Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-16 Thread Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes
Costco sells Preservision?  Cool!  When I look at the grid I see elephants
and tigers, oh my!

On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 8:59 AM  wrote:

> Here's the price sheets for Costco lenses.
> When I photographed the bifocal/trifocal page I cut off the prism info.
> Sorry.
>
> Most frames are $60-80.
> Kirklands are all $60.
> Ray Ban are $100.
> Some fashion frames (Coach etc) are $200-600.
> Compared to retail optician prices, I can believe the claim that Costco
> aims to break even in stores and profit on memberships.
>
> Same patient/simultaneous orders get $50 off on each frame/Rx lens set
> after the first one. So if I bought general use/sunglass/computer glass
> I'd save $100 and be looking at about $350 for all 3.
>
> Mom's frames are both titanium and both $60. The Saki is made in Japan.
> The Jill Stuart is made in China, as are 95% of frames at Costco. An
> equivalent Saki/Japan for men is $75. I found a good looking Bulova
> men's frame for $75, but it's made in China.
> The Saki mom bought would fit me, but the only color Costco has is rose
> gold (metallic pink), so I'll pay $75 for black.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-16 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes

On 2024-06-15 23:44, Craig via Mercedes wrote:

On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:12:50 -0400 Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes
 wrote:


I have adult diplopia/strabismus - aka double vision ... I  have Rxs
for lenses to correct the diplopia. I will try Costco.


IIRC, Costco does not do prism (wedge) corrections.


We ordered glasses at Costco for my mom Thursday. She's 1 BU 1 BO on the 
right, and 1 BD 1 BO on the left. I just looked it up on the Costco 
order sheet.


I'll send the progressive lens price sheet to Craig, Andrew and Dan in a 
separate email.

Most of the lenses are available with prism up to 5.5 or 6.0.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-16 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes

On 2024-06-15 23:03, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:

I’ve worn progressives from the start, and have learned that it’s 
important to have “tall” lenses so that the transition isn’t too 
“quick,” for lack of a better description. When “thin” styles were all 
the rage I tried a set and quickly realized these would not work for 
me.


Remember OmniLux?
This started out as a thread about OmniLux.
Some brands of progressive lens can be had with a transition corridor as 
tall as 18mm.

OmniLux is 22mm.

Progressives are like no-line trifocals. Most of the induced astigmatism 
(swim) on the sides is due to the two spots where the transition is 
somewhat abrupt.
OmniLux is a continuous (but not linear) transition from 20 to 1 foot. 
You still get the bad areas on the sides but they aren't riddled with 
astigmatism.


The good zone on a progressive is hourglass shaped, with the top part 
(full distance vision) as wide as the lens, the bottom part (reading 
zone) much narrower, and the good zone at intermediate range is 
practically a pinpoint.


The good zone with OmniLux is funnel shaped. Again you have a full width 
20' zone, and then it gets narrower as you get down towards the bottom 
of the lens. Where the narrowest useful area in a PAL is right in the 
middle, with OmniLux the narrow part is on the bottom.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread Bob Rentfro via Mercedes
I have what I was told, ten years ago, was a very aggressive form of AMD. 
Aggressive in that there was no evidence of it in an exam then at the next exam 
it was like, whoa! 
I’ve been taking the generic/Costco version of the Presservision and I look at 
the grid on the fridge every morning  for about 10 years and things are going 
well. 

AZBob

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 15, 2024, at 8:13 PM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> I have adult diplopia/strabismus - aka double vision - and just learned I
> also have age related macular degeneration (AMD) in the right eye.  Anyone
> else with AMD?
> 
> The eye doctor prescribed Preservision vitamins to see if that arrests the
> AMD in 6 months.  I  have Rxs for lenses to correct the diplopia.  I will
> try Costco.
> 
>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 11:04 PM dan penoff.com via Mercedes <
>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Starting about 25 years ago my near vision started to go. Slowly at first,
>> then more rapidly over about a 5 year period. Neighbor/friend is an
>> ophthalmologist and she kept close tabs on my vision. It was mainly due to
>> aging, as expected.
>> 
>> I see her once a year, and for the past 3-4 years my prescription has
>> barely changed, mainly refinements to my distance vision.
>> 
>> I’ve worn progressives from the start, and have learned that it’s
>> important to have “tall” lenses so that the transition isn’t too “quick,”
>> for lack of a better description. When “thin” styles were all the rage I
>> tried a set and quickly realized these would not work for me.
>> 
>> That latest pair of glasses I ordered and returned to Zennie has
>> disappeared into a black hole. They said 14 days to “review” but I haven’t
>> heard a peep.
>> 
>> -D
>> 
>>> On Jun 15, 2024, at 7:55 PM, mitch--- via Mercedes <
>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2024-06-15 22:39, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:
 Is “monovision” like when they do LASIK and one eye does close and the
>> other dies distance?
 That always seemed weird to me.
>>> 
>>> Yes.
>>> I believe it's intended for people who don't like to wear glasses
>> because they value vanity over seeing properly. Most people get used to it
>> over time. The guy I'm talking about invested in two pair of glasses with
>> high end Carl Zeiss lenses to undo the effects of monovision. But 20 years
>> later he does go without glasses some of the time.
>>> Back when it happened, there was a lot of "if you want to go with us,
>> hop in the damn car already" "wait a minute, I just realized I'm wearing my
>> computer glasses. I have to go back in the house and change". His first eye
>> was 20/15 post surgery. If they'd tried to do the same to the other eye he
>> would have been happy, even if it came out 20/30.
>>> 
>>> Now back to me. My non dominate eye is easily correctable to 20/20,
>> almost good enough for the 20/15 line on the chart. Trying to do a
>> refractive exam on my dominate eye drives me nuts because it never really
>> gets sharp, except momentarily it almost gets good before going bad again.
>> It's not horrible, but I just closed my right eye while typing this and the
>> screen went fuzzy. All the sharpness is coming from my left eye.
>>> When I wake up in the morning my vision is blurry and then gradually
>> clears up. I finally figured it out just now, it clears up when my left eye
>> takes over.
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>>> 
>> ___
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> 
>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>> 
>> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:12:50 -0400 Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes
 wrote:

> I have adult diplopia/strabismus - aka double vision ... I  have Rxs
> for lenses to correct the diplopia. I will try Costco.

IIRC, Costco does not do prism (wedge) corrections.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread Allan Streib via Mercedes
Yeah now that I think more about it, my friend who was complaining about it 
could have had the surgery covered, but implanting corrective lenses was the 
part that was not covered, as that was considered "cosmetic."

He had the droopy eyelids too, and got those fixed.


On Sat, Jun 15, 2024, at 19:12, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:
> Not quite true.
>
> Medicare Parts A & B cover the diagnosis and treatment of cataracts 
> when it has been deemed “medically necessary.” That’s the catch. In 
> other words, you’ve probably got to be close to legally blind before 
> you qualify.
>
> I have droopy eyelids like my Mom did, and they’ve flat-out told me 
> that they won’t consider corrective surgery until they’re blocking my 
> vision.
>
> -D
>
>> On Jun 15, 2024, at 3:03 PM, Allan Streib via Mercedes 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> If your insurance covers cataracts get it done. Medicare doesn’t, from what 
>> I’ve heard, so don’t wait until you retire.
>> 
>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2024, at 15:52, mitch--- via Mercedes wrote:
>>> Took my mom to the Costco in East Lansing MI Thursday.
>>> We used the optometrist who rents an office inside Costco, who turned 
>>> out to be great.
>>> $79 for full exam. He listened to her complaints of double vision when 
>>> fatigued, and spent a lot of time dialing in prism correction to 
>>> eliminate it.
>>> 
>>> Now on to the optical department. Found a Japanese titanium frame that 
>>> fit her and was very lightweight. $60. She had polycarb trifocals and 
>>> wanted to stick with that. OK, lenses, $110, all coatings included in 
>>> the base price. For reference, the frame was nicer than she currently 
>>> wears, the lenses identical, and she paid $252 (plus $256 from her 
>>> insurance coverage) in 2019. OK, we're half done. Found a slightly 
>>> larger frame, also titanium, also $60, but made in China like everything 
>>> else. Bifocal polarized gray sunglasses, also polycarb, $108. Discount 
>>> for buying multiple sets of glasses for the same patient in the same 
>>> order: $50. Total $118 for sunglasses, plus $170 for the first pair, is 
>>> $288 for glasses.
>>> 
>>> Now about me: I saw the same optometrist today for a 2nd opinion on my 
>>> Rx and to fix my computer glasses Rx that my MD wrote for 16 away when I 
>>> need 20-24". He wrote my Rx, but referred me to a surgeon and 
>>> recommended I don't buy glasses yet. When I went to my MD two months 
>>> ago, I fully expected we'd be setting up a referral for cataract 
>>> removal, but he didn't think it was time yet. The DO agrees that I'm 
>>> having trouble seeing, and thinks everything in my eyes is OK except for 
>>> the cataracts. Therefore he thinks the reason my dominate right eye is 
>>> blurred is cataracts.
>>> 
>>> Everybody I know says they wished they'd had their cataracts removed 
>>> years earlier than they did.
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>> 
>> ___
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> 
>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>> 
>
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes
I have adult diplopia/strabismus - aka double vision - and just learned I
also have age related macular degeneration (AMD) in the right eye.  Anyone
else with AMD?

The eye doctor prescribed Preservision vitamins to see if that arrests the
AMD in 6 months.  I  have Rxs for lenses to correct the diplopia.  I will
try Costco.

On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 11:04 PM dan penoff.com via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> Starting about 25 years ago my near vision started to go. Slowly at first,
> then more rapidly over about a 5 year period. Neighbor/friend is an
> ophthalmologist and she kept close tabs on my vision. It was mainly due to
> aging, as expected.
>
> I see her once a year, and for the past 3-4 years my prescription has
> barely changed, mainly refinements to my distance vision.
>
> I’ve worn progressives from the start, and have learned that it’s
> important to have “tall” lenses so that the transition isn’t too “quick,”
> for lack of a better description. When “thin” styles were all the rage I
> tried a set and quickly realized these would not work for me.
>
> That latest pair of glasses I ordered and returned to Zennie has
> disappeared into a black hole. They said 14 days to “review” but I haven’t
> heard a peep.
>
> -D
>
> > On Jun 15, 2024, at 7:55 PM, mitch--- via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2024-06-15 22:39, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:
> >> Is “monovision” like when they do LASIK and one eye does close and the
> other dies distance?
> >> That always seemed weird to me.
> >
> > Yes.
> > I believe it's intended for people who don't like to wear glasses
> because they value vanity over seeing properly. Most people get used to it
> over time. The guy I'm talking about invested in two pair of glasses with
> high end Carl Zeiss lenses to undo the effects of monovision. But 20 years
> later he does go without glasses some of the time.
> > Back when it happened, there was a lot of "if you want to go with us,
> hop in the damn car already" "wait a minute, I just realized I'm wearing my
> computer glasses. I have to go back in the house and change". His first eye
> was 20/15 post surgery. If they'd tried to do the same to the other eye he
> would have been happy, even if it came out 20/30.
> >
> > Now back to me. My non dominate eye is easily correctable to 20/20,
> almost good enough for the 20/15 line on the chart. Trying to do a
> refractive exam on my dominate eye drives me nuts because it never really
> gets sharp, except momentarily it almost gets good before going bad again.
> It's not horrible, but I just closed my right eye while typing this and the
> screen went fuzzy. All the sharpness is coming from my left eye.
> > When I wake up in the morning my vision is blurry and then gradually
> clears up. I finally figured it out just now, it clears up when my left eye
> takes over.
> >
> > ___
> > http://www.okiebenz.com
> >
> > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> >
> > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> >
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread dan penoff.com via Mercedes
Starting about 25 years ago my near vision started to go. Slowly at first, then 
more rapidly over about a 5 year period. Neighbor/friend is an ophthalmologist 
and she kept close tabs on my vision. It was mainly due to aging, as expected.

I see her once a year, and for the past 3-4 years my prescription has barely 
changed, mainly refinements to my distance vision.

I’ve worn progressives from the start, and have learned that it’s important to 
have “tall” lenses so that the transition isn’t too “quick,” for lack of a 
better description. When “thin” styles were all the rage I tried a set and 
quickly realized these would not work for me.

That latest pair of glasses I ordered and returned to Zennie has disappeared 
into a black hole. They said 14 days to “review” but I haven’t heard a peep.

-D 

> On Jun 15, 2024, at 7:55 PM, mitch--- via Mercedes  
> wrote:
> 
> On 2024-06-15 22:39, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:
>> Is “monovision” like when they do LASIK and one eye does close and the other 
>> dies distance?
>> That always seemed weird to me.
> 
> Yes.
> I believe it's intended for people who don't like to wear glasses because 
> they value vanity over seeing properly. Most people get used to it over time. 
> The guy I'm talking about invested in two pair of glasses with high end Carl 
> Zeiss lenses to undo the effects of monovision. But 20 years later he does go 
> without glasses some of the time.
> Back when it happened, there was a lot of "if you want to go with us, hop in 
> the damn car already" "wait a minute, I just realized I'm wearing my computer 
> glasses. I have to go back in the house and change". His first eye was 20/15 
> post surgery. If they'd tried to do the same to the other eye he would have 
> been happy, even if it came out 20/30.
> 
> Now back to me. My non dominate eye is easily correctable to 20/20, almost 
> good enough for the 20/15 line on the chart. Trying to do a refractive exam 
> on my dominate eye drives me nuts because it never really gets sharp, except 
> momentarily it almost gets good before going bad again. It's not horrible, 
> but I just closed my right eye while typing this and the screen went fuzzy. 
> All the sharpness is coming from my left eye.
> When I wake up in the morning my vision is blurry and then gradually clears 
> up. I finally figured it out just now, it clears up when my left eye takes 
> over.
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes

On 2024-06-15 22:39, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:
Is “monovision” like when they do LASIK and one eye does close and the 
other dies distance?


That always seemed weird to me.


Yes.
I believe it's intended for people who don't like to wear glasses 
because they value vanity over seeing properly. Most people get used to 
it over time. The guy I'm talking about invested in two pair of glasses 
with high end Carl Zeiss lenses to undo the effects of monovision. But 
20 years later he does go without glasses some of the time.
Back when it happened, there was a lot of "if you want to go with us, 
hop in the damn car already" "wait a minute, I just realized I'm wearing 
my computer glasses. I have to go back in the house and change". His 
first eye was 20/15 post surgery. If they'd tried to do the same to the 
other eye he would have been happy, even if it came out 20/30.


Now back to me. My non dominate eye is easily correctable to 20/20, 
almost good enough for the 20/15 line on the chart. Trying to do a 
refractive exam on my dominate eye drives me nuts because it never 
really gets sharp, except momentarily it almost gets good before going 
bad again. It's not horrible, but I just closed my right eye while 
typing this and the screen went fuzzy. All the sharpness is coming from 
my left eye.
When I wake up in the morning my vision is blurry and then gradually 
clears up. I finally figured it out just now, it clears up when my left 
eye takes over.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:39:20 + "dan penoff.com via Mercedes"
 wrote:

> Is “monovision” like when they do LASIK and one eye does close and the
> other dies distance?

Yes, one eye does close, one eye does distance.


> That always seemed weird to me.

It seems weird to me, too.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread dan penoff.com via Mercedes
Is “monovision” like when they do LASIK and one eye does close and the other 
dies distance?

That always seemed weird to me.

-D

> On Jun 15, 2024, at 7:33 PM, mitch--- via Mercedes  
> wrote:
> 
> On 2024-06-15 21:43, OK DonN via Mercedes wrote:
> 
>> In several situations I see better than she does now, but the Dr wants me to 
>> get the cataracts out - but then he's the surgeon as well. I think I'll find 
>> an ophthalmologist who doesn't do the surgery for a second opinion.
> 
> I mentioned to my new optometrist that my ophthalmologist (retired five years 
> ago) did both my parents' cataracts. He was not keen on the idea, thinks that 
> a full time surgeon should do that work. Both my parents' operations were 
> successful without complications but I never considered asking his successor 
> if he did surgery.
> 
> A friend of mine went to a somewhat famous surgeon who is the founding 
> partner in a huge practice, back when the founder did surgery full time. The 
> operations were a success, but the planned result was what the surgeon 
> thought the patient should want, not what the patient actually wanted. My new 
> optometrist said "I hate when they play God". (the issue was monovision, 
> which my friend didn't want and the surgeon thought everybody should have). 
> I'm in the "no monovision" camp. I want perfect binocular vision, and if I 
> have to wear reading glasses, so be it. It's better than wearing distance and 
> reading glasses because one eye doesn't do distance and one eye doesn't do 
> near.
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes

On 2024-06-15 21:43, OK DonN via Mercedes wrote:

In several situations I see better than she does now, but the Dr wants 
me to get the cataracts out - but then he's the surgeon as well. I 
think I'll find an ophthalmologist who doesn't do the surgery for a 
second opinion.


I mentioned to my new optometrist that my ophthalmologist (retired five 
years ago) did both my parents' cataracts. He was not keen on the idea, 
thinks that a full time surgeon should do that work. Both my parents' 
operations were successful without complications but I never considered 
asking his successor if he did surgery.


A friend of mine went to a somewhat famous surgeon who is the founding 
partner in a huge practice, back when the founder did surgery full time. 
The operations were a success, but the planned result was what the 
surgeon thought the patient should want, not what the patient actually 
wanted. My new optometrist said "I hate when they play God". (the issue 
was monovision, which my friend didn't want and the surgeon thought 
everybody should have). I'm in the "no monovision" camp. I want perfect 
binocular vision, and if I have to wear reading glasses, so be it. It's 
better than wearing distance and reading glasses because one eye doesn't 
do distance and one eye doesn't do near.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread OK DonN via Mercedes
My wife has had cataract surgery, isn't really happy with the result, but it's 
better than it was. Medicare A took care of 80% and our supplemental 
insurance covered that last 20%. The Dr declared it medically necessary, so no 
issue. There was a cocktail of eye drops they recommended that wasn't covered 
because we don't have part D, but it was ~ $70 - no problem.

In several situations I see better than she does now, but the Dr wants me to 
get the cataracts out - but then he's the surgeon as well. I think I'll find an 
ophthalmologist who doesn't do the surgery for a second opinion.


On Saturday, June 15th, 2024 at 6:12 PM, dan penoff.com via Mercedes 
 wrote:

> 
> 
> Not quite true.
> 
> Medicare Parts A & B cover the diagnosis and treatment of cataracts when it 
> has been deemed “medically necessary.” That’s the catch. In other words, 
> you’ve probably got to be close to legally blind before you qualify.
> 
> I have droopy eyelids like my Mom did, and they’ve flat-out told me that they 
> won’t consider corrective surgery until they’re blocking my vision.
> 
> -D
> 
> > On Jun 15, 2024, at 3:03 PM, Allan Streib via Mercedes 
> > mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
> > 
> > If your insurance covers cataracts get it done. Medicare doesn’t, from what 
> > I’ve heard, so don’t wait until you retire.
> > 
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2024, at 15:52, mitch--- via Mercedes wrote:
> > 
> > > Took my mom to the Costco in East Lansing MI Thursday.
> > > We used the optometrist who rents an office inside Costco, who turned
> > > out to be great.
> > > $79 for full exam. He listened to her complaints of double vision when
> > > fatigued, and spent a lot of time dialing in prism correction to
> > > eliminate it.
> > > 
> > > Now on to the optical department. Found a Japanese titanium frame that
> > > fit her and was very lightweight. $60. She had polycarb trifocals and
> > > wanted to stick with that. OK, lenses, $110, all coatings included in
> > > the base price. For reference, the frame was nicer than she currently
> > > wears, the lenses identical, and she paid $252 (plus $256 from her
> > > insurance coverage) in 2019. OK, we're half done. Found a slightly
> > > larger frame, also titanium, also $60, but made in China like everything
> > > else. Bifocal polarized gray sunglasses, also polycarb, $108. Discount
> > > for buying multiple sets of glasses for the same patient in the same
> > > order: $50. Total $118 for sunglasses, plus $170 for the first pair, is
> > > $288 for glasses.
> > > 
> > > Now about me: I saw the same optometrist today for a 2nd opinion on my
> > > Rx and to fix my computer glasses Rx that my MD wrote for 16 away when I
> > > need 20-24". He wrote my Rx, but referred me to a surgeon and
> > > recommended I don't buy glasses yet. When I went to my MD two months
> > > ago, I fully expected we'd be setting up a referral for cataract
> > > removal, but he didn't think it was time yet. The DO agrees that I'm
> > > having trouble seeing, and thinks everything in my eyes is OK except for
> > > the cataracts. Therefore he thinks the reason my dominate right eye is
> > > blurred is cataracts.
> > > 
> > > Everybody I know says they wished they'd had their cataracts removed
> > > years earlier than they did.
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > http://www.okiebenz.com
> > > 
> > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> > > 
> > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> > 
> > ___
> > http://www.okiebenz.com
> > 
> > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread dan penoff.com via Mercedes
Not quite true.

Medicare Parts A & B cover the diagnosis and treatment of cataracts when it has 
been deemed “medically necessary.” That’s the catch. In other words, you’ve 
probably got to be close to legally blind before you qualify.

I have droopy eyelids like my Mom did, and they’ve flat-out told me that they 
won’t consider corrective surgery until they’re blocking my vision.

-D

> On Jun 15, 2024, at 3:03 PM, Allan Streib via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> If your insurance covers cataracts get it done. Medicare doesn’t, from what 
> I’ve heard, so don’t wait until you retire.
> 
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2024, at 15:52, mitch--- via Mercedes wrote:
>> Took my mom to the Costco in East Lansing MI Thursday.
>> We used the optometrist who rents an office inside Costco, who turned 
>> out to be great.
>> $79 for full exam. He listened to her complaints of double vision when 
>> fatigued, and spent a lot of time dialing in prism correction to 
>> eliminate it.
>> 
>> Now on to the optical department. Found a Japanese titanium frame that 
>> fit her and was very lightweight. $60. She had polycarb trifocals and 
>> wanted to stick with that. OK, lenses, $110, all coatings included in 
>> the base price. For reference, the frame was nicer than she currently 
>> wears, the lenses identical, and she paid $252 (plus $256 from her 
>> insurance coverage) in 2019. OK, we're half done. Found a slightly 
>> larger frame, also titanium, also $60, but made in China like everything 
>> else. Bifocal polarized gray sunglasses, also polycarb, $108. Discount 
>> for buying multiple sets of glasses for the same patient in the same 
>> order: $50. Total $118 for sunglasses, plus $170 for the first pair, is 
>> $288 for glasses.
>> 
>> Now about me: I saw the same optometrist today for a 2nd opinion on my 
>> Rx and to fix my computer glasses Rx that my MD wrote for 16 away when I 
>> need 20-24". He wrote my Rx, but referred me to a surgeon and 
>> recommended I don't buy glasses yet. When I went to my MD two months 
>> ago, I fully expected we'd be setting up a referral for cataract 
>> removal, but he didn't think it was time yet. The DO agrees that I'm 
>> having trouble seeing, and thinks everything in my eyes is OK except for 
>> the cataracts. Therefore he thinks the reason my dominate right eye is 
>> blurred is cataracts.
>> 
>> Everybody I know says they wished they'd had their cataracts removed 
>> years earlier than they did.
>> 
>> ___
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> 
>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread Allan Streib via Mercedes
If your insurance covers cataracts get it done. Medicare doesn’t, from what 
I’ve heard, so don’t wait until you retire.

On Sat, Jun 15, 2024, at 15:52, mitch--- via Mercedes wrote:
> Took my mom to the Costco in East Lansing MI Thursday.
> We used the optometrist who rents an office inside Costco, who turned 
> out to be great.
> $79 for full exam. He listened to her complaints of double vision when 
> fatigued, and spent a lot of time dialing in prism correction to 
> eliminate it.
>
> Now on to the optical department. Found a Japanese titanium frame that 
> fit her and was very lightweight. $60. She had polycarb trifocals and 
> wanted to stick with that. OK, lenses, $110, all coatings included in 
> the base price. For reference, the frame was nicer than she currently 
> wears, the lenses identical, and she paid $252 (plus $256 from her 
> insurance coverage) in 2019. OK, we're half done. Found a slightly 
> larger frame, also titanium, also $60, but made in China like everything 
> else. Bifocal polarized gray sunglasses, also polycarb, $108. Discount 
> for buying multiple sets of glasses for the same patient in the same 
> order: $50. Total $118 for sunglasses, plus $170 for the first pair, is 
> $288 for glasses.
>
> Now about me: I saw the same optometrist today for a 2nd opinion on my 
> Rx and to fix my computer glasses Rx that my MD wrote for 16 away when I 
> need 20-24". He wrote my Rx, but referred me to a surgeon and 
> recommended I don't buy glasses yet. When I went to my MD two months 
> ago, I fully expected we'd be setting up a referral for cataract 
> removal, but he didn't think it was time yet. The DO agrees that I'm 
> having trouble seeing, and thinks everything in my eyes is OK except for 
> the cataracts. Therefore he thinks the reason my dominate right eye is 
> blurred is cataracts.
>
> Everybody I know says they wished they'd had their cataracts removed 
> years earlier than they did.
>
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:52:24 -0400 mitch--- via Mercedes
 wrote:

> Everybody I know says they wished they'd had their cataracts removed 
> years earlier than they did.

Shirley had cataract surgery on both eyes. Her experience was no doubt
complicated by her long-term Type 1 diabetes and by an irritated and
uncooperative retinologist for her second eye.

After the cataract surgery, the back sides of her lens capsules clouded
and caused her to be unable to see well. She ended up having laser
surgery where they made X cuts in the back sides of the lens capsules,
which caused the points of the cut portions to curl back out of the way
so she could see again.

All that considered, the cataract surgery was helpful for her.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses (Costco content)

2024-06-15 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes



Took my mom to the Costco in East Lansing MI Thursday.
We used the optometrist who rents an office inside Costco, who turned 
out to be great.
$79 for full exam. He listened to her complaints of double vision when 
fatigued, and spent a lot of time dialing in prism correction to 
eliminate it.


Now on to the optical department. Found a Japanese titanium frame that 
fit her and was very lightweight. $60. She had polycarb trifocals and 
wanted to stick with that. OK, lenses, $110, all coatings included in 
the base price. For reference, the frame was nicer than she currently 
wears, the lenses identical, and she paid $252 (plus $256 from her 
insurance coverage) in 2019. OK, we're half done. Found a slightly 
larger frame, also titanium, also $60, but made in China like everything 
else. Bifocal polarized gray sunglasses, also polycarb, $108. Discount 
for buying multiple sets of glasses for the same patient in the same 
order: $50. Total $118 for sunglasses, plus $170 for the first pair, is 
$288 for glasses.


Now about me: I saw the same optometrist today for a 2nd opinion on my 
Rx and to fix my computer glasses Rx that my MD wrote for 16 away when I 
need 20-24". He wrote my Rx, but referred me to a surgeon and 
recommended I don't buy glasses yet. When I went to my MD two months 
ago, I fully expected we'd be setting up a referral for cataract 
removal, but he didn't think it was time yet. The DO agrees that I'm 
having trouble seeing, and thinks everything in my eyes is OK except for 
the cataracts. Therefore he thinks the reason my dominate right eye is 
blurred is cataracts.


Everybody I know says they wished they'd had their cataracts removed 
years earlier than they did.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread dan penoff.com via Mercedes
Yeah, while I was scrolling through the various values for my script I saw at 
the end of the ranges there were some serious upcharges. Never noticed that 
before.

And I’ve rarely gone for coatings, as I’m not convinced they’re worth it other 
than for UV and glare. The “blue light from computers” stuff is silly. There’s 
never been a study to show that blue light is a bad thing, however, it does 
affect your wake/sleep cycles, so you should avoid devices that emit blue light 
when you’re planning on going to sleep.

-D

> On Jun 12, 2024, at 6:04 PM, Jim Cathey via Mercedes  
> wrote:
> 
>> got hung up at "upload my Rx", wouldn't let me select material and coatings 
>> to get the price until I upload.
> 
> Not all prescriptions are suitable for all materials.  Makes sense that it 
> won't let you
> go further until it knows more.
> 
> -- Jim
> 
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes
> got hung up at "upload my Rx", wouldn't let me select material and coatings 
> to get the price until I upload.

Not all prescriptions are suitable for all materials.  Makes sense that it 
won't let you
go further until it knows more.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes

On 2024-06-12 20:42, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:

Mitch,

I just did mine on their website up and to the upload of my Rx, and it 
was only another $10 for the Omnilux over “regular” progressives.


Both are probably CAD/CAM on the same machine, with a royalty fee 
(apparently $10 or less) for the patented design. Just don't know how 
hard they'll hit me for coatings and high index material until I upload 
a pic.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread dan penoff.com via Mercedes
Mitch,

I just did mine on their website up and to the upload of my Rx, and it was only 
another $10 for the Omnilux over “regular” progressives.

I’m going to wait to find out what the determination is on my glasses with 
Zenni that are being “reviewed” before I do anything, but I will check into 
these. Thanks a bunch for doing the research and sharing!

Dan

> On Jun 12, 2024, at 5:10 PM, mitch--- via Mercedes  
> wrote:
> 
> While I was typing that message, I got an email from Jeremy at Quest, 
> suggesting that if I use gosmarteyewear.com he'll take personal charge of 
> making sure my order is perfect. I just went there to try to price my lenses, 
> and got hung up at "upload my Rx", wouldn't let me select material and 
> coatings to get the price until I upload.
> Will try again when I'm ready to order.
> If the price comes out too high I'll contact them and ask them to price-match
> BestNewGlasses.com. Quest does the lab work for both web sites, but 
> apparently Jeremy has a closer relationship with the owner of go smart.
> Mitch.
> 
> On 2024-06-12 19:45, mitch--- via Mercedes wrote:
>> We shall see.
>> I hope I'm not gullible, and I'm convinced to the point of spending $280 to 
>> find out, when I can get HD digital progressives from Costco for $185. (not 
>> quite a direct comparison, $280 is MR174 (1.74 refractive index) and $185 is 
>> 1.67 high index. I could get 1.67 NAL for $235)
>> One link I gave is from a professional optician's forum.
>> In three pages, I saw "I'm skeptical, won't bother to try it", "Jeremy sent 
>> my a free demo, and it's better than I expected" and "I've sold ten of these 
>> with zero pushback. Progressives have a xx% rejection rate".
>> What I didn't see was a single case of "tried it and it's snake oil" or 
>> "tried it and it's no big improvement".
>> https://www.optiboard.com/forums/forum/optical-forums/general-optics-and-eyecare-discussion-forum/75139-omnilux#post857901
>> Mitch.
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes
While I was typing that message, I got an email from Jeremy at Quest, 
suggesting that if I use gosmarteyewear.com he'll take personal charge 
of making sure my order is perfect. I just went there to try to price my 
lenses, and got hung up at "upload my Rx", wouldn't let me select 
material and coatings to get the price until I upload.

Will try again when I'm ready to order.
If the price comes out too high I'll contact them and ask them to 
price-match
BestNewGlasses.com. Quest does the lab work for both web sites, but 
apparently Jeremy has a closer relationship with the owner of go smart.

Mitch.

On 2024-06-12 19:45, mitch--- via Mercedes wrote:

We shall see.
I hope I'm not gullible, and I'm convinced to the point of spending 
$280 to find out, when I can get HD digital progressives from Costco 
for $185. (not quite a direct comparison, $280 is MR174 (1.74 
refractive index) and $185 is 1.67 high index. I could get 1.67 NAL for 
$235)


One link I gave is from a professional optician's forum.
In three pages, I saw "I'm skeptical, won't bother to try it", "Jeremy 
sent my a free demo, and it's better than I expected" and "I've sold 
ten of these with zero pushback. Progressives have a xx% rejection 
rate".
What I didn't see was a single case of "tried it and it's snake oil" or 
"tried it and it's no big improvement".

https://www.optiboard.com/forums/forum/optical-forums/general-optics-and-eyecare-discussion-forum/75139-omnilux#post857901

Mitch.



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes

We shall see.
I hope I'm not gullible, and I'm convinced to the point of spending $280 
to find out, when I can get HD digital progressives from Costco for 
$185. (not quite a direct comparison, $280 is MR174 (1.74 refractive 
index) and $185 is 1.67 high index. I could get 1.67 NAL for $235)


One link I gave is from a professional optician's forum.
In three pages, I saw "I'm skeptical, won't bother to try it", "Jeremy 
sent my a free demo, and it's better than I expected" and "I've sold ten 
of these with zero pushback. Progressives have a xx% rejection rate".
What I didn't see was a single case of "tried it and it's snake oil" or 
"tried it and it's no big improvement".

https://www.optiboard.com/forums/forum/optical-forums/general-optics-and-eyecare-discussion-forum/75139-omnilux#post857901

Mitch.

On 2024-06-12 15:54, OK DonN via Mercedes wrote:
Never heard of these before, but they read like snake oil -- so I 
searched for reviews and found this one:


https://www.reddit.com/r/glasses/comments/11kkx94/quest_omnilux_nal/?rdt=37249

I could not use progressives and found the old school tri-focals a much 
better solution for my vision. I'm doubt that these are much better. 
YMMV


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread OK DonN via Mercedes
Never heard of these before, but they read like snake oil -- so I searched for 
reviews and found this one:

https://www.reddit.com/r/glasses/comments/11kkx94/quest_omnilux_nal/?rdt=37249

I could not use progressives and found the old school tri-focals a much better 
solution for my vision. I'm doubt that these are much better. YMMV

On Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 at 11:21 AM, mitch--- via Mercedes 
 wrote:

> 
> 
> Firstly, I've discovered a substitute for crappy progressive lens called
> OmniLux.
> And I'm most likely going to send my existing frames to Florida for this
> lens.
> 
> https://www.qldsamerica.com/omnilux
> 
> https://www.optiboard.com/forums/forum/optical-forums/general-optics-and-eyecare-discussion-forum/75139-omnilux#post857901
> 
> https://www.bestnewglasses.com/lens-replacement
> 
> Now for my question: My last couple of exams, I've struggled during the
> prescription phase. "Which is better, this first or this second"? "Ummm"
> "First, or second?" "Well, they're both bad, but first is
> infinitesimally less bad".
> Then a month later, I go to a retina specialist, and the first thing
> they did was put me in an autorefractor and do a vision test. The 20/20
> line was super clean, and I really had to strain to make out the 20/15
> line. So I asked them for the autorefractor numbers, which luckily did a
> good job of verifying my original Rx.
> 
> Does anybody know how accurate the correction for astigmatism is on
> those autorefraction machines? I'm thinking it's probably more accurate
> than the angle in my Rx, so I'm thinking of ordering lenses made to the
> autorefractor numbers.
> 
> RX: 9.75 2.00 75
> Auto: 9.75 2.25 62
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread mitch--- via Mercedes

Zenni has long been the standard for Chinese opticians.

One of the youtube optometrists said he's gotten it right from Zenni all 
but once, when it was wrong frame, wrong Rx, and he assumed it was 
somebody else's order.


Costco has a great guarantee, and prices are about 10% higher than Zenni 
with a real fitting by a real optician.


I just re-joined Costco Sunday so I could order PAL, computer and 
sunglasses, getting $50/pr off the 2nd and 3rd set. But the Costco 
optician I talked to was a bit hesitant to fit progressives to a strong 
Rx 60 year old who had never tried progressives. Then I remembered 
reading that optiboards thread on OmniLux and started an email 
discussion with the Quest rep who responded to that thread.


The big drawback to Costco is the good lenses are all PAL and single 
vision, and their in-store frame selection is limited, at least in my 
size. Their bifocal and trifocal mostly aren't even available for my Rx, 
and they're all CR-39 and polycarbonate, both of which would be thicker 
than coke bottles if their lab were willing to produce them.


The web site I want to get the OmniLux lenses from tells me to mail the 
frames to the same address as the guy I'm talking to from Quest, which 
invented OmniLux.


On 2024-06-12 13:13, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:

Keep us posted, at least I’m interested.

Our eye doctor was a neighbor lady who always did a great job for us. I 
got my eyes checked right before we left FL and then orderd some new 
glasses from Zenni, who I have used in the past and been happy with.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread Allan Streib via Mercedes
I wear contacts and use readers. I have tried glasses off and on but don't like 
dealing with them. Reminds me that I am way overdue for an exam, last one was 
pre-pandemic.


On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, at 13:13, dan penoff.com via Mercedes wrote:
> Keep us posted, at least I’m interested.
>
> Our eye doctor was a neighbor lady who always did a great job for us. I 
> got my eyes checked right before we left FL and then orderd some new 
> glasses from Zenni, who I have used in the past and been happy with.
>
> When I got my new glasses (progressive lenses as always) off the new 
> prescription, the very top part of the lens where I would be using 
> distance vision was out of focus more thna about 8-10 feet away and 
> farther. I ordered two pairs, and both were that way. My script didn’t 
> change significantly, so I was a bit befuddled about this and returned 
> the glasses for “inspection.” I’m waiting for their determination if 
> they screwed up or not, but I suspect if they didn’t they’ll tell me 
> tough beans and I’ll have two pairs of glasses that are essentially 
> paperweights, not to mention the money.
>
> -D
>

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT: Optometry and glasses

2024-06-12 Thread dan penoff.com via Mercedes
Keep us posted, at least I’m interested.

Our eye doctor was a neighbor lady who always did a great job for us. I got my 
eyes checked right before we left FL and then orderd some new glasses from 
Zenni, who I have used in the past and been happy with.

When I got my new glasses (progressive lenses as always) off the new 
prescription, the very top part of the lens where I would be using distance 
vision was out of focus more thna about 8-10 feet away and farther. I ordered 
two pairs, and both were that way. My script didn’t change significantly, so I 
was a bit befuddled about this and returned the glasses for “inspection.” I’m 
waiting for their determination if they screwed up or not, but I suspect if 
they didn’t they’ll tell me tough beans and I’ll have two pairs of glasses that 
are essentially paperweights, not to mention the money.

-D

> On Jun 12, 2024, at 9:21 AM, mitch--- via Mercedes  
> wrote:
> 
> Firstly, I've discovered a substitute for crappy progressive lens called 
> OmniLux.
> And I'm most likely going to send my existing frames to Florida for this lens.
> 
> https://www.qldsamerica.com/omnilux
> 
> https://www.optiboard.com/forums/forum/optical-forums/general-optics-and-eyecare-discussion-forum/75139-omnilux#post857901
> 
> https://www.bestnewglasses.com/lens-replacement
> 
> Now for my question: My last couple of exams, I've struggled during the 
> prescription phase. "Which is better, this first or this second"? "Ummm" 
> "First, or second?" "Well, they're both bad, but first is infinitesimally 
> less bad".
> Then a month later, I go to a retina specialist, and the first thing they did 
> was put me in an autorefractor and do a vision test. The 20/20 line was super 
> clean, and I really had to strain to make out the 20/15 line. So I asked them 
> for the autorefractor numbers, which luckily did a good job of verifying my 
> original Rx.
> 
> Does anybody know how accurate the correction for astigmatism is on those 
> autorefraction machines? I'm thinking it's probably more accurate than the 
> angle in my Rx, so I'm thinking of ordering lenses made to the autorefractor 
> numbers.
> 
> RX: 9.75 2.00 75
> Auto: 9.75 2.25 62
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com