NDR for specific domain
Hi all A couple of days ago, I set up a SMTP connector on my E2K SP3 server so that I can block external email access for some users. I configured it as per the MS document and all seemed to be working fine. Today though, no-one seems to be able to send mail to one particular domain. We have a very standard installation and I have checked every place I can think of to see if someone has configured anything incorrectly but cannot find anything. The message I get is as follows: * Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test email - please ignore Sent: 6/03/2003 14:44 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/03/2003 14:51 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. ... Relaying denied> I thought this might be an issue at their end (as it only seems to be happening for the one domain) but I sent a test message from hotmail and it did not bounce. I know this looks like a permissions issue but as I say, I have checked every setting I can think of. Any ideas Thanks in advance. Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading -- NT4 PDC w/ Exchange 5.5 to Win2k w/ Exchange2k
I have a client that has 1 server. It's a PDC running NT4 and exchange5.5. They just bought a new windows 2000 server and want to migrate from the old server to the new one(they want the old server gone). Any ideas? I know how to migrate a NT4 PDC to a Windows 2000 DC. And I know how to migrate a 5.5 box to a exchange 2k box, but I have no idea how to do both at the same time on the same box... Thanks in advance . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rules Wizard Client/Server rules
Hi all, I am looking for a way to export Rules in Outlook. I need to amend a rule on a particular mailbox hosted on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 Server. When I open Rules Wizard (with Outlook 2000 SR-1), I am prompted to make a selection between keeping the Client or Server rules on the machine (Q287640). Since I did not set up this mailbox, I do not know what rules have been created, and am apprehensive about losing rules I do not know about. It is an administrative mailbox with a rule to email reports to particular recipients, and therefore I suspect that I should select to keep the Server-side rules (I understand that Client-side rules require the client to be running). Articles I have seen that suggest using the Rules Wizard Export feature do not help, as I cannot get past the select Server / Client prompt to use the Export feature. This is the case in Outlook 2000 and 2002. I attempted to use EXMERGE to try and get the messages and rules out to PST, but saw no rules in the exported version. (Have also seen many articles discussing the dubious nature of this feature.) Any help appreciated, Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mail routing question
This is done on the SMTP virtual server. Out of the box, only authenticated users are allowed to relay. You can allow an IP or group of IPs to relay on the relay restrictions button I believe. On 3/5/03 21:20, "Jerry J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In 5.5 I was able to lock the system down so that no one could route mail > other than my internal network. But at the same time I was able to have a > computer in another state on a different network connect and send an > e-mail to everyone on our network at all was fine, everyone got the e-mail > from the computer out of state. But as soon as I added an outside address > to the list of our internal addresses the entire message would fail with > relaying restricted. But I was able to add that particular domain as a > always relay list. So at this point if anyone tried to relay and had any > domains listed that were not either my local domain or the one domain > listed it would fail and all was well. > How do I do that on 2k? I am in a real bind here. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade problem 5.5 > 2k
Ah... Forgot to run NTDSNoMatch eh? You can disconnect a mailbox and connect it to another. Then disconnect the disabled mailbox enabled user account which has your mailbox and connect it to your own. On 3/5/03 19:43, "Jerry J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, upgraded our 5.5 server to 2k. everyone seems to be fine except me. > The problem is that it pointed my user to a different mailbox. This > mailbox is just for daily delivery of data files so no one else is > affected. But, it gave me its e-mail address and alias, everything but the > logon name. The account that I got now has no e-mail address. This I can > fix but how can I get my mailbox back? Or am I screwed? The original 5.5 > server got the upgrade so everything should be there but how can I link > back to it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail routing question
In 5.5 I was able to lock the system down so that no one could route mail other than my internal network. But at the same time I was able to have a computer in another state on a different network connect and send an e-mail to everyone on our network at all was fine, everyone got the e-mail from the computer out of state. But as soon as I added an outside address to the list of our internal addresses the entire message would fail with relaying restricted. But I was able to add that particular domain as a always relay list. So at this point if anyone tried to relay and had any domains listed that were not either my local domain or the one domain listed it would fail and all was well. How do I do that on 2k? I am in a real bind here. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrade problem 5.5 > 2k
Ok, upgraded our 5.5 server to 2k. everyone seems to be fine except me. The problem is that it pointed my user to a different mailbox. This mailbox is just for daily delivery of data files so no one else is affected. But, it gave me its e-mail address and alias, everything but the logon name. The account that I got now has no e-mail address. This I can fix but how can I get my mailbox back? Or am I screwed? The original 5.5 server got the upgrade so everything should be there but how can I link back to it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange & NAV crash diag
Replace NAV with something else? Be sure NAV is running at the current version with most current patches. Escalate the problem with their support. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich III Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange & NAV crash diag >From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Completely uninstall NAV and see if things come back up... Sorry for not making this clear, I'm up and running now. I'm just wondering what went wrong so I can prevent it from happening again -- problems that go away on their own come back on their own. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Contacts to OWA Clients
I imagine you could use Web Folders and save the contact into those -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Contacts to OWA Clients We have a group of about 25 OWA clients that we would like to send a Contact file to. Is there a way they can import that contact file into their contacts folder? In Outlook you can just drag and drop, but I can't seem to figure out how to do it in OWA. We are running Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000. Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Contacts to OWA Clients
OWA is still not Outlook. Not even in Exchange 2003. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Contacts to OWA Clients We have a group of about 25 OWA clients that we would like to send a Contact file to. Is there a way they can import that contact file into their contacts folder? In Outlook you can just drag and drop, but I can't seem to figure out how to do it in OWA. We are running Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000. Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Limits [was Re: OOO...]
Possibly an offshoot of the inability to accurately report mailbox sizes over 2GB in the UI? On 3/5/03 14:24, "Matt Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is > the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would > you really want to have a user synching a 2 GB file over a 56k dial-up > line... > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I doubt that a burglar would leave a personal message telling the victim how he knew of the absence. I never have claimed that this has happened. But you apply lots of patches to close vulnerabilities that have never been exploited, no? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allison M. Wittstock Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has been emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train tickets, etc. This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking site, Snopes. The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this happening. Cheers, Allison On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: > The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the > following: > > Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France > until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at > 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. > If you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your > friends! > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this > still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" available > out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively > with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Technically, that's a problem with Rules, as opposed to Out of Office, even if the rules are under the Out of Office Wizard. The risks with allowing rules, i.e. automatic replies or forwards to the Internet, as you have described are numerous and dangerous. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick R. Sweeney Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? Ok, so here goes my OOO horror story. First off, this is not straight on point because it involved an older Outlook client, Exchange 5.5, and a quick hack for a user that I shouldn't have done -- but I didn't know it at the time. 1. We upgraded to Exchange 5.5 and got some complaints because some folks auto-reply rules weren't working. So I enabled it. 2. We had a consultant leave, and as was normal and expected at this particular firm left him with email and allowed him to set up a rule to auto-forward his email to an outside address, and auto-reply to incoming messages. 3. The consultant in question popped back after a few days later and complained about the format of the forwarded messages, commenting that they were difficult to respond to since they appeared to be from his account. Now a custom recipient would have been perfect for this purpose, but not knowing that, and knowing the Inbox Assistant would forward in the fashion he wanted, I disabled the Rules Wizard in his inbox, and set up an Inbox Assistant rule to auto-reply. 4. We went away for a Holiday weekend, and the holiday in question either fell during the weekend or on a Tuesday, but we had a four day weekend. This was actually some time later, but the user received a message from a subscription service at the beginning of this long weekend informing him of their support constraints around the holiday, and then continuing to do so with every message we sent back. 5. I walked in on day 5, and sat down at my desk to see 8 (I think that was the number) overflow messages from the users mailbox which was well past its limit. I tried to pup up the Exchange Administrator but it just hung and I ran downstairs to pull the network wire. 6. I got there just in time to watch the Exchange Server reboot, and then spend the rest of the day restoring. It was the combination of OOO, and reversion to the older Inbox Assistant that toasted me. The Out of Office Assistant isn't supposed to loop like that. Regardless, someone advocated an approach where an assistant or another employee is assigned as an alternate recipient. I think you are better off to do this for several reasons, including some that benefit the person on vacation. 1. Email is a company resource - if a client uses it to contact you they should get a response. They aren't on vacation, you are. 2. Email is a company resource - if an employee knows that someone else will read his email when he is out, it becomes increasingly likely that he will encourage friends and family to use a personal address for personal business, jokes, and other nonsense. (And no, it isn't an invasion of privacy as far as I'm concerned.) 3. Vacation is time off from work - that is increasingly true if you aren't returning to stale, unanswered messages. The first word on my voicemail when I'm on vacation is STOP -- and they usually do. I do use OOO, typically to provide contact information for my coworkers and boss and intranet and Internet resources for general troubleshooting, and reinforcement that if the sender doesn't forward his message to another resource it will go unanswered until at least the day of my return. (The use of present tense here is to say this is my normal practice. I don't use OOO at all at the moment since I don't have a job.) -Patrick R. Sweeney - Original Message - From: "Byron Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:23 PM Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > Humm... Seems like we could mitigate that risk with verbiage in the > acceptable use policy on what is acceptable content to put into an > OOO. No? > I do recall your standard disclaimer on this "behavioral" approach. :) > Granted, enforcing that portion of the policy would be a chore. > Though someone would surely bring that point up. > > So far, SPAM sounds like the only real solid ground. > > > :( byron > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:39 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the > following: > > Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France until > the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 > Any Street, Anytown, USA, and he
RE: Mailbox Limits [was Re: OOO...]
Thanks..that definitely makes more sense :-) -Original Message- From: Matt Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Limits [was Re: OOO...] I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would you really want to have a user synching a 2 GB file over a 56k dial-up line... -- Matt Cross, MOS+FLA SAIC -- Orlando mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ben Schorr wrote: > > I'm not sure that 2Gigs is much of a "limit" is it? > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox > > limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send > > and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above > > 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? > > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 e-mail will not go to msn.com
> None of our e-mail mail will go to any e-mail address that > ends in "msn.com". We > are able to receive mail from them but not vice versa. I did > what it said in the "257265 XCON" KB. It worked fine until > about a week ago. Now, I get the following entry in the event log: I am seeing more and more of my clients with problems sending mail to MSN or hotmail. MSN has implemented anti-SPAM measures.. You might be black-listed somewhere. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Terminal Server - Documents and Settings folder Redirection HELP!
This might help: (link might wrap) http://hqextsrvsft01.citrix.com/cgi-bin/webcgi.exe/,/?Session=6731822,U= 1,ST=294,N=0005,K=25163,SXI=13,Case=obj(3924) Andrew, CCNA + MCSE ( W2K + NT4 ) -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:33 PM Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion Conversation: Terminal Server - Documents and Settings folder Redirection HELP! Subject: Terminal Server - Documents and Settings folder Redirection HELP! Hello, I have 3 citrix servers and and every time my user logs into a the citrix server thru terminal services, she/he gets the application that she/he needs. When they click on the application the user gets routed to the appropriate server. However, their profile is created on the C:\ drive under documents and settings and its causing us a lot of problem as in the server's C:\ partition with the OS installed is getting very quickly. Has any one figured out a way to redirect the user profiles or the entire Documents and Settings to a file server? This way when the user terminal services into the server, the user's profile (settings) follows the user. The roaming profile doesn't work. I would prefer moving the entire Documents and Settings off of the server rather than just redirecting the user profiles if possible. I have been searching for the past several weeks and haven't found anything that will work. By the way, this is caused by the terminal services and not because of the Citrix servers as far as I know. Please help. Thanks a bunch every one! rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the recipient. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. All messages are processed to reduce SPAM and Viruses _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terminal Server - Documents and Settings folder Redirection HELP!
Hello, I have 3 citrix servers and and every time my user logs into a the citrix server thru terminal services, she/he gets the application that she/he needs. When they click on the application the user gets routed to the appropriate server. However, their profile is created on the C:\ drive under documents and settings and its causing us a lot of problem as in the server's C:\ partition with the OS installed is getting very quickly. Has any one figured out a way to redirect the user profiles or the entire Documents and Settings to a file server? This way when the user terminal services into the server, the user's profile (settings) follows the user. The roaming profile doesn't work. I would prefer moving the entire Documents and Settings off of the server rather than just redirecting the user profiles if possible. I have been searching for the past several weeks and haven't found anything that will work. By the way, this is caused by the terminal services and not because of the Citrix servers as far as I know. Please help. Thanks a bunch every one! rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Limits [was Re: OOO...]
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would you really want to have a user synching a 2 GB file over a 56k dial-up line... -- Matt Cross, MOS+FLA SAIC -- Orlando mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ben Schorr wrote: > > I'm not sure that 2Gigs is much of a "limit" is it? > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox > > limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send > > and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above > > 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? > > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Now that's funny :) Thx for the feedback all! -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point about mail box limits cool thanks bill -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a "delegate" than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to every message" rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. Darcy -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's "Gold List" of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. > Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" > available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service > effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in > the past? > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swin
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I'm not sure that 2Gigs is much of a "limit" is it? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox > limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send > and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above > 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > > > -Original Message- > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an > important point about mail box limits > > cool > thanks > bill > > -Original Message- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our > sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer > to be contacted directly by a "delegate" than have to send a > second message to an address they got out of an OOO. > > Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of > enabling OOO to the Internet. > > I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the > VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet > for that reason among other's. > > Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one > when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to > every message" rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply > mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" > messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. > > Darcy > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most > effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all > know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming > that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's > account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly > increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to > every spammer's "Gold List" of valid e-mail addresses. > > There are also security issues and the occasional technical > reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is > turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient > while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle > any crucial issues that come up, including notifying > legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of > the office and will reply when they return. > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. > > Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" > > available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service > > effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid > pitfalls in > > the past? > > > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > === > This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not > the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the > information within this email or its attachments. If you have > received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. > === > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Still clueless on the Delivery message
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 2000 I'm still getting the following Message delivery status email almost everyday, although there is no pattern to the frequency and the time. I have checked my Message tracking options and they haven't been turned on. There is no proof of any emails being sent to these people in my SENT ITEMS folder nor is there any proof of any email being received from me in USER1 and USER2's Inbox. I guess no one is able to figure out the cause for this... The message looks like this: FROM: SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR TO: MYSELF SUBJECT: DELIVERED Your message To: Unknown Subject: was delivered to the following recipient(s): USER1 on 3/5/2003 2:00 PM USER2 on 3/5/2003 2:00 PM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point about mail box limits cool thanks bill -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a "delegate" than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to every message" rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. Darcy -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's "Gold List" of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. > Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" > available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service > effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in > the past? > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still clueless on the Delivery message
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 2000 I'm still getting the following Message delivery status email almost everyday, although there is no pattern to the frequency and the time. I have checked my Message tracking options and they haven't been turned on. There is no proof of any emails being sent to these people in my SENT ITEMS folder nor is there any proof of any email being received from me in USER1 and USER2's Inbox. I guess no one is able to figure out the cause for this... The message looks like this: FROM: SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR TO: MYSELF SUBJECT: DELIVERED Your message To: Unknown Subject: was delivered to the following recipient(s): USER1 on 3/5/2003 2:00 PM USER2 on 3/5/2003 2:00 PM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending Contacts to OWA Clients
We have a group of about 25 OWA clients that we would like to send a Contact file to. Is there a way they can import that contact file into their contacts folder? In Outlook you can just drag and drop, but I can't seem to figure out how to do it in OWA. We are running Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000. Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point about mail box limits cool thanks bill -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a "delegate" than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to every message" rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. Darcy -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's "Gold List" of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. > Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" > available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service > effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in > the past? > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
This mail loop was again a result of automatic replies/forwards to the internet being enabled. OOO responses alone would not have cause this loop. I can envision several ways in which an OOO loop alone could be created, all of them involved poorly written software and the potential of them actually happening is extremely low. On 3/5/03 13:14, "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels > couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a > "delegate" than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an > OOO. > > Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the > Internet. > > I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as > objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. > > Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user > enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to every message" rule to his OOO. > He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" messages > until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading Exchange Servers
If you're using Exchange 5.5 and not upgrading that, you'll get better advice about a W2K upgrade on an NT admin list. Athough if you're just going to upgrade the one server from NT4 to W2K, it's not difficult, just pop in the CD - after reading all the KB articles and doing the obligatory bazillion backups. Exch55 runs very happily on a W2K box. You do know, I presume, that you cannot run Exchange 2000 unless you're doing Active Directory. Outlook 2K is a good product. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading Exchange Servers Hello Everyone, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4. We are interested in upgrading our Exchange servers from NT 4.0 to Windows 2000. What would be the best way to go about that? Once we have done what would be the best option as to Outlook clients. We do not plan on active directory for three years. Have a great day and thanks for all of your help. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point about mail box limits cool thanks bill -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a "delegate" than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to every message" rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. Darcy -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's "Gold List" of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. > Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" > available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service > effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in > the past? > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a "delegate" than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to every message" rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. Darcy -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's "Gold List" of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > -Original Message- > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. > Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" > available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service > effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in > the past? > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Allison M. Wittstock wrote: > Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some > real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO > message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to > be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that > sees my postbox has been emptied in days, or someone overhearing me > order plane/train tickets, etc. > > This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking > site, Snopes. The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm > > I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this > happening. > > Cheers, > Allison > It's unlikely that a burglar will notice that you left the front door unlocked if you go away for the weekend. But, it could happen, so why not lock the door? It's unlikely that you'll be pick pocketed in the Paris metro, but it could happen, so why not wear a money belt? Jim Helfer > > > > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: >> The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the >> following: >> >> Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France >> until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house >> at 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is >> left. If you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell >> your friends! >> >> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP >> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher >> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron >> Kennedy Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? >> >> >> I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this >> still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" available >> out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service >> effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls >> in the past? >> >> How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? >> >> Thx for ideas... byron >> >> >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Allowing a User to Open Another User's Mailbox ...
Yes, that's what I tried and it didn't work. I don't think I waited long enough ... it works now. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. Trevor -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allowing a User to Open Another User's Mailbox ... Is this how you are doing it: Go to Active Directory under user2's account and go to Exchange Advanced. Go into the Mailbox Rights and add user1 and click the Full Mailbox Access box and click apply. This should work. -Original Message- From: Trevor Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions How do I allow user1 to open user2's mailbox through Outlook 2k profiles when logged in as user1? (i.e. I don't just want to open the inbox or other folder, but the whole mailbox using Outlook profiles). I'm using ES2k. Giving user1 Full Mailbox Access doesn't seem to do it. Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 e-mail will not go to msn.com
None of our e-mail mail will go to any e-mail address that ends in "msn.com". We are able to receive mail from them but not vice versa. I did what it said in the "257265 XCON" KB. It worked fine until about a week ago. Now, I get the following entry in the event log: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeTransport Event Category: Connection Manager Event ID: 4000 Date: 03/05/2003 Time: 1:38:55 PM User: N/A Computer: WARDMEAGLE Description: Message delivery to the remote domain 'msn.com' failed for the following reason: The connection was dropped by the remote host. Any ideas? Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Allowing a User to Open Another User's Mailbox ...
Is this how you are doing it: Go to Active Directory under user2's account and go to Exchange Advanced. Go into the Mailbox Rights and add user1 and click the Full Mailbox Access box and click apply. This should work. -Original Message- From: Trevor Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions How do I allow user1 to open user2's mailbox through Outlook 2k profiles when logged in as user1? (i.e. I don't just want to open the inbox or other folder, but the whole mailbox using Outlook profiles). I'm using ES2k. Giving user1 Full Mailbox Access doesn't seem to do it. Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
I actually tracked a deadbeat ex-friend down once from the source IP in the header of an email from him. -Patrick R. Sweeney http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:31 PM Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? > The more substantial risk IMHO is in Human Engineering exploits of your > business. I've certainly gotten more than enough information in OOA > responses to attempt such a thing. > > Snopes underestimates the difficulty of matching names to addresses, > especially when working with known domains. (e.g. Dell in Austin or > government workers for the City of Detroit) > > Still, though unlikely to occur we generally don't change our home answering > machines to reflect that we are going to be out of town either. > > > On 3/5/03 11:37, "Allison M. Wittstock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real > world > > examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the > > world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a > > neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has been > > emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train tickets, etc. > > > > This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking site, > Snopes. > > The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm > > > > I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this happening. > > > > Cheers, > > Allison > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: > >> The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the > >> following: > >> > >> Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France > >> until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at > >> 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If > >> you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your friends! > >> > >> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > >> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > >> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM > >> To: Exchange Discussions > >> Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? > >> > >> > >> I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this > >> still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" available out > >> there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with > >> exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? > >> > >> How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > >> > >> Thx for ideas... byron > >> > >> > >> > >> _ > >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> _ > >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allowing a User to Open Another User's Mailbox ...
How do I allow user1 to open user2's mailbox through Outlook 2k profiles when logged in as user1? (i.e. I don't just want to open the inbox or other folder, but the whole mailbox using Outlook profiles). I'm using ES2k. Giving user1 Full Mailbox Access doesn't seem to do it. Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAC Outlook client errors
Some things to check. 1) Run a trace on the effected message and see what is happening. 2) What events show up in the tracking logs for these messages? 3) For grins make sure the new Exchange 2000 server is in the users hosts file. Mac users can not use WINS. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: The Geek Q > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2003 12:17 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MAC Outlook client errors > > > I just added a E2K system into an existing 5.5 site. Same routing groups. > When I moved the mailboxes to the E2K system, MAC Outlook users sometimes > get this error. After a resend some of them go through, some NEVER do. > None > on the MS Outlook users do get this error ever. These are to outside SMTP > addresses, not internal. Internal never fails. > Is the a good place for MAC Outlook info?, MS site is not it! > > > Why are the MAC clients getting this. > > Kurt, any clue about this error message? > > Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. > > Subject: FW: BASMC Baylor Health 0503 > > Sent: Today, 5:07 PM > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > Ted McAfee (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM > > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did > not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original > message > is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 > > MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to > > Internet format failed > > Lauren Law (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM > > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did > not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original > message > is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 > > MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to > > Internet format failed > > Quay Lutrell (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM > > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did > not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original > message > is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 > > MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to > > Internet format failed > > > > _ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAC Outlook client errors
http://is.curtin.edu.au/help/hfiles/hfile01.htm Conversion failure of attachment, resulting in undeliverable messages If an Office document attached to an email message has been edited and saved while attached to the message, the message may be returned undeliverable when sent to a user external to Exchange via the Internet Mail Connector. The following error message will be generated: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: email and fax (Sent by senders name) 09:55 Sent: 29/08/2001 12:54 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 29/08/2001 12:55 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=AU;a= ;p=CURTIN;l=EXMSB04-010829045428Z-12491 MSEXCH:IMS:CURTIN:BENTLEY:EXMSB01 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed There is no problem if the message is sent to recipients within the Exchange environment: it only occurs when the message is processed by the Exchange Internet Mail Connector. The problem will also occur on a PC if a message which was generated in the above circumstances is sent to a PC user and that user forwards the message to a recipient via the Exchange IMC. The work around for this problem is: Users should only attach finished, saved documents to email messages. Always save attachments to disk before editing, and reattach to message after saving changes. On 3/5/03 12:17, "The Geek Q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just added a E2K system into an existing 5.5 site. Same routing groups. > When I moved the mailboxes to the E2K system, MAC Outlook users sometimes > get this error. After a resend some of them go through, some NEVER do. None > on the MS Outlook users do get this error ever. These are to outside SMTP > addresses, not internal. Internal never fails. > Is the a good place for MAC Outlook info?, MS site is not it! > > > Why are the MAC clients getting this. > > Kurt, any clue about this error message? > > Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. > > Subject: FW: BASMC Baylor Health 0503 > > Sent: Today, 5:07 PM > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > Ted McAfee (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM > > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message > is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 > > MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to > Internet format failed > > Lauren Law (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM > > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message > is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 > > MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to > Internet format failed > > Quay Lutrell (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM > > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message > is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 > > MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to > Internet format failed > > > > _ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
The more substantial risk IMHO is in Human Engineering exploits of your business. I've certainly gotten more than enough information in OOA responses to attempt such a thing. Snopes underestimates the difficulty of matching names to addresses, especially when working with known domains. (e.g. Dell in Austin or government workers for the City of Detroit) Still, though unlikely to occur we generally don't change our home answering machines to reflect that we are going to be out of town either. On 3/5/03 11:37, "Allison M. Wittstock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world > examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the > world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a > neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has been > emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train tickets, etc. > > This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking site, Snopes. > The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm > > I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this happening. > > Cheers, > Allison > > > > > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: >> The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the >> following: >> >> Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France >> until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at >> 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If >> you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your friends! >> >> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP >> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher >> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy >> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? >> >> >> I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this >> still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" available out >> there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with >> exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? >> >> How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? >> >> Thx for ideas... byron >> >> >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAC Outlook client errors
I just added a E2K system into an existing 5.5 site. Same routing groups. When I moved the mailboxes to the E2K system, MAC Outlook users sometimes get this error. After a resend some of them go through, some NEVER do. None on the MS Outlook users do get this error ever. These are to outside SMTP addresses, not internal. Internal never fails. Is the a good place for MAC Outlook info?, MS site is not it! Why are the MAC clients getting this. Kurt, any clue about this error message? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: BASMC Baylor Health 0503 Sent: Today, 5:07 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Ted McAfee (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed Lauren Law (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed Quay Lutrell (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Telnetting to rsaarchitects.com 25 resulted in a "572 Relay not authorized - Connection to host lost" message from here as well. It's not a problem on your end, but on theirs. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain The domain name is rsaarchitects.com if that will help. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problems Emailing one Domain Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of assistance one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is 572, it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com is actually the Mx record for that domain. On 3/5/03 9:38, "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error > from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into > mail.xx.com 25 > > When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, "572 Relay not authorized" > > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > Try telnetting to post 25... > >> -Original Message- >> From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >> >> >> Yes, here is what I get.. >> >> Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host >> on port 23: Connect failed >> >> I can email them from my home account without any problems though. >> And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. >> >> Greg Householder >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Cc: Gregory Householder >> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >> >> >>> I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from >>> everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone >> outside my >>> domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it >> just keeps on >>> retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote >> host". Is there >>> anything on my side that could be causing this problem? >> >> Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server >> to see what the actual error is? >> >> -Kevin >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems Emailing one Domain
Well, their Mx record points to mail-fwd.ameritech-hosting.net, which seems to accept mail for the domain in question. Connected to mail-fwd.ameritech-hosting.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail10b.sbc-webhosting.net SMTP RS ver 1.0.63s helo foo.bar 250 mail10b.sbc-webhosting.net Hello 216.30.136.98 [216.30.136.98], I'm listening mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender ok rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient ok quit On 3/5/03 11:19, "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The domain name is rsaarchitects.com if that will help. > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Problems Emailing one Domain > > Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of > assistance > one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is > 572, > it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com > is > actually the Mx record for that domain. > > On 3/5/03 9:38, "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error >> from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into >> mail.xx.com 25 >> >> When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, "572 Relay not authorized" >> >> >> Greg Householder >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:34 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >> >> Try telnetting to post 25... >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM >>> To: Exchange Discussions >>> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >>> >>> >>> Yes, here is what I get.. >>> >>> Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection >>> to host on port 23: Connect failed >>> >>> I can email them from my home account without any problems >>> though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. >>> >>> Greg Householder >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM >>> To: Exchange Discussions >>> Cc: Gregory Householder >>> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >>> >>> I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone >>> outside my domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it >>> just keeps on retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote >>> host". Is there anything on my side that could be causing this problem? >>> >>> Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail >>> server to see what the actual error is? >>> >>> -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange & NAV crash diag
>From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Completely uninstall NAV and see if things come back up... Sorry for not making this clear, I'm up and running now. I'm just wondering what went wrong so I can prevent it from happening again -- problems that go away on their own come back on their own. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has been emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train tickets, etc. This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking site, Snopes. The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this happening. Cheers, Allison On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: > The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the > following: > > Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France > until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at > 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If > you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your friends! > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this > still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" available out > there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with > exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
The domain name is rsaarchitects.com if that will help. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problems Emailing one Domain Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of assistance one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is 572, it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com is actually the Mx record for that domain. On 3/5/03 9:38, "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error > from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into > mail.xx.com 25 > > When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, "572 Relay not authorized" > > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > Try telnetting to post 25... > >> -Original Message- >> From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >> >> >> Yes, here is what I get.. >> >> Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection >> to host on port 23: Connect failed >> >> I can email them from my home account without any problems >> though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. >> >> Greg Householder >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Cc: Gregory Householder >> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >> >> >>> I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from >>> everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone >> outside my >>> domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it >> just keeps on >>> retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote >> host". Is there >>> anything on my side that could be causing this problem? >> >> Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail >> server to see what the actual error is? >> >> -Kevin >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
You drank Coors light beer. Got day0 once a year. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions When I was 23, it was a very good year... - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:39 AM Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > Port 23? > > > -Original Message- > From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Yes, here is what I get.. > > Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on > port 23: Connect failed > > I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And > when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Cc: Gregory Householder > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > > > I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my > > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on > > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote host". Is there > > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? > > Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to > see what the actual error is? > > -Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk Public Folder Replication?
Right-click the parent folder, select All Tasks > Propagate Settings. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uso Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk Public Folder Replication? I don't see the Propagate function. I know it from Exchange 5.5 but can't see it in E2K. - Original Message - From: "Schwartz, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 7:50 PM Subject: RE: Bulk Public Folder Replication? > You can use the propagate these properties to all subfolders to do > bulk moves to another server. > > -Original Message- > From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:00 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Bulk Public Folder Replication? > > > Hi, > > is there an easy way to replicate a large number of public folders to > another server or do I have to click each single one and configure a > replica? appreciate your help. > > regards > Uso > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Size Restriction
Put the two in separate routing groups and create a routing group connector that has a message limit in its Content Restrictions properties page. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Size Restriction Dear list, I have single forest in which one root domain and 2 DC each one is running e2k, the 2 DC's are spread geographically, we have 128K of bandwidth which connects our DC's to the root domain. As we have a limited bandwidth my management wants that users belongs to DC1 site should unable to send mails heavier than 200k to users belong to root domain or to DC2 users, but can send mails locally to their users of any size. How can I achieve this task, any help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Storage limit warning not emailing
Did you schedule when the warning messages are sent in the Limits properties page for the mailbox store? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Storage limit warning not emailing Exchange 2k Standard sp3 Windows 2k sp3 Due to the looming 16GB limit I am starting to setup storage limits on my server. I wanted to start the testing by enabling the warning on one account (my account). I set my warning limit to 10k, which is less than the 5k that my mailbox currently takes up. I have it set to run every night at midnight in the Private Information store properties, but I don't have any storewide warnings or quotas set there. I don't get any emails about exceeding the limit. Is there anything else that I have to do beyond the setting on the user object? I don't see any errors in event viewer that anything failed or even ran at Midnight other than the database maintenance that runs from 11PM to 3AM. Any help or direction is greatly appreciated. Thank you, Jeremy I. Shannon, Network Administrator Premier Dental Products [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be priveleged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems Emailing one Domain
Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of assistance one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is 572, it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com is actually the Mx record for that domain. On 3/5/03 9:38, "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error > from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into > mail.xx.com 25 > > When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, "572 Relay not authorized" > > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > Try telnetting to post 25... > >> -Original Message- >> From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >> >> >> Yes, here is what I get.. >> >> Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection >> to host on port 23: Connect failed >> >> I can email them from my home account without any problems >> though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. >> >> Greg Householder >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Cc: Gregory Householder >> Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain >> >> >>> I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from >>> everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone >> outside my >>> domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it >> just keeps on >>> retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote >> host". Is there >>> anything on my side that could be causing this problem? >> >> Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail >> server to see what the actual error is? >> >> -Kevin >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems Emailing one Domain
When I was 23, it was a very good year... - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:39 AM Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > Port 23? > > > -Original Message- > From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Yes, here is what I get.. > > Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on > port 23: Connect failed > > I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And > when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Cc: Gregory Householder > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > > > I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my > > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on > > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote host". Is there > > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? > > Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to > see what the actual error is? > > -Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange & NAV crash diag
Completely uninstall NAV and see if things come back up... On 3/5/03 9:16, "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I'm looking for some assistance. > > Ex5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3 1 Gig Mem NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI Mode > > Yesterday @ 2:58 NAV started reporting errors in the application log, life > went: > > 45 - Scan Engine Failure. > HRESULT = 0x80004005. This error occurred while scanning the attachment > "play.exe" of message "unknown" located in "unknown". > > 68 - Unable to initialize Scan Engine. The virus definitions may be missing > or corrupt. Perform a LiveUpdate to retrieve the latest virus defintions. > > 110 - The process navesp.exe failed to start (0xC009008A). > > 167 - The process NAVECTRL.EXE terminated unexpectedly. > > 168 - The process NAVECTRL.EXE was restarted. > > 68, 110, 167, 168, 68, 110, 167, ... > > This goes on until the app log fills up -- then the machine started to beep. > The beeps were rapid enough that I couldn't login (no real keyboard > response) so I connected to the machine from my desktop, stopped the > exchange and NAV services. I tried a remote shutdown (PSTOOLS and my own app > that calles the API) but no luck -- finally I hit the reset button -- ugh! > > OK, machine comes back up, I resize app logs and bring the machine down and > up normally. By the time I'm back up and running it's 3:50. OK, life goes > on... > > At 4:38 I get 2 X.400 entries Info first, warning second: > > 270 - A permanent error has occurred with Entity /O=TECH > SOFTWARE/OU=TECH/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=EX1/CN=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB. > Entity is a Message Object is a Normal Priority Message. Object: 0633. > Message ID: C=us;A= ;P=tech software;L=EX10303042138GJTJN7LD Content > length: 3381, External Trace information (first 100 bytes) = > 308063806180130255536280130120130D5465636820536F6674776172653180 > 800D3033303330343231333831375A82010083020600, PDU dump reference 1 > [MTA SUBMIT 15 74] (14) > > And > > 290 - A non-delivery report (reason code transfer-failure and diagnostic > code undeliverable-mail-recipient-deceased) is being generated for message > C=us;A= ;P=tech software;L=EX10303042138GJTJN7LD. It was originally destined > for DN:/o=TECH > SOFTWARE/ou=TECH/cn=CONFIGURATION/cn=SERVERS/cn=EX1/cn=MICROSOFT PUBLIC > MDB§DDA:EX=/O=TECH SOFTWARE/OU=TECH/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=INTERNET DOMAIN > ADMIN599E3495599E3495599E349577EE8281045431; (recipient number 1), and was > to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 19 136] (12) > > And life goes on... > > At 5:10 DrWatson reports: > > The application, store.exe, generated an application error The error > occurred on 03/04/2003 @ 17:10:20.734 The exception generated was c005 > at address 77FCBB23 (RtlFreeHeap) > > STORE CRASHES > > I look at services, sure enough store is down, and IMC is on it's way down. > Lots of later messages from IMC, SA, and ES about unexpected errors -- > probably because store isn't there. > > I restart Store and restart IMC, log playbacks go ok and I appear good at > this point. > > Ideas? > > -Walden > > > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Port 23? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yes, here is what I get.. Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on port 23: Connect failed I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Gregory Householder Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote host". Is there > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to see what the actual error is? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain
See Technet article 152808 and the associated whitepaper discussed in the article. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 March 2003 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain FAQ On 3/5/03 5:48, "Eve Jimah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone > How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4 > Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our > migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us > change our domain name from London_city to londoncity > without the underscore. This is to avoid any future > DNS problems. The idea is to phase out the NT domain > after moving all our servers to the new win2k domain. > > Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Try connecting on port 25 instead. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain Yes, here is what I get.. Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on port 23: Connect failed I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Gregory Householder Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote host". Is there > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to see what the actual error is? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into mail.xx.com 25 When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, "572 Relay not authorized" Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain Try telnetting to post 25... > -Original Message- > From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > > Yes, here is what I get.. > > Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection > to host on port 23: Connect failed > > I can email them from my home account without any problems > though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Cc: Gregory Householder > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > > > I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone > outside my > > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it > just keeps on > > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote > host". Is there > > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? > > Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail > server to see what the actual error is? > > -Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading Exchange Servers
Hello Everyone, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4. We are interested in upgrading our Exchange servers from NT 4.0 to Windows 2000. What would be the best way to go about that? Once we have done what would be the best option as to Outlook clients. We do not plan on active directory for three years. Have a great day and thanks for all of your help. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Try telnetting to post 25... > -Original Message- > From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > > Yes, here is what I get.. > > Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection > to host on port 23: Connect failed > > I can email them from my home account without any problems > though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Cc: Gregory Householder > Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > > > > I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone > outside my > > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it > just keeps on > > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote > host". Is there > > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? > > Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail > server to see what the actual error is? > > -Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Yes, here is what I get.. Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on port 23: Connect failed I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Gregory Householder Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain > I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote host". Is there > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to see what the actual error is? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange & NAV crash diag
OK, I'm looking for some assistance. Ex5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3 1 Gig Mem NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI Mode Yesterday @ 2:58 NAV started reporting errors in the application log, life went: 45 - Scan Engine Failure. HRESULT = 0x80004005. This error occurred while scanning the attachment "play.exe" of message "unknown" located in "unknown". 68 - Unable to initialize Scan Engine. The virus definitions may be missing or corrupt. Perform a LiveUpdate to retrieve the latest virus defintions. 110 - The process navesp.exe failed to start (0xC009008A). 167 - The process NAVECTRL.EXE terminated unexpectedly. 168 - The process NAVECTRL.EXE was restarted. 68, 110, 167, 168, 68, 110, 167, ... This goes on until the app log fills up -- then the machine started to beep. The beeps were rapid enough that I couldn't login (no real keyboard response) so I connected to the machine from my desktop, stopped the exchange and NAV services. I tried a remote shutdown (PSTOOLS and my own app that calles the API) but no luck -- finally I hit the reset button -- ugh! OK, machine comes back up, I resize app logs and bring the machine down and up normally. By the time I'm back up and running it's 3:50. OK, life goes on... At 4:38 I get 2 X.400 entries Info first, warning second: 270 - A permanent error has occurred with Entity /O=TECH SOFTWARE/OU=TECH/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=EX1/CN=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB. Entity is a Message Object is a Normal Priority Message. Object: 0633. Message ID: C=us;A= ;P=tech software;L=EX10303042138GJTJN7LD Content length: 3381, External Trace information (first 100 bytes) = 308063806180130255536280130120130D5465636820536F6674776172653180 800D3033303330343231333831375A82010083020600, PDU dump reference 1 [MTA SUBMIT 15 74] (14) And 290 - A non-delivery report (reason code transfer-failure and diagnostic code undeliverable-mail-recipient-deceased) is being generated for message C=us;A= ;P=tech software;L=EX10303042138GJTJN7LD. It was originally destined for DN:/o=TECH SOFTWARE/ou=TECH/cn=CONFIGURATION/cn=SERVERS/cn=EX1/cn=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB§DDA:EX=/O=TECH SOFTWARE/OU=TECH/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=INTERNET DOMAIN ADMIN599E3495599E3495599E349577EE8281045431; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 19 136] (12) And life goes on... At 5:10 DrWatson reports: The application, store.exe, generated an application error The error occurred on 03/04/2003 @ 17:10:20.734 The exception generated was c005 at address 77FCBB23 (RtlFreeHeap) STORE CRASHES I look at services, sure enough store is down, and IMC is on it's way down. Lots of later messages from IMC, SA, and ES about unexpected errors -- probably because store isn't there. I restart Store and restart IMC, log playbacks go ok and I appear good at this point. Ideas? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
> I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from > everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my > domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on > retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote host". Is there > anything on my side that could be causing this problem? Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to see what the actual error is? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems Emailing one Domain
Hello Everyone, I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on retrying and saying "connection was dropped by remote host". Is there anything on my side that could be causing this problem? Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain
FAQ On 3/5/03 5:48, "Eve Jimah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone > How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4 > Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our > migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us > change our domain name from London_city to londoncity > without the underscore. This is to avoid any future > DNS problems. The idea is to phase out the NT domain > after moving all our servers to the new win2k domain. > > Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
You've described a problem with Automatic replies/forwards to the internet, not the OOA. One can allow the latter, without the former. On 3/5/03 0:35, "Patrick R. Sweeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so here goes my OOO horror story. First off, this is not straight on > point because it involved an older Outlook client, Exchange 5.5, and a quick > hack for a user that I shouldn't have done -- but I didn't know it at the > time. > > 1. We upgraded to Exchange 5.5 and got some complaints because some folks > auto-reply rules weren't working. So I enabled it. > 2. We had a consultant leave, and as was normal and expected at this > particular firm left him with email and allowed him to set up a rule to > auto-forward his email to an outside address, and auto-reply to incoming > messages. > 3. The consultant in question popped back after a few days later and > complained about the format of the forwarded messages, commenting that they > were difficult to respond to since they appeared to be from his account. > Now a custom recipient would have been perfect for this purpose, but not > knowing that, and knowing the Inbox Assistant would forward in the fashion > he wanted, I disabled the Rules Wizard in his inbox, and set up an Inbox > Assistant rule to auto-reply. > 4. We went away for a Holiday weekend, and the holiday in question either > fell during the weekend or on a Tuesday, but we had a four day weekend. > This was actually some time later, but the user received a message from a > subscription service at the beginning of this long weekend informing him of > their support constraints around the holiday, and then continuing to do so > with every message we sent back. > 5. I walked in on day 5, and sat down at my desk to see 8 (I think that > was the number) overflow messages from the users mailbox which was well past > its limit. I tried to pup up the Exchange Administrator but it just hung > and I ran downstairs to pull the network wire. > 6. I got there just in time to watch the Exchange Server reboot, and then > spend the rest of the day restoring. > > It was the combination of OOO, and reversion to the older Inbox Assistant > that toasted me. The Out of Office Assistant isn't supposed to loop like > that. Regardless, someone advocated an approach where an assistant or > another employee is assigned as an alternate recipient. I think you are > better off to do this for several reasons, including some that benefit the > person on vacation. > 1. Email is a company resource - if a client uses it to contact you they > should get a response. They aren't on vacation, you are. > 2. Email is a company resource - if an employee knows that someone else will > read his email when he is out, it becomes increasingly likely that he will > encourage friends and family to use a personal address for personal > business, jokes, and other nonsense. (And no, it isn't an invasion of > privacy as far as I'm concerned.) > 3. Vacation is time off from work - that is increasingly true if you aren't > returning to stale, unanswered messages. The first word on my voicemail > when I'm on vacation is STOP -- and they usually do. I do use OOO, > typically to provide contact information for my coworkers and boss and > intranet and Internet resources for general troubleshooting, and > reinforcement that if the sender doesn't forward his message to another > resource it will go unanswered until at least the day of my return. (The > use of present tense here is to say this is my normal practice. I don't use > OOO at all at the moment since I don't have a job.) > > > > > -Patrick R. Sweeney > > > - Original Message - > From: "Byron Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:23 PM > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > >> Humm... Seems like we could mitigate that risk with verbiage in the >> acceptable use policy on what is acceptable content to put into an OOO. > No? >> I do recall your standard disclaimer on this "behavioral" approach. :) >> Granted, enforcing that portion of the policy would be a chore. Though >> someone would surely bring that point up. >> >> So far, SPAM sounds like the only real solid ground. >> >> >> :( byron >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:39 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? >> >> >> The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the >> following: >> >> Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France > until >> the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 Any >> Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If you are a >> spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your friends! >> >> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP >> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher >> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain
Hello everyone How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4 Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us change our domain name from London_city to londoncity without the underscore. This is to avoid any future DNS problems. The idea is to phase out the NT domain after moving all our servers to the new win2k domain. Thanks for your help __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
