RE: IMC Mail Que

[Herrick, Michael]

Adriaan,
I have an idea of what you are going through. Managing a system without
prior training is tough. And a system that is in use and having problems
makes it much more difficult.

But your education will proceed at a faster pace if you purchase a book or
two that has been recommended on this list. This, and previous questions,
are so basic, that the answers tend towards the curt and/or sarcastic. And
then they won't help you as much as you would hope or need. Many can be
answered by reading, in less time than it takes to type the question. (Well
for me, anyway. I type real slow)

If one of my admins asked this question, his Exchange permissions would
revert to View Only before I gave an answer.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Mail Que


Where can I see what Mail is que up in the IMC que to leave the server?

Thanks

Adriaan Van Huissteden

Network Administrator
Connect Credit Union
Phone: (03) 6233 0660



Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments (if any) may be
confidential or legally privileged material. It is intended solely for the
addressee.  Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If you
are not the intended recipient, and disclosure, copying or distribution of
the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If your receive this communication in error,
please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and associated
material from any computer.   Any views expressed in this communication are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be views of CONNECT Credit Union.   Whilst virus scanning software
is utilised by CONNECT, no responsibility is taken for virus damage that may
originate from this transmission 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes

[Herrick, Michael]

As a member of the Inner Circle, evidently not yours, I believe you erred on
a single crucial point. 

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes


Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached.

-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: PGP 7.1
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RE: File system in outlook/exchange

[Herrick, Michael]

Sure sounds like ytou need some training sessions for your users. Starting
with your boss.

Spending $ on training is probably the best investment any company can make.
Especially with Outlook. Unfortunately most consider it an expense, not an
investment. Outlook has the potential to really enhance productivity. And
most of it's power is never used.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange


Yeah I think he just wants to keep track of all the data because everyone is
just filing stuff in their own way on one of our servers.  Also their older
guys here that dont know how to manuver in outlook as well as others

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: File system in outlook/exchange


Outlook can do this.  It's silly though.

- Original Message -
From: "Drewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:07 PM
Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange


Exchange doesn't work that way.

Drew

If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)

KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net

"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the
spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that
spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives
people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the
presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the
range of the debate." - Noam Chomsky, Linguist and Social Critic

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange


yeah he wants it too act like explorer, he wants to be able to drop messages
in folders on the network without moving out of outlook

-Original Message-
From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange


If Outlook = File system Then
something = wrong


You can have you boss's outlook bar shortcuts have his personal folders
but i dont think you can have your email and file system open at the
same time

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: File system in outlook/exchange


Outlook != File System

- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: File system in outlook/exchange


Ok I was just speaking to my boss and he told me that he wants a new
server
as a file server.  He wants to use outlook 2000 as a file system.  He
doest
want to have it stored in public folders he wants them stored in folder
on
the new file server.  Ok so I looked at outlook and showed him that you
can
do this with the outlook bar, you know by going to other shortcuts.  But
of
course there was a problem with that, he wants the least amount of steps
as
possible.  Basically he wants to be able to see all of his outlook
folders
and messages as well as seeing all the shared networks folders on the
file
server in one window in outlooks application.  He want to be able to
drag
and drop files from his inbox to a public share in one window.  Has
anyone
ever seen anything out there that can do this to outlook.  I went to
slipstick.com but didn't find any tools their that has this feature.
Thanks
for your time.

Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Licensing

[Herrick, Michael]

How do you pronounce 'moynd'?

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Licensing


a) damn right
b) poor excuse for crap MS policy and dissemination of info
c) i was thinking more along the lines of 'discussion of licensing isn't
popular on the list, talk to your rep'
d) in the west of england, people say 'mind' at the end of most sentences,
pronounced 'moynd'.

:)

> a) Yeah, isn't that annoying?!?
> b) yep.  Because it's always changing.
> c) because that would grant an even greater liability -- 
> people who didn't
> know about the list could find our 'recommendation' and get 
> into trouble
> without having the luck to ask us in 'person'.
> d) mind is a funny word... :P
> 
> As unconvincing as your licensing rep sounds, her/his word is 
> the final
> word.  Sorry.
> 
> Drew
> 
> If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we 
> belong to each
> other. (Mother Theresa)
> 
> KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
> Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net
> 
> If we in our turn plan on militarism, vengeance, and 
> retaliation, if we
> steel our spirits against the suffering which such pursuits 
> always cause to
> the innocent, in short, if we turn to the tools of death, 
> then whatever
> hollow triumph we may trumpet, it will have been Death alone which has
> won. --G. Simon Harak, Jesuit Priest interviewed 9/21 in NY
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Atkinson, Daniel
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Licensing
> 
> 
> well, i 'give a flip', that's why i asked! of course we talk to the
> licensing rep, but I asked because:
> 
> a) the licensing reps don't always sound entirely convincing
> b) the information on the MS site is ambiguous
> c) there's nothing about licensing in the FAQ
> d) i didn't think anyone would mind.
> 
> 
> > "i might ask for some friendly advice though, and take that into
> > consideration along with what MS and the vendor says."?
> >
> > Think through that statement again.  When it comes to something like
> > licensing, who gives a flip what anyone here says versus what
> > MS says?  We
> > can't bust you for a license violation.  And if you're not
> > going to rely on
> > it, why ask?
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:32 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Licensing
> >
> >
> > > Take it either way.  I don't really care, but I'm not going
> > to rely on
> > > this list to tell me how my licensing works for my company.
> >
> > nor would i.
> >
> > i might ask for some friendly advice though, and take that into
> > consideration along with what MS and the vendor says.
> >
> > maybe i'm wrong, but your response seems paranoid and
> > unhelfpful. that said,
> > i'm sorry if I've offended you.
> >
> > dan.
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addres

RE: mailbox causes Outlook to freeze

[Herrick, Michael]

Ensure the client is off line. Then use ExAdmin to move the mailbox to
another server in the site. Have the user start Outlook. It will find the
new home server automagically. I have seen moving a mailbox clean up
otherwise unsolveable weirdness.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mailbox causes Outlook to freeze


Guess I should clarify a bit.  This problem is happening on different
machines, so it has nothing to do with her profile or with a PST.  I can
create a new profile on a computer that she has never used, setting it up
for her mailbox.  Then, when I open Outlook as her, glack! 

-Kirsten

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mailbox causes Outlook to freeze


Can anyone think of a reason that a mailbox could cause Outlook to freeze
up?  We're using Exchange 5.5 SP4, and the client is Outlook 2000.  If I add
the user's mailbox to my profile, I can open it up fine.  When I create a
new profile with the user's mailbox as the primary, and then open Outlook,
Outlook freezes up.  It opens the mailbox and I can see the mail, but
Outlook no longer responds.

This was reported to me by the user's support folks, and they tried it on
two different machines.  I tried it on my workstation as well with the same
results.  Nothing about the mailbox looks strange.  It only has about 11
Megs of data.  Permissions settings look correct.  I would just say "let's
try recreating the mailbox" but the user is at a remote location, so that
might be difficult to arrange with her.  

If anyone has any insights, I would love to hear them.  This is about the
sixty-thousandth wierd problem I have had today and my brain has turned to
jelly. 

Thanks,
-Kirsten

___
Attend OSU Internet2 Day!  http://www.net.orst.edu/I2 
Kirsten Petersen
Network Engineering
Oregon State University
541-737-9187


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Restore

[Herrick, Michael]

Why BLB = BAD. A true tale from my last company.
After 3 months of banging their heads, the idiots at a remote site got BLB &
restores to work in test. So they ran it on the production box. I was
adamant that the Exchange online backup be run first. That took about 2-3
hours. The BLB took over 12 hours.

So, the VP needed a message restored from the previous day that was
shift-deleted. Can't do it yet. BLB was still in progress. He has to wait.
The next day, they restore his mailbox. And the message was not there! VP is
unhappy. So they go to the next day's tape (a day later). Still no message.
Seems like it came and went between BLB's. VP is now beyond irate. Calls the
CIO. Who calls me. I have DumpsterAlwaysOn. Go into VP's mailbox and give
him his message in 2 minutes.

Oh yes, most of their problems were permissions/UghServe related. So the
full restore did not work. While they had "practiced" restores, they never
opened a mailbox. Just accepted the logging information that the restore was
complete.

Do not waste your time on BLB. Deleted Items Retention, DumpsterAlwaysOn on
an admin workstation, Circular logging OFF. Practice restores. Read the FAQ.
Sleep easy. And keep the untrained away from the server.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restore


Possible corruption of the store.

Increased tape drive usage, which will result in a shorter lifespan for your
tape drive.

The wrath of the list.  :P

Drew

If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)

KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net

We cannot do evil to others without doing it to ourselves. -- Joseph
Francois Eduard Desmahis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Amir El Aziq
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Restore


Scenario:
5 users in the organisation.
1 server for file/print/email
Full Online Exchange backup every night.
Exchange BLB every night also.
Data backup every night.
All backups complete in 3 hours, on 1 tape.

Please explain to me why doing a BLB is bad in this scenario.


> -Original Message-
> From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 October 2001 12:35
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Restore
>
>
> Because BLB SUCK Donkey Sausage!!! And if an exchange admin needs
BLB's
> then he doesn't know how to admin his Exchange Box.
>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:43 AM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>Subject: Re: Restore
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>How can you know it will always a bad thing?
> >>>
> >>>- Original Message -
> >>>From: "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:09 AM
> >>>Subject: RE: Restore
> >>>
> >>>
>  Still is a bad thing, it will always be a bad thing.
> 
>  -Original Message-
>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N.
>  Precht
>  Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:03 PM
>  To: Exchange Discussions
>  Subject: RE: Restore
> 
> 
>  Wasnt that a bad thing to do in 5.5 , wouldnt also be true in 2k ?
> 
>  -Original Message-
>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> >>>Van Huissteden,
>  Adriaan
>  Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 23:56
>  To: Exchange Discussions
>  Subject: Restore
> 
> 
>  Can you backup and Restore individual Mailboxes on
> >>>Exchange Server 2K?
>  Thanks
> 
>  Adriaan Van Huissteden
> 
>  Network Administrator
>  Connect Credit Union
>  Phone: (03) 6233 0660
> 
> 
>  _
>  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>  _
> 
>  Do You Yahoo!?
> 
>  Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  _
>  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Exchange List admin:

RE: Cannot Generate Offline Address Book

[Herrick, Michael]

We had a similar problem at my last company. Some untrained admin-wannabe
added a fax connector and it created a bogus address template. PSS had us
delete a template for a foreign language. I can't remember the details. It
may have been done in raw mode. You should call PSS to walk you through it. 

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Paul Markette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot Generate Offline Address Book


Hello,
For some reason, my Exchange servers are no longer generating the
OAB.  When I try to manually generate it from Configuration\DS Site
Configuration Properties\Offline Address Book, I get an error with ID no:
c1031662 and the Event Viewer logs event 5004.  Micro's Support site
describes a problem where the foreign Details Templates or One-Off Address
Templates have been installed, but the corresponding Code Pages have not.  I
have followed their directions to check it, but everything looks as they say
it should.  I do have 3 templates installed, English/USA, French and German.
Does anyone have any ideas about what else could be causing this
problem?  I have 5 5.5 SP4 servers.

Paul Markette
NT Systems Administrator
Epicentric, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
415-995-7228


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Replication problem

[Herrick, Michael]

All Exchange servers in a site or org do NOT have to be at the same SP
level. In a site with many servers it may not be possible to upgrade the SP
on all servers at the same time. And if there are problems, this may be most
undesireable. However, you certainly should run with all servers at the same
SP. So upgrade them all within as short a time frame as your business will
allow. Have a contingency plan for restores of machines with different SPs.

Be sure to check out the post SP hotfixes. And TEST. TEST. TEST.

Upgrade the admin workstations to the latest SP of the servers first. IIRC
there were issues with older SP workstations connecting to newer Sp servers.


Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem


What about machines that admin the boxes ?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 15:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem


all the exchange servers need to be at the same SP level.

Drew

If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)

KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net

"A state without the means of change is without the means of its own
conservation." - Edmund Burke

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WILLIAMS,JESSICA
D
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem


Don,

I had looked at Q247654, but I'm a bit confused.  It has the correct
exception error number, but the parameters are different.  Also, is it only
caused by large DLs?  My largest is only 1542 so would this really be my
problem?  But I do think now is probably the time to install sp4.  Will I
have to install throughout the entire site or can I have just the one server
on SP4?  You've been a great help.

Jessica

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem


Jessica,

Check out these couple of articles.  The first thing I see is that you
are running SP3 for Exchange and I'm seeing that SP4 is recommended to
fix this.  SO with that said, I would make sure you have a good backup
and apply SP4.

Again, check out these articles.  From the sounds of them, they might
very well apply to you.

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q247/6/54.ASP
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/1/72.ASP

D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
WILLIAMS,JESSICA D
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeDS
Event Category: Internal Processing
Event ID:   1171
Date:   10/3/2001
Time:   11:12:04 AM
User:   INFOSYS\ExchAdmin
Computer:   EXCH-SRV4
Description:
Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 1651 (internal
ID 208017d). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance.

--and--

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeDS
Event Category: Replication
Event ID:   1059
Date:   10/3/2001
Time:   11:12:04 AM
User:   INFOSYS\ExchAdmin
Computer:   EXCH-SRV4
Description:
Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned
error 22.

--and--

Event Type: Information
Event Source:   MSExchangeDS
Event Category: Replication
Event ID:   1070
Date:   10/3/2001
Time:   11:11:33 AM
User:   INFOSYS\ExchAdmin
Computer:   EXCH-SRV4
Description:
Internal event: Directory f68ebf464c66d4118f5200b0d0205037 EXCH-SRV3
asked the directory replication agent (DRA) to get changes from naming
context /o=WHF/ou=Hospital starting at update sequence number (USN)
56504 with flags 71 and sensitivity 100.


Even with errors, Microsoft's KB isn't helping much.  I get results when
I query for the Event ID, but what I get tends to be for Exchange 5.0.
Thanks Don.

Jessica

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem


I would, it might lead you to the problem before you call PSS and they
may have you do that anyway.  What sort of errors are showing up now?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
WILLIAMS,JESSICA D
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem


Thanks for the help gu

RE: Blocking External E-mail

[Herrick, Michael]

Blocking Sending is indirect. Create a DL. Add this DL to the delivery
restrictions tab in the IMS. Then add users to the DL.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking External E-mail


Were using Exchange 5.5, SP4, on NT 4.0, SP6.  I know if I remove the SMTP
address
from a users mailbox, they will not be able to RECEIVE incoming E-mail from
outside
of the company.  I can't remember what setting I change though to block them
from
SENDING E-mail outside the company.  A point in the right direction would be
greatly
appreciated.

Thanks!

Robert



*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***

This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail
message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and
may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information.  It is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s).
If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this electronic mail message in
error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system.

*** The Dayton Power & Light Company. ***

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K

[Herrick, Michael]

Well, after the digressions, by now you may have guessed that the answer is
**yes**. 

Do you have a specific question?


Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 9:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win 2K and Exchange 2K


Has anyone used these products?

Any Problems

Thanks

Adriaan Van Huissteden

Network Administrator
Connect Credit Union
Phone: (03) 6233 0660


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: command line directory import

[Herrick, Michael]

The easiest way to check the required syntax for an import to a container is
to
create one object manually and do an export from that container.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Beavers, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: command line directory import


All the imports I have ever done were to a container other than Recipients. 

For example, use the /o parameter on the admin.exe command:

   /o del.txt

where del.txt looks something like this:

 [Import]
 Basepoint=/o=MyOrg/ou=MySite/cn=MyContainer

Terry L Beavers
USF IT/TAA

-Original Message-
From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: command line directory import


Has anybody done a directory import to a folder other than Recipients from
the command line?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Weird Problem w/OWA

[Herrick, Michael]

Is his alias the same as his username?

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA


That does nothing.  Same result.  This is so annoying.  Thanks though

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA

Have him use his SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the username
box, instead of his username (jsmith).

-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird Problem w/OWA


Not sure this message made it.

Maybe someone else has experienced this.  I have 1 user that can not log
into OWA.  His box has the right username associated to it.  And all the
spelling is right.  When he logs into OWA to his mailbox it says can not
connect to server.  I can log in as me to his box so it CAN find the
server.
I did change his username in AD but there are other who have had
username
changes and they work.  Any ideas would be appreciated.

Thanks
Ron 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Export Field Size

[Herrick, Michael]

Try exporting to a txt file and open it in Notepad or Word. Or rename the
csv to txt and open it in Notepad or Word. 

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Jeff Caron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Export Field Size


We are not trying to use anything to get to the fiel.  It's an actual error
message in the Event viewer.

See http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q184/5/32.ASP and look
at error 156.

Ex Admin will not place the info in the CSV.

It could be a long street address or a notes field.

jEFF

- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: Export Field Size


> What do horse supplies have to do with this subject?
>
> Well, there's nothing wrong with the CSV file.  It's
> just that Excel can't handle it.  So don't use Excel
> and everything will remain intact.
>
> What is the field?  Maybe there's another way to
> accomplish what you're trying to do.
>
> Ed Crowley
> Compaq Computer
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Jeff Caron
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Export Field Size
>
>
> On attempting to export a large field from the
> directory using Exchange
> Admin I received a message stating that Excel can only
> handle fields of 255
> or less.
>
> Admin then placed the contents of that field into a
> .BIN field and entered
> the Hex location of the field contents into the
> exported .CSV field.
>
> Does anyone know of a way to export this information
> and have the field
> contents remain in tack in the .CSV file?
>
> Thanks,
> jEFF
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Error

[Herrick, Michael]

These 2 names could have resolved off her PAB, pointing to an MS Mail
address or a mailbox moved to another site.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Error


These people are internal users that she's trying to send to.  Also, I found
out that it's only 2 the two people that she's trying to send to that mail
gets bounced back.  I take it she sent out an email to a distribution list
and someone else tried to "Reply to All" and the two same users bounced
back.  I checked their mail limits and they are well below the limit.  What
could be the problem here?

Thanks,

 
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 


-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Error


Classic...

She has her address for these people configured incorrectly.  Make sure they
were created with (presuming) SMTP or Internet address format.  I have had
people do this all the time.

If you really want to test her sending mail, then make sure she types the
address like...  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  and try it that way.  I bet it works.

Scott

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Error


All,

One of my users is getting this strange problem when trying to email certain
people.  If I send email to this person he receives it just fine.  But when
she sends it she receives this message.  Any ideas?  We are using Exchange
5.5 w/SP 4 on NT 4.0 w/SP6a.


The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'Cain, Chris' on 9/26/01 8:51 AM
No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient.
'Coonley, Charles' on 9/26/01 8:51 AM
No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient.

Thanks,

John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Help with Public Folder

[Herrick, Michael]

IBID is hardly jargon.

i·bi·dem (b-dm, -bdm)
adv. Abbr. ib. or ibid.
In the same place. Used in footnotes and bibliographies to refer to the
book, chapter, article, or page cited just before. [Latin ibdem. See i- in
Indo-European Roots.]

Source: http://www.dictionary.com/

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help with Public Folder


What's IBID?  I couldn't find it at jargon.org.

-Original Message-
From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help with Public Folder


IBID

> -Original Message-
> From: Mehringer, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Help with Public Folder
> 
> 
> I have a user who's Public Folder is showing up as "Mailbox - 
> Lattinville,
> Bob".  This user does have Delegate rights to that users 
> folder, but it
> shows up twice.  One of the two is actually the Public 
> Folders.  I have
> never run into this before and can't seem to find an answer 
> for this on
> Knowledge Base.  The folder cannot be renamed.  Deleting and 
> recreating the
> .ost does not fix it either.  I've tried removing the one 
> users mailbox, but
> the Public Folder is still named incorrectly.  Ever seen this 
> before?  Any
> thoughts, ideas?  I know it's not high level stuff, but it's 
> annoying... :-)
>  
> Thanks,
> 
> Douglass W. Mehringer
> Network Administrator
> Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
> 100 South Fourth Street
> St. Louis, MO 63102
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (314) 393-1404 (cell)
> (314) 259-4541(office)
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

[Herrick, Michael]

Try moving mailboxes in small groups of 20-30. Then check database
consistency. I have seen the move cure corruption problems. I think you will
be pleasantly surprised. A 20MB mailbox takes about 3-5 minutes, in my
experience, over a similar LAN.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate


No, that was by selecting 850 mailboxes and moving them all.  One by
one?  Heh.  Someone's a glutton for punishment.

> -Original Message-
> From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 07:10 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
> Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
> 
> 
> Thanks Tom
> 
> That was doing one by one right? Not using exmerge.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Sander
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 25 September 2001 02:01
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
> 
> 
> Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley asked people to 
> report this
> info to him.  About a month ago, I'd say.  I don't know how 
> many people
> forwarded off-site, and it was never determined how a high or low SIS
> ratio affected the move rate, but he may have his results in compiled
> form.   My answer to him was that I did a 16gb store overnight.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:00 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
> Subject: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
> 
> 
> Hi All
> 
> I know one should not generalise and each system is different. I
> acknowledge these two factors, but does anyone have any stats on the
> average transfer speed they obtained while doing a move mailbox. The
> servers in question are not in my site so I cannot quickly run a test.
> The servers are on a 100 MB switch.The total mail store is 
> approx 40 GB.
> I would like to calculate an approx time needed to move mailboxes this
> way, exmerge is not an option as the original store has corruptions in
> it. I need to check after each mailbox if the new store is still
> consistent.
> 
> Any info is appreciated.
> 
> Regards
> Sander
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 sp4

[Herrick, Michael]

Harriet - 
Upgraded to Sp4, applied all subsequent hotfixes and the Security Rollup
Patch on many servers. Took exactly 1 hour on servers with approx 25GB
priv.edb. 

If you have teamed NICs on Compaq servers, be sure to break the teaming
before applying the Security Rollup Patch and then re-team afterward.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp4


I saw in a recent thread that exchange 5.5 service pack 4 updates the
databases and cannot be removed. 
Can anyone advise how long this is likely to take (yes I know trhis a stupid
question, but compared to other SPs, usually I'd get the service back within
about half an hour say) Hours?  Most of a day?

restoring if anything goes wrong - if the server is upgraded to SP4, then
the database conversion screws up , could I restore the online backup? Or
would I have to rebuild the server?

any advice welcome,
thanks,
Harriet



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Editing Inbox Contents

[Herrick, Michael]

I think you are needlessly worrying about editing received messages.
Certainly it is possible. My experience has shown that almost all employees
are looking to contribute to the company/dept/organization. When some user
changes a message, it will most likely be discovered or challenged. Compare
the message to the one in the sent items folder of the original sender. Then
let management deal with the incident. 

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Editing Inbox Contents



hi ed,

i don't see a problem with editing inbox contents, in fact i find it to be a
useful feature. however, one of our site managers expressed the opinion that
someone could falsify the contents of a recieved message (say from a
customer) in order to get away with something. 
 
> What does "skive" mean?

sorry, english slang here. Skiving (sky-ving) means not doing any work, or
not even turning up for work

'Where's the admin gone, is he skiving off somewhere?'
'I'm so tired after last night, I might skive off work today'.

dan.


> There are seldom good technological solutions to
> behavioral problems.  I don't really see how it's any
> different than if they compose their e-mail in
> Notepad, then cut and pasted it later.  What is the
> real worry?  Please provide a scenario.
> 
> What does "skive" mean?
> 
> Ed Crowley
> Compaq Computer
> 
> --- "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 
> > hi all,
> > 
> > we've just moved a load of users onto outlook 2001
> > (mac) from OE5. They're
> > not too happy because of missing features and no
> > easy migration tools, but
> > hey ho. 
> > 
> > The admin at one site has raised the point that in
> > outlook, as with the pc
> > version, you can edit and save messages in the
> > inbox. He's worried people
> > will abuse this feature to forge dishonest email to
> > help them skive off and
> > generally get away with stuff at work. 
> > 
> > I'm sure there's no way to restrict this, but how
> > would you handle this one
> > with the powers-that-be, should they be concerned?
> > 
> > cheers
> > dan.
> > 
> >
> _
> > List posting FAQ:  
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:  
> > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with 
> Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: # of folders in mailboxes

[Herrick, Michael]

If I read the question correctly, you scanned the server and saw other
folders in their mailbox. How did you do this? If you saw folders on the
Exchange server, then what you saw were not PST files. And PST files do not
prompt with a warning about running out of disk space. Can you please
clarify what you are seeing?

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: "Gomez, Mary Lou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: # of folders in mailboxes


Does anyone know if there is a way to run some kind of a report on Exchange
that will tell me how many personal folders were created in each user's
mailbox? We are running Exchange 5.5, sp3 on 1 server and Outlook 98. While
running a scan on our server, I noticed some users had folders they'd
created under their Inbox or somewhere within their mailbox. We want to
notify these people that we want them to point their Personal Folders to
their Home drives and not on the C:\drive. Some of these people are usually
pretty obvious because they constantly complain about running out of mail
space.
Thanks

Mary Lou Gomez, Sr. Network Administrator
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corp.
TSDS - Systems Management
512-219-4980 (direct)
512-336-6644 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Calendar of user causes hanging

[Herrick, Michael]

This may be helpful. I had a similar problem some time ago. I do not recall
the specific steps, but they went somthing like this.
MS-PSS had us export the calendar to a PST (the one instance where they are
useful). Then on importing it back to a dummy mailbox, it croaked. They had
us import the first half of the calendar. That failed. So then we imported
one month at a time. Finally narrowing the problem down to one meeting. THEN
the user recalled that was the day the cable from her handheld device
disconnected while synching. We deleted that appointment from the PST copy.
Then the entire import went without a hitch, first into the dummy mailbox,
then the production mailbox.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Vuyk, Wim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar of user causes hanging


Thanks for the suggestions so far... A few more questions on this though...

OWA does work on the calendar, but how can you recognise the corrupt
appointment?
Problem is that this user has been on a holiday for 6 weeks *jealous* and
the problem became visible during his holiday. In that time lots of
recurring appointments have been made by his secretary, up till the end of
2002... it is gonna be a lot of searching.

When this problem occurs, is this always visible immediately? Because we can
track changes so far being succesfull from August 14, but after August 27
the problem became visible...

We will apply the q281935 on CDO, there is a good chance this applies to us,
as Outlook is defenitly in a loop here Main problem for us now is
finding the corrupt record


Wim Vuyk
Wegener NV - Holland

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: maandag 10 september 2001 16:15
Aan: 'Exchange Discussions'
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: Calendar of user causes hanging


It's the corrupt meeting that's causing the problem.  All you have to do
is use OWA to access this person's calendar and delete the corrupt
calendar item.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vuyk, Wim
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Calendar of user causes hanging
> 
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I have one user in my organisation who has a problem on his 
> calendar. When he, or any other user approaches his calendar 
> through Outlook, Outlook will stop responding. Either 
> directly through the authorised account, or indirectly 
> through opening the calendar via opening the calendar via 
> "File", "open", "folder" of another user.
> 
> We expect this to be a problem of the server, because it 
> happens to anyone approaching his calendar. We used EXMERGE 
> to move the user to a test environment and tested if the 
> problem would occur again in the test environment. Same 
> problem again. We tried ISINTEG, but no troubling information 
> came out of this run. We subsequently solved all the warnings 
> (5) ISINTEG generated. The messages generated concerned 
> mainly inconsistancies in counts. Problem with the calendar 
> was still the same.
> 
> We did run ESEUTIL, without any problems, and no result for 
> this problem Ofcourse the user involved is a manager with 
> a busy, busy busy schedule. I am running out of options here, 
> who has a good suggestion for me to continue on?
> 
> Our configuration: Exchange 5.5 SP 5.5
>Outlook 98 8.5.5603.0
>Windows 95/ 98 /2000 environment
> 
> Any help will be appreciated!!!
> 
> Wim Vuyk
> Wegener NV
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Excha

RE: exchange 5.5 e-mail disclaimer

[Herrick, Michael]

but this would slow down the server and then we would have to deal with the
spam about that!

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 e-mail disclaimer


On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Soysal, Serdar wrote:
> Maybe we should change it so that the FAQ link is at the top of each
> message as opposed to the bottom.  Even better.  Force HTML format and
> have a dancing icon next to the FAQ link that says "Click Me".  Or maybe
> we can rename the FAQ to Magic e-Crystal Ball.  Clik to learn all of
> life's secrets.

  How's this:

  Before the system will accept a post to the mailing list from an address
for the first time, it mails a confirmation request message to the would-be
poster.  The confirmation includes the text from a Q from the FAQ, selected
at random. To enable posting, you have to reply to the list server with the
*section number* of the question.

  That way, they are forced to find the FAQ, and read enough of it to at
least find which question was randomly selected.

  And by using item 4.1 instead of a random question, we could cut list
traffic in half.

  ;-)

  Happy Friday.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not
|
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Blocking Outside Mail

[Herrick, Michael]

Here is a short outline of the process for blocking outgoing SMTP.
1. Create a DL for this specific purpose.
2. In the IMS properties, Delivery Restrictions tab, add the DL to "Reject
messages from". Stop & Restart the IMS.
3. You can now hide the DL from the GAL
4. Add names for those who will be blocked to the DL.

I don't think you need to stop/restart the IMS when you add names tothe DL.

IIRC, senders will get a message something like "a restriction in the system
prevented the message from being sent" or something like that. It's easy to
test.

For inbound mail, delete their SMTP address from their mailbox.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking Outside Mail


IMS Props>Delivery Restrictions>Reject messages from.

>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Milan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:23 AM
>>>To: Exchange Discussions
>>>Subject: Blocking Outside Mail
>>>
>>>
>>>I wish to disallow certain users to send mail outside my 
>>>domain. they are
>>>anly allowed to send mail messages internally. But they can 
>>>receive mail
>>>from outside. How can I do this ? help me urgent..
>>>
>>>_
>>>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Plain Text Only

[Herrick, Michael]

Every user who can start Outlook is an Exchange Expert!!

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Plain Text Only

[Herrick, Michael]

Tell your user it's a security feature.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Plain Text Only





We'll just to give you some ideas to look at.

Things I'd check.  Not in any order.
1. Plug the video card that doesn't seem to work into another system and
see
if the card works. It might be a dead card.
Did that.  Works fine in other machines.

2. Check Ati and make sure you have the correct drivers.
(http://support.ati.com/products/pc/rageltpro/rageltpro_drivers.html)
Plug
and Play will not always install the correct driver. 
Did that. Everything is as it should be.
 
3. I'd also check to make sure that the bios is the latest version.
Find
the Make/Model of the motherboard and head over to their site.  Look for
any
bios updates for that motherboard.  If there is something messed with
bios
this will set everything back to the defaults.
Not looking forward to taking that machine apart AGAIN!

4. Make sure you're not booting into safe mode. :)
Don't be silly.

5. Look for bent pins on the monitor cable.
Monitor works fine on other machines.  Not a cable problem.

6. Take a vacation and let somebody else worry about it (SEP). ;)
I wish.

ve





> -Original Message-
> From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 28, 2001 2:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
> 
> 
> What OS is the on (Win9x, WinNT, Win2k)?\
> Win98SE
> 
> What are the model number for the video cards?
> ATI XPERT98
> 
> Do you know what the Motherboard make and model is?
> Sorry, without throwing the user off the unit, I couldn't 
> tell you right
> now.
> 
> Or do you guys/gals have a technician onsite that can look at this.
> That's me.  I'm it.  Told you -- we are on a shoestring these 
> days.  We
> spent all our money on upgrading to W2K server, ISA Server and E2K and
> buying 3 new servers for that deployment. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:45 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
> 
> 
> Just a few questions for ya.  I might be able to help narrow down the
> video
> problem.
> 
> What OS is the on (Win9x, WinNT, Win2k)?
> What are the model number for the video cards?
> Do you know what the Motherboard make and model is?
> 
> Or do you guys/gals have a technician onsite that can look at this.
> 
> Jeremy Newell
> Systems Technician
> 
> INSCRIBER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
> 26 Peppler Street
> Waterloo, Ontario   
> Canada, N2J 3C4
> T.519.570.9111
> F.519.570.9140 
> www.inscriber.com 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: August 28, 2001 1:42 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
> > 
> > 
> > I've put two different ones in.  A Matrox and an ATI.  I 
> suspect it is
> > something in the BIOS, which is not something I am prepared to deal
> > with.
> > 
> > ve
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:08 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
> > 
> > 
> > So if you completely wipe the disk clean. Reinstall Windows (without
> > installing anything else), you still cannot change the video mode?
> > What kind of card is it?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> > Ewart, Vicki L.
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:15 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
> > 
> > 
> > Already been done.  Didn't help.
> > 
> > ve
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:04 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
> > 
> > 
> > It means wipe the drive & start over!  :0)
> > 
> > -Michèle
> > Immigration site:  
> > Our new 2001 Miata:  
> > Tiggercam:  
> > -
> > Behind every successful woman . . . is a substantial amount 
> of coffee.
> > -Stephanie Piro 
> > -
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:10 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
> > 
> > 
> > If I could identify the problem, I could solve it.  All 
> HTML messages
> > come out with a black background. I've replaced the video 
> > board and the
> > monitor, but have had no luck.  The machine will not display 
> > in anything
> > but 16 colors, 640 x 480. 
> > 
> > Format C: /U? - What does this mean?
> > 
> > ve
> > 
> > --

RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders

[Herrick, Michael]

DL = Distribution List in ExchangeSpeak

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders


#7 - What's a DL?

V. Ewart

-Original Message-
From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders


What I've learned after inheriting an unplanned PF hierarchy and then
integrating 5 servers in Europe into our org...

1: A naming convention that makes sense

2: No one but Admins can create Top Level Folders.

3: No Top Level folders created unless NO alternative folder can have
the
data as a sub folder. Keep visible Top Level Folders to a minimum.

4: The Default and Anonymous roles are *always* set to None and Not
Visible.
Only the people who need a folder should even know that it is there.(if
they
can't even see the folder, less questions, less hassles.) This also
keeps
folders like "Zahlungsanweisungen" and other such from our euro sites
from
the view of US users that don't need to see them.

5: All subfolders will have an owner, preferably as close to the
business
unit requiring access. That owner is responsible for all add/removal of
users. That owner will have a backup owner for vacations/absences etc..

6: All Folders have a data retention time stated and agreed to in
writing.
After that date, all data is irretrievable. (some folders are agreed to
be
'indefinite') All folders will have storage limits agreed to (even
'none')

7: All folder access rights are managed with DL's whenever possible.

8: Folders will not be replicated to other sites by default, to keep
cross
Atlantic Wan traffic down.

9: Set up deleted item recovery for the public store for people who
ignore
#6.


---
Paul E. Pelfrey, MCSE, A+
The Scotts Company
NT/Exchange Admin
937.644.7036 Cell:614.496.7174



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rule of thumb for Public Folders


An issue has reared its ugly head over public folders. Due to lack of
planning in the beginning, we have dumped all folders under the public
folder area for folks to post to. Some folders allow all, some folders
allow
only certain folks to access them. What is the general rule of thumb
concerning Public folders? 
1. Do you let anyone create them as will?
2. Does the Exchange admin force everyone to go to him for requests?
3. Do all folders under "Public Folders" let all employees in?
4. Do you create sub folders for folders that are needing restrictions
on
who access it?

I was thinking of creating a Main folder called Company info with
subfolders
like Bulleting board, MIS tips, HR forms etc. Then creating another Main
folder called "Business related" or something and have sub folders that
only
certain folks can get to.

Does this sound normal? How do you maintain your public folder
hierarchy?

Thanks!!
Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders

[Herrick, Michael]

Heer are some of the things I have learned. I wish I could put them into
practice.
1. Do not let any users create public folders. Have them send the request to
a knowledgable Exchange admin. Preferably the one who will have to restore
them.
2. Design a naming standard and hierarchy first. Think WAY ahead for the
potential requests months down the road.
3. Train users. Delegate management of permissions to users. Train them
more. Create DLs for managing permissions.
4. By intelligently and creatively naming the items in a folder, the number
of folders can be drastically reduced. Think document names & key word
fields.
5. Severely limit the number of users who can delete items in a PF. The
inconvenience is worth it. This alone will save many restores!

Once a PF is created and in use, making changes is almost impossible and can
be quite painful.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders


Why not create the subfolders you indicate and then give the responsibility
of managing the folders to the respective people?  The responsible people
can set up permissions on the applicable public folders as needed.  You
don't need separate subdirectories for that, if that is what you are
thinking (a public folder and a semi-public folder?)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rule of thumb for Public Folders


An issue has reared its ugly head over public folders. Due to lack of
planning in the beginning, we have dumped all folders under the public
folder area for folks to post to. Some folders allow all, some folders allow
only certain folks to access them. What is the general rule of thumb
concerning Public folders? 
1. Do you let anyone create them as will?
2. Does the Exchange admin force everyone to go to him for requests?
3. Do all folders under "Public Folders" let all employees in?
4. Do you create sub folders for folders that are needing restrictions on
who access it?

I was thinking of creating a Main folder called Company info with subfolders
like Bulleting board, MIS tips, HR forms etc. Then creating another Main
folder called "Business related" or something and have sub folders that only
certain folks can get to.

Does this sound normal? How do you maintain your public folder hierarchy?

Thanks!!
Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Clean out Public Folders

[Herrick, Michael]

Yes, go here: Site...Server... Public Information store...Age Limits tab.
You can set an age for every PF homed on the server and replicas on other
servers.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clean out Public Folders


Yes.  Look into replica ages.  

-Original Message-
From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clean out Public Folders


Is there a way to set up a public folder to purge its content after a
certain amount of days?  This can be done through autoarchive on my
regular mailbox but I can't seem to find a way to do it via a public
folder.

Thanks
-Chad

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: blocking internet access (OT)

[Herrick, Michael]

A simple solution: unplug the modem. Plug it in when you want to surf.

When your kids have figured out how to see all the pictures YOU have
downloaded, then you can leave it plugged in and just let them surf away.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT)


so does we-blocker (www.we-blocker.com).  Freeware and very
configurable.  Worth a look, for the price.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:42 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: blocking internet access (OT)
> Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT)
> 
> 
> Hmm...that's interesting. Although it wont block all sites, I 
> can spend some
> time blocking most offensive ones, and it does have passwords. Thanks!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:11 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT)
> 
> Can you use the Content Advisor that comes with IE?
> 
> Jessica Williams
> Network Messaging Administrator
> Woman's Hospital
> (225) 924-8611
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: blocking internet access (OT)
> 
> 
> Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie...
> I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be 
> able to use it
> when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue).
> Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to " do not 
> allow IE to access
> the internet", all that needs to be done is open ZA, and 
> click "allow it".
> If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone 
> have a link or
> suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just 
> limit WHERE they
> can go?
> Thanks!
> Ron
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000

[Herrick, Michael]

Any message now, then you will find out. When was the last time you ran
Scanpst.exe?

And what the heck do you do with ALL that old stuff anyhow?

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000


You're almost lucky. Wait till it hits that 2GB mark. Bye bye email

- Original Message -
From: "Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000


> Could you give me a brief description on why you think that?? What are the
> advatages to this as opposed to psts, I hear all these horror stories
about
> pst files, but mine is almost 2 Gig, running on outlook 2k standard
install,
> on an original pentium 233 with 92 megs of ram and I havnt had any issues
at
> all in 3 years with this file, guess I am lucky huh ?? thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000
>
>
> Personally, I think working with MAPI and Offline Synchronization is far
> superior.  With a little education your presales guys might agree,
> especially the part about if they blow away their hard drives all their
mail
> will still be on the server.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> All your base are belong to us.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000
>
>
> We have a group of produce Presales guys that are mostly ex-field
engineers
> now running around the world selling are products/giving presentations so
> they are familiar with day to day IT operations , and most prefer to have
> their mail on pst's... So they have complete control, and like to have all
> their info pdf and other techie docs they email to each other for reading
> material so this is what they prefer,.. Is their a way to determine if or
a
> rule of thumb about what you just explained saying that even though you
are
> using pop/inernet email service that the rules are still processed on
server
> side ?? Is their a good rule of thumb to go buy onto when a particular
> configuration is processed server side or client side ?? A good book maybe
> ??
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 8:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000
>
>
> Just because everyone uses PSTs doesn't mean that the rules are
client-side.
> If you're using POP or IMAP, then they certainly are, but if you're using
> MAPI, they may well be server-side.
>
> Now why do you force all your users to keep their mail on their
> workstations?  Why even use Exchange, then?  Any old cheesy e-mail system
> (like Netscape Mail) can handle that.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> All your base are belong to us.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 8:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000
>
>
> I was looking for away to do this when the environment consists of the
> following: Outlook 2000 using pst only so all is stored on the clients,
then
> the users will have all sorts of different rules set up which i am
assuming
> is being processed on the local box , as the spooler receives them, so
when
> users move I want to be able to save their rules on their next computer so
> that they dont have to recreate them
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti
> Chakravarty
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 8:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000
>
>
> Rules are stored either on the server or in the client's mail profile.  If
> you get a box popping up when opening Rules Wizard, select Server.  When
> they get a new box, set up the mail profile again and Rules will be taken
> from the server settings.
>
> Moving a user to a different server using Move Mailbox keeps rules intact.
> Export to PST doesn't.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2001 1:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: How to save a users rules settings in outlook 2000
>
>
> Is their away to sa

RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

[Herrick, Michael]

A quick solution is move the mailbox to another server in the site, via
ExAdmin. User needs to be logged out of Outlook. This has worked for me in
the past. If there was corruption, it gets cleaned up as messages are
gathered from the store for the move.

Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails


If Outlook hangs or burps when opening a particular folder, it's often due
to a corrupt item, or message.  (Each calendar entry is a message.)  In that
case, you need to find the corrupt message and delete it.  Sometimes
changing the view makes that possible, sometimes you might have to open the
mailbox with an old Exchange 5.0 client.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails


What do you mean by cleaning out corrupted items? Deleting the user's
mailbox?

This is to resolve the Free/Busy error correct?

W

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails


You'll need to clean out the corrupt item(s).  Then you'll need to update
cdo.dll on the OWA server and any server running the event service.

> Odd problem...
>
> Win2K SP1
> Exchange 5.5 SP4
> Outlook 2000 SR1
> User on separate subnet
> User behind an internal firewall
>
>
> A user came to me complaining that evertime that he tried to accept a
> meeting request his outlook would freeze.("program not responding"). We
let
> this problem go for a while while we tried to troubleshoot it because he
> could accept his meetings and work with his email through OWA.
>
> Eventually when he went to just look at his calendar, outlook would
freeze.
> He'd click on the calendar folder in the folder list and outlook would
lock
> up.
>
> So I backed up his mail folders into a PST except for his calendar. Blew
> away his mailbox, created a new one, and added the mail folders back.
>
> He doesn't have trouble with his calendar anymore but intermittently
emails
> to his account get bounced. Postmaster is not notified, he only knows when
> the sender (on the same Ex server and GAL) FWD's the email to him at the
> same address, which usually goes through.
>
> Note 1: This user doesn't have all that much data in his mailbox. I have a
> few users with over a gig (yes I know) that have no problem.
>
> Note 2: I am getting a error in the app log on the Ex server about every
10
> mins. Another Ex server in the same site holds the Free/Busy unhidden.:
> 1038 - MSExchangeFB
> Unable to access the Microsoft Schedule+ Free/Busy Information folder.
>
> Ensure that the (hidden) Microsoft Schedule+ Free/Busy Information folder
> exists. Open the Recipients container and select View.HiddenRecipients.
>
>
> Note 3: This is the second user with a problem similar to this, but
> recreating her mailbox and blowing away her calendar fix her problem.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> William L. Smith
> Systems Administrator

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents 
of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized 
and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Excha