Re: [Elecraft] TRX frequency offset with -S parameter

2008-07-06 Thread oe9fwv



oe9fwv wrote:
 
 I am trying the latest beta firmware with my K3 in Pactor mode. 
 Like in a former try I encountered a problem, when I activate the -s 
 Parameter in DATA A USB mode. 
 My transceiver is sending 2.5 kHz higher than the dial display says.
 With the first try all was ok. Then I started to try different PTT RLS
 settings, 
 and suddenly my automatic tuner did not tune anymore. I discouvered that 
 the signal out of my K3 was broad and distorted. 
 I switch off and on, the signal was clean again and the smartuner did his
 job, 
 but now the frequency offset appeared.
 
 


for the reference of you all who are interested in this mode. 
the mystery is solved - the culprit found:
We found out that a frequency offset is introduced, when I choose a
different filter for receive than the default 2.7 or 2.8 filter. There is a
bug in the firmware when using the -s command and Lyle and Wayne are working
on it. For me pactor and other ARQ data modes work very well when I do the
following:
disable all filters for data modes in Filter configuration of the Utility
program except the 2.7 or 2.8 filter
or choose the 2.7 resp. 2.8 kHz filter for receive. 
choose -s for data modes
use PTT RLS of 20 in configuration menu.
mni thanks to Dave, Brendan, Lyle and Wayne for the help in finding the
cause for the problem and solving it.

73! de Werner OE9FWV

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/TRX-frequency-offset-with--S-parameter-tp18282957p18299154.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Band Buttons...

2008-07-06 Thread Dave G.
Lyle,

Excuse me for being a pedant but the English expression my Dad taught 
me is Furlongs per Fortnight...

--
Dave G.   KK7SS
'65 MK III Sprite in Richland, WA
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
Terry Pratchett, 'Hogfather'

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 OWNER’S MANUAL ERRATA

2008-07-06 Thread Dave G4AON
In the manual errata, the following mentions setting alternative filter 
norm settings. I think this has been mentioned previously, but mine 
doesn't seem to work as the manual errata suggests it should. The 
-SAV- appears but only for a split second, not allowing time to pick 
an alternate... I am using firmware 2.13, but haven't tried using the 
ALT filter settings previously.


From the manual errata:

In addition to the K3's standard NORM values, you can save two of your 
own often-used filter setups in each
mode, and recall them using the NORM function. These are referred to as 
ALT1 and ALT2. To save a filter
setup, hold NORM until you see - SAV - (3 seconds), then rotate the 
knob left or right to save it as ALT1
or ALT2. (The arrows to the left and right of SAV are a reminder that 
you can rotate the knob left or right go
get to the ALTernate filter memories.) To recall, hold NORM until you 
see - NOR - (about 1/2 second),

then rotate the knob left or right to recall ALT1 or ALT2.

73 Dave
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 OWNER’S MANUAL ERRATA

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Howard
You need to do the rotation while still holding the knob in.

On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 07:31 +0100, Dave G4AON wrote:
 and ALT2. To save a filter
 setup, hold NORM until you see - SAV - (3 seconds), then rotate
 the 
 knob left or right to save it as ALT1

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Tom Childers, N5GE
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:46:44 -0400, Tony Fegan VE3QF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


   My vote is for the VFO displays to be in wavelength (YARDS, FEET and 
INCHES) with an option for frequency in ROMAN NUMERALS!

:O)

[snip]

Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Tom Childers, N5GE
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 18:47:25 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip]


Actually, both terms are used by FCC. I just checked Part 97, and the terms 
are used almost interchangeably.

For example, the title of 97.301 is Authorized Frequency Bands. But when 
you look at the charts which tell who can operate where in what region, the 
leftmost column is labeled Wavelength Bands.

Even odder, FCC refers to 3.5-3.6 MHz as 80 meters and 3.6-4.0 MHz as 75 
meters as if they were not right next to each other.

I am not making this up. When I first heard about it, I thought my leg was 
being pulled, so I went and checked. 

73 es yes it's trivia, but it's my trivia de Jim, N2EY

[snip]

Yes , and the OSHA Manual, in the fire extinguisher section says that sand
buckets need not be included in the yearly test of fire extinguisher apparatus.

Ain't bureaucracy grand?

Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Ham Radio Deluxe with K3

2008-07-06 Thread Tom Childers, N5GE
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:54:33 -0500, Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have Ham Radio Deluxe Version 3.1in the set-up for radios it only lists 
the K2on the web site it says it supports K2 and K3, do I need an updated 
version or will the version work with the K3?


Download the latest version.  It includes Both K2 and K3...

Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread George Victor
Brian,
I was wondering if you have or had a K2 and if you relabeled it as well?
George
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Band Button

2008-07-06 Thread Tom Boucher
Thanks all for a good laugh this Sunday morning on the subject of 
frequency/wavelength units!
73
Tom G3OLB (patiently waiting)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Fred Jensen

Lyle Johnson wrote:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixed My 
vote is for the VFO displays to be in wavelength (YARDS, FEET and

INCHES) with an option for frequency in ROMAN NUMERALS!


Only the VFO B can display in roman numerals.  We can't do M, V or X in 
VFO A.


And we'll use furlongs for wavelength.

The audible feedback from the DVR option will be in Latin in the form of 
a Gregorian chant.


For those who prefer frequency in this mode, the reference won't be in 
Hertz, but in cycles per fortnight.


Sounds good to me.  As one of my UK colleagues once said, We're going 
metric ... inch by inch.  How about you?  The tour bus driver in 
Victoria BC remarked that We Canadians sell gasoline by the teaspoon, 
that's why the price looks so low.  Did the Romans have a decimal point?


Interesting thread.  Useless ... but interesting.

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2008 Cal QSO Party  4-5 Oct 08
- www.cqp.org


This is a great Forum...


Yes it is.  Hopefully with a lot of humor when you're not solving our 
[sometimes imagined] problems.


73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2008 Cal QSO Party  4-5 Oct 08
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Betas Not Showing on FTP Site

2008-07-06 Thread N2TK
In addition to what Gus mentions, one time when I was in the ftp directory I
needed to click PAGE, then clicked OPEN FTP SITE IN WINDOWS EXPLORER to see
the latest release. 
N2TK, Tony

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Augie Hansen
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 5:38 PM
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Betas Not Showing on FTP Site

AE4CW wrote:
 I can't find the two most recent betas.  Only 2.00 is visible in the FTP
beta
 directory dated 06/06.  Is anyone else having this problem or just me?
Tnx.

The following URL should take you to the beta firmware folder:

ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/beta

It's the one specified on the *K3 **Beta Test Firmware Instructions* 
page. If you don't see the notes file and the two latest firmware ZIP 
files, your browser may be using a cached page. Force the browser to 
reload the page.

Good luck,

Gus Hansen
KB0YH

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3: More on AF Gain delay

2008-07-06 Thread Joel R. Hallas
Thanks for the suggestion Don, but that wasn't it either. Any other
thoughts?

 

Remove both knobs from the concentric shafts and see if the nut holding 

the control to the front panel has loosened.  Yes, the pots are fastened 

to the board so you might not notice it at end of rotation, but a loose 

mounting nut can impart a 'squishy' feel when the knob is rotated 

because of the slight flexing.

 

73,

Don W3FPR

 

 

Regards, Joel

Joel R. Hallas

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button - way OT

2008-07-06 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
The Romans didn't even have the concept of zero - it was introduced  
from Messopitainia (spelling?) after their fall, if I remember  
correctly.

73 de M0XDF, K3 #174.0
--
I never did a day's work in my life; it was all fun. -Thomas Edison

Did the Romans have a decimal point?


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] 2Khz Up Split Command

2008-07-06 Thread G4ILO


Bob Serwy wrote:
 
 The following command works.  For some reason, adding a swap VFO made it
 work.  The following command set: sets A=B (including mode), then swap
 VFO,
 then move VFO A up 2 khz, then swap VFO again, then turn on split.
 
 
Thanks. Bob. I did have a version working that swapped the VFOs and then
changed the frequency of the current VFO. But then I discovered the UPB/DNB
commands and thought it should be possible to do it in fewer commands the
way I suggested.

On a totally unrelated topic, anyone who runs an website especially one that
offers software for download might be interested to read the last two
entries at http://blog.tech-pro.net to see how McAfee and Yahoo can destroy
your business.

-
Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
KComm for K2/K3: www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/2Khz-Up-Split-Command-tp18296661p18300446.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Breaking Threads

2008-07-06 Thread George Victor
Please don't take this the wrong way folks, this is just my opinion.

I feel that if a thread is started, all of the related replies should
be kept within that particular thread.
That makes the thread easier to read and the whole mail system more
clean and organized.

Just looking back a couple of days:
We have -

2 threads on k2 Diversity (with 4 messages in each)
3 threads on K3 and HRD (6 in one 1 in the other and 1 called Ham
Radio Deluxe With K3)
2 threads on Bail Height
2 on New Zealand WOW
2 on AF Gain Delay
And now we have 3 separate threads going on Band Button.

Wouldn't be better and easier to follow if the broken threads were combined?

Just my 2¢,
George
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Broken Threads

2008-07-06 Thread George Victor
Please don't take this the wrong way folks, this is just my opinion.

I feel that if a thread is started, all of the related replies should
be kept within that particular thread.
That makes the thread easier to read and the whole mail system more
clean and organized.

Just looking back a couple of days:
We have -

2 threads on k2 Diversity (with 4 messages in each)
3 threads on K3 and HRD (6 in one 1 in the other and 1 called Ham
Radio Deluxe With K3)
2 threads on Bail Height
2 on New Zealand WOW
3 on AF Gain Delay
And now we have 4 separate threads going on Band Button.

Wouldn't it be better, easier to follow and messages would not get
lost if the broken threads were combined into one?

Just my 2¢,
George
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

[Elecraft] K3 - mounting the front panel

2008-07-06 Thread Monty Shultes
I have found the following procedure gives me time and support to do this 
easily:
1) Remove right side panel (probably off already if you're working on the 
front).
2) Remove the rear mounting screw on the 2-D fastener, front right of RF board
3) Lay the K3 on its right side, on a smooth anti-static surface.
4) Lay the front panel on its right edge and cozy it up to the K3. 
5) Be sure the front dress panel comes inside the left side panel.
6) Be sure the front dress panel overlaps the 2-D connectors correctly.
7) Check connector alignment and mate the front panel slowly, while everything 
is on its side.

Since the table carries all the weight, your toper's hands will not have a 
chance to louse things up!

As always, YMMV.  Works for me.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Broken Threads

2008-07-06 Thread George Victor
Hi Folks,
Please don't take this the wrong way, this is just my opinion.

I feel that if a thread is started, all of the related replies should
be kept within that particular thread.
That makes the thread easier to read and the whole mail system more
clean and organized.

Just looking back a couple of days:
We have -

2 threads on k2 Diversity (with 4 messages in each)
3 threads on K3 and HRD (6 in one 1 in the other and 1 called Ham
Radio Deluxe With K3)
2 threads on Bail Height
2 on New Zealand WOW
3 on AF Gain Delay
And now we have 4 separate threads going on Band Button.

Wouldn't be better, easier to follow and messages would not be lost if
the broken threads were combined?

Just my 2¢,
George
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Re: [Elecraft] Broken Threads

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Howard
Now we've got 3 separate threads asking people not to have separate
threads...  How ironic...  :)


On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 07:30 -0400, George Victor wrote:
 Hi Folks,
 Please don't take this the wrong way, this is just my opinion.
 
 I feel that if a thread is started, all of the related replies should
 be kept within that particular thread.
 That makes the thread easier to read and the whole mail system more
 clean and organized.
 
 Just looking back a couple of days:
 We have -
 
 2 threads on k2 Diversity (with 4 messages in each)
 3 threads on K3 and HRD (6 in one 1 in the other and 1 called Ham
 Radio Deluxe With K3)
 2 threads on Bail Height
 2 on New Zealand WOW
 3 on AF Gain Delay
 And now we have 4 separate threads going on Band Button.
 
 Wouldn't be better, easier to follow and messages would not be lost if
 the broken threads were combined?
 
 Just my 2¢,
 George
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy

Jim N2EY wrote:

Even odder, FCC refers to 3.5-3.6 MHz as 80 meters and 3.6-4.0 MHz as 
75

meters as if they were not right next to each other.

I am not making this up. When I first heard about it, I thought my leg was
being pulled, so I went and checked.


Tradition in Region 2 was that 80 metres referred to the portion of the 
3.5 - 4.0 MHz allocation in which only CW could be used, and 75 metres to 
that portion in which 'phone and CW could be used.  My first VE licence (Dec 
1947) placed the divide at 3.800 MHz, but it was moved down to 3.750 MHz a 
year or two later. Further changes later.


73,
Geoff
GM4ESD

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question

2008-07-06 Thread Bill W4ZV


Brett Howard wrote:
 
 So am I to assume that the 8-pole filters are not going to need to worry
 about this as they are all at 0 anyway?  What is the advantage of
 getting two matched pairs of 5-pole filters when you can get two 8-poles
 for only 10 bucks a filter more?
 
 I'm assuming that its 100 + 100 + 30 for matched 5-pole filters or 125 +
 125 for the 8-pole filters.  I can see there being a great advantage if
 you already have a 5-pole and want to match it in your sub RX.  But if
 you're just getting 2 at the same time it seems like the 8-pole makes
 for a good option too..  At least I hope so cause diversity receive was
 the main reason I figured I'd go for the 8-poles... :) 
 

You're correct that 8-poles have no offsets and avoid this problem.  When I
ordered my 5-poles there was a $40 per filter discount to 8-poles and nobody
(including Elecraft) understood that the Sub RX filters needed to matched if
using 5-poles.  EI6IZ on the Field Test team discovered this in December
when he saw slight frequency offsets as the WIDTH control toggled different
filters.

But the real reason I ordered my 500 and 200 combination is purely
bandwidth.  Here are Elecraft's measurements:

Filter  BW(-6dB) Shape Factor

 200 224 4.0
 250 370 2.1
 400 435 2.1
 500 565 3.1

For weak CW signals or in contests I prefer a wider bandwidth.  For weak
signals the additional bandwidth gives my ears a better context in which to
apply my ear/brain's internal 50 Hz filter.  In contests, I also want to be
able to hear stations calling me off-frequency as well as hear what's going
on around my run frequency (so I can chase off those folks who send ? once
and then start CQ-ing 250 Hz above me).  

I would actually prefer 8-pole filters for rejection reasons, but the
bandwidth choices above are simply wrong for my use.  The 400 is too narrow
and the 250 is too wide (and only 65 Hz between the two!).  When I need a
narrow filter, I want a *truly* narrow filter.  The main use I have for the
200 is in nearly simplex pileups with lots of S9+++ signals (think 160m DX
pileups).

Another reason one might want 8-poles is when using N8LP's LP-PAN and SDR
software for a panadaptor/waterfall display.  The 5-pole offsets can cause a
similar problem here as you rotate WIDTH through different filters. 
However, with the recent addition of Elecraft's programming commands to read
the internal filter offsets, N8LP says WU2X can correct for the offsets in
his PowerSDR-IF software.

The bottom line to me is that I choose filters primarily for their bandwidth
and I prefer the 500/200 combination even with their offset warts.  If
Elecraft offered different BW choices in the 8-poles, I might prefer them. 
Quite frankly, given the current $25 price differential, I don't see why
Elecraft doesn't go to all 8-pole filters and make some better bandwidth
choices (e.g. at least octave differences at the low end...say 600 and a
*true* 250...not the one above which is actually 370).  I wouldn't be
surprised to see Inrad eventually do this even if Elecraft doesn't.

73,  Bill
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-KRX3-question-tp18280281p18301358.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Broken Threads

2008-07-06 Thread George Victor
Yes it is ironic Brett,
Sorry about that, I had a problem with the elecraft mailman this
morning. The messages were getting kicked back.
Apologies,
George


On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Brett Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Now we've got 3 separate threads asking people not to have separate
 threads...  How ironic...  :)


 On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 07:30 -0400, George Victor wrote:
 Hi Folks,
 Please don't take this the wrong way, this is just my opinion.

 I feel that if a thread is started, all of the related replies should
 be kept within that particular thread.
 That makes the thread easier to read and the whole mail system more
 clean and organized.

 Just looking back a couple of days:
 We have -

 2 threads on k2 Diversity (with 4 messages in each)
 3 threads on K3 and HRD (6 in one 1 in the other and 1 called Ham
 Radio Deluxe With K3)
 2 threads on Bail Height
 2 on New Zealand WOW
 3 on AF Gain Delay
 And now we have 4 separate threads going on Band Button.

 Wouldn't be better, easier to follow and messages would not be lost if
 the broken threads were combined?

 Just my 2¢,
 George
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

[Elecraft] K3 re. Beancounters

2008-07-06 Thread David Robertson
At the topside of the planet in America it is called playing hooky.

73
Dave KD1NA
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question

2008-07-06 Thread Brian Alsop

Hi Bill,

If you worked RTTY you would find out that the 250Hz filter is ideal 
for recovering weak ones and for 20M during RTTY contests.  The dual 
passband filter fits very nicely within it.   I don't care what 
bandwidth you call it.  Don't eliminate it as a choice.


I was astounded the difference it made during yesterdays DL RTTY 
contest.  Fine tuning + the selectivitiy made the 20 KHz RTTY band seem 
like 100KHz wide while doing search and pounce.  A/B comparisons between 
it and the 400Hz filter did indeed show significant benefit.  
Spectrogram spectra, with a band loaded with signals, strengthen this 
A/B comparions conclusion.
Some offending signals simply fell off the edge of the 250 Hz filter 
slope.  Part of this benefit is undoubtedly due to the capture effect of 
FM like modes.  Strongest wins.


73 de Brian/K3KO

Bill W4ZV wrote:


Brett Howard wrote:
 


So am I to assume that the 8-pole filters are not going to need to worry
about this as they are all at 0 anyway?  What is the advantage of
getting two matched pairs of 5-pole filters when you can get two 8-poles
for only 10 bucks a filter more?

I'm assuming that its 100 + 100 + 30 for matched 5-pole filters or 125 +
125 for the 8-pole filters.  I can see there being a great advantage if
you already have a 5-pole and want to match it in your sub RX.  But if
you're just getting 2 at the same time it seems like the 8-pole makes
for a good option too..  At least I hope so cause diversity receive was
the main reason I figured I'd go for the 8-poles... :) 

   



You're correct that 8-poles have no offsets and avoid this problem.  When I
ordered my 5-poles there was a $40 per filter discount to 8-poles and nobody
(including Elecraft) understood that the Sub RX filters needed to matched if
using 5-poles.  EI6IZ on the Field Test team discovered this in December
when he saw slight frequency offsets as the WIDTH control toggled different
filters.

But the real reason I ordered my 500 and 200 combination is purely
bandwidth.  Here are Elecraft's measurements:

Filter  BW(-6dB) Shape Factor

200 224 4.0
250 370 2.1
400 435 2.1
500 565 3.1

For weak CW signals or in contests I prefer a wider bandwidth.  For weak
signals the additional bandwidth gives my ears a better context in which to
apply my ear/brain's internal 50 Hz filter.  In contests, I also want to be
able to hear stations calling me off-frequency as well as hear what's going
on around my run frequency (so I can chase off those folks who send ? once
and then start CQ-ing 250 Hz above me).  


I would actually prefer 8-pole filters for rejection reasons, but the
bandwidth choices above are simply wrong for my use.  The 400 is too narrow
and the 250 is too wide (and only 65 Hz between the two!).  When I need a
narrow filter, I want a *truly* narrow filter.  The main use I have for the
200 is in nearly simplex pileups with lots of S9+++ signals (think 160m DX
pileups).

Another reason one might want 8-poles is when using N8LP's LP-PAN and SDR
software for a panadaptor/waterfall display.  The 5-pole offsets can cause a
similar problem here as you rotate WIDTH through different filters. 
However, with the recent addition of Elecraft's programming commands to read

the internal filter offsets, N8LP says WU2X can correct for the offsets in
his PowerSDR-IF software.

The bottom line to me is that I choose filters primarily for their bandwidth
and I prefer the 500/200 combination even with their offset warts.  If
Elecraft offered different BW choices in the 8-poles, I might prefer them. 
Quite frankly, given the current $25 price differential, I don't see why

Elecraft doesn't go to all 8-pole filters and make some better bandwidth
choices (e.g. at least octave differences at the low end...say 600 and a
*true* 250...not the one above which is actually 370).  I wouldn't be
surprised to see Inrad eventually do this even if Elecraft doesn't.

73,  Bill
 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 Running PSK 31

2008-07-06 Thread David Robertson
Bruce,

I don't know what software you are using on the K2/K3, but most software that I 
have used allows you to select 'PTT Via CAT Command' on the serial RS232 input 
which doesn't require setting DTR/RTS. I have had very good luck with this 
configuration.

73
Dave KD1NA

Due to the different levels present between the Line In and the FP or RP mic 
inputs you will need to adjust the VOX to a higher level.  When I tried this 
I had to almost set the VOX to maxbut not quite.

Why use VOX at all?  If you have the radio connected to a computer using a 
soundcard program why not utilitze the RS-232 line already connected?  You 
can do this by setting the PTT-KEY CONFIG menu item and making the correct 
DTR/RTS settings in the software you are using.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Broken Threads

2008-07-06 Thread Steef PA2A

George,

I received the daily digest a few years until a few days ago, so double 
topics can easily be generated. I changed it to receive all separate mail to 
keep up with the latest answers to the questions asked as a new K3 owner. 
Even now it is not easy to find wheather a topic is new or old between all 
QRM about a band switch label or 21.5 wpm cw speed.


I hope this Elecraft reflector doesn 't end up as a chatbox, just like the 
DX cluster which was also not meant for that.


73 's Steef PA2A
K2 4654
K3 1184

- Original Message - 
From: George Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Broken Threads



Yes it is ironic Brett,
Sorry about that, I had a problem with the elecraft mailman this
morning. The messages were getting kicked back.
Apologies,
George


On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Brett Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Now we've got 3 separate threads asking people not to have separate
threads...  How ironic...  :)


On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 07:30 -0400, George Victor wrote:

Hi Folks,
Please don't take this the wrong way, this is just my opinion.

I feel that if a thread is started, all of the related replies should
be kept within that particular thread.
That makes the thread easier to read and the whole mail system more
clean and organized.

Just looking back a couple of days:
We have -

2 threads on k2 Diversity (with 4 messages in each)
3 threads on K3 and HRD (6 in one 1 in the other and 1 called Ham
Radio Deluxe With K3)
2 threads on Bail Height
2 on New Zealand WOW
3 on AF Gain Delay
And now we have 4 separate threads going on Band Button.

Wouldn't be better, easier to follow and messages would not be lost if
the broken threads were combined?

Just my 2¢,
George
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com












___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Vox and PSK31

2008-07-06 Thread David Robertson
Everyone,

There is a definite downside using VOX to control your rig when using computer 
sound card digital commumication software. To discover this downside just 
monitor 14,070 for a period of time while the band is open. You will hear many 
of the Windows sound chimes or warnings.  It is too easy to forget your rig is 
on, in the VOX mode while you are working with other programs in Windows.

73
Dave KD1NA
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question

2008-07-06 Thread David Cutter

I think I must be missing something.

As I understand it, the additional crystal filters are only really necessary 
when operating with very strong adjacent signals in the passband.  So, if 
you don't have a need for rejection of such strong signals, let's say 40 
over S9 (somebody correct this figure please) then you don't need these 
extra filters, the DSP will cope with these large signals.  The filters are 
only there to prevent overload of the DSP.


Therefore, to perform the very best diversity reception in 40 over S9 
conditions, turn off those extra filters in configuration menu.


Having turned off the filters, I can engage the attenuator to avoid DSP 
overload if needed.  Yes, I know it also reduces the signal I'm trying to 
hear, but that sacrifice may be what is needed.


For diversity reception using low gain loop, pennant, flag, Beverage, loaded 
whip antennas, the signal input is very much lower than from the tx antenna, 
so, crystal filters are probably not be needed at all.


Or do I have it all completely wrong?

David
G3UNA 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] CORRECTION: K3 - mounting the front panel

2008-07-06 Thread Monty Shultes
While dalking my wog my senses reverted and I remembered that right should 
have been left in the following.
Sorry for the bandwidth and confusion.

I have found the following procedure gives me time and support to do this 
easily:
1) Remove left side panel, the one with the handle (probably off already if 
you're working on the front).
2) Remove the rear mounting screw on the 2-D fastener, left front of RF board, 
behind mic connector.
3) Lay the K3 on its left side, on a smooth anti-static surface.
4) Lay the front panel on its left edge and cozy it up to the K3. 
5) Be sure the front dress panel comes inside the right side panel.
6) Be sure the front dress panel overlaps the 2-D connectors correctly.
7) Check connector alignment and mate the front panel slowly, while everything 
is on its side.

Since the surface carries all the weight, your toper's hands will not have a 
chance to louse things up!

As always, YMMV.  Works for me.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX-3 R-19

2008-07-06 Thread Don Wilhelm

Steve,

I believe you meant R91.

This resistor is *only* to be added if the measured value of R91 is 
about 100 ohms.  Many later K3s already have it changed to 22 ohms, and 
on those the resistor should *not* be added.  The KRX3 manual makes it 
clear that one should measure R19 with a DMM and add the 27 ohm resistor 
only if the measured value is in the vicinity of 100 ohms. 

Elecraft's instruction manuals are written to cover installation in all 
K3s no matter whether early or late serial numbers.  I believe the DMM 
check method is a more reliable way of determining whether the resistor 
needs to be added than any reference to a serial number.


As an added trivia note - Elecraft does not use dashes in either product 
numbers or part designations.
That is left for the manufacturers who want to bring out an updated 
version of the radio with a different model number.  Elecraft radios are 
fully upgradable for the entire life of the product and upgrade kits are 
provided.  As a result, there is no such animal as a KRX-3 or R-19 in 
the Elecraft world.  The only exceptions are the N-gen and 2T-gen mini 
modules.  I  believe those were named by someone other than Wayne or Eric.


73,
Don W3FPR

W0SZ wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knows if R-19 will need to be modified in 
all K-3s or is there a serial number where the value for R-19 was 
changed.  Also would it be possible to change the Surface Mounted 
resistor for the correct value rather than add the old through the 
hole 1/4 watt resistor?  Thanks and 73, Steve W0SZ



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question

2008-07-06 Thread Don Wilhelm

David,

In most instances, you are correct.  My K3 has only the stock 2.7 
filter, but then I am not into heavy contesting nor intense DX chasing - 
I do some contesting and work DX for fun only.  When it gets to the 
point where I really need narrow roofing filters, it is time for me to 
go listen to some relaxing music, so you will not find me using 
diversity reception to pull out some obscure weak signal.


One related point - the Hardware AGC should prevent overload of the DSP, 
so the K3 will handle those strong signals nicely.  The problem is that 
the AGC action when a strong unwanted signal is within the roofing 
filter passband, the AGC will reduce the sensitivity of the entire 
receiver, so your wanted signal gets weaker too - and you may not even 
know the offending signal is there if you have the DSP bandwidth at a 
narrow width - it will behave as though there is QSB on the signal you 
are listening to.  Of course using diversity reception with one antenna 
having lower gain, that QSB effect may be minimized.


73,
Don W3FPR

David Cutter wrote:

I think I must be missing something.

As I understand it, the additional crystal filters are only really 
necessary when operating with very strong adjacent signals in the 
passband.  So, if you don't have a need for rejection of such strong 
signals, let's say 40 over S9 (somebody correct this figure please) 
then you don't need these extra filters, the DSP will cope with these 
large signals.  The filters are only there to prevent overload of the 
DSP.


Therefore, to perform the very best diversity reception in 40 over S9 
conditions, turn off those extra filters in configuration menu.


Having turned off the filters, I can engage the attenuator to avoid 
DSP overload if needed.  Yes, I know it also reduces the signal I'm 
trying to hear, but that sacrifice may be what is needed.


For diversity reception using low gain loop, pennant, flag, Beverage, 
loaded whip antennas, the signal input is very much lower than from 
the tx antenna, so, crystal filters are probably not be needed at all.


Or do I have it all completely wrong?


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question

2008-07-06 Thread Ed Muns
 If you worked RTTY you would find out that the 250Hz filter 
 is ideal for recovering weak ones and for 20M during RTTY 
 contests.  The dual 
 passband filter fits very nicely within it.   I don't care what 
 bandwidth you call it.  Don't eliminate it as a choice.
 
 I was astounded the difference it made during yesterdays DL 
 RTTY contest.  Fine tuning + the selectivitiy made the 20 KHz 
 RTTY band seem like 100KHz wide while doing search and 
 pounce.  A/B comparisons between it and the 400Hz filter did 
 indeed show significant benefit.  
 Spectrogram spectra, with a band loaded with signals, 
 strengthen this A/B comparions conclusion.
 Some offending signals simply fell off the edge of the 250 Hz 
 filter slope.  Part of this benefit is undoubtedly due to the 
 capture effect of FM like modes.  Strongest wins.

What DSP bandwidths were you using and where did you have your crystal
filters engaging?  There is only a 65 Hz bandwidth difference between the
400 and 250 crystal filters and both are wider than the what is needed
for 170 Hz shift RTTY.  The crystal filter function is to protect the DSP
from strong nearby signals and a 65 Hz delta is irrelevant at 400 Hz.  So
there will NOT be any discernible benefit on RTTY or any other mode if you
do the A/B comparison with the same DSP bandwidth (with or without the DTF).
For example, if your 400 Hz filter engages at DSP bandwidth of 400 Hz and
your 250 Hz filter engages at 250 Hz, then you are really A/B comparing DSP
bandwidths of 400 and 250 Hz, not the crystal filter differences.

What can make a difference in large RTTY pileups is running the DSP down as
low as 200 Hz which rolls off the outer edges of the tones, but eliminates
enough of the pileup to sometimes be a net advantage.  In general, running
the DSP at 300 Hz with the DTF engaged is ideal for 170 Hz shift RTTY
because there is little roll off of the desired passband.  Of course, the
250 Hz DSP bandwidth is a step between these two settings and also a viable
alternative in some situations.  The 250 Hz crystal filter at an actual -6
dB bandwidth of 370 Hz is a good roofer for these three DSP bandwidths, but
the 400 Hz crystal filter at an actual BW of 435 Hz is essentially the
same as far as protecting the DSP from nearby strong signals.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 Install...choices....

2008-07-06 Thread ny9h
now that I received my katiegram for the second receiverI have 
read the instructions. Looks like I need to make a decision whether 
to hook the 2nd rcvr aux in  to the unused ( non- transmitting) KAT3 
ANT port...
or the ext BNC..   Since I can't cogitate the correct choice for 
my mess o wires...
I will read the instruction a few more times, so my first guess might 
be correct.


 I wonder if there is any harm to bringing an extension from the bnc 
up to near the KAT3 jack...   then when I pick the wrong 
implementation, I only have to pop the lid and move the plug. 
decisions  decisions.   ain't  life swell..

with such problems

I will read the instruction a few more times, so my first guess might 
be correct.nc on the back...


Also , I do want to sneak out the 2nd rcvrs if out to a bnc on the backi.

bill   #44
Who just did a 'K3  show  tell for the Washington, PA  club meeting 
last Thursday night.




  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 Install...choices....

2008-07-06 Thread Stewart Baker
Thanks Bill,
That was a question I was going to ask :-)

73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:51:23 -0500, ny9h wrote:
 now that I received my katiegram for the second receiverI
have
 read the instructions. Looks like I need to make a decision
whether
 to hook the 2nd rcvr aux in  to the unused ( non- transmitting)
KAT3
 ANT port...
 or the ext BNC..   Since I can't cogitate the correct choice
for
 my mess o wires...
 I will read the instruction a few more times, so my first guess
might
 be correct.

 I wonder if there is any harm to bringing an extension from the
bnc
 up to near the KAT3 jack...   then when I pick the wrong
 implementation, I only have to pop the lid and move the plug.
 decisions  decisions.   ain't  life swell..
 with such problems

 I will read the instruction a few more times, so my first guess
might
 be correct.nc on the back...

 Also , I do want to sneak out the 2nd rcvrs if out to a bnc on
the backi.

 bill   #44
 Who just did a 'K3  show  tell for the Washington, PA  club
meeting
 last Thursday night.


 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question

2008-07-06 Thread Don Rasmussen
I sense that a fair amount of folks view K3 crystal
filters in the traditional sense, for example the
need for a 500hz filter on if one is going to
operate CW. This ia a long way from the truth with K3.
Same thing for the 1.8khz filter, unless you're having
antennas that bring in contest strength signals, not
necessary at all. 

Buck can probably comment on this, I never owned
Orion, but it seems they never had the ability for a
roofing filter on the second receiver and if you put
K3's receiver or subreceiver head to head without a
roofing filter (DSP only), the Orion receiver would
suffer AGC pumping terribly since it's default roofing
filter is at more than 10 khz and K3 is at 2.7khz.
That's what my Argo V did. 

The point is, the stock K3 setup is majorly robust for
either the main receiver or the subRx in stock form. 



[Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question
Don Wilhelm w3fpr at embarqmail.com 
Sun Jul 6 09:24:31 EDT 2008 

Previous message: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question 
Next message: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question 


David,

In most instances, you are correct.  My K3 has only
the stock 2.7 
filter, but then I am not into heavy contesting nor
intense DX chasing - 
I do some contesting and work DX for fun only.  When
it gets to the 
point where I really need narrow roofing filters, it
is time for me to 
go listen to some relaxing music, so you will not find
me using 
diversity reception to pull out some obscure weak
signal.

One related point - the Hardware AGC should prevent
overload of the DSP, 
so the K3 will handle those strong signals nicely. 
The problem is that 
the AGC action when a strong unwanted signal is within
the roofing 
filter passband, the AGC will reduce the sensitivity
of the entire 
receiver, so your wanted signal gets weaker too - and
you may not even 
know the offending signal is there if you have the DSP
bandwidth at a 
narrow width - it will behave as though there is QSB
on the signal you 
are listening to.  Of course using diversity reception
with one antenna 
having lower gain, that QSB effect may be minimized.

73,
Don W3FPR


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 --- Buddipole and Buddistick Antenna's

2008-07-06 Thread Paul Maruna
I notice that Elecraft has the Buddipole and Buddistick antennas in their order 
form.

Can the K3 use the Buddistick antenna or is it better built for the Buddipole 
antenna ?

Any help would be appreciated.

73, Paul
KD8HWP

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Vox and PSK31

2008-07-06 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

 To discover this downside just monitor 14,070 for a 
 period of time while the band is open. You will hear many of 
 the Windows sound chimes or warnings.  It is too easy to 
 forget your rig is on, in the VOX mode while you are working 
 with other programs in Windows.

This is one place that installing a second sound card in your 
computer - or using an interface like the microHAM DigiKeyer 
or microKEYER II with USB sound capability - is important.  
With a second sound card Windows Sounds continue to go to the 
default sound card and speakers while the digital software 
is configured to use the second sound card and the radio.  

With many computers it is possible to listen to streaming audio 
and operate digital modes at the same time if that's your thing. 
The dual soundcard systems also provide support for some of the 
new digital audio (digital voice modes) where one card is used 
for mic/speaker and the other card for audio to/from the 
radio. 

73, 

   ... Joe Subich, W4TV 
   microHAM America 
   http://www.microHAM-USA.com 
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Robertson
 Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 8:28 AM
 To: Elecraft
 Subject: [Elecraft] Vox and PSK31
 
 
 Everyone,
 
 There is a definite downside using VOX to control your rig 
 when using computer sound card digital commumication 
 software. To discover this downside just monitor 14,070 for a 
 period of time while the band is open. You will hear many of 
 the Windows sound chimes or warnings.  It is too easy to 
 forget your rig is on, in the VOX mode while you are working 
 with other programs in Windows.
 
 73
 Dave KD1NA
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Don Wilhelm
For those who will now want to add cycles per fortnight to their 
conversion tables:


1 Hz = 1,209,600 cycles per fortnight.

I just thought you would want to know - I had a moment of leisure this 
morning and did the calculation on paper :-)


73,
Don W3FPR

Lyle Johnson wrote:
For those who prefer frequency in this mode, the reference won't be in 
Hertz, but in cycles per fortnight.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Vox and PSK31

2008-07-06 Thread Brian Alsop

Simplier solution.  Costs nothing
Go to SOUND in the Windows configuration.  Create a file with all sounds 
turned off.  Save it.  Use it when operating PSK.


You might like the silence so much, you'll use this file all the time.
Personally,  I really dislike any sound intrusions from Windows ever.

73 de Brian/K3KO

Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

To discover this downside just monitor 14,070 for a 
period of time while the band is open. You will hear many of 
the Windows sound chimes or warnings.  It is too easy to 
forget your rig is on, in the VOX mode while you are working 
with other programs in Windows.
   



This is one place that installing a second sound card in your 
computer - or using an interface like the microHAM DigiKeyer 
or microKEYER II with USB sound capability - is important.  
With a second sound card Windows Sounds continue to go to the 
default sound card and speakers while the digital software 
is configured to use the second sound card and the radio.  

With many computers it is possible to listen to streaming audio 
and operate digital modes at the same time if that's your thing. 
The dual soundcard systems also provide support for some of the 
new digital audio (digital voice modes) where one card is used 
for mic/speaker and the other card for audio to/from the 
radio. 

73, 

  ... Joe Subich, W4TV 
  microHAM America 
  http://www.microHAM-USA.com 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] 2Khz Up Split Command

2008-07-06 Thread Vic K2VCO

G4ILO wrote:


On a totally unrelated topic, anyone who runs an website especially one that
offers software for download might be interested to read the last two
entries at http://blog.tech-pro.net to see how McAfee and Yahoo can destroy
your business.


Unfortunately, a similar philosophy seems to pervade the industry which 
prefers to ignore collateral damage in its war against spam, malware, 
etc.  I have had the experience -- several times and with several ISPs 
-- of having my emails bounced because the IP address was on some 
blacklist or for other reasons.


In one particularly annoying incident, a customer of mine in Perth, 
Australia asked an urgent technical question. Of course my replies to 
him bounced, as his questions became more and more panicky. Ultimately I 
phoned him.


The website of the blacklist that caught me explained its functions in 
an insulting, patronizing manner, and did not respond to entreaties from 
me or my ISP (who tried to be helpful). Ultimately the guy in Australia 
got *his* ISP to stop subscribing to the blacklist and we could 
communicate again!

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Vox and PSK31

2008-07-06 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

 Simplier solution.  Costs nothing
 Go to SOUND in the Windows configuration.  Create a file with 
 all sounds turned off.  Save it.  Use it when operating PSK.

That's fine if you never use the PC for anything except PSK. 
However, if you use DXLab Suite or similar programs with DX 
alerting functions ... or use the PC for any other purpose ... 
a second sound card is still a must have.  Without it, the 
question is not IF you will get non-PSK audio on the air - it 
is only a matter of WHAT and WHEN.  

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Alsop
 Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 11:17 AM
 To: 'Elecraft'
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Vox and PSK31
 
 
 Simplier solution.  Costs nothing
 Go to SOUND in the Windows configuration.  Create a file with 
 all sounds 
 turned off.  Save it.  Use it when operating PSK.
 
 You might like the silence so much, you'll use this file all 
 the time. Personally,  I really dislike any sound intrusions 
 from Windows ever.
 
 73 de Brian/K3KO
 
 Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
 
 To discover this downside just monitor 14,070 for a
 period of time while the band is open. You will hear many of 
 the Windows sound chimes or warnings.  It is too easy to 
 forget your rig is on, in the VOX mode while you are working 
 with other programs in Windows.
 
 
 
 This is one place that installing a second sound card in your
 computer - or using an interface like the microHAM DigiKeyer 
 or microKEYER II with USB sound capability - is important.  
 With a second sound card Windows Sounds continue to go to the 
 default sound card and speakers while the digital software 
 is configured to use the second sound card and the radio.  
 
 With many computers it is possible to listen to streaming audio
 and operate digital modes at the same time if that's your thing. 
 The dual soundcard systems also provide support for some of the 
 new digital audio (digital voice modes) where one card is used 
 for mic/speaker and the other card for audio to/from the 
 radio. 
 
 73,
 
... Joe Subich, W4TV 
microHAM America 
http://www.microHAM-USA.com 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 - setting the AGC threshold

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Siu
Hello Group,

Although I built a lot of K2 in the past, I encountered problem nearly each 
time.  This time, p.48 of the K2 manual, I can only get a maximum voltage of 
3.75v no matter how I adjust R1 on the control board.

Is this matter? If yes, how I can solve the problem and get a reading of 3.8v 
on DMM.

Thanks for your help.

73

Johnny Siu VR2XMC
K2 #6538 K3#46

___
 YM - 離線訊息
 就算你沒有上網,你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你,當你上網時就能立即看到,任何說話都冇走失。
 http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Vic K2VCO

Don Wilhelm wrote:
For those who will now want to add cycles per fortnight to their 
conversion tables:


1 Hz = 1,209,600 cycles per fortnight.

I just thought you would want to know - I had a moment of leisure this 
morning and did the calculation on paper :-)


Funny, the first thing I did when I saw Lyle's message was to do the same!

What's really interesting is the wavelength of 1 cpf: 2.5 x10**6 m. The 
2-1/2 million meter band!

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 --- Buddipole and Buddistick Antenna's

2008-07-06 Thread Vic K2VCO

Paul Maruna wrote:

I notice that Elecraft has the Buddipole and Buddistick antennas in their order 
form.

Can the K3 use the Buddistick antenna or is it better built for the Buddipole 
antenna ?


It would work fine with either antenna. The real issue is that both of 
these antennas are compromises designed to make it easy to set up a 
station in the field. If you are planning to operate from a fixed 
location, you will get much better performance from a wire antenna 
mounted as high as possible, and such an antenna would be much cheaper.


In the field, a Buddipole would be especially good if you can locate it 
next to a sharp dropoff, which would compensate for the low height. A 
Buddistick would be especially good on a beachfront or other salt-water 
location, but relatively poor in the mountains where ground conductivity 
is not so good.


Many operators have good luck in the field with wire antennas placed in 
trees by slingshot/reel devices, etc. The higher the better.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] KRX3 - COR

2008-07-06 Thread Mike Harris
G'day,

Interested in what power level is required to trigger the carrier operated 
relay in the KRX3.  Just out of interest I've checked the coupling between 
my OB9-5 and the OB5-6 about 2.4 metres above it, booms in-line.

900W into the HF coax, terminated WM-2 on the 6M coax.  worst case 45mW on 
21250kHz.

Same test but looking at the pickup on the 40M coax, 5mW.

Regards,

Mike VP8NO 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 re. Beancounters

2008-07-06 Thread Bob

Before I retired it was also known as a well day or a mental health day.

73,
Bob
K2TK



David Robertson wrote:


At the topside of the planet in America it is called playing hooky.

73
Dave KD1NA


 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Vic K2VCO

Vic K2VCO wrote:

Don Wilhelm wrote:
For those who will now want to add cycles per fortnight to their 
conversion tables:


1 Hz = 1,209,600 cycles per fortnight.

I just thought you would want to know - I had a moment of leisure this 
morning and did the calculation on paper :-)


Funny, the first thing I did when I saw Lyle's message was to do the same!

What's really interesting is the wavelength of 1 cpf: 2.5 x10**6 m. The 
2-1/2 million meter band!


Oops. The real wavelength is 3.6 x 10**14 meters! Sorry.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread George Victor
Heinrich Hertz would be proud !
You have to credit Don for his new term for cpf - perhaps wm?
Lets all meet on 8.515584e12 wm for some QRP CW.
So do I push the button UP or DOWN? :-)

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Vic K2VCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Vic K2VCO wrote:

 Don Wilhelm wrote:

 For those who will now want to add cycles per fortnight to their
 conversion tables:

 1 Hz = 1,209,600 cycles per fortnight.

 I just thought you would want to know - I had a moment of leisure this
 morning and did the calculation on paper :-)

 Funny, the first thing I did when I saw Lyle's message was to do the same!

 What's really interesting is the wavelength of 1 cpf: 2.5 x10**6 m. The
 2-1/2 million meter band!

 Oops. The real wavelength is 3.6 x 10**14 meters! Sorry.

 --
 73,
 Vic, K2VCO
 Fresno CA
 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 - setting the AGC threshold

2008-07-06 Thread Don Wilhelm
Johnny,

All will be OK if you just set it to maximum.
The cause is the 8 volt regulator is on the low end of its tolerance range.
You could replace the regulator to being it up, but you will not notice
any difference in the K2 nor its performance.
If you wish to increase the AGC Threshold voltage without changing the
regulator, you can solder a resistor across pins 3 and 4 of RP6 - you
may have to experiment a bit with the value until you can obtain a bit
greater than 3.8 volts from the AGC Threshold pot adjustment, I would
recommend starting with 15k and work from there.

Be aware that there is a note in the manual instructions for Setting the
AGC Threshold which states that This is the suggested setting, but it
can be adjusted later to suit the operator. Any setting that will
improve the sensitivity of the K2 will be lower than 3.8 volts. If the
AGC Threshold is set too low (below 3.65 volts or so), the S-meter
adjustments get a bit tedious if one is picky about the low end reading,
the high end reading and the S-9 reading with a 50 uV input signal. All
3 conditions can usually only be met with an AGC Threshold voltage in
the 3.7 to 3.8 volt range.

73,
Don W3FPR

Johnny Siu wrote:
 Hello Group,

 Although I built a lot of K2 in the past, I encountered problem nearly each 
 time.  This time, p.48 of the K2 manual, I can only get a maximum voltage of 
 3.75v no matter how I adjust R1 on the control board.

 Is this matter? If yes, how I can solve the problem and get a reading of 3.8v 
 on DMM.

   
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Don Wilhelm
No credit for me on that one George - Lyle was the first to recognize 
the units.


73,
Don W3FPR

George Victor wrote:

Heinrich Hertz would be proud !
You have to credit Don for his new term for cpf - perhaps wm?
Lets all meet on 8.515584e12 wm for some QRP CW.
So do I push the button UP or DOWN? :-)
  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 - COR

2008-07-06 Thread Bill W4ZV



Mike Harris-9 wrote:
 
 Interested in what power level is required to trigger the carrier operated 
 relay in the KRX3. 
 

According to Wayne, +20 to +25 dBm activates the COR in both RX ANT (KXV3)
and AUX RF (KRX3).

73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/KRX3---COR-tp18303477p18304493.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread AD6XY - Mike

I think there is a misunderstanding of the meaning of the word Band. 

The higher bands for example refer to the bands in terms of frequency. The
20m band is in terms of wavelength. However, no bands are officially
described in terms of wavelength any more. Not since 150m and down! Look at
all band plans - even the USA one - and you will find it is defined by
frequency.

So, the K3 and all other radios are correct.

Mike



K3KO wrote:
 
 This isn't just the K3.  Other radios have the same problem.   It seems to
 be a mistake that persisted through the years.
 
 The button marked band with up and down arrows really is frequency.
 
 You push the up arrow and the band goes down.  Press down arrow and band
 goes up.
 
 It would be nice to have this fixed in the K3.  No hope for other radios.
 
 Right now I have a white sticky label with freq on it pasted over the band
 marking.
 
 73 de Brian/K3KO
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Band-button-tp18291244p18304496.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
Bzzt.  What does top band mean?

73, doug

   Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
   From: AD6XY - Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]


   I think there is a misunderstanding of the meaning of the word Band. 

   The higher bands for example refer to the bands in terms of frequency. The
   20m band is in terms of wavelength. However, no bands are officially
   described in terms of wavelength any more. Not since 150m and down! Look at
   all band plans - even the USA one - and you will find it is defined by
   frequency.

   So, the K3 and all other radios are correct.

   Mike



   K3KO wrote:

This isn't just the K3.  Other radios have the same problem.   It seems to
be a mistake that persisted through the years.

The button marked band with up and down arrows really is frequency.

You push the up arrow and the band goes down.  Press down arrow and band
goes up.

It would be nice to have this fixed in the K3.  No hope for other radios.

Right now I have a white sticky label with freq on it pasted over the band
marking.

73 de Brian/K3KO

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] KRX3- K3 R91

2008-07-06 Thread Bruce Beford
I am waiting on my KRX3 (backordered since July '07) but decided to check my
K3 for the value of R91.

My K3 s/n 559 had 100 ohms for R91. I removed the existing 0603 sized
resistor and replaced it with an 0805 size 22 ohms that I had on-hand. (The
method I usually employ for resistors and caps is to use two soldering
irons, one in each hand. Observing through an Opti-visor, heat both ends of
the component simultaeously, and gently lift it off the board.)The pads on
the PC board are large enough to allow the used of the 0805 component.

I had no difficulty performing this mod. I look forward to installing the
KRX3 once it arrives.

73,
Bruce N1RX

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 7/6/08 2:36:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:


 What does top band mean?
 

160 meters (1.8 to 2.0 MHz)

The name derives from the time when we thought primarily in terms of 
wavelength. Going to a longer wave was going up and to a shorter wave was 
down. 
Hence Clinton B. Desoto's book title 200 Meters and Down (yes, it should be 
metres)

160 is the longest wave hams can use, hence it's the top band.

73 de Jim, N2EY


**
Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos 
for fuel-efficient used cars.
  
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut000507)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: KRX3 question

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Howard
I find that the narrower filters take out a lot of the noise before it
hits the DSP and it can even make just rag chew conditions nicer in my
very electrically noisy area.  Actually I'm quite excited that once I
get my K3 back that I can set the 250Hz filter to be able to use it up
at 350.  I even am adding the 1Khz filter as the step in the noise when
switching from my 250Hz to my 1.8Khz was pretty large.  

Honestly I'm not so sure that the 1.8 is really all that much of a help
over the 2.7 but the 250 is a big help over the 2.7 and the 1.8.  Plus I
just like having the radio do all the intelligent rock switching.  Makes
it a very nice combination and mixing of the old way of doing things and
the new way of doing things.

On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 13:56 +0100, David Cutter wrote:
 I think I must be missing something.
 
 As I understand it, the additional crystal filters are only really necessary 
 when operating with very strong adjacent signals in the passband.  So, if 
 you don't have a need for rejection of such strong signals, let's say 40 
 over S9 (somebody correct this figure please) then you don't need these 
 extra filters, the DSP will cope with these large signals.  The filters are 
 only there to prevent overload of the DSP.
 
 Therefore, to perform the very best diversity reception in 40 over S9 
 conditions, turn off those extra filters in configuration menu.
 
 Having turned off the filters, I can engage the attenuator to avoid DSP 
 overload if needed.  Yes, I know it also reduces the signal I'm trying to 
 hear, but that sacrifice may be what is needed.
 
 For diversity reception using low gain loop, pennant, flag, Beverage, loaded 
 whip antennas, the signal input is very much lower than from the tx antenna, 
 so, crystal filters are probably not be needed at all.
 
 Or do I have it all completely wrong?
 
 David
 G3UNA 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Mike Harris
G'day,

| 160 is the longest wave hams can use, hence it's the top band.
| 
| 73 de Jim, N2EY

137kHz = 2188 metres

Regards,

Mike VP8NO
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Bob
I think the most practical unit of measure is the chain.  It is 
perfect in that 20  would be 1 and then the bands are up  or down from 
there.


Also makes laying out antennas in the yard very easy.

73,
Bob
K2TK

Vic K2VCO wrote:


Don Wilhelm wrote:

For those who will now want to add cycles per fortnight to their 
conversion tables:


1 Hz = 1,209,600 cycles per fortnight.

I just thought you would want to know - I had a moment of leisure 
this morning and did the calculation on paper :-)



Funny, the first thing I did when I saw Lyle's message was to do the 
same!


What's really interesting is the wavelength of 1 cpf: 2.5 x10**6 m. 
The 2-1/2 million meter band!



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button

2008-07-06 Thread Ian White GM3SEK

N2EY wrote:


160 is the longest wave hams can use, hence it's the top band.


That's right - keep pressing BAND ^ and there it is, just above 50MHz.


--

73 from Ian GM3SEK
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Band button [END of Thread]

2008-07-06 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
This one has been beaten into submission. Time to end the thread.

Eric  WA6HHQ
Elecraft List Moderator
_..._
-Original Message-
From: Ian White GM3SEK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, Jul 6, 2008 2:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Band button
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ian White GM3SEK [EMAIL PROTECTED]

N2EY wrote:

160 is the longest wave hams can use, hence it's the top band.

That's right - keep pressing BAND ^ and there it is, just above 50MHz.


-- 

73 from Ian GM3SEK
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


re: [Elecraft] Breaking Threads

2008-07-06 Thread Mike Scott
 Wouldn't be better and easier to follow if the broken threads were
combined?

 

How do you do that? 

I take my list email in the summary form (about 50 emails per summary) and I
don't have a clue on how to keep a thread together as I see no threads.

 

Mike Scott

AE6WA Tarzana, CA

K3/100 SN508

 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Need help setting up mic jumpers on K2

2008-07-06 Thread George Victor
Hi Folks,
Has anyone set up the jumpers on a K2 for an Icom SM-6?
The desk microphone has an internal preamp.
The KSB2 manual says:

Do not connect pin 2 unless mic
has internal preamp. Touch-tone
ICs may be sensitive to stray RF.
Resistor, AF to 5V: HM-7, 820
ohms; HM-12/22/23/36, 10 K.

I am assuming I should just connect the 5V to pin 2

If possible I would like to be able to use the HM-36 as well.
Should I use a resistor?

Thanks in advance,
George
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 --- Park Portable Antenna

2008-07-06 Thread k7hbg
Hi Vic;
 Your advice of launching a long wire into tree punched my lets do
something button. I think I'll take my K2 out to the park next week and
try getting on the air with a tree vertical as you suggested. Twenty
meters should have some life in it and with this in mind, what form would
this simple antenna system take? I have a KAT100 which I could take along
to match it.

Regards, Bob K7hbg




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 --- Park Portable Antenna

2008-07-06 Thread Vic K2VCO

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Vic;
 Your advice of launching a long wire into tree punched my lets do
something button. I think I'll take my K2 out to the park next week and
try getting on the air with a tree vertical as you suggested. Twenty
meters should have some life in it and with this in mind, what form would
this simple antenna system take? I have a KAT100 which I could take along
to match it.


The KAT100 will match almost anything, but an odd number of 
quarter-wavelengths will produce a reasonable impedance for a random 
wire antenna with less likelihood of making the radio 'hot' for RF. Then 
you should also attach a counterpoise to the ground terminal; this could 
be 16 ft (5M) or so of wire thrown on the ground.


You might get better results with a dipole, but this is about the 
simplest antenna there is and it will probably work better than small 
loaded verticals, etc.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 --- Park Portable Antenna

2008-07-06 Thread Brian Lloyd


On Jul 6, 2008, at 5:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Vic;
Your advice of launching a long wire into tree punched my lets do
something button. I think I'll take my K2 out to the park next week  
and

try getting on the air with a tree vertical as you suggested. Twenty
meters should have some life in it and with this in mind, what form  
would
this simple antenna system take? I have a KAT100 which I could take  
along

to match it.


I have done this. I use a 40' piece of wire with nylon line tied to  
the end. A monkey-fist around a tennis ball makes a dandy throwing- 
thing to get the line over a tree branch. I then string out a 45'  
piece of wire as a counterpoise. Works just dandy.


--

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] k3 fan noise

2008-07-06 Thread eurom6

Just finished my K3/100 and all's well but the fan noise is an aggravation. 
If I loosen the screws and hold the fans, no noise but when assembled it
sounds like the old card on the spokes of our bikes 50 yrs ago (obviously
much softer).  The back of the K3 is acting like a sounding board for the
fan and it amplifies and resonates.  Felt washers didn't help, tightening
hardware didn't help.  No fan wires in the way.  I noticed this is not a
common problem so I wonder if I have an out of balance fan/motor.  John 
N0GBR


H. Cary III wrote:
 
 K3-100 #178 went together flawlessly, well almost, but it was smooth.  Was
 missing two standoffs and two screws for the fan assembly on the KPA-100.
 When I did the first fan check, the relay or relays clicked but only one
 operated very quietly (short lead) ...disconnected it as instructed,
 installed the KPA-100 module and reconnected the fans  panel per
 instructions.   Both fans operate this time but WOW, is it every loud! 
 - my wife came in from the next room wanting to know what was making the
 noise.  Her facial reaction when she realized it was the K3 clearly said:
 This is the latest and greatest?
 
 Is it the missing hardware or are others experiencing noisy fans, too?
 I've got to fix this, both for my sanity and to save face!
 
 Thanks for the help and Happy New Year.
 
 73,
 Cary, K4TM
 K2-100 #5266
 K3-100 #0178
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/k3-fan-noise---lots-of-it.-tp14543796p18308741.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2 --- Park Portable Antenna

2008-07-06 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
As Vic pointed out, a center fed half wave (i.e. center fed dipole) is
probably the most efficient and easiest to erect, especially on 20 meters
where it's only 32 feet end-to-end. Such an antenna provides a low
impedance, letting you use coaxial feeder if you use a feed line.  

Keep in mind that it does *not* need to be in a straight line. It can be
erected in various ways. For example, if you throw one end over a tree so it
drops vertically to the rig, the other half can run horizontally near the
ground, making a very efficient vertical. Such an arrangement will be
somewhat directive in the direction you run the horizontal segment near the
ground. 

Optionally you can use feed line and make an inverted V 

Skip the coax and use a reasonable length of 300 or 450 ohm window line for
a feeder (just hook one side of the twin lead to the center pin on the
antenna jack and the other side to the chassis ground) and you can use the
antenna on any band from 40 through 10. On 40, where it's only 1/4
wavelength overall, it'll be 1 or 2 dB weaker than a full half wave, but
that's pretty darn good. 

On higher frequencies you'll actually see a little gain. .

Ron AC7AC 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 5:38 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K2 --- Park Portable Antenna


Hi Vic;
 Your advice of launching a long wire into tree punched my lets do
something button. I think I'll take my K2 out to the park next week and try
getting on the air with a tree vertical as you suggested. Twenty meters
should have some life in it and with this in mind, what form would this
simple antenna system take? I have a KAT100 which I could take along to
match it.

Regards, Bob K7hbg




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] k3 fan noise

2008-07-06 Thread Bill W5WVO
You're right that it is uncommon. Properly installed, the fans are
completely inaudible. I believe all the instances where fan noise has been
encountered were traced down to some kind of assembly error. Probably Don
could point you in the right direction. (Of course, a bad fan is possible as
well. Just never heard of one on this list.)

Bill W5WVO

- Original Message - 
From: eurom6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] k3 fan noise



 Just finished my K3/100 and all's well but the fan noise is an
aggravation.
 If I loosen the screws and hold the fans, no noise but when assembled it
 sounds like the old card on the spokes of our bikes 50 yrs ago (obviously
 much softer).  The back of the K3 is acting like a sounding board for the
 fan and it amplifies and resonates.  Felt washers didn't help, tightening
 hardware didn't help.  No fan wires in the way.  I noticed this is not a
 common problem so I wonder if I have an out of balance fan/motor.  John
 N0GBR


 H. Cary III wrote:
 
  K3-100 #178 went together flawlessly, well almost, but it was smooth.
Was
  missing two standoffs and two screws for the fan assembly on the
KPA-100.
  When I did the first fan check, the relay or relays clicked but only one
  operated very quietly (short lead) ...disconnected it as instructed,
  installed the KPA-100 module and reconnected the fans  panel per
  instructions.   Both fans operate this time but WOW, is it every loud!
  - my wife came in from the next room wanting to know what was making the
  noise.  Her facial reaction when she realized it was the K3 clearly
said:
  This is the latest and greatest?
 
  Is it the missing hardware or are others experiencing noisy fans, too?
  I've got to fix this, both for my sanity and to save face!
 
  Thanks for the help and Happy New Year.
 
  73,
  Cary, K4TM
  K2-100 #5266
  K3-100 #0178
 
 
  ___
  Elecraft mailing list
  Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
  Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
   http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
  Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

 -- 
 View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/k3-fan-noise---lots-of-it.-tp14543796p18308741.html
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for July 6th 7th, 2008

2008-07-06 Thread Kevin Rock
Good Evening,
   Forty meters got so bad I had to quit.  I know there was one more station, 
W??O?, but I could not drag him out of the noise.  The QSB was eating most of 
his signal which was not covered up by the QRN.  Very tough copy but I am sorry 
I missed you :(
   Twenty meters was a little noisy but nothing like what forty became near the 
end of the net.  There was a little QSB on twenty meters but once again nothing 
like it was on forty meters.  At first I thought forty was going to be better 
than twenty but gradually it deteriorated.  
   On to the lists =

   On 14050 kHz at 2300z:
WB3AAL - Ron - PA - K2 - 1392
NK6A - Don - CA - K2 - 1217
W6ZH - Pete - CA - K2 - 5138   * QNI #125 *
W0JFR - John - CO - K3 - 994 
K1THP - Dave - CT - K3 - 686
W0RSR - Mike - CO - K2 - 5767
K6DGW - Fred - CA - K3 - 642
K6PJV - Dale - CA - K3 - 1183
K9DMV - Joe - IL - K2 - 5628
N0AR - Scott - MN - K2 - 4866
AH6RE - Curt - HI - K3 - 469
KL7CW - Rick - AK - KX1 - 798
N7KRT - Jeff - TX - K2 - 5471
WS7L - Carl - OR - K3 - 486
N7AF - Dave - AZ - K2 - 4795
NF8J - Paul - MI - K3 - 758

   On 7044.5 kHz at 0200z:
AH6RE - Curt - HI - K3 - 469 
W6ZH - Pete - CA - K3 - 657
W0JFR - John - CO - K3 - 994QNI #45!!!
W0RSR - Mike - CO - K2 - 5767
WC7S - Dale - WY - K2 - 4360
K6PJV - Dale - CA - K3 - 1183
K9DMV - Joe - IL - K2 - 5628 
N7AF - Dave - AZ - K2 - 4795

   I am getting distracted by other news right now.  If there are any errors in 
the above lists please email me with the corrections. 

Until next week stay well,
   73,
  Kevin.  KD5ONS (Net Control Operator 5th Class) 







___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com