Fwd: NDN: Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-11 Thread David Reynolds
What the heck is this? I get it for the last couple weeks when sending to this 
list. No weird email abbreviations are at fault - I'm typing the list address 
in raw. the message does get through after all, I just get this failure 
notice as well.

--  Forwarded Message  --

Subject: NDN: Re: [newbie] File Management
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:45:36 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:

linux-mandrake newbie,emc (The name was not found at the remote site.
Check that the name has been entered correctly.)

---

David
-- 
Three kinds of people worthless to they who are just and honest:
 the drunkard;
 the perjurer;
 the traitor.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-11 Thread David Reynolds
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 05:45 pm, FemmeFatale proclaimed:
> At 10:41 AM 2/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:23, FemmeFatale wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 04:25, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> >
> >After 20 years using DOS/Windows I am rather used to the A;, C:, D:
> >schema but after working with the file system way I recognized that the
> >DOS schema is somehow like asking yourself: In what drive this part of
> >my data is in this RAID? Ok, I am exaggerating but I don't know how many
> >times I have lost data because I forgot to backup a directory in another
> >drive.

I had a weird little encounter with this problem today.

Was trying to get a MS Access database to shut itself down when it was 
launched from the sever (front-end is too huge for transmitting forms across 
crappy government data lines). Came across the brilliant idea of using the 
"\\" prefix in the UNC server address. Then couldn't figure out why it 
wouldn't work.

Hmmm, what does it THINK the path is?
"F:\Center\...\CSS.mdb"  Yaargh!

Another example of the maxim:
Everything in Linux, from changing a font to recompiling a kernel, takes 5 
hours. It then runs forever without a problem.
Everything in Windows takes 5 minutes. It then takes forever to debug it and 
figure out why it isn't working without a problem.

David
-- 
Three joys of the lawless:
 gluttony;
 fighting;
 fickleness.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-11 Thread FemmeFatale
At 10:41 AM 2/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:

On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:23, FemmeFatale wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 04:25, Adolfo Bello wrote:

After 20 years using DOS/Windows I am rather used to the A;, C:, D:
schema but after working with the file system way I recognized that the
DOS schema is somehow like asking yourself: In what drive this part of
my data is in this RAID? Ok, I am exaggerating but I don't know how many
times I have lost data because I forgot to backup a directory in another
drive.

Or maybe I really stick a little too much to Marcel Proust's quotation
at the bottom of my signature.


*giggles* Well Adolfo, I wasn't criticizing you.  And I know what you were 
driving at too.  However stating things as you did *IMO* won't endear ppl 
who are refugees from other OS's to the linux community.

And fwiw, I agree... linux's FS is somewhat more intuitive with the 
exception being that if you change distros some parts of the FS are 
(sometimes) radically different from the distro you used before!  Heh see 
Debians & Gentoos for example as opposed to RH or MDK.

-
FemmeFatale

Good Decisions You boss Made:
"We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts."

- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-11 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:23, FemmeFatale wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 04:25, Adolfo Bello wrote:

> Now now dear, that windows crap (as you call it) is still useful. 
> Everyone needs to learn one way or another & no way is wrong.  Not even
> Windows methods.  They're just different, albeit some are more efficient
> than others.  And your linking suggestion is very good for beginners &
> experts alike if it helps them get around in their preferrred
> environment(s).
> 
> :)

My point, that I recognized was stated rather unpolitely, is that he
better gets used to the new system instead of trying to bring his old
baggage of knowledge to another land (OT: a source of conflicts and
misunderstandings between different citizenships).

I am myself a Windows user (lately a bit forcefully because most of my
customers are using W2K networks). So I'll keep using Windows for a
while (as long as they keep using it and I don't find replacements for
Visio and Access Reports). I feel that I can manage Windows much better
than GNU/Linux but I also know that the only way to really get into
Linux will be getting used to the Linux way. Being a newbie right now
most of my system management work in Linux is done through the CLI.
There will be time for using graphical tools after I have learned what I
am doing. 

After 20 years using DOS/Windows I am rather used to the A;, C:, D:
schema but after working with the file system way I recognized that the
DOS schema is somehow like asking yourself: In what drive this part of
my data is in this RAID? Ok, I am exaggerating but I don't know how many
times I have lost data because I forgot to backup a directory in another
drive.

Or maybe I really stick a little too much to Marcel Proust's quotation
at the bottom of my signature.

-- 
__ 
   / \\   @   __ __@   Adolfo Bello / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  /  //  // /\   / \\   // \  //   Bello Ingenieria S.A, ICQ: 65910258
 /  \\  // / \\ /  //  //  / //cel: +58 416 609-6213
/___// // / <_/ \__\\ //__/ // fax: +58 212 952-6797
www.bisapi.com   //pager: www.tun-tun.com (# 609-6213)

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:22:35 -0400
 10:22am  up 31 min,  3 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.07


  The real voyage of discovery consists not in
seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes.
 Marcel Proust




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-11 Thread robin
FemmeFatale wrote:

On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 04:25, Adolfo Bello wrote:


On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 23:56, Russ wrote:


Hi All,






IF what you want is to have quick access to data in a drive, you can
symlink to the mount point, like:
ln -s /mnt/disk /a
ln -s /mnt/windows /d
ln -s /mnt/cdrom /e

However, I would recommend you to unlearn that Window$ crap and stay
with the linux/unix file system way.




Now now dear, that windows crap (as you call it) is still useful. 
Everyone needs to learn one way or another & no way is wrong.  Not even
Windows methods.  They're just different, albeit some are more efficient
than others.  And your linking suggestion is very good for beginners &
experts alike if it helps them get around in their preferrred
environment(s).

I usually put symlinks in all users' home directories - I think whatever 
file manager they are using, ordinary users should never have to go 
outside their home directories (of course they do go outside as soon as 
they click on that symlink, but it doesn't feel like that).I don't use 
the Windows letter system, though.  There are all those people out there 
claiming that Windows is so "intuitive" compared to that "difficult" 
Linux OS, but I can't for the life of me see how "a:" is more intuitive 
than "floppy".

Sir Robin


--
" Like these cutters, and hackers, who will take the wall of men, and 
picke quarrells."
- G. Pettie

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-10 Thread et
On Monday 10 February 2003 07:23 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 04:25, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 23:56, Russ wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> >
> > IF what you want is to have quick access to data in a drive, you can
> > symlink to the mount point, like:
> > ln -s /mnt/disk /a
> > ln -s /mnt/windows /d
> > ln -s /mnt/cdrom /e
> >
> > However, I would recommend you to unlearn that Window$ crap and stay
> > with the linux/unix file system way.
>
> Now now dear, that windows crap (as you call it) is still useful.
> Everyone needs to learn one way or another & no way is wrong.  
ehh,,, femme, believe me, I can find the wrong way, so I am willing to sware 
there is a wrong way... 

blame the drugs... 


> Not even
> Windows methods.  They're just different, albeit some are more efficient
> than others.  And your linking suggestion is very good for beginners &
> experts alike if it helps them get around in their preferrred
> environment(s).
>
> :)



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-10 Thread FemmeFatale
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 04:25, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 23:56, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 

> IF what you want is to have quick access to data in a drive, you can
> symlink to the mount point, like:
> ln -s /mnt/disk /a
> ln -s /mnt/windows /d
> ln -s /mnt/cdrom /e
> 
> However, I would recommend you to unlearn that Window$ crap and stay
> with the linux/unix file system way.
> 

Now now dear, that windows crap (as you call it) is still useful. 
Everyone needs to learn one way or another & no way is wrong.  Not even
Windows methods.  They're just different, albeit some are more efficient
than others.  And your linking suggestion is very good for beginners &
experts alike if it helps them get around in their preferrred
environment(s).

:)




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-10 Thread civileme
On Monday 10 February 2003 02:25 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 23:56, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have been trying to learn how Linux's file system works and what goes
> > where. I am gaining ground. Here is my pet peeve though. When navigating
> > the various files and folders, you do not know which actual partition it
> > is on. In windows explorer it separates the drives and shows you what is
> > on each. I hate to say it (especially here) but I like how windows
> > explorer works. The left column gives you a list of all drives,
> > floppies, CD's and what not. Makes it easy to navigate your file system.
> > Is there a file manager for Linux that does this as well? This would
> > help me keep all these things straight.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Russ
>
> IF what you want is to have quick access to data in a drive, you can
> symlink to the mount point, like:
> ln -s /mnt/disk /a
> ln -s /mnt/windows /d
> ln -s /mnt/cdrom /e
>
> However, I would recommend you to unlearn that Window$ crap and stay
> with the linux/unix file system way.

Ummm Actual drive the directory is on?

Windows doesn't do that.  I can take a single drive and make 5 partitions and 
windows will tell me about C:, D:, E:, F:, G: and make my CDROM H:

Or I could have 4 drives and I would see C: D: E: F: with CDROM as G: 

And even if you wanted information about partitions

Like suppose /dev/hda1 is /  and /dev/hda5 is swap and /dev/hda6 is /usr and 
/dev/hda7 is /home, where would you find /opt?

/opt could be part of / or it could have been set up with a symbolic link as 
in

ln -s /usr/opt /opt

Now with that said, the analog of explorer is like Krusader or gmc.  Just 
realize that linux is a little too flexible for windows-centric thinking.

If you want to see the top-level directories by drive and partition, that 
information is in a separate window -- call up Kwikdisk from 
Configuration->Hardware or KDiskFree from Applications-->monitoring
Both use kdf but Kwikdisk docks it into the "system tray"




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-10 Thread Carlos
Hi Russ,
I'm in the spot as you find yourself in. All I can say is try this book
called
"Sams teach yourself Linux in 24 hours" 3th edition. It will start you off
with
the very basics of Linux. I would have been even more lost without and has
helped me from having to pound my head against a wall (which is good 'cause
am running out of hair to pull).
Carlos Betancourt
- Original Message -
From: "Russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Newbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 7:56 PM
Subject: [newbie] File Management


> Hi All,
>
> I have been trying to learn how Linux's file system works and what goes
> where. I am gaining ground. Here is my pet peeve though. When navigating
> the various files and folders, you do not know which actual partition it
> is on. In windows explorer it separates the drives and shows you what is
> on each. I hate to say it (especially here) but I like how windows
> explorer works. The left column gives you a list of all drives,
> floppies, CD's and what not. Makes it easy to navigate your file system.
> Is there a file manager for Linux that does this as well? This would
> help me keep all these things straight.
>
> Thanks
> Russ
>
>
>






> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-10 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 10 Feb 2003 16:43:25 +1100, Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 16:28, Russ wrote:
> > I like to know where things are. Example, what files are on the /
> > partition, or the /usr, /var, /home. I just like to know what I am
> > playing with.
> > 
> > Russ
> > 
> > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 20:24, Todd Slater wrote:
> > 
> > > For normal operation, why do you need to know what partition stuff is on?
> > > 
> > > Todd
> > 
> 
> Ok - here's a simple one for ya:
> 
> / - the root of all the filesystem. DON'T put anything here - it's the
> top of the hierarchy
> 
> /bin - basic binary programs/utils for the system (don't use this
> neither)
> 
> /sbin - other system binaries (sbin - system binary)
> 
> /lib - system libraries
> 
> /usr/bin - the basic binaries for all users to use - you can put
> programs in here
> 
> /usr/local/bin - same as above
> 
> /usr/share - repository of all your programs OTHER dependant bits -
> except for libraries and includes
> 
> /usr/lib - program libraries
> 
> /usr/include - program includes
> 
> /tmp - temporary crap
> 
> /var - system variables and other program necessary information (and
> other cool things like ftp root and web root)
> 
> /usr/X11R6 - the root for the XWindows system - sometimes things can go
> under here - but let the programs decide where they want to go so you
> don't break things.
> 
> /home - the users home directory root - your personal root directory is
> here - and whomever else has an account on your machine.
> 
> Does that make it a bit more, er, graphical? (g)
> 
> Cheers!

It helps to know what the directory names mean, so that you may better
understand their functions. To rephrase what Stephen has written above (and to
add a few more):

bin - binary executable

sbin - system binary executable

lib - libraries, sort of like DLL files in Windows.

include - programme includes

share - components shared between apps, excluding libraries and includes

tmp - temporary files

etc - 'et cetera'. Various config files for the whole system.

var - variables

X11R6 - The X Window System version 11 release 6.
In Mandrake, this means XFree86.

local - Stuff intended to run only on the local system. Normally, you won't
access this stuff from another system or OS installation.

opt - 'Optional' stuff. In some other distros (like SuSE), this is where desktop
environments like GNOME and KDE are installed. Mandrake (and Red Hat,
Gentoo, etc.) considers these to be part of the core system, so they are
installed in /usr instead.

root - The root user's home directory. It is stored in / instead of /home to
allow a root login even if /home (which is often stored on a separate
partition) is inaccessible.

home - user data

usr - Contrary to popular belief, this does _not_ stand for 'user'. It does, in
fact, stand for 'UNIX System Resources'. Most apps go here.


-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan
  [Yama | http://www.pclinuxonline.com/]

Without C, We would only have Pasal, Basi, and obol.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Dale Huckeby
Well, how did you partition it?  Mine, for instance, is /, swap, /home,
/usr, /var.  Any filename that starts with /home is on the /home partition,
any filename that starts with /usr (ie. /usr/X11R6/bin/DrakConf) is on the 
/usr partition, any filename that starts with /var is on the /var partition.
Any filename (on my system) that doesn't start with /home, /usr, or /var
is on the / partition.  

Dale Huckeby

On 9 Feb 2003, Russ wrote:

> I like to know where things are. Example, what files are on the /
> partition, or the /usr, /var, /home. I just like to know what I am
> playing with.
> 
> Russ
> 
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 20:24, Todd Slater wrote:
> 
> > For normal operation, why do you need to know what partition stuff is on?
> > 
> > Todd
> 
> 
> 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Russ
Yes the Knoq thing did work, thank you. And as to the partitions, I know
which ones I have but I am still learning exactly what goes on each.

Russ

On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 18:42, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> On Monday 10 February 2003 05:28, Russ wrote:
> > I like to know where things are. Example, what files are on the /
> > partition, or the /usr, /var, /home. I just like to know what I am
> > playing with.
> >
> 
> Surely you are not telling us you don't know how you laid out your
> own partitions, are you? :oP
> 
> Now, seriously, did the konq thing do any good?
> 
> Damian



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 16:28, Russ wrote:
> I like to know where things are. Example, what files are on the /
> partition, or the /usr, /var, /home. I just like to know what I am
> playing with.
> 
> Russ
> 
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 20:24, Todd Slater wrote:
> 
> > For normal operation, why do you need to know what partition stuff is on?
> > 
> > Todd
> 

Ok - here's a simple one for ya:

/ - the root of all the filesystem. DON'T put anything here - it's the
top of the hierarchy

/bin - basic binary programs/utils for the system (don't use this
neither)

/sbin - other system binaries (sbin - system binary)

/lib - system libraries

/usr/bin - the basic binaries for all users to use - you can put
programs in here

/usr/local/bin - same as above

/usr/share - repository of all your programs OTHER dependant bits -
except for libraries and includes

/usr/lib - program libraries

/usr/include - program includes

/tmp - temporary crap

/var - system variables and other program necessary information (and
other cool things like ftp root and web root)

/usr/X11R6 - the root for the XWindows system - sometimes things can go
under here - but let the programs decide where they want to go so you
don't break things.

/home - the users home directory root - your personal root directory is
here - and whomever else has an account on your machine.

Does that make it a bit more, er, graphical? (g)

Cheers!

-- 
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:35:01 +1100
  4:35pm  up 3 days,  8:53,  5 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.14, 0.16
--
|____  | kuhn media australia|
|   / ,, /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |=|
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  |/ ._/  |"| |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808 |
|  ;"""/ / | | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389|
|  '  `-`' " " | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
--
 linux user:267497 * RH 8.0 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
--

Thank god!! ... It's HENNY YOUNGMAN!!


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 10 Feb 2003 15:04:06 +1100, Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:56, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I have been trying to learn how Linux's file system works and what goes
> > where. I am gaining ground. Here is my pet peeve though. When navigating
> > the various files and folders, you do not know which actual partition it
> > is on. In windows explorer it separates the drives and shows you what is
> > on each. I hate to say it (especially here) but I like how windows
> > explorer works. The left column gives you a list of all drives,
> > floppies, CD's and what not. Makes it easy to navigate your file system.
> > Is there a file manager for Linux that does this as well? This would
> > help me keep all these things straight. 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Russ
> > 
> 
> This is the nature of the *nix file system structure. Every partition
> and/or drive is mounted as part of the file system. This allows you to
> have many drives, but a single file structure. To my knowledge, there
> are heaps and heaps of different file managers, but nothing that will
> ever show anything like a drive.
> 
> If you've done a default installation side-by-side with a Windows
> installation, you will find your Windows partition under /mnt/
> 
> The true beauty of the file system was designed from the beginning (more
> than 30 years ago) to be able to have a single file system.
> 
> If you open up a console window, you can type:
> 
> sfdisk --list
> 
> ...to get a listing of the partitions
> 
> You can type:
> 
> mount
> 
> ...to view the drive mountings.
> 
> If you're in KDE, you can type
> 
> kwikdisk
> 
> ...to show how drives are mounted and allow you to mount/unmount from
> your system tray.
> 
> Remember that you're going to have to rethink/relearn how the file
> system works. In the reality of it, the MSDOS manner of drive labelling
> is actually more clunky and less logical...only 26 drives?
> H...strange...(grin)
> 
> Peace!

I agree 100%. A user should not have to even _think_ about physical devices.
Everything should be transparent in a single hierarchy. The beauty of the UNIX
way is that you can mount _any_ device (not just local partitions) at any point
in the hierarchy, providing unparallelled power and flexibility. This may not be
very evident on a single system with only a few partitions, but it becomes very
obvious when multiple partitions and networked machines are involved.

Russ, if you want to learn Linux/UNIX you will have to realise that it is a very
different system than Windows, and that everything exists for a very good
reason. You will have to 'unlearn' a lot of the (bad) habits and terms you
learnt from Windows in order to properly adjust.

Don't worry, it's isn't as hard as it sounds. I was in the same situation as
you, back in 1999. I had been using DOS/Windows since 1985, and it seemed to
make perfect sense to me. After I switched to GNU/Linux, I finally realised how
stupid things can be in the DOS/Windows world. If you open your mind, you can
learn all kinds of new and neat stuff :)

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan
  [Yama | http://www.pclinuxonline.com/]

  "When you say 'I wrote a program that crashed Windows', people just stare
   at you blankly and say 'Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*'."
   -- Linus Torvalds



msg118930/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Damian Gatabria
On Monday 10 February 2003 05:28, Russ wrote:
> I like to know where things are. Example, what files are on the /
> partition, or the /usr, /var, /home. I just like to know what I am
> playing with.
>

Surely you are not telling us you don't know how you laid out your
own partitions, are you? :oP

Now, seriously, did the konq thing do any good?

Damian

-- 
--
I don't want Windows to be only for the 31173. Yes, we've come a long way from
all those security holes, virii, and cryptic commands like "Edit textfile.txt"
(what in the hell is that supposed to mean?)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Russ
I like to know where things are. Example, what files are on the /
partition, or the /usr, /var, /home. I just like to know what I am
playing with.

Russ

On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 20:24, Todd Slater wrote:

> For normal operation, why do you need to know what partition stuff is on?
> 
> Todd



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Todd Slater
On 09 Feb 2003 19:56:05 -0800
Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I have been trying to learn how Linux's file system works and what goes
> where. I am gaining ground. Here is my pet peeve though. When navigating
> the various files and folders, you do not know which actual partition it
> is on. In windows explorer it separates the drives and shows you what is
> on each. I hate to say it (especially here) but I like how windows
> explorer works. The left column gives you a list of all drives,
> floppies, CD's and what not. Makes it easy to navigate your file system.
> Is there a file manager for Linux that does this as well? This would
> help me keep all these things straight. 
> 
> Thanks
> Russ

For normal operation, why do you need to know what partition stuff is on?

Todd


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Damian Gatabria

> Hi All,
>
> I have been trying to learn how Linux's file system works and what goes
> where. I am gaining ground. Here is my pet peeve though. When navigating
> the various files and folders, you do not know which actual partition it
> is on. In windows explorer it separates the drives and shows you what is
> on each. I hate to say it (especially here) but I like how windows
> explorer works. The left column gives you a list of all drives,
> floppies, CD's and what not. Makes it easy to navigate your file system.
> Is there a file manager for Linux that does this as well? This would
> help me keep all these things straight.
>
> Thanks
> Russ

If you open up a terminal (like konsole or xterm) and type " df " you will see
each partition, with information about it's free space and where is it mounted
 on.

I felt a bit lost too at first, but as you gain more experience, you'll notice
that Linux's way of handling devices and partitions is much more logical and
flexible than Windows'. The reason you cannot see each drive separately
is because Linux does not build it's structure on drives or partitions. It has
one tree. One structure. And you can add partitions to any branch of it,
giving you a whole lot of control of where stuff goes. 

If you REALLY need to manage your files in a partition-oriented way,
you can open up konqueror. You'll have the tree view of all the directories,
and on the right side, the main pane with the view of the current dir. Now,
between the tree view and the right pane (depending on you konqueror
version, you can have it at the left of the treeview too) you will see a small
column of buttons. click on the one at the bottom. The treeview will dissapear
and a new one with device-oriented structure will appear, much like
explorer's. 

But, i must say this: You will not regret it once you get familiar with
Linux and the way it does things. On the other hand, you might regret it
if you try to make Linux behave like Windows as you will find that "Linux is
not a better Windows than Windows." It is different.


HTH

Damian







-- 
--
I don't want Windows to be only for the 31173. Yes, we've come a long way from
all those security holes, virii, and cryptic commands like "Edit textfile.txt"
(what in the hell is that supposed to mean?)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:56, Russ wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I have been trying to learn how Linux's file system works and what goes
> where. I am gaining ground. Here is my pet peeve though. When navigating
> the various files and folders, you do not know which actual partition it
> is on. In windows explorer it separates the drives and shows you what is
> on each. I hate to say it (especially here) but I like how windows
> explorer works. The left column gives you a list of all drives,
> floppies, CD's and what not. Makes it easy to navigate your file system.
> Is there a file manager for Linux that does this as well? This would
> help me keep all these things straight. 
> 
> Thanks
> Russ
> 

This is the nature of the *nix file system structure. Every partition
and/or drive is mounted as part of the file system. This allows you to
have many drives, but a single file structure. To my knowledge, there
are heaps and heaps of different file managers, but nothing that will
ever show anything like a drive.

If you've done a default installation side-by-side with a Windows
installation, you will find your Windows partition under /mnt/

The true beauty of the file system was designed from the beginning (more
than 30 years ago) to be able to have a single file system.

If you open up a console window, you can type:

sfdisk --list

...to get a listing of the partitions

You can type:

mount

...to view the drive mountings.

If you're in KDE, you can type

kwikdisk

...to show how drives are mounted and allow you to mount/unmount from
your system tray.

Remember that you're going to have to rethink/relearn how the file
system works. In the reality of it, the MSDOS manner of drive labelling
is actually more clunky and less logical...only 26 drives?
H...strange...(grin)

Peace!

-- 
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:55:00 +1100
  2:55pm  up 3 days,  7:13,  5 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.15, 0.21
--
|____  | kuhn media australia|
|   / ,, /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |=|
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  |/ ._/  |"| |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808 |
|  ;"""/ / | | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389|
|  '  `-`' " " | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
--
 linux user:267497 * RH 8.0 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
--

   Nothing I do is my fault.
  -- Calvin


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] File Management

2003-02-09 Thread Robert Wideman
You are too used to Winblowz.  Stay on Linux/UNIX for another year and you
will totally disagree with your current self.
Rob

>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Russ
>> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 9:56 PM
>> To: Newbie
>> Subject: [newbie] File Management
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have been trying to learn how Linux's file system works and what goes
>> where. I am gaining ground. Here is my pet peeve though. When navigating
>> the various files and folders, you do not know which actual partition it
>> is on. In windows explorer it separates the drives and shows you what is
>> on each. I hate to say it (especially here) but I like how windows
>> explorer works. The left column gives you a list of all drives,
>> floppies, CD's and what not. Makes it easy to navigate your file system.
>> Is there a file manager for Linux that does this as well? This would
>> help me keep all these things straight.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Russ
>>
>>
>>



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com