Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-29 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

"Aqua" is the name Apple have given to their GUI interface design (because it 
looks like liquid). M$ have made an inferior copy for WinXP and have called 
it "Luna". No surprises there.

On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:29, Robert MacLean wrote:
> whats Apples "Aqua"? Is it Mac OS X?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sridhar Dhanapalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Robert MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  
>
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:40, Robert MacLean wrote:
> > > heres my personal stand on M$.
> > > If you think of every one of M$ products with the exception of the
> > > OS's, and imagine all the products ran on a decent OS's (eg Linux
> :
> :)
> :
> > > then think how good M$ really is. There downfall is that they have
>
> a 2
>
> > > bit OS and they charge too much for there products. M$ comes out
>
> with
>
> > > some of the best ideas in GUI's and ways of doing things.
> >
> > The Windos interface pre-Win95 was a cross between that of the Mac
>
> and one
>
> > developed at the Xerox PARC Institute. WinXP's "Luna" interface is a
>
> poor
>
> > rip-off of Apple's "Aqua". People attribute far too much to
>
> Microsoft, often
>
> > since they haven't used the environments that originated these
>
> designs.
>
> > --
> > Sridhar Dhanapalan.
> > "There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
> > LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
> > -- Jeremy S. Anderson
>
> --
> --
>
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > Go to http://.mandrakestore.com

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
"There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-29 Thread Michael Scottaline

On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:29:36 +0200
"Robert MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was inspired to comment:

> whats Apples "Aqua"? Is it Mac OS X?

It's the user interface for OSX.
Mike
-- 
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it
helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons,
but at the very least you need a beer."
- Frank Zappa


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-28 Thread paul rodríguez

Try typing "about:mozilla" in you mozilla address bar.

- Paul Rodríguez


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-28 Thread rand



> From: Matt Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:45:18 -0500
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  
> 
> This article is pre OS X. I've also never used OS X. I do know from reading
> about OS X, Apple took a few steps backwards in interface design. In fact
> earlier in OS X's development Apple was taking so many steps backwards that
> it caused me to get a PC instead of another Mac. They since fixed a lot of
> the things they were going to do poorly (but not all of them).
> 
> Matt

Matt,

An unreleased OS caused you to switch platforms?  Why?  I'm not bashing here
or anything, but this just strikes me as incredibly strange.  I think that
if you based all your decisions like that then I'm surprised your using
computers at all :)

Heh, I just had to erase a whole paragraph here, re-reading it I realised
that my now 25 hours of no sleep began to make this message into almost an
attack which it defiantly is not.

I am using OSX on a few machines here at home and my one at work, I'm also
using win 2k on a home built PC, and mandrake linux 8 on an ipaq.  All of
them have flaws, infact I have reinstalled linux s many times it's not
funny (all after clean installs, for the longest time I could not get any
networking happening at all, then tried lynx, and suddenly _everything_ was
working...reeely strange...but I digress). The only reason I mention all
of this is for people to say WOW what a guy... er no, actually it's just me
trying to understand that comment :)  I think it's just because I hate to
see anyone leave the mac platform for whatever reason (my platform of choice
over _any_ of the others), but I was not wanting to look like just a typical
mac user who has had no experience outside of the comfy mac os.

And just to say it, I LOVE OSX ... I'm running xfree86 on it in rootless
mode right along side the Aqua stuff, it's great. It has also given me much
less problems that linux has. :)  OSX is also what got me into the command
line, something which I had never touched before, which led to me playing
with linux to see what all the fuss was about, and then to here, ahh,
heartwarming isn't it :)

Now if I could just stop bashing my head against linux trying to get
Globecom.net/jukebox installed, This OS would rock.

before anyone takes offence at this, remember  : SLEEP DEPRIVED :)
(tho I'm sure there are a few on this list that will take that 25hours with
a  "beginner!"  :)

rand




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



RE: Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-27 Thread Mark Johnson

Yup, I aggree... and this is also true of other scripting languages like PHP
and PERL... but maybe I'm just being too much of a purist. I think you also
have to understand that a lot of so called "crappy" programmers never had
anyone show them how to write code so it's not their fault. My wife is
learning ActionScripting for Flash at her new job.  There is a "senior"
programmer that she works under. I have been working with her at home on her
programming skils, and the quality of her work now surpasses the her
manager's work.  But it's hard to fault either of them because they are
simply ignorant of programming practices and plus they don't really care
because they don't see themselves as programmers.

I mean you just don't see a lot of discussions about design patterns and
application modeling in the VB, PHP, PERL, etc.. newsgroups... 

It's too bad really...  

As linux becomes more and more popular and as time goes on some sort of
basic programming skill will be required -- kind of like typing was when I
was in high school.

> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  
> 
> 
> That must be a popular title. I've seen more crappy 
> prgorammers writing in VB than in any other language. ;-)
> 
> Too many pepole seem to think that just because a language 
> such as VB makes it easy to program, real programming skills 
> are not actually required.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay DeKing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:56:52 -0400
> Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  
> 
> and today I bought a book on (cringe) VBscript, aka "VB for crappy
> programmers," so I can customize (i.e. make functional) some 
> new software my
> department at work just bought.
> 
> 
> 
> 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-27 Thread Jim Dawson

That must be a popular title. I've seen more crappy prgorammers writing in VB than in 
any other language. ;-)

Too many pepole seem to think that just because a language such as VB makes it easy to 
program, real programming skills are not actually required.

-Original Message-
From: Jay DeKing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:56:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  

and today I bought a book on (cringe) VBscript, aka "VB for crappy
programmers," so I can customize (i.e. make functional) some new software my
department at work just bought.





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-27 Thread Charles Punch

Robert MacLean wrote:
> 
> heres my personal stand on M$.
> If you think of every one of M$ products with the exception of the
> OS's, and imagine all the products ran on a decent OS's (eg Linux :)
> then think how good M$ really is. There downfall is that they have a 2
> bit OS and they charge too much for there products. M$ comes out with
> some of the best ideas in GUI's and ways of doing things.

This is my take on it. MS is an advertiser. The sell illusions. They mix
in a few real products to trick you into thinking that they are actually
selling you something, when in fact, they are trying to slowly chain you
into a system in which you cannot buy anything, but have to rent it. Do
you think I am being paranoid? If so, please state why?

ShalomOut
  Chal
Elder PCUSA
Registered Linux user # 217118



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-27 Thread Matt Greer

on 8/27/01 7:58 AM, Mark Johnson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> This isn't really on topic here, but does anyone know of any sites the
> compare what UI aspects of Microsoft are poor in relation to Mac (and for
> that matter KDE and GNOME).  I always hear the Mac's UI is superior than MS,
> but to tell you the truth, I've never heard that claim backed up. It's very
> hard for me to get around Mac, and I realize that it's because I'm so use to
> Windows but I figured that I'm a smart enough guy that I should be able to
> figure it out.

These guys are a bit Mac biased, but they do a good job pointing out the
differences

http://www.mackido.com/Interface/

A particularly good example is how to close a window in MacOS or Windows

http://www.mackido.com/Interface/windows_close.html

> (ps: I'm running OS X at home

This article is pre OS X. I've also never used OS X. I do know from reading
about OS X, Apple took a few steps backwards in interface design. In fact
earlier in OS X's development Apple was taking so many steps backwards that
it caused me to get a PC instead of another Mac. They since fixed a lot of
the things they were going to do poorly (but not all of them).

Matt


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-27 Thread Mark Johnson

This isn't really on topic here, but does anyone know of any sites the
compare what UI aspects of Microsoft are poor in relation to Mac (and for
that matter KDE and GNOME).  I always hear the Mac's UI is superior than MS,
but to tell you the truth, I've never heard that claim backed up. It's very
hard for me to get around Mac, and I realize that it's because I'm so use to
Windows but I figured that I'm a smart enough guy that I should be able to
figure it out.

Some people say the Windows users try to hard and impose too much complexity
on the Mac's UI and that's why they have so much trouble -- that they just
need to relax more... I guess so, but I'd like to see a side by side
comparison of where MS dropped the ball as far as UI design.

(ps: I'm running OS X at home, you no longer have the ability to position a
background, you can only tile it.  Now, I might be just stupid and can't
find the "center" preference, but if I'm right in believing that you no
longer have a choice in positioning the background I'd have to say Mac
goofed up on this one)


> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > heres my personal stand on M$.
> > If you think of every one of M$ products with the exception of the
> > OS's, and imagine all the products ran on a decent OS's (eg Linux :)
> > then think how good M$ really is. There downfall is that 
> they have a 2
> > bit OS and they charge too much for there products. M$ 
> comes out with
> > some of the best ideas in GUI's and ways of doing things.
> 
> Microsoft's Mac programs are great. I believe because they 
> are constrained
> within Apple's human interface guidelines. But MS and good 
> GUI really don't
> mix. A close study of MacOS and Windows really shows how poor 
> the Windows
> GUI is. Apple is referred to quite a bit in the world of 
> interface design,
> and their book on the human interface is practically canon.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-27 Thread Matt Greer


- Original Message -
From: "Robert MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> heres my personal stand on M$.
> If you think of every one of M$ products with the exception of the
> OS's, and imagine all the products ran on a decent OS's (eg Linux :)
> then think how good M$ really is. There downfall is that they have a 2
> bit OS and they charge too much for there products. M$ comes out with
> some of the best ideas in GUI's and ways of doing things.

Microsoft's Mac programs are great. I believe because they are constrained
within Apple's human interface guidelines. But MS and good GUI really don't
mix. A close study of MacOS and Windows really shows how poor the Windows
GUI is. Apple is referred to quite a bit in the world of interface design,
and their book on the human interface is practically canon.

Matt


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-27 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:40, Robert MacLean wrote:
> heres my personal stand on M$.
> If you think of every one of M$ products with the exception of the
> OS's, and imagine all the products ran on a decent OS's (eg Linux :)
> then think how good M$ really is. There downfall is that they have a 2
> bit OS and they charge too much for there products. M$ comes out with
> some of the best ideas in GUI's and ways of doing things.

The Windos interface pre-Win95 was a cross between that of the Mac and one 
developed at the Xerox PARC Institute. WinXP's "Luna" interface is a poor 
rip-off of Apple's "Aqua". People attribute far too much to Microsoft, often 
since they haven't used the environments that originated these designs.

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
"There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-26 Thread Robert MacLean

heres my personal stand on M$.
If you think of every one of M$ products with the exception of the
OS's, and imagine all the products ran on a decent OS's (eg Linux :)
then think how good M$ really is. There downfall is that they have a 2
bit OS and they charge too much for there products. M$ comes out with
some of the best ideas in GUI's and ways of doing things.

Robert MacLean
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Scottaline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  


> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:14:43 +0100
> "Adams, Jamie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
>
> AJ> Okay, flame me too.. i liked IE for windows, but i dont miss it
that
> AJ> much, im getting used to the Opera way of doing things..
> AJ> Jamie Adams
> ==
> What i find most "similar" to IE (at least a feature that I
particularly
> liked) about Opera 5.x is the ability to get rid of the *entire*
interface
> (at least the visible portion) and have "nothing but page" showing.
I
> have a 19" monitor, but still like to fill it withe the page..., no
> vestige of browser visible, not even the title bar!!  Right mouse
click
> gives one all the features you are likely to need for day to day
browsing.
>  Others are available via simple keyboard commands.
> About the only M$ windows app I truly _miss_ is PowerPoint.  Yeah
I've
> tried SO and Applix presentation programs.  They're OK, but they're
NOT
> PowerPoint.  Read an interview very recently in which Linus even
claimed
> to like PowerPoint.  He often used it for presentations about his
favorite
> OS ;-)
> Mike
>
> --
> "Always remember, I have taken more out of alcohol than
> alcohol has taken out of me."
> --Winston Churchill
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>


--
--


> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
>




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-26 Thread Pascal Goguey

Hello,

>16:9 And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by how you use worldly
>wealth, so that when it runs out you will be welcomed into the eternal
>homes. 16:10 "The one who is faithful in a very little is also faithful
>in much, and the one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest
>in much. 16:11 If then you haven't been trustworthy in handling worldly
>wealth, who will entrust you with the true riches? 16:12 And if you
>haven't been trustworthy with someone else's property, who will give you
>your own

Localization comment:
For American readers, 16:9 ... 16:12 should be read
4:9 PM ... 4:12 PM.

Pascal




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Michel Clasquin

On Friday 24 August 2001 16:14, Robert MacLean wrote:

> isn't mac os x, based on unix?
> and doesn't that mean with a but of modifying (a very small bit) the
> stuff written for it should work on linux?

OS X uses a proprietary display system. I imagine that rewriting apps that 
use it for X Window would be non-trivial. Possible, but not easy.

> or atleast the mac os x gui should work, and thus apps for the gui
> should work.

It won't work without major recompiling, and for that you'd need Apple to 
release the source.  And before that Adobe would have to release the source 
to the PDF-based display system  ...

-- 
Michel Clasquin, D Litt et Phil (Unisa)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/unisa.ac.za   http://www.geocities.com/clasqm
This message was posted from a Microsoft-free PC

To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 22:26, Charles Punch wrote:
> chris swain wrote:
> > If linux has many christian influences.  What religion is microsoft?
>
> I think Linux is diverse in it's religious influences, not specifically
> Christian. MS is probably in danger of worshipping the false God, Mamon
> (Money).
>
> 16:9 And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by how you use worldly
> wealth, so that when it runs out you will be welcomed into the eternal
> homes. 16:10 "The one who is faithful in a very little is also faithful
> in much, and the one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest
> in much. 16:11 If then you haven't been trustworthy in handling worldly
> wealth, who will entrust you with the true riches? 16:12 And if you
> haven't been trustworthy with someone else's property, who will give you
> your own
>
> Linus Torvalds certainly made himself a lot of friends by sharing his
> code with the world, instead of being greedy. Yes I have heard that he
> is an atheist, but that is irrelevant. Ghandi was not a Christian
> either, but he exhibited many Christlike characteristics. Those
> qualities are inherent in our inner man. The lust for money (power) is
> inherent in our carnal nature.

It's certainly not a Christian thing. It'd be more like a moral thing. The 
major religions of the world share a very common set of morality. After that, 
things begin to diverge...

BTW, Gandhi was a Jain, essentially a very strict Hindu. Hinduism would have 
to be one of the most tolerant and inclusive religions out there. In India, 
they celebrate just about every major religious occasion, no matter what 
religion it comes from (any reason to party :-).

> ShalomOut
>   Chal
> Elder PCUSA
> Registered Linux user # 217118
>
> Some men rob you with a six-gun -- others with a fountain pen.
>   -- Woodie Guthrie

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
"There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux and RE: [newbie] Re: Modem Busy/Support

2001-08-24 Thread d

LURKER here,

These two subjects are NOT what I would call appropoe for this Mail 
List.  ONE, slamming others is NOT very NICE even though you may have 
thingys correct or NOT.  TWO, the subject is NOT correct for what is placed 
in each message.  I do thank you for responding but if the subject is 
changed then change what is in that field, SUBJECT:.  These types of 
messages should be addressed directly to the individuals you are wanting to 
communicate this information NOT to the LIST.

This is what gives this LIST a BLACK EYE in PROFESSIONALISM.  Most of the 
info asked for is received with the intent of assisting.  If you want to 
have this type of discussion then create your own Mail List for that and 
let those of us that want to learn our systems to the best of our abilities 
to this List.

Thank YOU,
TIA,
'd'
Don Hodges
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
San Antonio, Texas




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread steve

On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Robert MacLean wrote:
> isn't mac os x, based on unix?
> and doesn't that mean with a but of modifying (a very small bit) the
> stuff written for it should work on linux?
> or atleast the mac os x gui should work, and thus apps for the gui
> should work.
> 
> or am i way off?

Geez another top poster. 

Mac OS X is the Quartz technology on top of the Open Source Darwin,
which is based on an older version of BSD. So apps written in the Coca
language will only work on Quartz, not on the underlying Darwin.

So no they won't work on Linux.

-- 
Steve - Toronto ICQ 35454764
  
  /~\
'If you're not a rebel when you're 20 you've got no heart; if \ /
 you're not establishment when you're 30 you've got no brain.  X
 Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML email/ \




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Matt Greer

on 8/24/01 9:14 AM, Robert MacLean at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> isn't mac os x, based on unix?

Yup, it's based on BSD.

> and doesn't that mean with a but of modifying (a very small bit) the
> stuff written for it should work on linux?

Some unix apps out now that run on Linux also have an available MacOS X
counterpart. I've also noticed some apps I've installed from source talk
about compiling for OSX in the readmes.

> or atleast the mac os x gui should work, and thus apps for the gui
> should work.
> 
> or am i way off?
> 
Beats me. But I'd be willing to bet getting the source for the gui would be
nigh impossible :)

Apple does offer a free OS which is basically the unix core of Mac OS X.
Although the name escapes me at the moment.

Matt


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Adams, Jamie

Okay, flame me too.. i liked IE for windows, but i dont miss it that
much, im getting used to the Opera way of doing things..
Jamie Adams
Housing Assistant
-
Tel:  (01723) 507543
Fax: (01723) 355862


>--
>From:  Matt Greer[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Reply To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent:  24 August 2001 14:46
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:   Re: [newbie] religion in linux  
>
><>
>on 8/24/01 8:14 AM, Robert MacLean at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> okay okay I appologise, maybe a bit excessive.but you don't have
>> to work with internet explorer all day every day, after a while you
>> start losing it.
>> 
>
>Heh heh. I have to admit I wish IE was available for Linux :)
>
>But don't flame me too hard. I'm coming from a Mac perspective where IE is
>quite good, as is Outlook Express for the Mac.
>
>Matt
>
>
>_
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>_
>This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
>delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
>information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
>Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>

_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Robert MacLean

I agree that IE is very good (duck rotten fruit), what bugs me is I
have to develop web apps, and IE does everything differently, very
differently. it's annoying have to code 2 different versions because
M$ is too lazy to follow the standards that are setup.


Robert MacLean
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  


> on 8/24/01 8:14 AM, Robert MacLean at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > okay okay I appologise, maybe a bit excessive.but you don't
have
> > to work with internet explorer all day every day, after a while
you
> > start losing it.
> >
>
> Heh heh. I have to admit I wish IE was available for Linux :)
>
> But don't flame me too hard. I'm coming from a Mac perspective where
IE is
> quite good, as is Outlook Express for the Mac.
>
> Matt
>
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>


--
--


> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
>




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Matt Greer

on 8/24/01 8:14 AM, Robert MacLean at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> okay okay I appologise, maybe a bit excessive.but you don't have
> to work with internet explorer all day every day, after a while you
> start losing it.
> 

Heh heh. I have to admit I wish IE was available for Linux :)

But don't flame me too hard. I'm coming from a Mac perspective where IE is
quite good, as is Outlook Express for the Mac.

Matt


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Charles Punch

chris swain wrote:
> 
> If linux has many christian influences.  What religion is microsoft?

I think Linux is diverse in it's religious influences, not specifically
Christian. MS is probably in danger of worshipping the false God, Mamon
(Money).

16:9 And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by how you use worldly
wealth, so that when it runs out you will be welcomed into the eternal
homes. 16:10 "The one who is faithful in a very little is also faithful
in much, and the one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest
in much. 16:11 If then you haven't been trustworthy in handling worldly
wealth, who will entrust you with the true riches? 16:12 And if you
haven't been trustworthy with someone else's property, who will give you
your own

Linus Torvalds certainly made himself a lot of friends by sharing his
code with the world, instead of being greedy. Yes I have heard that he
is an atheist, but that is irrelevant. Ghandi was not a Christian
either, but he exhibited many Christlike characteristics. Those
qualities are inherent in our inner man. The lust for money (power) is
inherent in our carnal nature. 

ShalomOut
  Chal
Elder PCUSA
Registered Linux user # 217118

Some men rob you with a six-gun -- others with a fountain pen.
-- Woodie Guthrie



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Robert MacLean

okay okay I appologise, maybe a bit excessive.but you don't have
to work with internet explorer all day every day, after a while you
start losing it.


Robert MacLean
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Scottaline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in linux  


> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:12:00 +0200
> "Robert MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was inspired to comment:
>
> > MICROSOFT IS THE EVIL!!
> > MICROSOFT IS THE DARK SIDE!
> ==
> I absolutely agree!
> ===
> > MICROSOFT IS YOUR MOTHER IN LAW!
> 
> Get a grip on yourself, Robert!!  These types of out of control,
blinded
> by passion and hate, diatribes will have people ignoring you as a
ranting
> ad raving looney!  Please calm down and be rational.  The use of
such
> abusive language is totally uncalled for on this list, even when
referring
> to M$.
> Chill   ;o)
> Mike
>
> --
> "You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline -
it
> helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear
weapons,
> but at the very least you need a beer."
> - Frank Zappa
>
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>


--
--


> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
>




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Michael Scottaline

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:12:00 +0200
"Robert MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was inspired to comment:

> MICROSOFT IS THE EVIL!!
> MICROSOFT IS THE DARK SIDE!
==
I absolutely agree!
===
> MICROSOFT IS YOUR MOTHER IN LAW!

Get a grip on yourself, Robert!!  These types of out of control, blinded
by passion and hate, diatribes will have people ignoring you as a ranting
ad raving looney!  Please calm down and be rational.  The use of such
abusive language is totally uncalled for on this list, even when referring
to M$.
Chill   ;o)
Mike

-- 
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it
helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons,
but at the very least you need a beer."
- Frank Zappa


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread Robert MacLean

MICROSOFT IS THE EVIL!!
MICROSOFT IS THE DARK SIDE!
MICROSOFT IS YOUR MOTHER IN LAW!


Robert MacLean
- Original Message -
From: "chris swain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: [newbie] religion in linux


> If linux has many christian influences.  What religion is microsoft?
>
> Jehova's witnesses?
> Satanists?
>
>


--
--


> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
>




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] religion in linux

2001-08-24 Thread chris swain

If linux has many christian influences.  What religion is microsoft?

Jehova's witnesses?
Satanists?



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-17 Thread Robert Fargher

On August 14, 2001 10:31 pm, Paul wrote:

> I assume the 'daemon' is because of the fact that it is a program/process
> that is running in memory without a fixed terminal. 

  Daemon = Disk And Environment MONitor

-- 
Cheers,
Robert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-16 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

The web site for this book (http://www.hackerethic.org/) has both the Preface 
(http://www.hackerethic.org/preface.html) and Chapter 1 
(http://www.hackerethic.org/chapter01.html) available for free. Also of 
interest is the Writings section (http://www.hackerethic.org/writings/).

One of these writings is intended to be somewhat of a sequel to Eric S. 
Raymond's famous work "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" 
(http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/). This piece is 
credited for persuading Netscape to open up its code, the first such instance 
of a major commercial company embracing open source. This, in turn, set the 
path for companies like IBM to accept open source development.


On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 03:44, Charles Punch wrote:
> It seems we agree on at least one point, that is, that the names of
> various shells, progs, processes etc. are probably puns or double
> meanings done in a light vein. However the concepts in the GPL have
> roots in most religions or at least in spirituality. You know, don't be
> ruled by greed etc. By the way Linus Torvalds wrote the preface for the
> book I mentioned. In case you didn't catch it the first time , it's "The
> Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age" by Pekka Himanen.
> The preface by Linus is "Prologue: what makes hackers Tick? a.k.a.
> Linus's Law, by Linus Torvalds." One more thing and then I'll hold my
> peace, (true) Christianity should not be confused with religion. I did
> not for one minute mean anything like that.
>
> ShalomOut
>   Chal
> Elder PCUSA
> Registered Linux user # 217118

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
"There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-15 Thread Charles Punch


> 
> > One more thing and then I'll hold my peace, (true) Christianity
> > should not be confused with religion. I did not for one minute
> >mean anything like that.
> >
> Yeah, we could quibble with words, but I think I understand what you are a
> getting at.  

My whole point was "don't read too much into things"...
> 
Maybe I didn't express it properly, but that's exactly what I was
getting at. The book I mentioned does not base the spiritual aspect of
open source on religion or cute little double meanings. It speaks of an
attitude, not dogma. I would be hard for me to imagine hackers
subscribing to any kind of doctrine, no matter how liberal. I was not
implying that Linus Torvalds is a religious person, in fact in his
preface, he ponders the reason why he was asked to write it. Yet he did,
so evidently he was not afraid to be open minded and consider the
possibility of there being another perspective. I guess what *I'm*
trying to say, is that if you're gonna look for spirituality in
something, you've got to look in the right place, i.e., if your
religion, spirituality or whatever you call it (we all have it in one
form or another), is based on shallow principles, then it's effect on
you will be small. Wait, that almost made sense! Yeah that's it! Forget
all that other stuff I said. 

ShalomOut
  Chal
Elder PCUSA
Registered Linux user # 217118



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-15 Thread Charles Punch

It seems we agree on at least one point, that is, that the names of
various shells, progs, processes etc. are probably puns or double
meanings done in a light vein. However the concepts in the GPL have
roots in most religions or at least in spirituality. You know, don't be
ruled by greed etc. By the way Linus Torvalds wrote the preface for the 
book I mentioned. In case you didn't catch it the first time , it's "The
Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age" by Pekka Himanen.
The preface by Linus is "Prologue: what makes hackers Tick? a.k.a.
Linus's Law, by Linus Torvalds." One more thing and then I'll hold my
peace, (true) Christianity should not be confused with religion. I did
not for one minute mean anything like that. 

ShalomOut
  Chal
Elder PCUSA
Registered Linux user # 217118

Mark Johnson wrote:
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Charles Punch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:23 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!
> >
> >
> > manuels would have aquired. It would seem to me, that if someone were
> > looking into whether there is a possibility of religious roots in
> > "daemons" and "ncurses," that they must have at least a basic working
> > knowledge of Linux.
> >
> 
> FWIW, the original meaning of "daemon" means "strong spiritual/natural
> force" and it was used in connection with both good and evil. If you look up
> this word on dictionary.com you'll find the more current meaning (demon); I
> will need to look around and find the original definition.  I think I found
> it originally discussed in Rollo May's "Love and Will", however, if someone
> knows where the history of UNIX/Linux/computer science that discuss terms
> can be found I'd really be interested. I would bet that to serious UNIX
> folks the general connotation of the words "daemon" and "demon" mean two
> different things for them even outside of the computing environment.
> 
> Anyway as for "ncurses" or "curses" I couldn't tell you, however, if you
> are looking for religious roots in linux I think you will find that they are
> not serious religious bindings but rather a sarcastic play on religious
> thems and idioms (especially BASH).  Many programmers for example will use
> 666 as a number when debugging programs or creating data for test cases.
> Not because they are satanist (or Christians) but because they are playful
> programmers. Then there's always SATAN (Security Administrator Tool for
> Analyzing Networks), more playful programmers!
> 
> I think it's safe to say that most computer folks are probably
> anti-establishment (& anti-church), but probably not not anti-spiritual.  A
> lot of the hackers in the 60's and 70's where hippies. Most are probably not
> very extroverted and consequently suspicious of anything organized, or like
> to play games with languages (both human and computer).  You can see this
> language play in perl programmers...
> 
> In my opinion, the religious themes in linux (or for that matter computer
> science) is pretty trivial and purely for fun. There's also the whole "I am
> God" mentality for sysadmins and programmers (compare Torvalds opening line
> at a user's group meeting: "I am your God").  If you've ever looked through
> enough source code you'll find a ton of allusions to The Lord of the Rings
> (admittedly a book based on religious themes).
> 
> Western Religion is part of our cultural and literary history here in
> America and Europe whether you are a church-goer or not, so they are bound
> to show up in some variation in our contemporary lives and consequently in
> Linux.
> 
> (ps: this thread could go south really fast, we should be careful not to
> translate "religion" to mean "Catholicism" or "Protestantism" or etc...
> "religio" means "to link back" and there is a reason why the word religion
> is used to address these themes that are much larger than Catholicism,
> Buddhism, etc...  What I am getting at is becareful to think that there is a
> Christian sentiment running through Linux, but rather what seems religious
> is rather a play on ideas that represent the big primal themes and symbology
> that humans have had to deal with since the beginning.)
> 
>   
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-15 Thread John Rye

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:04:48 -0500
Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



> (ps: this thread could go south really fast, we should be careful not to
> translate "religion" to mean "Catholicism" or "Protestantism" or etc...
> "religio" means "to link back" and there is a reason why the word religion
> is used to address these themes that are much larger than Catholicism,
> Buddhism, etc...  What I am getting at is becareful to think that there is a
> Christian sentiment running through Linux, but rather what seems religious
> is rather a play on ideas that represent the big primal themes and symbology
> that humans have had to deal with since the beginning.)

Well done that man!!

Ok hows about a bit of associated associations - (just to keep this thoroughly on
topic )

MarkJohnson
MarkPhysic
Johnson  Son of John
Mark&John  Evangalists of Old
JohnFisherman
Fish water
Water  floats
Floats  bird
Bird  floats
Floats  swims
Swims fish
Fish  food
Foodfisherman
fishermanfisherbird
Fisherbirdpenguin!

Now I hear that call - must off and make my ritual supplications to the
severely handicapped avian which makes it life bearable by attempting to
reduce the invasion of the genus picsae in disdain of the great distractors
the god Linus.

Morning all - had my coffee!!!


-- 
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
   (The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)
 Registered Linux User: 102826ICQ#: 89345394



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-15 Thread Jim Kempton

On Wednesday 15 August 2001 10:04, Mark Johnson wrote:

>
> FWIW, the original meaning of "daemon" means "strong spiritual/natural
> force" and it was used in 
 

AMEN

Here endeth the lesson?
-- 
MJK Systems-IT Consultants & Training
Phone/Fax-020 8697 4912
Mobile-077 4066 3292
Linux User #-196384



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-15 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:42, A V Flinsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 August 2001 01:31, Paul wrote:
> > For that we have Jesux, a linux for Christians:
> >
> >http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Node/4081/ 
>
> That is onbe of the funniest pages that I have seen in a long time
>
>--
> Alex
>
> Steve Balmer, CEO of Microsoft, recently referred to LINUX as a cancer.
> Unsurprisingly, that's incorrect; LINUX was released on August 25th,
> 1991 and is therefore a Virgo.

Steve also called GNU/Linux communist. If that were true, how could a 
Christian distribution exist, given that communism is aethiestic? Food for 
thought...

That site was sooo funny!

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
"There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-15 Thread Mark Johnson

> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Punch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!
> 
> 
> manuels would have aquired. It would seem to me, that if someone were
> looking into whether there is a possibility of religious roots in
> "daemons" and "ncurses," that they must have at least a basic working
> knowledge of Linux. 
>

FWIW, the original meaning of "daemon" means "strong spiritual/natural
force" and it was used in connection with both good and evil. If you look up
this word on dictionary.com you'll find the more current meaning (demon); I
will need to look around and find the original definition.  I think I found
it originally discussed in Rollo May's "Love and Will", however, if someone
knows where the history of UNIX/Linux/computer science that discuss terms
can be found I'd really be interested. I would bet that to serious UNIX
folks the general connotation of the words "daemon" and "demon" mean two
different things for them even outside of the computing environment.

Anyway as for "ncurses" or "curses" I couldn't tell you, however, if you
are looking for religious roots in linux I think you will find that they are
not serious religious bindings but rather a sarcastic play on religious
thems and idioms (especially BASH).  Many programmers for example will use
666 as a number when debugging programs or creating data for test cases.
Not because they are satanist (or Christians) but because they are playful
programmers. Then there's always SATAN (Security Administrator Tool for
Analyzing Networks), more playful programmers!

I think it's safe to say that most computer folks are probably
anti-establishment (& anti-church), but probably not not anti-spiritual.  A
lot of the hackers in the 60's and 70's where hippies. Most are probably not
very extroverted and consequently suspicious of anything organized, or like
to play games with languages (both human and computer).  You can see this
language play in perl programmers...

In my opinion, the religious themes in linux (or for that matter computer
science) is pretty trivial and purely for fun. There's also the whole "I am
God" mentality for sysadmins and programmers (compare Torvalds opening line
at a user's group meeting: "I am your God").  If you've ever looked through
enough source code you'll find a ton of allusions to The Lord of the Rings
(admittedly a book based on religious themes).

Western Religion is part of our cultural and literary history here in
America and Europe whether you are a church-goer or not, so they are bound
to show up in some variation in our contemporary lives and consequently in
Linux.

(ps: this thread could go south really fast, we should be careful not to
translate "religion" to mean "Catholicism" or "Protestantism" or etc...
"religio" means "to link back" and there is a reason why the word religion
is used to address these themes that are much larger than Catholicism,
Buddhism, etc...  What I am getting at is becareful to think that there is a
Christian sentiment running through Linux, but rather what seems religious
is rather a play on ideas that represent the big primal themes and symbology
that humans have had to deal with since the beginning.)




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-15 Thread Charles Punch

Thanx (err, I mean thanks). I stand corrected. However, I think you may
have missed my point. With all due respect to Mr. Bourne and Mr.
Webster, my point was not about the history of Linux, nor about the
technical aspects of spelling in regard to that noble end. Even though
this is a newbie list, I assumed it was understood that I was speaking
of the second part of a double meaning or a pun on on Mr. Bourne's name.
If there were no double meaning implied, bash could just as well have
been named "sbSHell" (for second Bourne Shell) or "bSHell2." Even in the
secular vernacular, the term "Born Again" is well known. 
Actually it is a misnomer. The proper term is "born of the Spirit" or
born from above. Since we were discussing the possibility of spiritual
roots in Linux, I thought we were already established in the technical,
at least of the particulars being discussed, if not in the basic
knowledge which anyone who has read past the table of contents in most
manuels would have aquired. It would seem to me, that if someone were
looking into whether there is a possibility of religious roots in
"daemons" and "ncurses," that they must have at least a basic working
knowledge of Linux. I am no expert myself, but I wouldn't try to get
spiritual meaning out of something that I don't understand the basic
essentials of. The main point I was trying to make is that, to
understand spirituality (in any arena), one must get past lables, catch
phrases and buzz words. Spirituality, in our time, has become a seperate
entity from the rest of our lives. I think it is time we re-connected
it. The book I mentioned is written from that point of view. It was a
great comfort to know that someone else is thinking along those same
lines.

ShalomOut
  Chal
Elder PCUSA
Registered Linux user # 217118

Dyslectic not are I!


Paul Wrote:
> 
> > As long as were digging deep into the spiritual side, BASH stands for
> > "born again shell." It seems to me that these kind of things are just a
> > result of people naming things from the vernacular.
> 
> Beg to differ... It is Bourne Again SHell.
> The original Bourne shell had some strange things in it, and someone improved
> that.
> The original Bourne shell was written by a mr. Bourne, and it incorporates
> the goodies of csh and ksh.
> Paul
> 
>   
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-14 Thread Paul

> As long as were digging deep into the spiritual side, BASH stands for
> "born again shell." It seems to me that these kind of things are just a
> result of people naming things from the vernacular.

Beg to differ... It is Bourne Again SHell.
The original Bourne shell had some strange things in it, and someone improved
that.
The original Bourne shell was written by a mr. Bourne, and it incorporates
the goodies of csh and ksh.
Paul




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-14 Thread Charles A. Punch

As long as were digging deep into the spiritual side, BASH stands for
"born again shell." It seems to me that these kind of things are just a
result of people naming things from the vernacular. If you want to
seriously look into the spiritual side of Open Source, check out "The
Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age" by Pekka Himanen.
I'm not sure where to find it. I picked it up on a trip to Baltimore
recently and it was the only copy in the bookstore. I'm sure a search
engine would find it for you though.

ShalomOut
  Chal
Elder PCUSA
Registered Linux user # 217118


Andrei Raevsky wrote:
> 
> Call me curious, or call my plain stupid.  But I cannot but help notice
> stuff such as the names "daemons" or "ncurses" or the FreeBSD logo with a
> little devil on it. Could anyone explain why this is so?  Is there some
> historical reason for this, or is this just a coencidence, or just as in
> rock bands - a way of looking more interesting?
> 
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> 
>   
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-14 Thread Paul

> Call me curious, or call my plain stupid.  But I cannot but help notice 
> stuff such as the names "daemons" or "ncurses" or the FreeBSD logo with a 
> little devil on it. Could anyone explain why this is so?  Is there some 
> historical reason for this, or is this just a coencidence, or just as in 
> rock bands - a way of looking more interesting?

I assume the 'daemon' is because of the fact that it is a program/process
that is running in memory without a fixed terminal. It's like a ghost. But
a ghost process is another thing, it is a runaway application.
I can't believe that this is a religious thing.
For that we have Jesux, a linux for Christians:

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Node/4081/  :

Welcome to the Jesux home page
The distribution that will not lead you into temptation

http://www.lowendmac.com/linux/jesux.shtml   :

Jesux: Sanctified Linux?

Paul




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] religion in Linux?!

2001-08-14 Thread Andrei Raevsky

Call me curious, or call my plain stupid.  But I cannot but help notice 
stuff such as the names "daemons" or "ncurses" or the FreeBSD logo with a 
little devil on it. Could anyone explain why this is so?  Is there some 
historical reason for this, or is this just a coencidence, or just as in 
rock bands - a way of looking more interesting?

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com