RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
As a member of the Inner Circle, evidently not yours, I believe you erred on a single crucial point. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: PGP 7.1 qANQR1DBwU4D8XE+82mH6LkQB/9r/bjjOegcvDkeRvqeTDR9BcY4slhoT6JNVM4p t4Rp9EPQgQj6bcJm6+cZ6mkfq3ksuDMxhB5GU55ciVq/DVkuv9a8fpiRMAjlhIoW tzg4RtkIxm8mcW8iJinGpqwsbndps90jvYeDHt7RewY46c5nw1B9nWtY+84Z6D+3 VUrb2jzo+a8n4uLvQKUn83BRwpKSDKVYzP2dFAX9f/s2bzH/Ot3tnrCMwXflmTkf /eJfak+knkE6Z+ptFgtJQkxoXFKlLfkCFkFZEhhJj2maqFZwfBxnWwde3wW/uxL2 k7J3d6kCNXhbxgVCC1u+xScdp07KxnBq3fCuMPeyq8rUZg7oCADcDae0vJFASMe5 YQqWtDZnFxj+E++HnJqmOPxo9QRC7Q/QEBR6UAsK4V3tIASliX9rR3LTt3nM8gHh MnQEmqWkxkRks2SkHNNESEo4j/nHY0CjgRHQJ7lU/B6gR2nUP7nPEAEzdxOhlEAk aZ9rp/fATSJFOruAqCH7gWTywB6DJXWUhgb0eVfgrQFjERYfhSJsnzR+JpCY94Ei RSITCrjXFs5TQrxqv3jCKJ0J9jvp2CzcvLsgAs2Z5bAC4SS8MJ/Kn7jnblDxyQ1I +F3lDYn0kxyMDS/Lq6tepn8CEBdLTJkXpJ1DyqYwqt3TsriiAiNJqPLNOv8pRvuy +xxVNT2nyeziMggXq3NmFOjsNWNJ+hXBXoxA+/xqu+P4a97oik6HpMzGATTmLlaH WzFBH451A8JB+mfvr115HCcDx7Ui126lk4/h/BvJRnyzYK3ECA7nXVWYvhD+Umv6 xwXpgtwxUo1zxlSdt0ThhBYGlmE89Ihc0ltwTDQBOq4bAxiHXiQDiGGahzjsVGKl 2w9N1tKQJOwH1UBHVEq46tScAvegIUUbBuC21FsNi6y8jQLHDjCw7d9OvIGM0sJ5 iMAuOPcJIMEhBhwl+Zg6tQk3N5I7mHhyp9qBOKhxtsflIUF45ToFE5CHZAQh9psZ 6BxQClSqL/s3CqjQPt/whhe6Lb4lCll0bhmWL8dVoUbBen4zxbEQLItaIjxGXZSr fgR+9Lz5i3pti3axSPGSN4xdeR2yko0McoQkcVbzkZJ9lBqu37gUQkUeHjHyKVeQ hmKj5gIO9988NdWaVDJaNK+Z4KVgVrwilYe96DhXcaaQtjErRlATVmpQTJcA1iek bdF0wzj35pQbGMQnJMH0xF2h/NUCX9lxRhZ4RYcWSQphSJN+olqUOvikJQZHzJf1 7AAPCG8MHYFTmeXsXT7aq2A2aM5sATQTudop9mjocyu82Ct7F5MzjsAfIlT4RAQS TKzpTW+YgjfHTa9vzjyHkO5IH5tvMouSxfsBuKPVT5osK7Adygp4klI9B5tJliFc Apuy6Og4DBWWTS8xG0efrp/MFeDNqedgtXhYlHl2DfHFPazkFdhdlB84qWOpyfv3 ztTvi1c8xK1OB0RLwtB7KOj0DbbPBc0WFgeuHLtJ+hBmFhu3ZtDHEGFYsAAB68M2 rdYhW98wfc+IYcK7+FBRTbjr3ce7unJ2YC63mKbS/ONShxY09wSIbjCwjbL7Na5O RH0BMLBSAWhKuQaFNAIHe1fLLdEsbv8opX9ps2dmWAXJLcOZ6xfdt1acaD/6M28W ovLBvZdkI7SRMfAfsFCK3VS3yxQbF9bB9MEs/aplP1vMD4mOFLczMY9cN5eHHatZ djOIY9F1HFiSuDs3xKNj+64Yn1Y4uCTX3QFR9PT/PvDbbYaR51nszV+ZeumQvrFm 0zTJiWTVfDfpnu+dNJxnw25GV+xcQLTCi+EyRnexF82j2MUOw9zlD0vgf1YZ7C3d Bp6JaXkazKMAaOJ5Wi+n3P/tUJVPkFaSWaT6B/pEJpXeds6Ya3FEYP9R79VrbSHR f7x3xSzQfXhKRp+SBTA4DAwX7NZWjLw4B3iaqEZ0n8ikO6zwOj8/u0AWO9/uNGuP T96fHHlXIeJV2AgpWGUi+VaDbn3sYS/2NOaR1BXxC8XEVwBNSFQO5dUll/za8n5O fPO4V5ln0yzZ7Nbx0rKEG2GoDpX7jtBvMCSY9thm1aewnqnjMfxtZT5y6IleZ2mt jYkDBtOfi+ZglUKsNEh32LFzlq7DJUCokrHvKCAI3CuBtaQtfQhcWAyYuzIIM0LM G1Jc6BDwUrKaVktfM+c5WXfuKnT8KhoDnPLgpsp6VvuBLBz4FAA4JI3Q7fJEnFTK K1JZ3dMO9fQjqf6RnSwonoi6WTr0eS5fSfZL0xKn+MzLx206S8Vi44YTqRUDjoi/ pvAk6mNGRbyFIARLCDG4mb5zp6G9H3xwJ+k0Ma29OCCIHZvXb7fFKoOZvNnIUT04 Qwb49yY0nVbhNgHE7hRB4OMDb4tElP0xxbsO73bH0okVcDY/8t8AU6Nk8iz/Tr/h MLzEGF6Dc7Qh2Y5wYB2yJL1jN29t+LIDAh3dWq4gn+vb4ylGyzEc8c8fbyO4JVmI sY5376guFym13AYQAton58G4BchdYFaSrrGY7lGUaNeHoNXS6uBCrQU0n4jR9rot Di76pQhWKVwxMk1YbCZ/uLE5dh9FanL+j6vHAEu+eNgBnptJYh5Yw6NhCbZ+aq1p Y1E6hnERv3PSzaCEaw/qxufbkSQ12S3cQNpQ1lGZJejDk27KlKKIJVjFY8oA83it fm6sanbW+BgzCUtxwoimBtfcdPAB1izSGrDXuvUF6Hp5jN0cBOake0/66nZkAYEz NJl5hq2WDcyt52b39xz2ISBKXwbZNtpqUkhl97WWe082FSbZPTHx213SP5sP/6s1 94Y+uV+sieEVJcZlJ2CQ9X99vWfs+1lI98VpNhO1rnzWVVUdZ5/+J2Zg8g6wDnq4 EBRhin2nCPqH9/ws5FGgs3r3wgD3nL3gVpf5/1KO1//2jB7NMyCXIIMvlL6luWwA 95HENExo4qS4rdHVN/FMK0gnmOSJm9234W4rbLgzbnN2o9CDacatqblAQp4f+hd1 zxyK1/6BcvO9tY+Jwy6MCB8ARs9IRHjaDTo6fl+3+TipisD9/71LdJBzWBEOxFyJ tpvzI5XJirL2uDXuvwCg1jXgMmC9PCxW5nRdRykP9XqvgB9sorCwVQaBdPaNZCID czD/sRL1NOjW8dPLlXQigNZCp+zK9uu4pEXUE2AYsU5PQtqE7caV0fK1h8LarHNr 5d+RDy9dkzgh1arcyVPIvuMyyJ0Zgwb/DMEXENpBCLWMyzi86xg/T1WV2FeXQ69Q zodiET1pmlnYG34CDPkI3FrKMHE4DAOfXQLkYPmu45I+kHh/JXP2bChbFbGIw5sx p+7HvBsMQTB9MwwdAJU8YhtamIjF/Vi2+AUAgmLcbT0PZHO+wJtvms0LhE5RvDjv h73dNWWx1mzi+np73t5WGjli9+EPgPj7zGKvPx8EdwFlPI3OMVi3TUwh6+V7FLZ8 BIz1Gar5lb2aDDuRdmlUCBWBZ2nnwdolLhJAfKy/MpsVTphD4Oyne0QhLnv+rmbh GBC+gI95UvRrpJA2S4P25ZBJjKNZyl/g9fjA2I6bebynVSJ4h4fhaMwEh1E7oA7P pgw3MYyZhCTk4X47nhEtzFe1HsCG4uOQ/oovLfHaMZRoX0uWjJJt9Ol+GHxvk/56 KhmRWP3xgYgKLGSPcsGtWF6t8nEaPxtht6TaqmmaftmmGXCpsZxPt+DVX2z8XeF5 26rkb3ptOue7MXJXhsQQEN19fRHbE/NnDAedHWRV5fQerOJZVdloVqmWo7qHhrWT 3xtCj98hIclXzrMBtN00w006M1u9aYYSkLKRn6DKO2e95Psy5NV0AwoQvLYTvxp5 AAqQKiGj6khHaLnBFVma2Zq+UxXXb9az/2LegjOg4d3/vxw7T12INEvDTfZLvglr UjONLlhN6k9lglenJFzd7JwAXtbH0IOfc8nGUAKdwkpQnGi6cM6P5Yytm5L2iOTw bcHBOf5jcW23Wp3TWIbLE+81kb+kSWX6d90N3HOhIVmEh2PpXp9XWzJg09rhfcAd BQ8HJFpUdDOXMcVmUnemIGVv9eHXm7nsK4zhVrRySqPQzyt1rxdl7eYhIF44sMRg 1d9MDZr6TAt70aMkzBm/myZ15Rr1bZY73ptV+2sCkJTg+8a+DrPKirtYXbZwGDRO ov6xJDD97lGmESnKuESNpukGowokNJ8OQBpoQ8F8mc6Q4r5XrjhLFVsyhCphDokW DNzLCZ7NhX0ea94wPgXwLpPQKG7rIGIwW+7npNAeZS5NarNPyNfGKdUzxZ+vBGe/ ZaPGgensj4Jynr3dN8cEWTWn3HaK9j3bVTBfDA51SRnvJqe3eMH8x9cs8XVevRL2 ULD+MbxE1q9SkpVb7Ka14SHWqby8pSSrZZAFhFWr5bjdDp9wBtrU6oBZSyLq32Aw
RE: IMC Mail Que
Adriaan, I have an idea of what you are going through. Managing a system without prior training is tough. And a system that is in use and having problems makes it much more difficult. But your education will proceed at a faster pace if you purchase a book or two that has been recommended on this list. This, and previous questions, are so basic, that the answers tend towards the curt and/or sarcastic. And then they won't help you as much as you would hope or need. Many can be answered by reading, in less time than it takes to type the question. (Well for me, anyway. I type real slow) If one of my admins asked this question, his Exchange permissions would revert to View Only before I gave an answer. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Mail Que Where can I see what Mail is que up in the IMC que to leave the server? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments (if any) may be confidential or legally privileged material. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, and disclosure, copying or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If your receive this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and associated material from any computer. Any views expressed in this communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be views of CONNECT Credit Union. Whilst virus scanning software is utilised by CONNECT, no responsibility is taken for virus damage that may originate from this transmission _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore
Why BLB = BAD. A true tale from my last company. After 3 months of banging their heads, the idiots at a remote site got BLB restores to work in test. So they ran it on the production box. I was adamant that the Exchange online backup be run first. That took about 2-3 hours. The BLB took over 12 hours. So, the VP needed a message restored from the previous day that was shift-deleted. Can't do it yet. BLB was still in progress. He has to wait. The next day, they restore his mailbox. And the message was not there! VP is unhappy. So they go to the next day's tape (a day later). Still no message. Seems like it came and went between BLB's. VP is now beyond irate. Calls the CIO. Who calls me. I have DumpsterAlwaysOn. Go into VP's mailbox and give him his message in 2 minutes. Oh yes, most of their problems were permissions/UghServe related. So the full restore did not work. While they had practiced restores, they never opened a mailbox. Just accepted the logging information that the restore was complete. Do not waste your time on BLB. Deleted Items Retention, DumpsterAlwaysOn on an admin workstation, Circular logging OFF. Practice restores. Read the FAQ. Sleep easy. And keep the untrained away from the server. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore Possible corruption of the store. Increased tape drive usage, which will result in a shorter lifespan for your tape drive. The wrath of the list. :P Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net We cannot do evil to others without doing it to ourselves. -- Joseph Francois Eduard Desmahis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Amir El Aziq Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Restore Scenario: 5 users in the organisation. 1 server for file/print/email Full Online Exchange backup every night. Exchange BLB every night also. Data backup every night. All backups complete in 3 hours, on 1 tape. Please explain to me why doing a BLB is bad in this scenario. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2001 12:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore Because BLB SUCK Donkey Sausage!!! And if an exchange admin needs BLB's then he doesn't know how to admin his Exchange Box. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Restore How can you know it will always a bad thing? - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Restore Still is a bad thing, it will always be a bad thing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore Wasnt that a bad thing to do in 5.5 , wouldnt also be true in 2k ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Van Huissteden, Adriaan Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore Can you backup and Restore individual Mailboxes on Exchange Server 2K? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox causes Outlook to freeze
Ensure the client is off line. Then use ExAdmin to move the mailbox to another server in the site. Have the user start Outlook. It will find the new home server automagically. I have seen moving a mailbox clean up otherwise unsolveable weirdness. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox causes Outlook to freeze Guess I should clarify a bit. This problem is happening on different machines, so it has nothing to do with her profile or with a PST. I can create a new profile on a computer that she has never used, setting it up for her mailbox. Then, when I open Outlook as her, glack! -Kirsten -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox causes Outlook to freeze Can anyone think of a reason that a mailbox could cause Outlook to freeze up? We're using Exchange 5.5 SP4, and the client is Outlook 2000. If I add the user's mailbox to my profile, I can open it up fine. When I create a new profile with the user's mailbox as the primary, and then open Outlook, Outlook freezes up. It opens the mailbox and I can see the mail, but Outlook no longer responds. This was reported to me by the user's support folks, and they tried it on two different machines. I tried it on my workstation as well with the same results. Nothing about the mailbox looks strange. It only has about 11 Megs of data. Permissions settings look correct. I would just say let's try recreating the mailbox but the user is at a remote location, so that might be difficult to arrange with her. If anyone has any insights, I would love to hear them. This is about the sixty-thousandth wierd problem I have had today and my brain has turned to jelly. Thanks, -Kirsten ___ Attend OSU Internet2 Day! http://www.net.orst.edu/I2 Kirsten Petersen Network Engineering Oregon State University 541-737-9187 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Licensing
How do you pronounce 'moynd'? Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing a) damn right b) poor excuse for crap MS policy and dissemination of info c) i was thinking more along the lines of 'discussion of licensing isn't popular on the list, talk to your rep' d) in the west of england, people say 'mind' at the end of most sentences, pronounced 'moynd'. :) a) Yeah, isn't that annoying?!? b) yep. Because it's always changing. c) because that would grant an even greater liability -- people who didn't know about the list could find our 'recommendation' and get into trouble without having the luck to ask us in 'person'. d) mind is a funny word... :P As unconvincing as your licensing rep sounds, her/his word is the final word. Sorry. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net If we in our turn plan on militarism, vengeance, and retaliation, if we steel our spirits against the suffering which such pursuits always cause to the innocent, in short, if we turn to the tools of death, then whatever hollow triumph we may trumpet, it will have been Death alone which has won. --G. Simon Harak, Jesuit Priest interviewed 9/21 in NY -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing well, i 'give a flip', that's why i asked! of course we talk to the licensing rep, but I asked because: a) the licensing reps don't always sound entirely convincing b) the information on the MS site is ambiguous c) there's nothing about licensing in the FAQ d) i didn't think anyone would mind. i might ask for some friendly advice though, and take that into consideration along with what MS and the vendor says.? Think through that statement again. When it comes to something like licensing, who gives a flip what anyone here says versus what MS says? We can't bust you for a license violation. And if you're not going to rely on it, why ask? Stephen -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing Take it either way. I don't really care, but I'm not going to rely on this list to tell me how my licensing works for my company. nor would i. i might ask for some friendly advice though, and take that into consideration along with what MS and the vendor says. maybe i'm wrong, but your response seems paranoid and unhelfpful. that said, i'm sorry if I've offended you. dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If
RE: File system in outlook/exchange
Sure sounds like ytou need some training sessions for your users. Starting with your boss. Spending $ on training is probably the best investment any company can make. Especially with Outlook. Unfortunately most consider it an expense, not an investment. Outlook has the potential to really enhance productivity. And most of it's power is never used. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange Yeah I think he just wants to keep track of all the data because everyone is just filing stuff in their own way on one of our servers. Also their older guys here that dont know how to manuver in outlook as well as others -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: File system in outlook/exchange Outlook can do this. It's silly though. - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:07 PM Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange Exchange doesn't work that way. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate. - Noam Chomsky, Linguist and Social Critic -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange yeah he wants it too act like explorer, he wants to be able to drop messages in folders on the network without moving out of outlook -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange If Outlook = File system Then something = wrong You can have you boss's outlook bar shortcuts have his personal folders but i dont think you can have your email and file system open at the same time -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: File system in outlook/exchange Outlook != File System - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: File system in outlook/exchange Ok I was just speaking to my boss and he told me that he wants a new server as a file server. He wants to use outlook 2000 as a file system. He doest want to have it stored in public folders he wants them stored in folder on the new file server. Ok so I looked at outlook and showed him that you can do this with the outlook bar, you know by going to other shortcuts. But of course there was a problem with that, he wants the least amount of steps as possible. Basically he wants to be able to see all of his outlook folders and messages as well as seeing all the shared networks folders on the file server in one window in outlooks application. He want to be able to drag and drop files from his inbox to a public share in one window. Has anyone ever seen anything out there that can do this to outlook. I went to slipstick.com but didn't find any tools their that has this feature. Thanks for your time. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replication problem
All Exchange servers in a site or org do NOT have to be at the same SP level. In a site with many servers it may not be possible to upgrade the SP on all servers at the same time. And if there are problems, this may be most undesireable. However, you certainly should run with all servers at the same SP. So upgrade them all within as short a time frame as your business will allow. Have a contingency plan for restores of machines with different SPs. Be sure to check out the post SP hotfixes. And TEST. TEST. TEST. Upgrade the admin workstations to the latest SP of the servers first. IIRC there were issues with older SP workstations connecting to newer Sp servers. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem What about machines that admin the boxes ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem all the exchange servers need to be at the same SP level. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net A state without the means of change is without the means of its own conservation. - Edmund Burke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WILLIAMS,JESSICA D Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem Don, I had looked at Q247654, but I'm a bit confused. It has the correct exception error number, but the parameters are different. Also, is it only caused by large DLs? My largest is only 1542 so would this really be my problem? But I do think now is probably the time to install sp4. Will I have to install throughout the entire site or can I have just the one server on SP4? You've been a great help. Jessica -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem Jessica, Check out these couple of articles. The first thing I see is that you are running SP3 for Exchange and I'm seeing that SP4 is recommended to fix this. SO with that said, I would make sure you have a good backup and apply SP4. Again, check out these articles. From the sounds of them, they might very well apply to you. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q247/6/54.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/1/72.ASP D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of WILLIAMS,JESSICA D Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 1171 Date: 10/3/2001 Time: 11:12:04 AM User: INFOSYS\ExchAdmin Computer: EXCH-SRV4 Description: Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 1651 (internal ID 208017d). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. --and-- Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Replication Event ID: 1059 Date: 10/3/2001 Time: 11:12:04 AM User: INFOSYS\ExchAdmin Computer: EXCH-SRV4 Description: Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error 22. --and-- Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Replication Event ID: 1070 Date: 10/3/2001 Time: 11:11:33 AM User: INFOSYS\ExchAdmin Computer: EXCH-SRV4 Description: Internal event: Directory f68ebf464c66d4118f5200b0d0205037 EXCH-SRV3 asked the directory replication agent (DRA) to get changes from naming context /o=WHF/ou=Hospital starting at update sequence number (USN) 56504 with flags 71 and sensitivity 100. Even with errors, Microsoft's KB isn't helping much. I get results when I query for the Event ID, but what I get tends to be for Exchange 5.0. Thanks Don. Jessica -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem I would, it might lead you to the problem before you call PSS and they may have you do that anyway. What sort of errors are showing up now? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of WILLIAMS,JESSICA D Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication problem Thanks for the help
RE: Cannot Generate Offline Address Book
We had a similar problem at my last company. Some untrained admin-wannabe added a fax connector and it created a bogus address template. PSS had us delete a template for a foreign language. I can't remember the details. It may have been done in raw mode. You should call PSS to walk you through it. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Markette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cannot Generate Offline Address Book Hello, For some reason, my Exchange servers are no longer generating the OAB. When I try to manually generate it from Configuration\DS Site Configuration Properties\Offline Address Book, I get an error with ID no: c1031662 and the Event Viewer logs event 5004. Micro's Support site describes a problem where the foreign Details Templates or One-Off Address Templates have been installed, but the corresponding Code Pages have not. I have followed their directions to check it, but everything looks as they say it should. I do have 3 templates installed, English/USA, French and German. Does anyone have any ideas about what else could be causing this problem? I have 5 5.5 SP4 servers. Paul Markette NT Systems Administrator Epicentric, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 415-995-7228 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
Well, after the digressions, by now you may have guessed that the answer is **yes**. Do you have a specific question? Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 9:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Has anyone used these products? Any Problems Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking External E-mail
Blocking Sending is indirect. Create a DL. Add this DL to the delivery restrictions tab in the IMS. Then add users to the DL. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking External E-mail Were using Exchange 5.5, SP4, on NT 4.0, SP6. I know if I remove the SMTP address from a users mailbox, they will not be able to RECEIVE incoming E-mail from outside of the company. I can't remember what setting I change though to block them from SENDING E-mail outside the company. A point in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: command line directory import
The easiest way to check the required syntax for an import to a container is to create one object manually and do an export from that container. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Beavers, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: command line directory import All the imports I have ever done were to a container other than Recipients. For example, use the /o parameter on the admin.exe command: /o del.txt where del.txt looks something like this: [Import] Basepoint=/o=MyOrg/ou=MySite/cn=MyContainer Terry L Beavers USF IT/TAA -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: command line directory import Has anybody done a directory import to a folder other than Recipients from the command line? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Error
These 2 names could have resolved off her PAB, pointing to an MS Mail address or a mailbox moved to another site. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Error These people are internal users that she's trying to send to. Also, I found out that it's only 2 the two people that she's trying to send to that mail gets bounced back. I take it she sent out an email to a distribution list and someone else tried to Reply to All and the two same users bounced back. I checked their mail limits and they are well below the limit. What could be the problem here? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Error Classic... She has her address for these people configured incorrectly. Make sure they were created with (presuming) SMTP or Internet address format. I have had people do this all the time. If you really want to test her sending mail, then make sure she types the address like... [EMAIL PROTECTED] and try it that way. I bet it works. Scott -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Error All, One of my users is getting this strange problem when trying to email certain people. If I send email to this person he receives it just fine. But when she sends it she receives this message. Any ideas? We are using Exchange 5.5 w/SP 4 on NT 4.0 w/SP6a. The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Cain, Chris' on 9/26/01 8:51 AM No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient. 'Coonley, Charles' on 9/26/01 8:51 AM No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient. Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird Problem w/OWA
Is his alias the same as his username? Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA That does nothing. Same result. This is so annoying. Thanks though -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Problem w/OWA Have him use his SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the username box, instead of his username (jsmith). -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird Problem w/OWA Not sure this message made it. Maybe someone else has experienced this. I have 1 user that can not log into OWA. His box has the right username associated to it. And all the spelling is right. When he logs into OWA to his mailbox it says can not connect to server. I can log in as me to his box so it CAN find the server. I did change his username in AD but there are other who have had username changes and they work. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 sp4
Harriet - Upgraded to Sp4, applied all subsequent hotfixes and the Security Rollup Patch on many servers. Took exactly 1 hour on servers with approx 25GB priv.edb. If you have teamed NICs on Compaq servers, be sure to break the teaming before applying the Security Rollup Patch and then re-team afterward. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp4 I saw in a recent thread that exchange 5.5 service pack 4 updates the databases and cannot be removed. Can anyone advise how long this is likely to take (yes I know trhis a stupid question, but compared to other SPs, usually I'd get the service back within about half an hour say) Hours? Most of a day? restoring if anything goes wrong - if the server is upgraded to SP4, then the database conversion screws up , could I restore the online backup? Or would I have to rebuild the server? any advice welcome, thanks, Harriet _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
Try moving mailboxes in small groups of 20-30. Then check database consistency. I have seen the move cure corruption problems. I think you will be pleasantly surprised. A 20MB mailbox takes about 3-5 minutes, in my experience, over a similar LAN. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate No, that was by selecting 850 mailboxes and moving them all. One by one? Heh. Someone's a glutton for punishment. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 07:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Thanks Tom That was doing one by one right? Not using exmerge. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2001 02:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley asked people to report this info to him. About a month ago, I'd say. I don't know how many people forwarded off-site, and it was never determined how a high or low SIS ratio affected the move rate, but he may have his results in compiled form. My answer to him was that I did a 16gb store overnight. -Original Message- From: Sander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:00 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Subject: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Hi All I know one should not generalise and each system is different. I acknowledge these two factors, but does anyone have any stats on the average transfer speed they obtained while doing a move mailbox. The servers in question are not in my site so I cannot quickly run a test. The servers are on a 100 MB switch.The total mail store is approx 40 GB. I would like to calculate an approx time needed to move mailboxes this way, exmerge is not an option as the original store has corruptions in it. I need to check after each mailbox if the new store is still consistent. Any info is appreciated. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: # of folders in mailboxes
If I read the question correctly, you scanned the server and saw other folders in their mailbox. How did you do this? If you saw folders on the Exchange server, then what you saw were not PST files. And PST files do not prompt with a warning about running out of disk space. Can you please clarify what you are seeing? Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Gomez, Mary Lou [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 4:17 PM Subject: # of folders in mailboxes Does anyone know if there is a way to run some kind of a report on Exchange that will tell me how many personal folders were created in each user's mailbox? We are running Exchange 5.5, sp3 on 1 server and Outlook 98. While running a scan on our server, I noticed some users had folders they'd created under their Inbox or somewhere within their mailbox. We want to notify these people that we want them to point their Personal Folders to their Home drives and not on the C:\drive. Some of these people are usually pretty obvious because they constantly complain about running out of mail space. Thanks Mary Lou Gomez, Sr. Network Administrator Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corp. TSDS - Systems Management 512-219-4980 (direct) 512-336-6644 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar of user causes hanging
This may be helpful. I had a similar problem some time ago. I do not recall the specific steps, but they went somthing like this. MS-PSS had us export the calendar to a PST (the one instance where they are useful). Then on importing it back to a dummy mailbox, it croaked. They had us import the first half of the calendar. That failed. So then we imported one month at a time. Finally narrowing the problem down to one meeting. THEN the user recalled that was the day the cable from her handheld device disconnected while synching. We deleted that appointment from the PST copy. Then the entire import went without a hitch, first into the dummy mailbox, then the production mailbox. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Vuyk, Wim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar of user causes hanging Thanks for the suggestions so far... A few more questions on this though... OWA does work on the calendar, but how can you recognise the corrupt appointment? Problem is that this user has been on a holiday for 6 weeks *jealous* and the problem became visible during his holiday. In that time lots of recurring appointments have been made by his secretary, up till the end of 2002... it is gonna be a lot of searching. When this problem occurs, is this always visible immediately? Because we can track changes so far being succesfull from August 14, but after August 27 the problem became visible... We will apply the q281935 on CDO, there is a good chance this applies to us, as Outlook is defenitly in a loop here Main problem for us now is finding the corrupt record Wim Vuyk Wegener NV - Holland -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: maandag 10 september 2001 16:15 Aan: 'Exchange Discussions' CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: Calendar of user causes hanging It's the corrupt meeting that's causing the problem. All you have to do is use OWA to access this person's calendar and delete the corrupt calendar item. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vuyk, Wim Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar of user causes hanging Hi everyone, I have one user in my organisation who has a problem on his calendar. When he, or any other user approaches his calendar through Outlook, Outlook will stop responding. Either directly through the authorised account, or indirectly through opening the calendar via opening the calendar via File, open, folder of another user. We expect this to be a problem of the server, because it happens to anyone approaching his calendar. We used EXMERGE to move the user to a test environment and tested if the problem would occur again in the test environment. Same problem again. We tried ISINTEG, but no troubling information came out of this run. We subsequently solved all the warnings (5) ISINTEG generated. The messages generated concerned mainly inconsistancies in counts. Problem with the calendar was still the same. We did run ESEUTIL, without any problems, and no result for this problem Ofcourse the user involved is a manager with a busy, busy busy schedule. I am running out of options here, who has a good suggestion for me to continue on? Our configuration: Exchange 5.5 SP 5.5 Outlook 98 8.5.5603.0 Windows 95/ 98 /2000 environment Any help will be appreciated!!! Wim Vuyk Wegener NV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 e-mail disclaimer
but this would slow down the server and then we would have to deal with the spam about that! Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 e-mail disclaimer On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Soysal, Serdar wrote: Maybe we should change it so that the FAQ link is at the top of each message as opposed to the bottom. Even better. Force HTML format and have a dancing icon next to the FAQ link that says Click Me. Or maybe we can rename the FAQ to Magic e-Crystal Ball. Clik to learn all of life's secrets. How's this: Before the system will accept a post to the mailing list from an address for the first time, it mails a confirmation request message to the would-be poster. The confirmation includes the text from a Q from the FAQ, selected at random. To enable posting, you have to reply to the list server with the *section number* of the question. That way, they are forced to find the FAQ, and read enough of it to at least find which question was randomly selected. And by using item 4.1 instead of a random question, we could cut list traffic in half. ;-) Happy Friday. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders
Heer are some of the things I have learned. I wish I could put them into practice. 1. Do not let any users create public folders. Have them send the request to a knowledgable Exchange admin. Preferably the one who will have to restore them. 2. Design a naming standard and hierarchy first. Think WAY ahead for the potential requests months down the road. 3. Train users. Delegate management of permissions to users. Train them more. Create DLs for managing permissions. 4. By intelligently and creatively naming the items in a folder, the number of folders can be drastically reduced. Think document names key word fields. 5. Severely limit the number of users who can delete items in a PF. The inconvenience is worth it. This alone will save many restores! Once a PF is created and in use, making changes is almost impossible and can be quite painful. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders Why not create the subfolders you indicate and then give the responsibility of managing the folders to the respective people? The responsible people can set up permissions on the applicable public folders as needed. You don't need separate subdirectories for that, if that is what you are thinking (a public folder and a semi-public folder?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rule of thumb for Public Folders An issue has reared its ugly head over public folders. Due to lack of planning in the beginning, we have dumped all folders under the public folder area for folks to post to. Some folders allow all, some folders allow only certain folks to access them. What is the general rule of thumb concerning Public folders? 1. Do you let anyone create them as will? 2. Does the Exchange admin force everyone to go to him for requests? 3. Do all folders under Public Folders let all employees in? 4. Do you create sub folders for folders that are needing restrictions on who access it? I was thinking of creating a Main folder called Company info with subfolders like Bulleting board, MIS tips, HR forms etc. Then creating another Main folder called Business related or something and have sub folders that only certain folks can get to. Does this sound normal? How do you maintain your public folder hierarchy? Thanks!! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders
DL = Distribution List in ExchangeSpeak Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders #7 - What's a DL? V. Ewart -Original Message- From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders What I've learned after inheriting an unplanned PF hierarchy and then integrating 5 servers in Europe into our org... 1: A naming convention that makes sense 2: No one but Admins can create Top Level Folders. 3: No Top Level folders created unless NO alternative folder can have the data as a sub folder. Keep visible Top Level Folders to a minimum. 4: The Default and Anonymous roles are *always* set to None and Not Visible. Only the people who need a folder should even know that it is there.(if they can't even see the folder, less questions, less hassles.) This also keeps folders like Zahlungsanweisungen and other such from our euro sites from the view of US users that don't need to see them. 5: All subfolders will have an owner, preferably as close to the business unit requiring access. That owner is responsible for all add/removal of users. That owner will have a backup owner for vacations/absences etc.. 6: All Folders have a data retention time stated and agreed to in writing. After that date, all data is irretrievable. (some folders are agreed to be 'indefinite') All folders will have storage limits agreed to (even 'none') 7: All folder access rights are managed with DL's whenever possible. 8: Folders will not be replicated to other sites by default, to keep cross Atlantic Wan traffic down. 9: Set up deleted item recovery for the public store for people who ignore #6. --- Paul E. Pelfrey, MCSE, A+ The Scotts Company NT/Exchange Admin 937.644.7036 Cell:614.496.7174 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rule of thumb for Public Folders An issue has reared its ugly head over public folders. Due to lack of planning in the beginning, we have dumped all folders under the public folder area for folks to post to. Some folders allow all, some folders allow only certain folks to access them. What is the general rule of thumb concerning Public folders? 1. Do you let anyone create them as will? 2. Does the Exchange admin force everyone to go to him for requests? 3. Do all folders under Public Folders let all employees in? 4. Do you create sub folders for folders that are needing restrictions on who access it? I was thinking of creating a Main folder called Company info with subfolders like Bulleting board, MIS tips, HR forms etc. Then creating another Main folder called Business related or something and have sub folders that only certain folks can get to. Does this sound normal? How do you maintain your public folder hierarchy? Thanks!! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Plain Text Only
Tell your user it's a security feature. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only We'll just to give you some ideas to look at. Things I'd check. Not in any order. 1. Plug the video card that doesn't seem to work into another system and see if the card works. It might be a dead card. Did that. Works fine in other machines. 2. Check Ati and make sure you have the correct drivers. (http://support.ati.com/products/pc/rageltpro/rageltpro_drivers.html) Plug and Play will not always install the correct driver. Did that. Everything is as it should be. 3. I'd also check to make sure that the bios is the latest version. Find the Make/Model of the motherboard and head over to their site. Look for any bios updates for that motherboard. If there is something messed with bios this will set everything back to the defaults. Not looking forward to taking that machine apart AGAIN! 4. Make sure you're not booting into safe mode. :) Don't be silly. 5. Look for bent pins on the monitor cable. Monitor works fine on other machines. Not a cable problem. 6. Take a vacation and let somebody else worry about it (SEP). ;) I wish. ve -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 28, 2001 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only What OS is the on (Win9x, WinNT, Win2k)?\ Win98SE What are the model number for the video cards? ATI XPERT98 Do you know what the Motherboard make and model is? Sorry, without throwing the user off the unit, I couldn't tell you right now. Or do you guys/gals have a technician onsite that can look at this. That's me. I'm it. Told you -- we are on a shoestring these days. We spent all our money on upgrading to W2K server, ISA Server and E2K and buying 3 new servers for that deployment. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Just a few questions for ya. I might be able to help narrow down the video problem. What OS is the on (Win9x, WinNT, Win2k)? What are the model number for the video cards? Do you know what the Motherboard make and model is? Or do you guys/gals have a technician onsite that can look at this. Jeremy Newell Systems Technician INSCRIBER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 26 Peppler Street Waterloo, Ontario Canada, N2J 3C4 T.519.570.9111 F.519.570.9140 www.inscriber.com -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 28, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only I've put two different ones in. A Matrox and an ATI. I suspect it is something in the BIOS, which is not something I am prepared to deal with. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only So if you completely wipe the disk clean. Reinstall Windows (without installing anything else), you still cannot change the video mode? What kind of card is it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Already been done. Didn't help. ve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only It means wipe the drive start over! :0) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Behind every successful woman . . . is a substantial amount of coffee. -Stephanie Piro - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only If I could identify the problem, I could solve it. All HTML messages come out with a black background. I've replaced the video board and the monitor, but have had no luck. The machine will not display in anything but 16 colors, 640 x 480. Format C: /U? - What does this mean? ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Format C: /U? So what
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
A simple solution: unplug the modem. Plug it in when you want to surf. When your kids have figured out how to see all the pictures YOU have downloaded, then you can leave it plugged in and just let them surf away. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) so does we-blocker (www.we-blocker.com). Freeware and very configurable. Worth a look, for the price. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:42 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Hmm...that's interesting. Although it wont block all sites, I can spend some time blocking most offensive ones, and it does have passwords. Thanks! -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Can you use the Content Advisor that comes with IE? Jessica Williams Network Messaging Administrator Woman's Hospital (225) 924-8611 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
