Re: Help Installing Debian

2011-05-22 Thread Arno Schuring
Klistvud (klist...@gmail.com on 2011-05-21 10:04 +0200):
> Dne, 21. 05. 2011 09:40:02 je Camaleón napisal(a):
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > I have not much experience with GPT partitioning but nowadays with
> > moderns distributions it should not be a problem :-?
> 
> Don't know about LVM/RAID setups, but plain old one-disk setups need
> a (tiny) dedicated boot partition if you want GRUB-PC installed.
> There's no place for its boot code in GPT (as it was in the MS-DOS
> partition table).
Exactly. If you want to boot from a GPT-based disk with grub2 (and you
have a BIOS-based system), you need to create a partition for it. The
type is "BIOS Boot Partition" (gdisk type ef02, don't know how other
partitioning software handles it), and it can be as small as 64kB. I
usually use a partition size of 256kB just to be sure.

For a laugh, check out the GUID for the BBP on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIOS_Boot_partition :)


HTH,
Arno


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110522202227.046a3...@neminis.loos.site



Re: Help Installing Debian

2011-05-21 Thread Klistvud

Dne, 21. 05. 2011 09:40:02 je Camaleón napisal(a):

[snip]


I have not much experience with GPT partitioning but nowadays with
moderns distributions it should not be a problem :-?


Don't know about LVM/RAID setups, but plain old one-disk setups need a  
(tiny) dedicated boot partition if you want GRUB-PC installed. There's  
no place for its boot code in GPT (as it was in the MS-DOS partition  
table).


[pins]

--
Cheerio,

Klistvud  
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com
Certifiable Loonix User #481801  Please reply to the list, not to  
me.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1305965054.4298.1@compax



Re: Help Installing Debian

2011-05-21 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:35:42 +0530, Joy wrote:

>  I am using IBM System X 3400 M3 with Raid1 and Raid5.
> Raid1 id being used to have Debian and raid5 for /home partiotion.

Are those raid over a hardware raid controller or you want to create a 
software based raid?

> Whenever i am trying to install it after creating a partition when it
> goes to format reboots my system. 

You can try to install Debian with the partitions already made and 
formatted, using the Gparted LiveCD.

> I have also tried lenny 5.8 which is not detecting my disk at all
> neither showing anything missing. 

Better than lenny is squeeze, now the current stable. If lenny was not 
detecting your hard disks that can mean that:

1/ Your hard disk controller is very new and the kernel shipped with 
lenny did not included the drivers for it.

2/ Your hard disk setup is not recognized by the installer (for instance, 
if you are using the BIOS sata raid facility and so you need to use 
"dmraid", which I do not recommend at all).

> I have tried RHEL 5.4 which says can not create boot partition because
> og GPT partitioning scheme. I could  only manage to install RHEL 6
> successfully.

I have not much experience with GPT partitioning but nowadays with 
moderns distributions it should not be a problem :-?

Debian installer logs messages to console tty4, maybe you can jump into 
it at the partitioning stage to have more information about the error.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.05.21.07.40...@gmail.com



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )

2001-09-16 Thread Paul Mackinney
Here's what I do, got it from some dual-boot HOWTO or something:

1. The Win2000 system is set up and installed, all OK.
2. Lilo is set up as follows:
  boot=/dev/hda5  # instead or boot=/dev/hda
This is the option to install to the partition instead of the MBR.
3. After running lilo, I run the command
  dd bs=512 if=/dev/hda5 of= bootsect.lnx count=1
This copies the first 512 bytes of /dev/hda5 to the file bootsect.lnx.
4. Copy the file bootsect.lnx into the root of your Win2000 system.
5. Edit your Windows boot.ini file by adding the line:
  C:\bootsect.lnx="Debian Linux"
6. Now you're good to go. Each time you boot, the Windows boot menu will
list Debian Linux as an option. On my system it's the default.

The downside to this method is that you have to recreate the 
bootsect.lnx file every time you you run lilo, but I don't do that too
often.

HTH, Paul

-- 
Paul Mackinney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <- Please note new email address



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )

2001-09-12 Thread Joe Bouchard
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 05:20:57PM -0600, LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:
> I would do that, but there is one main problem that i can't remember if i
> mentioned way back in the beginning...I have my three hard drives on a
> Promise UDMA66 card...and my DVD and CD burner are on the motherboard.
> So...maybe that's the problem my BIOS is having.  It could be conflicting
> with my Promise card's BIOS and not knowing which drive to boot up, so the
> BIOS overrides anything else.  I might be stuck with trying GRUB...but not
> much is going on there either...I made a GRUB boot disk...and when it boots,
> it doesn't give me a menu or anything...just says "GRUB >".  I'll get Linux
> on this machine one way or another.  Just don't know the best way to go
> about doing it.  I have a backup of Win2000, and the rest of the drive, so
> that isn't a problem(not that I know of).  Anyone out there have a Promise
> card, and had Windows2000 installed first, then tried to install Debian?  If
> you did, please let me know how the heck you got it installed.  The help
> would be GREATLY appreciated!!! :))  I'm not giving up...

A few years ago, when I was first learning linux, there was a rule that
a pc operating system MUST boot off one of the first 2 IDE drives.  I
believe that wasn't a LILO thing so much as in IA (Intel Architecture)
thing.  Of course at that time, we had a 512 Mb booting rule too . . .

Maybe the above doesn't apply any more, but it might.

-- 

Thank you,
Joe Bouchard

Powered by Debian GNU/Linux



RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )

2001-09-05 Thread LaGuardia, Kristofer S.
Title: RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )





I would do that, but there is one main problem that i can't remember if i mentioned way back in the beginning...I have my three hard drives on a Promise UDMA66 card...and my DVD and CD burner are on the motherboard.  So...maybe that's the problem my BIOS is having.  It could be conflicting with my Promise card's BIOS and not knowing which drive to boot up, so the BIOS overrides anything else.  I might be stuck with trying GRUB...but not much is going on there either...I made a GRUB boot disk...and when it boots, it doesn't give me a menu or anything...just says "GRUB >".  I'll get Linux on this machine one way or another.  Just don't know the best way to go about doing it.  I have a backup of Win2000, and the rest of the drive, so that isn't a problem(not that I know of).  Anyone out there have a Promise card, and had Windows2000 installed first, then tried to install Debian?  If you did, please let me know how the heck you got it installed.  The help would be GREATLY appreciated!!! :))  I'm not giving up...

> -Original Message-
> From: csj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: LaGuardia, Kristofer S.
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain
> misfire )
> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:32:13 -0600 
> "LaGuardia, Kristofer S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Believe me, I don't want to give up on Debian.  I would 
> really really
> like
> > to get it up and running.  My biggest problem is Win2000 is 
> installed
> on the
> > C drive, or first drive, and Debian is installed on the D drive.  I
> would
> > like to stay with LILO if possible.  I'm about to break down and
> install it
> > onto the same drive as Win2000.  I'll just make another partition on
> it...I
> > have 20 gigs free on it so I don't have a problem with installing
> something
> > else on it.  Then some of the tutorials and the installation might
> make
> > sense.
> 
> If you're that desperate, I suggest just going to the bios and
> temporarily tagging drive C as "uninstalled." That way it won't boot
> even if you can't get LILO to dual boot. Just install your 
> bootloader on
> drive D (hdb), and forget that drive C exists. I once did that in my
> dark Window$ days so I can get two different Window$ installations to
> live in peace and harmony. Now if you want Bill back, just go to the
> bios and do the reverse, tag D as "uninstalled" and C as "installed."
> 





Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )

2001-09-05 Thread csj
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:32:13 -0600 
"LaGuardia, Kristofer S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Believe me, I don't want to give up on Debian.  I would really really
like
> to get it up and running.  My biggest problem is Win2000 is installed
on the
> C drive, or first drive, and Debian is installed on the D drive.  I
would
> like to stay with LILO if possible.  I'm about to break down and
install it
> onto the same drive as Win2000.  I'll just make another partition on
it...I
> have 20 gigs free on it so I don't have a problem with installing
something
> else on it.  Then some of the tutorials and the installation might
make
> sense.

If you're that desperate, I suggest just going to the bios and
temporarily tagging drive C as "uninstalled." That way it won't boot
even if you can't get LILO to dual boot. Just install your bootloader on
drive D (hdb), and forget that drive C exists. I once did that in my
dark Window$ days so I can get two different Window$ installations to
live in peace and harmony. Now if you want Bill back, just go to the
bios and do the reverse, tag D as "uninstalled" and C as "installed."



RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3

2001-09-05 Thread LaGuardia, Kristofer S.
Title: RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3





How did you do it?  Also, do you have Win2000 on your first drive and then Debian on your second drive?


> -Original Message-
> From: Rino Mardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 6:16 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:16:46PM +1000 or thereabouts, 
> Matthew Dalton wrote:
> > Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > 
> > > No worries here... Using seperate physical drives makes things
> > > much easier. This will actually be a LILO 'issue', but it can
> > > handle it just fine. One thing: Install Lilo to your 'first'
> > > (/dev/hdaX) hard disk's MBR.
> > 
> > Don't install LILO to the MBR! If Windows 2000 is anything 
> like NT (it
> > is supposed to be NT 5, after all), you will need to setup 
> Linux to boot
> > from the Windows 2000 bootloader.
> > 
> > If you install LILO to the MBR, you will likely render your 
> Windows 2000
> > installation unbootable.
> > 
> <...snipped...>
> i object! always wanted to say that. :-)
> 
> i have win2k, linux, freebsd on my box and i use lilo to boot each OS.
> 
> letting the win2k bootloader to boot your linux partition 
> will only make it
> hard for you should you choose to recompile your kernel.
> 





Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-05 Thread Rino Mardo
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:16:46PM +1000 or thereabouts, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> Hall Stevenson wrote:
> 
> > No worries here... Using seperate physical drives makes things
> > much easier. This will actually be a LILO 'issue', but it can
> > handle it just fine. One thing: Install Lilo to your 'first'
> > (/dev/hdaX) hard disk's MBR.
> 
> Don't install LILO to the MBR! If Windows 2000 is anything like NT (it
> is supposed to be NT 5, after all), you will need to setup Linux to boot
> from the Windows 2000 bootloader.
> 
> If you install LILO to the MBR, you will likely render your Windows 2000
> installation unbootable.
> 
<...snipped...>
i object! always wanted to say that. :-)

i have win2k, linux, freebsd on my box and i use lilo to boot each OS.

letting the win2k bootloader to boot your linux partition will only make it
hard for you should you choose to recompile your kernel.


pgpFGIVTXZyO6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )

2001-09-05 Thread dman
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:32:13AM -0600, LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:
| Believe me, I don't want to give up on Debian.  I would really really like
| to get it up and running.  My biggest problem is Win2000 is installed on the
| C drive, or first drive, and Debian is installed on the D drive.  I would
| like to stay with LILO if possible.  I'm about to break down and install it
| onto the same drive as Win2000.  I'll just make another partition on it...I
| have 20 gigs free on it so I don't have a problem with installing something
| else on it.  Then some of the tutorials and the installation might make
| sense.

Go with GRUB!  It works beautifully.  There is a Dell machine at work
that has win2k on the beginning of the (big) hard drive and RH on the
end.  LILO (that came with RH6.2 anyways) had trouble booting Linux
because it was too far into the disk, and I couldn't get it to boot
win2k at all.  Then I tried grub and had no trouble with either OS.

In addition, my home PC had win98 on the first hard disk (ide bus 0)
and Debian on the second hard disk (ide bus 1).  LILO couldn't boot
linux because my BIOS was too crappy to boot from the second disk (it
was a compaq machine).  After my good experience with grub at work I
tried it at home and it had no trouble dual-booting!

IMO grub is much easier to configure and use than lilo too.

http://www.gnu.org/software/grub

HTH,
-D




RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )

2001-09-05 Thread LaGuardia, Kristofer S.
Title: RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire)





Believe me, I don't want to give up on Debian.  I would really really like to get it up and running.  My biggest problem is Win2000 is installed on the C drive, or first drive, and Debian is installed on the D drive.  I would like to stay with LILO if possible.  I'm about to break down and install it onto the same drive as Win2000.  I'll just make another partition on it...I have 20 gigs free on it so I don't have a problem with installing something else on it.  Then some of the tutorials and the installation might make sense.

> -Original Message-
> From: Timeboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:46 AM
> To: LaGuardia, Kristofer S.
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain
> misfire)
> 
> 
> On 2001.09.05 15:39 "LaGuardia, Kristofer S." wrote:
> > Okay, I didn't install LILO to the MBR.  I did install it 
> to the boot
> > partition.  However, nothing came up at boot time.  Oh 
> well, i will try
> > again tonight...maybe I'm just missing something.  Where 
> would I find cd
> > images of "Woody"?  I am willing to give it a whirl.  If I 
> can't find the
> > images I might have to go back to Mandrake...shudder...
> 
> Hey!
> 
> Don't give up. Debian is a little bit harder to use for newbies, then
> Mandrake or somthimg like else. But the best Linux i ever used.
> 
> How i remember you have your Windows on a FAT32 partition? You can put
> LILO into your MBR. And if you take my suggestion (Linux on the first
> HD), there are no problems if you install LILO into MBR of this Linux
> drive.
> 
> I don't know whether there is a CD image for Woody. But do you have a
> CD set from Potato? Then install first Potato. Best only the base
> packages and that was is needed to get an connection to the internet.
> Using the tool dselect is very good to get an easy upgrade to Woody.
> And then you can install the other packages are needed of you.
> 
> There is nothing while booting your new Debian Linux? Do you remember
> my words that the BIOS only can boot from you first hard disk? If
> Debian is on another disk you have to set your other disks to "none"
> in your BIOS. Then you should be able to boot from your Linux drive.
> After you have configured your LILO correct, you can put your other 
> drives again into the BIOS.
> 
> Timo
> 





Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire)

2001-09-05 Thread Timeboy
On 2001.09.05 15:39 "LaGuardia, Kristofer S." wrote:
> Okay, I didn't install LILO to the MBR.  I did install it to the boot
> partition.  However, nothing came up at boot time.  Oh well, i will try
> again tonight...maybe I'm just missing something.  Where would I find cd
> images of "Woody"?  I am willing to give it a whirl.  If I can't find the
> images I might have to go back to Mandrake...shudder...

Hey!

Don't give up. Debian is a little bit harder to use for newbies, then
Mandrake or somthimg like else. But the best Linux i ever used.

How i remember you have your Windows on a FAT32 partition? You can put
LILO into your MBR. And if you take my suggestion (Linux on the first
HD), there are no problems if you install LILO into MBR of this Linux
drive.

I don't know whether there is a CD image for Woody. But do you have a
CD set from Potato? Then install first Potato. Best only the base
packages and that was is needed to get an connection to the internet.
Using the tool dselect is very good to get an easy upgrade to Woody.
And then you can install the other packages are needed of you.

There is nothing while booting your new Debian Linux? Do you remember
my words that the BIOS only can boot from you first hard disk? If
Debian is on another disk you have to set your other disks to "none"
in your BIOS. Then you should be able to boot from your Linux drive.
After you have configured your LILO correct, you can put your other 
drives again into the BIOS.

Timo



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire)

2001-09-05 Thread dman
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:39:17AM -0600, LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:
| Okay, I didn't install LILO to the MBR.  I did install it to the boot
| partition.  However, nothing came up at boot time.  Oh well, i will try
| again tonight...maybe I'm just missing something.  Where would I find cd
| images of "Woody"?  I am willing to give it a whirl.  If I can't find the
| images I might have to go back to Mandrake...shudder...

Grab ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-0.90-i386-pc.ext2fs and dump it
to a floppy disk.  Then you can boot with it.  If you like grub then I
can provide you with more details on configuring and installing it.
When booting grub provides you with a preconfigured menu (that is, you
configure it by ediing a file, this floppy image comes with a sample
config) and a command line so that you can try out various options and
see what works.  If you installed Linux on /dev/hda1 then you want to
have (hd0,0) as your root partition in grub's config.

You can dump the image to a floppy using

dd if=grub-0.90-i386-pc.ext2fs of=/dev/fd0

or you can use rawwritewin if you have a windows system (it's much
better now since it has a gui).

HTH,
-D



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-05 Thread Sam Varghese
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:16:46PM +1000, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> Hall Stevenson wrote:
> 
> > No worries here... Using seperate physical drives makes things
> > much easier. This will actually be a LILO 'issue', but it can
> > handle it just fine. One thing: Install Lilo to your 'first'
> > (/dev/hdaX) hard disk's MBR.
> 
> Don't install LILO to the MBR! If Windows 2000 is anything like NT (it
> is supposed to be NT 5, after all), you will need to setup Linux to boot
> from the Windows 2000 bootloader.
> 
> If you install LILO to the MBR, you will likely render your Windows 2000
> installation unbootable.

It depends on what kind of filesystem you have chosen for your
Win2K installation. If it is NTFS, then you can use lilo to
call the Win2K bootloader; Linux can be booted through lilo
as usual. If you have used FAT32, then you can use lilo
as you would for earlier avatars of Windoze.

Sam
-- 
(Sam Varghese)
http://www.gnubies.com



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-05 Thread Dmitriy
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:16:46PM +1000, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> Hall Stevenson wrote:
> 
> > No worries here... Using seperate physical drives makes things
> > much easier. This will actually be a LILO 'issue', but it can
> > handle it just fine. One thing: Install Lilo to your 'first'
> > (/dev/hdaX) hard disk's MBR.
> 
> Don't install LILO to the MBR! If Windows 2000 is anything like NT (it
> is supposed to be NT 5, after all), you will need to setup Linux to boot
> from the Windows 2000 bootloader.
> 
> If you install LILO to the MBR, you will likely render your Windows 2000
> installation unbootable.
> 
> This howto tells you what to do for a Windows NT/Linux dual boot
> machine. Read it and see if it can apply to Windows 2000 as well.
> 
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Linux+NT-Loader.html
> 
I really don't know about LILO with this,
but I have GRUB in my MBR, and it is able to load W2K using 
chainloader  +1 , but I am not sure if LILO will be able to load it.



> 
> Matthew
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
GPG key-id: 1024D/5BE3DCFD Dmitriy
CCAB 5F17 A099 9E43 1DBE  295C 9A21 2F1C 5BE3 DCFD

Free Dmitry Sklyarov!  http://www.freesklyarov.org


pgpYToZ26c0N0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-05 Thread Matthew Dalton
Hall Stevenson wrote:

> No worries here... Using seperate physical drives makes things
> much easier. This will actually be a LILO 'issue', but it can
> handle it just fine. One thing: Install Lilo to your 'first'
> (/dev/hdaX) hard disk's MBR.

Don't install LILO to the MBR! If Windows 2000 is anything like NT (it
is supposed to be NT 5, after all), you will need to setup Linux to boot
from the Windows 2000 bootloader.

If you install LILO to the MBR, you will likely render your Windows 2000
installation unbootable.

This howto tells you what to do for a Windows NT/Linux dual boot
machine. Read it and see if it can apply to Windows 2000 as well.

http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Linux+NT-Loader.html


Matthew



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-04 Thread Timeboy
On 2001.09.04 21:39 Timeboy wrote:
> On 2001.09.04 11:51 "LaGuardia, Kristofer S." wrote:
> 
> > Quick question, if I
> > want to create a partition for /usr, how would I specify the partition is
> > for /usr?  Is it a type?  Anyhow...
> 
> Hope i understand this question! What do you mean with specify a
> partition? Ok. I think you like to know wheter there is a different
> between a root and a /usr partition. The answer is no.
> 
> Only the swap partition is a special one. All others are ext2
> partitions. This is the standart, like fat32 in windows. You can
> have a lot of ext2 partitions on your Linux system. For best HD
> performance you should have only the root ( / ) partition.
> 
> I don't know why it shold be good to have a seperate /usr partition
> I only have some extra pertitions for software, that has nothing to
> do with the Debian system like audio files and sources and other stuff, 
> that i have to save on my HD for a little time. And i have a /home 
> partition, cause i also here save a lot of own software like HTML 
> sites for the web.
> 
> All this partitions you can initialize while installing Debian after
> the part for partiton a HD. 
>  
> > I then get all the way to the step when it asks me to mount the swap, so I
> > select the partition for swap...then the same for Linux...no problem.  I had
> > set both as primary, but the non-swap partition as boot.  is that correct?
> 
> No! If you like to have only one ext2 partition, you have to set this
> to / partition. This is the highest level of the Linux directory tree.
> On this partition you can mount the /boot partition if nessessary. But
> on the /boot partitin you can't install the Debian system that needs
> the / partition as highest place. Both partitions as primary is ok.
> Linux makes no differents between primary and extended. You can use
> both possibilities.
> 
> > Or should Linux type be primary and the swap type to be logical?
> 
> Do it how you like!!
> 
> > Then it
> > asks me if I want to install LILO to MBR or to the partition, right?  So I
> > choose to the partition...then it asks me if I want to boot into Linux when
> > I start the computer, and I say yes.  is this all correct for a dual boot?
> 
> No!
> 
> First: For a dual boot you need to install LILO in the MBR of your first
> hard disk. If you have your windows allready installed on your first HD,
> you should change your disks if possible.
> 
> If your Windows goes to slave, you will have no big problems with 
> installing LILO into MBR of your master hard disk cause it's a Linux
> HD now.
> 
> If you then boot your Debian at first time, you will only have access
> to your first hard disk. But this you can do, to be able to boot both
> systems:
> 
> edit your /etc/lilo.conf. You can use the editor vi. Install vi if
> not installed and type as root:
> 
> vi /etc/lilo.conf
> 
> To insert text into this file you need to type the i. Only after this
> you can put new text into this lilo.conf file. If all is donne use
> Escape to leave the insert modus. And with  :wq  you will write your
> changes to hd and exit of vi.
> 
> This is my /etc/lilo.conf, written for Linux on first and Windows on
> second drive:
> 
> lba32
> boot=/dev/hda
> install=/boot/boot.b
> map=/boot/map
> # password=tatercounter2000
> # message=/boot/bootmess.txt
> prompt
> timeout=100
> vga=0x133 <---for biger letters in console you should set: vga=normal
> default=Linux
> 
> image=/boot/vmlinuz
>   root=/dev/hda1
>   label=Linux
>   read-only
> 
> other=/dev/hdb1
>   table=/dev/hdb
>   label=win
>   map-drive=0x80   <---This and the following lines will change your
>   to=0x81  drive addresses for the BIOS, which can normally
>   map-drive=0x81   only boot from first drive.
>   to=0x80
> 
> After you have modified your /etc/lilo.conf you have to type on console:
> 
> lilo
> 
> This will write your new configured Lilo into MBR. That's all!!
> 
> > Then I don't know what to do.  There's also a question I have about the
> > video card detection.  It mentions it can scan the PCI...does this also mean
> > it will check AGP(or is AGP also part of the PCI?)?
> 
> Yes! I also have an AGP card but the kernel tells me thomething about
> PCI. This is ok.
> 
> > I need a tutorial on how to get Windows 2000(C:), to dual boot with Debian
> > on a different physical drive(D:).
> 
> Hope my suggestions will be enough. It's very easy to boot more systems
> with Lilo and you don't need much knowledge about this. 
> 
> > On a side note, anyone know of a Debian tutorial on setting up @HOME?  Just
> > a brief walkthrough would be nice...
> 
> I can suggest you the book Debian GNU Linux Guide. You should get it in
> all good book shops. And you can ask us more.
> 
> If you have not yet installed the debian packages manpages and man-db:
> do it. For the example Lilo:
> 
> man lilo
> 
> will give you some more informations about this boot loader. And there
> are

Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-04 Thread Timeboy
On 2001.09.04 21:56 Timeboy wrote:
> 
> A little warning:
> 
> 
> image=/boot/vmlinuz<-!!
>   root=/dev/hda9
>   append="idebus=33 hdc=ide-scsi"
>   label=Linux
>   read-only
> 
> My vmlinuz is on this place: /boot/vmlinuz. But i mean yours will be:
> /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.17. You can let this part of lilo.conf on your
> current settings. /vmlinuz should it be. Cause there is a link to
> /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.17 on /. Check this if lilo makes an error message.
> 
> Timo
> 



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-04 Thread Timeboy

A little warning:


image=/boot/vmlinuz<-!!
root=/dev/hda9
append="idebus=33 hdc=ide-scsi"
label=Linux
read-only

My vmlinuz is on this place: /boot/vmlinuz. But i mean yours will be:
/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.17. You can let this part of lilo.conf on your
current settings. /vmlinuz should it be. Cause there is a link to
/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.17 on /. Check this if lilo makes an error message.

Timo



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-04 Thread Timeboy
On 2001.09.04 11:51 "LaGuardia, Kristofer S." wrote:

> Quick question, if I
> want to create a partition for /usr, how would I specify the partition is
> for /usr?  Is it a type?  Anyhow...

Hope i understand this question! What do you mean with specify a
partition? Ok. I think you like to know wheter there is a different
between a root and a /usr partition. The answer is no.

Only the swap partition is a special one. All others are ext2
partitions. This is the standart, like fat32 in windows. You can
have a lot of ext2 partitions on your Linux system. For best HD
performance you should have only the root ( / ) partition.

I don't know why it shold be good to have a seperate /usr partition
I only have some extra pertitions for software, that has nothing to
do with the Debian system like audio files and sources and other stuff, 
that i have to save on my HD for a little time. And i have a /home 
partition, cause i also here save a lot of own software like HTML 
sites for the web.

All this partitions you can initialize while installing Debian after
the part for partiton a HD. 
 
> I then get all the way to the step when it asks me to mount the swap, so I
> select the partition for swap...then the same for Linux...no problem.  I had
> set both as primary, but the non-swap partition as boot.  is that correct?

No! If you like to have only one ext2 partition, you have to set this
to / partition. This is the highest level of the Linux directory tree.
On this partition you can mount the /boot partition if nessessary. But
on the /boot partitin you can't install the Debian system that needs
the / partition as highest place. Both partitions as primary is ok.
Linux makes no differents between primary and extended. You can use
both possibilities.

> Or should Linux type be primary and the swap type to be logical?

Do it how you like!!

> Then it
> asks me if I want to install LILO to MBR or to the partition, right?  So I
> choose to the partition...then it asks me if I want to boot into Linux when
> I start the computer, and I say yes.  is this all correct for a dual boot?

No!

First: For a dual boot you need to install LILO in the MBR of your first
hard disk. If you have your windows allready installed on your first HD,
you should change your disks if possible.

If your Windows goes to slave, you will have no big problems with 
installing LILO into MBR of your master hard disk cause it's a Linux
HD now.

If you then boot your Debian at first time, you will only have access
to your first hard disk. But this you can do, to be able to boot both
systems:

edit your /etc/lilo.conf. You can use the editor vi. Install vi if
not installed and type as root:

vi /etc/lilo.conf

To insert text into this file you need to type the i. Only after this
you can put new text into this lilo.conf file. If all is donne use
Escape to leave the insert modus. And with  :wq  you will write your
changes to hd and exit of vi.

This is my /etc/lilo.conf, written for Linux on first and Windows on
second drive:

lba32
boot=/dev/hda
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
# password=tatercounter2000
# message=/boot/bootmess.txt
prompt
timeout=100
vga=0x133 <---for biger letters in console you should set: vga=normal
default=Linux

image=/boot/vmlinuz
root=/dev/hda1
label=Linux
read-only

other=/dev/hdb1
table=/dev/hdb
label=win
map-drive=0x80   <---This and the following lines will change your
to=0x81  drive addresses for the BIOS, which can normally
map-drive=0x81   only boot from first drive.
to=0x80

After you have modified your /etc/lilo.conf you have to type on console:

lilo

This will write your new configured Lilo into MBR. That's all!!

> Then I don't know what to do.  There's also a question I have about the
> video card detection.  It mentions it can scan the PCI...does this also mean
> it will check AGP(or is AGP also part of the PCI?)?

Yes! I also have an AGP card but the kernel tells me thomething about
PCI. This is ok.

> I need a tutorial on how to get Windows 2000(C:), to dual boot with Debian
> on a different physical drive(D:).

Hope my suggestions will be enough. It's very easy to boot more systems
with Lilo and you don't need much knowledge about this. 

> On a side note, anyone know of a Debian tutorial on setting up @HOME?  Just
> a brief walkthrough would be nice...

I can suggest you the book Debian GNU Linux Guide. You should get it in
all good book shops. And you can ask us more.

If you have not yet installed the debian packages manpages and man-db:
do it. For the example Lilo:

man lilo

will give you some more informations about this boot loader. And there
are much more man pages for all kommands, tools and so on.

Timo



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-04 Thread F Zimmermann
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:

> I tried searching the lists, but couldn't find anything.  I want to dual
> boot 2.2r17 with Windows 2000.  All of the tutorial I have seen show both
> residing on the same hard drive.  Well, I would like them on separate hard
> drives. The hard drives are arranged as:

 guess you can't find anything because 2.2r17 is far from being released,
if ever ;-)

Where is the problem? It makes no difference for Linux if its on another
partition on the same drive or on a different drive. Just make sure you
got the names right: the second IDE drive is hdb; the first partitio is
hdb1, the second is hdb2... ; logical ones start counting at 5!

>
> First Drive - 30GB - Windows 2000 Only(FAT32 full drive)
> Second Drive - 13 GB - Linux Only (Two partitions with one as swap)
> Third Drive - 10GB - FAT32 Full drive and to be used as a shared drive for
> both OSs
>

I am not sure about lilo in potato but i think the one thats in the distri
has no longer the problem with the 1024 cylinders.

> have this and that licensed.  I've read documentation on dual-booting, but
> there are some steps that don't make any sense to me since they are either
> written for Mandrake, or they don't use the same version of Debian as I
> have.  I have 2.2r17, and i get to partitioning my hard drive.  I'm not new

should make no big differnce, if at all!

> to computers, but am new to the terminology used in Linux.  I understand
> that I need at least two partitions for Linux.  So on my second drive I
> create a Linux swap type partition(512MB because I have 256MB of RAM), and
> then the rest of the drive is just a Linux partition.  Quick question, if I
> want to create a partition for /usr, how would I specify the partition is
> for /usr?  Is it a type?  Anyhow...

256 MB of swap seems far to much for me, but partitioning is a kind of art
and experience but should be all right for the beginnig.
If you create a partition for e.g. /usr you just tell the setup that you
want to mount /usr there. There is one point in the setup where you create
your partitions and then there is a step which says use existing
partitions (I am not sure about the right useage of sentences) thats what
you whant.


>
> I then get all the way to the step when it asks me to mount the swap, so I
> select the partition for swap...then the same for Linux...no problem.  I had
> set both as primary, but the non-swap partition as boot.  is that correct?

No, if you have only 2 partitions the one shuld be swap and the other
should be / I don't think the setup would let yo ugoing on without
specifying the root partition.

> Or should Linux type be primary and the swap type to be logical?  Then it
> asks me if I want to install LILO to MBR or to the partition, right?  So I
> choose to the partition...then it asks me if I want to boot into Linux when
> I start the computer, and I say yes.  is this all correct for a dual boot?

I woul drecommed to install lilo in the mbr and let lilo boot Linux or W2k
otherwise you need a bootmanager that is able to boot lilo.

> Then I don't know what to do.  There's also a question I have about the
> video card detection.  It mentions it can scan the PCI...does this also mean
> it will check AGP(or is AGP also part of the PCI?)?

Don't know about that, but Debian was quite good in detecting my hardware,
so why not letting it go and see what it does. You can change everything
later if somethings wrong.

>
> I need a tutorial on how to get Windows 2000(C:), to dual boot with Debian
> on a different physical drive(D:).
>

See above.

> On a side note, anyone know of a Debian tutorial on setting up @HOME?  Just
> a brief walkthrough would be nice...
>

what is @HOME? Debain on a home PC? How about
http://www.uk.debian.org/releases/stable/#new-inst
??


> Thanks to anyone who is willing to spend some time with a newbie who wants
> to learn this challenging OS, but needs a little guidance.  Thanks!
>
> Kris the Lost
>
Don't give up, Debian is worth it.

Frank



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-04 Thread Mike Egglestone
Hi,
Glad to hear about you using the Linux OS. and Debian is a great 
Dist. to use, a little more tricky than most others, (mandrake, etc)
but in the end, I think you may prefer it over others.

Quoting "LaGuardia, Kristofer S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I tried searching the lists, but couldn't find anything.  I want to dual
> boot 2.2r17 with Windows 2000. 

Firstly, 2.217 isn't the latest kernel, check out potato r3, if you want
the "stable" release of debian, goto woody or sid if your into the
newest stuff.



> if I
> want to create a partition for /usr, how would I specify the partition
> is
> for /usr?  Is it a type?  Anyhow...

I think there are different ways of doing this, but for now,
you could just create a 3rd partition in the same way as your / partition.
Then specify a mount point during the install process.

for example:
you would make hda1 --> swap
   hda2 --> linux   mounted to /
   hda3 --> linux   mounted to /usr
> 
> I then get all the way to the step when it asks me to mount the swap, so
> I
> select the partition for swap...then the same for Linux...no problem.  I
> had
> set both as primary, but the non-swap partition as boot.  is that
> correct?

yes

> asks me if I want to install LILO to MBR or to the partition, right?  So
> I
> choose to the partition...then it asks me if I want to boot into Linux
> when
> I start the computer, and I say yes.  is this all correct for a dual
> boot?

This part can be tricky, becuase I don't know how Windows2000 handles its 
booting. Usually, I would install all my OS's first, and then install Debian 
last.
and use its boot manager to decice which OS I wanted.
After you install Linux, and then boot into it, you have to edit
the /etc/lilo.conf file to setup your other OS's.
Then run lilo from the command prompt to set the boot loader, and then your 
done.

Check out www.linuxdoc.org and goto the HOW to's, they have some good stuff 
in there.
Feel free to post more detailed questions here if you get stuck.

Hope this helps a bit:)
Cheers,
Mike



Re: Help installing Debian 2.2r17

2001-09-04 Thread Hall Stevenson
> I tried searching the lists, but couldn't find anything.
> I want to dual boot 2.2r17 with Windows 2000.  All
> of the tutorial I have seen show both residing on the
> same hard drive.  Well, I would like them on separate
> hard drives. The hard drives are arranged as...

No worries here... Using seperate physical drives makes things
much easier. This will actually be a LILO 'issue', but it can
handle it just fine. One thing: Install Lilo to your 'first'
(/dev/hdaX) hard disk's MBR.

I think many of the problems people see with dual-booting is
that they're installing Linux on the same drive as their
Windows setup.

Hall



Re: Help installing Debian-LINUX

2001-05-24 Thread Paul Wright
On Thu, 24 May 2001 10:07:18, Smruti wrote:

>
> Hello
> I am a new user of LINUX, & want to install Debian-LINUX in my system. I 
> already have windows-98 in my system. I have a 20GB hard disk partitioned 
> into 4 Drives. I want to install LINUX in one of my pre-exixting 
> partitions(e,g : D/). How can I do it? Can I install it in D:\ without 
> disturbing the windows-98 which is in c: drive? Do I have to repartition the 
> hard disk while installing Debian-LINUX? If I succeed in installing how can 
> I swith between operating systems?
> Please help me in these matters.
> 

For a good reference on how to set up your machine for dual-boot, see the 
document at:

http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Linux+Windows-HOWTO/

It is quite detailed, will explain all the necessary steps for the 
install.



-- 
Paul T. Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-currently seeking employment-





Re: Help installing Debian-LINUX

2001-05-24 Thread ktb
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:07:18AM +0530, Smruti Jena wrote:
> Hello
> I am a new user of LINUX, & want to install Debian-LINUX in my system. I 
> already have windows-98 in my system. I have a 20GB hard disk partitioned 
> into 4 Drives. I want to install LINUX in one of my pre-exixting 
> partitions(e,g : D/). How can I do it? Can I install it in D:\ without 
> disturbing the windows-98 which is in c: drive? Do I have to repartition the 
> hard disk while installing Debian-LINUX? If I succeed in installing how can 
> I swith between operating systems?

You should take the time to read the installation instructions at -
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/#new-inst

Yes you can install debian on the disk in question without disturbing
Windows.  I'm assuming you are installing from a bootable cd disk.  Slap
the cd in and boot.  Make sure the bios is set to boot off the cdrom.
You will be asked to partion the disk.  At that point you should create
your debian partitions on what would be the D: partition looking from
your windows side.  After you have installed debian you can dual boot
with Lilo or Grub.  Keep in mind that if you make the wrong move during
the partitioning/creating filesytem stage you could hose your Windows
side -- so make a backup.  
hth,
kent


-- 
 From seeing and seeing the seeing has become so exhausted
 First line of "The Panther" - R. M. Rilke




Re: HELP!!! Installing Debian

2001-05-21 Thread Tony Crawford
Jan Enning wrote (on 20 May 2001, at 21:17):

> > I am new to Debian Linux. After downloading files from BASE-i386 and
> > DISK-i386 directory, i've tried to install debian.  I typed INSTALL  and
> > the install.bat file run. After loading some modules, I am stuck to the
> > the following message:
> > 
> > Kernel Panic : VFS : Unable to mount root on FS on 01:00
> > 
> > What have I missed?  Please help!

Similar experience yesterday trying to repair the installation 
on my Toshiba. (I needed to neutralize /etc/init.d/pcmcia in 
order to boot after stupidly apt-get-upgrading to a wrong 
package.) Anyway, I recently upgraded my iso images from 2.2 r0 
to r3, and now the gear in the "install" directory on CD 1 only 
got me as far as the same message you noted. Fortunately I still 
had the 2.2 r0 CDs with me, and they worked!

Has something been broken? Is anyone interested in more detail?

T.

-- Tony Crawford
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- +49-3341-30 99 99



Re: HELP!!! Installing Debian

2001-05-20 Thread Jan Enning
Well I've got a 'solution' :-) The reason I didn't use any floppy is simple
because they are most of the time broken, old, etc...not very reliable.
But if you don't have any bandwidth, stick with the floppy :-)

I downloaded the complete Debian ISO and burned it on a CD, then bought a
crappy ATA 50X cd-rom drive for $30. The reason that I did this was that the
ATA drives are really plug and play AND bootable! I think on every pentium u
can boot with this kind of drive. Now I only plugged it to my OLD P133 and
ready to go!
No boot floppy's, corrupted files, missing sectors etc...
Before I used 'windoos 98' bootfloppy's to get CD-rom support and then
booted Debian from DOS. With the Crappy ATA drive  you're the king :)

I hope it helped u a bit :)
Good luck!
kleinejan

> Hello guys!

> I am new to Debian Linux. After downloading files from BASE-i386 and
> DISK-i386 directory, i've tried to install debian.  I typed INSTALL  and
> the install.bat file run. After loading some modules, I am stuck to the
> the following message:
> 
> Kernel Panic : VFS : Unable to mount root on FS on 01:00
> 
> What have I missed?  Please help!
> 
> Thanks and more power.
> 
> Arnold
> 
> 
> 



* J a n  E n n i n g
MoBiLe:06-26 106 926
faX:020 88 26 297
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kleinejan.org
ICQ:5506065




Re: HELP!!! Installing Debian

2001-05-16 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:18:30PM -0700, Arnold Canete wrote:
> Hello guys!
> 
> I am new to Debian Linux. After downloading files from BASE-i386 and
> DISK-i386 directory, i've tried to install debian.  I typed INSTALL  and
> the install.bat file run. After loading some modules, I am stuck to the
> the following message:
> 
> Kernel Panic : VFS : Unable to mount root on FS on 01:00
> 
> What have I missed?  Please help!

I take it that you don't have a bootable CD-ROM? If so just boot off the
CD. If you've downloaded the disk images, boot off the floppies. Looking above
you haven't said whether or not you did either. 

Mike

-- 
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a
good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be
dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925


pgpQGkpQRv7Xr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help installing debian first time

2001-02-13 Thread Thomas Guettler
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 06:18:53PM +0100, Tobias Hahn wrote:
> Hi! 
> 
> I purchased a new computer and I would like to install debian on it. If
> possible, I would like to install kernel 2.4. Is this possible from the
> beginning of the installation? If not so, is there a way to build custom
> boot cds/floppies containing at least reiserfs?

I don't know how stable the woody boot-floppies are. Maybe it would be
the safest way, that you install a normal potato system and them
upgrade your kernel. There have been some notes how to use 2.4 in
potato on this list. 

Do you really need reiserfs in the boot-floppies? You could make /boot
ext2 and the rest could be reiserfs.

-- 
Thomas Guettler
Office: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.interface-business.de
Private:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://yi.org/guettli



Re: HELP: Installing Debian in a Bussines

1997-12-04 Thread Oliver Elphick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  > My father wants to make some changes in his Bussines and I am
  >trying to get Debian/Linux into those changes.
  >
  > I will explain myself:
  >He is going to change his system:
  >
  >Computer: FUJITSU TITAN2600 (with 24 terminals)
  >O.S.: PICK O.A. v5.2
  >With: Terminal based menues for entering, changing, checking data on each
  >terminal.
  >
  >With a network (Debian if I can help it)
  >
  > The idea is that if I can give him a Debian/Linux based system which
  >fits his needs he installs it, also he wants tu use ( at least for a while) 
  >his
  >old programs so something like a PICK O.A. interpreter should be perfect and
  >also needs to port the data to the new system.
  >
  >What I think he needs:
  >
  > -A PICK interpreter or so.

I don't know of any freeware PICK product.  PICK Systems make a Linux
version of their software; you can also run JBase.  You can run a
SCO version of UniVerse if you use the iBCS kernel module to run
COFF executables.

  > -Something to convert the old data.

Write a DataBasic program to dump data out to tape in a set format.  Read
it in again on the new machine.  (If the OA system is co-existing with Unix
you could perhaps make a network connection.


  > -Some program to later on replace that ¿PICK interpreter?

The PICK data model is unique.  If you use an SQL database like PostgreSQL,
you will need to rework the design of the database; multi-valued fields
will have to be normalised.  It's a big job.

  > -Probably some way to keep both systems in parallel.

You will need to define input and dump routines for both systems (unless
the traffic is one-way only).  Do the update via tape.

[for tape read floppy if appropriate]
-- 
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight  http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver

PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1

Unsolicited email advertisements are not welcome; any person sending
such will be invoiced for telephone time used in downloading together
with a £25 administration charge.



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: HELP: Installing Debian in a Bussines

1997-12-04 Thread Stephen Zander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What I think he needs:
> 
>  A PICK interpreter or so.
>  Something to convert the old data.
>  Some program to later on replace that PICK interpreter?
>  Probably some way to keep both systems in parallel.

That sounds like a pretty complete list.  However, it's likely to be a
significant effort! (Gawd, PICK. Makes me feel old & I just turned 30).

You biggest challange is likely to be finding a PICK interpreter.  IIRC,
there used to be a dual universe system running PICK over SCO or something
similar, but I've no idea where you'd try to find such a beast.  I'd suggest
you try Fujitsu first... they'll probably want to sell you something but you
might get some useful information.

Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Help installing debian "Other" packages

1996-11-18 Thread Wayne Richardson
Hi all,

I have found out that I am having a problem downloading the file from the
ftp site (sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/debian/buzz/msdos-i386),
but I don't know how to fix it.  If I click on the file (using Netscape
Navigator), I get the binary garbage written out to my screen.  If I right
click on the file icon, and use the "Save Link As.." option, I can save it to
my hard disk.  The problem is that it is not saving this in a binary format.  I
can go to the Netscape options (Options | General Preferences... |
helpers) and add in the deb extention to the "application/x-compress"
entry but this still doesn't work.  I went through compuserve and
retrieved the same file using their ftp menu and then compared them
(saved the same file with a different name) doing a DOS command "fc
win95tmp.deb cmpsvtmp.deb /b" and they are way different.  I can copy
them both to diskette and the one that I downloaded from compuserve
will work but the other one won't.

What is wrong here?

Regards,
-- 
---
Wayne Richardson
Advanced Software Engineer
3M Health Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
"Life is not a spectator sport..."
---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help installing debian "Other" packages

1996-11-17 Thread Paul Christenson
On Fri, 15 Nov 1996, Wayne Richardson wrote:

> I can download these packages from the internet from my windows '95
> machine and then transfer them to the Linux system using a diskette. 

> When I try to run dpkg on these files I get errors. 

Are you *certain* that you are transferring them in BINARY mode?

Do you have your floppy drive mounted so that it does automatic *nix<->DOS
conversion?  (It shouldn't.)

   |   This is OFFICIAL WRITTEN notification that I want to be REMOVED   |
   |   from ALL commercial mailing lists.  EVERY message sent from this  |
   | account has had this request posted. ALL UNSOLICITED ADVERTISEMENTS |
   | SENT TO THIS ACCOUNT ARE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL (U.S.) LAW.|

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]