[CTRL] Afghani Tribal Dances
-Caveat Lector- From www.wsws.org WSWS : News Analysis : The US War in Afghanistan The Taliban, the US and the resources of Central Asia Part 1 By Peter Symonds 24 October 2001 Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author The following is the first article in a two-part series on the history of the Taliban movement in Afghanistan. The concluding part will be published tomorrow. The target of the latest US military aggression in Afghanistan is the Taliban. However, one searches in vain in the extensive media coverage of the war on terrorism for any coherent explanation of the origins of this Islamic extremist organisation, its social and ideological base, and its rise to power. The omission is no accident. Any serious examination of the Taliban reveals the culpability of Washington in fostering the current theocratic regime in Kabul. The Bush administration rails against the Taliban for harbouring the Islamic extremist Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda organisation. But throughout the 1980s, successive US administrations spent billions of dollars funding the Islamic holy war or jihad by Mujaheddin fighters against the Moscow-backed regime in Kabul in order to undermine the Soviet Union. Moreover, until the late 1990s, the US turned a blind eye to the Islamic fundamentalism and regressive social policies of the Taliban, which was backed and funded by two of Washingtons closest allies in the regionSaudi Arabia and Pakistan. The primary factor in determining the twists and turns of Washingtons orientation in Afghanistan has not been the threat from Islamic extremism but how best to exploit the new opportunities that opened up in Central Asia following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Throughout the last decade, the US has been vying with Russia, China, the European powers and Japan for political influence in this key strategic region and for the right to exploit the worlds largest untapped reserves of oil and gas in the newly formed Central Asian republicsTurkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. The key to the huge potential profits in Central Asia was distributionhow to transport the oil and gas from this isolated, backward and landlocked region to the worlds main energy markets. The only existing pipelines were those of the old Soviet distribution network through Russia. As the scramble for resources in the region intensified, the US aims were clear. It wanted to undermine Russias economic monopoly while at the same time making sure that other rivals were kept out of the race. The pipelines therefore had to run through countries over which the US could exert substantial political influence, which excluded China and Iran. The Central Asian republics were previously part of the Soviet Union and had long borders with both China and Iran. So a pipeline that excluded Russia, China and Iran left two alternatives. One was a convoluted route under the Caspian Sea, through the Caucasus via Azerbaijan and Georgia, and then across Turkey. The second through Afghanistan and Pakistan was shorter, but immediately raised difficult political questions. With whom was one to negotiate in Afghanistan and how could the political stability necessary to construct and maintain pipelines be guaranteed? Following the fall of the Soviet-backed regime of Mohammad Najibullah in 1992, Kabul had been turned into a battleground by competing Mujaheddin militia. The nominal head of government was Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani, who presided over a highly unstable and shifting coalition, based mainly on ethnic Tajiks and Uzbeks from northern Afghanistan. The rival Hizb-e-Islami militia, drawn from the Pashtun majority in southern Afghanistan, was also entrenched in the suburbs of Kabul. Led by Gulbuddin Hikmetyar, it was subjecting government positions in the capital to withering rocket barrages. Arrayed on either side of the conflict, which was reducing the capital to rubble and producing wave after wave of refugees, were other militia groups reflecting the countrys myriad of ethnic and religious divisions. The rivalries reflected not only local animosities but the interests of various sponsor states, each seeking to establish its own predominance. Pakistan supported Hikmetyar, Iran backed the Shiite Hazaras, and Saudi Arabia financed a number of groups, particularly those sympathetic to its brand of IslamWahabbism. The Central Asian republics had connections to the ethnic groups in northern Afghanistan and, in the background, India, Russia and the US all had a hand in Afghani political affairs. The situation in Kabul was a microcosm of the country as a whole. The Rabbani government exercised no real authority beyond the areas under its immediate military control. The country was carved up among rival militia, the economy was in ruins and the social fabric in tatters. Over a million people died in the war against the Soviet-backed regime in the 1980s and many more were
[CTRL] War not a matter of conscience
-Caveat Lector- From www.wsws.org The lengths to which the government is prepared to go in stifling opposition to its war drive is revealed ... }}}This is almost getting to be funny, in a cliche' sense. Every time these lame brained politicians need to drive their point home, they invoke the Spectre of none other than Der Phooey himself in order to heap insult upon their opponents. The irony is -- of course -- that they are striving for exactly what Der Phooey had in his times of crisis, a bunch of people who waved at him, indicating their assent to whatever he thunked up during his hours of revelry. Now, we have a Britlander Hilary, who, without the benefit of being able to acquire the Britlandic equivalent of a Selective Service System Card or an International Most Dangerous Game Hunting License, can easily put war as matter of conscience out of her mind (which she may be anyway: out of her mind). But, it's still nice to know there is such a thing a conscience ovah theyah. AER {{{ }}}Begin WSWS : News Analysis : Europe : Britain Britain: Government member says war is not a matter of conscience By Richard Tyler 24 October 2001 Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author Cabinet member Hilary Armstrong said last week that war was not a matter of conscience. The outburst came when Armstrong, Labours Chief Whip, responsible for ensuring backbenchers support the government in the House of Commons, called MP Paul Marsden into her office to give him a dressing down. Armstrong berated Marsden for publicly opposing the war in Afghanistan, threatening him, Those that arent with us are against us. On October 13, the backbench Labour MP spoke out against the war at a march and rally organised by CND in London that attracted up to 50,000 protestors. Prior to this on October 8, in the third debate on the international coalition against terrorism, Marsden had raised a point of order calling for a Commons vote on the conduct of the war. Marsden also asked, When will British citizens be given a written constitution so that Parliament, not a prime minister, authorises a declaration of war? Both questions were brushed aside. The lengths to which the government is prepared to go in stifling opposition to its war drive is revealed by last weeks exchange in the Chief Whips office, which Marsden subsequently passed on to the press. Armstrong: We may hold a vote [on the war]... but it will be whipped [i.e., support for the war would be made compulsory for Labour MPs]. Marsden: That is outrageous. You wont even give us a free vote on whether we go to war, which should be a matter of conscience. Armstrong: War is not a matter of conscience. Abortion and embryo research, they are matters of conscience. Marsden: Are you seriously saying that blowing people up and killing people is not a moral issue? Armstrong: It is government policy that we are at war... anyway you must stop using the media. Marsden: Thats a bit rich coming from people like you and Downing Street when [Transport Secretary] Stephen Byers spin doctor Jo Moore says September 11 is a good day to bury bad news. Armstrong: Jo Moore didnt say that. Marsden: That is exactly what she said in her email. Armstrong: We dont have spin doctors in No 10 [Downing Street], or anywhere else. Marsden: (laughing) You arent seriously telling me that you dont have spin doctors and they dont exist. You are losing it, Hilary. Armstrong: (shouting) You wait until I really do lose it. I am not going to have a dialogue with you about that. It was people like you who appeased Hitler in 1938. (The Whips take their name from the whippers-in, who kept hunting hounds in line. Labour Whips are answerable directly to the prime minister, until recently being housed adjacent to his official residence at No 10 Downing Street. When they call a three-line whip, every Labour MP is required to attend the Commons to support the government in any vote.) Not only did Marsden refuse to submit to the Chief Whips remonstrations, he then provided the press with his own verbatim account of the confrontation. This is considered an almost unpardonable breach of parliamentary etiquette, according to which the actions of the Whips are not subject to any public scrutiny. Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who had been the first government member to liken those opposing the war with supporters of appeasement with Nazi Germany, also attacked Marsden for publishing his account of what Straw described as a private conversation with the Chief Whip. Following publication of the exchange between Armstrong and Marsden in the Mail on Sunday, armed forces minister Adam Ingram told Sky television that Labour MPs opposed to the bombing were moving towards those who appeased the Nazi regime in the 1930s. The pressure was kept up on Monday, when Defence Minister Geoff Hoon said, Labour members... know what are the consequences of crossing the
[CTRL] Armchair Worriers
-Caveat Lector- From http://www.thetexasmercury.com/articles/weber/PW20011021.html }}}Begin The Rules of War? Paul Weber When, after centuries of warfare, Rome finally managed to conquer Carthage, the Roman general Scipio Africanus ordered the city to be leveled such that no stone stood upon another and the soil be sown with salt so that nothing might ever grow there again. When the warrior-king Tamerlane swept out of central Asia, pillaging and destroying every city along the way, for a brief moment in time establishing the largest empire the world has known (in terms of sheer geography), he set up monuments along the roads his army had traveled, consisting of pyramids of human skulls. When Tamerlane fell into the hands of his enemies, however, they all wanted to participate in his demise. It is said they killed him by setting a huge board on him, then gathering around the makeshift table. On a signal, they all leaned their weight on the tabletop, crushing Tamerlane to death. Then, they proceeded to have a hearty dinner on the tabletop. All's well that ends well. In most of the wars of antiquity, the conquered peoples were routinely butchered, and their wives and daughters sold into slavery. The Romans, realizing this might breed a bit of resentment and eventually weaken their empire, gave the conquered peoples the option of joining their conquerors, even giving them the high honor of having their own gods worshipped as part of the Roman pantheon. We must note, however, that such gestures of magnanimity were only offered after the enemy was decisively conquered. These gestures of magnanimity seem to be early examples of what we now call Rules of War--guidelines of conduct that are inevitably broken in the course of warfare, since victory often goes to those who are willing to be the most brutal. The German word for war--Krieg--comes from the verb meaning to acquire, reflecting the old view of war that you waged it in order to get something, or steal a bunch of loot from the tribe on the other side of the hill. Well, John-Boy, things were a lot simpler--and honest--back then. If you asked Tamerlane or Genghis Khan why they went to war, they would probably had thought you awfully dull-witted. They went to war to get stuff! To rape, to pillage, to enjoy some spectacular arson, and then move on. The Romans undoubtedly invented some fine fictions to explain why they went to war--the greater glory of the empire, the service of the god-emperor, the spreading of culture to the far corners of the world--but if we really cut to the chase, Roman war was all about getting a bunch of stuff, mainly for the pleasure of the ruling classes, but also for the entertainment and mollification of the proletarians. You see, we human beings secretly love war. Now, dont get all huffy on me with denials. Face it: we love it! Why else would any species engage in deliberate self-destruction on such an awe-inspiring level, unless, to some degree, we loved it? Oh, I know--people claim to hate war when they experience the aftermath, like a drunkard bemoaning his hangover, but still, most people love it. Why else do yo u go to the bookstore, and find shelf after shelf filled with books rehashing, over and over again, the history of wars, in every nauseating detail? In response to the atrocity of September 11, several commentators, left and right, have been whooping it up for war, almost as though theyve been waiting for an opportunity like this for years. There is definitely some weird, twisted aspect of the human psyche that we need to explore regarding war: people who were otherwise normal human beings suddenly start ranting like schoolboys, fairly drooling about how bad were gonna hurt bin Laden, the convenient Hitler of the moment. Then come the demands that everyone in the entire country think exactly the same way. Seriously, folks--read the recent columns by Michael Kelly in the Wall Street Journal in which he says that anyone who is for peace is on the side of bin Laden. Im sure Mr. Kelly, when he strips off his editorial tunic and goes home, is otherwise a normal human being. But something about the prospect of war turns him into a megalomaniac. Surely there is some deep-seated biologic al drive that takes over the majority of the species from time to time, egging people on to kill each other. Just a few deep thinkers--libertarians and free-market advocates, mostly--sit on the sidelines and wonder why ev eryone is acting so crazy. Man, its tough being right all the time. After the Romans, the excuses for war started to get a little more clever. Religious rationalizations became all the rage as the Muslim armies stormed out of Arabia, conquering kingdom after kingdom and demanding--surprise!--that everyone think like them or be put to the
[CTRL] Looney In WashingToon
-Caveat Lector- From }}}Begin Figures of Childish Imagination Occupy High Positions in American Government Bert's Collaboration With Osama Bin Laden Shown to Be Tip of the Iceberg. UPYRS Wire WASHINGTON, DC-The revelations of Sesame Street character Berts partnership with Osama bin Laden sent shockwaves through official Washington. However, new discoveries are now beginning to overshadow even that scandal. UPYRS investigators have found that cartoon and muppet infiltration extends deeper than anyone had previously suspected. Figures of childish imagination now occupy a surprising number of official positions, including one who works as a communications adviser for the American president. Mr. Pig has been a loyal employee and has always given the president excellent advice, said Senior White House Counselor Karen Hughes. Sure, Porky has his speech impediment, but he can turn an elegant phrase when the situation calls for it, and hes great with closing lines. Our only mistake was allowing him to dictate the final drafts for President Bushs speeches. When asked how the president could allow an imaginary figure to help craft policy, Ms Hughes defended the administration, President Bush has made it very clear that there will be no discrimination on his watch. Almost everyone agrees that no matter what a persons color, gender, religion, or sexual orientation is they should not be denied an opportunity to contribute. I dont see why we should act any differently when it comes to a persons fictional status. Compassionate conservatism, if it is to mean anything, cannot allow any undue realism to affect policy. Cartoon policy makers have also been found in the center of some rather high level disputes. The recent feud between the Defense and State Departments, it has been learned, was really nothing more than a dispute between t wo cartoon aides. Mr. Daffy Duck, who is an assistant to Paul Wolfowitz, the Undersecretary of Defense, and Mr. Bugs Bunny, an assistant to Colin Powell, the Secretary of State disagreed on whether US policy in the Middle East should lean towards Israel or accommodate Arabic concerns. Its Arafat season, screamed Mr. Duck at one meeting. No, its Sharon season, responded Mr. Bunny. Reportedly, this exchange repeated itself for over an hour until, finally, an agreement was reached when Mr. Bunny riposted, Look, Daffy, its Arafat season, and you know it. The heck you say, rabbit. Its Sharon season, and Im not leaving here until you fess up to it. Okay, Daffy, you win, Mr. Bunny relented. Let me clear it with Colin, and well send the papers over to you. Later Bugs Bunny claimed that there really was no division between the two departments, or even between him and his colleague Daffy. Said the cartoon hare, No, no. We get along fine. Daffys a great guy. We play golf on the weekends, you know. Actually, his joining Wolfowitzs team has been a blessing as hes been able to act as something of a stable element over there. In this same interview, Bugs Bunny talked about other cartoon figures working in Washington: Sure, doc, theres lots of us out there. Pepe le Pew made some very significant contributions to our chemical warfare divisions. OK, so he was fired because of sexual harassment issues, but that cat had it coming to her. Who else? Oh, yeah, theres also Wile E. Coyote. He had a position in RD. I hear he was working on a laser-guided anvil, but the Pentagon had to let him go later because they found out he was getting kickbacks from the boys at Acme. Other government agencies beyond the State and Defense Departments have been found using cartoon labor, too. In the newly organized Office of Homeland Security, Linus from the Peanuts Gang was found distributing blankets. When questioned, the Head of Homeland Security, former Governor Tom Ridge, defended Linus actions, saying, Cmon, its a more effective form of security than what we had in place beforehand. At the Immigration and Naturalization Service, one Mr. Magoo was found processing applicants for naturalization. Answered Agent Magoo when asked about his qualifications: Why, I can spot the best ofem, my boy. No one gets past ol Magoo without a thorough check. This is the INS, you know. Now, if youll excuse me, that nice Middle Eastern fellow who was just in here dropped this taped-up bundle of Linkin Logs, and Id like to return it to him. Oh, my! What a pretty sparkler it has on the end! Listen to it hiss. Oh my yes, that boy will make an excellent addition to our country, continued Agent Magoo, who at this point was addressing his hatrack. Said he was going to Wall Street and wanted to make a killing. I think hes going to invest in Pork Bellies. He kept talking about a company called -umm, oh yes!- Infidel Swine I think it was.
Re: [CTRL] Wrenching, incriminating quotes - Dick Eastman
-Caveat Lector- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/awpd/message/1227?threaded=1 From: Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed Oct 17, 2001 12:12 pm Subject: Wrenching, incriminating quotations -- Top Establishment disposition for crashbombing frame-up, war provocation What I found infinitely disturbing and compelling was this page of quotations -- many of which I too have located and confirmed over the years and so know to be genuine. But I am dumbfounded at all I missed! These quotations are historical data, not interpretation, not theory. These well-positioned and much-honored men actaully did reach these consistent conclusions. --Dick Eastman, Yakima === We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995) The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent. Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries. DAVID ROCKEFELLER, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991. From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. WINSTON CHURCHILL, stated to the London Press, in l922. In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily pressThey found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers. U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917 The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind. GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all. STROBE TALBOT, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992. We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent. Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950 The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans. British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876 Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom
Re: [CTRL] Is Camel Pox Coming? - Maureen Dowd
-Caveat Lector- nytimes.com Is Camel Pox Coming? October 21, 2001 By MAUREEN DOWD WASHINGTON John McCain called to try to talk me down. I put aside Scourge, the book I was reading about smallpox - It covered the skin with hideous, painful boils, killed a third of its victims, and left the survivors disfigured for life - and listened. There's nothing wrong with being afraid, the senator said in that soft, reassuring voice. Every time I heard the guard's key chain rattle when he came to my cell at an odd hour, I felt fear, but it didn't incapacitate me. Easy for him to say. He's a national hero who was tortured in Vietnam. I'm a spoiled yuppie who desperately wants to go back to a time before we'd heard of microns and milling, aerosolization and clumps in the alveoli. Mr. McCain advised me to channel my fear into something productive. O.K. I am channeling my fear of terrorism into a fear of bureaucracy. Many government officials here do not yet have a grip on an enemy etched in disappearing ink. Washington is rife with contradictory signals. The White House urges us to go out while Dick Cheney is under wraps. Congress urges us to stay calm and go about our business while the entire House takes a powder at the first sign of powder. We are supposed to shop till we drop, literally, as the F.B.I. and C.I.A. warn of major attacks at any moment. The capital is the heart of confusion. The U.S. has been at war with the Taliban for two weeks so . . . we can reinstate the Taliban? The Post Office is sending us mail warning us . . . about opening mail? Nothing seems to track: Gov. George Pataki said he was taking Cipro but wouldn't get tested. Senator John Breaux said he got tested but might not take Cipro. Dan Rather said he hadn't been tested or taken Cipro. Tom Brokaw ended the NBC news with In Cipro we trust. I went to the White House, seeking some answers from Tom Ridge at his briefing on Friday. But he looked a bit like a big Pennsylvania deer in the headlights. He didn't even know what CNN had been running - that an assistant to a New York Post editor had contracted anthrax. When Mr. Ridge said they didn't know if the anthrax came from a foreign or a domestic source, he was slapped around by Helen Thomas, doyenne of the homeland. And why are you so slow in finding the actual source? she asked tartly. I mean, is it that difficult really? Tommy Plenty for Everyone Thompson was still buddying up to the pharmaceutical industry, refusing to break Bayer's patent to ensure generic Cipro for everyone. A grandfatherly looking man stood at the edge of the stage. Mr. Ridge introduced him as D. A. Henderson, head of his science advisory committee and the father of the eradication of smallpox. At first I was relieved to see Dr. Henderson, a public health legend. But I began to fret that he was like a detective brought out of retirement to catch a criminal he thought he'd locked up long ago. I ran into my colleague Judy Miller, a bioterrorism expert, and asked if we should be worried about smallpox, camel pox and mouse pox. We should be worried for the next few years, she said briskly, and then we'll be fine. The next few years? An F.B.I. swat team descended on a mailbox in the Jersey suburbs, but the agency still has no idea who's doing the mailings or where the anthrax was procured or made, and hasn't had one big break in the Sept. 11 investigation. The C.I.A. and the F.B.I. keep telling reporters how close they came to breaking up the hijackers' plot - if only they had had cooperation from the other agency. It's irritating to hear lame after-the-fact excuses in romance, but it's infuriating to hear them in national security. The F.B.I. is remaking itself to focus on counterterrorism. But when it can't figure out the last attack, how can it prevent the next? I called a reporter who's covered Central Asia and the Mideast. I said, despite news of an anthrax letter sent to the Times's Rio bureau and postmarked New York, I would get beyond my phobia about germ warfare. Anthrax is not the problem, he agreed. I'm afraid we're going to have a nuclear exchange in the next four weeks. Sharon's about to go to war with the Palestinians. India could use that as a cover to provoke Pakistan. Then Pakistan might nuke India. All these friction points will be a huge test of Bush. Oh, Senator McCain . . . ? http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/21/opinion/21DOWD.html?ex=1004910372ei=1en=cd 8c83a62655e325 HOW TO ADVERTISE - For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other creative advertising opportunities with The New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo For general information about NYTimes.com, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion
[CTRL] Pres. Bush Sees Vast Conspiracy
-Caveat Lector- .. From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed] Note: We store 100's of related New Paradigms Posts at: http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html From: Brian Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pres. Bush Sees Vast Conspiracy Date: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:38 PM Pres. Bush Sees Vast Conspiracy (Conspiracy Nation, 10/20/01) -- U.S. president George W. Bush is calling the Sept. 11th terror attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon a vast, global conspiracy. But less paranoid observers scoff at the notion. This is a common American reaction to what are in reality merely random events, stated professor G. Steadfast of Oberlin college. President Bush is exhibiting paranoid symptoms, part of what I call 'the paranoid style' in American politics. Author Gerald Poser concurs: What you have on September 11th is just three, random, lone nuts, who simultaneously hijacked planes. Because of the chance synchronicity of the events, which according to Chaos Theory, *can* happen, president Bush has jumped to paranoid conclusions. Case closed. But conspiracy theorists throughout the world, drinking gallons of coffee and with tired eyes glued to Internet late at night, aren't so sure. Some even venture beyond what president Bush has said. I see an evil man with a towel wrapped around his head, sitting in a cave, as being the ultimate mastermind of the plot, said one of these caffeinated theorists. Chirp Ballet, noted writer, laughs at the multiplying theories born from president Bush's original theory. Of course, there are no conspiracies, he chuckled. But beware of the crypto-fascists, he added, as an afterthought. Also dismissing notions of a conspiracy behind the Sept. 11 terror attacks is Umberto Eco, author of Foucault's Pendulum. Eco offered his own scholarly perspective on the Bush conspiracy theory: Ever since Nietzche dethroned God, with his statement 'God is dead,' there has been a 'God vacuum.' People such as president Bush seek to fill that void by creating a new 'God,' in the form of a vast conspiracy, he proselytized. Hence, Mr. Bush *needs* to see a 'vast conspiracy,' as security blanket against God's demise. But president Bush is adamant. The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were the acts of crazed assassins, coordinated by the Devil, he insisted. And, Bush adds, What about that fourth plane that crashed in Pennsylvania? Merely a random event, allowable in the framework of Chaos Theory, responded Poser. -- Brian Redman | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html Editor-in-Chief| ---Phone: 217-356-4418 Conspiracy Nation | The perfect slave thinks he's free. Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List, not necessarily endorsed by: *** Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Explore Our Archive: http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] The War Against Humanity: Afghan front
-Caveat Lector- from Richard K. Moore Aid officials estimate that up to 7.5 million Afghans might be threatened with starvation. - from article below Friends, The evidence seems to be that more people will die in Afghanistan this winter than died in all of Hitler's concentration camps. During these last few weeks when something might still be done about it, the US-UK Axis continues the bombing raids and drops token food packages - not enough to feed a single village. And these are dropped in the wrong places, often in fields infested with land mines. There is no possibility that the Axis leaders are unaware of the genocidal consequences of their acts, and the token food drops amount to a cynical propaganda ploy to distract public attention from those consequences. Add this to the 1.5 million Iraqi's killed by Axis sanctions, and millions killed by IMF/CIA actions in Rwanda and elsewhere in Africa -- we are witnessing history's greatest intentional holocaust. Following a brief report on the humanitarian disaster, and another about U.S. cover-up measures, there's a longer piece from ZNet. disgusted, rkm http://cyberjournal.org *** Today's commentary on the web: http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2001-10/19albert.cfm ZNet Commentary What's So Complex About It? October 19, 2001 By Michael Albert In the past few weeks I have minutely explored, often with Stephen Shalom, multifold concerns about September 11 and the war on terrorism. With him I have tried to calmly and soberly respond to all kinds of concerns people feel. I recommend doing it. We all need to become adept at rebutting the insanely manipulative media messages that crowd into so many people's minds, and into our own as well. But going straight to the uncomplicated heart of the matter sometimes has merit, too. The U.S. bombing of Afghanistan is a barbaric assault on defenseless civilians. It threatens a nearly incomprehensible human calamity. It is pursuing abominable goals. The bombing is not a just war, as Richard Falk labels it in The Nation, but a vigilante attack. No, it is not a vigilante attack; it is a vigilante lynch-mob assault writ large. No, it is not even a vigilante lynch mob assault writ large--even vigilante lynch mobs go after only those they think are culprits and not innocent bystanders. The bombing of Afghanistan is a gargantuan repugnance hurled against some of the poorest people on the planet. And this gargantuan repugnance is undertaken not out of sincere if horrendously misguided desires to curtail terrorism--since the bombing undeniably manifests terror and feeds the wellsprings of more terrorism to come--but out of malicious desires to establish a new elite-serving logic of U.S. policy-making via an endless War on Terrorism to replace the defunct Cold War. This is rehashed Reaganism made more cataclysmic than even his dismal mind could conceive. When people say, but doesn't the U.S. have a right to defend itself?. I understand their hurt, pain, anger, and confusion. But I also have to admit that I want to scream that the U.S. is increasing the likelihood that a million or more souls will suffer fatal starvation. Is that self defense? Put differently, what kind of thinking sees denying food to humans as self defense? The answer is thinking like Bush's, thinking like bin Laden's, thinking that treats innocent human lives as chess pieces, as checkers, as tidily winks, in pursuit of its own deadly agendas. Thinking that is willing to rocket a plane into a building to take 6,000 innocent lives, or thinking that is willing to drop bombs into an already devastated country abetting cataclysmic starvation. Or, more often, it is thinking that has been systematically denied the most basic information relevant to the issues at hand, and that is too fearful, depressed, angry, or cynical to admit disturbing truths. You think I exaggerate? Jean Ziegler, Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food to the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, said October 15, The bombing has to stop right now. There is a humanitarian emergency. Lest anyone miss the point, he continued, In winter the lorries cannot go in any more. Millions of Afghans will be unreachable in winter and winter is coming very, very soon. As Reuters reported (and AP carried as well, but not any U.S. newspaper or other major media outlet, as best I can tell), the United Nations has warned of a catastrophe unless aid can get through for up to seven million Afghans. Ziegler continues, We must give the (humanitarian) organizations a chance to save the millions of people who are internally displaced (inside Afghanistan), adding that he was echoing an (essentially unreported) appeal made by U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson a few days earlier, who was in turn echoing reports that go back to before the bombing. Ziegler called the bombing a catastrophe for humanitarian work. Or in the words of Christian Aid Spokesman
[CTRL] FW: check it out
-Caveat Lector- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - He who does not prefer exile to slavery is not free by any measure of freedom, truth and duty. Kahil Gibran, Spirits Rebellious NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew EVERYONE..PLEASE READ THIS! Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail. Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet. Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out of alternative postage fees. Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on! every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: There is nothing like a letter. Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day - or over $180 per year - above and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service they do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is democracy and non-interference. You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter t! o be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the free Internet in the United States. Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a $20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea of E-mail surcharge a useful concept who's time has come (March 6th, 1999 Editorial) Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends andrelatives to write their congressional representative and say NO to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not want. PLEASE FORWARD A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Afghani Tribal Dances
-Caveat Lector- once again- this is a twisting of facts it is WIDELY reported about the US role in the rise of the taliban, even on the most mainstream news sources such as cnn, and the networks. -- Doubt. Doubt thyself. Doubt even if thou doubtest thyself. Doubt all. Doubt even if thou doubtest all. It seems sometimes as if beneath all conscious doubt there lay some deepest certainty. O kill it! Slay the snake! The horn of the Doubt-Goat be exalted Dive deeper, ever deeper, into the Abyss of Mind, until thou unearth the fox THAT. On, hounds! Yoicks! Tally-ho! Bring THAT to bay! Then, wind the Mort! Uncle Al. the kiddies pal NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew From: Euphorian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:43:34 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CTRL] Afghani Tribal Dances -Caveat Lector- From www.wsws.org WSWS : News Analysis : The US War in Afghanistan The Taliban, the US and the resources of Central Asia Part 1 By Peter Symonds 24 October 2001 Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author The following is the first article in a two-part series on the history of the Taliban movement in Afghanistan. The concluding part will be published tomorrow. The target of the latest US military aggression in Afghanistan is the Taliban. However, one searches in vain in the extensive media coverage of the war on terrorism for any coherent explanation of the origins of this Islamic extremist organisation, its social and ideological base, and its rise to power. The omission is no accident. Any serious examination of the Taliban reveals the culpability of Washington in fostering the current theocratic regime in Kabul. The Bush administration rails against the Taliban for harbouring the Islamic extremist Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda organisation. But throughout the 1980s, successive US administrations spent billions of dollars funding the Islamic holy war or jihad by Mujaheddin fighters against the Moscow-backed regime in Kabul in order to undermine the Soviet Union. Moreover, until the late 1990s, the US turned a blind eye to the Islamic fundamentalism and regressive social policies of the Taliban, which was backed and funded by two of Washingtons closest allies in the regionSaudi Arabia and Pakistan. The primary factor in determining the twists and turns of Washingtons orientation in Afghanistan has not been the threat from Islamic extremism but how best to exploit the new opportunities that opened up in Central Asia following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Throughout the last decade, the US has been vying with Russia, China, the European powers and Japan for political influence in this key strategic region and for the right to exploit the worlds largest untapped reserves of oil and gas in the newly formed Central Asian republicsTurkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. The key to the huge potential profits in Central Asia was distributionhow to transport the oil and gas from this isolated, backward and landlocked region to the worlds main energy markets. The only existing pipelines were those of the old Soviet distribution network through Russia. As the scramble for resources in the region intensified, the US aims were clear. It wanted to undermine Russias economic monopoly while at the same time making sure that other rivals were kept out of the race. The pipelines therefore had to run through countries over which the US could exert substantial political influence, which excluded China and Iran. The Central Asian republics were previously part of the Soviet Union and had long borders with both China and Iran. So a pipeline that excluded Russia, China and Iran left two alternatives. One was a convoluted route under the Caspian Sea, through the Caucasus via Azerbaijan and Georgia, and then across Turkey. The second through Afghanistan and Pakistan was shorter, but immediately raised difficult political questions. With whom was one to negotiate in Afghanistan and how could the political stability necessary to construct and maintain pipelines be guaranteed? Following the fall of the Soviet-backed regime of Mohammad Najibullah in 1992, Kabul had been turned into a battleground by competing Mujaheddin militia. The nominal head of government was Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani, who presided over a highly unstable and shifting coalition, based mainly on ethnic Tajiks and Uzbeks from northern Afghanistan. The rival Hizb-e-Islami militia, drawn from the Pashtun majority in southern Afghanistan, was also entrenched in the suburbs of Kabul. Led by Gulbuddin Hikmetyar, it was subjecting government positions in the capital to withering rocket barrages. Arrayed on either side of the
Re: [CTRL] I smell a skunk in BioPort....
-Caveat Lector- In early 1970 my son got meningitis; it was then when I was at the hospital, I had a medical book out in the libriary and looked up meningitis - and it said see Anthrax. Yesterday I asked my doctor about this and he said well it must have been an old book.yes it was, but what an answer.the doctor at the hospital nearly 30 years ago took the book away from me when he saw me in the library. When my son was there a man in USAF uniform came into our isolated room where another child also lay - and walked over to my son and just stared at him, and then looked at me - and I got the message who he was just by looking at him . So later I did more research and found that Battelle Memorial in our area had an entire floor devoted to germ warfare.I was horrified by this but what can one do? Now Admiral Crowe I have followed off and on and I never liked him but I did not know about this Clinton connection - this man, Crowe, teamed up with a man from Battelle Memorial - so this means they not only know how to get into the germ warfare but now they also have alleged cure. And further - my son was treated with penicillin for a cold for a week before it was discovered he had meningitis - but at the hospital they had to find the right strain before they could put him on the right medication. It was then I found that two Air Force Bases, meningitis outbreaks and in Brazil there was anthrax and Mafia delivered a lot of bad mean up here. Point I am trying to make is this - you get more meningitis and whatever from eating bad meat than you do from the germ warfarewe now have labs coming up with diagnosis some of which may not be accuraate. These tests are not accurate - and some of the labs employeeds are incompetent. This sudden attack of anthrax at the White House, etcSenate and Congress closing down - maybe a better word is this - they fear the city of Washington is going to be blown apart and why not - they have sat back for years, and they control believe it or not, what you see in Hollywood and on TV - the experimentor and the experimentees - consider Larry Flynt in like Flyn with TWO Presidents, Carter and Clinton and under their administrations - Carter made his first appearance of notice in Playboy Magazinefrom there it went to an introduction of Hustler whereby Larry Flynt attempted to stand in Kennedy spotlight, by professing to be interested in the Kennedy conspiracy and I have some first hand information here - this guy was nothing but front for DRUGS, Pornography and in with Meyer Lansky. So he was gunned down when he decided to bypass the Lansky local machine and not pay his dues, and he was gunned down. And all this, and meningitis and anthrax too. So slowly the picture has been drawn by Hollywood aided by the Congress and people like this degenerate Gary Condit - to portray America as a receptacle for a Sodom and Gomorrah..and it has been successful. That we have sat back and let these people do as they have done in silence, permitted our television to be so corupted it is not fit to watch - well put it this way, this terrorism is home grown and I hope Washington gets the message.. For if they have not, their days are numbered for the terrorists have been very selective in their targets. World Trade Center? This building had to go and what a set up.what a set up..cui bono?Why the same people who caused the demolition of these buildings will now profit for 99 year lease? Get real.who ever heard of a 99 year lease - these are long range plans. We have Murder Inc. calling the shots nowwe have a Senate and Congress who have left a yellow streak from the Halls of Congress to their hole in the wall where they now live in fear. Anthrax attack..how many people died of heart attacks this year, or cancer, or accidents in their own home and must we be consumed by their greed? Something really wrong in America - but Osama bin Laden did not take down the Twin Towers.. We have put our boys in harms way for a handful of people who profit - for Schumberger stocks was going up while other stocks were giong down - and the gold market...Schlumberger of course was the munitions company that was robbed by the Bay of Pigs conspirators in which Gordon Novel, was involved - and they got caught. Justice Department, and how odd - believed the Schlumberger munitions had been hidden on a farm outside my town, where a doctor and a mafia hit man lived, all of whom entertained Meyer Lansky during the 70 period and involved in murder, murder murder. Same old secret societies just a new cast of characters. Some say all roads lead to Rome, but my bet is all roads lead to Jerusalem? Jerry Falwell's new Cog for the big Wheel of the World which will be get this - the World Trade Center? Odds are, the new World Trade Center - no more tallest building in the world, if the assassins have their way. Seems the assassins have an
[CTRL] OSAMA BOUGHT A BATCH FOR 10G
-Caveat Lector- http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/32458.htm OSAMA BOUGHT A BATCH FOR 10G By NILES LATHEM October 24, 2001 -- WASHINGTON - Terror master Osama bin Laden bought samples of anthrax by mail from shady laboratories in Eastern Europe and Asia for as little as $10,000, a former follower has told authorities in Egypt. The astonishing claim of how easily - and cheaply - the world's most wanted terrorist was able to acquire anthrax and other deadly germ agents was made in a 143-page confession of former extremist Ahmad Ibrahim al-Najjar at a recent trial of more than 100 members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Al-Najjar, serving a life sentence in Egypt, was among several Islamic Jihad operatives arrested in Albania in 1999 and brought home to Egypt to face trial for a series of attempts to destabilize the pro-Western government of President Hosni Mubarak. According to translated accounts of his testimony obtained by The Post, al-Najjar told authorities there was nothing cloak- and-dagger about bin Laden's transactions involving deadly biological agents. Factories in the Czech Republic and elsewhere in Eastern Europe supplied deadly bacteria, including e-coli and salmonella, by mail without checking the identities of the purchasers as long as bin Laden's agents paid $7,500 up front, al-Najjar said. Bin Laden's group was able to get the anthrax germ from another factory in Southeast Asia, which supplied it to the Indonesian-based Islamic Moro Front, a terror group closely associated with bin Laden. The price for the anthrax spores, al-Najjar said, was $3,685, plus shipping costs. U.S. officials say they don't yet know whether bin Laden is responsible for the anthrax scare gripping the nation, although President Bush and other senior officials say they are suspicious. Bin Laden is known to have contacts with Iraqi officials and mafia groups in former Soviet republics - nations that have extensive chemical- and biological-weapons programs and that are known to have experimented with anthrax. -- Best wishes A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] The Interventionist-Internationalist Complex
-Caveat Lector- .. From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed] Note: We store 100's of related New Paradigms Posts at: http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html From: M.A. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Recipient list suppressed Subject: The Interventionist-Internationalist Complex Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:16 PM ~~for educational purposes only~~ [Title 17 U.S.C. section 107] The Interventionist-Internationalist Complex by Gary North In a previous essay, I expressed admiration for the non-interventionist foreign policy set forth by George Washington in what we call the Farewell Address (1796). I stated that the American way of life is best expressed by the phrase, live and let live. George Washington's foreign policy of peaceful neutrality basically, what Switzerland's policy has been for five centuries is an application of live and let live. This view of the American way has always had two major rivals. The first rival view has shaped American foreign policy for almost two centuries, and American economic policy since Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. This view can also be stated in four words: Defend the little guy. Hans Krepelene coined a word for this outlook over 30 years ago: infracaninophilia love of the underdog. The second rival view can be also expressed in four words: Do it our way. We used this phrase with the tribes that originally occupied North America above the Rio Grande, and also on Spanish-speaking people who came under our jurisdiction as a result of the war for Texas, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War. In the case of the colonies that we gained during the Spanish-American war Puerto Rico and the Philippines we justified the theft in terms of defending the little guy, and then we ran things our way, but officially on behalf of the little guys. We became the overdog. As for the American tribes, we placed them on reservations, and, after the Civil War ended, began the initial American experiment in welfarism, which is still going on. When you think welfare State, think Bureau of Indian Affairs. When you think socialized medicine, think Indian Health Service. Defend the little guy was the ethical impulse, and when it was combined with the secularized postmillennial vision of America's manifest destiny, it produced modern interventionist foreign policy. It was the ethical-racial vision of the English-speaking man's burden that led to the creation of the Council of Foreign Relations in 1921. The CFR was an extension of the Rhodes-Milner group, represented by the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA). (On this point, see The Anglo-American Establishment, written by Carroll Quigley, who taught Bill Clinton history at Georgetown University. Even better is Part I of Otto Scott's 1985 book on South Africa, The Other End of the Lifeboat.) I have described the racial aspect of this vision in a chapter on William Jennings Bryan, who opposed it. The Aryan triumphalism of the Progressives, 1910-1939, was an extension of Charles Darwin's Origin of Species by way of the work of his cousin, Francis Galton. Anyone who has studied the history of the eugenics movement in the United States is familiar with this dark side of the Progressive movement. Eugenics was bankrolled by the Eastern Establishment, especially John D. Rockefeller, Jr. The use of foreign policy as a way to uplift other nations, but always at a profit for large corporate interests, was basic to British-American foreign policy in the twentieth century. Consider the career of Raymond Fosdick (1883-1972). He was the brother of Harry Emerson Fosdick, who was Rockefeller's pastor and for whom Rockefeller built the Riverside Church in the mid-1920's. Raymond Fosdick had gone on Rockefeller's payroll in 1913. He had been sent to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 as part of Col. Edward Mandell House's group, the Inquiry, which ran the American team at Paris. At the League of Nations, Fosdick, as Under Secretary General, worked daily with 31-year-old Jean Monnet, France's Under Secretary General. Fosdick wrote to his wife that he, Monnet, and the British Under Secretary General were working to lay the foundations of the framework of international government. . . . (Letter of July 31, 1919; in Fosdick, ed., Letters on the League of Nations [Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1966], p. 18.) This was no idle boast. Over the next six decades, Monnet became the driving force behind the creation of the European Common Market and the New European order. He died in 1979. Meanwhile, Fosdick returned to the United States, became Rockefeller's attorney in 1920, and ran the Rockefeller Foundation's empire for the next three decades. He wrote Rockefeller's authorized biography, published in 1956. He was a founding member of the CFR in 1921, along with many other members of the Inquiry. To justify the
[CTRL] Fwd: War and Inflation
War and Inflation THE DAILY RECKONING PARIS, FRANCE TUESDAY, 23 OCTOBER 2001 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** Gold down. Euro down. Commodities down. Deflation up... *** Consumers give credit cards a rest... *** Ad budgets slashed...employees slashed... entertainment budgets slashed...slash, slash, slash... * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Gold dropped $4.50 yesterday - to $263. The euro fell to 89 cents. Commodities fell to a new low. For the first time in years, Americans start to give their credit cards a rest..., declares a Houston Chronicle headline. And...Virtually all of the world's major economies have broken decisively to the downside in the past few months, reports Stephen Roach from Tokyo. Prices are falling in Taiwan, with the CPI down .5% year to year...and wholesale prices down even more. Japan, meanwhile, is in its 4th recession in a decade. Worldwide deflation...get used to it. The glass-half-empty folks might see our country today as a land of frightening terrorist plots, falling corporate earnings and bad TV sitcoms, writes Eric Fry from New York, but clearly, Mr. Market sees something else altogether - something hopeful, something upbeat, something so positively marvelous that it is worth almost 40 times annual earnings. Though they suffer the torments of Job...investors still believe... Here's the rest of Eric's report: * Mr. Eric Fry in New York: - The stock market is going up because it is going up. Who are we to quarrel with it? Like pierced tongues and facial tattoos, some things just seem to happen...for no good reason. - The Dow gained nearly 2% yesterday, rising 173 points to 9,377, while the Nasdaq advanced more than 2%, to 1,708. - It would be nice if Mr. Market would let us in on what he sees because, to the naked eye, the economy and the stock market don't look so good. - Case-in-point: SBC Communications announced yesterday it would cut several thousand jobs, trim next year's capital budget by 20% in and delay the build-out of its broadband network. The telecom giant is hardly alone in declaring that it plans to save money next year, not spend it. (To refresh: spending is good and saving is bad). - Company after company has been reporting terrible earnings lately...the market is rallying anyway, which prompts smartmoney.com's Igor Greenwald to suggest doing away with reporting season this quarter. The hundreds of public companies reporting earnings over the coming week should save their breath, red ink and crocodile tears, he writes. A single press release will do: 'The 170-odd SP 500 companies reporting this week announced a 20%+ drop in third-quarter profits, after subtracting very special charges in a procedure no one should try at home. Those results beat, by a penny a share here and there, forecasts those companies supplied three weeks ago...Business, meanwhile, is still slow.' No fuss, no muss, no annoying conference calls. Igor's got a point. Business, indeed, is still slow. - Many companies are slashing their advertising budgets, along with every other budget they can find. The media executives from across the country who convened at the annual American Magazine Conference in Manhattan yesterday all griped about the grim outlook for ad spending. Frederick Hill, executive vice president of marketing and communication for J.P. Morgan Chase told Crain's magazine, Our advertising dollars will be curtailed until the second quarter of 2002. - As ad budgets fall, so do entertainment budgets, and that's bad news for the restaurant trade. Many Manhattan restaurants continue to do a steady business in the aftermath of skyscraper bombings and anthrax attacks, although most are not serving organic mixed greens, seared tuna steaks and tiramisus the way they used to. According to Crain's, some 15,000 jobs have been lost and hundreds of eateries in the highly fragmented industry face the possibility of going out of business by the beginning of next year... - But the Big Apple's loss is the burbs' gain. I dined Saturday night at a restaurant in Westchester County, about an hour north of Manhattan. The place was packed to its rustic 300-year-old rafters. Ever since Sept. 11th, the manager explained, we've been very busy. Customers say they don't want to go into Manhattan. So - I hate to say it - but terrorism has been good for us. - Terrorism might also be good for the oil market. John Myers, editor of the Resource Trader Alert, is not afraid to say it: Osama bin Laden and the Taliban are getting the lion's share of attention, but the most important player in the Middle East is Saudi Arabia. Beneath the Saudi desert sands lie one-third of the world's oil reserves, much of which can be developed for less than $2 a barrel. The pro-American sheikdom is OPEC's swing producer, able to dictate prices and make up disruptions to the world's oil supply. - But Saudi Arabia may also be an oil
[CTRL] Fwd: US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq
If you have received this e-mail, then you are on the mailing list of the Center for an Informed America. If you feel you have received this in error, please send back a reply asking to be removed from the list. If this message was forwarded to you and you would like to receive future mailings, e-mail a request to be added to the list. This article comes courtesy of The Times of India. The original is at: http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=67147283 US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq PRETORIA: Wouter Basson, the spy and mastermind behind the apartheid government's chemical warfare programme, claimed on Friday the United States had used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq during the Gulf War. Basson told the Pretoria High Court television footage shot during the war showed clearly that elite Iraqi troops who surrendered en masse were under the influence of hallucinogens. He said their faces were expressionless, their pupils were dilated and they were drooling at the mouth - typical side effects of a particularly dangerous type of hallucinogenic drug. Basson, a former military officer, was testifying about the 1993 destruction of hundreds of kilograms (pounds) of drugs such as cocaine, Mandrax and Ecstasy, manufactured or bought by the South African army for use in crowd control. He told the court: "Analysis of video material showing surrendering (Iraqi) troops emerging from their underground bunkers show that they had dilated pupils, were drooling and had vacant stares." "It appeared like the clinical profile of a BZ variant. The variant was also tested in laboratory animals in South Africa but it was stopped because it caused permanent damage to the subject. "I had good reason to believe that America used a BZ variant against Iraq during the Gulf War." Basson said BZ was a hallucinogenic which altered a person's ability to act rationally. It could either make somebody completely passive or uncontrollably aggressive, to the point where he would attack his own colleagues, he said. Basson is facing 46 charges ranging from murder to fraud for acts allegedly committed while he was a high-ranking member of the apartheid-era military. Dubbed "Dr Death", he was the mastermind behind the regime's secret programme to develop biological and chemical warfare capabilities and this week testified that he had bought a zoo to research the use of animal hormones to control crowds.( AFP )
[CTRL] Fwd: Spies vs. Spies: The CIA makes a comeback
If you have received this e-mail, then you are on the mailing list of the Center for an Informed America. If you feel you have received this in error, please send back a reply asking to be removed from the list. If this message was forwarded to you and you would like to receive future mailings, e-mail a request to be added to the list. This article comes courtesy of the L.A. Weekly. The original is at: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/01/48/tv-lloyd.shtml Spies vs. Spies The CIA makes a comeback by Robert Lloyd October 19-25, 2001 Here we are in the early days of World War III, and television the part of it that is actually made up, as opposed to the part that is merely unbelievable is crawling with spies and spooks and secret agents. In three new series (The Agency, Alias and 24, which doesnt premiere until next month), the CIA figures centrally; another two (UC: Undercover and Thieves) involve federal agencies and undercover work. The arrival of these shows, on each of the four major networks, at exactly this time of crisis almost as if in response to it, though naturally planned long before suggests that we have been unsettled for a while, suggests that, somewhere not so deep in the American collective unconscious, we were already preparing for the new war paradigm, for a psychological state of siege. It is true in any case that the CIA has been staging an assault of its own, a campaign for the hearts and minds of the American mediated public; in 1996 they installed as a liaison to the entertainment industry former field-op Chase Brandon (name not made up, merely unbelievable), whose mission is to raise the profile of the agency in a good way to get the people picturing spies and spooks and secret agents as thoughtful citizens and patriotic team players, with full emotional lives, dynamite clothes sense, really nice hair (mostly), and a pretty high success rate. Michael Frost Beckner, who created The Agency, hung out with Brandon and visited CIA headquarters while preparing the pilot. I made some comments and he made some changes, Brandon told The Guardian. It is strange that just as the CIA was ready for its Hollywood close-up, real life and what one might call the largest intelligence failure in history thrust it awkwardly into a different sort of spotlight. Of course, even as we acknowledge their failures, hypocrisies and crimes, we want to believe that our spooks and spies and secret agents will keep the forces of evil and the gnats of annoyance quiet and out of our way. Its time to give the intelligence agencies the money and the manpower they need, said Alison Janney as fictional White House press secretary C.J. Cregg on The West Wings hastily assembled terrorist special. In fact, interest in the field was already up well before September 11: Campus recruiters who in olden days would have been chased off by the hippies and the Yippies with their flowers and their slogans and their signs have been reportedly getting a warm welcome and a gratifying response. But of course, we love our spies, even if we hate the CIA, which is allowable and even encouraged. Whose blood does not thrill to the words, Bond, James Bond? The spy is the cleverer, more agile, independent version of the soldier, a private eye with cooler stuff. Its a commonplace of the genre that he, and increasingly she, does not follow orders, is the affectionate bane of exasperated superiors, but always gets the job done, through improvisation, wit, physical grace and an utter disregard for collateral damage. Back in the 60s, where I come from, it was all about the espionage. And the TV, which is the mirror of all things, reflected it: There were not only I Spy and Secret Agent and Mission: Impossible and The Avengers and The Man From U.N.C.L.E. and The Girl From U.N.C.L.E., but also The Wild Wild West and The Prisoner and even Get Smart not to mention Lancelot Link, Secret Chimp and more, many more that I wont embarrass myself by publicly recalling, from memory. Most are piffle, but the best are among the best shows ever to have been on television. Its too soon to say whether a classic lurks among this new crop. The more serious shows The Agency and UC: Undercover are the less persuasive, while the nothing-on-their-mind comic-book graces of Alias and Thieves are utterly winning. (24, which I havent seen, has the novel twist of running in real-time thats to say, a day will pass over the course of the season and is therefore a historic event regardless of its yet unrevealed quality.) The Agency, executive-produced (with Beckner, Shaun Cassidy and Gail Katz) by Wolfgang Petersen, the director of Das Boot and Air Force One, is the most real of these series: Theres some of that ripped-from-the-headlines plotting they favor over at Law Order (anthrax was on the menu this week), some of the workplace soap operatics of The West Wing, an attempt to understand, in a very partial way, what
[CTRL] Fwd: [narconews] Issue #15 is Up: Fitts, Gorman, Teach-In Dates more...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck Monitoring Service trial http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/KlSolB/TM -~- October 24, 2001 Please Distribute Widely Dear Colleagues, Issue # 15 of Narco News is now online: http://www.narconews.com/ -- Narco-Dollars for Dummies: A Guide by Catherine Austin Fitts -- The Jungle Bungle in Peru, by Peter Gorman, with photos by Alan Shoemaker, Special to The Narco News Bulletin, of the downed missionaries' plane in Peru. -- War on Terrorism/War on Drugs: What is to be Done? Announcing first Narco News Teach-Ins for América (Finally!), November 5th in St. Louis and November 10th in Washington, DC (at Students for a Sensible Drug Policy conference with Russell Means, Ralph Nader, Ethan Nadelmann, Sanho Tree, FAMM, and hundreds more...) More Narco News coming this week... From somewhere in a Country called América, Al Giordano Publisher The Narco News Bulletin http://www.narconews.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spread the word: Inform a friend of our free subscription service for alerts of new reports: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/narconews _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[CTRL] 'It is palpably evident that they are not fleeing the Taliban but our bombs and missiles'
-Caveat Lector- from: http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=100895 Click Here: A HREF=http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=100895; Independent Argument/A - © 2001 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd 24 October 2001 16:32 GMT+1 Home Argument Commentators Robert Fisk: As the refugees crowd the borders, we'll be blaming someone else 'It is palpably evident that they are not fleeing the Taliban but our bombs and missiles' 23 October 2001 Mullah Mohammed Omar's 10-year-old son is dead. He was, according to Afghan refugees fleeing Kandahar, taken to one of the city's broken hospitals by his father, the Taliban leader and Emir of the Faithful, but the boy apparently travelling in Omar's car when it was attacked by US aircraft died of his wounds. No regrets, of course. Back in 1985, when American aircraft bombed Libya, they also destroyed the life of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's six-year-old adopted daughter. No regrets, of course. In 1992, when an Israeli pilot flying an American-made Apache helicopter fired an American-made missile into the car of Said Abbas Moussawi, head of the Hizbollah guerrilla army in Lebanon, the Israeli pilot also killed Moussawi's 10-year-old. No regrets, of course. Whether these children deserved their deaths, be sure that their fathers in our eyes were to blame. Live by the sword, die by the sword and that goes for the kids too. Back in 1991, The Independent revealed that American Gulf War military targets included secure bunkers in which members of Saddam Hussein's family or the families of his henchmen were believed to be hiding. That's how the Americans managed to slaughter well over 300 people in an air raid shelter at Amariya in Baghdad. No Saddam kids, just civilians. Too bad. I wonder now that President George Bush has given permission to the CIA to murder Osama bin Laden if the same policy applies today? And so the casualties begin to mount. From Kandahar come ever more frightful stories of civilians buried under ruins, of children torn to pieces by American bombs. The Taliban and here the Americans must breathe a collective sigh of relief refuse to allow Western journalists to enter the country to verify these reports. So when a few television crews were able to find 18 fresh graves in the devastated village of Khorum outside Jalalabad just over a week ago, the US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld could ridicule the deaths as ridiculous. But not, I suspect, for much longer. For if each of our wars for infinite justice and eternal freedom have a familiar trade mark the military claptrap about air superiority, suppression of command and control centres, radar capabilities each has an awkward, highly exclusive little twist to it. In 1999, Nato claimed it was waging war to put Kosovo Albanian refugees back in their homes even though most of the refugees were still in their homes when the war began. Our bo mbing of Serbia led directly to their dispossession. We bear a heavy burden of responsibility for their suffering since the Serbs had told us what they would do if Nato opened hostilities although the ultimate blame for their ethnic cleansing'' clearly belonged to Slobodan Milosevic. But Nato's escape clause won't work this time round. For as the Afghan refugees turn up in their thousands at the border, it is palpably evident that they are fleeing not the Taliban but our bombs and missiles. The Taliban is not ethnically cleansing its own Pashtun population. The refugees speak vividly of their fear and terror as our bombs fall on their cities. These people are terrified of our war on terror'', victims as innocent as those who were slaughtered in the World Trade Centre on 11 September. So where do we stop? It's an important question because, once the winter storms breeze down the mountain gorges of Afghanistan, a tragedy is likely to commence, one which no spin doctor or propaganda expert will be able to divert. We'll say that the thousands about to die or who are dying of starvation and cold are victims of the Taliban's intransigence or the Taliban's support for terrorism or the Taliban's propensity to steal humanitarian supplies. I have to admit having been weaned on Israel's promiscuous use of the word terror every time a Palestinian throws a stone at his occupiers that I find the very word terrorism increasingly mendacious as well as racist. Of course despite the slavish use of the phrase war on terrorism on the BBC and CNN it is nothing of the kind. We are not planning to attack Tamil Tiger suicide bombers or Eta killers or Real IRA murderers or Kurdish KDP guerrillas. Indeed, the US has spent a lot of time supporting terrorists in Latin America the Contras spring to mind not to mention the rabble we are now bombing in Afghanistan. This is, as I've said before, a war on America's enemies. Increasingly, as the date of 11 September acquires iconic status, we are
[CTRL] Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Other Criminal Acts and High Crimes in
-Caveat Lector- from: http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm - International War Crimes Tribunal United States War Crimes Against Iraq Initial Complaint Charging George Bush, J. Danforth Quayle, James Baker, Richard Cheney, William Webster, Colin Powell, Norman Schwarzkopf and Others to be named With Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Other Criminal Acts and High Crimes in Violation of the Charter of the United Nations, International Law, the Constitution of the United States and Laws made in Pursuance Thereof. Preliminary Statement These charges have been prepared prior to the first hearing of the Commission of Inquiry by its staff. They are based on direct and circumstantial evidence from public and private documents; official statements and admissions by the persons charged and others; eyewitness accounts; Commission investigations and witness interviews in Iraq, the Middle East and elsewhere during and after the bombing; photographs and video tape; expert analyses; commentary and interviews; media coverage, published reports and accounts gathered between December 1990 and May l991. Commission of Inquiry hearings will be held in key cities where evidence is available supporting, expanding, adding, contradicting, disproving or explaining these, or similar charges against the accused and others of whatever nationality. When evidence sufficient to sustain convictions of the accused or others is obtained and after demanding the production of documents from the U.S. government, and others, and requesting testimony from the accused, offering them a full opportunity to present any defense personally, or by counsel, the evidence will be presented to an International War Crimes Tribunal. The Tribunal will consider the evidence gathered, seek and examine whatever additional evidence it chooses and render its judgment on the charges, the evidence, and the law. Background Since World War I, the United Kingdom, France, and the United States have dominated the Arabian Peninsula and Gulf region and its oil resources. This has been accomplished by military conquest and coercion, economic control and exploitation, and through surrogate governments and their military forces. Thus, from 1953 to 1979 in the post World War II era, control over the region was exercised primarily through U.S. influence and control over the Gulf sheikdoms of Saudi Arabia and through the Shah of Iran. From 1953 to 1979 the Shah of Iran acted as a Pentagon/CIA surrogate to police the region. After the fall of the Shah and the seizure of U.S. Embassy hostages in Teheran, the U.S. provided military aid and assistance to Iraq, as did the USSR, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and most of the Emirates, in its war with Iran. U.S. policy during that tragic eight year war, 1980 - 1988, is probably best summed up by the phrase, we hope they kill each other. Throughout the seventy-five year period from Britain's invasion of Iraq early in World War I to the destruction of Iraq in 1991 by U.S. air power, the United States and the United Kingdom demonstrated no concern for democratic values, human rights, social justice, or political and cultural integrity in the region, nor for stopping military aggression there. The U.S. supported the Shah of Iran for 25 years, selling him more than $20 billion of advanced military equipment between 1972 and 1978 alone. Throughout this period the Shah and his brutal secret police called SAVAK had one of the worst human rights records in the world. Then in the 1980s, the U.S. supported Iraq in its wrongful aggression against Iran, ignoring Iraq's own poor human rights record.[l] When the Iraqi government nationalized the Iraqi Petroleum Company in 1972, the Nixon Administration embarked on a campaign to destabilize the Iraqi government. It was in the 1970s that the U.S. first armed and then abandoned the Kurdish people, costing tens of thousands of Kurdish lives. The U.S. manipulated the Kurds through CIA and other agencies to attack Iraq, intending to harass Iraq while maintaining Iranian supremacy at the cost of Kurdish lives without intending any benefit to the Kurdish people or an autonomous Kurdistan.[2] The U.S. with close oil and other economic ties to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait has fully supported both governments despite the total absence of democratic institutions, their pervasive human rights violations and the infliction of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments such as stoning to death for adultery and amputation of a hand for property offenses. The U.S., sometimes alone among nations, supported Israel when it defied scores of UN resolutions concerning Palestinian rights, when it invaded Lebanon in a war which took tens of thousands of lives, and during its continuing occupation of southern Lebanon, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and Gaza. The United States itself engaged in recent aggressions in violation of international law by invading Grenada in 1983, bombing Tripoli and
[CTRL] Fwd: [BIOWAR] OSAMA BOUGHT A BATCH FOR 10G
http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/32458.htm NY Post OSAMA BOUGHT A BATCH FOR 10G By NILES LATHEM October 24, 2001 -- WASHINGTON - Terror master Osama bin Laden bought samples of anthrax by mail from shady laboratories in Eastern Europe and Asia for as little as $10,000, a former follower has told authorities in Egypt. The astonishing claim of how easily - and cheaply - the world's most wanted terrorist was able to acquire anthrax and other deadly germ agents was made in a 143-page confession of former extremist Ahmad Ibrahim al-Najjar at a recent trial of more than 100 members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Al-Najjar, serving a life sentence in Egypt, was among several Islamic Jihad operatives arrested in Albania in 1999 and brought home to Egypt to face trial for a series of attempts to destabilize the pro-Western government of President Hosni Mubarak. According to translated accounts of his testimony obtained by The Post, al-Najjar told authorities there was nothing cloak-and-dagger about bin Laden's transactions involving deadly biological agents. Factories in the Czech Republic and elsewhere in Eastern Europe supplied deadly bacteria, including e-coli and salmonella, by mail without checking the identities of the purchasers as long as bin Laden's agents paid $7,500 up front, al-Najjar said. Bin Laden's group was able to get the anthrax germ from another factory in Southeast Asia, which supplied it to the Indonesian-based Islamic Moro Front, a terror group closely associated with bin Laden. The price for the anthrax spores, al-Najjar said, was $3,685, plus shipping costs. U.S. officials say they don't yet know whether bin Laden is responsible for the anthrax scare gripping the nation, although President Bush and other senior officials say they are suspicious. Bin Laden is known to have contacts with Iraqi officials and mafia groups in former Soviet republics - nations that have extensive chemical- and biological-weapons programs and that are known to have experimented with anthrax. PREPost to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info: www.topica.com/lists/biowar /PRE PRE==^ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: A HREF= http://topica.com/u/?bz8Q0W.bAgsdR http://topica.com/u/?bz8Q0W.bAgsdR/A Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! A HREF= http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register/A ==^/PRE
[CTRL] Fwd: Societal Implications
* * * * * * * * * * * * REMINDER * * * * * * * * * * * * * On the days that I don't publish, like today, you will receive Bill Bonner's DAILY RECKONING. This will help you to keep pace with the changes in the markets. Bonner and I agree on most things in the field of economics, so the two letters will reinforce each other. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS THE DAILY RECKONING PARIS, FRANCE WEDNESDAY, 24 OCTOBER 2001 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** Slash, slash, slash - companies cut back wherever they can as earnings, sales fall... *** Planet Hollywood goes chapter 11... *** Amazon's sad story...stocks still far too expensive for a bottom...what kind of recession...Irma La Douce... and more! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Slash, slash, slash...quarterly reports are coming in and they are almost all bad. Sales down. Earnings down. Operations trimmed back. Jobs cut. The Conference Board's Index of Leading Indicators recorded its biggest drop in 5 years. It is the worst advertising year since the depression, reports Dismal.com. Battle for jobs intensifies as more are laid off, adds the LA Times. But there's good news too - Planet Hollywood filed for chapter 11. Still, investors can't seem to come to terms with current events. They think stocks bottomed out on Sept. 21...and they're looking for quick and easy victories against terrorism and deflation. Eric, what's the latest from Planet Wall Street? * Eric Fry in New York: - If ever you wanted to take a cruise, now's the time to do it, USA Today suggests helpfully. Facing a glut of unsold cabins for departures in the next three months, cruise lines began slashing rates to levels not seen since the 1970s. The paper quotes Mike Driscoll, editor of industry newsletter Cruise Week: They're trying to find the price point where people will put their fears away and take a cruise. - The stock market is also busy trying to find the price point where people will put their fears away and take the plunge. Temporarily, at least, investors found that magical price point on September 21st, when the Dow broke below the 8,000-level. The venerable index has advanced almost 18% since then, despite incessant terrorist attacks and a barrage of bad earnings. The Nasdaq has soared almost 23% over the same time frame. - It's nice to see the market rally. But the dramatic advance from the September 21st lows looks less like a new bull market than an old bad habit. What are investors buying exactly? A good story? You know, the one about the economic recovery that's just a few months away? - Wall Street is full of storytellers, and who better to tell one than on-line storybook seller: Amazon. - Yesterday afternoon, the e-commerce pioneer hosted a conference call on which CFO Warren Jenson proclaimed, While the history of Q4 has yet to be written, we are in great shape. Later, lapsing into dot-com speak, he assured the listeners, Reaching pro forma profits does not require heroics, just execution. - So just what does this great shape look like, according to the Book of Amazon? For starters, the company posted a pro forma loss of $58 million for the third quarter. After adding in a couple of exceptional items here and there, the true net loss - i.e., the money that used to be in an Amazon bank account but no longer is - expands to $169.8 million. - Next up, Amazon's core books, music and video sales operations - which account for more than half of total revenues - fell about 12%. Sales in Amazon's smallest, but most profitable division, Services, also fell 12%. Services include deals such as booking on-line orders for other retailers like Toys R Us and Borders bookstores. - If you add it all up, you're looking at a company that will probably burn through about a half-billion dollars over the next nine months. Sounds...well...great! - Blindly paying any price for any stock will accumulate losses more rapidly and assuredly than wealth. Price matters. So do earnings. Right now, the former is too high and the latter is too low. - Amazon groupies are not the only ones suffering from a new paradigm relapse. The surge in home refinancing is giving a boost to the overall economy, Fannie Mae CEO, Franklin Raines was heard saying last week. In fact, a new economic paradigm seems to have taken hold. Traditionally, whenever the economy caught a cold, housing got pneumonia. Now the opposite is occurring - housing tends to do better than the economy. - That the head of a thinly capitalized company - operating with the implied backing of the U.S. taxpayer - having more than $330 billion of short-term debt and $1.5 trillion of mortgage exposure, comments the Prudent Bear's Doug Noland, in what is clearly a hostile economic environment, would make reference to a 'New Economic Paradigm' is, in a word, disturbing. (See: Marx Would Be Absolutely Giddy
[CTRL] Fwd: [ctrl] How vulnerable are the Saudi royals? (Ney Yorker Magazine) (fwd)
Assalamu'alaikum, KING'S RANSOM by SEYMOUR M. HERSH How vulnerable are the Saudi royals? http://www.newyorker.com/FACT/?011022fa_FACT1 Since 1994 or earlier, the National Security Agency has been collecting electronic intercepts of conversations between members of the Saudi Arabian royal family, which is headed by King Fahd. The intercepts depict a regime increasingly corrupt, alienated from the country's religious rank and file, and so weakened and frightened that it has brokered its future by channelling hundreds of millions of dollars in what amounts to protection money to fundamentalist groups that wish to overthrow it. The intercepts have demonstrated to analysts that by 1996 Saudi money was supporting Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda and other extremist groups in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Yemen, and Central Asia, and throughout the Persian Gulf region. Ninety-six is the key year, one American intelligence official told me. Bin Laden hooked up to all the bad guysit's like the Grand Alliance and had a capability for conducting large-scale operations. The Saudi regime, he said, had gone to the dark side. In interviews last week, current and former intelligence and military officials portrayed the growing instability of the Saudi regimeand the vulnerability of its oil reserves to terrorist attackas the most immediate threat to American economic and political interests in the Middle East. The officials also said that the Bush Administration, like the Clinton Administration, is refusing to confront this reality, even in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Saudis and the Americans arranged a meeting between Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and King Fahd during a visit by Rumsfeld to Saudi Arabia shortly before the beginning of the air war in Afghanistan, and pictures of the meeting were transmitted around the world. The United States, however, has known that King Fahd has been incapacitated since suffering a severe stroke, in late 1995. A Saudi adviser told me last week that the King, with round-the-clock medical treatment, is able to sit in a chair and open his eyes, but is usually unable to recognize even his oldest friends. Fahd is being kept on the throne, the N.S.A. intercepts indicate, because of a bitter family power struggle. Fahd's nominal successor is Crown Prince Abdullah, his half brother, who is to some extent the de-facto rulerhe and Prince Sultan, the defense minister, were the people Rumsfeld really came to see. But there is infighting about money: Abdullah has been urging his fellow-princes to address the problem of corruption in the kingdomunsuccessfully, according to the intercepts. The only reason Fahd's being kept alive is so Abdullah can't become king, a former White House adviser told me. The American intelligence officials have been particularly angered by the refusal of the Saudis to help the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. run tracesthat is, name checks and other background informationon the nineteen men, more than half of them believed to be from Saudi Arabia, who took part in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. They knew that once we started asking for a few traces the list would grow, one former official said. It's better to shut it down right away. He pointed out that thousands of disaffected Saudis have joined fundamentalist groups throughout the Middle East. Other officials said that there is a growing worry inside the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. that the actual identities of many of those involved in the attacks may not be known definitively for months, if ever. Last week, a senior intelligence official confirmed the lack of Saudi coperation and told me, angrily, that the Saudis have only one constantand it's keeping themselves in power. The N.S.A. intercepts reveal the hypocrisy of many in the Saudi royal family, and why the family has become increasingly estranged from the vast majority of its subjects. Over the years, unnerved by the growing strength of the fundamentalist movement, it has failed to deal with the underlying issues of severe unemployment and inadequate education, in a country in which half the population is under the age of eighteen. Saudi Arabia's strict interpretation of Islam, known as Wahhabism, and its use of mutawwa'inreligious policeto enforce prayer, is rivalled only by the Taliban's. And yet for years the Saudi princesthere are thousands of themhave kept tabloid newspapers filled with accounts of their drinking binges and partying with prostitutes, while taking billions of dollars from the state budget. The N.S.A. intercepts are more specific. In one call, Prince Nayef, who has served for more than two decades as interior minister, urges a subordinate to withhold from the police evidence of the hiring of prostitutes, presumably by members of the royal family. According to the summary, Nayef said that he didn't want the client list released under any circumstances. The intercepts produced a stream of sometimes
[CTRL] Asleep At The Switch ?
-Caveat Lector- Just how much overlap was there between the WTC (NY) trials and the OJ trial? OJ was not an issue until mid-1994 and the trial started later on ... AER From DMN }}}Begin U.S. ignored warnings, former FBI official says Federal law agencies fail to coordinate and plan, terrorism authority says 10/24/2001 By CAROLYN BARTA / The Dallas Morning News Despite more than a dozen terrorist attacks around the world since 1992, the United States failed to recognize impending disaster because its federal law enforcement is a dysfunctional montage, a retired FBI official said Tuesday. Why didn't we know about September 11? We were deaf, dumb, and blind. We were asleep at the switch, former deputy FBI director Oliver Buck Revell said at a Press Club of Dallas luncheon. The bureau's former counterterrorism chief blames federal officials and the American public for not taking the terrorism threat seriously enough. Though arrests were made in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, authorities failed to take out the bombers' supporting network. And he said Americans were too fixated on the O.J. Simpson trial to pay attention to the Trade Center trials, the most informative international terrorism trials in this country. Mr. Revell said federal law enforcement should be restructured and refocused under a Cabinet-level homeland defense secretary who has authority to consolidate law enforcement activities currently conducted by 140 agencies under 14 Cabinet officials. A former FBI special agent-in-charge in Dallas, Mr. Revell said terrorist dangers have been spelled out to Congress and various commissions during the Clinton administration. But nothing's been done to put together a coherent homeland defense, he said. There is no strategic planning, shared mission, or coordination among agencies dealing with global organized crime and terrorist activities. President Bush tried to bring order to the disjointed operation when he appointed Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge as head of a new Office of Homeland Security. It doesn't matter how many homeland czars we have, Mr. Revell said. The question is: Does he have the authority to command law enforcement agencies? He noted that the United Kingdom, Canada, and France have officials in charge of such a homeland defense ministry. The U.S. attorney general, he said, wears too many hats to deal only with homeland defense issues. Other needs to counter terrorism threats include a greater emphasis on human instead of technological intelligence and an expedited process for deporting undocumented immigrants, Mr. Revell said. The Immigration and Naturalization Service is hamstrung by regulations and a system that grants more due process rights to suspected undocumented immigrants than other countries, he said. Now an international security consultant, Mr. Revell recently told a U.S. House International Relations Committee hearing that, to prevent terrorism, we need the political will and we need public attention for more than 24 hours. Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/attack_on_america/dmn/stories/STORY.e9bc540b fe.b0.af.0.a4.110e.html © 2001 DallasNews.com End{{{ ~~~ Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it. The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller, German Writer (1759-1805) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Universal Declaration
[CTRL] Officials Test Samples After Crop Duster Sprays Boats on the Mississippi River
-Caveat Lector- Officials Test Samples After Crop Duster Sprays Boats on the Mississippi River By Jason Straziuso Associated Press Writer Published: Oct 21, 2001 JACKSON, Miss. (AP) - Crew members who were aboard a Mississippi River towboat when a crop duster sprayed it with an unknown substance have reported no health problems but were given an antibiotic as a precaution, health officials said Sunday. The towboat's skipper reported that the low-flying plane sprayed the towboat and barges Friday near Rosedale, Miss., then circled around and sprayed a pleasure craft. Officials were still searching for the pleasure boat. This was a deliberate act by a crop duster - this was no accident, said Kent Buckley of the Bolivar County Emergency Management Agency. Buckley said officials suspect the sprayed substance was sodium chlorate, used to defoliate cotton crops. Buckley said that sodium chlorate is similar to salt water and is not dangerous. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has asked the Mississippi Department of Health to test the unknown substance, said NancyKay Wessman, spokeswoman for the state health department. Officials do not know who owns the plane and are looking for witnesses who may have seen an identifying number, Buckley said. It was unclear how many crew members were on the towboat or if any were on deck when the plane passed over; owners of the towboat at Metropolis, Ill.-based Mid South Towing could not be reached for comment Sunday. Lt. Dale R. Dean of the U.S. Coast Guard said no crew members reported any symptoms. As a precaution, the crew was given the drug Cipro, the primary antibiotic used to treat anthrax, Buckley said. The FBI is investigating; Mississippi FBI spokesman Jeffery Artis declined to comment. The Environmental Protection Agency, the Coast Guard and the CDC were also involved in the investigation. The towboat and its 17 barges have been grounded and quarantined near Rosedale. Their contents were unknown. AP-ES-10-21-01 1834EDT Steve Wingate, Webmaster ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES http://www.anomalous-images.com A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: (en) Chomsky Transcript: The New War Against Terror - recorded at The Te...
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E http://www.ainfos.ca/ The New War Against Terror Transcribed from audio The Coalition Including Algeria, Russia, China, Indonesia Now thats pretty impressive and that has to do with the coalition that is now being organized to fight the war against terror. And its very interesting to see how that coalition is being described. So have a look at this mornings Christian Science Monitor. Thats a good newspaper. One of the best international newspapers, with real coverage of the world. The lead story, the front-page story, is about how the United States, you know people used to dislike the United States but now they are beginning to respect it, and they are very happy about the way that the US is leading the war against terror. And the prime example, well in fact the only serious example, the others are a joke, is Algeria. Turns out that Algeria is very enthusiastic about the US war against terror. The person who wrote the article is an expert on Africa. He must know that Algeria is one of the most vicious terrorist states in the world and has been carrying out horrendous terror against its own population in the past couple of years, in fact. For a while, this was under wraps. But it was finally exposed in France by defectors from the Algerian army. Its all over the place there and in England and so on. But here, were very proud because one of the worst terrorist states in the world is now enthusiastically welcoming the US war on terror and in fact is cheering on the United States to lead the war. That shows how popular we are getting. And if you look at the coalition that is being formed against terror it tells you a lot more. A leading member of the coalition is Russia which is delighted to have the United States support its murderous terrorist war in Chechnya instead of occasionally criticizing it in the background. China is joining enthusiastically. Its delighted to have support for the atrocities its carrying out in western China against, what it called, Muslim secessionists. Turkey, as I mentioned, is very happy with the war against terror. They are experts. Algeria, Indonesia delighted to have even more US support for atrocities it is carrying out in Ache and elsewhere. Now we can run through the list, the list of the states that have joined the coalition against terror is quite impressive. They have a characteristic in common. They are certainly among the leading terrorist states in the world. And they happen to be led by the world champion. What is Terrorism? Well that brings us back to the question, what is terrorism? I have been assuming we understand it. Well, what is it? Well, there happen to be some easy answers to this. There is an official definition. You can find it in the US code or in US army manuals. A brief statement of it taken from a US army manual, is fair enough, is that terror is the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to attain political or religious ideological goals through intimidation, coercion, or instilling fear. Thats terrorism. Thats a fair enough definition. I think it is reasonable to accept that. The problem is that it cant be accepted because if you accept that, all the wrong consequences follow. For example, all the consequences I have just been reviewing. Now there is a major effort right now at the UN to try to develop a comprehensive treaty on terrorism. When Kofi Annan got the Nobel prize the other day, you will notice he was reported as saying that we should stop wasting time on this and really get down to it. But theres a problem. If you use the official definition of terrorism in the comprehensive treaty you are going to get completely the wrong results. So that cant be done. In fact, it is even worse than that. If you take a look at the definition of Low Intensity Warfare which is official US policy you find that it is a very close paraphrase of what I just read. In fact, Low Intensity Conflict is just another name for terrorism. Thats why all countries, as far as I know, call whatever horrendous acts they are carrying out, counter terrorism. We happen to call it Counter Insurgency or Low Intensity Conflict. So thats a serious problem. You cant use the actual definitions. Youve got to carefully find a definition that doesnt have all the wrong consequences. Why did the United States and Israel Vote Against a Major Resolution Condemning Terrorism? There are some other problems. Some of them came up in December 1987, at the peak of the first war on terrorism, thats when the furor over the plague was peaking. The United Nations General Assembly passed a very strong resolution against terrorism, condemning the plague in the strongest terms, calling on every state to fight against it in every possible way. It passed unanimously. One country, Honduras abstained. Two
[CTRL] Bioport stock swindle
-Caveat Lector- -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 06:32:48 +0800 From: Curt Raftshol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Warren Johan Raftshol [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warren J Raftshol [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bioport stock swindle Subject: The Great Anthrax Stock Swindle! Where, oh where to begin! Well, let's begin with Adm. William J. Crowe, Jr. It seems that back when George H. W. Bush was setting up Osama Bin Laden as a Freedom fighter (A freedom fighter is the same thing as a terrorist, only aimed at someone you don't like), the good Admiral and his buddies on the Joint Chiefs were selling American made weapons-grade Anthrax to Saddam Hussein in the hopes that he would use it on Iran (and then we wonder why the Iranian people don't much like Americans). Who knows who else got these American-made weapons of mass destruction either from Admiral Crowe or Saddam. But that was then and this is now. Admiral Crowe is retired. Admiral Crowe is quite wealthy, far beyond what one might expect on even an Admiral's salary. In fact, Admiral Crowe sits on the Board of Directors and owns 13% of BioPort Corporation. What is the BioPort Corporation, I hear you ask? Well, it's the only corporation in the United States with a license to make Anthrax Vaccine. Except that BioPOrt doesn't actually make the vaccine, BioPOrt simply bought the lab that does make the vaccine, Michigan Biologic Products Institute, from the State of Michigan in 1998, oddly enough at the same time John J. Maresca, Vice President of International Relations, UNOCAL Corporation, was telling congress that access to the oil reserves under the Caspian Sea required a new government in Afghanistan. Along with the actual Anthrax Vaccine, BioPort acquired Michigan Biologic Products Institute's sole and exclusive customer for the vaccine, the US Department of defense. And here is the kicker. Since acquiring Michigan Biologic Products Institute, BioPort has not delivered a drop of the stuff! Only 4% of the vaccine contracted for has been delivered. FDA audits have uncovered suspicious record keeping and contamination problems, causing the FDA to ban delivery of the product. Despite this ban, the US Government has continued to front BioPort millions of dollars to keep the operation going. And, given the State of Emergency, it is likely that FDA concerns for the product will soon be set aside and the vaccine delivered, not to the citizens whose taxes paid for it all, but to the military and to the government. So, good old Admiral Crowe and his fellow investors in BioPort are set to make a bundle off of the Anthrax scare. Especially when market demand pushes the price of the product high up above the contracted for $3.50 an ounce. And who are those fellow investors? Well, another part of BioPort is owned by the Carlyle Group. That's George H. W. Bush's current occupation. Yet another portion is owned by (you had better sit down), the Bin Laden family! That's right. Just as the Bin Laden family made a fortune with the contract to rebuild the Khobar Towers supposedly blown up by Osama, the Bin Ladens will again make a fortune from their part ownership of the only company able to make an Anthrax Vaccine in the United States, because Osama might have some of that Anthrax that the United States sold to Saddam. In fact, the shortage created by the FDA bans will make all the players instant billionaires as market forces drive the price of the vaccine up to thousands of dollars per ounce. (The same amount of Anthrax treatment Cipro that sells for $20 in India now costs $690 in the US). A very cozy arrangement. The Bushes and Bin Ladens (and the occasional complicit Admiral) are all making money off of the fear and death of Americans and Afghanis. It's called profiteering, It's called conspiracy with a foreign power against the interests of the people of this nation. The USA... This sort of thing is what got Charles the First into trouble! --- End of forwarded message --- Steve Wingate, Webmaster ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES http://www.anomalous-images.com A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A
[CTRL] More 911 Questions, Anthrax Scare, Whos the Coward?
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html Jim Condit Jr. More 911 Questions, Anthrax Scare, Who’s the Coward? Wed Oct 24 01:40:51 2001 October 24, 2001 NA (Network America) e-wire More 911 Questions, Anthrax Scare, Who’s the Coward? I apologize for the length of this e-wire – but it will save you the 25 hours or more of research it took me to pull it together, and it cover a lot of the things investigative minds need to thinking about. There is NO HOPE of any investigation coming from the kept servants who work for the controlled Big Press. It’s up to you, it’s up to us . . . Before an analysis of what the Anthrax scare is all about, here is a -- RECAP, for those who didn’t see our first Network America e-wire on 911: On October 9, 2001 I sent out an e-wire entitled, “Who We Need Fear . . . and What is Global Hawk?” – it was a hurried compilation of facts and observations that had emerged since the 9-11 kamikaze attack, and which needed as wide a circulation as possible. My own urgency came because of my reading of Big Media clues – which indicated a gushing forth of mind manipulation from the Big Media against the American public – mind manipulation which simultaneously was building a hopeless tension and siege mentality in the collective American mind – and conditioning Americans for an “inevitable” coming germ / bio warfare attack on a major US population center. (That original e-wire is posted on rense.com, we are behind in updating our website, votefraud.org) That October 9th e-wire contained 35 items – and this e-wire will begin with item #36 – after -- AN OVERVIEW OF THE MEANING OF THE CURRENT NEWS The real agenda involves getting United States troops permanently into the Middle East permanently to a) put in puppet Moslem governments and b) defend the mini-state of Israel. At this hour, I vote for the position that the 911 attacks were orchestrated by the Ruling Elite of Shadow Government (Permanent Revolution) using Global Hawk or Home Run technology. Regardless, if it was done that way or was actually pulled off by desperate Moslem Kamikazi pilots all by themselves --- immediately the Ruling Elite and its Big 5 TV networks initiated too longed for goals: the low-grade World War III scenario, and the scrap the U.S. Constitution scenario. While many Moslem governments are backward and retrograde in many ways – and have horribly stunted the growth of their peoples – that is not what concerns “our” Ruling Elite – which has helped keep in power incredibly corrupt Moslem Regimes as long as the chosen Arab Playboys played ball with oil and non-opposition to Israel. The reason why the Bush/Clinton gang, and those behind it, are telling us that we are going to have to jump from Moslem country to Moslem country waging war against “terrorism” is because the Moslem world need to brought to heel to accept the Permanent Revolution’s Free Trade program (which will progressively turn all countries into a province in the New World Order), and to succumb to the world wide usururious, vultures who run bankstering systems such as the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank here in the USA. At the same time, this open ended “war against terror” can be used to vanquish all of potential nearby enemies of the state of Israel. (On a note of supreme yet sick irony, the current Prime Minister of Israel, terrorist Ariel Sharon, killed 17,000 civilians in Lebonan in 1982 with wanton terror bombing; even the state of Israel reproached him for his – publicly anyway; lawyers in Belgium are now trying to bring terrorist Ariel Sharon to justice before an international court.) The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming that the 9-11 attack was just a deadly made for TV Movie. Immediately following the 9-11 plane attacks on the NYC Twin Towers, -- within 10 minutes on CNN -- the Big Media had determined that the man hiding in the cave, Bin Laden, had done it -- and that we now needed an endless war to rout out terror. Within an hour, Henry Kissinger associate Lawrence Eagleburger was on TV stating that Americans would have to give up freedoms for more security. In the big picture --- the Kamikaze Global Hawk attack at the Trade Towesr and Pentagon provided the excuse to rush American troops over to Afghanistan – the first country target of choice. (And again, don’t forget, clangorous voices from all sides are warning that this is the first of MANY Moslem countries in the Mideast that the US will have to attack to “stamp out” terrorism. Voices such as Congressman Steve Buyer of Indiana, Henry Kissinger, Michael Weiner Savage of talk radio – among others are raising their voices for “tactical” (?) nuclear attacks on Afghanistan and other middle eastern countries. Now – how are Americans going to jump started into supporting THAT? Which brings us to -- . . . the well-managed “anthrax scare” – which took center stage right after the troops got over to Pakistan.
[CTRL] Baghdad After Kabul ?
-Caveat Lector- From WND }}}Begin This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25035 Tuesday, October 23, 2001 'On-to-Baghdad!' or 'Stop at Kabul!'? By Patrick J. Buchanan © 2001 Creators Syndicate, Inc. Neither the Taliban, nor al-Qaida, nor bin Laden is in the bag yet, but the war drums have already begun beating for phase II. If the war hawks have their way, Iraq is next on the target list. Three weeks ago, President Bush was warned in an open letter that his failure to attack Iraq will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism. The ultimatum was signed by 41 foreign policy veterans and writers, including Jeanne Kirkpatrick, William Bennett and editors at The Weekly Standard, Commentary and The New Republic. National Review has now enlisted, The Wall Street Journal is in full shriek, and syndicated columnists are slapping on their war paint. As Cato the Elder ended every speech in the Roman forum with Delenda est Carthago! (Carthage must be destroyed!), so our neo-conservatives have decreed that Iraq must be destroyed. Now, if Iraq colluded in the mass murder of 5,500 Americans, Saddam's regime should be destroyed and the pounding not stop until he is dead or gone. But the problem is this: There is as yet no hard evidence of Iraqi compl icity in the crime, but vast evidence of Saudi connections and involvement with the Taliban, al-Qaida and Osama. And if Iraq is not guilty of the atrocities of Sept. 11, and the U.S. lashes out at Baghdad, the Islamic world will see it not as a valid act of justice by a wounded, grieving America, but as an act of vengeance by an arr ogant superpower on a small nation that defied it. Moreover, this war on Iraq would not be Desert Storm II. In 1991, President Bush had a 28-nation alliance and General Schwarzkopf had tens of thousands of troops from Britain, France, Syria and Egypt. They will not be there this time. Even Tony Blair has told Mr. Bush he will t ake a pass. And the Saudis have put us on notice that their bases are not available for an attack on another Arab country. This time, America goes in alone. Moreover, the mighty Army of Desert Storm, like Lee's Army of Northern Virginia, is history. In a dozen years, U.S. defense spending has fallen from Reagan's 6 percent of GDP to Clinton's 3 percent. Adds Oliver North, We have cut our army divisions from 18 to 10. We now have 13 fighter wings, down from 24. Our Navy, which boasted 546 ships, today has only 316. In 1990, the U.S. had an open-and-shut case of naked aggression by Iraq that even the U.N. could recognize and our enemies could not deny. But without evidence of Saddam's collusion in the terrorism of Sept. 11, an attack on Iraq would be seen as an unprovoked, unjust war that could bring Arab and Islamic mobs into the streets from Morocco to Indonesia, risking the survival of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. What would it profit America t o march to Baghdad, only to have Cairo fall to anti-American mobs? Writing in The Weekly Standard, William Kristol and Robert Kagan, those Hardy Boys of global hegemony, seem to revel in what is coming. This war is not going to stop in Afghanistan, they exult, it is going to spread an d engulf a number of countries. ... It is going to resemble the clash of civilizations that everyone has hoped to avoid ... it is possible that the demise of some 'moderate' Arab regimes may be just round the corner. But while the little magazines and big talkers whoop it up for a war of civilizations, neither Congress nor the country is clamoring for a war on radical Arabdom or militant Islam. And a lesson from Vietnam ought especial ly to be remembered now: Before we commit the army, commit the nation. Finally, there is a small matter of the Constitution. Congress, alone, has the power to declare war. Before launching Desert Storm, President Bush won the authorization of Congress to go to war. But this President Bush ha s not been authorized to attack nations other than Afghanistan. And the GOP chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Henry Hyde, opposes a war on Iraq, and would stop at Kabul. If the neo-conservatives want their war on Iraq or a clash of civilizations between the West and Islam, or, since Europe will sit it out, between the U.S.-Israel on one side, and all the rogue states on the State Depart ment list on the other, they should make the case to Congress and the country. For if there was one principle for which the Old Right stood, it was no more presidential wars. No more Koreas. No more Vietnams. No more unde clared wars. This time, let us follow the Constitution as the founding fathers intended, and let the old debate begin anew: America First vs. Global Empire. The Old Republic vs. the New World Order. And let us rediscover what it means to be a
[CTRL] The Man Behind The Curtain
http://eyesonamerica.org/200110/10240101.html The Man Behind The Curtain by William Rivers Pitt October 24, 2001 "Every day they tell us that we are a free people fighting to defend freedom. That is the current that has whirled the young airman up into the sky and keeps him circulating there among the clouds. Down here, with a roof to cover us and a gasmask handy, it is our business to puncture gasbags and discover the seeds of truth." ~Virginia Woolf October 24, 2001-In the early months of 1962, General Lyman Lemnitzer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs under President Kennedy, wanted a war. Part of a cabal of extreme right wing anti-communist Cold Warriors within the Pentagon, General Lemnitzer believed Kennedy had gone soft on communism and Castro. Kennedy had put any and all provocative action against Cuba on hold, and ordered only the gathering of intelligence data. For, General Lemnitzer, this was totally unacceptable. Further frustrated by the fact that Castro himself had failed to do anything that would demand an invasion of Cuba, General Lemnitzer and his cabal planned an action called Operation Northwoods. Bluntly, this operation called for acts of terrorism within the United States perpetrated by agents of the United states loyal to Lemnitzer. A plan, crafted in exquisite detail, was drafted describing the scope of Operation Northwoods, and was later signed in approval by all of the Joint Chiefs. Citizens would be shot in the streets. Boats of Cuban refugees would be sunk on the high seas. Bombings would be perpetrated within Washington, DC, and Miami. There were even plans to fake the hijacking, and later the destruction, of a civilian aircraft. Phony evidence would then be provided pointing a finger at Castro. The American people, in their outrage, would demand a full invasion of Cuba. General Lemnitzer would have his war. Needless to say, Operation Northwoods was never put into effect. When directly asked by Congress whether plans were afoot for the invasion of Cuba, General Lemnitzer swore an oath and said no. Eventually, he was removed from his position. Operation Northwoods became buried under subsequent events, a forgotten idea for more than 40 years. It is an appalling thing to know that such an idea could even be spoken aloud in the Pentagon. It is comforting to believe General Lemnitzer was on the lunatic fringe, a man obsessed with Cuba to such a degree that he would be willing to attack his fellow citizens to create the false pretext for war. Yet, Operation Northwoods was signed off on by all the Joint Chiefs of Staff, leading to the inevitable conclusion that this cavalier and bloodthirsty attitude towards the lives and safety of American citizens and military personnel was not the exception, but the rule. This is but one story of our government, of the men behind the curtain. It took 40 years for this story to be told. The reason why such an insidious plot was hidden so completely and for so long from the eyes of the American people lies within the trust we give to the agencies that are supposed to stand in defense of our country. We give the Pentagon, the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, and to a lesser extent the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the widest possible latitude with vital information, all in the interest of national security. Today, a war is being fought in Afghanistan and on our own soil. Before the snow flies, it may well expand into a variety of other countries. The purpose of the war is as clear as the twisted rubble at the end of Lower Manhattan, as clear as the smashed and gutted section of the Pentagon. Terrorism has arrived on American shores, and those who perpetrated these acts must be brought to justice. We have been told that this is a "new type of war," where secrecy is paramount. The news media has been cut almost completely out of the information loop, relegated to reporting on grainy green videotapes of nothing highlighted by almost nothing. Those who operate in this new theater do so under the cover of complete darkness. In light of Operation Northwoods, in light of the legacy of men like General Lemnitzer, and in light of recently revealed information regarding warnings about the Sept. 11 attacks that were received and virtually ignored by the CIA and FBI, the question of whether our government deserves that cloak of secrecy must be voiced in the strongest possible terms. According to CIA agents interviewed by the Los Angeles Times, who refused to give their names, a warning about two "bin Laden related individuals" was transmitted to the FBI on Aug. 27, 2001. The information was classified as "Immediate," one step below the "Flash" warning reserved for the outbreak of war. Somewhere in the translation, according to the CIA, the veneer of urgency was dropped from the document. The FBI failed to apprehend Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, two men named in the CIA warning who later crashed an airliner into the
[CTRL] Fwd: FTW - The Chinese Government Is Not Supporting The Taliban With Troops
Please distribute widely... THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT IS NOT SUPPORTING THE TALIBAN WITH TROOPS RECENT STORIES INTENDED TO FRIGHTEN THE RIGHT ARE DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA by Michael C. Ruppert [© Copyright 2001, Michael C. Ruppert and From The Wilderness Publications, www.copvcia.com. All Rights Reserved. May Be Copied Or Distributed for Non-Profit Purposes Only] FTW, 10/24/01 1200 PDT Recent news stories circulating widely on the Internet and targeted at conservative U.S. interest groups, indicating that the Government of China (GOC) is actively supporting the Taliban and providing troops to assist Taliban and alQueda fighters are false. China, which gained admittance to the World Trade Organization just two days after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, is a full partner in globalization and has an essential and vested interest in seeing US war and economic plans succeed. Further, US economic influence in China, the worlds largest global market, is currently controlling political and military events as China faces a massive energy crisis that only US companies can resolve. An analysis of Chinas economic relations with the United States reveals the overriding reasons for a Chinese/US alliance and gives the lie to recent stories published by the Debka news organization which are designed to instill fear in the US public and divert attention away from US government covert economic, drug smuggling and military operations in the region. As reprinted by the conservative World Net Daily on October 22 the Debka Intelligence Files (www.debka.com) published a story entitled Chinese fighters killed in U.S. strikes. That story reported that, Military sources in Dushnabe and Bishbeck, capitals of Tajikistan respectively, report at least 15 Chinese fighting men on the side of the Taliban, were killed in last weeks U.S. bombing over Kandahar The story continues to state that Osama bin Laden aide Basir al Masri now reportedly deceased enjoyed the protection of at least 10 Chinese bodyguards, some of whom were reportedly killed in recent U.S. air attacks. The Debka report, using selected quotes from British and American papers, including the Washington Post which has long-documented affiliations with the Central Intelligence Agency - refers to prior stories indicating that the GOC has established intelligence and funding relationships with the Taliban in recent years. It quotes one Washington Post story as stating that Beijing and the Taliban signed a memorandum of understanding on September 11 for greater economic and military cooperation. These relationships fail to take into account a gift of $43 million to the Taliban from Secretary of State Colin Powell last May, or the fact that, through the Pakistani intelligence service, the ISI, the CIA has continually provided aid to the Taliban virtually up until the moment of the September 11 attacks. The implication of this story, especially when combined with previous Debka stories claiming massive Chinese troop deployments in and around Afghanistan, is that the United States is potentially facing a direct military confrontation with China. Nothing could be further from the truth. In spite of the fact that one additional October 22 story from the Hindustani Times states that Taliban Commander-in-Chief Jalaluddin Haqquani has claimed that the militia was in touch with China, which was assisting in the war against the U.S, there remains no credible evidence of such Chinese involvement. In fact, a simple examination of the economic interdependence of the U.S. and China makes such conclusions totally unbelievable. U.S.-China Economic Interdependence With more than three billion citizens China represents the worlds largest untapped marketplace, both for oil and for consumer goods. Not only is the economic future of major U.S. corporations dependent upon continued access to Chinese markets, the Chinese economy as demonstrated by its relentless 15-year effort to gain access to WTO is as dependent upon U.S. investment and economic assistance. China was swiftly admitted to the WTO on September 13. Theres an old saying that in a ham and eggs breakfast, the chicken is involved but the pig is committed. Many major U.S. corporations are totally committed to ongoing business relations with China and the Chinese government. This was demonstrated by Chinas hosting of the recent APEC conference in Shanghai. China is in dire need of continued investment and operations from U.S. based companies. This was a matter of pre-eminent concern to George W. Bush during the conference and is also reflective of the Bush familys long-standing business interests in China. According to the U.S-China Business Council (USCBC) (www.uschina.org), new foreign direct investment in China in 2000 alone equaled some $62.66 billion US. This represented a 50.8% increase over 1999. Major U.S.
Re: [CTRL] FW: check it out
-Caveat Lector- This is the oldest hoax on the Internet. http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blemtax2.htm?terms=602P --- thew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail. Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet. Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out of alternative postage fees. Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on! every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: There is nothing like a letter. Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day - or over $180 per year - above and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service they do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is democracy and non-interference. You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter t! o be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the free Internet in the United States. Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a $20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea of E-mail surcharge a useful concept who's time has come (March 6th, 1999 Editorial) Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends andrelatives to write their congressional representative and say NO to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not want. PLEASE FORWARD A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us
Re: [CTRL] get ready for afghan war syndrome..
-Caveat Lector- ...and many Americans wear sandals, myself included -- does that make us subhuman in your estimation? Perhaps not subhuman but certainly abnormal - and definitely not to be trusted. flw A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] FORMER GREEN BERET SAYS BUSH IS LYING ABOUT 9-11
-Caveat Lector- .. From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed] Note: We store 100's of related New Paradigms Posts at: http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: General Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FORMER GREEN BERET SAYS BUSH IS LYING ABOUT 9-11 Date: Sunday, October 21, 2001 11:14 AM Once again when Americans want to read the truth, they have to turn to Pravda, a Russian newspaper!!! This former Green Beret is daring to speak the awful truth about the events of 9-11-01 even as the entire American media remains silent. His conclusions are right on target. The 'official' explanation of the events on that horrific day is highly suspect. At best, government officials were criminally negligent or unspeakably stupid in the conduct of their duties. ~~ Source: http://english.pravda.ru/usa/2001/10/17/18410.html THE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE IS A FARCE: FORMER GREEN BERET SAYS BUSH IS LYING Stan Goff: The So-Called Evidence Is a Farce I'm a retired Special Forces Master Sergeant. That doesn't cut much for those who will only accept the opinions of former officers on military matters, since we enlisted swine are assumed to be incapable of grasping the nuances of doctrine. But I wasn't just in the army. I studied and taught military science and doctrine. I was a tactics instructor at the Jungle Operations Training Center in Panama, and I taught Military Science at West Point. And contrary to the popular image of what Special Forces does, SF's mission is to teach. We offer advice and assistance to foreign forces. That's everything from teaching marksmanship to a private to instructing a Battalion staff on how to coordinate effective air operations with a sister service. Based on that experience, and operations in eight designated conflict areas from Vietnam to Haiti, I have to say that the story we hear on the news and read in the newspapers is simply not believable. The most cursory glance at the verifiable facts, before, during, and after September 11th, does not support the official line or conform to the current actions of the United States government. But the official line only works if they can get everyone to accept its underlying premises. I'm not at all surprised about the Republican and Democratic Parties repeating these premises. They are simply two factions within a single dominant political class, and both are financed by the same economic powerhouses. My biggest disappointment, as someone who identifies himself with the left, has been the tacit acceptance of those premises by others on the left, sometimes naively, and sometimes to score some morality points. Those premises are twofold. One, there is the premise that what this de facto administration is doing now is a response to September 11th. Two, there is the premise that this attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was done by people based in Afghanistan. In my opinion, neither of these is sound. To put this in perspective we have to go back not to September 11th, but to last year or further. A man of limited intelligence, George W. Bush, with nothing more than his name and the behind-the-scenes pressure of his powerful father-a former President, ex-director of Central Intelligence, and an oil man-is systematically constructed as a candidate, at tremendous cost. Across the country, subtle and not-so-subtle mechanisms are put into place to disfranchise a significant fraction of the Democrat's African-American voter base. This doesn't come out until Florida becomes a battleground for Electoral College votes, and the magnitude of the story has been suppressed by the corporate media to this day. In a decision so lacking in legitimacy, the Supreme Court will neither by-line the author of the decision nor allow the decision to ever be used as a precedent, Bush v. Gore awards the presidency of the United States to a man who loses the popular vote in Florida and loses the national popular vote by over 600,000. This de facto regime then organizes a very interesting cabinet. The Vice President is an oil executive and the former Secretary of Defense. The National Security Advisor is a director on the board of a transnational oil corporation and a Russia scholar. The Secretary of State is a man with no diplomatic experience whatsoever, and the former Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The other interesting appointment is Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense. Rumsfeld is the former CEO of Searle Pharmaceuticals. He and Cheney were featured as speakers at the May, 2000, Russian-American Business Leaders Forum. So the consistent currents in this cabinet are petroleum, the former Soviet Union, and the military. Based on the record of Daddy Bush, in all his
Re: [CTRL] Baghdad After Kabul ?
-Caveat Lector- Strange these people seem to forget or want to forget that the traitor convicted of Treason Jonathan Pollard who was Mossad Agent while in Navy Department, was the cause of what happened to Iraq. Note now how the Zionist Press is pushing for war against Iraq and Joe Lieberman sat their like one of the 7 Dwarf's calling for war against Iraq ? Tlhis man should be booted out of the Senate or he doesn ot serve two masters, he serves Israel as he holds dual citizenship. He looks like one of those little sneaky elves one would find sabotaging toys at the bottom of a Christmas tree. Saba A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] [ParanoidTimes] Fw: WTC ATTACK: PROPHESY SAYS IT WAS JUST THE BEGINNING
-Caveat Lector- I myself wonder why the so-religious Americans don't all see this. - The Whore of Babylon is obviously about to fall and they're still singing God bless America. - I guess most people are blind. The gold of babylon keeps them bound to Babylon. Or, ... could it be that Bible was talking of Monica and Clinton - whore of babylon, and then Bush - the anti-christ, elected via fraud, and then the thousand year reich. Hmm... The Bible does give an interesting picture of the future of the USA, if that is the case. Anyone more intimate with the Bible care to present any theories of these possible character connections to the Bible prophesies? I haven't seen anyone pick these up or even see the note, yet. Is it some kind of tabu for (religious) Americans to see things this way? On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Dr. Byron Weeks wrote: Listen to this one, folks. The next attack will be a massive plague or nerve gas from the skies. Tons of it - Original Message - From: Carl F. Worden Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:43 AM Subject: WTC ATTACK: PROPHESY SAYS IT WAS JUST THE BEGINNING Ladies gentlemen: The very day of the WTC attack, I wrote you all to tell you the biblical prophesy of Revelation 18 had come to pass. I was wrong: The total destruction of the World Trade Center in one hour was only the beginning of the total fulfillment of Revelation 18. The words contained in Revelation 18:4-5 have kept haunting me. They are: And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. And that ye receive not of her plagues? You know what a plague is! It is not an explosion or a flood. It is not an army come to destroy. It is a disease condition that can befall nearly every living soul like the Black Plague of Medieval times. Right now, we all know we have been attacked by Anthrax. I believe we will be attacked by other biological agents as well, including the horrifying prospect of Smallpox. Come out of her, my people? What does that prophesy suggest we do? I'll tell you what I am doing right now, and then you can decide for yourself what you should do: Right now, my wife and I are in the process of obtaining updated passports in order to leave on a moment's notice. When God tells you to come out of her, I for one am not going to be asking questions, and I'm not going to be looking back. Take care. Carl F. Worden Liaison Officer Southern Oregon Militia Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck Monitoring Service trial http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/zgSolB/TM -~- == IF YOU'RE NOT PARANOID, THEN YOU'RE NOT PAYING ATTENTION! == To Post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ParanoidTimes Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml == Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: WHY AMERICA MUST STOP THE WAR NOW
___ __ / |/ / /___/ / /_ //M I D - E A S T R E A L I T I E S / /|_/ / /_/_ / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East /_/ /_/ /___/ /_/ \\©http://www.MiddleEast.Org News, Information, Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups, and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know! To receive MER regularly and free - http://www.MiddleEast.Org/subscribe --- In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell --- PLEASE put your comments at our new and easy FORUM http://www.MiddleEast.Org/forum Constantly spoon fed by and on Georges -- the equivalent of McDonalds cheeseburgers for the brain -- no wonder so many Americans are so obese and bumbling of mind as well as body. THE TWO GEORGES ON SUNDAY universal support - George W. Bush coalition of one - George Will ARUNDHATI ROY ON TUESDAY The bombing of Afghanistan is not revenge for New York and Washington. It is yet another act of terror against the people of the world. MID-EAST REALITIES © - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 10/24: Both of the Georges are oh so full of themselves cocky -- just the personality type so many American's truly love. One is (to the amazement of many who wonder how in the world the U.S. chooses such persons to lead it) the President of the United States. Speaking Sunday of America's new war as he was about to leave the international meetings in Shanghai, son of former CIA/Pres Bush told the world: We're not conducting these operations alone, we have universal support around the world! Yes sir, that's the same Dubya who really does seem to think the world is nothing more than an extension of the old wild west of American history -- put up a reward poster wanted dead or alive and go smoke 'em out because good will triump over evil. No wonder this still recovering frat-boy President with grade-school-teacher wife feels most confortable talking to children, of late encouraging them to send their dollars to help the poor children of Afghanistan -- doing so from the Headquarters of the American Red Cross on the very same day the Red Cross in Kabul was bombed! Then there is pundit George, a right-wing ideological cousin of Dubya who takes a certain pride in telling the truth about his convictions while at the same time cheerleading for the Pentagon Generals urging them on in their crusade to assert the new new world order. About the same time on Sunday that Dubya George was trumpeting his universal support inanities in Shanghai, George Will was much more candidly telling the country (as he does weekly for ABC News) that So far it's really a coalition of one, maybe one and a half (referring to the Brits of course). The coalition so far is nothing but window dressing. So much for the two Georges who constantly have America's ears; as well as the American media and the blabbering Sunday Talk Shows that so dominate the American nationalist agenda. A few days later however, on Tuesday, someone not allowed on American TV -- not weekly on Sundays and hardly even ever actually -- had something very important to say: author Arundhati Roy who said it in The Guardian. Same establishment TV blacklisting takes place of course when it comes to the very best experts and the giant intellects of our time -- Chomsky and Fisk leap immediately to mind. Constantly spoon fed on and by Georges -- the equivalent of McDonalds cheeseburgers for the brain -- no wonder so many Americans are so obese and bumbling of mind as well as body. No wonder nearly all Americans were caught so unawares on 11 September. No wonder nearly all Americans cheer and fly flags and simplistically talk incessantly about we good and they evil; themselves collectively killing millions while backing the worst thugs and dictators...all without even knowing what they have done in the recent past and that what is happening now is, to a very large extent, a direct result of what has come before. WHY AMERICA MUST STOP THE WAR NOW Brutality Smeared in Peanut Butter By Arundhati Roy* [THE GUARDIAN - London, UK - Tuesday, 23 October 2001]: As darkness deepened over Afghanistan on Sunday, October 7, 2001, the U.S. government, backed by the International Coalition Against Terror (the new, amenable surrogate for the United Nations), launched air strikes against Afghanistan. TV channels lingered on computer-animated images of cruise missiles, stealth bombers, tomahawks, bunker-busting missiles and
[CTRL] Mind Control Cult Involvement in World Trade Center Bombings
http://www.factnet.org/Current.html F.A.C.T.Net Newsletter Factnet News Opinion/Editorial October 2001 Subject: Mind Control Cult Involvement in World Trade Center Bombings Behind the World Trade Center and the Pentagon bombings was the involvement of a mind control cult just as a mind control cult was behind the Aum Shinrikyo sarin gas attacks in the Tokyo subways. Leading cult and mind control experts have confirmed that the terrorists are members of a mind control cult that had expediently hijacked and distorted Islamic religious dogma. But just how one of the world’s oldest and most secretive cults is involved will follow after a little background on the mind control element behind this terrorism… The individuals who perpetrated the World Trade Center bombings acted because of a set of ideas and values that they “believed.” These ideas and values seem to most of us not just extreme, but insane (i.e. suicide and the killing of innocent others.) To find out why, who and what actually caused the World Trade Center bombings you have to go beyond considering the mere scaffolding of any possible defensible rationality of the ideas, values and motivations held by the terrorists or that of the people who sent them. When you see the terrorist’s actions through the two lenses of mind control and the psychology of how to create and maintain a destructive cultic group, you will understand the real method used to implant the ideas and values that ultimately motivated their horrific acts. More importantly, when the US government and military also begin to see the World Trade Center terrorists as members of a mind control cult and that the cult terrorist and the cult fanatic are essentially the same, they will be more successful in hindering future acts of terrorism. The statement that the World Trade Center terrorists were members of a mind control cult does not imply in any way that the terrorists must not be handled with swift and appropriate physical intervention and detention to prevent more terrorist acts. It means that if the US government response is appropriate to the proper handling of the actual mind control and cult causes of the attacks it won’t make as the FBI lack of understanding of mind control cults did at WACO. How the World Trade Center and the Pentagon Cult Terrorists were manufactured: Experts on Middle Eastern terrorists have discovered that they are regularly recruited from ultra-fundamentalist Islamic religious schools.** In these schools the potential recruits are subjected a severe process of mental exercises, discipline and testing far more difficult than that of the terrorists’ physical training in the training camps. This known clue is important because it links directly to the long history of mind control cult terrorism in the Arabic world. As early as the 7th century AD a cult called the Hashishin was already in the terrorism business. (Hashishin is the derived source of the modern word assassin.) Through the centuries this cult perfected some of the earliest empirical antecedents of modern mind control using its members as unknowing test subjects. Using distorted Islamic religious imagery and a series of severe mental and physical exercises (initiations) they were able to program their members to kill themselves with or without reason literally on command or kill themselves while executing assassinations or, joyously go on missions of certain death. Their members did anything asked of them because they were programmed to believe they would immediately go to Paradise as a martyr for Islam and be awarded with scores of waiting virgins and all other forms of comfort and wealth. For centuries the Hashishin cult network has been the dark side of Arabic culture and has terrorized any person or organization that opposed it. Now, in an evolved and morphed form, the mind control skills and cultic structure of the Hashishin is still in existence and being used again. But, today it is also being augmented with the additional power of more modern mind control technology and modern intelligence training. It would take too much time here to describe the full terrorist history of the Hashishin mind control cult in the Arabic world much less the riveting Hashishin mind control training procedures. For this we strongly recommend you see Chapters 1 and 2 of Secret Societies: Yesterday and Today, by Arkon Daraul. (Published by the Frederick Muller, London.) There you will see in vivid detail the origins and history of the modern Arabic mind control system used in an evolved form to help create the terrorists who bombed the World Trade Center. Keep in mind not all terrorists go though mind control in a cult setting such as the World Trade Center terrorists. The terrorist suicide bombers currently plaguing Israel are generally not subjected to as an intense of a regimen of mind control or cultic surroundings as those terrorist recruited out of the Islamic ultra-fundamentalist religious
[CTRL] US, Israel head for confrontation
http://www.atimes.com/c-asia/CJ24Ag02.html Friends fall out: US, Israel head for confrontation By Jim Lobe WASHINGTON - Long-time allies Israel and the United States appear headed for a major confrontation following Prime Minister Ariel Sharon government's rejection on Tuesday of US demands that Israel withdraw its troops after their deepest incursions into Palestinian territory in a decade. The impasse comes amid rising concern in Washington that continuing clashes in Gaza and deep inside the West Bank will further inflame passions in the Arab world, already aroused by Washington's military campaign against the Taliban government and Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda forces in Afghanistan. "We have to recognize that [Israel's actions] can complicate our campaign," said former US ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk. "Our support for Israel has always been a fuel for anger in the Arab street." Indeed, some pro-Israel forces here warn that Sharon's actions may be putting at risk the "special relationship" between the two allie. "When your friend America is at war for its survival," New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman wrote on Tuesday in a mock letter from President George W Bush to Sharon, "there is only one question Israel should ask: How can we help?" As of Tuesday afternoon, however, Sharon appeared to be in no mood to help. His office released a statement saying Israel's current incursions into six West Bank towns in search of alleged Palestinian "terrorists" amounted to "exerting its right to self-defense" - the same rationale offered by Bush for his Afghanistan campaign. The current impasse was sparked by last week's assassination, apparently by members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), of Israeli Tourism Minister Rehavam Zeevi, a far-rightwing former general who had just announced his resignation from the government to protest against Sharon's acquiescence in ceasefire efforts orchestrated by Washington. Sharon demanded that Palestine Authority leader Yasser Arafat immediately arrest the murderers and hand them over to Israel by later this week. At the same time, he launched a major military offensive into Palestinian territory, touching off fighting that has killed some two dozen Palestinians. In unusually strong language on Monday, the State Department denounced the incursions as "unacceptable" and called for an immediate withdrawal. "We deeply regret and deplore Israeli Defense Force actions that have killed numerous Palestinian civilians over the weekend," said spokesperson Philip Reeker. At the same time, Reeker stressed that Washington is pressing Arafat to arrest the suspected assassins, although he did not echo Sharon's demand that they be handed over to Israel. Sharon insisted that Israel has no intention of permanently occupying the areas which its forces had entered. At the same time, he reiterated demands that Arafat turn over the suspects, although his Labor Party ministers, including Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, who met here with Secretary of State Colin Powell Tuesday, hinted that the government would be satisfied with action short of extradition. Peres, who has made little secret of his unhappiness with Sharon's more aggressive moves, is trying to work out with US officials the details of a plan that would permit a quick withdrawal and set the stage for an effective ceasefire. In a public address in Washington on Monday, Peres said such conditions could be satisfied if Arafat arrested "10 or 15 troublemakers", takes stronger measures to prevent suicide bombings in Israeli territory, and cracks down hard against several armed Palestinian groups. Whether and how soon Arafat can meet these demands remains unclear. And whether Sharon himself will go along with his foreign minister also is a matter of speculation among US officials, some of whom believe that the Israeli leader may be more interested in trying to destroy Arafat and the Palestinian Authority than in negotiating a ceasefire that might be a prelude to strong US pressure to enter into serious peace talks. "Sharon seems unusually ambivalent," said one administration official. "On the one hand, he seems to see in the present crisis a chance to blow up the whole Oslo process [which he has long criticized]. On the other hand, he knows that the diplomatic costs of that will be exorbitant." After the September 11 attacks on New York and the Pentagon, Sharon launched his own campaign to depict Arafat as "Israel's bin Laden", apparently both to claim a treasured spot under Bush's anti-terrorist umbrella and to cultivate his right wing. As his anti-Arafat rhetoric heated up, so did Israel's pace of targeted army killings of suspected terrorists, as Sharon sought to compare those efforts to Bush's stated wish to capture bin Laden "dead or alive". "He was certain that this was a historical opportunity," said Uri Avnery, a prominent Israeli peace activist. "Now, at long last, under the slogan
[CTRL] Off topic-Bronx man accused of stealing watches from WTC
-Caveat Lector- Off Topic FYI Bronx Man Accused Of Stealing Watches From World Trade Center Site OCTOBER 24TH, 2001 A Bronx man was indicted Tuesday on charges he snuck into the site of the World Trade Center and looted the Tourneau watch store there. Twenty-six year old Johnny Dunham of the Bronx is accused of impersonating an emergency worker the day after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Prosecutors say Dunham stole a firefighter's coat from an ambulance, then used his disguise to rip off the damaged Tourneau store. Dunham is accused of taking at least six watches and cash from the store, which is located on the first sub-level of 5 World Trade. The store was still intact after the collapse, but many of its showcases were broken. Sources say the scheme was discovered after Dunham bragged about his adventures. Police then raided his Morris Heights apartment on a search warrant, where authorities say they found a stolen $650 Tourneau watch, police clothing and equipment, and snapshots of him posing at the site of the disaster in the stolen coat. Dunham is now facing several charges, including burglary, larceny, and criminal impersonation. He could face up to seven years in prison if convicted of the most serious charges. A Bronx woman is also charged with having one of the stolen watches in her possession. A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Split in Vatican on Opus Dei's miracle
http://observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,577830,00.html Split in Vatican on Opus Dei's miracle Giles Tremlett, Madrid Sunday October 21, 2001 The Observer The relentless advance of one of the Roman Catholic Church's most mysterious, powerful and conservative groups, Opus Dei, is about to gain further momentum, thanks to the hands of Spanish surgeon Manuel Nevado. Nevado, 69, has assured the Vatican that his hands were crippled by overexposure to X-rays in the days when Spanish clinics were short of protective equipment. Now, according to a report being considered by the Vatican authorities, those hands have been miraculously cured after he prayed for help from Opus Dei's founder, the Spanish priest Josemaría Escrivá. That cure, Opus Dei claims, provides proof that Escrivá should be canonised. Escrivá already holds the Vatican record for the quickest beatification - a first step towards full sainthood - for five centuries. That took only 17 years after his death in 1975. His powerful supporters want Pope John Paul II, an Opus Dei admirer who has surrounded himself with the group's members, to canonise Escrivá by the end of next year. That would provide Opus Dei with even greater moral and religious weight inside the Vatican - where some fear it already has a grip on the reins of power. The group, which flourished during General Franco's dictatorship and brings together wealthy, conservative lay Catholics and priests across the world, already controls some of the Vatican's most important offices. Its grip is strongest in the Vatican's public relations department, where an Opus Dei member, Joaquín Navarro-Valls, has become the ailing Pope's all-powerful spin doctor. Not surprisingly, Escrivá's canonisation process is causing bitter conflict in the Vatican. The Jesuit order, home to some of the Church's most left-leaning members, is said to be fighting a fierce opposition campaign. Full saints need not just one miracle, but two. Escrivá's first miracle, which ensured his fast-track beatification, was said to have occurred in 1976 - when members of the family of a Spanish Carmelite nun prayed for his heavenly intercession to cure abnormal fat deposits. Nevado told the Vatican's investigators that within 15 days of praying to Escrivá, his illness was cured. 'The wounds disappeared and the hands were completely cured,' he said. Fellow doctors in Almendralejo were surprised by the news. 'He is a strong man,' one colleague said. 'His radiodermatitis never became cancerous. I think it stopped when he stopped using X-rays.' That is not what the Vatican doctors say about what they claimed was a chronic and irreversible disease. 'The diagnosis was terrible and without hope. He could have had to have his hands amputated,' one doctor said in a report from 50 Vatican doctors being reviewed by a commission of cardinals in charge of appointing new saints. A final report is due to be taken to Pope John Paul II within weeks. Opus Dei's status as the new power at the Vatican could well be confirmed then.
[CTRL] Fwd: [Fwd: Media accomplices to 9-11 deserve indictment
Original Message Subject: Media accomplices to 9-11 deserve indictment (article for posting) Date: 24 Oct 2001 16:19:34 PDT From: Fritz Springmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - MEDIA ACCOMPLICES TO 9-11 CRIME DESERVE INDICTMENT How the American Media continues to aid and abet the crime of the 21st century. By Fritz Springmeier Isnt it a delight that our media works hand in glove with our government? No one is going to plug politically incorrect material into our minds. We will all be united on the same page of information, and marching off to war in unison. Of course, people in other countries are disappointed that we dont have a free press. They find it strange that we Americans spend hours shopping around for the best model car but we seldom shop for news information. After all, they point out, werent the roots of this nation founded on a free flow of information, and the chance for debate to sort out the facts? This article is meant to take you back to the roots of what made America the envy of the world. Our states big daily newspaper warns us in an article, During World War I, excited patriots went around kicking dachshunds, on the grounds that they were German dogs. What a blow for freedom that was. One would have hoped our fellow citizens would show just a modicum more sense. On the other hand, it is quite likely some of these stories arent true: Rumors are particularly apt to circulate in a climate of fear, particularly on the Internet. (bold added, quote Oregonian, 10/19/01, p. C13) In an earlier paper, our establishment newspaper warned us with the headline, Attacks give extremists new ammunition. The article states, The extreme right and the extreme left have some extreme similarities, including their hatred for federal and international governments, said Randy Blazak, a professor of sociology at Portland State University and an expert on U.S. hate groups. So its not surprising that extremes from both ends could see something positive from these attacks. The paper goes on to say, While publicly professing sympathy for the innocent victims of the tragedy, they privately revel in the attack [on the WTC]. (Oregonian, 9/23/01, A21, bold added) Perhaps you have noticed similar articles in your local large daily newspaper in your state. The message here is that the Internet is unreliable and that anti-government leftists and rightists are reveling, gloating, about the 9-11 tragedy. Did the newspaper interview grief stricken Christian patriots or grief stricken socialists to learn how happy they feel about 9-11? Did they photograph Patriots partying in celebration? No, rather than interview one single rightist or leftist, they went directly to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has contempt for anyone against the New World Order and anyone genuinely conservative. It would be hard to find anyone more hatefully biased against anti-government activists than the Southern Poverty Law Center to interview. This is not investigative reporting. It is propaganda. Its hard enough to figure out a persons feeling by directly asking the person. Are we really going to find out how Rudolf the Red Nose Reindeer feels by asking the primary scoffing deer? What is the proper way to investigate a crime? The best manuals for investigating a crime teach that one should not start with preconceived ideas, but rather that investigation, questions, and gathering of data are crucial for the investigator to come to an accurate assessment of what happened. During the first month following the 9-11 crimes, I saw many intelligent good questions come over the Internet about the crime. Dozens of Internet articles have asked important insightful questions to help us solve the crimes of the 9-11 tragedy, which the establishment newspapers and other media have ignored, and appear trying to cover up. In fact I know from some newsmen, that their bosses have given instructions to their writers not cover certain important facts and questions and lines of inquiry. How dare they hide things from you about the biggest crime (so far) of the 21st century? You have a right to know these things. If America was attacked, and America is still the target, then dont you have a right to know who attacked you, how they attacked and why? If Osama bin Laden attacked America (not our government, not a battleship, but the man in the street)you and I, then dont we the intended victims have a right to know what our would be killer wants to say to us? And lets get this fact straight, whether Osama bin Laden carried out the attack on the WTC or not, he had clearly declared war on all Americans. You as an American have been the target of kidnappings, assassinations, torture and other abuse for years as you traveled in foreign lands. There are people out there who view it as open season on any American. Ive traveled, I know. I have had the
[CTRL] US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq
-Caveat Lector- --- Forwarded message follows --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:11:55 -0700 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq To: undisclosed-recipients:; If you have received this e-mail, then you are on the mailing list of the Center for an Informed America. If you feel you have received this in error, please send back a reply asking to be removed from the list. If this message was forwarded to you and you would like to receive future mailings, e-mail a request to be added to the list. This article comes courtesy of The Times of India. The original is at: http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=67147283 US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq PRETORIA: Wouter Basson, the spy and mastermind behind the apartheid government's chemical warfare programme, claimed on Friday the United States had used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq during the Gulf War. Basson told the Pretoria High Court television footage shot during the war showed clearly that elite Iraqi troops who surrendered en masse were under the influence of hallucinogens. He said their faces were expressionless, their pupils were dilated and they were drooling at the mouth - typical side effects of a particularly dangerous type of hallucinogenic drug. Basson, a former military officer, was testifying about the 1993 destruction of hundreds of kilograms (pounds) of drugs such as cocaine, Mandrax and Ecstasy, manufactured or bought by the South African army for use in crowd control. He told the court: Analysis of video material showing surrendering (Iraqi) troops emerging from their underground bunkers show that they had dilated pupils, were drooling and had vacant stares. It appeared like the clinical profile of a BZ variant. The variant was also tested in laboratory animals in South Africa but it was stopped because it caused permanent damage to the subject. I had good reason to believe that America used a BZ variant against Iraq during the Gulf War. Basson said BZ was a hallucinogenic which altered a person's ability to act rationally. It could either make somebody completely passive or uncontrollably aggressive, to the point where he would attack his own colleagues, he said. Basson is facing 46 charges ranging from murder to fraud for acts allegedly committed while he was a high-ranking member of the apartheid-era military. Dubbed Dr Death, he was the mastermind behind the regime's secret programme to develop biological and chemical warfare capabilities and this week testified that he had bought a zoo to research the use of animal hormones to control crowds.( AFP ) --- End of forwarded message --- Steve Wingate, Webmaster ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES http://www.anomalous-images.com A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] 9 Mysterious Coffins In Quetta Hospital- Are They US Special Forces?
http://williamcooper.com/ Nine Mysterious coffins in Quetta hospital could belong to US Special Forces Veritas News Service, October 24, 2001 -- ISLAMABAD Oct 24 (Pakistan News Service (PNS)): A thick security blanket shrouds the mortuary of a Quetta hospital, which according to some of the staffers houses nine mysterious coffins. Little is known as to whose bodies are in the coffins. However, insiders believe these coffins contain the remains of members of United States Special Forces, killed in action in Afghanistan. The Pentagon has so far confirmed only three casualties in its campaign in Afghanistan-one serviceman killed in a forklift accident in the Gulf and two pilots killed in a helicopter crash last night. However, the Taliban have claimed killing many more US commandos. Analysts say the Pentagon is reluctant to concede the actual toll of the campaign fearing public backlash in the US. One expert said it was possible that the US was reluctant to fly home body bags in view of the adverse reaction it was likely to attract.
[CTRL] Fwd: [APFN] Islams Hatred of the Clitoris
AB ~~for educational purposes only~~ [Title 17 U.S.C. section 107] www.frontpagemag.com Return to normal view Islam’s Hatred of the Clitoris FrontPageMagazine.com | October 18, 2001 By: Jamie Glazov Editor’s Note: The following article contains graphic descriptions of female genital mutilation, which some sensitive readers may wish to avoid. IF YOU HATE WOMEN, and you hate their sexuality, and you are terrified that you cannot control it, the most effective thing you can do is to mutilate female sexual pleasure. This can be done by a sexual lobotomy, which will destroy an essential and sacred part of a woman’s natural makeup. In achieving this feat on all women, you will become able to ruthlessly dominate them. That’s what female circumcision is all about. It’s about obliterating the clitoris, or the entire outer vagina. It is the barbarity that exists where misogyny festers most: in the Muslim and African world. The Muslims are the principal religious group that practice female circumcision. In Egypt, for instance, 97 percent of women are circumcised. Their clitorises are amputated. In countries like Sudan, meanwhile, the women-haters are not so kind: all the women’s external genital organs are completely removed. In a savagery called infibulation, the clitoris, the two major outer lips (labia majora) and the two minor inner lips (labia minora) are amputated. Nawal El Saadawi has documented these horrifying realities in The Hidden Face of Eve: Women in the Arab World. She demonstrates how the violence of female circumcision is performed on girls anywhere from the ages of one month to puberty. Usually, it is done around the age of seven or eight. Anesthetics are never used. The child is pinned down by several women, while one of them attacks. After infibulation, the small outer opening of the vagina is the only portion left intact. A tiny piece of wood or reed is inserted to allow urine and menstrual blood to seep out. Extra narrowing of the opening is carried out with stitches, which remain until marriage. The victim’s legs are often bound together from hip to ankle and she is immobile for about a month or two. This violence has to occur because, in much of the Islamic world, the female’s genital area is considered dirty and unacceptable. For example, in Egypt the uncircumcised girl is called nigsa (unclean). Thus, it has to be made "clean." Many of the victims lose their lives during this torture – which is often inflicted with broken glass. Many other victims are afflicted with acute and chronic infections for the rest of their lives. With serious and disabling lifelong consequences, the mutilation robs women of their equilibrium. It deprives them from enjoying the fullness of their sexuality and the completeness of their lives. In terms of sexual pleasure, for instance, we know that approximately 75 percent of women cannot achieve orgasm without clitoral stimulation. In other words, the possibility of orgasm has been obliterated for tens of millions of women in the Muslim world. So what does it mean if the psychic, mental and physical health of women cannot be complete if they do not experience sexual pleasure? The terror of the circumcision itself tracks its traumatized victims down like a nightmare. Most, if not all, of these poor women end up suffering from serious sexual and/or mental distortions. The mutilation of their sexual being becomes the epicenter where sex and violence meet constantly in their lives – with them as victims. Wedding night is often quite eventful. In some parts of the Arab and African world, the husband assaults the wife after the wedding. In Somalia, for instance, the groom beats the bride with a leather whip. After this romantic apex, he cuts the sealed vagina with a sharp scalpel or razor in order to have intercourse. He then has prolonged repeated intercourse with her for a week – to prevent the scarring from closing the vaginal opening again. During this time the wife must lie still and not move. Meanwhile, the husband takes the bloody sharp object, which represents the virginity of his wife, and makes rounds around the community – showing it off for approval. Scholars such as Raphael Patai and Vincent Crapanzano have documented these phenomena. After this honeymoon period, the woman is now, for the first time in her life, actually recognized as a person – because she has become the extension of her husband. Her status might even improve if she has a child (a boy). She will be humiliated and shamed, however, if she has a non-child (a girl). And if a little innocent girl enters this world, it will only be a short time before her genitals share the same fate as that of her mother’s. When the torturers and soul-destroyers begin to slice, who will hear her cries? Jamie Glazov holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in Soviet Studies. He is the author of 15 Tips on How to be a Good Leftist.. His father, Yuri Glazov, was a Soviet dissident
[CTRL] Fear Obscures Florida Sunshine
http://orlandosentinel.com/news/nationworld/orl-asecxsecrecy24102401oct24.story?coll=orl%2Dnews%2Dheadlines%2Dlocal Fear drives Senate's rush to secrecy By Mark Silva | Sentinel Political Editor Posted October 24, 2001 TALLAHASSEE -- The Florida Senate, gripped by the fear of terrorism, is set to launch a barrage of legislation and rules that would allow lawmakers to meet and cut deals in secret. All testimony, correspondence, staff reports and even senators' votes on anti-terrorism bills would be secret. The bid to remove protections guaranteed for decades by the state's landmark "government in the sunshine" law gets under way today. The Senate Rules Committee is expected to approve giving the Senate president the power to close any discussions of "possible acts of espionage, sabotage, attack and other acts of terrorism." The full Senate could follow suit Thursday. Leaders insist they will only impose secrecy in "a perfect storm" of terrorist threats. For now, a more cautious House is keeping the brakes on bills that mirror the Senate's efforts, including enabling state police to seal public records in pursuit of terrorism. House Speaker Tom Feeney insists that a two-week special session is no place to start closing records and meetings. "I haven't been convinced it is an immediate pressing problem," Feeney said, adding that he would be open to discussing the ideas at next year's regular session. "I would want to have plenty of healthy debate; I'd want to be very careful in how we change our open meeting rules," Feeney, R-Oviedo, said. All this is a measure of the post-Sept. 11 paranoia in Florida's Capitol, where metal detectors greet visitors at doors that once opened freely and armed guards stand sentry for the governor. "Scary thing, and not taken lightly," Senate Majority Leader Jim King, R-Jacksonville, said of the rules ready for open debate today. "I think it's pretty well agreed to that the potential problems we face warrant moves that we never otherwise would have taken. . . . "Sometimes, you have to ease civil liberties to protect the civil population." A Senate committee this week endorsed a dozen security-driven bills enabling the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to seal otherwise public records in terrorist-related investigations for one week, and judges to seal them for another two weeks, plus other new exemptions to the public-records law. "There's a paranoia that's clearly obvious when you take all of these proposals and put them together," said Barbara Petersen, executive director of the First Amendment Foundation, which watches open-government issues. The Senate's rush to secrecy is not only unconstitutional, she said: "It creates a sense of fear. What is it they don't want us to know?" Supporters of Florida's nationally recognized laws for open government have warned against allowing an atmosphere of terrorist-instilled fear to restrict liberties long held dear. "Everywhere you go, especially when you talk to open-records advocates in other states, they always look at Florida as pretty much the promised land," said Mark Fitzgerald, editor at large at Editor Publisher, a press trade journal. While the Senate can enact its own rules for meetings, it takes the Senate and House to approve any legislation for added police powers and new exemptions to the public-records law. Feeney has taken a staunch libertarian stand and plans to allow debate Monday on only a few uncontroversial bills, which have passed approval of press advocates, such as one clarifying an existing public-records exemption for state security plans and threat assessments. Another special session on security may be needed before the regular 2002 session of the Legislature convenes in late January, Feeney told House leaders in his office Tuesday. There appears to be widespread agreement within the Senate, however. "At the minute, it probably makes sense," Senate Democratic Leader Tom Rossin, D-West Palm Beach, said. "You certainly don't want to have critical information disseminated that would harm an investigation," he said, noting that the meeting-closing rules are "limited to terrorism." Senate Rules Chairman Tom Lee, R-Brandon, called the new rule "very narrowly drawn." "No president of the Senate would abuse this," Lee said. But something short of crisis could close a meeting, committee member Sen. Steve Geller, D-Hallandale Beach, said. For example, testimony in front of the Senate's select committee on security about vulnerabilities at a public facility and how much it will cost to fix them could be kept secret. Senators say the votes and records of these meetings also must be kept secret to prevent their subject from becoming known to potential terrorists. "To the extent that there are matters of national and/or state security, I think it may be appropriate to meet in secret," Geller said. "We've had a long record of openness in this country, but we've had a wake-up call."
[CTRL] long email lists...
-Caveat Lector- just a note to help 'un-clutter' the list... people who are sending email information to an entire list, of which ctrl is only one recipient, should use the 'bcc' option where you put in all of your addresses instead of using the 'to' option... this will get rid of things like the following example... Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc... if i'm unclear, please email me off list... thanks to everyone for all the valuable info... o) mike A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq
-Caveat Lector- damn we get anthrax, and they get to party -- --- -- -- -- -- They that can give up essential liberty for a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety, Ben Franklin NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Anomalous Images Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:54:26 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CTRL] US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq -Caveat Lector- --- Forwarded message follows --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:11:55 -0700 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq To: undisclosed-recipients:; If you have received this e-mail, then you are on the mailing list of the Center for an Informed America. If you feel you have received this in error, please send back a reply asking to be removed from the list. If this message was forwarded to you and you would like to receive future mailings, e-mail a request to be added to the list. This article comes courtesy of The Times of India. The original is at: http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=67147283 US used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq PRETORIA: Wouter Basson, the spy and mastermind behind the apartheid government's chemical warfare programme, claimed on Friday the United States had used hallucinogenic weapons against Iraq during the Gulf War. Basson told the Pretoria High Court television footage shot during the war showed clearly that elite Iraqi troops who surrendered en masse were under the influence of hallucinogens. He said their faces were expressionless, their pupils were dilated and they were drooling at the mouth - typical side effects of a particularly dangerous type of hallucinogenic drug. Basson, a former military officer, was testifying about the 1993 destruction of hundreds of kilograms (pounds) of drugs such as cocaine, Mandrax and Ecstasy, manufactured or bought by the South African army for use in crowd control. He told the court: Analysis of video material showing surrendering (Iraqi) troops emerging from their underground bunkers show that they had dilated pupils, were drooling and had vacant stares. It appeared like the clinical profile of a BZ variant. The variant was also tested in laboratory animals in South Africa but it was stopped because it caused permanent damage to the subject. I had good reason to believe that America used a BZ variant against Iraq during the Gulf War. Basson said BZ was a hallucinogenic which altered a person's ability to act rationally. It could either make somebody completely passive or uncontrollably aggressive, to the point where he would attack his own colleagues, he said. Basson is facing 46 charges ranging from murder to fraud for acts allegedly committed while he was a high-ranking member of the apartheid-era military. Dubbed Dr Death, he was the mastermind behind the regime's secret programme to develop biological and chemical warfare capabilities and this week testified that he had bought a zoo to research the use of animal hormones to control crowds.( AFP ) --- End of forwarded message --- Steve Wingate, Webmaster ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES http://www.anomalous-images.com A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance?not soap-boxing?please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'?with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds?is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed.
Re: [CTRL] Baghdad After Kabul ?
-Caveat Lector- saba you have to stop taking your facts from farrakhan's rhetoric. lieberman does not in fact have dual citizenship -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding. Justice Louis D. Brandeis NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew From: Saba [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:28:45 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CTRL] Baghdad After Kabul ? Tlhis man should be booted out of the Senate or he doesn ot serve two masters, he serves Israel as he holds dual citizenship. A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] FW: check it out
Urban myth: http://www.urbanmyths.com/email_internettax602p.html http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/emailtax.html - Original Message - From: thew To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:57 AM Subject: [CTRL] FW: check it out -Caveat Lector--- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- -He who does not prefer exile to slavery is not free by any measure offreedom, truth and duty. Kahil Gibran, Spirits RebelliousNEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew EVERYONE..PLEASE READ THIS! Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail. Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet. Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees". Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on! every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing like a letter." Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day - or over $180 per year - above and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service they do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is democracy and non-interference. You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter t! o be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States. Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999 Editorial) Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends andrelatives to write their congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not want. PLEASE FORWARDA HREF="'http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.orghttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/ADECLARATION DISCLAIMER==CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandicscreeds are unwelcomed. Substance-not soap-boxing-please! These aresordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'-with its many half-truths, mis-directions and outright frauds-is used politically by different groups withmajor and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, andalways suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives nocredence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.Archives Available at:http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.htmlA HREF="'http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives'>http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Ahttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A HREF="'http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrlhttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/ATo subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Om
[CTRL] Homeopathy Has Preventive Remedy for Anthrax?
-Caveat Lector- Homeopathy Has Preventive Remedy for Anthrax? Updated: Wed, Oct 24 8:12 AM EDT CALCUTTA, India (Reuters) - Indian homeopathic practitioners say that homeopathy, a traditional alternative system of medicine, has a magic pill that can prevent anthrax from infecting humans. Fears of germ warfare have spread worldwide since last month's attacks on New York and Washington as an outbreak of anthrax has spread in the United States through tainted mail. Twelve people have contracted the disease so far -- either skin anthrax or the more deadly inhaled version -- and three have died. Anthracinum, which is prepared by triturating (grinding) the puss from anthrax, is a very effective prophylactic against anthrax, Dr. B. Gangapadhyay, a former head of the Orissa Medical College of Homeopathy and Research, told Reuters. Homeopathy, seen either as a complement or alternative to orthodox medicine, uses metals from across the Periodic Table and a whole range of other substances from the plant and animal kingdoms. Its basic principle is that like cures like -- if a substance produces certain symptoms in a healthy individual, it can also treat those symptoms. Anthracinum works like magic. If a person just takes a dose (of anthracinum) for two days in succession, he would be immune from anthrax for at least three months, Gangapadhyay, who practices in Calcutta, said. Orthodox medical practitioners declined to comment on the effectiveness of the homeopathic remedy. Steve Wingate, Webmaster ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES http://www.anomalous-images.com A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Baghdad After Kabul ?
-Caveat Lector- I do not read Farakkhan nor do I take him seriously - now and then someone puts something on a list and I read it. For you see, Neuropsychotic - way back in the 1970 period I got on to them for what they were, i.e.: their New York Publications of which I have many, they knock the pope, the catholics, the christians, Christmas, Halloween .but not once do they knock the jews or the zionists. For you see they are nothing but a Zionist confraternity - like the FBI - more FBI in KKK, than KKK.. When I found Jewish Mafia in this area with neo nazi literature - I saw the light, and you should have seen their body bag count - Larry Fynt almost filled the one, but they brought him back to life - he was dead for a minute or so . Such lovely people .. as for Farakkhan he had guts until he became ill and he turned chicken a la mared even though he was, a big phoney all along. so stick to your ADL literature and I will stick to my Ku Klux Klan literature. Sayanora... You can read all the Farakkhan you wish - but to me it is all old hat, bucko. Right now I am more interested in who caused the demolition of the World Trade Center and cui bono? Will Jerusalem really be the center of the world and will they attempt to be Center for World Trade with lots more money laundeirng - for you see this Minister of Israel just assassinated - well he was going after Sharon and it was this Silverstein and Dr. Irvin Moskowitz who engineered Sharon's path to office. Saba A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Baghdad After Kabul ?
-Caveat Lector- In 1990, the U.S. had an open-and-shut case of naked aggression by Iraq that even the U.N. could recognize and our enemies could not deny. But without evidence of Saddam's collusion in the terrorism of Sept. 11, an attack on Iraq would be seen as an unprovoked, unjust war that could bring Arab and Islamic mobs into the streets from Morocco to Indonesia, risking the survival of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. What would it profit America t o march to Baghdad, only to have Cairo fall to anti-American mobs? if the united states truly sticks to this hypothetical policy of attacking anybody that disagrees with them, they are the ones that benefit MOST from an escalated war in the region. attack afghanistan, install us puppet regime. destroy iraq, install us puppet regime. attack iran, install us puppet regime. attack egypt, install us puppet regime. all of a sudden nato has five major staging grounds for an invasion of the former soviet union...from europe, from east asia, from japan, from alaska and from the caucusus...i just hope the russians catch on soon and stop this before it spirals out of control. as much as i wouldn't have wanted to live in the soviet union, their existence guaranteed a large measure of peace in the world for 50+ yearswe need a dualistic world at the very least to combat fundamentalism on both sides.. inri np: http://chat.carleton.ca/~jparent2/ This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law. - tony blair's bin laden dossier A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] get ready for afghan war syndrome..
-Caveat Lector- ...and many Americans wear sandals, myself included -- does that make us subhuman in your estimation? Perhaps not subhuman but certainly abnormal - and definitely not to be trusted. fight the worldwide sandal conspiracy! you know, jesus wore sandals... inri np: http://chat.carleton.ca/~jparent2/ This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law. - tony blair's bin laden dossier A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] get ready for afghan war syndrome..
-Caveat Lector- From: inri [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...and many Americans wear sandals, myself included -- does that make us subhuman in your estimation? Perhaps not subhuman but certainly abnormal - and definitely not to be trusted. fight the worldwide sandal conspiracy! you know, jesus wore sandals... I don't think He had indoor plumbing, esp. bathrooms, either. A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] FTW - The Government of China Is Not Supporting The Taliban
Please distribute widely... THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT IS NOT SUPPORTING THE TALIBAN WITH TROOPS RECENT STORIES INTENDED TO FRIGHTEN THE RIGHT ARE DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA by Michael C. Ruppert [© Copyright 2001, Michael C. Ruppert and From The Wilderness Publications, www.copvcia.com. All Rights Reserved. May Be Copied Or Distributed for Non-Profit Purposes Only] FTW, 10/24/01 1200 PDT Recent news stories circulating widely on the Internet and targeted at conservative U.S. interest groups, indicating that the Government of China (GOC) is actively supporting the Taliban and providing troops to assist Taliban and alQueda fighters are false. China, which gained admittance to the World Trade Organization just two days after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, is a full partner in globalization and has an essential and vested interest in seeing US war and economic plans succeed. Further, US economic influence in China, the worlds largest global market, is currently controlling political and military events as China faces a massive energy crisis that only US companies can resolve. An analysis of Chinas economic relations with the United States reveals the overriding reasons for a Chinese/US alliance and gives the lie to recent stories published by the Debka news organization which are designed to instill fear in the US public and divert attention away from US government covert economic, drug smuggling and military operations in the region. As reprinted by the conservative World Net Daily on October 22 the Debka Intelligence Files (www.debka.com) published a story entitled Chinese fighters killed in U.S. strikes. That story reported that, Military sources in Dushnabe and Bishbeck, capitals of Tajikistan respectively, report at least 15 Chinese fighting men on the side of the Taliban, were killed in last weeks U.S. bombing over Kandahar The story continues to state that Osama bin Laden aide Basir al Masri now reportedly deceased enjoyed the protection of at least 10 Chinese bodyguards, some of whom were reportedly killed in recent U.S. air attacks. The Debka report, using selected quotes from British and American papers, including the Washington Post which has long-documented affiliations with the Central Intelligence Agency - refers to prior stories indicating that the GOC has established intelligence and funding relationships with the Taliban in recent years. It quotes one Washington Post story as stating that Beijing and the Taliban signed a memorandum of understanding on September 11 for greater economic and military cooperation. These relationships fail to take into account a gift of $43 million to the Taliban from Secretary of State Colin Powell last May, or the fact that, through the Pakistani intelligence service, the ISI, the CIA has continually provided aid to the Taliban virtually up until the moment of the September 11 attacks. The implication of this story, especially when combined with previous Debka stories claiming massive Chinese troop deployments in and around Afghanistan, is that the United States is potentially facing a direct military confrontation with China. Nothing could be further from the truth. In spite of the fact that one additional October 22 story from the Hindustani Times states that Taliban Commander-in-Chief Jalaluddin Haqquani has claimed that the militia was in touch with China, which was assisting in the war against the U.S, there remains no credible evidence of such Chinese involvement. In fact, a simple examination of the economic interdependence of the U.S. and China makes such conclusions totally unbelievable. U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE With more than three billion citizens China represents the worlds largest untapped marketplace, both for oil and for consumer goods. Not only is the economic future of major U.S. corporations dependent upon continued access to Chinese markets, the Chinese economy as demonstrated by its relentless 15-year effort to gain access to WTO is as dependent upon U.S. investment and economic assistance. China was swiftly admitted to the WTO on September 13. Theres an old saying that in a ham and eggs breakfast, the chicken is involved but the pig is committed. Many major U.S. corporations are totally committed to ongoing business relations with China and the Chinese government. This was demonstrated by Chinas hosting of the recent APEC conference in Shanghai. China is in dire need of continued investment and operations from U.S. based companies. This was a matter of pre-eminent concern to George W. Bush during the conference and is also reflective of the Bush familys long-standing business interests in China. According to the U.S-China Business Council (USCBC) (www.uschina.org), new foreign direct investment in China in 2000 alone equaled some $62.66 billion US. This represented a 50.8% increase over 1999. Major U.S. corporations with active investments
[CTRL] Is an Oil Pipeline Behind the War in Afghanistan?
-Caveat Lector- .. From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed] Note: We store 100's of related New Paradigms Posts at: http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html From: M.A. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Recipient list suppressed Subject: Is an Oil Pipeline Behind the War in Afghanistan? Date: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:40 AM ~~for educational purposes only~~ [Title 17 U.S.C. section 107] Is an Oil Pipeline Behind the War in Afghanistan? by Bill Sardi Testimony before the US Congress is circulating on the internet. It pertains to a proposed oil pipeline through Central Asia that is applicable to the current war in Afghanistan. On February 12, 1998, John J. Maresca, vice president, international relations for UNOCAL oil company, testified before the US House of Representatives, Committee on International Relations. Maresca provided information to Congress on Central Asia oil and gas reserves and how they might shape US foreign policy. UNOCAL's problem? As Maresca said: How to get the region's vast energy resources to the markets. The oil reserves are in areas north of Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia. Routes for a pipeline were proposed that would transport oil on a 42-inch pipe southward thru Afghanistan for 1040 miles to the Pakistan coast. Such a pipeline would cost about $2.5 billion and carry about 1 million barrels of oil per day. Maresca told Congress then that: It's not going to be built until there is a single Afghan government. That's the simple answer. Dana Rohrbacher, California congressman, then identified the Taliban as the ruling controllers among various factions in Afghanistan and characterized them as opium producers. Then Rorhbacher asked Maresca: There is a Saudi terrorist who is infamous for financing terrorism around the world. Is he in the Taliban area or is he up there with the northern people? Maresca answered: If it is the person I am thinking of, he is there in the Taliban area. This testimony obviously alluded to Osama bin Laden. Then Rorhbacher asked: ... in the northern area as compared to the place where the Taliban are in control, would you say that one has a better human rights record toward women than the other? Maresca responded by saying: With respect to women, yes. But I don't think either faction here has a very clean human rights record, to tell you the truth. So women's rights were introduced into Congressional testimony by Congressman Rohrbacher as the wedge for UNOCAL to build its pipeline through Afghanistan. Three years later CNN would be airing its acclaimed TV documentary Under The Veil, which displayed the oppressive conditions that women endure in Afghanistan under the rule of the Taliban (a propaganda film for the oil pipeline?). Rohrbacher then went on to say that a democratic election should take place in Afghanistan and if the Taliban are not willing to make that kind of commitment, I would be very hesitant to move foreward on a $2.5 billion investment because without that commitment, I don't think there is going to be any tranquility in that land. Beginning in 1998 UNOCAL was chastized, particularly by women's rights groups, for discussions with the Taliban, and headed in retreat as a worldwide effort mounted to come to the defense of the Afghani women. This forced UNOCAL to withdraw from its talks with the Taliban and dissolve its multinational partnership in that region. In 1999 Alexander's Gas Oil Connections newsletter said: UNOCAL company officials said late last year (1998) they were abandoning the project because of the need to cut costs in the Caspian region and because of the repeated failure of efforts to resolve the long civil conflict in Afghanistan. [Volume 4, issue #20 - Monday, November 22, 1999] Three days following the attack on the World Trade Centers in New York City, UNOCAL issued a statement reconfirming it had withdrawn from its project in Afghanistan, long before recent events. [www.unocal.com September 14, 2001 statement] UNOCAL was not the only party positioning themselves to tap into oil and gas reserves in central Asia. UNOCAL was primary member of a multinational consortium called CentGas (Central Asia Gas) along with Delta Oil Company Limited (Saudi Arabia), the Government of Turkmenistan, Indonesia Petroleum, LTD. (INPEX) (Japan), ITOCHU Oil Exploration Co., Ltd. (Japan), Hyundai Engineering Construction Co., Ltd. (Korea), the Crescent Group (Pakistan) and RAO Gazprom (Russia). Just because CentGas had dissolved does not mean that the involved parties have totally abandoned their interest in building an oil pipeline out of Central Asia. There is also talk of another pipeline thru Iran. India and Pakistan are bidding to be the pipeline terminal ocean port since they would obtain hundreds of millions of dollars in fees. So, in 1998 Osama bin Laden was identified as the villain behind the
[CTRL] Fwd: [ctrl] mixed muck 10-24 pt2
This week the U.S. House of Representatives will take up an economic stimulus package that indicates just how much the House has sold out to the big corporate and wealthy interests at the expense of poor and working class people. http://www.counterpunch.org/turnipseed2.html US company in Pakistan hit by anthrax http://www.jang-group.com/thenews/oct2001-daily/24-10-2001/main/main2.htm Israel planning 'ethnic' bomb as Saddam caves in http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/98/11/15/stifgnmid03004.html Coercive Counterintelligence Interrogation of Resistant Sources http://www.parascope.com/articles/0397/kub_ix.htm National ID Card System Failing to Attract Supporters http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-102401idcards.story Deep in the heart of the Oxley billwhich is the short name for the Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001are provisions to allow law enforcement to poke around in heretofore personal and private financial information; to take cash from anyone who can't immediately explain where they got it; to eliminate any expectation of privacy in any international monetary transaction; and to, gasp, open and inspect any international mail without a warrant. http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/epaper/editions/sunday/issue_b32dd46d81b5509a1081.html Nato challenged over Belgrade bombing http://news.bbc.co.uk/low/english/world/europe/newsid_1616000/1616461.stm Bin Laden 'received UN cash' http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_161/1610214.stm UK planned to wipe out Germany with anthrax http://www.sundayherald.com/19248 British minister says no evidence linking Iraq to anti-US attacks http://sg.news.yahoo.com/011016/1/1kizi.html French report says London a haven for money laundering http://www.taipeitimes.com/news/2001/10/11/story/106622 Terror Money Trail Leads Home http://cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,313496-412,00.shtml NEW DELHI: While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former ISI director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed here on Tuesday, that the general lost his job because of the evidence India produced to show his links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Centre. http://news.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=1454238160 NEW DELHI: Pakistani director general of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Lt Gen Mahmud Ahmed has been forced into retirement after FBI investigators established credible links between him and Umer Sheikh, one of the three militants released in exchange for passengers of the hijacked Indian Airlines plane in 1999. http://news.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=751083879 Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has entered the debate on terrorism - telling a TV interviewer that the US might just as well bomb London if it is serious about fighting terrorism. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/monitoring/media_reports/newsid_1617000/1617075.stm WTC Survivors Wonder: Where is that $1 Billion in Donations? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,36371,00.html MEXICAN MOSSAD OPERATION? http://worldcrossing.com/WebX?[EMAIL PROTECTED]%5E10075899@.eeedf64/3 Why did the Pentagon allow BioPort Corp. to remain the sole U.S. supplier of a crucial weapon against bioterror despite years of failure to deliver the vaccine? http://salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/14/anthrax_vaccine/index_np.html Blowing up innocent civilians was an act that must be condemned regardless of the cause, Prime Minister Blair said, missing the irony of the remark http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/news/blaironbombinginnocentcivil.htm Tracking The Elusive Truth http://www.rense.com/general14/evlusive.htm It reminds me... of the techniques the CIA-mind controllers used.if you induce massive emotional trauma into the human psyche that it makes it highly suggestible and mentally programmable. http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/news/americasnewwar.htm There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's mass media of news and entertainment. http://natall.com/who-rules-america/ McVeigh, Nichols 'did not act alone' OKC investigating committee concludes U.S. 'had prior knowledge of the bombing' http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22684 Washington's strategic target in Central Asia http://www.workers.org/ww/2001/caspian1004.php Missing the oil story http://www.tompaine.com/news/2001/10/11/index.html Red Cross says bomb destroyed food supplies http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia_china/story.jsp?story=99893 UN demands bombing halt to let aid reach starving Afghans http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia_china/story.jsp?story=99276 =
[CTRL] Fwd: Media accomplices to 9-11 deserve indictment
MEDIA ACCOMPLICES TO 9-11 CRIME DESERVE INDICTMENT How the American Media continues to aid and abet the crime of the 21st century. By Fritz Springmeier Isnt it a delight that our media works hand in glove with our government? No one is going to plug politically incorrect material into our minds. We will all be united on the same page of information, and marching off to war in unison. Of course, people in other countries are disappointed that we dont have a free press. They find it strange that we Americans spend hours shopping around for the best model car but we seldom shop for news information. After all, they point out, werent the roots of this nation founded on a free flow of information, and the chance for debate to sort out the facts? This article is meant to take you back to the roots of what made America the envy of the world. Our states big daily newspaper warns us in an article, During World War I, excited patriots went around kicking dachshunds, on the grounds that they were German dogs. What a blow for freedom that was. One would have hoped our fellow citizens would show just a modicum more sense. On the other hand, it is quite likely some of these stories arent true: Rumors are particularly apt to circulate in a climate of fear, particularly on the Internet. (bold added, quote Oregonian, 10/19/01, p. C13) In an earlier paper, our establishment newspaper warned us with the headline, Attacks give extremists new ammunition. The article states, The extreme right and the extreme left have some extreme similarities, including their hatred for federal and international governments, said Randy Blazak, a professor of sociology at Portland State University and an expert on U.S. hate groups. So its not surprising that extremes from both ends could see something positive from these attacks. The paper goes on to say, While publicly professing sympathy for the innocent victims of the tragedy, they privately revel in the attack [on the WTC]. (Oregonian, 9/23/01, A21, bold added) Perhaps you have noticed similar articles in your local large daily newspaper in your state. The message here is that the Internet is unreliable and that anti-government leftists and rightists are reveling, gloating, about the 9-11 tragedy. Did the newspaper interview grief stricken Christian patriots or grief stricken socialists to learn how happy they feel about 9-11? Did they photograph Patriots partying in celebration? No, rather than interview one single rightist or leftist, they went directly to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has contempt for anyone against the New World Order and anyone genuinely conservative. It would be hard to find anyone more hatefully biased against anti-government activists than the Southern Poverty Law Center to interview. This is not investigative reporting. It is propaganda. Its hard enough to figure out a persons feeling by directly asking the person. Are we really going to find out how Rudolf the Red Nose Reindeer feels by asking the primary scoffing deer? What is the proper way to investigate a crime? The best manuals for investigating a crime teach that one should not start with preconceived ideas, but rather that investigation, questions, and gathering of data are crucial for the investigator to come to an accurate assessment of what happened. During the first month following the 9-11 crimes, I saw many intelligent good questions come over the Internet about the crime. Dozens of Internet articles have asked important insightful questions to help us solve the crimes of the 9-11 tragedy, which the establishment newspapers and other media have ignored, and appear trying to cover up. In fact I know from some newsmen, that their bosses have given instructions to their writers not cover certain important facts and questions and lines of inquiry. How dare they hide things from you about the biggest crime (so far) of the 21st century? You have a right to know these things. If America was attacked, and America is still the target, then dont you have a right to know who attacked you, how they attacked and why? If Osama bin Laden attacked America (not our government, not a battleship, but the man in the street)you and I, then dont we the intended victims have a right to know what our would be killer wants to say to us? And lets get this fact straight, whether Osama bin Laden carried out the attack on the WTC or not, he had clearly declared war on all Americans. You as an American have been the target of kidnappings, assassinations, torture and other abuse for years as you traveled in foreign lands. There are people out there who view it as open season on any American. Ive traveled, I know. I have had the privilege to bump into strangers who hated me simply because I was an American. They didnt know my politics, they didnt know my religion or personality, and they didnt care. I wasnt the ugly American, I was the loathed American.
Re: [CTRL] long email lists...
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 10/24/01 6:32:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: just a note to help 'un-clutter' the list... people who are sending email information to an entire list, of which ctrl is only one recipient, should use the 'bcc' option where you put in all of your addresses instead of using the 'to' option... this will get rid of things like the following example... I don't get that in my email, but then I 'm just a dumb aol'r, But i will try that on my posts. . Om K A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] get ready for afghan war syndrome..
-Caveat Lector- ...and many Americans wear sandals, myself included -- does that make us subhuman in your estimation? Perhaps not subhuman but certainly abnormal - and definitely not to be trusted. fight the worldwide sandal conspiracy! you know, jesus wore sandals... I don't think He had indoor plumbing, esp. bathrooms, either. here's an interesting question - if jesus urinates on a fig tree, does the fig tree grow faster or wither away and die? inri np: http://chat.carleton.ca/~jparent2/ This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law. - tony blair's bin laden dossier A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Futility
-Caveat Lector- From http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1024-06.htm }}}Begin Thursday, October 25, 2001 Featured Views Share This Article With Your Friends Published on Wednesday, October 24, 2001 in the Toronto Star History Confirms War a Futile Business by Dalton Camp While our allied air forces continue the redistribution of the rubble in Kabul, the objectives and purposes of this new war become, like the dust rising from that battered city, more difficult to comprehend. Historically, there have been necessary wars and wars fought whether necessary or not. But it is a futile business, as history will confirm. According to one political scientist, who counted the wars of the great powers, from 1495 to 1975, one or another of them has been at war 75 per cent of the time. Astonishingly, one of the more peaceful centuries was the 20th, although it has been, thus far, the bloodiest, as a result of its two world wars. We have been, if you're counting, marching off to battle much of our time, and here we are, marching off again. There must be something to the view of man as a natural hunter and natural killer. Still, one would think that man would run out of wars to make or nations to invade or, that at some epiphanous time, nations would conspire to stop the killing, that war would become not the last resort but simply an unthinkable one. But here we find ourselves at war again, against half the world in general and no one in particular, pulverizing ruins and inflicting collateral damage - a euphemism for killing - on people we know nothing of, in a land we have nothing against, hope never to see, in a cause so rhetorical and clothed so much in hyperbole as to be unattainable. I have been reading of late about the Allied bombing of the German city of Hamburg, in World War II, during July, 1944. At that time we (the Allies) had achieved air superiority. We had also developed superior aircraft and bigger bombs, as well as a means of deceiving the enemy's radar defenses. On July 25, nearly 800 bombers attacked Hamburg, a nearly helpless city, dropping their loads of 400- and 800- and 1,000-pound bombs and incendiaries. The city was soon ablaze, and without water to fight the fires; in this cauldron, the temperatures would exceed 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. In one week, the number of killed was put at 50,000 - just 1,000 short of those British civilians killed by German attacks in the first four years of the war. Of course, we won the war against infinitely greater and more menacing evil than that of terrorism. But more to the point, subsequent study by professional appraisers has concluded not even all the slaughter of civilians, not the collateral damage wrecked upon Hamburg, Dresden, Essen and the rest made any significant difference either to the result or the war's duration. It did, however, make a difference to those killed in the exercise, including those of our own. War is an exercise in excess. We emerge from battle choking on the blood of innocents. Self-deception is always helpful to those of delicate sensibility. Hence, we do try to limit collateral damage and ima gine ourselves fighting for democracy, justice and - heaven help us - peace. Should one be a refuge e, a bombed-out peasant or a child crippled by a mine, a just war is a true oxymoron, at least for those accompanied by a translator. I have come to be wary of Pentagon briefers. These films of direct hits on arbitrarily defined objectives remind one of the underlying irony of this new war. Bombing has become a kin d of elliptical express ion of military frustration. When in doubt, bomb. It is to politics what paving used to be to polic y. What is new about this new war, at ground level where all wars are finally settled, is that th e terrorists in our mid st - or in their caves - have found the equalizer to war as an exercise in technology. Terror is an extension of war by other means, including stealth, deception and disguise. It is not new that it is a war waged upon inn ocents; the graveyards of Europe are crowded with those who perished in their kitchens, in their sl eep, in their unknowing. What is new is that the oceans no longer protect us from the risks and per ils of war because the new enemy has new weapons of an original design and unfamiliar ruthlessness. Still, when it is fina lly over, when the struggle is exhausted, when we achieve another peace between another war, we can band together in reuni on and, in common folly and arrogance, be reborn in our usual ways, boasting of our superior means and inexhaustible bounty and, while the world will not be the same, can never be so, we will hardly know the difference. We should not, then, excessively fret over our present condition but view it, as much as we can, as a passing inconvenience. After all, were it a truly serious crisis, we would not, in our considerable genius, be acting like fools and behaving with such compulsive, ruinous mindlessness. The most
[CTRL] JW on Anthrax
-Caveat Lector- From http://www.judicialwatch.org/press_release.asp?pr_id=1699 }}}Begin Return to JW Home FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 10/24/2001 Press Office 202-646-5172 THE GOVERNMENT IS LYING ABOUT THE FULL EXTENT AND SOURCE OF ANTHRAX ATTACKS Evidence Mounts That White House and Federal Agencies Are Covering Up Key Information Political Elites Are Treated Differently Than Ordinary American Citizens (Washington, D.C.) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, has concluded, based on the below evidence, that the government is lying to the American people about the severity of the anthrax crisis. First, the Associated Press reported yesterday that, (a)t least some White House personnel were given Cipro six weeks ago. White House officials wont discuss who might be receiving the anthrax-treating antibiotic now. On the night of the September 11 attacks, the White House Medical Office dispensed Cipro to staff accompanying Vice President Dick Cheney as he was secreted off to the safety of Camp David, and told them it was a precaution, according to one person directly involved. This shows that The White House knew of the anthrax attacks much sooner than admitted. See White House Mail Machine Has Anthrax, Associated Press, October 23, 2001. Second, when asked yesterday if he had been tested for anthrax, President George W. Bush refused to answer on two occasions. Id. This buttresses the conclusion that The White House has known of the full extent of the pro blem for some time, but will not discuss it with the American people. In addition, the President should be honest and admit that widespread testing for anthrax exposure particularly in the D.C. area is necessary, part icularly given the deaths of postal workers. Had they been tested, and received Cipro like the President and members of Congress, perhaps they would now be alive. While Mr. Bushs evasiveness may be aimed at avoiding a run on medical clinics, American citizens deserve to know the full truth; that even the President of the United States has concerns about being infected with the deadly virus. Third, today it was reported in The Washington Post that the federal D.C. main post office at Brentwood has discontinued mail delivery to various residential area codes in the nations capitol. In addition, it was report ed that 14 of 29 mail sorting areas at Brentwood were quarantined for high exposure to anthrax. See Neely Tucker and Avram Goldstein, Anthrax Threat Takes A Wider Scope, New Cases Emerge: Some Mail Halted, The Washin gton Post, October 24, 2001. Citizens have asked whether ordinary letters delivered to their residences could be contaminated, and the government has said no. However, it is now obvious that the shutdown of mail deliverie s to various residential area codes was put into effect because the mail sorting equipment for these area codes is contaminated with anthrax. Yet, the government has failed again to make full disclosure. It is also obvious that the federal D.C. main post office at Brentwood must be flooded with anthrax-contaminated mail; otherwise why would over one-half of its facility be shut down, and how else could one explain the w idespread contamination that has occurred and the number of buildings and persons who have tested positive for anthrax. Fourth, nearly all federal agencies in D.C. have shut down their mail deliveries from Brentwood and other area post offices. This cements the fact that the mail is thoroughly contaminated with anthrax, based not on a few letters from terrorists, but a deluge of them. Finally, the government has claimed, until today, that the anthrax-laced letters are not necessarily from foreign Islamic terrorists. However, three letters released yesterday and published in newspapers today, show that they all contain references to killing Americans and Jews and end with the salutation Allah Is Great. Why would domestic terrorists write this? Obviously, the administration is seeking to justify not taking immediate military action against Iraq, who most suspect has supplied biological weapons to Bin Laden. (Indeed, the ringleader of the September 11 attacks, Mohamed Atta, also met with Iraqs agents at least twice in Prague, Czecho slovakia. See, Deborah Orin, U.S. Czechs Out Attas Trip, The New York Post, nypost.com, October 23, 2001. The Arabic members of the Administrations coalition Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia and others have all made it clear they will not support military action against Iraq. Judicial Watch is filing a host of document requests with the federal government to pry out the full truth from the administration, before more people die because of misinformation about the full extent of the anthrax cr isis. If cooperation is not forthcoming, lawsuits will be filed. It is a scandal in the making that The White House and Congress, which
[CTRL] Coisses!!! Foiled Again !!!
-Caveat Lector- From http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2001350024-2001371211,00.html }}}Begin THURSDAY OCTOBER 25 2001 Business-class suspect caught in container BY RICHARD OWEN IN ROME AND DANIEL MCGRORY ITALIAN police were investigating last night why a suspected al-Qaeda hijacker would smuggle himself halfway around the world locked inside a shipping container with its own bed and toilet. The bizarre discovery of an Egyptian carrying a Canadian passport was made on the dockside in Gioia Tauro in southern Italy, where detectives believe they may have foiled another hijacking. They were questioning Rizik Amid Farid, 43, about his choice of travel and why he was carrying airport maps and airside security passes for Canada, Thailand and Egypt. Unlike most stowaways they find, Mr Farid was smartly dressed, clean- shaven and rested as he stepped from his makeshift home. He was, his captors said, stunned to be found with a laptop computer, two mobile phones, cameras, a Canadian passport, other identity documents and a certificate saying he is an aircraft mechanic. Mr Farid was found last week but it was only yesterday that police admitted their curious discovery. Roberto Di Palma, a prosecutor, said: He was in possession of documents and apparatus that no ordinary illegal immigrant would have been able to afford. The average illegal immigrant does not have high-tech equipment and airport security passes. The FBI has been alerted to the discovery of Mr Farid. Like the 19 hijackers that al-Qaeda used on September 11, Mr Farids name is not on Interpols wanted list. The successful capture of this suspected hijacker is timely for the Italians after the admission that they had allowed nine Islamic militants to abscond from bail after a legal bungle. Police said Mr Farid was finding it difficult to explain why he was carrying a return airline ticket from Montreal to Egypt, via Rome. Investigators said that could be an insurance policy enabling him to reach Canada by air in case he was discovered on the ship but managed to escape. The priority now, police said, was to authenticate his identity and discover why he was heading for Canada. Had he not been found during a security check, Mr Farid would have faced another three weeks at sea to reach Toro nto. Mr Farid was discovered during a technical inspection of a ship from Port Said that had docked at the container port of Gioia Tauro. The container in which Mr Farid had been hidden was very tidy and well appointed, investigators said. It was furnished with supplies for a long journey and had a bucket which he used as a toilet. Magistrates said they were considering a charge of links with international terrorism, a new offence introduced last week as part of an emergency anti-terrorism package passed by Parliament after the attacks of Septembe r 11. Il Messaggero, the Rome daily, said it was a reasonable inference that his intention had been to gain admittance to an airport in Canada and perhaps commandeer an aircraft with the help of accomplices and fly it over the border to the United States. Michele Filippo Italiano, Mr Farids lawyer, denied that. He said Mr Farid lived in Montreal and had Canadian citizenship. He had fallen out with his brother-in-law in Cairo and feared he would be prevented from leaving Egypt, he said. Copyright 2001 Times Newspapers Ltd. End{{{ ~~~ Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it. The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller, German Writer (1759-1805) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that prevents us from living freely and
[CTRL] Bunglio Judiciano
-Caveat Lector- From http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,3117066,00.html }}}Begin Bungle frees al-Qa'ida suspects By Il Giornale, Italian newspaper and Richard Owen, Rome 25oct01 A JUDICIAL bungle has allowed nine suspects linked to the al-Qa'ida group to go on the run in Italy, where police fear they are plotting further terrorist attacks. The nine who absconded were among 14 Algerians who had been scheduled to stand trial in Milan this week. They had been given bail because prosecutors failed to translate legal documents into Arabic correctly. FBI chiefs, who have been sharing intelligence with European forces on al-Qa'ida's international links, were said yesterday to be astounded at the mistake, seen as the biggest security lapse in the crackdown on Osama bin Laden. Some of those on the run are believed to have been plotting bomb and chemical attacks in Europe. Their disappearance has jeopardised the efforts of those in Britain, Germany and Spain who were investigating the plans. Tapped telephone conversations show that al-Qa'ida agents in Italy were planning a crude chemical attack using a poison gas hidden in tomato cans. Bin Laden agents in Italy were also in contact with his followers in Britain. One suspect who made regular trips to Italy Lased bin Heni, a 31-year-old Libyan is said to have spoken directly to bin Laden about terrori st plans for cities in Europe. The nine Algerians were regular visitors to a mosque in Milan, which US authorities have identified as a centre for bin Laden's operations in Europe. All a police spokesman knew about the missing men was that they have gone to ground and could be anywhere planning attacks. Leading Italian jurists, opposition MPs and newspapers condemned the bungle over the Algerians, which they said had made the country a laughing stock and a liability among its allies. Two of the suspects are accused of involvement in the murder of two policemen in Paris. Ambrogio Moccia, the presiding judge, said there had been serious defects in the official notification of three of the defendants, and under Italian law he had no choice but to let all the suspects go. This was an occasion for Italy to look the fear of terrorism in the face and examine at close quarters the malaise of our time, said Il Giornale, the Milan newspaper. Instead, we are witnessing an Italian fiasco. The world may have changed after September 11 but evidently the Italian judicial system has not. The Times privacy policy © 2001 The Australian End{{{ ~~~ Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it. The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller, German Writer (1759-1805) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Universal Declaration of Human Rights + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut. --- Ernest Hemingway A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being
[CTRL] Afghan Tribal Dances: Dos y Deux
-Caveat Lector- From www.wsws.org WSWS : News Analysis : The US War in Afghanistan The Taliban, the US and the resources of Central Asia Part 2 By Peter Symonds 25 October 2001 Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author The following is the second article in a two-part series on the history of the Taliban movement in Afghanistan. The first part was published yesterday. Like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the US has repeatedly denied any support for the Taliban. Given the close involvement of the CIA with Pakistan and the ISI throughout the 1980s, however, it is highly implausible that Washington did not know of, and give tacit approval to, the Bhutto governments plans for the Taliban. Pakistans support for the Taliban was an open secret, yet it was only in the late 1990s that the US began to put pressure on Islamabad over its relations with the regime. Further indirect evidence of US-Taliban relations comes from the efforts of US Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, a member of the House Foreign Relations Committee, to obtain access to official US documents related to Afghanistan since the Talibans formation. Rohrabacher, a supporter of the Afghani king, certainly had an axe to grind with the Clinton administration. But the response to his demands was significant. After two years of pressure, the State Department finally handed over nearly one thousand documents covering the period after 1996, but has stubbornly refused to release any dealing with the crucial earlier period. While exact details of early US contacts with the Taliban or its Pakistani handlers are unavailable, Washingtons attitude was clear. Author Ahmed Rashid comments: The Clinton administration was clearly sympathetic to the Taliban, as they were in line with Washingtons anti-Iran policy and were important for the success of any southern pipeline from Central Asia that would avoid Iran. The US Congress had authorised a covert $20 million budget for the CIA to destabilise Iran, and Tehran had accused Washington of funnelling some of these funds to the Talibana charge that was always denied by Washington [Taliban: Islam, Oil and the New Great Game in Central Asia, p. 46]. In fact, the period from 1994 to 1997 coincided with a flurry of US diplomatic activity, aimed at securing support for the Unocal pipeline. In March 1996, prominent US senator Hank Brown, a supporter of the Unocal project, visited Kabul and other Afghan cities. He met with the Taliban and invited them to send delegates to a Unocal- funded conference on Afghanistan in the US. In the same month, the US also exerted pressure on the Pakistani government to ditch its arrangements with Bridas and back the American company. The following month, US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Robin Raphel visited Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia, urging a political solution to the continuing conflict. We are also concerned that economic opportunities here will be missed, if political stability cannot be restored, she told the media. Raphel did not hold talks with the Taliban leaders or offer any other indication of official support. But neither was the US stridently criticising the Taliban on womens rights, drugs and terrorism, which were to form the basis of its ultimatums to the regime in the late 1990s. On all three issues, there was an abundance of evidence, unless one chose to deliberately ignore it. * Ever since the seizure of Kandahar it was obvious that the Taliban would not countenance even the most basic democratic rights. Girls were banned from schools and women from workingmeasures which created enormous hardships. A strict, even absurd, dress code was imposed on men and women and virtually all forms of entertainment, from video and TV to kite flying, were banned. A religious police enforced the social code, meting out arbitrary justice on the street to offenders. Public executions were carried out for a wide range of crimes including adultery and homosexuality. The purpose of the entire system of repression was to terrorise people into accepting the Talibans theocratic dictatorship in which no one had any say except the Talibans mullahs. Even their decisions were subject to veto by Mullah Omar in Kandahar. * In the case of the huge Afghani heroin industry, the US played a major role in its expansion. Throughout the 1980s, the Mujaheddin groups and their Pakistani handlers exploited the covert supply lines, set up with CIA assistance to get arms into Afghanistan, in order to smuggle large quantities of opium out of the country. The CIA ignored the drug trade in the interests of prosecuting the war against the Soviet army. By the early 1990s, Afghanistan rivalled Burma as the worlds largest producer of opium. The US took much the same attitude to the Taliban, which initially pledged to outlaw opium cultivation but quickly reversed its decision after realising that there were few alternative sources of income in Afghanistans ruined