Re: [Fink-devel] [gtk+2, 10.4] missing text issues

[Maurizio Antonelli]

Dear Friends.

I'm very HAPPY to say to you all that
I've just compiled and installed cairo-1.11.2 and then rebuilded GTK2
and Pidgin.

And now Pidgin works very very well


Thanks a lot to You all.





On 17/04/13 01:33, David Fang wrote:
> Friends and fellow Finksters,
> Thanks to Mike and Ron's debugging and testing, the case of the
> missing text on gtk+ on OS X 10.4 has been solved.  I have committed the
> last working version of cairo to 10.4-EOL in fink.  After selfupdate,
> you should see cairo-1.11.2 under 10.4-EOL/graphics.  "Update" to that,
> and your text should be visible in GTK applications again.
> 
> Fang
> 
>> The problem is indeed with cairo.
>>
>> Downgrading to http://cairographics.org/snapshots/cairo-1.11.2.tar.gz and
>> applying the same patch as for 1.12 already in fink worked, i had to
>> recompile gtk+2 of course and everything else that had been linked to
>> 1.12,
>> but i do now have fonts. Tested with xchat and geany.
>>
>>
>> Whee!
>> -Mike
> 


-- 
Maurizio Antonelli
E-mail: ma...@maury.it
PEC: maurizio.antone...@pec.maury.it
Blog: http://www.maury.it/blog

--
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] [gtk+2, 10.4] missing text issues

[David Fang]

Friends and fellow Finksters,
Thanks to Mike and Ron's debugging and testing, the case of the 
missing text on gtk+ on OS X 10.4 has been solved.  I have committed the 
last working version of cairo to 10.4-EOL in fink.  After selfupdate, you 
should see cairo-1.11.2 under 10.4-EOL/graphics.  "Update" to that, and 
your text should be visible in GTK applications again.

Fang

> The problem is indeed with cairo.
>
> Downgrading to http://cairographics.org/snapshots/cairo-1.11.2.tar.gz and
> applying the same patch as for 1.12 already in fink worked, i had to
> recompile gtk+2 of course and everything else that had been linked to 1.12,
> but i do now have fonts. Tested with xchat and geany.
>
>
> Whee!
> -Mike

-- 
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/


--
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.12.10-1 failed on 10.4 pango-cairo (ppc and intel)

[William Scott]

The cure was simply to remove the older version of   gtk+2-dev ; it  
appears to conflict with the build


On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:46 PM, William Scott wrote:

> I'm getting this failure on 10.4 with pangocairo, on both my intel  
> and ppc machines, which I believe are up to date with everything.


-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.12.10-1 failed on 10.4 pango-cairo (ppc and intel)

[William Scott]

I'm getting this failure on 10.4 with pangocairo, on both my intel and  
ppc machines, which I believe are up to date with everything.


  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../gtk - 
I../../../gtk -I../../../gdk -I../../../gdk - 
DGTK_PRINT_BACKEND_ENABLE_UNSUPPORTED -I/sw/lib/pango-ft219/include/ 
pango-1.0 -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include/ 
freetype2 -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include -I/sw/include/pixman-1 -I/sw/ 
include/libpng12 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/cairo -I/sw/include/ 
glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/ 
include -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -DX_LOCALE -I/sw/lib/pango-ft219/ 
include/pango-1.0 -I/sw/lib/pango-ft219/include -I/sw/lib/freetype219/ 
include/freetype2 -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/ 
include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/sys -I/usr/X11R6/include -Os -Wall  
-c gtkprintbackendlpr.c -o gtkprintbackendlpr.o >/dev/null 2>&1
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=link gcc  -Os -Wall  -L/sw/lib/pango- 
ft219/lib -L/sw/lib/freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -o  
libprintbackend-lpr.la -rpath /sw/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends - 
avoid-version -module  gtkprintbackendlpr.lo -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXrandr  
-lXrender -lXinerama  -lXext -lX11   -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXrender -lX11   
-L/sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -L/sw/lib/ 
freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib -Wl,-framework,CoreServices -Wl,- 
framework,ApplicationServices -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 - 
lpango-1.0 -lm -lfreetype -lz -lfontconfig -latk-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 - 
lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -liconv -lcairo   -lm  ../../../gtk/ 
libgtk-x11-2.0.la
gcc ${wl}-undefined ${wl}dynamic_lookup -o .libs/libprintbackend- 
lpr.so -bundle  .libs/gtkprintbackendlpr.o  -L/sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib - 
L/sw/lib/freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib - 
lXrandr -lXinerama -lXext -lXrender -lX11 -L/sw/lib /sw/lib/pango- 
ft219/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.dylib /sw/lib/libglitz.dylib /sw/lib/ 
libpng12.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/ 
libSM.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.dylib / 
sw/lib/libpixman-1.dylib /sw/lib/libexpat.dylib /sw/lib/pango-ft219/ 
lib/libpangoft2-1.0.dylib /sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib/libpango-1.0.dylib / 
sw/lib/freetype219/lib/libfreetype.dylib -lz /sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib/ 
libfontconfig.dylib /sw/lib/libatk-1.0.dylib /sw/lib/ 
libgobject-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/ 
libglib-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libintl.dylib /sw/lib/libiconv.dylib /sw/lib/ 
libcairo.dylib -lm ../../../gtk/.libs/libgtk-x11-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/ 
libgdk-x11-2.0.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.dylib /sw/lib/ 
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/ 
libXinerama.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.dylib  -Wl,-framework - 
Wl,CoreServices -Wl,-framework -Wl,ApplicationServices
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
_gdk_threads_add_idle referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_event_request_motions referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_cairo_create referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be defined  
in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_cairo_set_source_color referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to  
be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_threads_add_timeout referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_cairo_rectangle referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_threads_add_timeout_full referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to  
be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_cairo_set_source_pixbuf referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to  
be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_atom_intern_static_string referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected  
to be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_cursor_new_from_name referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_display_warp_pointer referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_threads_add_idle_full referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_screen_get_resolution referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_window_beep referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be defined  
in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_screen_set_font_options referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to  
be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_screen_set_resolution referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_x11_display_set_cursor_theme referenced from libgtk-x11-2  
expected to be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_color_to_string referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_screen_get_font_options referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to  
be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_screen_is_composited referenced from libgtk-x11-2 expected to be  
defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_window_input_shape_combine_mask referenced from libgtk-x11-2  
expected to be defined in libgdk-x11-2
_gdk_notify_startup_complete_with_id referenced from libgtk-x11-2  
expected 

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 and librsvg2

[Daniel Macks]

On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> William Scott wrote:
> > gtk+2 seems to build and link to  /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib  when  
> > present, but silently not do so in its absence.
> > 
> > I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying  
> > right in coot depending on build-order, and I am at least somewhat  
> > certain this is where the problem lies.
> > 
> > Should gtk+2 depend on librsvg2-shlibs  and/or librsvg2-gtk ?
> 
> That would be circular.

I just rebuilt gtk+2 with fink's librsvg2/librsvg2-shlibs installed
and do not see any linking from any file installed by
gtk+2/gtk+2-shlibs to librsvg2-shlibs. What I do see is that
librsvg2-gtk (which, as Martin notes, must sit on top of gtk+2 in the
dependencies) supplies gtk+2 plugins to handle rsvg files. Does
(r)installing librsvg2-gtk solve the icon problem (i.e., coot needs
Depends:librsvg2-gtk)?

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 and librsvg2

[Martin Costabel]

William Scott wrote:
> gtk+2 seems to build and link to  /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib  when  
> present, but silently not do so in its absence.
> 
> I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying  
> right in coot depending on build-order, and I am at least somewhat  
> certain this is where the problem lies.
> 
> Should gtk+2 depend on librsvg2-shlibs  and/or librsvg2-gtk ?

That would be circular.

-- 
Martin


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 and librsvg2

[William Scott]

gtk+2 seems to build and link to  /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib  when  
present, but silently not do so in its absence.

I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying  
right in coot depending on build-order, and I am at least somewhat  
certain this is where the problem lies.

Should gtk+2 depend on librsvg2-shlibs  and/or librsvg2-gtk ?



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 2.6 to stable?

[Benjamin Reed]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Max Horn wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering: Is there any particular reason to *not* move gtk+2  
> v2.6 to the stable tree (which currently still has 2.4.9) ? All its  
> deps are in stable, according to a check done with
>fink --trees=stable,virtual rebuild gtk+
> (after copying the 2.6 .info file to stable).

Hm, I think that would be a good idea...

Especially since if I ever get to finishing testing the pangocairo
branch, gtk+-related packages are going to really be shaken up in
unstable soon...

- --
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development
http://www.racoonfink.com/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF6CAKUu+jZtP2Zf4RArmzAKCYeemLRqGPNa2Z9O6gzOrcP2tcHQCeMD5f
u6cTFMiGfWtMv5z34RJK7ww=
=ZG1w
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 2.6 to stable?

[Max Horn]

Hi,

I was wondering: Is there any particular reason to *not* move gtk+2  
v2.6 to the stable tree (which currently still has 2.4.9) ? All its  
deps are in stable, according to a check done with
   fink --trees=stable,virtual rebuild gtk+
(after copying the 2.6 .info file to stable).


Cheers,
Max

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Rogue]

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:57:10 -0500
Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > I will add the dep for good measure but I remain unconvinced.
> 
> It didn't work, and then you manually added something and now it
> works? What more proof could you possibly want that you need to list
> this something as one of your dependencies?

I guess some sutleties where lost in translation: I am fully aware that Alex 
advise was appropriate and information regarding gtk+2 are correct. sorry if it 
wasn't clear I am grateful for the help provided.

here are some reasons for me to doubt this, as a strict requirement for my 
package:

- not listed in dependencies on mother website (where upstream package is 
fetched from)
- no mention whatsoever in the install file or any other doc that comes with 
the source
- missing pango-dev yields non verbose check 'GTK+2 >= 2.4.0 - no' when it is 
obviously wrong
- the output of pkg-config that still bothers me

in fact looking deeper I know now that it is a dependency of pango and not 
pango-dev itself that is the issue so while adding it to the dep strings may do 
the trick it is hardly satisfying... I might as well list all packages under 
the fink tree just in case an unlisted dependency lies under a rock.

Best Regards,
Rogue


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Daniel Macks]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:34:57PM +, Rogue wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:55:39 -0500
> "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > anyway the issue in my case was pango1-xft2-dev that wasn't
> > > installed. I have no idea how that could have happened since
> > > it's a dependency for gtk+2 but here you go.
> >
> > It's a _build_ dependency for gtk+2, so it can be freely removed after
> > gtk+2 is installed.
> > 
> > This means that whatever package you're working on needs to require
> > pango1-xft2-dev as a build dependency.
> 
> I don't think that' the case.

It's easy enough to try this instead of assuming. 'fink show-deps
gtk+2' and see where pango1-xft2-dev is listed. Except in a few
legacy/compatibility circumstances, no -dev is ever a dependency of
anything ever.

> simply running
> 
> $ pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0
> 
> at the command line returns:
> 
> Package pangoxft was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `pangoxft.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> Package 'pangoxft', required by 'GDK', not found

Right. As the message tells you, it is pango1-xft2-dev that is
missing; gtk+2-dev was found.

> reinstalling the pango-dev package sorts out both pkg-config output
> and gtk+2 test program.
> 
> I will add the dep for good measure but I remain unconvinced.

It didn't work, and then you manually added something and now it
works? What more proof could you possibly want that you need to list
this something as one of your dependencies?

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Rogue]

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:55:39 -0500
"Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > anyway the issue in my case was pango1-xft2-dev that wasn't installed. I 
> > have no idea how that could have happened since it's a dependency for gtk+2 
> > but here you go.
> 
> It's a _build_ dependency for gtk+2, so it can be freely removed after
> gtk+2 is installed.
> 
> This means that whatever package you're working on needs to require
> pango1-xft2-dev as a build dependency.

I don't think that' the case. simply running

$ pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0

at the command line returns:

Package pangoxft was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `pangoxft.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'pangoxft', required by 'GDK', not found

reinstalling the pango-dev package sorts out both pkg-config output and gtk+2 
test program.

I will add the dep for good measure but I remain unconvinced.

Best Regards,
Rogue


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On 11/8/05, Rogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:32:53 +0100
> Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am answering in a new thread. It is a pity that you started this
> > thread inside the one on the fink binary distribution.
>
> apology for that.
>
> > Any self-respecting
> > configure script should use such a construct, or even simply 'pkg-config
> > --exists "gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0"'.
>
> this puzzles me. I thought the point of pkg-config was to simplify lib 
> linking... do you mean that the upload package configure script should 
> include this or that I should specify in the .info file?
>
> anyway the issue in my case was pango1-xft2-dev that wasn't installed. I have 
> no idea how that could have happened since it's a dependency for gtk+2 but 
> here you go.
>
> thanks for your help.
>
> Best Regards,
> Rogue
>
>

It's a _build_ dependency for gtk+2, so it can be freely removed after
gtk+2 is installed.

This means that whatever package you're working on needs to require
pango1-xft2-dev as a build dependency.

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink Documenter
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Rogue]

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:32:53 +0100
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I am answering in a new thread. It is a pity that you started this 
> thread inside the one on the fink binary distribution.

apology for that.

> Any self-respecting 
> configure script should use such a construct, or even simply 'pkg-config 
> --exists "gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0"'.

this puzzles me. I thought the point of pkg-config was to simplify lib 
linking... do you mean that the upload package configure script should include 
this or that I should specify in the .info file?

anyway the issue in my case was pango1-xft2-dev that wasn't installed. I have 
no idea how that could have happened since it's a dependency for gtk+2 but here 
you go.

thanks for your help.

Best Regards,
Rogue


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Martin Costabel]

I am answering in a new thread. It is a pity that you started this 
thread inside the one on the fink binary distribution.


Rogue wrote:
> I have gtk+ 2.6.10 installed but configure steps now fail saying gtk+ 
test can't be run. checking the config.log file I'm stumped by what has 
happened:

>
> configure:27156: checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.4.0
> configure:27301: result: no
> configure:27334: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -no-cpp-precomp 
-fno-common  -I/Volumes/Mac_UFS/sw/include -L/Volumes/Mac_UFS/sw/lib 
conftest.c   >&5

> conftest.c:83:21: error: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory

It is correct that this test should fail, because the compiler command 
line is insufficient. If you want to include gtk stuff, you need to have 
either -I/sw/include/gtk-2.0 or -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2 on the compiler 
command line. You (or rather the configure script) get this 
automatically from 'pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0'. Any self-respecting 
configure script should use such a construct, or even simply 'pkg-config 
--exists "gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0"'.


--
Martin




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On 11/7/05, Rogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have gtk+ 2.6.10 installed but configure steps now fail saying gtk+ test 
> can't be run. checking the config.log file I'm stumped by what has happened:
>
> configure:27156: checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.4.0
> configure:27301: result: no
> configure:27334: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -no-cpp-precomp -fno-common  
> -I/Volumes/Mac_UFS/sw/include -L/Volumes/Mac_UFS/sw/lib conftest.c   >&5
> conftest.c:83:21: error: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory
> conftest.c: In function 'main':
> conftest.c:89: error: 'gtk_major_version' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> conftest.c:89: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> conftest.c:89: error: for each function it appears in.)
> conftest.c:89: error: 'gtk_minor_version' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> conftest.c:89: error: 'gtk_micro_version' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> configure:27340: $? = 1
> configure: failed program was:
>
> pkg-config metadata seems to correctly acknowledge the version number. should 
> I just fink reinstall gtk+2?
>
> Best Regards,
> Rogue
>
> --
> R-Marechal
> Toontrack Music, Head of Support
> US: +1 (240) 764 4850
> UK: +44 (0)20 8816 7694
> FRANCE: +33 (0)870 444 062
>
>

I'd suspect that you may just need to install gtk+2-dev.

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink Documenter
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

[Rogue]

I have gtk+ 2.6.10 installed but configure steps now fail saying gtk+ test 
can't be run. checking the config.log file I'm stumped by what has happened:

configure:27156: checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.4.0
configure:27301: result: no
configure:27334: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -no-cpp-precomp -fno-common  
-I/Volumes/Mac_UFS/sw/include -L/Volumes/Mac_UFS/sw/lib conftest.c   >&5
conftest.c:83:21: error: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory
conftest.c: In function 'main':
conftest.c:89: error: 'gtk_major_version' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
conftest.c:89: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
conftest.c:89: error: for each function it appears in.)
conftest.c:89: error: 'gtk_minor_version' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
conftest.c:89: error: 'gtk_micro_version' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
configure:27340: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:

pkg-config metadata seems to correctly acknowledge the version number. should I 
just fink reinstall gtk+2?

Best Regards,
Rogue

--
R-Marechal
Toontrack Music, Head of Support
US: +1 (240) 764 4850
UK: +44 (0)20 8816 7694
FRANCE: +33 (0)870 444 062


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 strangeness.

[Corey Halpin]

On 2005-07-09, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> Hey Corey,
> 
> I'm kinda lunging in the dark here, but it could be useful to find  
> out which dlopen is causing the crash. Could you set a breakpoint  
> action to print that? This should work:
> 
> $ gdb gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
> (gdb) break dlopen
> (gdb) commands
> >x /s $r3
> >continue
> >end
> (gdb) run
> 
> Also, try running otool on that loader, just for the hell of it :-)  
> Reason I'm asking is 1) to detect if you have any external libraries  
> linked in by accident and 2) to see if it can explain the 'warning:  
> Unable to read symbols from "N?"'.


  I should mention that on my system /sw is a symlink to /sw_unstable.
  I noticed in the otool output that it finds libjpeg in /sw/lib rather
than /sw_unstable/lib.  But since they should be the same place anyway,
that shouldn't cause a problem?  Right?
  I'm rebuilding libjpeg and then gtk+2 to see if that fixes it.

  Here's the results of what you asked for:

calvin:~$ gdb gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
GNU gdb 5.3-20030128 (Apple version gdb-330.1) (Fri Jul 16 21:42:28 GMT
2004)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "powerpc-apple-darwin".
Reading symbols for shared libraries  done
(gdb) break dlopen
Breakpoint 1 at 0x9011f770
(gdb) commands
Type commands for when breakpoint 1 is hit, one per line.
End with a line saying just "end".
>x /s $r3
>continue
>end
(gdb) run
Starting program: /sw_unstable/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders 
Reading symbols for shared libraries +... done
# GdkPixbuf Image Loader Modules file
# Automatically generated file, do not edit
# Created by gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders from gtk+-2.6.8
#
# LoaderDir = /sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders
#

Breakpoint 1, 0x9011f770 in dlopen ()
0x1100930:   "/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/io-wmf.so"
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/io-wmf.so"
"wmf" 0 "gtk20" "Windows Metafile"
"image/x-wmf" ""
"wmf" ""
"\327\315\306\232" "" 100
"\001" "" 100


Breakpoint 1, 0x9011f770 in dlopen ()
0x1100a70:
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/l

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 strangeness.

[Dave Vasilevsky]

On Jul 8, 2005, at 11:43 PM, Corey Halpin wrote:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x8fe0878c in __dyld_is_library_loaded_by_name ()
#1  0x8fe02e38 in __dyld_load_library_image ()
#2  0x8fe0642c in __dyld_load_images_libraries ()
#3  0x8fe04720 in __dyld_map_bundle_image ()
#4  0x8fe12ec8 in __dyld__dyld_link_module ()
#5  0x9003fc88 in NSLinkModule ()
#6  0x9011f4fc in loadModule ()
#7  0x9011f884 in dlopen ()
#8  0xbe90 in g_module_open ()
#9  0x2d80 in query_module ()
#10 0x2c2c in main ()
#11 0x263c in _start (argc=1, argv=0xbb10, envp=0xbb18) at
/SourceCache/Csu/Csu-47/crt.c:267
#12 0x8fe1a278 in __dyld__dyld_start ()


Hey Corey,

I'm kinda lunging in the dark here, but it could be useful to find  
out which dlopen is causing the crash. Could you set a breakpoint  
action to print that? This should work:


$ gdb gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
(gdb) break dlopen
(gdb) commands
>x /s $r3
>continue
>end
(gdb) run

Also, try running otool on that loader, just for the hell of it :-)  
Reason I'm asking is 1) to detect if you have any external libraries  
linked in by accident and 2) to see if it can explain the 'warning:  
Unable to read symbols from "N?"'.


Dave




PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 strangeness.

[Corey Halpin]

  I'm running fink unstable, selfupdated about an hour before this mail, on
OS X 10.3.9 with the most recent dev tools for that OS release.

  When I try to update gtk+2, the build proceeds without error, however:
calvin:~$ fink install gtk+2
Information about 4948 packages read in 3 seconds.
The following package will be installed or updated:
 gtk+2
dpkg -i
/sw_unstable/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/gtk+2_2.6.8-1_darwin-powerpc.deb
(Reading database ... 107911 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace gtk+2 2.6.8-1 (using
.../gtk+2_2.6.8-1_darwin-powerpc.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gtk+2 ...
Setting up gtk+2 (2.6.8-1) ...
/sw_unstable/sbin/update-gdk-pixbuf-loaders: line 16:  5616 Segmentation
fault  gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >$TMPFILE
/sw_unstable/bin/dpkg: error processing gtk+2 (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139
Errors were encountered while processing:
 gtk+2
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't install package gtk+2-2.6.8-1

Here's some gdb information on the crashing program:
calvin:~$ gdb gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
GNU gdb 5.3-20030128 (Apple version gdb-330.1) (Fri Jul 16 21:42:28 GMT
2004)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "powerpc-apple-darwin".
Reading symbols for shared libraries  done
(gdb) run
Starting program: /sw_unstable/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
Reading symbols for shared libraries ... done
# GdkPixbuf Image Loader Modules file
# Automatically generated file, do not edit
# Created by gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders from gtk+-2.6.8
#
# LoaderDir = /sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders
#
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
*** ^- repeated several times 
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/io-wmf.so"
"wmf" 0 "gtk20" "Windows Metafile"
"image/x-wmf" ""
"wmf" ""
"\327\315\306\232" "" 100
"\001" "" 100

Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-ani.so"
"ani" 4 "gtk20" "The ANI image format"
"application/x-navi-animation" ""
"ani" ""
"RIFFACON" "" 100

unable to open symbol file: 9@: No such file or directory.
warning: Unable to read symbols from "9@".
warning: Unable to read symbols from "9@"; skipping.
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-bmp.so"
"bmp" 5 "gtk20" "The BMP image format"
"image/bmp" "image/x-bmp" "image/x-MS-bmp" ""
"bmp" ""
"BM" "" 100

unable to open symbol file: ??: No such file or directory.
warning: Unable to read symbols from "??".
warning: Unable to read symbols from "??"; skipping.
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-gif.so"
"gif" 4 "gtk20" "The GIF image format"
"image/gif" ""
"gif" ""
"GIF8" "" 100

Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-ico.so"
"ico" 5 "gtk20" "The ICO image format"
"image/x-icon" ""
"ico" "cur" ""
"  \001   " "zz znz" 100
"  \002   " "zz znz" 100

unable to open symbol file: ?!: No such file or directory.
warning: Unable to read symbols from "?!".
warning: Unable to read symbols from "?!"; skipping.
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-jpeg.so"
"jpeg" 5 "gtk20" "The JPEG image format"
"image/jpeg" ""
"jpeg" "jpe" "jpg" ""
"\377\330" "" 100

unable to open symbol file: ?0: No such file or directory.
warning: Unable to read symbols from "?0".
warning: Unable to read symbols from "?0"; skipping.
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-pcx.so"
"pcx" 4 "gtk20" "The PCX image format"
"image/x-pcx" ""
"pcx" ""
"\n \001" "" 100
"\n\002\001" "" 100
"\n\003\001" "" 100
"\n\004\001" "" 100
"\n\005\001" "" 100

Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so"
"png" 5 "gtk20" "The PNG image format"
"image/png" ""
"png" ""
"\211PNG\r\n\032\n" "" 100

unable to open symbol file: B?: No such file or directory.
warning: Unable to read symbols from "B?".
warning: Unable to read symbols from "B?"; skipping.
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
"/sw_unstable/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-pnm.so"
"pnm" 4 "gtk20" "The PNM/PBM/PGM/PPM image format family"
"image/x-portable-anymap" "image/x-portable-bitmap"
"image/x-portable-graymap" "image/x-portable-pixmap" ""
"pnm" "pbm" "pgm" "ppm" ""
"P1" "" 100
"P2" "" 100
"P3" "" 100
"P4" "" 100
"P5" "" 10

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

[David R. Morrison]

> From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Fink-devel] gtk+2
> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:46:42 -0800
> 
> Ok, now I have a new error.  I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin, 
> figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package 
> builds fine, but dpkg fails with:
> 
> (Reading database ... 11260 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking gtk+2 (from .../gtk+2_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb) ...
> Selecting previously deselected package gtk+2-shlibs.
> Unpacking gtk+2-shlibs (from 
> .../gtk+2-shlibs_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb) ...
> Setting up gtk+2-shlibs (2.6.2-3) ...
> Setting up gtk+2 (2.6.2-3) ...
> dyld: gtk-query-immodules-2.0 version mismatch for library: 
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.1.dylib (compatibility version of user: 4.0.0 
> greater than library's version: 1.2.0)
> /sw/sbin/update-gtk-immodules: line 15: 13344 Trace/BPT trap  
> gtk-query-immodules-2.0 >$TMPFILE
> dpkg: error processing gtk+2 (--install):
>  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 133
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  gtk+2
> ### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
> Failed: can't batch-install packages: 
> /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/gtk+2_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb
>  
> /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/gtk+2-shlibs_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb
> 
> Any ideas?
> Mike S


Mike,

When you changed the libraries in /usr/X11R6 and then compiled another
package, the new programs you created were linked to the newer versions
of those libraries.

Now that you've done a "clean install" of XDarwin, you've wiped out those
newer versions, so the programs compiled against them can't be run.

Fink attempts to track dependencies for you so that this doesn't happen
(but it's also possible for poorly-designed fink packages to produce
the same problem).

To repair your personal installation of fink, you'll need to rebuild the
affected packages.  In this case, the error arose when dpkg attempted to
run the program "/sw/sbin/update-gtk-immodules".  (I know this because of
the "Trace/BPT trap" error.)  To find out which fink package supplies this,
run "dpkg -S /sw/sbin/update-gtk-immodules".  Then rebuild that package.

There may be lots of packages to rebuild, unfortunately.

  -- Dave


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2

[Michael]

Ok, now I have a new error.  I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin, 
figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package 
builds fine, but dpkg fails with:

(Reading database ... 11260 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking gtk+2 (from .../gtk+2_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package gtk+2-shlibs.
Unpacking gtk+2-shlibs (from 
.../gtk+2-shlibs_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb) ...
Setting up gtk+2-shlibs (2.6.2-3) ...
Setting up gtk+2 (2.6.2-3) ...
dyld: gtk-query-immodules-2.0 version mismatch for library: 
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.1.dylib (compatibility version of user: 4.0.0 
greater than library's version: 1.2.0)
/sw/sbin/update-gtk-immodules: line 15: 13344 Trace/BPT trap  
gtk-query-immodules-2.0 >$TMPFILE
dpkg: error processing gtk+2 (--install):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 133
Errors were encountered while processing:
gtk+2
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't batch-install packages: 
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/gtk+2_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb 
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/gtk+2-shlibs_2.6.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb

Any ideas?
Mike S
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

[Martin Costabel]

Michael wrote:
I seem to have broken my own package, and am at a loss as to how.  The 
build fails with:

/usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
This means that there was an error, but the message describing the error 
comes before this line.

make[4]: *** [libgdk-x11-2.0.la] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of ulimit failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling gtk+2-2.6.2-3 failed
Immediately preceded by 50 or 60 lines of multiple definition warnings 
caused by the difference of fontconfig libraries contained in 
/usr/X11R6, and the ones that pango was forced to link to in the fink 
Sometimes you get many hundreds of multiple definition warnings. Nothing 
to worry about.

directory.  That's the same as it has been for a while.  Then before 
that, I get:

/.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -install_name  
/sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib -compatibility_version 601 
-current_version 601.2
ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib not found 
in segment address table LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE 
/sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/seg_addr_table

I don't understand the -compatibility_version error
This isn't an error. The -compatibility_version 601 is part of the 
compiler command, and the ld: warning is just that, a warning. Nothing more.

--
Martin

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

[David R. Morrison]

On Feb 19, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Michael wrote:
[snip]
  Then before that, I get:
/.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -install_name  
/sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib -compatibility_version 601 
-current_version 601.2
ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib not 
found in segment address table LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE 
/sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/seg_addr_table

I don't understand the -compatibility_version error
There isn't actually an error here.
The warning about LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE is a side-effect of the way that 
fink arranges "prebinding" for shared libraries.  Fink postpones the 
prebinding step until after the package is installed, which generates 
the warning that you see.

  -- Dave

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2

[Michael]

I seem to have broken my own package, and am at a loss as to how.  The 
build fails with:

/usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
make[4]: *** [libgdk-x11-2.0.la] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of ulimit failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling gtk+2-2.6.2-3 failed
Immediately preceded by 50 or 60 lines of multiple definition warnings 
caused by the difference of fontconfig libraries contained in 
/usr/X11R6, and the ones that pango was forced to link to in the fink 
directory.  That's the same as it has been for a while.  Then before 
that, I get:

/.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -install_name  
/sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib -compatibility_version 601 
-current_version 601.2
ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib not found 
in segment address table LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE 
/sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/seg_addr_table

I don't understand the -compatibility_version error
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

[David R. Morrison]

I've added these to the 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable tree, except for libxml2 
and gdbm3, which were already at the versions you requested.

  -- Dave
On Feb 19, 2005, at 1:58 PM, Michael wrote:
David R. Morrison wrote:
Mike,
If you will post a list of the precise packages (with version and 
revision
number) which you have "brought over" from 10.3 and tested under
10.2-gcc3.3, I will add them to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree.

The main issue here is that most maintainers are only keeping up with 
the
10.3 tree now, and probably didn't even have a way to test whether 
their
newer versions of packages worked on the older system.

 -- Dave

Package: gtk-doc
Version: 1.2
Revision: 13
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.6.11
Revision: 1
Package: libxslt
Version: 1.1.8
Revision: 6
Package: gmp
Version: 4.1.3
Revision: 11
Package: gdbm3
Version: 1.8.3
Revision: 1
Package: OpenSP4
Version: 1.5.1
Revision: 1
Package: openjade
Version: 1.3.2
Revision: 28
Thanks, :)
Mike S

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

[David R. Morrison]

Mike,

If you will post a list of the precise packages (with version and revision
number) which you have "brought over" from 10.3 and tested under
10.2-gcc3.3, I will add them to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree.

The main issue here is that most maintainers are only keeping up with the
10.3 tree now, and probably didn't even have a way to test whether their
newer versions of packages worked on the older system.

  -- Dave


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2

[Michael]

just to get glib2-2.6.2, and gtk+2-2.6.2 to work right with gtk-doc I 
had to copy alot of the 10.3 tree into the 10.2-gcc3.3 (my) tree.  Well 
not alot but opensp4 openjade gmp gdbm3 libxml2 libxslt and gtk-doc.  
Tony Arnold helped me with pango and I had to edit the fontconfig2-dev 
package from the 10.3 tree to use it.  Would it be possible for these 
packages to be made available in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree or would they have 
to be specifically rewritten for some usage that I fail to see a problem 
with?  Also with the pango1-xft2 package I was originally working on 
would someone be able to point me in the right direction as to how to 
get that to work with and recognize freetype2 libraries and fontconfig2 
libraries installed in the fink directory? Because as I saw that to be a 
problem I wrote full packages for those to satisfy that problem.  Also 
what is the major use of the gtk-doc portion of these?  Would it just be 
better to leave them disabled?

Mike S
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 2.6.2

[Michael]

Tony Arnold wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 17/02/2005, at 9:20 AM, Michael wrote:
OK, this is my first time posting here, I think, so forgive me if I 
brreak some rule about posting, I am completely new at this.  I have 
been trying to get ahold of the maintainer of the glib2 atk1 
pango1-xft2 and gtk+2 packages the gnome-core person.  Yesterday I 
learned this was a guy named Keith, but I never heard anything back.  
I read on this list that among others, the gtk+2 packages were really 
old.  looking at the source numbers for myself, 2.2 avail on fink I 
think and 2.6.2 avail on the gtk ftp site,  having heard nothing from 
this person, I took it upon myself and checked out the experimental 
tree and built some packages for myself, using glib-2.6.2 atk-1.9.0 
and gtk+-2.6.2 sources,  using the old ones as templates.(Kept 
Pango1-XFT2 as was) I have somewhat of an idea what I am doing so any 
input would be welcomed.  I posted to Fink-Users last night and got a 
reply that I should post here for this matter instead.  When building 
pango1-xft2 I had to manually build freetype-2.1.9, render, xrender, 
and fontconfig-2.2.99 and install them into usr/X11R6.  I read that 
this is because the version of fontconfig distributed with the 4.4.0 
sources of XFree86 are so old, that it would cause a problem.  And 
indeed it did.  For after I made those manual adjustments, plus 
building and installing expat-1.95.8 to /usr/X11R6 prefix it went off 
without a hitch.  Now It was also told me by that list that that type 
of "manual hacking" is against Fink's policy.  So is it ok with 
Fink's policies if I create packages for render xrender and 
fontconfig to be installed in /usr/X11R6 instead of fink's directory? 
(/sw for me) Normally I would think it was, but I know that Fink's 
XFree86 is installed into that directory, the only reason I don't use 
that is because I already had XDarwin on the 4.4.0 sources 
Downloaded, and on my slow machine compiling XFree takes like almost 
4 hours I think, (awhile anyway).  To sum it all up though, I am 
working on the 10.2-gcc3.3 unstable tree with OS X 10.2.8, if that 
helps, and the other packages seem to build fine, except I think 
there is one  bug I am still trying to work out, and I am still 
learning the ConfigParams, so I know I have something wrong because I 
get gcc errors with unrecognized options `-pthread' and `-03' (glib2 
I believe).

Another thing I  was wondering is if I would just make a fontconfig 
package for the normal installation of fink's directory, since there 
is a Freetype2 package also for fink.  But if that were the case 
would I also have to update fink's Freetype2 package to build the 
2.1.9 sources, instead of the 2.1.3

You've got the right list :)
Let's start at the top:
1. Obviously the easiest way to get the latest versions of everything 
running would be to install X.org's Xserver (is this even available 
under 10.2? I don't know), or XFree86 4.4.x. I have successfully 
compiled the entire GNOME 2.10 tree from gnome's CVS HEAD against 
Apple's bundled version of XFree86 (4.3.0), but I'm not entirely sure 
what else might be missing from a Mac OS X 10.2 install 
(libXplugin.dylib might not be there I think).

Obviously you can get around the expat problems (somewhat) by 
installing Fink's expat package, but the fontconfig and freetype 
issues are a little harder - I have .info files here for a newer 
version of fontconfig2-dev and freetype2 (which would allow you to 
build these packages without mucking with your /usr/X11R6 directory), 
and you're more than welcome to those, but you will need to face the 
issue at some point that average users aren't going to want to 
manually compile versions of software outside their Fink tree.

Guh, roll on modularised Xserver... one day this will all be an 
annoying memory :)

2. You should have a look at the freetype2* packages in Alexander 
Strange's experimental directory in CVS - there was some discussion 
about bundling a newer version of freetype2 with Fink recently on the 
Fink-devel list - go back and have a look in the archives. We do need 
a newer version of freetype2 - I believe there are packages that don't 
work correctly with more recent versions though, so people are still 
working on it.

Your ConfigureParams problems are twofold:
1. -pthreads is harmless - it does nothing on Darwin as a CFLAG, so 
just ignore it (if you've manually added it to any of the fields, 
remove it)
2. -03 should be -O3 (that's an o, not a zero), however, I would 
recommend you don't turn on optimisations until after you've tested 
your packages, or (at the very least), make it '-g -O3' so that 
debugging information will be included - you'll generally find this 
specified under the SetCFLAGS field.

Let us know if you get stuck! I've been helping fix the more common 
Darwin/Mac OS X problems in GNOME CVS HEAD lately, so GNOME 2.10+ 
should compile without a whole lot of modification (well... I can't 
back that up *grin*) - there

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 2.6.2

[Tony Arnold]

Hi Mike,
On 17/02/2005, at 9:20 AM, Michael wrote:
OK, this is my first time posting here, I think, so forgive me if I 
brreak some rule about posting, I am completely new at this.  I have 
been trying to get ahold of the maintainer of the glib2 atk1 
pango1-xft2 and gtk+2 packages the gnome-core person.  Yesterday I 
learned this was a guy named Keith, but I never heard anything back.  
I read on this list that among others, the gtk+2 packages were really 
old.  looking at the source numbers for myself, 2.2 avail on fink I 
think and 2.6.2 avail on the gtk ftp site,  having heard nothing from 
this person, I took it upon myself and checked out the experimental 
tree and built some packages for myself, using glib-2.6.2 atk-1.9.0 
and gtk+-2.6.2 sources,  using the old ones as templates.(Kept 
Pango1-XFT2 as was) I have somewhat of an idea what I am doing so any 
input would be welcomed.  I posted to Fink-Users last night and got a 
reply that I should post here for this matter instead.  When building 
pango1-xft2 I had to manually build freetype-2.1.9, render, xrender, 
and fontconfig-2.2.99 and install them into usr/X11R6.  I read that 
this is because the version of fontconfig distributed with the 4.4.0 
sources of XFree86 are so old, that it would cause a problem.  And 
indeed it did.  For after I made those manual adjustments, plus 
building and installing expat-1.95.8 to /usr/X11R6 prefix it went off 
without a hitch.  Now It was also told me by that list that that type 
of "manual hacking" is against Fink's policy.  So is it ok with Fink's 
policies if I create packages for render xrender and fontconfig to be 
installed in /usr/X11R6 instead of fink's directory? (/sw for me) 
Normally I would think it was, but I know that Fink's XFree86 is 
installed into that directory, the only reason I don't use that is 
because I already had XDarwin on the 4.4.0 sources Downloaded, and on 
my slow machine compiling XFree takes like almost 4 hours I think, 
(awhile anyway).  To sum it all up though, I am working on the 
10.2-gcc3.3 unstable tree with OS X 10.2.8, if that helps, and the 
other packages seem to build fine, except I think there is one  bug I 
am still trying to work out, and I am still learning the ConfigParams, 
so I know I have something wrong because I get gcc errors with 
unrecognized options `-pthread' and `-03' (glib2 I believe).

Another thing I  was wondering is if I would just make a fontconfig 
package for the normal installation of fink's directory, since there 
is a Freetype2 package also for fink.  But if that were the case would 
I also have to update fink's Freetype2 package to build the 2.1.9 
sources, instead of the 2.1.3
You've got the right list :)
Let's start at the top:
1. Obviously the easiest way to get the latest versions of everything 
running would be to install X.org's Xserver (is this even available 
under 10.2? I don't know), or XFree86 4.4.x. I have successfully 
compiled the entire GNOME 2.10 tree from gnome's CVS HEAD against 
Apple's bundled version of XFree86 (4.3.0), but I'm not entirely sure 
what else might be missing from a Mac OS X 10.2 install 
(libXplugin.dylib might not be there I think).

Obviously you can get around the expat problems (somewhat) by 
installing Fink's expat package, but the fontconfig and freetype issues 
are a little harder - I have .info files here for a newer version of 
fontconfig2-dev and freetype2 (which would allow you to build these 
packages without mucking with your /usr/X11R6 directory), and you're 
more than welcome to those, but you will need to face the issue at some 
point that average users aren't going to want to manually compile 
versions of software outside their Fink tree.

Guh, roll on modularised Xserver... one day this will all be an 
annoying memory :)

2. You should have a look at the freetype2* packages in Alexander 
Strange's experimental directory in CVS - there was some discussion 
about bundling a newer version of freetype2 with Fink recently on the 
Fink-devel list - go back and have a look in the archives. We do need a 
newer version of freetype2 - I believe there are packages that don't 
work correctly with more recent versions though, so people are still 
working on it.

Your ConfigureParams problems are twofold:
1. -pthreads is harmless - it does nothing on Darwin as a CFLAG, so 
just ignore it (if you've manually added it to any of the fields, 
remove it)
2. -03 should be -O3 (that's an o, not a zero), however, I would 
recommend you don't turn on optimisations until after you've tested 
your packages, or (at the very least), make it '-g -O3' so that 
debugging information will be included - you'll generally find this 
specified under the SetCFLAGS field.

Let us know if you get stuck! I've been helping fix the more common 
Darwin/Mac OS X problems in GNOME CVS HEAD lately, so GNOME 2.10+ 
should compile without a whole lot of modification (well... I can't 
back that up *grin*) - there are a lot of experts

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 2.6.2

[David R. Morrison]

Dear Mike,
I think its great that you're interested in getting more modern 
versions of the gnome packages working on 10.2.  Most of the fink 
developers are now working on 10.3 or beyond, but I'm hoping you'll get 
some help from the readers of this list in your quest.

  Yours,
  Dave
On Feb 16, 2005, at 5:20 PM, Michael wrote:
OK, this is my first time posting here, I think, so forgive me if I 
brreak some rule about posting, I am completely new at this.  I have 
been trying to get ahold of the maintainer of the glib2 atk1 
pango1-xft2 and gtk+2 packages the gnome-core person.  Yesterday I 
learned this was a guy named Keith, but I never heard anything back.  
I read on this list that among others, the gtk+2 packages were really 
old.  looking at the source numbers for myself, 2.2 avail on fink I 
think and 2.6.2 avail on the gtk ftp site,  having heard nothing from 
this person, I took it upon myself and checked out the experimental 
tree and built some packages for myself, using glib-2.6.2 atk-1.9.0 
and gtk+-2.6.2 sources,  using the old ones as templates.(Kept 
Pango1-XFT2 as was) I have somewhat of an idea what I am doing so any 
input would be welcomed.  I posted to Fink-Users last night and got a 
reply that I should post here for this matter instead.  When building 
pango1-xft2 I had to manually build freetype-2.1.9, render, xrender, 
and fontconfig-2.2.99 and install them into usr/X11R6.  I read that 
this is because the version of fontconfig distributed with the 4.4.0 
sources of XFree86 are so old, that it would cause a problem.  And 
indeed it did.  For after I made those manual adjustments, plus 
building and installing expat-1.95.8 to /usr/X11R6 prefix it went off 
without a hitch.  Now It was also told me by that list that that type 
of "manual hacking" is against Fink's policy.  So is it ok with Fink's 
policies if I create packages for render xrender and fontconfig to be 
installed in /usr/X11R6 instead of fink's directory? (/sw for me) 
Normally I would think it was, but I know that Fink's XFree86 is 
installed into that directory, the only reason I don't use that is 
because I already had XDarwin on the 4.4.0 sources Downloaded, and on 
my slow machine compiling XFree takes like almost 4 hours I think, 
(awhile anyway).  To sum it all up though, I am working on the 
10.2-gcc3.3 unstable tree with OS X 10.2.8, if that helps, and the 
other packages seem to build fine, except I think there is one  bug I 
am still trying to work out, and I am still learning the ConfigParams, 
so I know I have something wrong because I get gcc errors with 
unrecognized options `-pthread' and `-03' (glib2 I believe).

Another thing I  was wondering is if I would just make a fontconfig 
package for the normal installation of fink's directory, since there 
is a Freetype2 package also for fink.  But if that were the case would 
I also have to update fink's Freetype2 package to build the 2.1.9 
sources, instead of the 2.1.3?

Again if this is the wrong board I apologize.
Mike S

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real 
users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 2.6.2

[Michael]

OK, this is my first time posting here, I think, so forgive me if I 
brreak some rule about posting, I am completely new at this.  I have 
been trying to get ahold of the maintainer of the glib2 atk1 pango1-xft2 
and gtk+2 packages the gnome-core person.  Yesterday I learned this was 
a guy named Keith, but I never heard anything back.  I read on this list 
that among others, the gtk+2 packages were really old.  looking at the 
source numbers for myself, 2.2 avail on fink I think and 2.6.2 avail on 
the gtk ftp site,  having heard nothing from this person, I took it upon 
myself and checked out the experimental tree and built some packages for 
myself, using glib-2.6.2 atk-1.9.0 and gtk+-2.6.2 sources,  using the 
old ones as templates.(Kept Pango1-XFT2 as was) I have somewhat of an 
idea what I am doing so any input would be welcomed.  I posted to 
Fink-Users last night and got a reply that I should post here for this 
matter instead.  When building pango1-xft2 I had to manually build 
freetype-2.1.9, render, xrender, and fontconfig-2.2.99 and install them 
into usr/X11R6.  I read that this is because the version of fontconfig 
distributed with the 4.4.0 sources of XFree86 are so old, that it would 
cause a problem.  And indeed it did.  For after I made those manual 
adjustments, plus building and installing expat-1.95.8 to /usr/X11R6 
prefix it went off without a hitch.  Now It was also told me by that 
list that that type of "manual hacking" is against Fink's policy.  So is 
it ok with Fink's policies if I create packages for render xrender and 
fontconfig to be installed in /usr/X11R6 instead of fink's directory? 
(/sw for me) Normally I would think it was, but I know that Fink's 
XFree86 is installed into that directory, the only reason I don't use 
that is because I already had XDarwin on the 4.4.0 sources Downloaded, 
and on my slow machine compiling XFree takes like almost 4 hours I 
think, (awhile anyway).  To sum it all up though, I am working on the 
10.2-gcc3.3 unstable tree with OS X 10.2.8, if that helps, and the other 
packages seem to build fine, except I think there is one  bug I am still 
trying to work out, and I am still learning the ConfigParams, so I know 
I have something wrong because I get gcc errors with unrecognized 
options `-pthread' and `-03' (glib2 I believe).

Another thing I  was wondering is if I would just make a fontconfig 
package for the normal installation of fink's directory, since there is 
a Freetype2 package also for fink.  But if that were the case would I 
also have to update fink's Freetype2 package to build the 2.1.9 sources, 
instead of the 2.1.3?

Again if this is the wrong board I apologize.
Mike S

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: libpng3 (was Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1)

[David R. Morrison]

Hi Martin.  Ben Reed and I discussed this a bit on IRC after I sent my
previous message.  He tells me that this libpng problem has been a
problem with libpng on Linux as well, that it doesn't behave as a
library is expected to do when you upgrade.  That gives me some real
hope that we won't have a repeat of this situation with XFree86 or
other upgrades.  So, no "Boom!", I hope!

  -- Dave


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: libpng3 (was Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1)

[Martin Costabel]

David R. Morrison wrote:
[]
As far as I can tell, you would be able to build foo with libpng headers
installed, just fine.  Everything will have libpng support compiled in, and
then at link time, you are linking against libpng3.dylib and all symbols are 
This part I don't understand: How would foo even know that it wants to 
link against libpng.3.dylib when it only sees libpng.2.dylib during 
build time? It links to -lpng, and /sw/lib/libpng.dylib is a symlink to 
libpng.2.dylib in your scenario.

successfully resolved, so everything is still fine.  It is only at
execution time that the mismatch is detected.
In the case of the gimp help browser, the scenario was different, I 
think, and not caused by any problem with Fink's build process, but by a 
principal problem of the shlibs policy:

gimp-1.2.3-10 (this was the version that showed the problem, the newer 
one eliminated it by depending on libpng3) build-depends on libpng and 
depends on libpng-shlibs. The gimp helpbrowser of this version therefore 
links with libpng.2.dylib. It also links with libgtkxmhtml.1.dylib from 
gnome-libs-shlibs. So far no problem, while the latter links with 
libpng.2.dylib, too. Next, gnome-libs-shlibs is upgraded to a new 
version that has a dependency on libpng3. libgtkxmhtml.1.dylib now links 
with libpng.3.dylib.

When helpbrowser is run, the dynamical linker loads libpng.2.dylib, then 
libgtkxmhtml.1.dylib and then libpng.3.dylib (confirmed by looking at 
DYLD_PRINT_LIBRARIES). At this point, the famous error message appears. 
Everything was compiled correctly, though.

Something similar might happen with the different xfree versions:

Binary foo is built while xfree-4.2 is installed. It links with -lXft 
which has the install-name /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.1.dylib. foo also links 
with library libbar.1.dylib which is linked with -lXft, too. Now xfree 
is upgraded to 4.3.0 and package libbar is rebuilt. libbar.1.dylib now 
links with what libXft.dylib is symlinked to at this moment, namely 
libXft.2.1.dylib with install-name /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.2.dylib.

At runtime of foo, dyld loads first libXft.1.dylib (yes, this still 
exists in xfree-4.3.0 for compatibility reasons!), then libbar.1.dylib, 
then libXft.2.dylib. Boom! (Or maybe not?)

--
Martin








---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: libpng3 (was Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1)

[Benjamin Reed]

David R. Morrison wrote:

Well, I hope not.  I still don't fully understand what is happening with the
libpng/libpng3 business, but I strongly suspect the following scenario.  You
ask fink to install "foo" and it also requires "bar" so fink is going to
install both at once.  Let's say foo depends on libpng3 and bar depends on
libpng.  What does fink do?
  1) First loads libpng3 because thats what foo wants
  2) Next loads libpng because thats what bar wants
  3) Successfully compiles bar, linked to libpng.
  4) Manages to compile foo, with libpng still installed, because the
dependecies are not checked a second time just prior to building.
Yup, I'm pretty sure that's how it's triggered.  That also supports the 
fact that a rebuild of the offending package usually puts it right as well.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

libpng3 (was Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1)

[David R. Morrison]

On Mar 6,2003 21:45:17 +0100, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :

>But I suspect that as soon as you start compiling things under 4.3.0, 
>there will be conflicts of the libpng/libpng3 variety (one version of 
>library loaded directly, another one indirectly -> crash)

Well, I hope not.  I still don't fully understand what is happening with the
libpng/libpng3 business, but I strongly suspect the following scenario.  You
ask fink to install "foo" and it also requires "bar" so fink is going to
install both at once.  Let's say foo depends on libpng3 and bar depends on
libpng.  What does fink do?
  1) First loads libpng3 because thats what foo wants
  2) Next loads libpng because thats what bar wants
  3) Successfully compiles bar, linked to libpng.
  4) Manages to compile foo, with libpng still installed, because the
dependecies are not checked a second time just prior to building.

As far as I can tell, you would be able to build foo with libpng headers
installed, just fine.  Everything will have libpng support compiled in, and
then at link time, you are linking against libpng3.dylib and all symbols are 
successfully resolved, so everything is still fine.  It is only at
execution time that the mismatch is detected.

Does this scenario make sense to anyone else?  Has anybody seen a symptom
which is not consistent with this?

  -- Dave





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1

[Martin Costabel]

David R. Morrison wrote:
[]
Martin, I'd like to understand this situation better.  Are there specific
libraries which have been updated for 4.3?  Were the updates done in a
properly versioned manner?  If so, then packages which are compiled under
4.3 will link to the new versions, and packages compiled under 4.2 will
link to the old versions.  So long as we keep the different versions in
separate fink packages, a smooth transition should be possible.
Here is, for example, a list of libraries in 4.3.0 that aren't in 4.2.1

/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libOSMesa.4.0.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libXcursor.1.0.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libXft.2.0.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libXft.2.1.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libXrandr.2.0.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libXrender.1.2.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libXv.1.0.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libexpat.1.0.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libfontconfig.1.0.dylib
/usr/X11R6_4.3.0/lib/libfreetype.6.3.dylib
Some of them are higher versions (Xft, Xrandr, Xrender, freetype), and 
the others must correspond to new APIs which I don't know anything about.

The updated ones are done in a proper manner, so that compatibility is 
guaranteed in one direction, at least.
But I suspect that as soon as you start compiling things under 4.3.0, 
there will be conflicts of the libpng/libpng3 variety (one version of 
library loaded directly, another one indirectly -> crash)
Then, as has been detected from the case of pango, some headers have 
disappeared in 4.3.0. Others are new in 4.3.0.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1

[David R. Morrison]

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This was already on the beginners and users lists, and it is mentioned 
> in the pango description.
> 
> Recompile doesn't work, the packages need to be ported to xfree-4.3.0.
> 
> I said it some time ago, but it was considered too pessimistic at that 
> time:
> 
> The upgrade from xfree-4.2 to 4.3 has some unpleasant similarities to 
> the Jaguar upgrade.
> 
> - There are packages that won't compile under 4.3
> - Packages and libraries compiled under 4.3 will not work under 4.2, in 
> general, so you can't go back. "In general" may concern only very few 
> packages if we are lucky.
> - The threaded vs non-threaded issue has not been solved. Threaded is 
> now the default, so on the subject of Matlab, the ball is in 
> Apple's/Matlab's field now, but the fact remains that Matlab doesn't 
> work with 4.3.0.
> 
> IMHO there should be some big red warnings somewhere.
> 

Martin, I'd like to understand this situation better.  Are there specific
libraries which have been updated for 4.3?  Were the updates done in a
properly versioned manner?  If so, then packages which are compiled under
4.3 will link to the new versions, and packages compiled under 4.2 will
link to the old versions.  So long as we keep the different versions in
separate fink packages, a smooth transition should be possible.

(I'm not sure that we've done this yet, but it should be possible to
repackage things with this in mind.)

I don't have a good answer for the threaded issue, though.  Is Matlab the
only affected package?

The Jaguar upgrade was much worse, because the change of compiler produced
changes which were not tracked by library versioning.

  -- Dave





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1

[Martin Costabel]

On jeudi, mars 6, 2003, at 14:54 Europe/Paris, thomas kotzian wrote:
[]
configure: error: pangoxft Pango backend found, but Xft not found
### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
Failed: compiling gtk+2-2.0.9-3 failed
does pango need a recompile - which other packages too??
This was already on the beginners and users lists, and it is mentioned 
in the pango description.

Recompile doesn't work, the packages need to be ported to xfree-4.3.0.

I said it some time ago, but it was considered too pessimistic at that 
time:

The upgrade from xfree-4.2 to 4.3 has some unpleasant similarities to 
the Jaguar upgrade.

- There are packages that won't compile under 4.3
- Packages and libraries compiled under 4.3 will not work under 4.2, in 
general, so you can't go back. "In general" may concern only very few 
packages if we are lucky.
- The threaded vs non-threaded issue has not been solved. Threaded is 
now the default, so on the subject of Matlab, the ball is in 
Apple's/Matlab's field now, but the fact remains that Matlab doesn't 
work with 4.3.0.

IMHO there should be some big red warnings somewhere.

--
Martin




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1

[Max Horn]

Am Donnerstag, 06.03.03 um 14:54 Uhr schrieb thomas kotzian:

I have upgraded xfree86 to 4.3.0 with the xfree86-upgrade script. 
gtk+2 cannot compile and exits with:

checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes
checking for XRenderFindFormat in -lXrender... yes
checking for XftFontOpen in -lXft... yes
checking X11/Xft/XftFreetype.h usability... no
checking X11/Xft/XftFreetype.h presence... no
checking for X11/Xft/XftFreetype.h... no
configure: error: pangoxft Pango backend found, but Xft not found
### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
Failed: compiling gtk+2-2.0.9-3 failed
does pango need a recompile - which other packages too??

AFAIK GTK+ 2.0.x doesn't work with XFree86 4.3, while 2.1 doesn't work 
with XFree86 4.2, or something like this. Masanori sent a post on this 
subject some time ago (which was never addressed, hence I was somewhat 
upset when XFree86 4.3 was put into unstable w/o taking care of this... 
but that's past now )

Maybe for the time being, we should add a Conflicts to GTK+2 that 
prevents it from being used with XFree86.

Max



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2-2.0.9-3 problems with xfree86-4.3.0-1

[thomas kotzian]

I have upgraded xfree86 to 4.3.0 with the xfree86-upgrade script. gtk+2 
cannot compile and exits with:

checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes
checking for XRenderFindFormat in -lXrender... yes
checking for XftFontOpen in -lXft... yes
checking X11/Xft/XftFreetype.h usability... no
checking X11/Xft/XftFreetype.h presence... no
checking for X11/Xft/XftFreetype.h... no
configure: error: pangoxft Pango backend found, but Xft not found
### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
Failed: compiling gtk+2-2.0.9-3 failed
does pango need a recompile - which other packages too??

thanks, thomas

--
thomas kotzian, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 and gtk-engines still depend on libpng

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi developers,
(ps sorry for the previous message that was sent accidentally 
subject-less)

I have been using a modified Gtk+2 build, set to depend on libpng3, to 
run ROX Filer and everything works fine - should the dependencies on 
gtk+2 and gtk-engines be changed to reflect the upgrade to libpng3?

Thanks Masanori for the good work :). The only thing I would like now 
is pango 1.1.2 but I understand it would have to wait for XFree 4.3 and 
fontconfig

Regards,

- - Michel

Public key:
http://salimma.freeshell.org/files/crypto/publickey.asc

Fingerprint:
2030 FCC0 39EF 8BB6 1518  8BAA B469 B1DE B58A 8357

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAj5Kcr8ACgkQtGmx3rWKg1e3eACgyMx3+kJz2657JypKIKS29A9Q
BikAoNA3DB2m7g/dIpQzM5ZM7GOrT9QY
=dyJf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 compiling errors (ld: multiple definitions)

[David R. Morrison]

Robert Isenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I hope mailing this list is the correct place, but I've tried to email 
> the maintainer of the gtk+2 package, but I get an automatic email back 
> from his email provider saying that he is over his quota, so it won't 
> receive the message!!!
> 
> I'm having problems compiling GTK+2.0.6-2.  It was working when fink 
> installed it, but when I try to manually compile from the package in 
> the /sw/src directory I also get errors.  (I'm assuming the packages in 
> that directory are the versions that fink has already patched - is this 
> correct?).

Nope.

The tarball in /sw/src is just the one which is downloaded from the
remote site.  Fink first unpacks that tarball, and then (in the "patch
phase") applies a patch and/or runs a patchscript.  See the packaging
documentation for lots of details.  From the descriptions given there,
you can replicate everything Fink does, step by step.

  -- Dave




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 compiling errors (ld: multiple definitions)

[Robert Isenberg]

Hi,

I hope mailing this list is the correct place, but I've tried to email the maintainer of the gtk+2 package, but I get an automatic email back from his email provider saying that he is over his quota, so it won't receive the message!!!

I'm having problems compiling GTK+2.0.6-2.  It was working when fink installed it, but when I try to manually compile from the package in the /sw/src directory I also get errors.  (I'm assuming the packages in that directory are the versions that fink has already patched - is this correct?).

What I have done is as follows:

1. I installed downloaded the source version of gtk+2
2. I uninstalled it
3. I went to the /sw/src directory and unarchived the gtk+2 package
4. I went into the gtk+-2.0.6 directory created
5. I make sure the environment variables are set as specified in fink documentation i.e.

setenv CFLAGS -I/sw/include
setenv LDFLAGS -L/sw/lib
setenv CXXFLAGS $CFLAGS
setenv CPPFLAGS $CXXFLAGS
6. Then I run ./configure which completes and seems to have no problems
7. I run make and it terminates with the following errors:


/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc  -I/sw/include -Wall -L/sw/lib -o libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la -rpath /usr/local/lib -version-info 0:6:0 -export-symbols-regex "^[^_].*" gdk-pixbuf.lo gdk-pixbuf-animation.lo gdk-pixbuf-data.lo gdk-pixbuf-io.lo gdk-pixbuf-loader.lo gdk-pixbuf-scale.lo gdk-pixbuf-util.lo gdk-pixdata.lo gdk-pixbuf-enum-types.lo pixops/libpixops.la   -L/sw/lib -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -liconv-lm -liconv -lintl -liconv
rm -fr .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.* .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.*
generating symbol list for `libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la'
/usr/bin/nm -p  gdk-pixbuf.lo gdk-pixbuf-animation.lo gdk-pixbuf-data.lo gdk-pixbuf-io.lo gdk-pixbuf-loader.lo gdk-pixbuf-scale.lo gdk-pixbuf-util.lo gdk-pixdata.lo gdk-pixbuf-enum-types.lo  pixops/.libs/libpixops.al | sed -n -e 's/^.*[  ]\([BCDEGRST][BCDEGRST]*\)[   ][  ]*\(_\)\([_A-Za-z][_A-Za-z0-9]*\)$/\1 \2\3 \3/p' | sed 's/.* //' | sort | uniq > .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.exp
egrep -e "^[^_].*" ".libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.exp" > ".libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.expT"
mv -f ".libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.expT" ".libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.exp"
gcc -dynamiclib -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.0.0.6.dylib  gdk-pixbuf.lo gdk-pixbuf-animation.lo gdk-pixbuf-data.lo gdk-pixbuf-io.lo gdk-pixbuf-loader.lo gdk-pixbuf-scale.lo gdk-pixbuf-util.lo gdk-pixdata.lo gdk-pixbuf-enum-types.lo -all_load  pixops/.libs/libpixops.al  -L/sw/lib pixops/.libs/libpixops.al -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lm -lintl -liconv -lc -install_name  /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.0.dylib -compatibility_version 1 -current_version 1.6
ld: multiple definitions of symbol _pixops_composite
pixops/.libs/libpixops.al(pixops.lo) definition of _pixops_composite in section (__TEXT,__text)
pixops/.libs/libpixops.al(pixops.lo) definition of _pixops_composite in section (__TEXT,__text)
ld: multiple definitions of symbol _pixops_composite_color
pixops/.libs/libpixops.al(pixops.lo) definition of _pixops_composite_color in section (__TEXT,__text)
pixops/.libs/libpixops.al(pixops.lo) definition of _pixops_composite_color in section (__TEXT,__text)
ld: multiple definitions of symbol _pixops_scale
pixops/.libs/libpixops.al(pixops.lo) definition of _pixops_scale in section (__TEXT,__text)
pixops/.libs/libpixops.al(pixops.lo) definition of _pixops_scale in section (__TEXT,__text)
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _locale_charset
/sw/lib/libiconv.dylib(localcharset.lo) definition of _locale_charset
/sw/lib/libintl.dylib(localcharset.lo) definition of _locale_charset
/usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
make[3]: *** [libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1



Am I doing something wrong or is there a problem with this package?  Some other information:

- I am running Mac OS X (10.2.3)
- I have got the Dec 2002 developers tools
- I DO NOT have the gtk+2-dev or gtk+2-shlibs packages installed *

* I was unsure whether these were necessary to manually compile gtk+2.  I couldn't see find separate packages for them in the /sw/src directory, so I kind of assumed they must be build too when you compile the gtk+-2.0.6 package.  Perhaps my misunderstanding here is the problem?


If you have any information, or suggestions I would really appreciate it.  I really need to be able to compile this package.

Thanks,


Robert

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVS changes?

[jfm]

And I forgot : in the configure part, I have :

checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no


JF Mertens



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVS changes?

[jfm]

On Thursday, Oct 31, 2002, at 20:06 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote:


I tried building gtk+2-2.0.6-2 and it failed with this:

rm -fr .libs/im-viqr.la .libs/im-viqr.* .libs/im-viqr.*
ar cru .libs/im-viqr.a imviqr.lo
ranlib .libs/im-viqr.a
creating im-viqr.la
(cd .libs && rm -f im-viqr.la && ln -s ../im-viqr.la im-viqr.la)
../../gtk/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 *.la > gtk.immodules
gtk-query-immodules-2.0: can't map file: 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/ ((os/kern) 
invalid argument)

I get here (wth fink yesterday from cvs) :

rm -fr .libs/im-viqr.la .libs/im-viqr.* .libs/im-viqr.*
(cd . && ln -s imviqr.lo imviqr.o)
gcc -bundle -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/im-viqr.so  
imviqr.lo
-L/Volumes/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/gdk/.libs -L/usr/X11R6/lib
-L/Volumes/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/gdk-pixbuf/.libs -L/sw/lib 
-L../../gdk-pixbuf/.libs
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -L../../gdk/.libs -lgdk-x11-2.0 -L../../gtk/.libs 
-lgtk-x11-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0
-lpango-1.0 -latk-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lm -lintl 
-liconv -lc
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _locale_charset
/sw/lib/libiconv.dylib(localcharset.lo) definition of _locale_charset
/sw/lib/libintl.dylib(localcharset.lo) definition of _locale_charset
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _FT_GlyphLoader_New
/sw/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib(ftbase.lo) definition of _FT_GlyphLoader_New
/usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib(ftbase.o) definition of 
_FT_GlyphLoader_New
many similar "ld: warning"'s
creating im-viqr.la
(cd .libs && rm -f im-viqr.la && ln -s ../im-viqr.la im-viqr.la)
../../gtk/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 *.la > gtk.immodules
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.

I don't go through this ar and ranlib, but create an im-viqr.so instead 
of im-viqr.a
And all the im-*** in /sw/lib/gtk-2.0/2.0.0/immodules (as well as the 
libpixbufloader-***
in /sw/lib/gtk-2.0/2.0.0/loaders) are a pair ***.so ***.la...

JF Mertens



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVSchanges?

[Alexander Hansen]

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 14:06, Max Horn wrote:
> I tried building gtk+2-2.0.6-2 and it failed with this:

> 
> * does this package build correctly for all of you with fink 0.11.0 ?
> * assuming the answer to the above is "yes", any idea what could 
> cause this problem?

It built fine for me with fink 0.11..

> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Max
> -- 
> ---
> Max Horn
> Software Developer
> 
> email: 
> phone: (+49) 6151-494890
> 
> 
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
> ___
> Fink-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
> 
-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University 
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 build failure - maybe due to fink CVS changes?

[Max Horn]

I tried building gtk+2-2.0.6-2 and it failed with this:


rm -fr .libs/im-viqr.la .libs/im-viqr.* .libs/im-viqr.*
ar cru .libs/im-viqr.a imviqr.lo
ranlib .libs/im-viqr.a
creating im-viqr.la
(cd .libs && rm -f im-viqr.la && ln -s ../im-viqr.la im-viqr.la)
../../gtk/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 *.la > gtk.immodules
gtk-query-immodules-2.0: can't map file: 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/ ((os/kern) 
invalid argument)
Cannot load module 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/im-am-et.la: unknown 
error for /sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/im-am-et.la does not 
export GTK+ IM module API: unknown error for 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/
gtk-query-immodules-2.0: can't map file: 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/ ((os/kern) 
invalid argument)
Cannot load module 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/im-cyrillic-translit.la: 
unknown error for 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/im-cyrillic-translit.la 
does not export GTK+ IM module API: unknown error for 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/
[...]
gtk-query-immodules-2.0: can't map file: 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/ ((os/kern) 
invalid argument)
Cannot load module 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/im-xim.la: unknown 
error for /sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/im-xim.la does not 
export GTK+ IM module API: unknown error for 
/sw/src/gtk+2-2.0.6-2/gtk+-2.0.6/modules/input/.libs/
make[3]: *** [gtk.immodules] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
### execution of  failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling gtk+2-2.0.6-2 failed



Note that I am using a system bootstrapped with the current fink from 
CVS which has the experimental CPATH etc. changes. So I'd like to 
know:

* does this package build correctly for all of you with fink 0.11.0 ?
* assuming the answer to the above is "yes", any idea what could 
cause this problem?



Cheers,

Max
--
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 fonts

[Ben Hines]

the gtk+2 package should do

RunTimeVars: GDK_USE_XFT: 1

or setenv GDK_USE_XFT 1

So the fonts use xft properly. This enables packages like "gftp" to 
work without causing "font fallback" errors. It also gives you 
antialiased fonts. Very nice looking:

http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/xchat.png

-Ben



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now
for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664
http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel