RE: Exchange 5.5 utility

2002-03-27 Thread Jim Holmgren
Title: Exchange 5.5 utility



You 
coulduse Outlook. Put the SMTP address in the To: field and 
hitCheck Names, it should resolve the SMTP address to the display name in 
your GAL. 
One 
warning: I don't believe this works with hidden 
mailboxes/DLs.

-Jim


Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com 
We bring innovation to interactive 
communication. Advertising.com -- 
Superior Technology. Superior Performance. 

  
  Original 
  Message-From: Senter, John M 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 March 2002 
  21:56To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  utility
  
There is a utility that will allow me to put in a 
SMTP address and it will show what mailbox has that address. I cannot 
find the documentation I had on that and want to know if anybody remembered 
the name. I believe it is on the resource kit but did not see a name 
that looked familiar.
Thanks List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
***The information transmitted in this email is intended only forthe person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking ofany action in reliance upon, this information by persons orentities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.If you received this email in error, please contact thesender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

RE: restoration of mailbox

2002-03-27 Thread Jim Holmgren

Start here:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
Learn it, know it, practice it (frequently), love it.

Work your way forward from there.

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: restoration of mailbox


If you don't have brick level then you have to restore the full information
store.  You have to restore to another server (e.g. test server) and then
you can use EXMERGE to extract the mailboxes to .PST files.

-
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills


 -Original Message-
 From: Arun Kalia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:09 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: restoration of mailbox
 
 
 I am running Exchange 5.5 service pack 3, NT4.0 service pack 
 6a, ArcserveIT
 6.61 with backup agent for exchange. I am required to restore 
 5 mailboxes
 for certain dates. Other than brick level, I have every thing 
 on backup
 tapes. Can any body guide me how to restore mailbox using 
 information store
 or otherwise. Where can I find this information?
 
 Regards,
 
 Arun
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




datbase

2002-03-27 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message



ok

I did what MS 
said..
exmerged it 
out
created a new 
DB
exmerged it back 
in

the store runs, and 
people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in the 
event log

MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange Administrator

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchnage substitue

2002-03-27 Thread Allen Crawford
Title: Message









And is
very expensive I believe. But at
least Goldmine finally added the ability to authenticate the user on outgoing
email like all the other real email clients. Of course, it wasnt designed to be an email client



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:25
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



At least ACT supports Exch. Goldmine has
been around forever and still has no Exch support.

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:22
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

Not
so fast, you need to know how big the site is. ACT SUCKS when you overload it.
Plus, the SQL option is very expensive



-Original
Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



You want
something that does lots of stuff, but takes no brains to run?



goldmine
or Act2000.



-Original
Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchnage substitue

I need
a solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and contacts, but no
mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin dependant, this site also
doesn't even have a domain. Any ideas? They all use OL.

jlc

List Charter
and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Erik Sojka
Title: Message



Call 
PSS. 1018 errors are bad. 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:01 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  datbase
  ok
  
  I did what MS 
  said..
  exmerged it 
  out
  created a new 
  DB
  exmerged it back 
  in
  
  the store runs, 
  and people work, but i cannot back it up
  I get this in the 
  event log
  
  MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
  -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
  
  ?
  
  Michael Ross
  Panduit Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange Administrator
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message



Get 
back on the phone with MS. The problem isn't solved, so you can still keep the 
ticket open.

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 6:01 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  datbase
  ok
  
  I did what MS 
  said..
  exmerged it 
  out
  created a new 
  DB
  exmerged it back 
  in
  
  the store runs, 
  and people work, but i cannot back it up
  I get this in the 
  event log
  
  MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
  -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
  
  ?
  
  Michael Ross
  Panduit Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange Administrator
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread David N Precht
Title: Message



GIVE 
'em heck !!!

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 09:16To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  Get 
  back on the phone with MS. The problem isn't solved, so you can still keep the 
  ticket open.
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
6:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
datbase
ok

I did what MS 
said..
exmerged it 
out
created a new 
DB
exmerged it back 
in

the store runs, 
and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in 
the event log

MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange 
Administrator
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchnage substitue

2002-03-27 Thread Annette K. Raymond
Title: Message



Question about 
ACT: when you say it sucks if you overload it, what constitutes 
overloading it?

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:41 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchnage 
  substitue
  NEMX 
  is a Goldmine add-on?
  
  
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 
2002 2:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchnage substitue
You are 
probably thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine which allows this. GM 5.7 now 
supports the colanders thing.

SUPPOSEDLY, 
GM6 will finally include full Exch support.

  
  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  2:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchnage substitue
  We have users that synch Outlook and 
  Goldmine. It even supports iCalendars from 
  Outlook/Exchange.
  
  Am I thinking of another 
  product?
  
  
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 
26, 2002 2:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchnage substitue
At least 
ACT supports Exch. Goldmine has been around forever and still has no 
Exch support.

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  2:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchnage substitue
  
  Not so 
  fast, you need to know how big the site is. ACT SUCKS when you 
  overload it. Plus, the SQL option is very expensive
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  4:19 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchnage 
  substitue
  
  
  You want 
  something that does lots of stuff, but takes no brains to 
  run?
  
  
  
  goldmine or 
  Act2000.
  
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
2:13 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchnage 
substitue
I need a 
solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and 
contacts, but no mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin 
dependant, this site also doesn't even have a domain. Any ideas? 
They all use OL.
jlc
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchnage substitue

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: Message









It is made for a max of 15 users (unless
you use the SQL upgrade). The base product starts to flake at more than that
number of users (at the same time).



-Original Message-
From: Annette K. Raymond
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
8:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue





Question about
ACT: when you say it sucks if you overload it, what constitutes
overloading it?





-Original
Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:41
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



NEMX is a Goldmine
add-on?











-Original
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:34
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



You are probably
thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine which allows this. GM 5.7 now supports the
colanders thing.











SUPPOSEDLY,
GM6 will finally include full Exch support.





-Original
Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:29
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



We have users that synch
Outlook and Goldmine. It even supports iCalendars from Outlook/Exchange.











Am I thinking of another
product?











-Original
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:25
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



At least ACT
supports Exch. Goldmine has been around forever and still has no Exch support.





-Original
Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:22
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

Not
so fast, you need to know how big the site is. ACT SUCKS when you overload it.
Plus, the SQL option is very expensive



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue





You want
something that does lots of stuff, but takes no brains to run?











goldmine
or Act2000.











-Original
Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchnage substitue

I need
a solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and contacts, but no
mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin dependant, this site also
doesn't even have a domain. Any ideas? They all use OL.

jlc



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







128 ISDN Link (PPTP) Remote users

2002-03-27 Thread Jean-Francois Bourdeau

I have a customer, a 20 users company, who have a ISDN 128k link

SOmetime the remote users have do not have any problem to user PPTP to use
OL 2000 but other time they always loose the connection.

I know that 128k is not a lot but basically my question is, do you think
that a slow (or busy) link would drop PPTP connection ? Or it's more the
quality of the line that is problably the problem ?

Thanks

JF



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message



got 
info on those errors?

  
  -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:30 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Call 
  PSS. 1018 errors are bad. 
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
datbase
ok

I did what MS 
said..
exmerged it 
out
created a new 
DB
exmerged it back 
in

the store runs, 
and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in 
the event log

MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange 
Administrator
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Need suggestions for securing OWA

2002-03-27 Thread DanM . HQ

Greetings All:

I need suggestions for securing OWA.  

I want to allow OWA access to some individuals from our company and deny
access to others.  I'd also like to be able to turn it on and off as
required by my management.

My configuration is NT4 SP6a with all (I think) Hotfixes, IIS4, Exchange 5.5
SP4.  We are sitting behind a PIX firewall.  All software is installed and
operating.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Dan Munley
Keyence Corporation of America
MIS Department

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exchnage substitue

2002-03-27 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message



I don't know. I 
have never overloaded it. I have about 6 people here using a server homed ACT 
database. We have never had a problem.

  
  -Original Message-From: Annette K. Raymond 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 6:03 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchnage 
  substitue
  Question about 
  ACT: when you say it sucks if you overload it, what constitutes 
  overloading it?
  
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
5:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchnage substitue
NEMX is a Goldmine add-on?


  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 
  2002 2:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchnage substitue
  You are 
  probably thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine which allows this. GM 5.7 now 
  supports the colanders thing.
  
  SUPPOSEDLY, 
  GM6 will finally include full Exch support.
  

-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 
2002 2:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Exchnage substitue
We have users that synch Outlook and 
Goldmine. It even supports iCalendars from 
Outlook/Exchange.

Am I thinking of another 
product?


  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 
  26, 2002 2:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchnage substitue
  At 
  least ACT supports Exch. Goldmine has been around forever and still 
  has no Exch support.
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 
2002 2:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchnage 
substitue

Not so 
fast, you need to know how big the site is. ACT SUCKS when you 
overload it. Plus, the SQL option is very 
expensive

-Original 
Message-From: 
William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
4:19 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchnage 
substitue


You want 
something that does lots of stuff, but takes no brains to 
run?



goldmine or 
Act2000.



  -Original 
  Message-From: Joe L. Casale 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  2:13 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchnage 
  substitue
  I need a 
  solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and 
  contacts, but no mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin 
  dependant, this site also doesn't even have a domain. Any ideas? 
  They all use OL.
  jlc
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: 128 ISDN Link (PPTP) Remote users

2002-03-27 Thread Martin Blackstone

IMHO, 20 people sharing 128K THEN adding the overhead of PPTP, is a not
going to work real well. I would look at DSL as an option or perhaps a
fractional T.
Im sure some of it has to do with the quality of the line as well though.

-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 6:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 128 ISDN Link (PPTP) Remote users


I have a customer, a 20 users company, who have a ISDN 128k link

SOmetime the remote users have do not have any problem to user PPTP to use
OL 2000 but other time they always loose the connection.

I know that 128k is not a lot but basically my question is, do you think
that a slow (or busy) link would drop PPTP connection ? Or it's more the
quality of the line that is problably the problem ?

Thanks

JF



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: backup problems

2002-03-27 Thread Joe Irvine
Title: Message



I'm 
running 8.6 with no problems I wiuld reconmmend re-installing the exchange 
agent adn maybe the latest exchange and windows service 
packs.

Thanks! 
Joe Irvine 
Director of Information 
Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 
597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com 

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  12:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: backup 
  problems`
  Same problem I am getting 
  - I use 8.5 I was hoping 8.6 would solve it but does not seem so by your 
  error.
  
  If you figure this out 
  let me know. I am thinking of going to a different 
  product.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I went to a general store. They 
  wouldn't let me buy anything specifically. -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:54 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: backup 
problems`
We are running 
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
We use Backup 
Exec 8.6 build 3278.
I have one 
server that is giving me
Media Name: "Media created 3/26/2002 
10:37:20 AM"Backup of "\\MailServer\Microsoft Exchange Information Store "Backup set #2 on storage 
media #1Backup set description: "Backup FULL"Backup Type: FULL - 
Database  Logs (flush committed logs)Backup started on 3/26/2002 at 
10:38:40 AM.The Exchange Store service is not responding. Backup set 
canceled.^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Backup completed on 3/26/2002 at 10:50:00 
AM.Backed up 0 Exchange Server store(s)Processed 2,285,764,782 bytes 
in 11 minutes and 20 seconds.Throughput rate: 192.3 
MB/min


As an 
error.
We do NOT have 
Outlook installed on the exchange server, and should not need to have it 
installed.
Anyone got an 
idea of why this is happening on just this ONE server?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange 
Administrator
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchnage substitue

2002-03-27 Thread Chris Hampton

WHere can I get information about the sql upgrade.
Thanks
chris
--- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It is made for a max of 15 users (unless you use the
 SQL upgrade). The base
 product starts to flake at more than that number of
 users (at the same
 time).
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Annette K. Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:03 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
  
 
 Question about ACT:  when you say it sucks if you
 overload it, what
 constitutes overloading it?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:41 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 NEMX is a Goldmine add-on?
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:34 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 You are probably thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine
 which allows this. GM
 5.7 now supports the colanders thing.
 
  
 
 SUPPOSEDLY, GM6 will finally include full Exch
 support.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:29 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 We have users that synch Outlook and Goldmine.  It
 even supports iCalendars
 from Outlook/Exchange.
 
  
 
 Am I thinking of another product?
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:25 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 At least ACT supports Exch. Goldmine has been around
 forever and still has
 no Exch support.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Carpenter
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:22 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 Not so fast, you need to know how big the site is.
 ACT SUCKS when you
 overload it. Plus, the SQL option is very expensive
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
  
 
 You want something that does lots of stuff, but
 takes no brains to run?
 
  
 
 goldmine or Act2000.
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Exchnage substitue
 
 I need a solution like exchange for one site that
 has scheduling, and
 contacts, but no mail. I wanted to use exchange, but
 its to admin dependant,
 this site also doesn't even have a domain. Any
 ideas? They all use OL.
 
 jlc
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exchnage substitue

2002-03-27 Thread Chris Hampton

WHere can I get information about the sql upgrade.
Thanks
chris
--- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It is made for a max of 15 users (unless you use the
 SQL upgrade). The base
 product starts to flake at more than that number of
 users (at the same
 time).
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Annette K. Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:03 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
  
 
 Question about ACT:  when you say it sucks if you
 overload it, what
 constitutes overloading it?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:41 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 NEMX is a Goldmine add-on?
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:34 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 You are probably thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine
 which allows this. GM
 5.7 now supports the colanders thing.
 
  
 
 SUPPOSEDLY, GM6 will finally include full Exch
 support.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:29 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 We have users that synch Outlook and Goldmine.  It
 even supports iCalendars
 from Outlook/Exchange.
 
  
 
 Am I thinking of another product?
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:25 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 At least ACT supports Exch. Goldmine has been around
 forever and still has
 no Exch support.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Carpenter
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:22 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 Not so fast, you need to know how big the site is.
 ACT SUCKS when you
 overload it. Plus, the SQL option is very expensive
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
  
 
 You want something that does lots of stuff, but
 takes no brains to run?
 
  
 
 goldmine or Act2000.
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Exchnage substitue
 
 I need a solution like exchange for one site that
 has scheduling, and
 contacts, but no mail. I wanted to use exchange, but
 its to admin dependant,
 this site also doesn't even have a domain. Any
 ideas? They all use OL.
 
 jlc
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: backup problems

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: Message









What do you mean you don't need
Outlook? According to their documentation, you MUST have a mail profile set up
for the Backup service account on the server that is doing the backups. I may
have missed it, are you running the backup on this server, oir remotely. Even
so, it looks like your issue is not permissions, or access. I agree that you
should reinstall the agent. Our issue was a handful of items that they don't
bother to tell you upfront. We had to pay the $89 incident fee to find out. We
seem to be running in good order now though. What a pain in the a_s.



-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
9:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup problems





I'm running 8.6 with no
problems I wiuld reconmmend re-installing the exchange agent adn maybe the
latest exchange and windows service packs.











Thanks! 

Joe Irvine

Director of Information Technology 
The Business Office, Inc.

(609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860

www.tbopayroll.com 



-Original
Message-
From: Zangara, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002
12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup problems`



Same problem I am getting - I use
8.5 I was hoping 8.6 would solve it but does not seem so by your error.











If you figure this out let me
know. I am thinking of going to a different product.















Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



I went
to a general store. They wouldn't let me buy anything specifically. -- Steven
Wright 





-Original
Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:54
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: backup problems`



We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4.





We use Backup Exec 8.6 build 3278.





I have one server that is giving me






Media Name: Media created 3/26/2002 10:37:20 AM
Backup of \\MailServer\Microsoft Exchange
Information Store 
Backup set #2 on storage media #1
Backup set description: Backup FULL
Backup Type: FULL - Database  Logs (flush committed logs)
Backup started on 3/26/2002 at 10:38:40 AM.
The Exchange Store service is not responding. Backup set canceled.
^ ^ ^ ^ ^











Backup completed on 3/26/2002 at 10:50:00
AM.
Backed up 0 Exchange Server store(s)
Processed 2,285,764,782 bytes in 11 minutes and 20 seconds.
Throughput rate: 192.3 MB/min

















As an error.





We do NOT have Outlook installed on
the exchange server, and should not need to have it installed.





Anyone got an idea of why this is
happening on just this ONE server?









Michael Ross

Panduit Corp.

17301 Ridgeland Ave

Tinley Park, IL 60477

MCSE

MS Exchange Administrator







List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Seth Mitchell


Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our Exchange server
has been failing.  There are no nasty messages in the logs, it just stops.
When we try to restart it, it displays error 2140.  However, there are no
additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 41xx).  We're using
Exchange 5.54...

Any thoughts?

-Seth Mitchell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exchnage substitue

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: RE: Exchnage substitue





I would say their website. Our company is too cheap, so we do not have it. The quote was VERY expensive (10s of thousands). 

http://www.act.com/products/index.cfm


-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue


WHere can I get information about the sql upgrade.
Thanks
chris
--- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It is made for a max of 15 users (unless you use the
 SQL upgrade). The base
 product starts to flake at more than that number of
 users (at the same
 time).
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Annette K. Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:03 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 
 
 Question about ACT: when you say it sucks if you
 overload it, what
 constitutes overloading it?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:41 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 NEMX is a Goldmine add-on?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:34 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 You are probably thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine
 which allows this. GM
 5.7 now supports the colanders thing.
 
 
 
 SUPPOSEDLY, GM6 will finally include full Exch
 support.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:29 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 We have users that synch Outlook and Goldmine. It
 even supports iCalendars
 from Outlook/Exchange.
 
 
 
 Am I thinking of another product?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:25 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 At least ACT supports Exch. Goldmine has been around
 forever and still has
 no Exch support.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Carpenter
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:22 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 Not so fast, you need to know how big the site is.
 ACT SUCKS when you
 overload it. Plus, the SQL option is very expensive
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
 
 
 
 You want something that does lots of stuff, but
 takes no brains to run?
 
 
 
 goldmine or Act2000.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Exchnage substitue
 
 I need a solution like exchange for one site that
 has scheduling, and
 contacts, but no mail. I wanted to use exchange, but
 its to admin dependant,
 this site also doesn't even have a domain. Any
 ideas? They all use OL.
 
 jlc
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards(r)
http://movies.yahoo.com/


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message



im not 
sure about the disk caching
its a 
server in japan, and im in chicago.


  
  -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S 
  (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 
  27, 2002 8:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  1018 
  errors are internal problems with the page structure of the JET database. It 
  prevents the database being backed up simply because your backup program 
  figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. There's not usually a 
  fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new mailbox server in the 
  site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually (although not always) down to a 
  problem with your disk. You don't have any caches set on your disk controllers 
  do you?
  
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: datbase
ok

I did what MS 
said..
exmerged it 
out
created a new 
DB
exmerged it back 
in

the store runs, 
and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in 
the event log

MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange 
Administrator
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ray Zorz
Title: Message



Didn't 
he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
reimporting?

  -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 7:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  1018 
  errors are internal problems with the page structure of the JET database. It 
  prevents the database being backed up simply because your backup program 
  figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. There's not usually a 
  fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new mailbox server in the 
  site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually (although not always) down to a 
  problem with your disk. You don't have any caches set on your disk controllers 
  do you?
  
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: datbase
ok

I did what MS 
said..
exmerged it 
out
created a new 
DB
exmerged it back 
in

the store runs, 
and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in 
the event log

MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange 
Administrator
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Outlook 2K2

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: Outlook 2K2





Where is the spot to create a PAB file for your contacts in 2K2 compared to 2K?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Outlook 2K2

2002-03-27 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message



You don't use PAB 
anymore. Its contacts.

While the option 
exists, you dont want to go down that crusty old path any 
longer.

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:27 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook 
  2K2
  Where is the spot to create a PAB file for your contacts in 
  2K2 compared to 2K? List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Neil Hobson

These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you find the
hardware problem


Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: datbase
Subject: RE: datbase


Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and reimporting? 
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of the JET
database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because your
backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database.
There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a
new mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually
(although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have
any caches set on your disk controllers do you?

Kevin
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: datbase


ok

I did what MS said..
exmerged it out
created a new DB
exmerged it back in

the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in the event log
MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange Administrator

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Neil Hobson

Could be many possible causes.  One is if you don't have an
administrator's mailbox defined on the connector - check this.

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
Subject: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our Exchange
server has been failing.  There are no nasty messages in the logs, it
just stops. When we try to restart it, it displays error 2140.  However,
there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 41xx).
We're using Exchange 5.54...

Any thoughts?

-Seth Mitchell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA

2002-03-27 Thread Neil Hobson

You can turn HTTP protocol access off at the site, server or mailbox
level (in Exchange Administrator)

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:08
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Need suggestions for securing OWA
Subject: Need suggestions for securing OWA


Greetings All:

I need suggestions for securing OWA.  

I want to allow OWA access to some individuals from our company and deny
access to others.  I'd also like to be able to turn it on and off as
required by my management.

My configuration is NT4 SP6a with all (I think) Hotfixes, IIS4, Exchange
5.5 SP4.  We are sitting behind a PIX firewall.  All software is
installed and operating.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Dan Munley
Keyence Corporation of America
MIS Department

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA





Yes, you can disallow http access at the mailbox level:


Mailbox properties/Protocols


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA


You can turn HTTP protocol access off at the site, server or mailbox
level (in Exchange Administrator)


Neil Hobson


Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:08
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Need suggestions for securing OWA
Subject: Need suggestions for securing OWA



Greetings All:


I need suggestions for securing OWA. 


I want to allow OWA access to some individuals from our company and deny
access to others. I'd also like to be able to turn it on and off as
required by my management.


My configuration is NT4 SP6a with all (I think) Hotfixes, IIS4, Exchange
5.5 SP4. We are sitting behind a PIX firewall. All software is
installed and operating.


Thanks in advance for your replies.


Dan Munley
Keyence Corporation of America
MIS Department


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Seth Mitchell


Administrator mailbox is ok.  Next?

-Seth Mitchell

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart


Could be many possible causes.  One is if you don't have an
administrator's mailbox defined on the connector - check this.

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
Subject: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our Exchange
server has been failing.  There are no nasty messages in the logs, it
just stops. When we try to restart it, it displays error 2140.  However,
there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 41xx).
We're using Exchange 5.54...

Any thoughts?

-Seth Mitchell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request

2002-03-27 Thread Desiree Herrmann

I concur with the DL suggestion.  I have run into this issue, and it can be
a headache.  I solved it here in a somewhat small organization by using
aliases for certain users and we did change the address people were sending
resumes to, but as you can imagine, there was some swapping of messages
which still needed to be done as some resumes went to the wrong
individual...  Force them somehow to use one address, I'm going to try that.


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


I had something similiar with about 50 different information type e-mail
addresses that were published on a couple websites.  I think you were right
on with the DL idea.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


I agree. I don't like that idea either. But now they are reaping what they
sew, and it sounds like they don't want to do THEIR jobs.

Instead of doing any forwards or CRs, just create a single mailbox. Put
everything in there, and tell them how to open it to read mail. Then they
can do it at their convenience.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a.

Our HR department currently has an email address set up for job postings so
people can email their resume. They are getting so many that they no longer
want to process them. What they want to do is create a new email address for
each posting that would go to the appropriate person in the department with
the opening.

The do not wish to use the following suggestions I gave to them:
1. Just use the email of the person in the department you want to receive
the resumes.
2. We could create a few distribution lists (for running multiple jobs at
once) and they can add and remove users at will.
3. They could set up rules on the current mailbox to route based on job
posting number or some other piece of information.

I don't like the idea of creating an email address every time they do a job
posting.  So, I'm wondering if anyone else has had to deal with a similar
situation and if you found a workable solution.

TIA, MJ


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Neil Hobson

DNS settings on the server?

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:39
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



Administrator mailbox is ok.  Next?

-Seth Mitchell

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart


Could be many possible causes.  One is if you don't have an
administrator's mailbox defined on the connector - check this.

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
Subject: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our Exchange
server has been failing.  There are no nasty messages in the logs, it
just stops. When we try to restart it, it displays error 2140.  However,
there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 41xx).
We're using Exchange 5.54...

Any thoughts?

-Seth Mitchell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA

2002-03-27 Thread Rich Dave

See Technet article Q236811 - How to set up OWA for Specific Users

David J Rich MCSE

IT Technical Specialist

Ricardo Consulting Engineers Ltd.
Bridge Works
Shoreham By Sea
Sussex
BN43 5FG

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:08
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Need suggestions for securing OWA


Greetings All:

I need suggestions for securing OWA.  

I want to allow OWA access to some individuals from our company and deny
access to others.  I'd also like to be able to turn it on and off as
required by my management.

My configuration is NT4 SP6a with all (I think) Hotfixes, IIS4, Exchange 5.5
SP4.  We are sitting behind a PIX firewall.  All software is installed and
operating.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Dan Munley
Keyence Corporation of America
MIS Department

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find it. I believe
(through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the hardware
problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still have to move
data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do this from the
start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and
move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it
that way.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you find the
hardware problem


Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: datbase
Subject: RE: datbase


Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and reimporting? 
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of the JET
database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because your
backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database.
There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a
new mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually
(although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have
any caches set on your disk controllers do you?

Kevin
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: datbase


ok

I did what MS said..
exmerged it out
created a new DB
exmerged it back in

the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in the event log
MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange Administrator

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Neil Hobson

Indeed, that's exactly what I do.  What I meant to say in my first post,
and I don't think it came across very well, is that  even if you export
the data and whack priv.edb, it can still happen again.

The last time I had one of these was after arriving at 10pm back in the
UK from Holland, and getting a call at 2am from one of my colleagues
saying what's does jet error -1018 mean?.  Now I unplug the phone at
night.  :-)

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 16:30
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: datbase
Subject: RE: datbase


Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find it. I
believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the
hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still
have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do
this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server
to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so
you can't do it that way.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you find the
hardware problem


Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: datbase
Subject: RE: datbase


Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and reimporting? 
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of the JET
database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because your
backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database.
There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a
new mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually
(although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have
any caches set on your disk controllers do you?

Kevin
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: datbase


ok

I did what MS said..
exmerged it out
created a new DB
exmerged it back in

the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in the event log
MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange Administrator

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
Title: RE: datbase



ISinteg won't help - it doesn't look at the structure of the database, 
just some high level logical parsing to make sure the IS is well. As I say, 
tracking down the hardware issue probably won't help you either. 


Kevin

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 27 March 2002 15:52To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another server to put up 
  in that site. So Ill have to track down the hardware 
  issue I did an isinteg -pri -test alltests 
  It came back with all Zero's .. Like it should. 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find 
  it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the 
  hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still have 
  to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do this from 
  the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and 
  move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it that 
  way.
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
  
  These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you 
  find the hardware problem 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise 
  Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  -Original Message- From: Ray 
  Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  datbase Subject: RE: datbase 
  Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
  reimporting? -Original Message- 
  From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of 
  the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because your 
  backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. There's 
  not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new mailbox 
  server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually (although not 
  always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have any caches set on 
  your disk controllers do you?
  Kevin -Original 
  Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues Subject: datbase 
  ok 
  I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
  out created a new DB exmerged 
  it back in 
  the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it 
  up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with 
  error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
  ? 
  Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
  17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 
  60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
  Administrator 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  ** 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
  and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any 
  view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
  not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
  subsidiary companies. If you 
  have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA

2002-03-27 Thread Clark, Steve

Set up access thru your firewall. People that need access get ID's, those
that don't, don't. Set up group for log on locally perms required for OWA -
put in/ take out as needed.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Need suggestions for securing OWA

Greetings All:

I need suggestions for securing OWA.  

I want to allow OWA access to some individuals from our company and deny
access to others.  I'd also like to be able to turn it on and off as
required by my management.

My configuration is NT4 SP6a with all (I think) Hotfixes, IIS4, Exchange 5.5
SP4.  We are sitting behind a PIX firewall.  All software is installed and
operating.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Dan Munley
Keyence Corporation of America
MIS Department

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Neil Hobson

You'll be lucky to get any questions on Glam Rock names, though.

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 16:39
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: datbase
Subject: RE: datbase


The idea about the phone is a good one. I'll write that down in my
little black book of good ideas.

Of course, you'll miss out when I phone you from Who Wants to be a
Millionaire?.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


Indeed, that's exactly what I do.  What I meant to say in my first post,
and I don't think it came across very well, is that  even if you export
the data and whack priv.edb, it can still happen again.

The last time I had one of these was after arriving at 10pm back in the
UK from Holland, and getting a call at 2am from one of my colleagues
saying what's does jet error -1018 mean?.  Now I unplug the phone at
night.  :-)

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 16:30
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: datbase
Subject: RE: datbase


Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find it. I
believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the
hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still
have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do
this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server
to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so
you can't do it that way.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you find the
hardware problem


Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: datbase
Subject: RE: datbase


Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and reimporting? 
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: datbase


1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of the JET
database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because your
backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database.
There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a
new mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually
(although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have
any caches set on your disk controllers do you?

Kevin
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: datbase


ok

I did what MS said..
exmerged it out
created a new DB
exmerged it back in

the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it up
I get this in the event log
MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup

?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange Administrator

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any 

RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request

2002-03-27 Thread Ray Zorz

What I find kinda weird was that HR didn't want to even see the resumes.
But, regardless, maybe the company can designate various department heads
(actually, probably the AA's) to receive them. Salesjobs, HRjobs, Techjobs,
etc. @companyname.com.

Hopefully they'll do that and actually tell the exchange admin.  Since I'm
unemployed, I've been sending out a buncha resumes.  Amazing to me that
companies put e-mail addresses out there, and I get errors that they're not
active. Ironically, one was for a Exchange admin.

-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


I concur with the DL suggestion.  I have run into this issue, and it can be
a headache.  I solved it here in a somewhat small organization by using
aliases for certain users and we did change the address people were sending
resumes to, but as you can imagine, there was some swapping of messages
which still needed to be done as some resumes went to the wrong
individual...  Force them somehow to use one address, I'm going to try that.


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


I had something similiar with about 50 different information type e-mail
addresses that were published on a couple websites.  I think you were right
on with the DL idea.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


I agree. I don't like that idea either. But now they are reaping what they
sew, and it sounds like they don't want to do THEIR jobs.

Instead of doing any forwards or CRs, just create a single mailbox. Put
everything in there, and tell them how to open it to read mail. Then they
can do it at their convenience.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a.

Our HR department currently has an email address set up for job postings so
people can email their resume. They are getting so many that they no longer
want to process them. What they want to do is create a new email address for
each posting that would go to the appropriate person in the department with
the opening.

The do not wish to use the following suggestions I gave to them:
1. Just use the email of the person in the department you want to receive
the resumes.
2. We could create a few distribution lists (for running multiple jobs at
once) and they can add and remove users at will.
3. They could set up rules on the current mailbox to route based on job
posting number or some other piece of information.

I don't like the idea of creating an email address every time they do a job
posting.  So, I'm wondering if anyone else has had to deal with a similar
situation and if you found a workable solution.

TIA, MJ


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Todd White
Title: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart





has someone changed the settings on the routing tab located in the IMS?


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



DNS settings on the server?


Neil Hobson


Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions


-Original Message-
From: Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:39
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart




Administrator mailbox is ok. Next?


-Seth Mitchell


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



Could be many possible causes. One is if you don't have an
administrator's mailbox defined on the connector - check this.


Neil Hobson


Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions


-Original Message-
From: Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
Subject: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart




Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our Exchange
server has been failing. There are no nasty messages in the logs, it
just stops. When we try to restart it, it displays error 2140. However,
there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 41xx).
We're using Exchange 5.54...


Any thoughts?


-Seth Mitchell


[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





MSX 5.5 Maintenance

2002-03-27 Thread Jeff Schuckert



I have two questions on 
performing maintenance on the IS:

We have Exchange 
5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a and the ISseems to be growing about 1gb every other 
month even though the number of mailboxes has not 
changedsignificantlyand the storage in each mailbox has actually 
decreased. I have a 100gb storage limit set,the deleted item 
retention date is3 days andIS Maintenance automatically set to 
runevery day. I remember reading about dead/white space in the IS 
that needs to be cleaned out, but if I remember correctly the IS maintenance is 
supposed to do that. Does anyone have some suggestionson what I can 
do/check /or a good web site to read up on it?

Second question 
relates to the number of files in a directory - the ..imcdata\in\archive has 
some 125,000 files in it. They appear to be old messages. Does this 
need to be cleared out or is there some other maintenance I should be 
performing.

Thanks in 
advance.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Seth Mitchell
Title: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



Yes. However, I should note that we can get the IMC running again 
by restarting the server.

The 
change I made was very minor - I modified the address of the single IP we allow 
to relay. I just rechecked the address and mask for that entry - it's 
ok.

Other 
thoughts?

-Seth 
Mitchell

  -Original Message-From: Todd White 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IMC 
  Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
  has someone changed the settings on the routing tab located in 
  the IMS? 
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMC 
  Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
  DNS settings on the server? 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk 
  Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
  Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  
  -Original Message- From: Seth 
  Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:39 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: RE: IMC 
  Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
  Administrator mailbox is ok. Next? 
  -Seth Mitchell 
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMC 
  Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
  Could be many possible causes. One is if you don't have 
  an administrator's mailbox defined on the connector - 
  check this. 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk 
  Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
  Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  
  -Original Message- From: Seth 
  Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: IMC 
  Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
  Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our 
  Exchange server has been failing. There are no 
  nasty messages in the logs, it just stops. When we try 
  to restart it, it displays error 2140. However, there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 
  41xx). We're using Exchange 5.54... 
  Any thoughts? 
  -Seth Mitchell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  ** 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
  and intended solely for the use of the individual to 
  whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented 
  are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
  represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this 
  email in error, please contact our Support Desk 
  immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  ** 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
  and intended solely for the use of the individual to 
  whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented 
  are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
  represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this 
  email in error, please contact our Support Desk 
  immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange substitute

2002-03-27 Thread Roger Wright
Title: Message



Is an 
online web-based application something to consider for this 
situation?


Roger Wright
Southern Commerce Bank
___

Serving coffee on aircraft 
causes turbulence. 

  -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:13 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchnage 
  substitue
  
  I need 
  a solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and contacts, but 
  no mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin dependant, this site also 
  doesn't even have a domain. Any ideas? They all use OL.
  jlcList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






___

NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017.  It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above.  If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.  





RE: Outlook 2K2

2002-03-27 Thread Salvador Manzo
Title: Message



That 
is correct. Simply restrict the export to the Contacts 
folder.

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  07:41To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
  2K2
  
  Well, maybe I 
  should be more specific. I need to export contacts then, for another machine. 
  Can I use a pst and just import them into the new contact folder elsewhere, as 
  you do calendar items? What about going from Outlook to OE?
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:33 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
  2K2
  
  
  You don't use PAB 
  anymore. Its contacts.
  
  
  
  While the option 
  exists, you dont want to go down that crusty old path any 
  longer.
  
-Original 
Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:27 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Outlook 
2K2
Where is the spot to create a PAB file for your 
contacts in 2K2 compared to 2K? 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Todd White
Title: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



did 
you change the DNS entry for this?

  -Original Message-From: Seth Mitchell 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:19 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IMC Failure - 
  Error 2140 on Restart
  Yes. However, I should note that we can get the IMC running again 
  by restarting the server.
  
  The 
  change I made was very minor - I modified the address of the single IP we 
  allow to relay. I just rechecked the address and mask for that entry - 
  it's ok.
  
  Other thoughts?
  
  -Seth Mitchell
  
-Original Message-From: Todd White 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
has someone changed the settings on the routing tab located 
in the IMS? 
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
DNS settings on the server? 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative 
Solutions 
-Original Message- From: 
Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:39 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
Administrator mailbox is ok. Next? 
-Seth Mitchell 
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
Could be many possible causes. One is if you don't 
have an administrator's mailbox defined on the 
connector - check this. 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative 
Solutions 
-Original Message- From: 
Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our 
Exchange server has been failing. There are no 
nasty messages in the logs, it just stops. When we 
try to restart it, it displays error 2140. However, there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 
41xx). We're using Exchange 5.54... 
Any thoughts? 
-Seth Mitchell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the 
individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or 
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies. If you 
have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via 
email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
** 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the 
individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or 
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies. If you 
have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via 
email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
** 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Kopec, David
Title: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



2140 
is genericlook in the app/sys event IDs. What does it say there? 

-Original Message-From: Todd White 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
11:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
has someone changed the settings on the routing tab located in 
the IMS? 
-Original Message- From: Neil 
Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
DNS settings on the server? 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft 
Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems 
For Collaborative Solutions 
-Original Message- From: Seth 
Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:39 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
Administrator mailbox is ok. Next? 
-Seth Mitchell 
-Original Message- From: Neil 
Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
Could be many possible causes. One is if you don't have 
an administrator's mailbox defined on the connector - 
check this. 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft 
Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems 
For Collaborative Solutions 
-Original Message- From: Seth 
Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: IMC Failure 
- Error 2140 on Restart 
Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on our 
Exchange server has been failing. There are no 
nasty messages in the logs, it just stops. When we try 
to restart it, it displays error 2140. However, there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs (e.g., 
41xx). We're using Exchange 5.54... 
Any thoughts? 
-Seth Mitchell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
and intended solely for the use of the individual to 
whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary 
companies. If you have received this email in error, 
please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone 
on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
and intended solely for the use of the individual to 
whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary 
companies. If you have received this email in error, 
please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone 
on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: MSX 5.5 Maintenance

2002-03-27 Thread William Lefkovics



The 
information you heard on whitespace is completely incorrect. (What does 
event ID 1221 in the application event log say?)

As for 
the ims archive stuff. Yes, totally deletable.

Reference:
Section 3.27-3.30:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm

William

  -Original Message-From: Jeff Schuckert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  8:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MSX 5.5 
  Maintenance
  I have two questions on 
  performing maintenance on the IS:
  
  We have Exchange 
  5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a and the ISseems to be growing about 1gb every 
  other month even though the number of mailboxes has not 
  changedsignificantlyand the storage in each mailbox has actually 
  decreased. I have a 100gb storage limit set,the deleted item 
  retention date is3 days andIS Maintenance automatically set to 
  runevery day. I remember reading about dead/white space in the IS 
  that needs to be cleaned out, but if I remember correctly the IS maintenance 
  is supposed to do that. Does anyone have some suggestionson what I 
  can do/check /or a good web site to read up on it?
  
  Second question 
  relates to the number of files in a directory - the ..imcdata\in\archive has 
  some 125,000 files in it. They appear to be old messages. Does 
  this need to be cleared out or is there some other maintenance I should be 
  performing.
  
  Thanks in 
  advance.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: MSX 5.5 Maintenance

2002-03-27 Thread Steve Ens
Title: Message



That's 
a huge storage limit...I'd bring it down if I were you. People will use 
what they are given.

  
  -Original Message-From: Jeff Schuckert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MSX 5.5 
  Maintenance
  I have two questions on 
  performing maintenance on the IS:
  
  We have Exchange 
  5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a and the ISseems to be growing about 1gb every 
  other month even though the number of mailboxes has not 
  changedsignificantlyand the storage in each mailbox has actually 
  decreased. I have a 100gb storage limit set,the deleted item 
  retention date is3 days andIS Maintenance automatically set to 
  runevery day. I remember reading about dead/white space in the IS 
  that needs to be cleaned out, but if I remember correctly the IS maintenance 
  is supposed to do that. Does anyone have some suggestionson what I 
  can do/check /or a good web site to read up on it?
  
  Second question 
  relates to the number of files in a directory - the ..imcdata\in\archive has 
  some 125,000 files in it. They appear to be old messages. Does 
  this need to be cleared out or is there some other maintenance I should be 
  performing.
  
  Thanks in 
  advance.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA

2002-03-27 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Title: RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA





I would recommend SECUREIIS from eEye.com. Cost about $800 per IIS server.


It's an excellent product and blocks at least everything I've seen thrown at it and there's no .DAT or database files that need constant monitoring or downloading. It completely wraps itself around IIS (4 or 5) and has been rock solid since implementing it over 1 year ago during the NIMDA scare. This, on top of a normal FIREWALL (PIX) configuration has prevented attacks of all types.

http://eeye.com/html/Products/SecureIIS/index.html


-Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Need suggestions for securing OWA



Greetings All:


I need suggestions for securing OWA. 


I want to allow OWA access to some individuals from our company and deny access to others. I'd also like to be able to turn it on and off as required by my management.

My configuration is NT4 SP6a with all (I think) Hotfixes, IIS4, Exchange 5.5 SP4. We are sitting behind a PIX firewall. All software is installed and operating.

Thanks in advance for your replies.


Dan Munley
Keyence Corporation of America
MIS Department


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: MSX 5.5 Maintenance

2002-03-27 Thread William Lefkovics
Title: Message



100GB 
per person?

  -Original Message-From: Steve Ens 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:56 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MSX 5.5 
  Maintenance
  That's a huge storage limit...I'd bring it down if I were you. 
  People will use what they are given.
  

-Original Message-From: Jeff Schuckert 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
2002 10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MSX 
5.5 Maintenance
I have two questions on 
performing maintenance on the IS:

We have Exchange 
5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a and the ISseems to be growing about 1gb every 
other month even though the number of mailboxes has not 
changedsignificantlyand the storage in each mailbox has actually 
decreased. I have a 100gb storage limit set,the deleted item 
retention date is3 days andIS Maintenance automatically set to 
runevery day. I remember reading about dead/white space in the 
IS that needs to be cleaned out, but if I remember correctly the IS 
maintenance is supposed to do that. Does anyone have some 
suggestionson what I can do/check /or a good web site to read up 
on it?

Second question 
relates to the number of files in a directory - the ..imcdata\in\archive has 
some 125,000 files in it. They appear to be old messages. Does 
this need to be cleared out or is there some other maintenance I should be 
performing.

Thanks in 
advance.List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart

2002-03-27 Thread Seth Mitchell
Title: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart



SCORE! We use 'HOSTS' files (I know, I know, but my boss is 
stubbornly old-school), and there was no entry for that host. It doesn't 
send mail much, but I bet Exchange didn't like that at 
all...

Oh, 
and FWIW, there were _no_ other messages in the logs (per the articles 
mentioned).

Thanks,
Seth 
Mitchell

  -Original Message-From: Todd White 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  10:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IMC 
  Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
  did 
  you change the DNS entry for this?
  
-Original Message-From: Seth Mitchell 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
10:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IMC 
Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
Yes. However, I should note that we can get the IMC running 
again by restarting the server.

The change I made was very minor - I modified the address of the 
single IP we allow to relay. I just rechecked the address and mask for 
that entry - it's ok.

Other thoughts?

-Seth Mitchell

  -Original Message-From: Todd White 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart
  has someone changed the settings on the routing tab 
  located in the IMS? 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
  DNS settings on the server? 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk 
  Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative 
  Solutions 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:39 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: RE: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 

  Administrator mailbox is ok. Next? 
  -Seth Mitchell 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
  Could be many possible causes. One is if you don't 
  have an administrator's mailbox defined on the 
  connector - check this. 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk 
  Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative 
  Solutions 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Seth Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:20 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart Subject: IMC Failure - Error 2140 on Restart 
  Recently, the Internet Mail Connector (SMTP service) on 
  our Exchange server has been failing. There 
  are no nasty messages in the logs, it just stops. 
  When we try to restart it, it displays error 2140. However, 
  there are no additional error messages in the Event Logs 
  (e.g., 41xx). We're using Exchange 5.54... 
  
  Any thoughts? 
  -Seth Mitchell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  ** 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are 
  confidential and intended solely for the use of 
  the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
  or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
  not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or 
  any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our 
  Support Desk immediately by telephone on 
  01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  ** 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are 
  confidential and intended solely for the use of 
  the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
  or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
  not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or 
  any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our 
  Support Desk immediately by telephone on 
  01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 
  
  List 

Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay

2002-03-27 Thread William Lefkovics

XIMS: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay E-Mail Messages in
Third-Party Tests (Q304897)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q304897

I like this one because it shows the six primary SMTP relay tests.

William

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay

2002-03-27 Thread Martin Blackstone

I was reading that too. I liked it. Long time coming.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay


XIMS: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay E-Mail Messages in
Third-Party Tests (Q304897)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q304897

I like this one because it shows the six primary SMTP relay tests.

William

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




553 Error message

2002-03-27 Thread Jim Holmgren

I have a strange situation.  
I have one user sending Internet mail to one specific email address that
bounces with this error message:
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;553 Requested action not taken: mailbox name not
allowed

All other users can send to that email address OK, and the user in question
has no problems sending to other outside email addresses.

This is an Exchange 5.5 sp4 /Outlook 2000 install.  

I have already tried the following:
1)  Log into Outlook as the user on another PC and send mail - bounces with
same error.
2)  Telnet directly to the recipient's mail server and send mail as this
user - this works.
3)  Send mail from me to the recipient -  this goes through without a
problem.

I have not been able to find a good explanation of this particular SMTP
error message.

Any suggestions?

Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Rob Wilcox
Title: Message



So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same hardware? As 
someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by hardware problems. 
Check out the caching on your controller, and does your controller write 
anything to it's own internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do 
that? Maybe other vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 15:52To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server to put up 
in that site. So Ill have to track down the hardware 
issue I did an isinteg -pri -test alltests 
It came back with all Zero's .. Like it should. 
-Original Message- From: Snook, 
Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find it. 
I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the 
hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still have to 
move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do this from the 
start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and move 
mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it that 
way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: Neil 
Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 

These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you find 
the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft 
Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems 
For Collaborative Solutions 
-Original Message- From: Ray 
Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
datbase Subject: RE: datbase 
Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
reimporting? -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
datbase 
1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of the 
JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because your 
backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. There's 
not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new mailbox 
server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually (although not 
always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have any caches set on your 
disk controllers do you?
Kevin -Original Message- 
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues Subject: datbase 
ok 
I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
out created a new DB exmerged it 
back in 
the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it up 
I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error 
-1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
? 
Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 
60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
Administrator 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any 
view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies. If you 
have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Rob Wilcox
Title: Message



Did you look at :- http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248406
Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 16:05To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
i ran 
an eseutil /g and it came up with 1206

  
  -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S 
  (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 
  27, 2002 10:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  ISinteg won't help - it doesn't look at the structure of the database, 
  just some high level logical parsing to make sure the IS is well. As I say, 
  tracking down the hardware issue probably won't help you either. 
  
  
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 27 March 2002 15:52To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server to put 
up in that site. So Ill have to track down the 
hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri -test 
alltests It came back with all Zero's .. Like it 
should. 
-Original Message- From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find 
it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the 
hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still have 
to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do this from 
the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and 
move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it 
that way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 

These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you 
find the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message- From: Ray 
Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
datbase 
Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
reimporting? -Original Message- 
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
datbase 
1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of 
the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because 
your backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. 
There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new 
mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually 
(although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have any 
caches set on your disk controllers do you?
Kevin -Original 
Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange 
Admin Issues Subject: datbase 
ok 
I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
out created a new DB exmerged it back in 
the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it 
up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with 
error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
? 
Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 
60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
Administrator 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and 
do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of 
its subsidiary companies. If 
you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via 
email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message



ok
this 
is a dell server
i load 
array manager
and my 
virtual disk shows
Read 
policy : Read-Ahead
Write 
Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache 
Policy : Direct I/O

I dont 
see any alarms about the disk hardware...

  
  -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same hardware? As 
  someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by hardware problems. 
  Check out the caching on your controller, and does your controller write 
  anything to it's own internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards 
  do that? Maybe other vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 
  15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another server to put up 
  in that site. So Ill have to track down the hardware 
  issue I did an isinteg -pri -test alltests 
  It came back with all Zero's .. Like it should. 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find 
  it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the 
  hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still have 
  to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do this from 
  the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and 
  move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it that 
  way.
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
  
  These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you 
  find the hardware problem 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise 
  Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  -Original Message- From: Ray 
  Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  datbase Subject: RE: datbase 
  Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
  reimporting? -Original Message- 
  From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of 
  the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because your 
  backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. There's 
  not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new mailbox 
  server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually (although not 
  always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have any caches set on 
  your disk controllers do you?
  Kevin -Original 
  Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues Subject: datbase 
  ok 
  I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
  out created a new DB exmerged 
  it back in 
  the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it 
  up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with 
  error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
  ? 
  Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
  17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 
  60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
  Administrator 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  ** 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
  and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any 
  view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
  not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
  subsidiary companies. If you 
  have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay

2002-03-27 Thread Schwartz, Jim

Hahahahaha.
Oh, you're serious. I find it doubtful. Most of their tests are based on how
Sendmail works and anything else is not acceptable despite the RFC's.

 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:51 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay
 
 The bigger question is:  will some of the folks who run the various RBLs
 accept that you are not a relay even if you don't immediately return a
 5xx?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:46 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay
  
  
  I was reading that too. I liked it. Long time coming.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:36 AM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay
  
  
  XIMS: Microsoft SMTP Servers May Seem to Accept and Relay 
  E-Mail Messages in
  Third-Party Tests (Q304897)
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q304897
  
  I like this one because it shows the six primary SMTP relay tests.
  
  William
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




events

2002-03-27 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message



correct me if im 
wrong

Exchange 5.5 handles 
events asynchronizly, and e2k handles them synchronosly 
right?
Does the Auto Accept 
of meeting requests work better in e2k?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange Administrator

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Hiding Groups/E-mail Addresses

2002-03-27 Thread Ken Leyba

In Exchange 5.5 I have an e-mail group that the members want to have hidden
from the address book.  So I have a generic question, if I hide an address
from the address book they will no longer be able to send to that address?
Or do I need to create an SMTP address (right now I only have an X.400
address since there's no need for external access) and have them send to a
SMTP address instead?  Will that even work?

I'm open to other suggestions too but I'm not 100% sure what they want, i.e.
they don't know what they want.  They are getting back to me if just
limiting senders to group members is good enough.  

Ken

-
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message



What 
kind of RAIDController? What version is the firmware at? I'll 
bet I know what the problem is and if you go to Dell's support site and query on 
your RAID controller about Disk I/O's they'll have big red letters telling you 
what is wrong...


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:33 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this 
  is a dell server
  i 
  load array manager
  and 
  my virtual disk shows
  Read 
  policy : Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct I/O
  
  I 
  dont see any alarms about the disk hardware...
  

-Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same hardware? As 
someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by hardware problems. 
Check out the caching on your controller, and does your controller write 
anything to it's own internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards 
do that? Maybe other vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 
15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server to put 
up in that site. So Ill have to track down the 
hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri -test 
alltests It came back with all Zero's .. Like it 
should. 
-Original Message- From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find 
it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the 
hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still have 
to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do this from 
the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and 
move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it 
that way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 

These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you 
find the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message- From: Ray 
Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
datbase 
Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
reimporting? -Original Message- 
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
datbase 
1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of 
the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because 
your backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. 
There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new 
mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually 
(although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have any 
caches set on your disk controllers do you?
Kevin -Original 
Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange 
Admin Issues Subject: datbase 
ok 
I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
out created a new DB exmerged it back in 
the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it 
up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with 
error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
? 
Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 
60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
Administrator 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 

RE: Hiding Groups/E-mail Addresses

2002-03-27 Thread William Lefkovics

Hiding the address means it is not visible or resolvable in the address
lists.

People who know the full SMTP or X400 address for the object can still send
email there.
This applies to CR, Mail-enabled Public Folders, Users, and DL's.

William

-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hiding Groups/E-mail Addresses


In Exchange 5.5 I have an e-mail group that the members want to have hidden
from the address book.  So I have a generic question, if I hide an address
from the address book they will no longer be able to send to that address?
Or do I need to create an SMTP address (right now I only have an X.400
address since there's no need for external access) and have them send to a
SMTP address instead?  Will that even work?

I'm open to other suggestions too but I'm not 100% sure what they want, i.e.
they don't know what they want.  They are getting back to me if just
limiting senders to group members is good enough.  

Ken

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ray Zorz
Title: Message



Are 
you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid controller? I remember 
somebody having a problem with Dells and exchange. Might want to check the 
Dell site and look specifically for Exchange. 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this 
  is a dell server
  i 
  load array manager
  and 
  my virtual disk shows
  Read 
  policy : Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct I/O
  
  I 
  dont see any alarms about the disk hardware...
  

-Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same hardware? As 
someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by hardware problems. 
Check out the caching on your controller, and does your controller write 
anything to it's own internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards 
do that? Maybe other vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 
15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server to put 
up in that site. So Ill have to track down the 
hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri -test 
alltests It came back with all Zero's .. Like it 
should. 
-Original Message- From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to find 
it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you find the 
hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will still have 
to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well do this from 
the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and 
move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it 
that way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 

These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless you 
find the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message- From: Ray 
Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
datbase 
Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
reimporting? -Original Message- 
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
datbase 
1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure of 
the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply because 
your backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. 
There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new 
mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually 
(although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't have any 
caches set on your disk controllers do you?
Kevin -Original 
Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange 
Admin Issues Subject: datbase 
ok 
I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
out created a new DB exmerged it back in 
the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it 
up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with 
error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup
? 
Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 
60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
Administrator 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and 
do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of 
its subsidiary companies. If 
you have received 

RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request

2002-03-27 Thread Ulm, Jeff
Title: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request





Here's what I did for my HR dept. I set up a public folder for the HR dept and under that a folder for each type of resume they would get (we have 10 categories), i.e. HRjobs or ITjobs or Manufjobs, etc. Each folder has its corresponding smtp address that the department uses in its postings. The HR folder tree is restricted to allow access to only the HR personnel. You have to give the contributor permission to the default account in each folder so that anyone can post to the folder. The HR people responsible for looking at resumes are trained to look at the folders for new postings. It works great and I haven't had to do anything since it was set up, they even clean out the folders once in a while.

Hope this helps.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request


I agree with you and that's how they are currently doing it - single mailbox that someone checks. I guess they are SOO overworked up there, that they just don't have the time to continue doing it this way. ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request



I agree. I don't like that idea either. But now they are reaping what they
sew, and it sounds like they don't want to do THEIR jobs.


Instead of doing any forwards or CRs, just create a single mailbox. Put
everything in there, and tell them how to open it to read mail. Then they
can do it at their convenience.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for advice re HR Luser request



Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a.


Our HR department currently has an email address set up for job postings so
people can email their resume. They are getting so many that they no longer
want to process them. What they want to do is create a new email address for
each posting that would go to the appropriate person in the department with
the opening.


The do not wish to use the following suggestions I gave to them:
1. Just use the email of the person in the department you want to receive
the resumes.
2. We could create a few distribution lists (for running multiple jobs at
once) and they can add and remove users at will.
3. They could set up rules on the current mailbox to route based on job
posting number or some other piece of information.


I don't like the idea of creating an email address every time they do a job
posting. So, I'm wondering if anyone else has had to deal with a similar
situation and if you found a workable solution.


TIA, MJ



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request

2002-03-27 Thread Ray Zorz
Title: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request



I 
thought his problem was HR doesn't want to look at them anymore. They just want 
the resumes to go to the respective managers. 

  -Original Message-From: Ulm, Jeff 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  12:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking 
  for advice re HR Luser request
  Here's what I did for my HR dept. I set up a public 
  folder for the HR dept and under that a folder for each type of resume they 
  would get (we have 10 categories), i.e. HRjobs or ITjobs or Manufjobs, 
  etc. Each folder has its corresponding smtp address that the department 
  uses in its postings. The HR folder tree is restricted to allow access 
  to only the HR personnel. You have to give the contributor permission to 
  the default account in each folder so that anyone can post to the 
  folder. The HR people responsible for looking at resumes are trained to 
  look at the folders for new postings. It works great and I haven't had to do 
  anything since it was set up, they even clean out the folders once in a 
  while.
  Hope this helps. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Looking for advice re HR Luser request 
  I agree with you and that's how they are currently doing it - 
  single mailbox that someone checks. I guess they are SOO overworked up 
  there, that they just don't have the time to continue doing it this way. 
  ;-)
  -Original Message- From: 
  Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Looking for advice re HR Luser request 
  I agree. I don't like that idea either. But now they are 
  reaping what they sew, and it sounds like they don't 
  want to do THEIR jobs. 
  Instead of doing any forwards or CRs, just create a single 
  mailbox. Put everything in there, and tell them how to 
  open it to read mail. Then they can do it at their 
  convenience. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Looking 
  for advice re HR Luser request 
  Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a. 
  Our HR department currently has an email address set up for 
  job postings so people can email their resume. They 
  are getting so many that they no longer want to 
  process them. What they want to do is create a new email address for 
  each posting that would go to the appropriate person in the 
  department with the opening. 
  The do not wish to use the following suggestions I gave to 
  them: 1. Just use the email of the person in the 
  department you want to receive the resumes. 
  2. We could create a few distribution lists (for running 
  multiple jobs at once) and they can add and remove 
  users at will. 3. They could set up rules on the 
  current mailbox to route based on job posting number 
  or some other piece of information. 
  I don't like the idea of creating an email address every time 
  they do a job posting. So, I'm wondering if 
  anyone else has had to deal with a similar situation 
  and if you found a workable solution. 
  TIA, MJ 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Chris Norris
Title: Message



What 
model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am aware of with the Dell 
raid controllers on this specific server concerns the firmware, not the 
drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the firmware before loadingW2k, 
not just Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:06 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Are 
  you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid controller? I remember 
  somebody having a problem with Dells and exchange. Might want to check 
  the Dell site and look specifically for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i 
load array manager
and my virtual disk shows
Read policy : Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache Policy : Direct I/O

I 
dont see any alarms about the disk hardware...

  
  -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same 
  hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by 
  hardware problems. Check out the caching on your controller, and 
  does your controller write anything to it's own internal event 
  logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do that? Maybe other 
  vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 
  15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another server to 
  put up in that site. So Ill have to track down the 
  hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri -test 
  alltests It came back with all Zero's .. Like it 
  should. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to 
  find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you 
  find the hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will 
  still have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well 
  do this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server 
  to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so 
  you can't do it that way.
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless 
  you find the hardware problem 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
  Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
  reimporting? -Original Message- 
  From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure 
  of the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply 
  because your backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad 
  database. There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to 
  create a new mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's 
  usually (although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't 
  have any caches set on your disk controllers do you?
  Kevin -Original 
  Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange 
  Admin Issues Subject: datbase 
  ok 
  I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
  out created a new DB exmerged it back in 
  the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it 
  up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with 
  error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous 
backup
  ? 
  Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
  17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, 
  IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
  Administrator 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ray Zorz
Title: Message



See 
Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved via an update of 
the firmware. 

  -Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  What 
  model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am aware of with the 
  Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns the firmware, not the 
  drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the firmware before 
  loadingW2k, not just Exchange.
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:06 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look specifically for 
Exchange. 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this is a dell server
  i load array manager
  and my virtual disk shows
  Read policy : Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct I/O
  
  I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...
  

-Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same 
hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by 
hardware problems. Check out the caching on your controller, and 
does your controller write anything to it's own internal event 
logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do that? Maybe other 
vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 
2002 15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server to 
put up in that site. So Ill have to track down 
the hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri -test 
alltests It came back with all Zero's .. Like it 
should. 
-Original Message- From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to 
find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you 
find the hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you 
will still have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might 
as well do this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a 
mailbox server to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a 
good backup so you can't do it that way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
datbase 
These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless 
you find the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message- From: 
Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
datbase 
Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
reimporting? -Original Message- 
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
1018 errors are internal problems with the page 
structure of the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up 
simply because your backup program figures there's no point in backing 
up a bad database. There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, 
I've had to create a new mailbox server in the site and move all 
mailboxes off. It's usually (although not always) down to a problem with 
your disk. You don't have any caches set on your disk controllers do 
you?
Kevin -Original 
Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: datbase 

ok 
I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
out created a new DB 

How does a user copy a DL to spreadsheet

2002-03-27 Thread Mitchell Mike

Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4

I have a user that wants to take a distribution list from the global address
and
copy the members to a spreadsheet.  Does anyone know how this can be done at
end user level?  Cause I don't want to do it ...

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message



Doesn't matter which model of the server, it's specifically their PERC 
controllers in need of a firmware upgrade. It is not OS dependant 
either...


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:17 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  What 
  model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am aware of with the 
  Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns the firmware, not the 
  drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the firmware before 
  loadingW2k, not just Exchange.
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:06 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look specifically for 
Exchange. 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this is a dell server
  i load array manager
  and my virtual disk shows
  Read policy : Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct I/O
  
  I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...
  

-Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same 
hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by 
hardware problems. Check out the caching on your controller, and 
does your controller write anything to it's own internal event 
logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do that? Maybe other 
vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 
2002 15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server to 
put up in that site. So Ill have to track down 
the hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri -test 
alltests It came back with all Zero's .. Like it 
should. 
-Original Message- From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to 
find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you 
find the hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you 
will still have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might 
as well do this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a 
mailbox server to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a 
good backup so you can't do it that way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: 
Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
datbase 
These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless 
you find the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 

-Original Message- From: 
Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
datbase 
Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
reimporting? -Original Message- 
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
1018 errors are internal problems with the page 
structure of the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up 
simply because your backup program figures there's no point in backing 
up a bad database. There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, 
I've had to create a new mailbox server in the site and move all 
mailboxes off. It's usually (although not always) down to a problem with 
your disk. You don't have any caches set on your disk controllers do 
you?
Kevin -Original 
Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) 

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message



That 
would be Ely, Don... ;o)


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  See 
  Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved via an update 
  of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am aware 
of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns the 
firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the firmware 
before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:06 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
  controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
  exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look specifically 
  for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i load array manager
and my virtual disk shows
Read policy : Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache Policy : Direct I/O

I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...

  
  -Original Message-From: Rob 
  Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
  same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
  caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
  controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
  internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do that? 
  Maybe other vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 
  2002 15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another server 
  to put up in that site. So Ill have to track 
  down the hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri 
  -test alltests It came back with all Zero's .. 
  Like it should. 
  -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 
  AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to 
  find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if 
  you find the hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so 
  you will still have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you 
  might as well do this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add 
  a mailbox server to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't 
  have a good backup so you can't do it that way.
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  These errors are typically hardware problems, so 
  unless you find the hardware problem 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
  Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  
  -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 
  Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
  reimporting? -Original Message- 
  From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
  1018 errors are internal problems with the page 
  structure of the JET database. It prevents the database being backed 
  up simply because your backup program figures there's no point in 
  backing up a bad database. There's not usually a fix for this. On 

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread violettek
Title: Message



We had 
the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and drivers and have not seen 
it since. Thought the firmware flash and driver update was not as 
"straight forward" as the instructions stated. It took a couple of tries 
to get the procedure right.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  See 
  Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved via an update 
  of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am aware 
of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns the 
firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the firmware 
before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:06 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
  controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
  exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look specifically 
  for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i load array manager
and my virtual disk shows
Read policy : Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache Policy : Direct I/O

I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...

  
  -Original Message-From: Rob 
  Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
  same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
  caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
  controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
  internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do that? 
  Maybe other vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 
  2002 15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another server 
  to put up in that site. So Ill have to track 
  down the hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri 
  -test alltests It came back with all Zero's .. 
  Like it should. 
  -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 
  AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to 
  find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if 
  you find the hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so 
  you will still have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you 
  might as well do this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add 
  a mailbox server to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't 
  have a good backup so you can't do it that way.
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  These errors are typically hardware problems, so 
  unless you find the hardware problem 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
  Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  
  -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 
  Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
  reimporting? -Original Message- 
  From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
  1018 errors are internal problems with the page 
  structure of the JET database. It prevents the database being backed 
  up simply because your backup program figures there's no point in 
  

RE: Exchange substitute

2002-03-27 Thread Joe L. Casale
Title: Message









Sure! What you got?

jlc



-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange substitute





Is an online web-based
application something to consider for this situation?

















Roger Wright





Southern Commerce Bank





___











Serving coffee on aircraft causes turbulence. 





-Original
Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:13
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchnage substitue

I need
a solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and contacts, but no
mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin dependant, this site also doesn't
even have a domain. Any ideas? They all use OL.

jlc

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm








___

NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017.  It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above.  If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.  




AW: How does a user copy a DL to spreadsheet

2002-03-27 Thread Rickenbacher Beat

Open DL in Address Book
Select addresses
Add to Personal Addressbook (if not present they will be added to the
Contact Folder)
(Perhaps the user has to copy the addresses from PAB to the contact folder)
Export the Contacts to the Spreadsheet

It works for O2K. It shoud work in a similar way for O98.

Ricki

-UrsprĂĽngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. März 2002 20:26
An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Betreff: How does a user copy a DL to spreadsheet


Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4

I have a user that wants to take a distribution list from the global address
and
copy the members to a spreadsheet.  Does anyone know how this can be done at
end user level?  Cause I don't want to do it ...

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: How does a user copy a DL to spreadsheet

2002-03-27 Thread Campbell, Rob

I think you can use the ONDL utility from the RK.  Pipe the output to a
file, and then import the file.

 -Original Message-
 From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:26 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: How does a user copy a DL to spreadsheet
 
 
 Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4
 
 I have a user that wants to take a distribution list from the 
 global address
 and
 copy the members to a spreadsheet.  Does anyone know how this 
 can be done at
 end user level?  Cause I don't want to do it ...
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Regards,
 
 Mike Mitchell
 Systems eMAIL Administrator
 Alverno Information Services
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request

2002-03-27 Thread Ulm, Jeff
Title: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request









This may help them manage their resumes
better. Our HR department has to
review all resumes before they are sent on to the hiring manager. This solution can still be used instead
of a routing solution, you just have to give the hiring managers access to the corresponding
folders as well. If it's done
by department then it's manageable.



-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re
HR Luser request





I thought his problem was
HR doesn't want to look at them anymore. They just want the resumes to go to
the respective managers. 





-Original Message-
From: Ulm, Jeff
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
12:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for advice re
HR Luser request

Here's what I did for my HR dept. I set up a
public folder for the HR dept and under that a folder for each type of resume
they would get (we have 10 categories), i.e. HRjobs or ITjobs or Manufjobs,
etc. Each folder has its corresponding smtp address that the department
uses in its postings. The HR folder tree is restricted to allow access to
only the HR personnel. You have to give the contributor permission to the
default account in each folder so that anyone can post to the folder. The
HR people responsible for looking at resumes are trained to look at the folders
for new postings. It works great and I haven't had to do anything since it was
set up, they even clean out the folders once in a while.

Hope this helps. 

-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:46
PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Looking for advice re
HR Luser request 

I agree with you and that's how they are currently
doing it - single mailbox that someone checks. I guess they are SOO
overworked up there, that they just don't have the time to continue doing it
this way. ;-)

-Original Message- 
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:36
PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Looking for advice re
HR Luser request 



I agree. I don't like that idea either. But now they
are reaping what they 
sew, and it sounds like they don't
want to do THEIR jobs. 

Instead of doing any forwards or CRs, just create a
single mailbox. Put 
everything in there, and tell them
how to open it to read mail. Then they 
can do it at their convenience.


-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22
PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Looking for advice re HR
Luser request 



Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a. 

Our HR department currently has an email address set
up for job postings so 
people can email their resume. They
are getting so many that they no longer 
want to process them. What they
want to do is create a new email address for 
each posting that would go to the
appropriate person in the department with 
the opening. 

The do not wish to use the following suggestions I
gave to them: 
1. Just use the email of the person
in the department you want to receive 
the resumes. 
2. We could create a few
distribution lists (for running multiple jobs at 
once) and they can add and remove
users at will. 
3. They could set up rules on the
current mailbox to route based on job 
posting number or some other piece
of information. 

I don't like the idea of creating an email address
every time they do a job 
posting. So, I'm wondering if
anyone else has had to deal with a similar 
situation and if you found a
workable solution. 

TIA, MJ 



List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



bet this is what caused my 
corruption as well.

When the firmware is 
flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical machine 
I can build to as a restore server if needed.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I'm moving to Mars next week, so if 
you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  We 
  had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and drivers and have 
  not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and driver update was not 
  as "straight forward" as the instructions stated. It took a couple of 
  tries to get the procedure right.
  
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved 
via an update of the firmware. 

  -Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am 
  aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns 
  the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the 
  firmware before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look specifically 
for Exchange. 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this is a dell server
  i load array manager
  and my virtual disk shows
  Read policy : Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct I/O
  
  I dont see any alarms about the disk 
  hardware...
  

-Original Message-From: Rob 
Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do 
that? Maybe other vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 
2002 15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server 
to put up in that site. So Ill have to track 
down the hardware issue I did an isinteg 
-pri -test alltests It came back with all 
Zero's .. Like it should. 
-Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying 
to find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even 
if you find the hardware problem the structure may still be 
corrupted so you will still have to move data off of the disk. My 
view is that you might as well do this from the start. Easiest way 
to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and move 
mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it 
that way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
RE: datbase 
These errors are typically hardware problems, so 
unless you find the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands 

AW: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Rickenbacher Beat
Title: Message



Andfinally (!?)a look at this Q may also help (at least for 
the understanding):
Understanding and Analyzing -1018, -1019, and -1022 Exchange 
Database Errors (Q314917)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q314917

Ricki

  -UrsprĂĽngliche Nachricht-Von: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. März 2002 
  20:06An: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesBetreff: RE: 
  datbase
  Are 
  you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid controller? I remember 
  somebody having a problem with Dells and exchange. Might want to check 
  the Dell site and look specifically for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i 
load array manager
and my virtual disk shows
Read policy : Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache Policy : Direct I/O

I 
dont see any alarms about the disk hardware...

  
  -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the same 
  hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be caused by 
  hardware problems. Check out the caching on your controller, and 
  does your controller write anything to it's own internal event 
  logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do that? Maybe other 
  vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 
  15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another server to 
  put up in that site. So Ill have to track down the 
  hardware issue I did an isinteg -pri -test 
  alltests It came back with all Zero's .. Like it 
  should. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying to 
  find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even if you 
  find the hardware problem the structure may still be corrupted so you will 
  still have to move data off of the disk. My view is that you might as well 
  do this from the start. Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server 
  to the site and move mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so 
  you can't do it that way.
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  These errors are typically hardware problems, so unless 
  you find the hardware problem 
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For 
  Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 27 March 2002 15:27 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: datbase Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  Didn't he do all that by exmerging out, deleting and 
  reimporting? -Original Message- 
  From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  datbase 
  1018 errors are internal problems with the page structure 
  of the JET database. It prevents the database being backed up simply 
  because your backup program figures there's no point in backing up a bad 
  database. There's not usually a fix for this. On occasions, I've had to 
  create a new mailbox server in the site and move all mailboxes off. It's 
  usually (although not always) down to a problem with your disk. You don't 
  have any caches set on your disk controllers do you?
  Kevin -Original 
  Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01 To: MS-Exchange 
  Admin Issues Subject: datbase 
  ok 
  I did what MS said.. exmerged it 
  out created a new DB exmerged it back in 
  the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it 
  up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with 
  error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous 
backup
  ? 
  Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
  17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, 
  IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
  Administrator 
  List Charter and FAQ at: 

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message



Nope, 
no data loss issues in the numerous servers I have 
encountered...


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  bet this is what caused 
  my corruption as well.
  
  When the firmware is 
  flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical 
  machine I can build to as a restore server if needed.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I'm moving to Mars next week, so if 
  you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
We 
had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and drivers and have 
not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and driver update was 
not as "straight forward" as the instructions stated. It took a couple 
of tries to get the procedure right.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved 
  via an update of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am 
aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns 
the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the 
firmware before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
  controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
  exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look 
  specifically for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i load array manager
and my virtual disk shows
Read policy : Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache Policy : Direct I/O

I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
  same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
  caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
  controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
  internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do 
  that? Maybe other vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 
  15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another 
  server to put up in that site. So Ill have 
  to track down the hardware issue I did an 
  isinteg -pri -test alltests It came back 
  with all Zero's .. Like it should. 
  -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 
  AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages 
  trying to find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 
  errors), even if you find the hardware problem the structure may 
  still be corrupted so you will still have to move data off of the 
 

RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request

2002-03-27 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Title: Message



see 
second email from Mjohnston on this point.

-Original Message-From: Ulm, Jeff 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking 
for advice re HR Luser request

This may help them 
manage their resumes better. Our HR 
department has to review all resumes before they are sent on to the hiring 
manager. This solution can still be 
used instead of a routing solution, you just have to give the hiring managers 
access to the corresponding folders as well. If it's done by department then it's 
manageable.

-Original 
Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:14 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for 
advice re HR Luser request


I thought 
his problem was HR doesn't want to look at them anymore. They just want the 
resumes to go to the respective managers. 

  -Original 
  Message-From: Ulm, Jeff 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Looking 
  for advice re HR Luser request
  Here's what I did for my HR dept. I set up a 
  public folder for the HR dept and under that a folder for each type of resume 
  they would get (we have 10 categories), i.e. HRjobs or ITjobs or Manufjobs, 
  etc. Each folder has its corresponding smtp address that the department 
  uses in its postings. The HR folder tree is restricted to allow access 
  to only the HR personnel. You have to give the contributor permission to 
  the default account in each folder so that anyone can post to the 
  folder. The HR people responsible for looking at resumes are trained to 
  look at the folders for new postings. It works great and I haven't had to do 
  anything since it was set up, they even clean out the folders once in a 
  while.
  Hope this helps. 
  -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, 
  March 26, 2002 5:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR 
  Luser request 
  I agree with you and that's how they are currently 
  doing it - single mailbox that someone checks. I guess they are SOO 
  overworked up there, that they just don't have the time to continue doing it 
  this way. ;-)
  -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  1:36 PM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser 
  request 
  
  I agree. I don't like that idea either. But now they 
  are reaping what they sew, and it sounds like they don't want to do THEIR 
  jobs. 
  Instead of doing any forwards or CRs, just create a 
  single mailbox. Put everything in there, and tell them how to open it to 
  read mail. Then they can do it at their convenience. 
  
  -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, 
  March 26, 2002 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Looking for advice re HR Luser 
  request 
  
  Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a. 
  
  Our HR department currently has an email address set 
  up for job postings so people can email their resume. They are getting so 
  many that they no longer want to process them. What they want to do is create a 
  new email address for each posting that would go to the appropriate person 
  in the department with the opening. 
  The do not wish to use the following suggestions I 
  gave to them: 1. 
  Just use the email of the person in the department you want to 
  receive the 
  resumes. 2. We 
  could create a few distribution lists (for running multiple jobs 
  at once) and they 
  can add and remove users at will. 3. They could set up rules on the current mailbox to 
  route based on job posting number or some other piece of 
  information. 
  I don't like the idea of creating an email address 
  every time they do a job posting. So, I'm wondering if anyone else has 
  had to deal with a similar situation and if you found a workable 
  solution. 
  TIA, MJ 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message



Shouldn't take you too long now... After you flash the firmware, 
make sure you update the drivers right away...


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:11 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Ive 
  found my drivers were under par.
  Ive 
  found my firmware is under par. Im trying to flash them 
now
  

-Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
2:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Nope, no data loss issues in the numerous servers I have 
encountered...


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct 
(336) 516-4519 - 
Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  bet this is what 
  caused my corruption as well.
  
  When the firmware is 
  flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical 
  machine I can build to as a restore server if needed.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I'm moving to Mars next week, 
  so if you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
We had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and 
drivers and have not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and 
driver update was not as "straight forward" as the instructions 
stated. It took a couple of tries to get the procedure 
right.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and 
  solved via an update of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I 
am aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server 
concerns the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must 
upgrade the firmware before loadingW2k, not just 
Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray 
  Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 
  27, 2002 2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
  controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells 
  and exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look 
  specifically for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i load array manager
and my virtual disk 
shows
Read policy : 
Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- 
Thru
Cache Policy : Direct 
I/O

I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on 
  the same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are 
  likely to be caused by hardware problems. Check out the 
  caching on your controller, and does your controller write 
  anything to it's own internal event logs?? Don't some HP 
  

RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request

2002-03-27 Thread MJohnston
Title: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request



That 
sounds like a really good idea. I think I'll suggest it and see if it sticks. 
Thanks.

  -Original Message-From: Ulm, Jeff 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  11:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking 
  for advice re HR Luser request
  Here's what I did for my HR dept. I set up a public 
  folder for the HR dept and under that a folder for each type of resume they 
  would get (we have 10 categories), i.e. HRjobs or ITjobs or Manufjobs, 
  etc. Each folder has its corresponding smtp address that the department 
  uses in its postings. The HR folder tree is restricted to allow access 
  to only the HR personnel. You have to give the contributor permission to 
  the default account in each folder so that anyone can post to the 
  folder. The HR people responsible for looking at resumes are trained to 
  look at the folders for new postings. It works great and I haven't had to do 
  anything since it was set up, they even clean out the folders once in a 
  while.
  Hope this helps. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Looking for advice re HR Luser request 
  I agree with you and that's how they are currently doing it - 
  single mailbox that someone checks. I guess they are SOO overworked up 
  there, that they just don't have the time to continue doing it this way. 
  ;-)
  -Original Message- From: 
  Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Looking for advice re HR Luser request 
  I agree. I don't like that idea either. But now they are 
  reaping what they sew, and it sounds like they don't 
  want to do THEIR jobs. 
  Instead of doing any forwards or CRs, just create a single 
  mailbox. Put everything in there, and tell them how to 
  open it to read mail. Then they can do it at their 
  convenience. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Looking 
  for advice re HR Luser request 
  Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6a. 
  Our HR department currently has an email address set up for 
  job postings so people can email their resume. They 
  are getting so many that they no longer want to 
  process them. What they want to do is create a new email address for 
  each posting that would go to the appropriate person in the 
  department with the opening. 
  The do not wish to use the following suggestions I gave to 
  them: 1. Just use the email of the person in the 
  department you want to receive the resumes. 
  2. We could create a few distribution lists (for running 
  multiple jobs at once) and they can add and remove 
  users at will. 3. They could set up rules on the 
  current mailbox to route based on job posting number 
  or some other piece of information. 
  I don't like the idea of creating an email address every time 
  they do a job posting. So, I'm wondering if 
  anyone else has had to deal with a similar situation 
  and if you found a workable solution. 
  TIA, MJ 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exmerge extract errors

2002-03-27 Thread Aaron Kennedy

Just saw another thread mentioning errors with Exmerge being caused by a
corrupt information store.  Does this seem like something even remotely
reasonable that I may want to investigate given the errors I am
receiving?

-Aaron


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kennedy 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exmerge extract errors


Jennifer,

I have confirmed that I have full rights to the mailboxes.  I have even
tried my own mailbox and the Administrator's mailbox with no success...

Any other thoughts, anyone?

-A


-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 9:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exmerge extract errors


Try giving your logon user full mailbox access and read rights (Exchange
Advanced  mailbox rights) to each mailbox that you need to exmerge.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exmerge extract errors


I'm logged in as an administrator and have full permissions to the mail
store -- including adding the 'Send As' and 'Receive As' rights.  I have
run Exmerge actions on this store before, and nothing has changed since.
Exchange is running under the System context, so I can't log in as the
service account.

Any other thoughts...

-Aaron


-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exmerge extract errors


The only time I ever get any errors is when Im not logged in as the
exchange service account and don't have full permissions on the mail
store.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exmerge extract errors


I've searched the usual places, but couldn't seem to find anything on
this.  I'd appreciate any assistance anyone out there might be able to
offer.

Exchange 2k SP1 on Win2k SP2.  Trying to extract some mailboxes of old
users to .PST for archiving, but I continue to receive the following
error:


[XX:XX:XX] Error extracting information from server DN ''
(CMapiSession::GetInfoFromProfile)


I'm interpreting this (perhaps incorrectly) as exmerge being unable to
find the source server.  However, it can successfully contact the server
to pull a list of mailbox names (and indicates this in the log) and the
server is definitely up and operational.

I've never had a problem exporting messages before and I'm wondering if
I'm just missing something obvious.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

-Aaron

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread violettek
Title: Message



Also 
after the firmware flash, powerdown the box not just a 
reboot.

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:11 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Ive 
  found my drivers were under par.
  Ive 
  found my firmware is under par. Im trying to flash them 
now
  

-Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
2:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Nope, no data loss issues in the numerous servers I have 
encountered...


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct 
(336) 516-4519 - 
Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  bet this is what 
  caused my corruption as well.
  
  When the firmware is 
  flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical 
  machine I can build to as a restore server if needed.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I'm moving to Mars next week, 
  so if you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
We had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and 
drivers and have not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and 
driver update was not as "straight forward" as the instructions 
stated. It took a couple of tries to get the procedure 
right.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and 
  solved via an update of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I 
am aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server 
concerns the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must 
upgrade the firmware before loadingW2k, not just 
Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray 
  Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 
  27, 2002 2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
  controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells 
  and exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look 
  specifically for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i load array manager
and my virtual disk 
shows
Read policy : 
Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- 
Thru
Cache Policy : Direct 
I/O

I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on 
  the same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are 
  likely to be caused by hardware problems. Check out the 
  caching on your controller, and does your controller write 
  anything to it's own internal event logs?? Don't some HP 
  NetRAID cards do that? Maybe other vendors do 
  similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread violettek
Title: Message



We did 
not run into any data loss.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  bet this is what caused 
  my corruption as well.
  
  When the firmware is 
  flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical 
  machine I can build to as a restore server if needed.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I'm moving to Mars next week, so if 
  you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
We 
had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and drivers and have 
not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and driver update was 
not as "straight forward" as the instructions stated. It took a couple 
of tries to get the procedure right.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved 
  via an update of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am 
aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns 
the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the 
firmware before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
  controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
  exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look 
  specifically for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i load array manager
and my virtual disk shows
Read policy : Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache Policy : Direct I/O

I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
  same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
  caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
  controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
  internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do 
  that? Maybe other vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 
  15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: datbase
  True, but the problem is I don't have another 
  server to put up in that site. So Ill have 
  to track down the hardware issue I did an 
  isinteg -pri -test alltests It came back 
  with all Zero's .. Like it should. 
  -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 
  AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: datbase 
  Trouble is of course that you can spend ages 
  trying to find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 
  errors), even if you find the hardware problem the structure may 
  still be corrupted so you will still have to move data off of the 
  disk. My view is that you might as well do this from the start. 
  Easiest way to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and 
  move mailboxes. Remember 

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message



why?

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 2:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  Also 
  after the firmware flash, powerdown the box not just a 
  reboot.
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:11 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Ive found my drivers were under par.
Ive found my firmware is under par. Im trying to flash them 
now

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 2:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Nope, no data loss issues in the numerous servers I have 
  encountered...
  
  
  Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. 
  (336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct (336) 
  516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com 
  
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
bet this is what 
caused my corruption as well.

When the firmware 
is flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an 
identical machine I can build to as a restore server if 
needed.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I'm moving to Mars next week, 
so if you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  We had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and 
  drivers and have not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash 
  and driver update was not as "straight forward" as the instructions 
  stated. It took a couple of tries to get the procedure 
  right.
  
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
2002 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and 
solved via an update of the firmware. 

  -Original Message-From: 
  Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I 
  am aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server 
  concerns the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must 
  upgrade the firmware before loadingW2k, not just 
  Exchange.
  
-Original Message-From: 
Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
Are you sure you have the latest drivers 
for the raid controller? I remember somebody having a 
problem with Dells and exchange. Might want to check the 
Dell site and look specifically for Exchange. 


  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this is a dell server
  i load array manager
  and my virtual disk 
  shows
  Read policy : 
  Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- 
  Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct 
  I/O
  
  I dont see any alarms about the disk 
  hardware...
  

-Original 
Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
So you have 
exmerged out and recreated on 

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message



Good 
question! I've probably done 20 or so servers and not ever shut one down 
completely.


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  why?
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 2:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
Also after the firmware flash, powerdown the box not just a 
reboot.

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:11 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Ive found my drivers were under par.
  Ive found my firmware is under par. Im trying to flash them 
  now
  

-Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
2002 2:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
Nope, no data loss issues in the numerous servers I have 
encountered...


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. 
(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct (336) 
516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, 
  Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  bet this is what 
  caused my corruption as well.
  
  When the firmware 
  is flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an 
  identical machine I can build to as a restore server if 
  needed.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
  Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
  91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I'm moving to Mars next 
  week, so if you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
We had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and 
drivers and have not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash 
and driver update was not as "straight forward" as the instructions 
stated. It took a couple of tries to get the procedure 
right.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Ray 
  Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 
  27, 2002 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and 
  solved via an update of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: 
Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
What model Dell server? The 
2450? The problem I am aware of with the Dell raid 
controllers on this specific server concerns the firmware, not 
the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the firmware 
before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: 
  Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers 
  for the raid controller? I remember somebody having a 
  problem with Dells and exchange. Might want to check the 
  Dell site and look specifically for Exchange. 
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 
27, 2002 11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
ok
this is a dell 
server
i load array 
manager
and my virtual disk 
shows
Read 

RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Title: Message



Any 
firmware upgrade is a "potential" for data loss.. anyone that tells you 
otherwise hasn't been an Admin long or has just been plain lucky. 
Before making ANY server related changes:

In a 
word - BACKUP, BACKUP, BACKUP

If you 
have any problems, rollback the firmware/drivers and contact your vendor with 
your issue. At the very least you'll have the most current, if not partially 
corrupt, data. Something is better than nothing in my book.

Let me 
know how you make out.. we run many Dell 2400 series here 
too.
-Rick

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
bet this is what caused my 
corruption as well.

When the firmware is 
flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical machine 
I can build to as a restore server if needed.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I'm moving to Mars next week, so if 
you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  We 
  had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and drivers and have 
  not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and driver update was not 
  as "straight forward" as the instructions stated. It took a couple of 
  tries to get the procedure right.
  
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved 
via an update of the firmware. 

  -Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am 
  aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns 
  the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the 
  firmware before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look specifically 
for Exchange. 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this is a dell server
  i load array manager
  and my virtual disk shows
  Read policy : Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct I/O
  
  I dont see any alarms about the disk 
  hardware...
  

-Original Message-From: Rob 
Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do 
that? Maybe other vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 
2002 15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server 
to put up in that site. So Ill have to track 
down the hardware issue I did an isinteg 
-pri -test alltests It came back with all 
Zero's .. Like it should. 
-Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying 
to find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even 
if you find the hardware problem the structure may still be 
corrupted 

Errors importing multiple addresses

2002-03-27 Thread Sargent, Rob

Hi!   I know a number of you have set up a mailbox to which you move staff
SMTP addresses when they quit/leave.   I'd like to set up something similar
because we have a bunch of legacy e-mail addresses we'll be removing all at
once from staff mailboxes.  These addresses refer to former companies that
have amalgamated into our current company. I've now got these individual
staff addresses in a csv and, after deleting them from the individual
mailboxes, I want to import the .csv to put all of these addresses (1250)
into one mailbox (alias name is Legacy).  In testing I get the following
error after importing approx 370;   

Error 282
Source: MSExchangeDSImp
Could not modify object Legacy because the directory service
reported the following error:  The maximum number of administrative
connections to the server has been exceeded.  Try again later or connect to
a different server.

I can't find any description of this error on Technet.   If I try importing
more addresses later none get imported, with the same error.   I've tried
this from several servers - always stops at about 370 addresses.I can,
however, manually add more SMTP addresses to this mailbox.We're using
Exch5.5sp4 on NT4sp6.

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message



Ahh, 
but in his case, backup, backup, backup is not working with all of those 
1018's. ;o)

And I 
most certainly wouldn't attempt any upgrade w/o backing my data up. Even 
if that meant a file copy to another server! :o)


Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:47 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Any 
  firmware upgrade is a "potential" for data loss.. anyone that tells you 
  otherwise hasn't been an Admin long or has just been plain lucky. 
  Before making ANY server related changes:
  
  In a 
  word - BACKUP, BACKUP, BACKUP
  
  If 
  you have any problems, rollback the firmware/drivers and contact your vendor 
  with your issue. At the very least you'll have the most current, if not 
  partially corrupt, data. Something is better than nothing in my 
  book.
  
  Let 
  me know how you make out.. we run many Dell 2400 series here 
  too.
  -Rick
  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  bet this is what caused 
  my corruption as well.
  
  When the firmware is 
  flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical 
  machine I can build to as a restore server if needed.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I'm moving to Mars next week, so if 
  you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
We 
had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and drivers and have 
not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and driver update was 
not as "straight forward" as the instructions stated. It took a couple 
of tries to get the procedure right.

Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved 
  via an update of the firmware. 
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am 
aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns 
the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the 
firmware before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.

  -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
  controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
  exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look 
  specifically for Exchange. 
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
ok
this is a dell server
i load array manager
and my virtual disk shows
Read policy : Read-Ahead
Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
Cache Policy : Direct I/O

I dont see any alarms about the disk 
hardware...

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
  same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
  caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
  controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
  internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do 
  that? Maybe other vendors do similar?
  
  Thanks
  Rob
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 

Help port 25 closed

2002-03-27 Thread Benjamin Zachary
Title: Help port 25 closed







Okay, Bellsouth has decided apparently they wont let port 25/110 through their adsl. I can no longer connect to any 25/110 port, even the mail.bellsouth.net servers :) I get the connection was actively refused.

So I moved my pop3 to port 79 and smtp to port 29 and whala. I made second connectors thinking all was well, this am I awoke to all my mail sitting in the queue and the second smtp connector. So I changed it to port 25 and stopped the initial one and my mail zoomed out of the queue. My outbound says port 25 but I have it listening on port 29. Why didnt this work? I dont know what bellsouth's problem is obviously they are getting attacked or something because this is the 3rd time in a week that I cannot get 25/110 ports for hours, going on 24 hours right now. 

Thanks.. 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Help port 25 closed

2002-03-27 Thread David N Precht
Title: Message



What 
does TS on their side say ?

  
  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 16:38To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Help port 
  25 closed
  Okay, Bellsouth has decided apparently they wont 
  let port 25/110 through their adsl. I can no longer connect to any 25/110 
  port, even the mail.bellsouth.net servers :) I get the connection was actively 
  refused.
  So I moved my pop3 to port 79 and smtp to port 29 
  and whala. I made second connectors thinking all was well, this am I awoke to 
  all my mail sitting in the queue and the second smtp connector. So I changed 
  it to port 25 and stopped the initial one and my mail zoomed out of the queue. 
  My outbound says port 25 but I have it listening on port 29. Why didnt this 
  work? I dont know what bellsouth's problem is obviously they are getting 
  attacked or something because this is the 3rd time in a week that I cannot get 
  25/110 ports for hours, going on 24 hours right now. 
  Thanks.. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Help port 25 closed

2002-03-27 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Title: Message



probably TS... hehehe

-Original Message-From: David N Precht 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:52 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Help port 25 
closed
What 
does TS on their side say ?

  
  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 16:38To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Help port 
  25 closed
  Okay, Bellsouth has decided apparently they wont 
  let port 25/110 through their adsl. I can no longer connect to any 25/110 
  port, even the mail.bellsouth.net servers :) I get the connection was actively 
  refused.
  So I moved my pop3 to port 79 and smtp to port 29 
  and whala. I made second connectors thinking all was well, this am I awoke to 
  all my mail sitting in the queue and the second smtp connector. So I changed 
  it to port 25 and stopped the initial one and my mail zoomed out of the queue. 
  My outbound says port 25 but I have it listening on port 29. Why didn't this 
  work? I don't know what bellsouth's problem is obviously they are getting 
  attacked or something because this is the 3rd time in a week that I cannot get 
  25/110 ports for hours, going on 24 hours right now. 
  Thanks.. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: 553 Error message

2002-03-27 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Title: RE: 553 Error message





Does it do that if you just send to the SMTP address only?
i.e. don't use the outlook expanded friendly name P1/P2 names.


If it does send without a failed acknowledgement then either the resolved friendly name is bad to the remote system and you can change it on the Contact address, or the remote mail system can't deal with resolving P2 names.

That's as far as my thinking takes me..
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 553 Error message



I have a strange situation. 
I have one user sending Internet mail to one specific email address that bounces with this error message:
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;553 Requested action not taken: mailbox name not allowed


All other users can send to that email address OK, and the user in question has no problems sending to other outside email addresses.

This is an Exchange 5.5 sp4 /Outlook 2000 install. 


I have already tried the following:
1) Log into Outlook as the user on another PC and send mail - bounces with same error.
2) Telnet directly to the recipient's mail server and send mail as this user - this works.
3) Send mail from me to the recipient - this goes through without a problem.


I have not been able to find a good explanation of this particular SMTP error message.


Any suggestions?


Jim


Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com


We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.




***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 

retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Help port 25 closed

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: Message









TS?



-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
4:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help port 25 closed





probably TS... hehehe



-Original
Message-
From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help port 25 closed



What does TS on their
side say ?





-Original
Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
16:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help port 25 closed





Okay, Bellsouth has decided apparently they wont let
port 25/110 through their adsl. I can no longer connect to any 25/110 port,
even the mail.bellsouth.net servers :) I get the connection was actively
refused.

So I moved my pop3 to port 79 and smtp to port 29 and
whala. I made second connectors thinking all was well, this am I awoke to all
my mail sitting in the queue and the second smtp connector. So I changed it to
port 25 and stopped the initial one and my mail zoomed out of the queue. My
outbound says port 25 but I have it listening on port 29. Why didn't this work?
I don't know what bellsouth's problem is obviously they are getting attacked or
something because this is the 3rd time in a week that I cannot get 25/110 ports
for hours, going on 24 hours right now. 

Thanks.. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







Exch 5.5 Retention Limits

2002-03-27 Thread Roger Wright




Exchange 5.5 
SP4.

How can I set 
retention limits globally for all my mailboxes?


Roger Wright
Southern Commerce Bank
___

"You can observe a lot just by watchin'." 
- Yogi Berra 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






___

NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017.  It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above.  If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.  





RE: Exch 5.5 Retention Limits

2002-03-27 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message



Information Store 
Properties

  
  -Original Message-From: Roger Wright 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:46 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exch 5.5 
  Retention Limits
  
  Exchange 5.5 
  SP4.
  
  How can I set 
  retention limits globally for all my mailboxes?
  
  
  Roger Wright
  Southern Commerce Bank
  ___
  
  "You can observe a lot just by 
  watchin'." - Yogi Berra List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ___
  NOTICE: The information contained in this 
  electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida 
  Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the 
  recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are 
  hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of 
  the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
  message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the 
  original message. 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exch 5.5 Retention Limits

2002-03-27 Thread Roger Wright
Title: Message



Duh! I only looked right at it a dozen times been a 
hectic day today. 

Thanks!

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
  2002 5:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exch 5.5 Retention Limits
  Information 
  Store Properties
  

-Original Message-From: Roger Wright 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:46 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exch 5.5 
Retention Limits

Exchange 5.5 
SP4.

How can I set 
retention limits globally for all my mailboxes?


Roger Wright
Southern Commerce Bank
___

"You can observe a lot just by 
watchin'." - Yogi Berra List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
___
NOTICE: The information contained in this 
electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida 
Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the 
recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you 
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or 
disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have 
received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender 
and destroy the original message. List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






___

NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017.  It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above.  If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.  





RE: Exch 5.5 Retention Limits

2002-03-27 Thread Ken Leyba



Deleted Items Retention? Same place Server...Private Information 
Store...Properties.

-Ken LeybaWindows/Exchange System 
AdministratorCalifornia State University Dominguez Hills

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:50 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exch 5.5 
  Retention Limits
  
  Retention as in 
  storage limits?
  
  Server/Private 
  Information Store/Properties
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Roger 
  Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:46 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Exch 5.5 
  Retention Limits
  
  
  
  Exchange 5.5 
  SP4.
  
  
  
  How can I set retention limits 
  globally for all my mailboxes?
  
  
  
  
  
  Roger 
  Wright
  
  Southern Commerce 
  Bank
  
  ___
  
  
  
  "You can 
  observe a lot just by watchin'." - Yogi Berra 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ___
  NOTICE: The information contained in this 
  electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida 
  Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the 
  recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are 
  hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of 
  the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
  message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the 
  original message. 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Outlook 98 Offline folders

2002-03-27 Thread Joseph
Title: Outlook 98 Offline folders





With outlook 98, does anyone know of a way to set all folder to be enable for offline access? The client has several hundred folders and subfolders and I can't upgrade outlook because of corporate defaults. I wish I could since you just select all with the newer versions of outlook.

Joseph



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Hiding Groups/E-mail Addresses

2002-03-27 Thread Ken Leyba

OK. Thanks, that's what I figured.  BTW what is CR?

-
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills


 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:02 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Hiding Groups/E-mail Addresses
 
 
 Hiding the address means it is not visible or resolvable in 
 the address
 lists.
 
 People who know the full SMTP or X400 address for the object 
 can still send
 email there.
 This applies to CR, Mail-enabled Public Folders, Users, and DL's.
 
 William
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Hiding Groups/E-mail Addresses
 
 
 In Exchange 5.5 I have an e-mail group that the members want 
 to have hidden
 from the address book.  So I have a generic question, if I 
 hide an address
 from the address book they will no longer be able to send to 
 that address?
 Or do I need to create an SMTP address (right now I only have an X.400
 address since there's no need for external access) and have 
 them send to a
 SMTP address instead?  Will that even work?
 
 I'm open to other suggestions too but I'm not 100% sure what 
 they want, i.e.
 they don't know what they want.  They are getting back to me if just
 limiting senders to group members is good enough.  
 
 Ken
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exch 5.5 Retention Limits

2002-03-27 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message



Had 91 
gigs of retention until last night. 


--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
WebDesign, GO here!

  
  -Original Message-From: Roger Wright 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:03 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exch 5.5 
  Retention Limits
  Duh! I only looked right at it a dozen times been a 
  hectic day today. 
  
  Thanks!
  
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 
2002 5:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exch 5.5 Retention Limits
Information 
Store Properties

  
  -Original Message-From: Roger Wright 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  2:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exch 5.5 
  Retention Limits
  
  Exchange 5.5 
  SP4.
  
  How can I set 
  retention limits globally for all my mailboxes?
  
  
  Roger Wright
  Southern Commerce Bank
  ___
  
  "You can observe a lot just by 
  watchin'." - Yogi Berra List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ___
  NOTICE: The information contained in this 
  electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida 
  Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the 
  recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you 
  are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or 
  disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have 
  received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the 
  sender and destroy the original message. 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ___
  NOTICE: The information contained in this 
  electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida 
  Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the 
  recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are 
  hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of 
  the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
  message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the 
  original message. 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





  1   2   >