Re: sendmail error?
Are you using UUCP? What way did you do the re-install? Did you build from source, use a preset mc and m4? Or do you have an RPM? What is the platform SuSE? If this is the case go into Yast and config. Sendmail to you needs, there is a section under Admin someplace (Yast is not in front of me) that has Sendmail config, even an expert menu. Exit and call SuSEconfig, this will rebuild the cf, restart Sendmail with rcsendmail restart. uux BTW calls commands on another host (like rsh rcp) and is part of the uucp package. Regards, Jon Jon R. Doyle Sendmail Inc. 6425 Christie Ave Emeryville, Ca. 94608 (o_ (o_ (o_ //\ (/)_ (\)_ V_/_ On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Marcy Cortes wrote: I'm getting this message when I try to send mail from my Linux guest. I swear it was working in the past! I tried uninstalling and reinstalling sendmail and that didn't do it. Mar 19 16:39:26 blue sendmail 2459Y: g2K0dQp02456: SYSERR(marcy): Cannot exec /usr/bin/uux: No such file or directory It's not there. Where'd it go?
SAP on Z
Looks like 64 bit SuSE is already support, is that GA yet? http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/faq/pdf/mysap_on_linuxforz_faq.pdf?t=gr,l=335,p=mySAP Regards, Jon Jon R. Doyle Sendmail Inc. 6425 Christie Ave Emeryville, Ca. 94608 (o_ (o_ (o_ //\ (/)_ (\)_ V_/_
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
Mark, I wanted to run multiple Linux/390 LPARs but with tthis problem I ended up giving this Linux/390 lpar the whole IFL. I also ran the following command to test how long does it takes to compile sendmail on my Linux/390 Lpar as compared to Intel, the command is : time sh Build from Intel it takes about 1 min and from Linux/390 it took about 3min. I also tried to increase my storage to 1024 and gave it the expanded storage of 512 but that didn't make a different. When it started rejecting connections the CPU load was very high, about 10. My Lpar is connected via an escon channel to the 2216 which is shared among 4 other system. I dont thing that will be the case because the other lpar performs OK. Please assist moloko -Original Message- From: Post, Mark K [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 04:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel Other people have pointed out the absolute uselessness of BogoMIPS for anything and how they are _not_ generic across platforms, so I won't dwell on that. What I don't understand is why you are doing anything other than dedicating that IFL to your Linux/390 LPAR. Are you running multiple Linux/390 LPARs on that one processor? If so, you're probably asking for trouble. During the period of time the server was rejecting connections, what was your CPU load? High? Low? It may or may not be a lack of processor power, but unless you have some data you're never going to know one way or the other. What kind of network connection does this LPAR use? Are there any/many other systems on the same subnet? What kind of collision rate are you seeing? And on, and on, and on. If you don't have any measurements, there's no possible way to tell if your system will be able to handle a real life load or not. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Moloko Monyepao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel I RedHat 7.2 (Server Installation). I am currentely testing sendmail (Comparing the load handling between Linux on Intel and Linux on S390. I am using an IBM z37 machine with one IFL and I gave my Linux LPar 80Pwt (processor weighting on the IFL) When the sever gets too busy start rejecting messages. Just for outbount mail and I also want to test for both Inbound/Outbound. What could be the problem here. I will send any further information if it is needed. The following is what I got from my mail administrator. This is the BogoMips rating for the various machines: Mainframe: 326.04 BogoMIPS (Mainframe) Maggie (mail-spool, 500Mhz): 996.14 (Intel) 500meg (processor) Higher is better, BogoMIPS should also be generic across platforms. The mainframe is running very high load and is getting behind with mail. Due to the high load, it starts to block connections which is no good at all (might need to move it back). At this stage I am only running outbound mail through the box, which is not really where the load comes from. The real load comes from inbound mail (300-400 concurrent connections). I don't think this is going to work, unless you can get MUCH faster processors. At least in the range of 2Ghz+ as in Intel architecture. Please assist Moloko
Re: SAP on Z
Looks like 64 bit SuSE is already support, is that GA yet? As posted here a few days back http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-03-14-003-26-PR-EL-SS ) beginning of May. http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/faq/pdf/mysap_on_linuxforz_faq.pdf?t=gr,l=335,p=m ySAP Cites mySAP availability 31 May. (Love to know what the delay has been. It was demonstrated at CeBIT _LAST_ year.) -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803 +49 173 6242039
Cancelled
Cancelled
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
It can be difficult to tell without some sort of instrumentation or analysis of how Linux is performing. At the first hint of a performance problem, the typical solution in the Intel world is to throw more or bigger boxes at it. We don't always have that luxury in the 390 world. Therefore alot of shops have monitoring tools to tell us where the problem is so that we can come up with a game plan on how to fix it. Running in an LPAR you are somewhat limited in that you can only use Linux tools and the HMC displays. I do not know what monitoring packages exist for Linux (besides top), that will give you the information that you (and we) need to work this out. Of course under VM there are a number of choices. While you are testing sendmail, what does the HMC indicate about the CPU load if your IFL? Also, does the IFL use dedicated CHPIDs to the DASD? If so, what is their utilization? As mentioned earlier, try dedicating the IFL to this Linux partition (as long as there are no other LPARs that need it). On Wednesday 20 March 2002 12:19 am, you wrote: How can I find out what is causing my problem Connection rejected on my sendmail. Could it be the disk delays or what? How can I sort out this problem because whether it is BogoMips or not Intel box does not reject messages but my Linux/390 does. Is the any way I can sort out this problem. Please assist Moloko -- Rich Smrcina Sytek Services, Inc. Milwaukee, WI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Catch the WAVV! Stay for Requirements and the Free for All! Update your S/390 skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price. WAVV 2002 in Cincinnati (Fort Mitchell, KY). April 12-16, 2002 For details see http://www.wavv.org
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
Running in an LPAR you are somewhat limited in that you can only use Linux tools and the HMC displays. I do not know what monitoring packages exist for Linux (besides top), that will give you the information that you (and we) need to work this out. Of course under VM there are a number of choices. top will show you process data sard will show you disk statistics providing your vendor ships that feature (look in proc/partitions and you should see stuff like.. 2264 80043264 hdd 23376 219526 1943138 1722140 14309 266197 2244104 2311340 0 801060 4033700 ) vmstat will provide paging rate information (especially handy is vmstat 1) Sendmail defaults to stopping listening based on load average, the value it picks may be a bit low for the S/390 i/o v cpu. Look in /etc/sendmail.cf for # load average at which we just queue messages #O QueueLA=8 # load average at which we refuse connections #O RefuseLA=12 remove the comment, set values, and restart sendmail. The default sendmail tuning is fairly defensive for a small box. You can materially improve its performance, especially for stuff like mailing list work by tuning it. There are two favoured techniques for that. #1 is to get a copy of the book and/or read the sendmail faqs in full, the other is to replace it with exim, postfix or qmail 8) Alan
Samba and Security = server
I thought if I put 'security = server' in my [global] Samba would assume that the user was authenticated by some other controller lile the Windows PDC. I tried mapping the share from this machine and I still got prompted for an ID and password? I would like to try this type of security model (very single signonish) What did I do wrong? Thanks Bill
Re: Authentication on Linux using PAM to a z/OS RACF server
At LinuxWorld in January, we announced important new PAM capabilities for the CA security products (CA-ACF2 and CA-Top Secret). Both products will include a new built-in PAM server that works in conjunction with an open-source PAM client to authenticate Linux users directly against existing z/OS credentials. When will this capability be available for VM:Secure?
Re: Authentication on Linux using PAM to a z/OS RACF server
Mark: Thanks for this link. http://linuxvm.org/info/howtos/movefs.html Mostly explains things. I do have a question relating to the tar command therin described: tar -clpSf - . | (cd /mnt ; tar -xpSf - ) How do you get this process to handle symbolic links. In my case I was copying the /var tree and it left out /var/run/printer and /var/run/.nscd_socket which are both symbolic links to elsewhere.
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
Hi, Moloko. As others have already pointed out, to see what the problem(s) is/are with your sendmail Linux application, we need to have some system data collected. Since your configuration is Linux running in an LPAR (without VM, correct?) you are limited to using native Linux performance data collection and analysis tools. Try the following ideas and let the list know the results. 1) use the standard Linux top command to see what process are running. Use the f -u -enter option to see what the process is waiting for. 2) netstat -s will show the network statistics in detail. 3) download and install the RMFPMS package from IBM (see: http://www.s390.ibm.com/rmf/rmfhtmls/pmweb/pmlin.htm). It comes with a cool Java client (Windows or Linux) that displays the performance data in real time. If none of these things give you enough data to fix your sendmail problems, it might be worth it to run Linux under z/VM, instead of in an LPAR, just to be able to get accurate S/390 system (channel, processor, memory, network, etc.) data. Good luck. Dave -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Moloko Monyepao Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel How can I find out what is causing my problem Connection rejected on my sendmail. Could it be the disk delays or what? How can I sort out this problem because whether it is BogoMips or not Intel box does not reject messages but my Linux/390 does. Is the any way I can sort out this problem. Please assist Moloko -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Work: (919) 676-0847 Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com
Re: ISO FILES
OK, i have vmware, and a linux guest under vmware. so what do i do with the .iso files ?? do they get mounted someplace /mnt/tmp/filename.iso confused and stupid
Re: ISO FILES
Acquire FDISK. Partition your hard drive and install a Linux system. You can the choose to boot either W2K or Linux. Hercules will run on either. Failing that get VMWare so you can run Linux under W2K or W2K under Linux (but that would affect Hercules performance). -Original Message- Mount commands would be good if i had a unix platform, I have win 2000 pro with Hercules running a guest .
Re: ISO FILES
Ken, one way would be to mount them via the loopback device: mount -o loop /myiso.iso /mnt/directory-where-I-want-to-access-the-files-under-the-iso I hope you like my mount point name. Carlos Carlos A. Ordonez IBM Corporation Server Consolidation |-+--- | | Ken Dreger: Dr.| | | D | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | Sent by: Linux | | | on 390 Port | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | RIST.EDU | | | | | | | | | 03/20/2002 09:51| | | AM | | | Please respond | | | to Linux on 390 | | | Port| | | | |-+--- ---| | | |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |cc: | | From: | | Subject: ISO FILES | | | ---| I have grabbed the think blue .ISO files and downloaded them to my desktop system. I have hercules installed on the desktop. the question is how or what can I do with the .iso images to make them into disks ?? I cannot seem to find any material about these files, and they seem like they are pretty common can somebody point me to a good documentation site ?? ken
Re: ISO FILES
Mount commands would be good if i had a unix platform, I have win 2000 pro with Hercules running a guest . Any of the standard windows cd burners should work with .iso files For runtime stuff if there is a tool with hercules these days to turn a filesystem image into a disk image then do that and mount the disk image with mount -t iso9660 in Hercules
Re: ISO FILES
Mount commands would be good if i had a unix platform, I have win 2000 pro
with Hercules running a guest .
ken
Well, that sounds like a mistake. Well, there's always FIPS on an
x86 Linux Distro to help make room for a _real_ OS on your PC. :-)
Sorry for the cruelty, but your choice is to either burn the images
so that W2K can read them or to install a more flexible OS. While
you'll lose the pretty HercGUI tool (which I must admit is very
pretty) there are other reasons to run Linux under such a system.
Though I would suspect it'd be confusing to run Linux 390 on top of
hercules on top of another Linux system; Just make sure that you've
properly set up /etc/issue (and issue.net) to remind you of which is
which... :-)
John R. Campbell, Speaker to Machines (GNUrd) {813-356|697}-5322
Will Work for CLAIM Codes
IBM Certified: IBM AIX 4.3 System Administration, System Support
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:05:41AM -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote: While you are testing sendmail, what does the HMC indicate about the CPU load if your IFL? Also, does the IFL use dedicated CHPIDs to the DASD? If so, what is their utilization? As mentioned earlier, try dedicating the IFL to this Linux partition (as long as there are no other LPARs that need it). On Wednesday 20 March 2002 12:19 am, you wrote: How can I find out what is causing my problem Connection rejected on my sendmail. Could it be the disk delays or what? How can I sort out this problem because whether it is BogoMips or not Intel box does not reject messages but my Linux/390 does. Is the any way I can sort out this problem. It sure sounds to me like RefuseLA in the sendmail config. If you have the Bat Book, it's on page 741 of the 2d edition. Assuming that the system itself is still adequately responsive, I'd try doubling it and see what happens. Adam -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] My eyes say their prayers to her / Sailors ring her bell / Like a moth mistakes a light bulb / For the moon and goes to hell. -- Tom Waits
FW: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter
SUCCESS!! My OSA Adapter problem is solved and I have just completed my installation. I want to thank Alan Altmark and Mark Post for their assistance in solving my problem. It turned out that my IP address I was using for my Linux virtual machine did not match the IP address assigned in the configuration of the OSA card. Once I switched to the correct device on the OSA card all worked well. Thanks again for you help. I learned a lot about OSA. Thomas L. Geyer Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-2073 Fax:(330) 471-4034 -Original Message- From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:58 PM Subject: Re: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter Tom, From what I can tell, your routing looks right. The ifconfig output is really strange, though: RX packets:882347 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 _Something_ is sending you lots of packets, but nothing is going the other way. Just out of curiosity, have you tried downloading the latest OCO modules for the OSA card that match your kernel level, and see if they act any differently? (I know they've opened up the source code for them, but I don't want you to have to rebuild your kernel just to poke at this problem.) Also, pinging the local IP address from Linux doesn't show anything, really. The interface doesn't even get exercised by that, so unless it _fails_, it means very little. You've tried pinging the gateway router by it's IP address? Does that change the TX packets numbers on the ifconfig command any? Mark Post -Original Message- From: Geyer, Thomas L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter Mark is was a pleasure meeting you as well. I do hope to be able to attend Share again in the future. The address of the first router pass the OSA card is 147.185.2.1. The following is the output from the route -n command. route -n route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 147.185.2.470.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 147.185.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo 0.0.0.0 147.185.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 Here is the output from the ifconfig command: ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:AC:5E:E0:D5 inet addr:147.185.2.47 Bcast:147.185.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:882347 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 We tried pinging from the gateway 147.185.2.1 and it failed. I tried the following from the linux virtual machine: [root@vmlinux /root]# ping -c 3 147.185.2.47 ping -c 3 147.185.2.47 PING 147.185.2.47 (147.185.2.47): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 147.185.2.47: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.2 ms 64 bytes from 147.185.2.47: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from 147.185.2.47: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.2 ms --- 147.185.2.47 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/0.1/0.2 ms [root@vmlinux /root]# Any suggestions or help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Thomas L. Geyer Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-2073 Fax:(330) 471-4034 -Original Message- From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:29 PM Subject: Re: Problem wit OSA/2 Adapter Tom, It was nice meeting you at SHARE. I hope you get to come back and bring others from Timken with you. What does your routing table look like when you're attempting the pings? For that matter, what is the IP address of your OSA, and the first router past the OSA card? Post the output from route -n and ifconfig so that we can help you out. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Geyer, Thomas L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem wit OSA/2 Adapter I attended Share last week and I followed the Linux/390 track. I want to thank all of you who presented, all presentations were excellent and very informative. Share was especially special since I got to spend time with an old friend, Scott Courtney. Scott you and your talents are missed and it was great seeing you again. Now to my question. Since I returned from Share I have been trying to install the Marist distribution on our VM processor. I
disk format issue.
Im doing a redhat 7.2 390 install under win 2000 with hercules... I keep getting the following disk format messages: I have done a hercules dasdformat of the files all went fine. the addresses are 0220 0222 anybody have a clue ? If you know the address range of your DASDs, please enter it now. 19:15:39.551 0704 If you just press return, autodetection will be attempted. 19:15:39.561 0704 (200-20f is usually a good setting for vm, fd00-fd0f for LPARs) 19:15:39.571 0704 Danger: Autoprobing might give you wrong results 19:15:57.237 0704 ./0200-0220 19:15:57.367 0704 /0200-0220 19:15:57.768 0704 Loading DASD kernel module. This can take a while. 19:16:03.786 0704 dasd:initializing... 19:16:04.217 0704 debug: reserved 2 areas of 1 pages for debugging dasd 19:16:04.557 0704 dasd:Registered successfully to major no 94 19:16:04.958 0704 dasd:initialization not performed due to errors 19:16:05.118 0704 dasd:shutting down 19:16:05.499 0704 dasd:Unregistered successfully from major no 94 19:16:05.719 0704 debug: unregistering dasd 19:16:06.050 0704 debug: freeing debug area 006bf600 (dasd) 19:16:06.250 0704 dasd:shutdown completed 19:16:06.500 0704 dasd:initialization finished 19:16:06.761 0704 /tmp/dasd_mod.o: init_module: %m 19:16:07.381 0704 Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including inva 19:16:07.612 0704 lid IO or IRQ parameters 19:16:09.805 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_deq_Rsmp_2c35d1c1 19:16:10.386 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_default_erp_postaction_Rsmp_6531f76 19:16:10.426 0704 0 19:16:10.937 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_term_IO_Rsmp_2452db2c 19:16:11.417 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_start_IO_Rsmp_d899936b 19:16:11.998 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_discipline_add_Rsmp_6e2c44d9 19:16:12.519 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_int_handler_Rsmp_e706fc62 19:16:13.060 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_enq_Rsmp_56380498 19:16:13.620 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_set_normalized_cda_Rsmp_8f760f70 19:16:14.171 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_alloc_request_Rsmp_7ef23c86 19:16:14.702 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_schedule_bh_Rsmp_fc138f01 19:16:15.253 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_enq_head_Rsmp_bc7fd272 19:16:15.784 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_free_request_Rsmp_7e3d8b2c 19:16:16.384 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_default_erp_action_Rsmp_261cfa58 19:16:16.985 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_discipline_del_Rsmp_8a705fef 19:16:17.526 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_oper_handler_Rsmp_cbce7415 19:16:17.826 0704 Journalled Block Device driver loaded Ken
Re: Authentication on Linux using PAM to a z/OS RACF server
In my case I was copying the /var tree and it left out /var/run/printer and /var/run/.nscd_socket which are both symbolic links to elsewhere. You sure they were sym-links and not socket files? Sym-link should have an l in the far left of 'ls -l' output. A named socket would have an s in the far left of the same listing. Named sockets never get copied, from all the docs and refs I've seen. Files which do get copied are: plain, directory (sort of), char special, block special, symbolic link, and named pipe (this last one not to be confused with named socket). The two in question should be recreated automagically as needed.
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
As far as looking at the CPU use, you can use the RMF Partition Data Report running in any other partition on the CEC to view the CPU utilization of the IPL partition. Set the RMF interval down on one the other partitions to 1 minute and collect some data to look at. --- Original Message --- From: Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel It can be difficult to tell without some sort of instrumentation or analysis of how Linux is performing. At the first hint of a performance problem, the typical solution in the Intel world is to throw more or bigger boxes at it. We don't always have that luxury in the 390 world. Therefore alot of shops have monitoring tools to tell us where the problem is so that we can come up with a game plan on how to fix it. Running in an LPAR you are somewhat limited in that you can only use Linux tools and the HMC displays. I do not know what monitoring packages exist for Linux (besides top), that will give you the information that you (and we) need to work this out. Of course under VM there are a number of choices. While you are testing sendmail, what does the HMC indicate about the CPU load if your IFL? Also, does the IFL use dedicated CHPIDs to the DASD? If so, what is their utilization? As mentioned earlier, try dedicating the IFL to this Linux partition (as long as there are no other LPARs that need it). On Wednesday 20 March 2002 12:19 am, you wrote: How can I find out what is causing my problem Connection rejected on my sendmail. Could it be the disk delays or what? How can I sort out this problem because whether it is BogoMips or not Intel box does not reject messages but my Linux/390 does. Is the any way I can sort out this problem. Please assist Moloko -- Rich Smrcina Sytek Services, Inc. Milwaukee, WI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Catch the WAVV! Stay for Requirements and the Free for All! Update your S/390 skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price. WAVV 2002 in Cincinnati (Fort Mitchell, KY). April 12-16, 2002 For details see http://www.wavv.org Jon Nolting
Re: ISO FILES
Buy a cd burner and use Nero or Adaptec Easy CD Creator. Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/20/02 09:51AM I have grabbed the think blue .ISO files and downloaded them to my desktop system. I have hercules installed on the desktop. the question is how or what can I do with the .iso images to make them into disks ?? I cannot seem to find any material about these files, and they seem like they are pretty common can somebody point me to a good documentation site ?? ken
Re: FW: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter
I would say just by the sheer amount of work Mark does in order to keep the rest of us well informed, and the amount that Alan seems to contribute to the list, that we, the unwashed masses owe them both at this point a near lifetime supply of beer. I know mark has saved my sorry behind twice now. |-+ | | Geyer, Thomas | | | L. | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | | | | Sent by: Linux on| | | 390 Port | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | IST.EDU | | || | || | | 03/20/2002 10:15 | | | AM | | | Please respond to| | | Linux on 390 Port| | || |-+ --| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: FW: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter | --| SUCCESS!! My OSA Adapter problem is solved and I have just completed my installation. I want to thank Alan Altmark and Mark Post for their assistance in solving my problem.
IBM LDP Site
I just stumbled across this site: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linux/;. It's an IBM Linux Documentation Project site. Here's an overview of what's available: Clustering Standardizing Cluster APIs - A presentation by Alan Roberts. (Jan 2002) IBM Linux Clusters - Published by IBM Server Group Marketing Communications. (Nov 2001) Database DB2 on Linux HOWTO - Dan Scott wrote this HOWTO to assist with installation and configuration of DB2 on Linux. (Jun 2001) File Systems / Storage JFS Root Boot HOWTO Journaling Filesystems - Moshe Bar has written an article for Linux Magazine which includes discussion of JFS. (Aug 2000) Journal File Systems - The Linux Gazette has an article by Juan I. Santos Florido which includes discussion of JFS. (Jul 2000) Journalizing File Systems for Linux - Byte features an article which includes discussion of JFS. (May 2000) JFS Layout - IBM developerWorks features an article on JFS layout by Steve Best and Dave Kleikamp of the JFS team. (May 2000) JFS Overview - IBM developerWorks features a JFS overview by Steve Best of the JFS team. (Jan 2000) Linux Partition HOWTO - This HOWTO was converted from HTML to DocBook SGML by Dan Scott. (Sep 2001) Enterprise Volume Management in Linux - This was presented at the 5th Annual Linux Showcase in November, 2001. Emulating Multiple Logical Volume Management Systems within a Single Volume Management Architecture - Written by Ben Rafanello, John Stiles, Cuong H. Tran, this is a follow up to the LVMS whitepaper. The project has been renamed to the Enterprise Volume Management System. This paper was presented at the Linux Storage Management Workshop in Miami, FL during October 2000. Logical Volume Management System (LVMS) whitepaper - Ben Rafanello has published a whitepaper on a technology called a Logical Volume Management System (LVMS). An implementation of LVMS exists for OS/2, but has never been released in any product. We are considering whether or not to port some or all of this to Linux (open source, under GPL), and are soliciting input from the Linux technical community. Journaled File System (JFS) for Linux - Presented at LinuxWorld Expo Tokyo by Steve Best. (May 2000) Java Java, threads, and scheduling in Linux - Ray Bryant and Bill Hartner of the LTC have written an article discussing the performance of the Linux kernel when the system is running a Java program using the IBM Developer Kit for Linux, Java Technology Edition, Version 1.1.8. (Jan 2000) Faster apps on a better machine - Duc Vianney (LTC) and James Phelan (IBM Austin Research Center) have written an article on tuning Linux and Java performance. (May 2001) Kernel Linux for PowerPC Embedded Systems HOWTO - Boas Betzler wrote this HOWTO as an attempt to tell you what you need to know to use Linux on an embedded PowerPC-based system. It is a distillation of the collective wisdom from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list. (Aug 2001) Linux 2.4 Kernel Internals - Mingming Cao and Russell Weight have contributed Chapter 5 on shared memory to this document maintained by Tigran Aivazian. (Aug 2001) Enhancing Linux Scheduler Scalability - Mike Kravetz presented this paper at the 2001 Ottawa Linux Symposium. (Jul 2001) Lockmeter: Highly Informative Instrumentation for Spin Locks in the Linux Kernel - Ray Bryant (IBM) and John Hawkes (SGI) presented this paper at the 4th Annual Linux Showcase. (Oct 2000) SMP Scalability Comparisons of Linux® 2.2.14 and 2.3.99 - Ray Bryant (IBM), Bill Hartner (IBM), Qi He (Georgia Institute of Technology), and Ganesh Venkitachalam (VMWare, Inc.) presented this paper at the 4th Annual Linux Showcase and Conference. (Oct 2000) Networking Token-Ring mini-HOWTO - This HOWTO was updated and is now maintained by Tom Gall. (Mar 2000) Printing IBM OMNI Driver FrameWork - Presented by Mark Hamzy presented at LinuxWorld Expo in San Francisco. (Aug 2001) Quality Assurance How to run the LTP test suite HOWTO - Casey Abell and Robbie Williamson wrote this HOWTO to assist people interested in running the LTP test suite. (Dec 2001) RAS Dynamic Probes for Linux - A Tracing Mechanism for both User and Kernel Space - Richard Moore presented this paper at the 2001 UKUUG Linux Developers Conference 2001 in July 2001. A Universal Dynamic Trace for Linux and other Operating Systems - Richard Moore presented this paper at the 2001 USENIX Annual Technical Conference in June 2001. Dynamic Probes and Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface for Linux - Richard Moore presented this paper at the 4th Annual Linux Showcase in October 2000. Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface - A High Speed Call-back
Re: SAP on Z
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Phil Payne wrote: Looks like 64 bit SuSE is already support, is that GA yet? Nope. (Love to know what the delay has been. It was demonstrated at CeBIT _LAST_ year.) The Distributors. There is no 64 Bit GA Distribution till now. You need a GA Distribution to run a mySAP.com The whole mySAP.com pilot and CA-Phase run on our ThinkBlue/64 7.1 distribution available from http://linux.zseries.org/ This Distribution is based on RedHat 7.1. Greetings Oliver Paukstadt -- -- Oliver Paukstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mi||enuxfon: 0700 Millenux Lilienthalstrasse 2 fon: +49 711 88770-300 70825 Stuttgart-Korntal, Germanyfax: +49 711 88770-349 -- Linux without limits: http://linux.zSeries.org/
Re: Samba and Security = server
Bill, Using security=server just means that the actual authentication takes place on the other server. Samba still has to prompt you for the information it needs to have the authentication performed. If you do have a PDC already in place, use security=domain instead. This is actually lighter in terms of resources used on your PDC, and will provide you with the behavior you want. If you do this, you will have to add your Samba system to the domain, which means you will need to create a machine account for it in the domain before trying to join the domain. With your Samba software there is included the full text of the Using Samba book from O'Reilly and Associates. It's in html and other formats. Take a good look at it, it is _full_ of valuable information about setting up Samba and getting full use out of it. Mark Post -Original Message- From: William Raffloer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Samba and Security = server I thought if I put 'security = server' in my [global] Samba would assume that the user was authenticated by some other controller lile the Windows PDC. I tried mapping the share from this machine and I still got prompted for an ID and password? I would like to try this type of security model (very single signonish) What did I do wrong? Thanks Bill
Re: FW: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter
Jim, I've got beer in my fridge. Send _money_! Mark Post -Original Message- From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter I would say just by the sheer amount of work Mark does in order to keep the rest of us well informed, and the amount that Alan seems to contribute to the list, that we, the unwashed masses owe them both at this point a near lifetime supply of beer. I know mark has saved my sorry behind twice now.
Re: disk format issue.
200-220 does not cover 220 222 on the address range. Am I missing something? I also don't understand the slash in front of the addresses. Try specifying .220-222 Regards, Steve Oswald On Wednesday 20 March 2002 01:23 pm, you wrote: i GOT IT FROM: http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/redhat-7.2-en/os/s390/images/ Ken At 10:58 AM 3/20/2002, you wrote: Ken, Did you download the GA code, or something from the rawhide? What this looks like is a kernel module that was compiled with module versioning, and a kernel that was not. Or with/without SMP support (I can never really tell). Just _exactly_ where did you download the files from? (Both kernel and initrd.) Mark Post -Original Message- From: Ken Dreger: Dr. D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: disk format issue. Im doing a redhat 7.2 390 install under win 2000 with hercules... I keep getting the following disk format messages: I have done a hercules dasdformat of the files all went fine. the addresses are 0220 0222 anybody have a clue ? If you know the address range of your DASDs, please enter it now. 19:15:39.551 0704 If you just press return, autodetection will be attempted. 19:15:39.561 0704 (200-20f is usually a good setting for vm, fd00-fd0f for LPARs) 19:15:39.571 0704 Danger: Autoprobing might give you wrong results 19:15:57.237 0704 ./0200-0220 19:15:57.367 0704 /0200-0220 19:15:57.768 0704 Loading DASD kernel module. This can take a while. 19:16:03.786 0704 dasd:initializing... 19:16:04.217 0704 debug: reserved 2 areas of 1 pages for debugging dasd 19:16:04.557 0704 dasd:Registered successfully to major no 94 19:16:04.958 0704 dasd:initialization not performed due to errors 19:16:05.118 0704 dasd:shutting down 19:16:05.499 0704 dasd:Unregistered successfully from major no 94 19:16:05.719 0704 debug: unregistering dasd 19:16:06.050 0704 debug: freeing debug area 006bf600 (dasd) 19:16:06.250 0704 dasd:shutdown completed 19:16:06.500 0704 dasd:initialization finished 19:16:06.761 0704 /tmp/dasd_mod.o: init_module: %m 19:16:07.381 0704 Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including inva 19:16:07.612 0704 lid IO or IRQ parameters 19:16:09.805 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_deq_Rsmp_2c35d1c1 19:16:10.386 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_default_erp_postaction_Rsmp_6531f76 19:16:10.426 0704 0 19:16:10.937 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_term_IO_Rsmp_2452db2c 19:16:11.417 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_start_IO_Rsmp_d899936b 19:16:11.998 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_discipline_add_Rsmp_6e2c44d9 19:16:12.519 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_int_handler_Rsmp_e706fc62 19:16:13.060 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_enq_Rsmp_56380498 19:16:13.620 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_set_normalized_cda_Rsmp_8f760f70 19:16:14.171 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_alloc_request_Rsmp_7ef23c86 19:16:14.702 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_schedule_bh_Rsmp_fc138f01 19:16:15.253 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_enq_head_Rsmp_bc7fd272 19:16:15.784 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_free_request_Rsmp_7e3d8b2c 19:16:16.384 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_default_erp_action_Rsmp_261cfa58 19:16:16.985 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_discipline_del_Rsmp_8a705fef 19:16:17.526 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_oper_handler_Rsmp_cbce7415 19:16:17.826 0704 Journalled Block Device driver loaded Ken Ken Dreger www.ken.dreger.com www.acornartists.com www.laprivateeye.com 13,200 Hours of Seti time and clicking up more -- Steven J. Oswald Systems Consulting Engineer OzTech Systems Consulting, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (815) 337-1036 cell: (815) 715-4065 home: (815) 337-1035 fax:(847) 842-5931
Re: IBM LDP Site
Neale, It took a while, but I finally figured out that you were talking about http://www.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/pubs/ and not the URL you gave. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Ferguson, Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IBM LDP Site I just stumbled across this site: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linux/;. It's an IBM Linux Documentation Project site. Here's an overview of what's available: Clustering Standardizing Cluster APIs - A presentation by Alan Roberts. (Jan 2002) IBM Linux Clusters - Published by IBM Server Group Marketing Communications. (Nov 2001) Database DB2 on Linux HOWTO - Dan Scott wrote this HOWTO to assist with installation and configuration of DB2 on Linux. (Jun 2001) File Systems / Storage JFS Root Boot HOWTO Journaling Filesystems - Moshe Bar has written an article for Linux Magazine which includes discussion of JFS. (Aug 2000) Journal File Systems - The Linux Gazette has an article by Juan I. Santos Florido which includes discussion of JFS. (Jul 2000) Journalizing File Systems for Linux - Byte features an article which includes discussion of JFS. (May 2000) JFS Layout - IBM developerWorks features an article on JFS layout by Steve Best and Dave Kleikamp of the JFS team. (May 2000) JFS Overview - IBM developerWorks features a JFS overview by Steve Best of the JFS team. (Jan 2000) Linux Partition HOWTO - This HOWTO was converted from HTML to DocBook SGML by Dan Scott. (Sep 2001) Enterprise Volume Management in Linux - This was presented at the 5th Annual Linux Showcase in November, 2001. Emulating Multiple Logical Volume Management Systems within a Single Volume Management Architecture - Written by Ben Rafanello, John Stiles, Cuong H. Tran, this is a follow up to the LVMS whitepaper. The project has been renamed to the Enterprise Volume Management System. This paper was presented at the Linux Storage Management Workshop in Miami, FL during October 2000. Logical Volume Management System (LVMS) whitepaper - Ben Rafanello has published a whitepaper on a technology called a Logical Volume Management System (LVMS). An implementation of LVMS exists for OS/2, but has never been released in any product. We are considering whether or not to port some or all of this to Linux (open source, under GPL), and are soliciting input from the Linux technical community. Journaled File System (JFS) for Linux - Presented at LinuxWorld Expo Tokyo by Steve Best. (May 2000) Java Java, threads, and scheduling in Linux - Ray Bryant and Bill Hartner of the LTC have written an article discussing the performance of the Linux kernel when the system is running a Java program using the IBM Developer Kit for Linux, Java Technology Edition, Version 1.1.8. (Jan 2000) Faster apps on a better machine - Duc Vianney (LTC) and James Phelan (IBM Austin Research Center) have written an article on tuning Linux and Java performance. (May 2001) Kernel Linux for PowerPC Embedded Systems HOWTO - Boas Betzler wrote this HOWTO as an attempt to tell you what you need to know to use Linux on an embedded PowerPC-based system. It is a distillation of the collective wisdom from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list. (Aug 2001) Linux 2.4 Kernel Internals - Mingming Cao and Russell Weight have contributed Chapter 5 on shared memory to this document maintained by Tigran Aivazian. (Aug 2001) Enhancing Linux Scheduler Scalability - Mike Kravetz presented this paper at the 2001 Ottawa Linux Symposium. (Jul 2001) Lockmeter: Highly Informative Instrumentation for Spin Locks in the Linux Kernel - Ray Bryant (IBM) and John Hawkes (SGI) presented this paper at the 4th Annual Linux Showcase. (Oct 2000) SMP Scalability Comparisons of Linux® 2.2.14 and 2.3.99 - Ray Bryant (IBM), Bill Hartner (IBM), Qi He (Georgia Institute of Technology), and Ganesh Venkitachalam (VMWare, Inc.) presented this paper at the 4th Annual Linux Showcase and Conference. (Oct 2000) Networking Token-Ring mini-HOWTO - This HOWTO was updated and is now maintained by Tom Gall. (Mar 2000) Printing IBM OMNI Driver FrameWork - Presented by Mark Hamzy presented at LinuxWorld Expo in San Francisco. (Aug 2001) Quality Assurance How to run the LTP test suite HOWTO - Casey Abell and Robbie Williamson wrote this HOWTO to assist people interested in running the LTP test suite. (Dec 2001) RAS Dynamic Probes for Linux - A Tracing Mechanism for both User and Kernel Space - Richard Moore presented this paper at the 2001 UKUUG Linux Developers Conference 2001 in July 2001. A Universal Dynamic Trace for Linux and other Operating Systems
Resource and object access authorization products
Folks, We are presently evaluating a package called CA eTrust Access Control, which provides C2 and some B1 like security controls for resource and object access authorization. While we have been exploring SELinux, we ware looking for something that provides centralized security for applications hosted on Linux. Anyone know of any other products we should consider? Dave No warrantee is implied or explicitly stated. Do not bend, fold, spindle, or mutilate.
Salomon Smith Barney SHARE Presentation
One of the additional presentations that I was waiting for arrived today, and it's been uploaded to linuxvm.org. It was session 5534 by Doctor Robinson titled Linux z/900 at Salomon Smith Barney. They have Linux/390 in production doing some infrastructure work, with plans to migrate applications to the platform. http://linuxvm.org/present/index.html or http://linuxvm.org/present/SHARE98/S5534dr.pdf Mark Post
Re: IBM LDP Site
My URL was the LTC's LDP home page. Your URL is the page with the list of pubs. -Original Message- Neale, It took a while, but I finally figured out that you were talking about http://www.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/pubs/ and not the URL you gave.
Re: disk format issue.
Mark, Couldn't reply to you directly: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host ah.eds.com [192.85.154.71]: 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Access denied, sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- I wasn't sure about the unresolved symols as they seemed to occur after the dasd driver had already failed. I'm sure you're correct though. The dot/period is needed for the Hercules 3215 interface, and the slash may be an SDSF thing (something I'm often guilty of myself ;-). Regards, Steve Oswald On Wednesday 20 March 2002 12:58 pm, you wrote: Ken, Did you download the GA code, or something from the rawhide? What this looks like is a kernel module that was compiled with module versioning, and a kernel that was not. Or with/without SMP support (I can never really tell). Just _exactly_ where did you download the files from? (Both kernel and initrd.) Mark Post -Original Message- From: Ken Dreger: Dr. D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: disk format issue. Im doing a redhat 7.2 390 install under win 2000 with hercules... I keep getting the following disk format messages: I have done a hercules dasdformat of the files all went fine. the addresses are 0220 0222 anybody have a clue ? If you know the address range of your DASDs, please enter it now. 19:15:39.551 0704 If you just press return, autodetection will be attempted. 19:15:39.561 0704 (200-20f is usually a good setting for vm, fd00-fd0f for LPARs) 19:15:39.571 0704 Danger: Autoprobing might give you wrong results 19:15:57.237 0704 ./0200-0220 19:15:57.367 0704 /0200-0220 19:15:57.768 0704 Loading DASD kernel module. This can take a while. 19:16:03.786 0704 dasd:initializing... 19:16:04.217 0704 debug: reserved 2 areas of 1 pages for debugging dasd 19:16:04.557 0704 dasd:Registered successfully to major no 94 19:16:04.958 0704 dasd:initialization not performed due to errors 19:16:05.118 0704 dasd:shutting down 19:16:05.499 0704 dasd:Unregistered successfully from major no 94 19:16:05.719 0704 debug: unregistering dasd 19:16:06.050 0704 debug: freeing debug area 006bf600 (dasd) 19:16:06.250 0704 dasd:shutdown completed 19:16:06.500 0704 dasd:initialization finished 19:16:06.761 0704 /tmp/dasd_mod.o: init_module: %m 19:16:07.381 0704 Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including inva 19:16:07.612 0704 lid IO or IRQ parameters 19:16:09.805 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_deq_Rsmp_2c35d1c1 19:16:10.386 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_default_erp_postaction_Rsmp_6531f76 19:16:10.426 0704 0 19:16:10.937 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_term_IO_Rsmp_2452db2c 19:16:11.417 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_start_IO_Rsmp_d899936b 19:16:11.998 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_discipline_add_Rsmp_6e2c44d9 19:16:12.519 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_int_handler_Rsmp_e706fc62 19:16:13.060 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_enq_Rsmp_56380498 19:16:13.620 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_set_normalized_cda_Rsmp_8f760f70 19:16:14.171 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_alloc_request_Rsmp_7ef23c86 19:16:14.702 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_schedule_bh_Rsmp_fc138f01 19:16:15.253 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_chanq_enq_head_Rsmp_bc7fd272 19:16:15.784 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_free_request_Rsmp_7e3d8b2c 19:16:16.384 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_default_erp_action_Rsmp_261cfa58 19:16:16.985 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_discipline_del_Rsmp_8a705fef 19:16:17.526 0704 /tmp/dasd_eckd_mod.o: unresolved symbol dasd_oper_handler_Rsmp_cbce7415 19:16:17.826 0704 Journalled Block Device driver loaded Ken -- Steven J. Oswald Systems Consulting Engineer OzTech Systems Consulting, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (815) 337-1036 cell: (815) 715-4065 home: (815) 337-1035 fax:(847) 842-5931
Re: Resource and object access authorization products
access authorization. While we have been exploring SELinux, we ware looking for something that provides centralized security for applications hosted on Linux. Anyone know of any other products we should consider? RSBAC (www.rsbac.org)
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
sendmail are set a little low, and S/390 processors are simply not as fast as Intel for certain tasks, so the load averages are probably going to be higher on S/390 than Intel. If you've got unused capacity, a load average The load average includes disk wait blocking so in theory its accounting for most of that. Maybe S/390 just sucks runs off
Re: Bogomips S390(IFL) / Intel
I sense your holding something back, tell us what you really think... :) On Wednesday 20 March 2002 05:45 pm, you wrote: for most of that. Maybe S/390 just sucks -- Rich Smrcina Sytek Services, Inc. Milwaukee, WI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Catch the WAVV! Stay for Requirements and the Free for All! Update your S/390 skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price. WAVV 2002 in Cincinnati (Fort Mitchell, KY). April 12-16, 2002 For details see http://www.wavv.org
Linuxgram Article - GPL Enforceable Binding, Federal Judge Appa rently Thinks
For those interested in such things. This case involved a company basing some of their own software on GPL code, and then not releasing the source to the new product immediately. One quote from the article: Evidently the judge never questioned the GPL license, quoted sections of it at Progress' chief counsel, asked how exactly NuSphere had complied with this term or that of the thing, indicated that Progress needed to comply with the license and told MySQL lawyers that they could come back with a new motion for preliminary injunction if discovery indicated NuSphere hadn't fully complied with the GPL. http://www.linuxgram.com/article.pl?sid=02/03/05/058213section=newsflash Mark Post
Re: Linux S/390 Compatible Disk Layout.
Was there any response to this? Is this available in the 2.2.x distros? At 01:22 PM 3/19/02 -0500, you wrote: I just looked at the SHARE presentation Linux and IBM Storage by Tony Pearson at linuxvm.org web site provided by Mark. Thanks Mark! There are some visuals on the S/390 compatibility disk layout. Judging from the visuals, I'm guessing that this is available in the 2.4.5 kernel distros. Can anybody who attended the presentation comment on this? If we can vary the Linux volumes online from OS/390 or z/OS and use DSS or FDR, it sure is going to make our business recovery plans a lot easier. Colman Fink Geac Steve Shomaker -- Sytek Services, Inc 13896 Skyline Blvd. Woodside, CA 94062 Phn: (650)529-0268 Fax: (650)529-0347
Re: Linux S/390 Compatible Disk Layout.
Mark, Thanks for the info.. At 01:13 AM 3/21/02 -0500, you wrote: Steve, No, it is not available in the 2.2 kernels, only 2.4. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Steve Shomaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux S/390 Compatible Disk Layout. Was there any response to this? Is this available in the 2.2.x distros? At 01:22 PM 3/19/02 -0500, you wrote: I just looked at the SHARE presentation Linux and IBM Storage by Tony Pearson at linuxvm.org web site provided by Mark. Thanks Mark! There are some visuals on the S/390 compatibility disk layout. Judging from the visuals, I'm guessing that this is available in the 2.4.5 kernel distros. Can anybody who attended the presentation comment on this? If we can vary the Linux volumes online from OS/390 or z/OS and use DSS or FDR, it sure is going to make our business recovery plans a lot easier. Colman Fink Geac Steve Shomaker -- Sytek Services, Inc 13896 Skyline Blvd. Woodside, CA 94062 Phn: (650)529-0268 Fax: (650)529-0347 Steve Shomaker -- Sytek Services, Inc 13896 Skyline Blvd. Woodside, CA 94062 Phn: (650)529-0268 Fax: (650)529-0347
VM VSE linux/390 Employment Web Page
Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390) - - Now in its fifth year! - - Now includes VSE and linux/390! I have set up a public service web page at http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/ for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390. Please visit the web page for more information and feel free to send me any info you would like to have posted. Please make VM or VSE or linux/390 the first word in the subject. Questions and comments welcome! (Text or html OK. No java, gifs, etc. NO RESUMES or CVS!) Please check the web pages for examples before sending your ad! Good luck, Dennis VM VSE linux/390 Positions Available last updated Mar 7. VM VSE linux/390 Positions Wanted last updated Mar 14.
