[Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread Dave G4AON
Calibrating one 1 ppm TCXO against another 1 ppm TCXO calibrator (for 
those with the optional extra K3 KTCXO3-1) would not be a good idea. In 
any event the calibrator is going to drift with time and need 
calibrating itself every year or so.


G4JNT published a 60 KHz off air frequency standard in the RSGB 
publication RadCom in April 1994 (Mk 1 version) and March 1996 (Mk 2 
version). I have used his Mk2 version for some years and it works well, 
admittedly it's only good to a short term stability of 1 part in 10^8 
but that's still 50 to 100 times more stable than the TCXO in a K3 you 
are trying to calibrate. Long term the stability matches that of the 
national standard being broadcast. Cost of building is minimal, even 
allowing for the box, switches, paint, etc. I would expect a lot of 
change from $80 or £40.


On eBay GPS and rubidium units appear from time to time, I bought a GPS 
unit part kit, built by the guy who later sold another one:


http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GPS-10Mhz-FREQUENCY-STANDARD-COMPUTER_W0QQitemZ120166344327QQihZ002QQcategoryZ25399QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

He seems to like making GPS standards, so maybe worth dropping him an 
e-mail?


73 Dave, G4AON
K3/100 #80
---

Rather than a BC station, how about a fairly accurate 10Mhz frequency 
standard like


http://www.aade.com/freqstd/freqstd.html

73 to all
Trevor G0KTN
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 S/N 60 arrived in Tokyo

2008-01-13 Thread a yoshida

K3 S/N 60 arrived here on Dec 29, 2007.
It is K3/10+KAT3+200Hz Xtal filter (assembled)
I suppose it is one of first K3s in JA ordered by EDC, agency in JA.
I have already ordered KRX3, KPA3 and 400Hz Xtal filter.

K3 works GREAT as expected for CW and digital mode. (I do not work
SSB at all !)
My OLD K2 (S/N 4504) is now spare tranceiver.

Thanks

de aki  ja1nlx 
___

Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread AD6XY - Mike

GB3RAL at 50.05MHz should be a good signal in Warfield. I do not know how
accurate it is, it is well beyond my ability to measure it here at home. The
reference it is driven from is locked to GPS with a long time constant and
should be close to one part in 10^10. However, the frequency is DDS derived
and there may be a very small fixed offset error of a mHz or so due to the
limitations of a 48 bit frequency control register. For most purposes it
will do. There is also a companion beacon on 70.05 MHz you could use.

Mike



Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
 
 David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
I'd like to get a list of KNOWN frequencies of broadcast stations in 10 
- 40m in the UK - it's been pointed out tpo me that using BBC WS at 648 
KHz is a not so good, because its a low freq.

 The higher the reference frequency, the more accurately you can set the 
 TCXO. Don't  forget you have 50MHz now, and from your Callbook QTH in 
 IO91, you may be able to receive the GB3RAL beacon on 50.050MHz. (I'm 
 fairly sure it is locked to GPS, but not sure about ERP and operational 
 status... we'll soon find out, because Mr Beacon Keeper is an Elecraft 
 user!)
 
 
 -- 
 
 73 from Ian GM3SEK
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/SW-broadcast-to-calibrate-against.-tp14777212p14783758.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Thanks Trevor, but of course, I wanted something now, and not when I've
built it :(
And I have the 1ppm TCXO, so when firmware permits me to enter the offsets
from its calibration sheet, I'll be all set.

And Elecraft make the XG1 and XG2 kits too.

On 12/1/08 23:47, Trevor Smithers [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 Rather than a BC station, how about a fairly accurate 10Mhz frequency standard
 like
 
 http://www.aade.com/freqstd/freqstd.html
 
 73 to all
 Trevor  G0KTN 
-- 
For all our conceits about being the center of the universe, we live in a
routine planet of a humdrum star stuck away in an obscure corner ... on an
unexceptional galaxy which is one of about 100 billion galaxies. ... That
is the fundamental fact of the universe we inhabit, and it is very good for
us to understand that. -Carl Sagan, astronomer and writer (1934-1996)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New K3 SN#207 built but question on AM Filter

2008-01-13 Thread David Woolley

Paul Webb wrote:


now when i select SSB and tune to a AM signal i can alter the

] bandwidth to anything up to 6KHz, when i switch to AM i can only adjust
] the bandwidth up to 3KHz , the audio sounds like it is a 3KHz filter
] too, what am i doing wrong since i cant set the 6KHz bandwidth in AM.

any ideas???


The basic reason has already been explained, however, there are very few 
cases were exceeding 3kHz audio bandwidth is useful.  HF broadcast 
stations use 5kHz channelling, which would only allow them 2.5kHz with 
brick wall filtering at both transmit and receive ends, although they 
probably do expect to suffer significant adjacent channel interference.


MF broadcast stations use 9kHz channelling in Europe and 10kHz in the 
USA, but I suspect that adjacent channel interference is less 
acceptable.  As they were designed to be received with LC IF filters, 
with poor shape factors, I suspect they don't even make use of the full 
channel, and if they did, they would probably be required to have 
filters which put the adjacent channel into the filter stop band.


[ Note: excessively long lines re-wrapped. See RFC 1855. (Probably using 
yahoo.) ]



--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread David Woolley

David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:

I'd like to get a list of KNOWN frequencies of broadcast stations in 10 -
40m in the UK - it's been pointed out tpo me that using BBC WS at 648 KHz is
a not so good, because its a low freq.


The World Service is on on multiple HF frequencies and there are also 
BBC transmissions for specific regions.  I imagine the BBC web site will 
give details.  The actual high precision BBC transmission is at 
198.00 kHz, but that is even lower in frequency.


In practice, though, most Euopean HF broadcast stations are on properly 
assigned frequencies and therefore are on multiples of 5kHz. You will 
probably get quite a good estimate by simply finding the largest cluster 
of stations with the same apparent offset from this, which will 
represent your tuning error.  (European LF and MF stations use 9kHz 
channels.  Droitwich used to be on 200.0 kHz, before this was 
standardized.)


With a respectable crystal, you should be well within 300Hz at 30MHz, so 
there should be no problem in knowing which 5kHz you are on.



(Hope I have the right number of zeroes in the above, and that Droitwich 
is still a frequency standard.)



--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] EU 30 Meter Digital Weekend 19th-20th Jan

2008-01-13 Thread Dave G4AON
Wondering what to do with your new K3? There is going to be a lot of 
ragchewing on data modes next weekend on 30m, so get those leads 
connected and get typing!


http://www.30meterdigital.org/30mevents.html

73 Dave, G4AON
K3/100 #80, HRD/DM780 software on data modes

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] k2 diffuser

2008-01-13 Thread cfd

I'm having a problem with d2 and d3 leads on the diffuser(very short) even a
replacement one..The leads just make it thru one spacer..the only way I see
a fix is using a solder bridge or try to extend the leads?Anyone come across
this?
   Thanks 
Frank







-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/k2-diffuser-tp14785245p14785245.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 audio loss

2008-01-13 Thread Tom Z
I was working a contest this weekend and at one point the audio in my
K2 just stopped working. No audio on headphones or internal speaker.
At full volume I could hear a slight trace of noise on the speaker. I
reset power, and the audio came back.

I guess I should have checked the external speaker jack, but in my
panic, I did not.

Does this sound like it could be the infamous headphone jack problem?
When that does fail, does the external audio still work? I can not
risk a failure during a contest, so I wonder if I should replace it.

73,

Tom KG3V
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re K1 questions

2008-01-13 Thread Paul Huff

Hi Chris,

I have learned not to trust the K1's power indication during antenna tuning 
with an external tuner.  The reflected power seems to throw off the value 
displayed on the K1.  Try this... after you have tuned for best SWR go into 
the power out menu and bump it up a 10th of a watt and then bump it back 
down a 10th of a watt.  Just temporarily changing this menu setting seems to 
recalibrate the output power display.  It is also my understanding that the 
circuitry that measures the output power is somewhat influenced by the SWR 
and cannot be completely trusted unless it is very close to 1:1.


I actually use my K1 as my main rig.  I'm sure that you will enjoy yours.

73
Paul - N8XMS

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] k2 diffuser

2008-01-13 Thread Gerard Provoost
Hi Frank,

I solved the problem by using one spacer at both sides, put 4 short leads
from used glass diodes in the spacer, with the diffuser diode leads at the
other end. Press the spacer to the diffuser and solder with as little tin as
possible. Now you have 4 long leads. Mount the assembly, not putting the
leads through the second set of spacers, as this will not fit. Use the other
spacers to get the right distance between the first spacers and the pcb.
Just hold them somewere in the middle between the extended diode leads and
solder at the bottom. Then remove the second set of spacers. Worked fine
with me.

Best 73, Gerard PA1GP


- Original Message -
From: cfd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 1:57 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] k2 diffuser



 I'm having a problem with d2 and d3 leads on the diffuser(very short) even
 a
 replacement one..The leads just make it thru one spacer..the only way I
 see
 a fix is using a solder bridge or try to extend the leads?Anyone come
 across
 this?
   Thanks
Frank

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K1 questions

2008-01-13 Thread DW Holtman

Dave,

Great information. Very nice PDF file.

Best,
DW Holtan
WB7SSN

- Original Message - 
From: Dave G4AON [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 12:52 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K1 questions



Chris

You would only need to re-calibrate the VFO if you swap a board which 
has the same band as the other one, ie I have a 80/40 two band board for 
Winter use and a 40/30/20/15 one for summer, I have to re-set the 40m 
calibration when changing the boards as the two 40m band crystals differ 
in frequency slightly. You do have to tell the K1 which bands are on the 
board, but that is easy and can be done in the field.


Have you picked up the old tip of threading a rubber band through the 
spacers to make swapping boards less of a juggling act? The rubber band 
holds the spacers on the long bolts and still allows you to tighten 
everything up.


You can add capacitance to a KAT1 to improve the low frequency tuning 
ability, I've done that with mine. See: 
http://www.astromag.co.uk/k2/g4aon_kat1_mods.pdf for details of an easy 
and reversible modification.


73 Dave, G4AON
K1 #1154, K2 #1892, K3/100 #80
---

I recently purchased a K1 for use at our vacation QTH, and gave it
its first workout today during NAQP. It's not a contest rig,
but it did just fine :-)

I've got a couple of questions:

- I have two band modules: 40/30/20/15 and 80/17. Do I need to do
any recalibration when I swap? How involved is this?

- I have a KAT1, and it worked fine until I tried to use my W3EDP
on 40m. It's not really a W3EDP because I feed it remotely with
coax and a BL2 balun. I have the 'output' menu item set to 5W. If I
use the 4:1 setting on the BL2, the KAt1 would get down to about
1.7:1, but the max output was 3.8W (according to the display).
If I use the 1:1 setting, it would only get down to 3.6:1 or so,
but was happy to send 5W out. Huh?

73 de chris K6DBG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Wiring a K2 to 2 transverters

2008-01-13 Thread w2bvh

Hi

I need some advice on wiring my K2 to two transverters. I've got a newly 
built  XV50 and a homebrew 2 meter transverter. I've run each of them 
individually with the K2, using the KIO2 to control the XV50 and a 
WA6HHQ (see http://www.elecraft.com/Apps/Amp_keying_ckt.htm) keying 
circuit for the hb 2 meter xverter. But I've never had both transverters 
hooked up at the same time.


I'd like to have both transverters wired to the K2 at the same time and 
be able to use them with little (or no) manual intervention. The ARRL 
VHF/UHF test is coming up next weekend and I'm looking for a way to band 
switch as easily as possible.


Is it as simple as hooking the XV50's  RxOut/IF2 to the 2 meter 
transverter 28MHz input and putting a spst switch in the 2 meter 
trasverters keyline? Or will that not work?  Or is there a better way?


Thanks in advance for your advice.

73,
Lenny W2BVH






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] FS: MixW RigExpert and Ten-Tec 6m transverters

2008-01-13 Thread G4ILO

Apologies for posting this, but the following two items that I'm selling on
eBay might be of particular interest to K2 owners:

MixW RigExpert USB interface with K2 connecting cable: http://xaddr.com/2gi

Ten-Tec T-Kit 20m to 6m transverter, drive from K2 ANT 2 in xverter mode:
http://xaddr.com/2gj

In case you're wondering, xaddr.com is yours truly's rival to TinyURL. Feel
free to use it whever you need to shorten a long address, and help support a
ham-owned and operated business. :)

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 expected 14 January
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/FS%3A-MixW-RigExpert-and-Ten-Tec-6m-transverters-tp14787959p14787959.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New K3 SN#207 built but question on AM Filter

2008-01-13 Thread Paul Clay
I would.  :=)  I'm not a hardcore ham operator, and
one of the big selling points for the K3 for me was
getting   excellent broadcast radio receive capability
(say, on par with a Drake R8B or AOR7030).  (I
currently run a K2-100 with which I'm very satisfied.)

- Paul, N6LQ


--- Dave Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've seen a number of old U.S. broadcast receivers
 with a 10 KHz notch
 filter in the audio to get rid of the high pitched
 hetrodynes from the
 adjacent channels.  But the wide IF sure brightens
 up the music when
 listening to your local honky-tonk station, and
 nobody gave a rip how
 wide their IF was if their music sounded good. 
 That's why I was
 hoping for the option of going as wide as I see fit
 when conditions
 allow.  But then who (other than yours truly) would
 be using a K3 to
 listen to the local BC when he could be working CW
 while enjoying 100
 Hz selectivity?
 
 Dave  W5DHM
 
 
  The basic reason has already been explained,
 however, there are very few
  cases were exceeding 3kHz audio bandwidth is
 useful.  HF broadcast
  stations use 5kHz channelling, which would only
 allow them 2.5kHz with
  brick wall filtering at both transmit and receive
 ends, although they
  probably do expect to suffer significant adjacent
 channel interference.
 
  MF broadcast stations use 9kHz channelling in
 Europe and 10kHz in the
  USA, but I suspect that adjacent channel
 interference is less
  acceptable.  As they were designed to be received
 with LC IF filters,
  with poor shape factors, I suspect they don't even
 make use of the full
  channel, and if they did, they would probably be
 required to have
  filters which put the adjacent channel into the
 filter stop band.
 
 ...
  David Woolley
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] ATTN: Bill Fogle - KE5KWE

2008-01-13 Thread Ken Kopp
Bill, 

I've replied to your messages, but my messages 
are being rejected by yahoo.


Do you have another address I can use?

Rose Kopp - N7HKW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Need Help with K1 ATU

2008-01-13 Thread Norm Klieman
I just bought a used K1 and am having issues getting
it to work. From what I understand I should be able to
go from the Menu to the ATU mode and then hit the WMP+
and WPM- buttons at the same time to go into tune mode
and then hear the tuner make adjustments.

When I do this it just goes into Pfn mode and the auto
tune is not working.

The transmitter is working I just can't get the Auto
Tune to work.

Thanks for your help!!

Norm K9NK
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] KUSB Update

2008-01-13 Thread Rajiv Dewan, N2RD
I was having difficulty updating my K3 with the latest version of the 
DSP code.  On Greg's recommendation I updated the KUSB driver and that 
solved my problem.


I could not find the link to KUSB driver on the Elecraft site, but found 
them on www.prolific.com.tw.  The device is PL-2303.  I updated the 
driver from 2.0.0.18 to 2.0.2.8 (on WinXP SP2) and it solved the DSP 
update problem via KUSB.


Raj, N2RD
K3 #170
K2 #5613
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Need Help with K1 ATU

2008-01-13 Thread Dave G4AON
Is the ATU enabled in the menu? It should show Tun in the menu... 
(press menu, scroll up and down to ATU, then press and hold menu).


Dave

===
I just bought a used K1 and am having issues getting
it to work. From what I understand I should be able to
go from the Menu to the ATU mode and then hit the WMP+
and WPM- buttons at the same time to go into tune mode
and then hear the tuner make adjustments.

When I do this it just goes into Pfn mode and the auto
tune is not working.

The transmitter is working I just can't get the Auto
Tune to work.

Thanks for your help!!

Norm K9NK
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Hi Cur

2008-01-13 Thread AD6XY - Mike

How are you measuring those voltages? In any case, it looks like the driver
is not working. You will have installed a nylon standoff on it, I would look
for a short around that area.

Mike



Bo Andersson wrote:
 
 Hi!
 
 After building and installation of K60XV, I got problem with Hi Cur when
 testing transmission.
 
 All around K60XV, as receive and settings for transverter acts as
 exspected.
 
 Regardless if I set Power to 0,2 or 15 Watts or changning Cal Cur, I got
 Hi Cur and I can see on may power supply, radio drawing 3,5 amp.
 
 I make some test from K2 Manual appendix E, Troubleshooting 
 
 Page 13 around ALC Power Control Test VPWR reading was 1.10 VDC
 Expected 0.7 - 2.5 VDC, no problem
 
 Page 14 Pre-Driver, Driver and PA
 
 Driver Input Reading: 1.71 Vrms Expected: 0.026 Vrms
 Driver Output Reading: 0.416 Vrms Expected: 1.8 Vrms
 PA Input(Q7) Reading: 0.8 Vrms Expected: 0.38 Vrms
 PA Input(Q8) Reading  0.39 Vrms Expected: 0.38 Vrms
 RF Detector Input Reading  0.4 Vrms Expected: 2.0 Vrms
 
 It seems that one or both PA transistor could be defective.
 
 Measure Diode/Transistor as point 7.
 
 + = positive lead to
 -  = negative lead to
 
 Q7
 
 B C E
 + 0.68K 0.68K
 - 6.0k 0.85K
 
 Q8
 
 B C E
 + 0.68K 0.68k
 - 6.0K 0.85K
 
 I hope some one can read and understanding my measure and perhaps have an
 idee around this problem.
 
 73's Bo/SM6FPG
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K2-Hi-Cur-tp14785526p14789260.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Ian wrote:

The higher the reference frequency, the more accurately you can set the 
TCXO

---

Is that correct? I don't know the details of Wayne's firmware, but the
accuracy of a synthesized rig is normally independent of the frequency being
received. 

I go for the highest frequency standard available when I'm trying to zero
beat some lower-frequency oscillator as accurately as possible (such as when
I set my 4.000MHz counter reference oscillator zero beat to WWV at 20 MHz),
but that I don't believe that's what we're doing here. The accuracy at 50
MHz should be the same as at 500 kHz, excluding any rounding errors in the
algorithm math. 

I have set my K3 on a BCB band station at 830 kHz to within 1 Hz and noted
that WWV at 15.000 MHz is still within 1 Hz.

Ron AC7AC

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] AF1 - couple of questions

2008-01-13 Thread David Wilburn
I picked up the lexan cases for the AF1 and W1 from W8FGU.  Very nice, 
well made products by the way.  Questions;


1. - I am currently running the AF1 with a 9v battery, but I will be 
connecting it to 12v supply here in the shack.  I was going to leave 
the 9v battery installed, as it appears the diodes that are part of 
the circuit will protect it.  But wanted to confirm.  The case is 
clear, so I can also keep an eye on the battery, but I wanted the 
battery in, in case I wanted to operate away from the shack.


2. - I performed the circuit changes documented in the errata, and the 
AF1 works fine with headphones (stereo jacks), but it does not seem to 
work with any of my external speakers.  Did I loose that option when I 
made the changes in the errata?  They seemed to be required for it to 
work with headphones.


Dave Wilburn
K4DGW
K2/100 - S/N 5982
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] KUSB Update

2008-01-13 Thread Dick Dievendorff
Hi, Raj.

The link to the Prolific web site for updated drivers for the KUSB is in the
k3 Utility Help Troubleshooting section.  Yes, I know that no one ever reads
Help (me included), but as issues have come up I've tried to add a section
that describes the solutions that have been discovered.  

Eric asked me again for the link and I suspect he's planning to add a link
from the Elecraft web site.  He's a pretty busy guy, though.

Thanks for your note, it's another confirmation that the driver update is
consistently resolving this issue.

I had updated my Prolific driver some months ago and didn't ran into this
issue during development testing.  I'll have to find another test machine,
I'm using five now...

73 de Dick, K6KR


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rajiv Dewan, N2RD
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 10:26 AM
To: Elecraft List
Subject: [Elecraft] KUSB Update

I was having difficulty updating my K3 with the latest version of the 
DSP code.  On Greg's recommendation I updated the KUSB driver and that 
solved my problem.

I could not find the link to KUSB driver on the Elecraft site, but found 
them on www.prolific.com.tw.  The device is PL-2303.  I updated the 
driver from 2.0.0.18 to 2.0.2.8 (on WinXP SP2) and it solved the DSP 
update problem via KUSB.

Raj, N2RD
K3 #170
K2 #5613
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Video of my build of K3 S/N 207

2008-01-13 Thread Paul Webb
If any one  wants a look , i took a load of photos while building my K3 and 
have put them together as a video, i intend to put a voice over explaining the 
build but have not had time yet. anyway feel free to have a look if you wish.
The K3 is now up and running 100%
regards
Paul

http://www.fists.co.uk/K3Build.wmv


  __
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Video of my build of K3 S/N 207

2008-01-13 Thread AD6XY - Mike

Nicely done.

Did you use it in the AFS contest this evening?

Mike


Paul Webb-7 wrote:
 
 If any one  wants a look , i took a load of photos while building my K3
 and have put them together as a video, i intend to put a voice over
 explaining the build but have not had time yet. anyway feel free to have a
 look if you wish.
 The K3 is now up and running 100%
 regards
 Paul
 
 http://www.fists.co.uk/K3Build.wmv
 
 
   __
 Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Video-of-my-build-of-K3-S-N-207-tp14790503p14790641.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread Ian White GM3SEK

Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

Ian wrote:

The higher the reference frequency, the more accurately you can set the
TCXO

---

Is that correct? I don't know the details of Wayne's firmware, but the
accuracy of a synthesized rig is normally independent of the frequency being
received.

The error in ppm is independent of the frequency, but the resulting 
error in Hz is proportional to the frequency.



I go for the highest frequency standard available when I'm trying to zero
beat some lower-frequency oscillator as accurately as possible (such as when
I set my 4.000MHz counter reference oscillator zero beat to WWV at 20 MHz),
but that I don't believe that's what we're doing here.


On the contrary, that is exactly what you are doing with the K3 as well.

The firmware initially assumes that the TCXO frequency is 49,380,000Hz. 
The REF CAL adjustment is telling the firmware what the true frequency 
of the TXCO is, and then the firmware will re-calculate all the 
transmitted, received and displayed frequencies in proportion to that 
new value.


To set REF CAL with the minimum possible error in ppm, the zero-beating 
should therefore be done at the highest possible signal frequency.



I have set my K3 on a BCB band station at 830 kHz to within 1 Hz and noted
that WWV at 15.000 MHz is still within 1 Hz.


That is because you did a really good job at 830kHz :-)



--

73 from Ian GM3SEK
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Video of my build of K3 S/N 207

2008-01-13 Thread Matthew Zilmer
Paul,

Thanks!  Good Stuff(tm).

matt, W6NIA
K3 # 24

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:15:03 + (GMT), you wrote:

If any one  wants a look , i took a load of photos while building my K3 and 
have put them together as a video, i intend to put a voice over explaining the 
build but have not had time yet. anyway feel free to have a look if you wish.
The K3 is now up and running 100%
regards
Paul

http://www.fists.co.uk/K3Build.wmv


  __
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re[2]: [Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread Corboy-Poteet
Let me ask this again.

Are you saying, that since the mixer signal is a multiple of the TCXO
freq that any errors in the TCXO will be magnified as the ref signal
goes higher in frequency.  This will then magnify the difference in
audio note of (say) 10 MHz vs 20 MHz for the same TCXO setting. A one
cps zero beat error at 10 MHz will be 2 cps at 20 MHz (or some such)?

Mike  W5FTD






 Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
Ian wrote:

The higher the reference frequency, the more accurately you can set the
TCXO

---

Is that correct? I don't know the details of Wayne's firmware, but the
accuracy of a synthesized rig is normally independent of the frequency being
received.

 The error in ppm is independent of the frequency, but the resulting 
 error in Hz is proportional to the frequency.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 filter setup on RTTY

2008-01-13 Thread Charlie, W0YG

I have seen folks indicate it is necessary to set OP1 as FL1 when calibrating
the RTTY filters.  Is this true or can you set it to any width as long as
the filter is calibrated so the signal is in the center of the bandpass?

73,

Charlie, W0YG..

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K2-filter-setup-on-RTTY-tp14792145p14792145.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] SW broadcast to calibrate against.

2008-01-13 Thread Ian White GM3SEK

W5FTD wrote:

Let me ask this again.

Are you saying, that since the mixer signal is a multiple of the TCXO
freq


Multiple isn't quite the right word, but every synthesized signal in 
the box is directly proportional to the TXCO frequency. If the TCXO is 1 
ppm high, for example, then all frequencies derived from it will have 
that same +1ppm error.



that any errors in the TCXO will be magnified as the ref signal
goes higher in frequency.  This will then magnify the difference in
audio note of (say) 10 MHz vs 20 MHz for the same TCXO setting. A one
cps zero beat error at 10 MHz will be 2 cps at 20 MHz (or some such)?

You got it. So, if you can adjust the REF CAL frequency within 1Hz at 
50MHz, then at 1MHz it will be within 0.02Hz.


That's the basic principle, anyway. There will be some small errors 
introduced by the calculations in firmware, as Ron pointed out; and in 
the longer term the TCXO will drift.



--

73 from Ian GM3SEK
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Need Help with K1 ATU

2008-01-13 Thread Don Wilhelm

Norm,

You do not have to enter the menu at all - just press the WPM+ and WPM- 
buttons at the same time and it will go into tune.  If you enter the 
menu, then the operation of th eWPM+ and WPM- buttons become different 
because they will change from one menu item to another or after pressing 
EDIT will change the parameter.


Enter the menu only to edit the ATU setting to AUTO, then exit the menu 
and press the buttons together and it should go into TUNE.


73,
Don W3FPR

Norm Klieman wrote:

I just bought a used K1 and am having issues getting
it to work. From what I understand I should be able to
go from the Menu to the ATU mode and then hit the WMP+
and WPM- buttons at the same time to go into tune mode
and then hear the tuner make adjustments.

When I do this it just goes into Pfn mode and the auto
tune is not working.

The transmitter is working I just can't get the Auto
Tune to work.

Thanks for your help!!

Norm K9NK

  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 filter setup on RTTY

2008-01-13 Thread Don Wilhelm

Charlie,

When the RTTY filter set is selected, the transmission path is through 
the KSB2 (OP1) filter, so yes, you will have to set RTTY FL1 to OP1 (or 
OP2 -- OP4, all the same filter).


You are placing the filter passband for transmission, and not for 
receive.  FL2 through FL4 can be set to any width you desire - I 
generally set them for 1000, 700 and 400 and center them at 1000 Hz - 
then in operation, I tune the desired signal to the vicinity of 1000 Hz 
with the VFO knob and then click on the software display to fine tune 
it.  Works for me.


73,
Don W3FPR

Charlie, W0YG wrote:

I have seen folks indicate it is necessary to set OP1 as FL1 when calibrating
the RTTY filters.  Is this true or can you set it to any width as long as
the filter is calibrated so the signal is in the center of the bandpass?

73,

Charlie, W0YG..

  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Wiring a K2 to 2 transverters

2008-01-13 Thread Don Wilhelm

Lenny,

I do believe you could do as you suggest and connect one transverter to 
the hi-pwr RF output of the K2 and the other transverter to the K60XV 
jacks as long as you set up the K2 transverter bands properly in the 
menu.  The manual method of controlling the 2 meter transceiver keying 
you proposed will work fine as long as you remember to close the switch 
to operate 2 meters and open it when on 6 meters.


73,
Don W3FPR

w2bvh wrote:

Hi

I need some advice on wiring my K2 to two transverters. I've got a 
newly built  XV50 and a homebrew 2 meter transverter. I've run each of 
them individually with the K2, using the KIO2 to control the XV50 and 
a WA6HHQ (see http://www.elecraft.com/Apps/Amp_keying_ckt.htm) keying 
circuit for the hb 2 meter xverter. But I've never had both 
transverters hooked up at the same time.


I'd like to have both transverters wired to the K2 at the same time 
and be able to use them with little (or no) manual intervention. The 
ARRL VHF/UHF test is coming up next weekend and I'm looking for a way 
to band switch as easily as possible.


Is it as simple as hooking the XV50's  RxOut/IF2 to the 2 meter 
transverter 28MHz input and putting a spst switch in the 2 meter 
trasverters keyline? Or will that not work?  Or is there a better way?



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] FS: Astron 4 AMP Linear Power Supply

2008-01-13 Thread Doug Person

The Astron power supply has been spoken for.
Thanks,
Doug -- K0DXV

Doug Person wrote:
I'm cleaning out my shack. Many things are going out on eBay.  This 
power supply is perfect for the K2 QRP version (as wells as the K1 and 
KX1) so I thought I would posted it here before listing it.  4 amps 
continous, 5 amps peak. Old-fashioned transformer-based power supply. 
Very well made and in good condition. Has a short piece of cable with 
a PowerPole already mounted.  Reply off-list.


Thanks

Doug -- K0DXV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Video of my build of K3 S/N 207

2008-01-13 Thread Justin Croonenberghs

On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 20:15 +, Paul Webb wrote:
 If any one  wants a look , i took a load of photos while building my K3

That's an awesome idea dude! I'm glad I took pics of my K2 build; maybe
I'll be a copycat and do the same...


-- 
Justin L Croonenberghs

Suppose I called you a liar. And suppose you were a member of Congress.
But I repeat myself.  -- Mark Twain

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New K3 SN#207 built but question on AM Filter

2008-01-13 Thread Alan Bloom
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 02:49, David Woolley wrote:
 Paul Webb wrote:
 
...
 The basic reason has already been explained, however, there are very few 
 cases were exceeding 3kHz audio bandwidth is useful.  HF broadcast 
 stations use 5kHz channelling, which would only allow them 2.5kHz with 
 brick wall filtering at both transmit and receive ends, although they 
 probably do expect to suffer significant adjacent channel interference.
 
 MF broadcast stations use 9kHz channelling in Europe and 10kHz in the 
 USA, but I suspect that adjacent channel interference is less 
 acceptable.  As they were designed to be received with LC IF filters, 
 with poor shape factors, I suspect they don't even make use of the full 
 channel, and if they did, they would probably be required to have 
 filters which put the adjacent channel into the filter stop band.

Even with the 10 kHz channel spacing used in the USA, AM broadcast
stations do not have 5 kHz audio bandwidth.  The FCC requires a guard
band between stations.  As I recall, rgulations require that the audio
start to drop off at about 4 kHz so that it can be down 20 dB or so by 6
kHz (the passband edge of the adjacent station).

So there's not much point in the receiver audio being wider than 4 kHz.

Al N1AL


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2/100 - Power investigation

2008-01-13 Thread David Wilburn
After trying unsuccessfully to get email to take data in tabs, I ended 
up just putting the information on my website.  Sorry for the trouble.


I was playing with an assortment of power meters, and noticed my K2 
was reading lower than I expected.  The closes things I had to a 
gauge, was an IC-703+ that had just been to the shop, and repaired, 
thus I felt it was likely to be putting out 10w.


When I compared a Bird 43 with an element I picked up on line, and one 
that came with it, it read a bit low.  But when I used an MFJ949e, it 
was right on.  Gotta run with what I have.


So I checked out the K2/100 at what it said was 10w/53w/111w (Full 
Power).  And I got the results, that are displayed here;


http://www.k4dgw.com/k2.html

The 10w settings seem a little bit more dispersed than I would have 
thought.  The 10m, 12m  20m 53w settings seem a bit low.  Then at 
what the rig says is 111w/Full Power, the rig seems even lower.


Do I need to go back through and run the power calibration, or should 
I start troubleshooting?


I have a KAT100, that was powered down, and the power was taken out of 
the back of the K2/100.

--


Dave Wilburn
K4DGW
K2/100 - S/N 5982
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] New K3 SN#207 built but question on AM Filter

2008-01-13 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

 Even with the 10 kHz channel spacing used in the USA, AM broadcast
 stations do not have 5 kHz audio bandwidth.  The FCC requires a guard
 band between stations.  As I recall, rgulations require that the audio
 start to drop off at about 4 kHz so that it can be down 20 dB 
 or so by 6 kHz (the passband edge of the adjacent station).

I don't think that's right ... or wasn't the last time I was around 
an AM station (I spent most of my career in TV).  I remember the AM 
guys doing proof to 10 KHz. 

Admittedly, many of the directional stations could not maintain 10 KHz 
through the phasors and the high end got trashed at night but the old 
allocation systems generally kept first adjacent situations far enough 
apart that 10 KHz could be obtained on groundwave during the daytime.  

In the day most receivers would start to roll off somewhere around 
6 KHz and the better ones had a 10 KHz notch for nighttime conditions. 

Given the DSP demodulation in the K3, it's a shame that there isn't 
an offset option to do vestigial sideband demodulation (offset the 
AM filter to the upper sideband or lower sideband) and demodulate 
carrier and one sideband for better fidelity.  This would work quite 
well if the carrier were placed at the -6dB point on the composite 
filter passband since it would keep the proper ratio between carrier 
and sideband.  Alternatively, the carrier could be moved to 1 KHz 
from the -6 dB point and the DSP could equalize out the 6 dB boost 
in audio below 1 KHz from the opposite sideband. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Bloom
 Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 10:48 PM
 To: David Woolley
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New K3 SN#207 built but question on AM Filter
 
 
 On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 02:49, David Woolley wrote:
  Paul Webb wrote:
  
 ...
  The basic reason has already been explained, however, there 
 are very few 
  cases were exceeding 3kHz audio bandwidth is useful.  HF broadcast 
  stations use 5kHz channelling, which would only allow them 
 2.5kHz with 
  brick wall filtering at both transmit and receive ends, 
 although they 
  probably do expect to suffer significant adjacent channel 
 interference.
  
  MF broadcast stations use 9kHz channelling in Europe and 
 10kHz in the 
  USA, but I suspect that adjacent channel interference is less 
  acceptable.  As they were designed to be received with LC 
 IF filters, 
  with poor shape factors, I suspect they don't even make use 
 of the full 
  channel, and if they did, they would probably be required to have 
  filters which put the adjacent channel into the filter stop band.
 
 Even with the 10 kHz channel spacing used in the USA, AM broadcast
 stations do not have 5 kHz audio bandwidth.  The FCC requires a guard
 band between stations.  As I recall, rgulations require that the audio
 start to drop off at about 4 kHz so that it can be down 20 dB 
 or so by 6
 kHz (the passband edge of the adjacent station).
 
 So there's not much point in the receiver audio being wider 
 than 4 kHz.
 
 Al N1AL
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 - Power investigation

2008-01-13 Thread Don Wilhelm

Dave,

I cannot really give you a quick positive answer - the real answer is 
it all depends.  To give a positive answer would require that you 
operate into a dummy load which is 50 ohms non-reactive at all 
frequencies in question.  One can measure the dummy load with an antenna 
analyzer - expect to see 50 + j0 at all frequencies of interest for 
reliable and repeatable results.


I do not generally trust any wattmeter (including an uncalibrated Bird) 
to provide any greater than 20% of full scale accuracy.  If the full 
scale reading is 100 watts, then the error can be as great as 20 watts 
at any point on its scale.  A properly calibrated KPA100 wattmeter can 
do better than that.


I find that with a good 50 ohm dummy load and an 100 MHz oscilloscope 
with a 10X probe (probe rated for 100 MHz), I can calibrate the KPA100 
wattmeter to less than 5% accuracy on bands below 20 meters - at higher 
frequencies, the 'scope and probe rolloff will indicate lower than 
expected results.  But I can state that once calibrated, the KPA100 
power calibration can be trusted to greater accuracy than the 
run-of-the-mill wattmeters.


Using a good 50 ohm non-reactive dummy load and measuring the RF voltage 
across it:

At 4 watts, the Peak to Peak RF voltage will be 40 volts.
At 10 watts the p-p RF voltage will be 63.25 volts
At 40 watts, the p-p RF voltage will be 126.5 volts
At 100 watts, the p-p RF voltage will be 200 volts.

My dummy load is a heat-sinked Caddock MP9100-50.0-1% resistor rated at 
100 watts with zero length leads that has been measured flat at 50 ohms 
up to 60 MHz.


Up to the frequency limits of my oscilloscope, I trust my dummy load and 
the peak to peak voltage measurement to provide more accurate power 
measurement than any wattmeter available.  I find that, after 
calibrating with these tools, the typical KPA100 power indications are 
within 5% of the actual power output.


I can also say that the TelePost LP-200 (and I assume the LP100) will 
also produce power readings which are within 5% of the actual power 
after proper calibration.  I cannot make such statements about the 
accuracy of the more common wattmeters which spec their accuracy as a 
percentage of the full scale reading.  A Bird with a 100 watt slug that 
has been recently calibrated will have an accuracy of 5% of full scale, 
which is a 5 watt error anywhere on the scale - so a recently calibrated 
Bird with a 100 watt slug will indicate anywhere between 5 watts and 15 
watts for an actual power of 10 watts.  One can do better with a 
precision 50 ohm load and a 100 MHz oscilloscope.


OK, that is my wattmeter rant for this month!!!

73,
Don W3FPR

David Wilburn wrote:
After trying unsuccessfully to get email to take data in tabs, I ended 
up just putting the information on my website.  Sorry for the trouble.


I was playing with an assortment of power meters, and noticed my K2 
was reading lower than I expected.  The closes things I had to a 
gauge, was an IC-703+ that had just been to the shop, and repaired, 
thus I felt it was likely to be putting out 10w.


When I compared a Bird 43 with an element I picked up on line, and one 
that came with it, it read a bit low.  But when I used an MFJ949e, it 
was right on.  Gotta run with what I have.


So I checked out the K2/100 at what it said was 10w/53w/111w (Full 
Power).  And I got the results, that are displayed here;


http://www.k4dgw.com/k2.html

The 10w settings seem a little bit more dispersed than I would have 
thought.  The 10m, 12m  20m 53w settings seem a bit low.  Then at 
what the rig says is 111w/Full Power, the rig seems even lower.


Do I need to go back through and run the power calibration, or should 
I start troubleshooting?


I have a KAT100, that was powered down, and the power was taken out of 
the back of the K2/100.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for January 13th 14th, 2008

2008-01-13 Thread Kevin Rock
Good Evening,
   Both nets this evening were well attended.  So well, in fact, that it was 
difficult to hear beyond the wall of sound.  Thus the later calls were worked 
first simply because I could make out a letter or two!  I truly hear a solid 
tone with no modulation so there is no way I can copy anything.  It is 
gratifying and frustrating at the same time :)  There were also a number of 
folks who disappeared as I called them.  I know I heard BEH three times but 
never got a response.  There was a 9V but Mike was worked later by Tom.  JP got 
called but no response from Steve either.  Another was OP, of whom I have no 
clue.
   I read the sun was acting up and between nets read about aurora in 
Scandinavia.  Thus our conditions seem to have improved through the action of 
the sun.  Now that we are starting upward again that will occur more 
frequently.  I am glad of that since working through the very bottom of the 
cycle was getting tiring!  
   The weather was wonderful today.  I got recharged by seeing the sun and 
feeling a warm day.  It got to near 50 degrees and most of the snow has 
vanished.  Only in the shade is there a little over four inches.  Now to get a 
little cutting in while the weather is good for it.  I like to be ahead of the 
woodpile in case there is a cold snap later in the season.  Plus I have to burn 
a little wood each month of the year.  During the summer I can go a few weeks 
without heat but usually have at least one or two fires a month during July and 
August.  June is normally cold here so having fires is normal.  The valley 
people think I am a little strange.  But, then, they live where they can see 
and hear their neighbors; how odd!

On to the lists =
   
On 14049.25 kHz at 2300z:
K9DMV - Joe - IL - K2 - 5628
K5BGB - Rod - TX - K2 - 1126
W6ZH - Pete - CA - K2 - 5138
W0RSR - Mike - CO - K1 - 2320
W6SU - John - CA - K2 - 228QNI #5
W0CZ - Ken - ND - K2 - 1031
W0JFR - John - CO - K2 - 4507
W6JD - Doug - CA - K2 - 1626
N0SS - Tom - MO - K3 - 008
K9ZTV - Kent - MO - K3 - 0021
K7TQ - Randy - ID - K2 - 213
KS7D - Mike - FL - K3 - 118
AB9V - Mike - IN - K2 - 3993
KL7CW - Rick - AK - KX1 - 798

On 7045 kHz at 0100z:
W0JFR - John - CO - K2 - 4507 
W6ZH - Pete - CA - K2 - 5138
W0RSR - Mike - CO - K1 - 2320
N0SS - Tom - MO - K3 - 008
KL7CW - Rick - AK - KX1 - 798* QNI #110 *
W0CZ - Ken - ND - K2 - 1031
N7KRT - Jeff - NV - K2 - 5471  QNI #40!!!
K9ZTV - Kent - MO - K3 - 0021
K1THP - Dave - CT - K2 - 3942
W6SU - John - CA - K2 - 228 
N2YC - John - NY - K2 - 5949
K7TQ - Randy - ID - K2 - 213
K7CN - Mike - NH (?) - K2 - 5569
KS7D - Mike - FL - K3 - 118
AE6GC - Jack - CA - KX1 - 1403
K9DMV - Joe - IL - K2 - 5628   QNI #15!!
WL7WH - Bob - AK 

   Now that the moon has set and the sky has cleared I am going to find Comet 
Holmes (near Algol).  This is the longest I have ever been able to see a comet! 
 The sky was hazy earlier but the moon was up so it would not have been easy to 
find a comet anyway.  Now I'll get the chance.
   Hopefully I got all the information correct.  I do have a question about 
K7CN though: New Hampshire or Oregon?  The signal would have sounded much the 
same to me here so I cannot tell.  I think I got everyone's serial number 
correct since a few of you were running different rigs than normal.  Then there 
was Pete running QRP on his K2 to keep me on my toes.  The signal from him was 
excellent so copy was no problem whatsoever.  The duct to Alaska was as good as 
ever with Rick bringing along another to join us.  
   Please stay warm and safe so I can hear you all again next week,
  73,
 Kevin.  KD5ONS  (Net Control Operator 5th Class)



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for January 13th 14th, 2008

2008-01-13 Thread G3YMC



Kevin Rock wrote:
 
I read the sun was acting up and between nets read about aurora in
 Scandinavia.  Thus our conditions seem to have improved through the action
 of the sun.  Now that we are starting upward again that will occur more
 frequently.  I am glad of that since working through the very bottom of
 the cycle was getting tiring!  
 

Last week's sunspot from the next cycle does indeed show the start of the
next cycle, but you won't see any real improvement until 2010 at the
earliest, maybe later. That was a single spot, later ones were still from
the last cycle. The sunspot number at the moment is zero, conditions
basically flat, yesterday's disturbance not caused by spots at all. Any
feeling that you had good conditions was just in the mind...

73 Dave G3YMC

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Elecraft-CW-Net-Report-for-January-13th---14th%2C-2008-tp14796062p14796484.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com