Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
+1 Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the TCK. Please revote on this new distributable: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why. On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
+1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the TCK. Please revote on this new distributable: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why. On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
+1 2011/1/14 Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com +1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.comwrote: +1 Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ . The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the TCK. Please revote on this new distributable: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why. On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
Looks like I don't have a LICENSE/NOTICE file in the TCK svn project. As this distributable is just a zip of the svn project, it explains why you aren't seeing the files. Turns out this is a holdover from Bridge 1.0 TCK which has already been released and lacks the LICENSE/NOTICE files. Let me fix here and I will get the distributables rebuilt and restart the vote. -Mike- On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
there is a reason . the bits are no maven artifacts, so there is no need to deploy them to central (and we never did that). Michale, using your private URL is fine; Once the release is done, we will continue the regular process. where the bits 'just' got deployed to the MyFaces (Portal TCK) site -M On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a JIRA which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can include it. I'm not sure how feasible this is, given that the TCK needs to run against a native portal environment, but I certainly wouldn't be opposed to someone researching this. For now though, I think the release looks good provided we get the LISCENCE and NOTICE files straightened out. On 01/13/2011 10:05 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: there is a reason . the bits are no maven artifacts, so there is no need to deploy them to central (and we never did that). Michale, using your private URL is fine; Once the release is done, we will continue the regular process. where the bits 'just' got deployed to the MyFaces (Portal TCK) site -M On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote: was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
Would be a nice improvement -M On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a JIRA which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can include it. I'm not sure how feasible this is, given that the TCK needs to run against a native portal environment, but I certainly wouldn't be opposed to someone researching this. For now though, I think the release looks good provided we get the LISCENCE and NOTICE files straightened out. On 01/13/2011 10:05 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: there is a reason . the bits are no maven artifacts, so there is no need to deploy them to central (and we never did that). Michale, using your private URL is fine; Once the release is done, we will continue the regular process. where the bits 'just' got deployed to the MyFaces (Portal TCK) site -M On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote: was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
[RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the TCK. Please revote on this new distributable: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why. On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
+1 On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the TCK. Please revote on this new distributable: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why. On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
+1 On 1/13/2011 10:21 AM, Michael Freedman wrote: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the TCK. Please revote on this new distributable: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why. On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
+1 Good work Mike On 01/13/2011 11:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: +1 On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and are included in the various .wars that get built as part of building/running the TCK. Please revote on this new distributable: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why. On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
Leonardo and Matthias, Can Nexus host distributables only? There should be no repository entries associated with this project. It's run from maven directly so this distributable should simply be a zip of the svn source tree (without the svn directories). Scott On 01/12/2011 03:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com mailto:michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the maven project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the subversion tag associated with version of the TCK: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0 Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted. However, for convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project These components can be inspected in http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the TCK can be built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the subversion tag. Please review these materials and vote. [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, -Mike- -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
