RE: [leaf-user] Bering rc3 - cant load ramdisk
How much ram is in the machine? Antony Briggs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of me name Sent: 12 July 2002 09:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bering rc3 - cant load ramdisk I don't know if the last one got through.. the is the first list I've used.. So I'll try again! When I try to boot the bering rc3, it stops at a prompt with ... Cannot load a ramdisk with an old image bering rc2 just hangs. PC is Digital Celebris GL5100 (Pentium 100 with 48mB RAM, no hd, 2x fd, onboard DEC nic (tulip), PCI BT Highway ISDN (AVM Fritz)) Have you tried to boot from the original distro without any change ? Do you reach the shell and if not where does it stop ? Jacques Distro is straight out of the box with no change. With rc3, I get the 'Loading Cannot load ramdisk' message then a colon prompt. With rc2 I get 'Loading' only, then hang. As far as I can remember, the BIOS is the latest.. 1/5/1998 Cheers, Simon. _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
The command is just date hhnn[mmdd][] where n = minutes can't remember whether it's ddmm or mmdd I'm guessing mmdd TTFN Antony Briggs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Georgalis Sent: 12 July 2002 01:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] hwclock error? I tried to set the clock today, but I get this error, I must be looking at the wrong man page. Can't find any more doc. How does the syntax belong? (Bering_rc2, soon to be rc3) (also tried hwclock --set --date=1026432127) # hwclock --set --date='07/11/02 19:59:49' date: invalid option -- - BusyBox v0.60.2 (2002.04.04-20:23+) multi-call binary Usage: date [OPTION]... [+FORMAT] The date command issued by hwclock returned unexpected results. The command was: date --date=07/11/02 19:59:49 +seconds-into-epoch=%s The response was: No usable set-to time. Cannot set clock. Thanks, // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases more http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re:Re: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card
- Original Message - From: Brock Nanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:15:23 -0700 Subject: Re: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:17:54 +0900 (KST) | From: Taewoon.Goo [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re:RE: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Organization: | | | - Original Message - | From: Brock Nanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:31:47 -0700 | Subject: RE: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | | Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:07:54 +0900 (KST) | From: Taewoon.Goo [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Organization: | Subject: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card.. | | Hi, I'm having some trouble making a wireless gateway or router, and | need some help. | when I ping to 192.168.0.2(my second pc), Bering puts this message | repeatedly | eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | | what it means and what should i do? | | Thanks | | ah, my setup is as follows.. | | hardware | eth0 -- realtek 8139 pci | eth1 -- lucent orinoco 11mbit 802.11b card in a ricoh rl5c475 | pci-pcmcia adapter. | | software | bering 1.0 rc2 + pcmcia.lrp,wireless.lrp,libm.lrp | | | You don't mention if you have wireutil.lrp on your system. You probably | should. Also, some choice extracts from your logs would be helpful. | I'm going to guess that the card isn't coming up during boot properly at | all. | | Brock | | | | As you say, I added wireutil.lrp on my system. But nothing changed. | | In redhat7.3, same error message is occured, but it is doing well as a gateway. | ping and masquerading is ok. | error messages are eth1:Tx error status 4(FID=01E2) at boot time, and eth1: | Tx error status 1(FID=017E), eth1:Tx error status 1(FID=0xxx) at ping time continually. | | my logs in /var/log/ is changed. | | syslog for example | | ## before i ping to 192.168.0.2 | giant hack | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.24 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:10.0 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:07.2 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:07.3 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xd8821000, 00:c0:26:73:51:8d, IRQ 11 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139C' | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.1.33 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: kernel build: 2.4.18 #9 Sun Apr 7 13:54:58 CEST 2002 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: options: [pci] [cardbus] | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: Intel ISA/PCI/CardBus PCIC probe: | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:0e.0 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: Ricoh RL5C475 rev 80 PCI-to-CardBus at slot 00:0e, mem 0xdb003000 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: host opts [0]: [isa irq] [io 3/6/1] [mem 3/6/1] [pci irq 9] [lat 32/176] [bus 2/5] | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: ISA irqs (default) = 3,4,5,7,14,15 PCI status changes | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[699]: watching 1 sockets | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: starting, version is 3.1.33 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: socket 0: Intersil PRISM2 11 Mbps Wireless Adapter | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: memory probe 0xa000-0xa0ff: clean. | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/hermes.o' | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: hermes.c: 16 Jan 2002 David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/hermes.o | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco.o' | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: orinoco.c 0.09b (David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others) | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco.o | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco_cs.o' | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: orinoco_cs.c 0.09b (David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others) | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco_cs.o | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: excluding 0x170-0x177 0x1f0-0x1f7 0x220-0x22f 0x370-0x37f 0x388-0x38f 0x3c0-0x3df 0x3f0-0x3ff 0x4d0-0x4d7 | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0178-0x01ef: clean. | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x01f8-0x021f: clean. | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0230-0x036f: clean. | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0380-0x0387: clean. | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe
Re:Re: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card
- Original Message - From: Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 06:31:52 -0700 Subject: Re: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:15:23 -0700 Brock Nanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Lucent is NOT a PRISM2 card. The orinoco_cs driver will work with many PRISM2 cards, but I think what this suggests is that the /etc/pcmcia/config file is being checked and the wrong card is found. I don't know if that is causing your problem, but who knows ;-). I had my configuration miss my card at first too, so I deleted all the extra entries from the file... didn't need the other stuff anyway as I won't be using other cards. It eventually settled on using the right entry. http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/ http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/Linux.Wireless.drivers.html#WavelanIEEE -- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your links, especially second, were very useful for me. for your sake, I understood the difference between the orinoco and the prism2. Thank you. - DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/ DreamSearch Click the world!!! http://search.dreamwiz.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] problem with _startklips on bering rc3
Hello
i have a a testing setup with ipsec between 3 linux bering firewalls and
a zywall 10 router, all on static ip address i also have roadwarrior
support from dhcp clients on isdn/modem line using windows 98/ssh
sentinel and windows 2000/xp (with the aid of vpn.ebootis.de)
my problem arises when i try to setup a lan-lan tunnel between my master
vpn bering firewall and a adsl gateway
{worklan}[Bering1 static 194.248.214.187]{NET}[Bering2 adsl
dynamic 880.212.112.*]{homelan}
I realise i can't get ipsec on startup since the adsl ppp0 isn't up yet.
but running ipsec setup i expected the tunnel to come up
ipsec_setup: Stopping FreeS/WAN IPsec...
ipsec_setup: stop ordered, but IPsec does not appear to be running!
ipsec_setup: doing cleanup anyway...
ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.97...
ipsec_setup: Using /lib/modules/ipsec.o
ipsec_setup: unable to determine address of `ppp0'
I have tried with interface=%defaultroute
and interface=ipsec0=ppp0
i use the latest bering rc3
# uname -a
Linux frodeadsl 2.4.18 #4 Sun Jun 9 09:46:15 CEST 2002 i586 unknown
# lrpkg -l
NameVersionDescription
===-==-==
initrd
V1.0-rc3
root
V1.0-rc3
etc
V1.0-rc3
local V1.0-rc3 Local package. This package does not
contain a
modules V1.0-rc3 Modules package. Contains kernel modules
and u
keyboard0.3Use this package to adjust the keyboard
settin
dhcpd 2.0pl5 dhcpd - Autoconfigure client
machines
shorwall1.3.1 Shoreline Firewall
(Shorewall)
ppp 2.4.1-pppoePPPd
Deamon
pppoe 3.3-1 pppoe add-on for
pppd
dnscache1.05a dnscache from djbdns (V1.05a) package
creates
mawk
1.3.3
ipsec 1.97 Freeswan
IPSEC
libz1.1.4 zlib compression library. Needed for
openssh
ssh 3.2.3p1OpenSSH ssh scp
programs.
sshd3.2.3p1OpenSSH sshd daemon.
# ip addr show
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:04:75:7c:0a:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:04:75:7c:02:0a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.20.254/24 brd 192.168.20.255 scope global eth1
9: ppp0: POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP mtu 1492 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen
3
link/ppp
inet 80.212.112.139 peer 80.212.112.0/32 scope global ppp0
126: ipsec0: NOARP mtu 0 qdisc noop qlen 10
link/ipip
127: ipsec1: NOARP mtu 0 qdisc noop qlen 10
link/ipip
128: ipsec2: NOARP mtu 0 qdisc noop qlen 10
link/ipip
129: ipsec3: NOARP mtu 0 qdisc noop qlen 10
link/ipip
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering rc3 /etc/dir not owned by root?
Hi all, Especially the bering crew, is there any reason why /etc is no longer owned by root? Reason I ask is because I had to change it to make cipe work. Kim --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging
One other thing are you loading shorewall? If I remember right I had a problem with the configuration in shorewall and bridging. I don't use shorewall on my bridge setup's. The laptop you mentioned should not be a problem as you can prove it works though normal setup. I also use RC2 just because I haven't had a reason to change but it had a bug in the bridging script which I think was fixed in RC3 might want to double check that it has been mentioned several times on the list. When you boot up what messages do you get from the bridge you should see it setting up the cards? Jim aka snowcrash From: Mark A Nordstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jim TerWee [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:06:35 -0500 Jim TerWee wrote: 1. You should modify your modutils as follows ae /etc/init.d/modutils RCDLINKS=S,S20 PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin #Let PCMCIA catch up to the ethernet you might have to play with value #depending on equipment sleep 5 2. Set up your interfaces Scroll down to the bridge # Step 4 (optional): configure a bridge auto br0 iface br0 inet static address 123.456.789.000 masklen 24 broadcast 123.456.789.255 gateway 123.456.789.254 bridge_ports wlan0 wlan1 wlan2 This is assuming that you are loading the bridge module. There is maybe another bit of significance with my case. The hardware I'm using this on is fairly archaic. The laptop is an old 486-75, and the wireless card is the WebGear Aviator2.4. But seeing as how everything works fine before enabling bridge, I can't believe this is an issue. I don't mean to whine on and on since I've been constantly amazed at what I've been able to apply leaf to. -- Mark _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:30:30AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The command is just date hhnn[mmdd][] where n = minutes can't remember whether it's ddmm or mmdd I'm guessing mmdd # date 09450007122002 date: invalid date `09450007122002' also tried # date 094500071202 # date 094500 # date 0945 no go. The busybox home page was not much help either. // George TTFN Antony Briggs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Georgalis Sent: 12 July 2002 01:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] hwclock error? I tried to set the clock today, but I get this error, I must be looking at the wrong man page. Can't find any more doc. How does the syntax belong? (Bering_rc2, soon to be rc3) (also tried hwclock --set --date=1026432127) # hwclock --set --date='07/11/02 19:59:49' date: invalid option -- - BusyBox v0.60.2 (2002.04.04-20:23+) multi-call binary Usage: date [OPTION]... [+FORMAT] The date command issued by hwclock returned unexpected results. The command was: date --date=07/11/02 19:59:49 +seconds-into-epoch=%s The response was: No usable set-to time. Cannot set clock. Thanks, // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases more http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] cipe bridging over the internet SUCCES
Hi all, I am not quite finished yet and still need to do some testing. But I am way to excited to wait. Things that are working as we speak. Is pinging internal interfaces on both sides of the cipe tunnel. And accessing file shares through the cipe tunnel. Current setup Box 1: Internal ip 192.168.0.1 (mask 24) External ip x.x.172.2 eth1. Bridged interface (192.168.0.1). Bridge parts eth1 cipdb0. (both without ip). Box 2: Internal ip 192.168.0.10 External ip x.x.182.186 ppp0 (pppoe interface). Bridged interface 192.168.0.10 (mask 24) Bridge parts eth1, cipdb0 wlan0. Gonna try some lan gaming over the internet this weekend. Btw using bering RC3 on box2 RC2 on box 1 both modified to use glibc2.2 (cdrom based) Kim - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card
- Original Message - From: Taewoon.Goo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:57 AM Subject: Re:Re: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | | - Original Message - | From: Brock Nanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:15:23 -0700 | Subject: Re: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | | | Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:17:54 +0900 (KST) | | From: Taewoon.Goo [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Subject: Re:RE: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Organization: | | | | | | - Original Message - | | From: Brock Nanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:31:47 -0700 | | Subject: RE: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | | | | Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:07:54 +0900 (KST) | | From: Taewoon.Goo [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Organization: | | Subject: [leaf-user] eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card.. | | | | Hi, I'm having some trouble making a wireless gateway or router, and | | need some help. | | when I ping to 192.168.0.2(my second pc), Bering puts this message | | repeatedly | | eth1:Tx timeout! Resetting card | | | | what it means and what should i do? | | | | Thanks | | | | ah, my setup is as follows.. | | | | hardware | | eth0 -- realtek 8139 pci | | eth1 -- lucent orinoco 11mbit 802.11b card in a ricoh rl5c475 | | pci-pcmcia adapter. | | | | software | | bering 1.0 rc2 + pcmcia.lrp,wireless.lrp,libm.lrp | | | | | | You don't mention if you have wireutil.lrp on your system. You probably | | should. Also, some choice extracts from your logs would be helpful. | | I'm going to guess that the card isn't coming up during boot properly at | | all. | | | | Brock | | | | | | | | As you say, I added wireutil.lrp on my system. But nothing changed. | | | | In redhat7.3, same error message is occured, but it is doing well as a | gateway. | | ping and masquerading is ok. | | error messages are eth1:Tx error status 4(FID=01E2) at boot time, and | eth1: | | Tx error status 1(FID=017E), eth1:Tx error status 1(FID=0xxx) at ping | time continually. | | | | my logs in /var/log/ is changed. | | | | syslog for example | | | | ## before i ping to 192.168.0.2 | | | | giant hack | | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.24 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:10.0 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:07.2 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:07.3 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at | 0xd8821000, 00:c0:26:73:51:8d, IRQ 11 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: eth0: Identified 8139 chip type | 'RTL-8139C' | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: eth0: Setting half-duplex based on | auto-negotiated partner ability . | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.1.33 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: kernel build: 2.4.18 #9 Sun Apr 7 | 13:54:58 CEST 2002 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: options: [pci] [cardbus] | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: Intel ISA/PCI/CardBus PCIC probe: | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:0e.0 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: Ricoh RL5C475 rev 80 PCI-to-CardBus at | slot 00:0e, mem 0xdb003000 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: host opts [0]: [isa irq] [io 3/6/1] | [mem 3/6/1] [pci irq 9] [lat 32/176] [bus 2/5] | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: ISA irqs (default) = 3,4,5,7,14,15 | PCI status changes | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[699]: watching 1 sockets | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: starting, version is 3.1.33 | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: socket 0: Intersil PRISM2 11 Mbps | Wireless Adapter | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: memory probe 0xa000-0xa0ff: | clean. | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: executing: 'insmod | /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/hermes.o' | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: hermes.c: 16 Jan 2002 David Gibson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: + Using | /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/hermes.o | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: executing: 'insmod | /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco.o' | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: orinoco.c 0.09b (David Gibson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others) | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: + Using | /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco.o | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: executing: 'insmod | /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco_cs.o' | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: orinoco_cs.c 0.09b (David Gibson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others) | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall cardmgr[700]: + Using | /lib/modules/2.4.18/pcmcia/orinoco_cs.o | | Jul 10 08:39:21 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: |
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
George Georgalis wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:30:30AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The command is just date hhnn[mmdd][] where n = minutes can't remember whether it's ddmm or mmdd I'm guessing mmdd # date 09450007122002 date: invalid date `09450007122002' # date 071209452002.00 Fri Jul 12 09:45:00 CDT 2002 From woody: # date --help Usage: date [OPTION]... [+FORMAT] or: date [-u|--utc|--universal] [MMDDhhmm[[CC]YY][.ss]] hth -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging
Jim TerWee wrote: One other thing are you loading shorewall? If I remember right I had a problem with the configuration in shorewall and bridging. I don't use Not using shorewall. One thing at a time, and I don't think it would be appropriate for my setup. shorewall on my bridge setup's. The laptop you mentioned should not be a problem as you can prove it works though normal setup. I also use RC2 just I agree. Which is why I'm posting (and posting). because I haven't had a reason to change but it had a bug in the bridging script which I think was fixed in RC3 might want to double check that it has been mentioned several times on the list. I don't know. I'm using RC3 with the updated lrp. I started posting about my problems before the new lrp was released. Other than properly getting at the bridge scripts, I see no difference. When you boot up what messages do you get from the bridge you should see it setting up the cards? I see complaints about eth[01] not existing. Since I didn't see/hear pcmcia bring I've added debuging to the bridge scripts and the pre-up script has IFACE=lo and IF_BRIDGE_PORTS is empty. I tried setting/forcing expected values (br0 and eth0 eth1). This only delivers the complaints early. The up script has expected values, but since there are no devices, it just falls through at the bottom. I question the sleep in modutils. Playing with the value doesn't make any difference (other than having to wait longer for it to boot). And now some success. This morning I added: brctl addif br0 $DEVICE ip link set dev $DEVICE up to /etc/pcmcia/network, and I can get to the box with both cards but not through it. (side note: this doesn't light up the LED on the wireless card). In my eyes, this is an ugly kludge. -- Mark --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] problem with _startklips on bering rc3
On 12 Jul 2002 12:48:01 +0200
Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
i have a a testing setup with ipsec between 3 linux bering firewalls and
a zywall 10 router, all on static ip address i also have roadwarrior
support from dhcp clients on isdn/modem line using windows 98/ssh
sentinel and windows 2000/xp (with the aid of vpn.ebootis.de)
my problem arises when i try to setup a lan-lan tunnel between my master
vpn bering firewall and a adsl gateway
{worklan}[Bering1 static 194.248.214.187]{NET}[Bering2 adsl
dynamic 880.212.112.*]{homelan}
I realise i can't get ipsec on startup since the adsl ppp0 isn't up yet.
but running ipsec setup i expected the tunnel to come up
ipsec_setup: Stopping FreeS/WAN IPsec...
ipsec_setup: stop ordered, but IPsec does not appear to be running!
ipsec_setup: doing cleanup anyway...
ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.97...
ipsec_setup: Using /lib/modules/ipsec.o
ipsec_setup: unable to determine address of `ppp0'
Is the above output the result of /etc/init.d/ipsec restart?
Can you post the output of ipsec barf?
Thanks.
--
Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging
The wireless cards in this case are 200mw Prism cards with external antenna connectors which our company does sell. I also use standard 30mw Prism cards in alot of locations. The wireless driver is from http://hostap.epitest.fi/ which I use in both AP and station mode haven't had much luck with the Orinoco driver. So do I read this to say the Orinoco_cs driver *won't* work? Is it necessary to have access to the AP functions to make this work (which aren't available with the orinoco drivers)? Brock --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging
How about I send you a working floppy image that I use. You can run that and see what you see. I can send you off list tonight. If there is interest from the group I can post some of the floppy images that I use in our wireless. Plus a pcmcia.lrp for Dachstein that includes Prism wireless drivers. As far as the sleep command that is for a conventional computer. You probally don't need it for a laptop as the ethernet is also pcmcia Jim aka snowcrash From: Mark A Nordstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jim TerWee [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:40:34 -0500 Jim TerWee wrote: One other thing are you loading shorewall? If I remember right I had a problem with the configuration in shorewall and bridging. I don't use Not using shorewall. One thing at a time, and I don't think it would be appropriate for my setup. shorewall on my bridge setup's. The laptop you mentioned should not be a problem as you can prove it works though normal setup. I also use RC2 just I agree. Which is why I'm posting (and posting). because I haven't had a reason to change but it had a bug in the bridging script which I think was fixed in RC3 might want to double check that it has been mentioned several times on the list. I don't know. I'm using RC3 with the updated lrp. I started posting about my problems before the new lrp was released. Other than properly getting at the bridge scripts, I see no difference. When you boot up what messages do you get from the bridge you should see it setting up the cards? I see complaints about eth[01] not existing. Since I didn't see/hear pcmcia bring I've added debuging to the bridge scripts and the pre-up script has IFACE=lo and IF_BRIDGE_PORTS is empty. I tried setting/forcing expected values (br0 and eth0 eth1). This only delivers the complaints early. The up script has expected values, but since there are no devices, it just falls through at the bottom. I question the sleep in modutils. Playing with the value doesn't make any difference (other than having to wait longer for it to boot). And now some success. This morning I added: brctl addif br0 $DEVICE ip link set dev $DEVICE up to /etc/pcmcia/network, and I can get to the box with both cards but not through it. (side note: this doesn't light up the LED on the wireless card). In my eyes, this is an ugly kludge. -- Mark --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 07:17, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: BTW: A quick search for hwclock on my search page (which indexes my site and my c0wz mirror) would have found this quickly (that's how I found it, but it helps that I rememberd it was there in the first place :-) http://search.steinkuehler.net/ I don't think the SF site search indexes anything other than the dynamic PHP content. Charles, You're correct. I believe this will change when we update our site to phpWebSite 0.8.2. Until then Google site search is your friend. http://www.google.com/ ntp site:leaf.sourceforge.net -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Snort and Bering
I want to add Snort to my 2 floppy Bering RC3 setup. I found the package Charles has
on his site but thought it prudent to check with the masses to see who might have set
this up recently and where the latest package is (if it is not Charles's)
An additional note for any current LEAF snort users, I was planning on looking into
setting up a weblet add-on to display info from snort. If you are an experienced
snort user and have time on your hands you might be able to help with this endeavor.
Thanks!
Richard Amerman
áË ë^¨¥Ë)¢{(ç[É8bAzAv±Æ}è§zÛ!»l~éì¶çßÛiÿûay
yé ¢oì~W~ë ®f¢)à+-æºÇ«+-²Ê.Ç¢¸ ëa¶Úlÿùb²Û,¢êÜyú+éÞ·ùb²Û?+-wèþW~ë $Em¶ÿ榺#yËh®é¹¿Ý¡Ïݡɨ ¯÷hr'uóÝa¶i
Re: [leaf-user] Snort and Bering
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 13:43, Richard Amerman wrote: I want to add Snort to my 2 floppy Bering RC3 setup. I found the package Charles has on his site but thought it prudent to check with the masses to see who might have set this up recently and where the latest package is (if it is not Charles's) Richard, These are the snort packages I know of. http://leaf-project.org/ snort.lrp2000-01-17 pub/packages/eiger/snort.lrp snort.lrp2001-07-13 devel/ddouthitt/packages/snort.lrp snort18.lrp 2001-07-19 devel/wolffang/packages/snort18.lrp -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging
Jim, I'll take a look if you send it. I can understand the sleep for regular ethernet cards, but might a better place for it be in the bridge script? don't know what kind of problems this would cause. Jim TerWee wrote: How about I send you a working floppy image that I use. You can run that and see what you see. I can send you off list tonight. If there is interest from the group I can post some of the floppy images that I use in our wireless. Plus a pcmcia.lrp for Dachstein that includes Prism wireless drivers. As far as the sleep command that is for a conventional computer. You probally don't need it for a laptop as the ethernet is also pcmcia Jim aka snowcrash From: Mark A Nordstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jim TerWee [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Wireless PCMCIA and bridging Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:40:34 -0500 Jim TerWee wrote: One other thing are you loading shorewall? If I remember right I had a problem with the configuration in shorewall and bridging. I don't use Not using shorewall. One thing at a time, and I don't think it would be appropriate for my setup. shorewall on my bridge setup's. The laptop you mentioned should not be a problem as you can prove it works though normal setup. I also use RC2 just I agree. Which is why I'm posting (and posting). because I haven't had a reason to change but it had a bug in the bridging script which I think was fixed in RC3 might want to double check that it has been mentioned several times on the list. I don't know. I'm using RC3 with the updated lrp. I started posting about my problems before the new lrp was released. Other than properly getting at the bridge scripts, I see no difference. When you boot up what messages do you get from the bridge you should see it setting up the cards? I see complaints about eth[01] not existing. Since I didn't see/hear pcmcia bring I've added debuging to the bridge scripts and the pre-up script has IFACE=lo and IF_BRIDGE_PORTS is empty. I tried setting/forcing expected values (br0 and eth0 eth1). This only delivers the complaints early. The up script has expected values, but since there are no devices, it just falls through at the bottom. I question the sleep in modutils. Playing with the value doesn't make any difference (other than having to wait longer for it to boot). And now some success. This morning I added: brctl addif br0 $DEVICE ip link set dev $DEVICE up to /etc/pcmcia/network, and I can get to the box with both cards but not through it. (side note: this doesn't light up the LED on the wireless card). In my eyes, this is an ugly kludge. -- Mark --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -- Mark --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:17:52AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: # date 09450007122002 date: invalid date `09450007122002' also tried # date 094500071202 # date 094500 # date 0945 no go. The busybox home page was not much help either. I'm not sure the minimal busybox date command can be used by the hwclock command. The normal procedure is to set the system clock using date, rdate, ntpclient, or whatever, then copy the system time to the CMOS clock with the hwclock command. Something like: tempest: -root- # rdate time-A.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov Fri Jul 12 09:07:44 2002 tempest: -root- # hwclock --systohc --utc Yes, I routinely use rdate, and there appears to be systohc in the shutdown/startup scripts. I just found date and hwclock and it seemed like the way on lrp. Thanks for pointing out rdate. // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] can't login
Hi, I've been making .lrp's touching rsyncing dding calling remote hands to swap floppies and reboot *all* day, so please forgive me if I've missed something obvious. There doesn't seem to be any /bin/sh in Bering rc3? Should /etc/passwd read /bin/tinylogin for root??? Okay, I see there is a /bin/sh in the running filesystem... is it from initrd.lrp? but when trying to login with ssh I get this in the logs: Jul 12 21:20:01 firewall sshd[10380]: Accepted publickey for root from 192.168.2.36 port 58543 ssh2 Jul 12 21:20:02 firewall sshd[10380]: syslogin_perform_logout: logout() returned an error and this from my remote prompt: # ssh fw01.local login: No such file or directory Connection to fw01.local closed. These are the files in my sshd.lrp # find | sort . ./etc ./etc/init.d ./etc/init.d/sshd ./etc/ssh ./etc/ssh/sshd_config ./etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key ./etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key.pub ./root ./root/.ssh ./root/.ssh/authorized_keys2 ./usr ./usr/bin ./usr/bin/scp ./usr/sbin ./usr/sbin/sshd ./var ./var/lib ./var/lib/lrpkg ./var/lib/lrpkg/sshd.conf ./var/lib/lrpkg/sshd.help ./var/lib/lrpkg/sshd.list ./var/lib/lrpkg/sshd.version and these are the packages I'm using etc.lrp ldlinux.sys linux log.lrp root.lrp syslinux.cfg tc.lrp initrd.lrp libz.lrp local.lrp modules.lrp sshd.lrp syslinux.dpy weblet.lrp my syslinux.cfg: display syslinux.dpy timeout 0 default linux initrd=initrd.lrp init=/linuxrc root=/dev/ram0 log_size=20M boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0u1680 LRP=root,etc,local,modules,weblet,libz,sshd,tc humm, log.lrp is missing from my PKGPATH? Could this be causing the problem? How? It doesn't seem to be in the rc3 syslinux.dpy image either, yet it does work, even on mine. Ideas? What file is missing? How is Bering built anyway? Thanks, // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] DHCP Management
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:55:50 PDT Harold Miller wrote: Running Bering RC3, how can I check on current DHPC leases that have been used to set up my INET (eth0) ethernet port, Does RC3 still use pump by default? If so, is pump -s what you're looking for? It enumerates DHCP interfaces and includes a handful of configuration parameters, as well as renewal and expiration time. pump --help will list other options. and is it possible for a second ethernet card (eth2) to pass its MAC address to the same DHCP server and get an IP assigned as well? I haven't tested this, but have you tried setting iface eth2 inet dhcp and issuing a ifup eth2 command? ip link set eth2 up; pump -i eth2 might also work, but again that is untested. --Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
