Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #6)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014, at 05:58 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Yes I think so. I just read the bylaws [1] again and you’re right this > voting round would need two more +1 (binding) votes from PMC to be > passed. > > I thought any 3 +1 votes (majority) would make it pass and the 72 hour > voting window completed. Sorry, I was not too careful. In this case, > we’ll let the round continue until we’ve two more binding votes. +1 (binding) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Future
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014, at 04:08 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Some of us are in Amsterdam and discussing various things we want to do > for the project. I’ve aggregated some of them on a Trello board here: > https://trello.com/b/nj8dDBWl/apache-cloudstack-future > > Please share your ideas, publicly or private to me; I’ll add them on the > board. Our main focus right now is testing, release quality and aligning > efforts. I'd recommend adding a column for marketing. Some of these things probably fit more under marketing and also don't see anything around promoting releases, putting howtos into third party publications, etc. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mark Hinkle
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014, at 12:50 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Join me in congratulating Mark! Congrats, Mark! Happy to see you joining the PMC. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Mascot
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014, at 07:51 AM, David Nalley wrote: > For a moment I thought this was a message from Joe Brockmeier. My cats would also make excellent mascots. But I'd nominate Shark Cat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3tU_SYSfOU Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Mascot
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014, at 06:48 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 11.03.2014 01:10, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > FYI: My cat's decided he's the new Apache CloudStack mascot: > > > > http://i.imgur.com/zMcLGN5.jpg > > We should replace the monkey with a lolcat, btw. Everyone loves them. > :) +1 from me, shall we put it to a VOTE? :-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Documentation: Where are the page numbers in the PDFs? Publican changes?
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013, at 01:47 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > I will look into it as well. Maybe jzb has free time today copying him. Very little, I'm at USENIX LISA this week. Did a few quick searches to see if Publican 3.0 has issues with not producing page numbers, but I haven't found any. Will see if I can compile the docs on Fedora 19 and what I wind up with... Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 10:57 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Yeah, I would really appreciate Monday and Tuesday to run regression > tests on this. +1 - In the future I think we should probably schedule votes like this to allow 72 hours during "business hours" if at all possible. (Though some people do have more time on the weekend for testing if CloudStack isn't part of their $dayjob...) (Note that it's not just 72 hours, though - we also need a "lazy majority" of at least 3 PMC members.) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: 13317
Did you attach a patch to this? I see nothing. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Can committer review https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/, please? > > regards, > Daan Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Bylaw changes for new committer / new PMC member votes
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Are there any objections to me starting a VOTE on this change? Even though I occasionally disagree with the outcome of the current bylaws, I think there's value in having a "veto" over adding committers or PMC members. I'd be -1 to this. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Bylaw changes for new committer / new PMC member votes
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > As it stands now, we currently use a "Lazy Consensus" model (yes Noah, I > know we didn't define that term correctly as of now, but I think that's > a different discussion). We currently have that term defined as: I would be in favor of defining it correctly, though. :-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: New user - Introduction
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013, at 03:19 AM, René Diepstraten wrote: > A few small patches that I wrote have been accepted into Master, and I'd > like to contribute more to this great project in the future. Welcome René! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Demo Lab - To rent or To buy
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013, at 08:27 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Specs would really depend on budget, in US I can build this setup for > about $800, more or less depends on the componets. One of the things I've usually done is go to Geeks.com and buy a second-hand workstation. Typically you can pick up a pretty beefy machine for cheap. For example, they have a quad-core Xeon machine with 12GB of RAM for ~$350. (The inventory varies quite a bit, though. If you don't see something you like, check back in a few days. If you do see something you like, it might be gone in a few days if you wait to make a decision...) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Ending IRC Meetings
Hey all, So, we had a very slim turnout again today for the IRC meeting. I believe we're doing well enough communicating via email and using the available tools that most folks no longer feel they need to discuss issues in real time. (Or they're in IRC enough to have those discussions with other folks in #cloudstack-dev at other times and don't need a fixed time to do so.) At this point, I'm going to suggest we take the weekly meeting off the schedule. If there's a need down the road to set up a weekly meeting, we can always fire it up again. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > I updated the wiki because several people asked me to post my eclipse > preference file which includes 180 column widths. There's also a follow > up mail thread after I checked it in. The column width was not > questioned. I can send out a separate proposal if needed but supposedly > developers are already using it. I'm not asking to roll it back or restart a discussion - just saying in the future, it'd be good to break out "should we do this?" into a discussion thread rather than having it as a small part of a larger email that doesn't look like someone's making a proposal. Thanks, Joe -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 08:53 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > Donal, > > Our coding convention says 180. It was discussed about a week or two > back. So, I am surprised that it's already been changed. I noticed the comment when I was doing the weekly news - but it was buried in an email with the subject "coding convention reminder" - which tells most readers "this email is a reminder, there are no changes involved in this." There was no discussion of the change, though there was discussion about the Eclipse templates, etc. In the future, might be good to break out proposals for changes in a separate email. I suspect a few folks are going to be surprised by the change. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Weekly IRC Meeting Tomorrow at 17:00 UTC
Hi all, A reminder that we have the weekly CloudStack meeting in #cloudstack-meeting at 17:00 UTC on Wednesdays. We scuttled the meeting last week because we had low turnout, so I hope to see more folks turn up tomorrow! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 08:02 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Can we loosen/ignore this rule when readability becomes an issue? Alex raised this issue last week: http://markmail.org/message/z2hzz7efujgmhfnh I didn't see many responses to that particular part of his email, though. Personally, I think arbitrary maxlength at any column width is a PITA - but I spend most of my time looking at XML with prose rather than Java... I'd support a longer line length or keeping the 80 character limit, but I think it should be changed across the board if we change it. (i.e., not just for "some" files.) (This StackOverflow discussion might be worthwhile reading before making a decision: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/903754/do-you-still-limit-line-length-in-code) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [URGENT] KVM HA - (FW: cs 4.1 host disconnected status)
ull
> > > > ('I don't know')
> > > > 2013-07-11 10:19:16,153 DEBUG [cloud.ha.UserVmDomRInvestigator]
> > > > (AgentTaskPool-1:null) could not reach agent, could not reach agent's
> > > > host, returning that we don't have enough information
> > > > 2013-07-11 10:19:16,153 DEBUG
> > > > [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
> > > > (AgentTaskPool-1:null) null unable to determine the state of the host.
> > > > Moving on.
> > > > 2013-07-11 10:19:16,153 DEBUG
> > > > [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
> > > > (AgentTaskPool-1:null) null unable to determine the state of the host.
> > > > Moving on.
> > > > 2013-07-11 10:19:16,153 WARN [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
> > > > (AgentTaskPool-1:null) Agent state cannot be determined, do
> > > > nothing
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I power on dead node, it goes to state "Connecting" and then "Up"
> > > > in management interface.
> > > >
> > > > 2013-07-11 13:57:24,311 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] (Thread-6:null)
> > > > Ping timeout for host 12, do invstigation
> > > > 2013-07-11 13:58:24,315 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] (Thread-6:null)
> > > > Ping timeout for host 12, do invstigation
> > > > 2013-07-11 13:59:24,320 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] (Thread-6:null)
> > > > Ping timeout for host 12, do invstigation
> > > > 2013-07-11 13:59:57,239 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status]
> > > > (AgentConnectTaskPool-5:null) Transition:[Resource state =
> > > > Enabled, Agent event = AgentConnected, Host id = 12, name =
> > > > ad112.colobridge.net]
> > > > 2013-07-11 13:59:57,264 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status]
> > > > (AgentConnectTaskPool-5:null) Agent status update: [id = 12; name
> > > > = ad112.colobridge.net; old status = Up; event = AgentConnected;
> > > > new
> > > status
> > > > = Connecting; old update count = 1285; new update count = 1286]
> > > > 2013-07-11 14:00:50,611 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status]
> > > > (AgentConnectTaskPool-5:null) Transition:[Resource state =
> > > > Enabled, Agent event = Ready, Host id = 12, name =
> > > > ad112.colobridge.net]
> > > > 2013-07-11 14:00:50,633 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status]
> > > > (AgentConnectTaskPool-5:null) Agent status update: [id = 12; name
> > > > = ad112.colobridge.net; old status = Connecting; event = Ready;
> > > > new
> > > status =
> > > > Up; old update count = 1286; new update count = 1287]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I restart cloud-management service, dead node goes to state
> > > > "Disconnected" in management interface.
> > > > (there is nothing special in logs in this case)
> > > >
> > > > If I do nothing, dead node could stay in "Up" state forever (I
> > > > waited
> > > for
> > > > 12 hours) in management interface, throwing into logs "Agent state
> > > > cannot be determined, do nothing"
> > > >
> > > > Would appreciate if someone could help/suggest how to deal with
> > > > this problem.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Valery
> > > >
> > > > http://protocol.by/slayer
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Valery
> >
> > http://protocol.by/slayer
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take
> any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
> Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 09:42 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Any *free* ones? ;-) Haven't found one yet, I'll keep an eye out... Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 05:53 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Oh man, my two hours are wasted on devstack already. After installed > devstack, there is no swift service at all. For Edison, and anybody else who wants to use Swift with CloudStack, what about SwiftStack? http://swiftstack.com/docs/install/index.html I think you have to request a trial account, but it looks not overly difficult. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 08:40 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Based on CLOUDSTACK-3350, we have a known user. IMO, this should be a > blocker. We should either fix Swift to support users or revert the > object store branch merge changes. +1 Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Caleb Call wrote: > Although my voice doesn't mean a lot, I too would vote this as > a blocker. If it's going to be dropped, users need to be notified well > in advanced so they can be make plans moving forward instead of suddenly > being stranded on an out-dated version. Your voice does mean a lot, thanks for speaking up. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
IRC Meeting (10 July 2013)
No meeting today, as we had only four people show up. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
CloudStack Weekly News - 10 July 2013
at's going on in the CloudStack community? While all the discussion happens on the mailing lists, we also encourage members of the CloudStack community to share what they're working on their blogs. In this section, you'll find posts by Apache CloudStack community members and interesting news that's relevant to Apache CloudStack. ### CloudStack European User Group Summary [16]The ShapeBlue blog has a summary of the most recent meeting, by Giles Sirett. ### Apache Whirr and CloudStack for Big Data in the Clouds Sebastien Goasguen has a [17]tutorial on his blog about using Apache Whirr with CloudStack. "In this tutorial we introduce Apache Whirr, an application that can be used to define, provision and configure big data solutions on CloudStack based clouds. Whirr automatically starts instances in the cloud and boostrapps hadoop on them. It can also add packages such as Hive, Hbase and Yarn for map-reduce jobs." ### In Case You're Not Already Sold on DevOps Joe Brockmeier [18]talks a bit about Gene Kim's keynote at the CloudStack Collaboration Conference, "Why Every Company Needs DevOps Now." ### Hackathon Storage Group Puts Out Discussion and Proposal John Burwell who led the storage discussion group during the CloudStack Collaboration Conference Hackathon put out the first group discussion on the future needs and a proposal on how to better define storage for future versions of CloudStack. [19]Read the and participate in the discussion and weigh-in on the proposal. ### Interview with The Cloudcast (.net) Chip Childers and David Nalley sit down with Aaron Delp for the Cloudcast podcast. [20]Be sure to give it a listen! ### New Videos Coming Soon From Our Summer Video Project Gregg Witkin and Jessica Tomechak are [21]working together on videos this summer. Gregg hit the ground running by bringing his cameras to the Collab Conference June 24-25 in Santa Clara. He is editing that footage into short clips to help promote the November CloudStack Collaboration Conference in Amsterdam. These short videos will be posted as soon as the conference organizers approve them. Meanwhile, check out these videos Gregg did with CloudStack just last year. [22]Link 1, [23]Link 2 ## Events * [24]Apache CloudStack Meetup in Hyderabad, India on July 20th. Location is TBD, but will be published on Meetup.com. * [25]O'Reilly's Open Source Convention (OSCON) is being held July 22-26 at Oregon Convention Center, Portland Oregon. There will be several CloudStack talks. * CloudStack Study Meeting Suzuki-san will be organizing a study meeting in Osaka on August 2. * [26]OSC Kyoto The [27]Japanese CloudStack User Group (JCSUG) will be presenting at the Open Source Conference in Kyoto on August 2-3. * [28]CloudStack Meetup at SAP Labs in Palo Alto, CA on August 7th from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. Be sure to RSVP on Meetup.com! ## New Committers and PMC Members No new committers or PMC members have been announced in the last newsletter period. References 1. http://markmail.org/message/snon6ljkti6fgq4k 2. http://s.apache.org/BlH/ 3. http://markmail.org/message/aitv5264swzwpedh 4. http://markmail.org/message/jgci4s7afqi6ix4u 5. http://markmail.org/message/r3rqsxnrsvjm7gwx 6. http://markmail.org/message/5mwy2yuc5bvcg2qz 7. http://markmail.org/message/z2hzz7efujgmhfnh 8. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventions 9. http://markmail.org/message/frkn3pm7tc74yqvk 10. http://markmail.org/message/lllacr6tb64yqxly 11. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html 12. http://markmail.org/message/dzixkixurzlskqik 13. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212 14. http://markmail.org/message/dxv7aeirjz5itwdp 15. http://semver.org/ 16. http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/cloudstack-european-user-group-summary/ 17. http://sebgoa.blogspot.com/2013/07/apache-whirr-and-cloudstack-for-big.html 18. http://buildacloud.org/blog/272-why-every-company-needs-devops-now.html 19. http://markmail.org/message/hh5wmffsquqwjx6m 20. http://www.chipchilders.com/blog/2013/7/2/interview-with-the-cloudcast-net.html 21. http://markmail.org/thread/rs7paw6wfs4kktwh 22. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ4b8HFmFTc 23. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KATuxn5pimY 24. http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Hyderabad-Group/events/125208462/ 25. http://www.oscon.com/oscon2013 26. http://www.ospn.jp/osc2012-kyoto/ 27. http://cloudstack.jp/ 28. http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-SF-Bay-Area-Users-Group/events/117379992/ Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Dublin meetup tonight
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 06:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight: I tweeted this from the CloudStack account. Happy to add these to our social media for promotion ahead of time if folks send a note to marketing@ with the full info... Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 03:15 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Could they(swiftstack) help us, or guide us on how to implement > multi-part upload? I've sent an email to John at SwiftStack to see if they might be able to jump into the conversation. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013, at 07:33 AM, Alexandre Sousa wrote: > Oracle VM is getting better year after year, so I believe that this is a > good reason to include support for Oracle VM 3.x on CloudStack. It doesn't really matter where a hypervisor falls in the "magic quadrant" - we'd happily take patches for a hypervisor that analysts aren't hyping. What matters is having someone who steps up and provides patches and will help keep the code up to date. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 05:36 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > However at a certain point we should start to advice people to run > CloudStack on java 1.7 as there are no more public security updates to > java 1.6. Previously: http://markmail.org/thread/s2dzo5ib7ox46l4f > So summarized proposal, make 4.2 the last version to support 1.6 and > switch maven source version to 1.7 after we cut the release branch for > 4.2. The new reference platform for the next release would be jdk 1.7 and > tomcat7 (meaning packaging will be tested on those platforms). > > So what do you all think of this? If we are ok to do this i would like to > start with this right after the release branch cut. This constitutes a > major architecture change so i would want this to be in as early as > possible in the release cycle. I'm in favor of this. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Moving cloudmonkey to its own repository, have its own release process
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 01:00 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > +1 - reasonable plan. I'm not sure we need a "vote" though. Let's > > use lazy consensus on this one. > > > > Folks - you can see the plan. Shout if you disagree in any way. > > > > Agreed with lazy consensus for the move. > I would like some explicit reviews of the repo. > I'd really like to get this writable and a release generated. +1 to lazy consensus. (oh, wait...) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: git commit: Initial commit with LICENSE, NOTICE, and README.
On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:43 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013, at 04:01 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> Uhhh - can we start with a fresh license and notice file. >>> There are clearly not some of the things mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE >>> in this repo. >> >> NOTICE should have been fine, but I corrected the LICENSE file. > > Hmm - docs got its own repo too? I missed this. :/ > You haven't missed anything yet. I'm trying something out. If successful, there will be a proposal/discussion. > -- > Prasanna., > > > Powered by BigRock.com >
Re: git commit: Initial commit with LICENSE, NOTICE, and README.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013, at 04:01 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Uhhh - can we start with a fresh license and notice file. > There are clearly not some of the things mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE > in this repo. NOTICE should have been fine, but I corrected the LICENSE file. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
[OFFLINE] July 1 - July 7
Taking vacation first week of July and will offline (for any form of work purposes) from July 1st through 7th. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS]- Dynamic Rendering of tooltip Content from the documentation
of the documentation data, please update the > >> file /ui/scripts/docs.js. This contains key/value pairs with the key > >> indicating which field in the UI that particular string is for. > >> > >> Functional spec is @ > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ui-dynamic-tooltip.html > >> > >> Committed to master branch only right now. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Brian > > > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > I think I missed this message originally, and Jessica drew my attention to > > it. > > > > It's been 4 months since this message was sent. Has there been any progress > > on making the strings come from actual docs per the original func spec? > > How does the current implementation deal with l10n? > > > > My concern is that 'temporary' becomes permanent in a lot of cases, and the > > key-value pair system with what appears to be no capability for l10n is > > troubling. > > > > --David Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: CS 3.0.2 -> 4.1.0 upgrade instruction fail
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013, at 09:23 AM, France wrote: > Hi all, > > there are many errors in release notes for upgrade form CS 3.0.2 to > 4.0.1. > Here are just a few, from the top of my head. I suggest you correct them. Thanks for the email. We'll take a look. I would thank you even more if you filed a bug ;-) I've opened a Jira ticket here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3138 Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE] Update by-laws to add section for non-technical decision making (Was: Re: [RESULTS][SUMMARY][DISCUSS][VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website)
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 08:21 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Devs, > > I would like to call a vote on the following modification to our by-laws. > This is in response to the > > Summary of changes: > > * Addition of "3.4.2. Non-Technical Decisions" section. This specifies > that > non-technical decisions can be made on any appropriate list (i.e. > marketing@) Erm. Does this mean that marketing can't make any technical decisions about the Web site, for instance? I think this needs to be better worded. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: FW: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Mike Tutkowski
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 08:39 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Mike! Congrats Mike! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [gmcdon...@apache.org: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.]
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 09:36 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > This is going to require that we re-point all of the website links to > the wiki to the actual wiki URL's (not the exported HTML). So much for "The first rule of CWIKI is don't link to CWIKI!" I'll make the changes today so we don't get caught unawares next week. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Fwd: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.
Just in case they don't send directly to our dev@ list. Major upgrade coming to the wiki, some downtime ahead on Saturday, and some features may not work afterwards. Please read! - Original message - From: gmcdonald To: committ...@apache.org Subject: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now. Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:56:28 +1000 [Note this message may be received twice as this may also hit any dev lists you subscribe to] Hi All, If your project has a Confluence Wiki then this is an IMPORTANT announcement for you and your project. Please read this email carefully. NOTICE: The ASF Confluence instance is planned to be upgraded this Saturday 22nd June 2013. Judging by the time taken to upgrade the test instance, please expect the service to be in a down or read only state for the entire day. This email is to let you know that a test upgrade has already occurred and is live for you to play with now. This gives us all an opportunity to test for stability as well as any upgrade/plugin issues that might have happened along the way. Our current confluence wiki is at version 3.4.9 from way back in February 2011 and Atlassian have released a further 45 updates along the way, including another 2 major versions. The test instance has been upgraded several times along the way, with database surgery, operating system and server changes along the way. There have been casualties. Most notably is the Autoexport Plugin has had to be disabled permanently as during extensive testing, this plugin stopped working on version 4.3. Templates and Macros are also affected with major changes from wiki markup to xhtml amongst other things. Some plugins survived with upgrades all the way whilst some have been decommissioned/replaced or have changed to 'paid for' versions that we need to sort out licensing for. Nothing major that I can tell, but that's where you lot come in with your testing of your own spaces. Please familiarise yourself with what's new in Confluence 5.1 at https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Confluence+5.1+Release+Notes and also take a good look around our upgraded test instance. Do not worry about mucking anything up on the test instance as that is what it is there for. Any changes/additions made will be lost on Saturday when a new migration will take place. The current confluence version will remain online in a read only state until the new version is completed. A jira ticket has been raised at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6406 where projects can add comments on any issues they are having with the test instance as compared to their old site. Just problems only please, do not turn it into a how to use confluence 5 thread. In addition, if there are any features that you currently use that do not work in the test instance, please replicate the feature in the current production TEST space so that I can test them all in the one place along the way. (Ask if you need create page permissions to cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TEST ) It may be possible in the future to replace Autoexport by playing around with the API to export the pages but this is not a priority, nor is it supported. We warned projects long ago that the Autoexport Tool would be incompatible with future Confluence versions and that time has now come. Ok so, please test and report to the Jira Issue mentioned anything amiss with your space. Go to https://cwiki2.apache.org/confluence and have a play around. You have 3 DAYS to report anything you find. Thanks Gavin (ASF Infra) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Jayapal! Woot! Congrats! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: doc hacking at Hack Day at CCC13
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 09:27 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > To all of you planning to hack away at documentation: > > There is quite a lot of commeted out code. And there is quite a lot of > code > uncommented; classes and public/protected and package scope methods > without > description. I have not taken up the job of improving on this. Instead I > have been swearing at others for it, for which i apologise. > > Both Joe Brockmeier and Mike Tutkowski have useful proposals for doc > improvement and I want to call on them to devise doc-from-code generation > tooling to achieve their goals. (but i call not just on them of course) Can you expand on this? We already generate API docs from the code. Generally when I talk about docs, I'm referring to implementation docs - e.g. "how do I set up, install, and manage CloudStack" docs. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Hack Day at CloudStack Collaboration Conference
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, at 03:46 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I added 'secondary storage maintenance mode' > as a session. I don't mind to take ideas in advance! Thanks Daan! Look forward to meeting you at the conference! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Hack Day at CloudStack Collaboration Conference
Hi Mike, On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 03:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I was wondering if we have the following documentation (below). If not, I > was thinking it might be a good session to discuss and start in (at a > high level) on developing such documentation. > > 1) Class diagrams highlighting the main classes that make up the Compute, > Networking, and Storage components of CloudStack and how they relate to > each other. > > 2) Object-interaction diagrams showing how the main instances in the > system coordinate execution of tasks. > > 3) What kinds of threads are involved in the system (this will help > developers better understand what resources are shared among threads and > need to be locked at certain times)? AFAIK, this doesn't exist currently. Would love to see this - so if you want to take lead, I'm happy to attend to help facilitate and take down notes, etc. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Mac OS X Terminal Question
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 02:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > If so, do you know how to fix this issue? I have not noticed it there, but other programs do this. If you get this, try typing "reset" and hitting enter, that will sometimes help reset the terminal. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Hack Day at CloudStack Collaboration Conference
Hey all, As you know, the conference is coming up in less than two weeks. The first day is going to be a "hack day" using an un-conference/BarCamp type structure where we ask attendees to set the agenda and have spaces set aside to work on things or have more interactive sessions to hammer out ideas. This will probably work best if we start brainstorming before the event, so I've set up a page on the wiki for folks to propose sessions. Please take a minute to add topics you'd like to address during the hack day with a description and suggested leader for that session. (This is usually going to be the person proposing the idea, but might be a suggestion for someone else if you think they'd be better suited.) Here's the page on the wiki - please go wild and add the topics you think we need to hit on during the hack day! (Note, adding a session isn't a guarantee that it'll be chosen, but it's a good way to build interest ahead of time and ensure the right folks are there and ready to roll.) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Hack+Day+at+CCC13 Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Summary of IRC meeting in #cloudstack-meeting, Wed Jun 12 17:08:56 2013
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 04:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Reading the meeting summary, I learned about the [off] directive the hard > way. Is there a irc-etiquette for dummies somewhere that handles ASFBot > and other things newbees should know? There's a manual for ASFBot here: http://wilderness.apache.org/manual.html Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Want to contribute
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013, at 02:04 PM, iliyas shirol wrote: > Waiting for a postive response from you folks. No need to wait, jump right in. (But if you need an "invite," consider this it.) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Chip and David elected ASF Members
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013, at 03:31 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Congratulations to Chip and David for being elected members of the ASF: > > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_welcomes2 Awesome work, folks! Congrats! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Board report for June board meeting...
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 08:43 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Can everyone please take a look and provide comments if you have any. Minor formatting changes, and corrected the release date for 4.1.0 (was listed as June 7, actually was June 4). Otherwise it looks good to me. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: git pull fails since 10 june
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 08:34 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > is anyone working on this? do they need help? Apache Infra folks are on it. Note that you can see Apache infra status here: http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ If it's red, Infra should have been notified of the issue. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Contributing as a non-committer
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013, at 10:03 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > Forget about eclipse for now :) just use vi :) > > Why don't we just go back to ed? +1 Alex - do you want to start the vote? ;-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Contributing as a non-committer
Paul, where are you seeing that link? On Fri, Jun 7, 2013, at 03:55 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Guys, > > I'm just trying to get up to speed with how I can contribute more > (starting with a minor doc fix) but the link > http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-contributors.html is broken. > > Can it be fixed pls (does it count as a bug that I need to report). Is > there an alternate link for the time being? > > > Regards > > Paul Angus > Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect > > [cid:image002.png@01CE1071.C6CC9C10] > > S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: > +447711418784 > paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | > www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<https://twitter.com/> > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS > > ShapeBlue are proud to be sponsoring CloudStack Collaboration Conference > NA > [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/30760149/CloudStack+Collaboration+Conference+Banner+v2+Blue+Background+Only.jpg?version=3&modificationDate=1367282397297]<http://www.cloudstackcollab.net/> > > Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses > 19/20 June, > London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/> > 22/23 June, Santa Clara > CA<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/> > 10/11 July, Bangalore, > India<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/> > 21/22 August, > London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/> > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views > or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If > you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take > any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please > contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. > Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue > Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. > ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [GSOC] informal communication and blogs
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 07:15 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > For GSoC informal communication we can also use Twitter (I am @sebgoa). > I am already connected with Dharmesh and Ian. > > It would also be nice to see you guys start a blog about your experience. > Something like blogger.com is easy to use and get started. > You can then tweet your blog posts to the community (@CloudStack) If you write something up, a note to the marketing list would be a Good Thing (TM). If you haven't blogged before or want extra eyeballs on something before posting, happy to help... Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I would like to get everyone's opinions on the timeline and policies > for bringing in automated tests into the repo. Integration tests are > written in marvin by various people today within and without Citrix. > Similar to docs I'd like to propose that tests can be committed to the > repository beyond the freeze date. > > Right now all tests are being committed to master since that's the > branch that we cut our releases out of. But after the branch for a > release has been cut tests will be committed to both release branch > and master if everyone agrees this is a good thing. > > Thoughts? Unless there's something I'm missing, I can't think of any reason why tests would need to be frozen. I'm +1 for this. Thanks for raising it! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Ah, yes, I see on my test system that a version inadvertently got > sucked in from a different repo. Sorry about that, I suppose we should > pull that commit from 4.1.1? Have we verified that it's definitely the problem? (It sounds like it, but I'm double-checking...) > I develop primarily on CentOS, and have this one system that I *was* > using to sanity check ubuntu. It troubles me that we either don't have > the test coverage to catch this on Ubuntu, or that everyone is using > newer/modified versions, however that's probably a topic for a > different thread. Did you want to start that? :-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
Hi John, On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 09:42 PM, John Burwell wrote: > I would like to get clock drift fixed for 4.1.1 as well. What needs > to be done to test the 4.2 system VMs? How can folks assist with the > testing process? I'd like to get it fixed as well. However, I think that updating system VMs is a pretty big leap for a point release. We might have an issue with the fix that has gone in so far for KVM: http://markmail.org/message/xoy2wn4ypxpdek4r (Note, I am not saying I'm happy about letting the issue sit until 4.2 - but I'm not sure that a fix that potentially disruptive should go into a point release.) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 Released
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the 4.1.0 release of the CloudStack Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud orchestration platform. This is the first major release from Apache CloudStack since its graduation from the Apache Incubator on March 20th. Apache CloudStack is an integrated software platform that allows users to build a feature-rich IaaS. CloudStack includes an intuitive user interface and rich API for managing the compute, networking, accounting, and storage resources for private, hybrid, or public clouds. The 4.1.0 release represents more than five months of development effort by the Apache CloudStack community. The release includes many new features and bugfixes from the 4.0.x cycle. The 4.1.0 release also marks major changes in the codebase to make CloudStack easier for developers, a new structure for creating RPM/Debian packages, and completes the changeover to using Maven as a build tool. ## New Features Some of the notable new features in Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 include: * An API discovery service that allows an end point to list its supported APIs and their details. * Added an Events Framework to CloudStack to provide an "event bus" with publish, subscribe, and unsubscribe semantics. Includes a RabbitMQ plugin that can interact with AMQP servers. Introduces the notion of a state change event. * Implement L3 router functionality in the Nicira NVP plugin, and including support for KVM (previously Xen-only). * API request throttling to prevent attacks via frequent API requests. * AWS-style regions. * Egress firewall rules for guest networks. * Resizing root and data volumes. * Reset SSH key to access VMs. * Support for EC2 Query API. * Autoscaling support in conjunction with load balancing devices such as NetScaler. ## Downloads The official source is available from: http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html In addition to the official source code release, individual contributors also make convenience binaries available. 4.1.0 convenience binaries should be available within a day or so of the release announcement. Note that there is a known issue with 4.1.0 and a recent Tomcat release. This has been addressed in the convenience binaries, but is still present in 4.1.0 source release. We will be working on a 4.1.1 release that will contain that fix shortly. ## CloudStack Collaboration Conference The CloudStack community will be gathering for its second conference this month in Santa Clara, CA. The event will start on June 23rd with a hackathon, then formal programming on June 24th and 25th. This year we've gotten some fantastic keynotes, including DevOps legend Gene Kim (author of "The Phoenix Project"). You can find all the details at http://www.cloudstackcollab.org/, and the schedule at http://www.cloudstackcollab.org/schedule/. ## About Apache CloudStack Apache CloudStack is a complete software suite for creating Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) clouds. Target environments include service providers and enterprises. It is used by many service providers to set up an on-demand, elastic cloud computing services and by enterprises to set up a private cloud for use by their own employees. Apache CloudStack is also available to individuals and organizations that wish to study and implement an IaaS for personal, educational, and/or production use. Further information on Apache CloudStack can be found at cloudstack.apache.org. -- Joe Brockmeier PMC Member Apache CloudStack j...@apache.org Twitter: @jzb
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 12:49 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Thanks, this is more elegant for RPMs. I'm trying the fix now. But the > hack I put in should work for debian packages too. Are we sure on this? If the fix is good for 4.1.1, we can respin and start the VOTE Wednesday.z Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] The plan for object_store branch
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 01:24 PM, Edison Su wrote: > If you want to have a weekly IRC meeting on the subjects, definitely, we > can do that. The standing IRC meeting would be a good one to discuss this. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 08:35 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and > he has accepted. Congrats John! Congrats, John! Note that as the newest PMC member, you're obliged to buy the first three rounds at the bar. ;-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ACS41] Upgrade from 2.2.13
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Yes, looks like a doc bug to me. Have to replace systemvm-vmware-3.0.5 > with systemvm-vmware-4.0 I can update this in the docs if it's not correct before I upload them tonight. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please respond with one of the following: > > +1 : change the plan as listed above > +/-0 : no strong opinion, but leaning + or - > -1 : do not change the plan > > This vote will remain open until Tuesday morning US eastern time. -1 do not change the plan. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ACS41] Release process update
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > I've edited downloads.mdtext, and committed to staging. I'll be > building the DEB's and RPM's today. > > We have that new tomcat issue to address, which I'll do in the RPM > build. I think we have a decision to make... announce 4.1 release with > the permission defect or wait for a 4.1.1 to officially announce the > release. > > IMO, I think we announce but note the issue and fix for those attempting > to build their own RPMs from source. I've already sent out the media alert to let folks know we're announcing tomorrow, so I think the best course is to announce 4.1 with the caveats and work on getting 4.1.1 out quickly. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 08:39 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > 2) Someone (not me, due to vacation starting Wed) needs to spin a 4.1.1 > release > ASAP to include the fix for this. I'm happy to help get this together if Ilya needs any assistance. I'm flying today but will be around tomorrow and Wednesday. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
On Tue, May 28, 2013, at 08:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 (binding) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)
No worries. On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 01:14 AM, kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote: > I can't make it, I have a meeting with Websense Tomorrow from UTC 14:00 - > 18:00 > > Maybe next week. > > Sent from my HTC > > - Reply message - > From: "Abhinandan Prateek" > To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" > Subject: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29) > Date: Tue, May 28, 2013 10:52 PM > > Can it be shifted to somewhere between 2:00 - 16:00 UTC ? > > On 29/05/13 10:58 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > > wrote: > > >I will attend > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:44 AM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29) > >> > >> Hey all, > >> > >> The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC > >> tomorrow. We've had really low turnouts for the last month or so. > >> Instead of sending a reminder, I wanted to ping the list and see whether > >> we had enough interest to sustain the meeting time. > >> > >> Thoughts, suggestions, comments, flames? > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> jzb > >> -- > >> Joe Brockmeier > >> j...@zonker.net > >> Twitter: @jzb > >> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 12:52 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Can it be shifted to somewhere between 2:00 - 16:00 UTC ? If a different time would work for everybody, I'm open to suggestions. We set the current time by taking a survey of best times and based that on the responses. Happy to revisit that to set a new time - but changing the time week-to-week tends to be problematic. We had a lot of folks confused about the meeting time due to daylight savings, for example. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 03:24 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I'll be listening in if you don't mind. It's public, of course you're welcome to attend - anyone is. > Is an agenda set in advance? Yes. Here: https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/irc-meetings-logs-and-minutes.html Same every week. We used to go around the "room" and have folks report/ask questions, but that was pretty chaotic. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: patchviasocket: Why in Perl and not native Java?
On Sun, May 26, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Do we want to standardize and say that if it can't be in Java, and it > can't be in Bash, it has to be in Python? This seems like it'd be a good discussion to have - but really ought to be broken out into a separate thread so it's obvious to everyone that it's being discussed. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy
On Thu, May 23, 2013, at 04:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Venkata! Congrats and welcome aboard! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada
On Thu, May 23, 2013, at 04:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Sailaja! Congrats! Welcome aboard! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)
Hey all, The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC tomorrow. We've had really low turnouts for the last month or so. Instead of sending a reminder, I wanted to ping the list and see whether we had enough interest to sustain the meeting time. Thoughts, suggestions, comments, flames? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: 4.1 release manager
On Sat, May 25, 2013, at 09:52 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > In my opinion, an RM should have some autonomy in management. Is there some instance you've noticed the release manager not having sufficient autonomy? I'd be curious to know where the RM needs more autonomy than we've had so far. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code
On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 02:23 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Abhi, Kelcey, Hugo and Myself will be their mentors but if you see > questions from any of these five students feel free to jump in and help > them out. Congrats to all! Glad we're participating. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?
On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 10:51 AM, John Burwell wrote: > I would say that the only thing for an open source project worse than not > releasing is releasing a poor quality release. A late release with high > quality is soon forgotten. An on-time or late release with poor quality > lingers in folks memory. The KDE project made the near fatal mistake of > following the same logic when they release 4.0, and the reputation of KDE > 4.x continues to suffer from it to this day. CloudStack is trusted to > run at the core our user's operations. In my view, if we err, we should > err on the side of quality to avoid of erosion of that trust. If we ever > lost that trust, our new features would never be evaluated. I'm not sure this issue approaches KDE 4.0 levels, but otherwise +1. (Note - the KDE folks are *very* touchy about 4.0 *still* being held up as a high-water mark of poor judgement in releases, which is in and of itself a cautionary tale for releasing something that's not ready...) Why are users waiting for us to officially release instead of grabbing artifacts from Jenkins? In large part, they're waiting for the project to "bless" the quality of the release by saying it's ready. Time-based releases are supposed to be a way of ensuring that we don't hold up releases indefinitely because of missing features - but I don't think that extends to knowingly releasing something that is a pretty serious bug. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a 4.0.3?
On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 09:26 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 05/21/2013 10:03 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > The longer I think about it, the more I agree. Since these issues have > been resolved in 4.1 and we are so close, we'd better focus on 4.1 > indeed. > > Since I think 4.0.3 would only be a release with just this RBD fix. OK. Unless someone jumps in with passionate support for a 4.0.3 at this point, I think we'll stay the planned course and wait on 4.1.0. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?
> On Mon, May 20, 2013, at 03:15 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please respond with one of the following: > > +1: proceed with 4.1 without the Xen portion of CLOUDSTACK-2492 being > resolved > +0: don't care one way or the other > -1: do *not* proceed with any further 4.1 release candidates until > CLOUDSTACK-2492 has been fully resolved So, it's not an option, but I'm -0 on this. I do care, and I'm not really in favor of releasing without this being addressed but I'm not quite at -1. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Should we pause merges into master until 4.1 is out the door?
On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 04:53 AM, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote: > +1 for making effort to keep 4.1 maintained. > As far as I know, there're many people waiting 4.1 release. There are many people waiting for a 4.1 release *they can use*. There's nothing to stop end users from grabbing the 4.1 tree in its current state and running with that. The code is out there. What they're waiting for is a signal from the project that "it's ready." I think releasing before we're there harms the project and has many potential pitfalls for the end users who are currently waiting for the release. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
[DISCUSS] Do we need a 4.0.3?
Hi all, We apparently have a regression in 4.0.2 that will break new deployments on Ceph RDB, and I was also CC'ed on another fix last week that could apply to the 4.0.x branch. The thought was that we would not have another release in the 4.0.x branch because we're so close to 4.1.0, but right now it's unclear how quickly 4.1.0 will be released. So the question is: Should we go ahead and do a 4.0.3 release? It's relatively easy for me to pull in the patches and roll up a release. What I'm concerned about is distracting folks from the 4.1.0 process to take time to vote - if done correctly, the VOTE can be a time-consuming process. Thoughts? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [ACS402][URGENT] RBD/Ceph integration broken
On Tue, May 21, 2013, at 09:08 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > There wasn't a plan to do a 4.0.3, but I guess you could run with it if > you wanted to push that out there. Alternatively, help getting 4.1.0 > out the door (with this fix) could be another path to helping that user. I'm planning to be offline today, but I'll ask if folks think we need a 4.0.3. At this point, I think that a VOTE on a 4.0.3 with this (and another issue that was directed my way last week while I was traveling) would be a distraction. But let's see what folks think. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: How to seperate the user portal and admin portal？
On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:50 PM, sx chen wrote: > hello，I want to seperate the user portal and admin portal,So admin and > user > will login to different server and seperate from each other. Can you give > me some suggestion. > another mgr server for user only and disable some functions,Is it > possible? I don't think this is currently possible. Is there any reason they need to be separate servers? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?
On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 10:59 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Are you going to support upgrades from your Betas to release (and > betaN to betaN+1)? > If the answer is no, then there is no interest on my part. It's not > better than us producing nightly builds, or highlighting jenkins > builds. The problem with the nightly builds is that there's no signal to the larger community of "OK, seriously - we need you to start testing NOW." And presenting people with "pick any build" is a losing proposition. We need to be able to: 1) Signal that we're ready for a larger community to start testing because - while we know it's not perfect, we also need to find blockers that we don't already know about. 2) Engage folks who are less connected to the day-to-day development process and provide a well-defined process and point them at an artifact we're prepared to see a lot of bug reports against. 3) Promote the process and be ready to help a larger body of community members who will likely need guidance in filing bugs, etc. I'm indifferent to upgrades between betas or to production release. I think it's a nice to have, but I don't anticipate anyone using betas in production, or even starting a production deployment with a beta. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [GSOC] Student interviews
Hi Folks, You probably don't want to be sending phone numbers out on public lists. ;-) Please take that off-list when you need to share that sort of info. Thanks, Joe On Thu, May 16, 2013, at 02:14 PM, ADAMA COULIBALY wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > You and I have appointment today at 3pm. > I cannot find you on Skype. Please let me know what time you will be > calling me > my phone number is +1 267-243-3954 > > Adama > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > > > > > On May 13, 2013, at 7:45 AM, ADAMA COULIBALY wrote: > > > > > Hi Sebastien, > > > > > > OK, Do you mean Thursday 16th? 3:00pm eastern time is OK. > > > > > > > Yes, that's when you and I talk on Skype. > > > > > Adama > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Sebastien Goasguen > >wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Hi, Let's do it thursday 15th at 3pm, I believe you are on eastern time > > >> zone right ? > > >> > > >> You can find me on Skype at sebgoasguen > > >> > > >> -sebastien > > >> > > >> On May 9, 2013, at 2:51 PM, ADAMA COULIBALY > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Sebastien, > > >>> > > >>> My phone number is (1) 267-243-3954 > > >>> The best time to call me : 10:00 am to 12:00 > > >>> 2:pm to 5: pm > > >>> any day after this Wednesday 15th May, ( From Monday to Wednesday I > > will > > >> be > > >>> busy with my final) > > >>> So let know the day and time then I will be ready for your phone call. > > >>> > > >>> Best Regards, > > >>> > > >>> Adama > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> I would like to schedule phone/skype interviews with all the students > > >> who > > >>>> submitted proposals. > > >>>> (This is authorized and recommended by ASF gsoc guidelines) > > >>>> > > >>>> Please get in touch with me on IRC or direct email to set a meeting > > >> time. > > >>>> > > >>>> Once the times are set I will send it to the list and welcome anyone > > who > > >>>> wants to participate in the call. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> > > >>>> -Sebastien > > >> > > >> > > > > Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?
On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 09:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what > does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each > major feature release? Yes to beta releases. I know that users could test at any time, but we need explicit targets for users that say "now is a good time to test this and give feedback." +1 Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
CloudStack Collaboration Conference Deadline Extended to May 19th
Hi all, We've received a number of excellent proposals for the CloudStack Collaboration Conference, but also a number of requests for a little more time to get a good proposal in. So we've extended the CFP by *one week* to May 19th. You can see the CFP, and submit your proposal, here: http://www.cloudstackcollab.org/CfP/ Have questions about the CFP, or want feedback before submitting your final proposal? Feel free to email plann...@cloudstackcollab.org. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Storage Configuration Guide
Hi Mike, On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 03:19 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Please let me know if you have any comments. Great to see additional docs being added, and I don't mind them being specific to one device/product, etc. (at least initially). However, this doesn't really belong on the wiki or anything we distribute: "If you have any questions regarding the steps and/recommendations outlined above, or would like to see a live demo, please contact us at sa...@solidfire.com." When submitting stuff, can we make sure to strip things like that before they're posted? Thanks! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Upgrade from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 fails due to db schema upgrade fail
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 11:24 AM, France wrote: > I guess 4.1 is still a long way from being released: > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-41-release.html > because we haven't even hit the code freeze yet. We're close to the 4.1.0 release - we've hit a number of upgrade blockers, but as soon as those are resolved, Chip should be calling for a vote and the release will come out shortly after that. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Enabling access for jira account
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 03:58 AM, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: > Could you please enable create/modify access for my jira account: > gauravaradhye ? This should be done. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Jira account access.
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 03:57 AM, Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: > Hello, > > Could you please enable create/modify access for my jira account: > ashutoshk ? You should be able to do this now. Please let me know if you have any problems. Thanks! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
[REMINDER] The CloudStack Conference CFP Deadline is Approaching! Submit Talks by Sunday
Are you using, supporting, or helping develop Apache CloudStack? Doing interesting work around Apache CloudStack? If so, you should be speaking at the second [1]CloudStack Collaboration Conference this June in Santa Clara. ## TL;DR The deadline for submissions is Sunday, May 12th. You can submit talks at [2]http://www.cloudstackcollab.com/CfP/. Ask questions to market...@cloudstack.apache.org or plann...@cloudstackcollab.org. The Collaboration Conference will feature tracks for users, developers, and integrators of Apache CloudStack. We're looking for presentations that provide insight into best practices in deploying and developing Apache CloudStack. This includes supporting technologies like configuration management tools, monitoring solutions, and more. This will be an outstanding opportunity for developers to collaborate, exchange ideas, and get work done face-to-face with other Apache CloudStack contributors to improve Apache CloudStack. ## Proposals The program committee will be looking for presentations and workshops related to working with and developing Apache CloudStack. This includes everything from running CloudStack at scale, best practices for working with IaaS clouds, discussions about CloudStack's architecture, proposals for feature development, and more. We're also open to talks that go hand-in-hand with managing Apache CloudStack, like configuration management and monitoring tools. In short, if it's relevant to Apache CloudStack development, deployment, and integration, we're interested in what you might have to say. For an example of what we're looking for, check out some of the [3]videos from last year's event. To submit your talk, just go to [4]http://www.cloudstackcollab.com/CfP/ and follow the steps there. ## Timeline and Deadlines There's no time like the present to submit a proposal. We recommend getting your proposal in early, and feel free to ask questions about talk ideas on market...@cloudstack.apache.org if you want tips for success! You can reach the CfP committee at plann...@cloudstackcollab.org. Dates for proposals are as follows: * Call for Proposals closes on May 12th. * Notifications will go out on May 17th. * Confirmations will be due by May 22nd. ## Travel Sponsorships Not sure if you can afford the airfare and lodging to attend the Collaboration Conference? Please don't let that stop you from submitting your best proposal. We may be making a number of travel sponsorships available for speakers who have useful information to share with the Apache CloudStack community. ## Code of Conduct The Apache CloudStack community is open to everyone. As such, we are committed to providing a friendly, safe, and welcoming environment for all - regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, or religion. We respect and encourage diversity at our conference. By agreeing to present at the conference, you are agreeing to abide by the code of conduct. We expect all speakers and attendees to have read and understood the code of conduct, and that all presentations will meet this standard. ## Questions? If you have questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out to the conference planning committee by sending an email to plann...@cloudstackcollab.org. ## References 1. http://www.cloudstackcollab.com/ 2. http://www.cloudstackcollab.com/CfP/ 3. http://is.gd/CCC12vids 4. http://www.cloudstackcollab.com/CfP/ Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DOCS] OpenHelp writers conference in June: Is CS going?
On Tue, May 7, 2013, at 09:19 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > I thought JZB is planning to attend.. I was interested in attending, but it's the week before the CloudStack Collaboration Conference, and the weekend after SELF, which is the weekend after Texas LinuxFest. I did talk to one of the conference organizers a while back about attracting more doc contributors - and his response was essentially that we're welcoming enough and have sane contribution policies, but it's a matter of building enough critical mass of people who understand the project and wish to actually do docs... Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
[OFFLINE] May 6 and May 7
Hi all, Taking vacation on Monday and Tuesday this week, so I'll be mostly offline these days. Also flying on Wednesday, but should be back online for most of the day. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Primary maintainers?
On Fri, May 3, 2013, at 08:03 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > I understand the motivation behind this, but I believe the outcome of > that > thread was a consensus that auto-assignment does not happen in any other > Apache projects, and should not happen here either. (So no need for this > "primary maintainer" column.) Yeah, we should probably simply revise that to something like "people who are willing to be assigned bugs in this area" or "people who know these areas". I confess, I don't go through each and every bug in Jira - but I'd like some way to enable people who aren't intimately familiar with the project to ping me personally if they see bugs in the Web site or documentation that I can fix. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Dev/Test Environment
On Thu, May 2, 2013, at 03:16 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013, at 01:44 PM, Soheil Eizadi wrote: > > The wiki is organized around VirtualBox, assuming it works, I think it is > > a better choice than Fusion since it free and easy to setup. I don't have > > much experience with VirtualBox, does it not support nested hypervisors? > > If you've gotten something working in Fusion, it would be worth putting > that on the wiki for folks who aren't a fan of VirtualBox. (Or folks who > already use Fusion and don't want to run two desktop virt. products...) Didn't complete my thought - would be worth putting on the wiki *on a new page* so that it's not conflicting with the "standard" DevCloud info. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: Dev/Test Environment
On Thu, May 2, 2013, at 01:44 PM, Soheil Eizadi wrote: > The wiki is organized around VirtualBox, assuming it works, I think it is > a better choice than Fusion since it free and easy to setup. I don't have > much experience with VirtualBox, does it not support nested hypervisors? If you've gotten something working in Fusion, it would be worth putting that on the wiki for folks who aren't a fan of VirtualBox. (Or folks who already use Fusion and don't want to run two desktop virt. products...) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Clayton! Congratulations, Clayton! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Apache CloudStack 2013 Collaboration Conference Call for Proposals
We're pleased to announce that the [1]Call for Proposals (CfP) for the second CloudStack Collaboration Conference is now open! The conference is being held in Santa Clara, CA from Sunday June 23 through Tuesday June 25. The Collaboration Conference will feature tracks for users, developers, and integrators of Apache CloudStack. We're looking for presentations that provide insight into best practices in deploying and developing Apache CloudStack. This will be an outstanding opportunity for developers to collaborate, exchange ideas, and get work done face-to-face with other Apache CloudStack contributors to improve Apache CloudStack. ## Proposals The program committee will be looking for presentations and workshops related to working with and developing Apache CloudStack. This includes everything from running CloudStack at scale, best practices for working with IaaS clouds, discussions about CloudStack's architecture, proposals for feature development, and more. We're also open to talks that go hand-in-hand with managing Apache CloudStack, like configuration management and monitoring tools. In short, if it's relevant to Apache CloudStack development, deployment, and integration, we're interested in what you might have to say. For an example of what we're looking for, check out some of the [2]videos from last year's event. ## Timeline and Deadlines There's no time like the present to submit a proposal. We recommend getting your proposal in early, and feel free to ask questions about talk ideas on market...@cloudstack.apache.org if you want tips for success! You can reach the CfP committee at plann...@cloudstackcollab.org. ## Dates for proposals are as follows: * Call for Proposals is opened on April 22nd. * Call for Proposals closes on May 11th. * Notifications will go out on May 17th. * Confirmations will be due by May 22nd. ## Travel Sponsorships Not sure if you can afford the airfare and lodging to attend the Collaboration Conference? Please don't let that stop you from submitting your best proposal. We may be making a number of travel sponsorships available for speakers who have useful information to share with the Apache CloudStack community. ## Code of Conduct The Apache CloudStack community is open to everyone. As such, we are committed to providing a friendly, safe, and welcoming environment for all - regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, or religion. We respect and encourage diversity at our conference. By agreeing to present at the conference, you are agreeing to abide by the code of conduct. We expect all speakers and attendees to have read and understood the code of conduct, and that all presentations will meet this standard. ## Questions? If you have questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out to the conference planning committee by sending an email to plann...@cloudstackcollab.org. ## References 1. http://cloudstackcollab.org/CfP/ 2. http://is.gd/CCC12vids Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
[REMINDER] Weekly IRC Meeting on Wednesday, 17:00 UTC
Hi all, A friendly reminder, we have a weekly IRC meeting scheduled for Wednesday (1 May 2013) at 17:00 UTC [1]. Also - I'll be attending DevOps Days this week in Austin, and probably won't be available, so if someone else can moderate, that'd be helpful. The standing agenda is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/irc-meetings-logs-and-minutes.html Please join us in #cloudstack-meeting on Freenode. If you're not a regular IRC user, you can use the webchat: http://webchat.freenode.net/ It's useful if everyone arrives at the meeting time and stays on topic. Please try to arrive at or very close to 17:00 UTC and be sure to follow the topics as they're discussed, and add "EOF" or something similar when you're done speaking. Meeting summaries are posted immediately after the meeting, you can find older meeting logs here: http://wilderness.apache.org/archives/#logs-cloudstack-meeting [1] http://is.gd/APsWsB Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: CloudStack GitHub repository
Noah, I opened a bug on this weeks ago, and had reported to the mailing list. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6130 On Sat, Apr 27, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Devs, > > I have requested that our GitHub repository be moved to indicate we are > no > longer in incubation. > > Follow along here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6203 > > Thanks, > > -- > NS Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Call for News Items
Hi all, If you have any discussions, events, etc. that you think belong in the weekly news, please feel free to add them to next week's issue here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Apache+CloudStack+Weekly+News+-+29+April+2013 You can look at previous issues for examples of how items should be formatted. Thanks! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [DISCUSS] Authorship of translations
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013, at 08:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Do we have a legal issue here ? Question: When I go to Transifex and work on Apache docs, is it clear that I am submitting my work under the ASL and that it needs to be my own original authorship, etc.? If not - do we have a way of changing this? So, I tried to scour legal-discuss for any prior discussions that might shed light on this for us. The closest I came was this: http://markmail.org/message/zffpqhaaeoc2bkmm Specifically, the bit about committing translations done "by a translation team inside" a company. I think we're in a similar boat, with folks wanting to check in translations done by a team on Transifex. This *might* be an issue worth raising on legal-discuss, if not because we're totally unclear, then to provide a "paper trail" for any other projects that are using or thinking about using Transifex for their translations. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
