RE: Supporting Linux Clients
Now we just use Xen. From: Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Supporting Linux Clients For your *nix geeks, if they really don't want to use Windows for their desk top, there was an OS replacement for NT that was really an X-windows server (or client however you view that sort of mess) that made a Windows based desktop available for *nix boxes. You can control that type of environment all you want. I had it up in a test phase for our circuit provisioners that used Sun boxes and barely had room for their 3000 dollar Gateway boxes (this was back in the early 90's). We had Word, Outlook (for Exchange 4.0) and a couple of other office apps running on the X-windows server desktop. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 John, I am interested in looking at this, can you provide some details, like a url? Thanks! jlc ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Supporting Linux Clients
Like I said, I tested it back in the 90's. I'm not sure it exists anymore. William said he uses Xen. Whip up some google foo and it might lead you there. :-) My tin can and a kite string communications out here are rather limited today. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and Stripes. Woodrow Wilson -Original Message- From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting Linux Clients For your *nix geeks, if they really don't want to use Windows for their desk top, there was an OS replacement for NT that was really an X-windows server (or client however you view that sort of mess) that made a Windows based desktop available for *nix boxes. You can control that type of environment all you want. I had it up in a test phase for our circuit provisioners that used Sun boxes and barely had room for their 3000 dollar Gateway boxes (this was back in the early 90's). We had Word, Outlook (for Exchange 4.0) and a couple of other office apps running on the X-windows server desktop. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 John, I am interested in looking at this, can you provide some details, like a url? Thanks! jlc ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Supporting Linux Clients
Sneaker-NET down John? -Original Message- From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting Linux Clients Like I said, I tested it back in the 90's. I'm not sure it exists anymore. William said he uses Xen. Whip up some google foo and it might lead you there. :-) My tin can and a kite string communications out here are rather limited today. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and Stripes. Woodrow Wilson -Original Message- From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Supporting Linux Clients For your *nix geeks, if they really don't want to use Windows for their desk top, there was an OS replacement for NT that was really an X-windows server (or client however you view that sort of mess) that made a Windows based desktop available for *nix boxes. You can control that type of environment all you want. I had it up in a test phase for our circuit provisioners that used Sun boxes and barely had room for their 3000 dollar Gateway boxes (this was back in the early 90's). We had Word, Outlook (for Exchange 4.0) and a couple of other office apps running on the X-windows server desktop. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 John, I am interested in looking at this, can you provide some details, like a url? Thanks! jlc ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2994 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2994 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OT: humor... April 1 RFC
Anyone seen this yet? http://www3.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaplan-sip-four-oh-00 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Supporting Linux Clients
Well, as an alternative, we will be providing a TS machine in the production area, and they can use rdesktop in their favorite unix flavor to connect to that. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For your *nix geeks, if they really don't want to use Windows for their desk top, there was an OS replacement for NT that was really an X-windows server (or client however you view that sort of mess) that made a Windows based desktop available for *nix boxes. You can control that type of environment all you want. I had it up in a test phase for our circuit provisioners that used Sun boxes and barely had room for their 3000 dollar Gateway boxes (this was back in the early 90's). We had Word, Outlook (for Exchange 4.0) and a couple of other office apps running on the X-windows server desktop. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and Stripes. Woodrow Wilson -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting Linux Clients Heh. Definitely not there yet. But I expect to have made great progress by this time next year. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good luck - I personally think you are going the right direction - we're still trying to get there. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting Linux Clients On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMAP is out of the question, so I am stuck! IMAP is really the way to go for this kind of thing. IMAP is the Internet standard for server-based mailbox access, same way that SMTPis the Internet standard for mail transport. Any chance you can getthat restriction re-thought? -- Ben While I agree that IMAP is a good standard, I come at it from a different POV: Using IMAP denies individual use of certain features that might be important to the enterprise. Certainly calendaring, voting buttons, and some other goodies aren't going to be supported. Joseph didn't state the customer culture or use case for his environment, so I can't comment on that, but in my $job, we have a few (literally - no more than 3) engineers who have been absolutely adamant about using Linux to access our Exchange installation. Sucks to be them - they get the web interface. In point of fact, I'm still working towards a corporate environment where the standard tasks (email/word processing/spreadsheets/etc.) will be done on Windows machines, in a tightly controlled desktop environment where users are local users, not local administrators. It's a long row to hoe, but I'm starting to make headway. The flip side of that, though, is that the engineers will have two machines, one on the corporate domain, the other in a test/dev network that won't talk (except in tightly controlled ways) to the corporate network. They'll have their own lab manager for the things they do, though I'll probably still be on tap for whatever help is needed. Bottom line - no IMAP for you! Different POV and business requirements is all. Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Issues with users using an additional mailbox
Hi, Been a crazy weekend/week for me. Ever have a great idea that you KNOW will make everyone happy, and then you end up practically being burned in effigy? I created a new mailbox to replace a distribution group. The DL was getting about 300 emails a day, and so all of our CS people were getting their own copy of the email, filing it in their own folders, etc... It wasn't fun. So, Ev The Superhero steps in and decides it would be a good thing to create a mailbox with the address of the DL (and change the address of the DL to something that wouldn't be used.) So that's what I did. I created a mailbox, gave everyone permission to the mailbox, went around to their computers Monday morning and opened the mailbox within Outlook. I even created search folders so that different customers' emails would be automatically filed in the appropriate company folder. I didn't do this with a public folder, because 1) I couldn't find a way to create search folders within a public folder, and 2) I know public folders have been removed from E2K7, should I ever go in that direction from my current E2K3. I even found a utility that auto-fills the From field with the name of the account, so they don't have to type it when they make a new email or reply to one. So I'm great, right? No, I'm on the verge of having my tires slashed, re-inflated, and slashed yet again. The first complaint was that they don't get pop-up notifications when an email shows up in an inbox that is not their own. I'm onto a couple of third party utility things that may help this. But the really big issue is that there is no per-user read or unread information on this mailbox. People are used to their unread mail being in bold. Now, whenever someone, somewhere opens a piece of mail, it looks like it's been read to everyone, and people are losing track of what they have read and what they haven't. Any suggestions on this last item? Do I deserve to have my tires slashed, or is my heart in the right place? Okay, forget the heart... is my BRAIN in the right place? I'm not trying to push this down anyone's throat... I'm looking for something that would HELP :) Thanks, Evan ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Issues with users using an additional mailbox
No good deed goes unpunished. So, first off, did they have a problem with the way things used to be? If not, then why change it? People don't like change. Especially when they don't ask for it. Second, can't you just go back to the old way of doing things? Doesn't seem like it would take much work to give the addy back to the DL and be done with it? From: Evan Brastow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 8:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Issues with users using an additional mailbox Hi, Been a crazy weekend/week for me. Ever have a great idea that you KNOW will make everyone happy, and then you end up practically being burned in effigy? I created a new mailbox to replace a distribution group. The DL was getting about 300 emails a day, and so all of our CS people were getting their own copy of the email, filing it in their own folders, etc... It wasn't fun. So, Ev The Superhero steps in and decides it would be a good thing to create a mailbox with the address of the DL (and change the address of the DL to something that wouldn't be used.) So that's what I did. I created a mailbox, gave everyone permission to the mailbox, went around to their computers Monday morning and opened the mailbox within Outlook. I even created search folders so that different customers' emails would be automatically filed in the appropriate company folder. I didn't do this with a public folder, because 1) I couldn't find a way to create search folders within a public folder, and 2) I know public folders have been removed from E2K7, should I ever go in that direction from my current E2K3. I even found a utility that auto-fills the From field with the name of the account, so they don't have to type it when they make a new email or reply to one. So I'm great, right? No, I'm on the verge of having my tires slashed, re-inflated, and slashed yet again. The first complaint was that they don't get pop-up notifications when an email shows up in an inbox that is not their own. I'm onto a couple of third party utility things that may help this. But the really big issue is that there is no per-user read or unread information on this mailbox. People are used to their unread mail being in bold. Now, whenever someone, somewhere opens a piece of mail, it looks like it's been read to everyone, and people are losing track of what they have read and what they haven't. Any suggestions on this last item? Do I deserve to have my tires slashed, or is my heart in the right place? Okay, forget the heart... is my BRAIN in the right place? I'm not trying to push this down anyone's throat... I'm looking for something that would HELP :) Thanks, Evan ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Issues with users using an additional mailbox
I would've used public folders. They didn't go away in Exchange 2007 and they'll still be there in E14. That being said, I agree with Martin: put it back! Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Evan Brastow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Issues with users using an additional mailbox Hi, Been a crazy weekend/week for me. Ever have a great idea that you KNOW will make everyone happy, and then you end up practically being burned in effigy? I created a new mailbox to replace a distribution group. The DL was getting about 300 emails a day, and so all of our CS people were getting their own copy of the email, filing it in their own folders, etc... It wasn't fun. So, Ev The Superhero steps in and decides it would be a good thing to create a mailbox with the address of the DL (and change the address of the DL to something that wouldn't be used.) So that's what I did. I created a mailbox, gave everyone permission to the mailbox, went around to their computers Monday morning and opened the mailbox within Outlook. I even created search folders so that different customers' emails would be automatically filed in the appropriate company folder. I didn't do this with a public folder, because 1) I couldn't find a way to create search folders within a public folder, and 2) I know public folders have been removed from E2K7, should I ever go in that direction from my current E2K3. I even found a utility that auto-fills the From field with the name of the account, so they don't have to type it when they make a new email or reply to one. So I'm great, right? No, I'm on the verge of having my tires slashed, re-inflated, and slashed yet again. The first complaint was that they don't get pop-up notifications when an email shows up in an inbox that is not their own. I'm onto a couple of third party utility things that may help this. But the really big issue is that there is no per-user read or unread information on this mailbox. People are used to their unread mail being in bold. Now, whenever someone, somewhere opens a piece of mail, it looks like it's been read to everyone, and people are losing track of what they have read and what they haven't. Any suggestions on this last item? Do I deserve to have my tires slashed, or is my heart in the right place? Okay, forget the heart... is my BRAIN in the right place? I'm not trying to push this down anyone's throat... I'm looking for something that would HELP :) Thanks, Evan ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Supporting Linux Clients
That's what I am doing now, Xen is an option but not w/o consequence. The host has to be booted into a Xen kernel, extra mgmt overhead. I suppose Rdesktop will have to be it. I heard OpenNX can virtualize just an application and I hear there's an edition for windows. Don't know if its true, but I will have a looky! Thanks! jlc From: Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting Linux Clients Well, as an alternative, we will be providing a TS machine in the production area, and they can use rdesktop in their favorite unix flavor to connect to that. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For your *nix geeks, if they really don't want to use Windows for their desk top, there was an OS replacement for NT that was really an X-windows server (or client however you view that sort of mess) that made a Windows based desktop available for *nix boxes. You can control that type of environment all you want. I had it up in a test phase for our circuit provisioners that used Sun boxes and barely had room for their 3000 dollar Gateway boxes (this was back in the early 90's). We had Word, Outlook (for Exchange 4.0) and a couple of other office apps running on the X-windows server desktop. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and Stripes. Woodrow Wilson -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting Linux Clients Heh. Definitely not there yet. But I expect to have made great progress by this time next year. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good luck - I personally think you are going the right direction - we're still trying to get there. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Supporting Linux Clients On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMAP is out of the question, so I am stuck! IMAP is really the way to go for this kind of thing. IMAP is the Internet standard for server-based mailbox access, same way that SMTPis the Internet standard for mail transport. Any chance you can getthat restriction re-thought? -- Ben While I agree that IMAP is a good standard, I come at it from a different POV: Using IMAP denies individual use of certain features that might be important to the enterprise. Certainly calendaring, voting buttons, and some other goodies aren't going to be supported. Joseph didn't state the customer culture or use case for his environment, so I can't comment on that, but in my $job, we have a few (literally - no more than 3) engineers who have been absolutely adamant about using Linux to access our Exchange installation. Sucks to be them - they get the web interface. In point of fact, I'm still working towards a corporate environment where the standard tasks (email/word processing/spreadsheets/etc.) will be done on Windows machines, in a tightly controlled desktop environment where users are local users, not local administrators. It's a long row to hoe, but I'm starting to make headway. The flip side of that, though, is that the engineers will have two machines, one on the corporate domain, the other in a test/dev network that won't talk (except in tightly controlled ways) to the corporate network. They'll have their own lab manager for the things they do, though I'll probably still be on tap for whatever help is needed. Bottom line - no IMAP for you! Different POV and business requirements is all. Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~
Cluster setup
Hi Guys i was just in the proccess to start to setup my cluster and came to halt. I currently have one mail server which is Windows 03 Standard Server Edition with Exchange 03 Standard Edition. According to the cluster documenations i need to have Windows 03 Enterprise or Datacenter edition and Exchange 03 advanced edition. My window of downtime for mail environment is 30 minutes to 1 hour. I am consdering duplicating the new server with the exsisting server and disconnect the current mail server so it could be updated. I am just wondering what potentials issues that i can run into with the new live server. Our current mail server commuicates to our blackberry server and our spam filtering folder. Dr Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com/ [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Issues with users using an additional mailbox
Everything you've listed are the typical issues that happen with a resource mailbox. If the users know that's what they will have to deal with then they should be ok. Otherwise, as has already been stated, put it back the way it was. On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would've used public folders. They didn't go away in Exchange 2007 and they'll still be there in E14. That being said, I agree with Martin: put it back! Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Evan Brastow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:29 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Issues with users using an additional mailbox Hi, Been a crazy weekend/week for me. Ever have a great idea that you KNOW will make everyone happy, and then you end up practically being burned in effigy? I created a new mailbox to replace a distribution group. The DL was getting about 300 emails a day, and so all of our CS people were getting their own copy of the email, filing it in their own folders, etc... It wasn't fun. So, Ev The Superhero steps in and decides it would be a good thing to create a mailbox with the address of the DL (and change the address of the DL to something that wouldn't be used.) So that's what I did. I created a mailbox, gave everyone permission to the mailbox, went around to their computers Monday morning and opened the mailbox within Outlook. I even created search folders so that different customers' emails would be automatically filed in the appropriate company folder. I didn't do this with a public folder, because 1) I couldn't find a way to create search folders within a public folder, and 2) I know public folders have been removed from E2K7, should I ever go in that direction from my current E2K3. I even found a utility that auto-fills the From field with the name of the account, so they don't have to type it when they make a new email or reply to one. So I'm great, right? No, I'm on the verge of having my tires slashed, re-inflated, and slashed yet again. The first complaint was that they don't get pop-up notifications when an email shows up in an inbox that is not their own. I'm onto a couple of third party utility things that may help this. But the really big issue is that there is no per-user read or unread information on this mailbox. People are used to their unread mail being in bold. Now, whenever someone, somewhere opens a piece of mail, it looks like it's been read to everyone, and people are losing track of what they have read and what they haven't. Any suggestions on this last item? Do I deserve to have my tires slashed, or is my heart in the right place? Okay, forget the heart... is my BRAIN in the right place? I'm not trying to push this down anyone's throat... I'm looking for something that would HELP :) Thanks, Evan -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
logging for edge synchronization?
Is there such a thing as a log file or some way for me to get more information on why my edge synchronization is not staying synched? I thought it might show up in the App log, but no such luck. Ops Mgr is alerting on it, so that's how I know it isn't working as expected. I can start the synch manually, but I'd rather find the source of the problem. Not having much luck with The Google. Name: gatewayServer LeaseHolder : transportServer LeaseType : Option ConnectionResult: Succeeded FailureDetail : LeaseExpiry : 4/2/2008 2:10:34 PM LastSynchronized: 4/2/2008 1:10:34 PM CredentialStatus: Synchronized TransportServerStatus : Synchronized TransportConfigStatus : Synchronized AcceptedDomainStatus: Synchronized SendConnectorStatus : Synchronized MessageClassificationStatus : Synchronized RecipientStatus : *NotSynchronized* I don't know if this is a new occurrence or if it has always been the case. Thanks, Angie ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: logging for edge synchronization?
You can turn up logging on that process. In the EMS type Set-eventloglevel MSExchange EdgeSync\Synchronization -Level Expert For a list of all Processes with Configurable Event Logging Levels see the following link. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb201661(EXCHG.80).aspx Typically you can do a Set-eventloglevel and it will give you all the current logging levels of all processes. Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP Senior Practice Consultant EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/ From: Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: logging for edge synchronization? Is there such a thing as a log file or some way for me to get more information on why my edge synchronization is not staying synched? I thought it might show up in the App log, but no such luck. Ops Mgr is alerting on it, so that's how I know it isn't working as expected. I can start the synch manually, but I'd rather find the source of the problem. Not having much luck with The Google. Name: gatewayServer LeaseHolder : transportServer LeaseType : Option ConnectionResult: Succeeded FailureDetail : LeaseExpiry : 4/2/2008 2:10:34 PM LastSynchronized: 4/2/2008 1:10:34 PM CredentialStatus: Synchronized TransportServerStatus : Synchronized TransportConfigStatus : Synchronized AcceptedDomainStatus: Synchronized SendConnectorStatus : Synchronized MessageClassificationStatus : Synchronized RecipientStatus : NotSynchronized I don't know if this is a new occurrence or if it has always been the case. Thanks, Angie ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Cluster setup
It doesnt seem that i am going to get approved for Enterprise Exchange and Windows servers. What options do i have in setting up 2 exchange server standard and 2 windows standard server. My current solution would be to build a replica keep it offline and bring it online in case the main mail server was to go down. Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com/ [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Cluster setup Hi Guys i was just in the proccess to start to setup my cluster and came to halt. I currently have one mail server which is Windows 03 Standard Server Edition with Exchange 03 Standard Edition. According to the cluster documenations i need to have Windows 03 Enterprise or Datacenter edition and Exchange 03 advanced edition. My window of downtime for mail environment is 30 minutes to 1 hour. I am consdering duplicating the new server with the exsisting server and disconnect the current mail server so it could be updated. I am just wondering what potentials issues that i can run into with the new live server. Our current mail server commuicates to our blackberry server and our spam filtering folder. Dr Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com/ [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
You'll have to go to the RIM site for pricing but you may find other options there. Yes BES SHOULD be installed on another server. John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Define feature-less ?? -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: NT Backup Status
Sorry, wrong list, need sleep :-/ - Original Message - From: James Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:47 PM Subject: NT Backup Status Anyway to get an email using NT Backup in Server 2003 when a scheduled job using the Scheduled Tasks fails? I want an email sent to me if the backup has a problem. James ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
For two users, I would recommend you look at RIM's Blackberry Professional Software - http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/professional/. It includes one CAL with the free download and you can purchase additional licenses as you need them for up to 30. I have it installed and running on a couple of SBS 2003 servers, for less than 10 BB users; I would suggest that you install it on a separate machine for more than that though that would also depend on the load on your server. Either way, you can download the software and try it out for one of your users or testing purposes; if you like it, you can purchase the additional CAL. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Your carrier might also throw BES in for free with the purchase of a certain number of devices. Probably the best way to go. Or you could go BES Express or Professional for up to 15 users, 20 if you pay for it. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones You'll have to go to the RIM site for pricing but you may find other options there. Yes BES SHOULD be installed on another server. John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
Mmmm, I think you may have clued me in to something Kevin; I do have a lot of rules set. I'll check that... For the others: Inbox: Less than 100 Rules: About 20 Version: 11, Outlook 2003, SP3, Build 8139 Exchange: 2003, SP2 No cached mode Yes, it looks as if this happens when a new message begins to be received by Outlook, I checked the Connection status (Ctrl-Click on taskbar icon, states about 2 seconds average. No other apps are affected, only Outlook This is a brand new install of Windows XP, patched fully with Office 2003 Pro full install, fully patched also. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Agree - and perhaps best of all, no need to allow any inbound IP connections - the BES initiates the connection outbound - and provides intranet browser access as well (limited of course to the BB Browser). -Original Message- From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones For two users, I would recommend you look at RIM's Blackberry Professional Software - http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/professional/. It includes one CAL with the free download and you can purchase additional licenses as you need them for up to 30. I have it installed and running on a couple of SBS 2003 servers, for less than 10 BB users; I would suggest that you install it on a separate machine for more than that though that would also depend on the load on your server. Either way, you can download the software and try it out for one of your users or testing purposes; if you like it, you can purchase the additional CAL. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
If you have some complicated rules it can help to add, stop processing more rules at the end of them. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Mmmm, I think you may have clued me in to something Kevin; I do have a lot of rules set. I'll check that... For the others: Inbox: Less than 100 Rules: About 20 Version: 11, Outlook 2003, SP3, Build 8139 Exchange: 2003, SP2 No cached mode Yes, it looks as if this happens when a new message begins to be received by Outlook, I checked the Connection status (Ctrl-Click on taskbar icon, states about 2 seconds average. No other apps are affected, only Outlook This is a brand new install of Windows XP, patched fully with Office 2003 Pro full install, fully patched also. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
Also, 20 rules is not that many. I have 131 rules currently. Outlook 2007. However most of my rules are very simple TO or FROM then MOVE to folder rules. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Mmmm, I think you may have clued me in to something Kevin; I do have a lot of rules set. I'll check that... For the others: Inbox: Less than 100 Rules: About 20 Version: 11, Outlook 2003, SP3, Build 8139 Exchange: 2003, SP2 No cached mode Yes, it looks as if this happens when a new message begins to be received by Outlook, I checked the Connection status (Ctrl-Click on taskbar icon, states about 2 seconds average. No other apps are affected, only Outlook This is a brand new install of Windows XP, patched fully with Office 2003 Pro full install, fully patched also. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
I just checked some of my rules. A few were null and void missing the directories for the mail pointing to it. Thanks for your time Kevin. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Also, 20 rules is not that many. I have 131 rules currently. Outlook 2007. However most of my rules are very simple TO or FROM then MOVE to folder rules. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Mmmm, I think you may have clued me in to something Kevin; I do have a lot of rules set. I'll check that... For the others: Inbox: Less than 100 Rules: About 20 Version: 11, Outlook 2003, SP3, Build 8139 Exchange: 2003, SP2 No cached mode Yes, it looks as if this happens when a new message begins to be received by Outlook, I checked the Connection status (Ctrl-Click on taskbar icon, states about 2 seconds average. No other apps are affected, only Outlook This is a brand new install of Windows XP, patched fully with Office 2003 Pro full install, fully patched also. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
Large message? Large inbox? Cached mode? We run cached mode normally and I've had Outlook appear to freeze when some id-ten-t sends a 5-8 meg attachment to all 1000 users at our campus (remote from the centralized Exchange servers). Does your AV have an Outlook add-in? If so, did that get disabled as well during your test? -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
NT Backup Status
Anyway to get an email using NT Backup in Server 2003 when a scheduled job using the Scheduled Tasks fails? I want an email sent to me if the backup has a problem. James ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Good call, so this professional version could be installed directly in the SBS 2003 server? Miguel --- Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Agree - and perhaps best of all, no need to allow any inbound IP connections - the BES initiates the connection outbound - and provides intranet browser access as well (limited of course to the BB Browser). -Original Message- From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones For two users, I would recommend you look at RIM's Blackberry Professional Software - http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/professional/. It includes one CAL with the free download and you can purchase additional licenses as you need them for up to 30. I have it installed and running on a couple of SBS 2003 servers, for less than 10 BB users; I would suggest that you install it on a separate machine for more than that though that would also depend on the load on your server. Either way, you can download the software and try it out for one of your users or testing purposes; if you like it, you can purchase the additional CAL. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
As this is for SBS2003 and someday 2007 so you can probably include intranet browsing - at least for now. -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones 'My' list of features missing from WinMob 5: Lack of admin console/remote management/reporting Meeting Attendee Information Out of Office Management Dedicated Technical Support (For MS it's pay per incident, or forums, peers, etc). SSL Certificate Management Message Flags (Still can't get over that they missed this). Notes Search (It's very limited) Public Folders Contact Categories Push 3rd Party Applications to device Device Tracking, Monitoring, Reporting Updates to Software are about every year or two as opposed to quarterly with others. Inline Message Fetch Fetch emails from mail subfolders on first sync. A few of these are fixed in WinMob 6.1 and Exchange 2007 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Define feature-less ?? -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
'My' list of features missing from WinMob 5: Lack of admin console/remote management/reporting Meeting Attendee Information Out of Office Management Dedicated Technical Support (For MS it's pay per incident, or forums, peers, etc). SSL Certificate Management Message Flags (Still can't get over that they missed this). Notes Search (It's very limited) Public Folders Contact Categories Push 3rd Party Applications to device Device Tracking, Monitoring, Reporting Updates to Software are about every year or two as opposed to quarterly with others. Inline Message Fetch Fetch emails from mail subfolders on first sync. A few of these are fixed in WinMob 6.1 and Exchange 2007 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Define feature-less ?? -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
Add-ins are another good one to check. I ran some thread compressor thing for a while that was supposed to make treads more Gmail like. It seemed to crash everything. mutter, internal tools, mutter -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Large message? Large inbox? Cached mode? We run cached mode normally and I've had Outlook appear to freeze when some id-ten-t sends a 5-8 meg attachment to all 1000 users at our campus (remote from the centralized Exchange servers). Does your AV have an Outlook add-in? If so, did that get disabled as well during your test? -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
That's interesting. I import Gmail into Outlook because I prefer the way Outlook does threading to the way Gmail does it! I am SO old-school. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Add-ins are another good one to check. I ran some thread compressor thing for a while that was supposed to make treads more Gmail like. It seemed to crash everything. mutter, internal tools, mutter -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Large message? Large inbox? Cached mode? We run cached mode normally and I've had Outlook appear to freeze when some id-ten-t sends a 5-8 meg attachment to all 1000 users at our campus (remote from the centralized Exchange servers). Does your AV have an Outlook add-in? If so, did that get disabled as well during your test? -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Yeah, they are finally starting to address some of these things. It's just frustrating the Good and BB have done them since about 4 years ago out of the box. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I was thinking as I was reading this, it does these things Then I read your last line. Most of these things require Exchange 2007, Windows Mobile 6 or better. Some of these need SCMDM -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones 'My' list of features missing from WinMob 5: Lack of admin console/remote management/reporting Meeting Attendee Information Out of Office Management Dedicated Technical Support (For MS it's pay per incident, or forums, peers, etc). SSL Certificate Management Message Flags (Still can't get over that they missed this). Notes Search (It's very limited) Public Folders Contact Categories Push 3rd Party Applications to device Device Tracking, Monitoring, Reporting Updates to Software are about every year or two as opposed to quarterly with others. Inline Message Fetch Fetch emails from mail subfolders on first sync. A few of these are fixed in WinMob 6.1 and Exchange 2007 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Define feature-less ?? -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
I was thinking as I was reading this, it does these things Then I read your last line. Most of these things require Exchange 2007, Windows Mobile 6 or better. Some of these need SCMDM -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones 'My' list of features missing from WinMob 5: Lack of admin console/remote management/reporting Meeting Attendee Information Out of Office Management Dedicated Technical Support (For MS it's pay per incident, or forums, peers, etc). SSL Certificate Management Message Flags (Still can't get over that they missed this). Notes Search (It's very limited) Public Folders Contact Categories Push 3rd Party Applications to device Device Tracking, Monitoring, Reporting Updates to Software are about every year or two as opposed to quarterly with others. Inline Message Fetch Fetch emails from mail subfolders on first sync. A few of these are fixed in WinMob 6.1 and Exchange 2007 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Define feature-less ?? -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Yes - depending on your current load on the SBS server, of course. I have two installations of it on clients' SBS 2003 - three counting my own. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 5:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Good call, so this professional version could be installed directly in the SBS 2003 server? Miguel --- Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Agree - and perhaps best of all, no need to allow any inbound IP connections - the BES initiates the connection outbound - and provides intranet browser access as well (limited of course to the BB Browser). -Original Message- From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones For two users, I would recommend you look at RIM's Blackberry Professional Software - http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/professional/. It includes one CAL with the free download and you can purchase additional licenses as you need them for up to 30. I have it installed and running on a couple of SBS 2003 servers, for less than 10 BB users; I would suggest that you install it on a separate machine for more than that though that would also depend on the load on your server. Either way, you can download the software and try it out for one of your users or testing purposes; if you like it, you can purchase the additional CAL. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Fwiw, here at Sunbelt, we're a Blackberry shop. I've just never found a really happy Windows CE user. Blackberries are wonderful email machines, and they are incredibly durable and reliable. Now, we do have a BES server which we get as a Blackberry partner. But I am a strong believer in Blackberries -- again, for email, they are incredible. For browsing the web, well, get an iPhone. -Original Message- From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Yes - depending on your current load on the SBS server, of course. I have two installations of it on clients' SBS 2003 - three counting my own. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 5:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Good call, so this professional version could be installed directly in the SBS 2003 server? Miguel --- Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Agree - and perhaps best of all, no need to allow any inbound IP connections - the BES initiates the connection outbound - and provides intranet browser access as well (limited of course to the BB Browser). -Original Message- From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones For two users, I would recommend you look at RIM's Blackberry Professional Software - http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/professional/. It includes one CAL with the free download and you can purchase additional licenses as you need them for up to 30. I have it installed and running on a couple of SBS 2003 servers, for less than 10 BB users; I would suggest that you install it on a separate machine for more than that though that would also depend on the load on your server. Either way, you can download the software and try it out for one of your users or testing purposes; if you like it, you can purchase the additional CAL. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Also FWIW, and a slight tangent - RIM recently filed a patent for a touch screen interface, which going by their history, tends to indicate that they already have a product fairly close to completion if not already in testing. FYI - http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/02/08/blackberry-patents-angled-slider-and-r im-multi-touch-technology/ Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 7:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Fwiw, here at Sunbelt, we're a Blackberry shop. I've just never found a really happy Windows CE user. Blackberries are wonderful email machines, and they are incredibly durable and reliable. Now, we do have a BES server which we get as a Blackberry partner. But I am a strong believer in Blackberries -- again, for email, they are incredible. For browsing the web, well, get an iPhone. -Original Message- From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Yes - depending on your current load on the SBS server, of course. I have two installations of it on clients' SBS 2003 - three counting my own. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 5:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Good call, so this professional version could be installed directly in the SBS 2003 server? Miguel --- Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Agree - and perhaps best of all, no need to allow any inbound IP connections - the BES initiates the connection outbound - and provides intranet browser access as well (limited of course to the BB Browser). -Original Message- From: Amer Karim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones For two users, I would recommend you look at RIM's Blackberry Professional Software - http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/professional/. It includes one CAL with the free download and you can purchase additional licenses as you need them for up to 30. I have it installed and running on a couple of SBS 2003 servers, for less than 10 BB users; I would suggest that you install it on a separate machine for more than that though that would also depend on the load on your server. Either way, you can download the software and try it out for one of your users or testing purposes; if you like it, you can purchase the additional CAL. Regards, Amer Karim Nautilis Information Systems -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-02-08 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I think right now they are thinking of two users, I don't know if the user base will grow in the future (I guess). We have ISA 2004 server and thinking of migrating to ISA 2006. They need email and calendaring. BB server needs to be installed in a different machine? If so, It requires a Windows server machine? What is the range or pricing of BB Server? Thanks, Miguel --- John Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange
RE: Cluster setup
I would recommend that you move up to Exchange Server 2007 sp1 and use SCR. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cluster setup It doesnt seem that i am going to get approved for Enterprise Exchange and Windows servers. What options do i have in setting up 2 exchange server standard and 2 windows standard server. My current solution would be to build a replica keep it offline and bring it online in case the main mail server was to go down. Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com/ [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] _ From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Cluster setup Hi Guys i was just in the proccess to start to setup my cluster and came to halt. I currently have one mail server which is Windows 03 Standard Server Edition with Exchange 03 Standard Edition. According to the cluster documenations i need to have Windows 03 Enterprise or Datacenter edition and Exchange 03 advanced edition. My window of downtime for mail environment is 30 minutes to 1 hour. I am consdering duplicating the new server with the exsisting server and disconnect the current mail server so it could be updated. I am just wondering what potentials issues that i can run into with the new live server. Our current mail server commuicates to our blackberry server and our spam filtering folder. Dr Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com/ [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Cluster setup
I'm guessing the increased cost of all the new cals is worse then upgrading just the os and exchange level... jlc From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 8:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cluster setup I would recommend that you move up to Exchange Server 2007 sp1 and use SCR. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cluster setup It doesnt seem that i am going to get approved for Enterprise Exchange and Windows servers. What options do i have in setting up 2 exchange server standard and 2 windows standard server. My current solution would be to build a replica keep it offline and bring it online in case the main mail server was to go down. Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com/ [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Cluster setup Hi Guys i was just in the proccess to start to setup my cluster and came to halt. I currently have one mail server which is Windows 03 Standard Server Edition with Exchange 03 Standard Edition. According to the cluster documenations i need to have Windows 03 Enterprise or Datacenter edition and Exchange 03 advanced edition. My window of downtime for mail environment is 30 minutes to 1 hour. I am consdering duplicating the new server with the exsisting server and disconnect the current mail server so it could be updated. I am just wondering what potentials issues that i can run into with the new live server. Our current mail server commuicates to our blackberry server and our spam filtering folder. Dr Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com/ [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
