Lenovo athlon laptop

2011-12-22 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Hello,

I bought a lenovo laptop (cpu amd dual core, graphics is radeon 6250

Everything woks, except the graphics that only works with driver vga at
1024x768.

if I use the ati  driver, it works in 1366x800 (that is the panel
resolution,
it works ok, but ONLY ONCE, that is, the gdm program opens the 
login menu, I log in, works all the applications: libreoffice, nautilus,
firefox,
audio, video 
but when I log off, then gdm resets the display and all I can see it is
a black screen.
if I reset the screen several times (about 16 times , by killing gdm)
using an ssh session... 
the login screen appears OK...

Seems that the ati driver is mapping the fb wrong...

Thanks for any help,

Sergio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-20 Thread Warren Block

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:

The laptop is a compaq cq62 with a quad core phenom and a ATI 4200 Radeon 
mobility GPU, as well as 6300 GPU.


Sorry, I can't find any specs for a CQ62 with both ATI and NVidia. 
There's a trademark name for the dual GPU systems, at least the 
Intel-plus-something-else kind, but I can't recall it.


The HTPC/desktop is a whitebox quad core phenom on a ASUS MB (not 100% sure 
which) with a NVidia onboard pcie GPU, and an ATI Radeon 3450. There could be 
yet another GPU on there, but I can't remember.


That system is running 8.x FBSD (1 or 2- can't quite remember),


The start of /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be interesting, both for the 
version of FreeBSD and the version of xorg-server.  I don't think I 
have anything with dual PCIe X16 slots to test.


and the laptop I'm installing 9.0-RC3 on, with the view to using 
freebsd-update to RELEASE, because of the lack of Atheros 9285 support 
in 8.x (tried for hours, just couldn't get the bird to fly :( ).


From what I understand now, having been able assimilate what has been 
discussed here and through google, it seems there is a conflict when dealing 
with multiple onboard GPUs. What exactly is the issue with getting an arbiter 
for FreeBSD? Aside from time, naturally.


Usually it's finding someone able to do the work that's willing to do 
the work.  The Foundation is funding some of that, and I've heard 
they're interested in getting the KMS for the Radeon driver going.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-20 Thread Da Rock

On 12/21/11 07:39, Warren Block wrote:

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:

The laptop is a compaq cq62 with a quad core phenom and a ATI 4200 
Radeon mobility GPU, as well as 6300 GPU.


Sorry, I can't find any specs for a CQ62 with both ATI and NVidia. 
There's a trademark name for the dual GPU systems, at least the 
Intel-plus-something-else kind, but I can't recall it.

No, no- you won't. Both cards in the laptop are ATI.

The HTPC has an onboard NVidia, and a PCIe 16x ATI.


The HTPC/desktop is a whitebox quad core phenom on a ASUS MB (not 
100% sure which) with a NVidia onboard pcie GPU, and an ATI Radeon 
3450. There could be yet another GPU on there, but I can't remember.


That system is running 8.x FBSD (1 or 2- can't quite remember),


The start of /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be interesting, both for the 
version of FreeBSD and the version of xorg-server.  I don't think I 
have anything with dual PCIe X16 slots to test.
I'll have to look closer at it when I get a spare breath, it is a little 
intriguing.


and the laptop I'm installing 9.0-RC3 on, with the view to using 
freebsd-update to RELEASE, because of the lack of Atheros 9285 
support in 8.x (tried for hours, just couldn't get the bird to fly :( ).


From what I understand now, having been able assimilate what has been 
discussed here and through google, it seems there is a conflict when 
dealing with multiple onboard GPUs. What exactly is the issue with 
getting an arbiter for FreeBSD? Aside from time, naturally.


Usually it's finding someone able to do the work that's willing to do 
the work.  The Foundation is funding some of that, and I've heard 
they're interested in getting the KMS for the Radeon driver going.
Is there anyone here that _can_ do the work? What about mentoring? As 
for the financials... thats something else to consider.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-19 Thread Da Rock
I hate to come with this kind of a query, but my googling hasn't come 
across a satisfactory answer.


I'm running an install on a brand new laptop for a client, and I'm 
trying to get X up using xdm- nothing. The logs says it failed to load 
fbdev because there is no data module.


I try uninstalling fbdev and running a rebuild of xorg- its still using 
the builtin configuration and still can't load fbdev. No devices detected.


I run Xorg -configure, and it shows the radeon card fine, 2 displays. 
Still working with the config file, but it seems fine.


WTF? This is essentially the same hardware as another laptop I've setup 
(same video card - same brand CPU, just bigger and faster), and its 
fine. Both are AMD, the original is athlon dual core, the new is phenom 
quad core.


The googling failed as my searches came up with either root has access 
and user doesn't, or mixed intel/ati. Neither are the case here...


Cheers
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-19 Thread Da Rock

On 12/19/11 21:31, Da Rock wrote:
I hate to come with this kind of a query, but my googling hasn't come 
across a satisfactory answer.


I'm running an install on a brand new laptop for a client, and I'm 
trying to get X up using xdm- nothing. The logs says it failed to load 
fbdev because there is no data module.


I try uninstalling fbdev and running a rebuild of xorg- its still 
using the builtin configuration and still can't load fbdev. No devices 
detected.


I run Xorg -configure, and it shows the radeon card fine, 2 displays. 
Still working with the config file, but it seems fine.
correction - its dual display issue that I've never had trouble with 
before (I also have installed on a HTPC with same memory, phenom quad 
core, uses a radeon HD card and a NVidia HD card). And no, the Xorg 
-config /root/xorg.conf.new [-retro] doesn't work as it is locking up 
and I can't even ctl-alt-backspace, I have to acpi power off to shut the 
system down. Google's still not giving me any hope... :( Last time I 
came across this level of issue was with a solo vintage intel card on 
yet another laptop- it froze the system too.


BTW, who says multicard vga is rare?
WTF? This is essentially the same hardware as another laptop I've 
setup (same video card - same brand CPU, just bigger and faster), and 
its fine. Both are AMD, the original is athlon dual core, the new is 
phenom quad core.


The googling failed as my searches came up with either root has access 
and user doesn't, or mixed intel/ati. Neither are the case here...


Cheers
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-19 Thread Warren Block

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:


On 12/19/11 21:31, Da Rock wrote:
I hate to come with this kind of a query, but my googling hasn't come 
across a satisfactory answer.


I'm running an install on a brand new laptop for a client, and I'm trying 
to get X up using xdm- nothing. The logs says it failed to load fbdev 
because there is no data module.


I try uninstalling fbdev and running a rebuild of xorg- its still using the 
builtin configuration and still can't load fbdev. No devices detected.


I run Xorg -configure, and it shows the radeon card fine, 2 displays. Still 
working with the config file, but it seems fine.
correction - its dual display issue that I've never had trouble with before 
(I also have installed on a HTPC with same memory, phenom quad core, uses a 
radeon HD card and a NVidia HD card). And no, the Xorg -config 
/root/xorg.conf.new [-retro] doesn't work as it is locking up and I can't 
even ctl-alt-backspace, I have to acpi power off to shut the system down. 
Google's still not giving me any hope... :( Last time I came across this 
level of issue was with a solo vintage intel card on yet another laptop- it 
froze the system too.


BTW, who says multicard vga is rare?


Some newer laptops have dual GPUs, an onboard Intel combined with one 
from another vendor for higher performance.  There's hot-switching 
between the two, but AFAIK it's not supported in FreeBSD.  There may be 
a BIOS option to disable one or the other.  There should still be two 
video outputs.


More than one video card at a time is a different issue, which is also 
unsupported on FreeBSD AFAIK:

(WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-19 Thread Da Rock

On 12/20/11 03:05, Warren Block wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:


On 12/19/11 21:31, Da Rock wrote:
I hate to come with this kind of a query, but my googling hasn't 
come across a satisfactory answer.


I'm running an install on a brand new laptop for a client, and I'm 
trying to get X up using xdm- nothing. The logs says it failed to 
load fbdev because there is no data module.


I try uninstalling fbdev and running a rebuild of xorg- its still 
using the builtin configuration and still can't load fbdev. No 
devices detected.


I run Xorg -configure, and it shows the radeon card fine, 2 
displays. Still working with the config file, but it seems fine.
correction - its dual display issue that I've never had trouble with 
before (I also have installed on a HTPC with same memory, phenom quad 
core, uses a radeon HD card and a NVidia HD card). And no, the Xorg 
-config /root/xorg.conf.new [-retro] doesn't work as it is locking up 
and I can't even ctl-alt-backspace, I have to acpi power off to shut 
the system down. Google's still not giving me any hope... :( Last 
time I came across this level of issue was with a solo vintage intel 
card on yet another laptop- it froze the system too.


BTW, who says multicard vga is rare?


Some newer laptops have dual GPUs, an onboard Intel combined with one 
from another vendor for higher performance.  There's hot-switching 
between the two, but AFAIK it's not supported in FreeBSD.  There may 
be a BIOS option to disable one or the other.  There should still be 
two video outputs.


More than one video card at a time is a different issue, which is also 
unsupported on FreeBSD AFAIK:

(WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
It appears that it is something that needs to be resolved pretty quickly 
then. The linux guys jumped on it quick as (I'm not ribbing by the way) 
- probably their guys came across it sooner than BSD users.


What has thrown me is the fact that I didn't even consider it as a 
problem because I already had installed on a dual video system- ATI card 
and NVidia onboard, both that will work on a linux system, and that FBSD 
has no problem like this either; it just works. Weird...


So what are my options then? I have 2 high performance cards I can't 
use? VESA is not exactly an exciting solution - or secure: it somehow 
retains the image displayed in memory, and shows it as it loads up X the 
next time.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-19 Thread Warren Block

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:

Some newer laptops have dual GPUs, an onboard Intel combined with one from 
another vendor for higher performance.  There's hot-switching between the 
two, but AFAIK it's not supported in FreeBSD.  There may be a BIOS option 
to disable one or the other.  There should still be two video outputs.


More than one video card at a time is a different issue, which is also 
unsupported on FreeBSD AFAIK:

(WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
It appears that it is something that needs to be resolved pretty quickly 
then. The linux guys jumped on it quick as (I'm not ribbing by the way) - 
probably their guys came across it sooner than BSD users.


What has thrown me is the fact that I didn't even consider it as a problem 
because I already had installed on a dual video system- ATI card and NVidia 
onboard, both that will work on a linux system, and that FBSD has no problem 
like this either; it just works. Weird...


It's difficult to tell what you're saying.  It's possible that multiple 
cards would work in some combinations, and just that the ones I tried 
did not.  Also, you're talking about two systems, a laptop and a 
desktop.  So it would be good to get some specifics, like laptop brand 
and model, whether the desktop dual-card setup worked with FreeBSD (and 
which version of FreeBSD).

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xorg error: New athlon laptop, radeonhd video - unable to load fbdev

2011-12-19 Thread Da Rock

On 12/20/11 14:33, Warren Block wrote:

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:

Some newer laptops have dual GPUs, an onboard Intel combined with 
one from another vendor for higher performance.  There's 
hot-switching between the two, but AFAIK it's not supported in 
FreeBSD.  There may be a BIOS option to disable one or the other.  
There should still be two video outputs.


More than one video card at a time is a different issue, which is 
also unsupported on FreeBSD AFAIK:

(WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
It appears that it is something that needs to be resolved pretty 
quickly then. The linux guys jumped on it quick as (I'm not ribbing 
by the way) - probably their guys came across it sooner than BSD users.


What has thrown me is the fact that I didn't even consider it as a 
problem because I already had installed on a dual video system- ATI 
card and NVidia onboard, both that will work on a linux system, and 
that FBSD has no problem like this either; it just works. Weird...


It's difficult to tell what you're saying.  It's possible that 
multiple cards would work in some combinations, and just that the ones 
I tried did not.  Also, you're talking about two systems, a laptop and 
a desktop.  So it would be good to get some specifics, like laptop 
brand and model, whether the desktop dual-card setup worked with 
FreeBSD (and which version of FreeBSD).
NP. I thought I was clear, but I'm not always coherent when I 
communicate (apparently... just ask the missus :) ).


The laptop is a compaq cq62 with a quad core phenom and a ATI 4200 
Radeon mobility GPU, as well as 6300 GPU.


The HTPC/desktop is a whitebox quad core phenom on a ASUS MB (not 100% 
sure which) with a NVidia onboard pcie GPU, and an ATI Radeon 3450. 
There could be yet another GPU on there, but I can't remember.


That system is running 8.x FBSD (1 or 2- can't quite remember), and the 
laptop I'm installing 9.0-RC3 on, with the view to using freebsd-update 
to RELEASE, because of the lack of Atheros 9285 support in 8.x (tried 
for hours, just couldn't get the bird to fly :( ).


From what I understand now, having been able assimilate what has been 
discussed here and through google, it seems there is a conflict when 
dealing with multiple onboard GPUs. What exactly is the issue with 
getting an arbiter for FreeBSD? Aside from time, naturally.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


gigabyte GA-71XE4 (single amd athlon cpu motherboard

2008-09-04 Thread jlm
volodymyr,

greetings


   #Index Previous Next

gigabyte GA-71XE4 (single amd athlon cpu 
 motherboard

   Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kworr at gmail.com 
   Wed Sep 3 12:29:06 UTC 2008

 freebsd v5.2 and 5.3 boots no problems works well but freebsd v7 locks
 solid right when it get to teh load image to/from md0 device this
 happens when i use teh -release cdrom to install freebsd.

How exactly do you load your image?

i have freebsd 5.2-RELEASE and 5.3-RELEASE cdrom sets (downloaded from 
ftp.au.freebsd.org) and burned to cdrom, the same for 7.0-RELEASE as 
well as FreeSBIE v1.1 (this one is freebsd v5.3-release i think).

u i just put teh cdrom into teh dvd/cdrom reader in teh machine and 
reboot the machine ,, then it reads from teh cdrom and starts up (or 
not) depending on what it finds .. i tried again by using a diferent 
cdrom (cut by a diferent person) and if i use teh standard startup 
procedure it will lock solid, only turning off teh machine and pulling 
out teh power cord will recover it so that it will restart next time 
the power is applied.

if i choose option 3 (the safe mode option) it will continute without a 
pause and sysinstall notes that acpi has been disabled and asks if i 
want to make this installation do not use acpi ?? i now (on this 
machine) i say yes .. do not use acpi on this machine !!!

i noticed that in teh /var/log/messages freebsd says something about 
hptrr (rocketraid i think) not found/not available .. i think one of 
teh lines in teh last screen writings makes reference to this hptrr 
device ?? in a day or two i will have access again to this machine, it 
is .. i am not able to get to do anything for it. i plan to try this 
installation again and see if i can capture teh infomations ???

is there some way that i can capture information this early in teh 
'boot' processs ?? i do not have a vt100/vt52 etc terminial to plugin 
and try to capture the relevent details vi dumb terminal ??

much kind regards and sincere appreciations..

cheers and much thanks

jonathan

--  

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


gigabyte GA-71XE4 (single amd athlon cpu motherboard

2008-09-03 Thread jonathan michaels
greetings all,

i just repaired my old machine by replacing the damaged motherboard
with these items

motherboard: Gigabyte GA-71XE4 (chipset AMD-75?, with single AMD Athlon cpu)
audio:   Creative SB PCI 128 (CT-4815)
video:   nVidia GeForce 4 MX440 SE
nic: D-Link DFE-530TX+ 10/100BaseTX (be replaced with intel 10/100)

freebsd v5.2 and 5.3 boots no problems works well but freebsd v7 locks
solid right when it get to teh load image to/from md0 device this
happens when i use teh -release cdrom to install freebsd.

i looked on google and on marc tying for gigabyte/ga-71xe4 and various
combinations of teh whole chain of bits, also tried specific freebsd
lists (-hardware and -questions) and drew blanks .. guess this will
change that .. grin.

after a bit of thinking i tried booting in 'Safe mode it booted
properly and went on to complete the installation and is now working as
well as i have seen freebsd work on my other machines.

after starting to use safe mode i had no further problems witht eh
boot/startup lockups.

another thing thats confused me is how freebsd can work out the ide
cable is teh wrong one, dose it really make that much difference ??

i have attached the /var/run/dmesg.run and cut down version of
/var/log/messages.

please reply to address in headers .. i'm not subscribed to questions-


some light would be appreciated on this whole acpi issue and if i need
nvidia drivers to make teh video card work in normal/text mode ??

much thanks and kind regards

jonathan


/var/run/dmesg.run

Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x642  Stepping = 2
  
Features=0x183f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR
  AMD Features=0xc0440800SYSCALL,b18,MMX+,3DNow!+,3DNow!
real memory  = 805240832 (767 MB)
avail memory = 773992448 (738 MB)
kbd1 at kbdmux0
ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413)
hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Feb 24 2008 19:59:27)
cpu0 on motherboard
pcib0: AMD-751 host to PCI bridge pcibus 0 on motherboard
pir0: PCI Interrupt Routing Table: 7 Entries on motherboard
pci0: PCI bus on pcib0
agp0: AMD 751 host to AGP bridge on hostb0
pcib1: PCI-PCI bridge at device 1.0 on pci0
pci1: PCI bus on pcib1
vgapci0: VGA-compatible display mem 
0xee00-0xeeff,0xd800-0xdfff,0xe5c8-0xe5cf irq 11 at 
device 5.0 on pci1
isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 7.0 on pci0
isa0: ISA bus on isab0
atapci0: AMD 756 UDMA66 controller port 
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0
ata0: [ITHREAD]
ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0
pci0: bridge at device 7.3 (no driver attached)
ohci0: AMD-756 USB Controller mem 0xefffe000-0xefffefff irq 9 at device 7.4 
on pci0
ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
ohci0: [ITHREAD]
usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
usb0: AMD-756 USB Controller on ohci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 on usb0
uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
rl0: D-Link DFE-530TX+ 10/100BaseTX port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 
0xef00-0xefff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0
miibus0: MII bus on rl0
rlphy0: RealTek internal media interface PHY 0 on miibus0
rlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
rl0: Ethernet address: 00:05:5d:d5:23:f3
rl0: [ITHREAD]
pcm0: Creative CT5880-C port 0xde00-0xde3f irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0
pcm0: SigmaTel STAC9721/23 AC97 Codec
pcm0: [ITHREAD]
pcm0: Playback: DAC1,DAC2 / Record: ADC
pmtimer0 on isa0
atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
atkbd0: [ITHREAD]
psm0: PS/2 Mouse irq 12 on atkbdc0
psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
psm0: [ITHREAD]
psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0
fdc0: Enhanced floppy controller at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0
fdc0: [FILTER]
ppc0: Parallel port at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0
ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode
ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold
ppbus0: Parallel port bus on ppc0
ppbus0: [ITHREAD]
plip0: PLIP network interface on ppbus0
lpt0: Printer on ppbus0
lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
ppi0: Parallel I/O on ppbus0
ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
ppc0: [ITHREAD]
sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0
sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 16550A
sio0: [FILTER]
sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
sio1: type 16550A
sio1: [FILTER]
vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem

Re: gigabyte GA-71XE4 (single amd athlon cpu motherboard

2008-09-03 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko

jonathan michaels wrote:

greetings all,



freebsd v5.2 and 5.3 boots no problems works well but freebsd v7 locks
solid right when it get to teh load image to/from md0 device this
happens when i use teh -release cdrom to install freebsd.


How exactly do you load your image?

--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Passive cooling problem with Athlon CPU

2008-07-05 Thread Mike Clarke
I'm running 6.3STABLE with an AMD 4850e Athlon X2 and occasionally get 
the following message on the console:

acpi_tz0: failed to set new freq, disabling passive cooling

I also see the following 2 messages immediately after devd starts every 
time I boot (and which don't appear in any log file):

hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
sysctl: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argument

Should I be concerned about this and, if so, what should I do?

The CPU info from dmesg:

Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights 
reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 30 13:32:39 BST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP
ACPI APIC Table: Nvidia NVDAACPI
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Processor model unknown (2410.99-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x60fb2  Stepping = 2
  
Features=0x178bfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PS
E36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT
  Features2=0x2001SSE3,CX16
  AMD Features=0xea500800SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,RDTSCP,LM,3DNow!
+,3DNow!
  AMD Features2=0x11fLAHF,CMP,SVM,ExtAPIC,CR8,Prefetch
  Cores per package: 2
real memory  = 2080309248 (1983 MB)
avail memory = 2017738752 (1924 MB)
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2
ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard

... and output from grep acpi /var/run/dmesg.boot

acpi0: Nvidia NVDAACPI on motherboard
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0
acpi_hpet0: High Precision Event Timer iomem 0xfeff-0xfeff03ff on 
acpi0
device_attach: acpi_hpet0 attach returned 12
cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0
cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0
acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0
pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
acpi_tz0: Thermal Zone on acpi0
fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on 
acpi0
sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on 
acpi0
sio1: Generic IRDA-compatible device port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
ppc0: Standard parallel printer port port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0
atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0
acpi_hpet0: High Precision Event Timer iomem 0xfeff-0xfeff03ff on 
acpi0
device_attach: acpi_hpet0 attach returned 12

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Passive cooling problem with Athlon CPU

2008-07-05 Thread Mel
On Saturday 05 July 2008 13:12:19 Mike Clarke wrote:
 I'm running 6.3STABLE with an AMD 4850e Athlon X2 and occasionally get
 the following message on the console:

 acpi_tz0: failed to set new freq, disabling passive cooling

 I also see the following 2 messages immediately after devd starts every
 time I boot (and which don't appear in any log file):

 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
 sysctl: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argument

And your /etc/sysctl.conf where you set this value? If it's not set by you, it 
may be set by /etc/rc.d/power_profile based on your /etc/rc.conf.
Try to get the 'untainted' output of `sysctl hw.acpi':
0) reboot into single user
1) # fsck -p /
2) # mount -u /
3) # sysctl hw.acpi /tmp/acpi.sysctl
4) # exit

Then post /tmp/acpi.sysctl. My guess is no Cx values are obtained from the 
acpi, not even C1 (which is normal operation mode). This may or may not be 
related to your failing high precision timer.



-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Passive cooling problem with Athlon CPU

2008-07-05 Thread Mike Clarke
On Saturday 05 July 2008, Mel wrote:

 And your /etc/sysctl.conf where you set this value? If it's not set
 by you, it may be set by /etc/rc.d/power_profile based on your
 /etc/rc.conf.

It's not set by me. All I have in /etc/sysctl.conf is:

vfs.usermount=1
kern.ipc.shmmax=67108864
kern.ipc.shmall=32768

And, in case it helps, here's /etc/rc.conf:

defaultrouter=192.168.1.138
hostname=curlew.lan
ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.13  netmask 255.255.255.0
keymap=uk.iso
moused_enable=YES
linux_enable=YES
scrnmap=NO
sshd_enable=YES
apache_enable=YES
mysql_enable=YES
inetd_enable=YES
sendmail_enable=NO
sendmail_submit_enable=NO
sendmail_outbound_enable=NO
sendmail_msp_queue_enable=NO
exim_enable=YES
anacron_enable=YES
samba_enable=YES
cupsd_enable=YES
ntpd_enable=YES
ntpd_sync_on_start=YES
lptcontrol_enable=YES
background_fsck=NO
named_enable=YES
spamd_enable=YES
spamd_flags=-c -u spamd -H /var/spool/spamd
dumpdir=/usr/crash
devfs_system_ruleset=system
local_startup=/usr/local/etc/rc.d

 Try to get the 'untainted' output of `sysctl hw.acpi': 
 0) reboot into single user
 1) # fsck -p /
 2) # mount -u /
 3) # sysctl hw.acpi /tmp/acpi.sysctl
 4) # exit

 Then post /tmp/acpi.sysctl. My guess is no Cx values are obtained
 from the acpi, not even C1 (which is normal operation mode). This
 may or may not be related to your failing high precision timer.

Here's the output from single user mode:

hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S1 S4 S5
hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5
hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1
hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE
hw.acpi.standby_state: S1
hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3
hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 1
hw.acpi.s4bios: 0
hw.acpi.verbose: 0
hw.acpi.disable_on_reboot: 0
hw.acpi.handle_reboot: 0
hw.acpi.reset_video: 0
hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0
hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 10
hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 51.0C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.passive_cooling: 1
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 68.0C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 70.0C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 68.0C -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC1: 4
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC2: 3
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TSP: 60

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Still is error in atlas package on 2 machines with athlon processors

2007-12-20 Thread Zbigniew Komarnicki
Hello!

I would like to ask you for help with this issue, because about 4 month ago I 
tried compile atlas (ports/math/atlas) and today and still with no success. I 
still obtain the following assertion error:

10 cases: 10 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed
Benchmarking xcllttstF
NREPS   UPLO  Nlda  TIMEMFLOPS RESID
=  =  =  =      
1  Lower100100   0.00203   671.262  6.761073e-03
1  Lower200200   0.01329   811.882  4.470909e-03
1  Lower300300   0.02895  1253.066  2.536267e-03
1  Lower400400   0.06035  1421.975  2.848316e-03
1  Lower500500   0.13054  1282.513  3.074112e-03
1  Lower600600   0.21536  1342.329  2.439888e-03
1  Lower700700   0.31553  1454.058  2.280117e-03
1  Lower800800   0.46786  1463.242  1.895154e-03
1  Lower900900   0.62829  1550.929  1.907595e-03
1  Lower   1000   1000   0.84989  1572.366  2.426128e-03

10 cases: 10 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed
Benchmarking xzllttst
NREPS   UPLO  Nlda  TIMEMFLOPS RESID
=  =  =  =      
assertion ATL_zpotrf(CblasColMajor, Uplo, N, A, lda) == 0 failed, line 344 of  
file ../llttst.c
*** Error code 255

Stop in /usr/ports/math/atlas.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/math/atlas.



I have from dmesg the following processor:

FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Dec  1 18:32:38 CET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm)  (1240.53-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x681  Stepping = 1
  
Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
  AMD Features=0xc0400800SYSCALL,MMX+,3DNow!+,3DNow!
real memory  = 2147418112 (2047 MB)
avail memory = 2088062976 (1991 MB)


On similar machine at my work I also obtained similar assertion error. 
Whats is going on here? Could you help me?

It nervous me that this is not working (4 months pass and still not compiling 
with success), but I don't know why? Maybe it is hardware error? or maybe 
someone has this same problem? Please for your help and suggestions how to 
solve this problem.

If you need more information I send it to you.

I'm sorry for my English.

Thank you in advance.
Zbigniew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-29 Thread eculp

Quoting Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:12:39 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



What I am trying to do is compile an amd64 kernel, install it and
see what happens ;) I can always go back to the generic kernel
compiled in sys/i386.


amd64 and i386 are different platforms in the same sense that sparc64
and ppc are different platforms. An AMD 64 is not back-compatible to
pentium pro code  when it's in 64-bit mode. Whilst 32-bit binaries can
be run on the amd64 platform, they need special handling, you can't
just mix-and-match world and kernel platforms.


Thanks, RW.  I had assumed that and had hoped to run my make  
buildworld, make buildkernel, mergemaster, make installkernel and  
make installworld then upgrade all ports.


The problem is that I haven't been able to figure out, how to build  
using all amd64.


Again very dumb on my part, I'm sure.

ed
As RW has said before it's possible. However, it's better and no  
doubt quicker to go about starting from scratch.

-Garrett


Hi Garrett,

I have decided to do that one machine at a time but for now I'm just  
going to keep all as is.  It seems to be working fine on both current  
and releng with the standard intel compilation.  I just ordered a new  
machine that I will setup with current amd64 for evaluation and then  
decide after I've actually used it.


Thanks to all for helping me get my feet back on the ground.

have a great weekend,

ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-28 Thread Garrett Cooper

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:12:39 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



What I am trying to do is compile an amd64 kernel, install it and
see what happens ;) I can always go back to the generic kernel
compiled in sys/i386.


amd64 and i386 are different platforms in the same sense that sparc64
and ppc are different platforms. An AMD 64 is not back-compatible to
pentium pro code  when it's in 64-bit mode. Whilst 32-bit binaries can
be run on the amd64 platform, they need special handling, you can't
just mix-and-match world and kernel platforms.


Thanks, RW.  I had assumed that and had hoped to run my make 
buildworld, make buildkernel, mergemaster, make installkernel and make 
installworld then upgrade all ports.


The problem is that I haven't been able to figure out, how to build 
using all amd64.


Again very dumb on my part, I'm sure.

ed
As RW has said before it's possible. However, it's better and no doubt 
quicker to go about starting from scratch.

-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-28 Thread eculp

Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:54:52 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz
686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor
3800+ (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily
kernel with the old configuration and all is well.  Of course the
old configuration was/is i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit
apps.


Are you sure about that? there are few compelling reasons to go to
64-bit, if you already have a working system. As far as performance is
concerned, it may go either way.


Hi RW,

I probably didn't explain very well.  I'll try again.

The machines that I am updating are all athlon 32 bit machines, which  
I have been doing a daily cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel,  
installkernel, installworld and weekly portupgrade for several years.   
I just removed the disks from one that is running current and another  
that is running RELENG, both still running kernels cvsup-ed and  
compiled yesterday as well as userland.  The ports are also up to date.


What I am trying to do is compile an amd64 kernel, install it and see  
what happens ;) I can always go back to the generic kernel compiled in  
sys/i386.

If all were to go well, I would then recompile all my ports.

My problem is that when I created a sys/amd64/conf/AMD (just a generic  
kernel with PF added) file and went to /usr/src and tried make  
buildkernel KERNCONF=AMD it didn't find the kernel configuration file.  
 I tried with paths, etc. and no luck.  I also see that my daily  
compiles and installs have not changed userland programs.   
/usr/bin/file shows:


c++:  ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1  
(FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped


Using c++ and an example.  I assume it should give a 64-bin executable  
if it were.  This particular file was built and installed this morning.


The bottom line is that I'm totally ignorant as to this change and  
have been doing some really dumb searches in that I haven't found what  
I'm missing.  I'm convenced that it is something braindead simple but  
I am still looking.


The good news is that both the current and RELENG boxes are working  
well with all as before.


Again any suggestions or even flames with more information are appreciated.

ed


Right now all is
working fine with todays, sources and kernel except they are compiled
for Intel.


They are compiled for i386; Intel and AMD both produce CPUs for both
platforms.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-28 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:12:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:54:52 -0500
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz
 686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor
 3800+ (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily
 kernel with the old configuration and all is well.  Of course the
 old configuration was/is i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit
 apps.

No, you do not *need* to compile for 64-bit apps.


 
 Are you sure about that? there are few compelling reasons to go to
 64-bit, if you already have a working system. As far as performance is
 concerned, it may go either way.
 
 Hi RW,
 
 I probably didn't explain very well.  I'll try again.
 
 The machines that I am updating are all athlon 32 bit machines, which  
 I have been doing a daily cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel,  
 installkernel, installworld and weekly portupgrade for several years.   
 I just removed the disks from one that is running current and another  
 that is running RELENG, both still running kernels cvsup-ed and  
 compiled yesterday as well as userland.  The ports are also up to date.
 
 What I am trying to do is compile an amd64 kernel, install it and see  
 what happens ;) I can always go back to the generic kernel compiled in  
 sys/i386.

It probably will not work very well.

The compiler on an i386 system does not know how to create amd64 code.
It is not configured to be a crosscompiler - it will only compile to native
i386 code.


There is not really any support for switching from i386 to amd64 by source
code.  It can apparently be done if you know what you are doing but it is
not trivial and not documented.

The normal build system assumes that you are doing a native build by
default.  It is possible to build for a different system, but then you
first need to build the necessary cross-tools (compiler, linker, assembler,
etc.) and then use that to build the rest of the system.




 If all were to go well, I would then recompile all my ports.
 
 My problem is that when I created a sys/amd64/conf/AMD (just a generic  
 kernel with PF added) file and went to /usr/src and tried make  
 buildkernel KERNCONF=AMD it didn't find the kernel configuration file.  
  I tried with paths, etc. and no luck.  I also see that my daily  
 compiles and installs have not changed userland programs.   
 /usr/bin/file shows:
 
 c++:  ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1  
 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
 
 Using c++ and an example.  I assume it should give a 64-bin executable  
 if it were.  This particular file was built and installed this morning.
 
 The bottom line is that I'm totally ignorant as to this change and  
 have been doing some really dumb searches in that I haven't found what  
 I'm missing.  I'm convenced that it is something braindead simple but  
 I am still looking.
 
 The good news is that both the current and RELENG boxes are working  
 well with all as before.
 
 Again any suggestions or even flames with more information are appreciated.

Why don't you just keep running the i386 version of FreeBSD ?
Is there some particular reason you want to use the amd64 version ?


 
 ed
 
 Right now all is
 working fine with todays, sources and kernel except they are compiled
 for Intel.
 
 They are compiled for i386; Intel and AMD both produce CPUs for both
 platforms.



-- 
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-28 Thread RW
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:12:39 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 What I am trying to do is compile an amd64 kernel, install it and
 see what happens ;) I can always go back to the generic kernel
 compiled in sys/i386.

amd64 and i386 are different platforms in the same sense that sparc64
and ppc are different platforms. An AMD 64 is not back-compatible to
pentium pro code  when it's in 64-bit mode. Whilst 32-bit binaries can
be run on the amd64 platform, they need special handling, you can't
just mix-and-match world and kernel platforms.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-28 Thread eculp

Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:12:39 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



What I am trying to do is compile an amd64 kernel, install it and
see what happens ;) I can always go back to the generic kernel
compiled in sys/i386.


amd64 and i386 are different platforms in the same sense that sparc64
and ppc are different platforms. An AMD 64 is not back-compatible to
pentium pro code  when it's in 64-bit mode. Whilst 32-bit binaries can
be run on the amd64 platform, they need special handling, you can't
just mix-and-match world and kernel platforms.


Thanks, RW.  I had assumed that and had hoped to run my make  
buildworld, make buildkernel, mergemaster, make installkernel and make  
installworld then upgrade all ports.


The problem is that I haven't been able to figure out, how to build  
using all amd64.


Again very dumb on my part, I'm sure.

ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-28 Thread eculp

Quoting Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:12:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:54:52 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz
686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor
3800+ (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily
kernel with the old configuration and all is well.  Of course the
old configuration was/is i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit
apps.


No, you do not *need* to compile for 64-bit apps.




Are you sure about that? there are few compelling reasons to go to
64-bit, if you already have a working system. As far as performance is
concerned, it may go either way.

Hi RW,

I probably didn't explain very well.  I'll try again.

The machines that I am updating are all athlon 32 bit machines, which
I have been doing a daily cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel,
installkernel, installworld and weekly portupgrade for several years.
I just removed the disks from one that is running current and another
that is running RELENG, both still running kernels cvsup-ed and
compiled yesterday as well as userland.  The ports are also up to date.

What I am trying to do is compile an amd64 kernel, install it and see
what happens ;) I can always go back to the generic kernel compiled in
sys/i386.


It probably will not work very well.

The compiler on an i386 system does not know how to create amd64 code.
It is not configured to be a crosscompiler - it will only compile to native
i386 code.


There is not really any support for switching from i386 to amd64 by source
code.  It can apparently be done if you know what you are doing but it is
not trivial and not documented.

The normal build system assumes that you are doing a native build by
default.  It is possible to build for a different system, but then you
first need to build the necessary cross-tools (compiler, linker, assembler,
etc.) and then use that to build the rest of the system.





If all were to go well, I would then recompile all my ports.

My problem is that when I created a sys/amd64/conf/AMD (just a generic
kernel with PF added) file and went to /usr/src and tried make
buildkernel KERNCONF=AMD it didn't find the kernel configuration file.
 I tried with paths, etc. and no luck.  I also see that my daily
compiles and installs have not changed userland programs.
/usr/bin/file shows:

c++:  ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1
(FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped

Using c++ and an example.  I assume it should give a 64-bin executable
if it were.  This particular file was built and installed this morning.

The bottom line is that I'm totally ignorant as to this change and
have been doing some really dumb searches in that I haven't found what
I'm missing.  I'm convenced that it is something braindead simple but
I am still looking.

The good news is that both the current and RELENG boxes are working
well with all as before.

Again any suggestions or even flames with more information are appreciated.


Why don't you just keep running the i386 version of FreeBSD ?
Is there some particular reason you want to use the amd64 version ?

Hi Erik,

Ignorance, I assume, is my only excuse?  At least thanks to your  
patience and explanation, I understand and am somewhat less ignorant;)  
 Originally, I had ordered these and I was promised that they were  
dual core and I had to pay in advance.  When they finally arrived, I  
found that they were standard AMD Athlon 3800+ and no x2 so it looks  
like I was had but that will be another story.  Then it would have  
made sense to change to 64 bit.  For the moment my problem is solved  
and I'll stay with 32 bit for now.


Thanks,

ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-27 Thread eculp
I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz  
686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor  
3800+ (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily kernel  
with the old configuration and all is well.  Of course the old  
configuration was/is i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit apps.  I  
have configured a slightly modified sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC kernel and  
was going to build it as a test only to find out that a simple make  
buildkernel KERNCONF=AMD doesn't find /sys/amd64/conf/AMD.  There is  
an old reference in UPDATING from 5.0 that didn't work either.


The other question is on today's make world all seems to still be  
compiled ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386 so I am sure missing  
something very simple.


I'm actually going to update serveral machines, both Current and  
RELENG.  All of which are up to date.  Hopefully there will be no  
major problems.  I also plan to recompile all ports once I am able to  
build and install an AMD64 world and kernel.  Right now all is working  
fine with todays, sources and kernel except they are compiled for Intel.


Any other suggestions appreciated.  Maybe someone might recommend  
upgrading the RELENG boxes to CURRENT first?


Thanks,

ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-27 Thread eculp
I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz  
686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor  
3800+ (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily kernel  
with the old configuration and all is well.  Of course the old  
configuration was/is i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit apps.  I  
have configured a slightly modified sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC kernel and  
was going to build it as a test only to find out that a simple make  
buildkernel KERNCONF=AMD doesn't find /sys/amd64/conf/AMD.  There is  
an old reference in UPDATING from 5.0 that didn't work either.


The other question is on today's make world all seems to still be  
compiled ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386 so I am sure missing  
something very simple.


I'm actually going to update serveral machines, both Current and  
RELENG.  All of which are up to date.  Hopefully there will be no  
major problems.  I also plan to recompile all ports once I am able to  
build and install an AMD64 world and kernel.  Right now all is working  
fine with todays, sources and kernel except they are compiled for Intel.


Any other suggestions appreciated.  Maybe someone might recommend  
upgrading the RELENG boxes to CURRENT first?


Thanks,

ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-27 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 02:50:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz 
  686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3800+ 
  (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily kernel with the 
  old configuration and all is well.  Of course the old configuration was/is 
  i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit apps.  I have configured a slightly 
  modified sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC kernel and was going to build it as a test 
  only to find out that a simple make buildkernel KERNCONF=AMD doesn't find 
  /sys/amd64/conf/AMD.  There is an old reference in UPDATING from 5.0 that 
  didn't work either.
 
  The other question is on today's make world all seems to still be compiled 
  ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386 so I am sure missing something very 
  simple.
 
It is possible to cross-build for amd64, but you'll need a seperate
partition to put the 64-bit environment on. Look at the mailing list
archives. This question has come up before.

But to keep things simple, I'd advise you to backup your files,
configuration files from /etc and possible /usr/ports/distfiles,
reinstall from an amd64 CD and then rebuild your kernel, world and ports
to your liking.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpE5Lad6GZcr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-27 Thread eculp

Quoting Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 02:50:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz
 686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3800+
 (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily kernel with the
 old configuration and all is well.  Of course the old configuration was/is
 i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit apps.  I have configured a slightly
 modified sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC kernel and was going to build it as a test
 only to find out that a simple make buildkernel KERNCONF=AMD doesn't find
 /sys/amd64/conf/AMD.  There is an old reference in UPDATING from 5.0 that
 didn't work either.

 The other question is on today's make world all seems to still be compiled
 ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386 so I am sure missing something very
 simple.


It is possible to cross-build for amd64, but you'll need a seperate
partition to put the 64-bit environment on. Look at the mailing list
archives. This question has come up before.

But to keep things simple, I'd advise you to backup your files,
configuration files from /etc and possible /usr/ports/distfiles,
reinstall from an amd64 CD and then rebuild your kernel, world and ports
to your liking.


Hi Roland.

Boy am I glad that I asked.  That is probably the last thing I would  
have done.  Plus thanks for the answer, I must not have done a proper  
search.


I hope that the apps will run after reinstalling.   I assume that the  
source tree will somehow recognize that I will be building world and  
the kernel on a AMD64.  I'm downloading a copy of disk2 from FreeBSD  
now.


Have a great day.

ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading from an old athlon to a new 64 bit one.

2007-06-27 Thread RW
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:54:52 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have just stuck the disks from an old AMD Athlon(tm)  (1333.39-MHz  
 686-class CPU) into a new box with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor  
 3800+ (2387.78-MHz 686-class CPU).  I am still building a daily
 kernel with the old configuration and all is well.  Of course the
 old configuration was/is i386.  Now I need to compile for 64 bit
 apps.  

Are you sure about that? there are few compelling reasons to go to
64-bit, if you already have a working system. As far as performance is
concerned, it may go either way.

 Right now all is
 working fine with todays, sources and kernel except they are compiled
 for Intel.

They are compiled for i386; Intel and AMD both produce CPUs for both
platforms.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: optimization for Athlon 64 X2

2007-03-24 Thread Garrett Cooper

On Mar 23, 2007, at 10:51 PM, Josh Paetzel wrote:


Garrett Cooper wrote:

Daniel Dvo??ák wrote:

Hi all,
out of curiosity, which CPUTYPE setting is appropriate for dual  
Manchester core Athlon 64 X2 3800+ processor with FreeBSD 6.2  
(GCC 3.4.4) ?

Googling throws up nothing useful.
Dan


Try the -march value listed here (athlon64): http://gentoo- 
wiki.com/Safe_Cflags#Athlon_64_X2_.28AMD.29.


-Garrett


That looks suspiciously like linux documentation...and he was asking
about the CPUTYPE setting in make.conf which is (?) FreeBSD specific?

Anyways, there's a sample make.conf in
/usr/share/examples/etc/ that documents the various CPUTYPEs
available.


Thanks,

Josh Paetzel


It is Linux documentation, but considering that a) gcc is the gnu  
based compiler, b) FreeBSD uses gcc for compiling everything, and c)  
march = CPUTYPE, that's why I suggested to use that value :).  
Besides, Gentoo's crazier about compiling (in some respects) compared  
to FreeBSD.


Don't worry -- I wouldn't (knowingly) lead someone astray :).
-Garrett___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


optimization for Athlon 64 X2

2007-03-23 Thread Daniel Dvořák
Hi all,

out of curiosity, which CPUTYPE setting is appropriate for dual Manchester core 
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ processor with FreeBSD 6.2 (GCC 3.4.4) ?

Googling throws up nothing useful.

Dan

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: optimization for Athlon 64 X2

2007-03-23 Thread Garrett Cooper

Daniel Dvořák wrote:

Hi all,

out of curiosity, which CPUTYPE setting is appropriate for dual Manchester core 
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ processor with FreeBSD 6.2 (GCC 3.4.4) ?

Googling throws up nothing useful.

Dan


Try the -march value listed here (athlon64): 
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags#Athlon_64_X2_.28AMD.29.


-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: optimization for Athlon 64 X2

2007-03-23 Thread Josh Paetzel
Garrett Cooper wrote:
 Daniel Dvo??ák wrote:
 Hi all,
 out of curiosity, which CPUTYPE setting is appropriate for dual Manchester 
 core Athlon 64 X2 3800+ processor with FreeBSD 6.2 (GCC 3.4.4) ?
 Googling throws up nothing useful.
 Dan
 
 Try the -march value listed here (athlon64): 
 http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags#Athlon_64_X2_.28AMD.29.
 
 -Garrett

That looks suspiciously like linux documentation...and he was asking 
about the CPUTYPE setting in make.conf which is (?) FreeBSD specific?

Anyways, there's a sample make.conf in 
/usr/share/examples/etc/ that documents the various CPUTYPEs 
available.


Thanks, 

Josh Paetzel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How do I build i386 arch on Athlon 64?

2005-07-14 Thread Alex Zbyslaw

Gary W. Swearingen wrote:


So how do I build a i386 system on the amd64 system?
 


Download the i386 iso and burn that onto CD.

--Alex

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How do I build i386 arch on Athlon 64?

2005-07-14 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
I finally found a clue right there in /usr/src/Makefile, where
it talks about TARGET_ARCH.  But when I used it with i386, it seemed
to be compiling for the default gcc (386, I suppose), even when I
had CPUTYPE=athlon-xp in /etc/make.conf.  This seems to be doing
the job (though it's still building):

make TARGET_ARCH=i386 TARGET_CPUTYPE=athlon-xp make-target
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How do I build i386 arch on Athlon 64?

2005-07-14 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary W. Swearingen) writes:

 make TARGET_ARCH=i386 TARGET_CPUTYPE=athlon-xp make-target

Well, that built OK, but the resulting kernel panic'd
(the same way) with or without the TARGET_CPUTYPE in there:

  Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s4a
  exec /sbin/init : error 8
  ...
  init: not found in path
  panic: no init


I guess I'll try again after cvsup'ing and then give it up, get
an i386 CDROM, and try upgrading with that.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How do I build i386 arch on Athlon 64?

2005-07-13 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
I'm back... with more problems, naturally. New CPU  motherboard,
and now SCSI interface fails, CDRW fails as ATAPI or SCSI, PCI
parallel card fails, and too many wanted ports don't work on amd64.
I hope an i386 OS will work better and I can work the amd64 problems
at my leisure.

So how do I build a i386 system on the amd64 system?

I've tried passing ARCH=pentiumpro to make and also tried putting
pentiumpro in /etc/make and tried building a cross-compiling gcc34,
but I'm not having much luck.

This seems like it would be a FAQ, but I didn't see anything helpful
in the handbook or faq or groups.google or the make files.

Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help on Compaq Laptop Presario 3000 AMD Athlon 64

2005-01-04 Thread Kangaroo
Hello,
I also try freebsd-5.21 i386 still have the same problem.
I boot openBSD-i386 , the system freezed. Boot
openBSD-AMD64 OK but openBSD does not support nVIDIA
GeFORCE.xx so
No graphic display at all ..
It seems HP-compag presario R3240CA model ( athlon 64 AMD
) is not a good disigned ...
I like FreeBSD it's easier to install than OpenDSD or
NetBSD. It seems HP works well on Sesu linux from Novell.
Do you have any ideas what I need to make the system
works?
Thanks
Khai Dao
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help on Compaq Laptop Presario 3000 AMD Athlon 64 -Nvida-gforce3 chipset

2005-01-03 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Kangaroo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I need help on instaling freebsd 5.3 AMD64 on my lap top.
 
 When I boot from cd rom, The system boot up to menu screen
 show 1...7 where 2 eg. boot with disable ACPI...
 My system automatically shutdown when I press any key from
 1 or 7 or just press enter. I mean it SHUTDOWN my machine.

There is a possibility that the machine contains various components
which are not fully supported in FreeBSD/amd64. What happens if you try
booting FreeBSD/i386 instead? 

I know this may not be the most satisfying suggestion, but if it's that
or not getting the machine to boot at all, well, there it is. I'd
venture a guess that whichever software came with the machine originally
is not quite 64 bit clean either.

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
First, we kill all the spammers The Usenet Bard, Twice-forwarded tales

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Help on Compaq Laptop Presario 3000 AMD Athlon 64 -Nvida-gforce3 chipset

2005-01-02 Thread Kangaroo
I need help on instaling freebsd 5.3 AMD64 on my lap top.

When I boot from cd rom, The system boot up to menu screen
show 1...7 where 2 eg. boot with disable ACPI...
My system automatically shutdown when I press any key from
1 or 7 or just press enter. I mean it SHUTDOWN my machine.
What is wrong... 
I have follow the instruction from the web I need to
disbale some IO.. from BIOS. But my bios has no option to
do that. Is any one has the same LAPTOP I have? 

HELP!!!
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Khai
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-13 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
I tested with FreeBSD 4.10 and 5.3. The same problem ocurs, when the
the machine not reboot, varios coredumps in as/gcc hapens during make
buildworld.

Hardware:

Asus A7V600-X
AMD Sempron 2400+
512MB DDR 400

any ideas ??



On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:28:17 -0600, Vulpes Velox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:36:34 -0800 (PST)
 
 
 Minnesota Slinky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hello list.
 
  I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
  home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
  motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
  installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
  got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
  problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
  through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
  do with heat, but I'm not sure.
 
  Does anyone have any insight?  I've tried telling the
  BIOS to ignore the proc/mobo temp.  Not sure yet if
  that's working.
 
 For checking temp just ssh in and use mbmon while it is going...
 
 I would suspect ram problems. Heat problems from my experience
 generally cause some errors before failing and freezing. Never seen a
 heat problem result in a reboot yet.
 
 The way to check for this is to swap the ram out, after checking heat
 using ssh, mbmon, and a `cd /usr/src/ make buildworld/ cd
 /usr/ports/math/atlas make`. This command series you will also use
 each time as it provides a very good method for taking a system down
 since I've seen problems where just one of those would not take it
 down before.
 
 If you still get it, continue swap out the power supply next.
 Possiblility of not liking extra stress from active hard drive. Had
 this a bit on one old P2 gateway at one time.
 
 If it is still there do the same with proc. By now we should be able
 to safely rule out heat, provided that the sensor is functioning
 properly.
 
 If it still goes down, it is the mother board getting flaky under
 heavy load. This can happen. I had a Abit NF7-S2 that happened with
 lately. Swapped it out and it went away.
 
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-13 Thread Derrick Ryalls
 On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:19:25 -0600 (CST), draconius
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  what are your temperatures inside the case? what kind of cooling / airflow
  do you have in the case? I have had heat problems before due to bad
  airflow in the case where all the hot air concentraded around the
  processor(s)
 
  -drac
 
 
 
 
   I tested with FreeBSD 4.10 and 5.3. The same problem ocurs, when the
   the machine not reboot, varios coredumps in as/gcc hapens during make
   buildworld.
  
   Hardware:
  
   Asus A7V600-X
   AMD Sempron 2400+
   512MB DDR 400
  
   any ideas ??
  

I think I am running AV7600 (no X), and when I was thinking about
upgrading the ram, I saw a note saying to check Asus' website to make
sure they have tested the ram first.  With lower speed ram, you can
probably run anything, but for the highest speed stuff, you should
check to make sure they work well with it.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-13 Thread Vulpes Velox
Hmm... dude, you need to do the testing on your own...

read through my last email and you will find the path that will most
likely find the problem


On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:14:58 -0200
Alexandre Biancalana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I tested with FreeBSD 4.10 and 5.3. The same problem ocurs, when the
 the machine not reboot, varios coredumps in as/gcc hapens during
 make buildworld.
 
 Hardware:
 
 Asus A7V600-X
 AMD Sempron 2400+
 512MB DDR 400
 
 any ideas ??
 
 
 
 On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:28:17 -0600, Vulpes Velox
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:36:34 -0800 (PST)
  
  
  Minnesota Slinky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hello list.
  
   I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
   home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
   motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
   installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
   got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
   problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
   through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
   do with heat, but I'm not sure.
  
   Does anyone have any insight?  I've tried telling the
   BIOS to ignore the proc/mobo temp.  Not sure yet if
   that's working.
  
  For checking temp just ssh in and use mbmon while it is going...
  
  I would suspect ram problems. Heat problems from my experience
  generally cause some errors before failing and freezing. Never
  seen a heat problem result in a reboot yet.
  
  The way to check for this is to swap the ram out, after checking
  heat using ssh, mbmon, and a `cd /usr/src/ make buildworld/ cd
  /usr/ports/math/atlas make`. This command series you will also
  use each time as it provides a very good method for taking a
  system down since I've seen problems where just one of those would
  not take it down before.
  
  If you still get it, continue swap out the power supply next.
  Possiblility of not liking extra stress from active hard drive.
  Had this a bit on one old P2 gateway at one time.
  
  If it is still there do the same with proc. By now we should be
  able to safely rule out heat, provided that the sensor is
  functioning properly.
  
  If it still goes down, it is the mother board getting flaky under
  heavy load. This can happen. I had a Abit NF7-S2 that happened
  with lately. Swapped it out and it went away.
  
  
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-13 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Hi !

The case is opened I'm using the same cooling used in another
machine that is working great (Asus A7N8X-X/Sempron 2400+/DDR400).


On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:19:25 -0600 (CST), draconius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 what are your temperatures inside the case? what kind of cooling / airflow
 do you have in the case? I have had heat problems before due to bad
 airflow in the case where all the hot air concentraded around the
 processor(s)
 
 -drac
 
 
  I tested with FreeBSD 4.10 and 5.3. The same problem ocurs, when the
  the machine not reboot, varios coredumps in as/gcc hapens during make
  buildworld.
 
  Hardware:
 
  Asus A7V600-X
  AMD Sempron 2400+
  512MB DDR 400
 
  any ideas ??
 
 
 
  On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:28:17 -0600, Vulpes Velox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:36:34 -0800 (PST)
 
 
  Minnesota Slinky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hello list.
  
   I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
   home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
   motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
   installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
   got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
   problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
   through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
   do with heat, but I'm not sure.
  
   Does anyone have any insight?  I've tried telling the
   BIOS to ignore the proc/mobo temp.  Not sure yet if
   that's working.
 
  For checking temp just ssh in and use mbmon while it is going...
 
  I would suspect ram problems. Heat problems from my experience
  generally cause some errors before failing and freezing. Never seen a
  heat problem result in a reboot yet.
 
  The way to check for this is to swap the ram out, after checking heat
  using ssh, mbmon, and a `cd /usr/src/ make buildworld/ cd
  /usr/ports/math/atlas make`. This command series you will also use
  each time as it provides a very good method for taking a system down
  since I've seen problems where just one of those would not take it
  down before.
 
  If you still get it, continue swap out the power supply next.
  Possiblility of not liking extra stress from active hard drive. Had
  this a bit on one old P2 gateway at one time.
 
  If it is still there do the same with proc. By now we should be able
  to safely rule out heat, provided that the sensor is functioning
  properly.
 
  If it still goes down, it is the mother board getting flaky under
  heavy load. This can happen. I had a Abit NF7-S2 that happened with
  lately. Swapped it out and it went away.
 
 
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 : ***  Fight Back!  It may not be just YOUR life at risk!  * :
 :a.k.a - phoetoid : unix d00d : cowboy kid : pr0nmaster  :
 :  Fully Qualified   M.C.S.E : Minesweeper Consultant  Solitaire Expert :
 :[EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.pyrospheric.net  :
 :   [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.unixforums.net :
 :Unix Now!   ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. :
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-13 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:43:18 -0800
Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:19:25 -0600 (CST), draconius
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   what are your temperatures inside the case? what kind of cooling
   / airflow do you have in the case? I have had heat problems
   before due to bad airflow in the case where all the hot air
   concentraded around the processor(s)
  
   -drac
  
  
  
  
I tested with FreeBSD 4.10 and 5.3. The same problem ocurs,
when the the machine not reboot, varios coredumps in as/gcc
hapens during make buildworld.
   
Hardware:
   
Asus A7V600-X
AMD Sempron 2400+
512MB DDR 400
   
any ideas ??
   
 
 I think I am running AV7600 (no X), and when I was thinking about
 upgrading the ram, I saw a note saying to check Asus' website to
 make sure they have tested the ram first.  With lower speed ram, you
 can probably run anything, but for the highest speed stuff, you
 should check to make sure they work well with it.

This is only true if is a ram problem or the like, if it is a mother
board problem this does not make much of a difference from my
experience.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-11 Thread Peter Risdon
Minnesota Slinky wrote:
Hello list.
I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
do with heat, but I'm not sure.
Do you have any reason to suspect heat?
If you're trying to install 5.3, check /var/log/messages for lines about 
DMA errors. If there are any, you might have hit this DMA bug that 
affects some users (often with Maxtor hard drives).

Peter.
--
the circle squared
network systems and software
http://www.circlesquared.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-11 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
I'm having the same problem with Sempron 2400+.

When I do make buildworld or the machine reboot or assembler errors ocurs...



On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:59:36 +, Peter Risdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Minnesota Slinky wrote:
 
 
  Hello list.
 
  I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
  home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
  motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
  installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
  got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
  problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
  through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
  do with heat, but I'm not sure.
 
 Do you have any reason to suspect heat?
 
 If you're trying to install 5.3, check /var/log/messages for lines about
 DMA errors. If there are any, you might have hit this DMA bug that
 affects some users (often with Maxtor hard drives).
 
 Peter.
 
 --
 
 the circle squared
 
 network systems and software
 
 http://www.circlesquared.com
 
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-11 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Minnesota Slinky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello list.
 
 I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
 home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
 motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
 installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
 got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
 problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
 through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
 do with heat, but I'm not sure.
 
 Does anyone have any insight?  I've tried telling the
 BIOS to ignore the proc/mobo temp.  Not sure yet if
 that's working.

For checking temp just ssh in and use mbmon while it is going...

I would suspect ram problems. Heat problems from my experience
generally cause some errors before failing and freezing. Never seen a
heat problem result in a reboot yet.


The way to check for this is to swap the ram out, after checking heat
using ssh, mbmon, and a `cd /usr/src/ make buildworld/ cd
/usr/ports/math/atlas make`. This command series you will also use
each time as it provides a very good method for taking a system down
since I've seen problems where just one of those would not take it
down before.

If you still get it, continue swap out the power supply next.
Possiblility of not liking extra stress from active hard drive. Had
this a bit on one old P2 gateway at one time.

If it is still there do the same with proc. By now we should be able
to safely rule out heat, provided that the sensor is functioning
properly.

If it still goes down, it is the mother board getting flaky under
heavy load. This can happen. I had a Abit NF7-S2 that happened with
lately. Swapped it out and it went away.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-10 Thread Minnesota Slinky
Hello list.

I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
do with heat, but I'm not sure.

Does anyone have any insight?  I've tried telling the
BIOS to ignore the proc/mobo temp.  Not sure yet if
that's working.

Thanks for the input!

___
Eric F Crist  I am so smart,
S.M.R.T!
Secure Computing Networks  -Homer J
Simpson




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good. 
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-10 Thread jason
Minnesota Slinky wrote:
Hello list.
I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
do with heat, but I'm not sure.
Does anyone have any insight?  I've tried telling the
BIOS to ignore the proc/mobo temp.  Not sure yet if
that's working.
Thanks for the input!
___
Eric F Crist  I am so smart,
S.M.R.T!
Secure Computing Networks  -Homer J
Simpson

		
__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good. 
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Tell the bios to set off an alarm at a high temp, and use sysctl -a | 
grep thermal to get your temps.  What kind of power supply do you have?  
Have you changed or checked other bios settings?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ and reboots under load...

2004-12-10 Thread Minnesota Slinky
On Dec 10, 2004, at 10:34 PM, jason wrote:

Minnesota Slinky wrote:

Hello list.

I am in the process of doing a major upgrade to my
home server.  I purchased an Asus A7V600-X
motherboard, an AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor, and
installed 1GB of DDR 400 memory.  If it matters, I've
got two 120 GB Maxtor HDDs in a RAID 1 array.  The
problem I'm having is that the system reboots half-way
through a make buildworld.  I'm guessing this has to
do with heat, but I'm not sure.

Does anyone have any insight?  I've tried telling the
BIOS to ignore the proc/mobo temp.  Not sure yet if
that's working.

Thanks for the input!


Tell the bios to set off an alarm at a high temp, and
use sysctl -a | grep thermal to get your temps.  What
kind of power supply do you have?  Have you changed or
checked other bios settings?

I don't see any settings in BIOS regarding alarms and
such.  All I can do in BIOS is monitor the temp and
fan speeds.  I tried changing some settings, but when
I do, the mobo decides I must have a different
processor.

Thanks for the help.
___
Eric F Crist  I am so smart,
S.M.R.T!
Secure Computing Networks  -Homer J
Simpson




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


panic: page fault in /stand/sysinstall on Asus K8V with Athlon 64

2004-08-23 Thread Karl Swartz
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 4.10 in a new machine which has an Asus
K8V motherboard with an AMD Athlon 64 2800+ CPU and 1GB of PC3200 ECC
memory.  Storage is a pair of Seagate ST-3200822A 200GB UATA-100 disks
in a mirror group on a 3Ware Escalade 7006-2 RAID controller.

Initially, I didn't have a CDROM drive on the machine, so I created a
pair of floppies using /cdrom/floppies/{kern,mfsroot}.flp from the
FreeBSD Mall CD and attempted to boot from them.  After loading both
and going beyond the kernel config menu, FreeBSD booted then puked:

   Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c
   /stand/sysinstall running as init on vty0
   panic: page fault

Thinking perhaps FreeBSD 4.10 was being weird, I tried 4.9.  It got
very slightly further, displaying most of the first menu screen, before
the page fault.

I then scrounged a CDROM, installed it, and tried booting directly off
the CDROM.  Same results, both for 4.10 and for 4.9.  I also tried 5.2.1
with a similar outcome.

I didn't think the 3Ware care was likely to be a problem but just to be
thorough I pulled that and tried again.  No change.

Naturually I've gone through the archives and it seems that others are
using the K8V successfully.

Any suggestions?

--
Karl Swartz |Home   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.kls2.com/~karl/
The average dog is a nicer person than the average person.
  - Andrew A. Rooney
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-06 Thread Patrick Crosby
Bill Moran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Patrick Crosby wrote:
 Be aware that this is still somewhat experimental, and commits to the
 source tree may occasionally break this feature. If the world fails to
 compile using this parameter try again without it before you report any
 problems.
 
 this isn't for a 'make -j4 buildworld', it's for compilation of the
 software i'm developing...i got two cpu's to speed up a 45 minute
 build process...
 
 and, it hangs at other times as well, just most consistently during
 compilation.  i'm trying to help find what is causing this so that
 freebsd can improve.
 
 This is the standard weird hangs answer, forgive me if you've already
 checked these:
 
 1) Does is hang on other hardware as well or just this machine?

i'm the only one in the office running CURRENT, and since it is
hanging more than 5.1 was, i told everyone else to wait before
upgrading.  but a coworker (with different hardware [single
processor], but also AMD-based) does get hangs like mine.

 2) Have you checked the RAM with memtest86 or similar?

yes.

 3) Have you ensured the hardware isn't overheating?

i've checked the cpu temp and it is fine.

 4) Is the box in question on a UPS?

yes.

 These seem to be the most common problems with FreeBSD hanging.  I know
 none of them have much to do with FreeBSD, but that's just the statistical
 reality of it.
 
 If the answer to #1 indicates an issue with this particular machine, it
 could still be a problem with FreeBSD on that particular hardware.
 
 #4 is a rarity, but I've seen crappy power cause weird problems.  Undersized
 power supplies can cause similar problems.

so i should try running with it off the UPS?  the power supply should
be ok.  fwiw, the coworker who also gets hangs is *not* on a UPS.  it
could be a building power weirdness (which is why i plugged into the
UPS to begin with)...

would rebuilding the kernel with INVARIANTS or WITNESS help at all?

thanks.

patrick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-06 Thread Thierry DELHAISE
What I can say to this problem is :
- I've open a bug report : 66098 mainly for the same reason :
I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1 patch 5 with a fresh build world (it took me 
3  days to have world since gcc was hanging the machine all 5 minutes 
approximatly) on an SMP machine with two PIII 733 and a BIOS compatible 
SMP 1.4 specs (the motherboard is an MSI board) with feature like PM 
enable and APIC enable.

The first think I face out was when I shutdown the machine shutdown -h 
or -r my machine hangs at

stopping .. vnlru stopped after nothing  I 've seen that this 
allways hang when boot() is called on cpu1 and that when sometime when 
boot is called from cpu0 my machine can stop or reboot correctly. But 
boot on cpu1 represent 98% of my tests.

Some days after, when I was running an heavy compilation, I face out 
severals  machine hangs. So I've started to investigate temperature 
problem, RAM problem disk, etc... Just to be sure, I've reinstall this 
machine under Linux with a 2.6 Kernel. No problems. So I come back to 
FreeBSD from a fresh install and start investigating acpi.

Since now 2 weeks, the machine never hangs with just one trick (a bad 
trick for sure) : acpiconf -d . I've disabled acpi management. I let 
boot the machine and setting up acpi conf since the acpi.ko module is 
load at boot time and in the final boot process I disable acpi with 
this command.

May be you could test to see if you experience  allways the same 
problem or if that's solved the problem and report here the problem.

I think acpi code witch seems to be recent in FreeBSD have some problem 
may be due to specific management or bugs of our cheapset : mine is a 
VIA694. I remember that under Linux it took a long time to have a 
stable machine with acpi enable (in fact this was stabilize when IBM 
and Intel provide some code to handle acpi) :  acpi code was clean but 
this was how specs were implemented on cheapset that was breaking 
code So they had to handle some specific chipset feature ...

Another way to test could be to disable PM in Bios for a limited time 
to know if the problem persist.

just my two cents.
Thierry
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-05 Thread Patrick Crosby
This isn't a laptop, it's a dual-processor desktop w/ two athlon mp
2600's.  But I monitored the temperature all day long today.  It
hasn't fluctuated more than a degree, and yet I just got another hang
(while compiling).  The temperature of the cpus and motherboard was
the same that it was all day long...

Anyone have any other ideas?

Thanks.

Patrick

Ray Seals ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 I have the same problem with my laptop.  I'm running an AthlonXP-M.  My
 problem is due to overheating.  The machine hangs for 30 seconds and
 then runs for about 30 minutes and then hangs again.  Then it powers
 itself off.
 
 Ray
 
 On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 15:10, Patrick Crosby wrote:
  Just about every day, my FreeBSD system hangs.  I set up
  dumpdev/dumpdir, but I never get anything in /var/crashes.  I'm not
  sure what to do to debug the problem.  It usually happens during a
  'gmake -j4...', but has happened at other times as well.
  
  What can I do to get more information about what is causing the hang?
  
  I have the following in rc.conf to try to get a kernel crash dump:
  
  dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b
  dumpdir=/var/crash
  
  And I'm running a kernel with debug symbols.  I'm running FreeBSD
  5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 with 2 athlon mp processors, using the GENERIC kernel
  config file (except I commented out INET6 so that firefox will resolve
  domains in a timely fashion): 
  
  ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD  APIC  
  Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
  CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2600+ (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x6a0  Stepping = 0

  Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
AMD Features=0xc048MP,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!
  real memory  = 1073217536 (1023 MB)
  avail memory = 1033003008 (985 MB)
  FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
   cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  1
   cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  0
  ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard
  
  Thanks.
  
  Patrick
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-05 Thread Joshua Lokken
* Patrick Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-05 12:10]:
 This isn't a laptop, it's a dual-processor desktop w/ two athlon mp
 2600's.  But I monitored the temperature all day long today.  It
 hasn't fluctuated more than a degree, and yet I just got another hang
 (while compiling).  The temperature of the cpus and motherboard was
 the same that it was all day long...
 
 Anyone have any other ideas?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Patrick
 
 Ray Seals ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  I have the same problem with my laptop.  I'm running an AthlonXP-M.  My
  problem is due to overheating.  The machine hangs for 30 seconds and
  then runs for about 30 minutes and then hangs again.  Then it powers
  itself off.
  
  Ray
  
   'gmake -j4...', but has happened at other times as well.
   

[from
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html]

[snip]
It is now possible to specify a -j option to make which will cause it to
spawn several simultaneous processes. This is most useful on multi-CPU
machines. However, since much of the compiling process is IO bound
rather than CPU bound it is also useful on single CPU machines.

On a typical single-CPU machine you would run:

# make -j4 buildworld

make(1) will then have up to 4 processes running at any one time.
Empirical evidence posted to the mailing lists shows this generally
gives the best performance benefit.

If you have a multi-CPU machine and you are using an SMP configured
kernel try values between 6 and 10 and see how they speed things up.

Be aware that this is still somewhat experimental, and commits to the
source tree may occasionally break this feature. If the world fails to
compile using this parameter try again without it before you report any
problems.
[/snip]

-- 
Joshua

Mmm Jar-Jar; everyone hates you, but me.
 -- Comic Book Guy

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-05 Thread Patrick Crosby
Joshua Lokken ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 [from
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html]
 
 [snip]

[snip]

 # make -j4 buildworld

[snip]

 Be aware that this is still somewhat experimental, and commits to the
 source tree may occasionally break this feature. If the world fails to
 compile using this parameter try again without it before you report any
 problems.

this isn't for a 'make -j4 buildworld', it's for compilation of the
software i'm developing...i got two cpu's to speed up a 45 minute
build process...

and, it hangs at other times as well, just most consistently during
compilation.  i'm trying to help find what is causing this so that
freebsd can improve.

patrick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-05 Thread Bill Moran
Patrick Crosby wrote:
Be aware that this is still somewhat experimental, and commits to the
source tree may occasionally break this feature. If the world fails to
compile using this parameter try again without it before you report any
problems.
this isn't for a 'make -j4 buildworld', it's for compilation of the
software i'm developing...i got two cpu's to speed up a 45 minute
build process...
and, it hangs at other times as well, just most consistently during
compilation.  i'm trying to help find what is causing this so that
freebsd can improve.
This is the standard weird hangs answer, forgive me if you've already
checked these:
1) Does is hang on other hardware as well or just this machine?
2) Have you checked the RAM with memtest86 or similar?
3) Have you ensured the hardware isn't overheating?
4) Is the box in question on a UPS?
These seem to be the most common problems with FreeBSD hanging.  I know
none of them have much to do with FreeBSD, but that's just the statistical
reality of it.
If the answer to #1 indicates an issue with this particular machine, it
could still be a problem with FreeBSD on that particular hardware.
#4 is a rarity, but I've seen crappy power cause weird problems.  Undersized
power supplies can cause similar problems.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-05 Thread Mark Ovens
Patrick Crosby wrote:
Joshua Lokken ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

[from
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html]
[snip]
[snip]

# make -j4 buildworld
[snip]

Be aware that this is still somewhat experimental, and commits to the
source tree may occasionally break this feature. If the world fails to
compile using this parameter try again without it before you report any
problems.
this isn't for a 'make -j4 buildworld', it's for compilation of the
software i'm developing...i got two cpu's to speed up a 45 minute
build process...
and, it hangs at other times as well, just most consistently during
compilation.  i'm trying to help find what is causing this so that
freebsd can improve.
Don't know that this will help you at all, but I'm running dual Athlon 
MP2800s, ASUS A7M266-D m/b, 1Gbyte RAM with a month old  -CURRENT and 
have just built Mozilla, Firefox, and Thunderbird back to back and 
updated a few ports at the same time without any hangs so the problem 
isn't specific to all dual Athlon setups.

BTW, what do you use to monitor CPU temps in FreeBSD?

Regards,

Mark

patrick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-04 Thread Patrick Crosby
Just about every day, my FreeBSD system hangs.  I set up
dumpdev/dumpdir, but I never get anything in /var/crashes.  I'm not
sure what to do to debug the problem.  It usually happens during a
'gmake -j4...', but has happened at other times as well.

What can I do to get more information about what is causing the hang?

I have the following in rc.conf to try to get a kernel crash dump:

dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b
dumpdir=/var/crash

And I'm running a kernel with debug symbols.  I'm running FreeBSD
5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 with 2 athlon mp processors, using the GENERIC kernel
config file (except I commented out INET6 so that firefox will resolve
domains in a timely fashion): 

ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD  APIC  
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2600+ (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x6a0  Stepping = 0
  
Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
  AMD Features=0xc048MP,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!
real memory  = 1073217536 (1023 MB)
avail memory = 1033003008 (985 MB)
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  1
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  0
ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard

Thanks.

Patrick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-04 Thread Ray Seals
I have the same problem with my laptop.  I'm running an AthlonXP-M.  My
problem is due to overheating.  The machine hangs for 30 seconds and
then runs for about 30 minutes and then hangs again.  Then it powers
itself off.

Ray

On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 15:10, Patrick Crosby wrote:
 Just about every day, my FreeBSD system hangs.  I set up
 dumpdev/dumpdir, but I never get anything in /var/crashes.  I'm not
 sure what to do to debug the problem.  It usually happens during a
 'gmake -j4...', but has happened at other times as well.
 
 What can I do to get more information about what is causing the hang?
 
 I have the following in rc.conf to try to get a kernel crash dump:
 
 dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b
 dumpdir=/var/crash
 
 And I'm running a kernel with debug symbols.  I'm running FreeBSD
 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 with 2 athlon mp processors, using the GENERIC kernel
 config file (except I commented out INET6 so that firefox will resolve
 domains in a timely fashion): 
 
 ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD  APIC  
 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2600+ (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU)
   Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x6a0  Stepping = 0
   
 Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
   AMD Features=0xc048MP,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!
 real memory  = 1073217536 (1023 MB)
 avail memory = 1033003008 (985 MB)
 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
  cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  1
  cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  0
 ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard
 
 Thanks.
 
 Patrick
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-04 Thread Ray Seals
I'm also running 5.2.1.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: athlon-mp daily hang 5.2.1

2004-05-04 Thread Jose Lima
Check out this PowerNow! patch/module,
http://demira.shopkeeper.de/~sascha/nx9005/
Its supposed to automatically set processor voltage depending on the
hw.powernow.state set in the kernel.
I havent got it to work automatically but I can manually set it to state
2 or 3 and the tempeture and fan noise drop down dramatically.
Note that you do sacrifice speed for heat and noise. To me this is not
an issue, my XP 1600 is still fast running at 1ghz for my needs.
I just got started programming so I cant help out :), yet... 
maybe some of our smart delevopers will look into it further.


Jose Lima


On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 20:32, Ray Seals wrote:
 I have the same problem with my laptop.  I'm running an AthlonXP-M.  My
 problem is due to overheating.  The machine hangs for 30 seconds and
 then runs for about 30 minutes and then hangs again.  Then it powers
 itself off.
 
 Ray
 
 On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 15:10, Patrick Crosby wrote:
  Just about every day, my FreeBSD system hangs.  I set up
  dumpdev/dumpdir, but I never get anything in /var/crashes.  I'm not
  sure what to do to debug the problem.  It usually happens during a
  'gmake -j4...', but has happened at other times as well.
  
  What can I do to get more information about what is causing the hang?
  
  I have the following in rc.conf to try to get a kernel crash dump:
  
  dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b
  dumpdir=/var/crash
  
  And I'm running a kernel with debug symbols.  I'm running FreeBSD
  5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 with 2 athlon mp processors, using the GENERIC kernel
  config file (except I commented out INET6 so that firefox will resolve
  domains in a timely fashion): 
  
  ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD  APIC  
  Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
  CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2600+ (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x6a0  Stepping = 0

  Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
AMD Features=0xc048MP,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!
  real memory  = 1073217536 (1023 MB)
  avail memory = 1033003008 (985 MB)
  FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
   cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  1
   cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  0
  ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard
  
  Thanks.
  
  Patrick
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Teilhard Knight
Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an Athlon
processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of processor should
I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?

Teilhard



30mb Web based, POP3  IMAP4 e-mail.

Sign up now: http://www.ghostmailbox.com


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread DanGer
On Sunday 29 February 2004 19:12, Teilhard Knight wrote:
 Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an Athlon
 processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of processor should
 I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?


1) yes, athlons are i386 machines.
2) you should read your /var/run/dmesg.boot if it is i586 or i686 processor

-- 
DanGer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Remko Lodder
It's an i386 Architecture yes, the processor is not an 80386 if you ment
that.
I think you can select i686 if a 1.4Ghz machine (i think you ment that
instead
of Mhz?)

But setting the defaults will also work :)

Cheers,

--

Kind regards,

Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the
hackerscene

mrtg.grunn.org Dutch mirror of MRTG

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Teilhard Knight
Verzonden: zondag 29 februari 2004 19:12
Aan: FreeBSD
Onderwerp: Athlon


Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an Athlon
processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of processor should
I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?

Teilhard



30mb Web based, POP3  IMAP4 e-mail.

Sign up now: http://www.ghostmailbox.com


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:12:02PM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote:
 Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an Athlon
 processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of processor should
 I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?

One of these?

CPU: AMD Athlon(TM) XP1600+ (1400.06-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x662  Stepping = 2
  Features=0x383f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PA
T,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
  AMD Features=0xc048MP,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!

As /var/run/dmesg.boot says, it's a 686 class processor.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Conrad Sabatier

On 29-Feb-2004 Teilhard Knight wrote:
 Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an Athlon
 processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of processor should
 I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?

I use an Athlon here, myself.

In my kernel config, I have:

machine i386

cpu I686_CPU# aka Pentium Pro(tm)

options CPU_DISABLE_5X86_LSSER
options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU
options CPU_UPGRADE_HW_CACHE
options CPU_WT_ALLOC
options NO_MEMORY_HOLE

And in /etc/make.conf:

CPUTYPE?=k7
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe

HTH.

-- 
Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 29 February 2004 10:36 am, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:12:02PM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote:
  Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an
  Athlon processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of
  processor should I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?

 One of these?

 CPU: AMD Athlon(TM) XP1600+ (1400.06-MHz 686-class CPU)
   Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x662  Stepping = 2
  
 Features=0x383f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MC
A,CMOV,PA T,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
   AMD Features=0xc048MP,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!

 As /var/run/dmesg.boot says, it's a 686 class processor.


I was going to send one of these but then I got to thinking about what 
you needed to know before you download an iso or whatever. The web site 
really doesn't tell you that an Athlon is a 686 and you need to know 
that before you do the install and can look at the dmesg output.

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Teilhard Knight
- Original Message - 
From: DanGer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Athlon


 On Sunday 29 February 2004 19:12, Teilhard Knight wrote:
  Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an Athlon
  processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of processor
should
  I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?
 

 1) yes, athlons are i386 machines.
 2) you should read your /var/run/dmesg.boot if it is i586 or i686
processor

Right, I'll read that file. Thanks so much for the feedback.

Teilhard



30mb Web based, POP3  IMAP4 e-mail.

Sign up now: http://www.ghostmailbox.com


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Teilhard Knight
 It's an i386 Architecture yes, the processor is not an 80386 if you ment
 that.
 I think you can select i686 if a 1.4Ghz machine (i think you ment that
 instead
 of Mhz?)
 
 But setting the defaults will also work :)

I guess you composed your reply twice. Thaks so much for taking the time.

Teilhard
 
 Cheers,
 
 --
 
 Kind regards,___



30mb Web based, POP3  IMAP4 e-mail.

Sign up now: http://www.ghostmailbox.com


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Teilhard Knight
 On 29-Feb-2004 Teilhard Knight wrote:
  Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an Athlon
  processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of processor
should
  I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?

 I use an Athlon here, myself.

 In my kernel config, I have:

 machine i386

 cpu I686_CPU# aka Pentium Pro(tm)

 options CPU_DISABLE_5X86_LSSER
 options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU
 options CPU_UPGRADE_HW_CACHE
 options CPU_WT_ALLOC
 options NO_MEMORY_HOLE

 And in /etc/make.conf:

 CPUTYPE?=k7
 CFLAGS= -O -pipe
 COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe


Thanks a lot. This info will help me very much. I have compiled a kernel for
a Pentium IV 1.6 GHz, and I had no problems. I hope this time I can make it
right too.

Teilhard



30mb Web based, POP3  IMAP4 e-mail.

Sign up now: http://www.ghostmailbox.com


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon

2004-02-29 Thread Teilhard Knight
 On Sunday 29 February 2004 10:36 am, Matthew Seaman wrote:
  On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:12:02PM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote:
   Just a couple of easy questions for you. Is a machine with an
   Athlon processor 1.4 MHz an i386 machine? And if so, what kind of
   processor should I select in my kernel? i586, or i686?
 
  One of these?
 
  CPU: AMD Athlon(TM) XP1600+ (1400.06-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x662  Stepping = 2
 
  Features=0x383f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MC
 A,CMOV,PA T,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
AMD Features=0xc048MP,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!
 
  As /var/run/dmesg.boot says, it's a 686 class processor.
 

 I was going to send one of these but then I got to thinking about what
 you needed to know before you download an iso or whatever. The web site
 really doesn't tell you that an Athlon is a 686 and you need to know
 that before you do the install and can look at the dmesg output.

Many thanks. Yes, the web site only speaks about Pentium. Couldn't find the
info there. But now I know where I'm standing.

Teilhard



30mb Web based, POP3  IMAP4 e-mail.

Sign up now: http://www.ghostmailbox.com


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Migrating 5.2 from Pentium 4 to Athlon MP

2004-01-27 Thread Ihsan Junaidi
Hello all,

I have a server currently running on a Pentium 4 box. Yesterday I bought 
an AMD 762 MPX chipset to go with two Athlon MP 2000+. The production 
server is running FreeBSD 5.2, a GENERIC with additional SCSI/RAID 
controllers trimmed off.

The kernel and all of the userland + ports were built with -march=p4 
flags and I am wondering if there's any way I can just plug the disk 
into the Athlon box without rebuilding everything with the exception of 
the world+kernel. FYI, the kernel is SMP-aware.

How does the -march flag effect the userland programs? I am aware that 
only OpenSSL is capable of taking advantage of specific CPU instructions 
but other than that?

Thank you for your time,
Ihsan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Migrating 5.2 from Pentium 4 to Athlon MP

2004-01-27 Thread Kent Stewart
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 09:10 am, Ihsan Junaidi wrote:
 Hello all,

 I have a server currently running on a Pentium 4 box. Yesterday I
 bought an AMD 762 MPX chipset to go with two Athlon MP 2000+. The
 production server is running FreeBSD 5.2, a GENERIC with additional
 SCSI/RAID controllers trimmed off.

 The kernel and all of the userland + ports were built with -march=p4
 flags and I am wondering if there's any way I can just plug the disk
 into the Athlon box without rebuilding everything with the exception
 of the world+kernel. FYI, the kernel is SMP-aware.

 How does the -march flag effect the userland programs? I am aware
 that only OpenSSL is capable of taking advantage of specific CPU
 instructions but other than that?


Rebuild your system with out the cpu flags in make.conf. It is too 
likely that there is cpu specific stuff in userland libraries that were 
linked to your builds. I have moved from P-IIIs to AMDs without 
problems. I also don't use the cpu flag on systems that I may NFS mount 
to rebuild one of the other systems with. I have recovered systems by 
doing a NFS mount and and installkernel and installworld. I wouldn't 
have even tried if they had been built with a cpu option.

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Athlon to XP woes

2003-03-26 Thread jay desjardins
We have an  asus A7V133 that had a 1.2 and 256 megs or memory. It's
happily running 4.7 stable. I wanted to put an athlon XP chip and 1 gig
more memory. The first thing I did was update the bios and then
installed the chip and memory. Then when starting it got core dumps all
over (sendmail getty, ect.). Then I removed the memory and still got the
dumps. After I replaced the chip (XP1700) with the 1.2 and all the dumps
stopped.  When upgrading to a chip like that (athlon to XP) do I need to
do something different to BSD so it will not flake out.


--
Jay Desjardins Voice: 617-745-3802
Desktop and Phone support  Help desk: 617-745-3727
Eastern Nazarene CollegeE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 E. Elm Avenue
Quincy, MA 02170
*



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Athlon to XP woes

2003-03-26 Thread Gary Jennejohn
jay desjardins writes:
 We have an  asus A7V133 that had a 1.2 and 256 megs or memory. It's
 happily running 4.7 stable. I wanted to put an athlon XP chip and 1 gig
 more memory. The first thing I did was update the bios and then
 installed the chip and memory. Then when starting it got core dumps all
 over (sendmail getty, ect.). Then I removed the memory and still got the
 dumps. After I replaced the chip (XP1700) with the 1.2 and all the dumps
 stopped.  When upgrading to a chip like that (athlon to XP) do I need to
 do something different to BSD so it will not flake out.
 

Did you also upgrade the CPU cooler? This sounds like overheating to me.

I've gone from a 1.2 MHz Athlon-C to a 1800+ XP w/o any problem, but I
bought a new cooler.

---
Gary Jennejohn / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Good integrated Athlon chipset for FreeBSD

2003-01-12 Thread Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
Hello all,

I'm building a small workgroup (10 PCs) which will be used for software and 
network testing as well for day-to-day usage. We're also conducting small 
classes teaching UNIX for school students in our area. Therefore I'm looking 
for a good integrated Athlon chipset which are supported in FreeBSD. I'm 
specifically looking at Epox EP-8KMM+ utilizing the VIA KM266 chipset. But 
I'm a little doubtful about the sound, video and above all, the NIC.

The sound uses Realtek ALC201A chipset, the video is VT8375 ProSavage8 and the 
NIC utilizes Realtek RTL8100B(L). I can't seem to find on the FreeBSD 
hardware page supports for the sound and the NIC while a search on Xfree 
driver site turned zero on the video. Does this mean, that they are not 
supported? I'm really interested in the chipset because it's cheap and most 
of us are literate when it comes to hardware, we can skip the support that 
comes with pricier brands and motherboards.

My other option would be Asus A7N-266E using the nForce 420D chipset. I've 
heard cases that this particular motherboard is usable in FreeBSD. The NIC is 
RTL8139 (rl) while other nForce boards seem to use the MCP-D built-in LAN, 
which I can't seem to find any cases of it being run on any installation.

I'm open to any suggestion that will allow me to choose the best platform for 
our research. Cost of course is a factor but I will not buy cheap if it's 
going to prove a hassle in the future.

Thank you for your time.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Good integrated Athlon chipset for FreeBSD

2003-01-12 Thread Adam Maas
The nForce based boards would be your best bet. Good solid chipset with a
decent video core. You should be able to find one that's less expensive than
the Asus. Perhaps an MSI or Gigabyte.

--Adam
- Original Message -
From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 5:57 AM
Subject: Good integrated Athlon chipset for FreeBSD


Hello all,

I'm building a small workgroup (10 PCs) which will be used for software and
network testing as well for day-to-day usage. We're also conducting small
classes teaching UNIX for school students in our area. Therefore I'm looking
for a good integrated Athlon chipset which are supported in FreeBSD. I'm
specifically looking at Epox EP-8KMM+ utilizing the VIA KM266 chipset. But
I'm a little doubtful about the sound, video and above all, the NIC.

The sound uses Realtek ALC201A chipset, the video is VT8375 ProSavage8 and
the
NIC utilizes Realtek RTL8100B(L). I can't seem to find on the FreeBSD
hardware page supports for the sound and the NIC while a search on Xfree
driver site turned zero on the video. Does this mean, that they are not
supported? I'm really interested in the chipset because it's cheap and most
of us are literate when it comes to hardware, we can skip the support that
comes with pricier brands and motherboards.

My other option would be Asus A7N-266E using the nForce 420D chipset. I've
heard cases that this particular motherboard is usable in FreeBSD. The NIC
is
RTL8139 (rl) while other nForce boards seem to use the MCP-D built-in LAN,
which I can't seem to find any cases of it being run on any installation.

I'm open to any suggestion that will allow me to choose the best platform
for
our research. Cost of course is a factor but I will not buy cheap if it's
going to prove a hassle in the future.

Thank you for your time.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Good integrated Athlon chipset for FreeBSD

2003-01-12 Thread Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
On Monday 13 January 2003 04:28, Adam Maas wrote:
 The nForce based boards would be your best bet. Good solid chipset with a
 decent video core. You should be able to find one that's less expensive
 than the Asus. Perhaps an MSI or Gigabyte.


Gigabyte doesn't make nForce.

I'm keen on the MSI but I'm unsure of the NIC support. Unlike Asus which uses 
the clunky RTL8139 chipset, the MSI sticks with Nvidia original design, that 
is using the ones integrated into the MCP. I couldn't find any listing of it 
in the Hardware section so I'm assuming that it's unsupported.

I'm not keen on an add on NIC, if the NIC was integrated, might as well take 
advantage of it.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Dual Athlon MX install.

2002-12-11 Thread Yann Golanski
I'm looking for informations on installing FreeBSD on a dual Athlon MX
machine.  It's to be a research machine so will run intensive code -- NS
and other modeling tools.  I'm looking at things like:
 Which of 4.7, -STABLE, -CURRENT should I use?  
 What are the things I need to keep in mind while installing?  
 What are the pitfalls that I may fall into? 
 Any advice?

Thanks.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -=*=-  www.kierun.org
PGP:   009D 7287 C4A7 FD4F 1680  06E4 F751 7006 9DE2 6318
IRC:   nick kierun, server spod.uk.amiganet.org, channel #sanctus
NNGS:  nick kierun, server nngs.cosmic.org, port 9696.



msg11757/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Athlon motherboard for 5.0?

2002-12-09 Thread Gautham Ganapathy
On Sunday, December 08, 2002 2:01 AM, Cliff L. Biffle wrote

 I'm running 5.0-DP2 on an Asus motherboard with the Apollo
 KT133 chipset.  The
 chipset is notoriously buggy, according to the folks on
 -current, and I've
 been having trouble with the USB and ATA controllers -- though it's
 intermittent and hard to reproduce.

 I've stumbled across a new 1.4Ghz Athlon Thunderbird chip,
 which doesn't work
 in my older motherboard.  So, I'm in the market for a mobo.
 It's for a
 workstation, and integrated graphics and sound are not
 desired.  It'd be nice
 if it took PC133 SDRAM, since I have 768MB here, but DDR is okay if
 necessary.  But most importantly, everything on the
 motherboard needs to have
 good support in 5.0.  Support in 4-stable is nice, but hardly
 a requirement.
 If this means sticking with an older, more conservative chipset, and
 sacrificing things like USB 2.0, Firewire, or fast AGP, it
 doesn't bother me
 at all.  I'm not a gamer or a video producer; my motherboard
 is used solely
 to connect my CPU to RAM and cards. :-)

 Suggestions?

Don't know about 5.0. I am currently running 4.7-RELEASE on an ASUS
A7V333 with a 850 MHz Athlon TBird. Have had no problems so far with
audio/video/LAN... There were some problems with the chipset when I was
using 4.5-RELEASE, but i think they were fixed in 4.7


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon motherboard for 5.0?

2002-12-09 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:17:41AM +0530, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
 On Sunday, December 08, 2002 2:01 AM, Cliff L. Biffle wrote
 
  I'm running 5.0-DP2 on an Asus motherboard with the Apollo
  KT133 chipset.  The
  chipset is notoriously buggy, according to the folks on
  -current, and I've
  been having trouble with the USB and ATA controllers -- though it's
  intermittent and hard to reproduce.
 
  I've stumbled across a new 1.4Ghz Athlon Thunderbird chip,
  which doesn't work
  in my older motherboard.  So, I'm in the market for a mobo.
  It's for a
  workstation, and integrated graphics and sound are not
  desired.  It'd be nice
  if it took PC133 SDRAM, since I have 768MB here, but DDR is okay if
  necessary.  But most importantly, everything on the
  motherboard needs to have
  good support in 5.0.  Support in 4-stable is nice, but hardly
  a requirement.
  If this means sticking with an older, more conservative chipset, and
  sacrificing things like USB 2.0, Firewire, or fast AGP, it
  doesn't bother me
  at all.  I'm not a gamer or a video producer; my motherboard
  is used solely
  to connect my CPU to RAM and cards. :-)
 
  Suggestions?
 
 Don't know about 5.0. I am currently running 4.7-RELEASE on an ASUS
 A7V333 with a 850 MHz Athlon TBird. Have had no problems so far with
 audio/video/LAN... There were some problems with the chipset when I was
 using 4.5-RELEASE, but i think they were fixed in 4.7
 
I have a machine built around the A7V333-X using An Athlon 2000+XP. It
came with onboard sound and Lan (which is not why I bought it). The
sound works fine, the LAN not (but that does not worry me too much), It
works fine otherwise. I had some initial problems due to the fact I made the
mistake of building the machine on the floor instead of an a table while
sitting in a comfy chair, this caused me to read some jumper settings
the wrong way around .. *sigh*. I use DDR333 memory in it.

The BIOS was a bit cranky at first, seeming to forget things..but that
problem has gone away. Oh, the important part of your question .. 5.0 ..
yes it runs on it. Although my testing has hardly been exhaustive yet,

One of the problems I find with ASUS motherboards is that you get
contradictory information on their web-site and in publicity blurb about
what boards support what. In one place it would imply that my
combination should not work well, in another place fine.

I hesitate to recommend it, not because I have problems with it, but
because for something like 5.0 you should probably get as many opinions
as possible. Also 5.0 is quite new territory for me.

Usually, since I now build my own network computers I do a test of
installing FreeBSD, Linux and Windows on it. Apart from some issues I
have questioned, but sadly received no reply about yet, concerning
co-habitation of 4.7 and 5.0 on the same disk, and Linux moaning inconsequentially 
about not knowing what kind of South Bridge it had, Windows was by far and
away the most problematic,

Well I built it to eventually become a low traffic web/ftp server, so that is the way 
I am looking at it.


-- 
Regards
   Cliff Sarginson 
   The Netherlands

[ This mail has been checked as virus-free ]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Athlon motherboard for 5.0?

2002-12-07 Thread Cliff L. Biffle
I'd incorrectly posted this to -current earlier today, and was advised to 
repost here.  However, as I'm not subscribed, I'd appreciate any responses 
CC'd to my address. :-)

I'm running 5.0-DP2 on an Asus motherboard with the Apollo KT133 chipset.  The 
chipset is notoriously buggy, according to the folks on -current, and I've 
been having trouble with the USB and ATA controllers -- though it's 
intermittent and hard to reproduce.

I've stumbled across a new 1.4Ghz Athlon Thunderbird chip, which doesn't work 
in my older motherboard.  So, I'm in the market for a mobo.  It's for a 
workstation, and integrated graphics and sound are not desired.  It'd be nice 
if it took PC133 SDRAM, since I have 768MB here, but DDR is okay if 
necessary.  But most importantly, everything on the motherboard needs to have 
good support in 5.0.  Support in 4-stable is nice, but hardly a requirement.  
If this means sticking with an older, more conservative chipset, and 
sacrificing things like USB 2.0, Firewire, or fast AGP, it doesn't bother me 
at all.  I'm not a gamer or a video producer; my motherboard is used solely 
to connect my CPU to RAM and cards. :-)

Suggestions?

-Cliff L. Biffle

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



make builkernel error on Athlon

2002-11-26 Thread Nelis Lamprecht
Hi All

I'm busy compiling a custom kernel on a AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ to setup 
sound. I am also upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE to STABLE. After cvsuping to 
the latest stable source I run buildworld which works fine but on my 'make 
buildkernel KERNCONF=ENIGMA' I get the following error:


sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh ENIGMA
cc -c -O -pipe  -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs 
-Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline 
-Wcast-qual  -fformat-extensions -ansi  -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys 
-I/usr/src/sys/../include -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter  -D_KERNEL 
-include opt_global.h  -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2  vers.c
linking kernel
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_attach_sim':
umass.o(.text+0x137f): undefined reference to `cam_simq_alloc'
umass.o(.text+0x13a5): undefined reference to `cam_sim_alloc'
umass.o(.text+0x13be): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_register'
umass.o(.text+0x13ce): undefined reference to `cam_simq_free'
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan_callback':
umass.o(.text+0x13e7): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path'
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan':
umass.o(.text+0x1431): undefined reference to `xpt_periph'
umass.o(.text+0x143a): undefined reference to `xpt_create_path'
umass.o(.text+0x144d): undefined reference to `xpt_setup_ccb'
umass.o(.text+0x1468): undefined reference to `xpt_action'
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_detach_sim':
umass.o(.text+0x151f): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_deregister'
umass.o(.text+0x153d): undefined reference to `cam_sim_free'
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_detach':
umass.o(.text+0x157e): undefined reference to `xpt_create_path'
umass.o(.text+0x159f): undefined reference to `xpt_async'
umass.o(.text+0x15a7): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path'
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_action':
umass.o(.text+0x1913): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
umass.o(.text+0x1925): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_cb':
umass.o(.text+0x1a21): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_sense_cb':
umass.o(.text+0x1b28): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
umass.o(.text+0x1b39): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
umass.o(.text+0x1b53): more undefined references to `xpt_done' follow
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ENIGMA.
*** Error code 1

Any suggestions, help would be greatly appreciated. I have upgraded and 
built custom kernel's many times before without any problems on Intel 
platform but this is my first on an AMD machine. Any specific AMD kernel 
config's I should know about ?

Kind Regards,
Nelis


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: make builkernel error on Athlon

2002-11-26 Thread Akifyev Sergey
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 14:56, Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
 Hi All
 
 I'm busy compiling a custom kernel on a AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ to setup 

It's not your hardware problem. You could post your kernel config. :)
Bug probably resides there.

 sound. I am also upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE to STABLE. After cvsuping to 
 the latest stable source I run buildworld which works fine but on my 'make 
[...skipped...]

Also, there is a probability you've messed things up while cvsup'ing.
You should remove all SCSI (CAM(4)) devices from kernel, and I bet it
will compile.

Regards,
Sergey


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: make builkernel error on Athlon

2002-11-26 Thread iulian
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:56:04 +0200
NL wrote:

 Hi All
 
 I'm busy compiling a custom kernel on a AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ to setup 
 sound. I am also upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE to STABLE. After cvsuping to 
 the latest stable source I run buildworld which works fine but on my 'make 
 buildkernel KERNCONF=ENIGMA' I get the following error:
 
 
 sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh ENIGMA
 cc -c -O -pipe  -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs 
 -Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline 
 -Wcast-qual  -fformat-extensions -ansi  -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys 
 -I/usr/src/sys/../include -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter  -D_KERNEL 
 -include opt_global.h  -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2  vers.c
 linking kernel
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_attach_sim':
 umass.o(.text+0x137f): undefined reference to `cam_simq_alloc'
 umass.o(.text+0x13a5): undefined reference to `cam_sim_alloc'
 umass.o(.text+0x13be): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_register'
 umass.o(.text+0x13ce): undefined reference to `cam_simq_free'
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan_callback':
 umass.o(.text+0x13e7): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path'
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan':
 umass.o(.text+0x1431): undefined reference to `xpt_periph'
 umass.o(.text+0x143a): undefined reference to `xpt_create_path'
 umass.o(.text+0x144d): undefined reference to `xpt_setup_ccb'
 umass.o(.text+0x1468): undefined reference to `xpt_action'
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_detach_sim':
 umass.o(.text+0x151f): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_deregister'
 umass.o(.text+0x153d): undefined reference to `cam_sim_free'
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_detach':
 umass.o(.text+0x157e): undefined reference to `xpt_create_path'
 umass.o(.text+0x159f): undefined reference to `xpt_async'
 umass.o(.text+0x15a7): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path'
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_action':
 umass.o(.text+0x1913): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
 umass.o(.text+0x1925): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_cb':
 umass.o(.text+0x1a21): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
 umass.o: In function `umass_cam_sense_cb':
 umass.o(.text+0x1b28): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
 umass.o(.text+0x1b39): undefined reference to `xpt_done'
 umass.o(.text+0x1b53): more undefined references to `xpt_done' follow
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ENIGMA.
 *** Error code 1
 
I had exactly the same problem.
I was trying to build kernel using make buildkernel, make installkernel
I have not the same hardware
I solved that problem following 
cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf  /usr/sbin/config NEW_KERNEL
cd ../../compile/NEW_KERNEL
make depend
make
make install
An d I have a new kernel :)
 Any suggestions, help would be greatly appreciated. I have upgraded and 
 built custom kernel's many times before without any problems on Intel 
 platform but this is my first on an AMD machine. Any specific AMD kernel 
 config's I should know about ?
 
 Kind Regards,
 Nelis
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


---
Iulian
Romtelecom OM Network Operation
IN Management Center 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: make builkernel error on Athlon

2002-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:23:21PM +, iulian wrote:

 I had exactly the same problem.

You are both ignoring the documentation in GENERIC that tells you
which kernel option you are missing from your config file :)

Kris



msg10203/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


FreeBSD and Athlon XP

2002-11-08 Thread soheil soheil
Dear All
can i compile the FreeBSD kernel on Athlon XP processor Types ? and is 
freebsd compatible with it or not
Thanx

_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-11 Thread Roman Neuhauser

# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-10 15:43:36 -0700:
 I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86, 
 and with a tv card.   I'd like to know some motherboards that work well 
 with FreeBSD?
 
 Someone didn't have the same troubles with  soltek SL-75DRV2 
 http://www1.soltek.com.tw/English/product/75drv2.htm

looks like the solteks are fine. you might want to take DRV4 or
DRV5.
 
 I've bought asus card because my hp pavillion had a asus card with a via 
 chipset.  I read after that they don't document their boards so that 
 open source developers can support all the features easily.  Whats a 
 more open motherboard brand?  Are Via chipsets the best supported? The 
 card I'm having trouble with has a acer chipset.

i also wanted to buy asus when i was going for a new box, but during
the research i found out that people were having trouble getting X
up with some of the asus boards. X was essential since i was
upgrading my desktop, so i went with abit KR7A (the no-raid version,
VIA KT266A chipset), and i'm really happy with it.

btw, there was a Athlon XP mobo test in the august issue of the
czech Chip magazine, and they got the best numbers from
a DFI AD76 RAID mobo. VIA KT333 chipset, Promise 20276, onboard
sound (Realtek RTL8100). if i was buying a new mobo i would go for
this one.

(i have no experience with DFI mobos. maybe someone could chime in?)

-- 
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
10:26AM up 23 days, 17:41, 21 users, load averages: 0.25, 0.22, 0.16
end

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-11 Thread John Bleichert

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, W. D. wrote:

 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:31:16 -0500
 From: W. D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD
 
 At 17:43 10/10/2002, Corey Holcomb-Hockin, wrote:
 I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86, 
 and with a tv card.   I'd like to know some motherboards that work well 
 with FreeBSD?
 
 Does anyone know what motherboards will work with an AMD chip(s) in a 
 1U rack mount server case?
 
 Start Here to Find It Fast!© - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/
 

Have you found a HowTo on rolling your own rackmount? I'd love to see it. 
I've been considering one of these for my house:

http://eracks.com/eRacks/products/config?sku=PREMIUM

JB

#  John Bleichert 
#  http://vonbek.dhs.org/latest.jpg


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-11 Thread Jim Durham

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Corey Holcomb-Hockin wrote:

 I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86, 
 and with a tv card.   I'd like to know some motherboards that work well 
 with FreeBSD?
 
 Someone didn't have the same troubles with  soltek SL-75DRV2 
 http://www1.soltek.com.tw/English/product/75drv2.htm
 
 I've bought asus card because my hp pavillion had a asus card with a via 
 chipset.  I read after that they don't document their boards so that 
 open source developers can support all the features easily.  Whats a 
 more open motherboard brand?  Are Via chipsets the best supported? The 
 card I'm having trouble with has a acer chipset.
 

The A-Open AK77Pro runs very nicel with 4.6.2. I'm using
vinum in Raid 1 on it and it's greased lightning.

A friend who owns an ISP is using it all over his plant also.

-Jim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-11 Thread W. D.

At 08:18 10/11/2002, John Bleichert, wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, W. D. wrote:

 
 Does anyone know what motherboards will work with an AMD chip(s) in a 
 1U rack mount server case?

Have you found a HowTo on rolling your own rackmount? I'd love to see it. 
I've been considering one of these for my house:

http://eracks.com/eRacks/products/config?sku=PREMIUM

Nice!

Here are some monsters that would be nice to have if they worked with
FreeBSD:

http://www.ApPro.com/1124.html

http://www.DualAthlonServers.com/103multiview/


Start Here to Find It Fast!© - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-11 Thread Jud



-Original Message-
From: Jim Durham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Corey Holcomb-Hockin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:04:33 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Corey Holcomb-Hockin wrote:

 I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86, 
 and with a tv card.   I'd like to know some motherboards that work well 
 with FreeBSD?
 
 Someone didn't have the same troubles with  soltek SL-75DRV2 
 http://www1.soltek.com.tw/English/product/75drv2.htm
 
 I've bought asus card because my hp pavillion had a asus card with a via 
 chipset.  I read after that they don't document their boards so that 
 open source developers can support all the features easily.  Whats a 
 more open motherboard brand?  Are Via chipsets the best supported? The 
 card I'm having trouble with has a acer chipset.
 

The A-Open AK77Pro runs very nicel with 4.6.2. I'm using
vinum in Raid 1 on it and it's greased lightning.

A friend who owns an ISP is using it all over his plant also.

-Jim

**

I noticed someone else in this thread replying that
his A7A-133 worked OK.  I have an ASUS A7V333 that
works very nicely.  Have you considered that it may
just be XFree or video card problems and not the
motherboard?

Specifically, what problems are you having?

Jud


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-10 Thread Kevin Stevens



On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Corey Holcomb-Hockin wrote:

 I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86,
 and with a tv card.   I'd like to know some motherboards that work well
 with FreeBSD?

I just upgraded my FreeBSD system from an Abit KT7A-Raid to a MSI K7T266
Pro 2A board with an Athlon XP 1800+ (combo was $99 at Fry's a couple of
weeks ago).  This board will handle up to the 2600+ with the newer BIOS if
I remember correctly.

Smoothest upgrade I've ever done.  No glitches, no bridge workarounds, no
devices not found, nothing.  Came up running the first time and is still
there.

KeS



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-10 Thread John Bleichert

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Kenneth Culver wrote:

 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:41:26 -0400 (EDT)
 From: Kenneth Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Corey Holcomb-Hockin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD
 
  I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86,
  and with a tv card.  I'd like to know some motherboards that work well
  with FreeBSD?
 
 If your motherboard isn't working, then most likely there is some bios
 configuration that could be tweaked to fix the problem. That said I'm
 using an abit kx7-333 with an athlon xp 2000+ and have absolutely no
 problems at all.
 
  Someone didn't have the same troubles with  soltek SL-75DRV2
  http://www1.soltek.com.tw/English/product/75drv2.htm
 
  I've bought asus card because my hp pavillion had a asus card with a via
  chipset.  I read after that they don't document their boards so that
  open source developers can support all the features easily.  Whats a
  more open motherboard brand?  Are Via chipsets the best supported? The
  card I'm having trouble with has a acer chipset.
 
 I don't know how well FreeBSD supports the acer chipsets, but I've had no
 trouble with my via-based chipset.
 
 Ken
 

Agreed - my VIA chipset works fine. The board is an A7V-133:

johnnyb:~  dmesg | grep -i via
pcib2: VIA 8363 (Apollo KT133) PCI-PCI (AGP) bridge at device 1.0 on 
pci0
isab0: VIA 82C686 PCI-ISA bridge at device 4.0 on pci0
atapci0: VIA 82C686 ATA100 controller port 0xd800-0xd80f at device 4.1 
on pci0
uhci0: VIA 83C572 USB controller port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 5 at device 4.3 
on pci0
usb0: VIA 83C572 USB controller on uhci0
uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1

I haven't fiddled with the onboard RAID at all.

HTH - JB

#  John Bleichert 
#  http://vonbek.dhs.org/latest.jpg


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-10 Thread W. D.

At 17:43 10/10/2002, Corey Holcomb-Hockin, wrote:
I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86, 
and with a tv card.   I'd like to know some motherboards that work well 
with FreeBSD?

Does anyone know what motherboards will work with an AMD chip(s) in a 
1U rack mount server case?

Start Here to Find It Fast!© - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Athlon XP motherboards that work well with FreeBSD

2002-10-10 Thread erk

I'll give a good nod to my current board, a Soyo SY-K7V Dragon Plus! VIA
KT266A 100/133 FSB.  It has onboard sound and LAN, but both are well
supported, and can be put aside with a simple change under BIOS.  It was
a really good option for me, initially, because when I built this box, I
was somewhat low on cash.  The onboard stuff saved me a few $$$ early
on, though i've since upgraded the sound card to a Soundblaster Live
5.1.  It also has onboard RAID, and supports up to 3GB of PC2100
DDR-SDRAM.  Very, very smooth little board, even with just 256MB.  I
haven't made use of the RAID yet, but from what I understand, it works
just fine.

Both the processor and mobo have come down quite a bit in price since I
bought it, so you could probably get them cheaply from a place like
newegg.com or directron.com...assuming you want something in the 1+ghz
range.

- erik

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:43:36 -0700
Corey Holcomb-Hockin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've been having trouble with my a7a-133.  I had trouble with XFree86,
 
 and with a tv card.   I'd like to know some motherboards that work
 well with FreeBSD?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: /etc/make.conf and AMD Athlon 600

2002-10-08 Thread Adam Weinberger


 (10.07.2002 @ 2143 PST): Peter Leftwich said, in 0.8K: 
 I didn't have .../share/mk/ so I went out with google and downloaded
 bsd.cpu.mk -- Wouldn't it be nice if mv had a flag to create directories
 if they don't exist?  Same with the command touch.

put this in your shell's rcfile:
mvm() {mkdir -p `dirname $2`  mv $1 $2;}

seriously, peter, get a book on UNIX utilities. the o'reilly unix power
tools book is great.

-Adam


--
Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw.
-Lilo, Lilo  Stitch
Adam Weinberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: /etc/make.conf and AMD Athlon 600

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Leftwich

On 6 Oct 2002, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
 PL My PC has an AMD Athlon 600, so in /etc/make.conf should I have i686 or k7?
 Find your answer (k7) in /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk

I didn't have .../share/mk/ so I went out with google and downloaded
bsd.cpu.mk -- Wouldn't it be nice if mv had a flag to create directories
if they don't exist?  Same with the command touch.

 I've been using k6-2 for my AMD pre-Athlon CPU for a year or so,
 with no known problems, but do read the warnings in
 /etc/defaults/make.conf about it.  The default is i386.

Defaults are made to be over-ridden and surpassed as HW allows. ;-)

--
Peter Leftwich
President  Founder
Video2Video Services
Box 13692, La Jolla, CA, 92039 USA
+1-413-403-9555


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



/etc/make.conf and AMD Athlon 600

2002-10-06 Thread Peter Leftwich

From `dmesg` I see the following:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (598.84-MHz 686-class CPU)

My PC has an AMD Athlon 600, so in /etc/make.conf should I have i686 or k7?

#   Intel x86 architecture:
#   (AMD CPUs)  k7 k6-2 k6 k5
#   (Intel CPUs)p4 p3 p2 i686 i586/mmx i586 i486 i386
CPUTYPE=i686

--
Peter Leftwich
President  Founder
Video2Video Services
Box 13692, La Jolla, CA, 92039 USA
+1-413-403-9555


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



  1   2   >