[jira] [Closed] (COUCHDB-951) Test DB upgrade for 1.0.x to 1.1.0
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Cottlehuber closed COUCHDB-951. > Test DB upgrade for 1.0.x to 1.1.0 > -- > > Key: COUCHDB-951 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-951 > Project: CouchDB > Issue Type: Test >Affects Versions: 1.1 >Reporter: Robert Newson >Assignee: Robert Newson > Fix For: 1.1 > > > As the on-disk format has changed (for Range header support for attachments) > extensive testing of db upgrades should be performed. > The Range upgrade occurs on compaction, so it should suffice to; > 1) create a db with 1.0.x > 2) upgrade to 1.1.0 > 3) compact > 4) verify db > I will be working on scripts to automate as much as possible. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Created] (COUCHDB-1904) support snappy 1.1.0
Dave Cottlehuber created COUCHDB-1904: - Summary: support snappy 1.1.0 Key: COUCHDB-1904 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1904 Project: CouchDB Issue Type: Improvement Components: Database Core Reporter: Dave Cottlehuber Snappy 1.1.0 is out, I have a test branch that seems to work but its a bit early to drop it into CouchDB 1.5.0 yet. Main change (per commit message) from Snappy 1.0.5 is that iostream is no longer required as part of the C++ build. I also would like to get people to test this with lz4 http://code.google.com/p/lz4/ and the nif https://github.com/szktty/erlang-lz4, which I'll add to a separate branch later this week. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
Thanx all!cheers Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya | CTO | mah...@aptela.com | 703.386.1500 Ext. 9100593 Herndon Parkway | Suite 400 | Herndon, VA | www.aptela.comCheck out our Blog | Follow us on Twitter | Refer a Friend On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Robert Newson wrote:Hello,Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download: http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.htmlChanges in this release: * Native SSL support. * Added support for HTTP range requests for attachments. * Added built-in filters for `_changes`: `_doc_ids` and `_design`. * Added configuration option for TCP_NODELAY aka "Nagle". * Allow wildcards in vhosts definitions. * More granular ETag support for views. * More flexible URL rewriter. * Added OS Process module to manage daemons outside of CouchDB. * Added HTTP Proxy handler for more scalable externals. * Added `_replicator` database to manage replications. * Multiple micro-optimizations when reading data. * Added CommonJS support to map functions. * Added `stale=update_after` query option that triggers a view update after returning a `stale=ok` response. * More explicit error messages when it's not possible to access a file due to lack of permissions. * Added a "change password"-feature to Futon.Apache CouchDB is a document-oriented database that can be queried and indexedin a MapReduce fashion using _javascript_. CouchDB also offers incrementalreplication with bi-directional conflict detection and resolution.CouchDB provides a RESTful JSON API than can be accessed from any environmentthat allows HTTP requests. There are myriad third-party client libraries thatmake this even easier from your programming language of choice. CouchDB's builtin Web administration console speaks directly to the database using HTTPrequests issued from your browser.CouchDB is written in Erlang, a robust functional programming language ideal forbuilding concurrent distributed systems. Erlang allows for a flexible designthat is easily scalable and readily extensible.Your Eternal ServantRobert Newson
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
Relax, guys. :) Daniele, could you post this to u...@couchdb.apache.org please? Thanks. On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:14, Robert Newson wrote: > I'd say quite inappropriate, yes. It's telling that the question > includes the offer too, rather than waiting to find out if it was > inappropriate first...
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
On 6 Jun 2011, at 13:49, Paul Davis wrote: >> Your Eternal Servant > > Woot! I could use a coffee. Two sugars no milk. > > Also, awesome work on releasing 1.1. +1
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
I'd say quite inappropriate, yes. It's telling that the question includes the offer too, rather than waiting to find out if it was inappropriate first... B. On 6 June 2011 15:05, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > I'd say it's pretty inappropriate to post that in reply to a release > announcement... > > On 06.06.2011, at 16:03, Daniele Testa wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I hope it is OK to post job-offers here? >> >> In any case, I am looking for experienced CouchDB admins/developers >> for full time positions with a huge company in Germany. >> >> If you are interested, please send me your CV and I will get back to >> you with more information. >> >> Regards, >> Daniele > >
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
Great work everybody! On 06.06.2011, at 14:13, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download: > > http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html > > Changes in this release: > > * Native SSL support. > * Added support for HTTP range requests for attachments. > * Added built-in filters for `_changes`: `_doc_ids` and `_design`. > * Added configuration option for TCP_NODELAY aka "Nagle". > * Allow wildcards in vhosts definitions. > * More granular ETag support for views. > * More flexible URL rewriter. > * Added OS Process module to manage daemons outside of CouchDB. > * Added HTTP Proxy handler for more scalable externals. > * Added `_replicator` database to manage replications. > * Multiple micro-optimizations when reading data. > * Added CommonJS support to map functions. > * Added `stale=update_after` query option that triggers a view update after > returning a `stale=ok` response. > * More explicit error messages when it's not possible to access a file due > to lack of permissions. > * Added a "change password"-feature to Futon. > > Apache CouchDB is a document-oriented database that can be queried and indexed > in a MapReduce fashion using JavaScript. CouchDB also offers incremental > replication with bi-directional conflict detection and resolution. > > CouchDB provides a RESTful JSON API than can be accessed from any environment > that allows HTTP requests. There are myriad third-party client libraries that > make this even easier from your programming language of choice. CouchDB's > built > in Web administration console speaks directly to the database using HTTP > requests issued from your browser. > > CouchDB is written in Erlang, a robust functional programming language ideal > for > building concurrent distributed systems. Erlang allows for a flexible design > that is easily scalable and readily extensible. > > Your Eternal Servant > > Robert Newson
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
I'd say it's pretty inappropriate to post that in reply to a release announcement... On 06.06.2011, at 16:03, Daniele Testa wrote: > Hi, > > I hope it is OK to post job-offers here? > > In any case, I am looking for experienced CouchDB admins/developers > for full time positions with a huge company in Germany. > > If you are interested, please send me your CV and I will get back to > you with more information. > > Regards, > Daniele
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
Hi, I hope it is OK to post job-offers here? In any case, I am looking for experienced CouchDB admins/developers for full time positions with a huge company in Germany. If you are interested, please send me your CV and I will get back to you with more information. Regards, Daniele
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
Whoa! I owe you a bottle of vodka :) Cheers, Fedor. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download: > > > >http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > Changes in this release: > > > > * Native SSL support. > > * Added support for HTTP range requests for attachments. > > * Added built-in filters for `_changes`: `_doc_ids` and `_design`. > > * Added configuration option for TCP_NODELAY aka "Nagle". > > * Allow wildcards in vhosts definitions. > > * More granular ETag support for views. > > * More flexible URL rewriter. > > * Added OS Process module to manage daemons outside of CouchDB. > > * Added HTTP Proxy handler for more scalable externals. > > * Added `_replicator` database to manage replications. > > * Multiple micro-optimizations when reading data. > > * Added CommonJS support to map functions. > > * Added `stale=update_after` query option that triggers a view update > after > > returning a `stale=ok` response. > > * More explicit error messages when it's not possible to access a file > due > > to lack of permissions. > > * Added a "change password"-feature to Futon. > > > > Apache CouchDB is a document-oriented database that can be queried and > indexed > > in a MapReduce fashion using JavaScript. CouchDB also offers incremental > > replication with bi-directional conflict detection and resolution. > > > > CouchDB provides a RESTful JSON API than can be accessed from any > environment > > that allows HTTP requests. There are myriad third-party client libraries > that > > make this even easier from your programming language of choice. CouchDB's > built > > in Web administration console speaks directly to the database using HTTP > > requests issued from your browser. > > > > CouchDB is written in Erlang, a robust functional programming language > ideal for > > building concurrent distributed systems. Erlang allows for a flexible > design > > that is easily scalable and readily extensible. > > > > Your Eternal Servant > > > > Robert Newson > > > > Thanks for the release! I owe you a beer. > > - benoit >
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download: > > http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html > > Changes in this release: > > * Native SSL support. > * Added support for HTTP range requests for attachments. > * Added built-in filters for `_changes`: `_doc_ids` and `_design`. > * Added configuration option for TCP_NODELAY aka "Nagle". > * Allow wildcards in vhosts definitions. > * More granular ETag support for views. > * More flexible URL rewriter. > * Added OS Process module to manage daemons outside of CouchDB. > * Added HTTP Proxy handler for more scalable externals. > * Added `_replicator` database to manage replications. > * Multiple micro-optimizations when reading data. > * Added CommonJS support to map functions. > * Added `stale=update_after` query option that triggers a view update after > returning a `stale=ok` response. > * More explicit error messages when it's not possible to access a file due > to lack of permissions. > * Added a "change password"-feature to Futon. > > Apache CouchDB is a document-oriented database that can be queried and indexed > in a MapReduce fashion using JavaScript. CouchDB also offers incremental > replication with bi-directional conflict detection and resolution. > > CouchDB provides a RESTful JSON API than can be accessed from any environment > that allows HTTP requests. There are myriad third-party client libraries that > make this even easier from your programming language of choice. CouchDB's > built > in Web administration console speaks directly to the database using HTTP > requests issued from your browser. > > CouchDB is written in Erlang, a robust functional programming language ideal > for > building concurrent distributed systems. Erlang allows for a flexible design > that is easily scalable and readily extensible. > > Your Eternal Servant > > Robert Newson > Thanks for the release! I owe you a beer. - benoit
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
Fantastic - & what a sprint that was! homebrew? check windows? check I'm counting nanoseconds on behalf of davisp ... it's not looking too good. A+ Dave
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 14:13, Robert Newson wrote: > Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download: > > http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html Great stuff; thanks a bunch for driving this forward! Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
No problem, I've got your coffee right here. B. On 6 June 2011 13:49, Paul Davis wrote: >> Your Eternal Servant > > Woot! I could use a coffee. Two sugars no milk. > > Also, awesome work on releasing 1.1. >
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
> Your Eternal Servant Woot! I could use a coffee. Two sugars no milk. Also, awesome work on releasing 1.1.
[ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released
Hello, Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download: http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html Changes in this release: * Native SSL support. * Added support for HTTP range requests for attachments. * Added built-in filters for `_changes`: `_doc_ids` and `_design`. * Added configuration option for TCP_NODELAY aka "Nagle". * Allow wildcards in vhosts definitions. * More granular ETag support for views. * More flexible URL rewriter. * Added OS Process module to manage daemons outside of CouchDB. * Added HTTP Proxy handler for more scalable externals. * Added `_replicator` database to manage replications. * Multiple micro-optimizations when reading data. * Added CommonJS support to map functions. * Added `stale=update_after` query option that triggers a view update after returning a `stale=ok` response. * More explicit error messages when it's not possible to access a file due to lack of permissions. * Added a "change password"-feature to Futon. Apache CouchDB is a document-oriented database that can be queried and indexed in a MapReduce fashion using JavaScript. CouchDB also offers incremental replication with bi-directional conflict detection and resolution. CouchDB provides a RESTful JSON API than can be accessed from any environment that allows HTTP requests. There are myriad third-party client libraries that make this even easier from your programming language of choice. CouchDB's built in Web administration console speaks directly to the database using HTTP requests issued from your browser. CouchDB is written in Erlang, a robust functional programming language ideal for building concurrent distributed systems. Erlang allows for a flexible design that is easily scalable and readily extensible. Your Eternal Servant Robert Newson
[VOTE RESULTS] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Hello, The final tally of the vote is: 15 +1 votes This exceeds the required minimum three +1 votes and the proposal passes. I shall prepare the release as soon as possible. The individual votes are as follows: +1 Randall Leeds: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTimwGa4L2nY_Ga6HpAMHAMfxpvr=c...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Paul Davis: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3ca5d86857-7f27-47b4-9392-4e92b1ebe...@gmail.com%3E +1 Till Klampaeckel: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3cbanlktimrafkbbydvq97vsmcpguxdmkt...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Dave Cottlehuber: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTi=-tt6ejgf1acag+8lbqwcvqpr...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Dirkjan Ochtman: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3cbanlktinfe5exexekzsvetfaoa2xwcwy...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Jan Lehnardt: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3c871c4834-0252-428a-b4c8-85c2ca1c0...@apache.org%3E +1 Benoit Chesneau: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTin2QFLg-Tb=tknculxnwkxqhqt...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Robert Dionne: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3c6628daed-c4e5-4e6d-8873-f9e492e31...@dionne-associates.com%3E +1 Filipe David Manana: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTik80kwNYsq+pP8mviMLyvyhM=q...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Sam Bisbee: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTikZS=ttcuam0hpufkkrwbk8wqt...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Sebastian Cohnen: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3c21358eb2-dec6-4a27-af3c-f9b31ead6...@googlemail.com%3E +1 Noah Slater: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3c6bf4674d-1161-44d7-925e-e252cb358...@apache.org%3E +1 Adam Kocoloski: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3cb343261e-6a74-4a92-b098-a76c98bc6...@apache.org%3E +0 Peter Nolan: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktinsa29werzgegwcqktdepmbhka...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Robert Newson: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3CBANLkTimvdyUMSV+GN5cZx6Skoo=yfwk...@mail.gmail.com%3E +1 Chris Anderson: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktincwvtjmdbwnxteuesiweqyunl...@mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks to everyone who voted. B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 3 Jun 2011, at 11:09, Robert Dionne wrote: > Chris, > > This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are > also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and > use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in > share/www/script/test to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of > them moving to test/javascript to be run as part of "make check". They serve > a great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the > browser. > > I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend. Related: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201010.mbox/%3c4897047e-3c28-4ff4-900f-ff564bbc3...@apache.org%3e I still intend to commit this once 1.1.0 is out :) Cheers Jan -- > > Best, > > Bob > > > > > > On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: > >> I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a >> small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser >> (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey >> version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test >> suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow >> itself. >> >> I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically >> stock macbook air). >> >> +1 from me. >> >> Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1. >> >> Chris >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> >>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote >>>>> to +1 now. >>>>> >>>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to >>>>> Chrome. >>>>> >>>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. >>>> >>>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to >>>> 4 is also most of the issue. >>> >>> Could be. :) >>> >>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! >>> >>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Chris Anderson >> http://jchrisa.net >> http://couchbase.com >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Chris, This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in share/www/script/test to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of them moving to test/javascript to be run as part of "make check". They serve a great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the browser. I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend. Best, Bob On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: > I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a > small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser > (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey > version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test > suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow > itself. > > I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically > stock macbook air). > > +1 from me. > > Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1. > > Chris > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. >>> >>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to >>> 4 is also most of the issue. >> >> Could be. :) >> >> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! >> >> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) >> >> > > > > -- > Chris Anderson > http://jchrisa.net > http://couchbase.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow itself. I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically stock macbook air). +1 from me. Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1. Chris On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to >>> +1 now. >>> >>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. >>> >>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. >> >> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to >> 4 is also most of the issue. > > Could be. :) > > DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! > > (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) > > -- Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couchbase.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 14:38, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > I've seen this in the past occasionally, where the test suite does > a _restart and then waits forever for CouchDB to come back. The > Erlang console will show the regular startup procedure output, but > then it just waits there for requests. I have verified that it > actually *does* accept requests when it is in this state. Maybe > it is the "wait for restart" routine that has a bug or triggers > one inside Firefox. Oh yes, restarting Firefox and running new tests works. CouchDB is sat there, happily waiting to requests. The problem is with the test code.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 15:13, Paul Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >> On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> >>> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the >>> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone! >> >> Nope, nothing. >> >> > If Chrome passed fine I'm guessing the error is in the browser. I've seen this in the past occasionally, where the test suite does a _restart and then waits forever for CouchDB to come back. The Erlang console will show the regular startup procedure output, but then it just waits there for requests. I have verified that it actually *does* accept requests when it is in this state. Maybe it is the "wait for restart" routine that has a bug or triggers one inside Firefox. From the log: ... [info] [<0.2219.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'POST' /_restart 200 # _restart [info] [<0.2202.0>] Stopping all ongoing replications because the replicator database was deleted or changed Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting. # startup logs Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax. # cnt'd [info] [<0.2274.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/ # hangs here [info] [<0.2790.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' / 200 # verified that CouchDB accepts requests FWIW, this is the delayed_commits test. Cheers Jan --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the >> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone! > > Nope, nothing. > > If Chrome passed fine I'm guessing the error is in the browser.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the > erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone! Nope, nothing.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
mostly for fun, I did more testing than our standard procedure to even begin each round of this releasel +1 Mac OS X 10.6.7, erlang R14B03, firefox 4.0.1 digests and sigs verified. make check and Futon all clear (have to clear cache, though). As part of preparing for round 3 I ran all the above tests (and more) on R14B01 and R14B02 as well. B. On 2 June 2011 09:50, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Hi Peter, > > thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :) > > Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the > procedure and tell you what is expected or not: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Let us know if you have any questions :) > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote: > >> well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but >> an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances >> in this couch 'game'. >> >> With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my >> vote should have marginal weight. >> >> To quote, the streets >> >> lets push things forward. >> >> >> +0 > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Hi Peter, thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :) Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the procedure and tell you what is expected or not: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Let us know if you have any questions :) Cheers Jan -- On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote: > well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but > an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances > in this couch 'game'. > > With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my > vote should have marginal weight. > > To quote, the streets > > lets push things forward. > > > +0
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Top posting to Bob's top posting, same for me. FF 4.0.1 has been fine on R14B01 / 03 also, when I remember to clear cache. Chrome also seems to be fine & I've had no issues with safari current mac version either but not tested either systematically. @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone! A+ Dave On 2 June 2011 09:40, Robert Newson wrote: > I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite > passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is > fixed). > > B. > > On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> Just tangentially FYI: >> >> From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by >> success or failure per browser and version: >> >> http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9 >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> >> >> >> On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> >>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: >>> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. >>> >>> I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever. >> >> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances in this couch 'game'. With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my vote should have marginal weight. To quote, the streets lets push things forward. +0
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 23:43, Peter Nolan wrote: > /me votes 'present'. FYI, this vote will not be counted, if that is what you intended. You need to provide an Apache style vote. Preferably with a reason! :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
/me votes 'present'.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is fixed). B. On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Just tangentially FYI: > > From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by > success or failure per browser and version: > > http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9 > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > > > On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote: > >> >> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: >> >>> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. >>> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old >>> versions of the test scripts cached. >> >> I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever. > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Just tangentially FYI: From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by success or failure per browser and version: http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9 Cheers Jan -- On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: > >> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. >> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old >> versions of the test scripts cached. > > I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: > FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. > Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old > versions of the test scripts cached. I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:29, Paul Davis wrote: > What version of FF? 3.5 or newer? > 4.0.1 > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: >> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. >> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old >> versions of the test scripts cached. >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> >>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my >>> vote to +1 now. >>> >>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to >>> Chrome. >>> >>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. >> >> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to >> 4 is also most of the issue. > > Could be. :) > > DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! > > (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) > > I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its excellent HTTP support. >>> >>> >>> >>> (I've got nothing) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B. I'm +1 on releasing these artifacts, but I would like to note that, contrary to the INSTALL.Unix instructions, CouchDB 1.1 will not work on Erlang/OTP R12B05. We should update the docs in a future patch release. Cheers, Adam
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
What version of FF? 3.5 or newer? On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. > Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old > versions of the test scripts cached. > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote >> to +1 now. >> >> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to >> Chrome. >> >> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. > > Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to > 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) >>> >>> I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its >>> excellent HTTP support. >> >> >> >> (I've got nothing) >> >> -- >> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> >>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote > to +1 now. > > I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to > Chrome. > > Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. >>> >>> Could be. :) >>> >>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! >>> >>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) >>> >>> >> >> I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its >> excellent HTTP support. > > > > (I've got nothing) > > -- > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. >>> >>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to >>> 4 is also most of the issue. >> >> Could be. :) >> >> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! >> >> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) >> >> > > I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its > excellent HTTP support. (I've got nothing) --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to >>> +1 now. >>> >>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. >>> >>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. >> >> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to >> 4 is also most of the issue. > > Could be. :) > > DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! > > (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) > > I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its excellent HTTP support.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to >> +1 now. >> >> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. >> >> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. > > Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to > 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to > +1 now. > > I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. > > Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:21, Paul Davis wrote: > This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only > seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you > check if couch was still running? Couch was running, and the tests afterwards all passed. >> auth_cache fails >> >> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed >> >> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed >> > > This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep > button usually fixes it. Should the tests work around this? >> cookie_auth fails >> >> "error": "file_exists" >> > > Didn't we just fix this? Evidently not. ;) >> Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests. >> >> I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;) > > I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue > that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do > you? That can screw with things. I don't even have it installed! Just ran the tests in Chrome and they all pass. What gives?
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:19, Robert Dionne wrote: > Does "make check" run with all the etaps passing? > >> Everything else looks okay though. Yep. :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
>
> Unit tests fail for me.
>
> -
>
> replicator_db
> error
> 3001ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rev_stemming
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rewrite
> error
> 10ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> security_validation
> error
> 6ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> show_documents
> error
> 11ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> stats
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> update_documents
> error
> 5ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> users_db
> error
> 4ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only
seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you
check if couch was still running?
> auth_cache fails
>
> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
>
> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
>
This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep
button usually fixes it.
> cookie_auth fails
>
> "error": "file_exists"
>
Didn't we just fix this?
> Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests.
>
> I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;)
I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue
that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do
you? That can screw with things.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Noah,
Does "make check" run with all the etaps passing?
Bob
On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
>
> Unit tests fail for me.
>
> -
>
> replicator_db
> error
> 3001ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rev_stemming
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rewrite
> error
> 10ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> security_validation
> error
> 6ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> show_documents
> error
> 11ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> stats
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> update_documents
> error
> 5ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> users_db
> error
> 4ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> -
>
> Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up.
>
> The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running
> through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the
> whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than
> restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it
> wouldn't. Makes testing harder than it could be.
>
> -
>
> After restarting Firefox all these tests pass.
>
> Very weird.
>
> Going to run the whole test suite again.
>
> —
>
> auth_cache fails
>
> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
>
> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
>
> cookie_auth fails
>
> "error": "file_exists"
>
> The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
>
> Killing Firefox and trying again.
>
> —
>
> auth_cache fails
>
> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
>
> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
>
> The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
>
> Killing Firefox and trying again, manually.
>
> Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox.
>
> I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either.
>
> So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly.
>
> —
>
> Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors.
>
> Running through all the tests manually from the start.
>
> cookie_auth fails again for the same reason.
>
> Ran with debug:
>
> Exception raised: {"message":"ddoc is
> null","fileName":"http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js","lineNumber":41,"stack":";()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object
> Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\"test_suite_users\",
> {'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \"false\"});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var
> ddoc = usersDb.open(\"_design/_auth\");T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var
> password = \"3.141592653589\";var jasonUserDoc =
> CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"Jason Davies\", roles: [\"dev\"]},
> password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var checkDoc =
> usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \"Jason Davies\");var
> jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"jch...@apache.org\"},
> \"funnybone\");T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var duplicateJchrisDoc =
> CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"jch...@apache.org\"}, \"eh, Boo-Boo?\");try
> {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false && \"Can't create duplicate user
> names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error ==
> \"conflict\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var underscoreUserDoc =
> CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"_why\"}, \"copperfield\");try
> {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't create underscore user
> names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error ==
> \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc =
> CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"foo\"}, \"bar\");badIdDoc._id =
> \"org.apache.couchdb:w00x\";try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false && \"Can't
> create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e)
> {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status ==
> 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\"Jason Davies\",
> password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"Jason Davies\");var xhr =
> CouchDB.request(\"POST\", \"/_session\", {headers: {'Content-Type':
> \"application/json\"}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \"Jason Davies\",
> password:
> password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name
> == \"Jason Davies\");jasonUserDoc.foo =
> 2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\")
> == -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't delete other
> users docs. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error ==
> \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\"Jason
> Davies\", \"2.71828\").ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\"Robert Allen Zimmerman\",
> \"d00d\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \"Ja
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
Unit tests fail for me.
-
replicator_db
error
3001ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
rev_stemming
error
7ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
rewrite
error
10ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
security_validation
error
6ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
show_documents
error
11ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
stats
error
7ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
update_documents
error
5ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
users_db
error
4ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
-
Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up.
The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running
through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the
whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than
restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it wouldn't.
Makes testing harder than it could be.
-
After restarting Firefox all these tests pass.
Very weird.
Going to run the whole test suite again.
—
auth_cache fails
assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
cookie_auth fails
"error": "file_exists"
The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
Killing Firefox and trying again.
—
auth_cache fails
assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
Killing Firefox and trying again, manually.
Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox.
I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either.
So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly.
—
Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors.
Running through all the tests manually from the start.
cookie_auth fails again for the same reason.
Ran with debug:
Exception raised: {"message":"ddoc is
null","fileName":"http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js","lineNumber":41,"stack":";()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object
Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\"test_suite_users\",
{'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \"false\"});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var
ddoc = usersDb.open(\"_design/_auth\");T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var password
= \"3.141592653589\";var jasonUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"Jason
Davies\", roles: [\"dev\"]}, password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var
checkDoc = usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \"Jason
Davies\");var jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name:
\"jch...@apache.org\"}, \"funnybone\");T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var
duplicateJchrisDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"jch...@apache.org\"},
\"eh, Boo-Boo?\");try {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false && \"Can't
create duplicate user names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e)
{T(e.error == \"conflict\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var
underscoreUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"_why\"},
\"copperfield\");try {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't create
underscore user names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error
== \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc =
CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"foo\"}, \"bar\");badIdDoc._id =
\"org.apache.couchdb:w00x\";try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false && \"Can't
create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error
== \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\"Jason
Davies\", password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"Jason
Davies\");var xhr = CouchDB.request(\"POST\", \"/_session\", {headers:
{'Content-Type': \"application/json\"}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \"Jason
Davies\", password:
password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name
== \"Jason Davies\");jasonUserDoc.foo =
2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\")
== -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't delete other
users docs. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error ==
\"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\"Jason
Davies\", \"2.71828\").ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\"Robert Allen Zimmerman\",
\"d00d\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \"Jason Davies\");xhr =
CouchDB.request(\"POST\", \"/_session?next=/\", {headers: {'Content-Type':
\"application/x-www-form-urlencoded\"}, body: \"name=Jason%20Davies&password=\"
+ encodeURIComponent(password)});if (xhr.status == 200)
{T(/Welcome/.test(xhr.responseText));} else {T(xhr.status ==
302);T(xhr.getResponseHeader(\"Location\"));}T(CouchDB.login(\"jch...@apache.org\",
\"funnybone\").ok);T(Cou
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
OS X 10.6.7, Erlang R14B03 +1 * signatures: ok * make check: ok * browser test suite: Firefox 4.0.1 & Safari 5.0.5: ok Great work! On 31.05.2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011, at 17:51, Sam Bisbee wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >> On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote: >> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! >>> >>> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: >>> >>> - SHA passes >>> - `make check` passes all tests >>> - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though >>> Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps >>> hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs). >>> - Root URL signature is correct >>> >>> Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on >>> jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 >>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need >>> to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. >> >> The required mentions are in the commit you reference: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523 >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523 >> >> Cheers >> Jan > > I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that > is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the > release. I agree it'd be nice to have this in CHANGES, but AFAIK this is not required. I would not consider this a showstopper though, so thanks for changing your vote :) Cheers Jan --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! >> >> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: >> >> - SHA passes >> - `make check` passes all tests >> - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though >> Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps >> hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs). >> - Root URL signature is correct >> >> Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on >> jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 >> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need >> to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. > > The required mentions are in the commit you reference: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523 > > Cheers > Jan I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the release. Cheers, -- Sam Bisbee www.sbisbee.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote: > Howdy, > > The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! > > Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: > > - SHA passes > - `make check` passes all tests > - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though > Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps > hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs). > - Root URL signature is correct > > Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on > jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 > (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need > to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. The required mentions are in the commit you reference: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523 Cheers Jan -- > > -1 > > Cheers, > > -- > Sam Bisbee > www.sbisbee.com > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. >> >> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; >> >> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. >> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so >> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >> Everyone is >> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 >> >> Please follow our test procedure: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure >> >> Happy voting, >> >> B. >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Howdy, The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: - SHA passes - `make check` passes all tests - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs). - Root URL signature is correct Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. -1 Cheers, -- Sam Bisbee www.sbisbee.com On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B. >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:23, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > What Jan said! > This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!! +1. (I've tried the release and make check passes for me. I don't think any of the browsers I run are supported for the Futon tests, so I'm skipping those -- but most look good, anyway.) Cheesr, Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011 20:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out. What Jan said! This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!! A+ Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Verified, +1 On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Robert Dionne wrote: > +1 > > OS X 10.6 > Erlang 14B01 > All tests pass > > > > On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. >> >> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; >> >> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. >> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so >> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >> Everyone is >> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 >> >> Please follow our test procedure: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure >> >> Happy voting, >> >> B. > > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
+1 OS X 10.6 Erlang 14B01 All tests pass On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B. > signs ok, make check ok, js tests ok tested on ubuntu 11.04, fbsd 8.2 (32 & 64), macosx 10.7 tested with erlang r13B04 & erlang r14b03. +1 - benoît
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Hi Robert, I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out. On 31 May 2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ +1 Tested on Mac OS X 10.6.7, R14B02 and R14B03. Signatures, make check and the test suite in Firefox 3.6 and 4.0 all check out. Tested on Ubuntu 10.04, R13B03. make check and the test suite in Firefox 3.6 all check out. Cheers Jan --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011 10:25, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B. > +1 - md5 ok - sha1 ok Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B01 - make check ok - futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7) Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B03 - make check ok - futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7) Windows 7 Enterprise + erlang R14B01 - make check n/a as usual (note to self to fix this) - futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7) woo!!! A+ Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B. > Ubuntu (10.04): All tests successful. Files=41, Tests=735, 73 wallclock secs ( 0.44 usr 0.11 sys + 18.82 cusr 2.52 csys = 21.89 CPU) Result: PASS FreeBSD: All tests successful. Files=41, Tests=735, 85 wallclock secs (20.09 cusr + 3.78 csys = 23.87 CPU) +1 @Robert: Thanks very, very much for pulling through on this release! This is really, really appreciated! Till
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
+1 here. Motions pass on latest OS X. On May 30, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > * Signature OK > * MD5 OK > * SHA1 OK > * Make check OK > * Futon OK > > +1 > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. >> >> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; >> >> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. >> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so >> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >> Everyone is >> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 >> >> Please follow our test procedure: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure >> >> Happy voting, >> >> B. >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
* Signature OK * MD5 OK * SHA1 OK * Make check OK * Futon OK +1 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. > > Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; > > 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. > 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Please follow our test procedure: > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > > Happy voting, > > B. >
[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
I should clarify: the failure on R14B03 is because of a change to OTP.
Specifically, when using "cancel":true to stop a running replication
task, we call supervisor:terminate_child and then
supervisor:delete_child. In both cases, we expect 'ok' as the result.
In R14B03, the delete_child call returns {error, not_found} instead.
This lines up with OTP-9167 where they alter the behavior of temporary
child processes. Since these cannot be restarted, they are
automatically deleted once restarted.
I have already applied and tested a fix for this that will be
compatible with all versions.
B.
On 30 May 2011 11:14, Robert Newson wrote:
> I'm aborting round 2 because of;
>
> 1) replication.js failure on R14B03
> 2) Failure of candidate to build on Windows due to old version of
> autoconf/automake
>
> I have fixes for both issues and will release a round 3 candidate soon.
>
> Additional testing, particularly outside of our test suites, is still useful.
>
> B.
>
> On 28 May 2011 19:32, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Make check ok.
>>
>> Results from unit tests in Firefox:
>>
>> * First base on "basics" caused segfault in CouchDB. Started over with GDB.
>>
>> * Second time through with "cookie_auth" failed with "file exists" message.
>>
>> * Second time through "design_docs" caused segfault:
>>
>> Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
>> Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0
>> 0x107c3bc0 in ?? ()
>> (gdb) backtrace
>> #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? ()
>> Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0
>> #1 0x7fff8779b5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex ()
>> #2 0x7fff8776989d in ssleay_rand_bytes ()
>> #3 0x7fff87768f2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes ()
>> #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 ()
>> #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main ()
>> #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func ()
>> #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper ()
>> #8 0x7fff833694f6 in _pthread_start ()
>> #9 0x7fff833693a9 in thread_start ()
>>
>> * Restarted test suite and got a segfault in "basics" again:
>>
>> Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
>> Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0
>> [Switching to process 95309 thread 0x2803]
>> 0x107c3bc0 in ?? ()
>> (gdb) backtrace
>> #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? ()
>> Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0
>> #1 0x7fff8779b5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex ()
>> #2 0x7fff8776989d in ssleay_rand_bytes ()
>> #3 0x7fff87768f2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes ()
>> #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 ()
>> #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main ()
>> #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func ()
>> #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper ()
>> #8 0x7fff833694f6 in _pthread_start ()
>> #9 0x7fff833693a9 in thread_start ()
>>
>> At least it seems to be the same bit of code that is segfaulting.
>>
>> I am -1 on the release until we can figure out what's going on here.
>>
>> Perhaps I have a dodgy SSL library?
>>
>> I'm not sure how I could check for this, so looking for help!
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
I'm aborting round 2 because of; 1) replication.js failure on R14B03 2) Failure of candidate to build on Windows due to old version of autoconf/automake I have fixes for both issues and will release a round 3 candidate soon. Additional testing, particularly outside of our test suites, is still useful. B. On 28 May 2011 19:32, Noah Slater wrote: > Make check ok. > > Results from unit tests in Firefox: > > * First base on "basics" caused segfault in CouchDB. Started over with GDB. > > * Second time through with "cookie_auth" failed with "file exists" message. > > * Second time through "design_docs" caused segfault: > > Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. > Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 > 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () > Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0 > #1 0x7fff8779b5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex () > #2 0x7fff8776989d in ssleay_rand_bytes () > #3 0x7fff87768f2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes () > #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 () > #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main () > #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func () > #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper () > #8 0x7fff833694f6 in _pthread_start () > #9 0x7fff833693a9 in thread_start () > > * Restarted test suite and got a segfault in "basics" again: > > Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. > Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 > [Switching to process 95309 thread 0x2803] > 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () > Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0 > #1 0x7fff8779b5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex () > #2 0x7fff8776989d in ssleay_rand_bytes () > #3 0x7fff87768f2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes () > #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 () > #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main () > #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func () > #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper () > #8 0x7fff833694f6 in _pthread_start () > #9 0x7fff833693a9 in thread_start () > > At least it seems to be the same bit of code that is segfaulting. > > I am -1 on the release until we can figure out what's going on here. > > Perhaps I have a dodgy SSL library? > > I'm not sure how I could check for this, so looking for help! > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
On 30 May 2011, at 11:11, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> On 30 May 2011, at 10:50, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>>>> On 29 May 2011 05:26, Robert Newson wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Bob & all - that is a *lot* of bugs squashed!!
>>>>
>>>> md5, sha, etaps all good.
>>>> Mac OS X 10.6.7
>>>> NB I needed to do `brew link icu4c` to get couchdb ./configure to work.
>>>> ffox passes except for replication {"error": "not_found"}; logs at
>>>> http://friendpaste.com/2IS0zh1PjEAmJrgtqWp66u
>>>>
>>>> Swapping R14B01 in for R14B03 -> replication tests pass again as
>>>> discussed on IRC.
>>>>
>>>
>>> using R14B93, and still have the replication error. Tests with safari
>>> just block on replication and never end. I'm -1 until that's fixed.
>>> Will open/update a ticket with logs.
>>
>> In case it is unclear, it is R14B03 that introduces this error, 01
>> and 02 are fine.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>>
> Does it means 1.1 is supporting <= R14B01 only ? In that case we
> should be clear about it in README imo. We actually we say:
>
> * Erlang OTP (>=R12B5) (http://erlang.org/)
>
>
> Also in this case I will recheck with this version and others. (would
> be good if we had a bot doing that)
I don't think we came to any conclusions yet. I agree that we should
do so and make the correct change in the README and ./configure version
checks.
Ideally, we should be compatible with latest releases. Now, 02 introduced
a few instabilities that I believe we have worked around, and 03 fixes
them on the Erlang side. So while not advisable, we currently support <=02
and 03 is a rather fresh release.
I think it'd be worth halting this vote in favour of fixing replication.js
with 03, but I'll let Robert make that call.
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2011, at 10:50, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>>> On 29 May 2011 05:26, Robert Newson wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
>>>
>>> Thanks Bob & all - that is a *lot* of bugs squashed!!
>>>
>>> md5, sha, etaps all good.
>>> Mac OS X 10.6.7
>>> NB I needed to do `brew link icu4c` to get couchdb ./configure to work.
>>> ffox passes except for replication {"error": "not_found"}; logs at
>>> http://friendpaste.com/2IS0zh1PjEAmJrgtqWp66u
>>>
>>> Swapping R14B01 in for R14B03 -> replication tests pass again as
>>> discussed on IRC.
>>>
>>
>> using R14B93, and still have the replication error. Tests with safari
>> just block on replication and never end. I'm -1 until that's fixed.
>> Will open/update a ticket with logs.
>
> In case it is unclear, it is R14B03 that introduces this error, 01
> and 02 are fine.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
Does it means 1.1 is supporting <= R14B01 only ? In that case we
should be clear about it in README imo. We actually we say:
* Erlang OTP (>=R12B5) (http://erlang.org/)
Also in this case I will recheck with this version and others. (would
be good if we had a bot doing that)
- benoît
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
On 30 May 2011, at 10:50, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>> On 29 May 2011 05:26, Robert Newson wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
>>
>> Thanks Bob & all - that is a *lot* of bugs squashed!!
>>
>> md5, sha, etaps all good.
>> Mac OS X 10.6.7
>> NB I needed to do `brew link icu4c` to get couchdb ./configure to work.
>> ffox passes except for replication {"error": "not_found"}; logs at
>> http://friendpaste.com/2IS0zh1PjEAmJrgtqWp66u
>>
>> Swapping R14B01 in for R14B03 -> replication tests pass again as
>> discussed on IRC.
>>
>
> using R14B93, and still have the replication error. Tests with safari
> just block on replication and never end. I'm -1 until that's fixed.
> Will open/update a ticket with logs.
In case it is unclear, it is R14B03 that introduces this error, 01
and 02 are fine.
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> On 29 May 2011 05:26, Robert Newson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
>
> Thanks Bob & all - that is a *lot* of bugs squashed!!
>
> md5, sha, etaps all good.
> Mac OS X 10.6.7
> NB I needed to do `brew link icu4c` to get couchdb ./configure to work.
> ffox passes except for replication {"error": "not_found"}; logs at
> http://friendpaste.com/2IS0zh1PjEAmJrgtqWp66u
>
> Swapping R14B01 in for R14B03 -> replication tests pass again as
> discussed on IRC.
>
using R14B93, and still have the replication error. Tests with safari
just block on replication and never end. I'm -1 until that's fixed.
Will open/update a ticket with logs.
- benoît
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
On 29 May 2011 05:26, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
Thanks Bob & all - that is a *lot* of bugs squashed!!
md5, sha, etaps all good.
Mac OS X 10.6.7
NB I needed to do `brew link icu4c` to get couchdb ./configure to work.
ffox passes except for replication {"error": "not_found"}; logs at
http://friendpaste.com/2IS0zh1PjEAmJrgtqWp66u
Swapping R14B01 in for R14B03 -> replication tests pass again as
discussed on IRC.
Windows 7 enterprise
R14B01
md5 etc same as above.
no etap tests possible as usual.
all ffox tests pass (yay).
unable to build from dist package, but using svn/tags/1.1.0 checkout
and then local ./bootstrap / configure / make succeeds. Looks like
some issues between autoconf 2.61 / automake 1.10 used for
distribution build on Mac OS X, and cygwin using bastardised autoconf
2.68 / automake 1.11.1 re COUCHDB-440. Couch 1.0.2 release was done
with autoconf 2.68 / automake 1.11.1 by davisp; when it is checked out
from svn and release process followed on Mac OS X the same failure
occurs.
I'm working on it.
both platforms testing done via Mac Firefox 4.0.1
A+
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
Make check ok. Results from unit tests in Firefox: * First base on "basics" caused segfault in CouchDB. Started over with GDB. * Second time through with "cookie_auth" failed with "file exists" message. * Second time through "design_docs" caused segfault: Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () (gdb) backtrace #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0 #1 0x7fff8779b5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex () #2 0x7fff8776989d in ssleay_rand_bytes () #3 0x7fff87768f2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes () #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 () #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main () #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func () #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper () #8 0x7fff833694f6 in _pthread_start () #9 0x7fff833693a9 in thread_start () * Restarted test suite and got a segfault in "basics" again: Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 [Switching to process 95309 thread 0x2803] 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () (gdb) backtrace #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0 #1 0x7fff8779b5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex () #2 0x7fff8776989d in ssleay_rand_bytes () #3 0x7fff87768f2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes () #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 () #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main () #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func () #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper () #8 0x7fff833694f6 in _pthread_start () #9 0x7fff833693a9 in thread_start () At least it seems to be the same bit of code that is segfaulting. I am -1 on the release until we can figure out what's going on here. Perhaps I have a dodgy SSL library? I'm not sure how I could check for this, so looking for help!
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
OS X 10.6.7, Erlang R14B03
* signatures: ok
* make check: ok
* browser tests ran with Safari 5.0.5: Replication test fails over and over
again:
{"error":"not_found","line":461,"expressionBeginOffset":14945,"expressionEndOffset":14957,"sourceId":4827368832,"sourceURL":"http://localhost:5984/_utils/script/couch.js?0.11.0"}
Can somebody edit http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure in order to
specify which version of browsers are supported? Firefox 4 nor 3.6.17 works at
all (Futon seems to be broken), in Safari 5.0.5 one test is failing. With
Chrome (11.0.696.71) the replication test is also failing, but with a slightly
different message: Exception raised: {"error":"not_found"}
On 28.05.2011, at 19:26, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
>
> Since round 1 a host of bugs have been reported and fixed, here is an
> exhaustive list;
>
> * COUCHDB-885 - Attachments introduce conflicts after replication.
> * COUCHDB-1045 - Replication reports "missing" for docs which exist
> and are accesible
> * COUCHDB-1074 - trouble URL rewriting for key/startkey/endkey qs params
> * COUCHDB-1144 - oauth requests with non-percent-encoded realms result
> in function_clause error in HTTP request
> * COUCHDB-1154 - Revisions returned by GET, but not include_docs
> * COUCHDB-1156 - Futon shows apache license when performing
> unauthorised operations
> * COUCHDB-1163 - Document returned by id, but cannot be found by rev
> * COUCHDB-1171 - Multiple requests to _changes feed causes {error,
> system_limit} "Too many processes"
> * COUCHDB-1173 - Verify MD5 when replicating attachments
> * COUCHDB-1174 - multipart/related doc PUT API can respond too soon
> and discard parts of subsequent requests in the connection
> * COUCHDB-1175 - Improve content type negotiation for couchdb JSON responses
> * COUCHDB-1177 - function_clause error in write_streamed_attachment
> * COUCHDB-1178 - function_clause error in make_first_doc_on_disk
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts
> so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone
> is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
Since round 1 a host of bugs have been reported and fixed, here is an
exhaustive list;
* COUCHDB-885 - Attachments introduce conflicts after replication.
* COUCHDB-1045 - Replication reports "missing" for docs which exist
and are accesible
* COUCHDB-1074 - trouble URL rewriting for key/startkey/endkey qs params
* COUCHDB-1144 - oauth requests with non-percent-encoded realms result
in function_clause error in HTTP request
* COUCHDB-1154 - Revisions returned by GET, but not include_docs
* COUCHDB-1156 - Futon shows apache license when performing
unauthorised operations
* COUCHDB-1163 - Document returned by id, but cannot be found by rev
* COUCHDB-1171 - Multiple requests to _changes feed causes {error,
system_limit} "Too many processes"
* COUCHDB-1173 - Verify MD5 when replicating attachments
* COUCHDB-1174 - multipart/related doc PUT API can respond too soon
and discard parts of subsequent requests in the connection
* COUCHDB-1175 - Improve content type negotiation for couchdb JSON responses
* COUCHDB-1177 - function_clause error in write_streamed_attachment
* COUCHDB-1178 - function_clause error in make_first_doc_on_disk
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
We are voting on the following release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
Please follow our test procedure:
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
Happy voting,
B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 23:35, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> This is the most surreal email I've read for a long time. > > I work with this guy, it's like that every day. Just for the record, the genesis of this meme was on IRC today. 18:54 <+rnewson> davisp: I sent a manila envelope full of segfaults to nslater the other day, looks like they arrived. 18:55 <+davisp> rnewson: Had any kernel panics lately? 18:55 <+rnewson> davisp: nope. 18:55 <+rnewson> davisp: Oh, expect a parcel soon. 18:55 <+davisp> heh
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 18 May 2011, at 00:34, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 17 May 2011, at 23:30, Chris Anderson wrote: > >> +1 on the manilla envelope. I'm super happy that we have momentum on >> the release process. And it looks like some of the fixes we are >> finding are useful. >> >> It may be frustrating, but this is exactly what a release process is >> for -- finding those manila envelopes, and fixing them. > > > This is the most surreal email I've read for a long time. I work with this guy, it's like that every day.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 23:30, Chris Anderson wrote: > +1 on the manilla envelope. I'm super happy that we have momentum on > the release process. And it looks like some of the fixes we are > finding are useful. > > It may be frustrating, but this is exactly what a release process is > for -- finding those manila envelopes, and fixing them. This is the most surreal email I've read for a long time. Hehe.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
+1 on the manilla envelope. I'm super happy that we have momentum on the release process. And it looks like some of the fixes we are finding are useful. It may be frustrating, but this is exactly what a release process is for -- finding those manila envelopes, and fixing them. Chris On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 17 May 2011, at 20:24, Paul Davis wrote: > >> Let me know when your manilla envelope of segfaults is empty. > > I have stopped testing for now, as I do not know how to proceed. > > I'm sending you a manilla envelope of discontentment. > > -- Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couchbase.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 20:24, Paul Davis wrote: > Let me know when your manilla envelope of segfaults is empty. I have stopped testing for now, as I do not know how to proceed. I'm sending you a manilla envelope of discontentment.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 17 May 2011, at 19:49, Paul Davis wrote: > >> Maybe your fuzzy logic board needs replaced? > > New MBA is new. > > I installed by doing "brew install couchdb" and then installing CouchDB from > source from the tarball. Jan recomended this as a way of getting the > dependancies installed with minimum fuss. Open to suggestions on how to test > around this. Going to -1 the vote unless it passes for me. (Or someone > convinces me my brand new MBA is some how a unique and special snowflake that > randomly causes segfaults with stable software.) Let me know when your manilla envelope of segfaults is empty.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 19:49, Paul Davis wrote: > Maybe your fuzzy logic board needs replaced? New MBA is new. I installed by doing "brew install couchdb" and then installing CouchDB from source from the tarball. Jan recomended this as a way of getting the dependancies installed with minimum fuss. Open to suggestions on how to test around this. Going to -1 the vote unless it passes for me. (Or someone convinces me my brand new MBA is some how a unique and special snowflake that randomly causes segfaults with stable software.)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 17 May 2011, at 18:21, Paul Davis wrote: > >> Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you >> can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a >> stack trace of when it segfaults? > > Okay, now we have: > > Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. > Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 > [Switching to process 99177 thread 0x2a03] > 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () > (gdb) > Continuing. > > Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. > Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 > 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () > (gdb) bt > #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () > Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0 > #1 0x7fff86abe5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex () > #2 0x7fff86a8c89d in ssleay_rand_bytes () > #3 0x7fff86a8bf2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes () > #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 () > #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main () > #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func () > #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper () > #8 0x7fff8909f4f6 in _pthread_start () > #9 0x7fff8909f3a9 in thread_start () > (gdb) > > > That's down in OpenSSL in what appears to be a call to `crypto:rand_bytes(N)`. In other words, something goofy is going on cause that bit of code is pretty core to couchdb and the various tests, so if it were widespread we would've heard reports. Maybe your fuzzy logic board needs replaced?
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 18:21, Paul Davis wrote: > Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you > can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a > stack trace of when it segfaults? Okay, now we have: Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 [Switching to process 99177 thread 0x2a03] 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () (gdb) Continuing. Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x107c3bc0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x107c3bc0 in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0x107c3bc0 #1 0x7fff86abe5b1 in EVP_DigestInit_ex () #2 0x7fff86a8c89d in ssleay_rand_bytes () #3 0x7fff86a8bf2e in ssleay_rand_pseudo_bytes () #4 0x1074307a in rand_bytes_1 () #5 0x100fdc07 in process_main () #6 0x1006ff5e in sched_thread_func () #7 0x1018e8db in thr_wrapper () #8 0x7fff8909f4f6 in _pthread_start () #9 0x7fff8909f3a9 in thread_start () (gdb)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
All,
Firstly, thank you to everyone who took the time to vote on this artifact.
Unfortunately I'm voting -1 and aborting round one of this release.
We've uncovered a bug serious enough that we would like a fix for it
to ship with 1.1.0 (COUCHDB-885). The behavior at fault is not
verified by any of our automated tests, which is why no one in this
thread has seen it. This bug appears to have been present in all
releases since 0.10.2 but is not present on trunk (0.11.x has a
slightly different replicator to 0.10.x, and trunk has a whole new
one).
Round 2 will begin once we have fixed 885 and any related tickets.
Thanks again!
B.
On 17 May 2011 18:27, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Paul Davis
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> I'm getting the following unit test failures:
>>>
>>> http://friendpaste.com/ZMbw7g2OxETvcAzEDDcGv
>>>
>>
>> This is a known race condition. The problem is the test, not what's
>> being tested.
>>
>>> I tried running CouchDB and got a segfault.
>>>
>>
>> Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you
>> can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a
>> stack trace of when it segfaults?
>>
>>> I'm on OS X, latest version, yada yada.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you need any more information.
>>>
>>
>
> I'm getting an error in Futon in Chrome in the replicator test:
>
> Assertion failed: dbB.open("30") !== null
>
> Also I had it fail once so that an admin was left configured which
> cause every other test to fail.
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 18:21, Paul Davis wrote:
> Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you
> can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a
> stack trace of when it segfaults?
Yep, it's the design_docs tests. Segfaults every time.
From the log:
Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
[info] [<0.1248.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' / 200
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' / 200
[info] [<0.1367.0>] OS Process #Port<0.11151> Log :: function raised exception
(new ReferenceError("makebigstring is not defined", "", 2)) with doc._id 1
[info] [<0.1358.0>] checkpointing view update at seq 4 for test_suite_db
_design/test
[info] [<0.1358.0>] checkpointing view update at seq 289 for test_suite_db
_design/test
[info] [<0.1358.0>] checkpointing view update at seq 716 for test_suite_db
_design/test
[info] [<0.1358.0>] checkpointing view update at seq 1003 for test_suite_db
_design/test
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET'
/test_suite_db/_design/test/_view/commonjs?limit=1 200
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET'
/test_suite_db/_all_docs?startkey=%22_design%22&endkey=%22_design0%22 200
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET'
/test_suite_db/_design/test/_view/all_docs_twice 200
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET'
/test_suite_db/_design/test/_view/no_docs 200
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET'
/test_suite_db/_design/test/_view/single_doc 200
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'POST' /test_suite_db/_ensure_full_commit 201
[info] [<0.1331.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'POST' /_restart 200
[info] [<0.1314.0>] Stopping all ongoing replications because the replicator
database was deleted or changed
Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
Segmentation fault
My threats to debug it with GDB cause the problem to go away.
Damn heisenbugs.
I'll keep trying.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> I'm getting the following unit test failures:
>>
>> http://friendpaste.com/ZMbw7g2OxETvcAzEDDcGv
>>
>
> This is a known race condition. The problem is the test, not what's
> being tested.
>
>> I tried running CouchDB and got a segfault.
>>
>
> Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you
> can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a
> stack trace of when it segfaults?
>
>> I'm on OS X, latest version, yada yada.
>>
>> Let me know if you need any more information.
>>
>
I'm getting an error in Futon in Chrome in the replicator test:
Assertion failed: dbB.open("30") !== null
Also I had it fail once so that an admin was left configured which
cause every other test to fail.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > I'm getting the following unit test failures: > > http://friendpaste.com/ZMbw7g2OxETvcAzEDDcGv > This is a known race condition. The problem is the test, not what's being tested. > I tried running CouchDB and got a segfault. > Can you reproduce it? Which test was running when it failed? If you can reproduce it, can you attach gdb to your couchdb process to get a stack trace of when it segfaults? > I'm on OS X, latest version, yada yada. > > Let me know if you need any more information. >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
I'm getting the following unit test failures: http://friendpaste.com/ZMbw7g2OxETvcAzEDDcGv I tried running CouchDB and got a segfault. I'm on OS X, latest version, yada yada. Let me know if you need any more information.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
I have created a test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure This should help new users figure out how they can help with the vote. Please let me know your thoughts on it. Probably made a few mistakes, or missed some things out.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011 15:17, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1. > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > artifacts so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. > Everyone is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Happy voting, > +1 Ubuntu 11.04, built against erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3 and xulrunner 1.9.2. * make check all ok. * Test suite failed on 'changes' test in Firefox 4.0.1 on full run but passed when run on its own. * Test suite passed in Chromium 12.0.742.30. - Matt
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
Gabor, no hurt feelings, there's always a first time :) Thanks for your enthusiasm. I hope we could channel it into the right directions. Looking forward to your future contributions :) Cheers Jan -- On 17 May 2011, at 17:25, Gabor Ratky wrote: > Please fully ignore the email I sent below. As others have pointed out here > and on #couchdb, the email has gotten the following things wrong: > I am not meant to test the release artifacts with the release artifact > prepared for voting. > The release artifacts should be built from source using the tarball provided. > The purpose of voting is to perform 'make check' and run JS tests in the > browser (FF3 suggested in this case) > The version is correctly stated by `couchdb -V` built from the release > artifacts > > the minor detail I got right: > CouchDB 1.1.0 can read 1.0.2 databases > CouchDB built from the SVN 1.1.0 tag reports 1.2.0a-, opposed to 1.1.0 > > My only excuse is my excitement of the 1.1.0 release moving forward and > rushing to 'help' fellow CouchDB enthusiasts. > > > Let the voting continue (while I leave the stage). > > Gabor > On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Gabor Ratky wrote: > Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1], > should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications: >> >> >> > > redracted to prevent further embarassment >> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Robert Newson wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1. >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>> artifacts so >>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >>> Everyone is >>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >>> >>> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ >>> >>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 >>> >>> Happy voting, >>> >>> -- >>> Robert Newson >>> >>
RE: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
Please fully ignore the email I sent below. As others have pointed out here and on #couchdb, the email has gotten the following things wrong: I am not meant to test the release artifacts with the release artifact prepared for voting. The release artifacts should be built from source using the tarball provided. The purpose of voting is to perform 'make check' and run JS tests in the browser (FF3 suggested in this case) The version is correctly stated by `couchdb -V` built from the release artifacts the minor detail I got right: CouchDB 1.1.0 can read 1.0.2 databases CouchDB built from the SVN 1.1.0 tag reports 1.2.0a-, opposed to 1.1.0 My only excuse is my excitement of the 1.1.0 release moving forward and rushing to 'help' fellow CouchDB enthusiasts. Let the voting continue (while I leave the stage). Gabor On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Gabor Ratky wrote: Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1], should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications: > > > redracted to prevent further embarassment > On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1. > > > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > > artifacts so > > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. > > Everyone is > > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > > > Happy voting, > > > > -- > > Robert Newson > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 17:14, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 16:17, Robert Newson wrote:
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> I tested it on amd64 Gentoo Linux. etap tests passed, browser tests
> mostly passed. I got these failures, but I'm running this on a recent
> Firefox 5.0 alpha:
Hehe, can you try Firefox 3.6? :)
4 or later are currently not supported.
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> oauth
> Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
> http://localhost:15984/test_suite_db_a/"}
>
> replication
> Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
> http://localhost:15984/test_suite_db_b/"}
>
> replicator_db
> Exception raised: {}
>
> security_validation
> Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
> http://localhost:15984/test_suite_db_b/"}
>
> The failures in oauth, replication and security_validation are the
> same as in 1.0.2 in this setup. The replicator_db obviously didn't
> exist in 1.0.2, so not sure about that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 16:17, Robert Newson wrote:
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
I tested it on amd64 Gentoo Linux. etap tests passed, browser tests
mostly passed. I got these failures, but I'm running this on a recent
Firefox 5.0 alpha:
oauth
Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
http://localhost:15984/test_suite_db_a/"}
replication
Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
http://localhost:15984/test_suite_db_b/"}
replicator_db
Exception raised: {}
security_validation
Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
http://localhost:15984/test_suite_db_b/"}
The failures in oauth, replication and security_validation are the
same as in 1.0.2 in this setup. The replicator_db obviously didn't
exist in 1.0.2, so not sure about that.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 16:17, Robert Newson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1. > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 > > Happy voting, +1 Tested on Mac OS X 10.6.7, R14B01. make check and the test suite in Firefox 3.6 all check out. Tested on Ubuntu 10.04, R13B03. make check and the test suite in Firefox 3.6 all check out. Thanks Bob! Cheers Jan --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
And also 1.1.0 can read 1.0.2 databases though, as Noah noted, you shouldn't be trying this artifact on data you care about (a copy is fine, obviously). B. On 17 May 2011 15:47, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 17 May 2011, at 16:38, Gabor Ratky wrote: > >> PS It seems the version number has not been set correctly yet, `couchdb -V` >> returns 'couchdb - Apache CouchDB 1.2.0a-' for me > > It seems you may be testing a binary that is derived from trunk, not the > branch or posted tarball. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > >> >> [1] http://github.com/mxcl/homebrew (if you are not using Homebrew yet, you >> should seriously consider!) >> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Robert Newson wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1. >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>> artifacts so >>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >>> Everyone is >>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >>> >>> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ >>> >>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 >>> >>> Happy voting, >>> >>> -- >>> Robert Newson >>> > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 15:38, Gabor Ratky wrote: > Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1], > should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications: Also, please do not test the release artefact in this way. If you would like to vote on the release, please build from source directly, and by hand. That is absolutely crucial for the process to work properly. (Sorry for the negative feedback Gabor, I know you were trying to help. I just don't think that this particular approach is suitable for what we're trying to do here...)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 16:38, Gabor Ratky wrote: > PS It seems the version number has not been set correctly yet, `couchdb -V` > returns 'couchdb - Apache CouchDB 1.2.0a-' for me It seems you may be testing a binary that is derived from trunk, not the branch or posted tarball. Cheers Jan -- > > [1] http://github.com/mxcl/homebrew (if you are not using Homebrew yet, you > should seriously consider!) > On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Robert Newson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1. >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so >> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >> Everyone is >> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 >> >> Happy voting, >> >> -- >> Robert Newson >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
also this; PS It seems the version number has not been set correctly yet, `couchdb -V` returns 'couchdb - Apache CouchDB 1.2.0a-' for me appears not to be the case. The build artifact correctly reports 1.1.0 for me and others. B. On 17 May 2011 15:44, Noah Slater wrote: > On 17 May 2011, at 15:38, Gabor Ratky wrote: > >> Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1], >> should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications: > > If you're using CouchDB on your development machine, I would strongly > recommend AGAINST doing this. This release artefact is only to be used for > voting on at the moment. It is not intended to be used by anyone properly, or > to be used on any real data. > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 15:38, Gabor Ratky wrote: > PS It seems the version number has not been set correctly yet, `couchdb -V` > returns 'couchdb - Apache CouchDB 1.2.0a-' for me We've not been able to reproduce this. Could you provide some more information? What does curl localhost:5984 produce?
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release
On 17 May 2011, at 15:38, Gabor Ratky wrote: > Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1], > should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications: If you're using CouchDB on your development machine, I would strongly recommend AGAINST doing this. This release artefact is only to be used for voting on at the moment. It is not intended to be used by anyone properly, or to be used on any real data.
