Re: [appengine-java] Debugging in Eclipse - App Engine dev web server doesn't respond
Hello! I am experiencing a very similar problem but I have verified this only happens when I use eclipse. If I run a web service from netbeans for example, I can connect to localhost perfectly. What could be wrong? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Google checkout and GAE
Hello Will, I am assuming you are using the Google Checkout integration java API. Though I don't remember the exact details but I recall having run into similar issues with Google Checkout when I was doing some work for Exxtensionshttps://www.exxential.com/exxtensions/home and it turned out that it was the JAXB context creation that accounted for almost all the delay. So it is not really an issue with checkout being slow, but the client library just isn't optimized. Ultimately, I had to move the creation of the context to the static block apart from several other minor changes here and there. Hope that helps. Tarun On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 PM, WillSpecht willspe...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to integrate Google checkout with my GAE app. I am hitting 2 big bottle necks. exampleNotificationServelet is using a ton of CPU and usually fails with a time out if starting a new instance. I'm reading a few values from the merchant data and then doing one write to the data store. I don't see what can be taking that much time. It is also taking forever to create a cart and redirect to the Google checkout page. It takes almost 15 seconds once pressing the checkout button. I have narrowed this down to the build and postCart methods. When I step through while debugging on my local host, these methods take about 10-12 seconds to complete. Is this normal? I am having trouble debugging exampleNotificationServelet, since I don't know what checkout is sending to my server. Can anyone explain a good way to fake a notification to the localhost running exampleNotificationServelet? So I can set break points and see what is taking up so much CPU. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: ImagesServiceFactory.makeImageFromBlob(blobKey) image.getImageData() gets NULL error
I'm going to try to get the job done with HTML5 for now, until the server has the features to do the job. http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/index.html?overview-summary.html http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-canvas-element.html#images -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] raise limits for applications
Hi all, I was thinking if there could be a way to raise the limits for applications. My contecern is, that I have a JNLP application with a nice bunch of libraries included (e.g. jasper reports, etc), which takes the application nicely over 10 MB. The application is built as a Netbeans RPC application, so there is a jnlp-servlet for downloading all necessary files. Unfortunatelly, such applications are rarely under 10 MB. The jnlp-servlet itself does not consume much memory (as far I know), so this is not a problem, To download all libraries may take a little processing time, traffic and request time (well, even for slow trafic I hope each library is downloaded in 30s), but that's why there is billing quota for I am willing to pay. I'd see the google apps as a nice platform to deploy web start applications too, but for bigger application there would be nice to raise request handler quotas too, even if it would be a payed service. I don't think a need a separate VPS instance running 24x7 just to download a jnlp application. The question is, if there is another solution or I'll have to work on getting the static libraries deployed somewhere else (not a bad ide too). Regards Perun -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Google checkout and GAE
Can someone explain why the SDK doesn't work on app engine. Does it use a library that's not on the white list? Is it just broken in general and doesn't work well anywhere? On Mar 22, 7:02 am, Tarun Jain tj...@exxential.com wrote: Hello Will, I am assuming you are using the Google Checkout integration java API. Though I don't remember the exact details but I recall having run into similar issues with Google Checkout when I was doing some work for Exxtensionshttps://www.exxential.com/exxtensions/home and it turned out that it was the JAXB context creation that accounted for almost all the delay. So it is not really an issue with checkout being slow, but the client library just isn't optimized. Ultimately, I had to move the creation of the context to the static block apart from several other minor changes here and there. Hope that helps. Tarun On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 PM, WillSpecht willspe...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to integrate Google checkout with my GAE app. I am hitting 2 big bottle necks. exampleNotificationServelet is using a ton of CPU and usually fails with a time out if starting a new instance. I'm reading a few values from the merchant data and then doing one write to the data store. I don't see what can be taking that much time. It is also taking forever to create a cart and redirect to the Google checkout page. It takes almost 15 seconds once pressing the checkout button. I have narrowed this down to the build and postCart methods. When I step through while debugging on my local host, these methods take about 10-12 seconds to complete. Is this normal? I am having trouble debugging exampleNotificationServelet, since I don't know what checkout is sending to my server. Can anyone explain a good way to fake a notification to the localhost running exampleNotificationServelet? So I can set break points and see what is taking up so much CPU. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Google Apps Marketplace sample application exceptio
Hi! I followed the steps in this tutorial, and my app is hosted on app engine. http://code.google.com/intl/hu-HU/googleapps/marketplace/tutorial_java.html I had the following experiences: - On my private listing in the Apps Marketplace I click on Add it now, I give my apps domain and as I click on the Go button nothing happens. - I go to the app engine and open the application from there. It starts, asks for my domain, I grant access for the app to my domain, and after that the folowing message appears: Error: Server ErrorThe server encountered an error and could not complete your request. I checked the log and it says: 1. /hello com.google.gdata.util.AuthenticationException: OK HTML HEAD TITLEToken invalid - Invalid AuthSub token./TITLE /HEAD BODY BGCOLOR=#FF TEXT=#00 H1Token invalid - Invalid AuthSub token./H1 H2Error 401/H2 /BODY /HTML at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.handleErrorResponse(HttpGDataRequest.java:564) at com.google.gdata.client.http.GoogleGDataRequest.handleErrorResponse(GoogleGDataRequest.java:543) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.checkResponse(HttpGDataRequest.java:536) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.execute(HttpGDataRequest.java:515) at com.google.gdata.client.http.GoogleGDataRequest.execute(GoogleGDataRequest.java:515) at com.google.gdata.client.Service.getFeed(Service.java:1053) at com.google.gdata.client.Service.getFeed(Service.java:995) at com.google.gdata.client.GoogleService.getFeed(GoogleService.java:662) at com.google.gdata.client.Service.query(Service.java:1155) at com.google.gdata.client.Service.query(Service.java:1096) at com.google.code.samples.apps.marketplace.CalendarServlet.nextEvent(CalendarServlet.java:119) at com.google.code.samples.apps.marketplace.CalendarServlet.doGet(CalendarServlet.java:89) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1166) at com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.ParseBlobUploadFilter.doFilter(ParseBlobUploadFilter.java:97) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.SaveSessionFilter.doFilter(SaveSessionFilter.java:35) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.TransactionCleanupFilter.doFilter(TransactionCleanupFilter.java:43) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:388) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:765) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:418) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.handle(AppVersionHandlerMap.java:238) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:542) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:923) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.RpcRequestParser.parseAvailable(RpcRequestParser.java:76) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.JettyServletEngineAdapter.serviceRequest(JettyServletEngineAdapter.java:135) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.JavaRuntime.handleRequest(JavaRuntime.java:261) at com.google.apphosting.base.RuntimePb$EvaluationRuntime$2.handleRequest(RuntimePb.java:8440) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.RpcUtil.runRpcInApplication(RpcUtil.java:454) at com.google.net.rpc.impl.Server$RpcTask.runInContext(Server.java:572) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext$TraceContextRunnable$1.run(TraceContext.java:448) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext.runInContext(TraceContext.java:688) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext$AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContextNoUnref(TraceContext.java:326) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext$AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContext(TraceContext.java:318) at com.google.tracing.TraceContext$TraceContextRunnable.run(TraceContext.java:446) at
Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction
It's my understanding that, with HR, getting an entity by key is only strongly consistent within a transaction. If this is wrong, then a significant portion of my own task handling code may need revisiting... Perhaps someone who knows more could clarify this. Tom. On 21 March 2011 22:10, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote: I've got a query about tasks and transactions on a High-replication app that I'm hoping someone can help me with. I've got the following scenario: 1) Begin a transaction 2) Persist an entity 3) Enqueue a task within the transaction 4) Commit the transaction Within the task, I get the entity via its key and I'm finding that the object has yet to be updated in the datastore - it was my belief that getting an entity via its key is strongly consistent, so I was quite surprised to see that the entity was stale. Is this result expected? I've got some defensive code in place now which just re-enqueues the task, but I wasn't sure whether that was the right approach. I originally had the same issue on the MS version of my app, before I realised that I needed to enqueue the task within the same transaction to ensure the persist had occurred before the task was run. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction
I thought that it was strongly consistent because in the background the get-by-key was forced into a transaction and that you didn't have to declare it yourself. If it didn't happen so sporadically, I'd test to see whether this fixed the issue! As you say, if someone could clarify that would be great. If consistency isn't the issue, then it looks to me that the task is being kicked off before the transaction is committed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction
According to the docs, gets, puts, deletes, and ancestor queries are all strongly consistent: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/hr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Set password for appcfg.sh update
Hi, Is there way to use a pre-defined password (e.g. set as a parameter or from some file) for the update task (http://code.google.com/appengine/ docs/java/tools/uploadinganapp.html)? Unfortunately, I couldn't find an appropriate parameter. I'd like to upload my app to App Engine as part of an automated Continuous Integration process without having to enter the password on the command-line. Thanks, Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction
Thanks for the link, somehow I'd managed to miss that page of documentation entirely*; it's good to know, though it indicates other problems for the OP. I'm not clear on why eventually consistent gets aren't an option, ie. why all gets are indicated as being strongly consistent. Is this a direct consequence of replication algorithm used? There are various places in the code I'm currently developing where dirty gets are adequate and I'd be happy to see them faster. * As an aside, I do find the documentation on the datastore feels very scattered. I'd much prefer sections on the underlying app engine mechanics with less language specific guidance. Tom. On 22 March 2011 17:59, Jay Young jayyoung9...@gmail.com wrote: According to the docs, gets, puts, deletes, and ancestor queries are all strongly consistent: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/hr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Task Enqueue in a Transaction
Hi, For me, the answer is here: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/transactions.html#Isolation_and_Consistency They say: Queries and gets inside a transaction are guaranteed to see a single, consistent snapshot of the datastore as of the beginning of the transaction. In particular, entities and index rows in the transaction's entity group are fully updated so that queries return the complete, correct set of result entities, without the false positives or false negatives described in Transaction Isolation that can occur in queries outside of transactions. The task is part of the initial transaction so it sees the ds as of the beginning of the transaction regards didier On Mar 22, 9:12 pm, Tom Gibara tomgib...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the link, somehow I'd managed to miss that page of documentation entirely*; it's good to know, though it indicates other problems for the OP. I'm not clear on why eventually consistent gets aren't an option, ie. why all gets are indicated as being strongly consistent. Is this a direct consequence of replication algorithm used? There are various places in the code I'm currently developing where dirty gets are adequate and I'd be happy to see them faster. * As an aside, I do find the documentation on the datastore feels very scattered. I'd much prefer sections on the underlying app engine mechanics with less language specific guidance. Tom. On 22 March 2011 17:59, Jay Young jayyoung9...@gmail.com wrote: According to the docs, gets, puts, deletes, and ancestor queries are all strongly consistent: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/hr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: gae needs a counter service
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.comwrote: On 19 March 2011 00:22, Nick Johnson (Google) wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Joshua Smith wrote: Generate the next sequential ID is a function universally provided by SQL databases. Also, SQL databases always provide an efficient count(rows) function, whereas GAE does not. So I don't think it's unreasonable to expect google to back-fill this deficiency as David asks. Actually, I'm not aware of any relational databases that provide an efficient count() implementation other than on complete tables (which is rarely very useful) - counting the results in an arbitrary result set requires iterating over all the rows, which is what App Engine does. At least some can answer count queries using just index scans - ie doesnt touch the actual data. Can get close to that with keys_only - which persumably is just what the index contains - and counting the rows, but it still requires transfer of all keys to the application (I think anyway) just to be discarded. This is exactly what the .count() method does in App Engine. It's still O(n), though. -Nick Johnson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.4.3 now available for download
I run the prerelease through the test suite of my python app and passed. Thanks for the new features and for not introducing any regressions. I am glad to see fixes/new feature with sqlite and blobstore. In my case more fixes are needed before I am able to attempt the switch (3085 3835 for blobs/3265,3124,3689 for sqlite). I look forward to seeing these fixes in the near future along with the Next Gen queries... PK http://www.gae123.com On Mar 21, 11:27 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: Hey guys, We're pretty close to releasing SDK 1.4.3. You can download the prerelease SDKs for local verification at: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/list As usual, these are local SDK only and shouldn't work when deployed, though some features may partially work due to the fact that the backends may have partially been pushed (protip: don't do it). Release notes are below. Lots of cool stuff in this release! Big ones? Files API for programmatic blobstore writes, Prospective Search API, concurrent requests for Java (this is huge), deferred and Remote API libraries for Java + lots of bug fixes. Python 1.4.3 = - Added Files API that allows writing to and reading from files in blobstore. - You can now specify cron execution for a time interval between a start and end time. - You can now configure the specific application version to which a task queue or cron job will send requests. - The Admin Console Task Queues page now displays a more accurate estimate of queue size for queues containing more than 2000 tasks. - The Prospective Search API (formerly named the Matcher API) is available for use by all applications. This API is still experimental, so applications will be limited to a maximum of 1000 subscriptions. - The Testbed API provides easy configuration of stub libraries for local integration tests. - In the Images API, the quality parameter was added to the resize, rotate, horizontal_flip, vertical_flip, crop and im_feeling_lucky methods. - Fixed an issue where static file serving in the dev_appserver didn't support etags. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=368 - An error is now raised when the script mapping in the app.yaml file is missing the .py file extension. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=976 - Fixed an issue where no link was displayed in the Admin Console blobstore viewer for an unnamed blob. - Fixed an issue where the Admin Console data viewer couldn't edit entities with ByteString properties. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2367 - Fixed an issue where the Admin Console crashed when using a non-ascii key_name. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2451 - Fixed an issue filtering on __key__ while using the --use_sqlite option with the dev_appserver. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3232 - The Disable Application admin function has been button-ized. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4323 - Fixed an SDK issue where debugging logging wouldn't correctly print URLFetch payloads. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=783 - Fixed an SDK issue where an incompatible line ending was used on blob upload. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3328 - Added more graceful handling of the missing mapreduce.yaml file when the user has enabled the Datastore Admin but is not otherwise using the MapReduce framework. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3903 - Fixed an issue where the method webapp_add_wsgi_middleware was no longer recognized. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4236 Java 1.4.3 = - Added FileService API that allows writing to and reading from files in blobstore. - You can now specify cron execution for a time interval between a start and end time. - Java applications can enable concurrent request support by setting threadsafe to True in their appengine-web.xml. This flag indicates that request handlers for your app are thread safe and multiple request handlers may safely run at the same time in the same memory space for your application. - Deferred library support now available in Java. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2381 - Remote API library now available in Java. This can be used in conjunction with apps using either the Java or the Python runtime. - The Java SDK now supports kindless and ancestor only queries. - Fixed an issue where JAX-WS clients in the SDK could not handle receiving a SOAP fault. - Fixed an issue where the SDK did not support fetching HTTPS URLs. - Fixed an issue where no link was displayed in the Admin Console blobstore viewer for an unnamed blob. - Fixed an issue where the
[google-appengine] Python AppEngine down
Hi, My Python app has been down since approx 06:52 UTC; app can't seem to find the AppEngine runtime libraries; is this a general outage ? Thanks, Justin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Python AppEngine down
Hi, My Python app has been unavailable since approx 06:52 UTC today; looks like the app can't find the AppEngine runtime libraries; is this a general outage ? Thanks, Justin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Python AppEngine down
Apologies, my error; left a trailing bracket in an import library :-( On Mar 22, 7:02 am, Justin justin.worr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My Python app has been unavailable since approx 06:52 UTC today; looks like the app can't find the AppEngine runtime libraries; is this a general outage ? Thanks, Justin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.4.3 now available for download
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Matija matija.jerko...@gmail.com wrote: Can you explain 'concurrent requests for Java' ? (warning: I don't work for the big G) Believe it or not, all GAE/Java requests are all single-threaded right now... similar to the GAE/Python architecture. It doesn't matter much for your app since GAE spins up as many instances as necessary to handle load, but it's inefficient - especially considering the ~75MB memory footprint of each JVM compares unfavorably to ~13 for a Python VM. Looks like that restriction is about to be removed. Google: Why not just make this the default? Or at least announce that it will become the future default, so people don't start counting on single-threaded behavior. Presumably we've all been coding to the servlet API, which is very specific about thread behavior. I don't think anyone realized that requests were single-threaded, and if they coded with this (undocumented and spec-violating) assumption, they deserve to have their apps break. I imagine that you could cut down the total # of instances running in the cluster by a significant factor (2x, 3x, more?) this way. My hope is that this efficiency will ultimately lead to a cheaper and faster appengine... but people need some incentive not to use single thread mode. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
RE: [google-appengine] Re: Python AppEngine down
If you version your pushes you can always check if you blew something up by failing back to a last good version with the 1.myapp.appspot.com -Original Message- From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Justin Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:07 AM To: Google App Engine Subject: [google-appengine] Re: Python AppEngine down Apologies, my error; left a trailing bracket in an import library :-( On Mar 22, 7:02 am, Justin justin.worr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My Python app has been unavailable since approx 06:52 UTC today; looks like the app can't find the AppEngine runtime libraries; is this a general outage ? Thanks, Justin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] What's the syntax of the cron job for the first day of every month?
Hey, I want to generate a monthly report on the first day of the month, any idea on doing this with cron jobs? -- Best regards, Yuhui -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: email sent by GAE would be regarded as spam for some email services
me 2. Have integrated the SES service within our GAE apps. work good and solved our problems sure it would be more nice if GAE can provide email service at the quality level similar to the Amazon SES one (at least would not be classified as SPAM), so we dont need to manage both . could we make this suggestion to GAE team? - eric On 22 March 2011 05:30, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Wow, great idea! I have been having some delivery issues lately with GAE and looking for an alternative. I just downloaded a pythong Amazon SES library, signed up for SES, and put it all together and it works like a charm with GAE! On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote: Hi Eric, Have you looked at Amazon's Simple Email Service (SES)? http://aws.amazon.com/ses/ Pretty much the same cost as sending email using GAE, except with SES you only get 2,000 free emails if you're sending email from an EC2 instance. I haven't used it myself but apparently they scan outgoing mail to make sure it meets ISP standards. This leads me to believe emails sent via SES would be less likely to be automatically marked as spam than on GAE, since SES's spam-sending-reputation would be lower than GAE's, due to their pre-filtering and rate-limiting. Nick On 21 March 2011 13:51, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ernesto, thx for your suggestion! yes, i think it shall work. but in general if we can't ask all our users to add our email to their contact list (or they are not willing to do so), how can emails sent by us prevent to be regarded as spam? all our subject, body etc. are nothing spam-liked, and seems it's the problem of the email server that actually sends the email. anyone share similar case, or has other solution? regards, eric On 19 March 2011 00:12, Ernesto Karim Oltra ernestoka...@gmail.com wrote: Ask the user to add the e-mail from address of your e-mails to their contacts list, so your e-mails would never been sent to spam again (for that users, at least). It's a bit hacky, but can do a great work meanwhile you find another solution. On 18 mar, 07:52, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: we use mail.send_mail() to send some important messages to our users through an app hosted on GAE, in which the 'from' has been set to one of a registered admin for the app. it works quite well for most users, except for some email service provider (e.g. '...@yahoo.com.hk'), they would always automatically treat these emails as spam and put them into spam box of the user's email account (if the user has enabled the spam filtering feature, which is by default ON) . in this case, many of our users do not aware for these important messages (they would seldom look into mails in their spambox) we have tried using different from, subject, body and the results are the same. we suspect that it is the email server does matter, and maybe before there were some other apps hosted on GAE sending spams to like '@ yahoo.com.hk', so '...@yahoo.com.hk' would regard all emails sent from this email server in GAE as spam. do anyone share similar experiences? or there should be other causes? any ideas we can solve this problem? (successfully deliver the email to our users using those email service without being regarded as spam) thx in advanced! - eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at
Re: RE: [google-appengine] HR Issues (But Up time is great)
I'm glad to hear it's now working for you! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.4.3 now available for download
I agree with Jeff - anyone who is used to developing with a servlet container realises that they are dealing with a multi-threaded environment and should already be coding with this in mind. I'm honestly really surprised that this support isn't there already - thankfully it's performed well enough that it hasn't been noticable! A quick question for the Google team - will the multi-request handler behaviour be rolled out into the local development server as well, or is this only being enabled for the production environment? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: GQL performance slow
Hi Ikai, is there a measure to say the entities are large? is it about
the number of
columns or blob or text? if so in my entities I have string and number
properties only.
Yes. I need all the 2000 (some times bit more) entities at once for
reporting.
Currently I'm not seeing a way where I can split the keys and fetch.
On Mar 21, 11:54 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
If that's the performance, then I'm inclined to say the entities are large
and that's about the performance you can expect. One more thing to keep in
mind: the cost of deserializing each entity is non-trivial.
Is there a reason you need all 2000 entities? Perhaps there is a different
way to accomplish what you want without querying a (relatively) large number
of entities at once.
One other possible solution that will at least make your user facing code
run faster is to split the query up by key, perform multiple async queries
and join them at the end. It'll still consume the same (or more) CPU time,
but the user ms should be lower since you are doing things in parallel. The
tradeoff here, of course, is that you'd need to know how you can split up
the keyspace.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:17 AM, adhi adhinaraya...@gmail.com wrote:
q = db.Query(PrimaryData)
q.filter('SheetMetadataId', metadata.getSheetId())
return q.fetch(2000)
Hi Ikai, even the above query takes 3.3 ~ 3.6 seconds. The number of
entities returned by the query is 1261.
I'm using Expando model, the total number columns for this particular
set of entities are 25.
Yes. I've created composite index. Here is the index definition.
- kind: PrimaryData
properties:
- name: SheetMetadataId
- name: InstanceAssignedTo
please let me know if you need more information.
On Mar 17, 11:50 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
If you have a composite index, the performance of this query should be
mostly linear (find start location of index and just return min(2000,
number
of entities that satisfy query from there on out) number of keys and
items.
If you only have individual indexes for SheetMetadataId as well as
InstanceAssignedTo, this uses zigzag merge join, where performance can
greatly vary depending on the shape of the data.
Just out of curiosity, what is the performance of this query?
q = db.Query(PrimaryData)
q.filter('SheetMetadataId', metadata.getSheetId())
return q.fetch(2000)
If it's in a similar ballpark, my other guess is that the query takes
that
amount of time because the entities are large.
You mentioned created a composite index. Can you post that?
I'll talk to the datastore team to see what we can do to provide
something
similar to EXPLAIN plans for queries.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:07 AM, adhi adhinaraya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Robert,
I've not used reference properties. Its a simple query and it'll be
like this.
q = db.Query(PrimaryData)
q.filter('SheetMetadataId', metadata.getSheetId())
q.filter('InstanceAssignedTo IN',
[u'User_c42e8919_448e_11e0_b87b_f58d20c6e2c3',
u'User_1fd87ac5_073d_11e0_8ba1_c122a5867c4a'])
return q.fetch(2000)
and I replaced the IN filter to '=' with single value. Still its
taking same time.
On Mar 17, 6:27 am, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Use Appstats. It may not be the query that is slow. If you are using
reference properties, perhaps you are dereferencing them. If you
should us the query and how you're using the results we might be abel
to give more suggestions.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/appstats.html
Robert
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:54, adhi adhinaraya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm running a query in appengine which is returning just 1200
entities, but its taking 3.5 seconds. The query doesn't contains
inequality filters, but anyway I added index for that. Can anyone
tell
me how to analyse this and improve theperformance?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group athttp://
groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
[google-appengine] Re: emails are not received
hi Binu, You can have multiple cname entries like mail.domainname.com - ghs.google.com docs.domainname.com - ghs.google.com Calendar.domainname.com - ghs.google.com blog.domainname.com - ghs.google.com etc., On Mar 12, 1:13 pm, Binu vm binu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ravi, Thanks for the quick reply. I have added one cname entry. Should I enter another cname entry for email as well? Thanks Binu.V.M On Mar 12, 12:54 pm, VTR Ravi Kumar vtrraviku...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Binu, Does the domain provider allow you to create the cname entries like mail.domainname.com - ghs.google.com Thanks Ravi On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Binu vm binu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Hello, I have one domain.That domain has been mapped to google app engine. Now we have successfully created 2-3 email accounts. Now the problem is those email accounts are not able to receive any mails from any domain. But we are able to send mail to any domain. The problem what I have noticed is the domain name which is hosted on a free domain hosting. There it does not support free email accounts. Could that be a problem? In the application settings- Configured Services it is showing two serivces has been enabled. 1. Incomeing Email 2. Warmup Requests Request you to help on this issue. Thanks Binu.V.M -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Thanks Regards VTR Ravi Kumar, --- If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough - Mario Andretti http://www.firststop.inhttp://www.box.net/shared/hf82389ky7 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] What's the syntax of the cron job for the first day of every month?
Hi, Have you tried: cron: - description: monthly summary job url: /tasks/summary/monthly schedule: 1 of month 00:00 Robert On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:12, 王宇辉 yuhui.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I want to generate a monthly report on the first day of the month, any idea on doing this with cron jobs? -- Best regards, Yuhui -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.4.3 now available for download
Thanks for the fantastic news Ikai. Can't wait to play with the pre- release when I finish work today :) Keep up the great work! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Can't create a new app using the Google App Engine...
I've created my first App on the Google App Engine and everything went well, however, now when I try to create a new application it asks me to Verify my Account using SMS. As I've already done this previously, it will not allow me to specify my phone number again. I've tried using other phone numbers but it just won't let me past this verification screen Anybody experience a similar problem and have a solution? Thanks in advance, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Gobo-tools
Hi, It seems like a same problem as http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4603 How about follow above? -knj77 On Mar 22, 1:51 pm, VHT Corp vht...@gmail.com wrote: hi! i work with Google App Engine, I used Gobo-tools to backup and restores data, i has an erorr: Problem accessing /gobo/dump/start.gobo. Reason: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to complete the HTTP request Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to complete the HTTP request at gobo.GoboServlet.processReguest(GoboServlet.java:55) at gobo.GoboServlet.doPost(GoboServlet.java:20) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java: 511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1166) at com.google.appengine.api.blobstore.dev.ServeBlobFilter.doFilter(ServeBlobFi lter.java: 51) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.TransactionCleanupFilter.doFilter(Trans actionCleanupFilter.java: 43) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.StaticFileFilter.doFilter(StaticFile Filter.java: 122) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java: 388) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java: 216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java: 182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java: 765) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java: 418) at com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.DevAppEngineWebAppContext.handle(DevAppEn gineWebAppContext.java: 70) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.JettyContainerService $ApiProxyHandler.handle(JettyContainerService.java:351) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java: 542) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection $RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection.java:938) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:755) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:218) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java: 409) at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool $PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:582) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to complete the HTTP request at com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler $Connection.getHeaderFields(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:218) at com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler $Connection.getHeaderFields(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:74) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.isOAuthProxyErrorResponse(Htt pGDataRequest.java: 558) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.checkResponse(HttpGDataReques t.java: 549) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.execute(HttpGDataRequest.java : 530) at com.google.gdata.client.http.GoogleGDataRequest.execute(GoogleGDataRequest. java: 535) at com.google.gdata.client.Service.insert(Service.java:1409) at com.google.gdata.client.GoogleService.insert(GoogleService.java: 599) at com.google.gdata.client.media.MediaService.insert(MediaService.java: 381) at gobo.service.GbSpreadsheetService.createSpreadsheet(GbSpreadsheetService.ja va: 200) at gobo.controller.dump.StartController.runAuth(StartController.java: 45) at gobo.AuthSubBase.run(AuthSubBase.java:70) at gobo.GoboServlet.processReguest(GoboServlet.java:43) ... 28 more Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Could not verify SSL certificate for:https://docs.google.com/feeds/default/private/full/ at com.google.appengine.api.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceImpl.convertApplicationExc eption(URLFetchServiceImpl.java: 114) at com.google.appengine.api.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceImpl.fetch(URLFetchService Impl.java: 41) at com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler
[google-appengine] Re: Gobo-tools
Hi, It seems like the same problem as http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4603 How about following the above? Thanks, Kenji, On Mar 22, 1:51 pm, VHT Corp vht...@gmail.com wrote: hi! i work with Google App Engine, I used Gobo-tools to backup and restores data, i has an erorr: Problem accessing /gobo/dump/start.gobo. Reason: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to complete the HTTP request Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to complete the HTTP request at gobo.GoboServlet.processReguest(GoboServlet.java:55) at gobo.GoboServlet.doPost(GoboServlet.java:20) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java: 511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1166) at com.google.appengine.api.blobstore.dev.ServeBlobFilter.doFilter(ServeBlobFi lter.java: 51) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.TransactionCleanupFilter.doFilter(Trans actionCleanupFilter.java: 43) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.StaticFileFilter.doFilter(StaticFile Filter.java: 122) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java: 388) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java: 216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java: 182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java: 765) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java: 418) at com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.DevAppEngineWebAppContext.handle(DevAppEn gineWebAppContext.java: 70) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.JettyContainerService $ApiProxyHandler.handle(JettyContainerService.java:351) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java: 542) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection $RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection.java:938) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:755) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:218) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java: 409) at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool $PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:582) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to complete the HTTP request at com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler $Connection.getHeaderFields(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:218) at com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler $Connection.getHeaderFields(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:74) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.isOAuthProxyErrorResponse(Htt pGDataRequest.java: 558) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.checkResponse(HttpGDataReques t.java: 549) at com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.execute(HttpGDataRequest.java : 530) at com.google.gdata.client.http.GoogleGDataRequest.execute(GoogleGDataRequest. java: 535) at com.google.gdata.client.Service.insert(Service.java:1409) at com.google.gdata.client.GoogleService.insert(GoogleService.java: 599) at com.google.gdata.client.media.MediaService.insert(MediaService.java: 381) at gobo.service.GbSpreadsheetService.createSpreadsheet(GbSpreadsheetService.ja va: 200) at gobo.controller.dump.StartController.runAuth(StartController.java: 45) at gobo.AuthSubBase.run(AuthSubBase.java:70) at gobo.GoboServlet.processReguest(GoboServlet.java:43) ... 28 more Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Could not verify SSL certificate for:https://docs.google.com/feeds/default/private/full/ at com.google.appengine.api.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceImpl.convertApplicationExc eption(URLFetchServiceImpl.java: 114) at com.google.appengine.api.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceImpl.fetch(URLFetchService Impl.java: 41) at com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler
[google-appengine] Re: It's so sad.
Thanks all your guys! On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.comwrote: Sad. Wish it worked for you better. Brandon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: channel.js not returning the correct mime type
There's a fix for this rolling out soon (should be within a week). In the meantime, you can copy the file locally and serve it statically from your app (with the correct mime type). I realize that's not an ideal solution, but it should work. On Mar 21, 8:34 pm, Navraj S. Chohan nlak...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a fix to this or some work around? Any app with the channel API does not work in IE9 because of this issue. -Raj On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Philip phili...@gmail.com wrote: Google, please comment on this issue. It appears that the mime type being returned forhttp://talkgadget.google.com/talkgadget/channel.js is incorrect. If so, this needs to be fixed on your servers. On Jan 29, 6:19 pm, Philip phili...@gmail.com wrote: Some browsers (including IE 9) are experiencing issues withhttp:// talkgadget.google.com/talkgadget/channel.js. Specifically, here is an error from IE 9 (beta): SEC7112: Script fromhttp:// talkgadget.google.com/talkgadget/channel.js was blocked due to mime type mismatch Google, if you agree that this is an error on your server configuration for this javascript file, please make the necessary fix to the mime type being returned for this (and other) javascript file(s). Here are the headers currently being returned for channel.js: Cache-Control:private, max-age=0 Content-Encoding:gzip Content-Type:text/html; charset=UTF-8 == error in Content- Type? == Date:Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:09:09 GMT Expires:Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:09:09 GMT Server:GSE Transfer-Encoding:Identity X-Content-Type-Options:nosniff X-Xss-Protection:1; mode=block Please notice the content-type is currently text/html when it should probably be something like application/javascript. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Navraj Chohan (Raj)http://cs.ucsb.edu/~nchohanhttp://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu nlak...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.4.3 now available for download
Is there some sample code for the matcher API, out in the wild? On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Adam a...@boabtech.com wrote: Thanks for the fantastic news Ikai. Can't wait to play with the pre- release when I finish work today :) Keep up the great work! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Ross M Karchner -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Can't create a new app using the Google App Engine...
A common cause of this, when using a Google Apps domain, you should access it the admin at http://appengine.google.com/a/yourdomainhere.com/ Otherwise you will run into issues. ... if you not using Google Apps, then I dont have any suggestions :( On 22 March 2011 15:08, Tony O Dowd tonyat...@gmail.com wrote: I've created my first App on the Google App Engine and everything went well, however, now when I try to create a new application it asks me to Verify my Account using SMS. As I've already done this previously, it will not allow me to specify my phone number again. I've tried using other phone numbers but it just won't let me past this verification screen Anybody experience a similar problem and have a solution? Thanks in advance, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] UnicodeDecodeError in Appengine deployed version, but not in Devserver
'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x8a in position 2: ordinal not in range(128) I've read so many solutions about this problem, even Nick's Blog: http://blog.notdot.net/2010/07/Getting-unicode-right-in-Python ...which addresses the problem very well. So I've been able to resolve this unicode issue on GAE devserver, however I continue to experience it on my live deployed version. This makes no sense to me. Can anyone help?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] HR Issues (But Up time is great)
Good to hear it's working. If I hear anything about what changed, I'll let you guys know. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: I swear someone cheated... Or ran over and flipped a switch when I asked... Cause out of the same tool, now I get HTTP/1.1 200 OK Via: HTTP/1.1 GWA (remote cache hit) Accept-Ranges: bytes Last-Modified: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:25:48 GMT Etag: 159827d-169b0-49d75caeb5f00 Content-Type: image/png Age: 6985 Cache-Control: public; max-age=300 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:29:27 GMT Server: Google Frontend Content-Length: 92592 Which even says that Google gave me a cache hit. Which is interesting cause the Dashboard on the app doesn't claim it has any of those. (even though My MS version of the app does) So just ignore me, it seems to work well enough, I'm just partially insane. :-) -Original Message- From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 3:54 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] HR Issues (But Up time is great) On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote: 1. Caching doesn’t work, and because of the way headers are forced to be set all requests expire immediately so the user won’t cache either. (Headers from a request) HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate Expires: Fri, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:00 GMT Set-Cookie: S=apphosting=5hoCHm4x9c3ZrrxQEN5Q4A; path=/ Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 19:37:21 GMT Pragma: no-cache Server: Google Frontend Content-Length: 0 These look like headers from a response, not a request, and the response code is 405: Method Not Allowed. ie. the request was something other than a GET, POST, PUT or DELETE, in which case you might expect the error response to force a no-cache header. Are you sure your test is accurate? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: UnicodeDecodeError in Appengine deployed version, but not in Devserver
On Mar 22, 12:45 pm, Kwame iweg...@gmail.com wrote: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x8a in position 2: ordinal not in range(128) I've read so many solutions about this problem, even Nick's Blog:http://blog.notdot.net/2010/07/Getting-unicode-right-in-Python ...which addresses the problem very well. So I've been able to resolve this unicode issue on GAE devserver, however I continue to experience it on my live deployed version. This makes no sense to me. Can anyone help?? Without seeing your code, almost certainly not. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Serving talkgadet.google.com through your own app
Hi! I was just wondering how much of problem it would be to add the possibility to serve the channel API through your own app instead of via talkgadget.google.com. Kind of like how you serve the Remote API by adding the handler to your app.yaml without actually writing any code for it. BR / Fredrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: GQL performance slow
I think you should run AppStats and see what's going on. 2000 entities is
never going to be particularly fast, but 3 seconds might be a bit on the
high side. Run the tool to be sure.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:25 AM, adhi adhinaraya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ikai, is there a measure to say the entities are large? is it about
the number of
columns or blob or text? if so in my entities I have string and number
properties only.
Yes. I need all the 2000 (some times bit more) entities at once for
reporting.
Currently I'm not seeing a way where I can split the keys and fetch.
On Mar 21, 11:54 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
If that's the performance, then I'm inclined to say the entities are
large
and that's about the performance you can expect. One more thing to keep
in
mind: the cost of deserializing each entity is non-trivial.
Is there a reason you need all 2000 entities? Perhaps there is a
different
way to accomplish what you want without querying a (relatively) large
number
of entities at once.
One other possible solution that will at least make your user facing code
run faster is to split the query up by key, perform multiple async
queries
and join them at the end. It'll still consume the same (or more) CPU
time,
but the user ms should be lower since you are doing things in parallel.
The
tradeoff here, of course, is that you'd need to know how you can split up
the keyspace.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:17 AM, adhi adhinaraya...@gmail.com wrote:
q = db.Query(PrimaryData)
q.filter('SheetMetadataId', metadata.getSheetId())
return q.fetch(2000)
Hi Ikai, even the above query takes 3.3 ~ 3.6 seconds. The number of
entities returned by the query is 1261.
I'm using Expando model, the total number columns for this particular
set of entities are 25.
Yes. I've created composite index. Here is the index definition.
- kind: PrimaryData
properties:
- name: SheetMetadataId
- name: InstanceAssignedTo
please let me know if you need more information.
On Mar 17, 11:50 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
If you have a composite index, the performance of this query should
be
mostly linear (find start location of index and just return min(2000,
number
of entities that satisfy query from there on out) number of keys and
items.
If you only have individual indexes for SheetMetadataId as well as
InstanceAssignedTo, this uses zigzag merge join, where performance
can
greatly vary depending on the shape of the data.
Just out of curiosity, what is the performance of this query?
q = db.Query(PrimaryData)
q.filter('SheetMetadataId', metadata.getSheetId())
return q.fetch(2000)
If it's in a similar ballpark, my other guess is that the query takes
that
amount of time because the entities are large.
You mentioned created a composite index. Can you post that?
I'll talk to the datastore team to see what we can do to provide
something
similar to EXPLAIN plans for queries.
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:07 AM, adhi adhinaraya...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Robert,
I've not used reference properties. Its a simple query and it'll be
like this.
q = db.Query(PrimaryData)
q.filter('SheetMetadataId', metadata.getSheetId())
q.filter('InstanceAssignedTo IN',
[u'User_c42e8919_448e_11e0_b87b_f58d20c6e2c3',
u'User_1fd87ac5_073d_11e0_8ba1_c122a5867c4a'])
return q.fetch(2000)
and I replaced the IN filter to '=' with single value. Still its
taking same time.
On Mar 17, 6:27 am, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Use Appstats. It may not be the query that is slow. If you are
using
reference properties, perhaps you are dereferencing them. If you
should us the query and how you're using the results we might be
abel
to give more suggestions.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/appstats.html
Robert
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:54, adhi adhinaraya...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, I'm running a query in appengine which is returning just
1200
entities, but its taking 3.5 seconds. The query doesn't
contains
inequality filters, but anyway I added index for that. Can
anyone
tell
me how to analyse this and improve theperformance?
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Python AppEngine down
A general tip: Deploy a NON default version to stage your application, then run a quick visual verification. When you're happy with the release, switch that new version over to become the new default. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Justin justin.worr...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies, my error; left a trailing bracket in an import library :-( On Mar 22, 7:02 am, Justin justin.worr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My Python app has been unavailable since approx 06:52 UTC today; looks like the app can't find the AppEngine runtime libraries; is this a general outage ? Thanks, Justin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] how to make gae and gwt sdks work together?
Hi, I am developing web application where I use gwt and gae sdks.In a client module I'm using Users api and when i try to compile the app i'm getting an error that all gae imports and classes cannot be resolved.I was wondering if there is any special way to make them work together? Thank you for any help, Ania -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] appcfg error: No address associated with hostname
I got this error every time I use appcfg doing updating, dowloading, ... I
found some other threads with this problem and the reason was related to the
use of a proxy, but I'm not under a proxy.
~/google_appengine/appcfg.py --noisy --email=giurr...@gmail.com update
myapplication
Application: myapplication; version: 1.
Host: appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:30,530 DEBUG appengine_rpc.py:443 Could not load
authentication cookies; LoadError: '/home/ruggero/.appcfg_cookies' does not
look like a Netscape format cookies file
2011-03-22 21:04:30,530 INFO appengine_rpc.py:153 Server:
appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:30,532 INFO appcfg.py:413 Checking for updates to the SDK.
2011-03-22 21:04:30,533 DEBUG appengine_rpc.py:345 Sending HTTPS request:
POST
/api/updatecheck?release=1.4.2timestamp=1294960686api_versions=%5B%271%27%5D
HTTPS/1.1
Host: appengine.google.com
X-appcfg-api-version: 1
Content-type: application/octet-stream
User-agent: appcfg_py/1.4.2 Linux/2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64
Python/2.7.0.final.0
2011-03-22 21:04:30,534 DEBUG __init__.py:81 Creating preset proxy https
conn: appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:35,633 INFO appcfg.py:422 Update check failed: urlopen
error [Errno -5] No address associated with hostname
2011-03-22 21:04:35,634 INFO appcfg.py:1761 Reading app configuration.
Beginning update of app: myapplication, version: 1
Scanning files on local disk.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,637 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'app.yaml'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,638 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'index.html~':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,638 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'my_model.pyc':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,639 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'hello.py'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,639 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'contacts.html~':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,640 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'index.html'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,640 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'my_model.py~':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,640 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'hello.py~': File
matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,641 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'app.yaml~': File
matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,641 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'index.yaml'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,642 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'contacts.html'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,642 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'my_model.py'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,643 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file
'stylesheets/main.css'
Initiating update of app: myapplication, version: 1
2011-03-22 21:04:35,662 INFO appcfg.py:1502 Send: /api/appversion/create,
params={'version': '1', 'app_id': 'myapplication'}
2011-03-22 21:04:35,667 DEBUG appengine_rpc.py:345 Sending HTTPS request:
POST /api/appversion/create?version=1app_id=myapplication HTTPS/1.1
Host: appengine.google.com
X-appcfg-api-version: 1
Content-type: application/octet-stream
User-agent: appcfg_py/1.4.2 Linux/2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64
Python/2.7.0.final.0
admin_console:
pages:
- name: Datastore Admin
url: /_ah/datastore_admin/
api_version: '1'
application: myapplication
builtins:
- datastore_admin: 'on'
- default: 'on'
derived_file_type:
- python_precompiled
handlers:
- login: admin
script: $PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/datastore_admin/main.py
secure: optional
url: /_ah/datastore_admin.*
- login: admin
script: $PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/mapreduce/main.py
secure: optional
url: /_ah/mapreduce.*
- secure: optional
static_dir: stylesheets
url: /stylesheets
- script: hello.py
secure: optional
url: /.*
runtime: python
version: '1'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,668 DEBUG __init__.py:81 Creating preset proxy https
conn: appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:40,780 ERROR appcfg.py:1840 An unexpected error occurred.
Aborting.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py,
line 1795, in DoUpload
missing_files = self.Begin()
File /home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py,
line 1546, in Begin
self.Send('/api/appversion/create', payload=self.config.ToYAML())
File /home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py,
line 1503, in Send
return self.rpcserver.Send(url, payload=payload, **self.params)
File
/home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appengine_rpc.py,
line 346, in Send
f = self.opener.open(req)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 391, in open
response = self._open(req, data)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 409, in _open
'_open', req)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 369, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 1181, in https_open
return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPSConnection, req)
File
/home/ruggero/google_appengine/lib/fancy_urllib/fancy_urllib/__init__.py,
line 367, in do_open
raise url_error
URLError:
Re: [google-appengine] blogging drop-in package
bloog seems to be abandoned. No updates since 2008 there Will check out blogart Thank everyone! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Is HTTPS blobstore Upload Realy Secure ?
If you setup the upload example from the documentation and use it using an https url the upload url returned from create_upload_url will be https://*.appspot.com/_ah/upload/*. The File is uploaded but the Secure Incoming Bandwidth in the Quota Details of the admin remains at 0%. So is the file realy uploaded securely ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Is HTTPS blobstore Upload Realy Secure ?
Yes, it is encrypted. If it's not showing up in bandwidth, that could be a bug. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Mahron gan...@xehon.com wrote: If you setup the upload example from the documentation and use it using an https url the upload url returned from create_upload_url will be https://*.appspot.com/_ah/upload/*. The File is uploaded but the Secure Incoming Bandwidth in the Quota Details of the admin remains at 0%. So is the file realy uploaded securely ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Upcoming scheduled maintenance for April
HR applications will still have access to Memcache. I don't believe it will be flushed. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Raymond C. windz...@gmail.com wrote: How long will it last? By the way I am curious, is memcache still functions for HR during the maintenance on M/S? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Is HTTPS blobstore Upload Realy Secure ?
Ok, thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: email sent by GAE would be regarded as spam for some email services
I actually think we are moving away from this direction. For customers sending large volumes of email or who require delivery guarantees, we'll be encouraging the use of services that are specifically designed for this functionality. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: me 2. Have integrated the SES service within our GAE apps. work good and solved our problems sure it would be more nice if GAE can provide email service at the quality level similar to the Amazon SES one (at least would not be classified as SPAM), so we dont need to manage both . could we make this suggestion to GAE team? - eric On 22 March 2011 05:30, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Wow, great idea! I have been having some delivery issues lately with GAE and looking for an alternative. I just downloaded a pythong Amazon SES library, signed up for SES, and put it all together and it works like a charm with GAE! On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote: Hi Eric, Have you looked at Amazon's Simple Email Service (SES)? http://aws.amazon.com/ses/ Pretty much the same cost as sending email using GAE, except with SES you only get 2,000 free emails if you're sending email from an EC2 instance. I haven't used it myself but apparently they scan outgoing mail to make sure it meets ISP standards. This leads me to believe emails sent via SES would be less likely to be automatically marked as spam than on GAE, since SES's spam-sending-reputation would be lower than GAE's, due to their pre-filtering and rate-limiting. Nick On 21 March 2011 13:51, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ernesto, thx for your suggestion! yes, i think it shall work. but in general if we can't ask all our users to add our email to their contact list (or they are not willing to do so), how can emails sent by us prevent to be regarded as spam? all our subject, body etc. are nothing spam-liked, and seems it's the problem of the email server that actually sends the email. anyone share similar case, or has other solution? regards, eric On 19 March 2011 00:12, Ernesto Karim Oltra ernestoka...@gmail.com wrote: Ask the user to add the e-mail from address of your e-mails to their contacts list, so your e-mails would never been sent to spam again (for that users, at least). It's a bit hacky, but can do a great work meanwhile you find another solution. On 18 mar, 07:52, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: we use mail.send_mail() to send some important messages to our users through an app hosted on GAE, in which the 'from' has been set to one of a registered admin for the app. it works quite well for most users, except for some email service provider (e.g. '...@yahoo.com.hk'), they would always automatically treat these emails as spam and put them into spam box of the user's email account (if the user has enabled the spam filtering feature, which is by default ON) . in this case, many of our users do not aware for these important messages (they would seldom look into mails in their spambox) we have tried using different from, subject, body and the results are the same. we suspect that it is the email server does matter, and maybe before there were some other apps hosted on GAE sending spams to like '@ yahoo.com.hk', so '...@yahoo.com.hk' would regard all emails sent from this email server in GAE as spam. do anyone share similar experiences? or there should be other causes? any ideas we can solve this problem? (successfully deliver the email to our users using those email service without being regarded as spam) thx in advanced! - eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group,
[google-appengine] Task queue operation while datastore is in readonly mode.
I'm really sorry, if this question has already been answered, but I haven't found any clear answer. Is task queue fully operational, while datastore is in readonly mode? Do we still able to add new tasks? In my case I have to add log entry in the datastore on each request. I don't mind if this log entry is persisted in datastore with some lag. So I was thinking over to add task queue task to store log entry at later time, if datastore is not available at the time of original request. Will it work? I do not want to use memcache, since it can be flushed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Prerelease SDK 1.4.3 now available for download
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: Java 1.4.3 = - Deferred library support now available in Java. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2381 This looks really great. You guys did a good job with the API. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: email sent by GAE would be regarded as spam for some email services
Ikai, On that note, do you have any services besides SES that you recommend? SES works well with GAE however you must slowly up your quotas, forcing you to send some mail via SES and some through GAE until your quotas are adjusted high enough... On Mar 22, 4:29 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: I actually think we are moving away from this direction. For customers sending large volumes of email or who require delivery guarantees, we'll be encouraging the use of services that are specifically designed for this functionality. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: me 2. Have integrated the SES service within our GAE apps. work good and solved our problems sure it would be more nice if GAE can provide email service at the quality level similar to the Amazon SES one (at least would not be classified as SPAM), so we dont need to manage both . could we make this suggestion to GAE team? - eric On 22 March 2011 05:30, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Wow, great idea! I have been having some delivery issues lately with GAE and looking for an alternative. I just downloaded a pythong Amazon SES library, signed up for SES, and put it all together and it works like a charm with GAE! On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote: Hi Eric, Have you looked at Amazon's Simple Email Service (SES)? http://aws.amazon.com/ses/ Pretty much the same cost as sending email using GAE, except with SES you only get 2,000 free emails if you're sending email from an EC2 instance. I haven't used it myself but apparently they scan outgoing mail to make sure it meets ISP standards. This leads me to believe emails sent via SES would be less likely to be automatically marked as spam than on GAE, since SES's spam-sending-reputation would be lower than GAE's, due to their pre-filtering and rate-limiting. Nick On 21 March 2011 13:51, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ernesto, thx for your suggestion! yes, i think it shall work. but in general if we can't ask all our users to add our email to their contact list (or they are not willing to do so), how can emails sent by us prevent to be regarded as spam? all our subject, body etc. are nothing spam-liked, and seems it's the problem of the email server that actually sends the email. anyone share similar case, or has other solution? regards, eric On 19 March 2011 00:12, Ernesto Karim Oltra ernestoka...@gmail.com wrote: Ask the user to add the e-mail from address of your e-mails to their contacts list, so your e-mails would never been sent to spam again (for that users, at least). It's a bit hacky, but can do a great work meanwhile you find another solution. On 18 mar, 07:52, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: we use mail.send_mail() to send some important messages to our users through an app hosted on GAE, in which the 'from' has been set to one of a registered admin for the app. it works quite well for most users, except for some email service provider (e.g. '...@yahoo.com.hk'), they would always automatically treat these emails as spam and put them into spam box of the user's email account (if the user has enabled the spam filtering feature, which is by default ON) . in this case, many of our users do not aware for these important messages (they would seldom look into mails in their spambox) we have tried using different from, subject, body and the results are the same. we suspect that it is the email server does matter, and maybe before there were some other apps hosted on GAE sending spams to like '@ yahoo.com.hk', so '...@yahoo.com.hk' would regard all emails sent from this email server in GAE as spam. do anyone share similar experiences? or there should be other causes? any ideas we can solve this problem? (successfully deliver the email to our users using those email service without being regarded as spam) thx in advanced! - eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To
[google-appengine] Re: UnicodeDecodeError in Appengine deployed version, but not in Devserver
Sure Geoffrey. Sorry about that.
class Person(db.model):
name = db.StringProperty()
description = db.TextProperty()
class PersonHandler(webapp.RequestHandler):
def get(self):
pers = Person()
pers.name = unicode(encrypt_data(self.request.get('name')))
pers.description =
unicode(encrypt_data(self.request.get('description')))
pers.put()
def encrypt_data(plaintext):
obj=ARC4.new(RSAPrivateKey())
return obj.encrypt(plaintext)
def decrypt_data(ciphertext):
obj=ARC4.new(RSAPrivateKey())
return obj.decrypt(ciphertext)
#
This code properly encrypts/decrypts the webapp request variables and
stores into the Person Object while running on the localhost Dev
server, but on the Deployed app, it throws a UnicodeDecodeError. I've
also tried:
unicode(encrypt_data(self.request.get('description'))).encode('utf-8')
but that fails on both servers
On Mar 22, 1:25 pm, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 12:45 pm, Kwame iweg...@gmail.com wrote:
'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x8a in position 2: ordinal not in
range(128)
I've read so many solutions about this problem, even Nick's
Blog:http://blog.notdot.net/2010/07/Getting-unicode-right-in-Python
...which addresses the problem very well. So I've been able to resolve
this unicode issue on GAE devserver, however I continue to experience
it on my live deployed version. This makes no sense to me. Can anyone
help??
Without seeing your code, almost certainly not.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] appcfg error: No address associated with hostname
Have you tried it with Python 2.5?
Robert
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 16:09, Ruggero Turra giurr...@gmail.com wrote:
I got this error every time I use appcfg doing updating, dowloading, ... I
found some other threads with this problem and the reason was related to the
use of a proxy, but I'm not under a proxy.
~/google_appengine/appcfg.py --noisy --email=giurr...@gmail.com update
myapplication
Application: myapplication; version: 1.
Host: appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:30,530 DEBUG appengine_rpc.py:443 Could not load
authentication cookies; LoadError: '/home/ruggero/.appcfg_cookies' does not
look like a Netscape format cookies file
2011-03-22 21:04:30,530 INFO appengine_rpc.py:153 Server:
appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:30,532 INFO appcfg.py:413 Checking for updates to the SDK.
2011-03-22 21:04:30,533 DEBUG appengine_rpc.py:345 Sending HTTPS request:
POST
/api/updatecheck?release=1.4.2timestamp=1294960686api_versions=%5B%271%27%5D
HTTPS/1.1
Host: appengine.google.com
X-appcfg-api-version: 1
Content-type: application/octet-stream
User-agent: appcfg_py/1.4.2 Linux/2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64
Python/2.7.0.final.0
2011-03-22 21:04:30,534 DEBUG __init__.py:81 Creating preset proxy https
conn: appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:35,633 INFO appcfg.py:422 Update check failed: urlopen
error [Errno -5] No address associated with hostname
2011-03-22 21:04:35,634 INFO appcfg.py:1761 Reading app configuration.
Beginning update of app: myapplication, version: 1
Scanning files on local disk.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,637 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'app.yaml'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,638 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'index.html~':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,638 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'my_model.pyc':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,639 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'hello.py'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,639 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'contacts.html~':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,640 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'index.html'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,640 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'my_model.py~':
File matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,640 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'hello.py~': File
matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,641 INFO appcfg.py:1868 Ignoring file 'app.yaml~': File
matches ignore regex.
2011-03-22 21:04:35,641 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'index.yaml'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,642 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'contacts.html'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,642 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file 'my_model.py'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,643 INFO appcfg.py:1779 Processing file
'stylesheets/main.css'
Initiating update of app: myapplication, version: 1
2011-03-22 21:04:35,662 INFO appcfg.py:1502 Send: /api/appversion/create,
params={'version': '1', 'app_id': 'myapplication'}
2011-03-22 21:04:35,667 DEBUG appengine_rpc.py:345 Sending HTTPS request:
POST /api/appversion/create?version=1app_id=myapplication HTTPS/1.1
Host: appengine.google.com
X-appcfg-api-version: 1
Content-type: application/octet-stream
User-agent: appcfg_py/1.4.2 Linux/2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64
Python/2.7.0.final.0
admin_console:
pages:
- name: Datastore Admin
url: /_ah/datastore_admin/
api_version: '1'
application: myapplication
builtins:
- datastore_admin: 'on'
- default: 'on'
derived_file_type:
- python_precompiled
handlers:
- login: admin
script: $PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/datastore_admin/main.py
secure: optional
url: /_ah/datastore_admin.*
- login: admin
script: $PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/mapreduce/main.py
secure: optional
url: /_ah/mapreduce.*
- secure: optional
static_dir: stylesheets
url: /stylesheets
- script: hello.py
secure: optional
url: /.*
runtime: python
version: '1'
2011-03-22 21:04:35,668 DEBUG __init__.py:81 Creating preset proxy https
conn: appengine.google.com
2011-03-22 21:04:40,780 ERROR appcfg.py:1840 An unexpected error occurred.
Aborting.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py,
line 1795, in DoUpload
missing_files = self.Begin()
File /home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py,
line 1546, in Begin
self.Send('/api/appversion/create', payload=self.config.ToYAML())
File /home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py,
line 1503, in Send
return self.rpcserver.Send(url, payload=payload, **self.params)
File
/home/ruggero/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/appengine_rpc.py,
line 346, in Send
f = self.opener.open(req)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 391, in open
response = self._open(req, data)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 409, in _open
'_open', req)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 369, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 1181, in https_open
[google-appengine] Re: how to make gae and gwt sdks work together?
Are you trying to use the appengine sdk from client code that is compiled into javascript? That won't work. You'll need to make requests from the client to the server, and have the code on the server call the appengine sdk. Have a read of the following links: - http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/tutorial/RPC.html - http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/tutorial/clientserver.html A best practice way of doing this is using the command patternhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_pattern, you might want to check out a framework to help you with this. I currently contribute to gwt-platform, and have used gwt-dispatch in the past. - http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/GettingStartedDispatch - http://code.google.com/p/gwt-dispatch/wiki/GettingStarted Cheers, Brendan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: email sent by GAE would be regarded as spam for some email services
SendLabs is another option: http://dyn.com/enterprise-email/sendlabs-solutions On 23 March 2011 09:57, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Ikai, On that note, do you have any services besides SES that you recommend? SES works well with GAE however you must slowly up your quotas, forcing you to send some mail via SES and some through GAE until your quotas are adjusted high enough... On Mar 22, 4:29 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: I actually think we are moving away from this direction. For customers sending large volumes of email or who require delivery guarantees, we'll be encouraging the use of services that are specifically designed for this functionality. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: me 2. Have integrated the SES service within our GAE apps. work good and solved our problems sure it would be more nice if GAE can provide email service at the quality level similar to the Amazon SES one (at least would not be classified as SPAM), so we dont need to manage both . could we make this suggestion to GAE team? - eric On 22 March 2011 05:30, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Wow, great idea! I have been having some delivery issues lately with GAE and looking for an alternative. I just downloaded a pythong Amazon SES library, signed up for SES, and put it all together and it works like a charm with GAE! On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote: Hi Eric, Have you looked at Amazon's Simple Email Service (SES)? http://aws.amazon.com/ses/ Pretty much the same cost as sending email using GAE, except with SES you only get 2,000 free emails if you're sending email from an EC2 instance. I haven't used it myself but apparently they scan outgoing mail to make sure it meets ISP standards. This leads me to believe emails sent via SES would be less likely to be automatically marked as spam than on GAE, since SES's spam-sending-reputation would be lower than GAE's, due to their pre-filtering and rate-limiting. Nick On 21 March 2011 13:51, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ernesto, thx for your suggestion! yes, i think it shall work. but in general if we can't ask all our users to add our email to their contact list (or they are not willing to do so), how can emails sent by us prevent to be regarded as spam? all our subject, body etc. are nothing spam-liked, and seems it's the problem of the email server that actually sends the email. anyone share similar case, or has other solution? regards, eric On 19 March 2011 00:12, Ernesto Karim Oltra ernestoka...@gmail.com wrote: Ask the user to add the e-mail from address of your e-mails to their contacts list, so your e-mails would never been sent to spam again (for that users, at least). It's a bit hacky, but can do a great work meanwhile you find another solution. On 18 mar, 07:52, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: we use mail.send_mail() to send some important messages to our users through an app hosted on GAE, in which the 'from' has been set to one of a registered admin for the app. it works quite well for most users, except for some email service provider (e.g. '...@yahoo.com.hk'), they would always automatically treat these emails as spam and put them into spam box of the user's email account (if the user has enabled the spam filtering feature, which is by default ON) . in this case, many of our users do not aware for these important messages (they would seldom look into mails in their spambox) we have tried using different from, subject, body and the results are the same. we suspect that it is the email server does matter, and maybe before there were some other apps hosted on GAE sending spams to like '@ yahoo.com.hk', so '...@yahoo.com.hk' would regard all emails sent from this email server in GAE as spam. do anyone share similar experiences? or there should be other causes? any ideas we can solve this problem? (successfully deliver the email to our users using those email service without being regarded as spam) thx in advanced! - eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are
Re: [google-appengine] Re: email sent by GAE would be regarded as spam for some email services
Hi Ikai, thx for your note. with this, we could better decide on which cases we would like to send emails through GAE and which we would like to use other external services. and would it be more formally stated in any documents, or any guideline for these considerations be documented? if i'm a new GAE user, i would just use the email service straight forwardly without these considerations and background information. - eric On 23 March 2011 05:29, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: I actually think we are moving away from this direction. For customers sending large volumes of email or who require delivery guarantees, we'll be encouraging the use of services that are specifically designed for this functionality. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: me 2. Have integrated the SES service within our GAE apps. work good and solved our problems sure it would be more nice if GAE can provide email service at the quality level similar to the Amazon SES one (at least would not be classified as SPAM), so we dont need to manage both . could we make this suggestion to GAE team? - eric On 22 March 2011 05:30, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Wow, great idea! I have been having some delivery issues lately with GAE and looking for an alternative. I just downloaded a pythong Amazon SES library, signed up for SES, and put it all together and it works like a charm with GAE! On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote: Hi Eric, Have you looked at Amazon's Simple Email Service (SES)? http://aws.amazon.com/ses/ Pretty much the same cost as sending email using GAE, except with SES you only get 2,000 free emails if you're sending email from an EC2 instance. I haven't used it myself but apparently they scan outgoing mail to make sure it meets ISP standards. This leads me to believe emails sent via SES would be less likely to be automatically marked as spam than on GAE, since SES's spam-sending-reputation would be lower than GAE's, due to their pre-filtering and rate-limiting. Nick On 21 March 2011 13:51, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ernesto, thx for your suggestion! yes, i think it shall work. but in general if we can't ask all our users to add our email to their contact list (or they are not willing to do so), how can emails sent by us prevent to be regarded as spam? all our subject, body etc. are nothing spam-liked, and seems it's the problem of the email server that actually sends the email. anyone share similar case, or has other solution? regards, eric On 19 March 2011 00:12, Ernesto Karim Oltra ernestoka...@gmail.com wrote: Ask the user to add the e-mail from address of your e-mails to their contacts list, so your e-mails would never been sent to spam again (for that users, at least). It's a bit hacky, but can do a great work meanwhile you find another solution. On 18 mar, 07:52, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote: we use mail.send_mail() to send some important messages to our users through an app hosted on GAE, in which the 'from' has been set to one of a registered admin for the app. it works quite well for most users, except for some email service provider (e.g. '...@yahoo.com.hk'), they would always automatically treat these emails as spam and put them into spam box of the user's email account (if the user has enabled the spam filtering feature, which is by default ON) . in this case, many of our users do not aware for these important messages (they would seldom look into mails in their spambox) we have tried using different from, subject, body and the results are the same. we suspect that it is the email server does matter, and maybe before there were some other apps hosted on GAE sending spams to like '@ yahoo.com.hk', so '...@yahoo.com.hk' would regard all emails sent from this email server in GAE as spam. do anyone share similar experiences? or there should be other causes? any ideas we can solve this problem? (successfully deliver the email to our users using those email service without being regarded as spam) thx in advanced! - eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Re: [google-appengine] Serving talkgadet.google.com through your own app
Hi Fredrik, This isn't possible - the Channel API provides a service that isn't available otherwise through App Engine - if you could serve it yourself, there'd be no need for the Channel API. What are you trying to accomplish? -Nick Johnson On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Westmark fredrik.westm...@gmail.comwrote: Hi! I was just wondering how much of problem it would be to add the possibility to serve the channel API through your own app instead of via talkgadget.google.com. Kind of like how you serve the Remote API by adding the handler to your app.yaml without actually writing any code for it. BR / Fredrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
