RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald
Yes.

Mike is awesome.

- voogru.

-Original Message-
From: LDuke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 9:36 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
available at different times based on many specific requests in the hlcoders
list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
release, but they did.

On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented any
 beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
 marketing
 reasons and to help themselves and not us.

 I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so we
 could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed to
 help us at all.

 :rolleyes:



--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
Duke,

I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if Valve
just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's thousands
of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
available at different times based on many specific requests in the hlcoders
list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
release, but they did.

On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented any
 beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
 marketing
 reasons and to help themselves and not us.

 I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so we
 could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed to
 help us at all.

 :rolleyes:



--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
They didn't have to make the games. What's your point?

My point is, while I'm happy that the SDK caters for the mods who knock out
some great tools to keep our servers unique, the whole lot becomes
pointless, if we really don't have a clue about the updates Valve is
releasing, because Valve can't be bothered to run betas.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spencer 'voogru'
MacDonald
Sent: 17 October 2007 09:15
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Yes.

Mike is awesome.

- voogru.

-Original Message-
From: LDuke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 9:36 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
available at different times based on many specific requests in the hlcoders
list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
release, but they did.

On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented any
 beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
 marketing
 reasons and to help themselves and not us.

 I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so we
 could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed to
 help us at all.

 :rolleyes:



--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats back.
They did because they needed the communities help.

When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries with no
betas.

Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone told
me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even stupid
enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
everything would be released as beta in future.

Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries
as live and servers were left broken.

So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the times
they didn't.

If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100% of
the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many times in
the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
tool's arguments.

On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Duke,

 I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if Valve
 just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's thousands
 of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
 anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
 release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
 Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
 available at different times based on many specific requests in the
 hlcoders
 list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
 release, but they did.

 On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented
 any
  beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
  marketing
  reasons and to help themselves and not us.
 
  I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so we
  could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed to
  help us at all.
 
  :rolleyes:
 
 
 
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Thomas Morton

Uhh am I  missing something?

Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can be
updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper
release..

Tom

--
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:26 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements


When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats
back.
They did because they needed the communities help.

When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries with
no
betas.

Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone
told
me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even
stupid
enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
everything would be released as beta in future.

Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries
as live and servers were left broken.

So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the times
they didn't.

If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%
of
the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many times
in
the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
tool's arguments.

On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Duke,

I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
Valve
just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's
thousands
of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
available at different times based on many specific requests in the
hlcoders
list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
release, but they did.

On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented
any
 beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
 marketing
 reasons and to help themselves and not us.

 I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so
 we
 could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed
 to
 help us at all.

 :rolleyes:



--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
Most of the last updates

Most. That means. Most of the last updates Valve released as beta for their
own interests. Not yours or mine. When Valve thinks they can get away with
it, when it doesn't bring down most servers or piss off the army of 13 year
olds who'll flood their helpdesks, they'll just hoist it upon us with no
beta.

Don't believe me? You get Alfred to commit to betas 100% percent on all
released binaries. You won't, because his firm isn't interested in investing
any time on anything no matter how small, that just benefits the server
admin guys.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:33
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Uhh am I  missing something?

Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can be
updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper
release..

Tom

--
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:26 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats
 back.
 They did because they needed the communities help.

 When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries with
 no
 betas.

 Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone
 told
 me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even
 stupid
 enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
 everything would be released as beta in future.

 Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries
 as live and servers were left broken.

 So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the times
 they didn't.

 If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%
 of
 the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
 Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many times
 in
 the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
 tool's arguments.

 On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Duke,

 I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
 Valve
 just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's
 thousands
 of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
 anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
 release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
 Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
 available at different times based on many specific requests in the
 hlcoders
 list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
 release, but they did.

 On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented
 any
  beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
  marketing
  reasons and to help themselves and not us.
 
  I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so
  we
  could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed
  to
  help us at all.
 
  :rolleyes:
 
 
 
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please

RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
Oh right. So what you're saying is that if we want our servers to run hassle
free, we should run them vanilla.

Isn't that a bit ironic for a bunch of games that exist to be modded?

Most servers are modded.

For the 600th time (LITERALLY!)

No one is expecting Valve to support the mods. What I expect Valve to do, is
to stop a crazy system where 1000's of servers *MOST* of which are running
mods, are updated out of the blue.

For the 601st time.

Give us a guaranteed beta system...please.


Chris.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:36
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
As far as I know, all stock servers with no modifications or extras
installed have always worked properly on all released binaries. Valve does
not support third party plugins directly, and so any plugin-breakage due to
updates from them does not matter to them. I always had a test server
running on a spare box updated nightly, stock server with no addons, and I
never remember a time where it wouldn't run as expected. If you were running
a stock server with no addons, though, please forgive me for my statement.

On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats
 back.
 They did because they needed the communities help.

 When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries with
 no
 betas.

 Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone
 told
 me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even
 stupid
 enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
 everything would be released as beta in future.

 Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries
 as live and servers were left broken.

 So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the times
 they didn't.

 If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%
 of
 the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
 Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many times
 in
 the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
 tool's arguments.

 On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Duke,
 
  I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
 Valve
  just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's
 thousands
  of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
  anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
  release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.
 
  Chris.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
  Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
  To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
  Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements
 
  --
  [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
  Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
  available at different times based on many specific requests in the
  hlcoders
  list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
  release, but they did.
 
  On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented
  any
   beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
   marketing
   reasons and to help themselves and not us.
  
   I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so
 we
   could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed
 to
   help us at all.
  
   :rolleyes:
  
  
  
  --
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
  please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
 
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
  please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
 
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list

RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread larry
What's the chance of kicking this Barnett guy off the list? Seems we get idiots 
like him once a year and have to suffer through their adolescent view of 
things, it gets tiresome.

-- Original Message --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Date:  Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:06:12 +0100

Most of the last updates

Most. That means. Most of the last updates Valve released as beta for their
own interests. Not yours or mine. When Valve thinks they can get away with
it, when it doesn't bring down most servers or piss off the army of 13 year
olds who'll flood their helpdesks, they'll just hoist it upon us with no
beta.

Don't believe me? You get Alfred to commit to betas 100% percent on all
released binaries. You won't, because his firm isn't interested in investing
any time on anything no matter how small, that just benefits the server
admin guys.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:33
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Uhh am I  missing something?

Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can be
updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper
release..

Tom

--
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:26 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats
 back.
 They did because they needed the communities help.

 When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries with
 no
 betas.

 Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone
 told
 me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even
 stupid
 enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
 everything would be released as beta in future.

 Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries
 as live and servers were left broken.

 So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the times
 they didn't.

 If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%
 of
 the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
 Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many times
 in
 the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
 tool's arguments.

 On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Duke,

 I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
 Valve
 just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's
 thousands
 of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
 anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
 release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
 Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
 available at different times based on many specific requests in the
 hlcoders
 list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
 release, but they did.

 On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented
 any
  beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
  marketing
  reasons and to help themselves and not us.
 
  I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so
  we
  could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed
  to
  help us at all.
 
  :rolleyes:
 
 
 
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http

Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Roc

I second the motion



--
From: larry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:54 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements


What's the chance of kicking this Barnett guy off the list? Seems we get
idiots like him once a year and have to suffer through their adolescent
view of things, it gets tiresome.

-- Original Message --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Date:  Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:06:12 +0100


Most of the last updates

Most. That means. Most of the last updates Valve released as beta for
their
own interests. Not yours or mine. When Valve thinks they can get away with
it, when it doesn't bring down most servers or piss off the army of 13
year
olds who'll flood their helpdesks, they'll just hoist it upon us with no
beta.

Don't believe me? You get Alfred to commit to betas 100% percent on all
released binaries. You won't, because his firm isn't interested in
investing
any time on anything no matter how small, that just benefits the server
admin guys.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:33
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Uhh am I  missing something?

Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can be
updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper
release..

Tom

--
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:26 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements


When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats
back.
They did because they needed the communities help.

When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries
with
no
betas.

Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone
told
me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even
stupid
enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
everything would be released as beta in future.

Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new
binaries
as live and servers were left broken.

So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the
times
they didn't.

If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas
100%
of
the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many
times
in
the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
tool's arguments.

On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Duke,

I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
Valve
just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's
thousands
of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking
for
anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where
they
release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
available at different times based on many specific requests in the
hlcoders
list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
release, but they did.

On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not
 implemented
any
 beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
 marketing
 reasons and to help themselves and not us.

 I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so
 we
 could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed
 to
 help us at all.

 :rolleyes:



--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Robert Whelan
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
really... 'shut the front door' already

for the 602 time.. :p


- Original Message 
From: larry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:54:21 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

What's the chance of kicking this Barnett guy off the list? Seems we get idiots 
like him once a year and have to suffer through their adolescent view of 
things, it gets tiresome.

-- Original Message --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Date:  Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:06:12 +0100

Most of the last updates

Most. That means. Most of the last updates Valve released as beta for their
own interests. Not yours or mine. When Valve thinks they can get away with
it, when it doesn't bring down most servers or piss off the army of 13 year
olds who'll flood their helpdesks, they'll just hoist it upon us with no
beta.

Don't believe me? You get Alfred to commit to betas 100% percent on all
released binaries. You won't, because his firm isn't interested in investing
any time on anything no matter how small, that just benefits the server
admin guys.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:33
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Uhh am I  missing something?

Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can be
updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper
release..

Tom

--
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:26 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats
 back.
 They did because they needed the communities help.

 When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries with
 no
 betas.

 Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone
 told
 me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even
 stupid
 enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
 everything would be released as beta in future.

 Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries
 as live and servers were left broken.

 So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the times
 they didn't.

 If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%
 of
 the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
 Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many times
 in
 the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
 tool's arguments.

 On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Duke,

 I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
 Valve
 just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's
 thousands
 of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
 anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
 release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
 Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
 available at different times based on many specific requests in the
 hlcoders
 list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
 release, but they did.

 On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented
 any
  beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
  marketing
  reasons and to help themselves and not us.
 
  I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so
  we
  could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed
  to
  help us at all.
 
  :rolleyes:
 
 
 
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Eirik Nilssen
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

All though I think its nice to see people committed to a cause out of a wish to 
make things a little easier for server hosts, I find it somewhat anoying to see 
my hotmail account filled with 50 new messages just during normal office hours. 
Important information and urgent issues might get lost in the jungle of Valve 
complaints - wich is unfortunate.

I hope these matters can be handled offlist, or in Valves forums.
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements 
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:13:40 -0700  -- 
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] really... 'shut the front 
 door' already  for the 602 time.. :p   - Original Message  
 From: larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: 
 Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:54:21 AM Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of 
 Announcements  What's the chance of kicking this Barnett guy off the list? 
 Seems we get idiots like him once a year and have to suffer through their 
 adolescent view of things, it gets tiresome.  -- Original Message 
 -- From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 
 13:06:12 +0100  Most of the last updates  Most. That means. Most of 
 the last updates Valve released as beta for their own interests. Not yours 
 or mine. When Valve thinks they can get away with it, when it doesn't bring 
 down most servers or piss off the army of 13 year olds who'll flood their 
 helpdesks, they'll just hoist it upon us with no beta.  Don't believe 
 me? You get Alfred to commit to betas 100% percent on all released 
 binaries. You won't, because his firm isn't interested in investing any 
 time on anything no matter how small, that just benefits the server admin 
 guys.-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton Sent: 17 October 2007 
 12:33 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of 
 Announcements  Uhh am I missing something?  Most of the last updates 
 have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can be updated via -beta on the 
 command line! Usually a week before proper release..  Tom  
 -- From: Chris Barnett 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:26 PM To: 
 hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of 
 Announcements   When it suited them. When the project was so big they 
 wanted the stats  back.  They did because they needed the communities 
 help.   When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the 
 binaries with  no  betas.   Remember the variable weapon prices 
 in Counter-Strike source? Everyone  told  me to shut up and that Valve 
 had introduced betas finally. I was even  stupid  enough to thank 
 Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that  everything would 
 be released as beta in future.   Within weeks, they was back to their 
 old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries  as live and servers were left 
 broken.   So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's 
 all the times  they didn't.   If you want to put a smile on my face, 
 get Alfred to commit to betas 100%  of  the time. That all future 
 binaries will be released as beta first.   Chris.
 -Original Message-  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [mailto:[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL  Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11  To: 
 hlds@list.valvesoftware.com  Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of 
 Announcements   --  [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative 
 ]  I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many 
 times  in  the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to 
 the update  tool's arguments.   On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] wrote:   Duke,   I'm glad you're getting what you 
 want. But at the end of the day, if  Valve  just hoisst the server 
 binaries on us, without a beta, then it's  thousands  of people who 
 can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for  anywhere 
 between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they  release 
 a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.   Chris.   
  -Original Message-  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke  Sent: 17 October 2007 
 02:36  To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com  Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's 
 Lack of Announcements   --  [ Picked text/plain from 
 multipart/alternative ]  Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all 
 of the files he's made  available at different times based on many 
 specific requests in the  hlcoders  list. Valve didn't have to 
 release anything before the SDK is ready to  release, but they did.  
  On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  
Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not 
 implemented  any

RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
You subscribed to the list. You read an argument you don't have an answer
for. You call it tiresome and ask for someone to be kicked off the list,
with a personal insult, stating my argument is adolescent.

Sorry. It is not. It's perfectly reasonable to ask Valve to do a little, in
return for it's customers saving a lot of time.

It's really simple. 30 minutes to an hour extra of Valves time, that would
save thousands of operators a lot of time over the years.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of larry
Sent: 17 October 2007 13:54
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

What's the chance of kicking this Barnett guy off the list? Seems we get
idiots like him once a year and have to suffer through their adolescent view
of things, it gets tiresome.

-- Original Message --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Date:  Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:06:12 +0100

Most of the last updates

Most. That means. Most of the last updates Valve released as beta for their
own interests. Not yours or mine. When Valve thinks they can get away with
it, when it doesn't bring down most servers or piss off the army of 13 year
olds who'll flood their helpdesks, they'll just hoist it upon us with no
beta.

Don't believe me? You get Alfred to commit to betas 100% percent on all
released binaries. You won't, because his firm isn't interested in
investing
any time on anything no matter how small, that just benefits the server
admin guys.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:33
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Uhh am I  missing something?

Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can be
updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper
release..

Tom

--
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:26 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 When it suited them. When the project was so big they wanted the stats
 back.
 They did because they needed the communities help.

 When they no longer need our help, they'll be releasing the binaries with
 no
 betas.

 Remember the variable weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone
 told
 me to shut up and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even
 stupid
 enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that
 everything would be released as beta in future.

 Within weeks, they was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new
binaries
 as live and servers were left broken.

 So it doesn't matter how many times they did do a beta, it's all the
times
 they didn't.

 If you want to put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%
 of
 the time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
 Sent: 17 October 2007 12:11
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 I don't know if you remember, but they have done beta releases many times
 in
 the past, usually done with a -beta[number] command added to the update
 tool's arguments.

 On 10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Duke,

 I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
 Valve
 just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then it's
 thousands
 of people who can put out when it all goes tits up. I've been asking for
 anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a simple system, where they
 release a binary as beta, then as live two weeks later.

 Chris.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
 Sent: 17 October 2007 02:36
 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
 Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
 available at different times based on many specific requests in the
 hlcoders
 list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
 release, but they did.

 On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented
 any
  beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
  marketing
  reasons and to help themselves and not us.
 
  I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so
  we
  could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed
  to
  help us at all.
 
  :rolleyes

RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
OK. This list is about helping people. Here's what you do.

You run off and do what I did. You create an email account specificly for
email lists. That way, your personal emails are completely separate from
email lists.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eirik Nilssen
Sent: 17 October 2007 14:49
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

All though I think its nice to see people committed to a cause out of a wish
to make things a little easier for server hosts, I find it somewhat anoying
to see my hotmail account filled with 50 new messages just during normal
office hours. Important information and urgent issues might get lost in the
jungle of Valve complaints - wich is unfortunate.

I hope these matters can be handled offlist, or in Valves forums.
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of
Announcements To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007
06:13:40 -0700  -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
really... 'shut the front door' already  for the 602 time.. :p   -
Original Message  From: larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:54:21 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements  What's the chance of
kicking this Barnett guy off the list? Seems we get idiots like him once a
year and have to suffer through their adolescent view of things, it gets
tiresome.  -- Original Message --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:06:12 +0100  Most
of the last updates  Most. That means. Most of the last updates Valve
released as beta for their own interests. Not yours or mine. When Valve
thinks they can get away with it, when it doesn't bring down most servers
or piss off the army of 13 year olds who'll flood their helpdesks, they'll
just hoist it upon us with no beta.  Don't believe me? You get Alfred
to commit to betas 100% percent on all released binaries. You won't,
because his firm isn't interested in investing any time on anything no
matter how small, that just benefits the server admin guys.   
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:33 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject:
Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements  Uhh am I missing something?
 Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can
be updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper
release..  Tom  --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 17,
2007 12:26 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds]
Valve's Lack of Announcements   When it suited them. When the project
was so big they wanted the stats  back.  They did because they needed
the communities help.   When they no longer need our help, they'll be
releasing the binaries with  no  betas.   Remember the variable
weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone  told  me to shut up
and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even  stupid 
enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that 
everything would be released as beta in future.   Within weeks, they
was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries  as live and
servers were left broken.   So it doesn't matter how many times they
did do a beta, it's all the times  they didn't.   If you want to
put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%  of  the
time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.  
Chris.-Original Message-  From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL  Sent:
17 October 2007 12:11  To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com  Subject: Re:
[hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements   --  [ Picked text/plain from
multipart/alternative ]  I don't know if you remember, but they have done
beta releases many times  in  the past, usually done with a
-beta[number] command added to the update  tool's arguments.   On
10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Duke, 
 I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
 Valve  just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then
it's  thousands  of people who can put out when it all goes tits up.
I've been asking for  anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a
simple system, where they  release a binary as beta, then as live two
weeks later.   Chris.-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke  Sent: 17
October 2007 02:36  To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com  Subject: Re:
[hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements   --  [ Picked text/plain
from multipart/alternative ]  Mike Durand has been more than helpful
with all of the files he's made

Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chad

Or just add anyone participating in childish games to the direct to junk
folder express.

Chris Barnett wrote:

OK. This list is about helping people. Here's what you do.

You run off and do what I did. You create an email account specificly for
email lists. That way, your personal emails are completely separate from
email lists.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eirik Nilssen
Sent: 17 October 2007 14:49
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

All though I think its nice to see people committed to a cause out of a wish
to make things a little easier for server hosts, I find it somewhat anoying
to see my hotmail account filled with 50 new messages just during normal
office hours. Important information and urgent issues might get lost in the
jungle of Valve complaints - wich is unfortunate.

I hope these matters can be handled offlist, or in Valves forums.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of


Announcements To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007
06:13:40 -0700  -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
really... 'shut the front door' already  for the 602 time.. :p   -
Original Message  From: larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:54:21 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements  What's the chance of
kicking this Barnett guy off the list? Seems we get idiots like him once a
year and have to suffer through their adolescent view of things, it gets
tiresome.  -- Original Message --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:06:12 +0100  Most
of the last updates  Most. That means. Most of the last updates Valve
released as beta for their own interests. Not yours or mine. When Valve
thinks they can get away with it, when it doesn't bring down most servers
or piss off the army of 13 year olds who'll flood their helpdesks, they'll
just hoist it upon us with no beta.  Don't believe me? You get Alfred
to commit to betas 100% percent on all released binaries. You won't,
because his firm isn't interested in investing any time on anything no
matter how small, that just benefits the server admin guys.   


-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 12:33 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject:


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements  Uhh am I missing something?


Most of the last updates have been pre-released early as 'beta' and can


be updated via -beta on the command line! Usually a week before proper


release..  Tom  --
From: Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 17,


2007 12:26 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds]
Valve's Lack of Announcements   When it suited them. When the project
was so big they wanted the stats  back.  They did because they needed
the communities help.   When they no longer need our help, they'll be
releasing the binaries with  no  betas.   Remember the variable
weapon prices in Counter-Strike source? Everyone  told  me to shut up
and that Valve had introduced betas finally. I was even  stupid 
enough to thank Valve, even though they had made no formal promises that 
everything would be released as beta in future.   Within weeks, they
was back to their old ways. Hoisting brand new binaries  as live and
servers were left broken.   So it doesn't matter how many times they
did do a beta, it's all the times  they didn't.   If you want to
put a smile on my face, get Alfred to commit to betas 100%  of  the
time. That all future binaries will be released as beta first.  
Chris.-Original Message-  From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL  Sent:
17 October 2007 12:11  To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com  Subject: Re:
[hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements   --  [ Picked text/plain from
multipart/alternative ]  I don't know if you remember, but they have done
beta releases many times  in  the past, usually done with a
-beta[number] command added to the update  tool's arguments.   On
10/17/07, Chris Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Duke, 


I'm glad you're getting what you want. But at the end of the day, if
Valve  just hoisst the server binaries on us, without a beta, then


it's  thousands  of people who can put out when it all goes tits up.
I've been asking for  anywhere between a year and 2 years now, for a
simple system, where they  release a binary as beta, then as live two
weeks later.   Chris.-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke  Sent: 17
October 2007 02:36  To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com  Subject: Re:
[hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

[hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Big Bad
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Why should we do that? Mailing list has been working perfectly fine for
years until
you turned up.

So your saying we should all make new accounts just because you dont give a
toss
about what this mailing list is for or the people on it?

Nice 1 forumboy!

[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
OK. This list is about helping people. Here's what you do.

You run off and do what I did. You create an email account specificly for
email lists. That way, your personal emails are completely separate from
email lists.

Chris.

http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/private/hlds/2007-October/046430.html
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Fwd: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Big Bad
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 We subscribed to the list before you young man dont lecture the old hands
on how it works :

Your arguments are adolescent, your toys have come flying out of the pram so
fast they have hit everyone on the head several times and are now starting
to hurt!

Yes that is unreasonible, did you pay for the hlds or srcds code? have you
read the licence docs?
Being this hard working experenced server operator who can fit in 50 posts
worth of arguments im sure you have!
The dedicated server software is free, you pay for the client, valve from
the word go chose these specific settings that were locked.
Some clever folk unlocked them, valve no likey this so they filter it out.

Or do we need to get our crayons out? :)

Valve do far more in return than any other company I know, your I dont give
a toss about EA to someone else earlier on...well if you did then you would
know most companies bundle out the dedicated files, half the time you have
to upload your own game to finish the build and after 2 patches your on your
own.
Complete with exploits and hacks that easily crash servers... the reply is
buy Elite Fighting Combat similiator 3 next year it will be fixed in that.

So no I dont think valve owe us anything, if anything I and a lot of people
are greatful for the time and effort people like alfred and jason do
constantly listening to the actual problems not make believe problems your
flooding us with!

That of course is if you can ask for help nicely instead of demanding
answers you might have got an answer after one post without all this
unpleasnt stuff! Then again thats what using forums instead of mailing lists
does to ya! :)

-Original Message-
You subscribed to the list. You read an argument you don't have an answer
for. You call it tiresome and ask for someone to be kicked off the list,
with a personal insult, stating my argument is adolescent.

Sorry. It is not. It's perfectly reasonable to ask Valve to do a little, in
return for it's customers saving a lot of time.

It's really simple. 30 minutes to an hour extra of Valves time, that would
save thousands of operators a lot of time over the years.

Chris.
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Fwd: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Big Bad
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 *holds up hand* agreed!

Quick before he gets his 5th keyboard!

 I second the motion

-- From: larry 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:54 AM To:
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of
Announcements * What's the chance of kicking this Barnett guy off the list?
Seems we get ** idiots like him once a year and have to suffer through
their adolescent ** view of things, it gets tiresome.*
**
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett
Quit the personal stuff please.

1) While E.A and all the rest of them can release utter total shite, the
server operator is not left with either having to upgrade to said shite or
look at an empty server. Because of the way Steam works, 99.9% of the
clients get said shite, within the hour. Within about 2-3 hours a server is
empty. Empty server = useless piece of casing, contributing to global
warming...That can be avoided with a 100% beta - Steam is then perfect in
the eyes of a server operator. Because the server operator knows what knows
what's going to hit him in 2 weeks time and he has 2 weeks to sort himself
out. If he can't, then I'm sure a third party coder like Mani, Beetle or
L.Duke would come to our rescue, like they normally do.

2) This isn't OMFG Valve are crap. This isn't OMFG Steam is crap - Steam
is lovely. It really is. I love it. Both ends of it. I will now ONLY buy my
games through Steam. So I am sorry to disappoint you. I'm not anti-Valve in
the slightest. I just capable of using the brain on my head for independent
thought and any number of issues.

As for Demand. You are obviously taking things way too personally
especially considering you have nothing to do with Valve. A lot of us
Demanded a response from Valve on a totally separate issue...the delisting
of servers over 24 slots. Buy hey, you've obviously read something else that
I've posted that's offended you and in the red mist, you've gone for me on
this subject, conflating it with something else

Oh and as for help on this list. I asked Valve a long time ago NICELY for a
full blown beta. This isn't a revelation that I had 3 days ago. I'm not
being rude with Valve. It's a fact. They can't be bothered to run a beta
100% of the time.

Now I think that one of your requests to Valve be unreasonable. I would
argue the case as to why, without having to resort to nothing else but
Valve do more than any other company as my argument.

The fact of the matter is that a 100% beta, with a 2 week cycle would solve
a hell of a lot of the problems that server operators get. That's a lot of
hours saved, for an hour of Valves time on each go round.

Oh and before anyone says You keep going on and on about it...

Well, yeah, I do alright. But that's only because people are trying to
counter-argue with real lame personal B.S., with a bit of You're
anti-Valve smeared in.

Chris.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Big Bad
Sent: 18 October 2007 00:41
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Fwd: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 We subscribed to the list before you young man dont lecture the old hands
on how it works :

Your arguments are adolescent, your toys have come flying out of the pram so
fast they have hit everyone on the head several times and are now starting
to hurt!

Yes that is unreasonible, did you pay for the hlds or srcds code? have you
read the licence docs?
Being this hard working experenced server operator who can fit in 50 posts
worth of arguments im sure you have!
The dedicated server software is free, you pay for the client, valve from
the word go chose these specific settings that were locked.
Some clever folk unlocked them, valve no likey this so they filter it out.

Or do we need to get our crayons out? :)

Valve do far more in return than any other company I know, your I dont give
a toss about EA to someone else earlier on...well if you did then you would
know most companies bundle out the dedicated files, half the time you have
to upload your own game to finish the build and after 2 patches your on your
own.
Complete with exploits and hacks that easily crash servers... the reply is
buy Elite Fighting Combat similiator 3 next year it will be fixed in that.

So no I dont think valve owe us anything, if anything I and a lot of people
are greatful for the time and effort people like alfred and jason do
constantly listening to the actual problems not make believe problems your
flooding us with!

That of course is if you can ask for help nicely instead of demanding
answers you might have got an answer after one post without all this
unpleasnt stuff! Then again thats what using forums instead of mailing lists
does to ya! :)

-Original Message-
You subscribed to the list. You read an argument you don't have an answer
for. You call it tiresome and ask for someone to be kicked off the list,
with a personal insult, stating my argument is adolescent.

Sorry. It is not. It's perfectly reasonable to ask Valve to do a little, in
return for it's customers saving a lot of time.

It's really simple. 30 minutes to an hour extra of Valves time, that would
save thousands of operators a lot of time over the years.

Chris.
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Barnett

No that is not what I said. Please do not misrepresent my views.

Forumboy? I wouldn't touch the Steam forums with your keyboard.

:-)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Big Bad
Sent: 18 October 2007 00:38
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Why should we do that? Mailing list has been working perfectly fine for
years until
you turned up.

So your saying we should all make new accounts just because you dont give a
toss
about what this mailing list is for or the people on it?

Nice 1 forumboy!

[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
OK. This list is about helping people. Here's what you do.

You run off and do what I did. You create an email account specificly for
email lists. That way, your personal emails are completely separate from
email lists.

Chris.

http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/private/hlds/2007-October/046430.html

--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


[hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Nolan Hurlburt
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I think many of you may be missing a pertinent point in the whole 32 player
de-listing episode. Valve did not announce it. I recognize that they now
have, but its been days since. Of course valve is well within its rights to
do this, but to those defending valve's lack of posting to this list, I say
give me a break.

I work my ass off to keep my server in the top 50 (game-monitor.com).
I wake up at 5 AM hoping my server is empty so I can give it a reboot.
I pay $80/month hosting fees.
I take great pains to research admin mods/stats that will enhance my
players' experience.
I maintain a website proving the players a home.
I preordered a game to play in a beta.

Now I don't run a 32 player server and have no intention of doing so. But if
Valve delisted my server without telling me why, causing me to lose my
players and ruining all my hard work, I would be be livid. I recognize I can
stop playing/hosting if I don't like it, but I DO like it and Valve needs
people like us to run their servers.

Please Valve, don't keep us in the dark. We need to know these things ahead
of time. We love to help, make it easy for us.

Nolan
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread [ЯтR] The-/iller

Nolan Hurlburt wrote:

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I think many of you may be missing a pertinent point in the whole 32 player
de-listing episode. Valve did not announce it. I recognize that they now
have, but its been days since. Of course valve is well within its rights to
do this, but to those defending valve's lack of posting to this list, I say
give me a break.

I work my ass off to keep my server in the top 50 (game-monitor.com).
I wake up at 5 AM hoping my server is empty so I can give it a reboot.
I pay $80/month hosting fees.
I take great pains to research admin mods/stats that will enhance my
players' experience.
I maintain a website proving the players a home.
I preordered a game to play in a beta.

Now I don't run a 32 player server and have no intention of doing so. But if
Valve delisted my server without telling me why, causing me to lose my
players and ruining all my hard work, I would be be livid. I recognize I can
stop playing/hosting if I don't like it, but I DO like it and Valve needs
people like us to run their servers.

Please Valve, don't keep us in the dark. We need to know these things ahead
of time. We love to help, make it easy for us.

Nolan
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



Well said, we do what we do because we like it, and we do like valve as
much as we criticize them. Just lately they've made a lot of people
unhappy. Just would like a little more help for server admins from valve.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Yo Mama's A Chump
Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you will
go buy another game next month.

-YMAC


On 10/16/07 12:41 PM, Nolan Hurlburt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 I think many of you may be missing a pertinent point in the whole 32 player
 de-listing episode. Valve did not announce it. I recognize that they now
 have, but its been days since. Of course valve is well within its rights to
 do this, but to those defending valve's lack of posting to this list, I say
 give me a break.

 I work my ass off to keep my server in the top 50 (game-monitor.com).
 I wake up at 5 AM hoping my server is empty so I can give it a reboot.
 I pay $80/month hosting fees.
 I take great pains to research admin mods/stats that will enhance my
 players' experience.
 I maintain a website proving the players a home.
 I preordered a game to play in a beta.

 Now I don't run a 32 player server and have no intention of doing so. But if
 Valve delisted my server without telling me why, causing me to lose my
 players and ruining all my hard work, I would be be livid. I recognize I can
 stop playing/hosting if I don't like it, but I DO like it and Valve needs
 people like us to run their servers.

 Please Valve, don't keep us in the dark. We need to know these things ahead
 of time. We love to help, make it easy for us.

 Nolan
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
 visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Patrick Shelley
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Sorry, but i gotta say my piece here.

I got 2 servers - 1 UK and 1 USA

For a start - do you really think the lifespan of this game is just 2 months
before it gets boring?

Are you serously say that? Cause if you are - you must have the brain of a
child - nah, thats too kind.  The brain of a fish.

You know what I've decided?  I've decided to think this through logically.
And no i'm not a valve fanboy - im normal.

TF2 has only been released since the 12th of september. To date that is
exactly 5 weeks.

Up till the 10th of October it was offically beta. In which time they must
have got thousands of bug reports.  My guess is that in their offices they
dont have every single variation of PC that is out there.  That they
probably developed this game on a very limited selection of PC's and Servers
with varying hardware and software.

So, they release beta TF2 - get the feedback and address the most important
and specific problems. Release updates, the clients install updates - and
problems go away each time this cycle happens.

The game uses the latest source engine, and combined with the game beta tag
- its obvious that there are gonna be issues.

Then you get scripters and 3rd party devs creating mods while its still
in beta  Then they moan when x,y,z happens to break their mod and they
barrage this list with zillions of emails ranting and raving about how
valve dont care - OMG.. Please get some perspective here.

I'm ditching my servers until valve are happy with their creation - and
we're not getting server updates every other day.

When their happy and the code works as best as its gonna do on ALL types of
PC platform - then start making your mods

I agree valve should have addressed this sooner - but i suspect the reason
they didnt is because as steam news pointed out they went away to have a
break from what they completed.

So simply put - im waiting until the code is stable and modders could wait
until the code is stable before creating their masterpieces to aviod this
scenario.


On 10/16/07, Yo Mama's A Chump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

 I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
 week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
 but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

 One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
 keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
 months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you will
 go buy another game next month.

 -YMAC
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Thomas Morton

Good post!

Although:


Then you get scripters and 3rd party devs creating mods while its
still
in beta  Then they moan when x,y,z happens to break their mod and they
barrage this list with zillions of emails ranting and raving about how
valve dont care - OMG.. Please get some perspective here.


Nah they're over in the HLCoders list asking sensible technical questions
and getting good support from Valve.. and not ranting...

I wonder the real reason Valve hardly ever reply here

In other news you may be interested in: Mani is back and MAY be working on
Mani again so we may have an OB Mani sometime in the future.. which
might be handy :)
http://www.mani-admin-plugin.com
discuss?...?...?
Tom


--
From: Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:15 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements


--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Sorry, but i gotta say my piece here.

I got 2 servers - 1 UK and 1 USA

For a start - do you really think the lifespan of this game is just 2
months
before it gets boring?

Are you serously say that? Cause if you are - you must have the brain of a
child - nah, thats too kind.  The brain of a fish.

You know what I've decided?  I've decided to think this through logically.
And no i'm not a valve fanboy - im normal.

TF2 has only been released since the 12th of september. To date that is
exactly 5 weeks.

Up till the 10th of October it was offically beta. In which time they must
have got thousands of bug reports.  My guess is that in their offices they
dont have every single variation of PC that is out there.  That they
probably developed this game on a very limited selection of PC's and
Servers
with varying hardware and software.

So, they release beta TF2 - get the feedback and address the most
important
and specific problems. Release updates, the clients install updates - and
problems go away each time this cycle happens.

The game uses the latest source engine, and combined with the game beta
tag
- its obvious that there are gonna be issues.

Then you get scripters and 3rd party devs creating mods while its
still
in beta  Then they moan when x,y,z happens to break their mod and they
barrage this list with zillions of emails ranting and raving about how
valve dont care - OMG.. Please get some perspective here.

I'm ditching my servers until valve are happy with their creation - and
we're not getting server updates every other day.

When their happy and the code works as best as its gonna do on ALL types
of
PC platform - then start making your mods

I agree valve should have addressed this sooner - but i suspect the reason
they didnt is because as steam news pointed out they went away to have a
break from what they completed.

So simply put - im waiting until the code is stable and modders could wait
until the code is stable before creating their masterpieces to aviod this
scenario.


On 10/16/07, Yo Mama's A Chump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you
will
go buy another game next month.

-YMAC

--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald
As a 3rd party dev, making some serious 3rd party modifications to TF2.

I have yet to have anything bad happen.

My server, with my modifications, has yet to crash. Even with some nasty
hacks that are totally experimental, it's still rock solid.

I am impressed, and shocked.

And lag?

What lag?

There's lag in TF2?

3x Servers

2x 24
1x 32

Server CPU: 10%-20%
BW Usage when full: 4.5mbps

Awesome work valve.

Now quit being lame about the 32 player server bs.

- voogru.

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Shelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 7:16 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Sorry, but i gotta say my piece here.

I got 2 servers - 1 UK and 1 USA

For a start - do you really think the lifespan of this game is just 2 months
before it gets boring?

Are you serously say that? Cause if you are - you must have the brain of a
child - nah, thats too kind.  The brain of a fish.

You know what I've decided?  I've decided to think this through logically.
And no i'm not a valve fanboy - im normal.

TF2 has only been released since the 12th of september. To date that is
exactly 5 weeks.

Up till the 10th of October it was offically beta. In which time they must
have got thousands of bug reports.  My guess is that in their offices they
dont have every single variation of PC that is out there.  That they
probably developed this game on a very limited selection of PC's and Servers
with varying hardware and software.

So, they release beta TF2 - get the feedback and address the most important
and specific problems. Release updates, the clients install updates - and
problems go away each time this cycle happens.

The game uses the latest source engine, and combined with the game beta tag
- its obvious that there are gonna be issues.

Then you get scripters and 3rd party devs creating mods while its still
in beta  Then they moan when x,y,z happens to break their mod and they
barrage this list with zillions of emails ranting and raving about how
valve dont care - OMG.. Please get some perspective here.

I'm ditching my servers until valve are happy with their creation - and
we're not getting server updates every other day.

When their happy and the code works as best as its gonna do on ALL types of
PC platform - then start making your mods

I agree valve should have addressed this sooner - but i suspect the reason
they didnt is because as steam news pointed out they went away to have a
break from what they completed.

So simply put - im waiting until the code is stable and modders could wait
until the code is stable before creating their masterpieces to aviod this
scenario.


On 10/16/07, Yo Mama's A Chump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

 I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
 week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
 but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

 One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
 keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
 months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you will
 go buy another game next month.

 -YMAC
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Yo Mama's A Chump
On 10/16/07 7:15 PM, Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Sorry, but i gotta say my piece here.

 I got 2 servers - 1 UK and 1 USA

Whoop de do. I got cookie 4 you.

 For a start - do you really think the lifespan of this game is just 2 months
 before it gets boring?

Yes.

 Are you serously say that? Cause if you are - you must have the brain of a
 child - nah, thats too kind.  The brain of a fish.

I are seriously say that. You have the ass of a cow.

 You know what I've decided?  I've decided to think this through logically.
 And no i'm not a valve fanboy - im normal.

 BlaBlaBla...

What I said has nothing to do with TF2. I have been around Valve for a long
long time. I was playing CS when it was a beta mod for HL. And for years
Valve has not communicated or cooperated with the community. How long did it
take them to start a beta program after everyone started screaming for one?
Wipe that brown off your lips.

-YMAC


 On 10/16/07, Yo Mama's A Chump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

 I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
 week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
 but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

 One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
 keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
 months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you will
 go buy another game next month.

 -YMAC
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
 visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Chris Barnett
It's cracking post. Shame about 99% of it isn't relevant to the issues that
we've been discussing for the last 3 days.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Morton
Sent: 17 October 2007 00:25
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Good post!

Although:

 Then you get scripters and 3rd party devs creating mods while its
 still
 in beta  Then they moan when x,y,z happens to break their mod and they
 barrage this list with zillions of emails ranting and raving about how
 valve dont care - OMG.. Please get some perspective here.

Nah they're over in the HLCoders list asking sensible technical questions
and getting good support from Valve.. and not ranting...

I wonder the real reason Valve hardly ever reply here

In other news you may be interested in: Mani is back and MAY be working on
Mani again so we may have an OB Mani sometime in the future.. which
might be handy :)
http://www.mani-admin-plugin.com
discuss?...?...?
Tom


--
From: Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:15 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Sorry, but i gotta say my piece here.

 I got 2 servers - 1 UK and 1 USA

 For a start - do you really think the lifespan of this game is just 2
 months
 before it gets boring?

 Are you serously say that? Cause if you are - you must have the brain of a
 child - nah, thats too kind.  The brain of a fish.

 You know what I've decided?  I've decided to think this through logically.
 And no i'm not a valve fanboy - im normal.

 TF2 has only been released since the 12th of september. To date that is
 exactly 5 weeks.

 Up till the 10th of October it was offically beta. In which time they must
 have got thousands of bug reports.  My guess is that in their offices they
 dont have every single variation of PC that is out there.  That they
 probably developed this game on a very limited selection of PC's and
 Servers
 with varying hardware and software.

 So, they release beta TF2 - get the feedback and address the most
 important
 and specific problems. Release updates, the clients install updates - and
 problems go away each time this cycle happens.

 The game uses the latest source engine, and combined with the game beta
 tag
 - its obvious that there are gonna be issues.

 Then you get scripters and 3rd party devs creating mods while its
 still
 in beta  Then they moan when x,y,z happens to break their mod and they
 barrage this list with zillions of emails ranting and raving about how
 valve dont care - OMG.. Please get some perspective here.

 I'm ditching my servers until valve are happy with their creation - and
 we're not getting server updates every other day.

 When their happy and the code works as best as its gonna do on ALL types
 of
 PC platform - then start making your mods

 I agree valve should have addressed this sooner - but i suspect the reason
 they didnt is because as steam news pointed out they went away to have a
 break from what they completed.

 So simply put - im waiting until the code is stable and modders could wait
 until the code is stable before creating their masterpieces to aviod this
 scenario.


 On 10/16/07, Yo Mama's A Chump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

 I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
 week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
 but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

 One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
 keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
 months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you
 will
 go buy another game next month.

 -YMAC
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Chris Barnett
Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented any
beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own marketing
reasons and to help themselves and not us.

When they release separate betas for EVERY update, then I'll be happy.
Because then it's being done for the community and not just Valves
interests.

Also, I'm not happy with Alfreds response with the 32 slot business. I
believe the PC version of TF2 is being held back just to stop the console
version from looking so bad

Chris.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yo Mama's A Chump
Sent: 17 October 2007 00:56
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

On 10/16/07 7:15 PM, Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Sorry, but i gotta say my piece here.

 I got 2 servers - 1 UK and 1 USA

Whoop de do. I got cookie 4 you.

 For a start - do you really think the lifespan of this game is just 2
months
 before it gets boring?

Yes.

 Are you serously say that? Cause if you are - you must have the brain of a
 child - nah, thats too kind.  The brain of a fish.

I are seriously say that. You have the ass of a cow.

 You know what I've decided?  I've decided to think this through logically.
 And no i'm not a valve fanboy - im normal.

 BlaBlaBla...

What I said has nothing to do with TF2. I have been around Valve for a long
long time. I was playing CS when it was a beta mod for HL. And for years
Valve has not communicated or cooperated with the community. How long did it
take them to start a beta program after everyone started screaming for one?
Wipe that brown off your lips.

-YMAC


 On 10/16/07, Yo Mama's A Chump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

 I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
 week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
 but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

 One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
 keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
 months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you
will
 go buy another game next month.

 -YMAC
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please
 visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Hans Vos

And what about 64-bit support, big promises have been made but they
didn't deliver. But I have to say that the amount of bug fixes released
for Team Fortress 2 shows to me that they made a serious effort to
listen to the community. I'm quite satisfied with the way Steam provides
us with game server content and updates.

- Hans

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald
Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented any
beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own marketing
reasons and to help themselves and not us.

I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so we
could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed to
help us at all.

:rolleyes:

Also, I'm not happy with Alfreds response with the 32 slot business. I
believe the PC version of TF2 is being held back just to stop the console
version from looking so bad

Interesting theory.

Consoles have one strong advantage over PC's.

They are easy, you buy a game for a console, chances are you can run it and
it will be playable. You don't need to worry about a lot of the little BS
things, you can just play.

PC, not so much. It requires someone with more of a clue.

I have customers that want to buy a gaming computer and they have little 6-7
year old kids.

I always tell them to get a console instead. It's cheaper and easier for
people not so technically inclined.

I'm assuming the player limit on the XBOX 360 is simply because all of the
servers are ran as listen servers, not dedicated servers in a data center
somewhere.

If they had a dedicated server for XBOX players it would solve that problem
and they could then take off the player limits on the XBOX.


- voogru.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:23 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented any
beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own marketing
reasons and to help themselves and not us.

When they release separate betas for EVERY update, then I'll be happy.
Because then it's being done for the community and not just Valves
interests.

Also, I'm not happy with Alfreds response with the 32 slot business. I
believe the PC version of TF2 is being held back just to stop the console
version from looking so bad

Chris.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yo Mama's A Chump
Sent: 17 October 2007 00:56
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

On 10/16/07 7:15 PM, Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 Sorry, but i gotta say my piece here.

 I got 2 servers - 1 UK and 1 USA

Whoop de do. I got cookie 4 you.

 For a start - do you really think the lifespan of this game is just 2
months
 before it gets boring?

Yes.

 Are you serously say that? Cause if you are - you must have the brain of a
 child - nah, thats too kind.  The brain of a fish.

I are seriously say that. You have the ass of a cow.

 You know what I've decided?  I've decided to think this through logically.
 And no i'm not a valve fanboy - im normal.

 BlaBlaBla...

What I said has nothing to do with TF2. I have been around Valve for a long
long time. I was playing CS when it was a beta mod for HL. And for years
Valve has not communicated or cooperated with the community. How long did it
take them to start a beta program after everyone started screaming for one?
Wipe that brown off your lips.

-YMAC


 On 10/16/07, Yo Mama's A Chump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Valve has never cared about you and never will. Get used to it.

 I used to do all that and after fixing the plugins that Valve broke every
 week or so just to keep my server running I gave up. It is still running,
 but I just don't care. They have beaten all the care out of me.

 One day Valve will realize that mods and plugins are the only thing that
 keeps the game interesting for the majority of people after a couple of
 months. But on the other hand maybe they want you to get bored so you
will
 go buy another game next month.

 -YMAC
 --

 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please
 visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


Re: [hlds] Valve's Lack of Announcements

2007-10-16 Thread LDuke
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Mike Durand has been more than helpful with all of the files he's made
available at different times based on many specific requests in the hlcoders
list. Valve didn't have to release anything before the SDK is ready to
release, but they did.

On 10/16/07, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Be careful about the beta programme stuff. Valve have not implemented any
 beta programme to help anyone. They did it with TFC2 for their own
 marketing
 reasons and to help themselves and not us.

 I guess that's why they released the SDK header files early for us so we
 could get to work on server mods right away, nah that wasn't supposed to
 help us at all.

 :rolleyes:



--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds