Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Finding unused/dead groups?
I just record who was in a group (net group command), remove all the users from it, mark it as DEPRECATED in the description, and wait. If anyone calls up complaining, it was still in use - roll back. If a few weeks / months / years (delete as necessary for your environment) pass without issue, remove it completely. Of course, my habit of using very detailed descriptions and sticking to a one group, one function model tends to make sure you know exactly what the scope of each group is. Others prefer nesting, but as I have spent the last two years in a fairly small environment, I've been able to do things this way without too much administrative overhead. On 18 August 2010 20:17, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Is there a recommended way to determine which groups (be it Domain Local or Global) are still in active use in a given domain? Ideal world Microsoft would give groups a disable property, but since there isn't, other than at some point hitting Delete and waiting for the phone to ring there doesn't seem any decent way to determine this. Thanks. -- *MIRA Ltd* Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England. Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: PIX replacement
Why would you consider the smallest ASA 5505 as overkill compared to the SonicWall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' -Original Message- From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: PIX replacement PIX is at end of life and Cisco is pushing ASA. This product is overkill for smaller companies. Has anyone else replaced or implemented Sonicwall instead? One of our vendors is touting it and we are considering it. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Port 80 blocked?
Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: PIX replacement
Sorry for the time warp, didn't notice the OP date before responding Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' -Original Message- From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: PIX replacement Why would you consider the smallest ASA 5505 as overkill compared to the SonicWall ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' -Original Message- From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: PIX replacement PIX is at end of life and Cisco is pushing ASA. This product is overkill for smaller companies. Has anyone else replaced or implemented Sonicwall instead? One of our vendors is touting it and we are considering it. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Port 80 blocked?
Have you checked the hosts file in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc? On 19 August 2010 10:29, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.org wrote: Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I’d see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
Oh yes, sorry I forgot to mention that I'd checked this and it only had the loopback address listed which seemed fine. I could always lift a copy from another XP machine and copy it over the top I guess just to be sure... From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 19 August 2010 10:49 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Port 80 blocked? Have you checked the hosts file in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc? On 19 August 2010 10:29, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.org wrote: Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Scanned by iCritical. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
Are you sure the problem isn't with the router? (probably unlikely, but you never know) Cheers Ken From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Port 80 blocked?
Yep, I have other machines connected to the same router than can browse the web no problems... From: Ken Schaefer To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thu Aug 19 10:55:05 2010 Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked? Are you sure the problem isn’t with the router? (probably unlikely, but you never know) Cheers Ken From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I’d see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Web site connections
Excuse the IIS-noob question, one of our developers just asked me if there was any way to determine how many users are connected to our external website at any given time. It runs IIS7 on Windows Server 2008. Do any of the MS tools or logs allow you to view this, or would I need some sort of third-party tool (suggestions very welcome)? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Web site connections
For a very basic and free solution you could use netstat. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:19 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: Excuse the IIS-noob question, one of our developers just asked me if there was any way to determine how many users are connected to our external website at any given time. It runs IIS7 on Windows Server 2008. Do any of the MS tools or logs allow you to view this, or would I need some sort of third-party tool (suggestions very welcome)? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Web site connections
Not saying this is the easiest or most accurate but perfmon will give you current connections. If you are wanting live just start perfmon on the server and I think it is under the webservice current connections. I use it on occasion for special events. From: James Rankin [kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Web site connections Excuse the IIS-noob question, one of our developers just asked me if there was any way to determine how many users are connected to our external website at any given time. It runs IIS7 on Windows Server 2008. Do any of the MS tools or logs allow you to view this, or would I need some sort of third-party tool (suggestions very welcome)? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Port 80 blocked?
Does 'any browser' include non-installed browsers such as those from Portable Apps? http://portableapps.com/apps http://portableapps.com/apps On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.orgwrote: Yep, I have other machines connected to the same router than can browse the web no problems... -- *From*: Ken Schaefer *To*: NT System Admin Issues *Sent*: Thu Aug 19 10:55:05 2010 *Subject*: RE: Port 80 blocked? Are you sure the problem isn’t with the router? (probably unlikely, but you never know) Cheers Ken *From:* Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] *Sent:* Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I’d see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Web site connections
Thanks guys The developer in question seems happy to pick the bones out of perfmon and netstat Cheers! On 19 August 2010 11:20, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote: Not saying this is the easiest or most accurate but perfmon will give you current connections. If you are wanting live just start perfmon on the server and I think it is under the webservice current connections. I use it on occasion for special events. -- *From:* James Rankin [kz2...@googlemail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:19 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Web site connections Excuse the IIS-noob question, one of our developers just asked me if there was any way to determine how many users are connected to our external website at any given time. It runs IIS7 on Windows Server 2008. Do any of the MS tools or logs allow you to view this, or would I need some sort of third-party tool (suggestions very welcome)? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
Did you try to create another account on the fly ? Da: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 11.55 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Port 80 blocked? Are you sure the problem isn't with the router? (probably unlikely, but you never know) Cheers Ken From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
A user account? Yes I created a admin account but this account still had the issue... From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: 19 August 2010 11:41 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked? Did you try to create another account on the fly ? Da: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 11.55 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Port 80 blocked? Are you sure the problem isn't with the router? (probably unlikely, but you never know) Cheers Ken From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
Errr, no! When I said 'any browser', I actually meant three! The full versions IE 7, IE8, Google Chrome and Firefox... I will try one of these portable apps though, thanks for the tip. From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 August 2010 11:25 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Port 80 blocked? Does 'any browser' include non-installed browsers such as those from Portable Apps? http://portableapps.com/apps On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.org wrote: Yep, I have other machines connected to the same router than can browse the web no problems... From: Ken Schaefer To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thu Aug 19 10:55:05 2010 Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked? Are you sure the problem isn't with the router? (probably unlikely, but you never know) Cheers Ken From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
Yeah, I thought maybe you had multiple nics in a team/trunk from the vm's vswitch to the physical switch. Sorry, no idea:( jlc -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 7:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I have 3 adapters for the VMs, and two for management - network failover is set for link detection only, no load balancing, no notify switches, no failback. vswitch0 is the service console, vswitch1 is the virtual machine port group. Don't know if that answers the trunking question or not. Kurt -- Forwarded message -- From: Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com Date: Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:34 Subject: RE: The arrrgghhhness of it all... To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com I saw something very similar a while ago:) What's your esx vswitch and nic config and if you're using trunking, what switch and how's it configured? jlc -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 6:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 13.03 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
If it was me, and I had a couple of ESX hosts, I would VMotion everything off one, run update manager to remediate the patch level, and then move everything the other way and do it to my other hosts. I always take a screenshot first so I can put everything back the way it was. I can honestly say I haven’t seen this, but why in the back of my head does something tell me the VM drivers on the Windows host and the patches seem to be conflicting. Hopefully when running WU, you are NOT updating drivers. No need in a VM. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 6:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see which one breaks DNS? That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Port 80 blocked?
well, then try changing the IP address of your problem system to that of a known properly working system and see if there is an IP block in place On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.orgwrote: Yep, I have other machines connected to the same router than can browse the web no problems... -- *From*: Ken Schaefer *To*: NT System Admin Issues *Sent*: Thu Aug 19 10:55:05 2010 *Subject*: RE: Port 80 blocked? Are you sure the problem isn’t with the router? (probably unlikely, but you never know) Cheers Ken *From:* Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] *Sent:* Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I’d see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks. On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see which one breaks DNS? That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
YES! -Original Message- From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks. On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see which one breaks DNS? That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
Hmm. have you done a malware scan with something like Vipre Rescue and/or Malware Bytes and/or SpyBot SD? I've seen something similar happen when a machine was infested with Malware. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.jpgimage002.jpg
A bit OT: e-mail migration
Hey Folks, Anyone on this list (or know anyone) that has performed GroupWise -- Exchange migrations? We are considering moving to Exchange. GroupWise is a fine product but Exchange has direct integration with Great Plains and a our soon-to-be-new electronic medical records system. I've done this before so I know what's involved and the various option and issues. I'm looking to - potentially - out source it as I and my team are currently engaged in a number of other long-term projects. And last time I did it I lost a year of my life, never to return, forgotten. ;-) This would be pretty much migration of our various GroupWise post offices to a central location except for maybe one site. (We are implementing XenDesktop so if users want Outlook they will have to go to XenDesktop or OWA.) Hardware will be ready once the migration starts. 900 accounts so a simple setup, maybe clustering, not sure at this point. Feel free to reply off-list or on-list. Tom Miller Engineer, Information Technology Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board 757-788-0528 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
Snapshots rule. Unless (like I've had) you get some idiot using them to do a restore on a virtualised DC, in which case you may hear a lot of *NO* On 19 August 2010 13:41, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote: YES! -Original Message- From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks. On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see which one breaks DNS? That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
I have used 'HiJackThis' and also a lesser known spyware scanner and resolved all issues / deleted all bugs that were raised by these programs. I will download Vipre Rescue, thanks for the advice. From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 19 August 2010 13:45 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked? Hmm... have you done a malware scan with something like Vipre Rescue and/or Malware Bytes and/or SpyBot SD? I've seen something similar happen when a machine was infested with Malware. From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. -- Scanned by iCritical. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.jpgimage002.jpg
Re: Web site connections
Another option is CurrPorts ( www.nirsoft.net ). Nice free utility. -- Bob Hartung Wisco Industries, Inc. 736 Janesville St. Oregon, WI 53575 Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215 Fax: (608) 835-7399 e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com _ From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:36:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Web site connections Thanks guys The developer in question seems happy to pick the bones out of perfmon and netstat Cheers! On 19 August 2010 11:20, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote: Not saying this is the easiest or most accurate but perfmon will give you current connections. If you are wanting live just start perfmon on the server and I think it is under the webservice current connections. I use it on occasion for special events. _ From: James Rankin [kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Web site connections Excuse the IIS-noob question, one of our developers just asked me if there was any way to determine how many users are connected to our external website at any given time. It runs IIS7 on Windows Server 2008. Do any of the MS tools or logs allow you to view this, or would I need some sort of third-party tool (suggestions very welcome)? TIA, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Wow McCrap on a chip. 7.68B? Their worth that much? Surprise is not the word. From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Here is a surprise... http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your system. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
I'm guessing that the bigger surprise is still to come. Ask yourself this - what would a chip company need with security software? From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Here is a surprise. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: *subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner* *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* gio 19/08/2010 13.03 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise… http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
AMD to get Symantec Endpoint Protection integrated on their chips next then. Imagine the speed of those babies. On 19 August 2010 14:16, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise… http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Maybe putting them on firmware is the only way to make them fast. LOL Of course, the die size will be massive. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:18 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: AMD to get Symantec Endpoint Protection integrated on their chips next then. Imagine the speed of those babies. On 19 August 2010 14:16, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise… http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
On that last one, does that mean AMD will acquire Symantec? Or, perhaps, AVG? :) On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise… http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Mr. Alex E., If you're lurking, I'd love to hear\read what you think Shook From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamphttp://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise... http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Just what my Intel stock needed.
John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Here is a surprise...
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498
Simon.
--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.
e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://www.amset.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/
This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.{token}
NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public
disclosure.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Port 80 blocked?
You're welcome. Not saying that's the problem, but I've seen that sort of problem cause the symptoms you're describing. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked? I have used 'HiJackThis' and also a lesser known spyware scanner and resolved all issues / deleted all bugs that were raised by these programs. I will download Vipre Rescue, thanks for the advice. From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 19 August 2010 13:45 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked? Hmm. have you done a malware scan with something like Vipre Rescue and/or Malware Bytes and/or SpyBot SD? I've seen something similar happen when a machine was infested with Malware. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port 80 blocked? Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3 machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser. I have tried all the tricks that I know to resolve this, but the issue still persists. The steps I have tried are: Ensured no proxy server settings are checked Ensured that DHCP and DNS are working correctly Ensured that ping responses are successful via both hostname and IP address Flushed the DNS cache Released and renewed IP via DHCP Tried multiple browsers (Firefox, IE, Google Chrome) Dumped the IE cache Installed all the latest patches Uninstalled expired anti-virus products (i understand that Norton has been a cause of this in the past, but n this case the AV is Avast Home Edition) Switched off any personal firewalls Unsuccessfully rolled back to a System restore point three months old Trouble-shot the NIC to ensure successful operation Reset the winsock catalog Removed the winsock and winsock2 registry entries Reinstalled the TCP stack Swearing at it I am poised with the XP install disk and ready to wipe the OS and rebuild the machine, but I thought I'd see if anyone on this list had resolved this issue before? Many thanks! Mark IMPORTANT INFORMATION Internet communications are not secure and therefore CIPS does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of any e-mail message sent via this medium. The content of any e-mail communication is the view of the individual and CIPS does not accept legal liability for the contents. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by CIPS for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use. CIPS runs the following software packages: MS Office Suite 2003, MS Visio 2003, MS Project 2002. Please ensure that any files you send are compatible. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing Supply (CIPS) is an organisation incorporated under Royal Charter and is based at Easton House, Easton on the Hill, Stamford, Lincs PE9 3NZ, tel: +44 (0)1780 756777, and is a registered Charity number 1017938. CIPS Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary company of CIPS, registered in England under number 2610367 and is registered at the address shown above. Both organisations operate under a group VAT registration number: 3426 489 42. -- Scanned by iCritical. -- Scanned by iCritical. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.jpgimage002.jpg
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Surprising indeed. Intel got into and out of that business at least once before. Symantec's corporate anti-virus product used to be Intel LANDesk Virus Protection. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise… http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Extreme Networking
Hi Folks, Just wondering if anyone here uses Extreme Kit? If so what do you use for loop detection. We have EAPS setup and EAPS does not work with STP Any thoughts? Regards Fergal O'Connell ICT Support Cúram Software Emailto: foconn...@curamsoftware.commailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
It's more important now than it was then. Look for this to impact mobile devices more than desktops/laptops. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner ASB http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker (My XeeSM Profile) Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 13.03 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Remember that they left that market?!? I'm not saying that Intel has no business with security. I'm saying that swallowing a $7.7B pig to get back into that game is surprising. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote: Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.comwrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise… http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Google is your friend. For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more cost-effective. But hey... *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: *subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner* *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* gio 19/08/2010 13.03 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Exporting GPOs
Is there any better way to export Group Policy Objects rather than just using the Back Up function? I am moving jobs and want to take copies of some of the more useful and/or complex GPOs I've come up with while I've been here (yes, I do have my boss's blessing for this). The Back Up function just pumps 'em out in the same format they appear in the sysvol directory, which doesn't even give me the names to narrow them down. Is there any better way, or am I stuck with screenshots? :-) Cheers, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Also time is money! If I have (what I made really now) to read all options of the command, to type and retype for unwanted wrong input(you know , keyboards) and having an output file practically unreadable because lines too long Thank you and kind regards GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.58 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Google is your friend. For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more cost-effective. But hey... ASB http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker (My XeeSM Profile) Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner ASB http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker (My XeeSM Profile) Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 13.03 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
H. Maybe that explains the McCrappy customer service we've been getting from them. From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Here is a surprise... http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Have you tried exporting it to CSV and manipulating in excel? IE. subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner /file abc.csv From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Also time is money! If I have (what I made really now) to read all options of the command, to type and retype for unwanted wrong input(you know , keyboards) and having an output file practically unreadable because lines too long Thank you and kind regards GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.58 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Google is your friend. For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more cost-effective. But hey... ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamphttp://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.itmailto:g...@enter.it wrote: This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamphttp://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.itmailto:g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 13.03 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamphttp://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.itmailto:g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.commailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.itmailto:g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
I trust Kurt's good sense to not try a snapshot restore on a DC. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:46 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: Snapshots rule. Unless (like I've had) you get some idiot using them to do a restore on a virtualised DC, in which case you may hear a lot of *NO * On 19 August 2010 13:41, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote: YES! -Original Message- From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks. On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see which one breaks DNS? That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
/file reports error .Why? GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 16.34 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Have you tried exporting it to CSV and manipulating in excel? IE. subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner /file abc.csv From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Also time is money! If I have (what I made really now) to read all options of the command, to type and retype for unwanted wrong input(you know , keyboards) and having an output file practically unreadable because lines too long Thank you and kind regards GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.58 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Google is your friend. For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more cost-effective. But hey... ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 13.03 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
So.. Intel going to put McCrappy AV on their chips? Guess I will be looking
at AMD now.
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Wow McCrap on a chip. 7.68B? Their worth that much? Surprise is not the
word.
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Here is a surprise.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498
Simon.
--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.
e: si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://www.amset.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/
This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or
any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer
system.{token}
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Exporting GPOs
What do you mean by complex? Have you developed a lot of adm templates to perform different functions? You could just take those. In the GPMC, when viewing the settings for each policy, you can 'show all' and right-click / Save Report to html file. - Sean On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: Is there any better way to export Group Policy Objects rather than just using the Back Up function? I am moving jobs and want to take copies of some of the more useful and/or complex GPOs I've come up with while I've been here (yes, I do have my boss's blessing for this). The Back Up function just pumps 'em out in the same format they appear in the sysvol directory, which doesn't even give me the names to narrow them down. Is there any better way, or am I stuck with screenshots? :-) Cheers, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
LOL, U have stock? Fear... Tech is ebil these days...
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Just what my Intel stock needed.
John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Here is a surprise...
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498
Simon.
--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.
e: si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://www.amset.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/
This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.{token}
NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written
communications to or from this entity are public records that will be
disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail
communications may be subject to public disclosure.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: A bit OT: e-mail migration
Tom, We're in the planning stage of migrating from Groupwise 7.0 to Exchange 2010 right now. We have around 2800 users, at least 1200 of which are not connected to the network on a regular basis. We're looking at Quest tools and Messaging Architects tools to do the migration to an archive location first, then just take the last 30 days - 2 months or so of mail and move that from the archive location into our Exchange system. Looking like a very interesting time ahead. As far as clustering, if you're going to 2010, there is no clustering, per se. You put your mailbox servers into a DAG, which does failover clustering in the background, automagically. Very easy to setup, at least it was in the very controlled classroom location. Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org 8/19/2010 5:44 AM Hey Folks, Anyone on this list (or know anyone) that has performed GroupWise -- Exchange migrations? We are considering moving to Exchange. GroupWise is a fine product but Exchange has direct integration with Great Plains and a our soon-to-be-new electronic medical records system. I've done this before so I know what's involved and the various option and issues. I'm looking to - potentially - out source it as I and my team are currently engaged in a number of other long-term projects. And last time I did it I lost a year of my life, never to return, forgotten. ;-) This would be pretty much migration of our various GroupWise post offices to a central location except for maybe one site. (We are implementing XenDesktop so if users want Outlook they will have to go to XenDesktop or OWA.) Hardware will be ready once the migration starts. 900 accounts so a simple setup, maybe clustering, not sure at this point. Feel free to reply off-list or on-list. Tom Miller Engineer, Information Technology Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board 757-788-0528 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Well, my Apple stock has done quite nicely-I definitely have no complaints
there. :)
Intel, though, is another story. But I do continue to have confidence in their
future, so I've held my shares.
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
LOL, U have stock? Fear... Tech is ebil these days...
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Just what my Intel stock needed.
John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Here is a surprise...
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498
Simon.
--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.
e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://www.amset.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/
This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.{token}
NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public
disclosure.
NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public
disclosure.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: A bit OT: e-mail migration
Thanks Joe. At some point I may contact you off-list. I don't really mind doing the migration, I'd just prefer not too. Mail is so political. I am finishing a migration from Netware/eDirectory to Windows/Active Directory. Users could care less as long as they can get their files. Mail however...people complain but my standard line is usually to hand users a feature comparison sheet and be done with it. It's not like I write the code, but users don't understand that. I like the idea of putting migrated mail in a central repository. I've been looking at Messaging Architects products and I like the way mail is stubbed. I am not so sure about Quest. Quest wants you to purchase $$$ consulting services with their products. I didn't purchasing consulting services when I used Quest NDS Migrator, and support was weak and the product didn't work well. I ended up writing my own script for the PC migration. I'm sure it was a fine product but for me it was a waste of thousands of dollars. The Quest GW migration utility used to be Wingra before Quest purchased it. I used Wingra and it was okay, but slow and frustratingly bombed at the end of a mailbox migration occationally. That was at least five years ago so it's most likely improved. Happy migrating! Tom Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov 8/19/2010 11:36 AM Tom, We're in the planning stage of migrating from Groupwise 7.0 to Exchange 2010 right now. We have around 2800 users, at least 1200 of which are not connected to the network on a regular basis. We're looking at Quest tools and Messaging Architects tools to do the migration to an archive location first, then just take the last 30 days - 2 months or so of mail and move that from the archive location into our Exchange system. Looking like a very interesting time ahead. As far as clustering, if you're going to 2010, there is no clustering, per se. You put your mailbox servers into a DAG, which does failover clustering in the background, automagically. Very easy to setup, at least it was in the very controlled classroom location. Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org 8/19/2010 5:44 AM Hey Folks, Anyone on this list (or know anyone) that has performed GroupWise -- Exchange migrations? We are considering moving to Exchange. GroupWise is a fine product but Exchange has direct integration with Great Plains and a our soon-to-be-new electronic medical records system. I've done this before so I know what's involved and the various option and issues. I'm looking to - potentially - out source it as I and my team are currently engaged in a number of other long-term projects. And last time I did it I lost a year of my life, never to return, forgotten. ;-) This would be pretty much migration of our various GroupWise post offices to a central location except for maybe one site. (We are implementing XenDesktop so if users want Outlook they will have to go to XenDesktop or OWA.) Hardware will be ready once the migration starts. 900 accounts so a simple setup, maybe clustering, not sure at this point. Feel free to reply off-list or on-list. Tom Miller Engineer, Information Technology Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board 757-788-0528 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: A bit OT: e-mail migration
Heh... EVERYTHING is easier in a controlled, classroom environment. :-) -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: A bit OT: e-mail migration Tom, We're in the planning stage of migrating from Groupwise 7.0 to Exchange 2010 right now. We have around 2800 users, at least 1200 of which are not connected to the network on a regular basis. We're looking at Quest tools and Messaging Architects tools to do the migration to an archive location first, then just take the last 30 days - 2 months or so of mail and move that from the archive location into our Exchange system. Looking like a very interesting time ahead. As far as clustering, if you're going to 2010, there is no clustering, per se. You put your mailbox servers into a DAG, which does failover clustering in the background, automagically. Very easy to setup, at least it was in the very controlled classroom location. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Really? We are implementing a mobile device AV/malware product (at great expense), but what's the real threat landscape? Enterprise products (WinMo, Blackberry) already include the ability to lock down what can run on the device. Unless Intel is planning to hawk a product to SOHO markets (which I doubt), I don't think this is about a big mobile device play. Cheers Ken From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion It's more important now than it was then. Look for this to impact mobile devices more than desktops/laptops. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. ASB (My XeeSM Profile)http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamphttp://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise... http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Interesting VMware guest behaviour
I've quickly implemented a GPO to hide the icon again, but I'm slightly concerned that a user with standard privileges could initiate an installation, and a restart, to boot. That's a pet peeve of mine, but there is a more secure solution than yours, sorry I don't have the time to find the official docs, but a quick google shows http://goingvirtual.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/locking-down-vmware-tools/ which should get you going... Verify the params and syntax:) jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Consider that Intel could hawk to the wireless providers or phone manufacturers, or both. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Really? We are implementing a mobile device AV/malware product (at great expense), but what’s the real threat landscape? Enterprise products (WinMo, Blackberry) already include the ability to lock down what can run on the device. Unless Intel is planning to hawk a product to SOHO markets (which I doubt), I don’t think this is about a big mobile device play. Cheers Ken *From:* Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] *Sent:* Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:41 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion It’s more important now than it was then. Look for this to impact mobile devices more than desktops/laptops. *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:27 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise… http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Everything is about a mobile device play these days. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Consider that Intel could hawk to the wireless providers or phone manufacturers, or both. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Really? We are implementing a mobile device AV/malware product (at great expense), but what's the real threat landscape? Enterprise products (WinMo, Blackberry) already include the ability to lock down what can run on the device. Unless Intel is planning to hawk a product to SOHO markets (which I doubt), I don't think this is about a big mobile device play. Cheers Ken From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion It's more important now than it was then. Look for this to impact mobile devices more than desktops/laptops. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Because that's not the right parameter to use. Try: *subinacl /outputlog=C:\Output.LOG /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner * Assuming, of course, that all these folders exist. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:51 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: /file reports error .Why? *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 16.34 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* RE: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Have you tried exporting it to CSV and manipulating in excel? IE. subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner /file abc.csv *From:* HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] *Sent:* Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:26 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Also time is money! If I have (what I made really now) to read all options of the command, to type and retype for unwanted wrong input(you know , keyboards) and having an output file practically unreadable because lines too long Thank you and kind regards *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.58 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Google is your friend. For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more cost-effective. But hey... *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: *subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner* *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* gio 19/08/2010 13.03 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Exporting GPOs
Which version of Windows? I have scripts for backing up GPOs in 2003. I haven't tested under 2008, but I suspect they won't work there. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:25 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.comwrote: Is there any better way to export Group Policy Objects rather than just using the Back Up function? I am moving jobs and want to take copies of some of the more useful and/or complex GPOs I've come up with while I've been here (yes, I do have my boss's blessing for this). The Back Up function just pumps 'em out in the same format they appear in the sysvol directory, which doesn't even give me the names to narrow them down. Is there any better way, or am I stuck with screenshots? :-) Cheers, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: A bit OT: e-mail migration
There are some little gotchas with DAG administration, most of which will be addressed in SP1 (I say most because I'm sure I don't know all of them - but those I've run into are scheduled to be fixed). Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: A bit OT: e-mail migration Tom, We're in the planning stage of migrating from Groupwise 7.0 to Exchange 2010 right now. We have around 2800 users, at least 1200 of which are not connected to the network on a regular basis. We're looking at Quest tools and Messaging Architects tools to do the migration to an archive location first, then just take the last 30 days - 2 months or so of mail and move that from the archive location into our Exchange system. Looking like a very interesting time ahead. As far as clustering, if you're going to 2010, there is no clustering, per se. You put your mailbox servers into a DAG, which does failover clustering in the background, automagically. Very easy to setup, at least it was in the very controlled classroom location. Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org 8/19/2010 5:44 AM Hey Folks, Anyone on this list (or know anyone) that has performed GroupWise -- Exchange migrations? We are considering moving to Exchange. GroupWise is a fine product but Exchange has direct integration with Great Plains and a our soon-to-be-new electronic medical records system. I've done this before so I know what's involved and the various option and issues. I'm looking to - potentially - out source it as I and my team are currently engaged in a number of other long-term projects. And last time I did it I lost a year of my life, never to return, forgotten. ;-) This would be pretty much migration of our various GroupWise post offices to a central location except for maybe one site. (We are implementing XenDesktop so if users want Outlook they will have to go to XenDesktop or OWA.) Hardware will be ready once the migration starts. 900 accounts so a simple setup, maybe clustering, not sure at this point. Feel free to reply off-list or on-list. Tom Miller Engineer, Information Technology Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board 757-788-0528 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
If I had vmotion, I would do exactly that. I don't believe I'm updating drivers - none of the optional updates are for hardware. Kurt On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:26, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote: If it was me, and I had a couple of ESX hosts, I would VMotion everything off one, run update manager to remediate the patch level, and then move everything the other way and do it to my other hosts. I always take a screenshot first so I can put everything back the way it was. I can honestly say I haven’t seen this, but why in the back of my head does something tell me the VM drivers on the Windows host and the patches seem to be conflicting. Hopefully when running WU, you are NOT updating drivers. No need in a VM. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 6:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
Excellent idea. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:21, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks. On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see which one breaks DNS? That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all... 32-bit VM ESX 3.5.0 Update 2 110268 13 Aug 2008 Flexible adapter Don't know what you mean by 'guest OS set correctly' Kurt On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:24, Damien Solodow damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote: Few questions: Windows x86 or x64? What update or build of ESX are you using? Which virtual nic are you using? Is the guest OS set correctly on the VM? -- Sent using BlackBerry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 08:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: The arrrgghhhness of it all... I'm trying to install Win2k3 R2 SP2 in an ESX3.5 VM, from scratch. It's blowing up on it big time, and I am really unhappy with it right now. Sitrep: Install Disk1 (Win2k3 R2 SP2), reboot, then Disk2, then install the VMWare tools, reboot, then join doimain - no problem. Install first round of 90+ patches from the MSFT site, minus IE8 and the malicious software removal tool, and plus a few optional goodies, such as .NET framework updates, reboot - no problem Install the second round of 43 updates, and no more DNS name resolution. Error in the event log 11167 Dnsapi - I've looked at that, and several other eventlog entries that probably stem from that. (17 W32tm, 1010 MsGina, 1053 Userenv in particular) I've scratched the machine twice and started over, and it's the same each time. I can resolve NetBIOS names, but it barks on any FQDN. Ping request could not find host ad.example.com. Please check the name and try again. EventID.net isn't much help, as I've tried everything on there I can see, and it doesn't resolve the issue. Anyone run into this? It's terribly weird... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: type and retype for unwanted wrong input Suggestion: Put your stuff in batch files, so if you do need to type something, you only have to type it once. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Thank you. It works but, as I told you, for big folders with a lot of subfolders and files ,you have to read line by line . I need something that you can see at a glance like Windirstat GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 18.36 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Because that's not the right parameter to use. Try: subinacl /outputlog=C:\Output.LOG /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner Assuming, of course, that all these folders exist. ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:51 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: /file reports error .Why? GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 16.34 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Have you tried exporting it to CSV and manipulating in excel? IE. subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner /file abc.csv From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Also time is money! If I have (what I made really now) to read all options of the command, to type and retype for unwanted wrong input(you know , keyboards) and having an output file practically unreadable because lines too long Thank you and kind regards GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.58 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Google is your friend. For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more cost-effective. But hey... ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! _ Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 13.03 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to take ownership and is not a problem. As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ? There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab which will apply the Take ownership operation to all subfolders. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Hmm... have dual mons and no cursor issues... but using the Win7 drivers for the moment. -sc From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Where did you get thoseI don't need fancy graphics on a work box. Generic would be awesome. This cursor is killing me. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Hmm... have dual mons and no cursor issues... but using the Win7 drivers for the moment. -sc From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Good suggestion , but with all the things to batch is a hard job (and eventually many of them used once only) GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 18.54 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: type and retype for unwanted wrong input Suggestion: Put your stuff in batch files, so if you do need to type something, you only have to type it once. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Exporting GPOs
If you have GPMC installed on 2003 server, there should be some scripts available that might help-I think it's \program files\GPMC\Scripts. If you're on 2008 or higher, the old 2003 GPMC scripts were not included, but can be downloaded separately. http://blogs.technet.com/b/jlosey/archive/2009/08/29/winre-page-files-and-gpmc-scripts.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=38c1a89b-a6d2-4f2a-a944-9236999aee65 -Bonnie From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Exporting GPOs Is there any better way to export Group Policy Objects rather than just using the Back Up function? I am moving jobs and want to take copies of some of the more useful and/or complex GPOs I've come up with while I've been here (yes, I do have my boss's blessing for this). The Back Up function just pumps 'em out in the same format they appear in the sysvol directory, which doesn't even give me the names to narrow them down. Is there any better way, or am I stuck with screenshots? :-) Cheers, JRR -- On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: A bit OT: e-mail migration
What gotchas are those Michael? Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com 8/19/2010 9:45 AM There are some little gotchas with DAG administration, most of which will be addressed in SP1 (I say most because I'm sure I don't know all of them - but those I've run into are scheduled to be fixed). Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: A bit OT: e-mail migration Tom, We're in the planning stage of migrating from Groupwise 7.0 to Exchange 2010 right now. We have around 2800 users, at least 1200 of which are not connected to the network on a regular basis. We're looking at Quest tools and Messaging Architects tools to do the migration to an archive location first, then just take the last 30 days - 2 months or so of mail and move that from the archive location into our Exchange system. Looking like a very interesting time ahead. As far as clustering, if you're going to 2010, there is no clustering, per se. You put your mailbox servers into a DAG, which does failover clustering in the background, automagically. Very easy to setup, at least it was in the very controlled classroom location. Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org 8/19/2010 5:44 AM Hey Folks, Anyone on this list (or know anyone) that has performed GroupWise -- Exchange migrations? We are considering moving to Exchange. GroupWise is a fine product but Exchange has direct integration with Great Plains and a our soon-to-be-new electronic medical records system. I've done this before so I know what's involved and the various option and issues. I'm looking to - potentially - out source it as I and my team are currently engaged in a number of other long-term projects. And last time I did it I lost a year of my life, never to return, forgotten. ;-) This would be pretty much migration of our various GroupWise post offices to a central location except for maybe one site. (We are implementing XenDesktop so if users want Outlook they will have to go to XenDesktop or OWA.) Hardware will be ready once the migration starts. 900 accounts so a simple setup, maybe clustering, not sure at this point. Feel free to reply off-list or on-list. Tom Miller Engineer, Information Technology Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board 757-788-0528 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:02 PM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: (and eventually many of them used once only) If you use them only once, it still makes it easier to prep the command line. And two years from now when you need to do almost the same thing again, you can go back and change one thing and be done. Storage is cheap, batch files are tiny. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
MS's. The default ones detected, and the next Windows Update grabbed another set from MS... -sc From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Where did you get thoseI don't need fancy graphics on a work box. Generic would be awesome. This cursor is killing me. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Hmm... have dual mons and no cursor issues... but using the Win7 drivers for the moment. -sc From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and dial the settings so it does not magnify much. I have mine so it only magnifies on log in so I can deal for awhile. It has been around since 9.x on 4xxx and up models and is still there at 10.7 despite a hotfix that was released just after 10.2. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
DHCP Scope Option
15 DNS Domain Name Should it be just domain or domain.local? Or does it not matter? My win clients don't have any issues but I have a terminal client that can ping it's management server by the FQDN but not by machine name alone. And of course it won't work unless it can find it's management server by the machine name. All my win clients can do either. Just trying to figure out anything that would solve this because the vendor has never had this problem before. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Have you tried going into the WIN display control panel, Troubleshooting, and playing with hardware accelaration? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group ASPCA® 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 www.aspca.org The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA ®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote on 08/19/2010 12:13:23 PM: Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and dial the settings so it does not magnify much. I have mine so it only magnifies on log in so I can deal for awhile. It has been around since 9.x on 4xxx and up models and is still there at 10.7 despite a hotfix that was released just after 10.2. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
weird. I've never had that happen to me, and I use both monitors extensively. I am using Win7 32 bit though, so maybe that's why. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:13 AM Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and dial the settings so it does not magnify much. I have mine so it only magnifies on log in so I can deal for awhile. It has been around since 9.x on 4xxx and up models and is still there at 10.7 despite a hotfix that was released just after 10.2. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Yep, it is a 64 bit only thing. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? weird. I've never had that happen to me, and I use both monitors extensively. I am using Win7 32 bit though, so maybe that's why. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:13 AM Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and dial the settings so it does not magnify much. I have mine so it only magnifies on log in so I can deal for awhile. It has been around since 9.x on 4xxx and up models and is still there at 10.7 despite a hotfix that was released just after 10.2. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Oh yea, every checkbox, slider and mouse option has been tested. From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Have you tried going into the WIN display control panel, Troubleshooting, and playing with hardware accelaration? -- Richard D. McClary Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group ASPCA(r) 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 Urbana, IL 61802 richardmccl...@aspca.org P: 217-337-9761 C: 217-417-1182 F: 217-337-9761 www.aspca.orghttp://www.aspca.org/ The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(r) (ASPCA(r)) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote on 08/19/2010 12:13:23 PM: Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and dial the settings so it does not magnify much. I have mine so it only magnifies on log in so I can deal for awhile. It has been around since 9.x on 4xxx and up models and is still there at 10.7 despite a hotfix that was released just after 10.2. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
R: DHCP Scope Option
Option 15 in DHCP should be domain.local GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 19.15 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: DHCP Scope Option 15 DNS Domain Name Should it be just domain or domain.local? Or does it not matter? My win clients don't have any issues but I have a terminal client that can ping it's management server by the FQDN but not by machine name alone. And of course it won't work unless it can find it's management server by the machine name. All my win clients can do either. Just trying to figure out anything that would solve this because the vendor has never had this problem before. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: DHCP Scope Option
I just tried switching it to that and it fixed the problem. All my other scopes were domain.local. Guess I've just been lucky that nothing to this point has cared in the past 7 years. -Original Message- From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: DHCP Scope Option Option 15 in DHCP should be domain.local GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 19.15 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: DHCP Scope Option 15 DNS Domain Name Should it be just domain or domain.local? Or does it not matter? My win clients don't have any issues but I have a terminal client that can ping it's management server by the FQDN but not by machine name alone. And of course it won't work unless it can find it's management server by the machine name. All my win clients can do either. Just trying to figure out anything that would solve this because the vendor has never had this problem before. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Have you tried uninstalling the drivers, uninstalling the adapter and letting Windows redetect on a reboot? Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:22 AM Yep, it is a 64 bit only thing. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? weird. I've never had that happen to me, and I use both monitors extensively. I am using Win7 32 bit though, so maybe that's why. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:13 AM Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and dial the settings so it does not magnify much. I have mine so it only magnifies on log in so I can deal for awhile. It has been around since 9.x on 4xxx and up models and is still there at 10.7 despite a hotfix that was released just after 10.2. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Yep. However I just used the generic Windows ATI driver and it might be ok nowfingers crossed. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Have you tried uninstalling the drivers, uninstalling the adapter and letting Windows redetect on a reboot? Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:22 AM Yep, it is a 64 bit only thing. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? weird. I've never had that happen to me, and I use both monitors extensively. I am using Win7 32 bit though, so maybe that's why. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:13 AM Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and dial the settings so it does not magnify much. I have mine so it only magnifies on log in so I can deal for awhile. It has been around since 9.x on 4xxx and up models and is still there at 10.7 despite a hotfix that was released just after 10.2. -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box. Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for about 10 releases now. From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com Subject: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64? Anybody successfully got the 10.7 ATI Catalyst drivers to install on Win7x64? I keep getting a BSOD during detection phase, and the install of MS hotfix K983615 hasn't helped. Running in safe mode it'll not BSOD, but the installation routine can't successfully detect the card either. Of course if ATI has a method of manually specifying the hardware (An HD 3470 in this case) and installing the driver ONLY, and thus avoiding running their detector, they are hiding it well... -sc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Actually there is a quite a threat landscape on mobile devices, and its only going to get worse, because of the lack of controls on them. Think a remote wipe of a mobile device ( phone, BB, Iphone, Android, etc al) is forensically sound... think again it isn't and the remote-wipe is easy to bypass, pull the darn batter from the phone, attach a boot device to the phone recover the keys that are on the device and you got all the data on the phone itself. Now imagine its your CEO's phone and his emails, contacts and other company pertinent information is on the phone and now in the hands of the bad guys. I have to agree with Rod is defintely a mobile device power play these days, but again they are so insecure, I personally wouldn't be using them to store anything of value. If you have had the pleasure of listening or being apart of one of Aaron Turner (IANS Research Facility) discussions on the latest on mobile device security ( or lack thereof), you will better understand how really insecure and behind the times we are, and the risks we are taking when it comes to these devices. Aaron Turner Industry Experience: Before joining INL as the Cybersecurity Strategist for the National Homeland Security division, Mr. Turner worked in several of Microsoft's security divisions. He was also the Security Readiness Manager for Microsoft's Sales, Marketing, and Services Group where he led the development of information security curriculum. He has designed security solutions and responded to incidents in more than 25 countries around the world. Expertise: Information protection * Intellectual property protection * Critical infrastructure/government * Encryption * Host IDS * Network architecture * Network IDS * Data classification * Mobile security * Wireless security * Threat management Just google Aaron Turner Mobile Phone security. Z Edward E. Ziots CISSP, Network +, Security + Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email:ezi...@lifespan.org Cell:401-639-3505 From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Everything is about a mobile device play these days. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Consider that Intel could hawk to the wireless providers or phone manufacturers, or both. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Really? We are implementing a mobile device AV/malware product (at great expense), but what's the real threat landscape? Enterprise products (WinMo, Blackberry) already include the ability to lock down what can run on the device. Unless Intel is planning to hawk a product to SOHO markets (which I doubt), I don't think this is about a big mobile device play. Cheers Ken From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion It's more important now than it was then. Look for this to impact mobile devices more than desktops/laptops. From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: Yow!!! Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about: -- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions -- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get that capability -- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether we like it or not in a few months/years -- That AMD or other chipmakers might do something similar to avoid being left behind. ASB (My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: Here is a surprise... http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498 Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~image001.jpgimage003.jpg
RE: A bit OT: e-mail migration
Generally little stuff - like you get different behavior when creating a DAG depending on whether you create the DAG on a member server in the DAG or not. Like in RTM you can't enter a fixed IP address from the GUI, you have to use EMS. Like DAC occasionally gets confused about which is the local site and remote site. Like you can't create a mixed site DAG from the GUI. Etc. Nothing momentous (I say that because I'd rather use the cmdlets anyway, but when teaching a class it can be a PITA). Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: A bit OT: e-mail migration What gotchas are those Michael? Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com 8/19/2010 9:45 AM There are some little gotchas with DAG administration, most of which will be addressed in SP1 (I say most because I'm sure I don't know all of them - but those I've run into are scheduled to be fixed). Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: A bit OT: e-mail migration Tom, We're in the planning stage of migrating from Groupwise 7.0 to Exchange 2010 right now. We have around 2800 users, at least 1200 of which are not connected to the network on a regular basis. We're looking at Quest tools and Messaging Architects tools to do the migration to an archive location first, then just take the last 30 days - 2 months or so of mail and move that from the archive location into our Exchange system. Looking like a very interesting time ahead. As far as clustering, if you're going to 2010, there is no clustering, per se. You put your mailbox servers into a DAG, which does failover clustering in the background, automagically. Very easy to setup, at least it was in the very controlled classroom location. Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org 8/19/2010 5:44 AM Hey Folks, Anyone on this list (or know anyone) that has performed GroupWise -- Exchange migrations? We are considering moving to Exchange. GroupWise is a fine product but Exchange has direct integration with Great Plains and a our soon-to-be-new electronic medical records system. I've done this before so I know what's involved and the various option and issues. I'm looking to - potentially - out source it as I and my team are currently engaged in a number of other long-term projects. And last time I did it I lost a year of my life, never to return, forgotten. ;-) This would be pretty much migration of our various GroupWise post offices to a central location except for maybe one site. (We are implementing XenDesktop so if users want Outlook they will have to go to XenDesktop or OWA.) Hardware will be ready once the migration starts. 900 accounts so a simple setup, maybe clustering, not sure at this point. Feel free to reply off-list or on-list. Tom Miller Engineer, Information Technology Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board 757-788-0528 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Will AMD buy NORTON next???
How much would Norton be sold to AMD for ??? -- Justin IT-TECH ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Will AMD buy NORTON next???
Can AMD afford to purchase Symantec? Probably not... *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, justino garcia jgarciaitl...@gmail.comwrote: How much would Norton be sold to AMD for ??? -- Justin IT-TECH ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Then keep searching and let us know when you find it. I'd rather spend 10 minutes with a script or scriptlet that I can get one or more uses out of (and is easily transferable to other situations) than paying for commercial software each and every time I need something -- especially if it turns into single usage. Sometimes you need to spend some money, but many times you don't. Whatever. Thankfully there are options. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you. It works but, as I told you, for big folders with a lot of subfolders and files ,you have to read line by line . I need something that you can see at a glance like Windirstat *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 18.36 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Because that's not the right parameter to use. Try: *subinacl /outputlog=C:\Output.LOG /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner * Assuming, of course, that all these folders exist. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:51 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: /file reports error .Why? *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 16.34 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* RE: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Have you tried exporting it to CSV and manipulating in excel? IE. subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner /file abc.csv *From:* HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] *Sent:* Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:26 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Also time is money! If I have (what I made really now) to read all options of the command, to type and retype for unwanted wrong input(you know , keyboards) and having an output file practically unreadable because lines too long Thank you and kind regards *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.58 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Google is your friend. For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more cost-effective. But hey... *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing *GuidoElia* *HELPPC* -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer. http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/ However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI: *subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner* *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Isn't a problem with how to do it I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in a formatted way all at once ! -- *Da:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Inviato:* gio 19/08/2010 13.03 *A:* NT System Admin Issues *Oggetto:* Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you bat I can't do that I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: So I have to
RE: Will AMD buy NORTON next???
Wouldn't give two cents for either... Z Edward E. Ziots CISSP, Network +, Security + Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email:ezi...@lifespan.org Cell:401-639-3505 From: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Will AMD buy NORTON next??? How much would Norton be sold to AMD for ??? -- Justin IT-TECH ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote: Thank you. It works but, as I told you, for big folders with a lot of subfolders and files ,you have to read line by line . I need something that you can see at a glance like Windirstat How do you propose to reduce hundreds of objects with different permissions into an at-a-glance report? You can't comb a hairy ball smooth. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Website for finding developers
Anyone know a website like nextsprocket.com but obviously with some successful results where I can post a job request? For anyone interested, I need a web based interface that can access the live feed from this camera and interact with the Audio, specifically we need to be able to communicate with the person at the camera and hear/speak to them. The interface needs to support the following platforms: Windows/Linux/Android where the specific HW platform for the Android will be an Eken M002. The camera has an SDK available: http://www.axis.com/products/cam_m1031w/index.htm See bottom of page, More Features. It looks like using VAPIX, you can accomplish this just by sending HTTP commands, so this should be easy I hope! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Will AMD buy NORTON next???
symc is about twice the size of amd in terms of market cap, revenue, cash and employees etc so not likely From: Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 1:53:59 PM Subject: Re: Will AMD buy NORTON next??? Can AMD afford to purchase Symantec? Probably not... ASB (My XeeSM Profile) Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... Signature powered by WiseStamp On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, justino garcia jgarciaitl...@gmail.com wrote: How much would Norton be sold to AMD for ??? -- Justin IT-TECH ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
