Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Vote passes. I'll do my best to finalize the release really soon to have this out for Xmas and start a second release just after. Binding votes: Howard M. Lewis Ship: +1Igor Drobiazko: +1 Ulrich Stärk: +1 Non-binding votes: Massimo Lusetti: +1 lprimak: +1 Taha Hafeez: +1 François Facon: +1 Angelo Chen: +1 Bob Harner: -1 -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Angelo Chen: +1(non-binding) -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Tapestry-5-3-1-tp5072199p5085066.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
François Facon: +1(non-binding) well done Massimo. Best. 2011/12/18 Taha Hafeez Siddiqi : > Taha Hafeez: +1(non-binding) > > BTW, Congrats Massimo !! > > On Dec 18, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Am So, 18.12.2011, 12:34 schrieb Igor Drobiazko: >>> C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release >>> that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why delaying that if we can >>> ship? Massimo, please let the release pass. >>> >>> Apart from that, we have 3 binding votes (Howard, Uli and me). >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Massimo Lusetti >>> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC votes. As long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the release manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it or proceed. Thanks for clarifying the process. > I agree it's unfortunate that a fix for a problem in 5.3 did not make it into the first bugfix release but that's not a reason to hold up the release. I think I will do 5.3.2 soon and will let 5.3.1 fall apart, hoping to have a quicker vote process... Will everyone agree? Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Igor Drobiazko >>> http://tapestry5.de >>> http://twitter.com/drobiazko >>> >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Taha Hafeez: +1(non-binding) BTW, Congrats Massimo !! On Dec 18, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > +1 > > Am So, 18.12.2011, 12:34 schrieb Igor Drobiazko: >> C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release >> that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why delaying that if we can >> ship? Massimo, please let the release pass. >> >> Apart from that, we have 3 binding votes (Howard, Uli and me). >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Massimo Lusetti >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >>> Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC >>> votes. As long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the >>> release manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it >>> or >>> proceed. >>> >>> Thanks for clarifying the process. >>> I agree it's unfortunate that a fix for a problem in 5.3 did not make >>> it >>> into the first bugfix release but that's not a reason to hold up the >>> release. >>> >>> I think I will do 5.3.2 soon and will let 5.3.1 fall apart, hoping to >>> have a quicker vote process... Will everyone agree? >>> >>> Cheers >>> -- >>> Massimo >>> http://meridio.blogspot.com >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> Igor Drobiazko >> http://tapestry5.de >> http://twitter.com/drobiazko >> > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
+1 Am So, 18.12.2011, 12:34 schrieb Igor Drobiazko: > C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release > that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why delaying that if we can > ship? Massimo, please let the release pass. > > Apart from that, we have 3 binding votes (Howard, Uli and me). > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Massimo Lusetti > wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >> >> > Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC >> votes. As long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the >> release manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it >> or >> proceed. >> >> Thanks for clarifying the process. >> >> > I agree it's unfortunate that a fix for a problem in 5.3 did not make >> it >> into the first bugfix release but that's not a reason to hold up the >> release. >> >> I think I will do 5.3.2 soon and will let 5.3.1 fall apart, hoping to >> have a quicker vote process... Will everyone agree? >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Massimo >> http://meridio.blogspot.com >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > Igor Drobiazko > http://tapestry5.de > http://twitter.com/drobiazko > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why delaying that if we can ship? Massimo, please let the release pass. Apart from that, we have 3 binding votes (Howard, Uli and me). On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > > > Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC > votes. As long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the > release manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it or > proceed. > > Thanks for clarifying the process. > > > I agree it's unfortunate that a fix for a problem in 5.3 did not make it > into the first bugfix release but that's not a reason to hold up the > release. > > I think I will do 5.3.2 soon and will let 5.3.1 fall apart, hoping to > have a quicker vote process... Will everyone agree? > > Cheers > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de http://twitter.com/drobiazko
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC votes. As > long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the release > manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it or proceed. Thanks for clarifying the process. > I agree it's unfortunate that a fix for a problem in 5.3 did not make it into > the first bugfix release but that's not a reason to hold up the release. I think I will do 5.3.2 soon and will let 5.3.1 fall apart, hoping to have a quicker vote process... Will everyone agree? Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC votes. As long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the release manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it or proceed. I agree it's unfortunate that a fix for a problem in 5.3 did not make it into the first bugfix release but that's not a reason to hold up the release. That being said, Ulrich Stärk: +1 (binding) On 14.12.2011 23:17, David Rees wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Bob Harner wrote: >> It does appear to be a regression from 5.3. It reportedly only appears >> when upgrading to 5.3. I don't have any further details myself other >> than what's in the bug report and the mailing list thread on the >> topic. > No, it's a regression in 5.3 not from 5.3 and not a regression in > 5.3.1. So in my (non-binding) opinion, it should not hold up a 5.3.1 > release. If it were introduced in 5.3.1 then I would agree with you. > > -Dave > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Igor Drobiazko: +1 (binding) On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.3.1, ready to bevoted > upon. > > The source and source downloads are uploaded to: > http://people.apache.org/~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/ > > and the Maven artifacts staged to: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetapestry-325/ > > Please examine these files to determine if the new release, 5.X, is ready. > > I've also created a 5.X tag in Subversion: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry5/tags/releases/5.3.1 > > Please note that this is a bugfix release so it's a drop in > replacement for 5.3, here is the list of fixes: > > Bug > [TAP5-1762] - Some components do not have include a description of > their parameters in their JavaDoc pages > [TAP5-1765] - PerThread scope is not honored when service is created > using autobuild > [TAP5-1768] - @ActivationRequestParameter does not encode to be URL > friendly > [TAP5-1773] - FormFieldFocus mixin passes control name, not client id, > to JavaScriptSupport.autofocus() > [TAP5-1784] - Extra comma in tapestry-messages_de.js causes Internet > Explorer to fail to work > [TAP5-1785] - Exceptions while compressing JavaScript are not fully > reported > [TAP5-1786] - All forms/submission not working after > FileUploadException is raised > > Improvement > [TAP5-1756] - Let the asset path prefix be configurable > > Task > [TAP5-1780] - Upgrade Selenium dependency to 2.14.0 > > > On a successful vote, I'll release the Maven artifaces, and move the > source and javadoc distributions from these directories to the proper > distribution directories and update the Tapestry site documentation. > > Vote will run for three days; on success I'll move the voted artifacts > into place and send out appropriate notifications. > > Cheers > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I've created 5.3.2 in JIRA ... and I have no doubt we'll see a 5.3.2. Great. > I can't wait for Git; my workflow for cherrypicking from trunk/5.4 to > 5.3 is ugly now. I found that doing svn merge -r rev1:rev1 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry5/trunk . from the 5.3 working copy works nicely. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > +1 > > I haven't done more verification than to check the MD5 sum and the signature. > > We may need to move a bug or two from 5.3.1 to 5.3.2. I believe I > commited a fix after you cut the branch. We should double-check the > list of bugs fixed against the SVN log. Can I leave that in your > hands? I'm over-taxed this week. Yep. > Note: > > $ gpg --verify apache-tapestry-5.3.1-sources.zip.asc > gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 13 10:18:02 2011 PST using RSA key ID 4F7FEF55 > gpg: Good signature from "Massimo Lusetti " > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. > Primary key fingerprint: FCAF DD3B 5989 D139 3EC2 A499 7995 8D76 4F7F EF55 > ~/Downloads > $ gpg --verify apache-tapestry-5.3.1-javadocs.zip.asc > gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 13 10:19:39 2011 PST using RSA key ID 4F7FEF55 > gpg: Good signature from "Massimo Lusetti " > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. > Primary key fingerprint: FCAF DD3B 5989 D139 3EC2 A499 7995 8D76 4F7F EF55 > > I wonder what we can do about the WARNING above? I can confirm that this is my fingerprint. I think that we could/should exchange keys and sign each others, I will double check but my key is already at MIT and on people's keys: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x79958D764F7FEF55 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mlusetti.asc https://people.apache.org/keys/group/tapestry.asc Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
I've created 5.3.2 in JIRA ... and I have no doubt we'll see a 5.3.2. I can't wait for Git; my workflow for cherrypicking from trunk/5.4 to 5.3 is ugly now. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:17 PM, David Rees wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Bob Harner wrote: >> It does appear to be a regression from 5.3. It reportedly only appears >> when upgrading to 5.3. I don't have any further details myself other >> than what's in the bug report and the mailing list thread on the >> topic. > > No, it's a regression in 5.3 not from 5.3 and not a regression in > 5.3.1. So in my (non-binding) opinion, it should not hold up a 5.3.1 > release. If it were introduced in 5.3.1 then I would agree with you. > > -Dave > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
+1 I haven't done more verification than to check the MD5 sum and the signature. We may need to move a bug or two from 5.3.1 to 5.3.2. I believe I commited a fix after you cut the branch. We should double-check the list of bugs fixed against the SVN log. Can I leave that in your hands? I'm over-taxed this week. And I'd really like to congratulate Massimo on taking the initiative on this ... it's a good indicator for the community that someone beside me is doing these releases on occasion! Note: $ gpg --verify apache-tapestry-5.3.1-sources.zip.asc gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 13 10:18:02 2011 PST using RSA key ID 4F7FEF55 gpg: Good signature from "Massimo Lusetti " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: FCAF DD3B 5989 D139 3EC2 A499 7995 8D76 4F7F EF55 ~/Downloads $ gpg --verify apache-tapestry-5.3.1-javadocs.zip.asc gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 13 10:19:39 2011 PST using RSA key ID 4F7FEF55 gpg: Good signature from "Massimo Lusetti " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: FCAF DD3B 5989 D139 3EC2 A499 7995 8D76 4F7F EF55 I wonder what we can do about the WARNING above? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > >> Has the 5.3.1 Release Notes page been created yet? > > Not yet. > > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Bob Harner wrote: > It does appear to be a regression from 5.3. It reportedly only appears > when upgrading to 5.3. I don't have any further details myself other > than what's in the bug report and the mailing list thread on the > topic. No, it's a regression in 5.3 not from 5.3 and not a regression in 5.3.1. So in my (non-binding) opinion, it should not hold up a 5.3.1 release. If it were introduced in 5.3.1 then I would agree with you. -Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > >> Has the 5.3.1 Release Notes page been created yet? > > Not yet. I thought that has to go after the successful vote but I can create it now if it's due. But I cannot add a version in JIRA, I've not enough priv. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > Has the 5.3.1 Release Notes page been created yet? Not yet. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Has the 5.3.1 Release Notes page been created yet? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Bob Harner wrote: > It does appear to be a regression from 5.3. It reportedly only appears > when upgrading to 5.3. I don't have any further details myself other > than what's in the bug report and the mailing list thread on the > topic. > > If others don't agree it's important enough to try to fix immediately, > that's fine. My vote isn't binding, and others are free to vote in > favor of the release as always. > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Rees wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Bob Harner wrote: >>> I think we need to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1777 >>> as part of this release. Five people reported seeing the same thing >>> since upgrading to 5.3, and I know it's a blocker for at least one >>> project where I work. >>> >>> Bob Harner: -1 (non-binding) >> >> Can always roll another release to fix this issue (and perhaps >> others). If it's not a regression from 5.3, I don't see any reason to >> have this block 5.3.1. >> >> -Dave >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
It does appear to be a regression from 5.3. It reportedly only appears when upgrading to 5.3. I don't have any further details myself other than what's in the bug report and the mailing list thread on the topic. If others don't agree it's important enough to try to fix immediately, that's fine. My vote isn't binding, and others are free to vote in favor of the release as always. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Rees wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Bob Harner wrote: >> I think we need to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1777 >> as part of this release. Five people reported seeing the same thing >> since upgrading to 5.3, and I know it's a blocker for at least one >> project where I work. >> >> Bob Harner: -1 (non-binding) > > Can always roll another release to fix this issue (and perhaps > others). If it's not a regression from 5.3, I don't see any reason to > have this block 5.3.1. > > -Dave > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Bob Harner wrote: > I think we need to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1777 > as part of this release. Five people reported seeing the same thing > since upgrading to 5.3, and I know it's a blocker for at least one > project where I work. > > Bob Harner: -1 (non-binding) Can always roll another release to fix this issue (and perhaps others). If it's not a regression from 5.3, I don't see any reason to have this block 5.3.1. -Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Bob Harner wrote: > I think we need to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1777 > as part of this release. Five people reported seeing the same thing > since upgrading to 5.3, and I know it's a blocker for at least one > project where I work. > > Bob Harner: -1 (non-binding) Would you provide more details and a use case ? Does that has something to do with the enconding in particulars charset (wild guess: Ditt lösenord) ? Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
I think we need to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1777 as part of this release. Five people reported seeing the same thing since upgrading to 5.3, and I know it's a blocker for at least one project where I work. Bob Harner: -1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > >> I think I just marked a bug as fixed in 5.3.1 that's really going to >> be fixed in 5.3.2. > > I see but I don't have enough karma to make a new version in JIRA and > then change it... > > Cheers > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I think I just marked a bug as fixed in 5.3.1 that's really going to > be fixed in 5.3.2. I see but I don't have enough karma to make a new version in JIRA and then change it... Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
I just tested it with my app, it works fine, and the checksums are there. +1 from me. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Tapestry-5-3-1-tp5072199p5073564.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
I think I just marked a bug as fixed in 5.3.1 that's really going to be fixed in 5.3.2. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > We need to do some work on the Gradle build to support generating the > necessary checksums and signatures for the uploaded artifacts (not > just the Maven artifacts in Nexus). Right now, it's a bit manual. > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >> Great! Will check everything soon. >> >> Uli >> >> On 13.12.2011 19:21, Massimo Lusetti wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > It's missing the checksums and signatures. They're both present in the nexus staging repository, which contains the sources of all modules too. >>> BTW I've uploaded the signatures and checksums for the sources and >>> javadocs files too. >>> >>> Cheers >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! > > (971) 678-5210 > http://howardlewisship.com -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
We need to do some work on the Gradle build to support generating the necessary checksums and signatures for the uploaded artifacts (not just the Maven artifacts in Nexus). Right now, it's a bit manual. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > Great! Will check everything soon. > > Uli > > On 13.12.2011 19:21, Massimo Lusetti wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >>> It's missing the checksums and signatures. >>> They're both present in the nexus staging repository, which contains >>> the sources of all modules too. >> BTW I've uploaded the signatures and checksums for the sources and >> javadocs files too. >> >> Cheers > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Great! Will check everything soon. Uli On 13.12.2011 19:21, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: >> >>> It's missing the checksums and signatures. >> They're both present in the nexus staging repository, which contains >> the sources of all modules too. > BTW I've uploaded the signatures and checksums for the sources and > javadocs files too. > > Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > This is not the same. We vote on the source distribution that enables a user > to build the project. > This is at > http://people.apache.org/~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/apache-tapestry-5.3.1-sources.zip > . > Everything else is just there for the user's convenience, especially since a > user can't do anything > useful with the source jars. If I can't verify the integrity of that source > archive I'm -1. As I've already sent you can find all there, please verify. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > >> It's missing the checksums and signatures. > > They're both present in the nexus staging repository, which contains > the sources of all modules too. BTW I've uploaded the signatures and checksums for the sources and javadocs files too. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
This is not the same. We vote on the source distribution that enables a user to build the project. This is at http://people.apache.org/~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/apache-tapestry-5.3.1-sources.zip . Everything else is just there for the user's convenience, especially since a user can't do anything useful with the source jars. If I can't verify the integrity of that source archive I'm -1. Uli On 13.12.2011 19:09, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > >> It's missing the checksums and signatures. > They're both present in the nexus staging repository, which contains > the sources of all modules too. > > Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > It's missing the checksums and signatures. They're both present in the nexus staging repository, which contains the sources of all modules too. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
It's missing the checksums and signatures. Uli On 13.12.2011 18:59, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > >> Not Found >> >> The requested URL /~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/ was not found on this server. > Yep sorry was a typo... should be fine now, please check. > > Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > > Not Found > > The requested URL /~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/ was not found on this server. Yep sorry was a typo... should be fine now, please check. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
Not Found The requested URL /~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/ was not found on this server. On 13.12.2011 18:24, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.3.1, ready to bevoted upon. > > The source and source downloads are uploaded to: > http://people.apache.org/~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/ > > and the Maven artifacts staged to: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetapestry-325/ > > Please examine these files to determine if the new release, 5.X, is ready. > > I've also created a 5.X tag in Subversion: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry5/tags/releases/5.3.1 > > Please note that this is a bugfix release so it's a drop in > replacement for 5.3, here is the list of fixes: > > Bug > [TAP5-1762] - Some components do not have include a description of > their parameters in their JavaDoc pages > [TAP5-1765] - PerThread scope is not honored when service is created > using autobuild > [TAP5-1768] - @ActivationRequestParameter does not encode to be URL friendly > [TAP5-1773] - FormFieldFocus mixin passes control name, not client id, > to JavaScriptSupport.autofocus() > [TAP5-1784] - Extra comma in tapestry-messages_de.js causes Internet > Explorer to fail to work > [TAP5-1785] - Exceptions while compressing JavaScript are not fully reported > [TAP5-1786] - All forms/submission not working after > FileUploadException is raised > > Improvement > [TAP5-1756] - Let the asset path prefix be configurable > > Task > [TAP5-1780] - Upgrade Selenium dependency to 2.14.0 > > > On a successful vote, I'll release the Maven artifaces, and move the > source and javadoc distributions from these directories to the proper > distribution directories and update the Tapestry site documentation. > > Vote will run for three days; on success I'll move the voted artifacts > into place and send out appropriate notifications. > > Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
[VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1
I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.3.1, ready to bevoted upon. The source and source downloads are uploaded to: http://people.apache.org/~mlusetti/tapestry-releases/ and the Maven artifacts staged to: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetapestry-325/ Please examine these files to determine if the new release, 5.X, is ready. I've also created a 5.X tag in Subversion: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry5/tags/releases/5.3.1 Please note that this is a bugfix release so it's a drop in replacement for 5.3, here is the list of fixes: Bug [TAP5-1762] - Some components do not have include a description of their parameters in their JavaDoc pages [TAP5-1765] - PerThread scope is not honored when service is created using autobuild [TAP5-1768] - @ActivationRequestParameter does not encode to be URL friendly [TAP5-1773] - FormFieldFocus mixin passes control name, not client id, to JavaScriptSupport.autofocus() [TAP5-1784] - Extra comma in tapestry-messages_de.js causes Internet Explorer to fail to work [TAP5-1785] - Exceptions while compressing JavaScript are not fully reported [TAP5-1786] - All forms/submission not working after FileUploadException is raised Improvement [TAP5-1756] - Let the asset path prefix be configurable Task [TAP5-1780] - Upgrade Selenium dependency to 2.14.0 On a successful vote, I'll release the Maven artifaces, and move the source and javadoc distributions from these directories to the proper distribution directories and update the Tapestry site documentation. Vote will run for three days; on success I'll move the voted artifacts into place and send out appropriate notifications. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
