[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
> Hey, whaddya call a Buddhist who is full of shit? > > Turdquoise B! :-) > This is crap.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" > wrote: > > > > > > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > > wrote: > > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's > > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just > > ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. > > > > > > Fuck you asshole. I'll take 1000 of his posts to one of you mamby > pamby > > whines. > > > I think you meant this to go to Turdquoise, he's the one who wants to > fuck your asshole, asshole. > Well, I'm going to take at least a week time out. The temporary civility of FFL is gone and the rancor and language is jarring. Bye.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out JUST KEEP SILENT
In a message dated 1/26/2008 6:25:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sandiego: > > > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear > > is "mffmmffmm..." > > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for > > our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"-- > > how's FiFi? :-) > > Ofcourse it is not Jim. It is interesting to see how much frustration > one man created in the minds of frustrated souls like Turq et al by > claiming to have achieved enlightenment with TM. Since Jim is only > one in many, many that will achieve enlightenment in the months and > years to come, one can but wonder what effect that will have on the > boring nitwits who never took the Knowledge very seriously in the > first place anyway - "Governors" or not. Ok, Nabby, assume it's not Jim. It's some *other* person. I was wrong. So give us your assessment of the state of consciousness *of* this other person. What *is* the state of consciousness -- according to you and what you have learned from MMY and Benny Hill...uh, sorry...Benny Creme of the person who thinks and talks like this? I'm interested in hearing your assessment. In your opinion, would someone who went on like this about fucking dogs be a *possible* can- didate for enlightenment, or are they as lost in Maya as I am? We already know what you think of me, so use me as a "barometer" to measure sandiego108 with. Is he *as* low-vibe as I am, more low-vibe, or less low-vibe? We know you don't believe that it's Jim. But is it possible that this *other* person I have mistaken for Jim is enlightened? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links **Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300025 48)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > > Sandiego: > > > > > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear > > > is "mffmmffmm..." > > > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for > > > our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"- - > > > how's FiFi? :-) > > > > Ofcourse it is not Jim. It is interesting to see how much frustration > > one man created in the minds of frustrated souls like Turq et al by > > claiming to have achieved enlightenment with TM. Since Jim is only > > one in many, many that will achieve enlightenment in the months and > > years to come, one can but wonder what effect that will have on the > > boring nitwits who never took the Knowledge very seriously in the > > first place anyway - "Governors" or not. > > Ok, Nabby, assume it's not Jim. > > It's some *other* person. I was wrong. > > So give us your assessment of the state of > consciousness *of* this other person. What > *is* the state of consciousness -- according > to you and what you have learned from MMY and > Benny Hill...uh, sorry...Benny Creme of the > person who thinks and talks like this? > > I'm interested in hearing your assessment. No you are not. Evidence found to sentences above.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sandiego: > > > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear > > is "mffmmffmm..." > > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for > > our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"-- > > how's FiFi? :-) > > Ofcourse it is not Jim. It is interesting to see how much frustration > one man created in the minds of frustrated souls like Turq et al by > claiming to have achieved enlightenment with TM. Since Jim is only > one in many, many that will achieve enlightenment in the months and > years to come, one can but wonder what effect that will have on the > boring nitwits who never took the Knowledge very seriously in the > first place anyway - "Governors" or not. Ok, Nabby, assume it's not Jim. It's some *other* person. I was wrong. So give us your assessment of the state of consciousness *of* this other person. What *is* the state of consciousness -- according to you and what you have learned from MMY and Benny Hill...uh, sorry...Benny Creme of the person who thinks and talks like this? I'm interested in hearing your assessment. In your opinion, would someone who went on like this about fucking dogs be a *possible* can- didate for enlightenment, or are they as lost in Maya as I am? We already know what you think of me, so use me as a "barometer" to measure sandiego108 with. Is he *as* low-vibe as I am, more low-vibe, or less low-vibe? We know you don't believe that it's Jim. But is it possible that this *other* person I have mistaken for Jim is enlightened?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sandiego: > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is "mffmmffmm..." > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for our > continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"-- how's > FiFi? :-) > > > Curits: > > Welcome back Jim. At first I thought you were trying to establish some > new patterns with a new identity, but I can see that wasn't the purpose. > So what did you learn as an temporarily anonymous poster? > > I say this is NOT Jim. You're not gonna get Jim being this crude, OR > mean. I'll put money on it. Ofcourse it is not Jim. It is interesting to see how much frustration one man created in the minds of frustrated souls like Turq et al by claiming to have achieved enlightenment with TM. Since Jim is only one in many, many that will achieve enlightenment in the months and years to come, one can but wonder what effect that will have on the boring nitwits who never took the Knowledge very seriously in the first place anyway - "Governors" or not.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > > wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > These are but a few of the questions I and other seekers > > > have for you, O guru, now that you're back. Start with > > > these, and we'll try to work up some others that are > > > worthy of you. > > > > > spew on Turdquoise- you're as easy to bait as that limp fish you > > call your dick. Oh, and feel free to wave your "wee-pain" around in > > my absence- we're impressed! PS How's Fido? :-) > > > Is that really Jim Flanegin? No it is not.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > > It sure is nice to have a fully enlightened being > > > back with us, eh? > > > > > > I mean, now that Maharishi's on the verge of croak- > > > ing and all, isn't it good to be reminded of the > > > bliss, joy, contentment and peace of mind that lies > > > waiting for *all* of us if we just keep doing what > > > he told us to do. Y'know...the way Jim did. > > > > > > :-) > > > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is "mffmmffmm..." > > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here > > for our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal > > lover"-- how's FiFi? :-) > > Just as a tip for you newbies...if you've ever > had any questions about enlightenment and couldn't > get to the microphone to ask Maharishi, here's your > opportunity to ask a real, genuine, TM-enlightened > master. Jim Flanegin (now posting as sandiego108) is > not only enlightened, he experiences Brahman on a > fairly regular basis and his cognitions are by def- > iniion (at least his definition) Truth...just ask him. How do you know this is Jim ? You don't. You simply never got over the fact that Jim got enlightened by TM while you are still stuck in your pretentious mud.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Sandiego: > > > > > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is > > > "mffmmffmm..." > > > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here > > > for our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal > > > lover"-- how's FiFi? :-) > > > > Curtis: > > > > Welcome back Jim. At first I thought you were trying to > > establish some new patterns with a new identity, but I > > can see that wasn't the purpose. So what did you learn > > as an temporarily anonymous poster? > > I say this is NOT Jim. You're not gonna get Jim being > this crude, OR mean. I'll put money on it. >From post #162123, after I had suggested that he still had...uh...unresolved issues towards Buddhists. Note the geographical location, note the fact that he knows my name even though it hasn't come up since "sandiego108" has been on FFL, note the characteristic need to defend his enlightened self from any criticism. It's Jim. And just as enlightened as he's always been. > FYI-- > > San Francisco Asian Art Museum > AsiaAlive: Korean Buddhist Art > Date: Friday, January 18, 2008 > Start Time: 12:00 pm End Time: 4:00 pm > (Time Zone: US/Pacific) > Location: (Bogart) North Court > > Category: Demonstrations and Activities > > Description > Inspired by the hugely successful series on traditional Korean > Buddhist arts in 2003, the museum is thrilled to present another > artist residency by three gifted Korean monk/artists: Seol Min > seunim (a female monk and master painter formerly called Jae U > seunim), Myung Chun seunim (also a renowned artist), and Sung Ryun > seunim. The program will consist of painting demonstrations and > hands-on activities for the public. Visitors may create their own > woodblock prints of a Buddhist sutra, the "Heart Sutra," (Banya > Simgyeong in Korean), as well as create rubbings of the Buddha and a > stone pagoda. The program will culminate on January 20 with a sacred > eye-opening ceremony of two hanging scrolls that the monks are > donating to the museum. > > In 2003, Seol Min seunim completed a new painting of the Guardian > King of the West, which she then donated to the Asian Art Museum. To > see photographs related to this program, please click here. > = > > You should have been there Barry- I was. My wife made a wonderful > rubbing of an image of Buddha. The Buddhist monks were painting when > we were there. Also it was amazing to wander the galleries and look > at the many statues of Buddha and Hindu gods. Filled with silence. I > will be back! > > PS Just for contrast, I haven't visited a TM facility in about ten > years.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: spew on Turdquoise- you're as easy to bait as that limp fish you call your dick. Oh, and feel free to wave your "wee-pain" around in my absence- we're impressed! PS How's Fido? :-) No, this ain't Jim. Can't be. This was not Jim's personality. What makes others think this is Flanagan?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
Sandiego: speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is "mffmmffmm..." cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"-- how's FiFi? :-) Curits: Welcome back Jim. At first I thought you were trying to establish some new patterns with a new identity, but I can see that wasn't the purpose. So what did you learn as an temporarily anonymous poster? I say this is NOT Jim. You're not gonna get Jim being this crude, OR mean. I'll put money on it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Judy is so gone that she's on record as thinking > that I'm a demon and that you're *exorcising* me. :-) No, she's not. But Barry sure is on record as thinking that's what I said.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If *you* claim all this and then act like an idiot, > doesn't it kinda make it look like what Maharishi's > teachings *produce* is idiocy? > What does the "B" in "Turdquoise B" stand for, anyway? "Bitch"? Cuz that's all I hear from your direction- a little whiny bitch. Oh, right, because of your dog... hey bitch did I forget to act enlightened? Or should I get in touch with my "inner asshole"? or do we just do that when we're drinking? Damn, clue me in Turdquoise, I'm gettin' lost out here in Reality ...bitch. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2008, at 1:18 PM, do.rflex wrote: > > > > >>> These are but a few of the questions I and other seekers > >>> have for you, O guru, now that you're back. Start with > >>> these, and we'll try to work up some others that are > >>> worthy of you. > >>> > >> spew on Turdquoise- you're as easy to bait as that limp fish you > >> call your dick. Oh, and feel free to wave your "wee-pain" around in > >> my absence- we're impressed! PS How's Fido? :-) > > > > > > Is that really Jim Flanegin? > > The Enlightened One himself, flex, stepping down from Mt. Olympus to > give us paltry mortals the benefit of his sensitive and kind > observations, as per the lovely piece of drivel above. > > Sal How utterly repellent. Any shred of 'benefit of the doubt' I had for him just went flying out the window. What a dirtbag.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
On Jan 26, 2008, at 1:18 PM, do.rflex wrote: These are but a few of the questions I and other seekers have for you, O guru, now that you're back. Start with these, and we'll try to work up some others that are worthy of you. spew on Turdquoise- you're as easy to bait as that limp fish you call your dick. Oh, and feel free to wave your "wee-pain" around in my absence- we're impressed! PS How's Fido? :-) Is that really Jim Flanegin? The Enlightened One himself, flex, stepping down from Mt. Olympus to give us paltry mortals the benefit of his sensitive and kind observations, as per the lovely piece of drivel above. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2008, at 12:47 PM, authfriend wrote: > > >> Just as a tip for you newbies...if you've ever > >> had any questions about enlightenment and couldn't > >> get to the microphone to ask Maharishi, here's your > >> opportunity to ask a real, genuine, TM-enlightened > >> master. Jim Flanegin (now posting as sandiego108) is > >> not only enlightened, he experiences Brahman on a > >> fairly regular basis and his cognitions are by def- > >> iniion (at least his definition) Truth...just ask him. > > > > You don't even have to ask him. Just watch Barry > > tying himself into enraged knots like a demon at > > an exorcism. > > Judy, anyone who sees rage in Barry's jibing is seriously in > need of getting out more. IMO of course. And I'd say anyone who *doesn't* see the rage behind Barry's jibing is seriously in need of getting out more.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > wrote: [snip] > > These are but a few of the questions I and other seekers > > have for you, O guru, now that you're back. Start with > > these, and we'll try to work up some others that are > > worthy of you. > > > spew on Turdquoise- you're as easy to bait as that limp fish you > call your dick. Oh, and feel free to wave your "wee-pain" around in > my absence- we're impressed! PS How's Fido? :-) Is that really Jim Flanegin?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
On Jan 26, 2008, at 12:47 PM, authfriend wrote: Just as a tip for you newbies...if you've ever had any questions about enlightenment and couldn't get to the microphone to ask Maharishi, here's your opportunity to ask a real, genuine, TM-enlightened master. Jim Flanegin (now posting as sandiego108) is not only enlightened, he experiences Brahman on a fairly regular basis and his cognitions are by def- iniion (at least his definition) Truth...just ask him. You don't even have to ask him. Just watch Barry tying himself into enraged knots like a demon at an exorcism. Judy, anyone who sees rage in Barry's jibing is seriously in need of getting out more. IMO of course. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > > It sure is nice to have a fully enlightened being > > > back with us, eh? > > > > > > I mean, now that Maharishi's on the verge of croak- > > > ing and all, isn't it good to be reminded of the > > > bliss, joy, contentment and peace of mind that lies > > > waiting for *all* of us if we just keep doing what > > > he told us to do. Y'know...the way Jim did. > > > > > > :-) > > > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is "mffmmffmm..." > > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here > > for our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal > > lover"-- how's FiFi? :-) > > Just as a tip for you newbies...if you've ever > had any questions about enlightenment and couldn't > get to the microphone to ask Maharishi, here's your > opportunity to ask a real, genuine, TM-enlightened > master. Jim Flanegin (now posting as sandiego108) is > not only enlightened, he experiences Brahman on a > fairly regular basis and his cognitions are by def- > iniion (at least his definition) Truth...just ask him. You don't even have to ask him. Just watch Barry tying himself into enraged knots like a demon at an exorcism.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
> speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is "mffmmffmm..." > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for our > continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"-- how's > FiFi? :-) Welcome back Jim. At first I thought you were trying to establish some new patterns with a new identity, but I can see that wasn't the purpose. So what did you learn as an temporarily anonymous poster? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > It sure is nice to have a fully enlightened being > > back with us, eh? > > > > I mean, now that Maharishi's on the verge of croak- > > ing and all, isn't it good to be reminded of the > > bliss, joy, contentment and peace of mind that lies > > waiting for *all* of us if we just keep doing what > > he told us to do. Y'know...the way Jim did. > > > > :-) > > > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is "mffmmffmm..." > cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for our > continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"-- how's > FiFi? :-) >
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sure is nice to have a fully enlightened being > back with us, eh? > > I mean, now that Maharishi's on the verge of croak- > ing and all, isn't it good to be reminded of the > bliss, joy, contentment and peace of mind that lies > waiting for *all* of us if we just keep doing what > he told us to do. Y'know...the way Jim did. > > :-) > speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is "mffmmffmm..." cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for our continuing spiritual education-- an impotent "animal lover"-- how's FiFi? :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:20 PM, The Secret wrote: I hadn't even bothered to read the subject line, and I had no idea that it was our favorite Enlightened Soul doing the complaining. Figures. Sal Actually, I'm more interested in meeting your favorite Enlightened Soul. He's back, posting under the name of sandiego108. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, whaddya call a Buddhist who is full of shit? Turdquoise B! :-) An excellent play if ever there was one.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Lurk: > > Fuck you asshole. I'll take 1000 of his posts to one of you mamby > pambywhines. > > Sandiego: > > I think you meant this to go to Turdquoise, he's the one who wants to > fuck your asshole, asshole. > > At least we know who he is. I don't believe he has ever expressed a > sentiment of the type you propose > have I woken you up out of your comfortable stupor? Hey, whaddya call a Buddhist who is full of shit? Turdquoise B! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
Lurk: Fuck you asshole. I'll take 1000 of his posts to one of you mamby pambywhines. Sandiego: I think you meant this to go to Turdquoise, he's the one who wants to fuck your asshole, asshole. At least we know who he is. I don't believe he has ever expressed a sentiment of the type you propose
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > wrote: > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just > ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. > > > Fuck you asshole. I'll take 1000 of his posts to one of you mamby pamby > whines. > I think you meant this to go to Turdquoise, he's the one who wants to fuck your asshole, asshole.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You and your posts, I just lift my leg on and walk > away from, the same way my dog does... :-) > yeah, and now we now why your dog is bowlegged, you drunken old fart... :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "lurkernomore20002000" wrote: wrote: > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and > justceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. > > Fuck you asshole. I'll take 1000 of his posts to one of you mamby > pamby whines. > > Lurk: > Okay, Okay, my posts somehow got lined up backwards so I missed some > of Turq's "offending" posts. But really, was it THAT offensivie. Me > thinks not. Just the outer envelope of Turqs usual posting tenor. > And plus, Jimmy, is it really you? I must have missed that part too. > Welcome back kid. How goes it in 'ol San Fran? > I'm confused. Who's the insulter and who's the insultee?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: > > > I have no idea what you're talking about. My post was clearly a > > joke, and nobody was bothering me. But even if someone was, why > > would that be grounds for a "tome-out"? > > I just noticed this typo. :) This could be a break for someone to > write a really, really long book. > > > I hadn't even bothered to read the subject line, and I had no idea > > that it was our favorite Enlightened Soul doing the complaining. > > Figures. > > Sal > Actually, I'm more interested in meeting your favorite Enlightened Soul. I'd like to compare some notes with him or her and see if what appears to me and those who hear and decide this all is gen-u-ine is in actually genuine. I've already done such things as taken short courses of meds my shrink friends have phoned into the pharmacy to test if I was totally bonkers, if this was the result of a brain tumor, if the shakes where lack of dopamine or something else entirely. But I suspect you might be speaking tongue in cheek here. BTW, I was thinking during program this evening how I could prove to myself that I was not suffering from implanted memories or wishful thinking and actually remembered the big forgetting and that terrible stroke like thing which robs us of our ability to speak clearly, understand words clearly and walk when we're infants. Then I remembered Barbara B. She was my playmate. We started comparing notes before we were in kindergarten and we continued during the ensuing years. The first time we spoke about what we remembered was when we were trying to figure out what happened to hers and why mine was spared the chopping block. She didn't remember getting hers chopped off. HAHAHAHA. Kids. Sorry if I grossed y'all out. We continued to compare notes between ourselves and others as we grew up. Surely one of the group of kids wrote it down before we all moved away from each other. I merely have to track down Barbara and our other playmates and I'll have it verified.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000 Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 8:25 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: wrote: I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and justceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. Fuck you asshole. I'll take 1000 of his posts to one of you mamby pamby whines. Lurk: Okay, Okay, my posts somehow got lined up backwards so I missed some of Turq's "offending" posts. But really, was it THAT offensivie. Me thinks not. Just the outer envelope of Turqs usual posting tenor. And plus, Jimmy, is it really you? I must have missed that part too. Welcome back kid. How goes it in 'ol San Fran? If I may pontificate for a moment, I think many members of this forum could take a lesson in not taking people too seriously, even if those people take themselves seriously. We all tend to take ourselves too seriously to a degree – some people almost all the time, others once in a while. When we do, it’s good to be able to snap out of it ASAP. Life is more fun if you can goof on people rather than let them push your buttons. Nabby is a case in point for me. I could get all hot and bothered and threaten to sue him or beat him up, etc., as some people have done to others here. But it’s so much more fun to enjoy his personality, tease him a bit, etc. I suppose I might get very upset if I thought that the things he says about me or my future were true, but that would be taking him seriously, and for me, that would be as unlikely as taking the TMO rajas seriously, or Benny Feldman’s (Kuber-ji’s) assurances that the latest bonds he is selling, promising 15% annual earnings, are secure because they’re backed by the Raam. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1244 - Release Date: 1/25/2008 7:44 PM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: He is well known for having the most disgusting insulting potty breath around here by far. Off, please, please, don't go there. Please off, refrain from passing judgement on someone in this regard. I just ate a big meal. Kapeesh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. Fuck you asshole. I'll take 1000 of his posts to one of you mamby pamby whines.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:38 PM, The Secret wrote: > > > I don't feel that people should be made uncomfortable though I am ever > > uncomfortable on campus and there are people on rants, many of them > > are wearing Flash Gordon hats and wearing light color suits. If this > > person is disturbing you, then perhaps a time out is in order. But do > > understand the things of which you've here charged him with are part > > of the divine plan as well and God did not make us separate from Him, > > we made us out of the same stuff God is made of. And that includes > > the good, the bad, the ugly, the irritating, the gross. > > I have no idea what you're talking about. My post was clearly a > joke, and nobody was bothering me. But even if someone was, why > would that be grounds for a "tome-out"? I hadn't even bothered to > read the subject line, and I had no idea that it was our favorite > Enlightened Soul doing the complaining. Figures. > > Sal > As I said, I very selectively read posts. One would take your words to be completely in earnest without having read all the postings. Rick used to ban people for a time from this group and I've just recently starting selectively reading it. So a time out seemed an entirely righteous step forward in what appears me to be sudden civility in FFL. Tongue and cheek is when you say something in a deadpan matter while you throw out clues that you're joking or people know you must be joking. Not having read all of the posts perhaps I should not have chimed in. But frankly, I've lost fear, water cannot quench me nor fire burn me and frankly unless called on it, I'll chime in wherever I go unless the spies are about. I do belong to other groups which actually do have timeouts for members. I'm not going to say my bad, cause I ain't bad and right now I'm not certain I do bad things. It's really hard to stomp on yourself or be disrespectful to yourself when all is yourself and that's the way I see things right now. When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." -- Jimi Hendrix
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can appreciate the often rowdy atmosphere around FFL and that we don't always agree, but this guy has been crossing the line lately with references to child porn, Nazi atrocities, molesting women, calling people every name in the book, etc. I know I'm comin in late on this, but dude, what the F are you talking about? At the risk of drawing this thing out, give me an example. Christ almighty, chill out man. Newbies should be required to post a month before passing judgement on any grizzled veterans here. Plus, did you see the recent photo of the Turq. I don't know if he is a knower of Brahman, but that sucker looked more balanced that most people I see.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: I have no idea what you're talking about. My post was clearly a joke, and nobody was bothering me. But even if someone was, why would that be grounds for a "tome-out"? I just noticed this typo. :) This could be a break for someone to write a really, really long book. I hadn't even bothered to read the subject line, and I had no idea that it was our favorite Enlightened Soul doing the complaining. Figures. Sal
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:38 PM, The Secret wrote: I don't feel that people should be made uncomfortable though I am ever uncomfortable on campus and there are people on rants, many of them are wearing Flash Gordon hats and wearing light color suits. If this person is disturbing you, then perhaps a time out is in order. But do understand the things of which you've here charged him with are part of the divine plan as well and God did not make us separate from Him, we made us out of the same stuff God is made of. And that includes the good, the bad, the ugly, the irritating, the gross. I have no idea what you're talking about. My post was clearly a joke, and nobody was bothering me. But even if someone was, why would that be grounds for a "tome-out"? I hadn't even bothered to read the subject line, and I had no idea that it was our favorite Enlightened Soul doing the complaining. Figures. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:27 PM, sandiego108 wrote: > > > I can appreciate the often rowdy atmosphere around FFL and that we > > don't always agree, but this guy has been crossing the line lately > > with references to child porn, Nazi atrocities, molesting women, > > calling people every name in the book, etc. It is not the picture > > of a healthy mind. If all it takes is one spam to get someone > > removed, are there no guidelines *at all* for civility here? > > In a word, no. :) > > > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's > > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just > > ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. > > I agree--once in a while, fine. Ceaselessly?? Horrors. Toss him! > > Sal > I very selectively read and marvel that FFL has taken on a level of civility it hadn't had when I read it in the past. OTOH, all this is glorious and when I talk about the hook up with the truck driver I didn't want so I didn't accept the invitation but was honored by it as a friendly gesture, when I remember being a randy young pup and debate with Rick about the right of children to experience what they desire (but Rick has some compelling arguments against that viewpoint). I will tell you that I make some people, including Rick, uncomfortable at times with my emails and speech. So I put a clamp on it or choose another forum. But the gutter is also made in the image and likeness of God and it is glorious, divine, infinite and glowing and it's as intimate to me as the feel my tongue has inside my mouth. And though you may not be aware of it, the sky above and the mud below is all me but it's also you and you and you. I don't feel that people should be made uncomfortable though I am ever uncomfortable on campus and there are people on rants, many of them are wearing Flash Gordon hats and wearing light color suits. If this person is disturbing you, then perhaps a time out is in order. But do understand the things of which you've here charged him with are part of the divine plan as well and God did not make us separate from Him, we made us out of the same stuff God is made of. And that includes the good, the bad, the ugly, the irritating, the gross.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can appreciate the often rowdy atmosphere around FFL and that we > don't always agree, but this guy has been crossing the line lately > with references to child porn, Nazi atrocities, molesting women, > calling people every name in the book, etc. It is not the picture of a > healthy mind.>> He is well known for having the most disgusting insulting potty breath around here by far. OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" wrote: > > > > > On Behalf Of sandiego108 > > > > > > > > He's suspended `till tonight at midnight. ;-) > > > > > > Then what? He turns into a pumpkin? > > > > Nah, he seems to be able to get real women over there. > > This one tickled me so much that I'm going > to give Jim/Sandi Ego a chance to petition > for me to be banned. I'm going to post some- > thing I was saving for tomorrow morning right > now. > > Here it is. ALL that Jimbo would have to do > to get me banned for a week is to bring it > up to Rick and ask him to ban me for the next > week. I would go without a single protest, and > be back a week later, without a scar. > > Uh...unlike the person who feels he has to > change his username to come back after exceeding > the posting limit, all while claiming to be fully > enlightened. :-) > > Anyway, here it is, the offending post, the one > that takes me definitely Over The Limit and allows > Rick and the other moderators to Ban My Ass For A > Week. If they choose to do so, I hold *absolutely* > no grudges -- them's the rules. But I suggest that > you wait TO ban me *until* someone like Jimbo or > Judy or Shemp demands that you do so...that way > it'll have a better overall effect. > > So anyway, here is the offending post that officially > takes me over the 50-post-per-week limit: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > wrote: > > > > I can appreciate the often rowdy atmosphere around FFL and that we > > don't always agree, but this guy has been crossing the line lately > > with references to child porn, Nazi atrocities, molesting women, > > calling people every name in the book, etc. It is not the picture > > of a healthy mind. If all it takes is one spam to get someone > > removed, are there no guidelines *at all* for civility here? > > > > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's > > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just > > ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. > > Jim, > > Here's the real story. What you're pissed off about > is that while posing as an "enlightened one" you got > busted on this forum for having zero self control about > your compulsive posting and going over the posting limit. > As a result, you had to stop posting for a week. Rather > than just suck it up and make it a week and show some > humility and some "enlightened fallibility," you chose > to throw a hissy fit and pretend to "go away," as if it > would be a long, long time before you ever deigned to > reappear and as if you were done with us low-vibe suckers > who don't appreciate your oh-so-highly-evolved-enlightened > maginificence. > > Then you reappear, only a few weeks later, with a new > username, and it takes less than a couple of days > before someone figures out who you are. So what you are > so pissed off about is that your act and your vibe are > both so...uh...recognizable. > > Duh. Tough shit. Your act and your vibe are recognizable > because they are clichés, as are you. > > If Rick, or ANY of the other FFL moderators, chooses > to kick my ass off for a week or more to "lighten up," > that's cool with me. I will go without a word of protest. > And I'll come back, as if nothing untoward has happened. > > You and your posts, I just lift my leg on and walk > away from, the same way my dog does... :-) > What makes you think this is Jim Flanegin ? The wisdom and depth in Jim's post transcended anything ever written in this weird place. Just because he actually is enlightened (with TM) and you are not, does not give you a reason to let your Pitta to get out of hand. ;-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Behalf Of sandiego108 > > > > > > He's suspended `till tonight at midnight. ;-) > > > > Then what? He turns into a pumpkin? > > Nah, he seems to be able to get real women over there. This one tickled me so much that I'm going to give Jim/Sandi Ego a chance to petition for me to be banned. I'm going to post some- thing I was saving for tomorrow morning right now. Here it is. ALL that Jimbo would have to do to get me banned for a week is to bring it up to Rick and ask him to ban me for the next week. I would go without a single protest, and be back a week later, without a scar. Uh...unlike the person who feels he has to change his username to come back after exceeding the posting limit, all while claiming to be fully enlightened. :-) Anyway, here it is, the offending post, the one that takes me definitely Over The Limit and allows Rick and the other moderators to Ban My Ass For A Week. If they choose to do so, I hold *absolutely* no grudges -- them's the rules. But I suggest that you wait TO ban me *until* someone like Jimbo or Judy or Shemp demands that you do so...that way it'll have a better overall effect. So anyway, here is the offending post that officially takes me over the 50-post-per-week limit: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can appreciate the often rowdy atmosphere around FFL and that we > don't always agree, but this guy has been crossing the line lately > with references to child porn, Nazi atrocities, molesting women, > calling people every name in the book, etc. It is not the picture > of a healthy mind. If all it takes is one spam to get someone > removed, are there no guidelines *at all* for civility here? > > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just > ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. Jim, Here's the real story. What you're pissed off about is that while posing as an "enlightened one" you got busted on this forum for having zero self control about your compulsive posting and going over the posting limit. As a result, you had to stop posting for a week. Rather than just suck it up and make it a week and show some humility and some "enlightened fallibility," you chose to throw a hissy fit and pretend to "go away," as if it would be a long, long time before you ever deigned to reappear and as if you were done with us low-vibe suckers who don't appreciate your oh-so-highly-evolved-enlightened maginificence. Then you reappear, only a few weeks later, with a new username, and it takes less than a couple of days before someone figures out who you are. So what you are so pissed off about is that your act and your vibe are both so...uh...recognizable. Duh. Tough shit. Your act and your vibe are recognizable because they are clichés, as are you. If Rick, or ANY of the other FFL moderators, chooses to kick my ass off for a week or more to "lighten up," that's cool with me. I will go without a word of protest. And I'll come back, as if nothing untoward has happened. You and your posts, I just lift my leg on and walk away from, the same way my dog does... :-)
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sandiego108 Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 3:57 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out > He's suspended `till tonight at midnight. ;-) > Then what? He turns into a pumpkin? Nah, he seems to be able to get real women over there. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1242 - Release Date: 1/24/2008 8:32 PM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rick. I think Turq needs a time out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of sandiego108 > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 3:27 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rick. I think Turq needs a time out > > > > I can appreciate the often rowdy atmosphere around FFL and that we > don't always agree, but this guy has been crossing the line lately > with references to child porn, Nazi atrocities, molesting women, > calling people every name in the book, etc. It is not the picture of a > healthy mind. If all it takes is one spam to get someone removed, are > there no guidelines *at all* for civility here? > > I vote he gets suspended for a week, and then we'll see. There's > definitely a line between keeping this an open forum, and just > ceaselessly dragging it into the gutter. > > He's suspended `till tonight at midnight. ;-) > Then what? He turns into a pumpkin?
