RE: Slightly OT

2002-03-28 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry 
Title: Message



You 
might want to post this on the NT System Admin list.

  
  -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:41 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Slightly 
  OT
  Anyone know of any 
  good books/references on Network Monitor?
   
  Scot
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT

2002-03-28 Thread William Lefkovics 
Title: Message



Or an 
SMS list.
 

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Slightly 
  OT
  You 
  might want to post this on the NT System Admin list.
  

-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:41 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Slightly 
OT
Anyone know of 
any good books/references on Network Monitor?
 
Scot
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT

2002-03-28 Thread Kevin Miller 
Title: Message



But I 
stopped watching those lists.
 
 
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
WebDesign, GO here!

  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 
  11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Slightly OT
  You 
  might want to post this on the NT System Admin list.
  

-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:41 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Slightly 
OT
Anyone know of 
any good books/references on Network Monitor?
 
Scot
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT

2002-03-28 Thread Allen Crawford 
Title: Message









Are there
two Kevin Miller’s on this list? 
Do any of you (Kevin Miller’s) live/work in Florida?  I have an off-topic question if
so.  This may sound weird, but a
long time ago someone named Kevin Miller helped me with an Exchange issue and I
believe he said he was in the process of moving to Florida or just moved
there.  Anyway, I’m considering a
move so I wanted to chat to him.  Of
course, I could be losing my mind and it was someone else who lived in Florida…

 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002
3:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT

 

But I stopped watching those lists.

 

 

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS,
UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!

-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002
11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT

You might want to post this on the NT
System Admin list.

 




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT

2002-03-28 Thread Kevin Miller 
Title: Message



That 
was me, Moved there. then move back to the NW. am pondering going back to that 
coast again. Shoot me an email I would be more then happy to talk to ya. 

 
There 
are 2 Kevin Millers on the Peach soft NT list. but not this 
one.
--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
WebDesign, GO here!

  
  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:21 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Slightly 
  OT
  
  Are 
  there two Kevin Miller’s on this list?  
  Do any of you (Kevin Miller’s) live/work in Florida?  I have an off-topic question if 
  so.  This may sound weird, but a 
  long time ago someone named Kevin Miller helped me with an Exchange issue and 
  I believe he said he was in the process of moving to Florida or just moved 
  there.  Anyway, I’m considering a 
  move so I wanted to chat to him.  
  Of course, I could be losing my mind and it was someone else who lived 
  in Florida…
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Kevin 
  Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:04 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Slightly 
  OT
   
  But I stopped 
  watching those lists.
   
   
  --Kevinm 
  M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
  WebDesign, GO here!
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Slightly 
  OT
  You might want to 
  post this on the NT System Admin list.
   List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT

2002-03-28 Thread Garland Mac Neill 
Title: Message









You lie Kevin!

 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002
1:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT

 



But I stopped watching
those lists.





 





 



--Kevinm M,
WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!



-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002
11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT



You might want to post
this on the NT System Admin list.





-Original Message-
From: Scot Parsons
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002
1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT



Anyone know of any good
books/references on Network Monitor?





 





Scot





 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT

2002-03-29 Thread Kevin Miller 
Title: Message



Really 
I dont, that email folder is empty, has been for a while. So is my Thin folder. 
What is this rumor I hear about the licensing of ICA?? 
--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
WebDesign, GO here!

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 
  2002 7:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Slightly OT
  
  You lie 
  Kevin!
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Kevin 
  Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:04 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Slightly 
  OT
   
  
  But I 
  stopped watching those lists.
  
   
  
   
  --Kevinm M, 
  WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and 
  WebDesign, GO here!
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:51 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Slightly OT

You 
might want to post this on the NT System Admin 
list.
-Original 
  Message-From: Scot 
  Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:41 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Slightly 
  OT
  
  Anyone know of 
  any good books/references on Network 
  Monitor?
  
   
  
  Scot
  
   
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT

2009-02-19 Thread Jake Gardner 
Please tell me you meant to say the average mailbox size is 750Mb not Gb



Thanks,
 
Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246

-Original Message-
From: Raymond Brighenti [mailto:raymond.brighe...@actix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT

Hi,

Having a look around at the moment but can anyone recommend a hosted
exchange service that provides integration with a companies AD?
BES for 30-40 users.
250-300 users with an average mailbox of about 750Gb Archiving as an
option.

Thanks

Ray
---
Actix is the trading name of Actix Limited, with registered offices at:
200 Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7DL, United Kingdom. Actix Limited is
registered in England and Wales with company no. 02660615 and VAT no. GB
858742087. Actix GmbH is registered in (Sitz der Gesellschaft): Dresden,
Germany with company no. Handelsregister Amtsgericht Dresden HR B 19204
and VAT no. (Ust-IDNr.) DE 813 115 475. Managing Director of Actix GmbH
(Geschaeftsfuehrer): Alex Hawker. Information in this message is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender, and please delete the message from
your system immediately. The statements and opinions expressed in this
message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
Actix. Whilst Actix takes every effort to ensure this message is virus
free it cannot guarantee that this is the case. It is the recipient's
responsibility to carry out such virus checks as it deems necessary.
Actix company details: www.actix.com.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.  Thank you.

***



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Slightly OT

2009-02-19 Thread James Kerr 

Please tell me you meant an average of 75MB


- Original Message - 
From: "Jake Gardner" 

To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Slightly OT


Please tell me you meant to say the average mailbox size is 750Mb not Gb



Thanks,

Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246

-Original Message-
From: Raymond Brighenti [mailto:raymond.brighe...@actix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT

Hi,

Having a look around at the moment but can anyone recommend a hosted
exchange service that provides integration with a companies AD?
BES for 30-40 users.
250-300 users with an average mailbox of about 750Gb Archiving as an
option.

Thanks

Ray
---
Actix is the trading name of Actix Limited, with registered offices at:
200 Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7DL, United Kingdom. Actix Limited is
registered in England and Wales with company no. 02660615 and VAT no. GB
858742087. Actix GmbH is registered in (Sitz der Gesellschaft): Dresden,
Germany with company no. Handelsregister Amtsgericht Dresden HR B 19204
and VAT no. (Ust-IDNr.) DE 813 115 475. Managing Director of Actix GmbH
(Geschaeftsfuehrer): Alex Hawker. Information in this message is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender, and please delete the message from
your system immediately. The statements and opinions expressed in this
message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
Actix. Whilst Actix takes every effort to ensure this message is virus
free it cannot guarantee that this is the case. It is the recipient's
responsibility to carry out such virus checks as it deems necessary.
Actix company details: www.actix.com.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


***Teletronics Technology Corporation***
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.  Thank 
you.


***



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Slightly OT

2009-02-19 Thread Cesare' A. Ramos 
Intermedia.net

Great company, great service, great team to work with.

We have been working with them for over 2 years.

CAR
Mobile: 786-412-1746
e-Mail: cra...@idfllc.com
BB Pin:  305083B1
AIM: cramosMIA
MSN: cramos...@hotmail.com
Yahoo: cramosMIA

-Original Message-
From: Raymond Brighenti [mailto:raymond.brighe...@actix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT

Hi,

Having a look around at the moment but can anyone recommend a hosted
exchange service that provides integration with a companies AD?
BES for 30-40 users.
250-300 users with an average mailbox of about 750Gb
Archiving as an option.

Thanks

Ray
---
Actix is the trading name of Actix Limited, with registered offices at: 200 
Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7DL, United Kingdom. Actix Limited is registered 
in England and Wales with company no. 02660615 and VAT no. GB 858742087. Actix 
GmbH is registered in (Sitz der Gesellschaft): Dresden, Germany with company 
no. Handelsregister Amtsgericht Dresden HR B 19204 and VAT no. (Ust-IDNr.) DE 
813 115 475. Managing Director of Actix GmbH (Geschaeftsfuehrer): Alex Hawker. 
Information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, and please delete 
the message from your system immediately. The statements and opinions expressed 
in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of 
Actix. Whilst Actix takes every effort to ensure this message is virus free it 
cannot guarantee that this is the case. It is the recipient's responsibility to 
carry out such virus checks as it deems necessary. Actix company details: 
www.actix.com.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


This e-Mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this e-Mail in error please notify the sender via returned 
e-Mail. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-Mail are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the 
company. Although IDF operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept 
responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.

** Think before you print this message. **

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Slightly OT

2009-02-19 Thread Cesare' A. Ramos 
Can give you some contacts?  Are you looking to use internally or resale?

CAR
Mobile: 786-412-1746
e-Mail: cra...@idfllc.com
BB Pin:  305083B1
AIM: cramosMIA
MSN: cramos...@hotmail.com
Yahoo: cramosMIA


-Original Message-
From: Cesare' A. Ramos [mailto:cra...@idfllc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT

Intermedia.net

Great company, great service, great team to work with.

We have been working with them for over 2 years.

CAR
Mobile: 786-412-1746
e-Mail: cra...@idfllc.com
BB Pin:  305083B1
AIM: cramosMIA
MSN: cramos...@hotmail.com
Yahoo: cramosMIA

-Original Message-
From: Raymond Brighenti [mailto:raymond.brighe...@actix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT

Hi,

Having a look around at the moment but can anyone recommend a hosted
exchange service that provides integration with a companies AD?
BES for 30-40 users.
250-300 users with an average mailbox of about 750Gb
Archiving as an option.

Thanks

Ray
---
Actix is the trading name of Actix Limited, with registered offices at: 200 
Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7DL, United Kingdom. Actix Limited is registered 
in England and Wales with company no. 02660615 and VAT no. GB 858742087. Actix 
GmbH is registered in (Sitz der Gesellschaft): Dresden, Germany with company 
no. Handelsregister Amtsgericht Dresden HR B 19204 and VAT no. (Ust-IDNr.) DE 
813 115 475. Managing Director of Actix GmbH (Geschaeftsfuehrer): Alex Hawker. 
Information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, and please delete 
the message from your system immediately. The statements and opinions expressed 
in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of 
Actix. Whilst Actix takes every effort to ensure this message is virus free it 
cannot guarantee that this is the case. It is the recipient's responsibility to 
carry out such virus checks as it deems necessary. Actix company details: 
www.actix.com.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


This e-Mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this e-Mail in error please notify the sender via returned 
e-Mail. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-Mail are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the 
company. Although IDF operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept 
responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.

** Think before you print this message. **

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


This e-Mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this e-Mail in error please notify the sender via returned 
e-Mail. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-Mail are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the 
company. Although IDF operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept 
responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.

** Think before you print this message. **

This e-Mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this e-Mail in error please notify the sender via returned 
e-Mail. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-Mail are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the 
company. Although IDF operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept 
responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.

** Think before you print this message. **

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Slightly OT

2009-02-19 Thread Michael B. Smith 
That's a rather large mailbox size...

Microsoft Online is the typical service I'm recommending these days. But for
LARGE mailboxes - I'm in the process of firing up a new hosting company
EXACTLY for hosting those. Contact me off-list for prices.

-Original Message-
From: Raymond Brighenti [mailto:raymond.brighe...@actix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT

Hi,

Having a look around at the moment but can anyone recommend a hosted
exchange service that provides integration with a companies AD?
BES for 30-40 users.
250-300 users with an average mailbox of about 750Gb
Archiving as an option.

Thanks

Ray
---
Actix is the trading name of Actix Limited, with registered offices at: 200
Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7DL, United Kingdom. Actix Limited is
registered in England and Wales with company no. 02660615 and VAT no. GB
858742087. Actix GmbH is registered in (Sitz der Gesellschaft): Dresden,
Germany with company no. Handelsregister Amtsgericht Dresden HR B 19204 and
VAT no. (Ust-IDNr.) DE 813 115 475. Managing Director of Actix GmbH
(Geschaeftsfuehrer): Alex Hawker. Information in this message is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender, and please delete the message from your
system immediately. The statements and opinions expressed in this message
are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Actix.
Whilst Actix takes every effort to ensure this message is virus free it
cannot guarantee that this is the case. It is the recipient's responsibility
to carry out such virus checks as it deems necessary. Actix company details:
www.actix.com.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Richard Stovall 
How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Hello,

We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down
and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our
phones.

Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of
that going to the phones.

Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be
affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com

Re: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Jonathan Link 
Your users will have become accustomed to the avilable bandwidth,
contracting it will be a big deal.  IIRC, phones take 20Kbps/line when in
use...

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Doug Rooney wrote:

>  Hello,
>
> We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down and
> 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our phones.
>
> Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
> concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of that
> going to the phones.
>
> Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be affected?
> We have about 30 users on this circuit.
>
>
>
> Thank You
>
> ~Doug Rooney
> Sonoma Tilemakers
> IT Manager
> 7750 Bell Rd.
> Windsor Ca, 95492
> (707) 837-8177 X211
> (707) 837-9472 FAX
> i...@sonomatilemakers.com
>
>
>

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Doug Rooney 
They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Hello,

We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down
and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our
phones.

Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of
that going to the phones.

Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be
affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Eric Wittersheim 
Why would you want to switch to a slower speed connection?  Are you
having problems with your DSL connection?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Hello,

We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down
and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our
phones.

Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of
that going to the phones.

Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be
affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Doug Rooney 
About once a month it goes down, but the rep said because latency is
lower the speed is about the same, but that is why I am asking, because
he is a sales guy, not a tech.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Why would you want to switch to a slower speed connection?  Are you
having problems with your DSL connection?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Hello,

We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down
and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our
phones.

Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of
that going to the phones.

Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be
affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread David Mazzaccaro 
>From what I am reading... 
"IP Flex T1" - this is probably their term for SIP trunking.
What that means is you have 1.5M T1 circuit to use either for phone
calls or for internet.
If you use 20 lines for phone, that doesn't leave you with much left for
internet traffic.
How about getting (2) T1 circuits, have ATT bond them together, and this
would give you 1.5M for phone calls, 1.5M for internet?
 
 
 



From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection



About once a month it goes down, but the rep said because latency is
lower the speed is about the same, but that is why I am asking, because
he is a sales guy, not a tech.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Why would you want to switch to a slower speed connection?  Are you
having problems with your DSL connection?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Hello,

We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down
and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our
phones.

Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of
that going to the phones.

Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be
affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Eric Wittersheim 
Do you have any other DSL options?  I don't buy his latency sales pitch.
If your IP flex T1 is pegged you are going to feel it more, IMHO.  I
have 2 data T1 lines bonded for about 50 users plus Exchange and our web
sites.  I pretty much have at least 1 of the T1s worth of bandwidth used
throughout the business day.  We are about ready to switch over to 10MB
Ethernet. 

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:15 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

About once a month it goes down, but the rep said because latency is
lower the speed is about the same, but that is why I am asking, because
he is a sales guy, not a tech.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Why would you want to switch to a slower speed connection?  Are you
having problems with your DSL connection?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Hello,

We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down
and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our
phones.

Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of
that going to the phones.

Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be
affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com

Re: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Jonathan Link 
That's hooey.  If you needed a lot of interaction latency might be
important.  Or if you were used to satellite internet service it might be
important.  While the difference in latency between DSL and his offering may
be measurable, it may not be noticeable to you or your users.  The lack of
available bandwidth will be measurable AND noticeable.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Doug Rooney wrote:

>  About once a month it goes down, but the rep said because latency is
> lower the speed is about the same, but that is why I am asking, because he
> is a sales guy, not a tech.
>
>
>
> Thank You
>
> ~Doug Rooney
> Sonoma Tilemakers
> IT Manager
> 7750 Bell Rd.
> Windsor Ca, 95492
> (707) 837-8177 X211
> (707) 837-9472 FAX
> i...@sonomatilemakers.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2009 9:13 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Slightly OT: Connection
>
>
>
> Why would you want to switch to a slower speed connection?  Are you having
> problems with your DSL connection?
>
>
>
> *From:* Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Slightly OT: Connection
>
>
>
> They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.
>
>
>
> Thank You
>
> ~Doug Rooney
> Sonoma Tilemakers
> IT Manager
> 7750 Bell Rd.
> Windsor Ca, 95492
> (707) 837-8177 X211
> (707) 837-9472 FAX
> i...@sonomatilemakers.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Slightly OT: Connection
>
>
>
> How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?
>
>
>
> *From:* Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Slightly OT: Connection
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down and
> 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our phones.
>
> Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
> concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of that
> going to the phones.
>
> Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be affected?
> We have about 30 users on this circuit.
>
>
>
> Thank You
>
> ~Doug Rooney
> Sonoma Tilemakers
> IT Manager
> 7750 Bell Rd.
> Windsor Ca, 95492
> (707) 837-8177 X211
> (707) 837-9472 FAX
> i...@sonomatilemakers.com
>
>
>

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Steve Hart 
We have a Flex Line from XO and it's been problematic at best.  We haven't had 
any bandwidth problems, but we've had several configuration hassles trying to 
get to interface with our VOIP system.




From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.

Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX
i...@sonomatilemakers.com<mailto:i...@sonomatilemakers.com>



From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

Hello,
We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down and 
556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our phones.
Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our concern 
is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of that going to 
the phones.
Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be affected? We 
have about 30 users on this circuit.

Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX
i...@sonomatilemakers.com<mailto:i...@sonomatilemakers.com>

RE: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Doug Rooney 
Well, thanks everyone for your replies, I think it is pretty clear. We
will be staying with what we have.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

We have a Flex Line from XO and it's been problematic at best.  We
haven't had any bandwidth problems, but we've had several configuration
hassles trying to get to interface with our VOIP system.

 

 

 



From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection

 

How many channels do you need for phones at max usage?

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Connection

 

Hello,

We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down
and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have  a PRI for our
phones.

Well my AT&T rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our
concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of
that going to the phones.

Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be
affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com

Re: Slightly OT: Connection

2009-11-20 Thread Ben Scott 
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jonathan Link  wrote:
> IIRC, phones take 20Kbps/line when in use...

  A standard DS0 channel is *exactly* 64,000 bits per second.

  VoIP varies by codec and config, but 40 to 50 Kbit/sec is usually
what I see quoted.

-- Ben

RE: Slightly OT: Conditional Formatting

2002-02-06 Thread Nikki Peterson - ITCX 

I created a field called "AGE" and used the following formula (all one
line):

IIf(DateDiff("d",[Received],Now())>=7,DateDiff("w",[Received],Now()) & "
week(s)",(IIf(DateDiff("d",[Received],Now())>0.99,DateDiff("d",[Received],No
w()) & " day(s)",DateDiff("h",[Received],Now()) & " hr(s)")))

This will give you the age of a message within 0 hours to xx Weeks. Then
maybe you can figure out how to make them red based on that...

-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Conditional Formatting


This one's got me stumped - can you guru's help?

One of our desks has a contracted response time of 1 hour for all email.
Management want outlook to display all mails older than one hour in a big
red font. Problem is, conditional formatting in O2K will only allow this for
Today, Last 7 Days etc. Does anyone know how to conditionally format either
all items received in the last hour, or all items over 1 hour old? Failing
this, can anyone think of an alternative way of notifying them after an
email passes it's contracted response time? I know this is per-user, but
that's not an issue for me - I only set it up, whether they get fed up and
turn it off isn't my problem. 

TIA for any help!

Tim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT: Conditional Formatting

2002-02-07 Thread Boswell Tim 

Nice bit of coding!! I tweaked it a bit to add minutes and write !!OVERDUE!!
instead of hours, and that's close enough! Can't get it to conditionally
format, but at least it gives them at-a-glance view of what's outside it's
agreed time. They'd shrunk the 'received' field so they couldn't see the
time - you should've seen the looks on the agent's faces when I put it on in
front of the manager, and a whole lot of '!!OVERDUE!!' warnings appeared.
Classic:o) Thanks a lot Nikki, much appreciated!

Tim

-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 22:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Conditional Formatting


I created a field called "AGE" and used the following formula (all one
line):

IIf(DateDiff("d",[Received],Now())>=7,DateDiff("w",[Received],Now()) & "
week(s)",(IIf(DateDiff("d",[Received],Now())>0.99,DateDiff("d",[Received],No
w()) & " day(s)",DateDiff("h",[Received],Now()) & " hr(s)")))

This will give you the age of a message within 0 hours to xx Weeks. Then
maybe you can figure out how to make them red based on that...

-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Conditional Formatting


This one's got me stumped - can you guru's help?

One of our desks has a contracted response time of 1 hour for all email.
Management want outlook to display all mails older than one hour in a big
red font. Problem is, conditional formatting in O2K will only allow this for
Today, Last 7 Days etc. Does anyone know how to conditionally format either
all items received in the last hour, or all items over 1 hour old? Failing
this, can anyone think of an alternative way of notifying them after an
email passes it's contracted response time? I know this is per-user, but
that's not an issue for me - I only set it up, whether they get fed up and
turn it off isn't my problem. 

TIA for any help!

Tim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread Jason Gurtz 
> Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
> Then we created his activation password.
> He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
> sometimes tripled, or more?

Maybe a stupid question, but what do the contacts look like in Outlook?

~JasonG

Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread sms adm 
Single, standard contacts folder. Things look fine there. No multiples.

Thx

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Jason Gurtz  wrote:

> > Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
> > Then we created his activation password.
> > He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
> > sometimes tripled, or more?
>
> Maybe a stupid question, but what do the contacts look like in Outlook?
>
> ~JasonG
>
>
>


-- 
smsadm

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread Sobey, Richard A 
First thing I'd try is wipe and start activation again.

From: bounce-8906992-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8906992-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of sms adm
Sent: 07 May 2010 15:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

Single, standard contacts folder. Things look fine there. No multiples.

Thx
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Jason Gurtz 
mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com>> wrote:
> Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
> Then we created his activation password.
> He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
> sometimes tripled, or more?
Maybe a stupid question, but what do the contacts look like in Outlook?

~JasonG




--
smsadm

re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread pramatowski 

Have seen that here with express and 5.0  
Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if the 
user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with 
remove/re-add did the trick.
/Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB

New BB Express server.
One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.
Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
Then we created his activation password.
He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and 
sometimes tripled, or more?

Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread sms adm 
We wiped and reactivated twice.
First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went
well.
Thx for the suggestions and help

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:

>
> Have seen that here with express and 5.0
> Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if
> the user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with
> remove/re-add did the trick.
> /Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB
>
> New BB Express server.
> One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.
> Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
> Then we created his activation password.
> He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
> sometimes tripled, or more?
>



-- 
smsadm

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread Jean-Paul natola 

see if this helps

http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId=1%200%20155866781

 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 


Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

We wiped and reactivated twice.
First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went well.
Thx for the suggestions and help


On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:


Have seen that here with express and 5.0
Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if the 
user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with 
remove/re-add did the trick.
/Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB


New BB Express server.
One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.



Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
Then we created his activation password.
He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and 
sometimes tripled, or more?


-- 
smsadm
  
_
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread Jean-Paul natola 

or this

 

http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/5598

 

 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 


From: jnat...@hotmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:06:31 -0400



see if this helps
http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId=1%200%20155866781
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 


Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

We wiped and reactivated twice.
First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went well.
Thx for the suggestions and help


On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:


Have seen that here with express and 5.0
Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if the 
user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with 
remove/re-add did the trick.
/Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB


New BB Express server.
One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.



Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
Then we created his activation password.
He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and 
sometimes tripled, or more?


-- 
smsadm



The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get 
started.   
_
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3

Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread sms adm 
Thx, but there were no subfolders

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jean-Paul natola wrote:

>  see if this helps
>
> http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId=1%200%20155866781
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jean-Paul Natola
>
>
>
>
>
> ------
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400
>
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
> From: sms...@gmail.com
> To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
>
>
> We wiped and reactivated twice.
> First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went
> well.
> Thx for the suggestions and help
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:
>
>
> Have seen that here with express and 5.0
> Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if
> the user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with
> remove/re-add did the trick.
> /Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB
>
> New BB Express server.
> One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.
>  Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
> Then we created his activation password.
> He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
> sometimes tripled, or more?
>
>
>
>
> --
> smsadm
>
> --
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get
> started.<http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3>
>



-- 
smsadm

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread Jean-Paul natola 

go for contacts cleaner

 

everyone says thats the best (and for 3 bucks you cant beat it)

 

Also if you recently downloaded and installed BESexpress  when you registered 
the device you automatically get a FREE tech support incident from BB

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 


Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:31:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Thx, but there were no subfolders


On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jean-Paul natola  wrote:


see if this helps
http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId=1%200%20155866781
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 


Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400

Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com




We wiped and reactivated twice.
First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went well.
Thx for the suggestions and help


On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:


Have seen that here with express and 5.0
Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if the 
user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with 
remove/re-add did the trick.
/Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB


New BB Express server.
One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.



Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
Then we created his activation password.
He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and 
sometimes tripled, or more?


-- 
smsadm



The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get 
started.

-- 
smsadm
  
_
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-07 Thread Martin Blackstone 
Please verify that your CDO.DLL and MAPI32.DLL are matching versions on your
Exchange server as well as BES.

If not, update one to match.

 

From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

 

go for contacts cleaner
 
everyone says thats the best (and for 3 bucks you cant beat it)
 
Also if you recently downloaded and installed BESexpress  when you
registered the device you automatically get a FREE tech support incident
from BB

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 

  _  

Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:31:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Thx, but there were no subfolders

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jean-Paul natola 
wrote:

see if this helps
http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC
<http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalI
d=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId=1%200%20155866781>
&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId
=1%200%20155866781
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 

  _  

Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400 


Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 



We wiped and reactivated twice.
First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went
well.
Thx for the suggestions and help

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:


Have seen that here with express and 5.0
Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if
the user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with
remove/re-add did the trick.
/Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB


New BB Express server.
One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.

Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
Then we created his activation password.
He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
sometimes tripled, or more?




-- 
smsadm

  _  

The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
Get started.




-- 
smsadm

  _  

The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
Hotmail. Get busy.
<http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID2
8326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5>

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-11 Thread Brown, Larry 
If BES Express treats the mailbox the same as BES does...then I have seen this 
before.  The only way we got it to stop was to delete the user account from BES 
when we started from scratch, and selected the option to remove all BES traces 
from the email account.  The downside to this is, by default, BES will only 
upload the last 14 days worth of email to a new set up.  But...so far no one 
has complained.

Larry

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 8:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

Please verify that your CDO.DLL and MAPI32.DLL are matching versions on your 
Exchange server as well as BES.
If not, update one to match.

From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

go for contacts cleaner

everyone says thats the best (and for 3 bucks you cant beat it)

Also if you recently downloaded and installed BESexpress  when you registered 
the device you automatically get a FREE tech support incident from BB











Jean-Paul Natola






Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:31:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com<mailto:sms...@gmail.com>
To: 
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com<mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>

Thx, but there were no subfolders
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jean-Paul natola 
mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
see if this helps
http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId=1%200%20155866781













Jean-Paul Natola






Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400

Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com


We wiped and reactivated twice.
First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went well.
Thx for the suggestions and help
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM, 
mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com>> wrote:

Have seen that here with express and 5.0
Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if the 
user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with 
remove/re-add did the trick.
/Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB

New BB Express server.
One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.
Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
Then we created his activation password.
He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and 
sometimes tripled, or more?



--
smsadm

The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get 
started.



--
smsadm

The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
Hotmail. Get 
busy.<http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5>

Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

2010-05-11 Thread sms adm 
Thx Larry and everyone else for the replies.
We actually wiped and reset the activation password and it worked.
No idea why :)

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Brown, Larry wrote:

>  If BES Express treats the mailbox the same as BES does…then I have seen
> this before.  The only way we got it to stop was to delete the user account
> from BES when we started from scratch, and selected the option to remove all
> BES traces from the email account.  The downside to this is, by default, BES
> will only upload the last 14 days worth of email to a new set up.  But…so
> far no one has complained.
>
>
>
> *Larry*
>
>
>
> *From:* Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 07, 2010 8:14 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
>
>
>
> Please verify that your CDO.DLL and MAPI32.DLL are matching versions on
> your Exchange server as well as BES.
>
> If not, update one to match.
>
>
>
> *From:* Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 07, 2010 12:40 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
>
>
>
> go for contacts cleaner
>
> everyone says thats the best (and for 3 bucks you cant beat it)
>
> Also if you recently downloaded and installed BESexpress  when you
> registered the device you automatically get a FREE tech support incident
> from BB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jean-Paul Natola
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:31:08 -0400
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
> From: sms...@gmail.com
> To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
>
> Thx, but there were no subfolders
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jean-Paul natola 
> wrote:
>
> see if this helps
>
> http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId=1%200%20155866781
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jean-Paul Natola
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
>
> From: sms...@gmail.com
> To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
>
>
>
> We wiped and reactivated twice.
> First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went
> well.
> Thx for the suggestions and help
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:
>
>
> Have seen that here with express and 5.0
> Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if
> the user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with
> remove/re-add did the trick.
> /Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB
>
>
> New BB Express server.
> One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.
>
> Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
> Then we created his activation password.
> He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
> sometimes tripled, or more?
>
>
>
>
> --
> smsadm
>   --
>
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> Get started.
>
>
>
>
> --
> smsadm
>  --
>
> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
> Hotmail. Get 
> busy.<http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5>
>



-- 
smsadm

RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Michael B. Smith 
I don't see how your requirements are any different than what you are doing 
today. Please elucidate how they differ.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined for the outside 
world these emails are scanned and then delivered to the ISP.
We went through a process of giving certain staff an additional email address. 
This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a secure link and these 
emails get routed based on the recipients address.

If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the emails are send 
down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address. 
The software we have in place does this OK.


What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:

1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email address and the email 
is being sent to a secure domain route the email to the ISP for delivery. 
(email will contain non sensitive data)

2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure address route 
over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)

3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)

The current software routes all emails destined to a secure address regardless 
of senders address and routes all other emails out the ISP

What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass through regardless 
and then land onto a separate box for routing.

Maybe open source, IIS app, etc

Any thoughts people ?

Cheers

John

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com
**



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Ellis, John P. 
The current solution is a cut down version of a the full blown appliance
and as such only has limited routing functions.
The chances of the getting the money to upgrade to the full appliance is
very slim, hence the need to seek other options

All routing is based solely on the destination domain.
What I can't do is do rules based on the From address and To address. 

Any clearer?

Thanks

John

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: 30 September 2010 14:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

I don't see how your requirements are any different than what you are
doing today. Please elucidate how they differ.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined for the
outside world these emails are scanned and then delivered to the ISP.
We went through a process of giving certain staff an additional email
address. 
This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a secure link and
these emails get routed based on the recipients address.

If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the emails are
send down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address. 
The software we have in place does this OK.


What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:

1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email address and
the email is being sent to a secure domain route the email to the ISP
for delivery. (email will contain non sensitive data)

2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure address
route over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)

3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)

The current software routes all emails destined to a secure address
regardless of senders address and routes all other emails out the ISP

What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass through
regardless and then land onto a separate box for routing.

Maybe open source, IIS app, etc

Any thoughts people ?

Cheers

John

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com
**



---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Dave Wade 
John,

 We now send all mail to secure addresses to a mailsweeper box , which
then does source address based routing. We are still on a mixture of
Exchange 2003/2007 which also makes things interesting. I think if we
were pure 2010 you could set up transport rules, but we are not...

Dave Wade
Business Services I.C.T.
0161 474 5456
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
> Sent: 30 September 2010 14:00
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
> 
> With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined 
> for the outside world these emails are scanned and then 
> delivered to the ISP.
> We went through a process of giving certain staff an 
> additional email address. 
> This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a 
> secure link and these emails get routed based on the 
> recipients address.
> 
> If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the 
> emails are send down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address. 
> The software we have in place does this OK.
> 
> 
> What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:
> 
> 1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email 
> address and the email is being sent to a secure domain route 
> the email to the ISP for delivery. (email will contain non 
> sensitive data)
> 
> 2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure 
> address route over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)
> 
> 3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)
> 
> The current software routes all emails destined to a secure 
> address regardless of senders address and routes all other 
> emails out the ISP
> 
> What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass 
> through regardless and then land onto a separate box for routing.
> 
> Maybe open source, IIS app, etc
> 
> Any thoughts people ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> John
> 
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
> to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email 
> in error please notify the system manager.
> 
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been 
> swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 
> www.clearswift.com
> **
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
> 
> 

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Campbell, Rob 
Unfortunately, you can't do sender based routing in Exchange 2007/2010.  It 
just isn't in there.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

John,

 We now send all mail to secure addresses to a mailsweeper box , which
then does source address based routing. We are still on a mixture of
Exchange 2003/2007 which also makes things interesting. I think if we
were pure 2010 you could set up transport rules, but we are not...

Dave Wade
Business Services I.C.T.
0161 474 5456
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
> Sent: 30 September 2010 14:00
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
> 
> With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined 
> for the outside world these emails are scanned and then 
> delivered to the ISP.
> We went through a process of giving certain staff an 
> additional email address. 
> This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a 
> secure link and these emails get routed based on the 
> recipients address.
> 
> If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the 
> emails are send down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address. 
> The software we have in place does this OK.
> 
> 
> What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:
> 
> 1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email 
> address and the email is being sent to a secure domain route 
> the email to the ISP for delivery. (email will contain non 
> sensitive data)
> 
> 2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure 
> address route over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)
> 
> 3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)
> 
> The current software routes all emails destined to a secure 
> address regardless of senders address and routes all other 
> emails out the ISP
> 
> What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass 
> through regardless and then land onto a separate box for routing.
> 
> Maybe open source, IIS app, etc
> 
> Any thoughts people ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> John
> 
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
> to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email 
> in error please notify the system manager.
> 
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been 
> swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 
> www.clearswift.com
> **
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
> 
> 

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**

**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Dave Wade 
Today ALL MAIL to secure addresses goes via the secure pipe. In future,
e-mail from "insecure" addresses needs to go via the Public Internet.

Dave Wade
Business Services I.C.T.
0161 474 5456
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
> Sent: 30 September 2010 14:05
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
> 
> I don't see how your requirements are any different than what 
> you are doing today. Please elucidate how they differ.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:00 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
> 
> With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined 
> for the outside world these emails are scanned and then 
> delivered to the ISP.
> We went through a process of giving certain staff an 
> additional email address. 
> This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a 
> secure link and these emails get routed based on the 
> recipients address.
> 
> If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the 
> emails are send down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address. 
> The software we have in place does this OK.
> 
> 
> What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:
> 
> 1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email 
> address and the email is being sent to a secure domain route 
> the email to the ISP for delivery. (email will contain non 
> sensitive data)
> 
> 2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure 
> address route over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)
> 
> 3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)
> 
> The current software routes all emails destined to a secure 
> address regardless of senders address and routes all other 
> emails out the ISP
> 
> What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass 
> through regardless and then land onto a separate box for routing.
> 
> Maybe open source, IIS app, etc
> 
> Any thoughts people ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> John
> 
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
> to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email 
> in error please notify the system manager.
> 
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been 
> swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 
> www.clearswift.com
> **
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
> 
> 

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Michael B. Smith 
I'm not aware of any way to do what you want, with built-in functionality.

You'd need either to write or to buy a transport agent that knows how to do 
this.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

The current solution is a cut down version of a the full blown appliance and as 
such only has limited routing functions.
The chances of the getting the money to upgrade to the full appliance is very 
slim, hence the need to seek other options

All routing is based solely on the destination domain.
What I can't do is do rules based on the From address and To address. 

Any clearer?

Thanks

John

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 30 September 2010 14:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

I don't see how your requirements are any different than what you are doing 
today. Please elucidate how they differ.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined for the outside 
world these emails are scanned and then delivered to the ISP.
We went through a process of giving certain staff an additional email address. 
This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a secure link and these 
emails get routed based on the recipients address.

If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the emails are send 
down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address. 
The software we have in place does this OK.


What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:

1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email address and the email 
is being sent to a secure domain route the email to the ISP for delivery. 
(email will contain non sensitive data)

2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure address route 
over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)

3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)

The current software routes all emails destined to a secure address regardless 
of senders address and routes all other emails out the ISP

What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass through regardless 
and then land onto a separate box for routing.

Maybe open source, IIS app, etc

Any thoughts people ?

Cheers

John

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com
**



---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Kurt Buff 
I'm pretty sure Postfix can do that, with the right filters.

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:31, Michael B. Smith  wrote:
> I'm not aware of any way to do what you want, with built-in functionality.
>
> You'd need either to write or to buy a transport agent that knows how to do 
> this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:16 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
>
> The current solution is a cut down version of a the full blown appliance and 
> as such only has limited routing functions.
> The chances of the getting the money to upgrade to the full appliance is very 
> slim, hence the need to seek other options
>
> All routing is based solely on the destination domain.
> What I can't do is do rules based on the From address and To address.
>
> Any clearer?
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: 30 September 2010 14:05
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
>
> I don't see how your requirements are any different than what you are doing 
> today. Please elucidate how they differ.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:00 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
>
> With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined for the outside 
> world these emails are scanned and then delivered to the ISP.
> We went through a process of giving certain staff an additional email address.
> This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a secure link and these 
> emails get routed based on the recipients address.
>
> If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the emails are send 
> down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address.
> The software we have in place does this OK.
>
>
> What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:
>
> 1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email address and the 
> email is being sent to a secure domain route the email to the ISP for 
> delivery. (email will contain non sensitive data)
>
> 2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure address route 
> over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)
>
> 3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)
>
> The current software routes all emails destined to a secure address 
> regardless of senders address and routes all other emails out the ISP
>
> What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass through regardless 
> and then land onto a separate box for routing.
>
> Maybe open source, IIS app, etc
>
> Any thoughts people ?
>
> Cheers
>
> John
>
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
> you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>
> www.clearswift.com
> **
>
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software

2010-09-30 Thread Jason Gurtz 
You mention open source...

If you or anyone there has a modicum of experience with Unixy mail
software such as Postfix, Exim, or Sendmail you can do it.  I recommend to
do this since this kind of SMTP software is a much better Swiss-Army knife
for arbitrary mail routing and filtering and you will only very rarely
have to do any operational debugging once it is set up.  You could
probably do this kind of simple functionality on an old Pentium III 512MB
server with more than enough performance to spare.  Just have a mirrored
volume and dual power supplies and you can set it and forget it

I've been waiting a long time, but Exchange just doesn't have these
characteristics.  It's sorta like how you can't have Outlook rules apply
to outgoing mail, apply rules to arbitrary headers, or heck (in the latest
version) even maintain header fidelity on replies and forwards.  I guess
these kind of very basic things aren't a priority as your average
secretary or senior executive don't generally know to ask for these
features.  Someday maybe I.T. will count as a customer too.

Rant done, sorry.

~JasonG

> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 09:16
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
> 
> The current solution is a cut down version of a the full blown appliance
> and as such only has limited routing functions.
> The chances of the getting the money to upgrade to the full appliance is
> very slim, hence the need to seek other options
> 
> All routing is based solely on the destination domain.
> What I can't do is do rules based on the From address and To address.
> 
> Any clearer?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> John
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: 30 September 2010 14:05
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
> 
> I don't see how your requirements are any different than what you are
> doing today. Please elucidate how they differ.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:00 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Mail Routing Software
> 
> With our current setup when emails leave Exchange destined for the
> outside world these emails are scanned and then delivered to the ISP.
> We went through a process of giving certain staff an additional email
> address.
> This is designed to be used to send secure emails via a secure link and
> these emails get routed based on the recipients address.
> 
> If the recipients email address is @secure.domain.gov.uk the emails are
> send down a secure pipe regardless of the senders address.
> The software we have in place does this OK.
> 
> 
> What we need to do now (as the guidelines have been altered) is:
> 
> 1. Check the senders address. If this is a standard email address and
> the email is being sent to a secure domain route the email to the ISP
> for delivery. (email will contain non sensitive data)
> 
> 2. If the email address is a secure address going to a secure address
> route over the secure pipe(email will contain sensitive data)
> 
> 3. Any others emails route to the ISP (general chitchat etc)
> 
> The current software routes all emails destined to a secure address
> regardless of senders address and routes all other emails out the ISP
> 
> What I'm thinking, is modify the routes so all emails pass through
> regardless and then land onto a separate box for routing.
> 
> Maybe open source, IIS app, etc
> 
> Any thoughts people ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> John
> 
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
> system manager.
> 
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 
> www.clearswift.com
> **
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana.

RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread KevinM 
How were you finding the file sizes?

From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 7:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

Good morning all!

More an informational post than anything.

Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx, .docx, 
etc) were compressed files?

Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit was set 
to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed. So...Sunbelt 
Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to determine that the 
actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.

Who'd a thunk it.


Cheers,
Cameron

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Cameron 
Changed the .xlsx extension to .zip and then unzipped it. Amazed me that an
8mb xlsx file went to 54mbs.



On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:41 AM, KevinM  wrote:

>  How were you finding the file sizes?
>
>
>
> *From:* Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 20, 2010 7:40 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Slightly OT: Vipre for Email
>
>
>
> Good morning all!
>
>
>
> More an informational post than anything.
>
>
>
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?
>
>
>
> Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit was
> set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
>
>
>
> Who'd a thunk it.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cameron
>
> ---
>
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>  ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Ben Scott 
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Cameron  wrote:
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?

  Probably not just you.  :)

  The OpenOffice/Open Document Format (ODF) formats are the same thing, BTW.

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Cameron  wrote:
> Changed the .xlsx extension to .zip and then unzipped it.

  I have 7-Zip add its Explorer context menu items, which include
"Open".  7-Zip will open a great many files which are actually
containers, regardless of extension.  It's very useful for getting
MSIs out of SETUP.EXE files.

> Amazed me that an 8mb xlsx file went to 54mbs.

  The old .DOC, .XLS, etc., formats generally compressed very well,
too.  It would have been nice if Microsoft had started doing this back
when disk space was more precious.  :)

-- Ben

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr 
I'm confused.  So you would bounce .zip files for being too large if/when
uncompressed?  This seems to go against why people commonly compress email
attachments.

--
ME2




On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Cameron  wrote:

> Good morning all!
>
> More an informational post than anything.
>
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?
>
> Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit was
> set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
>
> Who'd a thunk it.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cameron
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Randal, Phil 
Because uncompressing highly compressed archive files can be a very
nice/nasty Denial Of Service.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_bomb

 

Cheers,

 

Phil

-- 
Phil Randal | Infrastructure Engineer 
NHS Herefordshire & Herefordshire Council  | Deputy Chief Executive's
Office | I.C.T. Services Division 
Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT 
Tel: 01432 260160

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 20 October 2010 16:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

 

I'm confused.  So you would bounce .zip files for being too large
if/when uncompressed?  This seems to go against why people commonly
compress email attachments.

--
ME2



 

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Cameron 
wrote:

Good morning all!

 

More an informational post than anything.

 

Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
.docx, etc) were compressed files?

 

Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit
was set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.

 

Who'd a thunk it.

 

 

Cheers,

Cameron

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr 
Fascinating!  I am surprised I haven't heard of this.  Thanks!

--
ME2




On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Randal, Phil
wrote:

> Because uncompressing highly compressed archive files can be a very
> nice/nasty Denial Of Service.
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_bomb
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Phil
>
> --
> Phil Randal | Infrastructure Engineer
> NHS Herefordshire & Herefordshire Council  | Deputy Chief Executive's
> Office | I.C.T. Services Division
> Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT
> Tel: 01432 260160
>
>
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 20 October 2010 16:36
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email
>
>
>
> I'm confused.  So you would bounce .zip files for being too large if/when
> uncompressed?  This seems to go against why people commonly compress email
> attachments.
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Cameron  wrote:
>
> Good morning all!
>
>
>
> More an informational post than anything.
>
>
>
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?
>
>
>
> Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit was
> set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
>
>
>
> Who'd a thunk it.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cameron
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Michael B. Smith 
XML is darned wordy.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

Changed the .xlsx extension to .zip and then unzipped it. Amazed me that an 8mb 
xlsx file went to 54mbs.



On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:41 AM, KevinM 
mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org>> wrote:
How were you finding the file sizes?

From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com<mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 7:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

Good morning all!

More an informational post than anything.

Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx, .docx, 
etc) were compressed files?

Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit was set 
to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed. So...Sunbelt 
Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to determine that the 
actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.

Who'd a thunk it.


Cheers,
Cameron

---

To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Kurt Buff 
Yep.

Knew that.

My Maia Mailguard installation caused a similar problem long ago - it
was quarantining the files because the filetype was zip, even though
the file extension was" [doc|ppt|xls]x".

And I'm extremely unhappy about that, because now I've had to let the
filetype of zip through, which is just wrong...

Kurt

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 07:40, Cameron  wrote:
> Good morning all!
>
> More an informational post than anything.
>
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?
>
> Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit was
> set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
>
> Who'd a thunk it.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cameron
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Ben Scott 
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Michael B. Smith
 wrote:
> XML is darned wordy.


Hi,
Whatmakesyousaythat?
-- Ben


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-20 Thread Michael B. Smith 
Worse than that:



Hi,
Whatmakesyousaythat?
-- Ben

 

Ben Scott wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Michael B. Smith  
wrote:
> XML is darned wordy.


Hi,
Whatmakesyousaythat?
-- Ben 

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-21 Thread Ben Scott 
  To paraphrase jwz: "Some people, when confronted with a problem,
think, 'I know, I'll use XML!'  Now they have several problems."

  (I admit XML has its uses (and word processing documents may
actually be one of them), but damn does it get over-used.)

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Michael B. Smith  wrote:
> Worse than that:
>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Whatmakesyousaythat?  />
> -- Ben
> 
>  
>
> Ben Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Michael B. Smith  
> wrote:
>> XML is darned wordy.
>
> 
> Hi,
> Whatmakesyousaythat?
> -- Ben 
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-21 Thread Jeff Steward 
Kinda funny that this came up yesterday and today as I'm working on parsing
XML data from a public database.  My choices are using a poorly formated
text dump or an XML dump.  The XML dump is 7 times the size of the text
output.  If they had bothered to add delimiters to the text dump I would be
done by now, instead I'm dealing with learning more than I care too about
complex XML schemas and how to work with xml data in SQL 2005 ;-)

On the plus side I enjoy learning new things.  The downside is that MSDN
articles almost always:

a) give examples that have nothing to do with what you are working on
b) leave out some critical piece of information in any example that does
pertain to what you are working on

-Jeff Steward

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Ben Scott  wrote:

>  To paraphrase jwz: "Some people, when confronted with a problem,
> think, 'I know, I'll use XML!'  Now they have several problems."
>
>  (I admit XML has its uses (and word processing documents may
> actually be one of them), but damn does it get over-used.)
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
> > Worse than that:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > Hi, />
> >
> Whatmakesyousaythat? />
> > -- Ben
> > 
> >  
> >
> > Ben Scott wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Michael B. Smith <
> mich...@smithcons.com> wrote:
> >> XML is darned wordy.
> >
> > 
> > Hi,
> >
> Whatmakesyousaythat?
> > -- Ben 
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> > with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
> >
> >
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-21 Thread Jason Gurtz 
That's about as friendly as generic message size limits that nearly
everyone seems to interpret as file size limits.
(MIME overhead and all being what it is)

Actually, this seems more egregious from a seat of the pants standpoint.
What is the actual description Vipre uses for this size limit feature?
Surely they should mean "message size" like everyone else and if they
really do mean "file size" then it should be the native file size.  The
fact that the new formats happen to internally use zip compression should
matter.  What happens to a rar or 7z file that is renamed with a .txt
extension?

You are not supposed to know about renaming .docx to .zip after all.
Well, for the purposes of this discussion anyway...

~JasonG

P.S. Java .jar and .war files are the same in this regard.

> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:40
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email
> 
> Good morning all!
> 
> More an informational post than anything.
> 
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?
> 
> Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit
was
> set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
> 
> Who'd a thunk it.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Cameron
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-
> software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-21 Thread Don Andrews 
Many anti-spam systems have a limit on the size of files they scan - including 
those in archives.  Don't know if this is AS or AV but if AS, quarantining or 
rejecting would seem to be an overreaction IMHO.

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

That's about as friendly as generic message size limits that nearly
everyone seems to interpret as file size limits.
(MIME overhead and all being what it is)

Actually, this seems more egregious from a seat of the pants standpoint.
What is the actual description Vipre uses for this size limit feature?
Surely they should mean "message size" like everyone else and if they
really do mean "file size" then it should be the native file size.  The
fact that the new formats happen to internally use zip compression should
matter.  What happens to a rar or 7z file that is renamed with a .txt
extension?

You are not supposed to know about renaming .docx to .zip after all.
Well, for the purposes of this discussion anyway...

~JasonG

P.S. Java .jar and .war files are the same in this regard.

> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:40
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email
> 
> Good morning all!
> 
> More an informational post than anything.
> 
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?
> 
> Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit
was
> set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
> 
> Who'd a thunk it.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Cameron
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-
> software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-22 Thread Cameron 
Just for $hits and giggles, I took the original file (8mbs - which unzipped
to 54mbs) and saved it as Excel 2003 compatible16mbs..



On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Don Andrews wrote:

> Many anti-spam systems have a limit on the size of files they scan -
> including those in archives.  Don't know if this is AS or AV but if AS,
> quarantining or rejecting would seem to be an overreaction IMHO.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 11:21 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>  Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email
>
> That's about as friendly as generic message size limits that nearly
> everyone seems to interpret as file size limits.
> (MIME overhead and all being what it is)
>
> Actually, this seems more egregious from a seat of the pants standpoint.
> What is the actual description Vipre uses for this size limit feature?
> Surely they should mean "message size" like everyone else and if they
> really do mean "file size" then it should be the native file size.  The
> fact that the new formats happen to internally use zip compression should
> matter.  What happens to a rar or 7z file that is renamed with a .txt
> extension?
>
> You are not supposed to know about renaming .docx to .zip after all.
> Well, for the purposes of this discussion anyway...
>
> ~JasonG
>
> P.S. Java .jar and .war files are the same in this regard.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:40
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email
> >
> > Good morning all!
> >
> > More an informational post than anything.
> >
> > Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> > .docx, etc) were compressed files?
> >
> > Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit
> was
> > set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> > So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> > determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
> >
> > Who'd a thunk it.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Cameron
> >
> > ---
> > To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-
> > software.com/read/my_forums/
> > or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> > with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

2010-10-22 Thread Don Andrews 
Yep, that's our recommendation for users encountering difficulties sending them 
as attachments - save in 2k3 format and try again.


From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 6:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

Just for $hits and giggles, I took the original file (8mbs - which unzipped to 
54mbs) and saved it as Excel 2003 compatible16mbs..



On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Don Andrews 
mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com>> wrote:
Many anti-spam systems have a limit on the size of files they scan - including 
those in archives.  Don't know if this is AS or AV but if AS, quarantining or 
rejecting would seem to be an overreaction IMHO.

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com<mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com>]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email

That's about as friendly as generic message size limits that nearly
everyone seems to interpret as file size limits.
(MIME overhead and all being what it is)

Actually, this seems more egregious from a seat of the pants standpoint.
What is the actual description Vipre uses for this size limit feature?
Surely they should mean "message size" like everyone else and if they
really do mean "file size" then it should be the native file size.  The
fact that the new formats happen to internally use zip compression should
matter.  What happens to a rar or 7z file that is renamed with a .txt
extension?

You are not supposed to know about renaming .docx to .zip after all.
Well, for the purposes of this discussion anyway...

~JasonG

P.S. Java .jar and .war files are the same in this regard.

> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron 
> [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com<mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:40
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Vipre for Email
>
> Good morning all!
>
> More an informational post than anything.
>
> Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
> .docx, etc) were compressed files?
>
> Vipre for Exchange was trapping an 8mb .xlsx file even though the limit
was
> set to 50mb and saying that it was over the size when uncompressed.
> So...Sunbelt Tech Support (which in my opinion rocks!) helped me to
> determine that the actual file size was 54mbs..therefore being bounced.
>
> Who'd a thunk it.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cameron
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-<http://lyris.sunbelt-/>
> software.com/read/my_forums/<http://software.com/read/my_forums/>
> or send an email to 
> listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Outlook 2010 Instant Search

2011-04-05 Thread Jason Gurtz 
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Outlook\search]
"disabledownloadsearchprompt"=dword:0001


12.0 key for 2007

~JasonG

> -Original Message-
> From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 16:32
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Slightly OT: Outlook 2010 Instant Search
> 
> Anyone know how to hide/delete/kill the "Click here to enable Instant
> Search" that resides in the top of my inbox of Office 2010?
> We're deploying in pilot and don't want our users installing this.
> 
> Thx in advance
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-
> software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT. Creating Distribution list from Excel

2001-10-23 Thread Missy Koslosky 

You need header fields defined.

Export from Contacts to see what the headers should look like.
- Original Message -
From: "Celoxica Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:11 AM
Subject: Slightly OT. Creating Distribution list from Excel


Slightly OT but if anyone can help I would be very grateful.

I have a list of 1000 names and email address's in an Excel spread sheet.
I would like to import them all to a personal address book so as I can
easily create a distribution list.

I was using the Import / Export wizard but this fails with the message the
file to be imported has no named ranges. Use Excel to name the ranges.

Can anyone help me with this please?

We use Exchange 5.5 sp3
NT 4 sp6a
Outlook 2000
Excel 2000

Thank you in advance for any help.

Kevan Dickinson

Celoxica Ltd
20 Park Gate
Milton Park, Abingdon,
Oxfordshire, OX14 4SH

TEL: +44 (0) 1235 863656
DDI: +44 (0) 1235 825062
FAX: +44 (0) 01235 86364

email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.celoxica.com
Reg No: 3209209


_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered on behalf of Celoxica Ltd through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning
Service.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
immediately. Whilst this email has been swept for viruses, you
should carry out your own virus check before opening any
attachment. Celoxica Ltd accepts no liability for any loss or
damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception
or interruption of this email.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT. Creating Distribution list from Excel

2001-10-23 Thread Boswell Tim 

Make sure row 1 contains headers rather than data (Name, email address etc),
then drag across all cells containing anything you want to import (including
the header row), click Insert > Name > Define, and type a name. 

HTH

Tim Boswell
Customer Support Specialist
BG Group Service Desk 
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 0870 240 0890, TVP Ext 2727
ICL Helpdesk 
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 01782 777888, Int Ext 7241 4678

This email is intended only for the addressee named above. As this email may
contain confidential or privileged information if you are not, or suspect
that you are not, the named addressee or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the named addressee, please telephone us
immediately. Please note that we cannot guarantee that this message or any
attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted and amended. The views
of the author may not necessarily reflect those of the company. 
International Computers Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered
Office 26, Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1SL




-Original Message-
From: Celoxica Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 October 2001 16:11
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT. Creating Distribution list from Excel


Slightly OT but if anyone can help I would be very grateful.

I have a list of 1000 names and email address's in an Excel spread sheet.
I would like to import them all to a personal address book so as I can
easily create a distribution list.

I was using the Import / Export wizard but this fails with the message the
file to be imported has no named ranges. Use Excel to name the ranges.

Can anyone help me with this please?

We use Exchange 5.5 sp3
NT 4 sp6a
Outlook 2000
Excel 2000

Thank you in advance for any help.

Kevan Dickinson 

Celoxica Ltd
20 Park Gate
Milton Park, Abingdon,
Oxfordshire, OX14 4SH

TEL: +44 (0) 1235 863656
DDI: +44 (0) 1235 825062
FAX: +44 (0) 01235 86364

email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.celoxica.com
Reg No: 3209209


_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered on behalf of Celoxica Ltd through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning
Service. 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received 
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
immediately. Whilst this email has been swept for viruses, you 
should carry out your own virus check before opening any 
attachment. Celoxica Ltd accepts no liability for any loss or 
damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception 
or interruption of this email.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Slightly OT - Outlook 2011 Accessing Shared Sub Folder Calendars

2013-04-11 Thread Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife 
How about going in the calendar properties, and add the OL2011 users with 
specific permissions?

Joe Heaton
Enterprise Server Support
CA Department of Fish and Wildlife
1807 13th Street, Suite 201
Sacramento, CA  95811
Desk:  (916) 323-1284

From: Eric [mailto:seag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:39 PM
To: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife; MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT - Outlook 2011 Accessing Shared Sub Folder Calendars

Sorry for the OT post, but I've posted this to Technet and been searching all 
morning for a solution.


We are a mixed Windows and Mac environment.  I have a user who has created a 
sub folder - calendar which she has shared.  The people who are using Outlook 
2010 on Windows can access the shared calendar just fine.  Users running 
Outlook 2011 on Macs cannot access the shared calendar.  The sharing invitation 
includes an xml attachment that Outlook 2011 cannot process  Any suggestions 
for getting access to this shared sub folder calendar would be appreciated.



Thanks!

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
or send an email to
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
or send an email to 
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT - Outlook 2011 Accessing Shared Sub Folder Calendars

2013-04-11 Thread Michael B. Smith 
For better or worse, this is a known issue.

I'm not aware of any schedule for correction.

Move the calendar to the root calendar of a shared mailbox; is the approved 
workaround.

From: Eric [mailto:seag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT - Outlook 2011 Accessing Shared Sub Folder Calendars

Sorry for the OT post, but I've posted this to Technet and been searching all 
morning for a solution.


We are a mixed Windows and Mac environment.  I have a user who has created a 
sub folder - calendar which she has shared.  The people who are using Outlook 
2010 on Windows can access the shared calendar just fine.  Users running 
Outlook 2011 on Macs cannot access the shared calendar.  The sharing invitation 
includes an xml attachment that Outlook 2011 cannot process.  Any suggestions 
for getting access to this shared sub folder calendar would be appreciated.



Thanks!

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
or send an email to
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
or send an email to 
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Slightly OT - Outlook 2011 Accessing Shared Sub Folder Calendars

2013-04-12 Thread Eric 
Thanks for confirming this is a known issue.  At least I don't have to
continue searching for a fix, just the work around!


On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:

>  For better or worse, this is a known issue.
>
> ** **
>
> I’m not aware of any schedule for correction.
>
> ** **
>
> Move the calendar to the root calendar of a shared mailbox; is the
> approved workaround.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Eric [mailto:seag...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:39 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>
> *Subject:* Slightly OT - Outlook 2011 Accessing Shared Sub Folder
> Calendars
>
> ** **
>
> Sorry for the OT post, but I've posted this to Technet and been searching
> all morning for a solution.
>
> ** **
>
> We are a mixed Windows and Mac environment.  I have a user who has created
> a sub folder - calendar which she has shared.  The people who are using
> Outlook 2010 on Windows can access the shared calendar just fine.  Users
> running Outlook 2011 on Macs cannot access the shared calendar.  The
> sharing invitation includes an xml attachment that Outlook 2011 cannot
> process.  Any suggestions for getting access to this shared sub folder
> calendar would be appreciated.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks!
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> or send an email to
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> or send an email to
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
or send an email to 
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Slightly OT: Creating Explicit Credentials in PowerShell for WMI, Exchange, Lync, Remoting, etc.

2011-11-07 Thread Michael B. Smith 
You are correct. And that's why there is a $host.UI.PromptForCredential 
"requirement" in a PowerShell host.

However, as I know that YOU know, security must always be balanced against 
usability. :-)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net] 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Creating Explicit Credentials in PowerShell for WMI, 
Exchange, Lync, Remoting, etc.

Just note that, AFAIK, the intended purpose of SecureString is to
avoid storing the entire password verbatim in memory where a malicious
program could discover it, and passing in a string argument means the
CLR might intern that string for a while... this is why SecureString
has no string constructor.

I know, I know, it's pretty tough to avoid reading a password as a
string unless you're prompting the user for char-by-char console
input... or maybe reading one char at a time from a crypto stream...

--Steve

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Michael B. Smith  wrote:
> New blog post: Creating Explicit Credentials in #PowerShell for WMI, 
> #Exchange, #Lync, Remoting, etc.
> http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2011/11/07/creating-explicit-credentials-in-powershell-for-wmi-exchange-lync-remoting-etc.aspx
> http://bit.ly/vKfIMN
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist