Multifile multivolume tape data set problem
Hi All, We have some GDG data sets that are stacked on a tape. Each month a new generation is added to the tape and data are appended to it periodically. One of the data sets have gone to a second volume. Subsequent generations were added with DSN=GDG(+1),LABEL=(n,SL),VOL=SER=(VOL1,VOL2). Access to a single data set in VOL1 or VOL2 has no problem. Also, access to two or more data sets that reside in VOL1 in a concatenation has no problem. However, access to two ore more data sets that reside in VOL2 in a concatenation will end with IEC147I 613-1C abend. Another msgid followed is CBR4110I Specific mount volser mismatch: int VOL1, ext VOL2. Could someone explain the problem and how can I correct it? We are in z/OS 1.4 and using DFSMSrmm as the TMS. Thanks. Howi Kok ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Multifile multivolume tape data set problem
Bruce That's it. Thanks for your help. Howi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Multifile multivolume tape data set problem One of the data sets have gone to a second volume. Subsequent generations were added with DSN=GDG(+1),LABEL=(n,SL),VOL=SER=(VOL1,VOL2). Access to a single data set in VOL1 or VOL2 has no problem. Also, access to two or more data sets that reside in VOL1 in a concatenation has no problem. However, access to two ore more data sets that reside in VOL2 in a concatenation will end with IEC147I 613-1C abend. Another msgid followed is CBR4110I Specific mount volser mismatch: int VOL1, ext VOL2. You probably should have used just VOL=SER=VOL2 for the subsequent files. You might have noticed that specifying both volsers forced OPEN to mount the first tape, spin all the way down it looking for the n-1 file, then mount the second tape and repeat. It probably also cataloged the new file to VOL1 and VOL2, which is not correct since the file existsonly on VOL2. If they are cataloged on both volumes, I suggest you do a DELETE NOSCRATCH then a DEFINE NONVSAM to catalog just to VOL2. -- Bruce A. Black Senior Software Developer for FDR Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300 personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: VSAM replication to Oracle?
This may involve the implementation of VSAM RLS, DFSMStvs, and perhaps another product that we are testing right now, called Power Exchange from Informatica. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: VSAM replication to Oracle? Our business intelligence people have stated that they need to be able to get real-time or near-real time updates to a number of VSAM datasets into their Sun/Oracle system. This would be from CICS and batch jobs. Anybody know of a product to do this? They mentioned something called DataMirror (http://www.datamirror.com), but I can't see any in depth documentation on that site. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS 1.7 Enhanced ACIF
Mark, Do you mean that Enhanced ACIF is really ACIF, but enhanced? Thanks. Howi Kok -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 1.7 Enhanced ACIF On Tuesday 29 August 2006 13:49, Kok, Howi wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to put together our order for z/OS 1.7 before time runs out. One thing that confuses me is the Enhanced ACIF pgm no 5655-M32. Does anyone know if I don't put this in the order list will I still get ACIF? The IBM partner that I'm working with could not get an answer from IBM. This is quite frustrating. For those of you who are already on 1.7 perhaps can guide me out of this confusion. Thanks a lot. Howi Kok PSF V4 only ships with enhanced ACIF, which is a charge product. If you don't order it you will not get the freebee ACIF. -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL - b.i.b.a.w.y.l.o. and i.w.w.y.t.b.w. Brian Smith to his wife Maureen To Sail Beyond the Sunset -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
z/OS 1.7 Enhanced ACIF
Hi All, I'm trying to put together our order for z/OS 1.7 before time runs out. One thing that confuses me is the Enhanced ACIF pgm no 5655-M32. Does anyone know if I don't put this in the order list will I still get ACIF? The IBM partner that I'm working with could not get an answer from IBM. This is quite frustrating. For those of you who are already on 1.7 perhaps can guide me out of this confusion. Thanks a lot. Howi Kok ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
VSAM data set monitor
Hi All, Is there a utility that I can use to monitor some VSAM data sets to tell me how full they are? Thanks, Howi Kok ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT
If you are right about not picking up track 0, then something has caused this. I haven't changed my cloning process for a long-long time. I'll try the ALLEXCP parm and report back after I migrate the current maintenance to production. Many thanks to all. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Skip Robinson Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 3:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT The only thing I can think of is that the sysres cloning step is not picking up Track 0. We use DFDSS with this control statement: COPY FULL INDDNAME(FROM) OUTDDNAME(TO) ALLEXCP PURGE . . JO.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT
I don't really know which APAR that might have caused my problem. For sure I init the volume from the correct SAMPLIB because I used the same JCL to reformat the volume after the init. This problem is really no big deal, but it is a problem. I can append a reformat step in the build IPL volume job to circumvent this. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ambat Ravi Nair Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 8:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT i remember seeing this APAR, as i was prepping my 1.4 with all tolerant fixes, readying for 1.7 anyway, i had about close to 300 PTFs applied, and several of the HOLDACTIONS mentioned re-creating the IPL text, as well as the SADump. had no problems with that - IPLed smoothly 2 weeks ago. did you create the text/bootstrap from the correct NUCLEUS/SAMPLIB prior to IPL ? i vaguely remember this APAR having an impact on EMC devices (or is it?) ... only bugbear i have is waiting on APAR OA15115 - ravi. On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:46:05 -0500, Kok, Howi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I don't know since which maintenance, could be OA09050, I have been unable to IPL until I reformat the IPL volume even though I initialized it with IPL TEXT. Does anyone has the same problem and how you solve it? We are at z/OS 1.4. Thanks, Howi Kok -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT
Dave, I believe writing a new IPL TEXT from the target during the clone process is a standard. But my problem is I have to reformat the cloned pack after the process, even though the cloned pack has been initialized with IPL TEXT from the target. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT Howie, On this topic, I have built into my clone process, a step that always builds new IPLTEXT from my master SMPE target datasets. That way I don't have to worry about getting the latest version due to a PTF. One less thing to worry about. Dave Dave Jousma Principal Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 616.653.8429 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kok, Howi Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT I don't really know which APAR that might have caused my problem. For sure I init the volume from the correct SAMPLIB because I used the same JCL to reformat the volume after the init. This problem is really no big deal, but it is a problem. I can append a reformat step in the build IPL volume job to circumvent this. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT
Hi All, I don't know since which maintenance, could be OA09050, I have been unable to IPL until I reformat the IPL volume even though I initialized it with IPL TEXT. Does anyone has the same problem and how you solve it? We are at z/OS 1.4. Thanks, Howi Kok ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT
I got wait code 075 but can't remember what reason code. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT I don't know since which maintenance, could be OA09050, I have been unable to IPL until I reformat the IPL volume even though I initialized it with IPL TEXT. Does anyone has the same problem and how you solve it? We are at z/OS 1.4. You didn't indicate what happens to your IPL. Do you get a WAIT code? what it is? OA13715 is a PE against OA09050 describing a WAIT064 during IPL. However, it seems to apply only to 1.5 and above. -- Bruce A. Black Senior Software Developer for FDR Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300 personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Abend 002-04 extracting SMF records
Hi All, I'm experiencing abend 002-04 when reading SMF data on a tape with IFASMFDP. I searched the list archive and found some records of the same problem in 1999. One suggestion offered was to use DFSORT with SPANINC=RC0. I tried this and did not work. We are on z/OS and DFSORT 1.4. The SORT message is ICE027A 2 END OF FIELD BEYOND MAXIMUM RECORD LENGTH. The tape data set is a weekly accumulation of SMF data and was initialized with the following JCL: //INIT EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSUT1 DD DUMMY //SYSUT2 DD DSN=SMF.WEEKLY(+1),DCB=(BLKSIZE=32760,RECFM=VBS),... //SYSIN DD DUMMY Can anyone suggest what might be the problem and how to deal with this? Thanks, Howi Kok ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Abend 002-04 extracting SMF records
Thanks for the help. I found that I have to specify DCB=(LRECL=32756,RECFM=VBS,BLKSIZE=32760) in the input DD regardless of IFASMFDP or SORT to get by. Will specifying the LRECL during the initialization of the data set solve this problem? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Abend 002-04 extracting SMF records Kok, Howi wrote: Hi All, I'm experiencing abend 002-04 when reading SMF data on a tape with IFASMFDP. I searched the list archive and found some records of the same problem in 1999. One suggestion offered was to use DFSORT with SPANINC=RC0. I tried this and did not work. We are on z/OS and DFSORT 1.4. The SORT message is ICE027A 2 END OF FIELD BEYOND MAXIMUM RECORD LENGTH. The tape data set is a weekly accumulation of SMF data and was initialized with the following JCL: //INIT EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSUT1 DD DUMMY //SYSUT2 DD DSN=SMF.WEEKLY(+1),DCB=(BLKSIZE=32760,RECFM=VBS),... //SYSIN DD DUMMY Can anyone suggest what might be the problem and how to deal with this? //K10 EXEC PGM=ICEMAN //SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=* //SORTIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.ARCHSMF.G0367V00 -- broken dataset //SORTOUT DD DSN=SYS1.VBSFIX,DISP=(,CATLG),LIKE=SYS1.ARCHSMF.G0367V00, // VOL=(,,,14),SPACE=(CYL,(1000,1000)) //SYSINDD * OPTION COPY,SPANINC=RC4 -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Mount a tape
I agree too. That was why I threw out some questions to try to clarify
his situation. Jerry did reply and clarify eventually, except that he
used two other threads ('Mount a tape in flexes', 'IBMLINK vs
techsupport.service.ibm.com') instead of this one.
Howi Kok
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mount a tape
I really think that in this type of question, someone should basically
ask for clarification, and then everyone should wait until the person
furthur states his question. If not, why waste all of the bandwidth
answering maybe this is what he wanted.
Agreed. It would have been nice if Jerry had replied to clarify his
question. If we (the collective IBM-MAIN we) had asked him nicely to
do so he might have replied. But I suspect that the testy replies have
scared him off. Jerry, if you are still listening, please let us know
what you really needed to know. We aren't all grouchy!
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.clearswift.com
**
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Volume Not Mounted
Jerry Try vary path offline and online, then vary device online after path is online as follow: V path(b81,fc),offline V path(b81,fc),online V b81,online Howi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Ragland Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 9:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Volume Not Mounted Hi Lizette, Thanks for your reply.. D M=DEV(0B81) displays - IEE174I 07.34.12 DISPLAY M 988 DEVICE 0B81 STATUS=OFFLINE CHP FC DEST LINK ADDRESS 00 PATH ONLINE Y CHP PHYSICALLY ONLINE Y PATH OPERATIONAL N PATHS NOT VALIDATED What can I infer from this and what should be my next step on this ? Can you please breif the steps need to be done because the machine is not in my place and I dont know the setup which is done there.. Thanks in advance. Jerry -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Where and how to start with Unicode fonts?
Steve Comstock's company website http://www.trainersfriend.com/General_content/Book_site.htm has an introduction to this topic. Steve is a regular contributor to a few listservs. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:16 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Where and how to start with Unicode fonts? In a message dated 11/3/2005 8:23:49 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Q8. Is there some listserver about fonts printing? http://lists.topica.com/lists/afp-l/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IEE889I Clarification
These are in the message manual: RPLY:CURR= The number of write to operator with reply (WTOR) message buffers in use by the system at this time. RPLY:LIM= The limit of the number of WTOR message buffers allowed outstanding. The maximum value of is specified by the RMAX parameter in the CONSOLxx parmlib member. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Kittendorf Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IEE889I Clarification In the IEE889I message, what does RPLY:CURR=99 LIM=20 mean? I see 1 outstanding messages, not 99. d c,b IEE889I 18.27.04 CONSOLE DISPLAY 372 MSG: CURR=3LIM=2000 RPLY:CURR=99 LIM=20 SYS=CDCP PFK=01 CONSOLE/ALTID --- SPECIFICATIONS - NO CONSOLES MEET SPECIFIED CRITERIA WTO BUFFERS IN CONSOLE BACKUP STORAGE =0 ADDRESS SPACE WTO BUFFER USAGE NO ADDRESS SPACES ARE USING MORE THAN 666 WTO BUFFERS d r,r IEE112I 18.27.40 PENDING REQUESTS 566 RM=1IM=0 CEM=0 EM=0 RU=0IR=0AMRF ID:R/K T MESSAGE TEXT 005 R *005 BMC1693 *BMCLINK* ACTIVE (STC=BMCLINK ) Thanks, Craig -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: F against a REXX STC
Instead of accepting command via console you can try using TCPIP. The IP API rexx exec sample members RSCLIENT and RSSERVER in TCPIP.SEZAINST or whatever TCPIP data set name your shop uses can be modified to do what you want. You can code your rexx stc to accept connection from a rexx client and receive a command from it. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zafiropoulos Konstantinos Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: F against a REXX STC Hi all, Can I send MVS modify command against a REXX that is running as an STC? I just want to trigger a specific function using this modify command on a loop-wait REXX STC. How this is implementing? Best regards, Zafiropoulos Konstantinos Main Systems support sector E.F.G. Eurobank-Ergasias 1-3 Lyssikratous Str, 17674 Kallithea Attikis, Hellas Tel: +30 (10) 9474082 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: F against a REXX STC
If the stc is doing serious tasks then proper coding is needed to examine the user who sends the command. Can RACF be used to restrict the client exec and port access? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walt Farrell Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: F against a REXX STC On 11/3/2005 11:24 AM, Kok, Howi wrote: Instead of accepting command via console you can try using TCPIP. The IP API rexx exec sample members RSCLIENT and RSSERVER in TCPIP.SEZAINST or whatever TCPIP data set name your shop uses can be modified to do what you want. You can code your rexx stc to accept connection from a rexx client and receive a command from it. That sounds like an interesting approach, but accepting commands via TCP/IP has some major differences from accepting commands from an operator console. You have a much more restricted set of users who could give you a command when it has to come from an operator console, but anyone could send you a command via TCP/IP. Walt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: GETHOSTNAME error
PFS - Physical File System Check the BPXPRMxx member in your PARMLIB to see if you have FILESYSTYPE TYPE(INET) and NETWORK DOMAINNAME(AF_INET) statement coded for the socket file system activation. You may find exactly what PFS is missing from the SYSLOG, and then code the appropriate FILESYSTYPE statement to a BPXPRMyy member and activate it using the SETOMVS RESET=(xx) command. You still need to add the FILESYSTYPE statement to the BPXPRMxx member referenced by OMVS parm in the IEASYSxx member. Read z/OS UNIX Systems Services Planning guide for more information. Howi Kok ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IOCDS question
As far as I remember no change to IODF/IOCDS. From the HMC you need to re-customize the LPAR activation profiles to specify the number of initial processors for each LPAR. We are running a 2064-003 and the last time we turned on an additional engine we had to deactivate and reactivate the LPARs so that the added engine will come online automatically after the IPL. Howi Kok -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goings, Rob Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IOCDS question We are a single processor shop running in Lpar mode. The machine is a 2064-104, but we're running it as a 103. At the end of this month we will turn on the 4th engine. My question is, are there any changes the the IOCDS I need to make when we add this 4th engine? Rob R. Goings Sr. IBM Systems Administrator Archer Daniels Midland Co. Decatur Il. ?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office / CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
