[Evolution-hackers] Exchange Connector folder tree
I've been searching through the archives and found a few messages relating the the Exchange Connector and the fact that it uses GNOME:Evolution:ShellComponent to manipulate the interface. Can anyone give me some examples on how this is achieved ? I'm interested in how to create the folder tree with different folder types and then to call the appropriate handler for the folder, i.e. evolution-calendar, evolution-mail, evolution-addressbook. I looked throught the code for evolution-test-component and installed it. I can see that it adds a couple of menu items to the New menu but it doesn't do anything after that. There is code that seems to do more but I can't find where to get it running. Thanks for your help Dave. ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Exchange Connector folder tree
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 11:25, Dave Kelly wrote: I've been searching through the archives and found a few messages relating the the Exchange Connector and the fact that it uses GNOME:Evolution:ShellComponent to manipulate the interface. Can anyone give me some examples on how this is achieved ? I'm interested in how to create the folder tree with different folder types and then to call the appropriate handler for the folder, i.e. evolution-calendar, evolution-mail, evolution-addressbook. Each component registers the types of folders that it handles. So to create a folder that will be handled by evolution-calendar, just use type calendar, etc. (You will of course also have to provide a calendar backend that can handle requests for your folder URLs, to provide the calendar UI with the relevant data.) -- Dan ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Calendar canvas-related crash
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 21:33, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: I don't think that's the bug. I couldn't replicate the problem with the attached program (e.g. it works fine and displays nothing). Actually, it works fine here too. So it looks like you're right, and this is a canvas issue after all :/ I found the GnomeCanvasRE item [probably] isn't being created by gnome_canvas_item_new(), so there could be a calendar item init mechanism screwing up. Let me get Evo built on 2.0 to see where the calendar is breaking. What version of libgnomecanvas are you using? I have 2.0.5. 2.1.4. But it's crashing for everyone. -- Hans Petter ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution] Installing different dictionaries for Evolution ?
Hi there, Can anybody tell me where I can find extra dictionaries for Evolution to use during spell checking. I am looking for the Afrikaans language dictionary. Kind regards, -- Leendert Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] KOVAC Technologies (Pty) Ltd. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Confused about trash folders
Thank you for your answer, Eric! In this case there are at least two persons being patient... :-)) Timm On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 23:32, Eric Lambart wrote: Unfortunately not, though there have been so many requests to use a REAL Trash folder (the standard Evo one is really just a vFolder--expunge your Inbox and you also wipe out the Trash, so be careful). The developers have said that eventually they will accomodate those of us who want to use a real Trash folder... so for now I am being patient =) Eric On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 02:55, Timm Riesen wrote: Hello I am using evolution 1.2.1 for accessing my cyrus imap folders. I have an INBOX.Trash folder, but evolution seems to prefer the use of a auto-generated Trash-folder outside the imap namespace. Can I prevent this? Is it possible to configure somewhere in which folder deleted mail should be moved? kind regards Timm -- Timm Riesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Looking for info on why all viewed mail from animap server is also stored in a local file
tor, 2003-01-09 kl. 22:07 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: Is this required/expected behaviour of Evolution? yes, that is the imap message cache (you are free to rm -rf anything in there if you want, though it'd be better to not rm -f the summary file or evolution will have to do a massive re-FETCH of the message headers again - the other files are safe to delete without any repercussions except that it might take longer to load that message in the viewer the next time you open it since we will have to download it instead of reading from the cache, obviously). Actually, I'd like to do things the other way around - to be able to sync the IMAP files on the server to my notebook, so that they're there to read if i disconnect from the network. Is that possible in one operation? I haven't found such.The IMAP summary setting doesn't sync, merely reports. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw When all's said and done ... there's nothing left to say or do. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:http://www.billy.demon.nl ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Blank Lines in Signatures
I have a 3-line signature, as you see below, with only one blank line in it below my first name. Often, though not always, extra blank lines get inserted into the signature when it gets sent. Is there a way to prevent this. Lane Lane P. Lester / Madison County, Georgia Running Linux more and Windows less
[Evolution] evo 1.2 Xinerama
hi, i tested Evo 1.2 under Gentoo in the Xinerama Modus, and i saw that evo doesn`t work, he can't connect to imap Server. If i start without Xinerama, evo works. Is that a Problem from evo, or from GTK? cu denny ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] evo 1.2 Xinerama
Le ven 10/01/2003 à 13:39, Denny Schierz a écrit : hi, i tested Evo 1.2 under Gentoo in the Xinerama Modus, and i saw that evo doesn`t work, he can't connect to imap Server. If i start without Xinerama, evo works. Is that a Problem from evo, or from GTK? I use it daily in Xinerama mode accessing my IMAP server, and don't have this problem. Xav ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 15:29, Thomas J. Baker wrote: Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports the following error when Evo 1.2.1 tries to connect: connection_get(10) connection_get(10): got connid=1 connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv2/v3 read client hello A TLS: can't accept. TLS: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol s23_srvr.c:565 connection_read(10): TLS accept error error=-1 id=1, closing connection_closing: readying conn=1 sd=10 for close connection_close: conn=1 sd=10 Connecting with openssl s_client -state -debug -connect server:ldaps seems to work fine. The ldap server reports the connection so it doesn't appear to be the server. Thanks, tjb Does anyone have ldaps working? Thanks, tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Archiving Deleted Mail
I was wondering if there is any way to get the following behavior in Evolution: My mail is handled by an IMAP server. When I delete a message, I would like it to be moved to a local folder on my desktop machine so it can be archived. I've tried to come up with some type of filter that would do this but haven't been unsuccessful. Currently what I do is periodically go to the Trash folder of my IMAP account, do a Select All, do a Move to Folder and select my archive folder, then do an expunge. It sure would be nice to automate this. It would also be nice to have a Shft+Ctl+D that would simply expunge the current message and not archive it. Thanks for your help. I apologize if this topic has already been covered. I looked in the Evolution FAQ and could not find an entry that addresses my problem. -Alfred -- Alfred A. Lorber Sandia National Laboratories [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Spell Check Component Fails to start
So I've been trying to diagnose why my Spell Checker in Evolution doesn't function. I've had a few conversations with some folks on the Users list who were quite helpful but weren't able to come up with an answer. I thought I'd try this list and see if I can come up with a solution. Basically, spell checking is no longer working. It used to work just fine, but somewhere amongst the flurry of upgrades, it ceased. I suspect it had something to do with the upgrade from Redhat 7.1 to Redhat 7.2. I'm currently running Evolution 1.2.1, and all my RPM's are fully up to date: rpm -qa | grep spell: pspell-0.12.2-ximian.7 aspell-0.33.7-1 gnome-spell-0.5-1.ximian.3 Spell check doesn't work in the composer window, the language option in the Edit menu of the composer window doesn't show up, and if I go into Composer Preferences-Spell Checking, no dictionarie's are listed. If I run gnome-spell-component-0.5 by hand in a terminal window, then spell checking will suddenly start working. I can launch a composer window and the option for what language to use will appear in the Edit menu. I do, however, have to go in and unselect English, then select it again to cause the automatic spell checking to start working. If I also go into the Preferences, I see that I suddenly have an english dictionary installed. Once I send the mail off, the spell-component exits and I no longer have spell check until I manually launch another one. Another piece of evidence is that, if I run gtkhtml-properties-capplet, and cick on the Miscellaneous tab, spell-checking IS checked. However, if I click on Configure Spell Checking I get an error dialog that says Cannot execute GNOME Spell control applet. Try to install GNOME Spell if you dont' have it installed. Meanwhile, the terminal window burps up THIS error: Gnome-Message: gnome_execute_async_with_env_fds: returning -1 Anyone have any ideas? -- - Aaron Smith vox: 269.226.9550 ext.26 Network Directorfax: 269.349.9076 Nexcerpt, Inc. http://www.nexcerpt.com ...Nexcerpt... Extend Your Expertise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 09:50, Thomas J. Baker wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 15:29, Thomas J. Baker wrote: Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports the following error when Evo 1.2.1 tries to connect: connection_get(10) connection_get(10): got connid=1 connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv2/v3 read client hello A TLS: can't accept. TLS: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol s23_srvr.c:565 connection_read(10): TLS accept error error=-1 id=1, closing connection_closing: readying conn=1 sd=10 for close connection_close: conn=1 sd=10 Connecting with openssl s_client -state -debug -connect server:ldaps seems to work fine. The ldap server reports the connection so it doesn't appear to be the server. Thanks, tjb I verified that mozilla-mail could connect using ldaps so it appears that the problem is with evolution. I thought I saw that Chris said it should work. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Changing attachment viewers
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:38, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Greetings, How does one go about changing the attachment viewers? I'm having a problem with the default viewer for .tif images where the inline vier, EoG or Gimp don't show multiple pages of .tif images (which is the format I recieve my fax-by-email message with). I've tried to change the default viewers in KDE but that doesn't seem to help and I can't find any option in Evolution to change them either. Being that Evolution is a GNOME program - it uses the GNOME file-viewer preferences and not the KDE file-viewer preferences. You can find these preferences in the GNOME Control Centre (gnomecc). I think you want the one called File Types and Handlers and not the MIME Types capplet (if you see them both). Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Re: [Evolution] configuration database not found(again) in 1.2.1 PART #2
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:46, Massimiliano Bini wrote: Il mer, 2003-01-08 alle 18:10, Max Bini ha scritto: Update: evo is back again? what I have done? nothing more then a killev and killall oafd once more. Note that I've done that before, too. When things fail, you should try running `killev' and then run `wombat' on the command line and see if it prints something useful. (If it doesn't, try running Evolution from a different terminal as well.) Did you compile Evolution yourself? -- Ettore Perazzoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Address book import
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:48, Dave Finnegan wrote: Is it possible to import a comma separated value file into the contacts db? Not presently, no. It would be nice to have though... -- Ettore Perazzoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Archive
Is there a mailing list archive? I missed how to setup the euro, wasn't paying attention :( -- Hans Scheffers http://www.jiffie.nl/stamboom/ The UPS is on strike. Linux Kernel 2.4.18-19 on a i686 - userid 282784 @ http://counter.li.org ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Images again
libgtkhtml1.1-3 and libgtkhtml20 are different parallel-installable versions of the shared libraries, intended so that applications that need different versions (e.g. evolution and gnucash) can use the versions they need. Shouldn't be a problem. -Mark Gordon On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 01:04, Willem wrote: I just looked, and found that there are two different libgtkhtml's installed on my system. These are LibGtkHtml 1.1-3 and LibGtkHtml20 Does thid have something todo with it, maybe? Thnx, Willem On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:05, Willem wrote: Hi Larry, It happens as soon as I insert it in a message. The only thing I see, is the placeholder, a square box in my letter. My gdk lib is okay, as far as I can tell. The funny thing is, before, with the old version of Evolution, I had no problem at all. Willem. On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 09:02, Larry Ewing wrote: No idea why this would happen the image code is the same for all image types. When does it start breaking? Does it fail to display them while editing, or fail to send them? Make sure your gdk-pixbuf packages are up to date. --Larry On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 10:20, Willem wrote: Hi, Isn't there anybody out there, that is able to give me a hint, as why I can't put gif, png and bmp pictures into email? The only thing that works is jpeg, so what lib or extra files am I missing here? I'm running Mandrake 9, and updated only Evolution with Red Carpet. thnx, Willem Nellen -- Willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Euro sign in Evi 1.2
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 12:33, Alexandre Aractingi wrote: Le mer 08/01/2003 à 17:40, Ettore Perazzoli a écrit : You can try to check your GtkHTML font settings in the GNOME Control Center and make sure you are using a font that has the Euro symbol in it... (In practice, check that the charset is ISO-8859-15.) Thanks for your answer! My fonts are Helvetica and Courier, and they both have support for the ISO-8859-15 charset. The weird thing is the euro sign prints correctly in apps like GEdit... Yeah but GEdit uses the GTK font setting, Evolution uses the GtkHTML one. BTW I should have said change the font settings in Evolution, not in GNOME Control Center (sorry, I was living in 1.0.x times when I wrote that for some reason :-))... -- Ettore Perazzoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Euro sign in Evi 1.2
Le ven 10/01/2003 à 17:16, Ettore Perazzoli a écrit : Yeah but GEdit uses the GTK font setting, Evolution uses the GtkHTML one. BTW I should have said change the font settings in Evolution, not in GNOME Control Center (sorry, I was living in 1.0.x times when I wrote that for some reason :-))... Ah, it works nice now! Can you see my euros :-) ?? ¤ I'm happy! Thanks! -- Alexandre Aractingi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker: Does anyone have ldaps working? Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley 4.1.24 backend). I can't depend on it, and have to permanently disable it, since I'm too bad-tempered to put up with the sporadic barfs.. Just as I have to with Evo with WU-IMAP snapshot. Also applies to TLS, on these two. Whereas Evo smtp TLS and CRAM-MD5 always works. However, my Exim 4.12 smtp server also relies on SSL ldap for absolutely everything, as do Horde's CVS Turba and Imp - and they *always* work without exception; so there's nothing wrong with my SSL/TLS setup, certificates, nothing. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw When all's said and done ... there's nothing left to say or do. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:http://www.billy.demon.nl ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:04, Tony Earnshaw wrote: fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker: Does anyone have ldaps working? Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley 4.1.24 backend). I can't depend on it, and have to permanently disable it, since I'm too bad-tempered to put up with the sporadic barfs.. Just as I have to with Evo with WU-IMAP snapshot. Also applies to TLS, on these two. Whereas Evo smtp TLS and CRAM-MD5 always works. that's because OpenLDAP libs use OpenSSL and libsasl, whereas evo-mail uses Mozilla's NSS for SSL and my own custom SASL library that I designed while drunk and implemented in a day or 2 /shameless plug :-) However, my Exim 4.12 smtp server also relies on SSL ldap for absolutely everything, as do Horde's CVS Turba and Imp - and they *always* work without exception; so there's nothing wrong with my SSL/TLS setup, certificates, nothing. Best, Tony -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:04, Tony Earnshaw wrote: fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker: Does anyone have ldaps working? Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley 4.1.24 backend). I can't depend on it, and have to permanently disable it, since I'm too bad-tempered to put up with the sporadic barfs.. Just as I have to with Evo with WU-IMAP snapshot. Also applies to TLS, on these two. Whereas Evo smtp TLS and CRAM-MD5 always works. that's because OpenLDAP libs use OpenSSL and libsasl, whereas evo-mail uses Mozilla's NSS for SSL and my own custom SASL library that I designed while drunk and implemented in a day or 2 /shameless plug :-) you may, of course, be right :) At least about the ssl cruft.. although my attempts at setting up sasl for openldap here have met with extremely poor results (i was also drunk at the time too. hm). toshok ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Exchange 2000
Jason - There are many many feature requests for Evolution in bugzilla.ximian.com. Most have a severity of Wishlist. You can search these and add yourself to be CC-ed list to be notified every time the bug is changed. If you cannot find a bug report that matches what you are looking for, you can enter a new bug and if a duplicate is located, your bug will be closed and linked to the original - where you also get notified. Hope this helps! -Christine On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:48, Jason Frisvold wrote: Excellent... Does the Ximian bugzilla handle the feature requests? ie, can I peruse them? :) On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 12:25, Christine McLellan wrote: Jason - Ok, so this is a feature request for a future release. Probably see enhancements to the Filter UI toward the middle of the year or later, but we do have plans to make improvements that should meet your needs. Thanks, -Christine On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 12:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Nah, it needs to be done manually. Jeff On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 11:08, Christine McLellan wrote: Sorry, I don't know of a way to make this happen automatically on a specific folder. Perhaps Jeff knows some undocumented way to accomplish this? On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 09:57, Jason Frisvold wrote: So it's purely manual... No automated way of doing it? Outlook handles this automatically, so I was hoping evo would as well.. On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 09:41, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: In the filters dialog, add a new filter and fill it out as follows: If: [Date received][is before][1 month ago] Then: [Delete] then, whatever folder you want to run it on... select that folder, then Edit-Select All and then do Actions-Apply Filters. Jeff On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 09:31, Jason Frisvold wrote: Can I assume that the lack of responses on this is due to the inability to do something like this? On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 12:25, Jason Frisvold wrote: So how would one go about setting up a filter to do something like ... delete all messages older than one month in the recentstuff folder ?? I can see how to delete messages older than one month, but isn't that only in the inbox? (This is not using vfolders, btw... I'm not to keen of vfolders) On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 09:52, Christine McLellan wrote: Not at this time. However, if you have or create a server-side filter from Outlook on a Windows system, it will continue to run while you re using Evolution. The alternative in Evolution is to use (locally stored) Filters to process the messages while Evolution is running. I just would not recommend you using both Exchange server filters and Evolution filters - if you were not careful the filters could stomp on each other. On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 08:49, Jason Frisvold wrote: Greetings all, Is there any way to interact with the stored filters on an exchange 2000 server? I can always jump to a windows machine and make the changes there, but I was hoping I could do the same thing within evolution I'm specifically looking for the ability to delete messages older than a certain date in specific folders Can evolution do this?
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
I do here. Well, I just fixed a post-1.2.1 regression that was keeping it from working, but 1.2.1 should work.. Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636? Here's my server output (with my latest patch): connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read client hello A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server hello A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write certificate A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server done A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv3 read client certificate A TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv3 read client certificate A connection_get(9): got connid=0 connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0 TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read client key exchange A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read finished A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write change cipher spec A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write finished A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data Chris On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 06:50, Thomas J. Baker wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 15:29, Thomas J. Baker wrote: Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports the following error when Evo 1.2.1 tries to connect: connection_get(10) connection_get(10): got connid=1 connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv2/v3 read client hello A TLS: can't accept. TLS: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol s23_srvr.c:565 connection_read(10): TLS accept error error=-1 id=1, closing connection_closing: readying conn=1 sd=10 for close connection_close: conn=1 sd=10 Connecting with openssl s_client -state -debug -connect server:ldaps seems to work fine. The ldap server reports the connection so it doesn't appear to be the server. Thanks, tjb Does anyone have ldaps working? Thanks, tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:27, Chris Toshok wrote: I do here. Well, I just fixed a post-1.2.1 regression that was keeping it from working, but 1.2.1 should work.. Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636? Here's my server output (with my latest patch): connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read client hello A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server hello A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write certificate A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server done A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv3 read client certificate A TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv3 read client certificate A connection_get(9): got connid=0 connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0 TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read client key exchange A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read finished A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write change cipher spec A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write finished A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data Chris That looks like the log when I connect with mozilla-mail. I tried using 389/Always and 636 (Always greyed out). Neither seem to work for me. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Spell Check Component Fails to start
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 12:53, Yves Bajard wrote: No, working in Konsole (in root), I typed the first command suggested by Rick: # rpm -qa ! grep spell And here is the answer I got: aspell-da-1.4.22-2 gnome-spell-o.5-1.ximian.3 aspell-devel-0.33.7.1-9 aspell-en-ca-0.33.7.1-9 aspell-es-0.2.8 aspell-fr.1-1 pspell-0.12.2-8 pspell-devel-0.12.2-8 My scant understanding of Linux is that: -qa in the command means question and answer -qa is the same as -q -a, which is the same as --query --all. It lists all the packages you have installed. Piping through grep allows you to perform regular expressions on the output, e.g. list all installed packages that have the spell string in them. grep may means go and fetch data g/re/p, Globally search for Regular Expression and Print. ed(1) syntax, very old. Am I understanding this correctly? It comes out the same. In the answer, I understand that I have in my filesystem (how do I find where they are?) e.g.: rpm -ql aspell-en-ca , aspell files (are they programs or data?)for Danish, Spanish, Canadian English, and French, which are my four operating languages. I do not have the American English aspell and my various dictionaries or spell check programs are of different ages (if I read their numbering OK). On Red Hat, there is no separate aspell-en package; what would be its contents are in the regular aspell package. Other distros (e.g. a certain French one and a certain German one) have aspell-en packages, which makes sense for French and German distros. Now, I hesistate about what to do next. Should I rpm the aspell programs separately? How do I get the gnome-spell-0.5-1.ximian.4, instead of my older file? How do I activated my aspells etc..? How do I get the spell check to work on my current ximian evolution, which is 1.2.0., untio I sort out Mark Gordon's instructions adn advice (Thanks, Mark) about how to get on to Red Carpet and download 1.2.1.? One significant difference between your system and mine at this point is the pspell package. I have pspell-0.12.2-ximian.7. And wher do I get a tutorial explaining in plain English how toadminster my system, where the authors are really clear about the starting points in taking on the tasks (for example, telling us where from we start from on the konsole, rather than assuming we know it already)(I am wading through O'ReillY,s latest publication of Running Linux, a very good book, but sometimes arcane..) I liked Running Linux back when I read it, about five years ago. I'm not sure there is one perfect source on all information. I still end up googling for things I don't know, mostly when trying to set up exotic new hardware. Sorry for a long post, bu i ahve quite a few questions adn feel somehwhat stupid when I read explanations given by people who think I am at their (unstated) starting point when I am not.. Yves Bajard -Mark Gordon ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?
Lane is right. It is inefficient and a time waster and I don't buy any of the excuses I got to my similar previous post. (the suggestion was that maybe the poster is not a list member -- nonsense) Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject treats its Reply to List feature as Reply to All. There should be a difference. On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 22:41, simran wrote: Not that i use the feature myself... but i can see why its there. Oftentimes, people filter based on the to address... i have filters saying ... if i'm on the 'To' or 'Cc' fields, then move it to the read properly folder... On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 12:40, Lane P. Lester wrote: I fail to understand the logic by which Reply to List generates replies to both the author and the list. After all, the author is subscribed to the list and will thereby receive two copies of the reply. Why doesn't the function simply put the list address in the To field? Lane Lane P. Lester / Madison County, Georgia Running Linux more and Windows less ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Arthur S. Alexion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arthur S. Alexion LLC ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 19:27 skrev Chris Toshok: Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636? Here's my server output (with my latest patch): Hmmm ... what (Openldap?) version is that, and what debug level? It doesn't tell me anything, compared to the debug output I know from 2.1.x at -d-1. What you quote doesn't show anything, simply that there's been an exchange between server and client. Either can reject, at that stage. I had to debug my own in the beginning, when the CA certificate / server-client exchange wasn't working. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw When all's said and done ... there's nothing left to say or do. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:http://www.billy.demon.nl ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:02, Tony Earnshaw wrote: fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 19:27 skrev Chris Toshok: Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636? Here's my server output (with my latest patch): Hmmm ... what (Openldap?) version is that, and what debug level? It doesn't tell me anything, compared to the debug output I know from 2.1.x at -d-1. What you quote doesn't show anything, simply that there's been an exchange between server and client. Either can reject, at that stage. I had to debug my own in the beginning, when the CA certificate / server-client exchange wasn't working. Best, Tony I'm using 2.0.25 from Red Hat 8.0 and the debug level was 5. I'm using a self signed certificate. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:23, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject treats its Reply to List feature as Reply to All. There should be a difference. Eh? This message is a result of Reply to List, and it contains only a single To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] header. Reply to All results in two headers (To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Looks like a significant difference to me. FWIW, I'm running evo 1.2.1 on a debain testing-ish system. Are you running an older version? Cheers! -- Brett Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - i n v e n t - ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Euro sign in Evi 1.2
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 17:23 skrev Alexandre Aractingi: Le ven 10/01/2003 à 17:16, Ettore Perazzoli a écrit : Yeah but GEdit uses the GTK font setting, Evolution uses the GtkHTML one. BTW I should have said change the font settings in Evolution, not in GNOME Control Center (sorry, I was living in 1.0.x times when I wrote that for some reason :-))... Ah, it works nice now! Can you see my euros :-) ?? ¤ I'm happy! Thanks! Et moi, je vois la même chose, mais je ne suis tout à fait pas heureux comme tu. J'ai seulement l'Euro en Bureau Vide (OOo). Sentiments, Antoine For those who do not understand French, neither do I. So, I see the same thing too, but I'm not at all as happy as you. I can only get the Euro in Open Office (OOo). -- Tony Earnshaw When all's said and done ... there's nothing left to say or do. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:http://www.billy.demon.nl ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 22:05 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
I'm using 2.0.25 from Red Hat 8.0 and the debug level was 5. I'm using a
self signed certificate.
Might work (I don't know 2.0.x at all, started with 2.1.2), but with
later Openldap versions you'd do better to make or buy a CA certificate
(Openssl, if you have Apache/mod_ssl or FreeS/WAN IPSEC, there's very
good documentation on how to make a CA cert and CRL cert) and sign with
that. Put it somewhere where all clients have read access and make sure
it agrees wih the host's FQDN ('hostname -f', in /etc/hosts, not 'uname
-n').
Best,
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw
When all's said and done ...
there's nothing left to say or do.
e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www:http://www.billy.demon.nl
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?
1.2.1, also, and this is a Reply to list, too. I think I have it narrowed down. If the original message was addressed to the list only, then Reply to List works. But if the 'original' message was a Reply to All with the sender in the To field, and the list in the cc field, then, even a Reply to list results in both the sender and the list as addressees. On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:17, Brett Johnson wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:23, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject treats its Reply to List feature as Reply to All. There should be a difference. Eh? This message is a result of Reply to List, and it contains only a single To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] header. Reply to All results in two headers (To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Looks like a significant difference to me. FWIW, I'm running evo 1.2.1 on a debain testing-ish system. Are you running an older version? Cheers! -- Arthur S. Alexion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arthur S. Alexion LLC ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
Yeah, I didn't really want to post a huge debug log, so I used -d 1. OpenLDAP 2.0.27. And yeah, it was bloody painful to get the thing set up and working (sasl looks to be another round of the fun too, maybe it's time to upgrade to 2.1 on the server side). I seem to recall someone having similar problems setting up ldap to work with evolution because of some problem with one of the .pem files... lemme grep my irc stuff, I'm sure I saved it. I don't think they had it working with any client though, so things might be different here. Chris On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:02, Tony Earnshaw wrote: fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 19:27 skrev Chris Toshok: Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636? Here's my server output (with my latest patch): Hmmm ... what (Openldap?) version is that, and what debug level? It doesn't tell me anything, compared to the debug output I know from 2.1.x at -d-1. What you quote doesn't show anything, simply that there's been an exchange between server and client. Either can reject, at that stage. I had to debug my own in the beginning, when the CA certificate / server-client exchange wasn't working. Best, Tony ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Re: [Evolution] configuration database not found(again) in 1.2.1 PART #2
Il ven, 2003-01-10 alle 17:19, Ettore Perazzoli ha scritto: On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:46, Massimiliano Bini wrote: Il mer, 2003-01-08 alle 18:10, Max Bini ha scritto: Update: evo is back again? what I have done? nothing more then a killev and killall oafd once more. Note that I've done that before, too. When things fail, you should try running `killev' and then run `wombat' on the command line and see if it prints something useful. (If it doesn't, try running Evolution from a different terminal as well.) Did you compile Evolution yourself? No, it's redcarpet's one. In the while I've found my problem: I've put env var in the wrong place so when X starts run oafd without correct settings. Thank you anyway Max -- Massimiliano Bini [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
I have a self signed cert as well, and when I use mozilla I get the
Website Certified by Unknown Authority window.. Things work from
evolution though, without any warnings/errors.. I'd really like to add
that mozilla dialog's functionality into the evolution addressbook but
I'm not sure it's even possible when using openldap.
Another option, of course, is porting evolution to use netscape's ldap
sdk, and therefore nss.. then the mailer and addressbook would be using
the same ssl library instead of the mess we have now :)
Chris
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:49, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 22:05 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
I'm using 2.0.25 from Red Hat 8.0 and the debug level was 5. I'm using a
self signed certificate.
Might work (I don't know 2.0.x at all, started with 2.1.2), but with
later Openldap versions you'd do better to make or buy a CA certificate
(Openssl, if you have Apache/mod_ssl or FreeS/WAN IPSEC, there's very
good documentation on how to make a CA cert and CRL cert) and sign with
that. Put it somewhere where all clients have read access and make sure
it agrees wih the host's FQDN ('hostname -f', in /etc/hosts, not 'uname
-n').
Best,
Tony
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Problem subscribing to shared IMAP folders
Using Courier IMAP 1.6.2 and Evolution 1.2.1. I created a shared IMAP folder and am able to subscribe and access it properly with Mozilla. The folder in question is: shared.its.test. The subscribe dialog in Evolution does not by default show the shared tree; it only shows what's under INBOX. Evolution is set to use the default namespace provided by the server. If I select the display option Folders whose names begin with and type shared., then it shows the shared branch. If I expand that, it shows its, but that is not an expandable branch -- in other words, there is no 'test' subfolder from that as there should be. I cannot subscribe to 'its' -- clicking the Subscribe button does nothing. The weird thing is that this _was_ working earlier today. After I subscribed to the folder with Mozilla, evolution picked it up okay. But suddenly it stopped working, and now I can't even see the subfolder 'test' at all in the subscriptions dialog. It continues to work fine with Mozilla mail. Any advice? I just started experimenting with shared folders, so I'm open to the possibility that I've done something wrong, which is why I'm asking here before filing a bug. So far I've been fairly unimpressed by the lack of support for shared folders in most mail clients. Evolution at least has Post a message and Post a reply options a la Outlook, but Netscape 4 and Mozilla mail remain anemic in this area. Thanks for any help, Jason. -- Jason Tackaberry :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 705-949-2301 x330 Academic Computing Support Specialist Information Technology Services Algoma University College :: www.auc.ca ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Problem subscribing to shared IMAP folders
We do not currently support multiple namespaces. Jeff On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 18:45, Jason Tackaberry wrote: Using Courier IMAP 1.6.2 and Evolution 1.2.1. I created a shared IMAP folder and am able to subscribe and access it properly with Mozilla. The folder in question is: shared.its.test. The subscribe dialog in Evolution does not by default show the shared tree; it only shows what's under INBOX. Evolution is set to use the default namespace provided by the server. If I select the display option Folders whose names begin with and type shared., then it shows the shared branch. If I expand that, it shows its, but that is not an expandable branch -- in other words, there is no 'test' subfolder from that as there should be. I cannot subscribe to 'its' -- clicking the Subscribe button does nothing. The weird thing is that this _was_ working earlier today. After I subscribed to the folder with Mozilla, evolution picked it up okay. But suddenly it stopped working, and now I can't even see the subfolder 'test' at all in the subscriptions dialog. It continues to work fine with Mozilla mail. Any advice? I just started experimenting with shared folders, so I'm open to the possibility that I've done something wrong, which is why I'm asking here before filing a bug. So far I've been fairly unimpressed by the lack of support for shared folders in most mail clients. Evolution at least has Post a message and Post a reply options a la Outlook, but Netscape 4 and Mozilla mail remain anemic in this area. Thanks for any help, Jason. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?
No, the problem is that you are using Reply-to-List on the message that was Cc'd to you and didn't pass through the mailing-list software and thus does NOT have the mailing-list headers that Evolution checks for. If you Reply-to-List on a message and Evolution can't figure out what list it was to, it reverts to Reply-to-All instead. Jeff On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 18:12, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: 1.2.1, also, and this is a Reply to list, too. I think I have it narrowed down. If the original message was addressed to the list only, then Reply to List works. But if the 'original' message was a Reply to All with the sender in the To field, and the list in the cc field, then, even a Reply to list results in both the sender and the list as addressees. On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:17, Brett Johnson wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:23, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject treats its Reply to List feature as Reply to All. There should be a difference. Eh? This message is a result of Reply to List, and it contains only a single To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] header. Reply to All results in two headers (To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Looks like a significant difference to me. FWIW, I'm running evo 1.2.1 on a debain testing-ish system. Are you running an older version? Cheers! -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Problem subscribing to shared IMAP folders
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: We do not currently support multiple namespaces. Guess that explains it (except for the part where it was sort of working for a little while.) Is this feature targeted for any specific future version? Thanks, Jason. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Sync with Toshiba e570...?
One of my customers has a Toshiba e570 and wants to know if it will sync with Evolution (or with linux at all). TIA! -- Sat Jan 11 12:10:00 EST 2003 12:10pm up 14:21, 3 users, load average: 0.12, 0.24, 0.31 -- |____ | kuhn media australia| | / ,, /| |'-. | http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | |=| | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' | stephen kuhn| | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | |/ ._/ || | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | |'. `\ | | |icq: 5483808 | | ;/ / | | | | | smk ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389| | ' `-`' | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU | -- * linux user:267497 * RH 7.3+ * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting -- Fourth Law of Applied Terror: The night before the English History mid-term, your Biology instructor will assign 200 pages on planaria. Corollary: Every instructor assumes that you have nothing else to do except study for that instructor's course. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Problem subscribing to shared IMAP folders
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:14, Jason Tackaberry wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: We do not currently support multiple namespaces. Guess that explains it (except for the part where it was sort of working for a little while.) Is this feature targeted for any specific future version? probably about the time we rewrite the imap plugin :-) Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?
I missed the beginning of this thread, so this may have been answered already. Is there any way to have a Reply to List button in the tool bar? IMO the ideal would be to have the button only show up for messages that came from a list server, but given that that may be difficult or look odd (button appearing/disappearing as different messages are selected), I would be happy to just be able to put the button into the tool bar and have it not work or do the Reply to All functionality that the menu selection currently has. /dwight -- Dwight N. Tovey Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dtovey.net/dwight --- Why are they called apartments when they are all stuck together? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Problem subscribing to shared IMAP folders
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: We do not currently support multiple namespaces. Oddly enough, if I override the server-supplied namespace and leave the field blank, things appear to work correctly. I can see both INBOX. and shared. namespaces. I guess I can expect odd behaviours since it's not officially supported. But still, at least it's something. Jason. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 17:35, Dwight Tovey wrote: I missed the beginning of this thread, so this may have been answered already. Is there any way to have a Reply to List button in the tool bar? IMO the ideal would be to have the button only show up for messages that came from a list server, but given that that may be difficult or look odd (button appearing/disappearing as different messages are selected), I would be happy to just be able to put the button into the tool bar and have it not work or do the Reply to All functionality that the menu selection currently has. Yup, see http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=34608 for the patch. It's easy enough to make it an addition to the toolbar instead of a replacement. Greg -- Gregory Leblanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Cannot create new messages
I have Evolution 1.2.1-1ximian installed on a Libranet 2.7 (Debian Woody) machine. It has worked without incident since I installed it about a week ago. However, tonight I was in the process of sending a few messages out and was copying text from one message to another (cut paste) when on about the second message Evolution froze. I could not do anything to exit the program and finally had to perform a 'killev' from the terminal. Since, that time I have started Evolution again (twice). I can navigate my various folders (IMAP POP) and view their contents. However, when I either select a 'Reply To:' email link or select the New-Mail Message option from the toolbar, Evolution freezes. Any way to recover from this without having to reinstall Evolution? Thanks for assistance. -Trey -- Trey Sizemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 23:35, Chris Toshok wrote: I have a self signed cert as well, and when I use mozilla I get the Website Certified by Unknown Authority window.. Things work from evolution though, without any warnings/errors.. I'd really like to add that mozilla dialog's functionality into the evolution addressbook but I'm not sure it's even possible when using openldap. Another option, of course, is porting evolution to use netscape's ldap sdk, and therefore nss.. then the mailer and addressbook would be using the same ssl library instead of the mess we have now :) I am voting for the latter ! Soeren. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
