[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin plugin interface - developers please liaise
On 28 Feb., 22:54, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: If you are working with HG, you should be able to just pull updates from the 'default' branch and never worry that your branch is diverging. I do worry about 'my' branch diverging. There are some bugs in the python_scripting branch that have been in it since it was started by Pablo. I have so far made an effort to only do hg exports from my local copy, basing my changesets on a pull from the SF repo with my newest changes committed to that. Maybe I'm suffering from a misconception here. Can I just merge the default branch into the python_scripting branch to bring it up-to-date with the default branch? I'd then have to do an hg bundle to export the changeset resulting from two parents, but the python_scripting branch would be up-to-date again. I wanted to keep it simple, but maybe I did the wrong thing and it's my fault having let the branches diverge so far. Please excuse my ignorance in these matters, I still haven't totally gotten my head round mercurial. Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Re: can't build latest hugin from source on ubuntu (error with flann_cpp_s)
On 28 Jan., 17:45, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote: If you upgrade than consider that on 10.10 the cmake is erroneous. (try somehow to downgrade cmake from 2.8.2 to version 2.8.0.) In what way erroneous? I've been using cmake 2.8.2 on my Kubuntu 10.10 system for months and it has always done precisely what it's supposed to do. Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: can't build latest hugin from source on ubuntu (error with flann_cpp_s)
Am Dienstag, 1. März 2011 schrieb kfj: On 28 Jan., 17:45, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote: If you upgrade than consider that on 10.10 the cmake is erroneous. (try somehow to downgrade cmake from 2.8.2 to version 2.8.0.) In what way erroneous? I've been using cmake 2.8.2 on my Kubuntu 10.10 system for months and it has always done precisely what it's supposed to do. Creating debian package with make package will create a deb file which includes a tar file. This tar file normally includes directories and regular files. But cpack from the 2.8.2 version of cmake creates only the regular files. That is, installing with dpkg is ok if the destination directories are already there. The target directory creation is missing. Kay Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[hugin-ptx] large masks considerably slow down nona
Hi group! I'm currently working on a script that relies heavily on masking. The script generates the masks to arbitrary precision. Most of the time I was using spacings of about 100 pixels for the masks, and all was well. Today, while testing, I generated much more precise masks. I set the spacing to one pixel, and this threw a spanner in the works when I tried to process the data with nona. I didn't wait for the process to terminate and tried with 10 pixel stride. This increased processing time by roughly 200%! So I made the test and made a single-image pto and put a 125-point mask on the image manually, just to be sure it wasn't some strange effect of my script. It took nona over 11 seconds to render the image. when I removed the mask, it only took 4.4 seconds. This was with a 12MP 16bit TIFF in stereographic projection, on Pre-Release 2010.5.0.a11acbf8be1d. I wonder if anyone else has noticed this? Has it been like this all along? Maybe I'm the only one using masks with more than a couple of dozen points? I've attached the .msk file which I used to slow down nona. Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx nonatest.msk Description: Binary data
Re: [hugin-ptx] Stitching and enfusing a handheld panorama with several exposures
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:42, David Haberthür david.haberth...@gmail.com wrote: I've loaded the images from your zip-file above in a development version of hugin (2010.5.0.4854:d29b1d6da0e0 built by Harry van der Wolf) [1]. From your website I presume you're also using OS X (And work in an interesting field, if I look at the references in your BibDesk window :) ) I've just used the assistant (with cpfind), cleaned some control points (in the Images tab), pressed Autocrop in the fast preview window and let hugin calculate a fused (and for kicks a blended and fused) panorama. The result (and the .pto-File) can be found here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/436546/jiho.zip There is some minor ghosting with the people moving, but no misalignment as you described. From what I guess, there must be a problem with some control points you placed manually. Did you try a clean, fresh start with your images? I don't think that the scaling down of your images prevents a problem from arising... [1]: http://panorama.dyndns.org/index.php?lang=ensubject=Hugintexttag=Hugin (Seems to be down for me at the moment!) I tried this and indeed it works for the few test images I provided, thanks (I should have started with simple things before getting into complex ones). It does not work for the full panorama however, because there seems to be too much parallax errors and too few remarquable points to be picked as control (the middle of the panorama is just the sea and the sky). It does not even work with only the 0EV images so I guess I need to get that right before getting into the HDR/enfuse stuff. Thanks again, JiHO --- http://maururu.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.0_beta2 released
Hi all, 2011/2/28 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hugin-2011.0.0_beta2 RELEASE NOTES Hugin is a panorama stitcher and more. A new version is available. A small error passed through the beta1. Please use this tarball instead. SCHEDULE https://launchpad.net/hugin/2011.0 The purpose of the schedule is to make the process as predictable as possible so that contributors can plan for their own contributions (e.g. translations and bug fixes) and distributors can plan for the binary builds. The schedule is just an indication. The release will happen when it is ready. We still have the bug in hugin for Leopard which causes the stitch to fail on OSX Leopard (10.5) [1,2,3]. This does however work correctly on Tiger (10.4) and Snow Leopard (10.6). I made a couple of test builds [2] which didn't solve it. As I hadn't got a good idea left, I then spend a week on the python branch. Then I went a week on wintersports holidays (this last action was by far the best). I consider this bug a show-stopper for a release even though there is a work-around in the form of PTBatcherGui. I will now continue my efforts to (try to) solve the issue, but might request support from the programming gurus here. Harry [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/697039 [2]: http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/556691be61ddc7ba?pli=1 [3]: http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/b18eaae2c7e21a80 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Can't commit translation to trunk
I think all Sourceforge accounts were suspended recently due to a security breach: http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-net-global-password-reset/ http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-net-global-password-reset/ On 1 March 2011 13:59, cri cri.pe...@gmail.com wrote: I used to send the the updated Italian translation using mercurial but now I'm not able to do it. That's what I see when I try to push my local changes: hg push ssh://m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net/hgroot/hugin/hugin m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net's password: m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net's password: m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net's password: remote: Permission denied, please try again. remote: Permission denied, please try again. remote: Received disconnect from 216.34.181.121: 2: Too many authentication failures for mcri abort: no suitable response from remote hg! I'm 100% sure the entered password is right. Was my account suspended? Thanks for any help Cristian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Re: Can't commit translation to trunk
Thank you! that was the problem. I knew of the Sourceforge problem but didn't associated it with my push error. Thanks again for the help Cristian On 1 Mar, 14:18, Tim Nugent timnug...@gmail.com wrote: I think all Sourceforge accounts were suspended recently due to a security breach: http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-net-global-password-reset/ http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-net-global-password-reset/ On 1 March 2011 13:59, cri cri.pe...@gmail.com wrote: I used to send the the updated Italian translation using mercurial but now I'm not able to do it. That's what I see when I try to push my local changes: hg push ssh://m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net/hgroot/hugin/hugin m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net's password: m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net's password: m...@hugin.hg.sourceforge.net's password: remote: Permission denied, please try again. remote: Permission denied, please try again. remote: Received disconnect from 216.34.181.121: 2: Too many authentication failures for mcri abort: no suitable response from remote hg! I'm 100% sure the entered password is right. Was my account suspended? Thanks for any help Cristian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: can't build latest hugin from source on ubuntu (error with flann_cpp_s)
Am Dienstag, 1. März 2011 schrieb Yuval Levy: On March 1, 2011 04:40:09 am Kornel Benko wrote: Am Dienstag, 1. März 2011 schrieb kfj: On 28 Jan., 17:45, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote: If you upgrade than consider that on 10.10 the cmake is erroneous. (try somehow to downgrade cmake from 2.8.2 to version 2.8.0.) In what way erroneous? I've been using cmake 2.8.2 on my Kubuntu 10.10 system for months and it has always done precisely what it's supposed to do. Creating debian package with make package ... ...is just more broken than in previous and latest version. AFAIK it has always been broken in that the Debian packages build with CMake/CPack don't pass basic Debian tests / policies. Google for a thread in this list where Andreas Metzler gives the details. It is. But still I am using this build-process without problems. (Until now I was using the 2.8.0 version, but since some days I use the 2.8.4 version on ubuntu 10.10) (Got it from ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cmake/; cmake_2.8.4-2_amd64.deb cmake-data_2.8.4-2_all.deb cmake-qt-gui_2.8.4-2_amd64.deb ) Using the combination of make package sudo dpkg -i NAME_OF_THE_GENERATED PACKAGE is barely better than using make sudo make install Naturally I don't follow you here. Installing through package makes it easy to deinstall also. Ok, maybe it's valid for me only ... ... Yuv Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.0_beta2 released
Hoi Harry, On March 1, 2011 08:18:10 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: a week on wintersports holidays (this last action was by far the best). ;-) can't wait for our little end-of-winter Florida vacation ;-) I consider this bug a show-stopper for a release even though there is a work-around in the form of PTBatcherGui. OK, I marked [0] as 'critical' in the tracker. The idea is to use the 'critical' status in the tracker for those issues that we want to have solved before the release. The list is not set in stone and things can be added and/or removed from it as we go along. Low/Medium/High are the 'normal' ticket prioritization. Right now we have 8 such 'critical' tickets open [1] but things can and will change. Yuv [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/697039 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bugs?search=Searchfield.importance=Criticalfield.status=Newfield.status=Incompletefield.status=Confirmedfield.status=Triagedfield.status=In+Progressfield.status=Fix+Committed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: can't build latest hugin from source on ubuntu (error with flann_cpp_s)
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 14:29, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote: Using the combination of make package sudo dpkg -i NAME_OF_THE_GENERATED PACKAGE is barely better than using make sudo make install Naturally I don't follow you here. Installing through package makes it easy to deinstall also. Ok, maybe it's valid for me only ... An alternative which I use is checkinstall, which works even when the make package doesn't. I'm sure it's not the best solution, but it works for me (and as Kornel says, it's easier to de-install). Seb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.0_beta2 released
Would it be easier to compile a special build for 10.5 on the same platform instead of a universal build compiled on 10.6? Carl Harry van der Wolf schrieb am 01.03.11 14:18: Hi all, 2011/2/28 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch mailto:goo...@levy.ch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hugin-2011.0.0_beta2 RELEASE NOTES Hugin is a panorama stitcher and more. A new version is available. A small error passed through the beta1. Please use this tarball instead. SCHEDULE https://launchpad.net/hugin/2011.0 The purpose of the schedule is to make the process as predictable as possible so that contributors can plan for their own contributions (e.g. translations and bug fixes) and distributors can plan for the binary builds. The schedule is just an indication. The release will happen when it is ready. We still have the bug in hugin for Leopard which causes the stitch to fail on OSX Leopard (10.5) [1,2,3]. This does however work correctly on Tiger (10.4) and Snow Leopard (10.6). I made a couple of test builds [2] which didn't solve it. As I hadn't got a good idea left, I then spend a week on the python branch. Then I went a week on wintersports holidays (this last action was by far the best). I consider this bug a show-stopper for a release even though there is a work-around in the form of PTBatcherGui. I will now continue my efforts to (try to) solve the issue, but might request support from the programming gurus here. Harry [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/697039 [2]: http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/556691be61ddc7ba?pli=1 [3]: http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/b18eaae2c7e21a80 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Stitching and enfusing a handheld panorama with several exposures
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:55, Gareth Jones gareth.k.jo...@gmail.com wrote: My method (working hand-held) is to take the photos with the camera settings basically as you do. Then in Hugin 2010.04: 1) Set up *unlinked* stacks. 2) Mask moving people etc. 3) Temporarily mask out any obviously parallaxed foreground. (Assuming that you prefer the background to be properly aligned.) 4) Run cpfind (multirow/stacked) on all. As far as I can tell this uses align_image_stack within stacks and normal cpfind between stacks. Cpfind seems to be aware of the masks, but align_image_stack isn't - deal with that in step 5. I then remove bad control points: 5) Edit-Remove control points in masks - this eliminates the masked out foreground and moving objects. Remove the temporary foreground masks now. 6) Run Celeste if there are clouds. 7) Clean control points button to remove outliers. 8) Edit-Fine tune, then remove points with 0.8 correlation. 0.9 works well if you only use align_image_stack, but cpfind creates lots of points with lower correlations for me. 9) During optimizing, I remove control points in stages between rerunning the optimizer, based on their mismatch distance (e.g. 10, 5, 2, 1). Sometimes I need to manually add points between stacks. After the initial positions-only optimization and straightening and centring the preview, I use calculate optimal size in the Stitcher tab so that the pixel mismatches are accurate for successive optimization passes. For stages 8 and 9 use View-Control point table to select and remove points with low correlation and high pixel mismatch. Then I mask lens flares etc., do photometric optimization and blending as described. If the foreground looks too bad I crop it out. Thanks for this very detailed explanation. It looks like a promising method. I have a few further questions though: - first, on my machine (developer preview of Hugin built on Jan 23rd and the control point detection settings you set me) the distance column in the control points table always contains distances (some numbers 1) while, after fine tuning, it is supposed to contain correlation coefficients (should always be 1). How do you select points by correlation in steps 8 and by distance in step 9, since the distance column should only contain one of those two? Can you switch between the two? - you say that you first do a position only optimisation, then remove problematic points and then do further optimisations. These are still position only right? - it seems the align button in the assistant tab does more than position optimize + photometric optimization. Indeed, If I create the control points, then optimize them in the Optimizer tab and finally do photometric optimization in the exposure tab, the assistant still says Images or control points have changed, new alignment is needed. What is missing? What else does it do? - when performing photometric optimisation, I need to use HDR, fixed exposure to avoid having hugin correct the under and over exposed images, right? Thanks in advance for the help. Sincerely, JiHO --- http://maururu.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.0.beta 2 from windows installer and zipfile gives a crash in Nona
Hello Matthew Installed Hugin 2011.0.beta2 and it works very well with control point generation and optimisation. However stitching is not possible. Nona gives an error. Glut32.dll is missing and stitching is not possible. My system is WindowsXP incl service pack 3. Tested the installer and Zipfile and with both Nona gives the same error. Has more people the same problem? Kind regards, Henk Tijdink -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Stitching and enfusing a handheld panorama with several exposures
Hi, - first, on my machine (developer preview of Hugin built on Jan 23rd and the control point detection settings you set me) the distance column in the control points table always contains distances (some numbers 1) while, after fine tuning, it is supposed to contain correlation coefficients (should always be 1). After the fine-tuning, the numbers should always be correlation coefficients. Sometimes they are indeed a little 1. (I don't know why, my memory of how such things work mathematically is a bit faded these days!) Pixel distances early on would be much 1 though. How do you select points by correlation in steps 8 and by distance in step 9, since the distance column should only contain one of those two? Can you switch between the two? Pressing select by distance (and using negative threshold values) should just do the right thing after fine-tuning. I don't know of any way of switching between correlation and distance other than to rerun the fine-tuner or optimizer. - you say that you first do a position only optimisation, then remove problematic points and then do further optimisations. These are still position only right? I normally optimize the positions (incremental from anchor); then straighten and centre in the preview; then calculate optimal size in the stitcher tab; then re-optimize the positions; then add view (for 360deg or multiple lenses); then barrel b; then d, e, a and c; and finally X, Y and Z (narrow scenes with no/implicit stacks). I remove obviously wrong points (mismatched features, or 50 pixels) as soon as they become visible in the preview, but I don't start trimming the smaller control point distances due to parallax until the end, repeating the final optimization till I'm happy with it. This is just habit; you can probably go straight from the position optimization to the final optimization without the intermediate runs, and repeat it whilst trimming control points. - it seems the align button in the assistant tab does more than position optimize + photometric optimization. Indeed, If I create the control points, then optimize them in the Optimizer tab and finally do photometric optimization in the exposure tab, the assistant still says Images or control points have changed, new alignment is needed. What is missing? What else does it do? I don't know what else the assistant does, but I assume (hope!) that all its functionality is available in the other tabs. The ...new alignment is needed message appears for me too after photometric optimization, but since I've already aligned everything at that point and I can't see how photometric alignment can alter the geometric alignment, I just regard it as a quirk of the way the assistant tracks changes to the image metadata. Maybe someone else here can enlighten us about that? - when performing photometric optimisation, I need to use HDR, fixed exposure to avoid having hugin correct the under and over exposed images, right? Yes, leave the exposure for Enfuse/hdr_merge to deal with. Thanks in advance for the help. No problem, I just hope it is help - I don't know if my way is the best way... Gareth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Hello, here is a Palmela 2011 update
Hi, Here is a Palmela 2011 - update: *For those without time to read the detail =* Over 60 registered attendees already signed in, we now have two hotels fully packed with Palmela 2011 attendees, a third hotel under contracthttp://www.palmela2011.com/featured/palmela-village-golf-resort to start accept bookings from today (March 1) with up to 100 rooms available! Speakers http://www.palmela2011.com/info/conference/speakers and sponsorshttp://www.palmela2011.com/info/conference/partners being announced at Palmela2011.com http://palmela2011.com/. Now it's a good time to sign up for Palmela 2011http://www.palmela2011.com/tutorials-and-conference-registration . And here is the more detailed update: * * *Conference Attendees:* As of today, March 1, we have over 60 attendees registered for the conference or tutorials + conference programs, this is the highest number of registrations in the first month of any previous IVRPA conference. Hopefully we should be able to start publish the attendee list on the Palmela 2011 website http://www.palmela2011.com/info/conference/attendees in the coming days. If you want to register for the conference, now it's a good time, check the ticket prices here http://www.palmela2011.com/tickets and register herehttp://www.palmela2011.com/tutorials-and-conference-registration . *Conference Speakers: * We have some great speakers lined up alreadyhttp://www.palmela2011.com/info/conference/speakers, Ignacio Ferrando Margelí, Joergen Geerds, Nicole Tung and Jason Barr, Thomas K. Sharpless, but we ain't stopping here, more speakers will be announced during next month as we aim to cover all hot topics in the panoramic world. If you are attending Palmela 2011 and want to give a talk here, contact ushttp://www.palmela2011.com/about/contact, we still have some 30min and 20min speaker slots available. *Conference Sponsors:* We recently opened sponsor registrations and already Nodal Ninjahttp://www.nodalninja.com/ , Tourwrist http://www.tourwrist.com/, Kolor http://www.kolor.com/ and Garden Gnome http://gardengnomesoftware.com/ showed their love for this conference by signing in as Palmela 2011 Sponsors, Vendors or Partners. Check the terms here http://www.palmela2011.com/info/sponsors and sign in by registering your company to become a sponsor herehttp://www.palmela2011.com/tutorials-and-conference-registration . *Conference Accommodation:* The first hotel, Palmela Castle Pousada was sold out on Feb. 14. The second Hotel, the S. Filipe Fortress Pousada in nearby Setúbal, sold out yesterday, Feb. 28. Given the high demand we are experiencing for this conference, we went to great lengths to find a third hotel to accommodate everyone that wants to attend Palmela 2011 - The Conference from June 1 to 5, 2011. The new hotel is the Palmela Village Golf Resorthttp://www.palmela2011.com/featured/palmela-village-golf-resort and although not up there in the Castle, it's located only 10 minutes away from the village on a recently built golf resort. We hope this new option with up to 100 rooms available will settle everyone's need for a room to attend Palmela 2011. *Palmela 2011 Exhibitions:* Several teams are working on many different exhibitions and we expect to start announce the exhibitions in detail next week. We have planned the following Palmela 2011 exhibitions to open to public on June 2 and 3, 2011: - Gigapixel Challenge. - Masters of Contemporary Panoramic Photography. - Panos for the People group exhibition (distributed across several places on Palmela Old Town). - My Planets (stereographic projection group exhibition). - Three individual exhibitions from renowned panoramic artists For some of the exhibitions we will launch in the coming days a request for submissions from the panoramic community. Everyone will have equal chance to participate, independently of being an IVRPA member or not. Exhibitions will open on the first week of June, remain on display during the summer and close on August 31. *Palmela 2011 Volunteers:* The Palmela 2011 – Panoramic Photography Festival was made possible by the dedicated work the following volunteers. - Carlos Chegado – *Conference Organizer* - Sandra Mexa – *Conference Treasurer* - Matthias Taugwalder – *Sponsorship Coordinator* - Pat Swovelin – *Tutorials Coordinator* - Aaron Spence – *Registration Coordinator* - Willy Kaemena – *Transport Coordinator* - Karyn Laudisi – *Video* *Palmela 2011 Exhibitions team:* - Carlos Chegado (*Portugal*) - G. Donald Bain (*USA*) - Jürgen Schrader (*Germany*) - Sam Rohn (*USA*) - Joergen Geerds (*USA*) *Palmela 2011 translate team:* - Carlos Chegado EN (*Portugal*) - Pat Swovelin EN (*USA*) - Inês Mendes PT (*Portugal*) - Vincèn Pujol FR (*France*) - Mike Sikorski PL (*Ireland*) - Sandra Pilar Paulino ES (*Portugal*) - Mauro Contrafatto IT (*Italy*) - Michael Hundrieser DE (*Germany*) On behalf of the IVRPA Board of
Re: [hugin-ptx] Stitching and enfusing a handheld panorama with several exposures
On Tue 01-Mar-2011 at 17:15 +, Gareth Jones wrote: I don't know what else the assistant does, but I assume (hope!) that all its functionality is available in the other tabs. Yes it just automates existing functions. The ...new alignment is needed message appears for me too after photometric optimization, but since I've already aligned everything at that point and I can't see how photometric alignment can alter the geometric alignment, I just regard it as a quirk of the way the assistant tracks changes to the image metadata. I think this flag is set whenever anything in the project has chnaged, it probably should be fixed so it only follows control point changes. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] large masks considerably slow down nona
On Tue 01-Mar-2011 at 02:33 -0800, Kay F. Jahnke wrote: So I made the test and made a single-image pto and put a 125-point mask on the image manually, just to be sure it wasn't some strange effect of my script. It took nona over 11 seconds to render the image. when I removed the mask, it only took 4.4 seconds. This was with a 12MP 16bit TIFF in stereographic projection, on Pre-Release 2010.5.0.a11acbf8be1d. I wonder if anyone else has noticed this? Has it been like this all along? Maybe I'm the only one using masks with more than a couple of dozen points? I've noticed that lots of masks slows down the preview, but everything generally works ok for the original intent of rough masks manually created in the GUI. Clearly your generated masks are pushing the limits, it would be nice to resolve these issues at some point, this should be a bug report. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] 2011.0 Release Plan
On Mon 28-Feb-2011 at 19:36 -0500, Yuval Levy wrote: I was going to say that we shouldn't be supporting anything older than the current stable release, but if we continue releasing at twice the rate of Ubuntu (and Fedora etc...) then there will always be people using the two most recent releases. There is plenty of evidence around that deviating from release early release frequently is nearly lethal, including the recent experience of Gimp, our own experience prior to 2009; the FreeBSD experience with 5.0 in 2000-2003. Yes the fast release schedule has been a good thing, I just couldn't do the work to make it happen. Releasing often gives contributors the chance to see their stuff get general distribution, but also works against half-finished stuff from being pushed into the trunk before it is ready. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: can't build latest hugin from source on ubuntu (error with flann_cpp_s)
Now the compile/package for hugin 2011.0.0 beta2 solved on UHU-Linux 2.1. Thanks. Newer cmake build (2.8.4), new cmake need upgrade the libarchive to 2.8.4. Now another problem, when i use help-about, hugin crash. Lajos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.0_beta2 released
From another and from this thread, my previous problem old cmake too. Now tthe compile/package for hugin 2011.0.0 beta2 solved on UHU-Linux 2.1. Thanks. Newer cmake build (2.8.4), new cmake need upgrade the libarchive to 2.8.4. Now another problem, when i use help-about, or click about icon, hugin crash. Lajos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
