Limit Internal Message Size

2002-07-15 Thread Alex Chan

How to limit the message size for the internal users ? I already set the
message size limit in MTA and restart the server, but doesn't take effect.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Limit Internal Message Size

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


Internal messages won't traverse the MTA.  You can set limits on each
user's mailbox (and I guess you could do this in bulk via a directory
export/import)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Alex Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 08:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Limit Internal Message Size
Subject: Limit Internal Message Size


How to limit the message size for the internal users ? I already set the
message size limit in MTA and restart the server, but doesn't take
effect.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Offline storage

2002-07-15 Thread Stephen J. Norton

It seems that I can drag messages form a clients container within Outlook
and drop them in a local directory within Windows Explorer where I can then
burn them to a CD for archiving purposes. There are products that export
messages (such as WinKeeper) but dragging and dropping seem to do the same
thing. Am I missing a downside to archiving in this fashion? Thank you.
Steve

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Offline storage

2002-07-15 Thread William Lefkovics

Indexing maybe.


-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Offline storage


It seems that I can drag messages form a clients container within
Outlook and drop them in a local directory within Windows Explorer where
I can then burn them to a CD for archiving purposes. There are products
that export messages (such as WinKeeper) but dragging and dropping seem
to do the same thing. Am I missing a downside to archiving in this
fashion? Thank you. Steve

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Offline defrag

2002-07-15 Thread Tom Gerstner

Thanks for the confirmation, I needed the reassurance. ;-)

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Offline defrag


Correct.

Eseutil /?  Will advise the syntax and options.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Gerstner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Offline defrag


I'm trying to troubleshoot for someone who sent me their log file. They
dont know if it's been run or not. It currently says ther's 43,309 mg
after online defrag. I can recover that running eseutil /d, correct?

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Offline defrag



Not sure what you are looking for. Are you trying to determine if
someone has run it against your DB?
 

 

 

  MORE INFORMATION

 

 

  To determine if a hard repair has been run against your database, dump

  the header by using the following command line (the repair count will
be  
  zero if the databases have not been repaired):

 

 


http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q259851

Since the services are stopped during the repair, I would imagine that
an actual event would not be generated.. .As I am sure you will soon
see, that most people here believe a tell tale sign that ESEUTIL has
been run is that your DB wont start  ; )

Thank you,
Patrick

The problem with most Chicken Burritos is that they never seem to have
enough surface area to hold an adequate amount of salsa - Me



 

  Tom Gerstner

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   MS-Exchange
Admin
Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  om  cc:

   Subject:  Offline defrag

  07/12/2002 09:00

  AM

  Please respond to

  MS-Exchange

  Admin Issues

 

 




Hidee Ho everyone
 After offline defrag of Priv.edb is run will there be a listing for it
in Event Viewer? And if so does it say it was an Offline defrag? All im
seeing are 1221 entries...

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Offline storage

2002-07-15 Thread Stephen J. Norton

Perhaps if I move the targeted items for archiving to the Deleted Items
container than copy them from there to a local Windows directory then empty
the Deleted Items container? If I understand it correctly (and I may not)
indexing looks only to the Info stores. Whadaya think? Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Offline storage


Indexing maybe.


-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Offline storage


It seems that I can drag messages form a clients container within
Outlook and drop them in a local directory within Windows Explorer where
I can then burn them to a CD for archiving purposes. There are products
that export messages (such as WinKeeper) but dragging and dropping seem
to do the same thing. Am I missing a downside to archiving in this
fashion? Thank you. Steve

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

2002-07-15 Thread Michael Reid
Title: Message









Sorry, Im probably off on the speed.
Ill have to check around to confirm the speeds.



Michael



-Original
Message-
From: Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: July 15,
 2002 12:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?



Their least expensive package (SkyPipeline)
comes with symmetrical 256kb, I am not familiar with the 60KB you
mentioned here.



-Original
Message-
From: Michael Reid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday,
 July 13, 2002
11:03
 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?



What
about the upload speed. If you are running an exchange server on the site, and
you are sending the data out over satellite, you are going to have a 60KB
upload rate or something like that arent you? That is what stopped us
from setting up an exchange server on a remote site.



Michael



-Original
Message-
From: Brian Politis
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: July 13,
 2002 2:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?





70ms latency is excellent. In fact
it's so good, I don't belive there's any way satellite can provide this kind of
latency. I've used several satellite rigs, and none come in under 500ms
latency. Either their smoking crack, or 70 ms is some BS their makreting
department came up with that refers to internal latencies on their wired
network, and doesn't represent what customer's see over their true satellite
links. You can't pump data into near earch orbit, and back that fast; the
distances are far enough that the speed of an electron becomes an issue.











That being said, most web protocols SMTP,
FTP, HTTP, etc. were initial designed for slow dial up networks with high
latency. And will run fine over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite
network. Issues would arise with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP
or SNA. If your users want to just browse the web, and POP mail they
should be fine.





-Original
Message-
From: Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday,
 July 12, 2002
11:51
 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?

Thanks. Yes, we were talking about high
speed connection. The issue
of latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels One such
measurement, 70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com. If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line speed what will it mean
to have 70ms using interactive applications specifically remote
access software?



guaranteed to have an average round
trip packet transit time within SkyPipeline's Broadband Wireless Network over a
calendar month of 70ms or less. The average network latency is measured as the
average of 15-minute samples taken throughout the month



-Original
Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday,
 July 11, 2002
9:31
 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?





As long as you get static ip it should be
okay. Others may complain about the terminology you are using, since DSL is a
connection method and so is satellite so I'm presuming you are talking about
satellite for high speed connectivity. There will be latency but it shouldn't
matter too much





-Original
Message-
From: Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday,
 July 11, 2002
6:33
 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?

We are in Ventura County, CA and just found out from the ISP
that slots on the D-SLAM may not be available for our IDSL connection. How well does satellite DSL weigh in
with SMTP mail on an Exchange Server environment? Thanks. Michael 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

2002-07-15 Thread Andy David

Heck, here in the NYC metro area, I live in one of the few towns in my
county that has either DSL or cable. 
Verizon was supposed to have this area DSL saturated a few years ago...



-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


Simi had 120,000 people, but spread out so only 35% max can get it (SBC).
Cable was Comcast and now is Adelphia - need I say more (No Cable Modems -
yet - been promised for 4 years).

Thousand oaks and Newbury Park have 160,000 people, but even more spread
out. Oxnard even more - over 200K people, and little penetration. Very many
farms, and businesses spread out, and telephone are centralized - so not
much DSL.

I work in Ventura, and we can't even get DSL there, because of location.

Pain in the Bu.

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 5:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


DSL is spooty in Ventura county, CA??  You wouldn't think so

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 19:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


That is why my suggestion to him was www.skypipeline.com
http://www.skypipeline.com . Not satellite, but earth-based direct
microwave, with min speeds of 256 K Both Ways - symmetrical Fractional
T-1 connectivity, with business and home accounts - with different
policies and Usage Uptime commitments. Home accounts are cheaper with
best effort - similar to Cable or home dsl, and business accounts priced
more, with better support and uptime commitments.
 
You pay for what you want. Speeds are available the same with both
styles of accounts, but responsiveness to problems aren't.
 
Also, this is really of benefit when you are outside of DSL range, cause
it is a little more costly.
 
Where he is in Ventura county, CA (same as me) dsl is spotty.
 
Dennis

-Original Message-
From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?



What about the upload speed. If you are running an exchange server on
the site, and you are sending the data out over satellite, you are going
to have a 60KB upload rate or something like that aren't you? That is
what stopped us from setting up an exchange server on a remote site.

 

Michael

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: July 13, 2002 2:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

 

70ms latency is excellent.  In fact it's so good, I don't belive there's
any way satellite can provide this kind of latency. I've used several
satellite rigs, and none come in under 500ms latency.  Either their
smoking crack, or 70 ms is some BS their makreting department came up
with that refers to internal latencies on their wired network, and
doesn't represent what customer's see over their true satellite links.
You can't pump data into near earch orbit, and back that fast; the
distances are far enough that the speed of an electron becomes an issue.

 

That being said, most web protocols SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc.  were initial
designed for slow dial up networks with high latency.  And will run fine
over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite network.  Issues would arise
with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP or SNA.  If your users
want to just browse the web, and POP mail they should be fine.

-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

Thanks.  Yes, we were talking about high speed connection.  The issue
of latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels... One such
measurement, 70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com
http://www.skypipeline.com/ .  If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line
speed what will it mean to have 70ms using interactive applications
specifically remote access software?

 

...guaranteed to have an average round trip packet transit time within
SkyPipeline's Broadband Wireless Network over a calendar month of 70ms
or less. The average network latency is measured as the average of
15-minute samples taken throughout the month

 

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

 

As long as you get static ip it should be okay. Others may complain
about the terminology you are using, since DSL is a connection method
and so is satellite so I'm presuming you are talking about satellite for
high speed connectivity. There will be latency but it shouldn't matter
too much


Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Thompson, Elizabeth

here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy, right?.
Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be dynamic as
well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and the web pages),
why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX box
and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also seems
that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

2002-07-15 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE
Title: Message



The 
60KB uplink speed is a common speed for satellite 
transmission.

This 
is dealing with terrestrial RF broadband - not satellite. No clue why the 
subject says satellite.

  -Original Message-From: Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 11:36 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SATELLITE DSL 
  WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?
  
  Their least expensive 
  package (SkyPipeline) comes with symmetrical 256kb, 
  I am not familiar with the 60KB you mentioned 
  here.
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Michael 
  Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 13, 
  2002 11:03 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE 
  SMTP?
  
  What 
  about the upload speed. If you are running an exchange server on the site, and 
  you are sending the data out over satellite, you are going to have a 60KB 
  upload rate or something like that arent you? That is what stopped us from 
  setting up an exchange server on a remote site.
  
  Michael
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Brian 
  Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 13, 
  2002 2:11 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE 
  SMTP?
  
  
  70ms 
  latency is excellent. In fact it's so good, I don't belive there's any 
  way satellite can provide this kind of latency. I've used several satellite 
  rigs, and none come in under 500ms latency. Either their smoking crack, 
  or 70 ms is some BS their makreting department came up with that refers to 
  internal latencies on their wired network, and doesn't represent what 
  customer's see over their true satellite links. You can't pump data into 
  near earch orbit, and back that fast; the distances are far enough that the 
  speed of an electron becomes an issue.
  
  
  
  That 
  being said, most web protocols SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc. were initial 
  designed for slow dial up networks with high latency. And will run fine 
  over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite network. Issues would arise 
  with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP or SNA. If your users want 
  to just browse the web, and POP mail they should be 
  fine.
  
-Original 
Message-From: Michael 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 
2002 11:51 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?
Thanks. Yes, we were talking about high 
speed connection. The issue of 
latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels One such measurement, 
70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com. If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line speed what will it 
mean to have 70ms using interactive applications specifically remote 
access software?

guaranteed 
to have an average round trip packet transit time within SkyPipeline's 
Broadband Wireless Network over a calendar month of 70ms or less. The 
average network latency is measured as the average of 15-minute samples 
taken throughout the month

-Original 
Message-From: Benjamin 
Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 
2002 9:31 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


As 
long as you get static ip it should be okay. Others may complain about the 
terminology you are using, since DSL is a connection method and so is 
satellite so I'm presuming you are talking about satellite for high speed 
connectivity. There will be latency but it shouldn't matter too 
much
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 
  2002 6:33 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: SATELLITE 
  DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?
  We are in 
  Ventura County, 
  CA and just found out from the ISP that 
  slots on the D-SLAM may not be available for our IDSL connection. How well does satellite DSL weigh 
  in with SMTP mail on an Exchange Server environment? Thanks. Michael 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 Org\Site

2002-07-15 Thread Paul Armstrong

ADC seems to be working fine, I do not have in errors in the event logs. The ADC is 
set up with one-way CA's, From Exchange to AD. The data replicated to AD without 
issues and is accessible, I see all the info in AD such as email address and the 
server that it exists on. When I check out the move mailbox option, the new E2k server 
shows up int the list. Public folders have seen set to replicate to both servers and 
they show up in the E2k System Manager. I recently created another test mailbox on 
E55, sent mail to it (both internally  externally,  was received), then moved it to 
the E2k server. After the move a E55 user still see the mailbox and was able to send 
mail to it without errors, but the message never shows up in the E2k mailbox. I have 
let the servers sit over the weekend just to see if syncronization\replication didn't 
complete, but I am still unable to send mail to the E2k mailboxes both externally  
internally. No errors show up in the eventlogs of both servers. How can I check to see 
if communication between the two servers are working?

-Original Message- 
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Fri 7/12/2002 9:35 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 Org\Site



Ew.

ADC is ok?


-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 Org\Site


Just connected to the E2k server via telnet and sent a message to a mailbox on 
E55 and it was successfully forwarded to the E55 Mailbox. I also sent a message form 
the test mailbox on E2K to a E55 user and the E55 user received the message. When I 
tried replying from the E55 User to the E2k account, it says:

The recipient name is not recognized

The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=play 
knits;l=NTSERVER02071220413ZF7PBBB

MSEXCH:IMS:Playknits:PLAYKNITS:NTSERVER 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient


Not sure why this is happening, did I forget a step when I added the E2K 
server to the exisitng Org  Site with the E55 server. Any help would be greatly 
appreciated. Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong
Sent: Fri 7/12/2002 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 Org\Site
   
   
Hello All,

I just recently upgraded a clients NT Domain to Windows 2K  AD. I 
have since installed the ADC and created ADC CA's to replicate recipients, contacts,  
public folders to AD. I then install Exchange 2000 on the new server, updated to SP2, 
then created a test user, mailbox-enabled, and tried sending it mail which bounced 
back. So the Exchange 5.5 Server still exists and I am testing the Exchange 2000 
server out before i start to move mailboxes. Both the servers are in the same 
Organization  Site. The router is forwarding mail to the exchange 5.5 server, and I 
thought that mail sent to a mailbox on Exchange 2000 should be routed to the server 
appropriately. I am unsure why the the mail is bouncing back when everything seems to 
be configured properly. the E5.5 server is NT4SP6a and the E2k server is W2KSP2. Any 
ideas, thanks in advance!

.+-
 @Aѫa 0 z[lpjo  Z \˅zm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



â²Ð¡j»^­©Ý¶m§ÿðÃ.·¥¶Ê·«yÊýì\…©àzX¬µÈZ®×«†Ù


Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get the reply.
I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our exchange2k disaster recovery 
plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the same as 
our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched for articles. Any 
one have any?
I'm running the standard edition of exchange with the latest patches.
Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Mark Kelsay

supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy, right?.
Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be dynamic as
well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and the web pages),
why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX box
and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also seems
that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Steve Balen


Wow. I would think the higher-ups would have more sense than to post the
GAL on an external web page.

If it can be done, the only way I am seeing right now (and keep in mind,
I have given uo caffine, so I haven't been thinking well) is exporting
the GAL into a csv file and then tagging the names with a mailto link to
their smtp addresses on the wbe page.

Two problems though - again, if this is external, someone could easily
copy the addresses and use them to do spam mass mailings, and two - if
you have a lot of users, it will take longer to load all of those names
onto a page.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET

Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation.

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy,
right?. Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be
dynamic as well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and
the web pages), why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL.

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX
box and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also
seems that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Morse, George

Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare  allow the 
users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to repair the store  
not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Thompson, Elizabeth

Will unix have any trouble with it?

CDO with anonymous wouldn't give any backdoors into the sever?

Thanks for your help...

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy, right?.
Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be dynamic as
well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and the web pages),
why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX box
and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also seems
that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

2002-07-15 Thread Michael
Title: Message









Hi Bill, at the beginning, the use of satellite
as part of the subject was largely due to my ignorance :O), and only one part of
this subject needing clarification.
I for one am so much wiser on the subject that I wouldnt change a
thing. Suffice it to say, you are
100% correct. We are dealing with a service using terrestrial RF
broadband and *NOT*
satellite Michael



BTW. Since this original
post was made we have even a second location that cannot be provisioned for DSL
for similar D-SLAM reasons. If this
service works out well in location A, then location B
will surely follow. The next
30-days will *SURELY* tell. Send us email if you wish feedback on
how this service worked out We are with one location in Ventura County,
CA, and another in a densely DSL populated location with an small area of
non-coverage in the San Fernando Valley









-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange
 Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?





The 60KB uplink speed is
a common speed for satellite transmission.











This is dealing with
terrestrial RF broadband - not satellite. No clue why the subject says
satellite.





-Original Message-
From: Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 11:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?

Their least expensive
package (SkyPipeline) comes with symmetrical 256kb, I am not familiar with the
60KB you mentioned here.



-Original Message-
From: Michael Reid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?



What about the upload speed. If you are
running an exchange server on the site, and you are sending the data out over
satellite, you are going to have a 60KB upload rate or something like that
arent you? That is what stopped us from setting up an exchange server on
a remote site.



Michael



-Original Message-
From: Brian Politis
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: July 13, 2002 2:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?





70ms
latency is excellent. In fact it's so good, I don't belive there's any
way satellite can provide this kind of latency. I've used several satellite
rigs, and none come in under 500ms latency. Either their smoking crack,
or 70 ms is some BS their makreting department came up with that refers to
internal latencies on their wired network, and doesn't represent what
customer's see over their true satellite links. You can't pump data into
near earch orbit, and back that fast; the distances are far enough that the
speed of an electron becomes an issue.











That
being said, most web protocols SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc. were initial
designed for slow dial up networks with high latency. And will run fine
over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite network. Issues would arise
with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP or SNA. If your users want
to just browse the web, and POP mail they should be fine.





-Original Message-
From: Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?

Thanks. Yes, we were talking about high
speed connection. The issue
of latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels One such
measurement, 70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com. If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line speed what will it mean
to have 70ms using interactive applications specifically remote
access software?



guaranteed
to have an average round trip packet transit time within SkyPipeline's Broadband
Wireless Network over a calendar month of 70ms or less. The average network
latency is measured as the average of 15-minute samples taken throughout the
month



-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?





As long
as you get static ip it should be okay. Others may complain about the
terminology you are using, since DSL is a connection method and so is satellite
so I'm presuming you are talking about satellite for high speed connectivity.
There will be latency but it shouldn't matter too much





-Original Message-
From: Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?

We are in Ventura
  County, CA and just found out
from the ISP that slots on the D-SLAM may not be available for our IDSL
connection. How well does satellite
DSL weigh in with SMTP mail on an Exchange Server environment? Thanks. Michael 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

2002-07-15 Thread Kent, Larry SYNETICS

Spooty?  Make sure you wash your hands afterwards...

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


DSL is spooty in Ventura county, CA??  You wouldn't think so

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 19:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


That is why my suggestion to him was www.skypipeline.com
http://www.skypipeline.com . Not satellite, but earth-based direct
microwave, with min speeds of 256 K Both Ways - symmetrical Fractional
T-1 connectivity, with business and home accounts - with different
policies and Usage Uptime commitments. Home accounts are cheaper with
best effort - similar to Cable or home dsl, and business accounts priced
more, with better support and uptime commitments.
 
You pay for what you want. Speeds are available the same with both
styles of accounts, but responsiveness to problems aren't.
 
Also, this is really of benefit when you are outside of DSL range, cause
it is a little more costly.
 
Where he is in Ventura county, CA (same as me) dsl is spotty.
 
Dennis

-Original Message-
From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?



What about the upload speed. If you are running an exchange server on
the site, and you are sending the data out over satellite, you are going
to have a 60KB upload rate or something like that aren't you? That is
what stopped us from setting up an exchange server on a remote site.

 

Michael

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: July 13, 2002 2:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

 

70ms latency is excellent.  In fact it's so good, I don't belive there's
any way satellite can provide this kind of latency. I've used several
satellite rigs, and none come in under 500ms latency.  Either their
smoking crack, or 70 ms is some BS their makreting department came up
with that refers to internal latencies on their wired network, and
doesn't represent what customer's see over their true satellite links.
You can't pump data into near earch orbit, and back that fast; the
distances are far enough that the speed of an electron becomes an issue.

 

That being said, most web protocols SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc.  were initial
designed for slow dial up networks with high latency.  And will run fine
over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite network.  Issues would arise
with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP or SNA.  If your users
want to just browse the web, and POP mail they should be fine.

-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

Thanks.  Yes, we were talking about high speed connection.  The issue
of latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels... One such
measurement, 70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com
http://www.skypipeline.com/ .  If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line
speed what will it mean to have 70ms using interactive applications
specifically remote access software?

 

...guaranteed to have an average round trip packet transit time within
SkyPipeline's Broadband Wireless Network over a calendar month of 70ms
or less. The average network latency is measured as the average of
15-minute samples taken throughout the month

 

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

 

As long as you get static ip it should be okay. Others may complain
about the terminology you are using, since DSL is a connection method
and so is satellite so I'm presuming you are talking about satellite for
high speed connectivity. There will be latency but it shouldn't matter
too much

-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

We are in Ventura County, CA and just found out from the ISP that slots
on the D-SLAM may not be available for our IDSL connection.  How well
does satellite DSL weigh in with SMTP mail on an Exchange Server
environment? Thanks. Michael 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

2002-07-15 Thread Eldridge, Dave

Has anyone seen any 802.11X show up anywhere. I have direcway sat. here in
Southern Colo. DSL is a never and Sprint line of site from Colo. Springs
just misses me. My sat. works ok considering its the only game for me. I am
keeping my eye on stories about using 802.11x for internet delivery. 
dave

-Original Message-
From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


Spooty?  Make sure you wash your hands afterwards...

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


DSL is spooty in Ventura county, CA??  You wouldn't think so

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 19:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


That is why my suggestion to him was www.skypipeline.com
http://www.skypipeline.com . Not satellite, but earth-based direct
microwave, with min speeds of 256 K Both Ways - symmetrical Fractional
T-1 connectivity, with business and home accounts - with different
policies and Usage Uptime commitments. Home accounts are cheaper with
best effort - similar to Cable or home dsl, and business accounts priced
more, with better support and uptime commitments.
 
You pay for what you want. Speeds are available the same with both
styles of accounts, but responsiveness to problems aren't.
 
Also, this is really of benefit when you are outside of DSL range, cause
it is a little more costly.
 
Where he is in Ventura county, CA (same as me) dsl is spotty.
 
Dennis

-Original Message-
From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?



What about the upload speed. If you are running an exchange server on
the site, and you are sending the data out over satellite, you are going
to have a 60KB upload rate or something like that aren't you? That is
what stopped us from setting up an exchange server on a remote site.

 

Michael

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: July 13, 2002 2:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

 

70ms latency is excellent.  In fact it's so good, I don't belive there's
any way satellite can provide this kind of latency. I've used several
satellite rigs, and none come in under 500ms latency.  Either their
smoking crack, or 70 ms is some BS their makreting department came up
with that refers to internal latencies on their wired network, and
doesn't represent what customer's see over their true satellite links.
You can't pump data into near earch orbit, and back that fast; the
distances are far enough that the speed of an electron becomes an issue.

 

That being said, most web protocols SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc.  were initial
designed for slow dial up networks with high latency.  And will run fine
over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite network.  Issues would arise
with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP or SNA.  If your users
want to just browse the web, and POP mail they should be fine.

-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

Thanks.  Yes, we were talking about high speed connection.  The issue
of latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels... One such
measurement, 70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com
http://www.skypipeline.com/ .  If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line
speed what will it mean to have 70ms using interactive applications
specifically remote access software?

 

...guaranteed to have an average round trip packet transit time within
SkyPipeline's Broadband Wireless Network over a calendar month of 70ms
or less. The average network latency is measured as the average of
15-minute samples taken throughout the month

 

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

 

As long as you get static ip it should be okay. Others may complain
about the terminology you are using, since DSL is a connection method
and so is satellite so I'm presuming you are talking about satellite for
high speed connectivity. There will be latency but it shouldn't matter
too much

-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

We are in Ventura County, CA and just found out from the ISP that slots
on the D-SLAM may not be available for our IDSL connection.  How well
does satellite DSL weigh 

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Mark Kelsay

Compaq?

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

Hpaq?

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Compaq?

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

I'm not sure CDO will work from Unix. Another way to do this is with LDAP
from your webpage. 

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 14:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Will unix have any trouble with it?

CDO with anonymous wouldn't give any backdoors into the sever?

Thanks for your help...

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy, right?.
Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be dynamic as
well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and the web pages),
why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX box
and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also seems
that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

You could look at a product called Double Take. But there is really no
supported Exchange replication system.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to
E2k enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime
would be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database
utilities wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller,
databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare
 allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I
need to repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

I wouldn't have to replicate. I would just bring the new server up clean. No restore 
or anything just enough so they can receive their mail  I can rebuild the old one. 
Then switch them back over.
Question is how can I do this? Bring the server up with the same name. I have had 
problems with this in the past. I received messages like account already exits. I 
tried the /disaster recovery switch  it did help either. So is this possible ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


You could look at a product called Double Take. But there is really no
supported Exchange replication system.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this. They want a 
cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to
E2k enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime
would be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database
utilities wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller,
databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare
 allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I
need to repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List 

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

But that isn't going to help you if you have IS corruption. You still need
to restore from a backup.

Frankly it sounds like your company wants the greatest, but doesn't want to
pay a dime for it.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I wouldn't have to replicate. I would just bring the new server up clean. No
restore or anything just enough so they can receive their mail  I can
rebuild the old one. Then switch them back over. Question is how can I do
this? Bring the server up with the same name. I have had problems with this
in the past. I received messages like account already exits. I tried the
/disaster recovery switch  it did help either. So is this possible ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


You could look at a product called Double Take. But there is really no
supported Exchange replication system.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I would use 
that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support 

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with 

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

I know!! But like I said,they want to know what their options are with what we 
currently have. I was hoping someone on this list would be in the same predicament  
had a crazy idea that could work.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


But that isn't going to help you if you have IS corruption. You still need
to restore from a backup.

Frankly it sounds like your company wants the greatest, but doesn't want to
pay a dime for it.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I wouldn't have to replicate. I would just bring the new server up clean. No
restore or anything just enough so they can receive their mail  I can
rebuild the old one. Then switch them back over. Question is how can I do
this? Bring the server up with the same name. I have had problems with this
in the past. I received messages like account already exits. I tried the
/disaster recovery switch  it did help either. So is this possible ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


You could look at a product called Double Take. But there is really no
supported Exchange replication system.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread David N. Precht

Whats the limits on the mailboxs?  If they don't want to pay, then lock
it down harder with lower limits.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them
this. They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to
E2k enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime
would be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database
utilities wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller,
databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare
 allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I
need to repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

no! It's not broken. I just tried  I was able to get to it. I also said intranet not 
internet. also the www site runs on apache.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

100megs. I tried that as you can see I lost that battle

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Whats the limits on the mailboxs?  If they don't want to pay, then lock
it down harder with lower limits.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them
this. They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to
E2k enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime
would be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database
utilities wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller,
databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare
 allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I
need to repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk 

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

Here is what I would do for starters.

Figure out the cost of additional hardware and software.
Figure out how long it would take you to restore everything to that box and
get folks up and running.

Frankly you cant find a solution to every scenario. Like was said before,
even clustering which while troublesome with Exchange already is still
probably the best solution, even it wont save you from a IS issue.

Present that to management and see what they say. Essentially tell them that
they will have to pay to play.


-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I know!! But like I said,they want to know what their options are with what
we currently have. I was hoping someone on this list would be in the same
predicament  had a crazy idea that could work.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


But that isn't going to help you if you have IS corruption. You still need
to restore from a backup.

Frankly it sounds like your company wants the greatest, but doesn't want to
pay a dime for it.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I wouldn't have to replicate. I would just bring the new server up clean. No
restore or anything just enough so they can receive their mail  I can
rebuild the old one. Then switch them back over. Question is how can I do
this? Bring the server up with the same name. I have had problems with this
in the past. I received messages like account already exits. I tried the
/disaster recovery switch  it did help either. So is this possible ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


You could look at a product called Double Take. But there is really no
supported Exchange replication system.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and 

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

That is the exact and only scenario available here...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Here is what I would do for starters.

Figure out the cost of additional hardware and software.
Figure out how long it would take you to restore everything to that box and
get folks up and running.

Frankly you cant find a solution to every scenario. Like was said before,
even clustering which while troublesome with Exchange already is still
probably the best solution, even it wont save you from a IS issue.

Present that to management and see what they say. Essentially tell them that
they will have to pay to play.


-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I know!! But like I said,they want to know what their options are with what
we currently have. I was hoping someone on this list would be in the same
predicament  had a crazy idea that could work.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


But that isn't going to help you if you have IS corruption. You still need
to restore from a backup.

Frankly it sounds like your company wants the greatest, but doesn't want to
pay a dime for it.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I wouldn't have to replicate. I would just bring the new server up clean. No
restore or anything just enough so they can receive their mail  I can
rebuild the old one. Then switch them back over. Question is how can I do
this? Bring the server up with the same name. I have had problems with this
in the past. I received messages like account already exits. I tried the
/disaster recovery switch  it did help either. So is this possible ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


You could look at a product called Double Take. But there is really no
supported Exchange replication system.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread David James

Exchange works great clustered, which is what he wants to do.

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server

Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


But that doesn't protect against database corruption.  In that scenario,
the ROI for clustering would be a minus figure!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 15:44
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Exchange works great clustered, which is what he wants to do.

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server

Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard
edition of exchange with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Primary NT Account deleted!

2002-07-15 Thread mark . smith

Hello Everyone,
I have a user that accesses another mailbox. The
Primary Windows NT Account for that mailbox was deleted. The user cannot
access the mailbox any longer.  I have Exchange Admin rights and can access
the mailbox. Is there any way I can get the user to access the mailbox
again. Short of creating a PST of the old mailbox, creating a new mailbox
and restoring the PST. Server is Exchange 5.5  and client is Outlook 98.
- Thanks,
 
 
Mark Smith
Department of Foreign Affairs
SIGNET -C4 Server Administrator, 
Phone:(613)944-1975 Fax: (613)944-0044 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O / 
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not 

RE: Primary NT Account deleted!

2002-07-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

Make that user the primary account holder

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Primary NT Account deleted!


Hello Everyone,
I have a user that accesses another mailbox. The
Primary Windows NT Account for that mailbox was deleted. The user cannot
access the mailbox any longer.  I have Exchange Admin rights and can access
the mailbox. Is there any way I can get the user to access the mailbox
again. Short of creating a PST of the old mailbox, creating a new mailbox
and restoring the PST. Server is Exchange 5.5  and client is Outlook 98.
- Thanks,
 
 
Mark Smith
Department of Foreign Affairs
SIGNET -C4 Server Administrator, 
Phone:(613)944-1975 Fax: (613)944-0044 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O / 
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Jeremiah Watson

PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files 

Problems after upgrade

2002-07-15 Thread Frey, James

I have a problem after upgrading the network/mail from nt4/exch5.5.
After moving all the machines over and users and mail, it seems there
are a few machines, that each time the user logs on, a new local profile
is created.  Has anyone seen this or know how to deal with it?

Thanks,

Jim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Primary NT Account deleted!

2002-07-15 Thread Carol Fee

Make the user the owner of the mailbox.


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Primary NT Account deleted!


Hello Everyone,
I have a user that accesses another mailbox. The
Primary Windows NT Account for that mailbox was deleted. The user cannot
access the mailbox any longer.  I have Exchange Admin rights and can access
the mailbox. Is there any way I can get the user to access the mailbox
again. Short of creating a PST of the old mailbox, creating a new mailbox
and restoring the PST. Server is Exchange 5.5  and client is Outlook 98.
- Thanks,
 
 
Mark Smith
Department of Foreign Affairs
SIGNET -C4 Server Administrator, 
Phone:(613)944-1975 Fax: (613)944-0044 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O / 
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

Well, here in NC it works great.  :P

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Jeremiah Watson

I'm surprised there wasn't a 

Neaner, Neaner, Neaner  After that :-P

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, here in NC it works great.  :P

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those 

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Tom Meunier

Are you sure?  Didja buy some tires?

It was broken from Austin earlier, now it's up  running.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 09:53 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Well, here in NC it works great.  :P
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 PA, Near Pittsburgh,
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Where are you?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Not out here it doesn't.  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Works here...  :P
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/
 
 You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

I thought about saying If page cannot be displayed, please contact your
systems administrator  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I'm surprised there wasn't a 

Neaner, Neaner, Neaner  After that :-P

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, here in NC it works great.  :P

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

Really. We have several store in PA. I will have to look into why you can't view our 
site. Thanks for the heads up

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

Well, I just went to the home page.  I wasn't really interested in any
tires...  :o)

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Are you sure?  Didja buy some tires?

It was broken from Austin earlier, now it's up  running.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 09:53 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Well, here in NC it works great.  :P
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 PA, Near Pittsburgh,
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Where are you?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Not out here it doesn't.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Works here...  :P
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Backup Server
 
 
 Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/
 
 You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Jeremiah Watson

Hey,  While your at it,  Can you send me some new

Bf Goodrich's  265/75/r15(Free of charge) of Course.  :-)  

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Really. We have several store in PA. I will have to look into why you can't view our 
site. Thanks for the heads up

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom 

Public Folders disappear after changing home server

2002-07-15 Thread Douglas Hull

I have just been rehoming a large number of PFs in my site onto a new
Exchange box so that I can decommission the old Exchange box. Most now
seem to be fine, but one set of folders has lost all of its content i.e.
all the folders and subfolders are there, but the content of each folder
is missing! I thought it might just be taking a while to complete
replication, but after several hours there is no improvement and there is
nothing queued up in either server's mta. Both servers are Exchange 5.5
SP3 on Win2k. The way I rehomed them was by selecting each folder in
Exchange administrator, adding a replica for the new server, changing the
home server and applying the changes to all subfolders. Any ideas?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Thompson, Elizabeth

Can you give me a direction on where I could find the LDAP calls for GAL?

THANKS!!!

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


I'm not sure CDO will work from Unix. Another way to do this is with LDAP
from your webpage. 

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 14:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Will unix have any trouble with it?

CDO with anonymous wouldn't give any backdoors into the sever?

Thanks for your help...

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy, right?.
Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be dynamic as
well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and the web pages),
why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX box
and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also seems
that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

I wish I could get free tires. Sorry but we probably have them on sale. Check the web 
site.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Hey,  While your at it,  Can you send me some new

Bf Goodrich's  265/75/r15(Free of charge) of Course.  :-)  

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Really. We have several store in PA. I will have to look into why you can't view our 
site. Thanks for the heads up

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched  searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard edition of exchange
with the latest patches. Thanks in 

Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Matthew Carpenter

I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Brien Mayer

try the rules wizard

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Another dumb one.....

2002-07-15 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Aside from forcing Plain Text, is there a way to suppress incoming mail
using stationery? Office 97 again. TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Clark, Steve

This sounds like using the organize feature and color coding email based on
sender or subject. Although, I don't recall if that was avail in O97.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one

I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Jeremiah Watson

I can't check the Website. :P

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


I wish I could get free tires. Sorry but we probably have them on sale. Check the web 
site.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Hey,  While your at it,  Can you send me some new

Bf Goodrich's  265/75/r15(Free of charge) of Course.  :-)  

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Really. We have several store in PA. I will have to look into why you can't view our 
site. Thanks for the heads up

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare 
allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured 

PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS

2002-07-15 Thread Murray Freeman


I've got a user who uses the follow up flag to remind her to follow up. (Is
that redundant?) She says it stopped reminding her, yet her calendar
reminders is working. I ran the repair option on Outlook 2000, but the
problem persists. Any ideas would be welcome.

Murray

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


I think Organize first came with OL98.  If the user is seeing pink,
sounds like they've been drinking...

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:12
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Dumb one
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's
certainly not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that
are..pink. It seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She
said that she made it do that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any
setting that jumps out to me on that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


No, it's not redundant AFAIK.  You could always try starting outlook.exe
with the /cleanreminders switch.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:23
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS
Subject: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS



I've got a user who uses the follow up flag to remind her to follow up.
(Is that redundant?) She says it stopped reminding her, yet her calendar
reminders is working. I ran the repair option on Outlook 2000, but the
problem persists. Any ideas would be welcome.

Murray

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Thank you for the sarcasm guru Don. Yes, I use Outlook, but I do not use
those features, so the extent of their ability is not my strongest point. I
prefer flat, plain text messages without the foof...

I have to learn foofiness for my users, it is a pain in the...


- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

I don't remember myself...  However, said user could have configured it
under a different version maybe??  ::shrug::

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one



I think Organize first came with OL98.  If the user is seeing pink, sounds
like they've been drinking...

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:12
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Dumb one
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

I don't do foofoo either...

The Do you use Outlook was a comment someone made a while back that has
garnered lots of humour since...  Just thought I'd throw it in for humours
sake..  :P

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Thank you for the sarcasm guru Don. Yes, I use Outlook, but I do not use
those features, so the extent of their ability is not my strongest point. I
prefer flat, plain text messages without the foof...

I have to learn foofiness for my users, it is a pain in the...


- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS

2002-07-15 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry
Title: RE: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS





Where is the flagged message stored? If it is in a .pst that is attached to Outlook the reminder flags do not work. Known issue from MS and no resolution other than not to put things w/reminders on them anywhere other than the mailbox.

Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.




-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS




No, it's not redundant AFAIK. You could always try starting outlook.exe with the /cleanreminders switch.


Neil


-Original Message-
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:23
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS
Subject: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS




I've got a user who uses the follow up flag to remind her to follow up. (Is that redundant?) She says it stopped reminding her, yet her calendar reminders is working. I ran the repair option on Outlook 2000, but the problem persists. Any ideas would be welcome.

Murray


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.


If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson


So your OL97 has an Organize feature?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Dumb one
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's
certainly not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that
are..pink. It seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She
said that she made it do that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any
setting that jumps out to me on that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Andy David

An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS

2002-07-15 Thread Neil Hobson
Title: Message



Good point, and thanks for the update. Of course, I'm a good boy 
and I don't use PSTs! :-)

Neil

  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 July 2002 
  16:30Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: 
  PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMSSubject: RE: PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" 
  ITEMS
  Where is the flagged message stored? If it is in a .pst 
  that is attached to Outlook the reminder flags do not work. Known issue 
  from MS and no resolution other than not to put things w/reminders on them 
  anywhere other than the mailbox.
  Sherry Abercrombie Data Center 
  Administration Team Information Technology 
  "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS 
  No, it's not redundant AFAIK. You could always try 
  starting outlook.exe with the /cleanreminders switch. 
  Neil 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:23 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS Subject: PROBLEM WITH 
  "FLAGGING" ITEMS 
  I've got a user who uses the follow up flag to remind her to 
  follow up. (Is that redundant?) She says it stopped reminding her, yet her 
  calendar reminders is working. I ran the "repair option on Outlook 2000, but 
  the problem persists. Any ideas would be welcome.
  Murray 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  * 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are 
  confidential and intended solely for the use of 
  the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
  or opinions presented are solely those of the 
  author and do not necessarily represent those of 
  Silversands. 
  If you have received this email in error, please 
  contact our Support Desk immediately on 
  01202-360360 or email 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*



Re: Another dumb one.....

2002-07-15 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Any ideas on this one now? heh

User is complaining about blinding incoming stationery. Can that be
suppressed on incoming emails for 97, 98, 2K or 2K2 (happy now Neil?)



- Original Message -
From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Another dumb one.


Aside from forcing Plain Text, is there a way to suppress incoming mail
using stationery? Office 97 again. TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: PROBLEM WITH FLAGGING ITEMS

2002-07-15 Thread Murray Freeman
Title: RE: PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS



My user tells 
me that the feature used to work fine. She merely creates an email, "flags" it 
and then sends it.

Murray

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: PROBLEM WITH 
  "FLAGGING" ITEMS
  Where is the flagged message stored? If it is in a .pst 
  that is attached to Outlook the reminder flags do not work. Known issue 
  from MS and no resolution other than not to put things w/reminders on them 
  anywhere other than the mailbox.
  Sherry Abercrombie Data Center 
  Administration Team Information Technology 
  "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." 
  
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS 
  No, it's not redundant AFAIK. You could always try 
  starting outlook.exe with the /cleanreminders switch. 
  Neil 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:23 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  PROBLEM WITH "FLAGGING" ITEMS Subject: PROBLEM WITH 
  "FLAGGING" ITEMS 
  I've got a user who uses the follow up flag to remind her to 
  follow up. (Is that redundant?) She says it stopped reminding her, yet her 
  calendar reminders is working. I ran the "repair option on Outlook 2000, but 
  the problem persists. Any ideas would be welcome.
  Murray 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  * 
  This email and any files transmitted with it are 
  confidential and intended solely for the use of 
  the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
  or opinions presented are solely those of the 
  author and do not necessarily represent those of 
  Silversands. 
  If you have received this email in error, please 
  contact our Support Desk immediately on 
  01202-360360 or email 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Re: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Matthew Carpenter

You win another Guinness!!


- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Nikki Peterson - ITCX
Title: RE: Dumb one





Past due flags turn message red...


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one



An OS and SP of your choice!



-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one



What do I win?!?!?!?!


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one



Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck


- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one



Do you use Outlook?!?!?!? :P


Can you say the Organize feature? How about Filters? It's certainly
not rocket science...


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one



I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.


She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you.

==



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Andy David

Back in 97, we didnt need organization.
Our email sucked and we liked it! 


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one



So your OL97 has an Organize feature?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Dumb one
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's
certainly not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that
are..pink. It seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She
said that she made it do that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any
setting that jumps out to me on that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Jeremiah Watson

Isn't that WinME?

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

No way!

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Isn't that WinME?

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Schwartz, Jim

One copy of Windows ME coming your way.

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Ely, Don

Funny, me email swallowed back then...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Back in 97, we didnt need organization.
Our email sucked and we liked it! 


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one



So your OL97 has an Organize feature?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 16:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Dumb one
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Another dumb one.....

2002-07-15 Thread Tom Meunier

OL2002 SR1.  Makes me happy.  The crap is still there if they really
want it, but you don't have to look at it.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q307594

 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:34 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Another dumb one.
 
 
 Any ideas on this one now? heh
 
 User is complaining about blinding incoming stationery. Can 
 that be suppressed on incoming emails for 97, 98, 2K or 2K2 
 (happy now Neil?)
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Murray Freeman

SP12, I'm only up to SP7!!

Murray

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Matthew Carpenter

LOL, sounds about right

- Original Message -
From: Jeremiah Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Isn't that WinME?

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


An OS and SP of your choice!


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb one


What do I win?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dumb one


Ahh, yes, bingo, thanks Don...you the man, and I suck

- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dumb one


Do you use Outlook?!?!?!?  :P

Can you say the Organize feature?  How about Filters?  It's certainly
not rocket science...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb one


I have this bozo user who is using Outlook 97.

She has items in her Inbox that are in black and some that are..pink. It
seems rather random to me, but what do I know. She said that she made it do
that, but doesn't know how. I do not see any setting that jumps out to me on
that. Any ideas? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Brian Politis


You could also set your webpage to only display email addresses, and
peronal information for Intranet users.  I would stop and write a
privacy policy and clearly define your goals before proceeding.  We're
currently doing the same thing with GALMOD on Exchange 5.5, and came up
with the following:

Dept. Managers and Above are required to input their Home #s and
addresses (for Disaster Recovery).
Line people can choose whether or not they want their Home information
posted.

Home information and full office information is only displayed on the
Intranet.  

Public Internet users can only access Names and Office Numbers.  (Most
office numbers are to a receptionist not a direct line)

All employees are required to update their information periodically.
The login script fires a prompt every 30 days to have them update their
info.  If their information is not kept updated it will reflect in their
perfomance reviews (like most managers are gonna care, but at least it's
written that they are supposed to keep it updated)



-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


I'm not sure CDO will work from Unix. Another way to do this is with
LDAP from your webpage. 

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 14:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Will unix have any trouble with it?

CDO with anonymous wouldn't give any backdoors into the sever?

Thanks for your help...

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy,
right?. Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be
dynamic as well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and
the web pages), why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX
box and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also
seems that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Thompson, Elizabeth

Unfortuantely, our e-mail addresses and business phone numbers are public
access (yeah, great for spammers...)

It would be nice to have their office phone next to their e-mail address.

we are also Exch 5.5

You said that you use GALMOD. what is that?



Liz

-Original Message-
From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page



You could also set your webpage to only display email addresses, and
peronal information for Intranet users.  I would stop and write a
privacy policy and clearly define your goals before proceeding.  We're
currently doing the same thing with GALMOD on Exchange 5.5, and came up
with the following:

Dept. Managers and Above are required to input their Home #s and
addresses (for Disaster Recovery).
Line people can choose whether or not they want their Home information
posted.

Home information and full office information is only displayed on the
Intranet.  

Public Internet users can only access Names and Office Numbers.  (Most
office numbers are to a receptionist not a direct line)

All employees are required to update their information periodically.
The login script fires a prompt every 30 days to have them update their
info.  If their information is not kept updated it will reflect in their
perfomance reviews (like most managers are gonna care, but at least it's
written that they are supposed to keep it updated)



-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


I'm not sure CDO will work from Unix. Another way to do this is with
LDAP from your webpage. 

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 14:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Will unix have any trouble with it?

CDO with anonymous wouldn't give any backdoors into the sever?

Thanks for your help...

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy,
right?. Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be
dynamic as well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and
the web pages), why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX
box and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also
seems that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Steve Balen


I am not too sure if ldap is what you want to do - unless you want to
query it. You said you want to display the entire gal on the web page,
correct?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET

Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Can you give me a direction on where I could find the LDAP calls for
GAL?

THANKS!!!

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


I'm not sure CDO will work from Unix. Another way to do this is with
LDAP from your webpage.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 14:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Will unix have any trouble with it?

CDO with anonymous wouldn't give any backdoors into the sever?

Thanks for your help...

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation.

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy,
right?. Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be
dynamic as well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and
the web pages), why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL.

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX
box and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also
seems that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Backup Server

2002-07-15 Thread Ray Zorz

Speaking of which, I could use a new Goodyear Wrangler RT/S.  Just left
one shredded on the freeway.  It really sucks changing tires in this
heat. 

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Hey,  While your at it,  Can you send me some new

Bf Goodrich's  265/75/r15(Free of charge) of Course.  :-)  

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Really. We have several store in PA. I will have to look into why you
can't view our site. Thanks for the heads up

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


PA, Near Pittsburgh,

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Where are you?

-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Not out here it doesn't.  

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Works here...  :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Is that the broken one? http://www.merchantstire.com/

You would still need to purchase another Exchange Server license.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


No your right. But I a intranet server that is exactly the same
hardware. I
would use that,if it came down to it. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Well, a standby server isn't going to be any cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them
this.
They want a cheaper way.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's actually quite a tricky one.

Clustering wouldn't help, since it's shared storage.  Why not upgrade to
E2k
enterprise and implement multiple databases?  At least your downtime
would
be minimised if you split your users well.  Running the database
utilities
wouldn't take that much time with multiple, smaller, databases.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:29
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare

allow the users to receive mail. This way it will give me the time I
need to
repair the store  not have vp's hounding me. 

-Original Message-
From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server


Every time we had failures it's been with the RAID card not the drives.

George

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



That's what RAID is for.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: RE: Backup Server


supposed the problem is the disks?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server



Have a spare server of the same hardware standing by.  If the production
server dies, bung the disks in the standby server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 July 2002 14:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Backup Server
Subject: Backup Server


Someone posted the question last week about a backup server  I didn't
get
the reply. I have been tasked with coming up with a solution for our
exchange2k disaster recovery plan. 
Is it possible to install exchange on another server configured exactly
the
same as our current one  leave it as a hot spare. I've searched 
searched
for articles. Any one have any? I'm running the standard 

RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page

2002-07-15 Thread Brian Politis

Galmod is a MS tool provided on the backoffice 4.5 resource kit CD.
It’s basically a sample website that allows users to update their
personal info in the GAL.  One of our developers took it as a sample on
how to get to the GAL and is now modifying it to do the other things I
posted.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Unfortuantely, our e-mail addresses and business phone numbers are
public access (yeah, great for spammers...)

It would be nice to have their office phone next to their e-mail
address.

we are also Exch 5.5

You said that you use GALMOD. what is that?



Liz

-Original Message-
From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page



You could also set your webpage to only display email addresses, and
peronal information for Intranet users.  I would stop and write a
privacy policy and clearly define your goals before proceeding.  We're
currently doing the same thing with GALMOD on Exchange 5.5, and came up
with the following:

Dept. Managers and Above are required to input their Home #s and
addresses (for Disaster Recovery). Line people can choose whether or not
they want their Home information posted.

Home information and full office information is only displayed on the
Intranet.  

Public Internet users can only access Names and Office Numbers.  (Most
office numbers are to a receptionist not a direct line)

All employees are required to update their information periodically. The
login script fires a prompt every 30 days to have them update their
info.  If their information is not kept updated it will reflect in their
perfomance reviews (like most managers are gonna care, but at least it's
written that they are supposed to keep it updated)



-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


I'm not sure CDO will work from Unix. Another way to do this is with
LDAP from your webpage. 

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 14:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Will unix have any trouble with it?

CDO with anonymous wouldn't give any backdoors into the sever?

Thanks for your help...

Liz

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Displaying the GAL on a web page


Just to display the GAL you can use CDO with anonymous authentication.

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Displaying the GAL on a web page


here's the situation. 

We have been told that we have to go to dynamic web pages. No biggy,
right?. Well, higher ups would like to have the employee directory be
dynamic as well. Their logic - why update it in 2 places (exchange and
the web pages), why not have it dynamically pull from the GAL. 

To add interest to the situation the Web pages run off of an AIX UNIX
box and with Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT sp6.

Does anyone know if it is do-able to have the GAL display on a open web
page? it seems like you could pull you info using the CDOs but it also
seems that you would want some sort of authentication with it?

Now is this actually possible? If so, can someone point me in the right
direction?

Thanks,

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Add all Contacts to Messenger Automatically

2002-07-15 Thread Ren Johnson

I just deployed Exchange Instant Messenger and was wondering if there is a way to 
include everyone in the company on the contact list for everyone's messenger client?  
Basically what I'm looking for is a new user installing messenger and not having to 
add each person individually.  

I tried to pull the info from the registry and add the key file through a script, but 
the key folder name is the user's name and %username% doesn't work for a key.  Can 
someone help?  

I guess the only other way I know of would be to create a VB script which would 
rewrite the .reg file for each person as they are logging on pulling the user's name 
through %username% (by batch script) and adding it to the new .reg file in the 
appropriate place.  Anyone got a better idea, please let me know.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Add all Contacts to Messenger Automatically

2002-07-15 Thread Kevin Miller

I remember the help file talking about a util or script to do this?? But
I have been known to be wrong.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Ren Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Add all Contacts to Messenger Automatically


I just deployed Exchange Instant Messenger and was wondering if there is
a way to include everyone in the company on the contact list for
everyone's messenger client?  Basically what I'm looking for is a new
user installing messenger and not having to add each person
individually.  

I tried to pull the info from the registry and add the key file through
a script, but the key folder name is the user's name and %username%
doesn't work for a key.  Can someone help?  

I guess the only other way I know of would be to create a VB script
which would rewrite the .reg file for each person as they are logging on
pulling the user's name through %username% (by batch script) and adding
it to the new .reg file in the appropriate place.  Anyone got a better
idea, please let me know.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

2002-07-15 Thread mwhitton

SBC changed their policies on offering DSL to clients in 2000. They were
offering up to 17,000 feet, now it's been reduced to 12,000...and some areas
will never be eligible for DSL, because they have also stopped offering to
remote clients as they canceled their remote setup program...they were
constructing remote boxes outside of the perimeter of the nearest CO.
- Original Message -
From: David N. Precht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


 You know what I meant ;)

 -Original Message-
 From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 09:39
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


 Spooty?  Make sure you wash your hands afterwards...

 -Original Message-
 From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:01 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


 DSL is spooty in Ventura county, CA??  You wouldn't think so

 -Original Message-
 From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 19:45
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?


 That is why my suggestion to him was www.skypipeline.com
 http://www.skypipeline.com . Not satellite, but earth-based direct
 microwave, with min speeds of 256 K Both Ways - symmetrical Fractional
 T-1 connectivity, with business and home accounts - with different
 policies and Usage Uptime commitments. Home accounts are cheaper with
 best effort - similar to Cable or home dsl, and business accounts priced
 more, with better support and uptime commitments.

 You pay for what you want. Speeds are available the same with both
 styles of accounts, but responsiveness to problems aren't.

 Also, this is really of benefit when you are outside of DSL range, cause
 it is a little more costly.

 Where he is in Ventura county, CA (same as me) dsl is spotty.

 Dennis

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:03 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?



 What about the upload speed. If you are running an exchange server on
 the site, and you are sending the data out over satellite, you are going
 to have a 60KB upload rate or something like that aren't you? That is
 what stopped us from setting up an exchange server on a remote site.



 Michael



 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: July 13, 2002 2:11 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?



 70ms latency is excellent.  In fact it's so good, I don't belive there's
 any way satellite can provide this kind of latency. I've used several
 satellite rigs, and none come in under 500ms latency.  Either their
 smoking crack, or 70 ms is some BS their makreting department came up
 with that refers to internal latencies on their wired network, and
 doesn't represent what customer's see over their true satellite links.
 You can't pump data into near earch orbit, and back that fast; the
 distances are far enough that the speed of an electron becomes an issue.



 That being said, most web protocols SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc.  were initial
 designed for slow dial up networks with high latency.  And will run fine
 over the 500+ ms latencies of a satellite network.  Issues would arise
 with other protols such as Citrix ICA, MS RDP or SNA.  If your users
 want to just browse the web, and POP mail they should be fine.

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:51 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?

 Thanks.  Yes, we were talking about high speed connection.  The issue
 of latency seems to be acceptable at certain levels... One such
 measurement, 70ms, comes from a company called www.SkyPipeline.com
 http://www.skypipeline.com/ .  If latency is an *ENEMY* to good line
 speed what will it mean to have 70ms using interactive applications
 specifically remote access software?



 ...guaranteed to have an average round trip packet transit time within
 SkyPipeline's Broadband Wireless Network over a calendar month of 70ms
 or less. The average network latency is measured as the average of
 15-minute samples taken throughout the month



 -Original Message-
 From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:31 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH EXCHANGE SMTP?



 As long as you get static ip it should be okay. Others may complain
 about the terminology you are using, since DSL is a connection method
 and so is satellite so I'm presuming you are talking about satellite for
 high speed connectivity. There will be latency but it shouldn't 

major problem

2002-07-15 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message



i had a server whose 
exchanage services wont start after the server booted.


it tells me the 
service is disabled (which its not) or its missing 
hardware...

anyone ever see 
this?

Event 
Type:ErrorEvent Source:Service Control ManagerEvent 
Category:NoneEvent 
ID:7001Date:7/15/2002Time:1:43:11 
PMUser:N/AComputer:SERVERDescription:The Microsoft 
Exchange Directory service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant 
service which failed to start because of the following error: The service 
cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled 
devices associated with it. 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: major problem

2002-07-15 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message



Need 
more info.. what happens when you try to start the system 
attendant?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
WebDesign, GO here!

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:45 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: major 
  problem
  i had a server 
  whose exchanage services wont start after the server 
  booted.
  
  
  it tells me the 
  service is disabled (which its not) or its missing 
  hardware...
  
  anyone ever see 
  this?
  
  Event 
  Type:ErrorEvent Source:Service Control ManagerEvent 
  Category:NoneEvent 
  ID:7001Date:7/15/2002Time:1:43:11 
  PMUser:N/AComputer:SERVERDescription:The Microsoft 
  Exchange Directory service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant 
  service which failed to start because of the following error: The service 
  cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled 
  devices associated with it. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





  1   2   3   >