RE: MCSE Update?

2008-01-14 Thread Beckett, William (Bill)
They do not expire, like I can always say I am an MCSE on NT 4.0.
However, who cares? Nonetheless, they do not expire
 



From: Steve Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MCSE Update?





As far as I know, MCSE Certifications do not expire.  MCP certifications
do expire one year after the exam has been retired but not MCSE's.

The new 2008 certifications will expire every three years unless renewed
but older 2000 and 2003 MCSE certifications do not.

   

I may be mistaken but I am basing my opinion on this quote from
Microsoft's Certification website:

 

Q. What happens to my current certification? 

A. Professionals who hold any currently recognized Microsoft
certification do not need to renew their credentials. Your current
credentials will be recognized as long as they are in demand, and they
will continue to be supported by Microsoft.

 

Microsoft also continues to recognize specializations in Messaging and
Security for the MCSA and MCSE certifications, with the exception of
certifications that have already expired.

 

Q. Will my current certifications expire? 

A. No, your current certifications will not expire

 

Hope this helps,

Steve Moore, MCSA, MCSE
Amerex Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 04:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MCSE Update?

 

I was informed that my old MCSE 2000 certification is being retired
soon. I do not put much weight on such things, and neither does my
employer. In fact, I am hardly doing hands on technical work anymore. I
am debating on whether to even pursue updating the certification at all.
That said, if I don't, and do need it someday, I will need to start over
completely. What a pain. 

Is anyone else debating the same thing?

-- 
http://www.otbdesign.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mqcarpenter 

 



This e-mail and any file(s) transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom they are addressed.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are
not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited. We have taken precautions to
minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to
carry out your own virus checks on any attachment(s) to this message. We
cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software
viruses.

This message has been scanned for viruses by SIG3300 , Groupshield for
Exchange, and McAfee Virus Enterprise 


 



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: MCSE Update?

2008-01-14 Thread Steve Moore
As far as I know, MCSE Certifications do not expire.  MCP certifications
do expire one year after the exam has been retired but not MCSE's.

The new 2008 certifications will expire every three years unless renewed
but older 2000 and 2003 MCSE certifications do not.

   

I may be mistaken but I am basing my opinion on this quote from
Microsoft's Certification website:

 

Q. What happens to my current certification? 

A. Professionals who hold any currently recognized Microsoft
certification do not need to renew their credentials. Your current
credentials will be recognized as long as they are in demand, and they
will continue to be supported by Microsoft.

 

Microsoft also continues to recognize specializations in Messaging and
Security for the MCSA and MCSE certifications, with the exception of
certifications that have already expired.

 

Q. Will my current certifications expire? 

A. No, your current certifications will not expire

 

Hope this helps,

Steve Moore, MCSA, MCSE
Amerex Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 04:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MCSE Update?

 

I was informed that my old MCSE 2000 certification is being retired
soon. I do not put much weight on such things, and neither does my
employer. In fact, I am hardly doing hands on technical work anymore. I
am debating on whether to even pursue updating the certification at all.
That said, if I don't, and do need it someday, I will need to start over
completely. What a pain. 

Is anyone else debating the same thing?

-- 
http://www.otbdesign.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mqcarpenter 

 



This e-mail and any file(s) transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the recipient to whom they are addressed. Please notify 
the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake 
and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient 
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. We have 
taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we 
advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment(s) to this 
message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software 
viruses.

This message has been scanned for viruses by SIG3300 , Groupshield for 
Exchange, and McAfee Virus Enterprise

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: MCSE Update?

2008-01-14 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
It's not the MCSE 2000 Certification that is retiring, it is the Exam for
MCSE 2000 Certification that is retiring soon.

I got the same email last week

On Jan 14, 2008 8:13 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
>
> They do not expire, like I can always say I am an MCSE on NT 4.0. However,
> who cares? Nonetheless, they do not expire
>
>
>  --
> *From:* Steve Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 14, 2008 9:12 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: MCSE Update?
>
>
>
>  As far as I know, MCSE Certifications do not expire.  MCP certifications
> do expire one year after the exam has been retired but not MCSE's.
>
> The new 2008 certifications will expire every three years unless renewed
> but older 2000 and 2003 MCSE certifications do not.
>
>
>
> I may be mistaken but I am basing my opinion on this quote from
> Microsoft's Certification website:
>
>
>
> Q. What happens to my current certification?
>
> A. Professionals who hold any currently recognized Microsoft certification
> do not need to renew their credentials. Your current credentials will be
> recognized as long as they are in demand, and they will continue to be
> supported by Microsoft.
>
>
>
> Microsoft also continues to recognize specializations in Messaging and
> Security for the MCSA and MCSE certifications, with the exception of
> certifications that have already expired.
>
>
>
> Q. Will my current certifications expire?
>
> A. No, your current certifications will not expire
>
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Steve Moore, MCSA, MCSE
> Amerex Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 11, 2008 04:09 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* MCSE Update?
>
>
>
> I was informed that my old MCSE 2000 certification is being retired soon.
> I do not put much weight on such things, and neither does my employer. In
> fact, I am hardly doing hands on technical work anymore. I am debating on
> whether to even pursue updating the certification at all. That said, if I
> don't, and do need it someday, I will need to start over completely. What a
> pain.
>
> Is anyone else debating the same thing?
>
> --
> http://www.otbdesign.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mqcarpenter
>
>
>
> --
> This e-mail and any file(s) transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom they are addressed.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
> e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not
> the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
> distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
> information is strictly prohibited. We have taken precautions to minimize
> the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out
> your own virus checks on any attachment(s) to this message. We cannot accept
> liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by SIG3300 , Groupshield for
> Exchange, and McAfee Virus Enterprise
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one."
-Albert Einstein

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Back Up Best Practices

2008-01-14 Thread Maglinger, Paul
You mean "Office" politics is a barrier to deployement success.  :-) 

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Back Up Best Practices

I find there is a lot of politics involved in making messaging
application
decisions, including backup methodologies.

Often politics is a barrier to deployment success.


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 4:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Back Up Best Practices

Ah ah ah, William and John!  Let's not bring politics into an otherwise
congenial and educational common stock of knowledge and understanding.  

-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 1:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Back Up Best Practices

Hi William:

It's too dusty out here to use data tapes for back up. I
actually
run our backups to disk. And just how did good ol'Woody mess up foreign
policy? 


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8000
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium - 717.633.3823

"A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group
in
America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you
to
trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and
Stripes."  Woodrow Wilson


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Back Up Best Practices

What is this 'tape' thing you are talking about? Are companies still
using
tapes?
We haven't used those since Woodrow Wilson screwed up US foreign policy.

If the time needed for backup is not too great, I don't bother with
incrementals or differentials.  
.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Log Files

2008-01-14 Thread Dahl, Peter
If there is corruption in the PF store database you will need to
diagnose and repair the problem.  If you have another server you could
replicate all content to the new server however if there is damage in
the PF database I doubt that everything would replicate properly.

-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Log Files

I've discovered that I cannot move public folders between public
folder trees.  And I cannot create a new public folder store in the
new storage group without adding a new public folder tree.  How do I
move the public folders?  I've googled this one to death and I can't
seem to find an answer.  Replicas?  Don't seem to work either.

On Jan 9, 2008 12:04 PM, Michael B. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is correct.
>
> Uh...you might want to wait on the removal until all users have a had
a
> chance to "check in" and get redirected.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> MCSE/Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:55 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>
> Subject: Re: Log Files
>
> Sounds good.  And the users won't notice a thing?  ie. the redirection
> is seamless I assume.
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 10:06 AM, Michael B. Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeppers.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael B. Smith
> > MCSE/Exchange MVP
> > http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:03 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Log Files
> >
> > I've got an odd one that I've not seen before.  I was on leave of
> > absence when my mailbox store seemed to be corrupted.  Apparently it
> > was still working (users able to send and receive as well as access
> > mail) but the Backup Exec reported it was corrupted and would not
back
> > it up.  So the tech on shift created a new mailbox store and moved
the
> > mailboxes over.  Now the public folders are still in the old store
and
> > I've got log files that keep getting created in the C:\Program
> > Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA directory since that date.  I've also got
> > logfiles that seem to be flushing in the new folder, which is
normal.
> > Should I be moving the public folders over to the newly created
store
> > as well and then get rid of the first storage group?  Any good ideas
> > appreciated.
> > Thanks
> > Steve
> >
> > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> >
> >
> > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> >
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) 
please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this 
communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be 
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Back Up Best Practices

2008-01-14 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
The other "awareness" that DPM 2007 has is DPM 2007, which is quite
possibly the best capability of all. DPM on a secondary DPM server is
aware that it is a secondary server and allows for selecting which
primary data you want to backup a second time (I use this for offsite
storage) and then it allows for archiving from disk to tape with any of
that secondary data if you so desire. It really is an awesome product if
you use Microsoft products on your network.
TVK

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 1:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Back Up Best Practices

Microsoft Data Protection Manager 2007.  Works well with Exchange
Server.
http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/dpm/workloads/exchange.mspx

It is a managed backup/recovery solution for all the Microsoft
applications
- Sharepoint, SQL, Exchange.

What's a TLA?


-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Back Up Best Practices

Please define DPM.  There are too many TLA's running around here and I
don't
have the glossary. 


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8000
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium - 717.633.3823

"A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group
in
America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you
to
trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and
Stripes."  Woodrow Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Back Up Best Practices



Nah (although you might have been), I dreamed it up about a year and a
half ago when I pulled the last of the tape drives off my network and
suddenly the sun shone brighter and the flowers smelled flowerier. DPM
has made it just that much better. (DPM is far more WAN resilient than
DoubleTake has dreamed of being.

TVK

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Back Up Best Practices

 

Did you dream that up while polishing Shook's knob?  :P

On Jan 11, 2008 8:38 AM, Tim Vander Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Which brings up what I consider the new world Backup Best Practice which
would be NO tapes. I am of the opinion that true "backups" should be
done to disk, "archives" should be done to tape. For years Bus and
archives have really been one and the same due to technology's inability
to truly differentiate them, but that isn't the case anymore. 
JMO YMMV,
TVK


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Troy Meyer
So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to use 
the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.

When I came back she had an interesting question for me.

My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog site)

She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com


I guess I was caught in the act!

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
You and Shook both!

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Monday Morning Funny

So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to
use the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.

When I came back she had an interesting question for me.

My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog
site)

She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com


I guess I was caught in the act!

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Steve Ens
Yah I like those morning restroom breaks too...very relaxing.

On Jan 14, 2008 11:21 AM, Troy Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to use 
> the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.
>
> When I came back she had an interesting question for me.
>
> My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog site)
>
> She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com
>
>
> I guess I was caught in the act!
>
> -troy
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Tom Strader
I TOLD you to stay away from Shook TVK, he has that influence on people.


-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Monday Morning Funny

You and Shook both!

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Monday Morning Funny

So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to
use the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.

When I came back she had an interesting question for me.

My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog
site)

She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com


I guess I was caught in the act!

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Sam Cayze
There was an article on digg about business using blahblahsexchange.
Lot's of examples, pretty funny.   "Students exchange" was one of
them...

I buy a lot of phone supplies from SmartPhonesexperts.com, and
interestingly enough, our spam filters always flag it :)





-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Monday Morning Funny

I TOLD you to stay away from Shook TVK, he has that influence on people.


-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Monday Morning Funny

You and Shook both!

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Monday Morning Funny

So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to
use the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.

When I came back she had an interesting question for me.

My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog
site)

She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com


I guess I was caught in the act!

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Public folder - Gone but can't forget

2008-01-14 Thread Joe Heaton
I deleted a public folder from ESM.  When I open my Outlook, I still see
a reference to this folder, but can't delete it.  Anyone know how to do
this?  

 

 

E2k3 SP2

Outlook 2k3

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

OT: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems
Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy
such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough
details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
Cached mode or not?

 

How many servers in your topology?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I deleted a public folder from ESM.  When I open my Outlook, I still see a
reference to this folder, but can't delete it.  Anyone know how to do this?


 

 

E2k3 SP2

Outlook 2k3

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

2008-01-14 Thread Joe Heaton
I am running cached mode, yes.  One Exchange server.

 

Joe Heaton



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

Cached mode or not?

 

How many servers in your topology?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I deleted a public folder from ESM.  When I open my Outlook, I still see
a reference to this folder, but can't delete it.  Anyone know how to do
this?  

 

 

E2k3 SP2

Outlook 2k3

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
The best was Experts Exchange...

expertsexchange.com



On Jan 14, 2008 1:07 PM, Sam Cayze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There was an article on digg about business using blahblahsexchange.
> Lot's of examples, pretty funny.   "Students exchange" was one of
> them...
>
> I buy a lot of phone supplies from SmartPhonesexperts.com, and
> interestingly enough, our spam filters always flag it :)
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:51 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Monday Morning Funny
>
> I TOLD you to stay away from Shook TVK, he has that influence on people.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:28 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Monday Morning Funny
>
> You and Shook both!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:22 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Monday Morning Funny
>
> So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to
> use the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.
>
> When I came back she had an interesting question for me.
>
> My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog
> site)
>
> She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com
>
>
> I guess I was caught in the act!
>
> -troy
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>



-- 
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
OK. Do you see it from OWA?

 

I'm guessing you won't. And it'll disappear from cached mode in a day or so,
when that change replicates down to your desktop.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I am running cached mode, yes.  One Exchange server.

 

Joe Heaton

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

Cached mode or not?

 

How many servers in your topology?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I deleted a public folder from ESM.  When I open my Outlook, I still see a
reference to this folder, but can't delete it.  Anyone know how to do this?


 

 

E2k3 SP2

Outlook 2k3

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: No more OOOs? (was TEST POST 2: Please ignore)

2008-01-14 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
RE: Redirecting DSNs (bounces etc)

I've been doing some research, and if Lyris supports it, I think you want to
use the RCPT TO parameter/extention: ORCPT ("original" recipient).

HTH

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: OT: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Steven Peck
On Jan 14, 2008 10:24 AM, Michael B. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.
You are forgiven.  Good karma is a good thing. :)

> 1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems
> Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy
> such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

If it provided value sure.  One way to provide value is to locate in
one spot information I need (me me me or well, someone else in my
shoes).  Right now, performance monitoring is scattered over web sites
and white papers.  Performance considerations for enterprises (SANS,
thousands of users per server) are not always the same for smaller
businesses (hundreds of users).

Important Exchange services to alert on is easily found, but what
event log entries should I monitor for?  What should I just have a
summary email for my morning checks and what should page me and cause
me to pull out ISINTEG/Esutil?

I've been thinking of (in my copious spare time) making a flow chart
from the client to server and back.  Digging up the numbers for the
connection (client to server - server to disk etc) and putting them on
the chart on my wall to point at.  We had an incident that we were
able to narrow down to the SAN.  We would get spikes of 4 seconds (not
ms, seconds) on disk IO.  As you would suspect, that does have a mild
side effect on an Exchange system.  It was many meetings before
management would agree that there was nothing Messaging could do to
mitigate it if SAN performance sucked and management was unwilling to
address mailbox sizes, multi-GB PST on file shares and suggest inbox
message counts be reduced etc.

> 2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and
> articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough
> details about? The more specific the better!
>
This is hard as there are lots of posts in this area.  The biggest
things would probably be performance and the delicate dance between
server and client.  When to set an alert?

How to prove a negative?  Outlook provides that lovely little
notification about client unable to connect to to Exchange, often
times it is something else causing this delay (locking the TCP stack).
 Of course, Exchange is fine. (this time).  How to 'prove' or
demonstrate that it is not Exchange, but is 'something else'.  So that
would cover client to Exchange monitoring.

>
> Regards,
> Michael B. Smith

Random thoughts on this general subject.

On a more generic note.  We've been running NetIQ AppManager for a few
years now and are doing a proof of concept on SCOM starting next week.

Things that we've learned with AppManager.  Collect data, but don't
collect everything.  It will bog your repository down with to much
stuff that you don't use.  If your monitoring tools performance sucks,
you won't use it much, so your team will wander and you will be caught
by surprise when things go wrong.

Planning for long term use of monitoring tools.  Monitoring is a job
and you will need a person who can dedicate some time for it if your
environment is in the mid to large size.  If you don't have the
resources, tools will suffer from neglect.

Find a balance on alerts.  Over alerting turns alerts into noise which
fades into the background and gets ignored.  Followed by disaster and
meetings about why you are ignoring alerts, followed by venting and
hard feelings of team mates and managers.

When first starting out with a monitoring solution, start with a
realistic plan and time frame.  Do NOT plan on implementing everything
in a short period of time.  Start with a base, solve the issues
discovered, move to the next phase.  If you have more then 20 servers,
plan 6-12 months.  Issues found may be simple, but planning, change
notifications, downtime, etc must be worked around normal business
needs so it ends up taking more time then individual issues would lead
one to think.

How does monitoring fit in with Microsoft Best Practices?  How many
people at smaller/medium shops even know how/where to find these best
practices in their copious spare time?

Well, back to work.  Hope to get some hands on with SCOM this month.
I plan on taking notes during the POC so if you want ping me in a week
or two off list.

Apologies for the ramble.
Steven Peck
http://www.blkmtn.org

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

2008-01-14 Thread Joe Heaton
Would it have been a smoother process if I had deleted the calendar from
within Outlook, or would it have been the same?

 

Joe Heaton



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

OK. Do you see it from OWA?

 

I'm guessing you won't. And it'll disappear from cached mode in a day or
so, when that change replicates down to your desktop.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I am running cached mode, yes.  One Exchange server.

 

Joe Heaton



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

Cached mode or not?

 

How many servers in your topology?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I deleted a public folder from ESM.  When I open my Outlook, I still see
a reference to this folder, but can't delete it.  Anyone know how to do
this?  

 

 

E2k3 SP2

Outlook 2k3

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Troy Meyer
MBS,

First off, I am not a big fan of 'combined' style books unless the products are 
obviously intertwined (something which SCCOM and EXCH are not in my opinion) so 
I would have a hard time buying a book that by title is only 50% related to my 
environment.Combos like Exch ADSI or Exch PoSH or even Exch Outlook are 
much smaller in scope but to me would seem like better 'combined' topics.

Rant aside, I like what this list provides.  Information on a multitude of 
installations and management styles and a ton of good information on scripting 
and automation.  I especially appreciate folks that link into their own (or 
others') blogs so I can read more info on the topic if I would like.

One thing I wish we saw more is  information on  performance tuning and 
maintenance .  So much of the time our discussions are reactionary on issues 
and problems and it would be nice to have folks post about cool stuff they are 
doing to AVOID breakage.  I know performance tuning and setup info is available 
in other lists, and in whitepapers and all that, but I think topics and input 
from lots of people concerning everyday setup and tuning would be good info.

Perhaps we all run a very out of the box setup and there isn't much tuning to 
talk about. (except for OOF suppression which we all talk about, but few it 
seems implement.)

-troy

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?


OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems 
Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy such 
a thing? What would you want to be in it?

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and 
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough details 
about? The more specific the better!

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

2008-01-14 Thread Joe Heaton
Changed my Outlook out of cached mode.  Under my Calendar tab, I still
see the old public calendar entry, but when I select it, nothing
happens.  It does not, however, react to a right-click, in order to try
to delete it.

 

Joe Heaton



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I am running cached mode, yes.  One Exchange server.

 

Joe Heaton



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

Cached mode or not?

 

How many servers in your topology?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I deleted a public folder from ESM.  When I open my Outlook, I still see
a reference to this folder, but can't delete it.  Anyone know how to do
this?  

 

 

E2k3 SP2

Outlook 2k3

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
It would've been different for YOU - but the same for all the other users in
cached mode.

 

A delay in synchronization is one of the tradeoffs associated with using
cached mode.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

Would it have been a smoother process if I had deleted the calendar from
within Outlook, or would it have been the same?

 

Joe Heaton

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

OK. Do you see it from OWA?

 

I'm guessing you won't. And it'll disappear from cached mode in a day or so,
when that change replicates down to your desktop.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I am running cached mode, yes.  One Exchange server.

 

Joe Heaton

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

Cached mode or not?

 

How many servers in your topology?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder - Gone but can't forget

 

 

I deleted a public folder from ESM.  When I open my Outlook, I still see a
reference to this folder, but can't delete it.  Anyone know how to do this?


 

 

E2k3 SP2

Outlook 2k3

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Campbell, Rob
As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library
that was available for 2003.

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 


**
 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Steve Hart
I would LOVE a complete installation guide.
 
There are so many variables in the installation procedure and very
little online documentation. A perfect book would talk about ALL of the
prereqs, including the common stuff (you need 64 bit server) to the less
common stuff (if you have trusted domains with Exchange, they need a
2003 DC). It would cover all of the setup.com switches and what each one
does in detail, then the install procedure, what the roles are and what
a particular install will need. It would cover entering the key, setting
up certs, OWA, OMA, OAB, all of the little detailed steps. Then, it
would cover properly decomissioning Exchange 2000 and 2003 servers.
 
After a couple weeks of learning and quite a bit of struggling, I
finally ran out of time and called in a consultant for our first E2007
install. His documentation is a document that they circulate internally,
because they haven't found any complete sources either.
 
Steve
 
 

  _  

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?





As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library
that was available for 2003.

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**



 



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Amen brother.  A guide with clear, concise, step-by-step instructions I
think would be welcome by most administrators.  I have no less than 4
books on Exchange 2003 that I reference frequently because no one book
covers everything effectively.  This, and having to administrate 4
operating systems, voicemail, and phones (not to mention, "other duties
as assigned") doesn't leave a great deal of time for sifting through
mountains of obscure documentation.
 
Sorry - rant off...



From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?




I would LOVE a complete installation guide.
 
There are so many variables in the installation procedure and very
little online documentation. A perfect book would talk about ALL of the
prereqs, including the common stuff (you need 64 bit server) to the less
common stuff (if you have trusted domains with Exchange, they need a
2003 DC). It would cover all of the setup.com switches and what each one
does in detail, then the install procedure, what the roles are and what
a particular install will need. It would cover entering the key, setting
up certs, OWA, OMA, OAB, all of the little detailed steps. Then, it
would cover properly decomissioning Exchange 2000 and 2003 servers.
 
After a couple weeks of learning and quite a bit of struggling, I
finally ran out of time and called in a consultant for our first E2007
install. His documentation is a document that they circulate internally,
because they haven't found any complete sources either.
 
Steve
 
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?





As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library
that was available for 2003.

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**



 



 



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Stephan Barr
Well the good news is your wife has sex on her mind.  Or sex change.

Cheers.

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Monday Morning Funny

So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to
use the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.

When I came back she had an interesting question for me.

My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog
site)

She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com


I guess I was caught in the act!

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Monday Morning Funny

2008-01-14 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Indeed.  This is all conversation that could be manipulated to your benefit.

On Jan 14, 2008 3:08 PM, Stephan Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well the good news is your wife has sex on her mind.  Or sex change.
>
> Cheers.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:22 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Monday Morning Funny
>
> So this weekend I was working on my laptop and when I had set it down to
> use the restroom my wife came over and fired up internet explorer.
>
> When I came back she had an interesting question for me.
>
> My home page is www.msexchangeteam.com (the Microsoft Exchange Team blog
> site)
>
> She asked me why I was looking at m sex change team.com
>
>
> I guess I was caught in the act!
>
> -troy
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>



-- 
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
Are you referring specifically to the "Exchange Server 2003 Technical
Reference Guide" document, or the entire Exchange 2003 Library?

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library that
was available for 2003.

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems
Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy
such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough
details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Campbell, Rob
Documentation similar to the E2K3 Deployment Guide, Administration
Guide, Transport and Routing Guide, etc. - available for download.

 

 

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

Are you referring specifically to the "Exchange Server 2003 Technical
Reference Guide" document, or the entire Exchange 2003 Library?

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library
that was available for 2003.

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 

 


**
 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
Asking for clarification: What size environment?

 

I presented a plan for something like that to two different publishers,
including sections on "small", "medium" and "large" environments; but it was
shot down. The feeling from the publishers was that small businesses
wouldn't want to spend the money on a book that covered so much material
that didn't apply to them. And vice versa - big companies would consider the
space spent on small companies a waste.

 

(And yes, when I do a design and install I work from my own set of notes and
URLs. There are some good books out there, but none cover "it all".)

 

From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

I would LOVE a complete installation guide.

 

There are so many variables in the installation procedure and very little
online documentation. A perfect book would talk about ALL of the prereqs,
including the common stuff (you need 64 bit server) to the less common stuff
(if you have trusted domains with Exchange, they need a 2003 DC). It would
cover all of the setup.com switches and what each one does in detail, then
the install procedure, what the roles are and what a particular install will
need. It would cover entering the key, setting up certs, OWA, OMA, OAB, all
of the little detailed steps. Then, it would cover properly decomissioning
Exchange 2000 and 2003 servers.

 

After a couple weeks of learning and quite a bit of struggling, I finally
ran out of time and called in a consultant for our first E2007 install. His
documentation is a document that they circulate internally, because they
haven't found any complete sources either.

 

Steve

 

 

 

  _  

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library that
was available for 2003.

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems
Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy
such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough
details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Maglinger, Paul
<1000 mailboxes with potential to double in next five years here.



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?





Asking for clarification: What size environment?

 

I presented a plan for something like that to two different publishers,
including sections on "small", "medium" and "large" environments; but it
was shot down. The feeling from the publishers was that small businesses
wouldn't want to spend the money on a book that covered so much material
that didn't apply to them. And vice versa - big companies would consider
the space spent on small companies a waste.

 

(And yes, when I do a design and install I work from my own set of notes
and URLs. There are some good books out there, but none cover "it all".)

 

From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

I would LOVE a complete installation guide.

 

There are so many variables in the installation procedure and very
little online documentation. A perfect book would talk about ALL of the
prereqs, including the common stuff (you need 64 bit server) to the less
common stuff (if you have trusted domains with Exchange, they need a
2003 DC). It would cover all of the setup.com switches and what each one
does in detail, then the install procedure, what the roles are and what
a particular install will need. It would cover entering the key, setting
up certs, OWA, OMA, OAB, all of the little detailed steps. Then, it
would cover properly decomissioning Exchange 2000 and 2003 servers.

 

After a couple weeks of learning and quite a bit of struggling, I
finally ran out of time and called in a consultant for our first E2007
install. His documentation is a document that they circulate internally,
because they haven't found any complete sources either.

 

Steve

 

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library
that was available for 2003.

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 


 



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Jason Gurtz
> First off, I am not a big fan of ‘combined’ style books unless the
> products are obviously intertwined (something which SCCOM and EXCH are
> not in my opinion)

I wholeheartedly agree.  It would be much better to see a title like
"Exchange: Best Practices for Operations and Monitoring."  Operations =
Common and esoteric business needs.  Monitoring = finding and solving
problems, and increasing performance and availability.  Possibly (due to
size) this would be two volumes, one for operations, one for monitoring.
If it's easily found in the documentation it probably doesn't belong.
This should focus on clarifying best practice and solving business need.

This book would cover Exchange in the current 2007 SP1 version and also
outline and note differences back to possibly 5.5 (still widely in use
thankfully not here :).  The best practices part would pertain to real
world operations in small, medium, and large (and possibly ISP if anyone's
that crazy) size organizations.

These best practices would include programs like SCCOM and other competing
products of that nature, homegrown programs in C#/VB.Net that utilize
various related messaging APIs, and scripts (in cmd, power shell, vbs,
Perl, iron Python, SysInternals tools, etc...) that utilize APIs or
interact with the filesystem.

I would fully expect that Spam/Malware fighting methods and proper
architecture represent a third of the content.  This would include
extensive discussion on DNS related items, not only in relation to
blocking the bad stuff, but also with a strong focus on site reputation
and deliverability.   Obviously, there would be talk of the edge transport
role in EX2k7, but a serious book would also talk extensively about third
party solutions (both commercial and open source).  Fully vetting in black
and white the SMTP bugs in the various versions of the Exchange SMTP
engine (incoming and outgoing) should be done including discussion of the
many hotfixes that deal with them!

Off the top of my head other topics should be (in no particular order):

-Relevant RFCs mentioned
-Mailbox management/provisioning
-MUA issues (cover not only lookout but also 3rd party clients that use
POP/IMAP)
-Remote traveling users and relaying.
-Effectively dealing with large attachments
-Aliases (distribution groups)
-General messaging security
-Archiving and compliance (HIPPA, etc...)
-performance on foo hardware (fully vet how much Ex loads disk writes vs.
reads, memory footprint, CPU loading etc... all per mailbox).
-reporting (in all its various guises)

Use one of the many O'Reilly animal series books (for example
Sendmail/Sendmail cookbook) as a guide.  I realize this future tome is
probably as much an MS marketing effort to sell SCCOM as much as it is
help for admins but hopefully that waste of paper won't happen.

Good luck,

~JasonG

-- 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Velkly, Eric
Please place my pre-order for this book!



-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

> First off, I am not a big fan of ‘combined’ style books unless the
> products are obviously intertwined (something which SCCOM and EXCH are
> not in my opinion)

I wholeheartedly agree.  It would be much better to see a title like
"Exchange: Best Practices for Operations and Monitoring."  Operations =
Common and esoteric business needs.  Monitoring = finding and solving
problems, and increasing performance and availability.  Possibly (due to
size) this would be two volumes, one for operations, one for monitoring.
If it's easily found in the documentation it probably doesn't belong.
This should focus on clarifying best practice and solving business need.

This book would cover Exchange in the current 2007 SP1 version and also
outline and note differences back to possibly 5.5 (still widely in use
thankfully not here :).  The best practices part would pertain to real
world operations in small, medium, and large (and possibly ISP if anyone's
that crazy) size organizations.

These best practices would include programs like SCCOM and other competing
products of that nature, homegrown programs in C#/VB.Net that utilize
various related messaging APIs, and scripts (in cmd, power shell, vbs,
Perl, iron Python, SysInternals tools, etc...) that utilize APIs or
interact with the filesystem.

I would fully expect that Spam/Malware fighting methods and proper
architecture represent a third of the content.  This would include
extensive discussion on DNS related items, not only in relation to
blocking the bad stuff, but also with a strong focus on site reputation
and deliverability.   Obviously, there would be talk of the edge transport
role in EX2k7, but a serious book would also talk extensively about third
party solutions (both commercial and open source).  Fully vetting in black
and white the SMTP bugs in the various versions of the Exchange SMTP
engine (incoming and outgoing) should be done including discussion of the
many hotfixes that deal with them!

Off the top of my head other topics should be (in no particular order):

-Relevant RFCs mentioned
-Mailbox management/provisioning
-MUA issues (cover not only lookout but also 3rd party clients that use
POP/IMAP)
-Remote traveling users and relaying.
-Effectively dealing with large attachments
-Aliases (distribution groups)
-General messaging security
-Archiving and compliance (HIPPA, etc...)
-performance on foo hardware (fully vet how much Ex loads disk writes vs.
reads, memory footprint, CPU loading etc... all per mailbox).
-reporting (in all its various guises)

Use one of the many O'Reilly animal series books (for example
Sendmail/Sendmail cookbook) as a guide.  I realize this future tome is
probably as much an MS marketing effort to sell SCCOM as much as it is
help for admins but hopefully that waste of paper won't happen.

Good luck,

~JasonG

--

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
Well, I think the "available for download" is the kicker. There is a huge
amount of documentation available for Exchange 2007, but 95% of it is WRO
(Web Release Only).

 

Personally, jumping from webpage to webpage gives me a headache.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

The January Technet is supposed to include "Exchange Server 2007 Technical
Documentation". I haven't received mine yet or had a chance to check the
website.

 

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

Documentation similar to the E2K3 Deployment Guide, Administration Guide,
Transport and Routing Guide, etc. - available for download.

 

 

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

Are you referring specifically to the "Exchange Server 2003 Technical
Reference Guide" document, or the entire Exchange 2003 Library?

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library that
was available for 2003.

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems
Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy
such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough
details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Scot Parsons
The January Technet is supposed to include "Exchange Server 2007 Technical 
Documentation". I haven't received mine yet or had a chance to check the 
website.


From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?


Documentation similar to the E2K3 Deployment Guide, Administration Guide, 
Transport and Routing Guide, etc. - available for download.




From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?


Are you referring specifically to the "Exchange Server 2003 Technical Reference 
Guide" document, or the entire Exchange 2003 Library?

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?


As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any references 
available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library that was available 
for 2003.


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?


OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM (Systems 
Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written. Would you buy such 
a thing? What would you want to be in it?

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and 
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough details 
about? The more specific the better!

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com





**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**








**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Jason Gurtz
> I presented a plan for something like that to two different
> publishers, including sections on “small”, “medium” and “large”
> environments; but it was shot down.

Typical moron PHBs  :)  Maybe they are looking for a SBS/Ex/SCE book?

Your market is individual system administrators and trainers, NOT a
business or its management!  What are they even thinking; a small business
usually can't even afford a full time sysadmin let alone a training
budget!?

I would say a better approach is by topic but with relevant notes that
cover the various size installations.  For example, at a small
installation (w/no full time sysadmin) it's probably best to have all the
external mail go through a managed service such as postini.  Obviously
this becomes prohibitively expensive and inflexible at larger sites.
Sizes at perhaps this many users: <20 w/no admin, 50-500/1000 w/full time
staff wearing many hats, >500/1000 w/dedicated messaging personnel.

Time to find a different publisher?

~JasonG

-- 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Steve Hart
Our environment is small, but pretty complex for its size. We have about
100 Exchange users in three facilities, each with its own domain and
Exchange 2000 server. (We're a graphics house saddled with large
customer attachments and slow internet connections)
 
I suppose I'm not really qualified to be a publisher, but that logic
seems backward to me. Small businesses might have simpler environments,
but we've also got a lot less staff, for example, my staff is me. I
think small businesses need more resources, since they're unlikely to
have an expert available. We buy a lot of books and find it's a lot
cheaper (albeit spottier) than classes or long-term support contracts.
Plus a high quality book is worth its weight in gold when it's 3AM on
Friday and the class was 2 years ago. Then again, it seems like every IT
book is $60, whether it has 100 pages or 1000.
 
Steve
 
 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?





Asking for clarification: What size environment?

 

I presented a plan for something like that to two different publishers,
including sections on "small", "medium" and "large" environments; but it
was shot down. The feeling from the publishers was that small businesses
wouldn't want to spend the money on a book that covered so much material
that didn't apply to them. And vice versa - big companies would consider
the space spent on small companies a waste.

 

(And yes, when I do a design and install I work from my own set of notes
and URLs. There are some good books out there, but none cover "it all".)

 

From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

I would LOVE a complete installation guide.

 

There are so many variables in the installation procedure and very
little online documentation. A perfect book would talk about ALL of the
prereqs, including the common stuff (you need 64 bit server) to the less
common stuff (if you have trusted domains with Exchange, they need a
2003 DC). It would cover all of the setup.com switches and what each one
does in detail, then the install procedure, what the roles are and what
a particular install will need. It would cover entering the key, setting
up certs, OWA, OMA, OAB, all of the little detailed steps. Then, it
would cover properly decomissioning Exchange 2000 and 2003 servers.

 

After a couple weeks of learning and quite a bit of struggling, I
finally ran out of time and called in a consultant for our first E2007
install. His documentation is a document that they circulate internally,
because they haven't found any complete sources either.

 

Steve

 

 

 

  _  

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library
that was available for 2003.

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 


 



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2003 Max .OST file size

2008-01-14 Thread Michael B. Smith
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/12/17/447750.aspx

It really isn't any different than Outlook 2007. Exchange got most of the
performance improvements in 2007, not Outlook.

But to answer your question specifically, it's 2 GB for both Outlook 2003
and Outlook 2007, with both Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2003 Max .OST file size

Does anybody know the max .OST file recommended size for Outlook 2003 with
Exchange 2007?

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Campbell, Rob
It does me, to.  Maybe I'm just "old school", but I'd much rather have
something I can download and put to hardcopy.

 

The web interface is OK if you've got a specific problem, or are looking
for a specific piece of information, but really sucks as a way to
acquire general knowledge about the product.

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

Well, I think the "available for download" is the kicker. There is a
huge amount of documentation available for Exchange 2007, but 95% of it
is WRO (Web Release Only).

 

Personally, jumping from webpage to webpage gives me a headache.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

The January Technet is supposed to include "Exchange Server 2007
Technical Documentation". I haven't received mine yet or had a chance to
check the website.

 

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

Documentation similar to the E2K3 Deployment Guide, Administration
Guide, Transport and Routing Guide, etc. - available for download.

 

 

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

Are you referring specifically to the "Exchange Server 2003 Technical
Reference Guide" document, or the entire Exchange 2003 Library?

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library
that was available for 2003.

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?

 

 

OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


**
 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immed

RE: Outlook 2003 Max .OST file size

2008-01-14 Thread Sam Cayze
Really.  Dang.  I thought it was more.

I don't think we have even 1 user under 2GB.   Even the people that have
been here for under 6 months.   We don't have any problems FYI.   We
just try to keep the inboxes under 3000 items...  (I think MS says keep
it under 5000 items).

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Max .OST file size

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/12/17/447750.aspx

It really isn't any different than Outlook 2007. Exchange got most of
the performance improvements in 2007, not Outlook.

But to answer your question specifically, it's 2 GB for both Outlook
2003 and Outlook 2007, with both Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2003 Max .OST file size

Does anybody know the max .OST file recommended size for Outlook 2003
with Exchange 2007?

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Outlook 2003 Max .OST file size

2008-01-14 Thread McCready, Robert
Does anybody know the max .OST file recommended size for Outlook 2003 with 
Exchange 2007?

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Naming convention suggestions

2008-01-14 Thread Campbell, Rob
I tried to do that once.  Then along came management and decided to P2V
some of them, and the naming convention became less than useless - it
became outright misleading.

 



From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 6:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Naming convention suggestions

 

 

Does anyone have any naming convention suggestions for me?  I'm working
on a deployment for Exchange 2007 SP1 with 2 node CCR clusters, edge
transport, hub transport, and CAS servers.  My naming constraint is 4
letters followed by 3 numbers.

 

For instance, for the mailbox nodes, I was thinking of something like:

 

Virtual

Physical

EXVS011

EXPN011

 

EXPN012

EXVS021

EXPN021

 

EXPN022

 

VS is Virtual Server and PN is Physical Node. 11 stands for cluster 1
node 1, and 22 stands for cluster 2 node 2.

 

I don't want to make the names too confusing.  I was wondering how other
people named their larger installations and if they had any suggestions
for me.

 

 

 

 


**
 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Naming convention suggestions

2008-01-14 Thread Matt Lathrum
Does anyone have any naming convention suggestions for me?  I'm working
on a deployment for Exchange 2007 SP1 with 2 node CCR clusters, edge
transport, hub transport, and CAS servers.  My naming constraint is 4
letters followed by 3 numbers.

 

For instance, for the mailbox nodes, I was thinking of something like:

 

Virtual

Physical

EXVS011

EXPN011

 

EXPN012

EXVS021

EXPN021

 

EXPN022

 

VS is Virtual Server and PN is Physical Node. 11 stands for cluster 1
node 1, and 22 stands for cluster 2 node 2.

 

I don't want to make the names too confusing.  I was wondering how other
people named their larger installations and if they had any suggestions
for me.

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

80040119-501-80040119-560

2008-01-14 Thread Groups
Google give me nothing much on this.

I get nothing server side.

I have deleted the OST locally and let it re-download everything.

Anyone have any ideas?

I'm getting 80040119-501-80040119-560 in the local sync log every minute.

 

 
Dave

===
Beach Computers
Affordable Hosting Solutions
http://www.beachcomp.com
===
Cheap Domain Warehouse
Get Your Own Dot!
http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com
 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Naming convention suggestions

2008-01-14 Thread Andy David
Why not something simple like:

Ex011  for the Cluster
Ex011A and B for the physical nodes...etc...

And dont forget the Windows Cluster Name.

Since users and apps connect to the mailbox cluster name and that's what you 
see in EMC, I dont see the point of giving the cluster name anything like 
"virtual" or "Cluster".




From: Matt Lathrum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 7:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Naming convention suggestions



Does anyone have any naming convention suggestions for me?  I’m working on a 
deployment for Exchange 2007 SP1 with 2 node CCR clusters, edge transport, hub 
transport, and CAS servers.  My naming constraint is 4 letters followed by 3 
numbers.

For instance, for the mailbox nodes, I was thinking of something like:

Virtual

Physical

EXVS011

EXPN011



EXPN012

EXVS021

EXPN021



EXPN022


VS is Virtual Server and PN is Physical Node. 11 stands for cluster 1 node 1, 
and 22 stands for cluster 2 node 2.

I don’t want to make the names too confusing.  I was wondering how other people 
named their larger installations and if they had any suggestions for me.






~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: What would YOU want to know?

2008-01-14 Thread Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
Good morning Michael:

As one of your other respondents noted, Exchange 2007 is such a
big animal, I don't think you could combine it with anything else (other
than all the bits and pieces of Exchange 2007) and do either subject
justice.

Beyond that, I would like to see a section on performance
counters, and not just a rehash of what is published with regards to
server counters. I want to see real world setups and the resultant
traces. The only thing Microsoft publishes is OS based RAID arrays and
that's not what goes on in the real world.

Along with perf-counters, I would also like to see a section on
the process internals of the product; i.e. play mister message and go
from the input SMTP process all the way through the server and out to
another server, and out to a local delivery mailbox.

Thanks.


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8000
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium - 717.633.3823

"A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group
in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among
you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the
Stars and Stripes."  Woodrow Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?



OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.

 

1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007 and SCOM
(Systems Center Operations Manager) together was going to be written.
Would you buy such a thing? What would you want to be in it?

 

2] What type of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs
and articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get
enough details about? The more specific the better! 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com


 



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~