Attachment not visible

[Liby Philip Mathew]

Hi
In my E2K7 SP2, I am facing an issue with attachments.
I cannot see the attachments in Outlook 2003 or 2007.  But If I use OWA I am 
able to see, save etc.
How can I get the attachment visible in Outlook.  This happens to mail coming 
from 1 external client only.  All others are working good.
Any thoughts much appreciated.
Regards
Liby



Disclaimer
[The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are 
confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein 
is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any 
errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.]

RE: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

[Peter Johnson]

Also Enterprise addresses more RAM than the standard version. However since STd 
X64 addresses 32GB of RAM I doubht this is actually an issue anymore :) Since 
32GB should be more than sufficient for most organisations,

Regards
[cid:image001.jpg@01CAEABB.EDD873D0]

Peter Johnson
I.T Architect
United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542
South Africa: +27 11 252 1100
Swaziland: +268 442 7000
Fax:+27 11 974 7130
Mobile: +2783 306 0019
peter.john...@peterstow.com


This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, 
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information 
contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this 
email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the 
sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of 
information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. 
Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of 
Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company.

Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information 
contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or 
inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any 
decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be 
made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, 
business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of 
the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any 
direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss 
of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or 
otherwise.

The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or 
incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other 
marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower.
No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower 
and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send 
this e-mail.
 [cid:image002.jpg@01CAEABB.EDD873D0]
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: 22 April 2010 22:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

Hi guys,

Quick question. Is there a benefit to running Exchange 2010 Enterprise on 
Windows 2008 Server Enterprise instead of Windows Server 2008 Standard?

Thanks,

Evan
<><>

Re: Attachment not visible

[Orland, Kathleen]

If you open Outlook in safe mode, can you see the attachment? What happens if 
you click Forward, do you see the attachment then? 

Have you tried (with Outlook closed) to delete the following files:

outcmd.dat
extend.dat
frmcache.dat
views.dat

Then open Outlook again to see if the issue has resolved? 

Kathleen Orland

  - Original Message - 
  From: Liby Philip Mathew 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:46 AM
  Subject: Attachment not visible


  Hi 

  In my E2K7 SP2, I am facing an issue with attachments.

  I cannot see the attachments in Outlook 2003 or 2007.  But If I use OWA I am 
able to see, save etc.

  How can I get the attachment visible in Outlook.  This happens to mail coming 
from 1 external client only.  All others are working good.

  Any thoughts much appreciated.

  Regards

  Liby

   



--
  Disclaimer
  [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are 
confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein 
is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any 
errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.]

Re: Middle Tennessee

[King's Kid]

My house is safe.  I can't say the same for all my stores or VPN connections.  
Going to be a busy week.

I hope everyone else is safe.  The damage I saw when I came to work this 
morning was bad.
 BJ 


When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever 





From: Webster 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Sun, May 2, 2010 1:21:07 PM
Subject: Middle Tennessee


Hope any list members in middle Tennessee are dry, safe and sound.  We are just 
far enough away from the rivers and lakes to be safe.  We also live at the 
highest point in our county so if we get flooded, Noah better show up.
 
 
Carl Webster
Citrix Technology Professional
http://dabcc.com/Webster


  

OWA 2003 Loading...(Somewhat fixed.)

[David McSpadden]

Found that URLScan.ini was the culprit and can now get logged into
OWA2003 and have a page display.  Can send email, can open previous
emails, CANNOT open new mail though.

Getting an HTTP 404 error??

 

"Please consider the environment before printing this email."

 

 

RE: Deleting extend.dat while outlook is open

[Jason Gurtz]

> Thanks ... I have no access to the login script nor GPO for this
project,
> software is being delivered over the web via SaaS and I'll need to
delete
> the extend.dat as part of the MSI/Winstall packaging

Why not have the installer check for a running Outlook and prompt to
close, etc...

If it's a silent install, you could have the installer return a code and
log all the stations that have a running outlook and deal with them later.

At worst, just system(tskill outlook.exe); before doing the delete :)

No matter what, make management decide what to do and sign off on it
before doing anything.  Otherwise, it's your backside...

~JasonG

RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)

[David W. McSpadden]

Does Windows 2003 IIS even need urlscan??

 

  _  

From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 2003 Loading...(Somewhat fixed.)

 

Found that URLScan.ini was the culprit and can now get logged into OWA2003
and have a page display.  Can send email, can open previous emails, CANNOT
open new mail though.

Getting an HTTP 404 error??

 

"Please consider the environment before printing this email."

 

 

 

RE: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

[Tim Evans]

and if you want to use DAGs, you'll need to install it on enterprise version.

...Tim

From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

Also Enterprise addresses more RAM than the standard version. However since STd 
X64 addresses 32GB of RAM I doubht this is actually an issue anymore :) Since 
32GB should be more than sufficient for most organisations,

Regards
[cid:image001.jpg@01CAEA8B.DB283700]

Peter Johnson
I.T Architect
United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542
South Africa: +27 11 252 1100
Swaziland: +268 442 7000
Fax:+27 11 974 7130
Mobile: +2783 306 0019
peter.john...@peterstow.com


This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, 
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information 
contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this 
email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the 
sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of 
information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. 
Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of 
Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company.

Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information 
contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or 
inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any 
decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be 
made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, 
business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of 
the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any 
direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss 
of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or 
otherwise.

The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or 
incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other 
marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower.
No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower 
and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send 
this e-mail.
 [cid:image002.jpg@01CAEA8B.DB283700]
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: 22 April 2010 22:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

Hi guys,

Quick question. Is there a benefit to running Exchange 2010 Enterprise on 
Windows 2008 Server Enterprise instead of Windows Server 2008 Standard?

Thanks,

Evan
<><>

RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)

[Michael B. Smith]

"need" is a funny word. It's not a requirement.

You can use the IIS W3SVC logs and the urlscan logs to see what verbs are being 
denied and if truly files are not being found.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)

Does Windows 2003 IIS even need urlscan??


From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 2003 Loading...(Somewhat fixed.)

Found that URLScan.ini was the culprit and can now get logged into OWA2003 and 
have a page display.  Can send email, can open previous emails, CANNOT open new 
mail though.
Getting an HTTP 404 error??

"Please consider the environment before printing this email."

RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)

[David W. McSpadden]

It was the : and . in the subject line.

Commented them out of URLScan and life is good, I guess.

 

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)

 

"need" is a funny word. It's not a requirement.

 

You can use the IIS W3SVC logs and the urlscan logs to see what verbs are
being denied and if truly files are not being found.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)

 

Does Windows 2003 IIS even need urlscan??

 

  _  

From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 2003 Loading...(Somewhat fixed.)

 

Found that URLScan.ini was the culprit and can now get logged into OWA2003
and have a page display.  Can send email, can open previous emails, CANNOT
open new mail though.

Getting an HTTP 404 error??

 

"Please consider the environment before printing this email."

 

 

 

RE: Archiving solution

[John Bowles]

Just an FYI.  Enteprise Vault 9 is the only version that supports E2K10.  From 
what I was told last, that is not going to hit the shelf until the 3rd quarter 
of this year.


John Bowles


From: Oliver Marshall [oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Archiving solution

Hi,

I'm looking for recommendations (either good or bad) of email archiving 
solutions for a colo'd Exchange 2010 box.

I'm looking at Red Gate, but the Symatec/Veritas Enterprise Vault some some 
good features too.

There's GFI as well though that always seems like it's on the small side of the 
SME market for my liking.

Any others that you have used ?

Olly

[cid:personal229.jpg]

[cid:g2support_2004823.png]

Network Support
Online Backups
Server Management

Tel: 0845 307 3443
Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com
Web: http://www.g2support.com
Twitter: g2support
Newsletter: http://www.g2support.com/newsletter
Mail: 2 Roundhill Road, Brighton, Sussex, BN2 3RF

G2 Support LLP is registered at Mill House, 103 Holmes Avenue, HOVE
BN3 7LE. Our registered company number is OC316341.

<><>

RE: Archiving solution

[John Hornbuckle]

If you're okay with outsourcing, we've successfully been using Postini for the 
past year or so. Never had a problem.



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us




From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Archiving solution

Hi,

I'm looking for recommendations (either good or bad) of email archiving 
solutions for a colo'd Exchange 2010 box.

I'm looking at Red Gate, but the Symatec/Veritas Enterprise Vault some some 
good features too.

There's GFI as well though that always seems like it's on the small side of the 
SME market for my liking.

Any others that you have used ?

Olly



[cid:image002.png@01CAEAAE.C1969200]


Network Support
Online Backups
Server Management

Tel: 0845 307 3443
Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com
Web: http://www.g2support.com
Twitter: g2support
Newsletter: http://www.g2support.com/newsletter
Mail: 2 Roundhill Road, Brighton, Sussex, BN2 3RF

G2 Support LLP is registered at Mill House, 103 Holmes Avenue, HOVE
BN3 7LE. Our registered company number is OC316341.




NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and 
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public 
disclosure.
<><>

Archiving Calendar Items

[Andrew Greene]

Happy Monday to all!

 

I came in to what I thought was a bit of an odd request - we're running
Exchange 2003 SP2 and run GFI MailArchiver as our message archiving
solution. Today I was asked about recovering calendar items from 2008
for a single user. I know that you can archive the calendar from the
Outlook level, but even if you auto-archive every day it still creates
an imperfect record that can be modified by a user prior to archiving.
Any thoughts? 

 

The more I stew on it the more I realize that this is the craziest damn
request I think I've ever received and it's getting under my skin more
than a little bit. 

 

Andrew Greene

IS Technician / Webmaster

City of Anderson

"Many eyes make all bugs shallow." - Linus's Law

 

Follow us on Twitter - @cityofanderson
 

Friend us on Facebook - Facebook
 

 

Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Paul Steele]

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead
and installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went
fine without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

 

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange
2010. We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had
everything figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery
problems after completing the install. The actual installation went
without problems. We have a shared address space, with some users on our
Exchange server and some on a Unix host. The biggest issue we're having
is sending to users who are not on our Exchange server. We've set the
Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to Internal Relay, but when we try to
send to usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the Exchange name
space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart host).
We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If
anyone has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

 

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Michael B. Smith]

Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix host?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead and 
installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went fine 
without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. 
We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had everything 
figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery  problems after 
completing the install. The actual installation went without problems. We have 
a shared address space, with some users on our Exchange server and some on a 
Unix host. The biggest issue we're having is sending to users who are not on 
our Exchange server. We've set the Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to 
Internal Relay, but when we try to send to 
usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the 
Exchange name space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart 
host). We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks 
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If anyone 
has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[John Bowles]

Mr. Smith.. you are quick!  I was just about to ask him that.


John Bowles


From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix host?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead and 
installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went fine 
without any errors, but we’re have delivery problems.

We’ve been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. 
We’ve done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had everything 
figured out. Unfortunately we’re having mail delivery  problems after 
completing the install. The actual installation went without problems. We have 
a shared address space, with some users on our Exchange server and some on a 
Unix host. The biggest issue we’re having is sending to users who are not on 
our Exchange server. We’ve set the Accepted Domains for “acadiau.ca” to 
Internal Relay, but when we try to send to 
usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the 
Exchange name space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart 
host). We’ve compared things with our test servers and everything looks 
correct. At this point we’ve very confused what we’re doing wrong. If anyone 
has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Michael B. Smith]

I'm working on slide decks for a presentation tomorrow. The only thing worse is 
working on the last couple of chapters of a book, when you are tired of it and 
just need to get it done! :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

Mr. Smith.. you are quick!  I was just about to ask him that.


John Bowles


From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues
Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix host?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead and 
installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went fine 
without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. 
We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had everything 
figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery  problems after 
completing the install. The actual installation went without problems. We have 
a shared address space, with some users on our Exchange server and some on a 
Unix host. The biggest issue we're having is sending to users who are not on 
our Exchange server. We've set the Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to 
Internal Relay, but when we try to send to 
usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the 
Exchange name space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart 
host). We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks 
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If anyone 
has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Paul Steele]

Yes, I had already done that. I'm a bit confused now though. I
stopped/started the SMTP virtual host (on the EXCH2003 side), and that
seemed to solve the problem. Things seem to be working so I guess
whatever was broken/stuck is ok. At least it's working...

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: May-03-10 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix
host?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead
and installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went
fine without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

 

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange
2010. We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had
everything figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery
problems after completing the install. The actual installation went
without problems. We have a shared address space, with some users on our
Exchange server and some on a Unix host. The biggest issue we're having
is sending to users who are not on our Exchange server. We've set the
Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to Internal Relay, but when we try to
send to usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the Exchange name
space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart host).
We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If
anyone has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

 

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Michael B. Smith]

That would tend to indicate that the mail is being routed through the Exchange 
2003 server and you don't have  a properly scoped send-connector on the 2010 
side.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

Yes, I had already done that. I'm a bit confused now though. I stopped/started 
the SMTP virtual host (on the EXCH2003 side), and that seemed to solve the 
problem. Things seem to be working so I guess whatever was broken/stuck is ok. 
At least it's working...

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: May-03-10 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix host?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead and 
installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went fine 
without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. 
We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had everything 
figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery  problems after 
completing the install. The actual installation went without problems. We have 
a shared address space, with some users on our Exchange server and some on a 
Unix host. The biggest issue we're having is sending to users who are not on 
our Exchange server. We've set the Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to 
Internal Relay, but when we try to send to 
usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the 
Exchange name space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart 
host). We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks 
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If anyone 
has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Paul Steele]

That might be it. I had sort of wanted to keep Exchange 2010 out of the
picture after this first phase since all the mail boxes are still on
Exchange 2003. I want to get backups, certificates, and other misc stuff
working on Exchange 2010 before moving mailboxes. 

 

One weird problem that has surfaced since the 2010 install is a problem
with Public folders. When I try to look at the folder in System Manager
on Exch2003, I get the error 

 

"The HTTP service used by Public Folders is not available, possible
causes are that Public stores are not mounted and the Information Store
service is not running."

 

I'm getting lots of google hits for this error but none specifically
relating to an Exchange 2010 upgrade. The folders show up fine in
Outlook, but not in OWA or System Manager. This issue did not come up in
our test lab.

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: May-03-10 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

That would tend to indicate that the mail is being routed through the
Exchange 2003 server and you don't have  a properly scoped
send-connector on the 2010 side.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

Yes, I had already done that. I'm a bit confused now though. I
stopped/started the SMTP virtual host (on the EXCH2003 side), and that
seemed to solve the problem. Things seem to be working so I guess
whatever was broken/stuck is ok. At least it's working...

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: May-03-10 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix
host?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead
and installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went
fine without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

 

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange
2010. We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had
everything figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery
problems after completing the install. The actual installation went
without problems. We have a shared address space, with some users on our
Exchange server and some on a Unix host. The biggest issue we're having
is sending to users who are not on our Exchange server. We've set the
Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to Internal Relay, but when we try to
send to usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the Exchange name
space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart host).
We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If
anyone has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

 

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Michael B. Smith]

How have you configured namespace sharing, i.e., namespaces vs. SSL 
certificates on the two servers?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

That might be it. I had sort of wanted to keep Exchange 2010 out of the picture 
after this first phase since all the mail boxes are still on Exchange 2003. I 
want to get backups, certificates, and other misc stuff working on Exchange 
2010 before moving mailboxes.

One weird problem that has surfaced since the 2010 install is a problem with 
Public folders. When I try to look at the folder in System Manager on Exch2003, 
I get the error

"The HTTP service used by Public Folders is not available, possible causes are 
that Public stores are not mounted and the Information Store service is not 
running."

I'm getting lots of google hits for this error but none specifically relating 
to an Exchange 2010 upgrade. The folders show up fine in Outlook, but not in 
OWA or System Manager. This issue did not come up in our test lab.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: May-03-10 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

That would tend to indicate that the mail is being routed through the Exchange 
2003 server and you don't have  a properly scoped send-connector on the 2010 
side.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

Yes, I had already done that. I'm a bit confused now though. I stopped/started 
the SMTP virtual host (on the EXCH2003 side), and that seemed to solve the 
problem. Things seem to be working so I guess whatever was broken/stuck is ok. 
At least it's working...

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: May-03-10 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix host?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead and 
installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went fine 
without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. 
We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had everything 
figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery  problems after 
completing the install. The actual installation went without problems. We have 
a shared address space, with some users on our Exchange server and some on a 
Unix host. The biggest issue we're having is sending to users who are not on 
our Exchange server. We've set the Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to 
Internal Relay, but when we try to send to 
usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the 
Exchange name space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart 
host). We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks 
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If anyone 
has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

RE: Archiving solution

[Alex Eckelberry]

Actually Sunbelt Exchange Archiver does support 2010, except for full support 
for OWA.  We do have a workaround that can be used if OWA use is imperative.


Alex


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving solution

Neither RedGate nor Sunbelt's archivers currently support Exchange 2010 either. 
Thus my first comment in the thread. :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving solution

Just an FYI.  Enteprise Vault 9 is the only version that supports E2K10.  From 
what I was told last, that is not going to hit the shelf until the 3rd quarter 
of this year.


John Bowles


From: Oliver Marshall [oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Archiving solution
Hi,

I'm looking for recommendations (either good or bad) of email archiving 
solutions for a colo'd Exchange 2010 box.

I'm looking at Red Gate, but the Symatec/Veritas Enterprise Vault some some 
good features too.

There's GFI as well though that always seems like it's on the small side of the 
SME market for my liking.

Any others that you have used ?

Olly



[cid:image002.png@01CAEAC5.99737CE0]


Network Support
Online Backups
Server Management

Tel: 0845 307 3443
Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com
Web: http://www.g2support.com
Twitter: g2support
Newsletter: http://www.g2support.com/newsletter
Mail: 2 Roundhill Road, Brighton, Sussex, BN2 3RF

G2 Support LLP is registered at Mill House, 103 Holmes Avenue, HOVE
BN3 7LE. Our registered company number is OC316341.

<><>

Digital Cert Request response

[Russ Patterson]

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard
on the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just
use Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the
-FileData part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc
first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully
accepted.

Russ

RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

[Paul Steele]

Mail delivery seems to be working properly now, so I think I've got the
various connectors configured properly. The 2003 server does not have a
certificate and I haven't installed a UC cert on 2010 yet. I'm reading
everything I can find on the topic before tackling the certificate
install. After the way things went today I doubt that things will go
problem free...

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: May-03-10 2:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

How have you configured namespace sharing, i.e., namespaces vs. SSL
certificates on the two servers?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

That might be it. I had sort of wanted to keep Exchange 2010 out of the
picture after this first phase since all the mail boxes are still on
Exchange 2003. I want to get backups, certificates, and other misc stuff
working on Exchange 2010 before moving mailboxes. 

 

One weird problem that has surfaced since the 2010 install is a problem
with Public folders. When I try to look at the folder in System Manager
on Exch2003, I get the error 

 

"The HTTP service used by Public Folders is not available, possible
causes are that Public stores are not mounted and the Information Store
service is not running."

 

I'm getting lots of google hits for this error but none specifically
relating to an Exchange 2010 upgrade. The folders show up fine in
Outlook, but not in OWA or System Manager. This issue did not come up in
our test lab.

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: May-03-10 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

That would tend to indicate that the mail is being routed through the
Exchange 2003 server and you don't have  a properly scoped
send-connector on the 2010 side.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

Yes, I had already done that. I'm a bit confused now though. I
stopped/started the SMTP virtual host (on the EXCH2003 side), and that
seemed to solve the problem. Things seem to be working so I guess
whatever was broken/stuck is ok. At least it's working...

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: May-03-10 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

Did you create a send-connector to forward the scoped domain to the Unix
host?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues

 

We did as much testing as we could in our test lab, so we moved ahead
and installed our production Exchange 2010 server. The installation went
fine without any errors, but we're have delivery problems.

 

We've been preparing for a transition from Exchange 2003 to Exchange
2010. We've done various test installs in our  lab and thought we had
everything figured out. Unfortunately we're having mail delivery
problems after completing the install. The actual installation went
without problems. We have a shared address space, with some users on our
Exchange server and some on a Unix host. The biggest issue we're having
is sending to users who are not on our Exchange server. We've set the
Accepted Domains for "acadiau.ca" to Internal Relay, but when we try to
send to usern...@acadiau.ca that does not exist in the Exchange name
space, the message bounces (it never makes it to our Unix smart host).
We've compared things with our test servers and everything looks
correct. At this point we've very confused what we're doing wrong. If
anyone has a suggestion what to look for we really appreciate it.

 

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Michael B. Smith]

Where did you generate the CSR?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Tim Evans]

You need to export it from your current server first, with the private key. It 
will give you a PFX file you can import into the new server. Whenever I get a 
new cert, I export like this and keep a copy for backup.

...Tim

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

Re: Digital Cert Request response

[Russ Patterson]

On that machine - that's why I'm so befuddled.

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:

>  Where did you generate the CSR?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com 
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 1:50 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> Hello all -
>
>
>
> We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into
> our 2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request"
> wizard on the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.
>
>
>
> Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just
> use Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the
> -FileData part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc
> first?
>
>
>
> Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully
> accepted.
>
>
>
> Russ
>

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Michael B. Smith]

But using what tool? The Certificates MMC? The IIS MMC? EMC? Certutil?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

On that machine - that's why I'm so befuddled.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
Where did you generate the CSR?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

Re: Digital Cert Request response

[Russ Patterson]

I created the request (still have a copy of the .req file there) on the
machine I'm trying to import onto.

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Tim Evans  wrote:

>  You need to export it from your current server first, with the private
> key. It will give you a PFX file you can import into the new server.
> Whenever I get a new cert, I export like this and keep a copy for backup.
>
>
>
> ...Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 10:50 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> Hello all -
>
>
>
> We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into
> our 2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request"
> wizard on the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.
>
>
>
> Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just
> use Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the
> -FileData part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc
> first?
>
>
>
> Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully
> accepted.
>
>
>
> Russ
>

Re: Digital Cert Request response

[Russ Patterson]

i generated the request with the Exchange wizard in the same place - E2010
Mgmt Console/ Server Configuration/Exchange Certificates.

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:

>  But using what tool? The Certificates MMC? The IIS MMC? EMC? Certutil?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com 
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 2:00 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> On that machine - that's why I'm so befuddled.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
>
> Where did you generate the CSR?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com 
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 1:50 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> Hello all -
>
>
>
> We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into
> our 2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request"
> wizard on the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.
>
>
>
> Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just
> use Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the
> -FileData part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc
> first?
>
>
>
> Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully
> accepted.
>
>
>
> Russ
>
>
>

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Tim Evans]

oops, never mind. I thought you were trying to move it from another server. I'd 
still make a backup once you get it installed.

...Tim

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

I created the request (still have a copy of the .req file there) on the machine 
I'm trying to import onto.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:
You need to export it from your current server first, with the private key. It 
will give you a PFX file you can import into the new server. Whenever I get a 
new cert, I export like this and keep a copy for backup.

...Tim

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:50 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Michael B. Smith]

Picture send offline.

Basically you have to click Server Config -> Server Name (if more than one) -> 
(new Certificate name) -> Complete Pending Request

If it's not there, then someone has deleted it for you.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

i generated the request with the Exchange wizard in the same place - E2010 Mgmt 
Console/ Server Configuration/Exchange Certificates.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
But using what tool? The Certificates MMC? The IIS MMC? EMC? Certutil?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:00 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

On that machine - that's why I'm so befuddled.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
Where did you generate the CSR?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:50 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

Re: Digital Cert Request response

[Russ Patterson]

Thanks Tim. I WILL back it up, if I ever get it installed, I promise :)

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Tim Evans  wrote:

>  oops, never mind. I thought you were trying to move it from another
> server. I'd still make a backup once you get it installed.
>
>
>
> ...Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 11:03 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> I created the request (still have a copy of the .req file there) on the
> machine I'm trying to import onto.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Tim Evans  wrote:
>
> You need to export it from your current server first, with the private key.
> It will give you a PFX file you can import into the new server. Whenever I
> get a new cert, I export like this and keep a copy for backup.
>
>
>
> ...Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 10:50 AM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> Hello all -
>
>
>
> We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into
> our 2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request"
> wizard on the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.
>
>
>
> Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just
> use Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the
> -FileData part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc
> first?
>
>
>
> Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully
> accepted.
>
>
>
> Russ
>
>
>

Re: Online Address Book

[James Kerr]

Wow, I finally got to look into this, that is a painful procedure to go through 
to make an address book available to one user from his mobile phone but he 
happens to be the executive director and wants access to all employees phone 
numbers (including home #s) from his phone. Sigh.

James


  - Original Message - 
  From: James Kerr 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:22 PM
  Subject: Re: Online Address Book


  Thanks Michael, I will look into this.

  James
- Original Message - 
From: Michael B. Smith 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: Online Address Book


You can do this with address list segregation on Exchange 2003 and 2007. 
(There is a white paper on Microsoft.com that discusses it. Google for it.)

 

While it works under SOME BUT NOT ALL circumstances in Exchange 2010, it's 
currently not a supported scenario.

 

From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Online Address Book

 

I need to setup an address book that is available to users with phones 
running WinMobile. I want the address book to only be available to certain 
users using Outlook and certain users running WinMobile with ActiveSync. I dont 
know how to go about this but I know there has to be a way. Any pointers?

 

James

Re: Digital Cert Request response

[Russ Patterson]

So do I have to create yet another dig cert request & start over? or is
there a user-friendly un-delete sort of feature??

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:

>  Picture send offline.
>
>
>
> Basically you have to click Server Config -> Server Name (if more than one)
> -> (new Certificate name) -> Complete Pending Request
>
>
>
> If it’s not there, then someone has deleted it for you.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com 
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 2:05 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> i generated the request with the Exchange wizard in the same place - E2010
> Mgmt Console/ Server Configuration/Exchange Certificates.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
>
> But using what tool? The Certificates MMC? The IIS MMC? EMC? Certutil?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com 
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 2:00 PM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>
> *Subject:* Re: Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> On that machine - that's why I'm so befuddled.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
>
> Where did you generate the CSR?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com 
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 1:50 PM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Digital Cert Request response
>
>
>
> Hello all -
>
>
>
> We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into
> our 2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request"
> wizard on the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.
>
>
>
> Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just
> use Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the
> -FileData part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc
> first?
>
>
>
> Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully
> accepted.
>
>
>
> Russ
>
>
>
>
>

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Michael B. Smith]

You have to create a new request. However, you SHOULD find that most of the 
data is pre-filled. I just tested it and most of the data was pre-filled for me.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

So do I have to create yet another dig cert request & start over? or is there a 
user-friendly un-delete sort of feature??
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
Picture send offline.

Basically you have to click Server Config -> Server Name (if more than one) -> 
(new Certificate name) -> Complete Pending Request

If it's not there, then someone has deleted it for you.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:05 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

i generated the request with the Exchange wizard in the same place - E2010 Mgmt 
Console/ Server Configuration/Exchange Certificates.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
But using what tool? The Certificates MMC? The IIS MMC? EMC? Certutil?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:00 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

On that machine - that's why I'm so befuddled.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
Where did you generate the CSR?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:50 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

Any SBS 2007 Book recommendations.

[Jason Gurtz]

Last time I dealt with the product, it was NT4/Ex5.5 era.  I have high
hopes that it will be better this time. :)

Looking for a best practices type of guide.

Thanks much,

~JasonG

I'm getting conflicting information...

[Reimer, Mark]

We are moving from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. We have one physical
server running Exchange 2003, and I was planning on one physical,
dedicated (i.e. nothing virtual) server for Exchange 2010.

 

I've heard a report that I can put all "parts" of Exchange 2010 on a
physical box except Transport Server. It wants/needs to be on a separate
box.

 

Can somebody give me guidance?

 

We have only about 350 hundred users, and many of these use OWA, and
only occasionally. We have about 100 that use Outlook, and most don't do
a lot of emailing. All this to say, there isn't a whole lot of email
traffic that the server would have to actively, concurrently handle.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Mark Reimer,  A+, MCSA

Windows Servers & Networking

Prairie Bible Institute

Box 4000

Three Hills, AB  T0M-2N0

Canada

Tel: 403-443-5511, Ext. 3476

Fax: 403-443-5540

Email: mark.rei...@prairie.edu  

www.prairie.edu  

 

 

RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

[Paul Steele]

You can definitely have all components on a single server. I just did
the same upgrade today after several weeks of testing in the lab.

 

From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu] 
Sent: May-03-10 5:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: I'm getting conflicting information...

 

We are moving from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. We have one physical
server running Exchange 2003, and I was planning on one physical,
dedicated (i.e. nothing virtual) server for Exchange 2010.

 

I've heard a report that I can put all "parts" of Exchange 2010 on a
physical box except Transport Server. It wants/needs to be on a separate
box.

 

Can somebody give me guidance?

 

We have only about 350 hundred users, and many of these use OWA, and
only occasionally. We have about 100 that use Outlook, and most don't do
a lot of emailing. All this to say, there isn't a whole lot of email
traffic that the server would have to actively, concurrently handle.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Mark Reimer,  A+, MCSA

Windows Servers & Networking

Prairie Bible Institute

Box 4000

Three Hills, AB  T0M-2N0

Canada

Tel: 403-443-5511, Ext. 3476

Fax: 403-443-5540

Email: mark.rei...@prairie.edu

www.prairie.edu

 

 

RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

[Kretche, Peter]

It's the "Edge Server" that can't be combined with other roles.  Hub Transport 
is fine to combine with Mailbox and Client Access.

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+, HP APS
Senior Network/Systems Administrator
E-mail Administrator
UW - Green Bay
Voice: 920.465.5014
Fax: 920.465.2864
kretc...@uwgb.edu

Don't become a phishing victim!  UW Green Bay and other reputable organizations 
will never use email to request that you reply with your password, Social 
Security Number, date of birth or confidential personal information.  NEVER 
REPLY TO AN EMAIL WITH YOUR PASSWORD, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, DATE OF BIRTH, OR 
ANY OTHER CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL INFORMATION!

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 4:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

You can definitely have all components on a single server. I just did the same 
upgrade today after several weeks of testing in the lab.

From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu]
Sent: May-03-10 5:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: I'm getting conflicting information...

We are moving from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. We have one physical server 
running Exchange 2003, and I was planning on one physical, dedicated (i.e. 
nothing virtual) server for Exchange 2010.

I've heard a report that I can put all "parts" of Exchange 2010 on a physical 
box except Transport Server. It wants/needs to be on a separate box.

Can somebody give me guidance?

We have only about 350 hundred users, and many of these use OWA, and only 
occasionally. We have about 100 that use Outlook, and most don't do a lot of 
emailing. All this to say, there isn't a whole lot of email traffic that the 
server would have to actively, concurrently handle.

Thanks in advance.

Mark Reimer,  A+, MCSA
Windows Servers & Networking
Prairie Bible Institute
Box 4000
Three Hills, AB  T0M-2N0
Canada
Tel: 403-443-5511, Ext. 3476
Fax: 403-443-5540
Email: mark.rei...@prairie.edu
www.prairie.edu

RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

[Michael B. Smith]

You can't put EDGE Transport on the same server as everything else. You can put 
HUB Transport on the same server.

Edge is an optional role anyway. Most people don't deploy it.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

You can definitely have all components on a single server. I just did the same 
upgrade today after several weeks of testing in the lab.

From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu]
Sent: May-03-10 5:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: I'm getting conflicting information...

We are moving from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. We have one physical server 
running Exchange 2003, and I was planning on one physical, dedicated (i.e. 
nothing virtual) server for Exchange 2010.

I've heard a report that I can put all "parts" of Exchange 2010 on a physical 
box except Transport Server. It wants/needs to be on a separate box.

Can somebody give me guidance?

We have only about 350 hundred users, and many of these use OWA, and only 
occasionally. We have about 100 that use Outlook, and most don't do a lot of 
emailing. All this to say, there isn't a whole lot of email traffic that the 
server would have to actively, concurrently handle.

Thanks in advance.

Mark Reimer,  A+, MCSA
Windows Servers & Networking
Prairie Bible Institute
Box 4000
Three Hills, AB  T0M-2N0
Canada
Tel: 403-443-5511, Ext. 3476
Fax: 403-443-5540
Email: mark.rei...@prairie.edu
www.prairie.edu

RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

[Reimer, Mark]

Thanks all. I can rest easy, since I had ordered only one server (we
aren't looking at DAG).

 

Mark

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

 

You can't put EDGE Transport on the same server as everything else. You
can put HUB Transport on the same server.

 

Edge is an optional role anyway. Most people don't deploy it.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I'm getting conflicting information...

 

You can definitely have all components on a single server. I just did
the same upgrade today after several weeks of testing in the lab.

 

From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu] 
Sent: May-03-10 5:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: I'm getting conflicting information...

 

We are moving from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. We have one physical
server running Exchange 2003, and I was planning on one physical,
dedicated (i.e. nothing virtual) server for Exchange 2010.

 

I've heard a report that I can put all "parts" of Exchange 2010 on a
physical box except Transport Server. It wants/needs to be on a separate
box.

 

Can somebody give me guidance?

 

We have only about 350 hundred users, and many of these use OWA, and
only occasionally. We have about 100 that use Outlook, and most don't do
a lot of emailing. All this to say, there isn't a whole lot of email
traffic that the server would have to actively, concurrently handle.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Mark Reimer,  A+, MCSA

Windows Servers & Networking

Prairie Bible Institute

Box 4000

Three Hills, AB  T0M-2N0

Canada

Tel: 403-443-5511, Ext. 3476

Fax: 403-443-5540

Email: mark.rei...@prairie.edu

www.prairie.edu

 

 

OST Size - and Outlook 2010

[Bill Egan]

Installed Office 2010 today after a clean uninstall of O2k7.  After a
long conversion process and a still incomplete index, I looked at the
size of my OST.  Its now 6.3gig.  If I do a folder size on my mailbox,
the server data shows 1.2G and the local data shows 2.3g.  Both 1.2
and 2.3 to 6.3 are big discrepancies.  does this strike anyone else as
odd or wrong?

thanks,
began

RE: OST Size - and Outlook 2010

[greg.sweers]

Have you accounted for the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which seems
to be an underlying equation in all major upgrades?
 
I would just create a new profile and see what the OST ends up on.  If
it all looks good, nuke the old one.  

 

-Original Message-
From: Bill Egan [mailto:william.e...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OST Size - and Outlook 2010

Installed Office 2010 today after a clean uninstall of O2k7.  After a
long conversion process and a still incomplete index, I looked at the
size of my OST.  Its now 6.3gig.  If I do a folder size on my mailbox,
the server data shows 1.2G and the local data shows 2.3g.  Both 1.2
and 2.3 to 6.3 are big discrepancies.  does this strike anyone else as
odd or wrong?

thanks,
began

RE: OST Size - and Outlook 2010

[greg.sweers]

A more constructive answer :
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc179067(office.14).aspx

"Offline folder (.ost file) recommendations: When you deploy Cached
Exchange Mode for Outlook, be aware that users' local .ost files can
increase 50 percent to 80 percent over the size of the mailbox reported
in Exchange Server. The format Outlook uses to store data locally for
Cached Exchange Mode is less space-efficient than the server data file
format. This results in the use of more disk space when mailboxes are
downloaded to provide a local copy for Cached Exchange Mode. 

When Cached Exchange Mode first creates a local copy of a user's
mailbox, the user's current .ost file, if one exists, is updated. If
users currently have non-Unicode ANSI-formatted .ost files, we recommend
that you upgrade their .ost files to Unicode. Non-Unicode (ANSI) Outlook
files have a limit of 2 gigabytes (GB) of data storage. The maximum size
for Unicode .ost files is configurable, with the default being 50 GB of
data storage."


You may also try to do a compress on the OST file to see if you reclaim
the space.

I am doing my 2010 upgrade sometime next week.  My OST is about 6 gig
right now, so I am curious as well.

Greg

-Original Message-
From: Bill Egan [mailto:william.e...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OST Size - and Outlook 2010

Installed Office 2010 today after a clean uninstall of O2k7.  After a
long conversion process and a still incomplete index, I looked at the
size of my OST.  Its now 6.3gig.  If I do a folder size on my mailbox,
the server data shows 1.2G and the local data shows 2.3g.  Both 1.2
and 2.3 to 6.3 are big discrepancies.  does this strike anyone else as
odd or wrong?

thanks,
began