RE: BES Question
And don't forget you can hide the icon on the device, but it's not through policy and any savvy user can get it back again. Just use the Blackberry button (not sure what else to call it!) on the icon, you'll get a popup menu allowing you to select Hide. -Original Message- From: bounce-8391754-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8391754-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Don Andrews Sent: 21 January 2009 19:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BES Question I'd consider sending users who don't like the default browser setting instructions on how to change it. -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BES Question Jeff, Thanks for the response. Is there a way to hide the BB browser icon? Then perhaps I could enable both icons, hide the BB browser icon and then set which domains require the BB browser (our internal one only). Would the internet browser then open the hidden BB browser when going to an internal domain? This is the directors pet peeve, hence the effort :( -troy -Original Message- From: May, Jeff [mailto:j...@bbandt.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BES Question You can change the MDS Browser use Separate Icon policy to TRUE to leave both browsers as an option, they can then use the IBS as needed and access the regular browser for other applications. -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BES Question BES 4.1.6 on Exchange 2007sp1 ~35 users. We would like to create an IT policy that sets the default browser on the phones to be the IBS or Internet browser rather than the BB browser so that folks are using the EVDO network for internet browsing rather than our local network connection. We would like the BB browser to remain available so people can switch to it and run reports on our local intranet site (only 2-3 folks actually do this) Blackberry support and forum surfing seem to say we can only disable the BB browser, we cant have it active and not be the default browser through policy. The policy choices are not very specific as to what they do, and its hard for me to test little changes because I don't have a BB (of course). Has anyone set this up or have any insight on the IT policies for BES? -Troy ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007
Hi chaps Anyone know how i can change the amount of time that subject logging log files are kept for in Exchange 2007? That is, the log files that are searchable using the message tracking feature of exchange 2007. Thanks Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007
Is there a GUI version? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:kretc...@uwgb.edu] Sent: 22 January 2009 14:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Set-TransportServer -MessageTrackingLogMaxAge - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay Voice: 920.465.5014 Fax: 920.465.2864 kretc...@uwgb.edu Be green, keep it on the screen! Please don't print this email unless it is absolutely critical. -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Hi chaps Anyone know how i can change the amount of time that subject logging log files are kept for in Exchange 2007? That is, the log files that are searchable using the message tracking feature of exchange 2007. Thanks Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007
Nothing in the GUI other than changing the path of the log files. Check out http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997984.aspx for more information on Message Tracking logs in Exchange 2007. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay Voice: 920.465.5014 Fax: 920.465.2864 kretc...@uwgb.edu Be green, keep it on the screen! Please don't print this email unless it is absolutely critical. -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Is there a GUI version? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:kretc...@uwgb.edu] Sent: 22 January 2009 14:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Set-TransportServer -MessageTrackingLogMaxAge - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay Voice: 920.465.5014 Fax: 920.465.2864 kretc...@uwgb.edu Be green, keep it on the screen! Please don't print this email unless it is absolutely critical. -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Hi chaps Anyone know how i can change the amount of time that subject logging log files are kept for in Exchange 2007? That is, the log files that are searchable using the message tracking feature of exchange 2007. Thanks Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007
Set-TransportServer -MessageTrackingLogMaxAge - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay Voice: 920.465.5014 Fax: 920.465.2864 kretc...@uwgb.edu Be green, keep it on the screen! Please don't print this email unless it is absolutely critical. -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Hi chaps Anyone know how i can change the amount of time that subject logging log files are kept for in Exchange 2007? That is, the log files that are searchable using the message tracking feature of exchange 2007. Thanks Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007
Not to my knowledge. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Is there a GUI version? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:kretc...@uwgb.edu] Sent: 22 January 2009 14:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Set-TransportServer -MessageTrackingLogMaxAge - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay Voice: 920.465.5014 Fax: 920.465.2864 kretc...@uwgb.edu Be green, keep it on the screen! Please don't print this email unless it is absolutely critical. -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changing subject logging length in exchange 2007 Hi chaps Anyone know how i can change the amount of time that subject logging log files are kept for in Exchange 2007? That is, the log files that are searchable using the message tracking feature of exchange 2007. Thanks Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
[OT] Thursday Funny
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Return address
I use Messaging Ninja for spam filtering. Ninja can only filter spam that is sent to a mailbox. Mail that is sent to a distribution list is not filtered. Spammers have discovered my distribution list address and now are spamming my whole department. Some of the people on the distribution list have exchange mailboxes and some have external addresses. In order to filter mail sent to the distribution list address I did the following. 1) Renamed the distribution list (and it's address) from All to AllD. 2) Created a mailbox with name and address All 3) Set the mailbox to forward all mail to AllD 4) set HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sunbelt Software\MessagingNinja\scanForwardedADContacts to 1 Ok, that works fine in that mail is distributed as it should be when it is sent to All and I'm guessing it is being filtered. (I haven't tried sending any spam to it to test the spam filtering part of it.) However, when the message arrives in an inbox the message says it was sent to AllD which is the distribution list. I want it to appear that the message was sent to All not AllD. Is there way to get the message To line to show All instead of AllD? Note: I'm not just talking about the display name - I want the actual address to be All. I don't want people or spammers to know the address of the AllD distribution list. Thanks for any help you can provide. Curt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: [OT] Thursday Funny
Funny, but wrong. So, so wrong. 2009/1/22 Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Return address
You allow your department distribution lists to receive mail from external senders? Seems like the easiest way around this one is to create a group and only allow that people in that group to send to your distro list. -troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Return address I use Messaging Ninja for spam filtering. Ninja can only filter spam that is sent to a mailbox. Mail that is sent to a distribution list is not filtered. Spammers have discovered my distribution list address and now are spamming my whole department. Some of the people on the distribution list have exchange mailboxes and some have external addresses. In order to filter mail sent to the distribution list address I did the following. 1) Renamed the distribution list (and it's address) from All to AllD. 2) Created a mailbox with name and address All 3) Set the mailbox to forward all mail to AllD 4) set HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sunbelt Software\MessagingNinja\scanForwardedADContacts to 1 Ok, that works fine in that mail is distributed as it should be when it is sent to All and I'm guessing it is being filtered. (I haven't tried sending any spam to it to test the spam filtering part of it.) However, when the message arrives in an inbox the message says it was sent to AllD which is the distribution list. I want it to appear that the message was sent to All not AllD. Is there way to get the message To line to show All instead of AllD? Note: I'm not just talking about the display name - I want the actual address to be All. I don't want people or spammers to know the address of the AllD distribution list. Thanks for any help you can provide. Curt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: [OT] Thursday Funny
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv5iEK-IEzwfeature=related This is good too... On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote: Funny, but wrong. So, so wrong. 2009/1/22 Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
re: [OT] Thursday Funny
Really, almost as good as the original. Not so funny Thursday tidbit: Microsoft to cut up to 5,000 jobs http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28791669/ From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: [OT] Thursday Funny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: [OT] Thursday Funny
I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: The company says profit slipped to $4.17 billion, or 47 cents per share, from year-ago earnings of $4.71 billion, or 50 cents per share. It says total revenue edged up 2 percent to $16.63 billion, as software for corporate computer servers helped offset an 8 percent drop in revenue for PC software. The results missed Wall Street's forecast for earnings of 49 cents per share on sales of $17.08 billion. They are complaining about a profit of 4 BILLION DOLLARS. OMG. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re: [OT] Thursday Funny Really, almost as good as the original. Not so funny Thursday tidbit: Microsoft to cut up to 5,000 jobs http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28791669/ _ From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: [OT] Thursday Funny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: [OT] Thursday Funny
No, they are not bitching about 4billion. They are bitching that they didn't get the extra 500 million they were expecting. Cutting 5000 jobs will save them 5000*(70,000*2) or $700,000,000 a year. Of course I am wildly guessing the $70k/year is the average salary accross all 5000 employees, and *2 for overhead and additional expenses the company must pay to have the employees working, ie. bennies, free food/soda/ice cream/beer in the office, electricity, pc's, other building expenses, on campus transportion, free meals in one of the restaraunts on campus, the list goes on and on. Mike, I've been to the MVP summit twice and it's quite impressive what they give away. They could prolly cut their freebies in half and save a billion. Thanks, Jake Gardner TTC Network Administrator Ext. 246 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: The company says profit slipped to $4.17 billion, or 47 cents per share, from year-ago earnings of $4.71 billion, or 50 cents per share. It says total revenue edged up 2 percent to $16.63 billion, as software for corporate computer servers helped offset an 8 percent drop in revenue for PC software. The results missed Wall Street's forecast for earnings of 49 cents per share on sales of $17.08 billion. They are complaining about a profit of 4 BILLION DOLLARS. OMG. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re: [OT] Thursday Funny Really, almost as good as the original. Not so funny Thursday tidbit: Microsoft to cut up to 5,000 jobs http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28791669/ From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: [OT] Thursday Funny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies. Thank you. *** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: [OT] Thursday Funny
What a justification for clearing out marginal employees. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: The company says profit slipped to $4.17 billion, or 47 cents per share, from year-ago earnings of $4.71 billion, or 50 cents per share. It says total revenue edged up 2 percent to $16.63 billion, as software for corporate computer servers helped offset an 8 percent drop in revenue for PC software. The results missed Wall Street's forecast for earnings of 49 cents per share on sales of $17.08 billion. They are complaining about a profit of 4 BILLION DOLLARS. OMG. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re: [OT] Thursday Funny Really, almost as good as the original. Not so funny Thursday tidbit: Microsoft to cut up to 5,000 jobs http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28791669/ From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: [OT] Thursday Funny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Return address
Is that possible if people on the list don't have an exchange mailbox? -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Return address You allow your department distribution lists to receive mail from external senders? Seems like the easiest way around this one is to create a group and only allow that people in that group to send to your distro list. -troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Return address I use Messaging Ninja for spam filtering. Ninja can only filter spam that is sent to a mailbox. Mail that is sent to a distribution list is not filtered. Spammers have discovered my distribution list address and now are spamming my whole department. Some of the people on the distribution list have exchange mailboxes and some have external addresses. In order to filter mail sent to the distribution list address I did the following. 1) Renamed the distribution list (and it's address) from All to AllD. 2) Created a mailbox with name and address All 3) Set the mailbox to forward all mail to AllD 4) set HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sunbelt Software\MessagingNinja\scanForwardedADContacts to 1 Ok, that works fine in that mail is distributed as it should be when it is sent to All and I'm guessing it is being filtered. (I haven't tried sending any spam to it to test the spam filtering part of it.) However, when the message arrives in an inbox the message says it was sent to AllD which is the distribution list. I want it to appear that the message was sent to All not AllD. Is there way to get the message To line to show All instead of AllD? Note: I'm not just talking about the display name - I want the actual address to be All. I don't want people or spammers to know the address of the AllD distribution list. Thanks for any help you can provide. Curt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Return address
I think this will limit those users who can SEND to the list, not receive from the list - or is this intended to be a free for all where anybody on the list should be able to send to all? -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Return address Is that possible if people on the list don't have an exchange mailbox? -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Return address You allow your department distribution lists to receive mail from external senders? Seems like the easiest way around this one is to create a group and only allow that people in that group to send to your distro list. -troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Return address I use Messaging Ninja for spam filtering. Ninja can only filter spam that is sent to a mailbox. Mail that is sent to a distribution list is not filtered. Spammers have discovered my distribution list address and now are spamming my whole department. Some of the people on the distribution list have exchange mailboxes and some have external addresses. In order to filter mail sent to the distribution list address I did the following. 1) Renamed the distribution list (and it's address) from All to AllD. 2) Created a mailbox with name and address All 3) Set the mailbox to forward all mail to AllD 4) set HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sunbelt Software\MessagingNinja\scanForwardedADContacts to 1 Ok, that works fine in that mail is distributed as it should be when it is sent to All and I'm guessing it is being filtered. (I haven't tried sending any spam to it to test the spam filtering part of it.) However, when the message arrives in an inbox the message says it was sent to AllD which is the distribution list. I want it to appear that the message was sent to All not AllD. Is there way to get the message To line to show All instead of AllD? Note: I'm not just talking about the display name - I want the actual address to be All. I don't want people or spammers to know the address of the AllD distribution list. Thanks for any help you can provide. Curt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Return address
Those people wouldn't be able to send to the list (receiving still would work fine)... But that might put the kabash on that one. -troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Return address Is that possible if people on the list don't have an exchange mailbox? -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Return address You allow your department distribution lists to receive mail from external senders? Seems like the easiest way around this one is to create a group and only allow that people in that group to send to your distro list. -troy -Original Message- From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Return address I use Messaging Ninja for spam filtering. Ninja can only filter spam that is sent to a mailbox. Mail that is sent to a distribution list is not filtered. Spammers have discovered my distribution list address and now are spamming my whole department. Some of the people on the distribution list have exchange mailboxes and some have external addresses. In order to filter mail sent to the distribution list address I did the following. 1) Renamed the distribution list (and it's address) from All to AllD. 2) Created a mailbox with name and address All 3) Set the mailbox to forward all mail to AllD 4) set HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sunbelt Software\MessagingNinja\scanForwardedADContacts to 1 Ok, that works fine in that mail is distributed as it should be when it is sent to All and I'm guessing it is being filtered. (I haven't tried sending any spam to it to test the spam filtering part of it.) However, when the message arrives in an inbox the message says it was sent to AllD which is the distribution list. I want it to appear that the message was sent to All not AllD. Is there way to get the message To line to show All instead of AllD? Note: I'm not just talking about the display name - I want the actual address to be All. I don't want people or spammers to know the address of the AllD distribution list. Thanks for any help you can provide. Curt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Return address
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Troy Meyer troy.me...@monacocoach.com wrote: Those people wouldn't be able to send to the list (receiving still would work fine)... But that might put the kabash on that one. H... what if you created Exchange Mail-Enabled Contact objects in Active Directory, with email address to match the external sender, and then assigned those objects to the allowed-senders list for the DL.? (Or will that even work?) -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: [OT] Thursday Funny
I think the sentiment is that the worst is yet to come and the increased trend toward the cloud (argh... i used a buzzword! I'm doomed!) means fewer physical 'seats' for their products. They answer to their shareholders, not their employees or their customers (though obviously ignoring the latter two will impact the former). Hey... I'm a shareholder. Ballmer's letter: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10147964-75.html?part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-5 From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: The company says profit slipped to $4.17 billion, or 47 cents per share, from year-ago earnings of $4.71 billion, or 50 cents per share. It says total revenue edged up 2 percent to $16.63 billion, as software for corporate computer servers helped offset an 8 percent drop in revenue for PC software. The results missed Wall Street's forecast for earnings of 49 cents per share on sales of $17.08 billion. They are complaining about a profit of 4 BILLION DOLLARS. OMG. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re: [OT] Thursday Funny Really, almost as good as the original. Not so funny Thursday tidbit: Microsoft to cut up to 5,000 jobs http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28791669/ From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: [OT] Thursday Funny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Lyris on Exchange
I was asked today a question that I know I used to know the answer for, but I don't seem to know anymore. How do I make exchange be my listserv server... what do I need to add. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Lyris on Exchange
Lyris isn't supported on Exchange however you can make it work. For a truly integrated Exchange listserv, look at Ikakura www.ikakura.comhttp://www.ikakura.com. I've used it in the past with great success. They have a version for 5.5/2000/2003 published. Their 2007 version is in beta, if you email them they will send you the beta. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay Voice: 920.465.5014 Fax: 920.465.2864 kretc...@uwgb.edumailto:kretc...@uwgb.edu [cid:image001.jpg@01C97C96.1AFB8680]Be green, keep it on the screen! Please don't print this email unless it is absolutely critical. From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Lyris on Exchange I was asked today a question that I know I used to know the answer for, but I don't seem to know anymore. How do I make exchange be my listserv server... what do I need to add. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~inline: image001.jpg
Re: [OT] Thursday Funny
For most companies (read, those that aren't rich enough to do it in house) the cloud is just another form of outsourcing, and a particularly bad one. Folks will come to realize that pretty quickly once the data breaches start happening in the cloud, just like they do inside of the company. I think MSFT's worries are not about the cloud - or at least, they shouldn't be. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM, will...@lefkovics.net will...@lefkovics.net wrote: I think the sentiment is that the worst is yet to come and the increased trend toward the cloud (argh... i used a buzzword! I'm doomed!) means fewer physical 'seats' for their products. They answer to their shareholders, not their employees or their customers (though obviously ignoring the latter two will impact the former). Hey... I'm a shareholder. Ballmer's letter: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10147964-75.html?part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-5 From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: The company says profit slipped to $4.17 billion, or 47 cents per share, from year-ago earnings of $4.71 billion, or 50 cents per share. It says total revenue edged up 2 percent to $16.63 billion, as software for corporate computer servers helped offset an 8 percent drop in revenue for PC software. The results missed Wall Street's forecast for earnings of 49 cents per share on sales of $17.08 billion. They are complaining about a profit of 4 BILLION DOLLARS. OMG. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re: [OT] Thursday Funny Really, almost as good as the original. Not so funny Thursday tidbit: Microsoft to cut up to 5,000 jobs http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28791669/ From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: [OT] Thursday Funny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2GmBkkaTU ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP
Do I need to reboot the server for the changes to take effect? Eric Wittersheim American Academy of Sleep Medicine One Westbrook Corporate Center Suite 920 Westchester, IL. 60185 Ph. 708-492-0930 Fax. 708-492-0943 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP
Never mind. Got it. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP Do I need to reboot the server for the changes to take effect? Eric Wittersheim American Academy of Sleep Medicine One Westbrook Corporate Center Suite 920 Westchester, IL. 60185 Ph. 708-492-0930 Fax. 708-492-0943 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: [OT] Thursday Funny
The cloud, Software-as-a-Service, Hosted Solutions, whatever you want to call it, is part of the evolution of networking. They are not _worried_ about it; they are embracing it (groove.com, mesh.com, office.live.com). However, it means fewer installed instances of Windows Server, Office, Exchange, etc over time. Some companies that ARE rich enough to do it in house are still considering and some moving to hosted solutions because it saves them money. That is both reasonable and expected. Data breaches are not unexpected. I don't think anyone believes that it isn't possible. Or outages. Or data loss. Even Google and their perpetual beta lost a bunch of peoples' e-mail. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT] Thursday Funny For most companies (read, those that aren't rich enough to do it in house) the cloud is just another form of outsourcing, and a particularly bad one. Folks will come to realize that pretty quickly once the data breaches start happening in the cloud, just like they do inside of the company. I think MSFT's worries are not about the cloud - or at least, they shouldn't be. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM, will...@lefkovics.net will...@lefkovics.net wrote: I think the sentiment is that the worst is yet to come and the increased trend toward the cloud (argh... i used a buzzword! I'm doomed!) means fewer physical 'seats' for their products. They answer to their shareholders, not their employees or their customers (though obviously ignoring the latter two will impact the former). Hey... I'm a shareholder. Ballmer's letter: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10147964-75.html?part=rsssubj=news; tag=2547-1_3-0-5 From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: [OT] Thursday Funny
It may be part of the evolution of networking, but I think it's a dead end. If you don't have the bits under your direct physical control, you don't own them or control them at all. Data breaches may not be unexpected, but they can and will hurt a lot more in the future than they do now, as they have more serious consequences, I sincerely believe. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, William Lefkovics will...@lefkovics.net wrote: The cloud, Software-as-a-Service, Hosted Solutions, whatever you want to call it, is part of the evolution of networking. They are not _worried_ about it; they are embracing it (groove.com, mesh.com, office.live.com). However, it means fewer installed instances of Windows Server, Office, Exchange, etc over time. Some companies that ARE rich enough to do it in house are still considering and some moving to hosted solutions because it saves them money. That is both reasonable and expected. Data breaches are not unexpected. I don't think anyone believes that it isn't possible. Or outages. Or data loss. Even Google and their perpetual beta lost a bunch of peoples' e-mail. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT] Thursday Funny For most companies (read, those that aren't rich enough to do it in house) the cloud is just another form of outsourcing, and a particularly bad one. Folks will come to realize that pretty quickly once the data breaches start happening in the cloud, just like they do inside of the company. I think MSFT's worries are not about the cloud - or at least, they shouldn't be. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM, will...@lefkovics.net will...@lefkovics.net wrote: I think the sentiment is that the worst is yet to come and the increased trend toward the cloud (argh... i used a buzzword! I'm doomed!) means fewer physical 'seats' for their products. They answer to their shareholders, not their employees or their customers (though obviously ignoring the latter two will impact the former). Hey... I'm a shareholder. Ballmer's letter: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10147964-75.html?part=rsssubj=news; tag=2547-1_3-0-5 From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: [OT] Thursday Funny
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM, William Lefkovics will...@lefkovics.net wrote: The cloud, Software-as-a-Service, Hosted Solutions, whatever you want to call it, is part of the evolution of networking. They are not _worried_ about it; they are embracing it ... I'm sorta with Kurt on this one. While I'm sure a great many companies can move to such services at reasonable risk, I also think there's going to be an eventual counter-migration for some of those companies. Same thing that's happened for some companies with outsourcing for other reasons; it's a short-term gain but a long-term loss. However, this counter-migration will not occur at any significant level until some massive breaches occur and cause some high-profile companies to loose significant money, or even go out of business. The public breaches we've seen so far are child's play in comparison to what's coming. Some will no doubt consider this needless fear. Only time will tell who is right. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: [OT] Thursday Funny
I appreciate your point. It is certainly not for everyone and it is not even an option for some. But in some cases, a hosting company can provide more control and not less. And it is not an 'all-or-nothing' thing. Some aspects of the business can be moved to a service model. My point was not whether it is a good or bad move, but rather that the cloud, SaaS, hosted services, etc, will have an impact on overall future sales for software vendors including Microsoft. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT] Thursday Funny It may be part of the evolution of networking, but I think it's a dead end. If you don't have the bits under your direct physical control, you don't own them or control them at all. Data breaches may not be unexpected, but they can and will hurt a lot more in the future than they do now, as they have more serious consequences, I sincerely believe. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, William Lefkovics will...@lefkovics.net wrote: The cloud, Software-as-a-Service, Hosted Solutions, whatever you want to call it, is part of the evolution of networking. They are not _worried_ about it; they are embracing it (groove.com, mesh.com, office.live.com). However, it means fewer installed instances of Windows Server, Office, Exchange, etc over time. Some companies that ARE rich enough to do it in house are still considering and some moving to hosted solutions because it saves them money. That is both reasonable and expected. Data breaches are not unexpected. I don't think anyone believes that it isn't possible. Or outages. Or data loss. Even Google and their perpetual beta lost a bunch of peoples' e-mail. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT] Thursday Funny For most companies (read, those that aren't rich enough to do it in house) the cloud is just another form of outsourcing, and a particularly bad one. Folks will come to realize that pretty quickly once the data breaches start happening in the cloud, just like they do inside of the company. I think MSFT's worries are not about the cloud - or at least, they shouldn't be. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM, will...@lefkovics.net will...@lefkovics.net wrote: I think the sentiment is that the worst is yet to come and the increased trend toward the cloud (argh... i used a buzzword! I'm doomed!) means fewer physical 'seats' for their products. They answer to their shareholders, not their employees or their customers (though obviously ignoring the latter two will impact the former). Hey... I'm a shareholder. Ballmer's letter: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10147964-75.html?part=rsssubj=news tag=2547-1_3-0-5 From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: [OT] Thursday Funny
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM, William Lefkovics will...@lefkovics.net wrote: My point was not whether it is a good or bad move, but rather that the cloud, SaaS, hosted services, etc, will have an impact on overall future sales for software vendors including Microsoft. Of course, in the past, Microsoft has changed their licensing terms to adapt to changing times. Sometimes to customer advantage, sometimes to their own. I wouldn't be surprised to see cloud CALs or something show up if it really starts to hurt them... -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: [OT] Thursday Funny
You might be right. There's an old stock market saying - the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. Heh. However, I think, as Ben points out, that an adjustment in client license prices or even a new type of licensing agreement might be in order. Of course, lawmakers will never do the rational thing, and allow MSFT to offer SAAS/Cloud directly. That would be unfair competition. As much as, at times, and more frequently, I'm not a fan of MSFT, I'm even less a fan of lawmakers. Sigh. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM, William Lefkovics will...@lefkovics.net wrote: I appreciate your point. It is certainly not for everyone and it is not even an option for some. But in some cases, a hosting company can provide more control and not less. And it is not an 'all-or-nothing' thing. Some aspects of the business can be moved to a service model. My point was not whether it is a good or bad move, but rather that the cloud, SaaS, hosted services, etc, will have an impact on overall future sales for software vendors including Microsoft. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT] Thursday Funny It may be part of the evolution of networking, but I think it's a dead end. If you don't have the bits under your direct physical control, you don't own them or control them at all. Data breaches may not be unexpected, but they can and will hurt a lot more in the future than they do now, as they have more serious consequences, I sincerely believe. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, William Lefkovics will...@lefkovics.net wrote: The cloud, Software-as-a-Service, Hosted Solutions, whatever you want to call it, is part of the evolution of networking. They are not _worried_ about it; they are embracing it (groove.com, mesh.com, office.live.com). However, it means fewer installed instances of Windows Server, Office, Exchange, etc over time. Some companies that ARE rich enough to do it in house are still considering and some moving to hosted solutions because it saves them money. That is both reasonable and expected. Data breaches are not unexpected. I don't think anyone believes that it isn't possible. Or outages. Or data loss. Even Google and their perpetual beta lost a bunch of peoples' e-mail. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT] Thursday Funny For most companies (read, those that aren't rich enough to do it in house) the cloud is just another form of outsourcing, and a particularly bad one. Folks will come to realize that pretty quickly once the data breaches start happening in the cloud, just like they do inside of the company. I think MSFT's worries are not about the cloud - or at least, they shouldn't be. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM, will...@lefkovics.net will...@lefkovics.net wrote: I think the sentiment is that the worst is yet to come and the increased trend toward the cloud (argh... i used a buzzword! I'm doomed!) means fewer physical 'seats' for their products. They answer to their shareholders, not their employees or their customers (though obviously ignoring the latter two will impact the former). Hey... I'm a shareholder. Ballmer's letter: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10147964-75.html?part=rsssubj=news tag=2547-1_3-0-5 From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: [OT] Thursday Funny I don't quite get their gloom and doom though. From that article: ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Any Help : Installing .msi on remote servers
Hai, Any idea, how to install .msi on Remote Servers. msiexec.exe is working fine locally. When am wrapping this with PSEXEC @SERVERS.TXT -- --Srinivas Guru Krupaahee Keevalam--- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Any Help : Installing .msi on remote servers
Hai, Any idea, how to install .msi on Remote Servers. msiexec.exe is working fine locally. When am wrapping this with 1. copying the .msi remotely to \\server\d$\code\ file://server/d$/code/ 2. wrapping with psexec .. psexec -u trmx\sriniv @servers.txt msiexec /i /qn /quiet d:\code\test.msi /norestart this is failing .. Any one can share their experience in similar case.. -- --Srinivas Guru Krupaahee Keevalam--- -- --Srinivas Guru Krupaahee Keevalam--- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
