RE: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension
We are keeping Cisco Call Manager for the primary call routing. We have call centers and need to do things that OCS cannot do. We are looking at replacing Unity Voice Mail with Exchange since the functionality is there and it would keep us from having to integrate the Unity system into our primary Exchange environment. The business is wanting the single mailbox but as a admin I do not want the telecom group to have the elevate rights that Unity requires. We are also looking at integrating OCS with the phone system but most likely in a split trunk because we will keep hard phones on each desk. From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension This conversation brings up the question about what phone hardware out there works with Exchange? I haven't been able to find any good/definitive resources. To the original poster, does this question mean that you are looking at replacing Unity with OCS 2007 R2? Please forgive me if that's a ridiculous question. I'm coming to the whole UC/UM arena from a place of complete ignorance. Thanks, RS On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Senter, John john.sen...@etrade.commailto:john.sen...@etrade.com wrote: 7 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension Just curious, what version of Unity are you using? From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.commailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension We are investigating replacing our Cisco Unity voicemail system with Exchange UM, looking at 2007 and 2010. In Unity you can assign multiple extensions to a single mailbox. Is this possible with Exchange UM? I have not found anywhere to indicate a extra number location. Thanks
RE: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension
Norstar, at least some models, apparently supports something called T1/E1 QSIQ which allows for EUM integration. Most people since the release of OCS 2007 R2 are using SIP trunking. Sorry. Exchange UM is no longer my area of expertise. :( (I used to be a Unity expert, long ago and far away.) The Exchange upgrade path is certainly doable and can be planned for UM/OCS at later date. That I can say with certainty. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension Thank you. That helps put things into the appropriate boxes, which is unfortunately the rudimentary knowledge level at which I find myself right now. I've uncovered innumerable references to Dialogics and Audiocodes media gateways, but I didn't know how to interpret the results. Our (very old, but going strong) Norstar system may, or may not, have a compatible gateway product that would allow us to leverage it -just a little bit longer-... (Boy, would it be nice if one exists...) My ideal upgrade path for our ~100 user environment (subject to much amendment / correction / improvement) is to migrate from on-premise Exchange 2003 (single server) to on-premise Exchange 2010 Standard with Enterprise CALs on Server 2008 R2 Enterprise (two servers with fully redundant roles). Server Enterprise would be deployed to take advantage of mailbox resiliency, and Enteprise CALs to immediately utilize archiving, custom retention, and delegated multi-mailbox search. Down the line I would like to add UM, but that is almost certainly a phase 2 project because of the likely cost involved in ripping out and replacing the Norstar. If a Norstar-compatible gateway happens to exist, that might allow us to add UM on the front end. As always, comments, and corrections (and even the occasional humiliation) are always appreciated. RS On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote: The question is what gateways work with Exchange. I'd have to hunt it down, but there is a certified gateway partner listing somewhere on Microsoft.com. In general, anything that talks TCP SIP should work. Exchange UM is more-or-less equivalent in concept to Unity - that is, Unified Messaging (Unity and its various add-ons are far more mature in feature set - but the average business user wouldn't notice). OCS 2007 R2 is more-or-less equivalent in concept to CallManager - that is, a software-based PBX. In terms of PBX functionality, CallManager wins, hands-down. In terms of other functionality - IM, presence, Office integration, whiteboarding, screen sharing; OCS 2007 R2 wins, hands-down. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension This conversation brings up the question about what phone hardware out there works with Exchange? I haven't been able to find any good/definitive resources. To the original poster, does this question mean that you are looking at replacing Unity with OCS 2007 R2? Please forgive me if that's a ridiculous question. I'm coming to the whole UC/UM arena from a place of complete ignorance. Thanks, RS On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Senter, John john.sen...@etrade.commailto:john.sen...@etrade.com wrote: 7 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension Just curious, what version of Unity are you using? From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.commailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension We are investigating replacing our Cisco Unity voicemail system with Exchange UM, looking at 2007 and 2010. In Unity you can assign multiple extensions to a single mailbox. Is this possible with Exchange UM? I have not found anywhere to indicate a extra number location. Thanks
Outlook question
I know this probably isn't the correct place to ask this question, so if anyone can direct me to either a resource for this issue or the correct place to ask I would appreciate it. The owner of our company is having an issue with the nickname file for Outlook. About every 2-3 months the file appears to go missing and he has to start over. Last time this happened I double checked the file. It was still there. There was still data in it and the file didn't appear to be corrupt. I looked at the timing but couldn't see anything that happens on his machine every 2-3 months only. He is the only one that has this issue. We're running SBS2k3 with Exchange included, fully patched. The workstations are running XP and Outlook 2k3, fully patched. Any guidance would be appreciated. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever
Transport Rule to Block Send/Receive of External Mail
I have a situation where management has requested a user be setup with a mailbox that is prohibited from sending or receiving mail outside of our company. I’ve created two different transport rules as follows. Environment: Exchange 2007 SP1 RU7 Block Receiving External Apply rule to messages from users Outside the organization and sent to useraddress send Delivery not authorized, message refused to sender with 5.7.1 Block Sending External Apply rule to messages from useraddress and sent to users Outside the organization send Delivery not authorized, message refused to sender with 5.7.1 This setup works great except for when our Help Desk tracking system sends automated messages based on ticket creation, updates, and closures. Even though the tracking system is “inside” the organization, and the emails always appear to be coming from *...@ourdomain.com, the automated messages are being bounced back. I know that I need to use the exceptions portion of the rule to try to allow these through but am hitting a wall. The tricky part to this is that the From, Subject, and Body fields are never consistent so many of the exceptions in the rules are not working. Thoughts? Suggestions? Can I create an exception based off IP address of the Help Desk server? If so, how to I add that to my transport rules?
RE: Transport Rule to Block Send/Receive of External Mail
Add an exception for a Received: header containing the IP address of the Help Desk server. -Original Message- From: Bonnie Pohlschneider [mailto:bpohlschnei...@crsi-oh.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Transport Rule to Block Send/Receive of External Mail I have a situation where management has requested a user be setup with a mailbox that is prohibited from sending or receiving mail outside of our company. I’ve created two different transport rules as follows. Environment: Exchange 2007 SP1 RU7 Block Receiving External Apply rule to messages from users Outside the organization and sent to useraddress send Delivery not authorized, message refused to sender with 5.7.1 Block Sending External Apply rule to messages from useraddress and sent to users Outside the organization send Delivery not authorized, message refused to sender with 5.7.1 This setup works great except for when our Help Desk tracking system sends automated messages based on ticket creation, updates, and closures. Even though the tracking system is “inside” the organization, and the emails always appear to be coming from *...@ourdomain.com, the automated messages are being bounced back. I know that I need to use the exceptions portion of the rule to try to allow these through but am hitting a wall. The tricky part to this is that the From, Subject, and Body fields are never consistent so many of the exceptions in the rules are not working. Thoughts? Suggestions? Can I create an exception based off IP address of the Help Desk server? If so, how to I add that to my transport rules? ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
Re: Outlook question
The nickname cache has a capacity of 1,000 entries. http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2005/up050609.htm#nk2 - Original Message - From: King's Kid To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:16 AM Subject: Outlook question I know this probably isn't the correct place to ask this question, so if anyone can direct me to either a resource for this issue or the correct place to ask I would appreciate it. The owner of our company is having an issue with the nickname file for Outlook. About every 2-3 months the file appears to go missing and he has to start over. Last time this happened I double checked the file. It was still there. There was still data in it and the file didn't appear to be corrupt. I looked at the timing but couldn't see anything that happens on his machine every 2-3 months only. He is the only one that has this issue. We're running SBS2k3 with Exchange included, fully patched. The workstations are running XP and Outlook 2k3, fully patched. Any guidance would be appreciated. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever
RE: BlackBerry Delays
Richard, Ours seemed to clear up about Midnight last night. How about you? FYI, we ran this tool against our BES logs that's pretty useful: http://www.blackberryforums.com/bes-admin-corner/205866-bes-mail-delays- pending-data-packets-queing.html Thx, Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com -Original Message- From: Richard Glauser [mailto:rglau...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: BlackBerry Delays I have users in all US time zones experiencing this issue. Our carrier is Sprint. On 2/16/10, Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.com wrote: Morning, Anyone experiencing any delays in sending BlackBerry messages/e-mails? We are using Verizon here in SouthEastern PA. It seems to have started approx 11AM EST yesterday. RIM support checked out our server and do not find any issues. Verizon does not report any service issues either. It doesn't matter if it's from Outlook or handheld, if a BB address is involved, it is delayed, sometimes 30 minutes. Thanks, Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
RE: Transport Rule to Block Send/Receive of External Mail
Thanks Rob. I was able to get it to work by changing the rule to: Apply rule to messages from users Outside the organization and sent to useraddress send Delivery not authorized, message refused to sender with 5.7.1 except when the text serverip appears in a Received Much appreciated!
RE: Transport Rule to Block Send/Receive of External Mail
You are welcome :) -Original Message- From: Bonnie Pohlschneider [mailto:bpohlschnei...@crsi-oh.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transport Rule to Block Send/Receive of External Mail Thanks Rob. I was able to get it to work by changing the rule to: Apply rule to messages from users Outside the organization and sent to useraddress send Delivery not authorized, message refused to sender with 5.7.1 except when the text serverip appears in a Received Much appreciated! ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
RE: rpc over https user problem
Thanks, Michael for the reply. I tell you this has me stumped. I continue to configure users for rpc but this one user is still repeating the login screen. In adsiedit, I've drilled into the domain and did properties on the user. What attribute am I looking for to check for inherited permissions? Thanks! Bill Lambert Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: rpc over https user problem I would check (in adsiedit) to see whether his account is properly set to inherit permissions from above. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: rpc over https user problem Hello all... I've installed a new Exchange 2003 box and I'm in the process of moving users over to the new one. All is going well but for one user. I've moved his mailbox and he can get to his email box fine. When I try to configure him for rpc, I get a repeating login screen. Accessing OWA over the internet is fine too. All other rpc users have been connecting fine since I moved their mailboxes. Google didn't come up with anything specific to this problem. Any ideas on what could be wrong? He has XP pro with Outlook 2007. Thanks for any tips! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. image001.gif
RE: rpc over https user problem
Open the Property sheet for the user object. Click on the Security tab and then click on the Advanced button. Near the bottom of the dialog that opens should be a checked box that says Include inheritable permissions from this object's parent. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: rpc over https user problem Thanks, Michael for the reply. I tell you this has me stumped. I continue to configure users for rpc but this one user is still repeating the login screen. In adsiedit, I've drilled into the domain and did properties on the user. What attribute am I looking for to check for inherited permissions? Thanks! Bill Lambert Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: rpc over https user problem I would check (in adsiedit) to see whether his account is properly set to inherit permissions from above. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: rpc over https user problem Hello all... I've installed a new Exchange 2003 box and I'm in the process of moving users over to the new one. All is going well but for one user. I've moved his mailbox and he can get to his email box fine. When I try to configure him for rpc, I get a repeating login screen. Accessing OWA over the internet is fine too. All other rpc users have been connecting fine since I moved their mailboxes. Google didn't come up with anything specific to this problem. Any ideas on what could be wrong? He has XP pro with Outlook 2007. Thanks for any tips! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 [clip_image001] NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. inline: image001.gif
RE: rpc over https user problem
Thanks, again, Michael. Bill Lambert Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: rpc over https user problem Open the Property sheet for the user object. Click on the Security tab and then click on the Advanced button. Near the bottom of the dialog that opens should be a checked box that says Include inheritable permissions from this object's parent. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: rpc over https user problem Thanks, Michael for the reply. I tell you this has me stumped. I continue to configure users for rpc but this one user is still repeating the login screen. In adsiedit, I've drilled into the domain and did properties on the user. What attribute am I looking for to check for inherited permissions? Thanks! Bill Lambert Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: rpc over https user problem I would check (in adsiedit) to see whether his account is properly set to inherit permissions from above. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: rpc over https user problem Hello all... I've installed a new Exchange 2003 box and I'm in the process of moving users over to the new one. All is going well but for one user. I've moved his mailbox and he can get to his email box fine. When I try to configure him for rpc, I get a repeating login screen. Accessing OWA over the internet is fine too. All other rpc users have been connecting fine since I moved their mailboxes. Google didn't come up with anything specific to this problem. Any ideas on what could be wrong? He has XP pro with Outlook 2007. Thanks for any tips! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. image001.gif
Re: Outlook question
Thank you Kathleen!! BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever From: Orland, Kathleen korl...@rogers.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed, February 17, 2010 9:20:56 AM Subject: Re: Outlook question The nickname cache has a capacity of 1,000 entries. http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2005/up050609.htm#nk2 - Original Message - From: King's Kid To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:16 AM Subject: Outlook question I know this probably isn't the correct place to ask this question, so if anyone can direct me to either a resource for this issue or the correct place to ask I would appreciate it. The owner of our company is having an issue with the nickname file for Outlook. About every 2-3 months the file appears to go missing and he has to start over. Last time this happened I double checked the file. It was still there. There was still data in it and the file didn't appear to be corrupt. I looked at the timing but couldn't see anything that happens on his machine every 2-3 months only. He is the only one that has this issue. We're running SBS2k3 with Exchange included, fully patched. The workstations are running XP and Outlook 2k3, fully patched. Any guidance would be appreciated. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever
Importing a new certificate
I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
RE: Importing a new certificate
No. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
RE: Importing a new certificate
Well I just tried it without and posh seems to be frozen - no activity and certainly no thumbprint, any hints? Can I safely kill the posh session and start over? John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate No. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
E-mails to junk folder
All of a sudden in the last day or two, many of our internally addressed messages are going to the Outlook 2007 (non-cached mode) junk folders for different mailboxes. For example, automated messages from a...@mukilteo.wednet.edumailto:a...@mukilteo.wednet.edu end up in junk for some users. So far, all of the messages are ones that come from other servers in the domain that are not the actual Exchange server, but are added as servers that are authenticated or allowed to relay (by IP address) on one of two receive connectors. Back end is E2k7 SP1 RU9 all roles with latest security patches from last week. I don't know much about how the junk mechanisms work and am just starting to dig, but if anyone has seen this or knows right where to go looking I'd appreciate it. I've checked our external IP for blacklisting and am not finding it turn up anywhere that I can see. Thanks, Bonnie
RE: E-mails to junk folder
And if I'm reading correctly, Outlook 2007 should not be using the junk folders in online mode-is that correct? We've been non-cached mode for a long time, and I've verified that has not changed on many of the accounts where this is happening. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc178957.aspx (Supported Account types section) Does not supported actually mean it doesn't work, or you shouldn't do it? In other words, something could be turning on our junk filter settings (like a group policy) and it's suddenly trying to work, but really just isn't supported? If I look at my junk filter settings (it has happened to my account as well) it shows low. Right before I get to the screen to view the settings (actions, junk e-mail, junk e-mail options), I get a warning about the filter not being available because I'm working online. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mails to junk folder All of a sudden in the last day or two, many of our internally addressed messages are going to the Outlook 2007 (non-cached mode) junk folders for different mailboxes. For example, automated messages from a...@mukilteo.wednet.edumailto:a...@mukilteo.wednet.edu end up in junk for some users. So far, all of the messages are ones that come from other servers in the domain that are not the actual Exchange server, but are added as servers that are authenticated or allowed to relay (by IP address) on one of two receive connectors. Back end is E2k7 SP1 RU9 all roles with latest security patches from last week. I don't know much about how the junk mechanisms work and am just starting to dig, but if anyone has seen this or knows right where to go looking I'd appreciate it. I've checked our external IP for blacklisting and am not finding it turn up anywhere that I can see. Thanks, Bonnie
RE: E-mails to junk folder
Isn't this controlled by antispam agent settings on the hub transport/edge? If you are in online mode, Outlook shouldn't process Junk Email itself - but it still can be processed server-side. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder And if I'm reading correctly, Outlook 2007 should not be using the junk folders in online mode-is that correct? We've been non-cached mode for a long time, and I've verified that has not changed on many of the accounts where this is happening. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc178957.aspx (Supported Account types section) Does not supported actually mean it doesn't work, or you shouldn't do it? In other words, something could be turning on our junk filter settings (like a group policy) and it's suddenly trying to work, but really just isn't supported? If I look at my junk filter settings (it has happened to my account as well) it shows low. Right before I get to the screen to view the settings (actions, junk e-mail, junk e-mail options), I get a warning about the filter not being available because I'm working online. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mails to junk folder All of a sudden in the last day or two, many of our internally addressed messages are going to the Outlook 2007 (non-cached mode) junk folders for different mailboxes. For example, automated messages from a...@mukilteo.wednet.edumailto:a...@mukilteo.wednet.edu end up in junk for some users. So far, all of the messages are ones that come from other servers in the domain that are not the actual Exchange server, but are added as servers that are authenticated or allowed to relay (by IP address) on one of two receive connectors. Back end is E2k7 SP1 RU9 all roles with latest security patches from last week. I don't know much about how the junk mechanisms work and am just starting to dig, but if anyone has seen this or knows right where to go looking I'd appreciate it. I've checked our external IP for blacklisting and am not finding it turn up anywhere that I can see. Thanks, Bonnie
RE: Importing a new certificate
That PROBABLY means that it's waiting for some input of some type. :-) Yes you can abort and restart. If the same thing happens, tell us the command you are using. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Well I just tried it without and posh seems to be frozen - no activity and certainly no thumbprint, any hints? Can I safely kill the posh session and start over? John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate No. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
RE: Importing a new certificate
Finally got it to run however I get Cannot import as there is already a certificate with a thumbprint xxx which is the old cert John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate That PROBABLY means that it's waiting for some input of some type. :-) Yes you can abort and restart. If the same thing happens, tell us the command you are using. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Well I just tried it without and posh seems to be frozen - no activity and certainly no thumbprint, any hints? Can I safely kill the posh session and start over? John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate No. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
RE: Importing a new certificate
Your new certificate should have a new thumbprint. Get-ExchangeCertificate should list them all. You want the new one, which should have the expiration date furthest in the future. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Finally got it to run however I get Cannot import as there is already a certificate with a thumbprint xxx which is the old cert John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate That PROBABLY means that it's waiting for some input of some type. :-) Yes you can abort and restart. If the same thing happens, tell us the command you are using. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Well I just tried it without and posh seems to be frozen - no activity and certainly no thumbprint, any hints? Can I safely kill the posh session and start over? John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate No. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print
RE: E-mails to junk folder
Thanks Michael-so, do you know where exactly I might find that in EMC? I've looked all over the hub transport options (again, single server all roles SP1 RU9) and am just not finding it. No Exchange edge server-we have a barracuda spam firewall on the outside. For example, I see a screenshot here of the configuration, but I can't find this screen anywhere. http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/02/exchange-2007-content-filter-how-to_07.html If I run get-organizationconfig I can see the SCLJunkThreshold value is set to 4. Get-contentfilterconfig shows the DN of the object to be under Transport Settings, but I only have two tabs in the properties of Transport settings under \Organization Configuration\Hub Transport. I'm SUPPOSED to be logged on with an admin with all of the correct rights, but I'm starting to wonder if there is a permission out of whack somewhere. -Bonnie From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder Isn't this controlled by antispam agent settings on the hub transport/edge? If you are in online mode, Outlook shouldn't process Junk Email itself - but it still can be processed server-side. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder And if I'm reading correctly, Outlook 2007 should not be using the junk folders in online mode-is that correct? We've been non-cached mode for a long time, and I've verified that has not changed on many of the accounts where this is happening. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc178957.aspx (Supported Account types section) Does not supported actually mean it doesn't work, or you shouldn't do it? In other words, something could be turning on our junk filter settings (like a group policy) and it's suddenly trying to work, but really just isn't supported? If I look at my junk filter settings (it has happened to my account as well) it shows low. Right before I get to the screen to view the settings (actions, junk e-mail, junk e-mail options), I get a warning about the filter not being available because I'm working online. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mails to junk folder All of a sudden in the last day or two, many of our internally addressed messages are going to the Outlook 2007 (non-cached mode) junk folders for different mailboxes. For example, automated messages from a...@mukilteo.wednet.edumailto:a...@mukilteo.wednet.edu end up in junk for some users. So far, all of the messages are ones that come from other servers in the domain that are not the actual Exchange server, but are added as servers that are authenticated or allowed to relay (by IP address) on one of two receive connectors. Back end is E2k7 SP1 RU9 all roles with latest security patches from last week. I don't know much about how the junk mechanisms work and am just starting to dig, but if anyone has seen this or knows right where to go looking I'd appreciate it. I've checked our external IP for blacklisting and am not finding it turn up anywhere that I can see. Thanks, Bonnie
RE: Importing a new certificate
I do this: New-exchangecertificate Get-exchangecertifcate |FL -note thumbprint of new certificate with the furthest out NotAfter data Enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint xxx -services iis,POP,whateverelseyouneedhere I remove the old one once I was done with the above on each server.(remove-exchangecertificate -thumprint oldthumbprint) but it isn't required. Thanks, JB -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Finally got it to run however I get Cannot import as there is already a certificate with a thumbprint xxx which is the old cert John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate That PROBABLY means that it's waiting for some input of some type. :-) Yes you can abort and restart. If the same thing happens, tell us the command you are using. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Well I just tried it without and posh seems to be frozen - no activity and certainly no thumbprint, any hints? Can I safely kill the posh session and start over? John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate No. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure
Number of databases for exchange 2010 standard with dag
Hi, First off, I want to let you know I found this http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/en/us/Licensing.aspx and understand everything there, that Exchange 2010 standard can host 1-5 databases. What I wonder is this. If we are using dag with 2 servers can we still have only 5 databases in the organization so that there is no chance of more than 5 being mounted on any one database server at any given time? Or is it possible to have more if you have two database servers. Say for example a total of 10 databases where each server has 5 mounted and 5 copies (copies of the 5 that are mounted on the other server). And if that were the case, and one server were to fail, would all 10 be able to mount on one server? Something inside me is telling me this wouldn't work. Also one other quick thing. In our Exchange 2007 organization we have a public folder database but we do not really use public folders at all. Once everyones mailboxes are migrated to 2010 can we just abandon that or do we need to migrate/copy something out of it into the 2010 org? Thanks so much! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci benso...@pa.msu.edumailto:benso...@pa.msu.edu 517-884-5469
Re: Importing a new certificate
Thx, will try when I get back in (mutiple disasters going today!) - Original Message - From: Barsodi.John john.bars...@igt.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed Feb 17 14:15:42 2010 Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate I do this: New-exchangecertificate Get-exchangecertifcate |FL -note thumbprint of new certificate with the furthest out NotAfter data Enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint xxx -services iis,POP,whateverelseyouneedhere I remove the old one once I was done with the above on each server.(remove-exchangecertificate -thumprint oldthumbprint) but it isn't required. Thanks, JB -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Finally got it to run however I get Cannot import as there is already a certificate with a thumbprint xxx which is the old cert John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate That PROBABLY means that it's waiting for some input of some type. :-) Yes you can abort and restart. If the same thing happens, tell us the command you are using. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Well I just tried it without and posh seems to be frozen - no activity and certainly no thumbprint, any hints? Can I safely kill the posh session and start over? John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate No. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
RE: Importing a new certificate
Nope,,,import the new one, enable the new one, then delete the old one. ___ Clint Kleciak Infrastructure Engineer Mgr CIGNA IT clint.klec...@cigna.com 1-860-226-1386 Confidential, unpublished property of CIGNA. Do not duplicate or distribute. Use and distribution limited solely to authorized personnel. © Copyright 2010 CIGNA -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2010 CIGNA ==
RE: Number of databases for exchange 2010 standard with dag
An Exchange Standard server can host 5 databases. Period. An instance of a DAG is a database. It is mounted - it may not be active, but it is mounted. A standalone mailbox database is a database. A PF database is a database. You can have 5 of the above on a standard server, in (almost) any combination. If you have more than two standard mailbox servers, yes you can have more than 5 databases, but still only 5 per server. If everyone in your Exchange 2007 organization is using Outlook 2007, you can go ahead and get rid of your PF database(s) now, as long as you are web publishing the OAB. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Ehren Benson [mailto:benso...@pa.msu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Number of databases for exchange 2010 standard with dag Hi, First off, I want to let you know I found this http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/en/us/Licensing.aspx and understand everything there, that Exchange 2010 standard can host 1-5 databases. What I wonder is this. If we are using dag with 2 servers can we still have only 5 databases in the organization so that there is no chance of more than 5 being mounted on any one database server at any given time? Or is it possible to have more if you have two database servers. Say for example a total of 10 databases where each server has 5 mounted and 5 copies (copies of the 5 that are mounted on the other server). And if that were the case, and one server were to fail, would all 10 be able to mount on one server? Something inside me is telling me this wouldn't work. Also one other quick thing. In our Exchange 2007 organization we have a public folder database but we do not really use public folders at all. Once everyones mailboxes are migrated to 2010 can we just abandon that or do we need to migrate/copy something out of it into the 2010 org? Thanks so much! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci benso...@pa.msu.edumailto:benso...@pa.msu.edu 517-884-5469
RE: E-mails to junk folder
Set the organizationConfig for SCLJunkThreshold to 8. :) Those tabs only show up in the EMC if you've run install-AntispamAgents.ps1 in $exscripts which causes the relevant DLLs to get registered. Get-TransportAgent shows you what agents are actually installed and can be configured from the EMS. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder Thanks Michael-so, do you know where exactly I might find that in EMC? I've looked all over the hub transport options (again, single server all roles SP1 RU9) and am just not finding it. No Exchange edge server-we have a barracuda spam firewall on the outside. For example, I see a screenshot here of the configuration, but I can't find this screen anywhere. http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/02/exchange-2007-content-filter-how-to_07.html If I run get-organizationconfig I can see the SCLJunkThreshold value is set to 4. Get-contentfilterconfig shows the DN of the object to be under Transport Settings, but I only have two tabs in the properties of Transport settings under \Organization Configuration\Hub Transport. I'm SUPPOSED to be logged on with an admin with all of the correct rights, but I'm starting to wonder if there is a permission out of whack somewhere. -Bonnie From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder Isn't this controlled by antispam agent settings on the hub transport/edge? If you are in online mode, Outlook shouldn't process Junk Email itself - but it still can be processed server-side. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder And if I'm reading correctly, Outlook 2007 should not be using the junk folders in online mode-is that correct? We've been non-cached mode for a long time, and I've verified that has not changed on many of the accounts where this is happening. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc178957.aspx (Supported Account types section) Does not supported actually mean it doesn't work, or you shouldn't do it? In other words, something could be turning on our junk filter settings (like a group policy) and it's suddenly trying to work, but really just isn't supported? If I look at my junk filter settings (it has happened to my account as well) it shows low. Right before I get to the screen to view the settings (actions, junk e-mail, junk e-mail options), I get a warning about the filter not being available because I'm working online. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mails to junk folder All of a sudden in the last day or two, many of our internally addressed messages are going to the Outlook 2007 (non-cached mode) junk folders for different mailboxes. For example, automated messages from a...@mukilteo.wednet.edumailto:a...@mukilteo.wednet.edu end up in junk for some users. So far, all of the messages are ones that come from other servers in the domain that are not the actual Exchange server, but are added as servers that are authenticated or allowed to relay (by IP address) on one of two receive connectors. Back end is E2k7 SP1 RU9 all roles with latest security patches from last week. I don't know much about how the junk mechanisms work and am just starting to dig, but if anyone has seen this or knows right where to go looking I'd appreciate it. I've checked our external IP for blacklisting and am not finding it turn up anywhere that I can see. Thanks, Bonnie
RE: Importing a new certificate
The first time I did this I went to digicert and went through their walk through and always refer to it whenever I need to do this to make sure I don’t miss a step and get the cert assigned to all the right services needed. -Original Message- From: Kleciak, Clint D A7IT [mailto:clint.klec...@cigna.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Nope,,,import the new one, enable the new one, then delete the old one. ___ Clint Kleciak Infrastructure Engineer Mgr CIGNA IT clint.klec...@cigna.com 1-860-226-1386 Confidential, unpublished property of CIGNA. Do not duplicate or distribute. Use and distribution limited solely to authorized personnel. © Copyright 2010 CIGNA -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2010 CIGNA ==
RE: E-mails to junk folder
Kewl... did not know about that one or it's been so long I forgot. http://www.expta.com/2008/08/how-to-configure-scl-in-exchange.html http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb201691(EXCHG.80).aspx I've adjusted the SCL level and restarted the transport service for good measure. Will see if it gets any better-thanks a bunch! From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder Set the organizationConfig for SCLJunkThreshold to 8. :) Those tabs only show up in the EMC if you've run install-AntispamAgents.ps1 in $exscripts which causes the relevant DLLs to get registered. Get-TransportAgent shows you what agents are actually installed and can be configured from the EMS. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder Thanks Michael-so, do you know where exactly I might find that in EMC? I've looked all over the hub transport options (again, single server all roles SP1 RU9) and am just not finding it. No Exchange edge server-we have a barracuda spam firewall on the outside. For example, I see a screenshot here of the configuration, but I can't find this screen anywhere. http://exchangepedia.com/blog/2007/02/exchange-2007-content-filter-how-to_07.html If I run get-organizationconfig I can see the SCLJunkThreshold value is set to 4. Get-contentfilterconfig shows the DN of the object to be under Transport Settings, but I only have two tabs in the properties of Transport settings under \Organization Configuration\Hub Transport. I'm SUPPOSED to be logged on with an admin with all of the correct rights, but I'm starting to wonder if there is a permission out of whack somewhere. -Bonnie From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder Isn't this controlled by antispam agent settings on the hub transport/edge? If you are in online mode, Outlook shouldn't process Junk Email itself - but it still can be processed server-side. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mails to junk folder And if I'm reading correctly, Outlook 2007 should not be using the junk folders in online mode-is that correct? We've been non-cached mode for a long time, and I've verified that has not changed on many of the accounts where this is happening. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc178957.aspx (Supported Account types section) Does not supported actually mean it doesn't work, or you shouldn't do it? In other words, something could be turning on our junk filter settings (like a group policy) and it's suddenly trying to work, but really just isn't supported? If I look at my junk filter settings (it has happened to my account as well) it shows low. Right before I get to the screen to view the settings (actions, junk e-mail, junk e-mail options), I get a warning about the filter not being available because I'm working online. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mails to junk folder All of a sudden in the last day or two, many of our internally addressed messages are going to the Outlook 2007 (non-cached mode) junk folders for different mailboxes. For example, automated messages from a...@mukilteo.wednet.edumailto:a...@mukilteo.wednet.edu end up in junk for some users. So far, all of the messages are ones that come from other servers in the domain that are not the actual Exchange server, but are added as servers that are authenticated or allowed to relay (by IP address) on one of two receive connectors. Back end is E2k7 SP1 RU9 all roles with latest security patches from last week. I don't know much about how the junk mechanisms work and am just starting to dig, but if anyone has seen this or knows right where to go looking I'd appreciate it. I've checked our external IP for blacklisting and am not finding it turn up anywhere that I can see. Thanks, Bonnie
RE: Importing a new certificate
I actually used their cert tool to generate the request but I see they have a youtube walk through so I'll go with that, thx. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate The first time I did this I went to digicert and went through their walk through and always refer to it whenever I need to do this to make sure I don’t miss a step and get the cert assigned to all the right services needed. -Original Message- From: Kleciak, Clint D A7IT [mailto:clint.klec...@cigna.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Importing a new certificate Nope,,,import the new one, enable the new one, then delete the old one. ___ Clint Kleciak Infrastructure Engineer Mgr CIGNA IT clint.klec...@cigna.com 1-860-226-1386 Confidential, unpublished property of CIGNA. Do not duplicate or distribute. Use and distribution limited solely to authorized personnel. © Copyright 2010 CIGNA -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Importing a new certificate I'm at the point of replacing my old cert (E2K7 SP1) with a new (different) cert so do I need to remove the old one (it's expired) before importing the new one? CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2010 CIGNA == CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
Mobile Device Policy
Anyone have any examples of their corporate policy regarding the use of personal mobile devices and what will happen to it when they leave the company. We've had a plethora of personal mobile devices connecting to Exchange, mostly iPhones, and most are owned by the individual, only a few are company devices. I tried to not allow it, but management overruled me. My concern is when a person is terminated by either voluntary, or otherwise, means, I want to wipe the device. I know that I need a policy in place stating that to cover the legalities of taking such action. So if anyone has such a policy written, and would be willing to share the verbiage it would be appreciated. Thanks, -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
OWA showing Webpage cannot be found externally but works internally
Just wondering if anyone has seen this or has any ideas. We have an SBS 2003 not R2 server. I just did the update to fix the premium access for users coming in through owa. We receive a message from an external vendor with a link embedded in it. It works in the full Outlook client and in OWA from within the core network. If you try to bring up OWA from outside the firewall, premium or basic mode client, when you click the email, it's throwing the Webpage cannot be found with a 404. If you manually type in the link and send it in a new email, it works fine. Is there some filtering or parms that are stopping this from working through the firewall or outside the core network in OWA? Thanks Don K
RE: Mobile Device Policy
copy sent off line ...Tim From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mobile Device Policy Anyone have any examples of their corporate policy regarding the use of personal mobile devices and what will happen to it when they leave the company. We've had a plethora of personal mobile devices connecting to Exchange, mostly iPhones, and most are owned by the individual, only a few are company devices. I tried to not allow it, but management overruled me. My concern is when a person is terminated by either voluntary, or otherwise, means, I want to wipe the device. I know that I need a policy in place stating that to cover the legalities of taking such action. So if anyone has such a policy written, and would be willing to share the verbiage it would be appreciated. Thanks, -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Mobile Device Policy
Can you send a copy my way as well, please? -Paul From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy copy sent off line ...Tim From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mobile Device Policy Anyone have any examples of their corporate policy regarding the use of personal mobile devices and what will happen to it when they leave the company. We've had a plethora of personal mobile devices connecting to Exchange, mostly iPhones, and most are owned by the individual, only a few are company devices. I tried to not allow it, but management overruled me. My concern is when a person is terminated by either voluntary, or otherwise, means, I want to wipe the device. I know that I need a policy in place stating that to cover the legalities of taking such action. So if anyone has such a policy written, and would be willing to share the verbiage it would be appreciated. Thanks, -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Mobile Device Policy
Send an off-list copy. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mobile Device Policy Anyone have any examples of their corporate policy regarding the use of personal mobile devices and what will happen to it when they leave the company. We've had a plethora of personal mobile devices connecting to Exchange, mostly iPhones, and most are owned by the individual, only a few are company devices. I tried to not allow it, but management overruled me. My concern is when a person is terminated by either voluntary, or otherwise, means, I want to wipe the device. I know that I need a policy in place stating that to cover the legalities of taking such action. So if anyone has such a policy written, and would be willing to share the verbiage it would be appreciated. Thanks, -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
