[Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2012-09-21 Thread Hans H Vollmer
Hi Gary,

I'm using since more than thee years the combination  K3 - Expert 1K-FA.

*I never use the ALC-connection*, but of course the band-information. 
That is more importand

As Don said this would cause distortion at the beginning af each 
transmission.

I simply adjust the K3-Power-Gain to 15 to 20 watts.

If You schould forget the powersetting, no problem, the Expert switches 
down, gives a warning signal
and a diagnosis on its display.

I'm very content with that nice PA. btw it works well also with my 
beloved K2 (with KRC2).

The KX3 is still not tested, hi

Best wishes de Hans

(K2 #7029; K3 #536, KX3 #478)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-29 Thread Igor Sokolov
  Expert does not need to occupy the only RS232 port on K3. Expert
  only eavesdrop what is going on between the K3 and logging program.

 Unfortunately, Expert will only eavesdrop at up to 9600 bps.  For
 those who use higher speeds, particularly 38.400 to avoid issues
 with autobaud routines,  Expert is a problem.

Joe, can you enlighten me on why one would need more then 9600 bps for radio 
control? I use to use 1200 (which is a default baud rate) on Icom and I use 
4800 on my K3. I never felt the need to speed up baud rate even in the 
fastest contests. It usually takes me 20 seconds to move the station to 
another band and work him there. And I am usually the first to get back and 
forth ;)


  Besides you can always use devices like Microham Microkeyer if you
  want  to isolate Expert from K3 RS232.  Microkeyer can translate
  K3 -logging program conversation into CI-V and one can use that
  CI-V to control Expert.

 CI-V output is only available from microKEYER II, MK2R/MK2R+ or
 Station Master (and now DigiKeyer II).  All of those devices have
 their uses but they are probably not justified just as a translator
 for band switching an amplifier.
I use my microkeyerII as winkey, sound card and sequencer. CI-V is redundant 
in my installation. Anyway it is very nice feature and  could be additional 
reason for someone to purchase MKII

73, Igor UA9CDC



 73,

... Joe Subich, W4TV
microHAM America, LLC.
http://www.microHAM-USA.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM


 On 6/29/2010 12:49 AM, Igor Sokolov wrote:
 Glen, since your tuner is only set correctly when you TX, that means
 that you loose in RX at times. When you jump on a new frequensy (band
 map spot) your tuner is set incorrectly. Another point is that when
 you start transmit on the frequency where tuner is set incorrectly,
 the relays in the tuner are somewhat hot switching which does not
 make them better at all. Expert does not need to occupy the only
 RS232 port on K3. Expert only eavesdrop what is going on between the
 K3 and logging program. Besides you can always use devices like
 Microham Microkeyer if you want  to isolate Expert from K3   RS232.
 Microkeyer can translate K3 -logging program conversation into CI-V
 and one can use that CI-V to control Expert. Just MHO

 73, Igor UA9CDC

 - Original Message - From: GLEN BROWN To: Igor Sokolov Cc:
 Elecraft Reflector Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:42 AM Subject: Re:
 [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?


 I use an Expert with my K3 and made up a cable with both serial and
 band data connections.  I ended up using only the band data, with the
 Expert set to expect a Yaesu connection.  When you switch bands, the
 amp selects the appropriate antenna(s).  The first time you key the
 amp sees the freq and sets the tuner without any delay at all.


 Otherwise the amp takes up the only serial port available from the K3
 and it is limited to 9600 baud.


 I am totally happy with this setup.


 73, Glen W6GJB





 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Igor Sokolovua9...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I use CAT data from my K3 to control 1k-FA. I think CAT control has
 a distinct advantage in case of 1K-FA because the internal antenna
 tuner in Expert usually has several settings per band. That is
 especially important on wide bands like 160 or 80 meters. With CAT
 control these tuner settings are correctly chosen in RX mode. That
 improves receiving as well as avoids tuner relays switching at the
 beginning of the transmission.

 73, Igor UA9CDC





 Andy,

 If you are using computer control of the K3, you will probably have
 better results if you use the DB15HD connection (BCD Band Data) to
 control the Expert 1K-FA than trying to parallel the RS-232 (CAT)
 connections.  With the Band Data connection the 1K-FA operates as
 if it were connected to a Yaesu transceiver.

 I will send you separately an old drawing by the former Expert
 distributor showing both (Band Data and CAT) connections.

 73,

 ... Joe, W4TV

 On 6/27/2010 8:22 AM, GD0TEP wrote:
 Hello to the group again,

 I want to connect my K3 to my 1K-FA amplifier, the amplifier
 manual isn't to clear (to me anyway) on the connections that need
 to be used.

 On the amplifier 15pin plug, I use pins 1, 9   14, yes it's
 that simple.

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 1 to K3 pin 3 (I
 think, I may have these two crossed) On the K3 RS232 I connect
 the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 2 (I think, I may have these two
 crossed)

 And

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 5 as
 ground

 Within the K3 RS232 I need to link the RST and CTS together, well
 RTS is pin 7 on the K3, but what pin is the CTS

 Advice would be greatly appreciated.

 73, Andy http://gd0tep.com


 -- 


 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-29 Thread GD0TEP
As I instigated this thread...

I received the relative information from W4TV. And, although it wasn't what
I was originally looking for, it works just fine.

I now have the USB2 interface linked to the K3 and the 1K-FA.

Thanks again to those who replied to my original email.

73,
Andy
http://gd0tep.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-28 Thread GLEN BROWN
I use an Expert with my K3 and made up a cable with both serial and band
data connections.  I ended up using only the band data, with the Expert set
to expect a Yaesu connection.  When you switch bands, the amp selects the
appropriate antenna(s).  The first time you key the amp sees the freq and
sets the tuner without any delay at all.

Otherwise the amp takes up the only serial port available from the K3 and it
is limited to 9600 baud.

I am totally happy with this setup.

73,
Glen W6GJB



On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Igor Sokolov ua9...@gmail.com wrote:

 I use CAT data from my K3 to control 1k-FA. I think CAT control has a
 distinct advantage in case of 1K-FA because the internal antenna tuner in
 Expert usually has several settings per band. That is especially important
 on wide bands like 160 or 80 meters. With CAT control these tuner settings
 are correctly chosen in RX mode. That improves receiving as well as avoids
 tuner relays switching at the beginning of the transmission.

 73, Igor UA9CDC



 
  Andy,
 
  If you are using computer control of the K3, you will probably
  have better results if you use the DB15HD connection (BCD Band
  Data) to control the Expert 1K-FA than trying to parallel the
  RS-232 (CAT) connections.  With the Band Data connection the
  1K-FA operates as if it were connected to a Yaesu transceiver.
 
  I will send you separately an old drawing by the former Expert
  distributor showing both (Band Data and CAT) connections.
 
  73,
 
 ... Joe, W4TV
 
  On 6/27/2010 8:22 AM, GD0TEP wrote:
  Hello to the group again,
 
  I want to connect my K3 to my 1K-FA amplifier, the amplifier manual
  isn't to clear (to me anyway) on the connections that need to be
  used.
 
  On the amplifier 15pin plug, I use pins 1, 9  14, yes it's that
  simple.
 
  On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 1 to K3 pin 3 (I think, I
  may have these two crossed) On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier
  pin 9 to K3 pin 2 (I think, I may have these two crossed)
 
  And
 
  On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 5 as ground
 
  Within the K3 RS232 I need to link the RST and CTS together, well RTS
  is pin 7 on the K3, but what pin is the CTS
 
  Advice would be greatly appreciated.
 
  73, Andy http://gd0tep.com
 
  __
  Elecraft mailing list Home:
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help:
  http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post:
  mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this
  email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-28 Thread Igor Sokolov
Glen, since your tuner is only set correctly when you TX, that means that you 
loose in RX at times. When you jump on a new frequensy (band map spot) your 
tuner is set incorrectly. Another point is that when you start transmit on the 
frequency where tuner is set incorrectly, the relays in the tuner are somewhat 
hot switching which does not make them better at all.
Expert does not need to occupy the only RS232 port on K3. Expert only eavesdrop 
what is going on between the K3 and logging program.
Besides you can always use devices like Microham Microkeyer if you want  to 
isolate Expert from K3   RS232. Microkeyer can translate K3 -logging program 
conversation into CI-V and one can use that CI-V to control Expert.
Just MHO

73, Igor UA9CDC

  - Original Message - 
  From: GLEN BROWN 
  To: Igor Sokolov 
  Cc: Elecraft Reflector 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:42 AM
  Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?


  I use an Expert with my K3 and made up a cable with both serial and band data 
connections.  I ended up using only the band data, with the Expert set to 
expect a Yaesu connection.  When you switch bands, the amp selects the 
appropriate antenna(s).  The first time you key the amp sees the freq and sets 
the tuner without any delay at all.


  Otherwise the amp takes up the only serial port available from the K3 and it 
is limited to 9600 baud.


  I am totally happy with this setup.


  73,
  Glen W6GJB





  On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Igor Sokolov ua9...@gmail.com wrote:

I use CAT data from my K3 to control 1k-FA. I think CAT control has a
distinct advantage in case of 1K-FA because the internal antenna tuner in
Expert usually has several settings per band. That is especially important
on wide bands like 160 or 80 meters. With CAT control these tuner settings
are correctly chosen in RX mode. That improves receiving as well as avoids
tuner relays switching at the beginning of the transmission.

73, Igor UA9CDC





 Andy,

 If you are using computer control of the K3, you will probably
 have better results if you use the DB15HD connection (BCD Band
 Data) to control the Expert 1K-FA than trying to parallel the
 RS-232 (CAT) connections.  With the Band Data connection the
 1K-FA operates as if it were connected to a Yaesu transceiver.

 I will send you separately an old drawing by the former Expert
 distributor showing both (Band Data and CAT) connections.

 73,

... Joe, W4TV

 On 6/27/2010 8:22 AM, GD0TEP wrote:
 Hello to the group again,

 I want to connect my K3 to my 1K-FA amplifier, the amplifier manual
 isn't to clear (to me anyway) on the connections that need to be
 used.

 On the amplifier 15pin plug, I use pins 1, 9  14, yes it's that
 simple.

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 1 to K3 pin 3 (I think, I
 may have these two crossed) On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier
 pin 9 to K3 pin 2 (I think, I may have these two crossed)

 And

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 5 as ground

 Within the K3 RS232 I need to link the RST and CTS together, well RTS
 is pin 7 on the K3, but what pin is the CTS

 Advice would be greatly appreciated.

 73, Andy http://gd0tep.com

 __
 Elecraft mailing list Home:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post:
 mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this
 email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-28 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

  Expert does not need to occupy the only RS232 port on K3. Expert
  only eavesdrop what is going on between the K3 and logging program.

Unfortunately, Expert will only eavesdrop at up to 9600 bps.  For
those who use higher speeds, particularly 38.400 to avoid issues
with autobaud routines,  Expert is a problem.

  Besides you can always use devices like Microham Microkeyer if you
  want  to isolate Expert from K3 RS232.  Microkeyer can translate
  K3 -logging program conversation into CI-V and one can use that
  CI-V to control Expert.

CI-V output is only available from microKEYER II, MK2R/MK2R+ or
Station Master (and now DigiKeyer II).  All of those devices have
their uses but they are probably not justified just as a translator
for band switching an amplifier.

73,

... Joe Subich, W4TV
microHAM America, LLC.
http://www.microHAM-USA.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM


On 6/29/2010 12:49 AM, Igor Sokolov wrote:
 Glen, since your tuner is only set correctly when you TX, that means
 that you loose in RX at times. When you jump on a new frequensy (band
 map spot) your tuner is set incorrectly. Another point is that when
 you start transmit on the frequency where tuner is set incorrectly,
 the relays in the tuner are somewhat hot switching which does not
 make them better at all. Expert does not need to occupy the only
 RS232 port on K3. Expert only eavesdrop what is going on between the
 K3 and logging program. Besides you can always use devices like
 Microham Microkeyer if you want  to isolate Expert from K3   RS232.
 Microkeyer can translate K3 -logging program conversation into CI-V
 and one can use that CI-V to control Expert. Just MHO

 73, Igor UA9CDC

 - Original Message - From: GLEN BROWN To: Igor Sokolov Cc:
 Elecraft Reflector Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:42 AM Subject: Re:
 [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?


 I use an Expert with my K3 and made up a cable with both serial and
 band data connections.  I ended up using only the band data, with the
 Expert set to expect a Yaesu connection.  When you switch bands, the
 amp selects the appropriate antenna(s).  The first time you key the
 amp sees the freq and sets the tuner without any delay at all.


 Otherwise the amp takes up the only serial port available from the K3
 and it is limited to 9600 baud.


 I am totally happy with this setup.


 73, Glen W6GJB





 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Igor Sokolovua9...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I use CAT data from my K3 to control 1k-FA. I think CAT control has
 a distinct advantage in case of 1K-FA because the internal antenna
 tuner in Expert usually has several settings per band. That is
 especially important on wide bands like 160 or 80 meters. With CAT
 control these tuner settings are correctly chosen in RX mode. That
 improves receiving as well as avoids tuner relays switching at the
 beginning of the transmission.

 73, Igor UA9CDC





 Andy,

 If you are using computer control of the K3, you will probably have
 better results if you use the DB15HD connection (BCD Band Data) to
 control the Expert 1K-FA than trying to parallel the RS-232 (CAT)
 connections.  With the Band Data connection the 1K-FA operates as
 if it were connected to a Yaesu transceiver.

 I will send you separately an old drawing by the former Expert
 distributor showing both (Band Data and CAT) connections.

 73,

 ... Joe, W4TV

 On 6/27/2010 8:22 AM, GD0TEP wrote:
 Hello to the group again,

 I want to connect my K3 to my 1K-FA amplifier, the amplifier
 manual isn't to clear (to me anyway) on the connections that need
 to be used.

 On the amplifier 15pin plug, I use pins 1, 9   14, yes it's
 that simple.

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 1 to K3 pin 3 (I
 think, I may have these two crossed) On the K3 RS232 I connect
 the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 2 (I think, I may have these two
 crossed)

 And

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 5 as
 ground

 Within the K3 RS232 I need to link the RST and CTS together, well
 RTS is pin 7 on the K3, but what pin is the CTS

 Advice would be greatly appreciated.

 73, Andy http://gd0tep.com


-- 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-27 Thread GD0TEP
Hello to the group again,

I want to connect my K3 to my 1K-FA amplifier, the amplifier manual isn't to
clear (to me anyway) on the connections that need to be used.

On the amplifier 15pin plug, I use pins 1, 9  14, yes it's that simple.

On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 1 to K3 pin 3 (I think, I may
have these two crossed)
On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 2 (I think, I may
have these two crossed)

And 

On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 5 as ground

Within the K3 RS232 I need to link the RST and CTS together, well RTS is pin
7 on the K3, but what pin is the CTS

Advice would be greatly appreciated.

73,
Andy
http://gd0tep.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-27 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

Andy,

If you are using computer control of the K3, you will probably
have better results if you use the DB15HD connection (BCD Band
Data) to control the Expert 1K-FA than trying to parallel the
RS-232 (CAT) connections.  With the Band Data connection the
1K-FA operates as if it were connected to a Yaesu transceiver.

I will send you separately an old drawing by the former Expert
distributor showing both (Band Data and CAT) connections.

73,

... Joe, W4TV

On 6/27/2010 8:22 AM, GD0TEP wrote:
 Hello to the group again,

 I want to connect my K3 to my 1K-FA amplifier, the amplifier manual
 isn't to clear (to me anyway) on the connections that need to be
 used.

 On the amplifier 15pin plug, I use pins 1, 9  14, yes it's that
 simple.

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 1 to K3 pin 3 (I think, I
 may have these two crossed) On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier
 pin 9 to K3 pin 2 (I think, I may have these two crossed)

 And

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 5 as ground

 Within the K3 RS232 I need to link the RST and CTS together, well RTS
 is pin 7 on the K3, but what pin is the CTS

 Advice would be greatly appreciated.

 73, Andy http://gd0tep.com

 __
 Elecraft mailing list Home:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post:
 mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this
 email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 with Expert 1K-FA, RS232 connections question?

2010-06-27 Thread Igor Sokolov
I use CAT data from my K3 to control 1k-FA. I think CAT control has a 
distinct advantage in case of 1K-FA because the internal antenna tuner in 
Expert usually has several settings per band. That is especially important 
on wide bands like 160 or 80 meters. With CAT control these tuner settings 
are correctly chosen in RX mode. That improves receiving as well as avoids 
tuner relays switching at the beginning of the transmission.

73, Igor UA9CDC




 Andy,

 If you are using computer control of the K3, you will probably
 have better results if you use the DB15HD connection (BCD Band
 Data) to control the Expert 1K-FA than trying to parallel the
 RS-232 (CAT) connections.  With the Band Data connection the
 1K-FA operates as if it were connected to a Yaesu transceiver.

 I will send you separately an old drawing by the former Expert
 distributor showing both (Band Data and CAT) connections.

 73,

... Joe, W4TV

 On 6/27/2010 8:22 AM, GD0TEP wrote:
 Hello to the group again,

 I want to connect my K3 to my 1K-FA amplifier, the amplifier manual
 isn't to clear (to me anyway) on the connections that need to be
 used.

 On the amplifier 15pin plug, I use pins 1, 9  14, yes it's that
 simple.

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 1 to K3 pin 3 (I think, I
 may have these two crossed) On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier
 pin 9 to K3 pin 2 (I think, I may have these two crossed)

 And

 On the K3 RS232 I connect the amplifier pin 9 to K3 pin 5 as ground

 Within the K3 RS232 I need to link the RST and CTS together, well RTS
 is pin 7 on the K3, but what pin is the CTS

 Advice would be greatly appreciated.

 73, Andy http://gd0tep.com

 __
 Elecraft mailing list Home:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post:
 mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this
 email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-16 Thread Tom W8JI
David,

Bandwidth might not be a good argument. I'm not convinced 
ALC transients are a major universal problem with SSB 
signals when they are compared to other reasons for 
bandwidth problems. This isn't the appropriate forum for 
that discussion.

I have looked at ALC overshoot because of my connection with 
amplifier designs and failures in semiconductors and other 
sensitive components caused by ALC problems, and the pulse 
duration is very short. That short pulse repeats only after 
the ALC has discharged significantly, so the transmitter's 
gain is high.

The problem is a great deal like automatic bias, where the 
leading edge always causes some distortion as the circuitry 
changes states. The deeper the bias, the more time it takes 
to remove it and the stronger the unwanted off-channel 
energy. ALC is a little worse because the control signal is 
sampled after some delay and has to wrap back around to the 
start. This means no matter what they do in the amplifier 
the cannot cure the leading edge problem. The one exception 
would be if they held the ALC voltage high and then pulled 
it down to a level that allowed proper drive. They may be 
doing that, but an indicator would be a slow power rise on 
the leading edges. It is a mirror of normal ALC.

As for bandwidth measurements, I'm not convinced the 
WaveNode is good at transient analysis. With FFT analysis, 
the window where waveform is sampled has to be present at 
the same time as the transient, and the processing cannot 
average the power. It has to calculate to provide bandwidth 
information of the very short duration peaks. The problem is 
much like the reason a conventional spectrum analyzer will 
miss ALC problems in all but a few really severe cases. If 
it isn't sampling the transient frequency when it is there, 
the extra bandwidth doesn't show.

I'm not convinced at all, because the overshoot is so short, 
it is the major problem we hear on the airor even a 
significant one. I'm not convinced, and actually think it 
unlikely, the WaveNode could measure such a short burst.

All that aside, because it is a big discussion, we are left 
with the fact Elecraft has clearly warned to NOT do 100% 
power control with an external ALC source. That warning is 
100% understandable based on the unique way the K3 ALC 
works. It is absolute common sense the K3 ALC should not be 
replaced with a traditional external ALC for primary power 
level control. Even without Wayne's warning, I would not do 
it now that I understand how the K3 ALC works.

To prevent splatter, the K3's internal pre-filter ALC must 
have primary control of power limits. The amplifier should 
only provide a fail-safe control that pulls back or kills 
the exciter drive if limits are reached.

By the way, I'm testing new PA module designs with an IC706. 
It has terrible ALC overshoot. It has 100-watt plus 
transients when I have it set at 20 watts to drive the PA 
modules. The K3 does not. Fortunately the MRF-150's are able 
to handle the 600% overdrive bursts from the IC706 without 
failure. I keep a couple ICOM's around just for that reason.

I cannot test for PA module survival with a bad ALC system 
in the exciter using the K3, unless I ran the K3 power on 
full and used an external ALC detector system. Then I could 
make the K3 emulate the IC-706. Why would people not testing 
things want to do that

73 Tom 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-16 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Hi Dave,

I'm not sure that the embedded picture I received from you would be passed
by the reflector, so I'm just quoting your text below.

The graphics show that peak distortion in the adjacent channel was only down
25 db from in-channel max power. This even though your trebled up voice is
still fairly bass controlled.

Which means that if you were up or down from this signal at 20 over on
channel, you would be hearing S8 or S9 splatter from it.  Sounds familiar,
doesn't it.

The 1500 watt power spike is particularly frightening, especially if it
comes out of my wallet.  Might want to pass your results on to the
manufacturer as a customer and request they pull that recommendation from
their publications and web page. Make sure they understand it's getting them
a lot of bad press and is NOT panning out.

About as graphic an underscore to Wayne's warning as one can get.   (Sorry,
couldn't resist)

73, Guy



Hello Guy,

Well, you sure called it.  This screen shot is taken under the same
conditions as the previous ones except that the tx equalizer was set to try
and simulate a Heil HC4.  The tx equalizer settings were: 1 - 0db, 2 - 0db,
3 - 0db, 4 - 0db, 5 - +2db, 6 - + 4db, 7 - + 10db, and 8 - +10db.  Two
things I noticed right away:  First, the peak power is nearly 1500 watts!  I
sure am glad I still have finals in the Expert.  Second, there is definite
splatter as evidenced by the light and dark blue on the Modulation quickview
window.

One can say a lot of things about these tests but one thing comes through
loud and clear to me:

ALC should not be used to control the K3 set to 100 watts with the Expert 1K
FA.  Rather the power should be set on each band to just what the Expert
needs to reach full power.

To do otherwise may cause splatter and might result in final failure.  How
long can the Expert finals take this kind of abuse?

73 de W6BK
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-16 Thread David M. Elliott
Hi Guy,

Apparently the reflector does not pass emails with large attachments.  I think 
it is pretty graphic and I would like others to see it if I can figure out how. 
 I'll call SteppIR tomorrow and discuss it with them.  I support your 
recommendation
 that they take that recommended method of operation out of their manual.  I 
will forward that email to Gianfranco at SPE (Expert).

Thanks for all your help.

73 de W6BK


On May 16, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:

 Hi Dave,
 
 I'm not sure that the embedded picture I received from you would be passed by 
 the reflector, so I'm just quoting your text below.
 
 The graphics show that peak distortion in the adjacent channel was only down 
 25 db from in-channel max power. This even though your trebled up voice is 
 still fairly bass controlled.  
 
 Which means that if you were up or down from this signal at 20 over on 
 channel, you would be hearing S8 or S9 splatter from it.  Sounds familiar, 
 doesn't it.  
 
 The 1500 watt power spike is particularly frightening, especially if it comes 
 out of my wallet.  Might want to pass your results on to the manufacturer as 
 a customer and request they pull that recommendation from their publications 
 and web page. Make sure they understand it's getting them a lot of bad press 
 and is NOT panning out.  
 
 About as graphic an underscore to Wayne's warning as one can get.   (Sorry, 
 couldn't resist) 
 
 73, Guy
 
 
 
 Hello Guy,
 
 Well, you sure called it.  This screen shot is taken under the same 
 conditions as the previous ones except that the tx equalizer was set to try 
 and simulate a Heil HC4.  The tx equalizer settings were: 1 - 0db, 2 - 0db, 3 
 - 0db, 4 - 0db, 5 - +2db, 6 - + 4db, 7 - + 10db, and 8 - +10db.  Two things I 
 noticed right away:  First, the peak power is nearly 1500 watts!  I sure am 
 glad I still have finals in the Expert.  Second, there is definite splatter 
 as evidenced by the light and dark blue on the Modulation quickview window.
 
 One can say a lot of things about these tests but one thing comes through 
 loud and clear to me:
 
 ALC should not be used to control the K3 set to 100 watts with the Expert 1K 
 FA.  Rather the power should be set on each band to just what the Expert 
 needs to reach full power.  
 
 To do otherwise may cause splatter and might result in final failure.  How 
 long can the Expert finals take this kind of abuse?
 
 73 de W6BK

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-16 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
The usual way is to put it up on a web page somewhere, and put the
link in the email.

73, Guy

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:07 PM, David M. Elliott
immondi...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Hi Guy,
 Apparently the reflector does not pass emails with large attachments.  I
 think it is pretty graphic and I would like others to see it if I can figure
 out how.  I'll call SteppIR tomorrow and discuss it with them.  I support
 your recommendation
  that they take that recommended method of operation out of their manual.  I
 will forward that email to Gianfranco at SPE (Expert).
 Thanks for all your help.
 73 de W6BK

 On May 16, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:

 Hi Dave,

 I'm not sure that the embedded picture I received from you would be passed
 by the reflector, so I'm just quoting your text below.

 The graphics show that peak distortion in the adjacent channel was only down
 25 db from in-channel max power. This even though your trebled up voice is
 still fairly bass controlled.

 Which means that if you were up or down from this signal at 20 over on
 channel, you would be hearing S8 or S9 splatter from it.  Sounds familiar,
 doesn't it.

 The 1500 watt power spike is particularly frightening, especially if it
 comes out of my wallet.  Might want to pass your results on to the
 manufacturer as a customer and request they pull that recommendation from
 their publications and web page. Make sure they understand it's getting them
 a lot of bad press and is NOT panning out.

 About as graphic an underscore to Wayne's warning as one can get.   (Sorry,
 couldn't resist)

 73, Guy



 Hello Guy,
 Well, you sure called it.  This screen shot is taken under the same
 conditions as the previous ones except that the tx equalizer was set to try
 and simulate a Heil HC4.  The tx equalizer settings were: 1 - 0db, 2 - 0db,
 3 - 0db, 4 - 0db, 5 - +2db, 6 - + 4db, 7 - + 10db, and 8 - +10db.  Two
 things I noticed right away:  First, the peak power is nearly 1500 watts!  I
 sure am glad I still have finals in the Expert.  Second, there is definite
 splatter as evidenced by the light and dark blue on the Modulation quickview
 window.
 One can say a lot of things about these tests but one thing comes through
 loud and clear to me:
 ALC should not be used to control the K3 set to 100 watts with the Expert 1K
 FA.  Rather the power should be set on each band to just what the Expert
 needs to reach full power.
 To do otherwise may cause splatter and might result in final failure.  How
 long can the Expert finals take this kind of abuse?
 73 de W6BK


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Björn Mohr
2010/4/22, LA8AW odd...@gmail.com:


Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 1K-FA - regarding
 ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:

 I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!

 *We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output power manual*
 *control to its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to its exclusive*
 *design, will provide to control that level as long as the required
 optimal*
  *value will be reached.*


Has anyone actually measured the combination of a K3 and the SPE amp
connected and adjusted as suggested by SPE? I have run my setup without ALC,
but I am curious about the statement and what the real results are.

73 de Björn,
SM0MDG
SE0X
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Tom W8JI
Elecraft has warned NOT to listen to that advice .

The K3 ALC could only get worse and misbehave when the slow 
loop from an amplifier is added.


- Original Message - 
From: Björn Mohr b...@broadcast.se
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC


2010/4/22, LA8AW odd...@gmail.com:


Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 
1K-FA - regarding
 ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:

 I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!

 *We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's 
 output power manual*
 *control to its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks 
 to its exclusive*
 *design, will provide to control that level as long as the 
 required
 optimal*
  *value will be reached.*


Has anyone actually measured the combination of a K3 and the 
SPE amp
connected and adjusted as suggested by SPE? I have run my 
setup without ALC,
but I am curious about the statement and what the real 
results are.

73 de Björn,
SM0MDG
SE0X
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: 
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Vic K2VCO
Sorry, with all due respect this is HORRIBLE advice.

I won't argue with those that say that the ALC should be connected for its 
protective 
value. But it should not be depended on to control output level -- the exciter 
should be 
adjusted to produce approximately the drive required for full output.

The SPE Expert may have an exclusive design, but it is not exclusive enough to 
include a 
time machine so that it can know how loud the operator is planning to talk, and 
it doesn't 
control the delay inherent in the exciter's ALC circuitry.

The result is guaranteed to be increased distortion.

On 5/15/2010 4:25 AM, Björn Mohr wrote:
 2010/4/22, LA8AWodd...@gmail.com:


 Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 1K-FA - regarding
 ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:

 I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!

 We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output power manual 
 control to
 its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to its exclusive design, will 
 provide to
 control that level as long as the required optimal value will be reached.


-- 
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread David M. Elliott
If increased distortion is guaranteed, why doesn't it show on the spectrum 
scope?

We are obviously missing something here.

73 de W6BK


On May 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Vic K2VCO wrote:

 Sorry, with all due respect this is HORRIBLE advice.
 
 I won't argue with those that say that the ALC should be connected for its 
 protective 
 value. But it should not be depended on to control output level -- the 
 exciter should be 
 adjusted to produce approximately the drive required for full output.
 
 The SPE Expert may have an exclusive design, but it is not exclusive enough 
 to include a 
 time machine so that it can know how loud the operator is planning to talk, 
 and it doesn't 
 control the delay inherent in the exciter's ALC circuitry.
 
 The result is guaranteed to be increased distortion.
 
 On 5/15/2010 4:25 AM, Björn Mohr wrote:
 2010/4/22, LA8AWodd...@gmail.com:
 
 
 Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 1K-FA - regarding
 ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:
 
 I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!
 
 We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output power manual 
 control to
 its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to its exclusive design, will 
 provide to
 control that level as long as the required optimal value will be reached.
 
 
 -- 
 Vic, K2VCO
 Fresno CA
 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Because if you are using something you can measure, like two tone, the
gains are already set and steady.  To measure leading edge distortions
before an AGC loop or loops bite and settle takes some pretty
expensive lab equipment, both before and after the transmitter/amp.
What you got?

It IS terrible advice.

73, Guy.

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:25 PM, David M. Elliott
immondi...@earthlink.net wrote:
 If increased distortion is guaranteed, why doesn't it show on the spectrum 
 scope?

 We are obviously missing something here.

 73 de W6BK


 On May 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Vic K2VCO wrote:

 Sorry, with all due respect this is HORRIBLE advice.

 I won't argue with those that say that the ALC should be connected for its 
 protective
 value. But it should not be depended on to control output level -- the 
 exciter should be
 adjusted to produce approximately the drive required for full output.

 The SPE Expert may have an exclusive design, but it is not exclusive enough 
 to include a
 time machine so that it can know how loud the operator is planning to talk, 
 and it doesn't
 control the delay inherent in the exciter's ALC circuitry.

 The result is guaranteed to be increased distortion.

 On 5/15/2010 4:25 AM, Björn Mohr wrote:
 2010/4/22, LA8AWodd...@gmail.com:


 Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 1K-FA - regarding
 ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:

 I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!

 We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output power manual 
 control to
 its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to its exclusive design, will 
 provide to
 control that level as long as the required optimal value will be reached.


 --
 Vic, K2VCO
 Fresno CA
 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Rob
I agree with Guy and Vic. It is not good to load up an amp and use AGC to 
tamp it down. Lord knows there are enough bad sounding stations already on 
the air, especially on sideband.

Rob K6RB

- Original Message - 
From: Vic K2VCO v...@rakefet.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC


Sorry, with all due respect this is HORRIBLE advice.

I won't argue with those that say that the ALC should be connected for its 
protective
value. But it should not be depended on to control output level -- the 
exciter should be
adjusted to produce approximately the drive required for full output.

The SPE Expert may have an exclusive design, but it is not exclusive enough 
to include a
time machine so that it can know how loud the operator is planning to talk, 
and it doesn't
control the delay inherent in the exciter's ALC circuitry.

The result is guaranteed to be increased distortion.

On 5/15/2010 4:25 AM, Björn Mohr wrote:
 2010/4/22, LA8AWodd...@gmail.com:


 Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 1K-FA - 
 regarding
 ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:

 I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!

 We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output power manual 
 control to
 its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to its exclusive design, 
 will provide to
 control that level as long as the required optimal value will be reached.


-- 
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread David M. Elliott
In general, I would agree with You and Guy and Vic.

However, Gianfranco of SPE (Expert) suggests running the exciter at full power. 
 He says there is no splatter and the proof of the pudding is in the eating.  
That seems to be true.  I can't see any splatter on the WaveNode and several on 
the air tests report fine audio with no splatter.

I repeat:  There is something here we don't understand.

Any comment, Gianfranco?

73 de W6BK



73 de W6BK
On May 15, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Rob wrote:

 I agree with Guy and Vic. It is not good to load up an amp and use AGC to 
 tamp it down. Lord knows there are enough bad sounding stations already on 
 the air, especially on sideband.
 
 Rob K6RB
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Vic K2VCO v...@rakefet.com
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 11:03 AM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC
 
 
 Sorry, with all due respect this is HORRIBLE advice.
 
 I won't argue with those that say that the ALC should be connected for its 
 protective
 value. But it should not be depended on to control output level -- the 
 exciter should be
 adjusted to produce approximately the drive required for full output.
 
 The SPE Expert may have an exclusive design, but it is not exclusive enough 
 to include a
 time machine so that it can know how loud the operator is planning to talk, 
 and it doesn't
 control the delay inherent in the exciter's ALC circuitry.
 
 The result is guaranteed to be increased distortion.
 
 On 5/15/2010 4:25 AM, Björn Mohr wrote:
 2010/4/22, LA8AWodd...@gmail.com:
 
 
 Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 1K-FA - 
 regarding
 ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:
 
 I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!
 
 We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output power manual 
 control to
 its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to its exclusive design, 
 will provide to
 control that level as long as the required optimal value will be reached.
 
 
 -- 
 Vic, K2VCO
 Fresno CA
 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Vic K2VCO
Any time the gain of the system changes, there's distortion. In SSB mode, I 
would expect 
it to occur when the ALC voltage changes, such as at the beginning of 
syllables, etc.

On 5/15/2010 3:10 PM, David M. Elliott wrote:
 In general, I would agree with You and Guy and Vic.

 However, Gianfranco of SPE (Expert) suggests running the exciter at full 
 power.  He
 says there is no splatter and the proof of the pudding is in the eating.  
 That seems to
 be true.  I can't see any splatter on the WaveNode and several on the air 
 tests report
 fine audio with no splatter.

 I repeat:  There is something here we don't understand.

 Any comment, Gianfranco?
-- 
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread juergen

Hi Vic

Yup, ALC is  not feedforward correction system. It is a servo like mechanism 
that corrects after the  distortion has left, then it corrects. For SSB 
splatter this is a disaster which we dont need. 

The worst example of this is the Yaesu Quadra, it is the worst buckshot 
generator on the bands. The Quadra when used with ALC is an horrendous splatter 
generator.

Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted, is not good amateur 
practice. Having the horse bolt several hundred times during  a QSO is not 
pleasant for others.

Feedback ALC systems dont belong in modern ham equipment. All Japanese 
transceivers have ALC overshoot issues. We need to get back to the transmitter 
gain or drive adjustments that set the drive power precisely with no overshoot. 
Its a nice dream that does not exist in modern ham transceiver.  Most 
commercial and mil SSB equipment have a drive or TGA(transmitter gain 
adjustment) knob.

John

--- On Sat, 5/15/10, Vic K2VCO v...@rakefet.com wrote:

 From: Vic K2VCO v...@rakefet.com
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC
 To: David M. Elliott immondi...@earthlink.net
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 3:56 PM
 Any time the gain of the system
 changes, there's distortion. In SSB mode, I would expect 
 it to occur when the ALC voltage changes, such as at the
 beginning of syllables, etc.
 
 On 5/15/2010 3:10 PM, David M. Elliott wrote:
  In general, I would agree with You and Guy and Vic.
 
  However, Gianfranco of SPE (Expert) suggests running
 the exciter at full power.  He
  says there is no splatter and the proof of the pudding
 is in the eating.  That seems to
  be true.  I can't see any splatter on the
 WaveNode and several on the air tests report
  fine audio with no splatter.
 
  I repeat:  There is something here we don't
 understand.
 
  Any comment, Gianfranco?
 -- 
 Vic, K2VCO
 Fresno CA
 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 


  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Tom W8JI
However, Gianfranco of SPE (Expert) suggests running the 
exciter at full power.  He says there is no splatter and 
the proof of the pudding is in the eating.  That seems 
to be true.  I can't see any splatter on the WaveNode and 
several on the air tests report fine audio with no 
splatter.

I repeat:  There is something here we don't understand.

We went through this ALC stuff just one month or so ago. The 
problem with ALC is the ALC system response delay and the 
propagation delay through the radio, especially narrow 
filters. The leading edge of everything takes a hit until 
the ALC level comes up. The time delay to interact with the 
system is the problem. With a reasonable ALC hang time the 
splatter is not too objectionable on a crowded band, but on 
real quiet bands it can be disruptive to weak signals. It is 
a very broad bandwidth short duration problem.

In my opinion it isn't the major problem we face with SSB 
bandwidth and we may be over focusing a little on it. The 
duration is so short the average power is very low, but it 
is there. It would be very easy to miss on a spectrum 
analyzer, as a matter of fact I would say it is nearly 
impossible to catch. A selective level meter would be a far 
better detector.

The real problem is the K3 has a unique ALC system that is 
in front of the filtering, so leading edge delay isn't an 
issue. Since the K3 has no leading edge transients, and 
since anything after the radio (except a clamp or fast 
attenuator) can not fix the transients, I don't see why 
anyone would want to run external ALC with the K3.

Here is what Wayne said:


K3 external ALC setup is covered on page 27 of the owner's 
manual.
Please read this page before attempting to use external ALC 
with any
amplifier.

Executive summary:

1. DO NOT turn the K3's power all the way up and use 
amplifier ALC to
maintain peak power at the output of your amplifier. This 
WILL NOT work.

2. Instead, adjust the power level at the K3 to provide just 
enough
drive to hit the peak power desired at the amp. You may want 
to set
CONFIG:PWR SET to PER BAND so you don't have to adjust power 
each time
you change bands. (This is also covered on page 27.)

3. External ALC is accommodated as a safety backup in the 
event that
peak power suddenly increases, etc., due to a failure or 
load change.
When properly applied, it will rarely be needed.

Technical details:

The K3 is designed to *not* depend on fast external ALC, 
because that
absolutely, positively causes splatter. We studied lab work 
from
several authors on this topic and decided to take a 
different
approach: our fast ALC is all applied *ahead* of the 1st 
I.F. crystal
filter (it's handled by DSP, at the AF and 2nd I.F. stages). 
We do
apply slow, long-term ALC after the crystal filter, but this 
can't
cause splatter because of the long time constant. External 
ALC, if
used, is factored into this part of the equation.

Yes, the K3 is unique in this regard. It may be slightly 
inconvenient,
but it will result in a cleaner signal.

73,
Wayne
N6KR




73 Tom




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Hi Dave,

Thank you for the pictures. Worth thousand words, etc.  And there IS
difference between the two.  Can you detail the setup from end to end,
particularly your RX setup and K3 TX voice settings?

I'm not sure what your audio waveform is from exactly in A and B,
you'll need to tell us.  But if that's human voice, it's a very
base-dominated voice spectrum, unlikely to generate obvious splatter.
The 0-400 or 0-500 band, whatever it is, is 18 db above the next
strongest band in your modulation quickview, and so the lowest band
is completely controlling the power, not the attack of the silibants.
This would not be the measured waveform for a contest optimized voice,
with the treble accentuated for punch, where splatter-producing
TX/amp setups show their true colors.

Set up for contest punch.  Do the comparison with the lower
frequencies severely reduced in the K3 TX equalization, and the
compression up around 20-30.  Or get your wife to do the voice and
have her holler at the mike like it was the kids (only a few
assumptions there...).   Turn OFF the averaging in the program and
leave the peak hold on.  The duration and hence the average power of
silibants are quite less than the lower frequencies, and the
distortion products off silibants even less. It is the distortion's
instantaneous peak power that causes the most problem, not its peak
power times duration (average power).

The speech used for the test should be on a recording. Run the K3
barefoot off the recording, bypassing the amp, measure and make your
pictures, and then include the amp and repeat from the recording
without changing anything on the K3. This is probably a 25 watt A/B
and a 100 watt A/B. The receiving device should be run with FIXED
gain, NO RX AGC, any overdrive issues worked out in advance.  Compare
those spectrums.  But even this is still approximate, because the RX
device (unless it's a very good RX device like another K3 or K2) can
create the highest distortion which covers up any true differences.

The real test would be to run a very stable square rise and fall CW
dit with a pulse width of about 2 or 3 milliseconds with a repetition
rate of about one second, and repeating the test for longer pulse
widths. This requires a signal generator followed by a high power lab
linear amp instead of a K3 to drive the amp, but would isolate added
spectrum that occurs on predictable frequencies at predictable times
and can be precisely measured.  The receiving device and presentation
would have to be certified for the general circumstances.  I don't own
this stuff either, just get to drool on it during isolated
opportunities.

As to others listening for splatter, one WOULD think others could hear
it.  However, back in the day of controversy over what rigs had and
didn't have key clicks, it was amazing how many people could NOT hear
or otherwise detect the bad clicks on a MEASURED dirty rig, for
whatever reason I really don't know.  So I'm skeptical since I don't
see much difference in hearing splatter and hearing key clicks.

The problem I have, even if the SBE does manage to do amplification
relatively cleanly, is if someone else reads this thread later on
without any blowback on the claim, the readers extrapolate to other
amps and there it goes...  So the SBE method is not going without
blowback.  SBE may think they have created a marketing
differentiation, but for the time being they've crossed themselves off
my list on account of recommending smashmouth drive and ALC.  What
else that I don't know about, yet?

73, Guy.

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:32 PM, David M. Elliott
immondi...@earthlink.net wrote:


 These two screen shots were taken using a WaveNode WN2.  The exciter was a K3 
 and the amplifier was the Expert 1K FA.  Both were SSB at 3.952 MHz.  The 
 conditions for both of these screen shots were the same except that the first 
 one was using an exciter power of 25 watts and the second was using an 
 exciter power of 100 watts.  The amp was using ALC control in both cases.

 I don't see any signs of splatter in either case, do you?

 This test seems to support what the Expert folks are saying.

 73 de W6BK


 On May 15, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:

 Because if you are using something you can measure, like two tone, the
 gains are already set and steady.  To measure leading edge distortions
 before an AGC loop or loops bite and settle takes some pretty
 expensive lab equipment, both before and after the transmitter/amp.
 What you got?

 It IS terrible advice.

 73, Guy.

 On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:25 PM, David M. Elliott
 immondi...@earthlink.net wrote:
 If increased distortion is guaranteed, why doesn't it show on the spectrum 
 scope?

 We are obviously missing something here.

 73 de W6BK


 On May 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Vic K2VCO wrote:

 Sorry, with all due respect this is HORRIBLE advice.

 I won't argue with those that say that the ALC should be connected for its 
 protective
 value. But it should not be 

Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-05-15 Thread David M. Elliott
Thanks Guy for the well thought out response.  Now we are getting somewhere.

The setup is a K3 using an Elecraft hand microphone feeding an Expert 1K FA 
solid state linear to a Windom antenna.  The detector is a WaveNode WM2.  The 
RF sensor module is between the Expert and the Antenna.  The WaveNode is 
described on their web site (You can Google it,) and the manual is there too.  
The K3 is set up using ESSB with a width of 3.2.  The tx equalizer is flat 
except for bands 7 and 8 which are set for -6db.  The audio was my spoken voice 
so would be different from A to B.  I have been told that I have a radio 
voice and should have been in broadcasting.  I made a few radio and tv 
commercials for a company I worked for in the mid 1970s and to this day I have 
people come up to me and ask if I was on the radio in Cleveland.  Somehow they 
remember the voice after decades.  As you say, it is very base dominated.

The WaveNode is a really fun toy which I am just now figuring out how to use.  
What I look for to see splatter is the presence of colors other than green in 
the Modulation Quickview window.  If I see that, I know there is splatter.  If 
I don't, then I assume I am OK.

As you suggest, I will try this with the tx equalizer set up for narrow contest 
operation.  I'll let you know what happens.

In any case, I am convinced that the K3 should be operated with the Expert with 
each band of the K3 set for only the power necessary to drive the Expert to its 
rated power.  In my case, this is 15 watts plus or minus a few.  It is 
interesting to note that I can drive the Expert to nearly full power with my 
QRP K2.

I'll report back on further tests.  Thanks for all your good words.

73 de W6BK


On May 15, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:

 Hi Dave,
 
 Thank you for the pictures. Worth thousand words, etc.  And there IS
 difference between the two.  Can you detail the setup from end to end,
 particularly your RX setup and K3 TX voice settings?
 
 I'm not sure what your audio waveform is from exactly in A and B,
 you'll need to tell us.  But if that's human voice, it's a very
 base-dominated voice spectrum, unlikely to generate obvious splatter.
 The 0-400 or 0-500 band, whatever it is, is 18 db above the next
 strongest band in your modulation quickview, and so the lowest band
 is completely controlling the power, not the attack of the silibants.
 This would not be the measured waveform for a contest optimized voice,
 with the treble accentuated for punch, where splatter-producing
 TX/amp setups show their true colors.
 
 Set up for contest punch.  Do the comparison with the lower
 frequencies severely reduced in the K3 TX equalization, and the
 compression up around 20-30.  Or get your wife to do the voice and
 have her holler at the mike like it was the kids (only a few
 assumptions there...).   Turn OFF the averaging in the program and
 leave the peak hold on.  The duration and hence the average power of
 silibants are quite less than the lower frequencies, and the
 distortion products off silibants even less. It is the distortion's
 instantaneous peak power that causes the most problem, not its peak
 power times duration (average power).
 
 The speech used for the test should be on a recording. Run the K3
 barefoot off the recording, bypassing the amp, measure and make your
 pictures, and then include the amp and repeat from the recording
 without changing anything on the K3. This is probably a 25 watt A/B
 and a 100 watt A/B. The receiving device should be run with FIXED
 gain, NO RX AGC, any overdrive issues worked out in advance.  Compare
 those spectrums.  But even this is still approximate, because the RX
 device (unless it's a very good RX device like another K3 or K2) can
 create the highest distortion which covers up any true differences.
 
 The real test would be to run a very stable square rise and fall CW
 dit with a pulse width of about 2 or 3 milliseconds with a repetition
 rate of about one second, and repeating the test for longer pulse
 widths. This requires a signal generator followed by a high power lab
 linear amp instead of a K3 to drive the amp, but would isolate added
 spectrum that occurs on predictable frequencies at predictable times
 and can be precisely measured.  The receiving device and presentation
 would have to be certified for the general circumstances.  I don't own
 this stuff either, just get to drool on it during isolated
 opportunities.
 
 As to others listening for splatter, one WOULD think others could hear
 it.  However, back in the day of controversy over what rigs had and
 didn't have key clicks, it was amazing how many people could NOT hear
 or otherwise detect the bad clicks on a MEASURED dirty rig, for
 whatever reason I really don't know.  So I'm skeptical since I don't
 see much difference in hearing splatter and hearing key clicks.
 
 The problem I have, even if the SBE does manage to do amplification
 relatively cleanly, is if someone else 

Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-25 Thread Phil Debbie Salas
Without an attenuator to match levels, people are gambling
with or without the ALC connected.  73 Tom

I agree.  I was surprised to see that my IC-706MKII put out a full power 
spike regardless of where the output power was set (even set at 5-weatts 
output, the first-dit spike was 100+ watts).  I measuered the drive required 
for my ALS-600 and built an attenuator that is switched in-line when I turn 
on the amplifier.   This way I can always leave my transceiver set to full 
power and not worry about overdriving the amp, either with a first-dit spike 
or forgetting to reduce drive when I put the amp in-line (info in the 
Articles section at www.ad5x.com).

The K3 has solved the overshoot problem, but not the forgetting to turn 
down drive problem for me.  The attenuator takes care of that.  I use my K3 
A-output for barefoot operation, and the B-output going to the 
ALS-600/MFJ-998 combo.  I do this since the amp and tuner are not designed 
for 6 meters, and don't look good on 6-meters even when bypassed.  So the 
A-output with the K3 ATU is used on 160-6 meters for barefoot operation, and 
the B-output with K3 ATU bypassed is used for 160-10 meters with the 
ALS-600/MFJ-998.  I connect A-barefoot or B-amplified outputs to the 
appropriate antenna with a 6x6 remote antenna switch (MFJ-4726).  Yes, the 
K3 remembers power settings on a per-band basis, but not on an A/B basis 
(yet).

Phil - AD5X 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Franco Cazzaniga
Hello
I  use the Expert 1K-FA  with K3 full power and ALC , but i think i have two 
issue.
When i use K3 full power ( with Expert full power ) the rig output  is not  
stable but fluctuates around 15 watt and more or less of 5 watt , and of course 
the output of Expert varies consequently .
When i use Expert half power i have not issue , the input and output power are 
stable.
Another issue is that when i put the Expert in STBY , the K3 output power does 
not return instantly at 100 w , but slowly in 3 - 4 seconds.
When i not use the ALC i have not issue.
Thank you
Franco I6QFZ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Arie Kleingeld PA3A
Franco,

Forget about the ALC.
Up till now I have never used the ALC between my TRX and PA. No need to.
Just gently set the power of the trx yourself to drive the PA to the
right powerlevel and go.

73
Arie PA3A

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
 
Hello
I  use the Expert 1K-FA  with K3 full power and ALC , but i think i have
two issue.
When i use K3 full power ( with Expert full power ) the rig output  is
not  stable but fluctuates around 15 watt and more or less of 5 watt ,
and of course the output of Expert varies consequently .
When i use Expert half power i have not issue , the input and output
power are stable.
Another issue is that when i put the Expert in STBY , the K3 output
power does not return instantly at 100 w , but slowly in 3 - 4 seconds.
When i not use the ALC i have not issue.
Thank you
Franco I6QFZ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Philippe Trottet
Hi Franco,
Fully agree Arie's comments, I'm not using an auto Amp. only a manual
one with a Russian tetrode, and only checked on the K3 that the time
delay corresponds to the amp specs and that's all. 
With my K3-100, most of the time I'm driving it with 12W and the output
with my amp is ±350W thats cover most of my applications.  At 13W it
engage the KPA100 for higher power needs.
Just set the K3 to the power level you want to use without going over
the specs of your equipment.
 
Bst 73's
Philippe A65BI

 Arie Kleingeld PA3A p...@xs4all.nl 21-04-2010 11:25 
Franco,

Forget about the ALC.
Up till now I have never used the ALC between my TRX and PA. No need
to.
Just gently set the power of the trx yourself to drive the PA to the
right powerlevel and go.

73
Arie PA3A

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-

Hello
I  use the Expert 1K-FA  with K3 full power and ALC , but i think i
have
two issue.
When i use K3 full power ( with Expert full power ) the rig output  is
not  stable but fluctuates around 15 watt and more or less of 5 watt ,
and of course the output of Expert varies consequently .
When i use Expert half power i have not issue , the input and output
power are stable.
Another issue is that when i put the Expert in STBY , the K3 output
power does not return instantly at 100 w , but slowly in 3 - 4
seconds.
When i not use the ALC i have not issue.
Thank you
Franco I6QFZ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Bob Naumann
Before this faulty opinion proliferates any further; what applies to tube amps 
does not follow with solid state amps.

ALC is required by most manufacturers of solid state amps to prevent 
overdriving and the resulting damage to the amplifier. ALC is the mechanism 
used to achieve this protection.

We were the original USA importer of the Expert 1KFA and it requires ALC. Tokyo 
Hy-Power does as well.

Can you manually limit your output from your radio and avoid damage? Yes. Even 
so, why take the risk? Hook up the ALC and adjust it according to the amplifier 
manufacturer's instruction.

If it is not working correctly, refer the problem to the amplifier manufacturer 
or dealer.

So, please do not advise someone with a solid state amp to disconnect their 
ALC- unless you want to assume the cost of repairs.

73,

Bob W5OV
Array Solutions
(Tokyo Hy-Power Dealer)

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Philippe Trottet
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:52 AM
To: Franco Cazzaniga; Arie Kleingeld PA3A
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

Hi Franco,
Fully agree Arie's comments, I'm not using an auto Amp. only a manual
one with a Russian tetrode, and only checked on the K3 that the time
delay corresponds to the amp specs and that's all. 
With my K3-100, most of the time I'm driving it with 12W and the output
with my amp is ±350W thats cover most of my applications.  At 13W it
engage the KPA100 for higher power needs.
Just set the K3 to the power level you want to use without going over
the specs of your equipment.
 
Bst 73's
Philippe A65BI

 Arie Kleingeld PA3A p...@xs4all.nl 21-04-2010 11:25 
Franco,

Forget about the ALC.
Up till now I have never used the ALC between my TRX and PA. No need
to.
Just gently set the power of the trx yourself to drive the PA to the
right powerlevel and go.

73
Arie PA3A

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-

Hello
I  use the Expert 1K-FA  with K3 full power and ALC , but i think i
have
two issue.
When i use K3 full power ( with Expert full power ) the rig output  is
not  stable but fluctuates around 15 watt and more or less of 5 watt ,
and of course the output of Expert varies consequently .
When i use Expert half power i have not issue , the input and output
power are stable.
Another issue is that when i put the Expert in STBY , the K3 output
power does not return instantly at 100 w , but slowly in 3 - 4
seconds.
When i not use the ALC i have not issue.
Thank you
Franco I6QFZ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Philippe Trottet
Hi Bob,
I will apologize because I responded to quickly thinking all Hams are
like me...by bad habit.
I will not listed here problems faced with not properly designed ALC's
during the past and as Hams we are suppose to go a bit further to keep
the maximum of our equipment...within the limits.
As the original importer it is your duty to write it and I fully agee
with your comments. 
ALC is useful for full auto Amps, specially the solid states one.
During my all career in Telecoms started 1972, I never burned any Amp
(Ham  Broadcast), solid state or valves by overdriving. 
But I read carefully the specs before testing any new equipment and
have costly equipment in my pro lab to monitor it, that is not the case
of most of Hams. 
So again mea culpa.
 
Bst 73's
Philippe A65BI
K3#3616
By Hams, for Hams...What else ?
 
 
 
 

Philippe TROTTET 
Head of Field Telecom Unit - DUBAI

 
United Nations High Commissioner for  Refugees
International Humanitarian City
Office Building Nº3 - Room 2, 1st Floor
Doha Street
PO BOX: 506013
DUBAI - U.A.E.
 
Dubai time: GMT +4
W: Sunday to Thursday
HQ Ext: 7120
Vsat: xx 41 22 7120
External:
+971 4 3601753
+41 22 739 7120
Mobile: +971 504531756
Website: www.unhcr.org ( http://www.unhcr.org/ )


 Bob Naumann w...@w5ov.com 21-04-2010 16:36 
Before this faulty opinion proliferates any further; what applies to
tube amps does not follow with solid state amps.

ALC is required by most manufacturers of solid state amps to prevent
overdriving and the resulting damage to the amplifier. ALC is the
mechanism used to achieve this protection.

We were the original USA importer of the Expert 1KFA and it requires
ALC. Tokyo Hy-Power does as well.

Can you manually limit your output from your radio and avoid damage?
Yes. Even so, why take the risk? Hook up the ALC and adjust it according
to the amplifier manufacturer's instruction.

If it is not working correctly, refer the problem to the amplifier
manufacturer or dealer.

So, please do not advise someone with a solid state amp to disconnect
their ALC- unless you want to assume the cost of repairs.

73,

Bob W5OV
Array Solutions
(Tokyo Hy-Power Dealer)

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Philippe
Trottet
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:52 AM
To: Franco Cazzaniga; Arie Kleingeld PA3A
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

Hi Franco,
Fully agree Arie's comments, I'm not using an auto Amp. only a manual
one with a Russian tetrode, and only checked on the K3 that the time
delay corresponds to the amp specs and that's all. 
With my K3-100, most of the time I'm driving it with 12W and the
output
with my amp is ±350W thats cover most of my applications.  At 13W it
engage the KPA100 for higher power needs.
Just set the K3 to the power level you want to use without going over
the specs of your equipment.

Bst 73's
Philippe A65BI

 Arie Kleingeld PA3A p...@xs4all.nl 21-04-2010 11:25 
Franco,

Forget about the ALC.
Up till now I have never used the ALC between my TRX and PA. No need
to.
Just gently set the power of the trx yourself to drive the PA to the
right powerlevel and go.

73
Arie PA3A

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-

Hello
I  use the Expert 1K-FA  with K3 full power and ALC , but i think i
have
two issue.
When i use K3 full power ( with Expert full power ) the rig output  is
not  stable but fluctuates around 15 watt and more or less of 5 watt ,
and of course the output of Expert varies consequently .
When i use Expert half power i have not issue , the input and output
power are stable.
Another issue is that when i put the Expert in STBY , the K3 output
power does not return instantly at 100 w , but slowly in 3 - 4
seconds.
When i not use the ALC i have not issue.
Thank you
Franco I6QFZ

__
Elecraft
 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http

Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Paul Christensen
 So, please do not advise someone with a solid state amp to disconnect 
 their ALC- unless you want to assume the cost of repairs.

Overall, I agree with that assessment.  However, I do no not make use of the 
K3's ALC line with my SPE solid-state amp.  In looking at the SPE's 
protection circuitry, a fault buss is created that applies a high level of 
bias to the power MOSFETs when any of about 6-7 different fault conditions 
occur.  The response time is exceptionally fast to the point where if I 
deliberately blast the SPE with full power from the K3 without ALC connected 
(don't try this at home - I'm a risk taker but did so only after reviewing 
the circuit), the SPE detects the presence of high input power and applies 
enough MOSFET bias to keep output power below about 1100 watts.  How 
instantaneous?  I have not measured the response time but it does respond 
well to the leading-edge power spike from another well-known transceiver. 
Today, a solid-state amp should be smart enough to know when it's being 
overdriven.

Also, an unknown with the SPE amp is what happens to amplifier linearity 
when the bias protection circuitry begins to engage to keep power from 
exceeding 1KW?  But the same question must be asked of any transceiver that 
interfaces to an amp while using an ALC line.  I like to think that when an 
amp and transceiver come from a common manufacturer, the ALC circuitry is 
probably optimized since the designer knows exactly what's needed at the ALC 
meet me point between the amp and transceiver.

Paul, W9AC 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Bob Naumann
Paul,

What if you have one of the 200w or new 400w output rigs? What if you have
one of those radios that shoot out a spike of greater than 100w at the
beginning of every transmission?

Do people blast the inputs of their SS amps with 200w or 400w? You bet they
do. They fry the FETs immediately too. We see them on a fairly frequent
basis and we have gotten adept at swapping out FETs quickly - at significant
expense to the owner of the amp. In the vast majority of cases, they had ALC
disconnected and made a mistake when switching antenna outputs from these
high-power transceivers.

So, if you feel confident that you won't make a mistake, then go ahead and
take the risk of not having ALC connected and adjusted properly. But, keep
in mind the costly consequences that can result if you make a mistake. I do
not understand why one would not connect the ALC when its purpose is to
prevent damage. Not using ALC is not a badge of courage; instead, it is a
foolish tempting of fate - in my opinion.

Also, most amp manufacturers recommend that you only increase the output of
the radio high enough to achieve the desired output from the amp - they do
not recommend turning the radio output up full-blast and throttling the
output back down with ALC - which, as we all know can cause distortion and
all sorts of bad things. There is no downside to using ALC in the manner
that SS amp manufacturers recommend.

So, the bottom line is to follow the manufacturer's recommendation regarding
ALC and setting your radio to work properly in conjunction with it.

73,

Bob W5OV

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Paul Christensen
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:10 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

 So, please do not advise someone with a solid state amp to disconnect 
 their ALC- unless you want to assume the cost of repairs.

Overall, I agree with that assessment.  However, I do no not make use of the

K3's ALC line with my SPE solid-state amp.  In looking at the SPE's 
protection circuitry, a fault buss is created that applies a high level of 
bias to the power MOSFETs when any of about 6-7 different fault conditions 
occur.  The response time is exceptionally fast to the point where if I 
deliberately blast the SPE with full power from the K3 without ALC connected

(don't try this at home - I'm a risk taker but did so only after reviewing 
the circuit), the SPE detects the presence of high input power and applies 
enough MOSFET bias to keep output power below about 1100 watts.  How 
instantaneous?  I have not measured the response time but it does respond 
well to the leading-edge power spike from another well-known transceiver. 
Today, a solid-state amp should be smart enough to know when it's being 
overdriven.

Also, an unknown with the SPE amp is what happens to amplifier linearity 
when the bias protection circuitry begins to engage to keep power from 
exceeding 1KW?  But the same question must be asked of any transceiver that 
interfaces to an amp while using an ALC line.  I like to think that when an 
amp and transceiver come from a common manufacturer, the ALC circuitry is 
probably optimized since the designer knows exactly what's needed at the ALC

meet me point between the amp and transceiver.

Paul, W9AC 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Paul Christensen
 Do people blast the inputs of their SS amps with 200w or 400w? You bet 
 they
 do. They fry the FETs immediately too.

And that can occur whether or not an ALC line is used between the 
transceiver and amp since ALC is a feedback function and the response time 
back to the transceiver, and the response time of the transceiver, is not 
instantaneous.

 We see them on a fairly frequent
 basis and we have gotten adept at swapping out FETs quickly - at 
 significant
 expense to the owner of the amp. In the vast majority of cases, they had 
 ALC
 disconnected and made a mistake when switching antenna outputs from these
 high-power transceivers.

When repairing the THP amps for failed MOSFETs, how do you know with 
certainty the ALC line was disconnected by the customer?  Also, what is the 
typical ALC response time of the THP amplifiers?

I think it would be an interesting exercise to set up multiple transceivers 
across vendors, together with multiple solid-state amps across vendors, and 
measure the total ALC loop time period.

Paul, W9AC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Franco, you should only use the ALC as amplifier protection.

ARRL's 1K-FA product review listed the 1K-FA drive requirements as
28-32 watts typical for full output.  Driving it at 100 watts and
using dynamic ALC to reduce the level to 30 watts running SSB
definitely will produce varying results. This is not a K3 problem.
Since the ALC had been reducing your drive to 30 watts, the K3 is
operating with the idea that when you set the power to 100 what you
really need is 30. When you put the amp in standby, it takes a while
for the K3 to figure out, by lack of ALC coming from the Expert, that
now you really do want 100 watts with the power knob at 100 watts.

The K3 has a slow power recovery curve to keep from spiking amps in
similar situations where ALC is slow or non existent.

Reduce the K3 output power to 25 watts and only increase it until you
have full power from the Expert which DOES NOT engage the Expert ALC.
Use a peak power meter, or adjust it on CW to determine the drive.  Do
NOT use ALC to accomplish speech compression, use the compression
control in the K3, which is a far more clever digital method without
the side effects.

Driving the ALC more than three times normal drive power WILL produce
splatter, no matter how good manufactures say their ALC is.

73, Guy


On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Franco Cazzaniga f.ame...@tin.it wrote:
 Hello
 I  use the Expert 1K-FA  with K3 full power and ALC , but i think i have two 
 issue.
 When i use K3 full power ( with Expert full power ) the rig output  is not  
 stable but fluctuates around 15 watt and more or less of 5 watt , and of 
 course the output of Expert varies consequently .
 When i use Expert half power i have not issue , the input and output power 
 are stable.
 Another issue is that when i put the Expert in STBY , the K3 output power 
 does not return instantly at 100 w , but slowly in 3 - 4 seconds.
 When i not use the ALC i have not issue.
 Thank you
 Franco I6QFZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread harrytheham
Well said Bob.

Harry WE1X


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Bob Naumann w...@w5ov.com
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:33:18 
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

Paul,

What if you have one of the 200w or new 400w output rigs? What if you have
one of those radios that shoot out a spike of greater than 100w at the
beginning of every transmission?

Do people blast the inputs of their SS amps with 200w or 400w? You bet they
do. They fry the FETs immediately too. We see them on a fairly frequent
basis and we have gotten adept at swapping out FETs quickly - at significant
expense to the owner of the amp. In the vast majority of cases, they had ALC
disconnected and made a mistake when switching antenna outputs from these
high-power transceivers.

So, if you feel confident that you won't make a mistake, then go ahead and
take the risk of not having ALC connected and adjusted properly. But, keep
in mind the costly consequences that can result if you make a mistake. I do
not understand why one would not connect the ALC when its purpose is to
prevent damage. Not using ALC is not a badge of courage; instead, it is a
foolish tempting of fate - in my opinion.

Also, most amp manufacturers recommend that you only increase the output of
the radio high enough to achieve the desired output from the amp - they do
not recommend turning the radio output up full-blast and throttling the
output back down with ALC - which, as we all know can cause distortion and
all sorts of bad things. There is no downside to using ALC in the manner
that SS amp manufacturers recommend.

So, the bottom line is to follow the manufacturer's recommendation regarding
ALC and setting your radio to work properly in conjunction with it.

73,

Bob W5OV

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Paul Christensen
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:10 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

 So, please do not advise someone with a solid state amp to disconnect 
 their ALC- unless you want to assume the cost of repairs.

Overall, I agree with that assessment.  However, I do no not make use of the

K3's ALC line with my SPE solid-state amp.  In looking at the SPE's 
protection circuitry, a fault buss is created that applies a high level of 
bias to the power MOSFETs when any of about 6-7 different fault conditions 
occur.  The response time is exceptionally fast to the point where if I 
deliberately blast the SPE with full power from the K3 without ALC connected

(don't try this at home - I'm a risk taker but did so only after reviewing 
the circuit), the SPE detects the presence of high input power and applies 
enough MOSFET bias to keep output power below about 1100 watts.  How 
instantaneous?  I have not measured the response time but it does respond 
well to the leading-edge power spike from another well-known transceiver. 
Today, a solid-state amp should be smart enough to know when it's being 
overdriven.

Also, an unknown with the SPE amp is what happens to amplifier linearity 
when the bias protection circuitry begins to engage to keep power from 
exceeding 1KW?  But the same question must be asked of any transceiver that 
interfaces to an amp while using an ALC line.  I like to think that when an 
amp and transceiver come from a common manufacturer, the ALC circuitry is 
probably optimized since the designer knows exactly what's needed at the ALC

meet me point between the amp and transceiver.

Paul, W9AC 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Tom W8JI
What if you have one of the 200w or new 400w output rigs? 
What if you have
one of those radios that shoot out a spike of greater than 
100w at the
beginning of every transmission?

Do people blast the inputs of their SS amps with 200w or 
400w? You bet they
do. They fry the FETs immediately too. We see them on a 
fairly frequent
basis and we have gotten adept at swapping out FETs 
quickly - at significant
expense to the owner of the amp. In the vast majority of 
cases, they had ALC
disconnected and made a mistake when switching antenna 
outputs from these
high-power transceivers.

So, if you feel confident that you won't make a mistake, 
then go ahead and
take the risk of not having ALC connected and adjusted 
properly. But, keep
in mind the costly consequences that can result if you make 
a mistake. 

A word of additional caution

While external ALC might force a long term power reduction, 
the external ALC system generally does not correct overshoot 
in radios. It  almost never reduces power spikes on leading 
edges.

The reason ALC does not normally affect the spikes, and why 
typical external ALC systems cannot reduce the spike, is the 
response delay in the ALC system inside the radio. There is 
group delay in filter, and there is propagation delay 
through the radio. There is also delay in the actual ALC 
system. The gain control system is up front in the radio, 
almost always ahead of filters and the delays. The ALC 
sampling is after filters, and in the case of amplifier 
derived ALC it is no better than the directional coupler 
that samples power inside the radio. It is a serious mistake 
to let the external ALC, derived after the filters and group 
delay in the radio, do primary power control.

What the ALC does buy people is gain control or power 
limiting if the knob on the radio is adjusted wrong, but it 
most certainly will not correct leading edge spikes.

It's my understanding the K3 uses a two stage system, and 
handles the sampling before passing through filters. I'm 
still trying to get my head around how it works and why I am 
uncomfortable with how the meters act, but at least it 
addresses the overshoot problem.
The amplifier ALC should be connected, if  the manufacturer 
requires it, but don't expect it to make something like an 
IC 775 not pop FET's. The correct approach would be an 
attenuator pad so the radio could run at near full power and 
not have a chance of overdriving the amp, or better yet buy 
a radio that does not spike to 250 watts at the leading 
edge.

Now there is one exception to this. If the amplifier has a 
memory on ALC, and holds the ALC at the highest value and 
reduces ALC until power comes slowly up to the correct 
value,, then there would be no overshoot. I'm not aware of 
any amplifiers that do this, and I expect customers would 
complain about the slow power response and lack of 
compression or reduced average power with a system like 
that.

Without an attenuator to match levels, people are gambling 
with or without the ALC connected.


73 Tom 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Alan Bloom
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 12:23 -0400, Tom W8JI wrote:

 The correct approach would be an 
 attenuator pad so the radio could run at near full power and 
 not have a chance of overdriving the amp, ...

I don't understand why more people don't do that.  For example, a 3 dB
attenuator between the transceiver and amplifier ensures that a 100W
exciter won't overdrive an amplifier that requires 50W of drive.  The 3
dB loss on receive is hardly ever an issue but if you're worried about
it, just put the attenuator inside the amplifier, after the T/R relay.

Seems like a simple, foolproof solution.

Al N1AL


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Wes Stewart
Yes.  In fact since with the except of a few newer radios 100W seems to be the 
standard it seems to me that amplifier suppliers should build amps to that 
standard.

If they have enough gain to deliver rated power with only 50 W in, then put a 3 
dB pad inside.  There are additional benefits to this, including a more uniform 
match for the exciter (possibly lowering IMD) and a better defined source match 
for the amplifier (possibly lowering IMD).

In fact, it can be argued that the ALC should be internal to the amplifier, 
rather than depending on some unknown loop characteristics in the exciter.  
Imagine a receiver designer trying to design an AGC loop when he doesn't know 
the characteristics of the gain-controlled stage(s).

Seems to me that some combination of fixed attenuation, some PIN diodes and 
active control of the device bias would solve a lot of operational issues.

Wes  N7WS

--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Alan Bloom n...@cds1.net wrote:


 On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 12:23 -0400,
 Tom W8JI wrote:
 
  The correct approach would be an 
  attenuator pad so the radio could run at near full
 power and 
  not have a chance of overdriving the amp, ...
 
 I don't understand why more people don't do that.  For
 example, a 3 dB
 attenuator between the transceiver and amplifier ensures
 that a 100W
 exciter won't overdrive an amplifier that requires 50W of
 drive.  The 3
 dB loss on receive is hardly ever an issue but if you're
 worried about
 it, just put the attenuator inside the amplifier, after the
 T/R relay.
 
 Seems like a simple, foolproof solution.
 
 Al N1AL



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread W4GRJ
I agree on the protective response time of the Expert being very fast, I
have accidently hit it with 100w a couple times . it alarms and shuts
down with no apparent harm done.the absolutely best amplifier I have
ever used.

Jack
W4GRJ


-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Paul Christensen
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:10 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

 So, please do not advise someone with a solid state amp to disconnect 
 their ALC- unless you want to assume the cost of repairs.

Overall, I agree with that assessment.  However, I do no not make use of the

K3's ALC line with my SPE solid-state amp.  In looking at the SPE's 
protection circuitry, a fault buss is created that applies a high level of 
bias to the power MOSFETs when any of about 6-7 different fault conditions 
occur.  The response time is exceptionally fast to the point where if I 
deliberately blast the SPE with full power from the K3 without ALC connected

(don't try this at home - I'm a risk taker but did so only after reviewing 
the circuit), the SPE detects the presence of high input power and applies 
enough MOSFET bias to keep output power below about 1100 watts.  How 
instantaneous?  I have not measured the response time but it does respond 
well to the leading-edge power spike from another well-known transceiver. 
Today, a solid-state amp should be smart enough to know when it's being 
overdriven.

Also, an unknown with the SPE amp is what happens to amplifier linearity 
when the bias protection circuitry begins to engage to keep power from 
exceeding 1KW?  But the same question must be asked of any transceiver that 
interfaces to an amp while using an ALC line.  I like to think that when an 
amp and transceiver come from a common manufacturer, the ALC circuitry is 
probably optimized since the designer knows exactly what's needed at the ALC

meet me point between the amp and transceiver.

Paul, W9AC 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-04-21 Thread LA8AW
All,

Here is the statement from the developer of the SPE Expert 1K-FA - regarding
ALC, quoted from an early Expert Reflector:

I hope this will clarify the SPE Expert vs K3 - and ALC !!

Please excuse me if I step on someones toes..


quote

*The Elecraft K3 had positive-going ALC, too.  In helping them test their*
*conversion of the K3 to negative-going ALC with different amps, I received*
*an email from Gianfranco, copy below.  His thoughts on how the SPE Expert
is*
*designed to handle transceiver drive may apply here to the Ten-Tec.*
*
*
*FWIW,*
*
*
*Bob*
*K5LLF*
*
*
*Hello Bob,*
*
*
*Elecraft has a strong reputation for manufacturing cost effective and*
*quality transceivers, and for this I'm glad that they decided to conform*
*with the state-of-the-art negative ALC how is commonly intended by all the*
*other manufacturers.*
*
*
*As you well know the ALC is a transceiver's input used to adjust its output
*
*power during transmission: at 0 Vdc there is a maximum power emission and,*
*little by little the control voltage decreases toward negative values,*
*output power emission is reduced until it becomes practically nothing at a*
*given BV (Break Voltage) control voltage.*
*
*
*Every brand has a different BV (ICOM: -3/-4 Vdc, YAESU: -4/-5 Vdc,*
*KENWOOD: -8/-9 Vdc; etc.).*
*
*
*In order to have the widest possible coverage, all the linear amplifiers'*
*manufacturers state that the maximum ALC voltage excursion sourced by their
*
*devices is -11 Vdc.*
*
*
*From this perspective Elecraft's choice (0 Vdc: max PW; -4 Vdc: min PW)*
*sounds good then, but a very important detail to take into account is the*
*overall intervention time which has to be the shortest possible!*
*
*
*All the ordinary linear amplifiers have an external potentiometer which
sets*
*
*
*a given threshold (manually adjusted by the user) whose purpose is to avoid
*
*the linear amplifier's over-driving when that threshold is exceeded.*
*
*
*SPE EXPERT 1K-FA is quite different from those because is fully automatic*
*within its working: ALC control is not only for avoiding over-driving*
*situations, but it is also intended as a system for adjusting the optimal*
*output power for a perfect driving of the transceiver itself.*
*
*
*We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output power manual*
*control to its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to its exclusive*
*design, will provide to control that level as long as the required optimal*
*value will be reached.*
*
*
*Don't try to analyse the ALC control voltage of our linear amplifier
because*
*it cannot be measured using ordinary methods as it operates dynamically for
*
*assuring a great linearity.*
*
*
*Elecraft has only to implement a very fast input able to deal with negative
*
*voltages as all the other manufacturers already do: SPE's amplifier will*
*adapt to that in order to work for the best possible linearity.*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*73's*
*
*
*Gianfranco I0ZY*


unquote



_

73 de LA8AW - Odd-Egil
_
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC

2010-04-21 Thread Tom W8JI
*We really suggest to always leave the transceiver's output 
power manual*
*control to its maximum level because the EXPERT, thanks to 
its exclusive*
*design, will provide to control that level as long as the 
required optimal*
*value will be reached.*
*Elecraft has only to implement a very fast input able to 
deal with negative
*voltages as all the other manufacturers already do: SPE's 
amplifier will*
*adapt to that in order to work for the best possible 
linearity.*

The ALC loop response can never be faster than group delay 
through the transmitter chain. While I have never measured 
the Elecraft filter, some crystal filters have a few mS 
delay. The propagation through the rest of the circuitry 
adds to the delay, as does the inevitable delay time in the 
actual ALC system. All of those delays, from the ALC control 
point forward to the ALC detection, and back from that point 
to the AGC controlled stage, add together.

Elecraft did a VERY smart thing by having the ALC detection, 
or at least part of the ALC detection, ahead of the narrow 
filters and everything else. Running the radio full on and 
relying on the amplifier ALC would undo this, and may not 
bring the results assumed.

Not only that, running other radios full on and depending 
100% on amplifier ALC is probably not a good idea either. 
The less stuff between the power sampling point and the 
gain controlled stage, the better off we are.

The whole reason some radios have overshoot is they run gain 
wide open and depend on a detector at the antenna port to 
reduce power, and the sum of delays from the gain controlled 
stage to the antenna, through the detector, through a 
comparator, and back to the gain controlled stage is what 
causes the problem in the first place. Moving the detection 
point out of the radio is never a benefit.

I can't think of a reason in the world to use the amplifier 
ALC for anything other than a safety limit, especially with 
a rig like the K3 that does gain control and ALC ahead of 
the filters and components that cause most of the delay in 
the ALC loop.

Can anyone else see why running the radio wide open and 
using 100% external detection is a good idea?

73 Tom 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread Bob Naumann
 When repairing the THP amps for failed MOSFETs, how do you know with
certainty the ALC line was disconnected by the customer?

The customers tell us.

73,

Bob W5OV




-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Paul Christensen
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:14 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Expert 1K-FA

 Do people blast the inputs of their SS amps with 200w or 400w? You bet 
 they
 do. They fry the FETs immediately too.

And that can occur whether or not an ALC line is used between the 
transceiver and amp since ALC is a feedback function and the response time 
back to the transceiver, and the response time of the transceiver, is not 
instantaneous.

 We see them on a fairly frequent
 basis and we have gotten adept at swapping out FETs quickly - at 
 significant
 expense to the owner of the amp. In the vast majority of cases, they had 
 ALC
 disconnected and made a mistake when switching antenna outputs from these
 high-power transceivers.

When repairing the THP amps for failed MOSFETs, how do you know with 
certainty the ALC line was disconnected by the customer?  Also, what is the 
typical ALC response time of the THP amplifiers?

I think it would be an interesting exercise to set up multiple transceivers 
across vendors, together with multiple solid-state amps across vendors, and 
measure the total ALC loop time period.

Paul, W9AC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html