[FairfieldLife] Casey Affleck PETA ad
http://www.goveg.com/f-caseyaffleck.asp
[FairfieldLife] Repost attempt #2
Hello group, The first 2 posts didnt come out right so here goes third attempt: Post 1: __Om Namo Narayana - __* My SatGuru is one in physical form, yet I have had no direct teachings. All have been in astral levels only.__G any teachings that come solely through astral realms are suspect. __* I do not have any direct Guru. __G this is unfortunate - __* Time to time I have had the needed trainings needed on my path. And the growth has been much to my own satisfaction and phenomenal in the eyes of many others. But the path is different than Tantra. __G what is the path ? __* While all in all any spiritual path is ultimately relating to tantra, yet there are different pathways. I am sure you would understand what I am conveying. __ G All paths Yes lead ultimately to the ONE Indivisible Truth of Being. Yet the _methodologies are vastly different on how to reach this end. __* Unfortunately I cannot disclose my satguru's identity because have been advised to refrain from doing such in the very initial stage of these astral transferences way back in 1997. __G i would Never ever promote that all teachings come within the realm of _Astral - as in Astral realm maybe what is given is correct - maybe what comes _through is tinged with ego leanings - maybe what comes is being masqueraded _and comes through another entity. This is also a probability. There is _very little stability with anything Astrally connected. Parabrahman is BEYOND_all astral nonsense. So why is the focal point within the realm of unending _phenomena ? __* With the grace flowing such, I have moved. Since almost a year now, I have been a victim of Kali Tantra (in conjunction with the energies of Rahu, Ketu, Shani and Mangal). __G what are you terming being a victim of Kali Tantra ? As far as the conjunction _of energies these only hold sway when one is within a mental fixation about them. _The Light beyond lights is ALWAYS PURE and the shadows are only flotsum of _reflected shadows. --- they have no substance other than what you yourself _are attributing them to have. __* I dont mean any offence here to path of tantra which in my own opinion is a sacred path. __G there is Tantra - and then there is an abusive aberation which i do not term _tantra at all but rather black arts. --- black arts is wrongly termed *tantra*. Just _as Occult is not Knowledge. Knowledge is having gone beyond all such phenomena. __* But you would surely know that there are other sides of this vidya also. I know the people also doing it. They have been caught redhanded and there is documentary evidence also for the same. __G ok - and ? Why are you being held by fear ? __* Unfortunately or as destined, whatever, they are my own students and trained in the same art that I practise. __G really ? so why did you teach your students such a thing ? or did they get their _knowledge from Astral realm beings ? such is my constraint on such things. _Only in ONE to ONE communication with Sat Guru to Sadhaka in the form of face _to face teaching and guidance is Reliable. __* I take this also as a state of Shakti Parikshan for myself. __G there is examination and then Examination. My questioning is why _a secrecy concerning a Sat Guru - these are not the actions of a Sat Guru to _require secrecy concerning their name. There is something very suspect in _this. __* A lot has been happenning since and there is undercover himsa that is affecting many people right from small children to old people. And there is regular suffering for many at physical, emotional, mental levels in this spiritual evolution thrown across at them without their wish or will through a use of force.__G what do you mean by this ? __* I have tried out all means for settlement. __G settlement in what way ? What needs to be settled ? __* The group involved is itself not really knowing what is wished for. They seem to have just one thing in mind. That I should surrender to them bowing on my feet, and then they would be the ones to uplift me in worldly realms of things, and see to it that I become a kind of star. They claim to be having such instruction from the same astral source. And to me this is catastrophy.__ G there is no good thing there - This is NOT the way of a Spiritual Teacher - _one is not a Sat Guru UNTIL one has gone Beyond all such drama's. A Sat Guru _would not for one instant put up with any of this drama. So my questioning _is - that perhaps your Guru is not in fact a Sat Guru (completed) but rather _something else. __in order to fully advise i need a transparent disclosure. __But what you are describing has all the earmarks of a cultic persuation. _One that has gone off the mark and is not headed towards the Liberation _of a Surrender to that Light beyond lights. But rather a fear based and greed _based dynamic and what has this to do with Realization and becoming free _of the egoic mind drama ? __Understand that Kali brings tough experience but it is with an
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'The Demoralization of America'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgot to add: Via Ilkka Kokkarinen, a 1984 interview with Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov, formerly of the KGB... In the interview he mocks Maharishi and his followers, calling them fools- gives insight to the Soviet mentality, that still prevails today... http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=915448763957391352
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I raised the point, partly, from the memory of speaking absolutely confidently, definitively, authoritatively about things like Chrst, drawing from my memorized (TMO) catechism, Christ never suffered, Christ's main message was that the kingdom of heaven is within. etc. It was SO logical, it HAD to be true. So I / we spoke it as if it was an established fact. That's really the issue, the thing that is so shocking about someone repeating the catechism of Maharishi is responsible for every good thing I see in the world or Maharishi is perfect and can do no wrong or even TM is the best technique of meditation in the world (even though I've never tried another one). There is no thought behind the statements, mere repetition of what one has been taught to say, and think. Catechism. And even more shocking, there is zero awareness in the person who is speaking that they get that they are saying things that 99% of the people on the planet would consider insane. Imagine saying the things you mention above, New, in front of a strong Christian. You'd have said them, as you say, confidently, definitely and authoritatively, with no hesitation, exactly *as* catechism. And the Christian would have been looking at you as if you had just uttered heresy. The reason I think it's good that such examples of cate- chism are occasionally challenged and discussed here is that a few otherwise sane people really need to understand that if they said in public the things they say here, most people would react to them the way that they themselves react when Nablus and Lou speak just as confidently, definitely and authoritatively about UFOs and the Space Brothers.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --Right - getting zapped is pretty useless, unless you can take it with you anytime, anyplace like TM. I got zapped by Muktananda on many occasions. Didn't help much. The point of the story I told below, and why the teacher in question left the room, was to make the point that you *can* take it with you. Everyone opened their eyes to realize that they'd been sitting in samadhi for over an hour *by themselves* with no outside assistance. What is the conclusion that one might draw from that? That one can get there on one's own. And, now, having had an extended experience of what samadhi is like, one might be able to recognize it when it appears in one's own meditation, unlike those TMers who still say after ten or fifteen years, I don't know if I've ever transcended. (Don't bristle...I was a TM teacher...I've heard that line spoken to me by hundreds of meditators.) The zapping is not a goal in itself, although admittedly there are people in the world stupid enough to consider it one and to flit from teacher to teacher like a druggie doing the rounds of the local dealers. Done properly, it's part of a larger method of instruction. The first part is instruction in how to meditate oneself. The next part is a vision of possibilities, being shown what the established goal of this particular meditation (samadhi, the fully conscious thoughtless state) is *like*, and the third part is one's daily meditation, as one works at being able to realize the goal more often and for longer periods of time. Don't try to judge it by TM standards. Maharishi *can't* offer step two, so he doesn't. What he does offer (step one) may be of value and you may prefer it, but to compare the two methods is like comparing apples and oranges. - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@ wrote: TurquoiseB wrote: I've been in rooms where the teacher just zapped everyone into samadhi and then got up and left, and it was over an hour before anyone in the room could open their eyes and figure out that he *had* left. :-) So, you got zapped by Fred the Zen Master. Was that before or after reading Fred's book Surfing the Himalayas? :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Repost attempt #2
Very interesting exchange. This poor woman, not swami g, seems to be caught in some real subtle mental traps and very confused. I wish her the best. --- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello group, The first 2 posts didnt come out right so here goes third attempt: Post 1: __Om Namo Narayana - __* My SatGuru is one in physical form, yet I have had no direct teachings. All have been in astral levels only.__G any teachings that come solely through astral realms are suspect. __* I do not have any direct Guru. __G this is unfortunate - __* Time to time I have had the needed trainings needed on my path. And the growth has been much to my own satisfaction and phenomenal in the eyes of many others. But the path is different than Tantra. __G what is the path ? __* While all in all any spiritual path is ultimately relating to tantra, yet there are different pathways. I am sure you would understand what I am conveying. __ G All paths Yes lead ultimately to the ONE Indivisible Truth of Being. Yet the _methodologies are vastly different on how to reach this end. __* Unfortunately I cannot disclose my satguru's identity because have been advised to refrain from doing such in the very initial stage of these astral transferences way back in 1997. __G i would Never ever promote that all teachings come within the realm of _Astral - as in Astral realm maybe what is given is correct - maybe what comes _through is tinged with ego leanings - maybe what comes is being masqueraded _and comes through another entity. This is also a probability. There is _very little stability with anything Astrally connected. Parabrahman is BEYOND_all astral nonsense. So why is the focal point within the realm of unending _phenomena ? __* With the grace flowing such, I have moved. Since almost a year now, I have been a victim of Kali Tantra (in conjunction with the energies of Rahu, Ketu, Shani and Mangal). __G what are you terming being a victim of Kali Tantra ? As far as the conjunction _of energies these only hold sway when one is within a mental fixation about them. _The Light beyond lights is ALWAYS PURE and the shadows are only flotsum of _reflected shadows. --- they have no substance other than what you yourself _are attributing them to have. __* I dont mean any offence here to path of tantra which in my own opinion is a sacred path. __G there is Tantra - and then there is an abusive aberation which i do not term _tantra at all but rather black arts. --- black arts is wrongly termed *tantra*. Just _as Occult is not Knowledge. Knowledge is having gone beyond all such phenomena. __* But you would surely know that there are other sides of this vidya also. I know the people also doing it. They have been caught redhanded and there is documentary evidence also for the same. __G ok - and ? Why are you being held by fear ? __* Unfortunately or as destined, whatever, they are my own students and trained in the same art that I practise. __G really ? so why did you teach your students such a thing ? or did they get their _knowledge from Astral realm beings ? such is my constraint on such things. _Only in ONE to ONE communication with Sat Guru to Sadhaka in the form of face _to face teaching and guidance is Reliable. __* I take this also as a state of Shakti Parikshan for myself. __G there is examination and then Examination. My questioning is why _a secrecy concerning a Sat Guru - these are not the actions of a Sat Guru to _require secrecy concerning their name. There is something very suspect in _this. __* A lot has been happenning since and there is undercover himsa that is affecting many people right from small children to old people. And there is regular suffering for many at physical, emotional, mental levels in this spiritual evolution thrown across at them without their wish or will through a use of force.__G what do you mean by this ? __* I have tried out all means for settlement. __G settlement in what way ? What needs to be settled ? __* The group involved is itself not really knowing what is wished for. They seem to have just one thing in mind. That I should surrender to them bowing on my feet, and then they would be the ones to uplift me in worldly realms of things, and see to it that I become a kind of star. They claim to be having such instruction from the same astral source. And to me this is catastrophy.__ G there is no good thing there - This is NOT the way of a Spiritual Teacher - _one is not a Sat Guru UNTIL one has gone Beyond all such drama's. A Sat Guru _would not for one instant put up with any of this drama. So my questioning _is - that perhaps your Guru is not in fact a Sat Guru (completed) but rather _something else. __in order to fully advise i need a transparent disclosure. __But what you are describing has all the
Re: [FairfieldLife] Torture
THIS IS A BEHEADING VIDEO!!! DO NOT WATCH THIS THING IT WILL MAKE YOU SICK. IT PROFOUNDLY TRAUMATIZES YOUR MIND/BODY. STAY AWAY!! IT IS INTRINSICALLY EVIL. THE PEOPLE WHO DO THESE THINGS ARE CONTROLLED BY POWERFUL DEMONIC INFLUENCES, SOMETHING YOU DON'T WANT TO SCREW AROUND WITH!! --- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This post is for those that are under the impression that what goes on at Gitmo or what went on at Abu Ghraib was torture. Go see the following video and then come back here and tell us if you still feel what the Americans did was torture (do NOT see the video if you are faint of heart because it very well may be the most disturbing video you ever see. That was certainly the case for me): http://www.bigducky.com/videos/beheading_videos/armstrong_beheading.htm To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool. http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
Great post, extremely funny! --- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bhairitu wrote: Most of everything in the meditation method of TM can be found in a book or two published by Swami Sivananda in the 1930s and that is just one example. So, how come Swami Satchitananda or Swami Vishnudevananda couldn't teach any of their students how to effortlessly transcend? I took their course in Yoga back in the '70s and neither one of them said anything about transcending - I got the impression that they didn't have a clue and so that's why they taught concentration on the tip of their nose. The reason so many teachers give shaktipat as part of the meditation instruction is so the student can instantly transcend and it sets up the mind for transcending with practicing the mantra. Maybe so, but I got shaktiput from Swami Muktananda when he visited California a few days before Franklin Jones met him. Later Jones called himself The Master Da, but neither one of them seemed to have a clue about teaching anyone how to transcend using a TM technique. If they did, I guess they would have said something about it, would they not? At any rate, I guess it's now been settled: Vaj got enlightened at seeing a guy sitting with locked legs in a cafeteria in Honesburg, Barry got zapped by Fred Lentz at a light show in Los Angeles, and now you're telling us that you got enlightened by a power touch in downtown Oakland. Maybe you three got touched in the head and you lost you marbles in a trance-induction state. Who knows? So, you guys have been in and out of cults for most of your adult life, but I'm the one who eats prarie dog tacos? Eat your rice, then wash your bowl! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
[FairfieldLife] Re: Repost attempt #2
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Very interesting exchange. This poor woman, not swami g, seems to be caught in some real subtle mental traps and very confused. I wish her the best. I agree. In this case, IMO Swami G is giving good advice. Who, after all, would dial a telephone number at random, get someone they don't know from Adam on the other end of the phone, and then base everything they do and believe in their lives on what that person says? That's what those who trust in astral teachers and communication with disembodied entities are doing. As a teacher I worked with once said, Just because they're dead doesn't make them smart. --- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello group, The first 2 posts didnt come out right so here goes third attempt: Post 1: __Om Namo Narayana - __* My SatGuru is one in physical form, yet I have had no direct teachings. All have been in astral levels only.__G any teachings that come solely through astral realms are suspect. __* I do not have any direct Guru. __G this is unfortunate - __* Time to time I have had the needed trainings needed on my path. And the growth has been much to my own satisfaction and phenomenal in the eyes of many others. But the path is different than Tantra. __G what is the path ? __* While all in all any spiritual path is ultimately relating to tantra, yet there are different pathways. I am sure you would understand what I am conveying. __ G All paths Yes lead ultimately to the ONE Indivisible Truth of Being. Yet the _methodologies are vastly different on how to reach this end. __* Unfortunately I cannot disclose my satguru's identity because have been advised to refrain from doing such in the very initial stage of these astral transferences way back in 1997. __G i would Never ever promote that all teachings come within the realm of _Astral - as in Astral realm maybe what is given is correct - maybe what comes _through is tinged with ego leanings - maybe what comes is being masqueraded _and comes through another entity. This is also a probability. There is _very little stability with anything Astrally connected. Parabrahman is BEYOND_all astral nonsense. So why is the focal point within the realm of unending _phenomena ? __* With the grace flowing such, I have moved. Since almost a year now, I have been a victim of Kali Tantra (in conjunction with the energies of Rahu, Ketu, Shani and Mangal). __G what are you terming being a victim of Kali Tantra ? As far as the conjunction _of energies these only hold sway when one is within a mental fixation about them. _The Light beyond lights is ALWAYS PURE and the shadows are only flotsum of _reflected shadows. --- they have no substance other than what you yourself _are attributing them to have. __* I dont mean any offence here to path of tantra which in my own opinion is a sacred path. __G there is Tantra - and then there is an abusive aberation which i do not term _tantra at all but rather black arts. --- black arts is wrongly termed *tantra*. Just _as Occult is not Knowledge. Knowledge is having gone beyond all such phenomena. __* But you would surely know that there are other sides of this vidya also. I know the people also doing it. They have been caught redhanded and there is documentary evidence also for the same. __G ok - and ? Why are you being held by fear ? __* Unfortunately or as destined, whatever, they are my own students and trained in the same art that I practise. __G really ? so why did you teach your students such a thing ? or did they get their _knowledge from Astral realm beings ? such is my constraint on such things. _Only in ONE to ONE communication with Sat Guru to Sadhaka in the form of face _to face teaching and guidance is Reliable. __* I take this also as a state of Shakti Parikshan for myself. __G there is examination and then Examination. My questioning is why _a secrecy concerning a Sat Guru - these are not the actions of a Sat Guru to _require secrecy concerning their name. There is something very suspect in _this. __* A lot has been happenning since and there is undercover himsa that is affecting many people right from small children to old people. And there is regular suffering for many at physical, emotional, mental levels in this spiritual evolution thrown across at them without their wish or will through a use of force.__G what do you mean by this ? __* I have tried out all means for settlement. __G settlement in what way ? What needs to be settled ? __* The group involved is itself not really knowing what is wished for. They seem to have just one thing in mind. That I should surrender to them bowing on my
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I raised the point, partly, from the memory of speaking absolutely confidently, definitively, authoritatively about things like Chrst, drawing from my memorized (TMO) catechism, Christ never suffered, Christ's main message was that the kingdom of heaven is within. etc. It was SO logical, it HAD to be true. So I / we spoke it as if it was an established fact. It is.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: One gets the credit for accomplishments by actually accomplishing something, not by claiming that your teacher did. I absolutely agree with this last bit. I also think you are taking what I said to an absurd degree. What I have said is analogous to the fact that the electrification of the US wouldn't have occurred were it not for Edison. You probably don't see it that way. OK by me. However to imply that I am denigrating those who followed in Maharishi's footsteps, like the Vanity Fair yoga photographer, is not at all what I am talking about, or that anyone who has ever accomplished anything spiritually including any of us here, hasn't done so entirely on their own merits, through their own choice, and through their own efforts. However, someone had to revitalize the spiritual momentum of the world. The religions weren't doing it. The fact that it is Maharishi and Guru Dev doesn't matter much. It could have been anyone else. Reality check: Its just that it wasn't, though Yogananda did a great job of softening up the soil in the West so to speak. And last, this implication that Maharishi and Guru Dev did this and therefore it reflects on me somehow is just plain nonsensical. I hope that clarifies to you what I have said originally. In a nutshell I said what I said without any further implications or conclusions to be drawn. A settled mind. It is what it is, and no more. :-) According to you MMY is perfect and revitalized the spiritual momentum of the world. Do tell, oh settled mind, where is your proof of this? Maharishi *and* Guru Dev. Do you have any proof that they haven't?:-) Are you serious? 99.99% of the world's population has never heard of either Guru Dev or MMY. The majority of the world's population who are religious follow traditions other than Hinduism. And the vast majority of Hindus have nothing to do with MMY. You've heard of the civil war going on on the Iraq, right? You've heard of the other wars going on in the middle east, right? Genocidesmany, in fact most conducted in the name of religion. Famine. What's YOUR proof? Pundits living behind barbed wire in FF? I'd really like to know. Look, if believing in the fairy tale that MMY has revitalized the spiritual momentum of the world brings you pleasure in thinking that you rode the right horse in this life, instead of some other spiritual leader, good on you. There's nothing finer than the security and warm blanketness of being in the know, of being in on cosmic secret. You too with the self aggrandizement argument? What is it with this? Is that why you were interested in TM and Maharishi at one time?? I don't get that connection. I've always derived a great deal from Maharishi and Guru Dev's teaching and the practice of TM, vs. going about smugly as a member of some sort of little club. My beliefs are purely derived from my experience, and not the other way around. My attitude has always been one of surrender vs. arrogance and condescension, though I might have been in the minority. Don't know, don't care. As to the world being unaware of Maharishi and Guru Dev's contribution, couldn't that be similar to Copernicus's assertion in the 15th century that the earth revolves around the sun vs the other way around? One of the few with such a belief at that time, but ultimately found to be right? Just asking the question. But from outside this little cocoon, MMY is a big man in a tiny and ever shrinking pond. Yes on the surface it would appear so. Just as on the surface the sun definitely and unmistakably revolves around the earth.:-) vs. going about smugly as a member of some little club. I see. So you believe that, like Copernicus, MMY alone has the keys to the castle, that he is way ahead of the spiritual truth curve and humanity just has to catch up. You sure you aren't going about smugly as a member of some little club? Like I said Jim, if this gives you personal satisfaction then enjoy your
[FairfieldLife] Re: Torture
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THIS IS A BEHEADING VIDEO!!! DO NOT WATCH THIS THING IT WILL MAKE YOU SICK. IT PROFOUNDLY TRAUMATIZES YOUR MIND/BODY. STAY AWAY!! IT IS INTRINSICALLY EVIL. THE PEOPLE WHO DO THESE THINGS ARE CONTROLLED BY POWERFUL DEMONIC INFLUENCES, SOMETHING YOU DON'T WANT TO SCREW AROUND WITH!! Dr. Pete is right! Don't watch it! I almost puked! :/ --- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This post is for those that are under the impression that what goes on at Gitmo or what went on at Abu Ghraib was torture. Go see the following video and then come back here and tell us if you still feel what the Americans did was torture (do NOT see the video if you are faint of heart because it very well may be the most disturbing video you ever see. That was certainly the case for me): http://www.bigducky.com/videos/beheading_videos/armstrong_beheading.h tm To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool. http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Torture
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This post is for those that are under the impression that what goes on at Gitmo or what went on at Abu Ghraib was torture. Go see the following video and then come back here and tell us if you still feel what the Americans did was torture (do NOT see the video if you are faint of heart because it very well may be the most disturbing video you ever see. That was certainly the case for me): http://www.bigducky.com/videos/beheading_videos/armstrong_beheading.htm I can't look at this as I'm in a public library but the title tells me all I need to know. But surely beheading isn't torture it's execution? the idea of torture is to get information out of people, tricky to confess to anything when your head is any distance from your body. The main question is, how do you know what the CIA are doing? Why do you think they've been flying people half-way round the world to countries that freely admit they practise torture? for the air-miles? Setting dogs on people and giving them electric shocks IS torture, and it's illegal under international law and any sane moral code. Besides, it doesn't even work if the people are guilty let alone innocent as most are/were at gitmo abu graib. I was going to end by saying the US doesn't get off because the people don't actually die but plenty have been beaten to death at the hands of the coalition of the willing Shame on us.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
On Jun 25, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote: The reason so many teachers give shaktipat as part of the meditation instruction is so the student can instantly transcend and it sets up the mind for transcending with practicing the mantra. Maybe so, but I got shaktiput from Swami Muktananda when he visited California a few days before Franklin Jones met him. Later Jones called himself The Master Da, but neither one of them seemed to have a clue about teaching anyone how to transcend using a TM technique. If they did, I guess they would have said something about it, would they no Maybe they wanted something deeper than transcending and only ripe students could perceive it. That would certainly explain the dullness you seem to have. Makes one wonder if M. really does put a block on some peoples nervous systems as some of his closest students claimed. I'm sure Larry Domash could transcend, but he dumped the Reesh for Da the Beer-bellied. How come?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Please help me find a good astrologer
We shall be very happy to assist with Vedic astrology. We do compatibility analysis to check how compatible 2 or more people are for marriage, business or any kind of partnership. Our astrologers are very skilled and experienced having experience of more than 10 years. Some of them are having international exposure through TM Movement. Pratmah2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/25/2007 1:57:07 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Go to Astrological Varieties . Lou Valentino uses both Western and Vedic for his clients. You should consult with Dr. Brendan Feeley who practices in the Washington DC area. You can google his name to find his website and email. He is primarily a vedic (jyotish) astrologer who also knows western astrology techniques. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need a good astrologer, either Western or Jyotish. Someone who is skilled at looking at two charts and seeing how the two people concerned fit together. Does anyone have any suggestions? Eleven years ago I had an excellent reading from a guy called Colin Maxwell. Anyone know him or where I could contact him? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. - See what's free at AOL.com. - Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Please help me find a good astrologer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, pratap Mahapatra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We shall be very happy to assist with Vedic astrology. We do compatibility analysis to check how compatible 2 or more people are for marriage, business or any kind of partnership. H. Given the general prudery of India and things Vedic, I'm wondering what the reading would be like for someone who ordered a compatibility chart for 2 or more people as *marriage* partners. I'm toying with the idea of ordering a compatibility chart from these folks for me (as husband) and Isabelle Adjani, Eva Green, Salma Hayek, and Maribel Verdú (as wives). I'm convinced that we'd all get along smashingly, but I'd like confirmation from God on this. I'd surely have a heart attack after a few months (weeks?) of such a marriage, but what a way to go, eh? :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Torture
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: This post is for those that are under the impression that what goes on at Gitmo or what went on at Abu Ghraib was torture. Go see the following video and then come back here and tell us if you still feel what the Americans did was torture (do NOT see the video if you are faint of heart because it very well may be the most disturbing video you ever see. That was certainly the case for me): I can't look at this as I'm in a public library but the title tells me all I need to know. But surely beheading isn't torture it's execution? the idea of torture is to get information out of people, tricky to confess to anything when your head is any distance from your body. Not to mention, if you're beheaded, at least you're spared prolonged, agonizing suffering. The main question is, how do you know what the CIA are doing? Why do you think they've been flying people half-way round the world to countries that freely admit they practise torture? for the air- miles? Setting dogs on people and giving them electric shocks IS torture, and it's illegal under international law and any sane moral code. Not to mention waterboarding, stress positions, sleep deprivation, extremes of temperature...and God knows what else. Besides, it doesn't even work if the people are guilty let alone innocent as most are/were at gitmo abu graib. I was going to end by saying the US doesn't get off because the people don't actually die but plenty have been beaten to death at the hands of the coalition of the willing And many others have been so psychologically traumatized they'll never be normal. Shame on us. Indeed. The Washington Post has been publishing a series of articles on Dick Cheney's vice presidency; his activities in making torture a tool of U.S. policy are truly sick-making.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
TurquoiseB wrote: Everyone opened their eyes to realize that they'd been sitting in samadhi for over an hour *by themselves* with no outside assistance. It doesn't usually require any assistance to sit in a crowd of people with your eyes closed, especially if you're bored stiff. But I'd say that if someone got zapped then that would certainly indicate they got SOME outside assistance. What is the conclusion that one might draw from that? That they were in a hypnotic, self-induced trance-state? That one can get there on one's own. And if, as you say, they got no outside assistance, then why would they need a teacher? And why would you give Freddy tens of thousands of dollars? And, now, having had an extended experience of what samadhi is like, one might be able to recognize it when it appears in one's own meditation, unlike those TMers who still say after ten or fifteen years, I don't know if I've ever transcended. I've never met any TMers, of ten or fifteen years, who said I don't know if I've ever transcended, and I've met and talked with thousands of TMers. Most people if they fail to transcend quit the practice after a few days, not years. (Don't bristle...I was a TM teacher...I've heard that line spoken to me by hundreds of meditators.) Maybe they didn't get checked very often. The zapping is not a goal in itself, although admittedly there are people in the world stupid enough to consider it one and to flit from teacher to teacher like a druggie doing the rounds of the local dealers. Sort of like you have been doing all your adult life? Done properly, it's part of a larger method of instruction. The first part is instruction in how to meditate oneself. The next part is a vision of possibilities, being shown what the established goal of this particular meditation (samadhi, the fully conscious thoughtless state) is *like*, and the third part is one's daily meditation, as one works at being able to realize the goal more often and for longer periods of time. Maybe so, but I've never promised anything like enlightenment in 5-7 years like you did. I've simply pointed out that transcending is the greatest relaxation technique on the planet. Don't try to judge it by TM standards. Maharishi *can't* offer step two, so he doesn't. What he does offer (step one) may be of value and you may prefer it, but to compare the two methods is like comparing apples and oranges. Maybe so, but you've been saying for over ten years, getting zapped is no big deal.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The zapping is not a goal in itself, although admittedly there are people in the world stupid enough to consider it one and to flit from teacher to teacher like a druggie doing the rounds of the local dealers. Done properly, it's part of a larger method of instruction. The first part is instruction in how to meditate oneself. The next part is a vision of possibilities, being shown what the established goal of this particular meditation (samadhi, the fully conscious thoughtless state) is *like*, and the third part is one's daily meditation, as one works at being able to realize the goal more often and for longer periods of time. Don't try to judge it by TM standards. Maharishi *can't* offer step two, so he doesn't. We don't know that, of course. In any case, it isn't the established goal of TM, so why should he?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote: I raised the point, partly, from the memory of speaking absolutely confidently, definitively, authoritatively about things like Chrst, drawing from my memorized (TMO) catechism, Christ never suffered, Christ's main message was that the kingdom of heaven is within. etc. It was SO logical, it HAD to be true. So I / we spoke it as if it was an established fact. That's really the issue, the thing that is so shocking about someone repeating the catechism of Maharishi is responsible for every good thing I see in the world or Maharishi is perfect and can do no wrong or even TM is the best technique of meditation in the world (even though I've never tried another one). There is no thought behind the statements, mere repetition of what one has been taught to say, and think. Catechism. Actually, I've never heard any of these statements in the TM context (except from critics who invent them to make TM sound bad, as here). snip The reason I think it's good that such examples of cate- chism are occasionally challenged and discussed here is that a few otherwise sane people really need to understand that if they said in public the things they say here, most people would react to them the way that they themselves react when Nablus and Lou speak just as confidently, definitely and authoritatively about UFOs and the Space Brothers. So what?? Are you suggesting that people should say only what others are willing to accept?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
Maybe so, but I got shaktiput from Swami Muktananda when he visited California a few days before Franklin Jones met him. Later Jones called himself The Master Da, but neither one of them seemed to have a clue about teaching anyone how to transcend using a TM technique. If they did, I guess they would have said something about it, would they no Vaj wrote: Maybe they wanted something deeper than transcending and only ripe students could perceive it. Maybe so, but how would you be knowing? That would certainly explain the dullness you seem to have. So, you can't cite a single case of anyone ever reaching enlightenment using a yoga technique taught by a yoga teacher. And all you can do is argue with me about the efficacy of the Marshy's relaxation technigue, but I'm the dull one. Makes one wonder if M. really does put a block on some peoples nervous systems as some of his closest students claimed. That would be pretty impressive in itself, since by all accounts not a single student has even been in the same room with the Marshy for at least thirty years. I'm sure Larry Domash could transcend, but he dumped the Reesh for Da the Beer-bellied. What makes you so sure? How come? To recruit more female students for the Da?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Torture
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This post is for those that are under the impression that what goes on at Gitmo or what went on at Abu Ghraib was torture. Go see the following video and then come back here and tell us if you still feel what the Americans did was torture (do NOT see the video if you are faint of heart because it very well may be the most disturbing video you ever see. That was certainly the case for me): http://www.bigducky.com/videos/beheading_videos/armstrong_beheading.htm PHOTOS of harmless fraternity pranks at Abu Ghraib http://www.thememoryhole.com/war/iraqis_tortured/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Please help me find a good astrologer
On Jun 26, 2007, at 6:55 AM, pratap Mahapatra wrote: e shall be very happy to assist with Vedic astrology. We do compatibility analysis to check how compatible 2 or more people are for marriage 2 or more people? You mean, like a group marriage? You should probably get together with Michael Dean Goodman, he's into that kind of stuff too. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
TurquoiseB wrote: That's really the issue, the thing that is so shocking about someone repeating the catechism of Maharishi is responsible for every good thing I see in the world or Maharishi is perfect and can do no wrong or even TM is the best technique of meditation in the world (even though I've never tried another one). Have any of the TMers on this forum ever said that? I think not. All I said was that Marshy taught me the greatest relaxation technique on the planet and I've tried quite a few relaxation techniques. Did I mention Tony Robbins and Dale Carnegie? There is no thought behind the statements, mere repetition of what one has been taught to say, and think. Catechism. And even more shocking, there is zero awareness in the person who is speaking that they get that they are saying things that 99% of the people on the planet would consider insane. Sort of like you repeating the Rama Catechism about a guy who could do amazing things with light bulbs and people getting zapped in a movie theater. You do realize that 99% of the people on this planet would consider you insane for joining cult groups and giving them tens-of-thousands of dollars? Imagine saying the things you mention above, New, in front of a strong Christian. You'd have said them, as you say, confidently, definitely and authoritatively, with no hesitation, exactly *as* catechism. And the Christian would have been looking at you as if you had just uttered heresy. Imagine you saying the things you do about Buddhism in front of just about any practicing Buddhist! Or, telling them your name is Uncle Tantra when you haven't read a single tantra. Or, calling yourself Shoki when you have never solved a single koan. Or, calling yourself a programmer when you've never programmed a single person. The reason I think it's good that such examples of cate- chism are occasionally challenged and discussed here is that a few otherwise sane people really need to understand that if they said in public the things they say here, most people would react to them the way that they themselves react when Nablus and Lou speak just as confidently, definitely and authoritatively about UFOs and the Space Brothers. So, lets discuss why you tried to recruit all those female students for the Marshy for 14 years or why you helped the Rama guy mix up all that kool-aid for another 14 years and why you'd want to say all these insane things about a guy who put a dog collar on and killed hisself and tried to take his girlfriend with him, but I like to eat prarie dog tacos. Go figure.
[FairfieldLife] A Tantric Path described- recomended book
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirsten schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Namaste Swami- G, Namaste and OM - * Thank you for your guidance and support. I have had enough suffering and do wish to find that peace. I don't want to be part of the blind leading the blind and respect that this is a place where you who have completed the journey gives guidance that can be taken or not. G am glad there is clarity in this. * My questions in other areas (Hundred Mantra Symbol) is part of my search to find the guidance that suits me. I'm not saying I haven't found it here...I'm currious when others make suggestions. I know that Mantras are very powerful and using them without guidance could do more harm than good ( that's my understanding any way). G using a mantra that is not Charged and kept Charged by an Authentic Guru offers very little in the end. It is the Guru's transmission which is the energetic force behind the mantra. It is more than simply various sounds and syllables. * I am seeking a Guru - one that I can trust and that will help me on my path.I guess that's what so many of us going through this process struggle withfinding someone who can guide us. There are many out there that make promises of helping you reach realization and it's finding a match. G it goes both ways - the Guru also looks to see if it is a match - if there is sincerity - if the potential sadhaka can listen and follow through on what is given - if there is enough maturity to handle this path and way - as this Tantric path and Guru will challenge ones belief systems and will do everything possible to aide in breaking through ones self created dramas. Again IF you are contemplating having this Sat Guru or any Guru or Lama within a Vajra or Tantric path a requirement is to read Dangerous Friend and you will quickly see that this is an established path modality --- there are very few Actual Guru's and Tantric Lama Adepts that are geared towards and remain in this One to One modality of working with Sadhaka's. Most have gone the way of pandering to society and the ego pampering which will bring lots of seekers to their door. And while the feel good way is more attractive it in the end only fosters enabling the illusory ME to keep on it's throne of MY way - MY desires - MY truths - ME - MY - and all the drama that keeps following that entrenchment. When people come there is a testing of sorts - When people come with this attitude of my truths are just as valid and you need to respect what i know etc. and if there is this stubborness that simply won't even use Namaste or a greeting which is respectful for all --- then again they will be challenged most heavily to SEE IF they can get beyond thier own foibles and are ready and open to having a Guide and Mentor OR if they are simply fooling themselves and looking for a place to have a rah rah club. This path is really not about the rah rah club approach. It is about diving in - diving down - and finding that Pearl of Great Price. It's about digging and mining through the emotions - and blasting away the hard shell - about continuing on until that Perfect Diamond Gem is found - then one continues to cut it until the Perfection Sparkles in it's Clarity. This is simply not the path for all seekers. For those who are ready and for those who trully seek Realization and not a caracture of it ie: a way of personal self control or escapsim - then this Modality of the Trantric Way is quite rapid. Now what is different here than the tibetan model ? Here i don't have all the Ritualized Drama in place - it is stripped down to it's most essential form - there is not the added scenery of pomp and circumstance that can also become a stumbling block of attachment. This Guru works in the form of the more Austere Yogi - bare bones - excuse the expression balls to the walls - out and out - let's get down to the bare bones way. Kali doesn't play around and when seekers get ready she will do everything to cut the head of ego and bring Realization. Kali will be feared by man caught in their ME throne - as this energy and way uses the Blade of Discrimination to cut through to the heart of the matter. For those who understand this form of Kali then she is the greatest protector and infinite Loving Mother - Kali gives what is needed and not always what is wanted. This path's icons are primarily - Ganesh which is Wisdom - the dispeller of Obstacles - The dynamic of coming in an open way. Shiva as ParaShiva or ParaBrhaman the Linga which represents that Eternal IS that is beyond form and is That to which Kali as Shakti and Kundalini and Guru will pull the aspirant ever forward to Merge within. When Shakti and ParaShiva are merged then Realization takes place - then 0 point balance may be entered and sustained IF the work has been done correctly. This is this path - this is this modality - this is the way this Guru
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
Judy, You understand the problems with the lack of evidence in the assertion. I am disappointed to see your support for his taking a personal shot at me in the context of a discussion of ideas. Jim However, someone had to revitalize the spiritual momentum of the world. The religions weren't doing it. The fact that it is Maharishi and Guru Dev doesn't matter much. It could have been anyone else. Reality check: Its just that it wasn't, though Yogananda did a great job of softening up the soil in the West so to speak. Me: The belief that MMY is unique in the ability to revitalize the spiritual momentum of the world by a member of his tiny group does remind me of the people who believe that they out of all the people on the planet have the spiritual specialness to go to heaven because of their beliefs. The mechanism of inflating personal specialness is identical, only the content of the belief is different. In each case the person believes that they are intrinsically special due to their beliefs and subjective experiences. I am not misstating the claim, I am disagreeing with it exactly as it was stated and comparing it to another example of that type of assertion by similarly sincere religious people. By all means bring on the evidence for the claim of MMY revitalizing the spiritual momentum of the world while Yogananda was merely softening the soil, Judy. Neither your phrase, grossly and insultingly misstated, nor Judy: As Robert correctly noted, this is the type of deliberate, malicious distortion we see from people like Karl Rove; decent people are at a loss to find an explation for it. take the place of evidence for the claim, and they don't distract me from the lack of it. But I would love to hear how decent people might come to the conclusion that my pointing out the lack of evidence for the assertion makes decent people compelled to claim that my sexual energy is misdirected, whatever that means. (nice but slippery touch dropping his misdirected sexual energy charge, it made him seem so much more decent while making a personal attack in response to a discussion of religious beliefs.) I was comparing the style of thinking with other sincere religious people ( I was thinking of Catholics, but many Christian sects believe they will uniquely go to heaven, the fundies assumption was your own invention) Robert, and now you, are comparing my skepticism to these claims and pointing out a similarity to other religious people's beliefs to a reviled character in politics. So unless you feel that your belief in MMY's claims are so totally special that even making a comparison to other religious people's beliefs is grossly and insultingly misstated, you can hold the faux outrage and the phony decent people routine. Karl Rove! Decent people! Misdirected sexual energy! Oh my! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: Perhaps it has to do with misdirected sexual energy? If you had any evidence to support the claim I was challenging then you wouldn't need to make degrading personal comments. Casting aspersions on me personally doesn't help your cause, it just reveals your own limitations in a discussion of ideas. I think he was referring to the fact that you grossly and insultingly misstated what Jim had said about MMY and Guru Dev, equating it with fundies claiming they alone will go to heaven while people believing a slightly different version of the same myth will suffer in hell. As Robert correctly noted, this is the type of deliberate, malicious distortion we see from people like Karl Rove; decent people are at a loss to find an explation for it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@ wrote: (snip) This kind of spiritual oneupmanship certainly isn't restricted to MMY's tiny group. Think of the spiritual arrogance at the basis of huge factions of Christianity believing that they alone will go to heaven while people believing a slightly different version of the same myth will suffer in hell for their lack of growing up in the right version. But they all fall in the category of pretending to know things that you couldn't possibly know. It is a self inflation of value relegating poor Yogananda to fluffer status in this spiritual regeneration skin flick. So, you are saying that I have at least a 50 percent chance of being completely correct? And you have an equally 50% chance of being completely wrong, right? And where did you get this notion that what I said is anything remotely like the TM folks go to heaven and the rest go to hell? That implied exclusivity is something Turq brought up also. I don't get it. I have never implied or assumed anything like that.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: One gets the credit for accomplishments by actually accomplishing something, not by claiming that your teacher did. I absolutely agree with this last bit. I also think you are taking what I said to an absurd degree. What I have said is analogous to the fact that the electrification of the US wouldn't have occurred were it not for Edison. You probably don't see it that way. OK by me. However to imply that I am denigrating those who followed in Maharishi's footsteps, like the Vanity Fair yoga photographer, is not at all what I am talking about, or that anyone who has ever accomplished anything spiritually including any of us here, hasn't done so entirely on their own merits, through their own choice, and through their own efforts. However, someone had to revitalize the spiritual momentum of the world. The religions weren't doing it. The fact that it is Maharishi and Guru Dev doesn't matter much. It could have been anyone else. Reality check: Its just that it wasn't, though Yogananda did a great job of softening up the soil in the West so to speak. And last, this implication that Maharishi and Guru Dev did this and therefore it reflects on me somehow is just plain nonsensical. I hope that clarifies to you what I have said originally. In a nutshell I said what I said without any further implications or conclusions to be drawn. A settled mind. It is what it is, and no more. :-) According to you MMY is perfect and revitalized the spiritual momentum of the world. Do tell, oh settled mind, where is your proof of this? Maharishi *and* Guru Dev. Do you have any proof that they haven't?:-) Are you serious? 99.99% of the world's population has never heard of either Guru Dev or MMY. The majority of the world's population who are religious follow traditions other than Hinduism. And the vast majority of Hindus have nothing to do with MMY. You've heard of the civil war going on on the Iraq, right? You've heard of the other wars going on in the middle east, right? Genocidesmany, in fact most conducted in the name of religion. Famine. What's YOUR proof? Pundits living behind barbed wire in FF? I'd really like to know. Look, if believing in the fairy tale that MMY has revitalized the spiritual momentum of the world brings you pleasure in thinking that you rode the right horse in this life, instead of some other spiritual leader, good on you. There's nothing finer than the security and warm blanketness of being in the know, of being in on cosmic secret. You too with the self aggrandizement argument? What is it with this? Is that why you were interested in TM and Maharishi at one time?? I don't get that connection. I've always derived a great deal from Maharishi and Guru Dev's teaching and the practice of TM, vs. going about smugly as a member of some sort of little club. My beliefs are purely derived from my experience, and not the other way around. My attitude has always been one of surrender vs. arrogance and condescension, though I might have been in the minority. Don't know, don't care. As to the world being unaware of Maharishi and Guru Dev's contribution, couldn't that be similar to Copernicus's assertion in the 15th century that the earth revolves around the sun vs the other way around? One of the few with such a belief at that time, but ultimately found to be right? Just asking the question. But from outside this little cocoon, MMY is a big man in a tiny and ever shrinking pond. Yes on the surface it would appear so. Just as on the surface the sun definitely and unmistakably revolves around the earth.:-) vs. going about smugly as a member of some little club. I see. So you believe that, like Copernicus, MMY alone has the keys to the castle, that he is
[FairfieldLife] Re: Repost attempt #2
Well, I also thought it was interesting. The woman is showing a turnaround at the end of the post. I have seen a few dramitic turn arounds in the posts. one I filed away - it was aorund 15 posts total. In that one, there was a dramitic turn around in the comments of the poster. It started out where the poster had all the perfect words placeing herself as Enlightened. It ended where the poster said she now sees where it wasn't the case and is contemplating deeply. This gave the appearence of one that was evloved but not quite there and a sincere and ripe seeker. However, as the months went by, and more exchanges took place, it may have been looking more like this person wasn't even ripe and was more like lost. What started out as One declaring enlightenment ends with the woman talking about being depressed, angry, lonesome, with violent thinking. So, my experience from the last year tells me that no matter what the experiences reported on paper, this is not going to substitute for spending time and being in the presence of both Guru's and disciples so that the real story is satisfied by the one looking for what they are looking for. Seeing disciples and Guru's writings and even videos is one thing, and that may give insight which will actually hold once an intimate knowing on both sides is there. If there is lack of transparency or being able to get close is not possible, this is also a different story. So weather this woman continues on the same lines or shows this dramatic turn around in understandings- whatever, but the fundementals are the woman appears to be all over in the place in my opinion, and the way out are the pointings that are listed- what unfolds next remains to be seen- As the world turns Very interesting exchange. This poor woman, not swami g, seems to be caught in some real subtle mental traps and very confused. I wish her the best. --- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello group, The first 2 posts didnt come out right so here goes third attempt: Post 1: __Om Namo Narayana - __* My SatGuru is one in physical form, yet I have had no direct teachings. All have been in astral levels only.__G any teachings that come solely through astral realms are suspect. __* I do not have any direct Guru. __G this is unfortunate - __* Time to time I have had the needed trainings needed on my path. And the growth has been much to my own satisfaction and phenomenal in the eyes of many others. But the path is different than Tantra. __G what is the path ? __* While all in all any spiritual path is ultimately relating to tantra, yet there are different pathways. I am sure you would understand what I am conveying. __ G All paths Yes lead ultimately to the ONE Indivisible Truth of Being. Yet the _methodologies are vastly different on how to reach this end. __* Unfortunately I cannot disclose my satguru's identity because have been advised to refrain from doing such in the very initial stage of these astral transferences way back in 1997. __G i would Never ever promote that all teachings come within the realm of _Astral - as in Astral realm maybe what is given is correct - maybe what comes _through is tinged with ego leanings - maybe what comes is being masqueraded _and comes through another entity. This is also a probability. There is _very little stability with anything Astrally connected. Parabrahman is BEYOND_all astral nonsense. So why is the focal point within the realm of unending _phenomena ? __* With the grace flowing such, I have moved. Since almost a year now, I have been a victim of Kali Tantra (in conjunction with the energies of Rahu, Ketu, Shani and Mangal). __G what are you terming being a victim of Kali Tantra ? As far as the conjunction _of energies these only hold sway when one is within a mental fixation about them. _The Light beyond lights is ALWAYS PURE and the shadows are only flotsum of _reflected shadows. --- they have no substance other than what you yourself _are attributing them to have. __* I dont mean any offence here to path of tantra which in my own opinion is a sacred path. __G there is Tantra - and then there is an abusive aberation which i do not term _tantra at all but rather black arts. --- black arts is wrongly termed *tantra*. Just _as Occult is not Knowledge. Knowledge is having gone beyond all such phenomena. __* But you would surely know that there are other sides of this vidya also. I know the people also doing it. They have been caught redhanded and there is documentary evidence also for the same. __G ok - and ? Why are you being held by fear ? __* Unfortunately or as destined, whatever, they are my own students and trained in the same art that I practise. __G really ? so why did you teach your
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Judy, You understand the problems with the lack of evidence in the assertion. I am disappointed to see your support for his taking a personal shot at me in the context of a discussion of ideas. Has nothing to do with whether there is evidence for Jim's assertion, and you know it. It isn't even about supporting Robert's shot at you. You're trying to make it something that you can self-righteously bluster about because you can't defend your equation of what Jim said with fundies (or Catholics, makes no difference) claiming everyone but them is going to hell. Your entire response here is disgracefully disingenuous. You know what the problem is. Jim, Robert, and I have all pointed it out. If you can't just acknowledge and, hopefully, apologize for the bogus comparison, you'd do much better to just keep quiet rather than compound the problem by addressing it dishonestly. Jim However, someone had to revitalize the spiritual momentum of the world. The religions weren't doing it. The fact that it is Maharishi and Guru Dev doesn't matter much. It could have been anyone else. Reality check: Its just that it wasn't, though Yogananda did a great job of softening up the soil in the West so to speak. Me: The belief that MMY is unique in the ability to revitalize the spiritual momentum of the world by a member of his tiny group does remind me of the people who believe that they out of all the people on the planet have the spiritual specialness to go to heaven because of their beliefs. The mechanism of inflating personal specialness is identical, only the content of the belief is different. In each case the person believes that they are intrinsically special due to their beliefs and subjective experiences. I am not misstating the claim, I am disagreeing with it exactly as it was stated and comparing it to another example of that type of assertion by similarly sincere religious people. By all means bring on the evidence for the claim of MMY revitalizing the spiritual momentum of the world while Yogananda was merely softening the soil, Judy. Neither your phrase, grossly and insultingly misstated, nor Judy: As Robert correctly noted, this is the type of deliberate, malicious distortion we see from people like Karl Rove; decent people are at a loss to find an explation for it. take the place of evidence for the claim, and they don't distract me from the lack of it. But I would love to hear how decent people might come to the conclusion that my pointing out the lack of evidence for the assertion makes decent people compelled to claim that my sexual energy is misdirected, whatever that means. (nice but slippery touch dropping his misdirected sexual energy charge, it made him seem so much more decent while making a personal attack in response to a discussion of religious beliefs.) I was comparing the style of thinking with other sincere religious people ( I was thinking of Catholics, but many Christian sects believe they will uniquely go to heaven, the fundies assumption was your own invention) Robert, and now you, are comparing my skepticism to these claims and pointing out a similarity to other religious people's beliefs to a reviled character in politics. So unless you feel that your belief in MMY's claims are so totally special that even making a comparison to other religious people's beliefs is grossly and insultingly misstated, you can hold the faux outrage and the phony decent people routine. Karl Rove! Decent people! Misdirected sexual energy! Oh my! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: Perhaps it has to do with misdirected sexual energy? If you had any evidence to support the claim I was challenging then you wouldn't need to make degrading personal comments. Casting aspersions on me personally doesn't help your cause, it just reveals your own limitations in a discussion of ideas. I think he was referring to the fact that you grossly and insultingly misstated what Jim had said about MMY and Guru Dev, equating it with fundies claiming they alone will go to heaven while people believing a slightly different version of the same myth will suffer in hell. As Robert correctly noted, this is the type of deliberate, malicious distortion we see from people like Karl Rove; decent people are at a loss to find an explation for it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@ wrote: (snip) This kind of spiritual oneupmanship certainly isn't restricted to MMY's tiny group. Think of the spiritual arrogance at the basis of huge factions of Christianity believing that they
[FairfieldLife] This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
Hello to all, Enlightenment means Liberation, no confinement what so ever, and certainly nothing on the outside touches this. Actually, the Enlightened will tell you that there is no outside for all is One, no duality. If I may ask, who transcribed this? Is this for sure what Maharihsi said? If so, what is your take on this ? I just gave mine. Maybe those reading this can see the Universe offering a wake up call? Ron Maryanne Lee-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maharishi on Vastu Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07 MAHARISHI: ...I am reminded of a proverb `the taste of pudding is in eating`, period. We can not describe what is indescribable. And what is indescribebable is the benefit of Vastu structured buildings - Sthapatya Ved buildings. I am living in the Sthapatya Ved building and what I feel is that the walls of the house, they don`t produce a cage for me. I don`t feel I am living inside the walls. The walls are as transparent as is the meaning of cosmic living. You don`t feel you are cramped by the walls. I have been throughout all my life, 40-50 years, living wherever I went, living whosoever kept me as his guest. And always I was feeling I am caged within these walls. And ever since they gave me this house to live in, I am not feeling restricted. This is cosmic living... ...and follow my advise that throughout my life I have been caged in, and ever since these 12-15 years I am here in this house (in Vlodrop) my thinking is absolutely unrestricted... ...I am alone, I know myself - the walls, I am living within the walls but the walls are transparent for me. That is the experience. I am very afraid to go to any house. I never feel to go because I will be caged in - such freedom, such abundance, such enormous authority over space and time. Such reality of living in cosmic magnitude. This is living in Vastu buildings... ...it is such a thing, it is beyond speech... ...the law says the house should face the sun. Everyone knows sun is the giver of health. The houses facing the sun, facing the east, are healthy. That`s all, simple. Morning sun, evening sun, enter the door - it is healthy. Morning rays of the sun are healthy, they are healthy. Just the orientation... ...I have the experience of all these 80-90 years of life living in wrong places. But somehow through the grace of Guru Dev, I never jolted from my purpose of life. The purpose of life was to be fully enlightened. So that was inside, that was very strong. And I was not living very long in some place - 2 days in some place, 15 days in some place, one month somewhere, like that. But ever since I came to this house, the house never left me because it is the same thing if one begins to live one`s cosmic status one can`t leave one`s Self, one can`t stoop down to one`s individual status... Maryanne Lee-Hartman
Re: [FairfieldLife] This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
In a message dated 6/26/2007 12:05:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is clear that MMY is admitting he is not enlightened since his inner experience is so dependent on structures outside of himself. Don't get me wrong The man is incredible. He has changed my life and thousands of people around the world. But, this is another sales pitch for Vastu living. If this is what he said then CC is not even developed since he would be in total bliss consciousness 24 hours a day regardless of the house he is living in. Lsoma. Hello to all, Enlightenment means Liberation, no confinement what so ever, and certainly nothing on the outside touches this. Actually, the Enlightened will tell you that there is no outside for all is One, no duality. If I may ask, who transcribed this? Is this for sure what Maharishi said? If so, what is your take on this ? I just gave mine. Maybe those reading this can see the Universe offering a wake up call? Ron Maryanne Lee-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maharishi on Vastu Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07 MAHARISHI: ...I am reminded of a proverb `the taste of pudding is in eating`, period. We can not describe what is indescribable. And what is indescribebable is the benefit of Vastu structured buildings - Sthapatya Ved buildings. I am living in the Sthapatya Ved building and what I feel is that the walls of the house, they don`t produce a cage for me. I don`t feel I am living inside the walls. The walls are as transparent as is the meaning of cosmic living. You don`t feel you are cramped by the walls. I have been throughout all my life, 40-50 years, living wherever I went, living whosoever kept me as his guest. And always I was feeling I am caged within these walls. And ever since they gave me this house to live in, I am not feeling restricted. This is cosmic living... ...and follow my advise that throughout my life I have been caged in, and ever since these 12-15 years I am here in this house (in Vlodrop) my thinking is absolutely unrestricted.th ...I am alone, I know myself - the walls, I am living within the walls but the walls are transparent for me. That is the experience. I am very afraid to go to any house. I never feel to go because I will be caged in - such freedom, such abundance, such enormous authority over space and time. Such reality of living in cosmic magnitude. This is living in Vastu buildings... ...it is such a thing, it is beyond speech... ...the law says the house should face the sun. Everyone knows sun is the giver of health. The houses facing the sun, facing the east, are healthy. That`s all, simple. Morning sun, evening sun, enter the door - it is healthy. Morning rays of the sun are healthy, they are healthy. Just the orientation.th ...I have the experience of all these 80-90 years of life living in wrong places. But somehow through the grace of Guru Dev, I never jolted from my purpose of life. The purpose of life was to be fully enlightened. So that was inside, that was very strong. And I was not living very long in some place - 2 days in some place, 15 days in some place, one month somewhere, like that. But ever since I came to this house, the house never left me because it is the same thing if one begins to live one`s cosmic status one can`t leave one`s Self, one can`t stoop down to one`s individual status... Maryanne Lee-Hartman ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Re: [FairfieldLife] This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
I find this to be very strange for MMY to give such power to the shape and orientation of a building to impact consciousness to such a degree. But I don't think too much about it because it has nothing to do with me or ME. --- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello to all, Enlightenment means Liberation, no confinement what so ever, and certainly nothing on the outside touches this. Actually, the Enlightened will tell you that there is no outside for all is One, no duality. If I may ask, who transcribed this? Is this for sure what Maharihsi said? If so, what is your take on this ? I just gave mine. Maybe those reading this can see the Universe offering a wake up call? Ron Maryanne Lee-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maharishi on Vastu Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07 MAHARISHI: ...I am reminded of a proverb `the taste of pudding is in eating`, period. We can not describe what is indescribable. And what is indescribebable is the benefit of Vastu structured buildings - Sthapatya Ved buildings. I am living in the Sthapatya Ved building and what I feel is that the walls of the house, they don`t produce a cage for me. I don`t feel I am living inside the walls. The walls are as transparent as is the meaning of cosmic living. You don`t feel you are cramped by the walls. I have been throughout all my life, 40-50 years, living wherever I went, living whosoever kept me as his guest. And always I was feeling I am caged within these walls. And ever since they gave me this house to live in, I am not feeling restricted. This is cosmic living... ...and follow my advise that throughout my life I have been caged in, and ever since these 12-15 years I am here in this house (in Vlodrop) my thinking is absolutely unrestricted... ...I am alone, I know myself - the walls, I am living within the walls but the walls are transparent for me. That is the experience. I am very afraid to go to any house. I never feel to go because I will be caged in - such freedom, such abundance, such enormous authority over space and time. Such reality of living in cosmic magnitude. This is living in Vastu buildings... ...it is such a thing, it is beyond speech... ...the law says the house should face the sun. Everyone knows sun is the giver of health. The houses facing the sun, facing the east, are healthy. That`s all, simple. Morning sun, evening sun, enter the door - it is healthy. Morning rays of the sun are healthy, they are healthy. Just the orientation... ...I have the experience of all these 80-90 years of life living in wrong places. But somehow through the grace of Guru Dev, I never jolted from my purpose of life. The purpose of life was to be fully enlightened. So that was inside, that was very strong. And I was not living very long in some place - 2 days in some place, 15 days in some place, one month somewhere, like that. But ever since I came to this house, the house never left me because it is the same thing if one begins to live one`s cosmic status one can`t leave one`s Self, one can`t stoop down to one`s individual status... Maryanne Lee-Hartman To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
Maharishi on Vastu Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07 MAHARISHI: ...I am reminded of a proverb `the taste of pudding is in eating`, period. We can not describe what is indescribable. And what is indescribebable is the benefit of Vastu structured buildings - Sthapatya Ved buildings. I am living in the Sthapatya Ved building and what I feel is that the walls of the house, they don`t produce a cage for me. I don`t feel I am living inside the walls. The walls are as transparent as is the meaning of cosmic living. You don`t feel you are cramped by the walls. I have been throughout all my life, 40-50 years, living wherever I went, living whosoever kept me as his guest. And always I was feeling I am caged within these walls. And ever since they gave me this house to live in, I am not feeling restricted. This is cosmic living... ...and follow my advise that throughout my life I have been caged in, and ever since these 12-15 years I am here in this house (in Vlodrop) my thinking is absolutely unrestricted... ...I am alone, I know myself - the walls, I am living within the walls but the walls are transparent for me. That is the experience. I am very afraid to go to any house. I never feel to go because I will be caged in - such freedom, such abundance, such enormous authority over space and time. Such reality of living in cosmic magnitude. This is living in Vastu buildings... ...it is such a thing, it is beyond speech... ...the law says the house should face the sun. Everyone knows sun is the giver of health. The houses facing the sun, facing the east, are healthy. That`s all, simple. Morning sun, evening sun, enter the door - it is healthy. Morning rays of the sun are healthy, they are healthy. Just the orientation... ...I have the experience of all these 80-90 years of life living in wrong places. But somehow through the grace of Guru Dev, I never jolted from my purpose of life. The purpose of life was to be fully enlightened. So that was inside, that was very strong. Very interesting quote; this is actually the first time I have seen Maharishi reffering to His own enlightenment.
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/26/2007 12:05:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is clear that MMY is admitting he is not enlightened since his inner experience is so dependent on structures outside of himself. Don't get me wrong The man is incredible. He has changed my life and thousands of people around the world. But, this is another sales pitch for Vastu living. If this is what he said then CC is not even developed since he would be in total bliss consciousness 24 hours a day regardless of the house he is living in. Lsoma. Hello to all, Enlightenment means Liberation, no confinement what so ever, and certainly nothing on the outside touches this. Actually, the Enlightened will tell you that there is no outside for all is One, no duality. If I may ask, who transcribed this? Is this for sure what Maharishi said? If so, what is your take on this ? I just gave mine. Maybe those reading this can see the Universe offering a wake up call? Ron Maryanne Lee-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maharishi on Vastu Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07 MAHARISHI: ...I am reminded of a proverb `the taste of pudding is in eating`, period. We can not describe what is indescribable. And what is indescribebable is the benefit of Vastu structured buildings - Sthapatya Ved buildings. I am living in the Sthapatya Ved building and what I feel is that the walls of the house, they don`t produce a cage for me. I don`t feel I am living inside the walls. The walls are as transparent as is the meaning of cosmic living. You don`t feel you are cramped by the walls. I have been throughout all my life, 40-50 years, living wherever I went, living whosoever kept me as his guest. And always I was feeling I am caged within these walls. And ever since they gave me this house to live in, I am not feeling restricted. This is cosmic living... ...and follow my advise that throughout my life I have been caged in, and ever since these 12-15 years I am here in this house (in Vlodrop) my thinking is absolutely unrestricted.th ...I am alone, I know myself - the walls, I am living within the walls but the walls are transparent for me. That is the experience. I am very afraid to go to any house. I never feel to go because I will be caged in - such freedom, such abundance, such enormous authority over space and time. Such reality of living in cosmic magnitude. This is living in Vastu buildings... ...it is such a thing, it is beyond speech... ...the law says the house should face the sun. Everyone knows sun is the giver of health. The houses facing the sun, facing the east, are healthy. That`s all, simple. Morning sun, evening sun, enter the door - it is healthy. Morning rays of the sun are healthy, they are healthy. Just the orientation.th ... I have the experience of all these 80-90 years of life living in wrong places. But somehow through the grace of Guru Dev, I never jolted from my purpose of life. The purpose of life was to be fully enlightened. So that was inside, that was very strong. Hey Lou; did you actually read the above ? What a strange question since it is self-evident that you did not... And I was not living very long in some place - 2 days in some place, 15 days in some place, one month somewhere, like that. But ever since I came to this house, the house never left me because it is the same thing if one begins to live one`s cosmic status one can`t leave one`s Self, one can`t stoop down to one`s individual status... Maryanne Lee-Hartman ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
snip But when you make grand pronouncements about MMY and GD being the spiritual saviors of mankind I'm going to speak up. I've been deep in there Very deep for sure. This forum is full of ex-tmers who claim to have been deep in there. But I remember this restless crowd from countless courses in Switzerland and elsewere; they would always stroll around somewhere outside, skipping this or that part of the programme, overeating, staying up late, sleeping during programme, talking during silence, etcetc - the list is endless - never taking the whole thing very seriously. Now they brag about having been deep in there. What a joke. 'Zat so Nabby? Didn't know I was a member of the restless crowd. Of course you know nothing about me or my activities in the TMO. I was young, but not restless. Probably overeating then.
[FairfieldLife] Beatles on LKL tonight
Channel 50, 8:00 CST, Paul, Ringo, along with Yoko Ono and Olivia Harrison. Should be quite interesting. Feel free to send this to any TBs you still know. I just love their reaction when anybody so much as mentions the Beatles--it's so, well, one-pointed. :)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip But when you make grand pronouncements about MMY and GD being the spiritual saviors of mankind I'm going to speak up. I've been deep in there Very deep for sure. This forum is full of ex-tmers who claim to have been deep in there. But I remember this restless crowd from countless courses in Switzerland and elsewere; they would always stroll around somewhere outside, skipping this or that part of the programme, overeating, staying up late, sleeping during programme, talking during silence, etcetc - the list is endless - never taking the whole thing very seriously. Now they brag about having been deep in there. What a joke. 'Zat so Nabby? Didn't know I was a member of the restless crowd. Of course you know nothing about me or my activities in the TMO. I was young, but not restless. Probably overeating then. Tough to do on a diet of Swiss Chard. Being a special techniques teacher I did run into plenty of fatties looking for eating techniques though.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Torture
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: This post is for those that are under the impression that what goes on at Gitmo or what went on at Abu Ghraib was torture. Go see the following video and then come back here and tell us if you still feel what the Americans did was torture (do NOT see the video if you are faint of heart because it very well may be the most disturbing video you ever see. That was certainly the case for me): http://www.bigducky.com/videos/beheading_videos/armstrong_beheading.ht m PHOTOS of harmless fraternity pranks at Abu Ghraib http://www.thememoryhole.com/war/iraqis_tortured/ The photos from the link you post are significantly different from the ones that Salon.com originally posted back when the Abu Ghraib scandal first broke. Those original photos WERE, indeed, on the level of harmless fraternity pranks. These ones aren't and are clearly indicative of torture.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Makes one wonder if M. really does put a block on some peoples nervous systems as some of his closest students claimed. You need to begin submitting your material to the Comedy Club in LA. Its that funny!:-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and not pure consciousness. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/26/2007 12:05:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is clear that MMY is admitting he is not enlightened since his inner experience is so dependent on structures outside of himself. Don't get me wrong The man is incredible. He has changed my life and thousands of people around the world. But, this is another sales pitch for Vastu living. If this is what he said then CC is not even developed since he would be in total bliss consciousness 24 hours a day regardless of the house he is living in. Lsoma. Hello to all, Enlightenment means Liberation, no confinement what so ever, and certainly nothing on the outside touches this. Actually, the Enlightened will tell you that there is no outside for all is One, no duality. If I may ask, who transcribed this? Is this for sure what Maharishi said? If so, what is your take on this ? I just gave mine. Maybe those reading this can see the Universe offering a wake up call? Ron Maryanne Lee-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maharishi on Vastu Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07 MAHARISHI: ...I am reminded of a proverb `the taste of pudding is in eating`, period. We can not describe what is indescribable. And what is indescribebable is the benefit of Vastu structured buildings - Sthapatya Ved buildings. I am living in the Sthapatya Ved building and what I feel is that the walls of the house, they don`t produce a cage for me. I don`t feel I am living inside the walls. The walls are as transparent as is the meaning of cosmic living. You don`t feel you are cramped by the walls. I have been throughout all my life, 40-50 years, living wherever I went, living whosoever kept me as his guest. And always I was feeling I am caged within these walls. And ever since they gave me this house to live in, I am not feeling restricted. This is cosmic living... ...and follow my advise that throughout my life I have been caged in, and ever since these 12-15 years I am here in this house (in Vlodrop) my thinking is absolutely unrestricted.th ...I am alone, I know myself - the walls, I am living within the walls but the walls are transparent for me. That is the experience. I am very afraid to go to any house. I never feel to go because I will be caged in - such freedom, such abundance, such enormous authority over space and time. Such reality of living in cosmic magnitude. This is living in Vastu buildings... ...it is such a thing, it is beyond speech... ...the law says the house should face the sun. Everyone knows sun is the giver of health. The houses facing the sun, facing the east, are healthy. That`s all, simple. Morning sun, evening sun, enter the door - it is healthy. Morning rays of the sun are healthy, they are healthy. Just the orientation.th ...I have the experience of all these 80-90 years of life living in wrong places. But somehow through the grace of Guru Dev, I never jolted from my purpose of life. The purpose of life was to be fully enlightened. So that was inside, that was very strong. And I was not living very long in some place - 2 days in some place, 15 days in some place, one month somewhere, like that. But ever since I came to this house, the house never left me because it is the same thing if one begins to live one`s cosmic status one can`t leave one`s Self, one can`t stoop down to one`s individual status... Maryanne Lee-Hartman ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
[FairfieldLife] Re: Please help me find a good astrologer
--Try Astro Computing Services, the oldest such service in the US. But there's a certain misunderstanding about Western astrology, i.e. transits. Transits in themselves are totally non-interpretive angular relationships between the planets; e.g. Mars can be opposed to Pluto (it remains to be seen if Pluto's demotion will affect astrology). In general, oppositions between Malefic planets tend to be associated with undesirable misfortunes. A minimum of interpretation is required. The basic interpretations are already set out in Hand's Planets in Transit. A computerized reading just selects the predominant influential transits and extracts a composite reading from Hand's text. It's all very straightforward and generally reliable. OTOH, Vedic astrologers tend to use more subjective means, less universal and more secret types of interpretations carried down through families or in disciplic succession. - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, pratap Mahapatra pratmah2001@ wrote: We shall be very happy to assist with Vedic astrology. We do compatibility analysis to check how compatible 2 or more people are for marriage, business or any kind of partnership. H. Given the general prudery of India and things Vedic, I'm wondering what the reading would be like for someone who ordered a compatibility chart for 2 or more people as *marriage* partners. I'm toying with the idea of ordering a compatibility chart from these folks for me (as husband) and Isabelle Adjani, Eva Green, Salma Hayek, and Maribel Verdú (as wives). I'm convinced that we'd all get along smashingly, but I'd like confirmation from God on this. I'd surely have a heart attack after a few months (weeks?) of such a marriage, but what a way to go, eh? :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
--Saying somebody is unenlightened by judging outer behavior is an erronous viewpoint. - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and not pure consciousness. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/26/2007 12:05:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is clear that MMY is admitting he is not enlightened since his inner experience is so dependent on structures outside of himself. Don't get me wrong The man is incredible. He has changed my life and thousands of people around the world. But, this is another sales pitch for Vastu living. If this is what he said then CC is not even developed since he would be in total bliss consciousness 24 hours a day regardless of the house he is living in. Lsoma. Hello to all, Enlightenment means Liberation, no confinement what so ever, and certainly nothing on the outside touches this. Actually, the Enlightened will tell you that there is no outside for all is One, no duality. If I may ask, who transcribed this? Is this for sure what Maharishi said? If so, what is your take on this ? I just gave mine. Maybe those reading this can see the Universe offering a wake up call? Ron Maryanne Lee-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maharishi on Vastu Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07 MAHARISHI: ...I am reminded of a proverb `the taste of pudding is in eating`, period. We can not describe what is indescribable. And what is indescribebable is the benefit of Vastu structured buildings - Sthapatya Ved buildings. I am living in the Sthapatya Ved building and what I feel is that the walls of the house, they don`t produce a cage for me. I don`t feel I am living inside the walls. The walls are as transparent as is the meaning of cosmic living. You don`t feel you are cramped by the walls. I have been throughout all my life, 40-50 years, living wherever I went, living whosoever kept me as his guest. And always I was feeling I am caged within these walls. And ever since they gave me this house to live in, I am not feeling restricted. This is cosmic living... ...and follow my advise that throughout my life I have been caged in, and ever since these 12-15 years I am here in this house (in Vlodrop) my thinking is absolutely unrestricted.th ...I am alone, I know myself - the walls, I am living within the walls but the walls are transparent for me. That is the experience. I am very afraid to go to any house. I never feel to go because I will be caged in - such freedom, such abundance, such enormous authority over space and time. Such reality of living in cosmic magnitude. This is living in Vastu buildings... ...it is such a thing, it is beyond speech... ...the law says the house should face the sun. Everyone knows sun is the giver of health. The houses facing the sun, facing the east, are healthy. That`s all, simple. Morning sun, evening sun, enter the door - it is healthy. Morning rays of the sun are healthy, they are healthy. Just the orientation.th ...I have the experience of all these 80-90 years of life living in wrong places. But somehow through the grace of Guru Dev, I never jolted from my purpose of life. The purpose of life was to be fully enlightened. So that was inside, that was very strong. And I was not living very long in some place - 2 days in some place, 15 days in some place, one month somewhere, like that. But ever since I came to this house, the house never left me because it is the same thing if one begins to live one`s cosmic status one can`t leave one`s Self, one can`t stoop down to one`s individual status... Maryanne Lee-Hartman ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. __ __ Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
[FairfieldLife] Re: Photos of Yogis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: One gets the credit for accomplishments by actually accomplishing something, not by claiming that your teacher did. I absolutely agree with this last bit. I also think you are taking what I said to an absurd degree. What I have said is analogous to the fact that the electrification of the US wouldn't have occurred were it not for Edison. You probably don't see it that way. OK by me. However to imply that I am denigrating those who followed in Maharishi's footsteps, like the Vanity Fair yoga photographer, is not at all what I am talking about, or that anyone who has ever accomplished anything spiritually including any of us here, hasn't done so entirely on their own merits, through their own choice, and through their own efforts. However, someone had to revitalize the spiritual momentum of the world. The religions weren't doing it. The fact that it is Maharishi and Guru Dev doesn't matter much. It could have been anyone else. Reality check: Its just that it wasn't, though Yogananda did a great job of softening up the soil in the West so to speak. And last, this implication that Maharishi and Guru Dev did this and therefore it reflects on me somehow is just plain nonsensical. I hope that clarifies to you what I have said originally. In a nutshell I said what I said without any further implications or conclusions to be drawn. A settled mind. It is what it is, and no more. :-) According to you MMY is perfect and revitalized the spiritual momentum of the world. Do tell, oh settled mind, where is your proof of this? Maharishi *and* Guru Dev. Do you have any proof that they haven't?:-) Are you serious? 99.99% of the world's population has never heard of either Guru Dev or MMY. The majority of the world's population who are religious follow traditions other than Hinduism. And the vast majority of Hindus have nothing to do with MMY. You've heard of the civil war going on on the Iraq, right? You've heard of the other wars going on in the middle east, right? Genocidesmany, in fact most conducted in the name of religion. Famine. What's YOUR proof? Pundits living behind barbed wire in FF? I'd really like to know. Look, if believing in the fairy tale that MMY has revitalized the spiritual momentum of the world brings you pleasure in thinking that you rode the right horse in this life, instead of some other spiritual leader, good on you. There's nothing finer than the security and warm blanketness of being in the know, of being in on cosmic secret. You too with the self aggrandizement argument? What is it with this? Is that why you were interested in TM and Maharishi at one time?? I don't get that connection. I've always derived a great deal from Maharishi and Guru Dev's teaching and the practice of TM, vs. going about smugly as a member of some sort of little club. My beliefs are purely derived from my experience, and not the other way around. My attitude has always been one of surrender vs. arrogance and condescension, though I might have been in the minority. Don't know, don't care. As to the world being unaware of Maharishi and Guru Dev's contribution, couldn't that be similar to Copernicus's assertion in the 15th century that the earth revolves around the sun vs the other way around? One of the few with such a belief at that time, but ultimately found to be right? Just asking the question. But from outside this little cocoon, MMY is a big man in a tiny and ever shrinking pond. Yes on the surface it would appear so. Just as on the surface the sun definitely and unmistakably revolves around the earth.:-) vs. going about smugly as a member of some little club. I see. So you believe that, like Copernicus, MMY alone has the keys to the castle, that he is way ahead of the spiritual truth curve and humanity just has to catch up. You sure you aren't going about smugly as a member of some little club? Like I said Jim, if this gives you personal satisfaction then
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --Right - getting zapped is pretty useless, unless you can take it with you anytime, anyplace like TM. I got zapped by Muktananda on many occasions. Didn't help much. The best quote I heard on that was that instantaneous enlight6enment is just that- it lasts for an instant.:-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find this to be very strange for MMY to give such power to the shape and orientation of a building to impact consciousness to such a degree. But I don't think too much about it because it has nothing to do with me or ME. It seems entirely normal if you read it as a man expressing himself, with the complex personality that each of us has, personal likes and dislikes. However if you view it under a microscope, it looks weird.:-)
[FairfieldLife] Support Low Power FM Radio
Dear Friend, I thought you might be interested in this activism campaign to support low power FM radio at freepress.net. If you go to the URL below you can check out what is at stake and send your own message directly to your member of congress. Take action on this action alert from Free Press at: HYPERLINK http://action.freepress.net/campaign/lpfmhttp://action.freepress.net/campa ign/lpfm Particularly relevant to those of us in Fairfield who appreciate KRUU and KHOE. Rick Archer President SearchSummit HYPERLINK http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmapaddr=1108+S.+B+St.csz=Fairfield% 2C+IA+52556-3805country=us \n1108 S. B St. Fairfield, IA 52556-3805 HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: fax: Skype ID: HYPERLINK http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?src=jj_signatureTo=641-472-9336Email=r [EMAIL PROTECTED] \n641-472-9336 914-470-9336 Rick_Archer HYPERLINK https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=25769982909v0=356483k0=1251699766v1=35648 4k1=804482755src=client_sig_212_1_card_joininvite=1 \nAlways have my latest info HYPERLINK http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_card_sig; \nWant a signature like this? No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.9/870 - Release Date: 6/26/2007 10:07 AM image001.gif
[FairfieldLife] 'Silver Beatles News Service'
John Lennon's sons are speaking again CTV.ca Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:25 AM PDT Half brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have reconciled after an eight-year feud. McCartney + Starr come together for chat with bandmates' widows world entertainment news via Yahoo! UK Ireland News Tue, 26 Jun 2007 1:35 AM PDT Beatles Sir Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr will make TV history on Tuesday night in America when they join George Harrison and John Lennon's widows for a panel chat. Lennon's sons hug and make up Detroit Free Press Tue, 26 Jun 2007 0:17 AM PDT They gave peace a chance! Half-brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have begun speaking to each other again, the New York post reports. Their reconciliation follows Julian's eight-year feud with Sean, 31, and Sean's mother, Yoko Ono, the widow of the men's father, Beatle John Lennon. George Harrison to get Walk Of Fame star Yahoo! Music via Yahoo! News Mon, 25 Jun 2007 9:00 AM PDT The late George Harrison will join his former bandmate John Lennon on the Hollywood Walk Of Fame. Giving peace a chance Miami Herald Tue, 26 Jun 2007 0:07 AM PDT Half brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have begun speaking to each other again. Their reconciliation follows Julian's eight-year feud with Sean, 31, and Sean's mother, Yoko Ono , the widow of the men's father, Beatle John Lennon . This Week in Immigration History: John Lennon Gets His Green Card About.com Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:05 AM PDT After much political banter between John Lennon and Nixon and co., the British pop star is finally granted his green card, becoming a permanent resident of the U.S. ... U2, Christina Aguilera, R.E.M. Cover John Lennon for Darfur CD Bloomberg.com Mon, 25 Jun 2007 9:52 PM PDT June 26 (Bloomberg) -- R.E.M., Lenny Kravitz and Avril Lavigne: names like this might be enough to sell a CD alone. If not, the cause might: ``Instant Karma: The Amnesty International Campaign to Save Darfur'' speaks for itself. - Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos more.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Please help me find a good astrologer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --Try Astro Computing Services, the oldest such service in the US. But there's a certain misunderstanding about Western astrology, i.e. transits. Transits in themselves are totally non- interpretive angular relationships between the planets; e.g. Mars can be opposed to Pluto (it remains to be seen if Pluto's demotion will affect astrology). In general, oppositions between Malefic planets tend to be associated with undesirable misfortunes. A minimum of interpretation is required. The basic interpretations are already set out in Hand's Planets in Transit. http://www.astro.com/ Sample interpretations by Robert Hand, Liz Greene, and stuff. :D
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: why not relinquish TM?
Richard J. Williams wrote: Bhairitu wrote: Most of everything in the meditation method of TM can be found in a book or two published by Swami Sivananda in the 1930s and that is just one example. So, how come Swami Satchitananda or Swami Vishnudevananda couldn't teach any of their students how to effortlessly transcend? I took their course in Yoga back in the '70s and neither one of them said anything about transcending - I got the impression that they didn't have a clue and so that's why they taught concentration on the tip of their nose. Sounds like you were learning stretching exercises not meditation. The reason so many teachers give shaktipat as part of the meditation instruction is so the student can instantly transcend and it sets up the mind for transcending with practicing the mantra. Maybe so, but I got shaktiput from Swami Muktananda when he visited California a few days before Franklin Jones met him. Later Jones called himself The Master Da, but neither one of them seemed to have a clue about teaching anyone how to transcend using a TM technique. If they did, I guess they would have said something about it, would they not? Shaktipat is one thing as if often just given as a blessing when crowds assemble. In conjunction with teaching meditation it is a jumpstart for the meditation. I take it you didn't learn meditation from them. At any rate, I guess it's now been settled: Vaj got enlightened at seeing a guy sitting with locked legs in a cafeteria in Honesburg, Barry got zapped by Fred Lentz at a light show in Los Angeles, and now you're telling us that you got enlightened by a power touch in downtown Oakland. Maybe you three got touched in the head and you lost you marbles in a trance-induction state. Who knows? So, you guys have been in and out of cults for most of your adult life, but I'm the one who eats prarie dog tacos? Eat your rice, then wash your bowl! Enjoy your prairie dog stew. Then take the garbage out.
[FairfieldLife] FW: Special Event Tonight!
Hi All, I just got an email notifying me about this event, hence the last minute nature of this. Sounds to be well worth attending if you can make it. Perhaps those with cars could stop by the Golden Dome Market before going out to see if anyone not having a car might be there looking for a ride. I will stop by the dome market at around 7:40 to see if anyone is there needing a ride. Big Green Summer is having a Sustainable Tuesdays presentation tonight on home gardens at Lonnie's place. Students will be offering a local foods meal for $6.00 from 6:30-7:30, program starts at 7:45, childrens program also offered. Directions: HEAD NORTH ON HIGHWAY 1, GO WEST (LEFT) ON 185TH STREET EXACTLY 2 MILES TO WOODLAND DRIVE (You will notice 6 mailboxes at the entrance). THEN WE ARE THE FIRST PLACE ON THE RIGHT W/WIND GENERATOR. I look forward to seeing many of you out there. Best regards, Tim No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.9/870 - Release Date: 6/26/2007 10:07 AM
[FairfieldLife] What I did on my summer vacation
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/world/europe/26rome.html
[FairfieldLife] Darwin upgrade?
But just as the erosive power of a river changes the future options for the course of the river, so evolution itself changes future evolutionary possibilities. This can happen in simple ways, as termites construct their own environment by building termite mounds. These mounds may last for dozens or hundreds of years and provide a sort of ecological inheritance for generations of termites. The first cyanobacteria turned carbon dioxide into oxygen and set off a revolution that completely changed the chemistry of the oceans and atmosphere. Most species modify their environment and this often changes how selection affects them: they construct, at least in part, their own environment. As evolutionary biologists we have little understanding of what these processes mean for evolution. Does all this add up to a new modern synthesis? There is certainly no consensus among evolutionary biologists, but development, ecology, genetics and paleontology all provide new perspectives on how evolution operates, and how we should study it. None of these concerns provide a scintilla of hope for creationists, as scientific investigations are already providing new insights into these issues. The foundations for a paradigm shift may be in place, but it may be some time before we see whether a truly novel perspective develops or these tensions are accommodated within an expanded modern synthesis. more at link http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/science/26essay.html
[FairfieldLife] U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
Hindu Prayer Will Open Senate Session in July By Nathan Burchfiel CNSNews.com Staff Writer June 26, 2007 (CNSNews.com) - For what is believed to be the first time in its history, the U.S. Senate will on July 12 be opened with a Hindu prayer, the Senate Chaplain's Office confirmed Monday. For more than 200 years, the Senate has opened each workday with a prayer usually delivered by the Senate Chaplain, currently Barry Black, a Seventh Day Adventist. It is common, however, for senators to recommend religious leaders from their home states to serve as guest chaplains. Rajan Zed, a Hindu chaplain from Nevada, will become the first Hindu to deliver the morning prayer. In a statement announcing his scheduled appearance, Zed called the occasion an illustrious day for all Americans and a memorable day for us. Read more at CNSNews.com: http://tinyurl.com/34s9uw (This is the same chap who recently delivered the prayer for the Nevada state legislature.)
Re: [FairfieldLife] U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:49 PM, authfriend wrote: For more than 200 years, the Senate has opened each workday with a prayer usually delivered by the Senate Chaplain, currently Barry Black, a Seventh Day Adventist. It is common, however, for senators to recommend religious leaders from their home states to serve as guest chaplains. So much for separation of Church and State. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
200% of life -perhaps that means 100% human along with 100% enlightenment. I wonder if enlightenment is more simple than our projections? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find this to be very strange for MMY to give such power to the shape and orientation of a building to impact consciousness to such a degree. But I don't think too much about it because it has nothing to do with me or ME.
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
I asked G to comment: Dr peter: Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and not pure consciousness. G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness. If that were the case then there is simply an intellectual knowledge being paraded as Pure Consciousness. Regarding the following post, I offer my comments: Post:200% of life -perhaps that means 100% human along with 100% enlightenment. I wonder if enlightenment is more simple than our projections? Tanmay: G said once you are there, it is never what you thought it was going to be. My thought is how complicated can it be if Ramana Maharishi's cow and other animals were enlightened ?- what is it that they knew about Madduchandas and devatas? Following that trend, what is it that happens to the simplicity if it is shrouded with circleing explanations that no one can understand- it ends up driving one further down the road of confusion than the clarity that rests in the simplicity of Being. 100% human- hmmm- I would say yes and no- You can fit that in with G's comments, enlightenment is the life of all lives and the death of all deaths. 100% enlightenment- hmmm- it seems more like either enlightened or not, just like one is either pregnant or not. Typically sadakas think my Guru is the One, but the Sat Guru knows 'Sat Guru is One- That One essence is either directly known or not- one Guru doesnt have 89 percent, another 93 percent- it is all or nothing, either enlightened or not. The Gurus talk of a deepening within that Enlightenment- but you wont find Ramana Maharihsi at any time talking about being caged in- He was covered with insects and it had no effect on consciousness. Main point to all of this is the Guru can take you only to the degree that they themselves are, so this is the value in considering the consciousness of the Guru and his sadakas. it is a mixture of the grace in the path and wisdom of descrimination- each has their choices they have to live with in the journey.
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked G to comment: Dr peter: Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and not pure consciousness. G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness. If that were the case then there is simply an intellectual knowledge being paraded as Pure Consciousness. Complete non sequitur. She has no idea what Peter is talking about. Did you not give her the context? If you did, she obviously didn't bother to read it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
On Jun 26, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:49 PM, authfriend wrote: For more than 200 years, the Senate has opened each workday with a prayer usually delivered by the Senate Chaplain, currently Barry Black, a Seventh Day Adventist. It is common, however, for senators to recommend religious leaders from their home states to serve as guest chaplains. So much for separation of Church and State. Hinduism is not a religion, it's a science Sal. Don't you know anything about Quantum Mechanics? Don't make me tell you about AGNI because it's really, really long!
[FairfieldLife] Re: U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:49 PM, authfriend wrote: For more than 200 years, the Senate has opened each workday with a prayer usually delivered by the Senate Chaplain, currently Barry Black, a Seventh Day Adventist. It is common, however, for senators to recommend religious leaders from their home states to serve as guest chaplains. So much for separation of Church and State. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. As long as they have representatives of different religions delivering the prayer, they're fine.
Re: [FairfieldLife] U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
On Jun 26, 2007, at 6:35 PM, Vaj wrote: On Jun 26, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:49 PM, authfriend wrote: For more than 200 years, the Senate has opened each workday with a prayer usually delivered by the Senate Chaplain, currently Barry Black, a Seventh Day Adventist. It is common, however, for senators to recommend religious leaders from their home states to serve as guest chaplains. So much for separation of Church and State. Hinduism is not a religion, it's a science Sal. Sure. And Creationism is on a par with Darwin. Don't you know anything about Quantum Mechanics? No, but I've passed by the Quantum Mechanic sign here in FF many times, so that probably qualifies me as an expert. Don't make me tell you about AGNI because it's really, really long! No problem, Vaj. Like many recovering meditators, I have an endless tolerance for boredom. Learned from the best. Want to hear something funny? When I just ran my spell check, and had mistyped boredom, one of the choices it gave me was bore-dome. If only they knew how fitting *that* was. Sal
Re: [FairfieldLife] U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
In a message dated 6/26/07 4:54:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For more than 200 years, the Senate has opened each workday with a prayer usually delivered by the Senate Chaplain, currently Barry Black, a Seventh Day Adventist. It is common, however, for senators to recommend religious leaders from their home states to serve as guest chaplains. So much for separation of Church and State. Sal It never has existed, at least how people interpret that phrase today. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
[FairfieldLife] The Lion Whisperer/ Talking to Animals
Fascinating article I found on Drudge Report link about a guy who can communicate with lions closeup without any force or violence. He somehow tunes into their ways and is sensitive enough to gain their trust after a relatively short time. Just shows how intelligence is alive in animals but requires the right approach and consciousness to tap into. Since I'm a big animal lover, I was wondering if anyone has had any experiences first hand communicating with their pets or other animals. The siddhi for speaking to animals was discontinued soon after it was given out, but I remember the rumors that John Shear was able to use the siddhi once to communicate. I know of a few pet psychics who give readings to pet owners, but I assumed they were variable in quality just as the regular psychics are. From my limited experience, you can almost tune into an animal if you have a quiet enough environment, but at the end, they'll do just what they want regardless of what you think they are saying to you.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Lion Whisperer/ Talking to Animals
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, pranamoocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fascinating article I found on Drudge Report link about a guy who can communicate with lions closeup without any force or violence. He somehow tunes into their ways and is sensitive enough to gain their trust after a relatively short time. Just shows how intelligence is alive in animals but requires the right approach and consciousness to tap into. Since I'm a big animal lover, I was wondering if anyone has had any experiences first hand communicating with their pets or other animals. The siddhi for speaking to animals was discontinued soon after it was given out, but I remember the rumors that John Shear was able to use the siddhi once to communicate. I know of a few pet psychics who give readings to pet owners, but I assumed they were variable in quality just as the regular psychics are. From my limited experience, you can almost tune into an animal if you have a quiet enough environment, but at the end, they'll do just what they want regardless of what you think they are saying to you. FORGOT TO PASTE THE LINK, BELOW: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=464353in_page_id=1770
Re: [FairfieldLife] U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
On Jun 26, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: Want to hear something funny? When I just ran my spell check, and had mistyped boredom, one of the choices it gave me was bore- dome. If only they knew how fitting *that* was. A coherence producing bore-dome with a leak isn't something to laugh about Sal.
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
Since there is a limit on how many posts can be made here, this is one reason I am not going to reply to every post. In this case, the question is directed to me but again, we have a limit so I am just not going to answer every one, many others probably do the same here. Secondly, in my camp here, you have heard my story, I am working with a Guru one to one- then I went on to say if there is something I promote, they are 2 things- find a Sat Guru, then work one to one. I also posted today what I thought was a profound description of a Tantra path, for which I am on one. It is explained how there is a 2 way deal in a working relationship with the Guru. From the Guru's side, they are willing to work with their sadakas to see to it that the unfoldment of enlightenment, the removing of the veil, is happening as fast as possible. Part of the process is that they see to it that their disciples are not in confusion. So, the Guru is right there to clear the air. However, for various reasons, the Guru is their to clear the air for the sadakas they are working with. If one with another Guru comes to another Guru, they most likely would tell the sadaka, go to your own Guru to clear the air. I mentioned all this because I had in mind that some comments are made here for which I could attempt to connect my Guru to clear the air for those interested but that is not either my Guru's job nor mine. I am trying to explain this so that should, for whatever reason, some confusion come out of this, again, I say if there is one thing I promote, it is find your Sat Guru, work one to one and they should be there to completely clear the air. If not, this may be a message from the Universe to possibly question what it is you have for a Guru. Now, back to this response- I choose to leave it as it is- my Guru, Swami G, is aware of the connection of the mind and Realization, and speaking from this platform, as she claims, has made that comment. You may want to check what Ramana, considered one of the great one;s has to say about the relationship of mind with One in Realization. What the Guru says is one thing, the rest of the story is living what they said within one's own existence- this trims the gap between what they say is the goal and what one knows from their own consciousness as a result of the connection and alignment to the Guru and the path --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote: I asked G to comment: Dr peter: Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and not pure consciousness. G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness. If that were the case then there is simply an intellectual knowledge being paraded as Pure Consciousness. Complete non sequitur. She has no idea what Peter is talking about. Did you not give her the context? If you did, she obviously didn't bother to read it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Now, back to this response- I choose to leave it as it is- my Guru, Swami G, is aware of the connection of the mind and Realization, and speaking from this platform, as she claims, has made that comment. You may want to check what Ramana, considered one of the great one;s has to say about the relationship of mind with One in Realization. What the Guru says is one thing, the rest of the story is living what they said within one's own existence- this trims the gap between what they say is the goal and what one knows from their own consciousness as a result of the connection and alignment to the Guru and the path No, this is all still non sequitur in context. Apparently you didn't read the context of Peter's comment either. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote: I asked G to comment: Dr peter: Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and not pure consciousness. G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness. If that were the case then there is simply an intellectual knowledge being paraded as Pure Consciousness. Complete non sequitur. She has no idea what Peter is talking about. Did you not give her the context? If you did, she obviously didn't bother to read it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: YouTube - We Are Theo - Chapter 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.jeremygillam.com Can't get it to play, and I have QuickTime 7... It may have needed time, Judy. It downloads, as opposed to streaming. Try YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joVCp13LX68
[FairfieldLife] Re: YouTube - We Are Theo - Chapter 1
--- Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maybe I'm just missing something, but to me it looked like a lot of still shots, with music and dialogue in the background. Maybe it was supposed to be that way. It's not an action movie, to be sure. I believe the next movie is to have bimbos and explosions, just to balance things out.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: YouTube - We Are Theo - Chapter 1
On Jun 26, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote: maybe I'm just missing something, but to me it looked like a lot of still shots, with music and dialogue in the background. Maybe it was supposed to be that way. It's not an action movie, to be sure. I believe the next movie is to have bimbos and explosions, just to balance things out. LOL...that's not what I meant, Patrick, I realize it's not an action movie. What I was getting at was that it didn't really look like a movie, at least not in the typical sense, with moving images. But that's fine, it's very well-done as it is. Sal
Re: [FairfieldLife] U.S. Senate to be opened with Hindu prayer
On Jun 26, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Vaj wrote: On Jun 26, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: Want to hear something funny? When I just ran my spell check, and had mistyped boredom, one of the choices it gave me was bore-dome. If only they knew how fitting *that* was. A coherence producing bore-dome with a leak isn't something to laugh about Sal. Especially with so many moldy-oldies sitting in it. I hope they get the bore-dome fixed soon. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: YouTube - We Are Theo - Chapter 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: www.jeremygillam.com Can't get it to play, and I have QuickTime 7... It may have needed time, Judy. It downloads, as opposed to streaming. I know...I waited quite a while. Try YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joVCp13LX68 Whoa, *very* impressive! He's a junior in *high school*?? I think you've got a major talent on your hands.
[FairfieldLife] According to the ancient Maharishis, Vastu equals 50% of spirituality. It solve
According to the ancient Maharishis, Vaastu equals 50% of spirituality. It solves 80% of life's problems. It's better to live in a hut under a tree than to live in bad Vaastu, he states. http://www.kaleshwaravaastu.com/enu/vaastu_kaleshwaravaastu.htm
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Silver Beatles News Service'
Just saw the Larry King interview with the surviving Beatles and -- as Larry so delicately put it -- the widows. I especially enjoyed the part where they showed the film footage from Let it Be where the Beatles perform Get Back on that roof in London. And as this film footage was showing, there was Paul with Larry King on his right and Tojo herself to his left. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Lennon's sons are speaking again CTV.ca Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:25 AM PDT Half brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have reconciled after an eight- year feud. McCartney + Starr come together for chat with bandmates' widows world entertainment news via Yahoo! UK Ireland News Tue, 26 Jun 2007 1:35 AM PDT Beatles Sir Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr will make TV history on Tuesday night in America when they join George Harrison and John Lennon's widows for a panel chat. Lennon's sons hug and make up Detroit Free Press Tue, 26 Jun 2007 0:17 AM PDT They gave peace a chance! Half-brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have begun speaking to each other again, the New York post reports. Their reconciliation follows Julian's eight-year feud with Sean, 31, and Sean's mother, Yoko Ono, the widow of the men's father, Beatle John Lennon. George Harrison to get Walk Of Fame star Yahoo! Music via Yahoo! News Mon, 25 Jun 2007 9:00 AM PDT The late George Harrison will join his former bandmate John Lennon on the Hollywood Walk Of Fame. Giving peace a chance Miami Herald Tue, 26 Jun 2007 0:07 AM PDT Half brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have begun speaking to each other again. Their reconciliation follows Julian's eight-year feud with Sean, 31, and Sean's mother, Yoko Ono , the widow of the men's father, Beatle John Lennon . This Week in Immigration History: John Lennon Gets His Green Card About.com Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:05 AM PDT After much political banter between John Lennon and Nixon and co., the British pop star is finally granted his green card, becoming a permanent resident of the U.S. ... U2, Christina Aguilera, R.E.M. Cover John Lennon for Darfur CD Bloomberg.com Mon, 25 Jun 2007 9:52 PM PDT June 26 (Bloomberg) -- R.E.M., Lenny Kravitz and Avril Lavigne: names like this might be enough to sell a CD alone. If not, the cause might: ``Instant Karma: The Amnesty International Campaign to Save Darfur'' speaks for itself. - Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos more.
[FairfieldLife] Re: According to the ancient Maharishis, Vastu equals 50% of spirituality. It solve
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the ancient Maharishis, Vaastu equals 50% of spirituality. It solves 80% of life's problems. It's better to live in a hut under a tree than to live in bad Vaastu, he states. http://www.kaleshwaravaastu.com/enu/vaastu_kaleshwaravaastu.htm It's been my own experience that bad vastu does crimp life (and what little good vastu I have been in has an uplifting effect), and anyway I can't argue with MMY's assignment of authenticity to Vedic lit on vastu (by extrapolating confidence gained by my 4 decades of practice of TM). But this guy's web site is typical of the muddled thinking in India which has made a mess of life there. What MMY has done has re-introduce the centerpiece of Vedic life, expanded awareness, without which the Vedic guidelines are scrambled by confused and limited thinking, as is this guy's claim that some south entrances are OK: http://www.kaleshwaravaastu.com/enu/vaastu_example1.htm
[FairfieldLife] Re: This post not approved by TM friends Yahoo group
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote: snip Now, back to this response- I choose to leave it as it is- my Guru, Swami G, is aware of the connection of the mind and Realization, and speaking from this platform, as she claims, has made that comment. You may want to check what Ramana, considered one of the great one;s has to say about the relationship of mind with One in Realization. What the Guru says is one thing, the rest of the story is living what they said within one's own existence- this trims the gap between what they say is the goal and what one knows from their own consciousness as a result of the connection and alignment to the Guru and the path No, this is all still non sequitur in context. Apparently you didn't read the context of Peter's comment either. Just to clarify: I got a real chuckle from your recommendation that I read Ramana to verify Swami G's comment, as if I were disputing what she said. Non sequitur doesn't mean wrong, it means This does not follow. It didn't have anything to do with what Peter said. It looks to me as though what happened was that Swami G glanced at Peter's comment without reading the context, saw an opportunity to put MMY down, and, of course, took it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote: I asked G to comment: Dr peter: Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and not pure consciousness. G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness. If that were the case then there is simply an intellectual knowledge being paraded as Pure Consciousness. Complete non sequitur. She has no idea what Peter is talking about. Did you not give her the context? If you did, she obviously didn't bother to read it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Silver Beatles News Service'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just saw the Larry King interview with the surviving Beatles and -- as Larry so delicately put it -- the widows. I especially enjoyed the part where they showed the film footage from Let it Be where the Beatles perform Get Back on that roof in London. And as this film footage was showing, there was Paul with Larry King on his right and Tojo herself to his left. I liked the comment by Ringo and Paul, that so many of their songs are known by the younger people, and that their songs were primarily about love... Yoko did look very old, and detatched. Shame, Cynthia couldn't be there... Also, was impressed that both Yoko and Olivia Harrison said that they both felt the presence of their husbands all the time... Interesting, entertaining and uplifting. The music for the show, is also remixed and in surround sound. Somehow still evolving. John Lennon's sons are speaking again CTV.ca Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:25 AM PDT Half brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have reconciled after an eight- year feud. McCartney + Starr come together for chat with bandmates' widows world entertainment news via Yahoo! UK Ireland News Tue, 26 Jun 2007 1:35 AM PDT Beatles Sir Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr will make TV history on Tuesday night in America when they join George Harrison and John Lennon's widows for a panel chat. Lennon's sons hug and make up Detroit Free Press Tue, 26 Jun 2007 0:17 AM PDT They gave peace a chance! Half-brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have begun speaking to each other again, the New York post reports. Their reconciliation follows Julian's eight-year feud with Sean, 31, and Sean's mother, Yoko Ono, the widow of the men's father, Beatle John Lennon. George Harrison to get Walk Of Fame star Yahoo! Music via Yahoo! News Mon, 25 Jun 2007 9:00 AM PDT The late George Harrison will join his former bandmate John Lennon on the Hollywood Walk Of Fame. Giving peace a chance Miami Herald Tue, 26 Jun 2007 0:07 AM PDT Half brothers Julian and Sean Lennon have begun speaking to each other again. Their reconciliation follows Julian's eight-year feud with Sean, 31, and Sean's mother, Yoko Ono , the widow of the men's father, Beatle John Lennon . This Week in Immigration History: John Lennon Gets His Green Card About.com Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:05 AM PDT After much political banter between John Lennon and Nixon and co., the British pop star is finally granted his green card, becoming a permanent resident of the U.S. ... U2, Christina Aguilera, R.E.M. Cover John Lennon for Darfur CD Bloomberg.com Mon, 25 Jun 2007 9:52 PM PDT June 26 (Bloomberg) -- R.E.M., Lenny Kravitz and Avril Lavigne: names like this might be enough to sell a CD alone. If not, the cause might: ``Instant Karma: The Amnesty International Campaign to Save Darfur'' speaks for itself. - Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos more.