow of dictator Mobutu Sese Seko. The Congo government has been trying to expel Rwandan and Ugandan troops that invaded eastern Congo in August 1998. The U.S. has secretly supported them and their occupation of this area of fabulous mineral wealth. The Congo's allies in this war are Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia--all countries that had to fight racist colonial regimes to win their independence. The invaders, on the other hand, have been supplied with high-tech weaponry and communications and transportation equipment by their imperialist backers. There is evidence of military training and coordination from the Pentagon and the involvement of mercenary companies, including MPRI of the U.S., Executive Outcome of South Africa, and Sandline of Britain. KABILA RESISTED 'GLOBALIZATION' What U.S. corporations wanted from Kabila, and what he refused to give, was outright control over an area that contains some of the world's most important deposits of gold, diamonds, cobalt, manganese, uranium, copper, zinc, germanium, silver, lead, iron and tungsten. It has been Washington's theme song for the last decade that oppressed countries must join the "global economy"--meaning sell off state-owned enterprises to imperialist investors, open their domestic markets and devalue their currencies, thus further lowering the standard of living. Even Mobutu tried to resist this and hold on to state control over the mines--one of the reasons the U.S. decided to dump him after having propped him up for almost 35 years. Washington helped a coalition force headed by Kabila but based on Rwandan and Ugandan military forces to topple Mobutu in 1997. But once Kabila became president, he surprised his former allies by refusing to be a puppet and trying to rally the Congolese people to unite and defend their country's sovereignty. Kabila also retracted a number of mining contracts signed with U.S. and European corporations during the period of the alliance
[CTRL] PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH SIGNALS FELLOW ILLUMINISTS
-Caveat Lector- From: Cosmic Comentary - http://CosmicRose.tripod.com/CCC.html Well here's something to think about. From an 'extremist' Christian site. I didn't hear the inaugural address, did Bush actually refer to an angel in the whirlwind? Anybody here listen to the inaugural? This certainly would put into question the motives of our founding fathers. Steve M. -- Title: PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH SIGNALS FELLOW ILLUMINISTS WITH CODED MESSAGE DURING HIS INAUGURAL SPEECH! Subtitle: When President Bush quoted Illuminist John Page writing to fellow Illuminist Thomas Jefferson, he sent a message to all current conspirators that the Illuminati is still in control in the White House. NEWS BRIEF: "Bush Inaugural Address", CNN, January 21, 2001. "After the Declaration of Independence was signed, Virginia statesman John Page wrote to Thomas Jefferson: 'We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?' " When I listened to President George W. Bush make this statement, I nearly came to my feet in excitement. I was positive that he was not quoting the Bible, even though it sounded like he might be. I was very sure that the Bible had no instance where an angel was depicted as riding in the whirlwind and directing any storm. As often as the Illuminati depicts Lucifer as an "angel", I was certain this statement was code, directed at occultists throughout the world. I immediately contacted Cisco Wheeler, a former Illuminist Satanist, now a Born Again Christian. She has worked with Christian author, Fritz Springmeier in books on Illuminati Mind Control. Cisco had not seen Bush's Inaugural Address, so I emailed the text to her. Her reaction was swift and excited: George W. had, indeed, spoken in Illuminist code! Remember the situation George W. was facing on January 20, 2001. Left Wing Illuminist President Bill Clinton was passing the baton off to Right Wing George W. Bush. While most of the Illuminists throughout the world were sure that George W. was just as Illuminist as Clinton, they were looking for a sign or signs during the Inaugural ceremony that would confirm their belief. As we reported in NEWS1463, George W. Bush gave strong visible signals during his Inaugural ceremony. Bush "faced the obelisk" during this ceremony, as he faced the Washington Monument, the world's most important and famous obelisk. All Illuminists throughout the world would immediately be alerted that George W. was a committed Illuminist and would continue to work toward the global plan to so change the world that a One-World Government, Economy, and Religion could achieve a "take-off" position that would allow Antichrist to arise. Secondly, as we reported in NEWS1463, Bush planned to use the huge, historic Masonic Bible on which to place his hand during his actual taking of the oath of office, but it did appear that a last-minute change was made. George W. appeared to place his hand on a smaller black Bible; a subscriber wrote that he had read that this Bible was a Bush family Bible. Since the Masonic Bible used by George Washington, and later by President George Bush in 1989, weighed nine pounds, it is possible that Laura Bush simply decided that she could not hold it. However, the fact of the matter is that George W. had initially decided to use this Masonic Bible, a definite signal to the Illuminati. GEORGE W. BUSH'S CODED MESSAGE Let us examine this coded statement now in the depth necessary to understand what President George W. Bush said, and how it was Illuminist code. "After the Declaration of Independence was signed, Virginia statesman John Page wrote to Thomas Jefferson: 'We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?' " The first thing to understand is that this above statement abounds in Illuminist symbolism. The Declaration of Independence was deliberately planned to be issued on July 4, 1776. This date is 66 days after the Satanic High Holy day period starting April 30, and it was exactly 13 days after Summer Solstice on June 21. Our Founding Fathers waited until there were precisely 13 states before they founded the Union. Finally, when you add the numbers forming the year, 1776, you get '21', a most revered number to the occultist. As much as we love our Declaration of Independence, we need to understand that it was a document emanating from Illuminists like Thomas Jefferson, and was specifically timed according to an Illuminist timetable. Thus, when President George W. Bush referred to the Declaration, he knew he was referring to an Illuminist document. Then, consider that when John
[CTRL] WHO SUCKS THIS WEEK? CNN FALLING, AOL GALLING
-Caveat Lector- Ether Zone The Intelligent Alternative News And Opinion Source Cosmic Comentary - http://CosmicRose.tripod.com/CCC.html Heh Heh Heh!! LOL! Hear Hear! Steve M. http://etherzone.com/ WHO SUCKS THIS WEEK? CNN FALLING, AOL GALLING By: Nathan Porter "They send out legions of brainwashed reporters like a million marching ants ready to devour the carcass of a roach called truth. No longer is it merely a question of objectivity. CNN has moved beyond a lack of objectivity into disinformation: dispensing information they know to be wrong as a weapon against political foes." Me-August 11, 2000. As the mighty ax of indiscriminate mass firings continues to bloody the waters at CNN, many find it difficult to remain unemotional about the human consequences of such a situation. Not me. With a speed rivaling the downfall of the Soviet Union, or worse yet, House Speaker* Bob Livingston, CNN has fallen and hopefully won't get up. Like the Soviet Union, CNN is an evil empire collapsing of its own self-indulgence. Every step of the way, the people at CNN could have reported the news in a fair and balanced way. Instead, they chose to report the news as they wish it were, particularly when covering politics. Despite the emergence of new cable news competitors and in the face of plummeting ratings, CNN chose to hire producers and put on the air a collection of reporters whose liberal bias could hardly be overstated. Like the Soviet Union, it was those at the top who ran CNN into the ground while the little people suffered. Therefore, it is no surprise to me that the people who brought us Time Magazine, America Online, and Both Sides With Jesse Jackson are managing the wave of layoffs much like the Kremlin would've dealt with TASS 20 years ago. The shock of CNN's massive firings has given way to outrage over the manner in which they were conducted. "INHUMAN RESOURCES" charged one news headline. "CNN TELLS STAFFERS TO GET OUT; GUARD ESCORTS, COMPUTER SHUT DOWNS, TEARS!" screams the headline at The Drudge Report. "Insiders describe a company in turmoil, with staffers watching as their shattered colleagues return from the Human Resources Department in tears - and then nervously wondering if they're next." Though I'm delighted with CNN's downturn, I truly do not wish financial or personal hardship on any CNN employee (except for Tucker Carlson, Greta Van Susteren and Bill Press, of course). I wish only the best for those at CNN who fear they are next to be axed. For some I wish a personal heaven, for others something a little warmer. My wish for Candy Crowley is that she wins the Oscar for her film debut in the John Candy Story. I wish Bernie Shaw success...as the first black Elvis impersonator to headline at the Cherokee Indian owned Chief Talking Ass Lounge and Casino, located in Tunica, Mississippi. It is my wish that Judy Woodruff find her true calling as a female wrestler (no biting, Judy). I hope that Jeff Greenfield finds success at ABC, where he is forced to remove the layers of grease covering Peter Jennings' skin. It is my fondest wish that Greta Van Susteren be forced to spend the rest of her life as law clerk to Barbara Olsen. My wish for Tucker Carlson is that he be damned to a life as Margaret Carlson's "house boy," the highlight of his day occurring when he massages Margaret's bunion-laden feet with his bare hands. And for Bill Press, my special wish is that he be damned to a life as Tucker Carlson's "house boy," the highlight of his day occurring when he massages Tucker's blister-laden ass with his bare hands. AOL Galling Look at them! Call me old fashioned, but I'm a tad leery of these corporate types who act like they work for Jim Jones, Inc. - "Pass the Kool-Aid, darling. We've just taken over the world." There is something eerily cultish about a corporation with a vision of how the world should be, and a plan that takes all of us on their journey to Utopia, whether we want to go or not. Despite the current suffering at CNN, the new AOLTIMEWARNERTEDCNNTURNER Mega Corporation is destined to become a force of evil not seen since Dr. No. CNN had Ted Turner, but AOL et.al has Gerald Levin, and Ted Turner has nothing on Gerald Levin (Anti-Christ alert**). Gerald Levin is the chief of AOL/Time Warner, and his goal in life is the creation of a global giant - or monster - in media and entertainment. He was the force behind the Time-Warner merger, and their subsequent merger with Turner Broadcasting System, and now he heads the whole AOL/Time/Warner/Turner Corporatorship. Last week, Levin questioned the Bush administration's commitment to fighting cancer. "I want to know why we're talking about building a missile defense system," he declared, "and not talking about doing more stem cell research." And I want to know why this high-powered CEO is such an ever bloomin', clay-brained, bum-bailey? What the hell does SDI
Re: [CTRL] Fwd: SOTHEBYS.COM - Collecting Guides - Jewelry
-Caveat Lector- From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED] During this show Larry King suddenly l grabbed her hand and said "where did you get this ting" and he pulled and tugged at her hand and would not let go Much the same as you not letting go of this worthless topic... Who gives a flyin' fig about Elizabeth Taylor, anyways (besides you, that is) Get a life. She was drunk or spaced out on drugs; Perhaps she is in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease... June A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Fwd: The Solari Story
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~ FONT COLOR="#99"eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups Click here for more details /FONTA HREF="http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/475667/_/980897668/"BClick Here!/B/A -_- Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Kris: New court transcripts just unsealed that prove DOJ wrongdoing beyond any doubt. We are now in the process of talking with reporters to see if we can start to get some media coverage. Could you post this overview on CIA-Drugs in the hopes that folks would circulate it to reporters who may be interested? Thanks. Catherine Austin Fitts Solari = My name is Catherine Austin Fitts. I live in Hickory Valley, Tennessee. I am an entrepreneur starting a new company--Solari. Solari's mission is to help communities start local software tool and database developer/knowledge management operations called solaris. Think of it as a local "resource compass" for a neighborhood that helps communities continuously reengineer their resource use to support local prosperity in a global environment. My goal is to start Hickory Valley Solari this year and use our website to teach others how to do the same. I am a former Managing Director and member of the Board of Directors of Dillon Read Co, Inc. and Assistant Secretary of Housing-FHA Commissioner in the Bush Administration. For my complete resume, see: http://www.solari.com/about/ca_fitts.html After leaving the Bush Administration in 1990, I started The Hamilton Securities Company in Washington, DC. I declined an offer from the Administration to be nominated as a governor of the Federal Reserve Board. My tour of duty in the Administration had persuaded me that new software, networking and telecommunication tools made it possible to build a new kind of collaborative economy based on knowledge as the principal wealth creating resource. If you have read Peter Drucker, the Solari model is geared towards the practical integration of these ideas and new technology into new forms of high performance organizations and communities. Eighteen months at HUD persuaded me that communities needed to take the lead in reengineering government and essential services investment locally. This reengineering---despite common notions---could not be done from Washington. If anything we needed to get Washington out of our communities. We started in a little brownstone off of 14th street in Washington. It did not take long to figure with the right computer set up and a satellite dish on the roof, that it did not matter if we were in a bad part of town. Our mission statement was "to liquefy and make accessible". We believed that new technology and tools could so increase learning speeds in both organizations and communities that private entrepreneurs could end poverty with education and small business creation. After several years, we found a loft space on DuPont circle and created the first open office in DC over looking the circle and the fountain on the second floor over CVS Pharmacy, with integrated phone and computers, which was to win an award from the American Institute of Architects: http://www.e-architect.com/conted/advntech/projcts/proj10.asp The first phase of Hamilton's business was to build the "know how" of prototyping the new tools sufficient to understand how to invent a new form of collaboartive organization and community venture capital. We sought any financial advisory assignment that would permit us to prototype reengineering and venture transactions and business starts up that would inform how to finance a small business network and a community with private equity controlled within the community that promoted substantially high learning speeds and knowledge. Overview information about clients, assignments, finances and software development can be found at: http://www.solari.com/gideon/about/index.html To say that Hamilton's culture was unique, does not begin to touch on how magical it was to start, to build, to grow. We started on the premise that knowledge and learning can solve the most intractable problems by building a alignment and moving out of a combative model and into collaborative learning models that used software tools and development techniques to simply and make accessible things that had once seemed hopeless complicated or uncertain. Our work force was remarkably diverse in a very wonderful way. The amazing thing was how financially successful our model was. We were a huge hit. The market for our tools and skills was very strong. We got things done. We were fun to work with. Everyone wanted to come over to our place. The food was great. In late 1993, we were hired through a
Re: [CTRL] How the Democrats made loving Dixie a hate crime
-Caveat Lector- Your premise is logical but wrong. Logic is only a human construct. Nature is. Hierarchy is the norm. It's not my logic. It's a basic axiom of anthropology, real 101, first semester stuff. If everybody does something, its human nature. If only some people do it, its not human nature; its culture. There are number of stable, long lived non hierarchical cultures. Ergo, hierarchy is not human nature. Its culture. The capacity for dominant/submissive relationships is human nature. Using that capacity to structure a culture is not. A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Truth and Slang
-Caveat Lector- Mature people don't ask for proof. They find out the truth for themselves. Prudy Truth, like Art, is in the eye of the beholder. -- "I am a jelly donut." - John F. Kennedy ("Ich bin ein berliner") Reminds me of a speech by our former PM Bob Hawke to some Japanese dignitaries, stating that they should not play 'funny buggers' over trade issues. After a pause this was translated as 'laughing homosexuals'. An equivalently funny event is when people misstate such slang, such as when an idiot at my former place of work told a colleague he 'didn't want to piss in her pants' (!) presumably meaning he didn't want to piss in her pockets, a slang expression meaning to BS someone. A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Dialing for Dollars
-Caveat Lector- This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?21521 Tuesday, January 30, 2001 Courting the presidential con By Anne Williamson 2001 WorldNetDaily.com It's over a week since Bill Clinton copped a plea before relinquishing the White House to George W. Bush, and yet the stench of his occupancy still lingers. Certainly the former president's interminable farewell, meant to upstage the new president on his inauguration day, will long be remembered as the ne plus ultra of boorish political leave-taking. But other facts emerged last week that justify the investigation by Chairman of the House Government Reform Committee Dan Burton into Clinton's last presidential deeds. The whirlwind of revelations regarding the Clintons' final, self-serving days include a hefty haul of presidential gifts the Clintons themselves selected for wealthy supporters to donate before Jan. 3 when Hillary Clinton's lust to have others furnish her newly-purchased mansions would become severely constricted by Senate ethics rules. The next assault upon citizens' sensitivities involved the former president's questionable pardons of some mighty curious folks in contradiction to the wishes of prosecutors from their own Justice Department, and who were largely bypassed in the process. And, finally, taxpayers learned of one last mugging when reports emerged detailing the Clinton entourage's looting aboard a presidential aircraft for the Saturday flight to New York from D.C., and their underlings' extensive vandalism in both the White House's West Wing and the vice president's offices in the Old Executive Office Building. The thefts and the vandalism speak to the character of a group of people who did not believe that they served at the people's pleasure, but rather thought of their political power as an entitlement. The other revelations speak not only to the ways in which both Clintons and their minions intend to reclaim that imagined entitlement, but also how they intend to cover up while enjoying the fruits of their many felonies. Felonies? Yes, felonies. Trillions are missing from federal agencies. That's right, gone. Poof! As in, "Nowhere to be found." People familiar with government accounts have charged off the record that in 1996 a concerted and intentional effort began with the support of the Office of Management and Budget and Treasury to strip agencies of honest officials and internal financial controls. Allegedly, the reports of missing money at the various agencies started rising exponentially in 1998 and 1999, but the actual problem began with Al Gore's "Reinventing Government" initiative. It was in the Clinton administration's first term that inspector generals and their staffs (each federal agency is assigned an inspector general who audits and monitors each agency's accounts and activities) were instructed to begin collaborating with their agencies -- a most peculiar instruction. As one frustrated inspector general remarked, "How can I collaborate with the very people I am meant to police?" Unsurprisingly, during the Clintons' time in office the ranks of the inspector generals were demoralized, and, in some cases, corrupted. This background is what made Robert Pear's Jan. 18 New York Times article, "Financial Problems in Government Are Rife, Nation's Top Auditor Says," so very timely. The comptroller general, David M. Walker, reported that " the Pentagon's financial statements are in such poor condition they cannot be audited, and that most other agencies do not comply with federal accounting standards." The result is that the comptroller general "cannot cer tify the accuracy of consolidated financial statements for the government as a whole." The report added, "Federal auditors have been complaining about this problem for several years." In other words, the Clintonista's looting did not begin or end with the purloining of cutlery, china, linen and other items bearing the presidential seal aboard the Boeing 747 President Bush made available to the Clintons and their guests for their departure from Washington on Inauguration Day. It began on the 20th of January, 1993, continued throughout their administration in a bewildering number of financial games involving domestic ag encies, foreign-aid agencies, development agencies and multilateral lenders, and has not yet ended. The presidential looting has not ended, because the pardons of Patty Hearst, insider trader Salim ("Sandy") Lewis, commodities outlaw Marc Rich and his partner Pincus Green, money-launderer Harvey Weinig, and questionable others all speak to the future, not the past. Sandy Lewis, Patty Hearst, Marc Rich and his former wife, Denise Rich, will all be expected to play a significant support role in Hillary Clinton's political future. And tha t means moola. Piles of it. I am not
[CTRL] New World Mish-Mosh
-Caveat Lector- From http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/world/2001/0127/wor9.htm }}Begin Saturday, January 27, 2001 A world order designed to serve economic imperatives By Finian Cunningham WORLD VIEW: We are entering a dangerous topsyturvy world where language is subverted in a way that would have abashed even George Orwell: danger is presented as security, violence as peace, and the poachers have become the gamekeepers. Ireland, with its temporary seat on the United Nations Security Council, should be using its influence to debate world security and raise concern over what appears to be a new arms race. Unfortunately, as a conference organised by the peace group Afri will hear today, the evidence suggests this State is meekly going with the destructive flow of powerful interests. First, let's go back 10 years. We were then promised a "new world order" in which democracy and the rule of international law would be cherished and protected. Western leaders galvanised the nations of the world to supposedly defend democracy and national sovereignty as the first instalment of their noble vision. No matter that the Butcher of Baghdad was an erstwhile Western ally and Kuwait was, and still is, an oil-rich petty fiefdom. Western ideologues were cranking up a propaganda charm offensive, proclaiming a fresh start to international relations supposedly founded on noble values of mutual respect and cooperation - the realisation of the UN Charter, no less. With the Cold War out of the way, so it was argued, the nations would now be free to act in unison to defend the foundations of democracy, even if it meant bombing miscreants back to the Stone Age. Ten years on it is clear that the so-called new world order and its grandiose claims lie in ruins as sure as the cancer-eaten bodies of children in Iraq and former Yugoslavia. World security and the promise of a peace div idend have been shelved, although Western leaders still cynically use the language of human rights and democracy to justify their actions. What is truly startling is how quickly the moral veil of the UN has been jettisoned. At the dawn of the new world order, enunciated by President George Bush snr, the moral authority of the UN was deemed to be a necessary illusion. Now the Western powers, primarily the US and the UK, are apparently emboldened enough to go it alone. The UN-sanctioned Operation Desert Storm against Iraq was quickly followed by Operation Restore Hope in which the US unilaterally sent its troops and gunships into Somalia. Less than a decade later NATO would launch a war in Europe with the UN not even consulted. Some observers did note that NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia with radioactive depleted uranium shells was an illegal war, but by this stage President Clinton and Prime Minister Blair were past caring about such cens ure. OMINOUSLY, the American dissident Noam Chomsky says the NATO action in former Yugoslavia signals a contempt for international law not seen since the 1930s. He notes that the real agenda behind the cynical use of this gratuitous aggression, dressed up in the language of human rights and defence of democracy, is the stamping of authority in a world order designed to serve West ern economic imperatives of so-called free markets. In this way the new world order is not much different from the old. One difference, however, was that the Mutually Assured Destruction of the Cold War served to curb Western aggression. That check is no longer there, and the Western powers increasingly feel free to wield the doctrine of Might is Right. It is somehow fitting that one of the architects of the new world order, George Bush, is now succeeded by his son. Even before taking office, Bush jnr signalled a more aggressive military policy, primarily in his backing of the National Missile Defence (Star Wars) programme. Concerns among Western allies, notably France and Germany, are brushed aside in a manner which confirms the adage of absolute power corrupting absolutely. This together with his tougher diplomatic stance towards Russia is predictably leading to a deteriorating international climate, fuelling insecurity and a new phase of the arms race. Russia was reported earlier this month to have reintroduced nuclear weapons into the Baltic region, after having removed them from eastern Europe when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. Observers note that due to the dilapidated state of its conventional armed forces, Russia is now relying even more on its huge nuclear arsenal as a deterrent. President Vladimir Putin is also making overtures to China for a new military alliance as a counterweight to the Star Wars initiative and the expansion of NATO in Europe. The joining of the NATO-inspired Partnership for Peace (another example of Orwellian doublespeak) by Ireland only serves to reinforce this negative dynamic. It's all a far cry from what was heroically promised in the hea dy days of the new world
Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE
you *believed* it? cool- they love 'overseas' audiences, they are so much more believing. and marketable cause you all think (wrongly) they have and ever had integrity. one thing in our favour is that we (in scotland) forced one of our main banks to not deal with pat robertson. he doesn't really agree with you about us being oppressed and weak- he reckons we are a dark country- full of gay homosexuals and drugs and stuff and we need a tougher authority to sort us out etc. you might be taken up the backalley if you go up a back alley in scotland- but it ain't gonna kill ya ;) - Original Message - From: Carl Amedio To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2001 20:13 Subject: Re: [CTRL] GUN REFRESHER COURSE In a message dated 1/30/01 2:08:12 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cameras every ten feet? LOL surely you jest, carl, you obviously haven't been here I just watched a BBC program on the complete loss of privacy in UK. The fact you pooh pooh this says volumes. Enjoy the gulag. Carl
[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] How the Democrats made loving Dixie a hate crime
-Caveat Lector- Even more curious is the persistence with which the fact that Southerners regularly state they were fighting for independence and State's Rights is ignored. Only 3% were slave owners, hardly enough for such drastic measures. Southerners are not even thinking about race/slaves/blacks when they love Dixie. That was a pretext for waging war on the South. Maybe they just wanted to be in their own country where people do not tell you just what you think and also why you think it. AKE - Original Message - From: "Marilyn Wright" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [CTRL] How the Democrats made loving Dixie a hate crime -Caveat Lector- Curiously, the number of wealthy, slave-owning plantation owners in the Old South was relatively few--as with any "aristocracy.". Many--if not most--of those who are now running around waving the Confederate flag and pining for those Dear Old Days are not the heirs of that wealthy few. They are folks who descend from merchants and shopkeepers and on down the ladder to poor white farmers and sharecroppers too poor to own slaves, struggling to hold on to a mule and a piece of land. What those great-great-grandsons of poor whites and sharecroppers really want is someone below them on the social ladder so they don't have to feel that they're the bottom of the barrel. That's where the Negro/African-American comes in. That's where he has a functiona dog to kick, as it were. Humans seem to love hierarchy (is it hardwired into the system?) Like a flock of chickens, all those great-great-grandchildren of poor southern white folks just don't want to see themselves at the low end of the pecking order. And now, at the very highest reaches of our government, we have a pack of men who not only understand but share their pain. sno0wl A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance-not soap-boxing-please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'-with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds-is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archiv es of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om