Re: File services hangs

2001-09-26 Thread klimo

Did you install a new software last time?
This could happen if you are runing programs, which are dealing with memory
not just the best way
( i.e. few old versions of Wingate).
Kliment
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: Sauer, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:58 AM
Subject: File services hangs


 Esteemed Colleagues,

I have a Compaq Proliant 3000 server with a Pentium II 333 Mhz CPU and
 128 Mb Ram running NT4.0 SP5.  Access to file and print services has
 recently started hanging...on a daily basis.  When the services hang I
can't
 even log into the server or connect in any way using naming services.  It
 has to be manually powered off to reboot.  There are no traces of any
 problems in the logs.  No evidence of Dr. Watson.

 I'm Stumped and at a loss of what to even look for in Technet or the
 archives.  Very baffling.

 Regards,

 Steve Sauer
 Technical Lead - Systems Operations
 WIPP Site, Carlsbad, NM


 Want to unsub? Do that here:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english




Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english




Re: OWA

2001-09-26 Thread Neil Harvey
Title: OWA



I might be being blonde here but does that mean 
that if OWA and Exchange are running on the same server then the passwords are 
encrypted?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:51 
  PM
  Subject: RE: OWA
  
  Yes, 
  First its has be loaded on a web server of course, Then load Exchange admin on 
  the web server you want to run OWA. Then Load OWA on web server. The only bad 
  thing to loading OWA on a different machine is that your Passwords will be 
  sent in clear text unless its a Domain Controller.
  
  STG1(SW) Kirk Etchberger 
  
  COMREGSUPPGRU MAYPORT FL 
  SERMC AIS LPO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  TEL: 904-270-5126 EXT 
  3119 DSN: 
  312-960-5126 EXT 3119 
  MCSE, MCSD, 
  CCNA
  Is anyone running OWA on a 
  different server than Exchange 5.5? If yes, what procedures did you 
  take? 
  
After getting hit with the Nimda virus, I had to 
reformat the hard drive and reinstall patches. I have not been able to 
get OWA installed on that server I keep receiving an error message when 
trying to install OWA "Failed to remove OWA" . The specified file 
cannot be found, Microsoft NT ID No: ox00c2.
Cassandra Cody, MCSE Missouri Botanical Garden  See the World 314-577-0813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





RE: OT: MS Project 98

2001-09-26 Thread Jolley Lee @Consult

Thanks for your help everyone. Very useful

Lee

-Original Message-
From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2001 21:54
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: MS Project 98


.. yes. save as and select which format.

Kent

--- Robert Toland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Great idea!  I take it they can save as...
 
 Thanks,
 
 Robert T.
 
 Kent Spencer wrote:
 
  .. Have your clients send you an HTML or GIF version for viewing.
 
  Kent
 
  --- Robert Toland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   No, but if you come across one I'd be interested.
  
   Jolley Lee @Consult wrote:
  
Dear All,
   
Sorry for the off topic question but I have hit a dead end.
   
Our users are receiving MS Project 98 files from clients but we
 use
   a
different package for project management. Does anybody know of
 a
   viewer for
MS project files?
   
Thankyou
   
Lee Jolley
   
   
  
 

**
This email transmission is confidential and intended for the
addressee only. It may contain privileged and confidential
information. If you are not the person or organisation to
whom it is addressed, you must not copy, distribute, or take
any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and return it.
   
Carillion PLC Registered in England No. 3782379
Registered Office:
Birch Street Wolverhampton WV1 4HY
   
  
 

**
   
   
  
 _
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star
   Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For
   further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or
 alternatively
   call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
   
Want to unsub? Do that here:
   
  
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english
  
  
   Want to unsub? Do that here:
  
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english
  
  
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
 Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english
 
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english


_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.


**
This email transmission is confidential and intended for the
addressee only. It may contain privileged and confidential
information. If you are not the person or organisation to
whom it is addressed, you must not copy, distribute, or take
any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and return it.

Carillion PLC Registered in England No. 3782379
Registered Office:
Birch Street Wolverhampton WV1 4HY
**

_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english




RE: Ideas for firewall

2001-09-26 Thread Martijn Eindhoven

Well,
It looks good. What would be the pricing for the XPRS2 

At 12:52 PM 9/24/2001 -0700, you wrote:
would
you be interested in this one?

-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall

Sonicwall is great, we are a reseller and currently have 10 clients
using them.


Darrin Carter 
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE 
Senior Systems Engineer

Elegrity, Inc. 
415.821.0900 (main) 
415.826.7758 (fax) 
415.726.0413 (direct) 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.elegrity.com 
-Original Message-
From: Negrete, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall

I use the Sonicwall pro that would fit your needs and will do vpn also.
I have to upgrade to Cisco equipment and will be getting a 515 pix.
Check out sonicwall.com

Arthur Negrete
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Ideas for firewall

Hey Guys,

I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers. What do you guys think is the best setup, per server or one dedicated firewall.
And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm thinkin of a stateful one. 


Met vriendelijke groet,


M. Eindhoven
W2K System Administrator
Bevelander Internet Services B.V. 
Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost 
Tel : 020 40 53 900 
Fax : 020 40 53 910 
http://www.bevelander.nl
= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this 
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. 
=
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Met vriendelijke groet,

M. Eindhoven
W2K System Administrator
Bevelander Internet Services B.V. 
Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost 
Tel : 020 40 53 900 
Fax : 020 40 53 910 
http://www.bevelander.nl
= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this 
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. 
=

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





SV: W2k server reboots

2001-09-26 Thread Jan Pedersen

Hi!

Thanks for the answers until now, I have loadet i386kd, and it gives:
Signature. . . . . . .PAGE
ValidDump. . . . . . .DUMP
MajorVersion . . . . .free system
MinorVersion . . . . .2195
DirectoryTableBase . .0x0003
PfnDataBase. . . . . .0x8204f000
PsLoadedModuleList . .0x8046ccf0
PsActiveProcessHead. .0x8046dbe0
MachineImageType . . .i386
NumberProcessors . . .1
BugCheckCode . . . . .0x007f
BugCheckParameter1 . .0x0008
BugCheckParameter2 . .0x
BugCheckParameter3 . .0x
BugCheckParameter4 . .0x

ExceptionCode. . . . .0x8003
ExceptionFlags . . . .0x0001
ExceptionAddress . . .0x804669be

Which I still don't understand.
I have found out that 0x007f means something hardware error related,
but I
have other servers with precisly same configuration, same patches, same
bios, same drivers etc.
-The machine is a IBM 5500 M20, with ½gb ram, serverraid v. 4,70, and
they don't reboot.

Any other ideas?


Jan Pedersen 


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shane van Jaarsveldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 10:40
Til: Jan Pedersen
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


Check with Veritas for updates there are known issues with some ROC
chips (Raid on Chip) controllers and certain machines - I have seen this
random reboot occasionally.


This email is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights. You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.


-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26 September 2001 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots

From Q254649:

You can load complete and kernel memory dumps with standard symbolic
debuggers
(such as I386kd.exe included with the Windows 2000 Support CD-ROM).
 





-Original Message-
From: Giles Caldersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 07:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


Is that on the Resource Kit?

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


I386kd.exe is your tool to read those badboys.

Search the kb...
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: W2k server reboots

Hi!

I have some trouble with a W2k server that reboots everynight, when the
backup starts on it.
(Backup Exec v. 8.5)
I have the server fully patched up to date.
It gives a entry in the eventlog:

Event Type: Information
Event Source:   Save Dump
Event Category: None
Event ID:   1001
Date:   26-09-2001
Time:   01:13:54
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck.  The bugcheck was: 0x007f
(0x0008, 0x, 0x, 0x). Microsoft Windows 2000
[v15.2195]. A dump was saved in: C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini092601-01.dmp. 

Is it possible to read anything from the information in the above?

BG

Jan Pedersen

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for
the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify TD
Waterhouse Investor Services Limited ABN 41 010 488 687 immediately by
return e-mail or telephone +61 2 9994 9000 and destroy the original
message.
The content and opinions contained in this e-mail are not necessarily
those
of TD Waterhouse. TD Waterhouse is a member of the Australian Stock
Exchange
Limited. 


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english


*
If you receive this e-mail in error, please contact +44 20 7280 5500. 
The information contained in this e-mail and in the attachments if 
any, is confidential.  Unauthorised use, disclosure, printing, 
forwarding or copying is strictly prohibited. 
*


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english




RE: perfmon to log

2001-09-26 Thread Jenkins, Andrew {IT~Welwyn}

Hi John,

Have you tried Performance Data Logging from the NT Resource Kit? it allows you to 
capture any NT counters and log them in a CSV formatted file.

Regards

Andrew Jenkins
NT Infrastructure Specialist
Roche Products Limited
Welwyn Garden City
Herts 
UK



-Original Message-
From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: perfmon to log


Is there a way to write the perfmon data to a text file periodically (every
fifteen minutes for two weeks, ideally), specifically the Logical Disk
data--Disk writes/sec, disk write bytes/sec?

I've tried using perfmon's native log format but when I choose Data From
that log file, I see the Logical Disk group category but the subcategory box
is empty.  One possible reason is that *some* but not all of the servers I'm
trying to collect data from do not have diskperf turned on.  Obviously that
needs to be addressed, but does one bad apple in a perfmon session spoil the
whole session?  I can't get data on any of the servers, not even the ones
with diskperf set correctly.

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english




RE: Ideas for firewall

2001-09-26 Thread Martijn Eindhoven

Anyone has any opinions on
checkpoint one firewall-1?


At 12:52 PM 9/24/2001 -0700, you
wrote:
would
you be interested in this one? 

-Original Message- 
From: Darrin J. Carter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:31 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall

Sonicwall is great, we are a reseller and currently have 10 clients
using them. 


Darrin Carter 
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE 
Senior Systems Engineer

Elegrity, Inc. 
415.821.0900 (main) 
415.826.7758 (fax) 
415.726.0413 (direct) 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.elegrity.com 
-Original Message- 
From: Negrete, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:45 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall

I use the Sonicwall pro that would fit your needs and will do vpn also. 
I have to upgrade to Cisco equipment and will be getting a 515 pix. 
Check out sonicwall.com 
 
Arthur Negrete 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-Original Message- 
From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:55 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Ideas for firewall

Hey Guys,

I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers. What do you guys think is the best setup, per server or one dedicated firewall. 
And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm thinkin of a stateful one. 



Met vriendelijke groet,



M. Eindhoven 
W2K System Administrator 
Bevelander Internet Services B.V. 
Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost 
Tel : 020 40 53 900 
Fax : 020 40 53 910 
http://www.bevelander.nl 
= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this 
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. 
= 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
Met vriendelijke groet,

M. Eindhoven
W2K System Administrator
Bevelander Internet Services B.V. 
Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost 
Tel : 020 40 53 900 
Fax : 020 40 53 910 
http://www.bevelander.nl
= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this 
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. 
=
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english

Met vriendelijke groet,

M. Eindhoven
W2K System Administrator
Bevelander Internet Services B.V. 
Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost 
Tel : 020 40 53 900 
Fax : 020 40 53 910 
http://www.bevelander.nl
= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this 
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. 
=

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





RE: W2k server reboots

2001-09-26 Thread Phillips, Glen

I'm no hardwware guru but as it happens when the backups start, is it
possible to swap tape drives? 




-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 10:02
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SV: W2k server reboots


Hi!

Thanks for the answers until now, I have loadet i386kd, and it gives:
Signature. . . . . . .PAGE
ValidDump. . . . . . .DUMP
MajorVersion . . . . .free system
MinorVersion . . . . .2195
DirectoryTableBase . .0x0003
PfnDataBase. . . . . .0x8204f000
PsLoadedModuleList . .0x8046ccf0
PsActiveProcessHead. .0x8046dbe0
MachineImageType . . .i386
NumberProcessors . . .1
BugCheckCode . . . . .0x007f
BugCheckParameter1 . .0x0008
BugCheckParameter2 . .0x
BugCheckParameter3 . .0x
BugCheckParameter4 . .0x

ExceptionCode. . . . .0x8003
ExceptionFlags . . . .0x0001
ExceptionAddress . . .0x804669be

Which I still don't understand.
I have found out that 0x007f means something hardware error related,
but I
have other servers with precisly same configuration, same patches, same
bios, same drivers etc.
-The machine is a IBM 5500 M20, with ½gb ram, serverraid v. 4,70, and
they don't reboot.

Any other ideas?


Jan Pedersen 


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shane van Jaarsveldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 10:40
Til: Jan Pedersen
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


Check with Veritas for updates there are known issues with some ROC
chips (Raid on Chip) controllers and certain machines - I have seen this
random reboot occasionally.


This email is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights. You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.


-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26 September 2001 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots

From Q254649:

You can load complete and kernel memory dumps with standard symbolic
debuggers
(such as I386kd.exe included with the Windows 2000 Support CD-ROM).
 





-Original Message-
From: Giles Caldersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 07:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


Is that on the Resource Kit?

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


I386kd.exe is your tool to read those badboys.

Search the kb...
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: W2k server reboots

Hi!

I have some trouble with a W2k server that reboots everynight, when the
backup starts on it.
(Backup Exec v. 8.5)
I have the server fully patched up to date.
It gives a entry in the eventlog:

Event Type: Information
Event Source:   Save Dump
Event Category: None
Event ID:   1001
Date:   26-09-2001
Time:   01:13:54
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck.  The bugcheck was: 0x007f
(0x0008, 0x, 0x, 0x). Microsoft Windows 2000
[v15.2195]. A dump was saved in: C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini092601-01.dmp. 

Is it possible to read anything from the information in the above?

BG

Jan Pedersen

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for
the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify TD
Waterhouse Investor Services Limited ABN 41 010 488 687 immediately by
return e-mail or telephone +61 2 9994 9000 and destroy the original
message.
The content and opinions contained in this e-mail are not necessarily
those
of TD Waterhouse. TD Waterhouse is a member of the Australian Stock
Exchange
Limited. 


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english


*
If you receive this e-mail in error, please contact +44 20 7280 5500. 
The information contained in this e-mail and in the attachments if 
any, is confidential.  Unauthorised use, disclosure, printing, 
forwarding or copying is strictly prohibited. 
*


Want to unsub? Do that 

RE: W2k server reboots

2001-09-26 Thread Frede Hundewadt

I would suggest you switch your backupdrive to a box know to run without
reboot.
If that box starts to reboot you'll have to replace you backupdrive.

Venlig hilsen / Best Regards

Frede Hundewadt
Midtjysk Alarm  Sikring
Midtjysk Computer Support

T/F +45 70 255 112 / +45 70 265 112
M +45 4017 2345


-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SV: W2k server reboots


Hi!

Thanks for the answers until now, I have loadet i386kd, and it gives:
Signature. . . . . . .PAGE
ValidDump. . . . . . .DUMP
MajorVersion . . . . .free system
MinorVersion . . . . .2195
DirectoryTableBase . .0x0003
PfnDataBase. . . . . .0x8204f000
PsLoadedModuleList . .0x8046ccf0
PsActiveProcessHead. .0x8046dbe0
MachineImageType . . .i386
NumberProcessors . . .1
BugCheckCode . . . . .0x007f
BugCheckParameter1 . .0x0008
BugCheckParameter2 . .0x
BugCheckParameter3 . .0x
BugCheckParameter4 . .0x

ExceptionCode. . . . .0x8003
ExceptionFlags . . . .0x0001
ExceptionAddress . . .0x804669be

Which I still don't understand.
I have found out that 0x007f means something hardware error related,
but I
have other servers with precisly same configuration, same patches, same
bios, same drivers etc.
-The machine is a IBM 5500 M20, with ½gb ram, serverraid v. 4,70, and
they don't reboot.

Any other ideas?


Jan Pedersen


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shane van Jaarsveldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 10:40
Til: Jan Pedersen
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


Check with Veritas for updates there are known issues with some ROC
chips (Raid on Chip) controllers and certain machines - I have seen this
random reboot occasionally.


This email is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights. You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.


-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2001 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots

From Q254649:

You can load complete and kernel memory dumps with standard symbolic
debuggers
(such as I386kd.exe included with the Windows 2000 Support CD-ROM).






-Original Message-
From: Giles Caldersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 07:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


Is that on the Resource Kit?

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


I386kd.exe is your tool to read those badboys.

Search the kb...
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: W2k server reboots

Hi!

I have some trouble with a W2k server that reboots everynight, when the
backup starts on it.
(Backup Exec v. 8.5)
I have the server fully patched up to date.
It gives a entry in the eventlog:

Event Type: Information
Event Source:   Save Dump
Event Category: None
Event ID:   1001
Date:   26-09-2001
Time:   01:13:54
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck.  The bugcheck was: 0x007f
(0x0008, 0x, 0x, 0x). Microsoft Windows 2000
[v15.2195]. A dump was saved in: C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini092601-01.dmp.

Is it possible to read anything from the information in the above?

BG

Jan Pedersen

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for
the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify TD
Waterhouse Investor Services Limited ABN 41 010 488 687 immediately by
return e-mail or telephone +61 2 9994 9000 and destroy the original
message.
The content and opinions contained in this e-mail are not necessarily
those
of TD Waterhouse. TD Waterhouse is a member of the Australian Stock
Exchange
Limited.


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english


*
If you receive this e-mail in error, please contact +44 20 7280 5500.
The information contained in this e-mail and in the attachments if
any, is 

RE: Ideas for firewall

2001-09-26 Thread Ian Richards



Try 
this web site www.keltec.co.uk

  -Original Message-From: Martijn Eindhoven 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  10:15To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for 
  firewallAnyone has any opinions oncheckpoint one 
  firewall-1?
  At 12:52 PM 9/24/2001 -0700, you 
wrote:
would you be interested in this one? 
  
-Original Message- 
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:31 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall
Sonicwall is great, we are a reseller and currently have 10 clients 
using them. 

Darrin Carter 
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE 
Senior Systems Engineer 
Elegrity, Inc. 
415.821.0900 (main) 
415.826.7758 (fax) 
415.726.0413 (direct) 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.elegrity.com 
-Original Message- 
From: Negrete, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:45 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall
I use the Sonicwall pro that would fit your needs and will do vpn 
also. 
I have to upgrade to Cisco equipment and will be getting a 515 pix. 
Check out sonicwall.com 
 
Arthur Negrete 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-Original Message- 
From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:55 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Ideas for firewall
Hey Guys,
I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers. What do 
you guys think is the best setup, per server or one dedicated firewall. 
And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm thinkin of 
a stateful one. 
Met vriendelijke groet,
M. Eindhoven 
W2K System Administrator 
Bevelander Internet Services B.V. 
Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost 
Tel : 020 40 53 900 
Fax : 020 40 53 910 
http://www.bevelander.nl 
= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this 
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. 
= 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmMet 
vriendelijke groet,M. EindhovenW2K System 
AdministratorBevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 
910 http://www.bevelander.nl= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended 
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that 
any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the 
information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then 
destroy any copies of it. 
=Want to unsub? Do 
that here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
  Met vriendelijke groet,M. EindhovenW2K System 
  AdministratorBevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 
  1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 910 
  http://www.bevelander.nl= 
  This communication contains information which is confidential and may 
  also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended 
  recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that 
  any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information 
  in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of 
  it. =Want to unsub? Do 
  that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishKeltec - The Winning Team

Leading Industry awards winner;
Oracle EMEA Internet Technology Sales Award for 2001

RE: Ideas for firewall

2001-09-26 Thread GMasters


Yeah, we use it enterprise wide (8 Sites) on Nokia Hardware and find it to
be perfect.  Especaially on the Nokia boxes, there are different scaleable
(can I spell?) options, and we are looking into their DSL Firewall for some
remote users in Europe.  We have inter-office VPN's setup between the
Firewalls as well as having all our European Field Sales team come in
through a VPN connection (Checkpoint SecureRemote) and are testing SecureID
with it too.

So my recommendation would be to go for it.  But I would have to say that I
have no idea what it cost us, as we bought all the Firewalls in one go from
the US office to get decent pricing...

Just my 2 cents (or pence...)

G.


   

Martijn

Eindhoven  To: NT System Admin Issues

meindhoven@beve[EMAIL PROTECTED]

lander.nl cc: 

   Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall 

26/09/2001 10:15   

Please respond 

to NT System  

Admin Issues  

   

   





Anyone has any opinions on
checkpoint one firewall-1?




 At 12:52 PM 9/24/2001 -0700, you wrote:
  would you be interested in this one?
   -Original Message-
   From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:31 AM
   To: NT System Admin Issues
   Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall

   Sonicwall is great, we are a reseller and currently have 10
   clients using them.


   Darrin Carter
   CNE, MCP+I, MCSE
   Senior Systems Engineer
   Elegrity, Inc.
   415.821.0900 (main)
   415.826.7758 (fax)
   415.726.0413 (direct)
   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.elegrity.com
   -Original Message-
   From: Negrete, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:45 AM
   To: NT System Admin Issues
   Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall

   I use the Sonicwall pro that would fit your needs and will
   do vpn also.
   I have to upgrade to Cisco equipment and will be getting a
   515 pix.
   Check out sonicwall.com

   Arthur Negrete
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   -Original Message-
   From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:55 AM
   To: NT System Admin Issues
   Subject: Ideas for firewall

   Hey Guys,

   I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers.
   What do you guys think is the best setup, per server or one
   dedicated firewall.
   And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm
   thinkin of a stateful one.





   Met vriendelijke groet,





   M. Eindhoven
   W2K System Administrator
   Bevelander Internet Services B.V.
   Folkstoneweg 10
   1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost
   Tel : 020 40 53 900
   Fax : 020 40 53 910
   http://www.bevelander.nl
   =
   This communication contains information which is
   confidential and
   may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
   intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended
   recipient(s),
   please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
   communication or the information in it is strictly
   prohibited.
   If you have received this communication in error, please
   notify
   the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
   

Get Quest Spotlight for free - at least that's what they claim

2001-09-26 Thread Yahoo




Hi,

you may have heared/seen the Quest Spotlight 
software that gives you a neat view of the performance of your servers 
(basically a GUI for perfmon counters).
Anyway, Quest are giving it away for free, no 
string attached.
I just registered and now have tto wait until they 
contact me and "continue the registration process"...whatever that 
means.

regards

Uso

http://www.quest.com/tenspot/
Free Windows Diagnostic Tool 

Brace 
Yourself!Our FREE Visual Root-cause Diagnostics Will Blow You 
Away!
If 
Spotlight's visual root-cause diagnostics doesn't blow you away, then getting 
the product for free through Quest Software's Ten-Spot program 
will!Spotlight on Windows graphically displays, in real time, the actual 
flow of data in your operating system, including I/O subsystem, cache and kernel 
information, enabling you to quickly identify congested areas and take 
appropriate corrective action.
Complete the 
registration form to participate in this program. You will receive, at no 
charge, 10 (ten) perpetual licenses of Spotlight on Windows and the first years 
technical support for free, subject to the terms and conditions of Quest 
Software's Software License Agreement.There is no fine print; there are 
no conditions or pre-requisites. Complete the registration form and brace 
yourself! You'll be able to respond to Windows performance issues faster than 
ever before!
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





Re: Get Quest Spotlight for free - at least that's what they claim

2001-09-26 Thread Neil Harvey



I have seen a demo of this and it is very very 
good. Thanks for the info

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Yahoo 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:28 
  AM
  Subject: Get Quest Spotlight for free - 
  at least that's what they claim
  
  
  Hi,
  
  you may have heared/seen the Quest Spotlight 
  software that gives you a neat view of the performance of your servers 
  (basically a GUI for perfmon counters).
  Anyway, Quest are giving it away for free, no 
  string attached.
  I just registered and now have tto wait until 
  they contact me and "continue the registration process"...whatever that 
  means.
  
  regards
  
  Uso
  
  http://www.quest.com/tenspot/
  Free Windows Diagnostic Tool 
  
  Brace 
  Yourself!Our FREE Visual Root-cause Diagnostics Will Blow You 
  Away!
  If 
  Spotlight™'s visual root-cause diagnostics doesn't blow you away, then getting 
  the product for free through Quest Software's Ten-Spot program 
  will!Spotlight on Windows graphically displays, in real time, the 
  actual flow of data in your operating system, including I/O subsystem, cache 
  and kernel information, enabling you to quickly identify congested areas and 
  take appropriate corrective action.
  Complete the 
  registration form to participate in this program. You will receive, at no 
  charge, 10 (ten) perpetual licenses of Spotlight on Windows and the first 
  year’s technical support for free, subject to the terms and conditions of 
  Quest Software's Software License Agreement.There is no fine print; 
  there are no conditions or pre-requisites. Complete the registration form and 
  brace yourself! You'll be able to respond to Windows performance issues faster 
  than ever before!Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





RE: Get Quest Spotlight for free - at least that's what they claim

2001-09-26 Thread Ashish Kotak

I have just had a look at this and it looks excellent. thanks.
 
Ash
-Original Message-
From: Neil Harvey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Get Quest Spotlight for free - at least that's what they
claim


I have seen a demo of this and it is very very good.  Thanks for the
info

- Original Message - 
From: Yahoo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
To: NT System Admin Issues
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:28 AM
Subject: Get Quest Spotlight for free - at least that's what they claim


Hi,
 
you may have heared/seen the Quest Spotlight software that gives you a
neat view of the performance of your servers (basically a GUI for
perfmon counters).
Anyway, Quest are giving it away for free, no string attached.
I just registered and now have tto wait until they contact me and
continue the registration process...whatever that means.
 
regards
 
Uso
 
http://www.quest.com/tenspot/ http://www.quest.com/tenspot/ 
Free Windows Diagnostic Tool 

Brace Yourself!
Our FREE Visual Root-cause Diagnostics Will Blow You Away!

If Spotlight(tm)'s visual root-cause diagnostics doesn't blow you away,
then getting the product for free through Quest Software's Ten-Spot
program will!

Spotlight on Windows graphically displays, in real time, the actual flow
of data in your operating system, including I/O subsystem, cache and
kernel information, enabling you to quickly identify congested areas and
take appropriate corrective action.


Complete the registration form to participate in this program. You will
receive, at no charge, 10 (ten) perpetual licenses of Spotlight on
Windows and the first year's technical support for free, subject to the
terms and conditions of Quest Software's Software License Agreement.

There is no fine print; there are no conditions or pre-requisites.
Complete the registration form and brace yourself! You'll be able to
respond to Windows performance issues faster than ever before!

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english




Re: Get Quest Spotlight for free - at least that's what they claim

2001-09-26 Thread Uso



I tried the eval version too and it's concept is 
simple and straight to the point. Very clean and understandable 
interface.
The prices however are totally overpriced 
considering that it's "nothing but" a fancy GUI for the NT Perfmon.

The Price for SpotLight for Exchange was something 
like 3500$ per server or something in that range. It was also licensed per 
processor / per number of processor. Good product, messed up marketing. It 
should have been licenses one Admin + agents or something (there are no agents 
it reads perfmon counters).

Spotlight for NT was around 300$, and that's per 
server. Also quite expensive. Hope someone else grabs up the idea and releases a 
smiliar tool for a decent price.

regards

Uso


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Neil 
  Harvey 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:39 
  PM
  Subject: Re: Get Quest Spotlight for free 
  - at least that's what they claim
  
  I have seen a demo of this and it is very very 
  good. Thanks for the info
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Yahoo 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
10:28 AM
Subject: Get Quest Spotlight for free - 
at least that's what they claim


Hi,

you may have heared/seen the Quest Spotlight 
software that gives you a neat view of the performance of your servers 
(basically a GUI for perfmon counters).
Anyway, Quest are giving it away for free, no 
string attached.
I just registered and now have tto wait until 
they contact me and "continue the registration process"...whatever that 
means.

regards

Uso

http://www.quest.com/tenspot/
Free Windows Diagnostic Tool 

Brace 
Yourself!Our FREE Visual Root-cause Diagnostics Will Blow You 
Away!
If 
Spotlight's visual root-cause diagnostics doesn't blow you away, then 
getting the product for free through Quest Software's Ten-Spot 
program will!Spotlight on Windows graphically displays, in real 
time, the actual flow of data in your operating system, including I/O 
subsystem, cache and kernel information, enabling you to quickly identify 
congested areas and take appropriate corrective action.
Complete 
the registration form to participate in this program. You will receive, at 
no charge, 10 (ten) perpetual licenses of Spotlight on Windows and the first 
years technical support for free, subject to the terms and conditions of 
Quest Software's Software License Agreement.There is no fine print; 
there are no conditions or pre-requisites. Complete the registration form 
and brace yourself! You'll be able to respond to Windows performance issues 
faster than ever before!Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





RE: W2k server reboots

2001-09-26 Thread Shane van Jaarsveldt

Now I see you have Raid - check out the Backup exec versions and make
sure it is'nt a veritas issue


This email is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights. You assume all risk for your use. © 2001 Microsoft Corporation.
All rights reserved.


-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26 September 2001 11:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SV: W2k server reboots

Hi!

Thanks for the answers until now, I have loadet i386kd, and it gives:
Signature. . . . . . .PAGE
ValidDump. . . . . . .DUMP
MajorVersion . . . . .free system
MinorVersion . . . . .2195
DirectoryTableBase . .0x0003
PfnDataBase. . . . . .0x8204f000
PsLoadedModuleList . .0x8046ccf0
PsActiveProcessHead. .0x8046dbe0
MachineImageType . . .i386
NumberProcessors . . .1
BugCheckCode . . . . .0x007f
BugCheckParameter1 . .0x0008
BugCheckParameter2 . .0x
BugCheckParameter3 . .0x
BugCheckParameter4 . .0x

ExceptionCode. . . . .0x8003
ExceptionFlags . . . .0x0001
ExceptionAddress . . .0x804669be

Which I still don't understand.
I have found out that 0x007f means something hardware error related,
but I
have other servers with precisly same configuration, same patches, same
bios, same drivers etc.
-The machine is a IBM 5500 M20, with ½gb ram, serverraid v. 4,70, and
they don't reboot.

Any other ideas?


Jan Pedersen 


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shane van Jaarsveldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 10:40
Til: Jan Pedersen
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


Check with Veritas for updates there are known issues with some ROC
chips (Raid on Chip) controllers and certain machines - I have seen this
random reboot occasionally.


This email is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights. You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.


-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26 September 2001 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots

From Q254649:

You can load complete and kernel memory dumps with standard symbolic
debuggers
(such as I386kd.exe included with the Windows 2000 Support CD-ROM).
 





-Original Message-
From: Giles Caldersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 07:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


Is that on the Resource Kit?

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


I386kd.exe is your tool to read those badboys.

Search the kb...
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: W2k server reboots

Hi!

I have some trouble with a W2k server that reboots everynight, when the
backup starts on it.
(Backup Exec v. 8.5)
I have the server fully patched up to date.
It gives a entry in the eventlog:

Event Type: Information
Event Source:   Save Dump
Event Category: None
Event ID:   1001
Date:   26-09-2001
Time:   01:13:54
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck.  The bugcheck was: 0x007f
(0x0008, 0x, 0x, 0x). Microsoft Windows 2000
[v15.2195]. A dump was saved in: C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini092601-01.dmp. 

Is it possible to read anything from the information in the above?

BG

Jan Pedersen

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for
the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify TD
Waterhouse Investor Services Limited ABN 41 010 488 687 immediately by
return e-mail or telephone +61 2 9994 9000 and destroy the original
message.
The content and opinions contained in this e-mail are not necessarily
those
of TD Waterhouse. TD Waterhouse is a member of the Australian Stock
Exchange
Limited. 


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english


*
If you receive this e-mail in error, please contact +44 20 7280 5500. 
The information contained in this e-mail and in the attachments if 
any, is confidential.  Unauthorised use, disclosure, 

Re: Get Quest Spotlight for free - at least that's what they claim

2001-09-26 Thread Neil Harvey



The only thing I found that was missing was some 
form of alerting, shame it doesn't send admin alerts or tie into exchange (if it 
does it couldn't find it.) 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Uso 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:46 
  AM
  Subject: Re: Get Quest Spotlight for free 
  - at least that's what they claim
  
  I tried the eval version too and it's concept is 
  simple and straight to the point. Very clean and understandable 
  interface.
  The prices however are totally overpriced 
  considering that it's "nothing but" a fancy GUI for the NT 
  Perfmon.
  
  The Price for SpotLight for Exchange was 
  something like 3500$ per server or something in that range. It was also 
  licensed per processor / per number of processor. Good product, messed up 
  marketing. It should have been licenses one Admin + agents or something (there 
  are no agents it reads perfmon counters).
  
  Spotlight for NT was around 300$, and that's per 
  server. Also quite expensive. Hope someone else grabs up the idea and releases 
  a smiliar tool for a decent price.
  
  regards
  
  Uso
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Neil 
Harvey 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
1:39 PM
Subject: Re: Get Quest Spotlight for 
free - at least that's what they claim

I have seen a demo of this and it is very very 
good. Thanks for the info

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Yahoo 
  To: NT System Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  10:28 AM
  Subject: Get Quest Spotlight for free 
  - at least that's what they claim
  
  
  Hi,
  
  you may have heared/seen the Quest Spotlight 
  software that gives you a neat view of the performance of your servers 
  (basically a GUI for perfmon counters).
  Anyway, Quest are giving it away for free, no 
  string attached.
  I just registered and now have tto wait until 
  they contact me and "continue the registration process"...whatever that 
  means.
  
  regards
  
  Uso
  
  http://www.quest.com/tenspot/
  Free Windows Diagnostic Tool 
  
  Brace 
  Yourself!Our FREE Visual Root-cause Diagnostics Will Blow You 
  Away!
  If 
  Spotlight™'s visual root-cause diagnostics doesn't blow you away, then 
  getting the product for free through Quest Software's Ten-Spot 
  program will!Spotlight on Windows graphically displays, in real 
  time, the actual flow of data in your operating system, including I/O 
  subsystem, cache and kernel information, enabling you to quickly identify 
  congested areas and take appropriate corrective action.
  Complete 
  the registration form to participate in this program. You will receive, at 
  no charge, 10 (ten) perpetual licenses of Spotlight on Windows and the 
  first year’s technical support for free, subject to the terms and 
  conditions of Quest Software's Software License Agreement.There is 
  no fine print; there are no conditions or pre-requisites. Complete the 
  registration form and brace yourself! You'll be able to respond to Windows 
  performance issues faster than ever before!Want to unsub? 
  Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





SV: W2k server reboots

2001-09-26 Thread Jan Pedersen

Hi!

Okay, I have mis-explanied...The backup is running on/from another
server,
the reboot occours then when the backupserver is going to take the
backup
of this server, 2-5 min. after starting it reboots.

Did I explain this good enough?



Jan Pedersen 


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 11:22
Til: NT System Admin Issues
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


I'm no hardwware guru but as it happens when the backups start, is it
possible to swap tape drives? 




-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 10:02
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SV: W2k server reboots


Hi!

Thanks for the answers until now, I have loadet i386kd, and it gives:
Signature. . . . . . .PAGE
ValidDump. . . . . . .DUMP
MajorVersion . . . . .free system
MinorVersion . . . . .2195
DirectoryTableBase . .0x0003
PfnDataBase. . . . . .0x8204f000
PsLoadedModuleList . .0x8046ccf0
PsActiveProcessHead. .0x8046dbe0
MachineImageType . . .i386
NumberProcessors . . .1
BugCheckCode . . . . .0x007f
BugCheckParameter1 . .0x0008
BugCheckParameter2 . .0x
BugCheckParameter3 . .0x
BugCheckParameter4 . .0x

ExceptionCode. . . . .0x8003
ExceptionFlags . . . .0x0001
ExceptionAddress . . .0x804669be

Which I still don't understand.
I have found out that 0x007f means something hardware error related,
but I
have other servers with precisly same configuration, same patches, same
bios, same drivers etc.
-The machine is a IBM 5500 M20, with ½gb ram, serverraid v. 4,70, and
they don't reboot.

Any other ideas?


Jan Pedersen 


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shane van Jaarsveldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 10:40
Til: Jan Pedersen
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


Check with Veritas for updates there are known issues with some ROC
chips (Raid on Chip) controllers and certain machines - I have seen this
random reboot occasionally.


This email is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights. You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.


-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26 September 2001 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots

From Q254649:

You can load complete and kernel memory dumps with standard symbolic
debuggers
(such as I386kd.exe included with the Windows 2000 Support CD-ROM).
 





-Original Message-
From: Giles Caldersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 07:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


Is that on the Resource Kit?

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


I386kd.exe is your tool to read those badboys.

Search the kb...
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: W2k server reboots

Hi!

I have some trouble with a W2k server that reboots everynight, when the
backup starts on it.
(Backup Exec v. 8.5)
I have the server fully patched up to date.
It gives a entry in the eventlog:

Event Type: Information
Event Source:   Save Dump
Event Category: None
Event ID:   1001
Date:   26-09-2001
Time:   01:13:54
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck.  The bugcheck was: 0x007f
(0x0008, 0x, 0x, 0x). Microsoft Windows 2000
[v15.2195]. A dump was saved in: C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini092601-01.dmp. 

Is it possible to read anything from the information in the above?

BG

Jan Pedersen

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for
the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify TD
Waterhouse Investor Services Limited ABN 41 010 488 687 immediately by
return e-mail or telephone +61 2 9994 9000 and destroy the original
message.
The content and opinions contained in this e-mail are not necessarily
those
of TD Waterhouse. TD Waterhouse is a member of the Australian Stock
Exchange
Limited. 


Want to unsub? Do that here:

RE: IIS and CA in 2000

2001-09-26 Thread Shannon Speck
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



Man, 
that was dead on!! After posting yesterday evening, I finally came across an 
article that explained this.This info was not the easiest to find. The 
only difference in the article from your info was how to access the local host. 
They are suggesting http://localhost/certsrv . This seemed to 
work. They did not mention the port #. I am going to have to go back through it 
and see if I can find the option for Web server. I don't recall seeing that. My 
next task is getting rid of the errors for stuff not matching. Thanks a million 
for the info.
Have a 
good one,
SS

  -Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  2:34 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS and CA 
  in 2000
  I'll assume that you have already generated and 
  saved the certificate request file (say certreq.txt) from IIS. Form 
  there:
  In your browser go to http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.asp
  Select Request a Certificate - hit 
  Next
  Select Advanced Request - hit Next
  Select the second option: "Submit a certificate 
  request using a base 64..." - hit Next
  Copy and Paste the entire contents of your 
  certreq.txt file into the "Saved Request" text field. On the Certificate 
  Template drop-down select "Web Server" and hit Submit.
  If your CA is appropriately set-up you can on the 
  next screen download and save the DER (or Base 64) encoded certificate - which 
  can then be picked up by the IIS Assign Server Certificate Wizard. If not: you 
  need to start the CA Management Console and manually issue the certificate 
  request by right-clicking the request in the Pending List - you can then use 
  http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.aspto 
  'pick-up' and save the certificate from the server (or export it manually from 
  the CA Management Console).
  In IIS when you 're-start' the Wizard just give 
  it the name/location of the .cer file that was generated containing the 
  encoded certificate.
  
  Chris Shattock
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon 
Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
1:10 AM
Subject: IIS and CA in 2000

I am not sure if this is an appropriate question 
for this list, but here it goes. I have a 
W2K SP2 server running IIS 5.0 and have installed Certificate Services in 
Stand Alone mode (because I want to issue certificates over the internet). I 
am trying to get the default website up and running SSL. The site functions 
properly until I invoke the SSL. My question is how do I "bind" a 
certificate to the site? I have used Verisign in the past and I just send 
them my file and they send back a new file to install on the site. I can not 
figure out how to do this with MS's Certificate Authority. I have never seen 
the process from a Verisign stand point and this is where I am stuck. I have 
read numerous articles on how to do this and they all seem to tell me how to 
install Certificate Services and stop there.
Thanks, 
SS Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





Re: IIS and CA in 2000

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Shattock
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



If you haven't been screwing around with your 
'default web site' like me then just use port 80 not 91 - i.e. http://localhost/CertSrv/default.asp

Chris Shattock

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Chris 
  Shattock 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:33 
  AM
  Subject: Re: IIS and CA in 2000
  
  I'll assume that you have already generated and 
  saved the certificate request file (say certreq.txt) from IIS. Form 
  there:
  In your browser go to http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.asp
  Select Request a Certificate - hit 
  Next
  Select Advanced Request - hit Next
  Select the second option: "Submit a certificate 
  request using a base 64..." - hit Next
  Copy and Paste the entire contents of your 
  certreq.txt file into the "Saved Request" text field. On the Certificate 
  Template drop-down select "Web Server" and hit Submit.
  If your CA is appropriately set-up you can on the 
  next screen download and save the DER (or Base 64) encoded certificate - which 
  can then be picked up by the IIS Assign Server Certificate Wizard. If not: you 
  need to start the CA Management Console and manually issue the certificate 
  request by right-clicking the request in the Pending List - you can then use 
  http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.aspto 
  'pick-up' and save the certificate from the server (or export it manually from 
  the CA Management Console).
  In IIS when you 're-start' the Wizard just give 
  it the name/location of the .cer file that was generated containing the 
  encoded certificate.
  
  Chris Shattock
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon 
Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
1:10 AM
Subject: IIS and CA in 2000

I am not sure if this is an appropriate question 
for this list, but here it goes. I have a 
W2K SP2 server running IIS 5.0 and have installed Certificate Services in 
Stand Alone mode (because I want to issue certificates over the internet). I 
am trying to get the default website up and running SSL. The site functions 
properly until I invoke the SSL. My question is how do I "bind" a 
certificate to the site? I have used Verisign in the past and I just send 
them my file and they send back a new file to install on the site. I can not 
figure out how to do this with MS's Certificate Authority. I have never seen 
the process from a Verisign stand point and this is where I am stuck. I have 
read numerous articles on how to do this and they all seem to tell me how to 
install Certificate Services and stop there.
Thanks, 
SS Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english





RE: IIS and CA in 2000

2001-09-26 Thread Shannon Speck
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



I just 
crashed my Certificate Service. I installed WS's latest cumulative IIS patch 
(q301625) to tighten IIS back up and the certificate service will not start now. 
I am going to re-install the W2K SP2 and see if that fixes it. If not I guess I 
will have to remove/re-install certificate services.Are you running 
theq301625 patch mentioned above?

SS

  -Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  6:10 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS and CA 
  in 2000
  Check my earlier reply for port# - if you have 
  all defaults forget it - just default to 80.
  Personally I don't read that much - this and 
  other things I find out by trying - consequently I end up rebuilding my server 
  every 3 weeks or so - but each time I do it goes quicker (after re-installing 
  W2KS and AS x times since 1998!).
  
  I have found a self-certified CA to be very 
  usefule for devolpment and testing out multiple IP-less hosting with different 
  SSL's and Exchange etc. - they're all done the same way. So have some 
  fun!
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon 
Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
1:02 PM
Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 2000

Man, that was dead on!! After posting yesterday evening, I finally 
came across an article that explained this.This info was not the 
easiest to find. The only difference in the article from your info was how 
to access the local host. They are suggesting http://localhost/certsrv . This seemed 
to work. They did not mention the port #. I am going to have to go back 
through it and see if I can find the option for Web server. I don't recall 
seeing that. My next task is getting rid of the errors for stuff not 
matching. Thanks a million for the info.
Have a good one,
SS

  -Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  2:34 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS 
  and CA in 2000
  I'll assume that you have already generated 
  and saved the certificate request file (say certreq.txt) from IIS. Form 
  there:
  In your browser go to http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.asp
  Select Request a Certificate - hit 
  Next
  Select Advanced Request - hit 
  Next
  Select the second option: "Submit a 
  certificate request using a base 64..." - hit Next
  Copy and Paste the entire contents of your 
  certreq.txt file into the "Saved Request" text field. On the Certificate 
  Template drop-down select "Web Server" and hit Submit.
  If your CA is appropriately set-up you can on 
  the next screen download and save the DER (or Base 64) encoded certificate 
  - which can then be picked up by the IIS Assign Server Certificate Wizard. 
  If not: you need to start the CA Management Console and manually issue the 
  certificate request by right-clicking the request in the Pending List - 
  you can then use http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.aspto 
  'pick-up' and save the certificate from the server (or export it manually 
  from the CA Management Console).
  In IIS when you 're-start' the Wizard just 
  give it the name/location of the .cer file that was generated containing 
  the encoded certificate.
  
  Chris Shattock
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
1:10 AM
Subject: IIS and CA in 2000

I am not sure if this is an appropriate 
question for this list, but here it goes. I have a W2K SP2 server running IIS 5.0 and have installed 
Certificate Services in Stand Alone mode (because I want to issue 
certificates over the internet). I am trying to get the default website 
up and running SSL. The site functions properly until I invoke the SSL. 
My question is how do I "bind" a certificate to the site? I have used 
Verisign in the past and I just send them my file and they send back a 
new file to install on the site. I can not figure out how to do this 
with MS's Certificate Authority. I have never seen the process from a 
Verisign stand point and this is where I am stuck. I have read numerous 
articles on how to do this and they all seem to tell me how to install 
Certificate Services and stop there.
Thanks, 
SS Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
to unsub? Do that 

RE: Wins Servers

2001-09-26 Thread Paul . Rochford



you 
may need to set a registry key that allows updates from non configured partners 
then you should get replication.

Have a 
look at http://www.jsiinc.com/ and do a 
search for wins, the reghack should be in there somewhere. It's where I got it 
before. 


  -Original Message-From: Brian 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  11:22To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Wins 
  Servers
  
  I have Two different Domains using 
  WINNT4lets call them X and Y. Have a WINS server on Both Domains but 
  since they are on different subnets I need to have them replicate for various 
  reasons but they will not replicate push or pull. ONe domain shuts out the 
  other with a message not having permissions. They are set up as push and pull 
  partners too in WINS manager. WHy can't they replicate. If it matters they are 
  set up as Trusted and Trusting Domains.
  
  Thanks
  BrianWant to unsub? Do 
  that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please 
notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this E-mail 
from your system. Thank you.
It is possible for data transmitted by email to be deliberately or
accidentally corrupted or intercepted. For this reason, where the
communication is by email, the Bank of Ireland Group does not accept 
any responsibility for any breach of confidence which may arise 
through the use of this medium.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept 
 for the presence of known computer viruses.

  

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





[LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



New on 
NTSYSADMIN?

Here 
are a few "Administrivia" pointers.

1) 
Lurk for a week before you dive into threads.
2) 
SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were 
sometimes
 impossible. We think we got that 
fixed now.
3) 
Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to the 
footer.
4) 
Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread. Delete 
whole threads
 that are not 
interesting.
5) We 
have asearchable archive. You can get there via the "unsub link" in the 
footer.

And 
remember these golden rules:

ON 
TOPIC, NO NOISE, andFRIENDLY.

Thanks.

Stu






Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Re: IIS 4.0 WWW Access Fails Intermittently

2001-09-26 Thread Peter Pearson
Title: IIS 4.0 WWW Access Fails Intermittently



It looks like you may have a bad driver/OBDC or 
something to that effect (MDAC maybe). Are you running an Oracle database on the 
same server by chance?

Peter

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rodarte, Tomas 
  
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:18 
  AM
  Subject: IIS 4.0 WWW Access Fails 
  Intermittently
  
  We have been having a strange problem lately on one of our IIS 
  4.0 web servers. This server will run for a few days without a single 
  problem or error... and then out of the blue a Dr. Watson error 
  appears. Below is the log entry for the Dr. Watson error from the Event 
  Viewer:
  --- 
  Event ID: 4097 
  The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg, generated an application 
  error The error occurred on 9/22/2001 @ 3: 
  7:33.399 The exception generated was c005 at address 60b1fefb 
  (nnciqdn) 
  --- 
  I have searched on MS Support Knowledge Base and on the 
  Internet with no solutions that have fixed this issue. If anyone has run 
  into something similar and may have some insight, please share this to the 
  list and me. 
  Looking at the DRWATSON.LOG file I found that this memory 
  reference the Oracle client. I am going to have the Oracle DBA's 
  re-install the client and have the web developers verify the code that uses 
  the client. I included some of the DRWATSON.LOG at the end of the 
  e-mail. 
  Here some more information about this. When this crash 
  happens, I cannot successfully start the WWW service again without closing the 
  Dr. Watson error or killing the DRWATSON process remotely. Once this is 
  killed, I can then restart all IIS services successfully. 
  FYI: I'm new to the list, but I enjoy reading the e-mail that 
  comes from it. I hope to be able to help others, and others to be able 
  to help me sometimes. 
  Thanks in advance! 
  --- 
  Microsoft (R) Windows NT (TM) Version 4.00 DrWtsn32 
  Copyright (C) 1985-1996 Microsoft Corp. All rights 
  reserved. 
  Application exception occurred:  App: exe\inetinfo.dbg 
  (pid=380)  
  When: 9/11/2001 @ 14:58:13.656  Exception number: c005 
  (access violation) 
  * System Information *  Computer Name: ZEUS 
   User Name: 
  SYSTEM  
  Number of Processors: 2  Processor Type: x86 Family 6 
  Model 8 Stepping 3  Windows Version: 4.0 
   Current Build: 
  1381  
  Service Pack: 6  Current Type: Multiprocessor 
  Free  
  Registered Organization: CSHS  Registered Owner: 
  CSHS 
  * Task List *  0 Idle.exe  2 
  System.exe  37 smss.exe  42 CSRSS.exe  51 
  WINLOGON.exe  57 SERVICES.exe  60 LSASS.exe  85 
  SPOOLSS.exe 101 RPCSS.exe 108 msdtc.exe 128 
  CPQRCMC.exe 132 defwatch.exe 138 DKService.exe 141 
  pds.exe 148 LLSSRV.exe 152 rtvscan.exe 172 
  PSTORES.exe 177 ATSVC.exe 186 SNMP.exe 192 
  surveyor.exe 197 sysdown.exe 202 dsmcad.exe 215 
  MSGSYS.exe 231 cpqnimgt.exe 242 cqmgserv.exe 247 
  cqmgstor.exe 276 HNDLRSVC.exe 209 IAO.exe 293 XFR.exe 
  316 cqmghost.exe 328 
  cpqwmgmt.exe 285 dsmcsvc.exe 335 NET.exe  56 NET1.exe 
  380 inetinfo.exe 180 
  vhttp.exe 238 dcm.exe 307 DRWTSN32.exe  0 
  _Total.exe 
  (0100 - 01005000) exe\inetinfo.dbg (77f6 - 77fbe000) dll\ntdll.dbg (7800 - 
  78044000) (77f0 - 77f5e000) 
  dll\kernel32.dbg (77dc - 77dff000) 
  dll\advapi32.dbg (77e7 - 77ec5000) 
  dll\user32.dbg (77ed - 77efc000) 
  dll\gdi32.dbg (77e1 - 77e67000) 
  dll\rpcrt4.dbg (77b2 - 77bd1000) 
  dll\ole32.dbg (68e8 - 68e86000) 
  dll\rpcref.dbg (77bf - 77bf7000) 
  dll\rpcltc1.dbg (683a - 683a7000) 
  dll\iisadmin.dbg (6822 - 6822c000) 
  dll\coadmin.dbg (77c4 - 77d7b000) 
  dll\shell32.dbg (7159 - 71617000) 
  COMCTL32.dbg (6802 - 6802a000) 
  dll\admwprox.dbg (7488 - 74894000) 
  dll\userenv.dbg (0088 - 008c1000) 
  dll\netapi32.dbg (7784 - 77849000) 
  dll\NetRap.dbg (777e - 777ed000) 
  dll\samlib.dbg (776d - 776d8000) 
  dll\wsock32.dbg (776b - 776c4000) 
  dll\ws2_32.dbg (776a - 776a7000) 
  dll\ws2help.dbg (7795 - 77979000) 
  dll\wldap32.dbg (6890 - 6890d000) 
  dll\nsepm.dbg (6844 - 6845) 
  dll\iismap.dbg (7740 - 7741e000) 
  dll\sch128c.dbg (5e38 - 5e3a5000) 
  dll\msoss.dbg (5cf0 - 5cf5e000) 
  dll\crypt32.dbg (68df - 68e03000) 
  dll\metadata.dbg (68c9 - 68c9b000) 
  dll\wamreg.dbg (5f40 - 5f4f2000) (6534 - 653d5000) oleaut32.dbg (7ca0 - 
  7ca1b000) dll\rsabase.dbg (5a80 - 5a80f000) 
  dll\pstorec.dbg (68db - 68db7000) 
  dll\admexs.dbg (68ea - 68ea7000) 
  dll\svcext.dbg (68c0 - 68c39000) 
  dll\w3svc.dbg (6859 - 685bf000) 
  dll\infocomm.dbg (6862 - 6862e000) 
  dll\isatq.dbg (682b - 682b6000) 
  dll\iisfecnv.dbg (6856 - 68568000) 
  dll\inetsloc.dbg (7767 - 77687000) 
  dll\mswsock.dbg (76e7 - 76e82000) 
  dll\secur128.dbg (6882 - 68827000) 
  dll\lonsint.dbg (4760 - 4760e000) 
  dll\wintrust.dbg 

RE: File services hangs

2001-09-26 Thread Ulm, Jeff
Title: RE: File services hangs





Kliment has the right idea. Our server would hang due to a memory leak that an application had. You might want to run Performance Monitor to see if your memory usage rises steadily for no apparent reason. If so, you may have to shut down services or applications individually to find the leak. Otherwise a scheduled reboot may be in order (not a recommended solution).

Jeff U.


-Original Message-
From: klimo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:23 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: File services hangs



Did you install a new software last time?
This could happen if you are runing programs, which are dealing with memory
not just the best way
( i.e. few old versions of Wingate).
Kliment
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
From: Sauer, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:58 AM
Subject: File services hangs



 Esteemed Colleagues,

 I have a Compaq Proliant 3000 server with a Pentium II 333 Mhz CPU and
 128 Mb Ram running NT4.0 SP5. Access to file and print services has
 recently started hanging...on a daily basis. When the services hang I
can't
 even log into the server or connect in any way using naming services. It
 has to be manually powered off to reboot. There are no traces of any
 problems in the logs. No evidence of Dr. Watson.

 I'm Stumped and at a loss of what to even look for in Technet or the
 archives. Very baffling.

 Regards,

 Steve Sauer
 Technical Lead - Systems Operations
 WIPP Site, Carlsbad, NM


 Want to unsub? Do that here:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmin_mod
e=0lang=english





Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmin_mode=0=english



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: What to check if my IIS server has been compromised.

2001-09-26 Thread Jim Holmgren



James,
In 
addition to all the other checks people have posted, you may also want to head 
over to eEyehttp://www.eeye.com/html/ and grab their 
free Nimda scanner (thanks Mark, et al!) to run after you've done all your 
patching/repairing. 
We 
have a fairly large development subnet here, I run the scanner against it 
daily. Some of our software developers are in too much of a rush to 
"bother" patching their IIS test boxes. These boxes are all internal on 
our network (172 IP range), nonetheless Nimda and Code Red can run amuck from 
the inside as well. When I find a box that hasn't been patched, I email 
the box admin and give him/her 15 minutes to patch it,after that I shut 
off the WWW service and turn off the port on the switch they are connected 
to...they usually find the time to patch things after that.

-Jim


Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com 
Anytime, anywhere, any Internet channel-- we 
touch tens of millions online each day. Advertising.com-- Superior Technology, Superior Performance. 


  -Original Message-From: James Corlew 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:50 
  PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: What to check if my 
  IIS server has been compromised.
  
  Hi everyone, I am a newer member to this list and enjoy all the good 
  information everyone shares.
  
  I got an e-mail from ouradmin at another location looking for 
  advice. I believe he is running IIS 4 on a NT 4 box without the current 
  security patches.If aNAV Corporate edition scan doesn't come up 
  with anything, whatfiles, entries, accounts etc. should I look 
  forafter patching the server to be sure it isn't 
compromised?
  
  Thanks in advance for any help
  
  James Corlew
  
  
  Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.comWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


***The information transmitted in this email is intended only forthe person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking ofany action in reliance upon, this information by persons orentities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.If you received this email in error, please contact thesender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Win 98

2001-09-26 Thread David Thomas
Title: Win 98



I might be wrong 
but Ithought that 10.x addresses came under the class A subnet ? i.e. 
255.0.0.0 but I might well be wrong, we use 10.10.x.x and thats a 255.0.0.0 
subnet
RegardsDavidt 

  -Original Message-From: Kopacko, Jason 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 September 2001 
  17:44To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Win 
  98
  I got a good one for you guys. I have a NT4 DC 
  server running DHCP/DNS/WINS. I am on a class B private subnet using the 
  10.52.x.x address range. I have a 98 machine that everytime it tries to renew 
  its lease at the half-way point, it changes the subnet mask from a class B 
  255.255.0.0 to a class A 255.0.0.0. Once that happens, of course all it can do 
  is access local machines and will not be able to get passed through my router 
  for internet and corporate access. I have done everything short of reloading 
  the system, which will get upgraded to 2000 soon. But I am curious if any of 
  you guys have bumped into this, since it is only one machine? Please 
  help!
  Thank You,  Jason 
  Kopacko Network 
  Engineer Gold Strike 
  Casino, Tunica, Mississippi (662) 
  357-1305 Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix

2001-09-26 Thread Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan

Does anyone know what percent of market share each of these have in North
America NT4, W2k, netware, and unix. 

Is this about right NT4 55% Win2k 5% netware 5% unix 45% ?

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




[LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] RE: maximum number of messages per day

2001-09-26 Thread Stu Sjouwerman



It's a 
limit we have built into Lyris as a precautionto prevent the list from 

looping, andis correct in the sense that 
it's not a bug. If you run into this, 
just 
wait till next morning and try again. If it gets too bad, we'll bump up 
that
500 
message-ceiling.

Warm 
regards,

Stu


  -Original Message-From: Yahoo 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:38 
  PMTo: Stu SjouwermanSubject: maximum number of messages 
  per day
  -=-=-=
  Sorry, your message was not sent out to 'ntsysadmin' because the 
  maximum number of messages per day has been reached. The maximum 
  number of messages is 500.If you believe you are receiving this 
  message in error, wait untiltomorrow and resend your message.-=-=
  
  The message came from Lyris ListManager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  andnot from Yahoo as I initially thought.
  What does that mean?
  
  regards
  
  Uso
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Re: Win 98

2001-09-26 Thread Neil Harvey
Title: Win 98



they do but there is nothing stopping you 
subnetting them.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  David 
  Thomas 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:44 
  PM
  Subject: RE: Win 98
  
  I might be wrong 
  but Ithought that 10.x addresses came under the class A subnet ? i.e. 
  255.0.0.0 but I might well be wrong, we use 10.10.x.x and thats a 255.0.0.0 
  subnet
  RegardsDavidt 
  
-Original Message-From: Kopacko, Jason 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 September 2001 
17:44To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Win 
98
I got a good one for you guys. I have a NT4 DC 
server running DHCP/DNS/WINS. I am on a class B private subnet using the 
10.52.x.x address range. I have a 98 machine that everytime it tries to 
renew its lease at the half-way point, it changes the subnet mask from a 
class B 255.255.0.0 to a class A 255.0.0.0. Once that happens, of course all 
it can do is access local machines and will not be able to get passed 
through my router for internet and corporate access. I have done everything 
short of reloading the system, which will get upgraded to 2000 soon. But I 
am curious if any of you guys have bumped into this, since it is only one 
machine? Please help!
Thank You,  Jason 
Kopacko Network 
Engineer Gold Strike 
Casino, Tunica, Mississippi (662) 
357-1305 Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
  a good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: SMTP server for W2K

2001-09-26 Thread Clark, Steve

Excuse the ignorance here - but, why would you want your own internal SMTP
address as opposed to using the ISP's SMTP server?

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax

-Original Message-
From: David Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP server for W2K

We use Rocklife MailSite:

http://www.mailsite.com/

It has been pretty good software.



-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP server for W2K


Any recommendations for a good mail server program for Win2K?  Thanks.

Stephen



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0?=english

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: MS Security Rollup

2001-09-26 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry
Title: 



I'm using Outlook XP, my rule for this list is 
setup like this:Apply this rule after the message arrivesWith NT 
System Admin Issues in the message headerMove it to the NT System 
Admin Issues folderWorks 
great!Sherry-Original Message-From: TDI Custom 
Computers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 
25, 2001 5:03 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: MS Security 
RollupIn Outlook XP, I can't get _any_ to filter. Am using To: and 
From: and justFrom: but neither work.All other lists 
work.Example:Apply this rule after the message arrivesWhere the 
>From line contains '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Move it to the 
ntsysadmin folderMike- Original Message -From: 
"John Eckenrode" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "NT System Admin Issues" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 
2001 7:36 AMSubject: RE: MS Security RollupI put in an MS 
Outlook rule to filter these newsgroup items to a specialfolder, and most 
get routed to the folder, but not all, for example theone 
below.Anyone experiencing this? Any ideas?thanks, John 
Eckenrode-Original Message-From: Lee, Damon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 
2001 8:29 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: MS Security 
RollupHello all,Has anyone encountered any problems using 
the post MS SP6a SecurityRollupPackage?DamonWant to 
unsub? Do that here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
to unsub? Do that here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
to unsub? Do that here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: OWA

2001-09-26 Thread Ian Kelly
Title: Message



Yes 
- AFAIK - they're not going anywhere to reach the Exchange 
server
Ian-[EMAIL PROTECTED]-The 
superior man is distressed by the limitation of his ability; he is not 
distressed by the fact that men do not recognize the ability he has. - Confucius 


  
  -Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 26, 2001 04:52 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
  OWA
  I might be being blonde here but does that mean 
  that if OWA and Exchange are running on the same server then the passwords are 
  encrypted?
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:51 
PM
Subject: RE: OWA

Yes, First its has be loaded on a web server of 
course, Then load Exchange admin on the web server you want to run OWA. Then 
Load OWA on web server. The only bad thing to loading OWA on a different 
machine is that your Passwords will be sent in clear text unless its a 
Domain Controller.

STG1(SW) Kirk 
Etchberger 
COMREGSUPPGRU MAYPORT FL 
SERMC AIS LPO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
TEL: 904-270-5126 EXT 
3119 DSN: 
312-960-5126 EXT 3119 
MCSE, MCSD, 
CCNA
Is anyone running OWA on 
a different server than Exchange 5.5? If yes, what procedures did you 
take? 

  After getting hit with the Nimda virus, I had 
  to reformat the hard drive and reinstall patches. I have not been 
  able to get OWA installed on that server I keep receiving an error message 
  when trying to install OWA "Failed to remove OWA" . The specified 
  file cannot be found, Microsoft NT ID No: ox00c2.
  Cassandra Cody, MCSE Missouri Botanical Garden  See the World 314-577-0813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
to unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishWant 
  to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Re: Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix

2001-09-26 Thread Neil Harvey

I doubt it that gives you 110%

- Original Message -
From: Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:42 PM
Subject: Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix


 Does anyone know what percent of market share each of these have in North
 America NT4, W2k, netware, and unix.

 Is this about right NT4 55% Win2k 5% netware 5% unix 45% ?

 Want to unsub? Do that here:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




To Unlock IISLock

2001-09-26 Thread Adil Hindistan

Hi All,

I used IISLock of MS on our IIS5 with the express option. Then instead of
undoing the changes I rerun the IISLock but this time unselecting ASP option
as I need to run ASP pages. To make things more complicated Nimda infected
the server! We were able to remove Nimda. Now .htm, .html pages work but ASP
pages do not work.

I am not sure what is causing all these, I actually tried to remove and
reinstall IIS from scratch or applying and undoing IISLock at express mode,
no hope yet.

Any suggestions ?

Adil 
ICQ 26477783

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix

2001-09-26 Thread Randal, Phil

It is extremely difficult to measure the market share taken by the free
operating systems such as GNU/Linux - I can legally download one copy of
Redhat Linux 7.1 (for example) and install it on all my servers.  How is
that going to show in the market share statistics?

Cheers,

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

 -Original Message-
 From: Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 September 2001 12:42
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix
 
 
 Does anyone know what percent of market share each of these 
 have in North
 America NT4, W2k, netware, and unix. 
 
 Is this about right NT4 55% Win2k 5% netware 5% unix 45% ?
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsys
admintext_mode=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix

2001-09-26 Thread Skelson, Jim

I would think that at least one of those market shares is incorrect.

Jim


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay

2001-09-26 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry
Title: Exchange 5.5  Preventing Mail Relay





Hi all,


I've got a situation that I need to resolve  would like to do it without having to call MS :)


I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that has routing enabled for POP3/IMAP4 support. I have gone through every MS Tech Net article that I can find on how to setup Exchange to not relay mail and have not been able to get it setup correctly. Right now there is an outsourced Linux box in front of the Exchange server that checks for mail being relayed. My organization wants to get rid of that box because we are paying a monthly fee for it that should be unnecessary because Exchange is supposed to be able to do this.

If anyone has any input/experience/advice on this I would really appreciate it.


Sherry Abercrombie



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Re: To Unlock IISLock

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Spencer

.. in file types, what is the .asp associated with for an application?
Kent

--- Adil Hindistan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 I used IISLock of MS on our IIS5 with the express option. Then
 instead of
 undoing the changes I rerun the IISLock but this time unselecting ASP
 option
 as I need to run ASP pages. To make things more complicated Nimda
 infected
 the server! We were able to remove Nimda. Now .htm, .html pages work
 but ASP
 pages do not work.
 
 I am not sure what is causing all these, I actually tried to remove
 and
 reinstall IIS from scratch or applying and undoing IISLock at express
 mode,
 no hope yet.
 
 Any suggestions ?
 
 Adil 
 ICQ 26477783
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. 
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




[LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix

2001-09-26 Thread Stu Sjouwerman

This thread is OFF TOPIC:

Please re-read:

Do's: 
-

- Discuss NT/W2K System Admin problems and/or workarounds, how to, 
what to, why to, type questions.  
- Discuss third-party Windows NT products, providing that the product 
is designed to aid in NT System Administration 
- Discuss other platforms (Macintosh, Netware, or Samba/Unix) 
assuming that the problem is related to Windows NT deployment 

Don'ts: 
--

- Discuss Windows '95, unless this is a client causing trouble 
with an NT environment. 
- Discuss Windows for Workgroups or Windows 3.x, for any reason
- Post large articles to the list, web pages were made for that. 
Send a link with the URL! 
- Generate noise, voice your upset, flame, or make inflammatory 
remarks. Save that for offline or better yet, do not do it at all. 

Thanks for your cooperation.

Warm regards,

Stu


 -Original Message-
 From: Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:42 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Market share of NT4, 2000, netware, and unix
 
 Does anyone know what percent of market share each of these have in North
 America NT4, W2k, netware, and unix. 
 
 Is this about right NT4 55% Win2k 5% netware 5% unix 45% ?
 
 

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




Re: IIS and CA in 2000

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Shattock
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



No I wasn't. Yes I am now: Following apply it 
appears that the patch removed the CertSrv virtual directory from localhost - 
these things are sent to amuse us. Just re-create a virtual directory called 
CertSrv and point it to the certsrv subdirectory of 
%systempath%\system32\certsrv.

Of course your machine is probably hugely different 
from mine (which will be rebuilt this weekend it is so screwed up) that you may 
have other issues. Firstly check to see if the localhost\CertSrv is still 
there.

Chris Shattock

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shannon 
  Speck 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:12 
  PM
  Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 2000
  
  I 
  just crashed my Certificate Service. I installed WS's latest cumulative IIS 
  patch (q301625) to tighten IIS back up and the certificate service will not 
  start now. I am going to re-install the W2K SP2 and see if that fixes it. If 
  not I guess I will have to remove/re-install certificate services.Are 
  you running theq301625 patch mentioned above?
  
  SS
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
6:10 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS and 
CA in 2000
Check my earlier reply for port# - if you have 
all defaults forget it - just default to 80.
Personally I don't read that much - this and 
other things I find out by trying - consequently I end up rebuilding my 
server every 3 weeks or so - but each time I do it goes quicker (after 
re-installing W2KS and AS x times since 1998!).

I have found a self-certified CA to be very 
usefule for devolpment and testing out multiple IP-less hosting with 
different SSL's and Exchange etc. - they're all done the same way. So have 
some fun!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shannon 
  Speck 
  To: NT System Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  1:02 PM
  Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 2000
  
  Man, that was dead on!! After posting yesterday evening, I finally 
  came across an article that explained this.This info was not the 
  easiest to find. The only difference in the article from your info was how 
  to access the local host. They are suggesting http://localhost/certsrv . This seemed 
  to work. They did not mention the port #. I am going to have to go back 
  through it and see if I can find the option for Web server. I don't recall 
  seeing that. My next task is getting rid of the errors for stuff not 
  matching. Thanks a million for the info.
  Have a good one,
  SS
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 2:34 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
IIS and CA in 2000
I'll assume that you have already generated 
and saved the certificate request file (say certreq.txt) from IIS. Form 
there:
In your browser go to http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.asp
Select Request a Certificate - hit 
Next
Select Advanced Request - hit 
Next
Select the second option: "Submit a 
certificate request using a base 64..." - hit Next
Copy and Paste the entire contents of your 
certreq.txt file into the "Saved Request" text field. On the Certificate 
Template drop-down select "Web Server" and hit Submit.
If your CA is appropriately set-up you can 
on the next screen download and save the DER (or Base 64) encoded 
certificate - which can then be picked up by the IIS Assign Server 
Certificate Wizard. If not: you need to start the CA Management Console 
and manually issue the certificate request by right-clicking the request 
in the Pending List - you can then use http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.aspto 
'pick-up' and save the certificate from the server (or export it 
manually from the CA Management Console).
In IIS when you 're-start' the Wizard just 
give it the name/location of the .cer file that was generated containing 
the encoded certificate.

Chris Shattock

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shannon Speck 
  To: NT System Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 1:10 AM
  Subject: IIS and CA in 2000
  
  I am not sure if this is an appropriate 
  question for this list, but here it goes. I have a W2K SP2 server running IIS 5.0 and have installed 
  Certificate Services in Stand Alone mode (because I want to issue 
  certificates over the internet). I am trying to get the default 
  website up and running SSL. The site functions properly 

Re: Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Spencer

http://www.slipstick.com/exs/relay.htm  bookmark www.slipstick.com
as a good Exchange reference.

Kent

--- Abercrombie, Sherry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I've got a situation that I need to resolve  would like to do it
 without
 having to call MS :)
 
 I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that has routing enabled for
 POP3/IMAP4 support.  I have gone through every MS Tech Net article
 that I
 can find on how to setup Exchange to not relay mail and have not been
 able
 to get it setup correctly.  Right now there is an outsourced Linux
 box in
 front of the Exchange server that checks for mail being relayed.  My
 organization wants to get rid of that box because we are paying a
 monthly
 fee for it that should be unnecessary because Exchange is supposed to
 be
 able to do this.
 
 If anyone has any input/experience/advice on this I would really
 appreciate
 it.
 
 Sherry Abercrombie
 
 
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. 
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Craig Cameron
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



Any 
chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the subject header to ease outlook 
sorting.

I 
currently have three rules which pick out the messages.

Craig


  -Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
  stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
  NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
  New 
  on NTSYSADMIN?
  
  Here 
  are a few "Administrivia" pointers.
  
  1) 
  Lurk for a week before you dive into threads.
  2) 
  SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were 
  sometimes
   impossible. We think we got that 
  fixed now.
  3) 
  Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to the 
  footer.
  4) 
  Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread. Delete 
  whole threads
   that are not 
  interesting.
  5) 
  We have asearchable archive. You can get there via the "unsub link" in 
  the footer.
  
  And 
  remember these golden rules:
  
  ON 
  TOPIC, NO NOISE, andFRIENDLY.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Stu
  
  
  
  
  
  Want to unsub? 
  Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
  a good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/



 

This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 



Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay

2001-09-26 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry
Title: Exchange 5.5  Preventing Mail Relay





Hi all,


I've got a situation that I need to resolve  would like to do it without having to call MS :)


I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that has routing enabled for POP3/IMAP4 support. I have gone through every MS Tech Net article that I can find on how to setup Exchange to not relay mail and have not been able to get it setup correctly. Right now there is an outsourced Linux box in front of the Exchange server that checks for mail being relayed. My organization wants to get rid of that box because we are paying a monthly fee for it that should be unnecessary because Exchange is supposed to be able to do this.

If anyone has any input/experience/advice on this I would really appreciate it.


Sherry Abercrombie



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: MS Security Rollup

2001-09-26 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry
Title: RE: MS Security Rollup





I'm using Outlook XP, my rule for this list is setup like this:


Apply this rule after the message arrives
With NT System Admin Issues in the message header
Move it to the NT System Admin Issues folder


Works great!
Sherry


-Original Message-
From: TDI Custom Computers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: MS Security Rollup



In Outlook XP, I can't get _any_ to filter. Am using To: and From: and just
From: but neither work.
All other lists work.


Example:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
Where the From line contains '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'


Move it to the ntsysadmin folder


Mike



- Original Message -
From: John Eckenrode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:36 AM
Subject: RE: MS Security Rollup



I put in an MS Outlook rule to filter these newsgroup items to a special folder, and most get routed to the folder, but not all, for example the one below.

Anyone experiencing this? Any ideas?


thanks, John Eckenrode


-Original Message-
From: Lee, Damon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Security Rollup



Hello all,


Has anyone encountered any problems using the post MS SP6a Security Rollup Package?


Damon


Want to unsub? Do that here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmin
_mode=0lang=english



Want to unsub? Do that here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmin_mod
e=0lang=english






Want to unsub? Do that here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmin_mode=0=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



Craig,

This 
was looked at before and voted down by a vast majority at that 
time.

Warm 
regards,
Stu


  -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 8:24 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST 
  ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  Any 
  chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the subject header to ease outlook 
  sorting.
  
  I 
  currently have three rules which pick out the messages.
  
  Craig
  
  
-Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
New on NTSYSADMIN?

Here are a few "Administrivia" 
pointers.

1) 
Lurk for a week before you dive into threads.
2) 
SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were 
sometimes
 impossible. We think we got that 
fixed now.
3) 
Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to the 
footer.
4) 
Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread. 
Delete whole threads
 that are not 
interesting.
5) 
We have asearchable archive. You can get there via the "unsub link" in 
the footer.

And remember these golden 
rules:

ON 
TOPIC, NO NOISE, andFRIENDLY.

Thanks.

Stu





Want to unsub? 
Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
   
  
  This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the 
  addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par 
  disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail 
  in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. 
  This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied 
  upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. 
  Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in 
  particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that 
  may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 
  
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Win 98

2001-09-26 Thread Matthew McMullen
Title: Win 98



 Just a stab in the dark here but make sure that IP 
auto config is turned off. Sometimes if windows cannot access the DHCP 
server it will auto assign an IP and subnet mask for the 
computer.

Matthew McMullen
PC/LAN 
Tech/Admin
TX RX 
Systems Inc.

  -Original Message-From: Kopacko, Jason 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 
  12:44 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Win 
  98
  I got a good one for you guys. I have a NT4 DC 
  server running DHCP/DNS/WINS. I am on a class B private subnet using the 
  10.52.x.x address range. I have a 98 machine that everytime it tries to renew 
  its lease at the half-way point, it changes the subnet mask from a class B 
  255.255.0.0 to a class A 255.0.0.0. Once that happens, of course all it can do 
  is access local machines and will not be able to get passed through my router 
  for internet and corporate access. I have done everything short of reloading 
  the system, which will get upgraded to 2000 soon. But I am curious if any of 
  you guys have bumped into this, since it is only one machine? Please 
  help!
  Thank You,  Jason 
  Kopacko Network 
  Engineer Gold Strike 
  Casino, Tunica, Mississippi (662) 
  357-1305 Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Keith Johnson
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



One 
rule needed
to:NT 
System Admin Issues
that's 
all you need  all messages will be sorted

  -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 8:24 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST 
  ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  Any 
  chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the subject header to ease outlook 
  sorting.
  
  I 
  currently have three rules which pick out the messages.
  
  Craig
  
  
-Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
New on NTSYSADMIN?

Here are a few "Administrivia" 
pointers.

1) 
Lurk for a week before you dive into threads.
2) 
SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were 
sometimes
 impossible. We think we got that 
fixed now.
3) 
Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to the 
footer.
4) 
Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread. 
Delete whole threads
 that are not 
interesting.
5) 
We have asearchable archive. You can get there via the "unsub link" in 
the footer.

And remember these golden 
rules:

ON 
TOPIC, NO NOISE, andFRIENDLY.

Thanks.

Stu





Want to unsub? 
Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
   
  
  This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the 
  addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par 
  disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail 
  in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. 
  This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied 
  upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. 
  Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in 
  particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that 
  may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 
  
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Ian Kelly
Title: Message



I 
set a rule to look for certain words (and by this I mean [EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
in the recipients address and move it.
Don't see why we need something 
else...
Ian-[EMAIL PROTECTED]-There's 
nothing new under the sun, but there are lots of old things we don't know. - 
Ambrose Bierce 

  
  -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 26, 2001 08:24 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST ADMIN 
  MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  Any 
  chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the subject header to ease outlook 
  sorting.
  
  I 
  currently have three rules which pick out the messages.
  
  Craig
  
  
-Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
New on NTSYSADMIN?

Here are a few "Administrivia" 
pointers.

1) 
Lurk for a week before you dive into threads.
2) 
SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were 
sometimes
 impossible. We think we got that 
fixed now.
3) 
Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to the 
footer.
4) 
Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread. 
Delete whole threads
 that are not 
interesting.
5) 
We have asearchable archive. You can get there via the "unsub link" in 
the footer.

And remember these golden 
rules:

ON 
TOPIC, NO NOISE, andFRIENDLY.

Thanks.

Stu





Want to unsub? 
Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
   
  
  This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the 
  addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par 
  disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail 
  in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. 
  This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied 
  upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. 
  Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in 
  particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that 
  may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 
  
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Can I maintain data drives after virus reinstall?

2001-09-26 Thread Zona.Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Concerning this 
nimda beast: My head is hurting from chasing it for the past eight 
days.

I need some thoughts 
on areinstall ofMS NT4 and 2000on my 
clusters.

I would have to 
rebuild all the shares, reinstall the SQL, andrestore the databases, to 
say the least. However, my databases all point to gigabytes of source files. 
Will l have to reformat the data drives and restore data also, or will I be able 
to maintain my data drives?

Tony 
Zona
Erie, 
PA.
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: To Unlock IISLock

2001-09-26 Thread Adil Hindistan

Well, I guess I know why do you ask that. I have two IIS 5 servers. Both of
them have the .asp extension associated to Notepad. You may say that's why
.asp is not working but no!

If you are opening an .asp page with windows explorer, yes Notepad will open
it. But if you are accessing the page using Internet Explorer, notepad is
not employed. Instead, IIS will send the page to asp.dll for processing.

Any other idea ?

Adil Hindistan
ICQ: 26477783

 -Original Message-
 From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:02 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: To Unlock IISLock
 
 
 .. in file types, what is the .asp associated with for an 
 application? Kent
 
 --- Adil Hindistan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi All,
  
  I used IISLock of MS on our IIS5 with the express option. 
 Then instead 
  of undoing the changes I rerun the IISLock but this time 
 unselecting 
  ASP option
  as I need to run ASP pages. To make things more complicated Nimda
  infected
  the server! We were able to remove Nimda. Now .htm, .html pages work
  but ASP
  pages do not work.
  
  I am not sure what is causing all these, I actually tried to remove 
  and reinstall IIS from scratch or applying and undoing IISLock at 
  express mode,
  no hope yet.
  
  Any suggestions ?
  
  Adil
  ICQ 26477783
  
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsys
admintext_mode=0lang=english
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: IIS and CA in 2000

2001-09-26 Thread Shannon Speck
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



Thanks 
Chris.I am going to give that a look. I am a little confused as to whether 
I need to re-install the q301625 after (first) un-installing/re-installing 
Certificate Services and (second) W2K SP 2. I have alwaysbeen told that a 
good rule of thumb is if you have to insert the W2KServer install CD and 
it copies files from it you need to re-install the latest Service pack. I am not 
sure if this is the case with q301625.BTW, I had already un-installed and 
re-installed Certificate Services/W2K SP2before I got your reply. It is 
all back up now. I am still having one issue that I need to deal with. 
I am still getting the error "The security certificate was issued by a 
company that you have not chosen to trust. View the certificate and to determine 
whether you want to trust the certifying authority". I click view the 
certificate, then I run the "Install Certificate" and it imports and installs 
successfully, but I still get the security alert each time I exit Internet 
Explorer and restart Internet Explorer to access the site. Sorry to 
keep hitting you with questions.I really appreciate your help with this 
issue. It has been very useful.

SS


-Original 
Message-From: Chris Shattock 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:03 
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS and CA in 
2000

  No I wasn't. Yes I am now: Following apply it 
  appears that the patch removed the CertSrv virtual directory from localhost - 
  these things are sent to amuse us. Just re-create a virtual directory called 
  CertSrv and point it to the certsrv subdirectory of 
  %systempath%\system32\certsrv.
  
  Of course your machine is probably hugely 
  different from mine (which will be rebuilt this weekend it is so screwed up) 
  that you may have other issues. Firstly check to see if the localhost\CertSrv 
  is still there.
  
  Chris Shattock
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon 
Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
2:12 PM
Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 2000

I 
just crashed my Certificate Service. I installed WS's latest cumulative IIS 
patch (q301625) to tighten IIS back up and the certificate service will not 
start now. I am going to re-install the W2K SP2 and see if that fixes it. If 
not I guess I will have to remove/re-install certificate services.Are 
you running theq301625 patch mentioned above?

SS

  -Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  6:10 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS 
  and CA in 2000
  Check my earlier reply for port# - if you 
  have all defaults forget it - just default to 80.
  Personally I don't read that much - this and 
  other things I find out by trying - consequently I end up rebuilding my 
  server every 3 weeks or so - but each time I do it goes quicker (after 
  re-installing W2KS and AS x times since 1998!).
  
  I have found a self-certified CA to be very 
  usefule for devolpment and testing out multiple IP-less hosting with 
  different SSL's and Exchange etc. - they're all done the same way. So have 
  some fun!
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
1:02 PM
Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 
2000

Man, that was dead on!! After posting yesterday evening, I 
finally came across an article that explained this.This info was 
not the easiest to find. The only difference in the article from your 
info was how to access the local host. They are suggesting http://localhost/certsrv . This 
seemed to work. They did not mention the port #. I am going to have to 
go back through it and see if I can find the option for Web server. I 
don't recall seeing that. My next task is getting rid of the errors for 
stuff not matching. Thanks a million for the info.
Have a good one,
SS

  -Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 2:34 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Re: IIS and CA in 2000
  I'll assume that you have already 
  generated and saved the certificate request file (say certreq.txt) 
  from IIS. Form there:
  In your browser go to http://localhost:91/CertSrv/default.asp
  Select Request a Certificate - hit 
  Next
  Select Advanced Request - hit 
  Next
  Select the second option: "Submit a 
  certificate request using a base 64..." - hit Next
  Copy and Paste the entire contents of 
  your certreq.txt file into the "Saved 

RE: Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay

2001-09-26 Thread Adil Hindistan
Title: Message



Hi,

I 
had gone through the same hassle of reading everything and came up with the 
following to resolve the issue:

- In 
the MS Exchange Administrator, open CONNECTIONS  INTERNET MAIL SERVICE 
properties

- In 
the ROUTING Tab, choose "Reroute incoming SMTP mail (Required for 
POP3/SMTP)

- if 
not already added, add you domains to the list in the form of 
xyz.com

- 
Click the Routing Restrictions and select the two checkboxes at the top, 
namely:
1- 
Hosts and clients that successfully authenticate 

2- 
Hosts and Clients with these IP addresses

That's it. You may ask why you dont put any IP address. Ugh, I just don't 
remember what was the reason but I am 100% sure that this was a trick to do it 
right!

Adil 
Hindistan
ICQ:26477783



  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 3:15 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 
  5.5  Preventing Mail Relay
  
Hi all, 
I've got a situation that I need to resolve  
would like to do it without having to call MS :) 
I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that has 
routing enabled for POP3/IMAP4 support. I have gone through every MS 
Tech Net article that I can find on how to setup Exchange to not relay mail 
and have not been able to get it setup correctly. Right now there is 
an outsourced Linux box in front of the Exchange server that checks for mail 
being relayed. My organization wants to get rid of that box because we 
are paying a monthly fee for it that should be unnecessary because Exchange 
is supposed to be able to do this.
If anyone has any input/experience/advice on this 
I would really appreciate it. 
Sherry Abercrombie Want to unsub? 
  Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Blue screen (ntoskrnl)

2001-09-26 Thread Krueger, Aaron G. - Lonesome
Title: Message



I 
think that was the same article IIRC - thanks a ton!


Aaron G. 
Krueger
Sr. Network 
Analyst



  
  -Original Message-From: Henry Heerschap 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:08 
  PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Blue screen 
  (ntoskrnl)
  We've set up ERD scripts for both our NT and Win2K servers 
  based on the following article: http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=15976 
  
  Both scripts update the ERD files and copy it to our 
  PDC. I have an additional batch file that copies them over to a BDC for 
  redundancy. I use AT or the Task Scheduler to run the files once a 
  week. Works great.
  Our NT script reads as follows: @echo 
  off C:\winnt\system32\rdisk.exe /s- copy C:\winnt\repair \\ts-dc1\ERDinfo$\ts-file01 
  Our Win2K script (lifted from the article): @Echo Off REM 
  ** 
  REM RDisk script for Windows 2000 REM 
  Description: Utilizes the Rdisk utility from NT 4.0 to make emergency 
  REM 
   ERD files in Win2K without 
  the need of NTbackup. REM Author: Tim Arp 
  REM 
  ** 
  
  Echo Begin creating ERD files for Win2K Echo. Echo Deleting old ERD backup files 
  *.ARP Del %SYSTEMROOT%\Repair\*.ARP /q 
  Echo Backing up old ERD files For %%i 
  In (%SYSTEMROOT%\Repair\*.) Do REN %%i %%~ni.ARP 
  Echo Creating new ERD files... RDisk.Exe /s- 
  Echo Expanding new ERD files For %%i 
  In (%SYSTEMROOT%\Repair\*._) Do Expand %%i %%~ni 
  Echo Deleting compressed ERD files Del 
  %SYSTEMROOT%\Repair\*._ /q 
  copy %SYSTEMROOT%\repair \\ts-dc1\ERDinfo$\ts-print01 
  
  Echo. Echo Finished creating ERD files 
  for Win2K 
  Henry Heerschap Information Systems 
  Support Tenzing Communications, Inc. (206) 607-2890 37 C109 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  -Original Message- From: 
   Krueger, Aaron G. - Lonesome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:09 
  AM To: NT System Admin 
  Issues Subject: RE: Blue screen 
  (ntoskrnl) 
  I once saw a script (that unfortunately I failed to keep) that 
  would go to each server specified in a listing, and 
  copy/create the ERD stuff to a central location, such 
  that you could create an ERD for any server in the event that it went down. All that without any manual intervention 
  (other than verifying and creating the physical floppy 
  in the event). Anyone come across anything similar and 
  'free'? 
  Aaron G. Krueger Sr. Network 
  Analyst 
  -Original Message- From: Don 
  Collier (Intermap Denver) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:02 PM 
  To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: Blue screen (ntoskrnl) 
  I would like to see that batch file. 
  _ Don 
  Collier Network Administrator Intermap Technologies Inc. Voice: 
  303-708-0955 x-207 Fax: 
  303-708-0952 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  www.intermaptechnologies.com 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 4:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blue 
  screen (ntoskrnl) 
  Nice - welcome to the new company! 
  I've got a batch process to create ERD's automatically if 
  you're interested. 
  Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, 
  LLC AVIEN Charter Member www.clarksupport.com 
   301-610-9584 
  voice  240-465-0323 Efax 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Stephen Moreau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 6:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Blue 
  screen (ntoskrnl) 
  Thanks for the info but I recently took over these servers 
  (the admin before me quit) and he didn't maintain the 
  erd. I tried the emergency repair process and 
  told the process to look on the harddrives but it didn't work. 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
  
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
  
  Want to unsub? Do that here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod 
  e=0lang=english 
  Want to unsub? Do that here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english 
  
  --- 
  79% of business travellers would switch airlines to use 
  Tenzing. To read more, visit http://www.tenzing.com/switch 
  The contents of this email are confidential. If you are not, 
  or believe you may not be, the intended recipient of this email, please let us 
  know by reply and then delete it from your system. You should not copy the 
  message or disclose its contents to anyone. No warranty or other assurance is 
  given by us that this email is free of any virus or any other defect or 
  error.Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
Want 

RE: Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay

2001-09-26 Thread Geoff Waycik
Title: Message



The 
"1-" and "2-"are treated as OR rather than AND.

  -Original Message-From: Adil Hindistan 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:45 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
   Preventing Mail Relay
  Hi,
  
  I 
  had gone through the same hassle of reading everything and came up with the 
  following to resolve the issue:
  
  - 
  In the MS Exchange Administrator, open CONNECTIONS  INTERNET MAIL SERVICE 
  properties
  
  - 
  In the ROUTING Tab, choose "Reroute incoming SMTP mail (Required for 
  POP3/SMTP)
  
  - 
  if not already added, add you domains to the list in the form of 
  xyz.com
  
  - 
  Click the Routing Restrictions and select the two checkboxes at the top, 
  namely:
  1- 
  Hosts and clients that successfully authenticate 
  
  2- 
  Hosts and Clients with these IP addresses
  
  That's it. You may ask why you dont put any IP address. Ugh, I just 
  don't remember what was the reason but I am 100% sure that this was a trick to 
  do it right!
  
  Adil Hindistan
  ICQ:26477783
  
  
  

-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 3:15 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
Exchange 5.5  Preventing Mail Relay

  Hi all, 
  I've got a situation that I need to resolve 
   would like to do it without having to call MS :) 
  I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that 
  has routing enabled for POP3/IMAP4 support. I have gone through 
  every MS Tech Net article that I can find on how to setup Exchange to not 
  relay mail and have not been able to get it setup correctly. Right 
  now there is an outsourced Linux box in front of the Exchange server that 
  checks for mail being relayed. My organization wants to get rid of 
  that box because we are paying a monthly fee for it that should be 
  unnecessary because Exchange is supposed to be able to do this.
  If anyone has any input/experience/advice on 
  this I would really appreciate it. 
  Sherry Abercrombie Want to unsub? 
Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good 
FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: To Unlock IISLock

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Spencer

.. On the properties page for your web, is there anything in the
   Application settings at the bottom? Can you click configure and
   make sure ASP is associated with VBScript?
Kent

--- Adil Hindistan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, I guess I know why do you ask that. I have two IIS 5 servers.
 Both of
 them have the .asp extension associated to Notepad. You may say
 that's why
 .asp is not working but no!
 
 If you are opening an .asp page with windows explorer, yes Notepad
 will open
 it. But if you are accessing the page using Internet Explorer,
 notepad is
 not employed. Instead, IIS will send the page to asp.dll for
 processing.
 
 Any other idea ?
 
 Adil Hindistan
 ICQ: 26477783
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:02 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: Re: To Unlock IISLock
  
  
  .. in file types, what is the .asp associated with for an 
  application? Kent
  
  --- Adil Hindistan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi All,
   
   I used IISLock of MS on our IIS5 with the express option. 
  Then instead 
   of undoing the changes I rerun the IISLock but this time 
  unselecting 
   ASP option
   as I need to run ASP pages. To make things more complicated Nimda
   infected
   the server! We were able to remove Nimda. Now .htm, .html pages
 work
   but ASP
   pages do not work.
   
   I am not sure what is causing all these, I actually tried to
 remove 
   and reinstall IIS from scratch or applying and undoing IISLock at
 
   express mode,
   no hope yet.
   
   Any suggestions ?
   
   Adil
   ICQ 26477783
   
   Want to unsub? Do that here:
  
  http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsys
 admintext_mode=0lang=english
  Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
 Messenger.
 http://im.yahoo.com
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. 
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Craig Cameron
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



Yeah . 
I tried that and it only sorted some messages. If you assure me it works I'll 
look at it again.

I'm 
currently using a mixture of that rule, the unsub text in body and the web page 
address in the body!

How 
does your rule read?

I 
might have another rule confilicting or something silly.

Many 
thanks In advance

Craig

  -Original Message-From: Keith Johnson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  13:23To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST ADMIN 
  MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  One 
  rule needed
  to:NT System Admin Issues
  that's all you need  all messages will be 
  sorted
  
-Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 8:24 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
[LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
Any chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the 
subject header to ease outlook sorting.

I 
currently have three rules which pick out the messages.

Craig


  -Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
  stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
  NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
  New on NTSYSADMIN?
  
  Here are a few "Administrivia" 
  pointers.
  
  1) Lurk for a week before you dive into 
  threads.
  2) SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit 
  too much. Unsubs were sometimes
   impossible. We think we got 
  that fixed now.
  3) Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a 
  question. I have added it to the footer.
  4) Filter all postings into a folder with an 
  outlook rule. Sort by thread. Delete whole threads
   that are not 
  interesting.
  5) We have asearchable archive. You can get 
  there via the "unsub link" in the footer.
  
  And remember these golden 
  rules:
  
  ON TOPIC, NO NOISE, 
  andFRIENDLY.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Stu
  
  
  
  
  
  Want to 
  unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
  a good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 

This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for 
the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par 
disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail 
in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the 
document. This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended 
to be relied upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of 
physicians. Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par 
matter, in particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any 
symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 
Want 
  to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a 
  good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/



 

This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 



RE: IIS and CA in 2000

2001-09-26 Thread Shannon Speck
Title: Message



Yes, 
it is with Windows NT. I am very new to W2k Server world. Thanks for the 
info.

  -Original Message-From: Adil Hindistan 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:55 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IIS and CA in 
  2000
  
  Windows NT had the bad habit of 
  overwritingservice packs but that's not the case for W2K server. If you 
  have applied SP and then if you are asked for the original CD while 
  installingsomething, you can be sure that these files were not 
  changedby SP or you would be asked the put the Service Pack CD! I have 
  seen this in several occasions and MS documentation clearly states 
  this.
  
  I 
  am sure that your rule of thumbis a result of your experience with 
  Windows NT, is not it ?
  
  
  Adil HindistanICQ: 26477783 
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Shannon Speck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:35 PMTo: NT System 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IIS and CA in 
  2000
  
Thanks Chris.I am going to give that a look. I am a little 
confused as to whether I need to re-install the q301625 after (first) 
un-installing/re-installing Certificate Services and (second) W2K SP 2. I 
have alwaysbeen told that a good rule of thumb is if you have to 
insert the W2KServer install CD and it copies files from it you need 
to re-install the latest Service pack. I am not sure if this is the case 
with q301625.BTW, I had already un-installed and re-installed 
Certificate Services/W2K SP2before I got your reply. It is all back up 
now. I am still having one issue that I need to deal with. 
I am still getting the error "The security certificate was issued by a 
company that you have not chosen to trust. View the certificate and to 
determine whether you want to trust the certifying authority". I click view 
the certificate, then I run the "Install Certificate" and it imports and 
installs successfully, but I still get the security alert each time I exit 
Internet Explorer and restart Internet Explorer to access the site. 
Sorry to keep hitting you with questions.I really 
appreciate your help with this issue. It has been very 
useful.

SS


-Original 
Message-From: Chris Shattock 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
7:03 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS and 
CA in 2000

  No I wasn't. Yes I am now: Following apply it 
  appears that the patch removed the CertSrv virtual directory from 
  localhost - these things are sent to amuse us. Just re-create a virtual 
  directory called CertSrv and point it to the certsrv subdirectory of 
  %systempath%\system32\certsrv.
  
  Of course your machine is probably hugely 
  different from mine (which will be rebuilt this weekend it is so screwed 
  up) that you may have other issues. Firstly check to see if the 
  localhost\CertSrv is still there.
  
  Chris Shattock
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
2:12 PM
Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 
2000

I just crashed my Certificate Service. I installed WS's latest 
cumulative IIS patch (q301625) to tighten IIS back up and the 
certificate service will not start now. I am going to re-install the W2K 
SP2 and see if that fixes it. If not I guess I will have to 
remove/re-install certificate services.Are you running 
theq301625 patch mentioned above?

SS

  -Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 6:10 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Re: IIS and CA in 2000
  Check my earlier reply for port# - if you 
  have all defaults forget it - just default to 80.
  Personally I don't read that much - this 
  and other things I find out by trying - consequently I end up 
  rebuilding my server every 3 weeks or so - but each time I do it goes 
  quicker (after re-installing W2KS and AS x times since 
  1998!).
  
  I have found a self-certified CA to be 
  very usefule for devolpment and testing out multiple IP-less hosting 
  with different SSL's and Exchange etc. - they're all done the same 
  way. So have some fun!
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Shannon Speck 
To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 
2000

Man, that was dead on!! After posting yesterday evening, I 
  

RE: DISABLING ACCESS TO UNWANTED SUBNET

2001-09-26 Thread Goldoff, Erik

on the NT box, enter a 
ROUTE ADD -P aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd mask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx aaa.bbb.ccc.fff

where aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd is the subnet you don't want them to reach,
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the subnet mask for that subnet, and aaa.bbb.ccc.fff is
some other node (valid or otherwise) on the box's same subnet that doesnt'
have IP Forwarding turned on, nor a route to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd.

Erik Goldoff
Systems Manager
The HoneyBaked Ham Company
678-966-3320
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Brent McCrary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DISABLING ACCESS TO UNWANTED SUBNET


I'd like to be able to disable my NT box from being able to reach
a certain subnet that is connected via a router.  This particular NT box
needs access to the router, but not all of the subnets.   I don't have admin
control of the router,
so I need to do it from NT.  Is there an NT route command that would allow
me to block
the unwanted subnet or any other ways via NT?

Thanks All,

Brent McCrary
kccconnct.net


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: disabling 'connect as'

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Spencer

.. better to implement a policy and disable this feature/object.

kent

--- Miley, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 change their passwords, or disable their accounts
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blair, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:48 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: disabling 'connect as'
 
 
 Our network was hit with the Nimba virus. All of the computers in our
 control are protected. Rouge computers, however, can map to our
 drives
 using the 'connect as', 'connect using different user name', or
 passthrough authentication. These rouge computers keep writing the
 virus
 back up to our shares. 
  
 Is there any way to prevent this?
  
 -Jason Blair
 Y�Z唶zmʸ   z[lpjo挠rʸWʞ{uzx%
 This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender
 does not
 waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
 copying
 of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
 intended
 recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error,
 please
 advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. 
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. 
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Dave Holton









Yes it is ... although It only runs on NT4 workstation and above.



Install from Exchange server CD and just
select exchange admin ...





__

Dave
 Holton, Consultant





-Original Message-
From: Neil Harvey
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26 September 2001 14:03
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin





Does anyone know ifit possible
to run the exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer
the server.



Want to unsub? Do that
here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





**
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be 
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee 
and access to the e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. 
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
When addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice 
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing client engagement 
letter or contract.

If you have received this email in error please notify: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/







RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Paul . Rochford



yup 
 you will also need to have rights on the exchange org, site and server to 
administer it remotely. The rights don't propagate down either. You can add the 
rights in from the exchange admin program on the server 
itself.

  -Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  14:03To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
  exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
  server.Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
  this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please 
notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this E-mail 
from your system. Thank you.
It is possible for data transmitted by email to be deliberately or
accidentally corrupted or intercepted. For this reason, where the
communication is by email, the Bank of Ireland Group does not accept 
any responsibility for any breach of confidence which may arise 
through the use of this medium.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept 
 for the presence of known computer viruses.

  

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Ian Kelly
Title: Message



Yes, 
go through setup but only install the admin option, then serivce pack it (yes, 
the client pc) to the same level as the server
Assuming of course you're talking XCH 5.5 and an NT / 2000 workstation 
(doubt you can do it from a 9x box...)
Ian-[EMAIL PROTECTED]-An 
elephant is a mouse with an operating system. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 26, 2001 09:03 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
  exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
  server.Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
  this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Adil Hindistan
Title: Message



Of 
course. Just start the set up of Exchange Server and then deselect all but 
Exchange Admin option.

Adil HindistanICQ: 26477783 

  
  -Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  4:03 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
  exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
  server.Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
  this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Randal, Phil



SP4 
has some updates for Exchange Admin too.

Phil
-Phil 
RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK 


  -Original Message-From: Dave Holton 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  13:58To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  
  Yes it is ... 
  although It only runs on NT4 workstation and 
  above.
  
  Install from Exchange 
  server CD and just select exchange admin ...
  
  
  __
  Dave 
  Holton, 
  Consultant
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Neil 
  Harvey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 14:03To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  
  
  Does anyone know ifit 
  possible to run the exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely 
  administer the server.
  Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
  this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/**The 
  information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
  It is intended solely for the addressee and access to the e-mail by anyone 
  else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
  disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
  taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When 
  addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail 
  are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing client 
  engagement letter or contract.If you have received this email in 
  error please notify: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]**Want 
  to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a 
  good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: SMTP server for W2K

2001-09-26 Thread Leif Wahlberg

Take a look at Hermes, all freeware at www.alixoft.com

Leif Wahlberg

-Original Message-
From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 03:42
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP server for W2K


what are you looking for?

POP3/iMap/Routing/Calendaring???

How many clients...

What is your budget...

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:38
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP server for W2K


Any recommendations for a good mail server program for Win2K?  Thanks.

Stephen



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadminte
xt_mod
e=0lang=english

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadminte
xt_mode=0lang=english




Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Rudi Bruyninckx



Yes,
Just 
install admin prog from your CD

  -Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: woensdag 26 september 2001 
  15:03To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
  exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
  server.Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
  this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: disabling 'connect as'

2001-09-26 Thread Miley, Dan

how do you create a policy on a rougue computer,or passthrough
authentication?

if they are connecting, and have valid ID and pwd it shouldn't matter what
app provides it.  I thought the password prompting (through dialog, runas,
or connectas) was local to the workstation.  

would you set a policy on the server machine to not allow network
connections, or not allow that user?

Wondering,
Dan

- ---
Mathematics is music for the mind, music is mathematics for the soul. -
Pythagoras

-Original Message-
From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: disabling 'connect as'


.. better to implement a policy and disable this feature/object.

kent

--- Miley, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 change their passwords, or disable their accounts
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blair, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:48 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: disabling 'connect as'
 
 
 Our network was hit with the Nimba virus. All of the computers in our
 control are protected. Rouge computers, however, can map to our
 drives
 using the 'connect as', 'connect using different user name', or
 passthrough authentication. These rouge computers keep writing the
 virus
 back up to our shares. 
  
 Is there any way to prevent this?
  
 -Jason Blair
 Yí¶Zå¶zmʸ   z[lpjoæOE rʸWÊz{uzx%
 This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender
 does not
 waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
 copying
 of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
 intended
 recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error,
 please
 advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. 
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying
of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended
recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please
advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. 

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Kevin Kerr - Lynn University



You 
can run the Exchange admin only on WinNT and W2k platforms. Just use the 
Exchange 5.5CD to run install as if you are installing Exchange 5.5 and 
only select Exchange Admin from the list of options.

  -Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  9:03 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
  exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
  server.Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
  this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Dal Cosby
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



If 
you set up your rule as:

Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to: NT 
Systems Admin Issues 
move it to the x folder
***
where  is the folder you created off your inbox 
tree
everything should be filtered into there as 
everything in this list seems to be sent to NT Systems Admin 
Issues.
You 
can do the same for all the other lists that sunbelt provides...you might also 
want to right clik the email and add it to 
your
contacts.

Dal 
Cosby
QA 
Manager
Evault Canada Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.evault.com


  -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 9:17 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST 
  ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  Yeah 
  . I tried that and it only sorted some messages. If you assure me it works 
  I'll look at it again.
  
  I'm 
  currently using a mixture of that rule, the unsub text in body and the web 
  page address in the body!
  
  How 
  does your rule read?
  
  I 
  might have another rule confilicting or something silly.
  
  Many 
  thanks In advance
  
  Craig
  
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
13:23To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST 
ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
One rule needed
to:NT System Admin Issues
that's all you need  all messages will be 
sorted

  -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 
  26, 2001 8:24 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  Any chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in 
  the subject header to ease outlook sorting.
  
  I currently have three rules which pick out the 
  messages.
  
  Craig
  
  
-Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
New on NTSYSADMIN?

Here are a few "Administrivia" 
pointers.

1) Lurk for a week before you dive into 
threads.
2) SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit 
too much. Unsubs were sometimes
 impossible. We think we got 
that fixed now.
3) Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a 
question. I have added it to the footer.
4) Filter all postings into a folder with an 
outlook rule. Sort by thread. Delete whole threads
 that are not 
interesting.
5) We have asearchable archive. You can 
get there via the "unsub link" in the footer.

And remember these golden 
rules:

ON TOPIC, NO NOISE, 
andFRIENDLY.

Thanks.

Stu





Want to 
unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? 
  Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good 
  FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
   
  
  This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for 
  the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not 
  /par disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this 
  e-Mail in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the 
  document. This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended 
  to be relied upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of 
  physicians. Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par 
  matter, in particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any 
  symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 
  Want 
to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
   
  
  This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the 
  addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par 
  disclose or use the information contained in it. If you 

RE: SMTP server for W2K

2001-09-26 Thread Jeff_Johnson


'tha bomb' only if you refer to it meaning it's gonna blow up all over the
place

One place I'd check, if you were looking for a small environment, and
didn't want to spend much is http://www.tucows.com

They have mailservers ranging from shareware to thousands of $$, and some
of it even works pretty well.

If all you're looking for is SMTP/POP mail, I'd actually recommend Internet
Anywhere Mail server.  Heck, unlimited mailbox version is only $399 or so.


***
Jeff Johnson
MCSE+I, MCSE 2k
Network Engineer
Triple S Plastics
***


   

Joe L.

Casale  To: NT System Admin Issues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Ritmo2k@yahoo   cc:   

.comSubject: RE: SMTP server for W2K  

   

09/25/2001 

06:41 PM   

Please respond 

to NT System  

Admin Issues  

   

   





Ipswitch, Imail -Overpriced-
Gordano, NTMail -cheesey, but very reliable and cheap-
MS, Exchange -Tha Bomb baby!

jlc

-Original Message-
From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP server for W2K

what are you looking for?

POP3/iMap/Routing/Calendaring???

How many clients...

What is your budget...

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:38
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP server for W2K


Any recommendations for a good mail server program for Win2K?  Thanks.

Stephen



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english







Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: disabling 'connect as'

2001-09-26 Thread Bryann Thomas

Is a Rouge computer one running Red Hat?

-Original Message-
From: Miley, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2001 13:05
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: disabling 'connect as'


change their passwords, or disable their accounts

-Original Message-
From: Blair, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: disabling 'connect as'


Our network was hit with the Nimba virus. All of the computers in our
control are protected. Rouge computers, however, can map to our drives
using the 'connect as', 'connect using different user name', or
passthrough authentication. These rouge computers keep writing the virus
back up to our shares. 
 
Is there any way to prevent this?
 
-Jason Blair
Y�Z唶zmʸ z[lpjo挠rʸWʞ{uzx%
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying
of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended
recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please
advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. 

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
stated.  This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




Fw: NT 4.0 supports Firewire?

2001-09-26 Thread TDI Custom Computers




 Win98 was the first MS OS to support Firewire. If support now exists in
NT4,
 and I am not sure it does, it must have come about as a result of a
service
 pak.
 Mike

 - Original Message -
 From: Diane Beckham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:19 PM
 Subject: RE: NT 4.0 supports Firewire?


  Thank you, I apologize for giving wrong info.  All the stuff I tried
with
  Firewire all said they didn't work with NT.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: T. Bradley Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:36 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: NT 4.0 supports Firewire?
 
 
  Yes, it does. I used a Studio DV PCI Firewire card with my Sony miniDV
  camera on NT 4 very successfully. It worked with both StudioDV and Adobe
  Premier.
 
  ~Brad
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:50 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: NT 4.0 supports Firewire?
 
 
  no
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Calvin Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:07 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: NT 4.0 supports Firewire?
 
 
  Does NT 4.0 support Firewire?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:46 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: new email
 
 
  Stu,
 
  What's the deal with all of these strange happenings?  You guys still
  dealing with the ill affects of Lyris?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Bret Hanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:22 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: new email
 
 
  An email account has been activated for Pete Puchter, our new
  Installation Technician.  His email address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Bret Hanson
  Systems Administrator
  Yunker Industries, Inc.
 
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
  http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
  _mode=0lang=english
 
 
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
  e=0lang=english
 
 
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
  e=0lang=english
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
  e=0lang=english
 
 
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
  e=0lang=english
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
 e=0lang=english
 
 




Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Craig Cameron



Yes.

  -Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  14:03To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
  exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
  server.Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
  this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/



 

This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 



RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Kevin Lundy
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



I can 
assure you that it works. My rule looks just like Keith's, and 100% of my 
NT Sysadmin email's go into the dedicated folder. Just make sure that you 
add the NT Sysadmin email address to your contacts - that way it can be a server 
side rule and filter even without a client open.

  -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 9:17 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST 
  ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  Yeah 
  . I tried that and it only sorted some messages. If you assure me it works 
  I'll look at it again.
  
  I'm 
  currently using a mixture of that rule, the unsub text in body and the web 
  page address in the body!
  
  How 
  does your rule read?
  
  I 
  might have another rule confilicting or something silly.
  
  Many 
  thanks In advance
  
  Craig
  
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
13:23To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST 
ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
One rule needed
to:NT System Admin Issues
that's all you need  all messages will be 
sorted

  -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 
  26, 2001 8:24 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  Any chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in 
  the subject header to ease outlook sorting.
  
  I currently have three rules which pick out the 
  messages.
  
  Craig
  
  
-Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
New on NTSYSADMIN?

Here are a few "Administrivia" 
pointers.

1) Lurk for a week before you dive into 
threads.
2) SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit 
too much. Unsubs were sometimes
 impossible. We think we got 
that fixed now.
3) Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a 
question. I have added it to the footer.
4) Filter all postings into a folder with an 
outlook rule. Sort by thread. Delete whole threads
 that are not 
interesting.
5) We have asearchable archive. You can 
get there via the "unsub link" in the footer.

And remember these golden 
rules:

ON TOPIC, NO NOISE, 
andFRIENDLY.

Thanks.

Stu





Want to 
unsub? Do that 
here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? 
  Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good 
  FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
   
  
  This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for 
  the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not 
  /par disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this 
  e-Mail in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the 
  document. This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended 
  to be relied upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of 
  physicians. Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par 
  matter, in particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any 
  symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 
  Want 
to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
   
  
  This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the 
  addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par 
  disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail 
  in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. 
  This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied 
  upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. 

OT: Sending 0ut 0f 0ffice replies w/ Outlook

2001-09-26 Thread John Hornbuckle

I really ate to post OT like this, but I can't seem to find the answer
to this one.

How do I configure Outlook (XP/2002) to automatically send out-of-office
replies if I'm NOT using Exchange as my e-mail server? Is this even
possible? I've found lots of info on how to do it with Exchange, but not
without.

And if it's possible to do without Exchange, how do I go about making
sure that I don't send them to mailing lists? I've been so critical of
others who do this that I would be terribly embarrassed to do it myself!



John Hornbuckle
Network Manager
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347 


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay

2001-09-26 Thread Keith Johnson
Title: Exchange 5.5 & Preventing Mail Relay



Sherry,

Open 
IMS, routing tab, select "routing restrictions", check "hosts  clients that 
successfully authenticate". After doing this all POP3 clients will need to check 
the box that says "my server requires authentication". That's all there is to 
it. 

If 
your POP3 clients have static addresses you could allow 
POP3relayingfrom thoseaddresses also.


Keith 
JohnsonInformation Systems ManagerPulaski 
County DSS[EMAIL PROTECTED]Voice - 540.980.7920Cell - 
540.616.6444Fax - 540.980.7993 





  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:15 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5  
  Preventing Mail Relay
  
Hi all, 
I've got a situation that I need to resolve  
would like to do it without having to call MS :) 
I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that has 
routing enabled for POP3/IMAP4 support. I have gone through every MS 
Tech Net article that I can find on how to setup Exchange to not relay mail 
and have not been able to get it setup correctly. Right now there is 
an outsourced Linux box in front of the Exchange server that checks for mail 
being relayed. My organization wants to get rid of that box because we 
are paying a monthly fee for it that should be unnecessary because Exchange 
is supposed to be able to do this.
If anyone has any input/experience/advice on this 
I would really appreciate it. 
Sherry Abercrombie Want to unsub? 
  Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: disabling 'connect as'

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Spencer

.. I'm a little confused as to your configuration? Are all the
   servers/workstations 2000? RunAS is a service on 2000 which
   could be stopped and set to manual to start. However, if the
   user has privileges to restart this does no good and why I suggest
   a policy to disable. If the user has a valid account he/she
   shouldn't have to use connect as or run as if you have security
   set properly. The only way to stop reinfecting your servers
   is to disable all shares until the users computers are virus' free
   which I doubt you can achieve. Users tend to scream when they can't
   get to information. Guess I need to hear more information.
Kent

--- Miley, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 how do you create a policy on a rougue computer,or passthrough
 authentication?
 
 if they are connecting, and have valid ID and pwd it shouldn't matter
 what
 app provides it.  I thought the password prompting (through dialog,
 runas,
 or connectas) was local to the workstation.  
 
 would you set a policy on the server machine to not allow network
 connections, or not allow that user?
 
 Wondering,
 Dan
 
 -

---
 Mathematics is music for the mind, music is mathematics for the soul.
 -
 Pythagoras
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:10 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: disabling 'connect as'
 
 
 .. better to implement a policy and disable this feature/object.
 
 kent
 
 --- Miley, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  change their passwords, or disable their accounts
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Blair, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:48 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: disabling 'connect as'
  
  
  Our network was hit with the Nimba virus. All of the computers in
 our
  control are protected. Rouge computers, however, can map to our
  drives
  using the 'connect as', 'connect using different user name', or
  passthrough authentication. These rouge computers keep writing the
  virus
  back up to our shares. 
   
  Is there any way to prevent this?
   
  -Jason Blair
  Yí¶Zå¶zmʸ z[lpjoæOE rʸWÊz{uzx%
  This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender
  does not
  waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
  copying
  of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
  intended
  recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error,
  please
  advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. 
  
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
  http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
  Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
  http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
 Messenger.
 http://im.yahoo.com
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender
 does not
 waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
 copying
 of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
 intended
 recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error,
 please
 advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. 
 
 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. 
http://im.yahoo.com

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay

2001-09-26 Thread Javier Gonzalez
Title: Message




In: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696you've got the document: 
Is Your Exchange Server Relay-Secure?apply all that, it'sdefinitive.~~~ J. Javier Gonzalez, mcse.w2000/nt4 mcp+i IT Dept  Data-Set, 
s.l. Madrid (España) (Spain) Doctor Castelo, 
10-3ºd +34 915 738 002 / 03  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  URL: 
www.dataset.es~~~ El contenido de 
esta comunicación debe considerarse privado y confidencial. Si Vd. no es el 
destinatario y la hubiere recibido por error, se le informa que cualquier 
divulgación, distribución o copia de esta comunicación está estrictamente 
prohibida; por favor, notifíquelo inmediatamente al remitente y elimine este 
mensaje. This Email is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use the 
contents nor disclose them to any other person and you should immediately notify 
the sender and delete the 
Email.~~~ 

  -Mensaje original-De: Adil Hindistan 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Enviado el: miércoles, 26 de septiembre 
  de 2001 14:45Para: NT System Admin IssuesAsunto: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5  Preventing Mail Relay
  Hi,
  
  I 
  had gone through the same hassle of reading everything and came up with the 
  following to resolve the issue:
  
  - 
  In the MS Exchange Administrator, open CONNECTIONS  INTERNET MAIL SERVICE 
  properties
  
  - 
  In the ROUTING Tab, choose "Reroute incoming SMTP mail (Required for 
  POP3/SMTP)
  
  - 
  if not already added, add you domains to the list in the form of 
  xyz.com
  
  - 
  Click the Routing Restrictions and select the two checkboxes at the top, 
  namely:
  1- 
  Hosts and clients that successfully authenticate 
  
  2- 
  Hosts and Clients with these IP addresses
  
  That's it. You may ask why you dont put any IP address. Ugh, I just 
  don't remember what was the reason but I am 100% sure that this was a trick to 
  do it right!
  
  Adil Hindistan
  ICQ:26477783
  
  
  

-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 3:15 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
Exchange 5.5  Preventing Mail Relay

  Hi all, 
  I've got a situation that I need to resolve 
   would like to do it without having to call MS :) 
  I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that 
  has routing enabled for POP3/IMAP4 support. I have gone through 
  every MS Tech Net article that I can find on how to setup Exchange to not 
  relay mail and have not been able to get it setup correctly. Right 
  now there is an outsourced Linux box in front of the Exchange server that 
  checks for mail being relayed. My organization wants to get rid of 
  that box because we are paying a monthly fee for it that should be 
  unnecessary because Exchange is supposed to be able to do this.
  If anyone has any input/experience/advice on 
  this I would really appreciate it. 
  Sherry Abercrombie Want to unsub? 
Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good 
FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Network Login

2001-09-26 Thread Jose, Pradeep OLNG-QTE/537

Hi Guys,
 
Got a small problem. 
 
One of the PC running win95 is not able to login to the NT Domain. When a
User tries to login into the domain, he gets the message You are not
allowed to logon from this workstation. But there's no problem for Domain
administrators to logon from this 95box. 
 
This PC is connected to a hub which is connected to the switch. If I hook up
the PC directly to the switch(Through the patch panel), Users are able to
login.
 
There are no workstation restrictions for the user.
 
Any ideas would be of great help. 
 
Thanks in advance
Pradeep Jose 
* This email may be confidential,  privileged and/or protected by
copyright.   If you are not the intended recipient,  you should not copy it,
retransmit it or disclose its contents but should return it to the sender
immediately and delete your copy from your system *

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Rogers, Jeff L (OM)
Title: Message



Don't 
forget. On a stock Win2K setup it won't install. you have to first 
enable remote registry before it will even install. I think Win 2K does 
not default to that, if I recall correctly. Been there done 
it.

~ 
Jeff Rogers, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Operation  Maintenance 
Information Technology 
Services - Room 20 1501 S. 
Oak Champaign, IL 61820 
Desk: 217-244-8013 
Pager: 217-265-3682  Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission 
errors and not the fault of the sender. 
 


  -Original Message-From: Ian Kelly 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  08:10To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
  admin
  Yes, go through setup but only install the admin option, then serivce 
  pack it (yes, the client pc) to the same level as the 
  server
  Assuming of course you're talking XCH 5.5 and an NT / 2000 workstation 
  (doubt you can do it from a 9x box...)
  Ian-[EMAIL PROTECTED]-An 
  elephant is a mouse with an operating system. 
  

-Original Message-From: Neil Harvey 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 26, 2001 09:03 
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
admin
Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
server.Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to 
  unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a 
  good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Re: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Neil Harvey



Nice one cheers guys that one has been bugin me for 
ages.

Neil HarveyMCP, MCP+I, MCSE, CNAIT 
Manageremw lawDDI: +44 (0)1604 666425

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Randal, Phil 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:22 
  PM
  Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin
  
  SP4 
  has some updates for Exchange Admin too.
  
  Phil
  -Phil 
  RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK 
  
  
-Original Message-From: Dave Holton 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
13:58To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
5.5 admin

Yes it is ... 
although It only runs on NT4 workstation and 
above.

Install from 
Exchange server CD and just select exchange admin 
...


__
Dave 
Holton, 
Consultant

-Original 
Message-From: Neil 
Harvey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 
14:03To: NT System Admin 
IssuesSubject: Exchange 
5.5 admin


Does anyone know ifit 
possible to run the exchange administrator program on a client PC to 
remotely administer the server.
Want to unsub? Do that 
here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try 
this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/**The 
information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and access to the 
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or 
omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be 
unlawful. When addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice 
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions 
expressed in the governing client engagement letter or 
contract.If you have received this email in error please notify: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]**Want 
to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed 
a good FAQ? Try this one 
  first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do 
  that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Sending 0ut 0f 0ffice replies w/ Outlook

2001-09-26 Thread Ian Kelly

Exeverything in OL2002 points to needing Exchange for this...I could be
wrong though...!

Ian

-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
 


-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: September 26, 2001 09:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Sending 0ut 0f 0ffice replies w/ Outlook


I really ate to post OT like this, but I can't seem to find the answer
to this one.

How do I configure Outlook (XP/2002) to automatically send out-of-office
replies if I'm NOT using Exchange as my e-mail server? Is this even
possible? I've found lots of info on how to do it with Exchange, but not
without.

And if it's possible to do without Exchange, how do I go about making
sure that I don't send them to mailing lists? I've been so critical of
others who do this that I would be terribly embarrassed to do it myself!



John Hornbuckle
Network Manager
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347 


Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




Web filtering software advice

2001-09-26 Thread Dan Munley
Title: RE: Quick Launch toolbar



I need to dompile a 
report on "Web Filtering" softwares. I am asware of SurfControl. Can 
anyone recomend other packages?
Thanks in 
advance.

Daniel J. Munley Keyence Corporation of America 
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Benjamin Winzenz
Title: Message









???



I have
installed it several times on my W2K Pro computers, and never needed to do
anything special. Works fine for
me.



Ben
Winzenz, MCSE

Network/Systems
Administrator

Peregrine
Systems, Inc.



-Original Message-
From: Rogers, Jeff L (OM)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26,
2001 9:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin



Don't forget. On a stock Win2K setup
it won't install. you have to first enable remote registry before it will
even install. I think Win 2K does not default to that, if I recall
correctly. Been there done it.



~ 
Jeff
Rogers, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Operation
 Maintenance 
Information
Technology Services - Room 20 
1501 S. Oak 
Champaign, IL 61820 
Desk:
217-244-8013 Pager: 217-265-3682 
 
Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or
fact are transmission

errors and not the fault of the sender. 
 

-Original
Message-
From: Ian Kelly
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26,
2001 08:10
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

Yes, go through setup
but only install the admin option, then serivce pack it (yes, the client pc) to
the same level as the server

Assuming of course
you're talking XCH 5.5 and an NT / 2000 workstation (doubt you can do it from a
9x box...)



Ian

-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-

An elephant is a mouse with an operating system. 

-Original
Message-
From: Neil Harvey
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: September 26, 2001 09:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin

Does anyone know
ifit possible to run the exchange administrator program on a client PC to
remotely administer the server.

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/







RE: W2k server reboots

2001-09-26 Thread Frede Hundewadt

OK

As mentioned - you might need to look for at patch or upgrade to your backup
software.
I'm sure you have examined your event log to see what is causing the reboot
?
It's prob a file request that cause the box to reboot thou I cant figure out
why

Frede



-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SV: W2k server reboots


Hi!

Okay, I have mis-explanied...The backup is running on/from another
server,
the reboot occours then when the backupserver is going to take the
backup
of this server, 2-5 min. after starting it reboots.

Did I explain this good enough?



Jan Pedersen


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 11:22
Til: NT System Admin Issues
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


I'm no hardwware guru but as it happens when the backups start, is it
possible to swap tape drives?




-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 10:02
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SV: W2k server reboots


Hi!

Thanks for the answers until now, I have loadet i386kd, and it gives:
Signature. . . . . . .PAGE
ValidDump. . . . . . .DUMP
MajorVersion . . . . .free system
MinorVersion . . . . .2195
DirectoryTableBase . .0x0003
PfnDataBase. . . . . .0x8204f000
PsLoadedModuleList . .0x8046ccf0
PsActiveProcessHead. .0x8046dbe0
MachineImageType . . .i386
NumberProcessors . . .1
BugCheckCode . . . . .0x007f
BugCheckParameter1 . .0x0008
BugCheckParameter2 . .0x
BugCheckParameter3 . .0x
BugCheckParameter4 . .0x

ExceptionCode. . . . .0x8003
ExceptionFlags . . . .0x0001
ExceptionAddress . . .0x804669be

Which I still don't understand.
I have found out that 0x007f means something hardware error related,
but I
have other servers with precisly same configuration, same patches, same
bios, same drivers etc.
-The machine is a IBM 5500 M20, with ½gb ram, serverraid v. 4,70, and
they don't reboot.

Any other ideas?


Jan Pedersen


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shane van Jaarsveldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 26. september 2001 10:40
Til: Jan Pedersen
Emne: RE: W2k server reboots


Check with Veritas for updates there are known issues with some ROC
chips (Raid on Chip) controllers and certain machines - I have seen this
random reboot occasionally.


This email is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights. You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.


-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2001 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots

From Q254649:

You can load complete and kernel memory dumps with standard symbolic
debuggers
(such as I386kd.exe included with the Windows 2000 Support CD-ROM).






-Original Message-
From: Giles Caldersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 07:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


Is that on the Resource Kit?

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: W2k server reboots


I386kd.exe is your tool to read those badboys.

Search the kb...
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Jan Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: W2k server reboots

Hi!

I have some trouble with a W2k server that reboots everynight, when the
backup starts on it.
(Backup Exec v. 8.5)
I have the server fully patched up to date.
It gives a entry in the eventlog:

Event Type: Information
Event Source:   Save Dump
Event Category: None
Event ID:   1001
Date:   26-09-2001
Time:   01:13:54
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck.  The bugcheck was: 0x007f
(0x0008, 0x, 0x, 0x). Microsoft Windows 2000
[v15.2195]. A dump was saved in: C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini092601-01.dmp.

Is it possible to read anything from the information in the above?

BG

Jan Pedersen

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for
the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you 

Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Neil Harvey



Does anyone know ifit possible to run the 
exchange administrator program on a client PC to remotely administer the 
server.
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: Exchange 5.5 admin

2001-09-26 Thread Roger Seielstad

yup, but it has to be either NT or Win2k.

Run the install from the Exchange server CD, choose custom install, and just
install the Admin component (and Books Online would be good to have, too).
Then install the same Exchange service pack that you have on your server(s)
on the machine, and you're good to go.

Roger
Iron Chef - Migration
-- 
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT 
Senior Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 
Atlanta, GA 
http://www.peregrine.com 
-Original Message-
From: Neil Harvey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin


Does anyone know if it possible to run the exchange administrator program on
a client PC to remotely administer the server.
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Win 98

2001-09-26 Thread Jolley Lee @Consult
Title: Win 98



I've 
had a problem where a laptop running Windows 98was picking up rogue IP 
addresses. There was nothhing wrong with 98 or the config. In the end it turned 
out to be the NIC driver. Got the updated driver from the web and that fixed the 
problem.

  -Original Message-From: Kopacko, Jason 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 September 2001 
  17:44To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Win 
  98
  I got a good one for you guys. I have a NT4 DC 
  server running DHCP/DNS/WINS. I am on a class B private subnet using the
  10.52.x.x address range. I have a 98 machine that everytime it tries to renew 
  its lease at the half-way point, it changes the subnet mask from a class B 
  255.255.0.0 to a class A 255.0.0.0. Once that happens, of course all it can do 
  is access local machines and will not be able to get passed through my router 
  for internet and corporate access. I have done everything short of reloading 
  the system, which will get upgraded to 2000 soon. But I am curious if any of 
  you guys have bumped into this, since it is only one machine? Please 
  help!
  Thank You,  Jason 
  Kopacko Network 
  Engineer Gold Strike 
  Casino, Tunica, Mississippi (662) 
  357-1305 Want to unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english_This 
  message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internetdelivered 
  through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For furtherinformation 
  visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively callStar Internet 
  for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

**
This email transmission is confidential and intended for the
addressee only. It may contain privileged and confidential
information. If you are not the person or organisation to
whom it is addressed, you must not copy, distribute, or take
any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and return it.

Carillion PLC Registered in England No. 3782379
Registered Office:
Birch Street Wolverhampton WV1 4HY
**

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Roger Seielstad

You should only need one rule:
Anything sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should get moved to
the folder of your choosing.

[text] added to the subject line munge up some other things, and we had them
removed over a year ago.

Alternately, if you are an Exchange user, sub a public folder to the list to
receive all the mail, and then sub yourself with the nomail option. Read it
from the PF and respond from your own account. Issue solved.

Roger
Iron Chef - Migration
-- 
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT 
Senior Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 
Atlanta, GA 
http://www.peregrine.com 
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?


Any chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the subject header to ease
outlook sorting.

I currently have three rules which pick out the messages.

Craig

-Original Message-
From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2001 12:28
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: stuhome
Subject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
Importance: High


New on NTSYSADMIN?

Here are a few Administrivia pointers.

1) Lurk for a week before you dive into threads.
2) SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were
sometimes
impossible. We think we got that fixed now.
3) Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to
the footer.
4) Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread.
Delete whole threads
that are not interesting.
5) We have a searchable archive. You can get there via the unsub link in
the footer.

And remember these golden rules:

ON TOPIC, NO NOISE, and FRIENDLY.

Thanks.

Stu






Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


 
This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the
information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please
contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is
for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or
used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice
should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters
relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require
diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




W2K Server problems - Satellite

2001-09-26 Thread L. M. Rappaport

I've had a Starband 360 installed on our Windows 2000 network.  It has
been installed on a Windows 2000 server, an HP NetServer E800.  This
was a working domain server, but with only one NIC, the one which was
built-in.  As the installer came from a great distance, we decided to
use the built-in NIC.  We set the TCPIP parameters as desired by
Starband - get the address from Starband, use their DNS and gateway.
Obviously, this disabled the network, but we finally had broadband.

We bought the Starband because they allow networking.  They
specifically recommend WinProxy.  We bought a license for 5 computers.
We also bought a NetGear FA311 10/100 PCI Network card and installed
it.  We now have two problems:

1.  I can't seem to get the network running on the second NIC.  I
can ping in both directions by both name and number.  (however, there
are LMHOSTS files in both workstations and server).  I have changed
the network server address from 192.168.100.10 to 192.168.0.1 and
listed that address for both DNS and gateway.  That machine is the
domain controller.  When I try to connect to a share on the server, I
variously get a not available or in use message.  I tried removing
a workstation and re-entering it.  I tried removing the NIC and
putting it in a different PCI slot although there are no conflicts
showing in the system hardware diagnosis.  

2.  When I boot the computer with both NICs enabled, the Starband
shows at first that it is working (small icon in the right side of the
taskbar) and then it fails.  If I disable the other network card, it
works fine.  It appears as if the Starband is detecting the second MAC
card and turning itself off, although the Starband tech folks say that
shouldn't happen.  

Anybody have any ideas?  Thanks,

Larry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Roger Wright

Same OL2000 rule works perfectly for me.

 
Roger Wright
Southern Commerce Bank
___

Lack of capability is usually disguised by lack of interest.


-Original Message-
From: Gregory Kuhn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?


I have this as my rule, and it has worked 100% for the duration:

if the To field contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to
folder NTSYSADMIN


Gregory Kuhn
Network Administrator
Manicmoment Network
http://mozart.manicmoment.net

- Original Message -
From: Craig Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:17 AM
Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?


 Yeah . I tried that and it only sorted some messages. If you assure me it
 works I'll look at it again.

 I'm currently using a mixture of that rule, the unsub text in body and the
 web page address in the body!

 How does your rule read?

 I might have another rule confilicting or something silly.

 Many thanks In advance

 Craig

 -Original Message-
 From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 September 2001 13:23
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?


 One rule needed
 to:NT System Admin Issues
 that's all you need  all messages will be sorted

 -Original Message-
 From: Craig Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:24 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?


 Any chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the subject header to ease
 outlook sorting.

 I currently have three rules which pick out the messages.

 Craig


 -Original Message-
 From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 September 2001 12:28
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Cc: stuhome
 Subject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
 Importance: High


 New on NTSYSADMIN?

 Here are a few Administrivia pointers.

 1) Lurk for a week before you dive into threads.
 2) SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were
 sometimes
 impossible. We think we got that fixed now.
 3) Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to
 the footer.
 4) Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread.
 Delete whole threads
 that are not interesting.
 5) We have a searchable archive. You can get there via the unsub link in
 the footer.

 And remember these golden rules:

 ON TOPIC, NO NOISE, and FRIENDLY.

 Thanks.

 Stu






 Want to unsub? Do that here:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
 e=0lang=english
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


 --
--
 

 This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you
 are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the
 information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please
 contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail
is
 for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par
or
 used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice
 should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular
matters
 relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require
 diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par
 --
--
 

 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


 --
--
 
 This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you
 are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the
 information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please
 contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail
is
 for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par
or
 used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice
 should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular
matters
 relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require
 diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par
 --
--
 


 Want to unsub? Do that here:
 http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
 Need a good 

RE: Network Login

2001-09-26 Thread David James

Sounds like the hub, cabling, or NIC.  
Troubleshoot!
Last resort you could hook up a different PC to that spot, see if it
happens.  Or, you could get a real OS.

DJ


-Original Message-
From: Jose, Pradeep OLNG-QTE/537 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Network Login


Hi Guys,
 
Got a small problem. 
 
One of the PC running win95 is not able to login to the NT Domain. When a
User tries to login into the domain, he gets the message You are not
allowed to logon from this workstation. But there's no problem for Domain
administrators to logon from this 95box. 
 
This PC is connected to a hub which is connected to the switch. If I hook up
the PC directly to the switch(Through the patch panel), Users are able to
login.
 
There are no workstation restrictions for the user.
 
Any ideas would be of great help. 
 
Thanks in advance
Pradeep Jose 
* This email may be confidential,  privileged and/or protected by
copyright.   If you are not the intended recipient,  you should not copy it,
retransmit it or disclose its contents but should return it to the sender
immediately and delete your copy from your system *

Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




Re: IIS and CA in 2000

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Shattock
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



Shannon,

Adil is right - W2K will complain if something goes 
wrong - usually only the result of crap application installprograms or 
determined manual messing around.

Can you check if your CA is in the Trusted Root 
list - should be already ifyou installed CA as a stand-alone 
(IE\Tools\Internet Options\Content\Certificates - "Trusted Root Certification 
Authorities")

I assume you did install as a Stand-alone 
CA?

Chris Shattock

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shannon 
  Speck 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:35 
  PM
  Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 2000
  
  Thanks Chris.I am going to give that a look. I am a little 
  confused as to whether I need to re-install the q301625 after (first) 
  un-installing/re-installing Certificate Services and (second) W2K SP 2. I have 
  alwaysbeen told that a good rule of thumb is if you have to insert the 
  W2KServer install CD and it copies files from it you need to re-install 
  the latest Service pack. I am not sure if this is the case with 
  q301625.BTW, I had already un-installed and re-installed Certificate 
  Services/W2K SP2before I got your reply. It is all back up now. I am 
  still having one issue that I need to deal with. 
  I am still getting the error "The security certificate was issued by a 
  company that you have not chosen to trust. View the certificate and to 
  determine whether you want to trust the certifying authority". I click view 
  the certificate, then I run the "Install Certificate" and it imports and 
  installs successfully, but I still get the security alert each time I exit 
  Internet Explorer and restart Internet Explorer to access the site. 
  Sorry to keep hitting you with questions.I really appreciate 
  your help with this issue. It has been very useful.
  
  SS
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Chris Shattock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  7:03 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: IIS and CA 
  in 2000
  
No I wasn't. Yes I am now: Following apply it 
appears that the patch removed the CertSrv virtual directory from localhost 
- these things are sent to amuse us. Just re-create a virtual directory 
called CertSrv and point it to the certsrv subdirectory of 
%systempath%\system32\certsrv.

Of course your machine is probably hugely 
different from mine (which will be rebuilt this weekend it is so screwed up) 
that you may have other issues. Firstly check to see if the 
localhost\CertSrv is still there.

Chris Shattock

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shannon 
  Speck 
  To: NT System Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  2:12 PM
  Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 2000
  
  I just crashed my Certificate Service. I installed WS's latest 
  cumulative IIS patch (q301625) to tighten IIS back up and the certificate 
  service will not start now. I am going to re-install the W2K SP2 and see 
  if that fixes it. If not I guess I will have to remove/re-install 
  certificate services.Are you running theq301625 patch 
  mentioned above?
  
  SS
  
-Original Message-From: Chris Shattock 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 6:10 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
IIS and CA in 2000
Check my earlier reply for port# - if you 
have all defaults forget it - just default to 80.
Personally I don't read that much - this 
and other things I find out by trying - consequently I end up rebuilding 
my server every 3 weeks or so - but each time I do it goes quicker 
(after re-installing W2KS and AS x times since 1998!).

I have found a self-certified CA to be very 
usefule for devolpment and testing out multiple IP-less hosting with 
different SSL's and Exchange etc. - they're all done the same way. So 
have some fun!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shannon Speck 
  To: NT System Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 1:02 PM
  Subject: RE: IIS and CA in 
  2000
  
  Man, that was dead on!! After posting yesterday evening, I 
  finally came across an article that explained this.This info was 
  not the easiest to find. The only difference in the article from your 
  info was how to access the local host. They are suggesting http://localhost/certsrv . This 
  seemed to work. They did not mention the port #. I am going to have to 
  go back through it and see if I can find the option for Web server. I 
  don't recall seeing that. My next task is getting rid of the errors 
  for stuff not matching. Thanks a million for the 
  

Re: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Shattock
Title: IIS and CA in 2000



Two more rules:

1. Subject Contains "[LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
NTSYSADMIN" - Action - DELETE FROM SERVER.
2.Subject Contains "Exchange 5.5" - Action - 
DELETE FROM SERVER (and possibly either of "upgrade to E2K"or re-route to 
Exchange SysAdmin List).

And perhaps:Subject Contains "Outlook Rules" 
- Action - DELETE FROM SERVER.

Kill this discussion on Email rules or take 
offline - it is trivial.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin 
  Lundy 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:23 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
  NTSYSADMIN?
  
  I 
  can assure you that it works. My rule looks just like Keith's, and 100% 
  of my NT Sysadmin email's go into the dedicated folder. Just make sure 
  that you add the NT Sysadmin email address to your contacts - that way it can 
  be a server side rule and filter even without a client 
  open.
  
-Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 9:17 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
[LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
Yeah . I tried that and it only sorted some 
messages. If you assure me it works I'll look at it 
again.

I'm currently using a mixture of that rule, the 
unsub text in body and the web page address in the body!

How does your rule read?

I 
might have another rule confilicting or something silly.

Many thanks In advance

Craig

  -Original Message-From: Keith Johnson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  13:23To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST 
  ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
  One rule needed
  to:NT System Admin Issues
  that's all you need  all messages will be 
  sorted
  
-Original Message-From: Craig Cameron 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 
26, 2001 8:24 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
Any chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in 
the subject header to ease outlook sorting.

I currently have three rules which pick out the 
messages.

Craig


  -Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
  12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: 
  stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on 
  NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High
  New on NTSYSADMIN?
  
  Here are a few "Administrivia" 
  pointers.
  
  1) Lurk for a week before you dive into 
  threads.
  2) SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a 
  bit too much. Unsubs were sometimes
   impossible. We think we 
  got that fixed now.
  3) Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a 
  question. I have added it to the footer.
  4) Filter all postings into a folder with an 
  outlook rule. Sort by thread. Delete whole threads
   that are not 
  interesting.
  5) We have asearchable archive. You can 
  get there via the "unsub link" in the footer.
  
  And remember these golden 
  rules:
  
  ON TOPIC, NO NOISE, 
  andFRIENDLY.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Stu
  
  
  
  
  
  Want to 
  unsub? Do that 
  here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed 
  a good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to 
unsub? Do that 
here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
 

This E-Mail is confidential and is intended 
for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must 
not /par disclose or use the information contained in it. If you 
received this e-Mail in error, please contact the sender /par 
immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is for information 
purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or used as a 
substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice should 
always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters 
relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require 
diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par 
Want 
  to unsub? Do that 
 

RE: Repetitive posts

2001-09-26 Thread Shannon Speck
Title: RE: Repetitive posts





It is hard to tell when a question has been answered. I sent a response to a question early this morning, but my response didn't hit the server for quite a while. By the time it did hit, there had already been several responses from other list members. (Which I think is great!!) One thing that I do like to see is when a question gets answered that the question sender sends a response letting everyone know that he has resolved his issue. This will kill the thread. I have noticed that some people do not do this and the question keeps getting answered. It is not a perfect animal, but WELL worth the time.

-Original Message-
From: TDI Custom Computers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Fw: Repetitive posts






 Which is why I sort by thread, rather than by time stamp.
 Mike

 - Original Message -
 From: Alavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:01 AM
 Subject: Repetitive posts


  This list is high volume. But much of that can be cured by people
reading
  the rest of the posts to see if the question's been answered already -
  before they post their answer.
 
  Case in point: there must've been 20 Memphis responses to the Win98
Code
  name question and a similar number of responses to the 'Safe Mode' key
  question.
 
  Please, let's keep this list manageable.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Alavan
 
 
  Want to unsub? Do that here:
 

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmin_mod
 e=0lang=english
 
 





Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





RE: SMTP server for W2K

2001-09-26 Thread Benjamin Winzenz

I prefer www.bhs.com for finding shareware/freeware stuff.  Tons better than
Tucows, if you ask me.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.

 -Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:RE: SMTP server for W2K


'tha bomb' only if you refer to it meaning it's gonna blow up all over the
place

One place I'd check, if you were looking for a small environment, and
didn't want to spend much is http://www.tucows.com

They have mailservers ranging from shareware to thousands of $$, and some
of it even works pretty well.

If all you're looking for is SMTP/POP mail, I'd actually recommend Internet
Anywhere Mail server.  Heck, unlimited mailbox version is only $399 or so.


***
Jeff Johnson
MCSE+I, MCSE 2k
Network Engineer
Triple S Plastics
***


 

Joe L.

Casale  To: NT System Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Ritmo2k@yahoo   cc:

.comSubject: RE: SMTP server for
W2K  
 

09/25/2001

06:41 PM

Please respond

to NT System

Admin Issues

 

 





Ipswitch, Imail -Overpriced-
Gordano, NTMail -cheesey, but very reliable and cheap-
MS, Exchange -Tha Bomb baby!

jlc

-Original Message-
From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP server for W2K

what are you looking for?

POP3/iMap/Routing/Calendaring???

How many clients...

What is your budget...

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:38
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP server for W2K


Any recommendations for a good mail server program for Win2K?  Thanks.

Stephen



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mod
e=0lang=english

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext
_mode=0lang=english


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english







Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: Create a Registry File

2001-09-26 Thread Gary Pearson

Khurram,

What I think you are asking is how to create file (.bat, .exe., etc.) that
will make modifications to the registry. If that is the case, then what I
have used for years is Wilson's WindowWare Winbatch with the compiler
(http://www.windowware.com/winware/wb-first.html). I have used it to
automate installations of applications, modify registry keys/values, check
software revisions, create desktop shortcuts, map network drives and just
about anything else that you could think of to assist users in a Windows
environment. I'm not a programmer, so if I can do these things, anyone can.

Hope this helps.

Gary Pearson, MCP
Expert Tech Solutions, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Khurram Chaudhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Create a Registry File


Does anyone know how to create a registry file that will modify certain
keys and values?

Khurram Chaudhary
Astley-Gilbert Reproductions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mod
e=0lang=english



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




RE: OWA

2001-09-26 Thread xylog
Title: OWA









Not necessarily. If you use Windows
Integrated Authentication on your IIS box then the passwords are encrypted. If
you use basic authentication then passwords are sent in clear text. 



xylog

-Original Message-
From: Neil Harvey
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26,
2001 4:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA





I might be being blonde here but
does that mean that if OWA and Exchange are running on the same server then the
passwords are encrypted?







- Original Message - 





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





To: NT System Admin Issues 





Sent: Tuesday,
September 25, 2001 6:51 PM





Subject: RE: OWA











Yes, First its has be
loaded on a web server of course, Then load Exchange admin on the web server
you want to run OWA. Then Load OWA on web server. The only bad thing to loading
OWA on a different machine is that your Passwords will be sent in clear text
unless its a Domain Controller.









STG1(SW) Kirk Etchberger 

COMREGSUPPGRU MAYPORT FL 
SERMC AIS LPO 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
TEL: 904-270-5126
EXT 3119 
DSN: 312-960-5126
EXT 3119 

MCSE, MCSD, CCNA



Is anyone running OWA on a
different server than Exchange 5.5? If yes, what procedures did you
take? 





After getting hit with the Nimda virus, I had to
reformat the hard drive and reinstall patches. I have not been able to
get OWA installed on that server I keep receiving an error message when trying
to install OWA Failed to remove OWA . The specified file
cannot be found, Microsoft NT ID No: ox00c2.

Cassandra Cody, MCSE 
Missouri
Botanical Garden 

See the World 
314-577-0813

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english



Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english




Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/







Re: Web filtering software advice

2001-09-26 Thread Thomas Day

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I need to dompile a report on Web Filtering softwares.  I am asware of
SurfControl.  Can anyone recomend other packages?
Thanks in advance.
Daniel J. Munley 
Keyence Corporation of America 




Check out WebSense  http://www.websense.com/index2.cfm




Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




  1   2   3   4   >