Re: [Elecraft] Wherefore art thou, K3 (in CQWW)

2008-11-25 Thread Julius Fazekas n2wn

OK...

or better yet, D'oh!

It was pointed out to me that I live in Zone 4 (I knew that) and operate
from the same.

SCP has it right...
I have been sending 04 for a number of years...

The only problem was that my CQ WW DX certificate states new Zone 5 record
and I bought into it. Oops! ;o)

That record is for Zone 4 and was set using a K2 :o)

Now to see what we can do with a K3 *heheh*

GL and happy huntin' to all this weekend!

73,
Julius
n2wn


Hi Ken,

Look forward to catching you on 160! That would be a new one for me ;o)

K3/100 #366 will be on from Zone 5.

Teams anyone???

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Wherefore-art-thou%2C-K3-%28in-CQWW%29-tp1560556p1576283.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Wherefore art thou, K3 (in CQWW)

2008-11-24 Thread Julius Fazekas n2wn

Hi Ken,

Look forward to catching you on 160! That would be a new one for me ;o)

K3/100 #366 will be on from Zone 5.

Teams anyone???

73,
Julius
n2wn


K3s #320 and 321 at ZM1A - Multi-Two category.
Good luck and 73,
Ken ZL1AIH (at ZM1A in contests)

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Wherefore-art-thou%2C-K3-%28in-CQWW%29-tp1560556p1572125.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Wherefore art thou, K3 (in CQWW)

2008-11-21 Thread Berni G0IDA

Will be on CQWW from 'G'.

73's

G0IDA
K3 #1474



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

K3 #128 will be on air from 9M2CNC in CQWW - SOAB HP.

Good luck to all. I hope the A/K values stay low to allow some East 
Coast US stations over the pole this year on 20m.


73 de Rich, G4ZFE/9M2CNC

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft  
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Wherefore art thou, K3 (in CQWW)

2008-11-21 Thread Lance Collister, W7GJ

Hello Igor,

Will you also have a beam for 6m?  It would really be GREAT to contact 8Q7 on JT65A 
mode during your moonrise!!!  I can send you more information about JT65A and 6m EME 
if it is a possibility for you to be QRV.  The smallest station I have contacted so 
far was running 100w to a 5 element yagi, but most of the hundreds of 6m EME contacts 
I have made are running an amplifier.  GL and VY 73, Lance


Igor Sokolov wrote:

I take my K3 with the second receiver to 8Q7DV for CQWW CW

73, Igor UA9CDC


+


Where are the peripatetic K3s going to be for CQWW? Mine will be at
C6AKX, sadly without the second receiver :-(
Hope to work you all,
73,
Fred KE7X
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the 
system manager. This message contains confidential information and is 
intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named 
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com




--
Lance Collister, W7GJ (ex: WN3GPL, WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8)
P.O. Box 73
Frenchtown, MT  59834  USA
QTH: DN27UB
TEL: (406) 626-5728
URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj
2m DXCC #11/6m DXCC #815


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Wherefore art thou, K3 (in CQWW)

2008-11-21 Thread Andy Faber

K3 number 076 at P49Y, single band 40m (it's second year in that service).
 73, andy, ae6y, p49y
- Original Message - 
From: Cady, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 6:32 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Wherefore art thou, K3 (in CQWW)


Where are the peripatetic K3s going to be for CQWW? Mine will be at
C6AKX, sadly without the second receiver :-(
Hope to work you all,
73,
Fred KE7X
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. 
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Wherefore art thou, K3 (in CQWW)

2008-11-20 Thread Igor Sokolov

I take my K3 with the second receiver to 8Q7DV for CQWW CW

73, Igor UA9CDC


+


Where are the peripatetic K3s going to be for CQWW? Mine will be at
C6AKX, sadly without the second receiver :-(
Hope to work you all,
73,
Fred KE7X
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-29 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
- Original Message - 
From: David Toepfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]



A bigger case with a new bigger front panel for
more/larger knobs, larger display, and analog S-meter;  As someone said, 
more

base/main station like.


That would make me seriously consider a K3/4/5 - I bought the TS-480SAT 
earlier this year to use as GD4ELI when visiting my mother. The TS-480SAT is 
a great performer, excellent value for money, easy to use at home and 
mobile. But IMO neither the K2 or TS-480SAT are 'real' radios of the type I 
grew up with - Eddystone EA-12, ex-military etc. although they obviously 
offer far better performance and in relative terms are much cheaper.


Don't take this as a knock on Elecraft, but were I to build a large radio (I 
have the K1 and KX1 here and applaud Elecraft's commitment to the Amateur 
market) then I would want to build something Meaty Beaty Big and not very

Bouncy.

Even a K2 re-packaged - one thing I like about my IC-7800 (which I am 
selling) is the large user interface.


Simon Brown
---
RSGB HF Convention October 2006: http://www.rsgb-hfc.org.uk/

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Darwin, Keith
Quite a post there Doug.  Thanks for the comments  insight.

... But ...

That line of logic would have suggested the K2 would not have been
successful.  A QRP rig for $600?  Gee, for that price we can get a full
power rig from Asia.  But as history has show, the risk has paid off and
the K2 has indeed been a pretty successful rig both within and beyond
the QRP community.

If there were a K3 and if it offered enough improvements or changes to
differentiate itself from the K2, then you'd see some pretty good sales.
I suspect much of the sales would be to existing customers who already
have a K2, K1 and/or KX1.  We as a group have already shown that we're
eager to buy multiple Elecraft offerings.  After all there is
substantial overlap between the 3 rigs (esp. K1  KX1) yet many have all
3!

Being a kit is a differentiator all it's own.  With no Heathkit kits
anymore, those who want to build are left rather unsatisfied.  Let's say
the K3 were a 100 watt HF rig with a full-size form factor, full size
ergonomics and operating features similar to the K2.  Further assume a
price tag of, say $1000.  I bet you'd see sales!

Of course, as you point out, the trick is just what would a K3 be?  Top
notch contest rig?  Bottom tier starter rig?  DC to Daylight all mode
rig?  SDR?  It makes my head spin just thinking about it.

Which is why I personally favor a K2-B.  K2 internals married with a
larger front panel featuring more and larger knobs.  Same basic K2
performance in a larger package with more base-station oriented
ergonomics.  Basically, I guess I'm thinking I don't really need a K3 at
all.  The K2's performance is all I require, but a bigger box and analog
S-meter would be nice.

73!

- Keith KD1E -
- K2 5411 -

-Original Message-

Wherefore at thou, K3?

*snip*

I think the dream of a K3 is something necessary to the group.  I think
the reality might be something different.  I would love to be proven
wrong
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Darrell Bellerive
On August 28, 2006 09:38 am, Darwin, Keith wrote:
 Which is why I personally favor a K2-B.  K2 internals married with a
 larger front panel featuring more and larger knobs.  Same basic K2
 performance in a larger package with more base-station oriented
 ergonomics.  Basically, I guess I'm thinking I don't really need a K3 at
 all.  The K2's performance is all I require, but a bigger box and analog
 S-meter would be nice.

Yes! And the six meter band in the radio as well, and a variable IF shift, and 
a manual notch filter, and...

Count me in.

Darrell  VA7TO  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Darrell Bellerive
Amateur Radio Stations VA7TO and VE7CLA
Grand Forks, British Columbia, Canada
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Craig Rairdin
 Yes! And the six meter band in the radio as well, and a variable IF shift,

 and a manual notch filter, and...

I sympathize with Eric and Wayne as they think about the future of this
product. Everybody wants something different. I seem to be able to work as
many stations as I care to talk to without variable IF shift and a manual
notch filter. And the last time I was on 6m was using my TV to watch channel
2 when the cable went out. Not that these aren't important features but that
everyone's needs are different.

Frankly I just want something that looks cooler. I don't know what features
those $10K rigs have that are better or different than my K2, but I like
those big color screens with lots of waveforms, numbers, and digitally
reproduced analog meters on them. Hey, maybe they pick up channel 2 on those
screens and I could work 6m, too. :-)

Craig
NZ0R

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3? (style)

2006-08-28 Thread W4ABW
The K-3 ! How about that.
I see a more ergonomic styled Elecraft with enhanced meters and nice big  
knobs.
In kit form still but in a larger box to allow more room to populate the  
boards.
A style more in tune with the new Elecraft amplifier.
Perhaps a built in power supply as well.
 
Classic black in color, to match the new amp, for sure !
 
Al
W4ABW
Raleigh
 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Fred (FL)
I feel, all Elecraft needs to consider - is creating
a 2007 version of the K2, updated with 2006
technology, 2006 microelectronics, better display,
and a few bells and whistles to play with.

What the HOO  bigger knobs, larger front
panel to boot.  

Call it the K2+ or K2MKII or K207  IMHO many
new and previous K2 owners would buy it.  Consider
how many auto owners upgrade to buy the latest
VERSION of their favorite auto.  Happens every day.
Unfortunately, in the U.S. auto industry - NEW
MODELS may contain less features, and less
quality. Ala no chrome, no metal bumpers, no
HP, no 8 cylinders, no oil pressure 

If Elecraft told me I could buy the K2+ or K207
- why wouldn't I want one?

And this would give the Elecraft principals - more
memory to play around in, and more technology to
beef up the performance even more.  Its a win,
win.

Thanks,
Fred
N3CSY


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Thom R LaCosta

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Fred (FL) wrote:


I feel, all Elecraft needs to consider - is creating
a 2007 version of the K2, updated with 2006
technology, 2006 microelectronics, better display,
and a few bells and whistles to play with.



It's very interesting to hear all the second guessing of the Elecraft folks 
hereone might make the assumption that without the K3 Elecraft will dry up 
and blow away in the winds.


Another viewpoint might be that Eric and Wayne looked long and hard at the 
Amateur Radio market and produced a superior product that is well accepted, and 
if judged by price is quite a value, or if judged by quality is quite a value, 
or if judged by the ability for the owner to repair the unit is quite a value.
Other benefits such as building your own rig, having something that is 
sub-sub-sub battleship size, easily used in portable and emergency situations 
seem to appeal to many.


But what do I know, simple appliance operator that I am, and not with unlimited 
funds to purchase the latest(but not always greatest) technology with large 
knobs, multi-colored displays and bands from DC to light, including a general 
coverage receiver, TV monitor, radar detector and security system.


I'm glad that Elecraft didn't design and produce a rig that I could never 
afford!


73,Thom-k3hrn
www.zerobeat.net Home of QRP Web Ring, Drakelist home page,Drake Web Ring,
QRP IRC channel, Drake IRC Channel, Elecraft Owners Database
www.tlchost.net/hosting/  ***  Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread David Toepfer
I could embrace that, as I doubt (I do not know if) it would be a huge
development investment.  A bigger case with a new bigger front panel for
more/larger knobs, larger display, and analog S-meter;  As someone said, more
base/main station like.  Your old K2 could attach right to the new
control/display board and you would be off and running.  But who knows if it
would be worth the investment for Elecraft.

'T'would be sweet.

David, k3tue
.


--- Fred (FL) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I feel, all Elecraft needs to consider - is creating
 a 2007 version of the K2, updated with 2006
 technology, 2006 microelectronics, better display,
 and a few bells and whistles to play with.
 
 What the HOO  bigger knobs, larger front
 panel to boot.  
 
 Call it the K2+ or K2MKII or K207  IMHO many
 new and previous K2 owners would buy it.  Consider
 how many auto owners upgrade to buy the latest
 VERSION of their favorite auto.  Happens every day.
 Unfortunately, in the U.S. auto industry - NEW
 MODELS may contain less features, and less
 quality. Ala no chrome, no metal bumpers, no
 HP, no 8 cylinders, no oil pressure 
 
 If Elecraft told me I could buy the K2+ or K207
 - why wouldn't I want one?
 
 And this would give the Elecraft principals - more
 memory to play around in, and more technology to
 beef up the performance even more.  Its a win,
 win.
 
 Thanks,
 Fred
 N3CSY
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread David Toepfer
 I'm glad that Elecraft didn't design and produce a rig that I could never 
 afford!

Amen!

dt
.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Solosko, Robert B (Bob)
It seems to me that the K2 does everything I want it to do from a feature and 
performance point of view - where it's lacking, as may people have said,  is in 
user ergonomics. There are just too many functions that are squeezed into the 
limited front panel to make it very easy to use. While I haven't yet hooked my 
K2 to a computer, it looks like a number of the programs that work with the K2 
effectively expand the front panel with more push buttons and controls. But 
since I don't want to have to haul a laptop with me when I travel with my K2, 
what I would like is not another bigger (and more expensive) K2+ or K3 but a 
simple, and small front panel extension box... perhaps something about the size 
of a KX-1. This box would have separate push buttons for each XTAL and DSP 
filter and for each of the  tuning rates - that way I can just press a button 
and not have to cycle around all of the different choices to get to the one 
that I want. And, each button would have a built in L!
 ED that would light to indicate which button I pushed so that the choice is 
immediately obvious. This front panel extension box could also have a number of 
buttons for other functions that now require several menu steps, such as 
turning the DSP noise filter on and off, displaying the clock, etc. It can also 
have separate LED indicators to indicate when the RIT is on, when the XIT is 
on, etc. The box wouldn't duplicate any of the functions that are now directly 
available on the K2 front panel but would make it much easier to get to the 
frequently used functions that require multiple pushes of a button or multiple 
menus. 

The nice thing about such a front panel extension, besides making the K2 much 
more user friendly, and being small and light enough to take along, is that it 
could be easily implemented with a small processor that interfaces to the K2 
via the remote K2 commands through the KIO2. 

So, would you buy such a front panel extension? How much would this go toward 
satisfying your desire for a K2+ or a K3, and how much would you be willing to 
pay for it?

Bob W1SRB

P.S. I sent this idea to Wayne and Eric several months ago.


. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fred (FL)
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 3:13 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?


I feel, all Elecraft needs to consider - is creating
a 2007 version of the K2, updated with 2006
technology, 2006 microelectronics, better display,
and a few bells and whistles to play with.

What the HOO  bigger knobs, larger front
panel to boot.  

Call it the K2+ or K2MKII or K207  IMHO many
new and previous K2 owners would buy it.  Consider
how many auto owners upgrade to buy the latest
VERSION of their favorite auto.  Happens every day.
Unfortunately, in the U.S. auto industry - NEW
MODELS may contain less features, and less
quality. Ala no chrome, no metal bumpers, no
HP, no 8 cylinders, no oil pressure 

If Elecraft told me I could buy the K2+ or K207
- why wouldn't I want one?

And this would give the Elecraft principals - more
memory to play around in, and more technology to
beef up the performance even more.  Its a win,
win.

Thanks,
Fred
N3CSY


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Darwin, Keith
Bob, that's a GREAT idea.  As I think about it, I realize ...

I DON'T WANT A K3.

There, I said it.  I don't want a K3, I just want an larger and more
spread out UI for the K2.  I want a new front panel, bigger case, bigger
knobs.

BUT that ruins the K2 for portable use, now doesn't it.

So, your approach of a K2 docking station may be the better answer.
Plug in to the thingy and you have a larger UI.  Unplug and your rig is
still portable.  No PC to lug around.  Now combine the large UI panel
with the 100 watt PA in a single case and it gets cooler yet!

How much?  I guess I'm willing to spend $250 or so on a new front panel
thingy.  I'm not willing to spend $1100 on a new rig. 

- Keith KD1E -
- K2 5411 -

-Original Message-
From: Robert B (Bob)

So, would you buy such a front panel extension? How much would this go
toward satisfying your desire for a K2+ or a K3, and how much would you
be willing to pay for it?

Bob W1SRB

P.S. I sent this idea to Wayne and Eric several months ago.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread David Toepfer
Someone's already done this.  I forget his reason, but if I recall, he used a
pic controller to send commands to the i/o connection.  I immagine such a
device could be made to be quite flexable/programmable.

--- Solosko, Robert B (Bob) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It seems to me that the K2 does everything I want it to do from a feature and
 performance point of view - where it's lacking, as may people have said,  is
 in user ergonomics. There are just too many functions that are squeezed into
 the limited front panel to make it very easy to use. While I haven't yet
 hooked my K2 to a computer, it looks like a number of the programs that work
 with the K2 effectively expand the front panel with more push buttons and
 controls. But since I don't want to have to haul a laptop with me when I
 travel with my K2, what I would like is not another bigger (and more
 expensive) K2+ or K3 but a simple, and small front panel extension box...
 perhaps something about the size of a KX-1. This box would have separate push
 buttons for each XTAL and DSP filter and for each of the  tuning rates - that
 way I can just press a button and not have to cycle around all of the
 different choices to get to the one that I want. And, each button would have
 a built in L!
  ED that would light to indicate which button I pushed so that the choice is
 immediately obvious. This front panel extension box could also have a number
 of buttons for other functions that now require several menu steps, such as
 turning the DSP noise filter on and off, displaying the clock, etc. It can
 also have separate LED indicators to indicate when the RIT is on, when the
 XIT is on, etc. The box wouldn't duplicate any of the functions that are now
 directly available on the K2 front panel but would make it much easier to get
 to the frequently used functions that require multiple pushes of a button or
 multiple menus. 
 
 The nice thing about such a front panel extension, besides making the K2 much
 more user friendly, and being small and light enough to take along, is that
 it could be easily implemented with a small processor that interfaces to the
 K2 via the remote K2 commands through the KIO2. 
 
 So, would you buy such a front panel extension? How much would this go toward
 satisfying your desire for a K2+ or a K3, and how much would you be willing
 to pay for it?
 
 Bob W1SRB
 
 P.S. I sent this idea to Wayne and Eric several months ago.
 
 
   . 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fred (FL)
 Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 3:13 PM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?
 
 
 I feel, all Elecraft needs to consider - is creating
 a 2007 version of the K2, updated with 2006
 technology, 2006 microelectronics, better display,
 and a few bells and whistles to play with.
 
 What the HOO  bigger knobs, larger front
 panel to boot.  
 
 Call it the K2+ or K2MKII or K207  IMHO many
 new and previous K2 owners would buy it.  Consider
 how many auto owners upgrade to buy the latest
 VERSION of their favorite auto.  Happens every day.
 Unfortunately, in the U.S. auto industry - NEW
 MODELS may contain less features, and less
 quality. Ala no chrome, no metal bumpers, no
 HP, no 8 cylinders, no oil pressure 
 
 If Elecraft told me I could buy the K2+ or K207
 - why wouldn't I want one?
 
 And this would give the Elecraft principals - more
 memory to play around in, and more technology to
 beef up the performance even more.  Its a win,
 win.
 
 Thanks,
 Fred
 N3CSY
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread David Toepfer
Brilliant idea!  I would buy one, without question.

David, k3tue
.

--- Solosko, Robert B (Bob) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't want to have to haul a laptop with me when I travel with my K2,
 what I would like is [...] a simple, and small front panel extension box...
 [...]
 So, would you buy such a front panel extension? How much would this go toward
 satisfying your desire for a K2+ or a K3, and how much would you be willing
 to pay for it?

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-28 Thread Tony Morgan

Exactly Keith,
You need that $1100 to put towards the new Elecraft amp!

73
Tony W7GO
- Original Message - 
From: Darwin, Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?


Bob, that's a GREAT idea.  As I think about it, I realize ...

I DON'T WANT A K3.

There, I said it.  I don't want a K3, I just want an larger and more
spread out UI for the K2.  I want a new front panel, bigger case, bigger
knobs.

BUT that ruins the K2 for portable use, now doesn't it.

So, your approach of a K2 docking station may be the better answer.
Plug in to the thingy and you have a larger UI.  Unplug and your rig is
still portable.  No PC to lug around.  Now combine the large UI panel
with the 100 watt PA in a single case and it gets cooler yet!

How much?  I guess I'm willing to spend $250 or so on a new front panel
thingy.  I'm not willing to spend $1100 on a new rig. 


- Keith KD1E -
- K2 5411 -


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] wherefore art thou, K3?

2006-08-27 Thread Stephen W. Kercel

Doug:

Discussions about a prospective K3 have always 
struck me as a bit curious. I'm not sure just 
what it is that people are looking for. I get the 
impression that you're talking about more 
operational features rather than improved engineering characteristics.


As you note, there are lots of wish lists of 
features, but probably not enough overlap among 
the lists to create a market for a rig with a 
single list of extra features for which all the 
wishers are willing to pay an extra $1200.


The closest you come to specifying how a K3 might 
differ from a K2 is that a K3 would be two K2s in 
a common box, and a bit of hardware to make them run smoothly in concert.


Rather than come up with something like that, 
maybe the N4PY strategy is a better solution for 
the serious contester. Buy two K2s and tack them 
together with a contest box containing the 
interfacing electronics. If there are that many 
people looking to run two K2s simultaneously, 
perhaps Elecraft could develop a contest box 
accessory specifically for that purpose.


I would also comment that those $10K radios tend 
to be a human factors nightmare. There are so 
many features that human cognition is literally 
overwhelmed by all the possibilities. I suspect 
that the serious contester using one of these 
fancy rigs identifies (probably unconscioiusly) 
the features actually needed (with perception of 
what is needed varying among operators) for 
contest operating, arranges things (with perhaps 
some very tricky programming ahead of time) to 
bring those few needed features to the fore, and ignores everything else.


As you mentioned, SDRs are the wave of the 
future, but for go for blood contesting, they 
have not yet arrived. From that standpoint, it 
looks like a possible mod for the K2 would be for 
Elecraft to make the internals a bit more 
accessible to computer interaction, and let the 
aftermarket take care of the software.


73,

Steve
AA4AK









So…armed with 6 years of history, let's see what the prospects might
be for a K3.

First, what would be different than the K2?  I've seen lots of wish
lists but mostly they would be a K2 Mark II…not really strategic
thinking launched by a long range vision.  And, probably more
importantly, what would be the target market?



If the loaded K2 is $1800 (kit), I am thinking that an upgraded (whatever
that might be) K3 would at least be $3000…putting it into direct
competition with these other radios in terms of 
price.  ...And what would the selling feature be for a

K3 compared to these other radios (remember, we are talking in terms
of marketing).  Clearly, not price.


So just what would the motivation be for Elecraft to come out with a
K3?  I don't know!  I think it would be neat to smoothly be able to
conjoin a pair of K2's (either externally or within a single box).
Some say N4PY and N1MM can effectively do that.  When directly asked
about such a feature, the boyz will even direct one to N4PY (at
least they used to).  But would that be a K3?  Maybe.

I think the dream of a K3 is something necessary to the group.  I
think the reality might be something different.  I would love to be
proven wrong

de Doug KR2Q
K2/5285 ala W3FPR
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com