RE: HELP EseUtil still going.
It can take almost the same amount of time to copy it back then -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 20. Juni 2003 02:35 To: Exchange Discussions I didn't have enough on the Exchange server so I used the /t option and put the temp file on a server with 18GB free. It took 5.5 hours to get to 100% and its been there for 2 hours. I see the file there and its 200mb smaller than the original so.? Jim -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HELP EseUtil still going. I wouldn't recommend it. It takes as long as it takes. Do you have enough of disk space? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HELP EseUtil still going. Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 20:22:07 -0400 My exchange 5.5 server went down with a full 16 GB priv.edb today. I started a defrag at noon EST and it went to 100% complete at around 5:30 PM but it still says 100% and the disk drive is still very active and the prompt hasn't returned. Is this normal. About how long should a 16 GB defrag take on a P3 1Ghz server. Is it normal to stay at 100% so long or should I kill the process. Thanks for any quick responses cuz I'm stuck sitting here not sure if the process is hung. Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tracking email use to save bandwidth
check out e-nspect www.e-nspect.com i imagine that you will be able to find out what you need within the evaluation limits of the product. mike - Original Message - From: Peter White [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 7:06 PM Subject: Tracking email use to save bandwidth Hi, I hope somebody can help us out. We have Exchange 5.5 sp4 and about 100 users in three geographical locations. Our problem is that some of our users regard the company email as their own personal amusement center and frequently cc emails with large attachments to 25 or more of their personal internet email buddies. We have only a 512k internet connection and this heavy non-business email traffic slows our legitimate site-to-site communication to a crawl. I feel sure that just a few users are really abusing the system and I'd like to find out who they are. I don't want to penalize everyone in the company because of a few ignorant users who abuse the system. Can I track which users are sending attachements, how big the attachments are and how many people they are ccing to? If I can get that info I can deal with the abusers without stepping on email for everyone in the company. thanks Peter White _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.Pst on OWA?
Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: .Pst on OWA?
No .. you cannot open a PST file through OWA. ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:29 AM Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook team folders
Has anyone used the Outlook Team folders that is now discontinued? I'm trying to get the outlook team folders wizard to work on my system (sbs2000/ exch 2000 sp3) however I am getting the following error: Error: occurred during HTTP publishing of Web files. Select OK to try another destination to publish your files to or Cancel to exit the wizard. According to Q250861 I need to install it on NT4 then upgrade - not an option. However, on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/teamfolders.htm it states I need to install the web publishing wizard which I have done however I am still getting the error. Does this require a reboot to get it to work? Or any other ideas? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: OWA and the M:
Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
Mine've always been like that... And all the other servers I ever looked at. Andy -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post
Can someone else please try this so that we don't have to be the first one? Just kidding. Has anyone tried this yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Just came across KB article 817809 dated May 24 which sounds like MS may have listened to our complaints about the change at E2K on the format that SMTP mail is delivered to a Public Folder. I do not recall seeing this hotfix mentioned on this list so I thought I'd post a note about it. We have many 5.5 Public Folders that receive SMTP mail and are not looking forward to the impacts of the change in E2K. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809 Per the article (update requires Exchange 2000 SP3): After you install this update, incoming messages to public folders have their message class cached to IPM.Note instead of IPM.Post. You can configure this new setting by creating the Incoming registry value in the following registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchange IS\ ServerName\Public-GUID Value name: Incoming Value type: DWORD Value data: 0 defaults to IPM.Note. A DWORD value of 0 (zero) is default (false). A non-zero value (true) configures the public folder to cache incoming messages as IPM.Post . I'm just not clear on what they mean by the term cache. I just saw the article and have not obtained the hotfix yet to test it. Our Exchange 2000 is still only in our lab. If any of you try it out first, let us know the results. Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postmaster Team Tektronix, Inc. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/eJp0lB/TM -~- Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
Thanks - just needed re-assuring! -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 11:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Mine've always been like that... And all the other servers I ever looked at. Andy -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
There's plenty to steal - just look at all the appliances and cars without wheels in people's front yards! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers However, that might be due more to the fact that there isn't much to steal there! (My parents used to live right next door in Acworth.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers It apparently has one of the lowest property crime rates in the area. But that's not the point. I'd love to see that court battle and the fall out that comes from the city losing it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Sounds like it must be a real quite neighborhood From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:27:42 -0400 My guess is that it will be roughly equivalent to the law in the city of Kennesaw, Georgia (suburban Atlanta) in which the city requires all home owners to own a gun. To date, no one has been prosecuted for breaking that law. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Seems like that disclaimer (I do not give permission to forward) would be unnecessary. If the law requires express permission then the absence of any disclaimer wouldn't constitute permission and thus unless the message specifically said I *DO* give permission to forward it would be illegal to forward it. I'll be curious to know how many people they actually get prosecuted under this law. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com-Original Message-From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 13:28To: Exchange DiscussionsSubject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Scott, and others, I totally get your point, and to some degree agree. An interesting addition... The Australian federal govt recently (last year) passed legislation to say that it is illegal to forward and e-mail without the authors express permission. Thus, a whole NEW addition to the disclaimer in Australia is popping up, saying that the author DOES NOT give permission for the e-mail to be forwarded. I think, whether we like it or not, the disclaimer is here to stay... It is how we as Admins manage it. My additional $0.02 (inc GST). themolk.-Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Well I am not a legal speagle by any means, but the disclaimer issue it bad joke. The true responsibility of who the messagewent to is in the hands of the sender. If the message was addressedcorrectly then the need for disclaimers would be a non-issue. Sorry I watched this thread long enough that I had to put my two cents in there. I find it hard that anyone should accept the burden of responsibility for receiving an electronic message that was sent to them by mistake. And those disclaimers that try to shift the burden of responiblity from the shoulders of the sender to the reciever are a sad attempt at just that. -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions
Message 451 4.4.2 Bad connection (connection reset)
Hi list We have a problem which we have been struggling with for a couple of weeks now, hope somebody here can help. We have E2k SP3 on Win2k SP3 with all patches. We can send email to everywhere in the world and we can receive from everywhere in the world, except from the domain hanafos.com (211.202.13.0 - 211.202.13.255). Whenever they try to send us an email they get following message : == FIRST : Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:11:56 KST +0900 LAST : Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:32:02 KST +0900 RETRY COUNT : 3 LOOP COUNT : 0 REMOTE SERVER RESPONSE : 451 4.4.2 Bad connection (connection reset) == This IP range is not blocked in the Connection control of the virtual SMTP server and we are not performing reverse DNS lookup on incoming connections. We are using Vamsoft Open Relay Filter and we have added the entire IP Range to the IP ranges not to be checked. Funny thing is that f.ex mo02.hanafos.com (211.202.13.144) does not have reverse DNS so maybe this could still be the problem ? Does anybody know how to find out or how to solve this issue. It is really driving us crazy Thanks in advance Freddie -- Freddie Soerensen Conares Metal Supply Limited Tel : +423 235 5040 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.conares.com There are three kinds of death in this world. There's heart death, there's brain death, and there's being off the network. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP EseUtil still going.
We hit the 16GB limit just 30 days before the upgrade was to be done. Right now we're having people move stuff to personal folders. I'm just waiting for someone to blow the 2Gb limit in a .pst file. g Thanks Jim -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. I'm going to Disneyland! So, how ya gonna prevent this from happening again? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
you can replace that M:\blah-blah-blah with \\.\BackOfficeStorage\ -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Thanks - just needed re-assuring! -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 11:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Mine've always been like that... And all the other servers I ever looked at. Andy -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
this is disturbing -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: .Pst on OWA?
a newbie, you think? - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 08:54 Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? this is disturbing -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
some PSTs are good but in small doses -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
weird PF issue
One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post
A supported fix is now available from Microsoft, but it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in this article. Apply it only to computers that are experiencing this specific problem. This fix may receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, Microsoft recommends that you wait for the next Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server service pack that contains this fix. I think that I'll just wait for the next Service Pack, thankyouverymuch. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:13 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Can someone else please try this so that we don't have to be the first one? Just kidding. Has anyone tried this yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Just came across KB article 817809 dated May 24 which sounds like MS may have listened to our complaints about the change at E2K on the format that SMTP mail is delivered to a Public Folder. I do not recall seeing this hotfix mentioned on this list so I thought I'd post a note about it. We have many 5.5 Public Folders that receive SMTP mail and are not looking forward to the impacts of the change in E2K. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809 Per the article (update requires Exchange 2000 SP3): After you install this update, incoming messages to public folders have their message class cached to IPM.Note instead of IPM.Post. You can configure this new setting by creating the Incoming registry value in the following registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchange IS\ ServerName\Public-GUID Value name: Incoming Value type: DWORD Value data: 0 defaults to IPM.Note. A DWORD value of 0 (zero) is default (false). A non-zero value (true) configures the public folder to cache incoming messages as IPM.Post . I'm just not clear on what they mean by the term cache. I just saw the article and have not obtained the hotfix yet to test it. Our Exchange 2000 is still only in our lab. If any of you try it out first, let us know the results. Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postmaster Team Tektronix, Inc. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/eJp0lB/TM -~- Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracking email use to save bandwidth
http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm Scripts there that will generate email usage reports per user, breaking out internal mail, external mail, # of messages, size of messages, etc. You'll need to have Message Tracking enabled, as was already mentioned Hunter -Original Message- From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, I hope somebody can help us out. We have Exchange 5.5 sp4 and about 100 users in three geographical locations. Our problem is that some of our users regard the company email as their own personal amusement center and frequently cc emails with large attachments to 25 or more of their personal internet email buddies. We have only a 512k internet connection and this heavy non-business email traffic slows our legitimate site-to-site communication to a crawl. I feel sure that just a few users are really abusing the system and I'd like to find out who they are. I don't want to penalize everyone in the company because of a few ignorant users who abuse the system. Can I track which users are sending attachements, how big the attachments are and how many people they are ccing to? If I can get that info I can deal with the abusers without stepping on email for everyone in the company. thanks Peter White _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird PF issue
Maybe try deleting and re-creating the profile on her PC. Does she still have problems if you do that? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:42 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: weird PF issue Subject: weird PF issue One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Connector based on REPY address
Hi all, I don't know if this is possible without a bit of programming but can you create an SMTP connector based on a domain's reply address (Both Exch5.5 and Exch2000). i.e. mail from @ben.com over connector 1 and mail from @bill.com over connector 2 Any help as always gratefully received. Cheers Andrew This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Connector based on REPY address
Put all ben.com and bill.com users in separate groups, then use Delivery Restrictions on each SMTP Connector. Should do the trick. Neil -Original Message- From: Andrew Pike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 20 June 2003 14:53 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: SMTP Connector based on REPY address Subject: SMTP Connector based on REPY address Hi all, I don't know if this is possible without a bit of programming but can you create an SMTP connector based on a domain's reply address (Both Exch5.5 and Exch2000). i.e. mail from @ben.com over connector 1 and mail from @bill.com over connector 2 Any help as always gratefully received. Cheers Andrew This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
And all those guns must be worth a bob or two. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 12:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers There's plenty to steal - just look at all the appliances and cars without wheels in people's front yards! The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird PF issue
someone else in my team alredy tried that (PCAnywhere-ed to her machine and created a new profile) - didn't help These are the steps I took to no avail: - Created a subfolder under the bad folder and moved the messages in there, then back. - Created a TEMP subfolder under the bad folder, moved it to the top of PF hierarchy, moved the messages in there, deleted the original bad folder, then under the TEMP folder created a new subfolder with the same name as the old bad folder, then moved the new bad subfolder to the original location, then moved all the messages from TEMP folder to the new bad folder. - Did all the previous steps with copying messages instead of moving. - Exported all the messages from the bad folder to a PST file, deleted the bad folder altogether, created a new bad folder (with the same permissions as the original) and imported data from the PST file back. This is the first time my scientific jiggling method failed. :( -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird PF issue Maybe try deleting and re-creating the profile on her PC. Does she still have problems if you do that? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:42 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: weird PF issue Subject: weird PF issue One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP EseUtil still going.
Same thing happened to me 2 weeks ago. Are you upgrading to 2000 or to 5.5 Enterprise? If just the Enterprise edition, it's very quick and painless. Just make sure you have a solid backup and your TechNet handy in case you run into a little snag like we did with Q233219. We hit the 16GB limit just 30 days before the upgrade was to be done. Right now we're having people move stuff to personal folders. I'm just waiting for someone to blow the 2Gb limit in a .pst file. g Thanks Jim -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. I'm going to Disneyland! So, how ya gonna prevent this from happening again? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: weird PF issue
If user accounts have screwy permissions that can affect PF ACL's working correctly. If your account works ok it may pay to recreate hers? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird PF issue someone else in my team alredy tried that (PCAnywhere-ed to her machine and created a new profile) - didn't help These are the steps I took to no avail: - Created a subfolder under the bad folder and moved the messages in there, then back. - Created a TEMP subfolder under the bad folder, moved it to the top of PF hierarchy, moved the messages in there, deleted the original bad folder, then under the TEMP folder created a new subfolder with the same name as the old bad folder, then moved the new bad subfolder to the original location, then moved all the messages from TEMP folder to the new bad folder. - Did all the previous steps with copying messages instead of moving. - Exported all the messages from the bad folder to a PST file, deleted the bad folder altogether, created a new bad folder (with the same permissions as the original) and imported data from the PST file back. This is the first time my scientific jiggling method failed. :( -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird PF issue Maybe try deleting and re-creating the profile on her PC. Does she still have problems if you do that? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:42 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: weird PF issue Subject: weird PF issue One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP EseUtil still going.
Works out great if you are charging customer by the hour. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. On the plus side, it gives you more time to browse the web while you wait. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HELP EseUtil still going. Patience is one of the tools I would include in the Exchange Administrator's toolkit. More so with Exchange200x. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:10 PM Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. ITS DONE! HORRAY AND IT WORKS. I guess good things come to those who wait. LOL Thanks to everyone who responded so quickly. Jim -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. I once ran eseutil that took so long (How long did it take Johnny Carson) Till my neighbor with grew a beard. From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 20:47:46 -0400 Well, eseutil needs something like 110% of the existing database size of free space, so you just have enough room it seems. Let it do its thing! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. I didn't have enough on the Exchange server so I used the /t option and put the temp file on a server with 18GB free. It took 5.5 hours to get to 100% and its been there for 2 hours. I see the file there and its 200mb smaller than the original so.? Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
That's what I've got on the exadmin folder What I would really like to know tho is why I cannot publish a team calendar to my server -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: you can replace that M:\blah-blah-blah with \\.\BackOfficeStorage\ -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Thanks - just needed re-assuring! -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 11:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Mine've always been like that... And all the other servers I ever looked at. Andy -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tracking email use to save bandwidth
what about attachment names, sizes, mimemtypes? all very usefull stuff mike - Original Message - From: Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:42 PM Subject: RE: Tracking email use to save bandwidth http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm Scripts there that will generate email usage reports per user, breaking out internal mail, external mail, # of messages, size of messages, etc. You'll need to have Message Tracking enabled, as was already mentioned Hunter -Original Message- From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, I hope somebody can help us out. We have Exchange 5.5 sp4 and about 100 users in three geographical locations. Our problem is that some of our users regard the company email as their own personal amusement center and frequently cc emails with large attachments to 25 or more of their personal internet email buddies. We have only a 512k internet connection and this heavy non-business email traffic slows our legitimate site-to-site communication to a crawl. I feel sure that just a few users are really abusing the system and I'd like to find out who they are. I don't want to penalize everyone in the company because of a few ignorant users who abuse the system. Can I track which users are sending attachements, how big the attachments are and how many people they are ccing to? If I can get that info I can deal with the abusers without stepping on email for everyone in the company. thanks Peter White _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 on a WIN2000 Server
You could do what amounts to on offline restore. This main issue I see with the Move Server method is that if you have a big EDB it takes forever and can easily fill up your log disks if you try to do too many moves at once. The issue with this method though is yourmail system is down for however long it takes. - Build NewServer with W2K and all service packs and patches you need. This can be done well in advance. - Stop all exchange services on OldServer and set SA to disabled (just in case something else tries to start it) - Rename OldServer to OldServerXX - Rename NewServer to OldServer and install Exchange including any connectors. Install correct Exchange service pack. Use PerfWiz to move files to the correct locations. - Stop all Exchange services on New OldServer. Rename or delete all EDB's, all Log files and the Exchange .CHK file. - Copy over the edbs (not logs or any other files) from the original server to the correct locations. - Start the services. You will get error events telling you that it is rebuilding the indexes because of a new OS or service pack. When they are finished rebuilding you will get an error message telling you to run ISINTEG -PATCH. When that is run you are done. BUT dont forget to BACKUP straight away. If all goes pear shaped then you still have the original server which you can rename back. I have used this method many times and with a 150GB Priv.edb adn a 30GB Pub.edb the whole process took about 6hrs with nearly all the time taken copying the file. _ Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today! http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird PF issue
Does she have read only permissions to the items she cannot open? Are you Running Norton Corp Edition pre-v8.x? Try this one out if so.. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/3d2a1f71c5a0033485 25680f006426be/a6b13da3189e3c5888256b88007bb053?OpenDocument=3D20 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3D3Dexchangetext_mo d= e =3D3D=3D lang=3D3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird PF issue
awesome! the user thinks she has that installed. Double-checking now. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird PF issue Does she have read only permissions to the items she cannot open? Are you Running Norton Corp Edition pre-v8.x? Try this one out if so.. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/3d2a1f71c5a0033485 25680f006426be/a6b13da3189e3c5888256b88007bb053?OpenDocument=3D20 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3D3Dexchangetext_mo d= e =3D3D=3D lang=3D3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
I just got off the phone with MSS on exact samething. All it was I had to Stop and Start SMTP service all the time I made any changes in the relay permissions. -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modify exchange legacy value
Hello MS Exchange 2000 friends! Does anyone out there have a vbscript or any script that I can use to modify the values of legacyExchangeDN, I'm desperately need it. I don't want to use adsiedit to do it, I'm talking about 2000 users. Thanks!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracking email use to save bandwidth
I'm sure that information would be nice to have, but if you need that you'll have to look for other solutions. Promodag may do this, but I haven't looked at their stuff in a long time. Hunter -Original Message- From: mike dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions what about attachment names, sizes, mimemtypes? all very usefull stuff mike - Original Message - From: Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:42 PM Subject: RE: Tracking email use to save bandwidth http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm Scripts there that will generate email usage reports per user, breaking out internal mail, external mail, # of messages, size of messages, etc. You'll need to have Message Tracking enabled, as was already mentioned Hunter -Original Message- From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, I hope somebody can help us out. We have Exchange 5.5 sp4 and about 100 users in three geographical locations. Our problem is that some of our users regard the company email as their own personal amusement center and frequently cc emails with large attachments to 25 or more of their personal internet email buddies. We have only a 512k internet connection and this heavy non-business email traffic slows our legitimate site-to-site communication to a crawl. I feel sure that just a few users are really abusing the system and I'd like to find out who they are. I don't want to penalize everyone in the company because of a few ignorant users who abuse the system. Can I track which users are sending attachements, how big the attachments are and how many people they are ccing to? If I can get that info I can deal with the abusers without stepping on email for everyone in the company. thanks Peter White _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
Yes, my policy is correct. I can seem to get my finger on this. Christian - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=englishTo unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
I wish I could do that, but alas it did not work. Christian - Original Message - From: Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:29 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 I just got off the phone with MSS on exact samething. All it was I had to Stop and Start SMTP service all the time I made any changes in the relay permissions. -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=englishTo unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=englishTo unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
All looks good according to the MS documentation still doesn't say HOW your server is set up. Please detail how you are set up, including authentication methods, what the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc. Also, what is your domain name that is having problems? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Yes, my policy is correct. I can seem to get my finger on this. Christian - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=englishTo unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird PF issue
that was it! Thanks! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird PF issue Does she have read only permissions to the items she cannot open? Are you Running Norton Corp Edition pre-v8.x? Try this one out if so.. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/3d2a1f71c5a0033485 25680f006426be/a6b13da3189e3c5888256b88007bb053?OpenDocument=3D20 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3D3Dexchangetext_mo d= e =3D3D=3D lang=3D3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
XCH 5.5: Moving Mailboxes
If I move mailboxes from Server A to Server B do I destroy SIS for those mailboxes? I am running out of disk space for priv.edb on Server A but have buttloads (technical term) of room on Server B's disks. I know the db wont shrink without a offline defrag but this should potentially hedge against it getting bigger if all those moved mailboxes' storage space gets converted to white space in the db for the others to use? Make sense? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of http://www.cdolive.com/changemessageclass.htm) your co-worker found is designed for the Exchange Event Service which is only provided in Exchange 2000/2003 for backwards compatibility and I would not recommend using it with Exchange 2000/2003 due to being not reliable. 2. The issue you are facing not being able to reply to public folder messages will neither be fixed with KB817809 nor the script you mentioned or the one Andy Webb pointed you to. This is a limitation of Outlook Web Access 2000. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Looks like Microsoft released this yesterday. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817809 Has anybody had any experience with this issue? We see it because we are unable to reply or forward a message in a Public Folder when it is accessed through OWA. I was wondering if anyone had any workarounds until the SP is released, currently I am troubleshooting issues with this Script that a coworker of mine found online. http://www.netcomitc.com/post2note/esa.htm All help is appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
First I'll set the stage: We are currntly using an ISP for our mail we use either IMAP or POP# toget it from them and bring it home to the client. However, this is getting costly. So, the exchange server. Currently the isp still has the dns, but will be delegating it shortly. Here are the specs of my situation Domain name is: hillsboro.k12.wi.us DNS name is mail2.hillsboro.k12.wi.us (this is pointing to my server) Server setup: E2K SP3 on W2K SP3 Global settings in xch mngr: Internet Message format: Default - SMTP domain=* all else is default Recipeint policies: default policy - Email addresses (Policy) = SMTP (checked) = @hillsboro.k12.wi.us X400 (Checked) = appropriate paths Default SMTP Virtual Server: General tab= IP Address: (all unassigned) Access tab: Authentication= all boxes (except require TLS encryption) are checked Certificates = None used Connection control = all except the list below checked Relaying = Only the list below and allow all computers which successfully authenticate regardless of the list above. checked The rest of the SMTP virtual server tabs are in default. Connector: General = lists my exchange server as the virtual server Address space = type:SMTP Address:* Cost:1 Connector scope = entire organization Deivery restriction = none IF you guys can help, I will be VERY grateful. Thanks Christian - Original Message - From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:46 am Subject: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All looks good according to the MS documentation still doesn't say HOW your server is set up. Please detail how you are set up, including authentication methods, what the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc. Also, what is your domain name that is having problems? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Yes, my policy is correct. I can seem to get my finger on this. Christian - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=englishTo unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=englishTo unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 11 Reply to All
Do you have more than one account in your profile? If so, it's because outlook has a problem knowing who you are - it's a problem in older versions too. -Original Message- I have notice lately that when I do a reply to all I am now included in the reply to all . . . . Anyone noticed this? I know it is beta, but thought perhaps someone else had seen this? Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Modify exchange legacy value
http://www.cdolive.net/download/adusermanagement.zip includes a sample how to modify ExchangeLegacyDN. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Modify exchange legacy value Hello MS Exchange 2000 friends! Does anyone out there have a vbscript or any script that I can use to modify the values of legacyExchangeDN, I'm desperately need it. I don't want to use adsiedit to do it, I'm talking about 2000 users. Thanks!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
By multiplying the data n-times on each users hard drive. Why n-times? Because you loose SIS (Single Instance Storage) if you move data out of the central Exchange Storage database into gazillions of PST files (which are prone to get corrupted, limited to 2GB, slow and other quirks). Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Outlook Web Access is a *SERVER* application running against the Exchange *SERVER* Store database. A PST *FILE* is a local *CLIENT* copy of data only accessible by a *CLIENT* application like Outlook 97/98/2000/2002/2003. Should answer the question... Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Combining two .psts
Can the two .psts be combined together? If they can be then how? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Sounds like it works for you unless people want to search their whole mailbox after moving small doses into a PST. Also, make sure nobody ever tries to switch a 3GB mailbox to a PST ;-) Have fun with PST's :-) I used to use one back in 1998/99 and suffered more than one time from corruption and data loss. Of course if that'll happen the network admin is in charge to recover the data from the local hard drive of the laptop (which is surely backup'ed every night ;-) I'm happy with having all data on the server. I can search, use OWA or IMAP and the server admin (me, Doh!) takes care of the backup too... Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Combining two .psts
Open them both up in your Outlook profile, right-drag and drop between the two, select Move. You will have to do this for each folder. -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Can the two .psts be combined together? If they can be then how? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scan Gateway
Actually it would be. You could turn off AV scanning on your Exchange servers (for a short time) while the issue was corrected with a bad virus definition. You could also allow the mail traffic to pass directly to your Exchange servers if the gateway goes bad. Same process for a path of upgrade issue. You have it even easier as the gateway product and the Exchange AV product are from 2 vendors. One of them is bound to catch the virus even if the other fails. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway My Environment:- The first stage of external email scan will be on the DMZ (Trend Micro Server Gateway). Email flow from Internet to Firewall and pass to Trend Server in DMZ to do the content scanning and email will be flow back to the Firewall again, and then flow into the Internal Net (Exchange Server) and go through the second AV Scan inside the Exch Server. Exchange Server itself located inside the Internal Net will have AV Exchange(Symantec) installed to be the second scanning stage or to be the internally email scan. So in this scenario, your 2 points cant be justify because I still have one AV in the Exchange that might have your 2 points problem. thanks -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Currently we're the same way. There are two other advantages of having a dedicated gateway scanner. It's typical for the AV vendors to have one or two bad virus definition files a year. I've seen them totally hose up a box when they're real bad. If you have that at the gateway, your internal mail flow will still work while you repair the gateway. People may notice that they are not getting internet mail, but won't be screaming as loud as if you took their mailbox server off line. Second advantage is upgrade path. Since the gateway is a separate box and passes all mail via SMTP, you can upgrade the antivirus or the Exchange system separately from each other without impact. If you needed to install a hotfix for Exchange or the OS, you can do so without having the extra variable of the antivirus product in the mix. Costs are always a concern with the ducks, but the AV gateway doesn't need to be a huge server. We ran a dual 500mhz, 500GB RAM with two disk arrays on our inbound server and were handling around 100k messages a day on it. It rated about 5000 an hour before we upgraded to a larger server. That server may run you about 3-4k depending on your vendor but you probably wouldn't need that something even that large. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway At TechEd, one of the MS dudes told us that MS doesn't use AV on the mail servers at all. All email is scanned by gateway servers. Maybe he will like that. We can be just like MS -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Thanks everyone. But but but.. pardon me that these point is good for IT Engineer but not to management whereby there will ask Q such as, even though in same box, it will still be able to capture and hold the email if BE is down. They never care about the problem of crashes, upgrade etc. :) so I was thinking any reason that's I never thought of and of cox it should be valid to scare management off so that they agree to have it on dedicated box... Thanks ... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Correct. Another nice thing about the gateway on a separate box is that it give you a place to capture and hold email if you need to bring your Exchange boxes down for anything. It sits there nice and pretty and when Exchange comes back up, the mail goes in. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Scan Gateway Simply because its the easiest way to manage it. If it ever crashes or requires maintenance or upgrading, it wont affect other services. - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:31 PM Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Our Environment only have 275users internally, and another 50users access from overseas using OWA or POP3. Do you have any reason why should the gateway to be run on separate box? Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway I would advise to put your gateway on a separate
Re: .Pst on OWA?
www.kvault.com ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:33 PM Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Should we consider that as SPAM? gdr Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: .Pst on OWA? www.kvault.com ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:33 PM Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Yup, it ain't fun since I'd rather have everything on the server. I don't leave the pst file on the local hard drive. They very rarely access the pst files so I've moved the pst files on to a NAS box where it's being backed up every night and if I need to do a search on those, I use Active Folders. If they need to archive, we've been archiving by deal (only the dead/completed deals) -- one pst file per deal so the pst file usually never gets anywhere near 1 GB. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Sounds like it works for you unless people want to search their whole mailbox after moving small doses into a PST. Also, make sure nobody ever tries to switch a 3GB mailbox to a PST ;-) Have fun with PST's :-) I used to use one back in 1998/99 and suffered more than one time from corruption and data loss. Of course if that'll happen the network admin is in charge to recover the data from the local hard drive of the laptop (which is surely backup'ed every night ;-) I'm happy with having all data on the server. I can search, use OWA or IMAP and the server admin (me, Doh!) takes care of the backup too... Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Sounds like a good way to save your life ;-) I wish more folks would do it that way... -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Yup, it ain't fun since I'd rather have everything on the server. I don't leave the pst file on the local hard drive. They very rarely access the pst files so I've moved the pst files on to a NAS box where it's being backed up every night and if I need to do a search on those, I use Active Folders. If they need to archive, we've been archiving by deal (only the dead/completed deals) -- one pst file per deal so the pst file usually never gets anywhere near 1 GB. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Sounds like it works for you unless people want to search their whole mailbox after moving small doses into a PST. Also, make sure nobody ever tries to switch a 3GB mailbox to a PST ;-) Have fun with PST's :-) I used to use one back in 1998/99 and suffered more than one time from corruption and data loss. Of course if that'll happen the network admin is in charge to recover the data from the local hard drive of the laptop (which is surely backup'ed every night ;-) I'm happy with having all data on the server. I can search, use OWA or IMAP and the server admin (me, Doh!) takes care of the backup too... Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: .Pst on OWA?
That's fine. PST's aren't a good way to comply with those regulations though, because then you still lose both administrative control of that data as well as the ability to back it up. There's this cool product from Kvault that is designed to address those issues though... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
http://www.bruceisapimp.com -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: .Pst on OWA? www.kvault.com ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:33 PM Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: .Pst on OWA?
Not really .. it is a solution that enables you to get rid of those pesky PSTs and still keep the size of your stores down to the size you want without bothering the users too much. ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Siegfried Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:04 PM Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Should we consider that as SPAM? gdr Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: .Pst on OWA? www.kvault.com ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:33 PM Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Combining two .psts
You can drag/drop or archive PST to PST. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Combining two .psts Open them both up in your Outlook profile, right-drag and drop between the two, select Move. You will have to do this for each folder. -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Can the two .psts be combined together? If they can be then how? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I've actually downloaded their demo but I haven't got around to playing with it on my test lab. It hasn't really been an administrative nightmare ever since we moved the pst files to a central location. Though it does need a lot of cooperation from the user community and intervention from IT. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions That's fine. PST's aren't a good way to comply with those regulations though, because then you still lose both administrative control of that data as well as the ability to back it up. There's this cool product from Kvault that is designed to address those issues though... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Combining two .psts
Thanks much guys! -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Combining two .psts You can drag/drop or archive PST to PST. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Combining two .psts Open them both up in your Outlook profile, right-drag and drop between the two, select Move. You will have to do this for each folder. -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Can the two .psts be combined together? If they can be then how? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Combining two .psts
Thanks much guys! -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Combining two .psts You can drag/drop or archive PST to PST. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Combining two .psts Open them both up in your Outlook profile, right-drag and drop between the two, select Move. You will have to do this for each folder. -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Can the two .psts be combined together? If they can be then how? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Question then Why did they change the functionality?It worked in 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note 1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of http://www.cdolive.com/changemessageclass.htm) your co-worker found is designed for the Exchange Event Service which is only provided in Exchange 2000/2003 for backwards compatibility and I would not recommend using it with Exchange 2000/2003 due to being not reliable. 2. The issue you are facing not being able to reply to public folder messages will neither be fixed with KB817809 nor the script you mentioned or the one Andy Webb pointed you to. This is a limitation of Outlook Web Access 2000. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Looks like Microsoft released this yesterday. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817809 Has anybody had any experience with this issue? We see it because we are unable to reply or forward a message in a Public Folder when it is accessed through OWA. I was wondering if anyone had any workarounds until the SP is released, currently I am troubleshooting issues with this Script that a coworker of mine found online. http://www.netcomitc.com/post2note/esa.htm All help is appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
A... A financial institution. One of the nice features of KVS is the ability to allow your compliance officers to search only those mailboxes for the areas that they are responsible for. It cuts way down on the false positives that will happen with more common words. It also allows you to push the responsibility of looking at the data to the owners of the data. You only need to provide them with the proper access rights and if you manage it well, that means very little work for you in the long run. One of the largest problems that I encounter during an investigation or discovery is that I have no idea what they are looking for. I'm not a securities specialist. I'm not a investment banker. I'm not even a financial person. I can't decide what is appropriate for the workplace and what isn't. This allows you to let them manage that and you have time to do your job. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I've actually downloaded their demo but I haven't got around to playing with it on my test lab. It hasn't really been an administrative nightmare ever since we moved the pst files to a central location. Though it does need a lot of cooperation from the user community and intervention from IT. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions That's fine. PST's aren't a good way to comply with those regulations though, because then you still lose both administrative control of that data as well as the ability to back it up. There's this cool product from Kvault that is designed to address those issues though... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: .Pst on OWA?
At the bare minimum, you've given up centralized administrative control, which IMO is a bad thing when it comes to regulatory compliance. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I've actually downloaded their demo but I haven't got around to playing with it on my test lab. It hasn't really been an administrative nightmare ever since we moved the pst files to a central location. Though it does need a lot of cooperation from the user community and intervention from IT. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions That's fine. PST's aren't a good way to comply with those regulations though, because then you still lose both administrative control of that data as well as the ability to back it up. There's this cool product from Kvault that is designed to address those issues though... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
OK everyone here it is...the fix. As you veteran networkers probably detected right of the bat is...it is a DNS problem. Seems the ISP has not delgated our DNS to the gaining ISP. So, when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] my local sever thought the mail was a relay, hence the cannot relay through this machine message. To fix the problem, I have to add an email address to my user on the exchange 2k server that looked like this [EMAIL PROTECTED] (however, I think I can replace that with the dns name and be just fine). This allowed the mail to come straight into my server from public. Does this concern anyone? We will have to wait until I get all of the users forwarded to their new @ipaddress before we can delegate to the ISP and then I can forward all of their mail back to them from the old account. Unless someone knows of a way to make unix send mail pit this all out automatcally. Thanks for all of the replies to help sovle this. Especially to Ben for the think it again posting. Christian - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:23 pm Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 First I'll set the stage: We are currntly using an ISP for our mail we use either IMAP or POP# toget it from them and bring it home to the client. However, this is getting costly. So, the exchange server. Currently the isp still has the dns, but will be delegating it shortly. Here are the specs of my situation Domain name is: hillsboro.k12.wi.us DNS name is mail2.hillsboro.k12.wi.us (this is pointing to my server) Server setup: E2K SP3 on W2K SP3 Global settings in xch mngr: Internet Message format: Default - SMTP domain=* all else is default Recipeint policies: default policy - Email addresses (Policy) = SMTP (checked) = @hillsboro.k12.wi.us X400 (Checked) = appropriate paths Default SMTP Virtual Server: General tab= IP Address: (all unassigned) Access tab: Authentication= all boxes (except require TLS encryption) are checked Certificates = None used Connection control = all except the list below checked Relaying = Only the list below and allow all computers which successfully authenticate regardless of the list above. checked The rest of the SMTP virtual server tabs are in default. Connector: General = lists my exchange server as the virtual server Address space = type:SMTP Address:* Cost:1 Connector scope = entire organization Deivery restriction = none IF you guys can help, I will be VERY grateful. Thanks Christian - Original Message - From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:46 am Subject: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All looks good according to the MS documentation still doesn't say HOW your server is set up. Please detail how you are set up, including authentication methods, what the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc. Also, what is your domain name that is having problems? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Yes, my policy is correct. I can seem to get my finger on this. Christian - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: OWA and the M:
There is no M: drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is served up on the server, the server would have to know about the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So would you share the drive your PST is on so the server could read it? Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I agree with you that it's a lot better to keep everything in exchange that's why I'm seriously pursuing the idea of getting an archiving solution. In our current situation where we do not have the archiving solution, it's either we leave all the email messages on the server and probably at this point, we'd have users that would have 8GB mailboxes and probably the total size of the information store would be at the 250GB mark or archive the mail messages into smaller pst files and put them in a central location (NAS box). I still do have control since it's searchable, and I can run policies on it (using a 3rd party app) and users have stopped bugging us why their 3 GB mailboxes take forever to open up when they're dialing into our network on a 56Kbps line. It's far from ideal but it works for us right now and I'm looking forward to have a better solution. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions At the bare minimum, you've given up centralized administrative control, which IMO is a bad thing when it comes to regulatory compliance. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I've actually downloaded their demo but I haven't got around to playing with it on my test lab. It hasn't really been an administrative nightmare ever since we moved the pst files to a central location. Though it does need a lot of cooperation from the user community and intervention from IT. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions That's fine. PST's aren't a good way to comply with those regulations though, because then you still lose both administrative control of that data as well as the ability to back it up. There's this cool product from Kvault that is designed to address those issues though... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot
RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 OK everyone here it is...the fix. As you veteran networkers probably detected right of the bat is...it is a DNS problem. Seems the ISP has not delgated our DNS to the gaining ISP. So, when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] my local sever thought the mail was a relay, hence the cannot relay through this machine message. To fix the problem, I have to add an email address to my user on the exchange 2k server that looked like this [EMAIL PROTECTED] (however, I think I can replace that with the dns name and be just fine). This allowed the mail to come straight into my server from public. Does this concern anyone? We will have to wait until I get all of the users forwarded to their new @ipaddress before we can delegate to the ISP and then I can forward all of their mail back to them from the old account. Unless someone knows of a way to make unix send mail pit this all out automatcally. Thanks for all of the replies to help sovle this. Especially to Ben for the think it again posting. Christian - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:23 pm Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 First I'll set the stage: We are currntly using an ISP for our mail we use either IMAP or POP# toget it from them and bring it home to the client. However, this is getting costly. So, the exchange server. Currently the isp still has the dns, but will be delegating it shortly. Here are the specs of my situation Domain name is: hillsboro.k12.wi.us DNS name is mail2.hillsboro.k12.wi.us (this is pointing to my server) Server setup: E2K SP3 on W2K SP3 Global settings in xch mngr: Internet Message format: Default - SMTP domain=* all else is default Recipeint policies: default policy - Email addresses (Policy) = SMTP (checked) = @hillsboro.k12.wi.us X400 (Checked) = appropriate paths Default SMTP Virtual Server: General tab= IP Address: (all unassigned) Access tab: Authentication= all boxes (except require TLS encryption) are checked Certificates = None used Connection control = all except the list below checked Relaying = Only the list below and allow all computers which successfully authenticate regardless of the list above. checked The rest of the SMTP virtual server tabs are in default. Connector: General = lists my exchange server as the virtual server Address space = type:SMTP Address:* Cost:1 Connector scope = entire organization Deivery restriction = none IF you guys can help, I will be VERY grateful. Thanks Christian - Original Message - From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:46 am Subject: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All looks good according to the MS documentation still doesn't say HOW your server is set up. Please detail how you are set up, including authentication methods, what the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc. Also, what is your domain name that is having problems? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Yes, my policy is correct. I can seem to get my finger on this. Christian - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:39:31 -0500 OK everyone here it is...the fix. As you veteran networkers probably detected right of the bat is...it is a DNS problem. Seems the ISP has not delgated our DNS to the gaining ISP. So, when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] my local sever thought the mail was a relay, hence the cannot relay through this machine message. To fix the problem, I have to add an email address to my user on the exchange 2k server that looked like this [EMAIL PROTECTED] (however, I think I can replace that with the dns name and be just fine). This allowed the mail to come straight into my server from public. Does this concern anyone? We will have to wait until I get all of the users forwarded to their new @ipaddress before we can delegate to the ISP and then I can forward all of their mail back to them from the old account. Unless someone knows of a way to make unix send mail pit this all out automatcally. Thanks for all of the replies to help sovle this. Especially to Ben for the think it again posting. Christian - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:23 pm Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 First I'll set the stage: We are currntly using an ISP for our mail we use either IMAP or POP# toget it from them and bring it home to the client. However, this is getting costly. So, the exchange server. Currently the isp still has the dns, but will be delegating it shortly. Here are the specs of my situation Domain name is: hillsboro.k12.wi.us DNS name is mail2.hillsboro.k12.wi.us (this is pointing to my server) Server setup: E2K SP3 on W2K SP3 Global settings in xch mngr: Internet Message format: Default - SMTP domain=* all else is default Recipeint policies: default policy - Email addresses (Policy) = SMTP (checked) = @hillsboro.k12.wi.us X400 (Checked) = appropriate paths Default SMTP Virtual Server: General tab= IP Address: (all unassigned) Access tab: Authentication= all boxes (except require TLS encryption) are checked Certificates = None used Connection control = all except the list below checked Relaying = Only the list below and allow all computers which successfully authenticate regardless of the list above. checked The rest of the SMTP virtual server tabs are in default. Connector: General = lists my exchange server as the virtual server Address space = type:SMTP Address:* Cost:1 Connector scope = entire organization Deivery restriction = none IF you guys can help, I will be VERY grateful. Thanks Christian - Original Message - From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:46 am Subject: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All looks good according to the MS documentation still doesn't say HOW your server is set up. Please detail how you are set up, including authentication methods, what the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc. Also, what is your domain name that is having problems? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Yes, my policy is correct. I can seem to get my finger on this. Christian - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1
Fat fingers I think... -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 OK everyone here it is...the fix. As you veteran networkers probably detected right of the bat is...it is a DNS problem. Seems the ISP has not delgated our DNS to the gaining ISP. So, when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] my local sever thought the mail was a relay, hence the cannot relay through this machine message. To fix the problem, I have to add an email address to my user on the exchange 2k server that looked like this [EMAIL PROTECTED] (however, I think I can replace that with the dns name and be just fine). This allowed the mail to come straight into my server from public. Does this concern anyone? We will have to wait until I get all of the users forwarded to their new @ipaddress before we can delegate to the ISP and then I can forward all of their mail back to them from the old account. Unless someone knows of a way to make unix send mail pit this all out automatcally. Thanks for all of the replies to help sovle this. Especially to Ben for the think it again posting. Christian - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:23 pm Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 First I'll set the stage: We are currntly using an ISP for our mail we use either IMAP or POP# toget it from them and bring it home to the client. However, this is getting costly. So, the exchange server. Currently the isp still has the dns, but will be delegating it shortly. Here are the specs of my situation Domain name is: hillsboro.k12.wi.us DNS name is mail2.hillsboro.k12.wi.us (this is pointing to my server) Server setup: E2K SP3 on W2K SP3 Global settings in xch mngr: Internet Message format: Default - SMTP domain=* all else is default Recipeint policies: default policy - Email addresses (Policy) = SMTP (checked) = @hillsboro.k12.wi.us X400 (Checked) = appropriate paths Default SMTP Virtual Server: General tab= IP Address: (all unassigned) Access tab: Authentication= all boxes (except require TLS encryption) are checked Certificates = None used Connection control = all except the list below checked Relaying = Only the list below and allow all computers which successfully authenticate regardless of the list above. checked The rest of the SMTP virtual server tabs are in default. Connector: General = lists my exchange server as the virtual server Address space = type:SMTP Address:* Cost:1 Connector scope = entire organization Deivery restriction = none IF you guys can help, I will be VERY grateful. Thanks Christian - Original Message - From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:46 am Subject: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All looks good according to the MS documentation still doesn't say HOW your server is set up. Please detail how you are set up, including authentication methods, what the details are on your Relay Restrictions, etc. Also, what is your domain name that is having problems? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Subject: Re: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 Yes, my policy is correct. I can seem to get my finger on this. Christian - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:32 am Subject: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 you got a correct recipient policy for your internal domain name? -Original Message- From: CV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 All: I am receiving the following error when sending into my system from outside: Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for (email address) Does anyone have a clue about this one? I have checked, double checked, and triple checked my SMTP Connector properties for correct access and relaying information. All looks good according to newest MS documentation. I should add, I can send and receive internally just fine. Thanks CV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
RE: .Pst on OWA?
The delete key works wonders. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 13:34 To: Exchange Discussions I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
The line is that it was actually broken in 5.5 and they fixed it in E2K. Why there can't be a choice between Post type public folders and Note (email message) type public folders I don't understand. Actually I do - $$$. There /could/ be a choice if enough people griped about it. At this point, E2K3 is pretty much in the can and so it won't change much there. Since anything collaborative about public folders seems headed toward Sharepoint databases, there's probably not much harm in making PF's actually do mail correctly going forward. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:31 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Question then Why did they change the functionality?It worked in 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note 1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of http://www.cdolive.com/changemessageclass.htm) your co-worker found is designed for the Exchange Event Service which is only provided in Exchange 2000/2003 for backwards compatibility and I would not recommend using it with Exchange 2000/2003 due to being not reliable. 2. The issue you are facing not being able to reply to public folder messages will neither be fixed with KB817809 nor the script you mentioned or the one Andy Webb pointed you to. This is a limitation of Outlook Web Access 2000. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Looks like Microsoft released this yesterday. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817809 Has anybody had any experience with this issue? We see it because we are unable to reply or forward a message in a Public Folder when it is accessed through OWA. I was wondering if anyone had any workarounds until the SP is released, currently I am troubleshooting issues with this Script that a coworker of mine found online. http://www.netcomitc.com/post2note/esa.htm All help is appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA IIS settings
I've not seen that particular symptom with log off, but there's a KB article that tells you to put a single slash in the default domain in a few places that you need to do to make log off work properly. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA IIS settings I have a E2K FE/BE setup with the domain specified in IIS. When users use OWA and use the logoff button from the shortcuts they get an error, the would you like to debug? Error line:76 I have seen it may times. Then the close button will not function to close the browser window. I know it's a setting in IIS, but I can not track it down. I have used every know variable for each vrdirectory on the frontend box. Is there a Q article that describes the optimal settings for IIS in the setup? I can't locate one. Thanks, - John Q Jr. _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin console opens sloooow
Verify name resolution. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dolphin, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin console opens slw It only connects to one server...also, there's only around 100 recipients. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin console opens slw does the console connect to only one server? (if there are many saved connections, it will take extra time to open) On the second note - just one RAID5 for everything??? -Original Message- From: Dolphin, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin console opens slw Quick question...On my Exchange 5.5 server it takes about 2 mins for the splash screen to disappear and for the admin console to open. I have the admin console installed on two other workstations and it opens very quickly and everything is fine. The hang up only occurs on the server...Exchange itself runs great, mail zips right through, everything else on the server is normal, and I have no error messages. What should I do to start troubleshooting this problem? Thanks in advance... Server config: Poweredge 2600, Win2k sp3 in nt 4.0 domain, dual 2.0ghz xeon's, 2 gbs RAM, 4 drives RAID 5 with plenty of space left over... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
I thought they were in UTC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? IIS Log times are in GMT -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Nope - Zulu time. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? I thought they were in UTC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? IIS Log times are in GMT -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server unavailble message
Outlook startup delays and problems are almost always name resolution. Verify that the users are contacting a valid DNS and WINS server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Brezicky Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server unavailble message Hello, Two of my mobil users are having some issues. When they VPN, or dial in they connect to the network, however when trying to launch outlook 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 server they get the message. exchange server unavailable even if they hit retry several times they still can't get into mail. We have several other users that get in just fine. I defined a profile for one of them on another laptop and was able to access mail. Any suggestions on what to look at on the users laptop? Also why would this affect only those two users? Thanks in advance for any help, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: decommissioning an Admin Group
There are KB articles on orphan public folders. I believe the same techniques apply. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: decommissioning an Admin Group Hi all. is there a way to get rid of the system folders like Schedule+ Free Busy and Offline Addres Book that used to belong to an Administrative Group that used to exist at some point? If I just highlight these system folders and hit Delete, I get prompted for username and password, and no matter what credentials I supply I get Access Denied after 3-4 attempts. Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Credentials issue
There are hidden references in profiles that you don't see, usually referring to public folders. Prior to powering down, did you move all public folders to the new server and remove all instances from the old server? Did you change the home public folder store for the mailbox store to point to the new server? Those would help reduce this problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Credentials issue Negative. Only 1 profile. and the Exchange info points to new server. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: decommissioning an Admin Group
I have no problems with orphan folders and re-homing them. These things are different. Even when they are homed to an existing server it is impossible to get rid of them. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: decommissioning an Admin Group There are KB articles on orphan public folders. I believe the same techniques apply. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: decommissioning an Admin Group Hi all. is there a way to get rid of the system folders like Schedule+ Free Busy and Offline Addres Book that used to belong to an Administrative Group that used to exist at some point? If I just highlight these system folders and hit Delete, I get prompted for username and password, and no matter what credentials I supply I get Access Denied after 3-4 attempts. Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
UTC's French. GMT'll do g -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 17:45 To: Exchange Discussions I thought they were in UTC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? IIS Log times are in GMT -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can make whatever changes an owner should be able to make. Searching for something in PFs used to be a breeze when they were on our 5.5 servers, now, you may or may not find what you're looking for even though you know it's in there. We're getting to the point that it would be easier to create mailboxes for the PFs that we constantly get called on, the ones with rules that stop working, mostly, and that's such a waste to have to create a mailbox when all you really need is a PF. I'd guess we got maybe 10 PF calls in the 5 years we've been running Exchange for actual problems with the server, not the usual, user doesn't understand the permissions calls, and now that we've moved our PFs to E2K, we get at least 10 calls a week with PF server issues, if not more. We've turned logging up to highest on everything to do with PFs and nothing ever shows up in the logs to give us a clue as to why they sometimes work and sometimes don't. When the forwarding rules stop working, a server restart is the only thing that fixes it. I'm really beginning to hate PFs. When I went to MEC2000, in one of the classes, they said that in E2K, you'd be able to change permissions on PFs without replacing permissions - what happened to that? Wouldn't that be helpful when you have thousands of PFs? I know, PFAdmin, which may or may not work correctly. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The line is that it was actually broken in 5.5 and they fixed it in E2K. Why there can't be a choice between Post type public folders and Note (email message) type public folders I don't understand. Actually I do - $$$. There /could/ be a choice if enough people griped about it. At this point, E2K3 is pretty much in the can and so it won't change much there. Since anything collaborative about public folders seems headed toward Sharepoint databases, there's probably not much harm in making PF's actually do mail correctly going forward. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:31 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Question then Why did they change the functionality?It worked in 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note 1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of http://www.cdolive.com/changemessageclass.htm) your co-worker found is designed for the Exchange Event Service which is only provided in Exchange 2000/2003 for backwards compatibility and I would not recommend using it with Exchange 2000/2003 due to being not reliable. 2. The issue you are facing not being able to reply to public folder messages will neither be fixed with KB817809 nor the script you mentioned or the one Andy Webb pointed you to. This is a limitation of Outlook Web Access 2000. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Looks like Microsoft released this yesterday. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817809 Has anybody had any experience with this issue? We see it because we are unable to reply or forward a message in a Public Folder when it is accessed through OWA. I was wondering if anyone had any workarounds until the SP is released, currently I am troubleshooting issues with this Script that a coworker of mine found online. http://www.netcomitc.com/post2note/esa.htm All help is appreciated, Joshua
RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
I thought they were in Universal Coordinated Time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? UTC's French. GMT'll do g -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 17:45 To: Exchange Discussions I thought they were in UTC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? IIS Log times are in GMT -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
As for being posts instead of notes, see Andy's reply and call Microsoft for a free of charge fix. I've never used rules much on PF's hence I cannot comment on that. I do understand that a rule doesn't fire if it is a post item but it should fire on a note item. I'd be interested to hear if you have any additional info what's going on. Especially if the store is hit by other applications like a MAPI based backup (single folder backup thingy maybe?) or an antivirus scanner (either MAPI or ESE/VSAPI based)? Also, you do know that you should stay away from the M: Drive, don't you? The symptoms (like the permissions issue - I just tested with Outlook 2002 SP2 and it works here) you describe point me into the direction that you are running some piece of software which accesses the M: Drive (like a file based backup or AV scanner) and causes some of your grief. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can make whatever changes an owner should be able to make. Searching for something in PFs used to be a breeze when they were on our 5.5 servers, now, you may or may not find what you're looking for even though you know it's in there. We're getting to the point that it would be easier to create mailboxes for the PFs that we constantly get called on, the ones with rules that stop working, mostly, and that's such a waste to have to create a mailbox when all you really need is a PF. I'd guess we got maybe 10 PF calls in the 5 years we've been running Exchange for actual problems with the server, not the usual, user doesn't understand the permissions calls, and now that we've moved our PFs to E2K, we get at least 10 calls a week with PF server issues, if not more. We've turned logging up to highest on everything to do with PFs and nothing ever shows up in the logs to give us a clue as to why they sometimes work and sometimes don't. When the forwarding rules stop working, a server restart is the only thing that fixes it. I'm really beginning to hate PFs. When I went to MEC2000, in one of the classes, they said that in E2K, you'd be able to change permissions on PFs without replacing permissions - what happened to that? Wouldn't that be helpful when you have thousands of PFs? I know, PFAdmin, which may or may not work correctly. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The line is that it was actually broken in 5.5 and they fixed it in E2K. Why there can't be a choice between Post type public folders and Note (email message) type public folders I don't understand. Actually I do - $$$. There /could/ be a choice if enough people griped about it. At this point, E2K3 is pretty much in the can and so it won't change much there. Since anything collaborative about public folders seems headed toward Sharepoint databases, there's probably not much harm in making PF's actually do mail correctly going forward. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:31 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Question then Why did they change the functionality? It worked in 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note 1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of http://www.cdolive.com/changemessageclass.htm)
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
I assume you are asking about the reply from a PF with OWA issue. For the post vs. note issue see Andy's reply. Since Exchange 2000/2003 OWA has been developed from scratch a lot of architectural changes happened. While this gave us an OWA architecture that is pretty reliable and scalable (In OWA 5.5 days hitting it with more than 300 simultaneous users could bring your server close to 100% resource usage) it has some drawbacks. One drawback is that the ability to run any action which requires access to your mailbox (like a reply forward or sending an e-mail to a contact from a public folder contact form) is not possible while you are connected to the public folder store. The reason is pretty simple: when you open a connection to a store you log off from the other store in that instance of the browser. Because OWA 2000/2003 is a client server architecture (with the ability to deploy frontend/backend systems to distribute load) the browser instance can only logon to one store at a time. So, without having a connection to your mailbox you cannot send an e-mail. I understand that there are work arounds but almost all of those I do know would require server-side code execution which would (again - as we had in 5.5) way more load on the server and as far as I understand this is not the desired results. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Question then Why did they change the functionality? It worked in 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note 1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of http://www.cdolive.com/changemessageclass.htm) your co-worker found is designed for the Exchange Event Service which is only provided in Exchange 2000/2003 for backwards compatibility and I would not recommend using it with Exchange 2000/2003 due to being not reliable. 2. The issue you are facing not being able to reply to public folder messages will neither be fixed with KB817809 nor the script you mentioned or the one Andy Webb pointed you to. This is a limitation of Outlook Web Access 2000. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Looks like Microsoft released this yesterday. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817809 Has anybody had any experience with this issue? We see it because we are unable to reply or forward a message in a Public Folder when it is accessed through OWA. I was wondering if anyone had any workarounds until the SP is released, currently I am troubleshooting issues with this Script that a coworker of mine found online. http://www.netcomitc.com/post2note/esa.htm All help is appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Assuming you're not kidding, UTC is the same as GMT is the same as Zulu Time. The UK is currently at GMT/UTC+1. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions I thought they were in Universal Coordinated Time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? UTC's French. GMT'll do g -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 17:45 To: Exchange Discussions I thought they were in UTC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? IIS Log times are in GMT -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enabling LDAP for Exchange 5.5
Can I enable LDAP on Exchange 5.5? How can I go about it implementing it? I would greatly appreciate any help. Thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
I completely agree with you. We have tons of PF's designed to receive mail as well. I have heard of the permissions problem you describe as well - my wife's company is facing that now too I think on some of their 30,000+ public folders. Rather than rules, perhaps some Event Sinks designed to work on your most common applications would be worth developing for the public folders. Not as easy as rules, but once done, you could give the users a fairly easy interface to configure the folder the way it needs to behave. Have you filed issues with PSS on these problems? I hope so. If they never get the issues filed, they don't have the visibility to the degree of the problem. If you have a TAM, raise it there too. Continue the campaign to get the functionality back that we had in 5.5 - Public Folders as a shared mail repository. That simply disappeared in E2K. It has only slightly returned in E2K3. with the ability to reply/forward using OWA through a FrontEnd server. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:06 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can make whatever changes an owner should be able to make. Searching for something in PFs used to be a breeze when they were on our 5.5 servers, now, you may or may not find what you're looking for even though you know it's in there. We're getting to the point that it would be easier to create mailboxes for the PFs that we constantly get called on, the ones with rules that stop working, mostly, and that's such a waste to have to create a mailbox when all you really need is a PF. I'd guess we got maybe 10 PF calls in the 5 years we've been running Exchange for actual problems with the server, not the usual, user doesn't understand the permissions calls, and now that we've moved our PFs to E2K, we get at least 10 calls a week with PF server issues, if not more. We've turned logging up to highest on everything to do with PFs and nothing ever shows up in the logs to give us a clue as to why they sometimes work and sometimes don't. When the forwarding rules stop working, a server restart is the only thing that fixes it. I'm really beginning to hate PFs. When I went to MEC2000, in one of the classes, they said that in E2K, you'd be able to change permissions on PFs without replacing permissions - what happened to that? Wouldn't that be helpful when you have thousands of PFs? I know, PFAdmin, which may or may not work correctly. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The line is that it was actually broken in 5.5 and they fixed it in E2K. Why there can't be a choice between Post type public folders and Note (email message) type public folders I don't understand. Actually I do - $$$. There /could/ be a choice if enough people griped about it. At this point, E2K3 is pretty much in the can and so it won't change much there. Since anything collaborative about public folders seems headed toward Sharepoint databases, there's probably not much harm in making PF's actually do mail correctly going forward. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:31 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Question then Why did they change the functionality?It worked in 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note 1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of
RE: Enabling LDAP for Exchange 5.5
Enabled by default I believe. Exchange Admin/Configuration/Protocols/LDAP Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Enabling LDAP for Exchange 5.5 Can I enable LDAP on Exchange 5.5? How can I go about it implementing it? I would greatly appreciate any help. Thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
I remember a fix for permissions problems in Outlook 2002. IIRC it was rolled into Office XP SP2. And I am not going to deploy FE/BE just for the sake of PF replies. I can live with my custom (classic) ASP Exchange Web form to accomplish that ;-) Off to explore the possibilities now to turn a Sharepoint Portal Server 2003/Windows Sharepoint Services custom list into a shared mail repository :-)) Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 2:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I completely agree with you. We have tons of PF's designed to receive mail as well. I have heard of the permissions problem you describe as well - my wife's company is facing that now too I think on some of their 30,000+ public folders. Rather than rules, perhaps some Event Sinks designed to work on your most common applications would be worth developing for the public folders. Not as easy as rules, but once done, you could give the users a fairly easy interface to configure the folder the way it needs to behave. Have you filed issues with PSS on these problems? I hope so. If they never get the issues filed, they don't have the visibility to the degree of the problem. If you have a TAM, raise it there too. Continue the campaign to get the functionality back that we had in 5.5 - Public Folders as a shared mail repository. That simply disappeared in E2K. It has only slightly returned in E2K3. with the ability to reply/forward using OWA through a FrontEnd server. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:06 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can make whatever changes an owner should be able to make. Searching for something in PFs used to be a breeze when they were on our 5.5 servers, now, you may or may not find what you're looking for even though you know it's in there. We're getting to the point that it would be easier to create mailboxes for the PFs that we constantly get called on, the ones with rules that stop working, mostly, and that's such a waste to have to create a mailbox when all you really need is a PF. I'd guess we got maybe 10 PF calls in the 5 years we've been running Exchange for actual problems with the server, not the usual, user doesn't understand the permissions calls, and now that we've moved our PFs to E2K, we get at least 10 calls a week with PF server issues, if not more. We've turned logging up to highest on everything to do with PFs and nothing ever shows up in the logs to give us a clue as to why they sometimes work and sometimes don't. When the forwarding rules stop working, a server restart is the only thing that fixes it. I'm really beginning to hate PFs. When I went to MEC2000, in one of the classes, they said that in E2K, you'd be able to change permissions on PFs without replacing permissions - what happened to that? Wouldn't that be helpful when you have thousands of PFs? I know, PFAdmin, which may or may not work correctly. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The line is that it was actually broken in 5.5 and they fixed it in E2K. Why there can't be a choice between Post type public folders and Note (email message) type public folders I don't understand. Actually I do - $$$. There /could/ be a choice if enough people griped about it. At this point, E2K3 is pretty much in the can and so it won't change much there. Since anything collaborative about public folders seems headed
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I've though of that b4, I thought the new version is so powerful.. It might can work as how its work with using Outlook Properties with Exchange Server (Intranet) to open Mailbox P.Folder. Browse OWA through IE or etc is just only a browser, enable to open a file from within the workstation through browser is something that i can imagine (of coz,just imagine). Every Management in different Organization requires different thing. In my side, others country staff is using our Exchange Email. Hence they can only manage to open with either email through POP3 or OWA. I would stress to disable POP3. Their only choice left is to open with OWA. They needs to save ALL the items that they have SENT receive. They keep it either for an evidence or for information. No choice, their database is too big for it to keep inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is served up on the server, the server would have to know about the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So would you share the drive your PST is on so the server could read it? Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Enabling LDAP for Exchange 5.5
LDAP should be enabled in Exchange 5.5 by default. Someone might be able to help you further if you explain what you've tried to do and the results you've gotten. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Enabling LDAP for Exchange 5.5 Can I enable LDAP on Exchange 5.5? How can I go about it implementing it? I would greatly appreciate any help. Thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
You can already use OWA to open somebody else's mailbox calendar or anther public folder because this data is stored on the server. I can imagine a custom application to import a PST into the Exchanger server database using a Web browser based interface that integrates into OWA (fairly simple, works here in a simple prototype). But I cannot imagine how you'd share a drive or PST to open it directly in OWA. It's just two different worlds... -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I've though of that b4, I thought the new version is so powerful.. It might can work as how its work with using Outlook Properties with Exchange Server (Intranet) to open Mailbox P.Folder. Browse OWA through IE or etc is just only a browser, enable to open a file from within the workstation through browser is something that i can imagine (of coz,just imagine). Every Management in different Organization requires different thing. In my side, others country staff is using our Exchange Email. Hence they can only manage to open with either email through POP3 or OWA. I would stress to disable POP3. Their only choice left is to open with OWA. They needs to save ALL the items that they have SENT receive. They keep it either for an evidence or for information. No choice, their database is too big for it to keep inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is served up on the server, the server would have to know about the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So would you share the drive your PST is on so the server could read it? Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
